1
00:00:00,940 --> 00:00:01,440
Good

2
00:00:04,930 --> 00:00:17,510
evening, everyone. I'm Peter Fossilman, the Chair of the Historic Discrimination for the City of Rockville. Thank you for joining us this evening. This is meeting number 8, 2020, six. It's Thursday, August 20, 2026.

3
00:00:18,190 --> 00:00:22,490
I'm joined by fellow commissioner Seth Dembo in the Indian

4
00:00:22,490 --> 00:00:25,430
O'Powell and Mercy Shengai.

5
00:00:25,450 --> 00:00:27,810
Commissioner Goalfinger should be joining us shortly.

6
00:00:29,050 --> 00:00:32,550
We're also joined this evening by our deputy or acting deputy

7
00:00:32,550 --> 00:00:33,990
city attorney Nick Demay.

8
00:00:34,190 --> 00:00:35,490
Thank you for joining us this evening.

9
00:00:36,150 --> 00:00:37,590
Ms. Walters tired of us.

10
00:00:37,670 --> 00:00:39,390
What's going on?

11
00:00:39,830 --> 00:00:40,550
I don't know, I can't.

12
00:00:40,830 --> 00:00:41,990
Another engagement.

13
00:00:42,710 --> 00:00:44,610
That's okay, you don't have to explain, but thank you.

14
00:00:44,630 --> 00:00:46,550
Thank you for being here and taking a time.

15
00:00:46,550 --> 00:00:53,790
We're also joined by Megan Flick, our principal planner and Katie Garbys, our comprehensive planning manager.

16
00:00:55,470 --> 00:01:00,170
The agenda times in the estimate only, that may take a little longer unusual, but we only have one at him on the

17
00:01:00,170 --> 00:01:07,070
seatnings, so this should be a quick meeting. Tonight is virtual only, there is no in-person option,

18
00:01:07,850 --> 00:01:14,530
and also you may view the meeting on Brockville, channel 11, which is Brockville, md.gov, forward,

19
00:01:15,990 --> 00:01:21,810
Rockville 11, and you may also watch the recordings on the same link, which is Rockville

20
00:01:21,810 --> 00:01:24,990
MV.gov, forward video on demand.

21
00:01:25,770 --> 00:01:33,930
Our first item on the agenda is a request for reconsideration, this is 2026330 EOS, the request

22
00:01:33,930 --> 00:01:39,470
is Mr. Bishop, use the honor and the address to 200 more industry staff to report.

23
00:01:41,330 --> 00:01:48,490
Yeah, so we just have a verbal report for you guys this evening, so just to remind everyone,

24
00:01:48,550 --> 00:01:51,570
I guess on the context of the background of this case,

25
00:01:51,750 --> 00:01:56,430
they initially submitted an evaluation to significant in April of this year,

26
00:01:56,610 --> 00:02:00,370
and anticipation of filing a demolition permit for the shelters on the property.

27
00:02:00,890 --> 00:02:03,110
Again, it's 200 A&B and grocery.

28
00:02:03,970 --> 00:02:05,290
So the case was on the May agenda.

29
00:02:05,290 --> 00:02:10,730
the applicant requested to postpone the case at that meeting. We presumed it would be on the

30
00:02:10,730 --> 00:02:15,970
June agenda, but they requested an additional postponement to the July meeting, so the HEC

31
00:02:15,970 --> 00:02:22,650
officially reviewed this case in July, and found that 208 did not meet designation criteria,

32
00:02:22,950 --> 00:02:30,770
but that the original 1906 building at 200B did meet designation criteria, so the HEC approved

33
00:02:30,770 --> 00:02:39,990
emotions 3-0 to designate just a portion of 200 B Monroe. So since then the applicant has

34
00:02:39,990 --> 00:02:46,050
submitted a request for reconsideration on the grounds that won the applicant wishes to better

35
00:02:46,050 --> 00:02:50,950
detail and explain the original exterior material that remains from the original 1906 structure

36
00:02:51,490 --> 00:02:56,030
to the applicant wishes to present their position to the full historic district commission as

37
00:02:56,030 --> 00:03:01,610
commissioners were absent on July 16th and three the applicant would like clarity on what portions

38
00:03:01,610 --> 00:03:08,710
of the building at 200 beam and row are considered a sort. So, upon the staff's review of the

39
00:03:08,710 --> 00:03:17,350
reconsideration, our recommendation is that we do believe it should be reconsidered just based on inadvertence.

40
00:03:17,750 --> 00:03:23,770
It's really not a great policy outcome to designated portion. We don't believe it achieves the intent

41
00:03:23,770 --> 00:03:31,550
the designation policy, so this meeting will be solely to decide if you all wish to reconsider

42
00:03:31,550 --> 00:03:36,950
this case at the September meeting. So it's a yes we'll reconsider or I know we will not.

43
00:03:37,410 --> 00:03:43,690
There won't be testimony at this meeting. And then, I guess the grounds are that the

44
00:03:43,690 --> 00:03:50,630
ACC could consider the reconsideration if it finds a mistake of factor law in a certain surprise

45
00:03:50,630 --> 00:03:55,410
fraud or other good costs. So if the HEC wishes to

46
00:03:55,410 --> 00:03:59,150
reconsider, the motion must state the reasons for doing so.

47
00:03:59,570 --> 00:04:03,110
And we will have some example motions later on.

48
00:04:03,570 --> 00:04:06,970
We also have acting deputy attorney Nick Dume here.

49
00:04:06,970 --> 00:04:10,530
If he wants to offer an additional legal perspective.

50
00:04:11,650 --> 00:04:13,030
So that's it for me for now.

51
00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:19,120
Thank you very much.

52
00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:22,300
Sure, Mr. Chair, if he's like I can kind of provide a little bit more information.

53
00:04:24,200 --> 00:04:25,000
Thank you.

54
00:04:25,280 --> 00:04:28,680
So, Ms. Fleck did a great job in the staff report as, you know, short but comprehensive,

55
00:04:30,580 --> 00:04:35,340
but I just wanted to give the commission a little bit more information about the scope

56
00:04:35,340 --> 00:04:41,840
of tonight's meeting, what the consequences of reconsideration would ultimately be.

57
00:04:42,580 --> 00:04:46,480
Just for your background, I've been the attorney for the planning commission in Board

58
00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:49,680
of Appeals for about seven and a half years, but I know I've only met with you all.

59
00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:51,780
I think once or twice in that time.

60
00:04:52,940 --> 00:04:54,540
And so I didn't want to start by saying,

61
00:04:54,680 --> 00:04:57,580
reconsideration is rare, not only with the HDC,

62
00:04:57,720 --> 00:04:59,160
but also with the other land use for...

63
00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:25,240
Or some commissions. But your rules of procedure do allow it as Ms. Fleck noted. And the scope of tonight's meeting is really, it's not to re-evaluate at this point whether the property should be designated as historic, or place in the historic district overlays own, or if you wanted to provide more specificity about the portion of the property that you wanted designated.

64
00:05:25,240 --> 00:05:30,000
you know, that's for another meeting. Tonight is really just a determine whether the commission

65
00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:36,360
feels that there are adequate grounds to reconsider the decision it made at its last meeting

66
00:05:36,360 --> 00:05:42,040
to file the sectional map and then to designate the property. So as Ms. Flick noted, there are

67
00:05:42,740 --> 00:05:47,400
several grounds that are provided in your rules of procedure for reconsidering a decision.

68
00:05:47,980 --> 00:05:53,960
Those are common throughout Maryland. Those are just normal grounds for reconsidering an administrative

69
00:05:53,960 --> 00:06:02,260
of decision. But because you have other good cause as a rationale that would allow for reconsideration,

70
00:06:02,700 --> 00:06:08,580
you do have fairly wide latitude in what grounds you ultimately determine are sufficient for

71
00:06:08,580 --> 00:06:14,000
reconsideration. And so just to kind of point out a few of them, you know, you have the applicants

72
00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:17,920
suggesting they have additional information that they think would be relevant to this decision.

73
00:06:18,740 --> 00:06:23,200
You also have the applicant noting some lack of clarity, at least on their part as to what portion

74
00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:26,620
of the property would be designated, and then of course you have staff

75
00:06:26,620 --> 00:06:33,140
recommendation as well regarding the kind of the policy outcomes of ultimately

76
00:06:33,140 --> 00:06:37,420
designating only a portion of the property. And we can get into more information

77
00:06:37,420 --> 00:06:41,360
or more detail on that point because that ultimately does go to the

78
00:06:41,360 --> 00:06:45,980
the appropriateness of reconsidering the decision. So if you do reconsider as

79
00:06:45,980 --> 00:06:49,800
Ms. Flick noted, you know, we would need a motion a second and a vote just like all

80
00:06:49,800 --> 00:06:54,260
your decisions. And the motion would need to establish the grounds for reconsideration.

81
00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:58,920
And it doesn't need to be a super long motion, but you do need to provide staff,

82
00:07:01,240 --> 00:07:05,840
ultimately the detail it needs to understand why the reconsideration is moving forward.

83
00:07:06,800 --> 00:07:11,640
If you choose not to reconsider under your rules of procedure, you do need to make a motion and

84
00:07:11,640 --> 00:07:17,120
take a vote on denying the reconsideration, which is kind of somewhat unique to your rules.

85
00:07:17,900 --> 00:07:20,760
And then the last point sort of what happens if you do reconsider.

86
00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:25,260
So at that point, as your rules note, it would void your original decision.

87
00:07:26,080 --> 00:07:29,400
At your next meeting, I believe you would pull the new hearing

88
00:07:29,940 --> 00:07:34,020
and deliberate again on really the entire application

89
00:07:34,540 --> 00:07:36,960
or the entire evaluation of significance.

90
00:07:38,820 --> 00:07:41,780
And in particular under your rules, you have to focus on the grounds

91
00:07:41,780 --> 00:07:43,580
that lead to your reconsideration.

92
00:07:43,580 --> 00:07:48,120
But in this case, that would really involve re-evaluating the entire complication.

93
00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:54,940
And, you know, with that, I just wanted to note, of course, as Ms. Flick said, I'll be on for the whole meeting.

94
00:07:55,120 --> 00:08:00,680
I'm happy to answer any questions that you have, but I think that's the broad overview of what you're here for tonight.

95
00:08:02,840 --> 00:08:08,680
Thank you, Mr. Dominic. Just to note that Commissioner Goldfinger has joined us, so thank you for getting on Michael.

96
00:08:08,680 --> 00:08:11,740
Yeah, it took me a while.

97
00:08:11,800 --> 00:08:12,340
Okay.

98
00:08:12,600 --> 00:08:15,720
That doesn't like me for some reason.

99
00:08:16,380 --> 00:08:17,340
It's okay.

100
00:08:18,980 --> 00:08:19,360
It's true.

101
00:08:20,040 --> 00:08:21,640
I'm going to start with commissioners.

102
00:08:22,420 --> 00:08:27,580
We're not taking any testimony this evening unless the commissioners have a question,

103
00:08:28,340 --> 00:08:32,940
a staff or an applicant or some need to talk to someone outside of us.

104
00:08:33,860 --> 00:08:35,960
So I'm going to start in the order of my screen.

105
00:08:35,960 --> 00:08:39,060
permission to download, did you have anything to add?

106
00:08:41,740 --> 00:08:42,300
No, I'm not really.

107
00:08:42,480 --> 00:08:46,560
I think this is pretty, it's from my point of view.

108
00:08:46,700 --> 00:08:49,760
I don't see any reason not to reconsider this.

109
00:08:49,920 --> 00:08:55,440
You know, the reason for we can use, for reconsidering it.

110
00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:59,620
You know, other good calls seems to give us a lot of the ways.

111
00:09:01,280 --> 00:09:03,300
Mr. Dimae said,

112
00:09:04,600 --> 00:09:09,540
I don't really have a huge amount to add, I don't think this is, from my point of view, a difficult decision.

113
00:09:11,700 --> 00:09:13,060
I don't, I mean,

114
00:09:15,700 --> 00:09:24,660
the applicant's argument that they only presented it to three commissioners, doesn't really sway, persuade me much, because three commissioners is a quorum.

115
00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:30,660
It's better when we're all here and we usually are just circumstances that they'll work.

116
00:09:30,660 --> 00:09:34,880
But the complexity of trying to figure out

117
00:09:34,880 --> 00:09:37,980
at whether or not we can designate a portion

118
00:09:37,980 --> 00:09:40,460
of the property and how we go about doing that seems

119
00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:48,480
to give us good calls for reconsidering.

120
00:09:49,020 --> 00:09:50,760
Yeah, and one other thing that comes to mind

121
00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:55,040
as I'm talking is that despite the excellent work

122
00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:58,700
that Megan and her other colleagues did,

123
00:09:58,700 --> 00:09:59,700
when this was first.

124
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:21,140
Submit it to us, we didn't have the kind of staff support that we normally have. She had just left. I think Katie was on maternity leave. So there really just wasn't, you know, there wasn't the opportunity to raise again a full picture of this. So I'm more than happy to reconsider. Stop talking there.

125
00:10:21,140 --> 00:10:23,960
I know those are good comments. Thank you very much.

126
00:10:24,260 --> 00:10:27,630
Again, go on in no order. My screen commissioner sang ahead. Do you have anything to add?

127
00:10:28,760 --> 00:10:34,720
Yes. So, Mr. Dumas mentioned that the applicant has additional information.

128
00:10:35,860 --> 00:10:38,070
So, is it possible for us to know what this information is?

129
00:10:43,380 --> 00:10:55,500
I think unless Mr. Dumas says otherwise. If you would like to hear from the applicant, that's up to the

130
00:10:56,820 --> 00:11:05,150
I'm happy to I'm happy to hear from the that's up to the commissioners.

131
00:11:05,310 --> 00:11:11,790
Okay, the request that was submitted to staff was included in your briefbook in the entirety.

132
00:11:12,250 --> 00:11:18,730
So it was simply that letter that mentioned additional information staff have not been provided with any additional information today.

133
00:11:18,730 --> 00:11:25,710
Okay. Okay, so we are considering in September, you know, and look at this additional details

134
00:11:25,710 --> 00:11:26,650
during the meeting.

135
00:11:29,600 --> 00:11:31,560
Okay, so you're okay with waiting until September?

136
00:11:34,310 --> 00:11:36,890
Yeah, I'm okay. Okay.

137
00:11:38,170 --> 00:11:41,230
Okay, thank you, Commissioner Neil Powell.

138
00:11:44,620 --> 00:11:47,900
Hey, Beth, if I say information provided by Stalkenia

139
00:11:47,900 --> 00:11:54,360
Charlie, I'm okay with the reconsideration of this application and also to hear from others

140
00:11:54,360 --> 00:11:58,020
who have an interest in hearing and providing testimony.

141
00:12:00,830 --> 00:12:01,250
Thank you very much.

142
00:12:01,830 --> 00:12:07,930
Do you want to, yes, I know when we provide you with our comments, as to whether

143
00:12:07,930 --> 00:12:11,930
we would reconsider or just comments, and then you take a vote.

144
00:12:13,650 --> 00:12:15,970
I think comments is what I'm looking for.

145
00:12:16,230 --> 00:12:18,070
And then we could call for a motion.

146
00:12:18,970 --> 00:12:22,130
If something like we normally would do, unless you have another idea.

147
00:12:23,230 --> 00:12:24,210
I don't have another idea.

148
00:12:24,210 --> 00:12:29,610
I want to make sure that we were giving you our opinion at this point in addition to our comments.

149
00:12:30,010 --> 00:12:30,310
That's all.

150
00:12:30,750 --> 00:12:31,430
Thank you.

151
00:12:31,690 --> 00:12:33,370
Thank you.

152
00:12:33,690 --> 00:12:35,190
And Commissioner Goldfinger.

153
00:12:37,990 --> 00:12:38,770
Yeah, you can hear me.

154
00:12:38,910 --> 00:12:42,630
I know you can't see me because my camera is busted on the computer.

155
00:12:43,530 --> 00:12:48,690
But yeah, I'm, I will go along with a reconsideration.

156
00:12:49,350 --> 00:12:55,630
It seems from some of the material that went out in the brief book that

157
00:12:55,630 --> 00:13:02,250
And I think we just didn't get the full picture that the motion just included the footprint

158
00:13:02,250 --> 00:13:11,550
of the building with no regard to surrounding which leaves a question of apparently street

159
00:13:11,550 --> 00:13:13,870
frontage, which I guess we need to clarify.

160
00:13:15,230 --> 00:13:21,330
So that would be assuming that would be one of the major talking points at our September

161
00:13:21,330 --> 00:13:23,110
meeting when we reconsidered this.

162
00:13:23,110 --> 00:13:33,270
It's, I think it's the motion that we passed last month in that regard as incomplete and so I think we need to

163
00:13:33,270 --> 00:13:40,230
To just add whatever needs to be added to to complete the the the picture so

164
00:13:40,950 --> 00:13:50,950
That's and I missed it for I apologize. Well, it's not mindful where that's just doesn't like me and and it took me while to get in. Thank you Katie for your help

165
00:13:53,510 --> 00:13:56,170
Anyway, that's my take on this.

166
00:13:57,010 --> 00:13:57,750
Thank you, Commissioner.

167
00:13:58,550 --> 00:14:00,950
Well, I too agree with my fellow commissioners.

168
00:14:02,050 --> 00:14:08,890
To be honest, when I first heard this request was being put forward, my initial response to myself was absolutely not.

169
00:14:09,510 --> 00:14:17,710
But then after talking to staff and learning or facts, I think it's something that we owe the applicant at least to hear and give them a second chance.

170
00:14:17,710 --> 00:14:20,310
that doesn't mean we're going to change our minds,

171
00:14:20,610 --> 00:14:22,030
but if there's more things added,

172
00:14:22,530 --> 00:14:24,650
I'm certainly open to hearing them.

173
00:14:25,110 --> 00:14:28,150
So if there's no other comments from the staff,

174
00:14:28,930 --> 00:14:32,750
we're commissioners, senior hands, okay.

175
00:14:33,350 --> 00:14:35,450
I'll call for a motion if someone would like to move.

176
00:14:35,830 --> 00:14:37,350
And staff, if you have an example for,

177
00:14:37,510 --> 00:14:38,650
oh, thank you, look at you all.

178
00:14:38,710 --> 00:14:40,970
Thank you very much, even online, you got the quick.

179
00:14:44,430 --> 00:14:45,850
We try our best.

180
00:14:46,130 --> 00:14:47,010
That was all Katie.

181
00:14:47,950 --> 00:14:52,130
So there are several possible motions here.

182
00:14:52,530 --> 00:14:54,830
The first motion is not to grant the request.

183
00:14:55,110 --> 00:14:57,770
It seems like that is not the desire of this body.

184
00:14:57,890 --> 00:14:58,830
So we'll skip by that.

185
00:14:59,290 --> 00:14:59,970
But we have the...

186
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:12,560
Community potential motions to approve the request. As Mr. Jimay mentioned, it's very important in a case like this, we're doing a reconsideration to be specific and why we are reconsidering.

187
00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:19,560
So I will go through the three kind of sample motions and then you as a body can discuss what you may be interested in.

188
00:15:20,060 --> 00:15:27,620
So this first sample motion is granting the applicants requests, so citing what the applicant has cited in their reconsideration letter.

189
00:15:27,620 --> 00:15:34,540
which is being made aware of additional information that the property owner will leave should be considered by the commission.

190
00:15:35,900 --> 00:15:41,640
The next potential motion that we have is staffs or questions, staffs recommendations.

191
00:15:42,020 --> 00:15:48,580
So this would be citing inadvertence and good cause talking about how we're not sure how the past motion, the previous motion,

192
00:15:49,100 --> 00:15:53,000
is really consistent with the intent that we had here with this designation.

193
00:15:54,520 --> 00:16:06,060
And then the final possible motion is kind of a choose your own adventure style, so if the commission did not want either of the two motions that were previously put forward and you wanted to

194
00:16:06,060 --> 00:16:08,160
pre your own, this is how you could do it.

195
00:16:08,500 --> 00:16:21,700
The one thing that I will note here is we have the five permissible rationale for reconsideration, so in this motion you would need to state which of those reasons it would be and then give any specifics and details there.

196
00:16:21,700 --> 00:16:26,540
So with that, I will turn it over to you all, and I'm happy to flip through slides as you

197
00:16:26,540 --> 00:16:27,420
direct me to.

198
00:16:28,640 --> 00:16:29,940
Thank you, Kate, it's very helpful.

199
00:16:31,000 --> 00:16:37,280
One question, could we, is it possible to combine the first two that you shared into one

200
00:16:37,280 --> 00:16:39,620
vision if we could have more than one reason?

201
00:16:40,900 --> 00:16:43,480
All the deferred to Mr. Dumei on that.

202
00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:49,460
Absolutely, that's totally possible, and actually I did want to also mention, it doesn't

203
00:16:49,460 --> 00:16:53,980
need to be part of the motion, it could happen after the voter curves, but your rules also

204
00:16:53,980 --> 00:16:59,520
do require that you actually set the date of the new hearing of the reconsidered hearing.

205
00:17:00,740 --> 00:17:05,360
And that that can simply be by kind of a voice vote or just a concurrence of the body,

206
00:17:05,420 --> 00:17:09,480
but I wanted to make sure you all knew that after the vote you should do that if you decide

207
00:17:09,480 --> 00:17:09,920
to reconsider.

208
00:17:11,040 --> 00:17:19,260
And just thank you, is that need to be separate from our normal September meeting or could it be at the September meeting?

209
00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:21,220
It could be at the September meeting.

210
00:17:22,160 --> 00:17:23,400
And that would be staff recommendations.

211
00:17:23,900 --> 00:17:24,340
I was there.

212
00:17:24,540 --> 00:17:24,860
That's okay.

213
00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:26,800
Okay.

214
00:17:26,900 --> 00:17:28,180
Thank you.

215
00:17:28,280 --> 00:17:32,140
Commissioner has given me further comments before we call for a motion.

216
00:17:35,640 --> 00:17:37,320
I don't see any themes.

217
00:17:38,240 --> 00:17:45,320
for any discussion, you know. Okay. Then I'm just going to call for motion if one of the commissioners would like to move.

218
00:17:50,380 --> 00:17:53,440
Excuse me, may I ask the question first before we.

219
00:17:53,480 --> 00:17:53,900
Of course.

220
00:17:54,980 --> 00:17:57,580
Um, staff, can you come back to.

221
00:17:59,320 --> 00:18:00,820
The sink is.

222
00:18:01,380 --> 00:18:02,600
You have five reasons.

223
00:18:07,300 --> 00:18:09,740
Okay, I just want to make sure that other good cars.

224
00:18:10,100 --> 00:18:11,780
Okay, thank you so much.

225
00:18:15,760 --> 00:18:16,200
Good.

226
00:18:16,500 --> 00:18:18,720
I'm pulling for motion still on the floor.

227
00:18:24,520 --> 00:18:27,560
Yeah, and you can you flip back to the first one.

228
00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:30,520
I'm just going to look over the first two and because I feel like Peter,

229
00:18:30,660 --> 00:18:35,680
I was thinking before Peter made that comment about combining the two.

230
00:18:35,780 --> 00:18:38,860
I was thinking that makes makes a lot of sense too.

231
00:18:38,860 --> 00:18:56,760
Although I do like, I do prefer to make this about this, you know, what this staff has said in terms of I just think that's that's a tidy away of doing it, but I'm fine with with combining them as well.

232
00:18:56,760 --> 00:18:57,180
Um,

233
00:19:01,880 --> 00:19:03,500
and now the second one, sorry,

234
00:19:06,060 --> 00:19:06,540
um,

235
00:19:13,660 --> 00:19:15,360
I'm actually I'm fine with the second one.

236
00:19:15,360 --> 00:19:21,020
I think that that does what it needs to do, in terms of giving good reason why we are going

237
00:19:21,020 --> 00:19:21,860
to review this.

238
00:19:21,940 --> 00:19:25,220
If others are okay with that, I'm happy to move the second one.

239
00:19:25,420 --> 00:19:26,020
Having read it.

240
00:19:26,060 --> 00:19:27,160
Can't have more carefully.

241
00:19:27,720 --> 00:19:31,220
I agree with Seth, if that makes a difference.

242
00:19:32,520 --> 00:19:33,400
Thank you.

243
00:19:33,400 --> 00:19:36,660
I'm going to jump up if you want to read it and for the record.

244
00:19:38,460 --> 00:19:44,120
I'm going to reconsider the HTC's July 16 decision to file the sectional map amendment to

245
00:19:44,120 --> 00:19:48,380
this portion of the property at 200 and revs street in the historic district overlays

246
00:19:48,380 --> 00:19:50,960
own for inadvertence and good cause.

247
00:19:51,480 --> 00:19:55,480
Specifically, the commission has been made aware of the lack of clarity and how much of

248
00:19:55,480 --> 00:19:59,980
property to designate and concern related to the effect of

249
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:05,120
Only listing a portion of the property. May have a second.

250
00:20:05,460 --> 00:20:06,440
How second?

251
00:20:07,460 --> 00:20:12,480
Thank you, Commissioner. All in favor if you could raise your hands. And if you could just say,

252
00:20:12,680 --> 00:20:15,440
aye, aye, aye, aye, aye.

253
00:20:18,040 --> 00:20:18,900
Any opposed?

254
00:20:21,500 --> 00:20:23,500
Looks like it's unanimous.

255
00:20:23,500 --> 00:20:32,800
We need to confirm the September meeting that is healing, is everyone okay for the September meeting.

256
00:20:33,760 --> 00:20:37,580
It's all my calendar staff, but I can't remember that exact date.

257
00:20:38,080 --> 00:20:38,420
17.

258
00:20:39,420 --> 00:20:40,240
Thank you.

259
00:20:40,360 --> 00:20:41,720
Oh, the day after my birthday.

260
00:20:43,320 --> 00:20:46,680
So September 17th is the scheduled commission meeting.

261
00:20:47,040 --> 00:20:49,580
Is that okay with the commissioners?

262
00:20:49,940 --> 00:20:50,620
Yes.

263
00:20:50,620 --> 00:20:58,480
Any opposition about the perfect. All right. Well, if there's nothing else, then I appreciate the commission and also the staff

264
00:20:59,580 --> 00:21:03,720
For coming out for we were not supposed to meet and I'll just and so I appreciate your time

265
00:21:04,300 --> 00:21:10,700
I'm taking a few minutes in your evening and we will talk to everyone soon. I have a nice evening. Can I can I can I just add one

266
00:21:10,700 --> 00:21:11,380
question?

267
00:21:12,640 --> 00:21:17,280
Sure, of course. Yeah, um for the subcender meeting. I know the motion we just passed

268
00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:28,260
against it, unspecified surrounding land area will that be, will there be, or something from

269
00:21:28,260 --> 00:21:37,520
staff or somehow to specifically delineate the area of ground around the original structure for

270
00:21:37,520 --> 00:21:41,100
the motion or, you know, for our discussion in September?

271
00:21:44,360 --> 00:21:45,800
Can you say that once more, Michael, I want

272
00:21:45,800 --> 00:21:51,920
make sure I'm following the question. Yeah, I kind of muddled up in my mind. But the

273
00:21:51,920 --> 00:21:58,700
most we just passed talked about, you know, specifically about the land area around the

274
00:21:59,860 --> 00:22:06,720
original footprint that we approved in July, right? But it didn't specify exactly what it is and it

275
00:22:06,720 --> 00:22:13,940
seems to me. And this is probably maybe more legal question, but it seems to me that when if we

276
00:22:13,940 --> 00:22:19,080
head will review it and if we're going to vote on something it should have, it should specify,

277
00:22:19,840 --> 00:22:27,180
you know, from the original house to the sidewalk and from either side, I don't know, pick

278
00:22:27,180 --> 00:22:35,960
another 10 feet on either side and 10 feet behind the building will be incorporated into the overlaid zone.

279
00:22:36,000 --> 00:22:41,520
Something very specific like that is that will, will that be part of the information that we

280
00:22:41,520 --> 00:22:44,520
we see prior to the September meeting.

281
00:22:45,400 --> 00:22:46,220
Well, that's a wrap.

282
00:22:47,540 --> 00:22:47,740
Sure.

283
00:22:47,960 --> 00:22:54,020
Staff will pull together in your staff report kind of your menu of options there of what you can choose to do.

284
00:22:54,820 --> 00:22:56,720
Now, we haven't drafted.

285
00:22:57,220 --> 00:22:59,660
That's a report yet certainly since we're here tonight.

286
00:23:00,900 --> 00:23:03,520
It might consist of some like fill in the blanks.

287
00:23:04,240 --> 00:23:11,480
So it's kind of some sample language where we can get to specifics, but ultimately you as a body would be who's responsible for determining

288
00:23:11,480 --> 00:23:17,380
what those specifics are. And so I anticipate your menu of options is going to be, we

289
00:23:17,380 --> 00:23:21,640
designate the whole property, we designate none of the property, or we designate a portion.

290
00:23:21,720 --> 00:23:24,640
And if we do that portion, that's where we're going to have to be awful, Lisa.

291
00:23:25,640 --> 00:23:31,920
Okay, yeah, I was just, I just want to get clarity in my mind for that. So yeah, that's perfect. Thank you.

292
00:23:34,800 --> 00:23:36,940
Those are nothing else. Everyone have the nice evening.

293
00:23:36,940 --> 00:23:38,360
Thank you.

294
00:23:38,360 --> 00:23:42,340
One moment to share, we need a motion to adjourn.

295
00:23:42,920 --> 00:23:45,840
You're so excited to leave here early, but for you to add.

296
00:23:47,200 --> 00:23:48,720
I'm also on the meeting.

297
00:23:49,600 --> 00:23:51,180
May I have a motion to adjourn, please?

298
00:23:53,620 --> 00:23:54,700
I'm also on the meeting.

299
00:23:55,600 --> 00:23:56,100
It's not the second.

300
00:23:56,700 --> 00:23:57,720
Okay, all in favour?

301
00:23:59,560 --> 00:23:59,880
Aye.

302
00:24:01,320 --> 00:24:01,620
Okay.

303
00:24:02,300 --> 00:24:03,000
Thank you, everyone.

304
00:24:03,600 --> 00:24:05,020
We're going to see you next month.

305
00:24:05,920 --> 00:24:07,100
See you next month.

306
00:24:07,100 --> 00:24:09,700
Do you want to say a word with a renovation to be done?