1 00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:07,420 Any welcome all to the village of Ryebrook planning board meeting? 2 00:00:07,940 --> 00:00:10,080 Let us all rise for the pledge of allegiance. 3 00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:33,840 Welcome to applicants, clients, professionals and members of the public. 4 00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:35,940 My name is Rob Goodman. 5 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:38,200 I'm a chair of the Planning Board. 6 00:00:38,860 --> 00:00:43,260 Board members also in attendance tonight as John Bresan, 7 00:00:44,180 --> 00:00:48,480 Donald Trump, Scott Mendelssohn, Matthew Retner, Amy Schoen, 8 00:00:48,940 --> 00:00:51,160 and Jeffrey Richmond is joining us. 9 00:00:51,780 --> 00:00:56,360 Jeff has been on the ZBA, on the zoning board of appeals 10 00:00:56,800 --> 00:01:01,960 for two years, from 2015, from 2012 to 2015. 11 00:01:01,960 --> 00:01:09,180 and he was actually a colleague of ours on the planning board from 2015 to 2017 and he 12 00:01:10,080 --> 00:01:17,880 is entering as Dan Tartaglia, a longtime member of the board for the last 12 years, has taken 13 00:01:17,880 --> 00:01:25,060 leaves to expand his practice and so Jeff, you know, thanks for coming in and filling Dan's 14 00:01:25,060 --> 00:01:31,600 shoes, look forward to working with you and it's also nice seeing all the board members together 15 00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:33,620 after the holiday. 16 00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:42,200 I also want to acknowledge David Heiser, who is our liaison from the Board of Trustees, 17 00:01:43,780 --> 00:01:49,340 our Village Attorney Jew Gamles, our Superintendent of Public Works, Michael Noak, 18 00:01:49,340 --> 00:01:54,180 on our village planning consultant from Hardestian Hanover, Sarah Brown. 19 00:01:54,860 --> 00:02:02,680 As always, we thank Terralanda in spirit for assembling all the minutes that we have to review 20 00:02:02,680 --> 00:02:08,340 and for all the back office things that she does to keep us going here. 21 00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:16,360 I think the minutes, actually, there are a couple of minutes that are ready for review. 22 00:02:17,660 --> 00:02:18,780 See, 23 00:02:25,860 --> 00:02:33,360 we have minutes from July 2022 and minutes from February 10, 2022. 24 00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:42,480 I think there we have a quorum for both, maybe. 25 00:02:44,220 --> 00:02:49,840 As anyone who attended those meetings have anything to add to those minutes, 26 00:02:53,110 --> 00:02:53,430 let's take 27 00:02:53,430 --> 00:03:00,170 February 10, 2022 minutes. If not, can I have a motion in the second to adopt a minute? 28 00:03:00,830 --> 00:03:03,890 Luke. Second. Second. 29 00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:12,700 Yes. Mr. Crom. Yes. Mr. Mandelson. Yes. Mr. Rettner. Yes. 30 00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:25,360 The 31 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:31,060 And I think, one, two, three, we have a quorum for that. 32 00:03:31,700 --> 00:03:38,780 So does anyone have any additions amendments to the July 2022 minutes? 33 00:03:38,820 --> 00:03:41,700 If not, can I have a motion in a second to adopt those minutes? 34 00:03:43,260 --> 00:03:43,860 Oofed. 35 00:03:43,860 --> 00:03:44,180 Second. 36 00:03:46,160 --> 00:03:47,140 Just because they're just in? 37 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:48,240 Yes, again. 38 00:03:48,960 --> 00:03:49,440 Mr. Krum. 39 00:03:50,180 --> 00:03:50,940 Mr. Mendelsen. 40 00:03:51,720 --> 00:03:52,920 I believe I have to abstain. 41 00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:55,580 Mr. Retner. 42 00:03:56,360 --> 00:03:58,000 Mr. Richmond. 43 00:03:58,200 --> 00:03:59,420 I'll have staying again. 44 00:04:00,560 --> 00:04:01,240 Michelle. 45 00:04:01,640 --> 00:04:02,180 Oh, vote. 46 00:04:03,060 --> 00:04:04,080 Thank you. 47 00:04:05,240 --> 00:04:06,300 Chairman Goodman, please. 48 00:04:07,820 --> 00:04:08,340 Thank you. 49 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:09,180 Okay. 50 00:04:09,180 --> 00:04:09,940 And that should happen. 51 00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:11,680 Really? 52 00:04:12,120 --> 00:04:12,220 Yeah. 53 00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:14,020 Are we like up to date? 54 00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:14,580 Yeah. 55 00:04:15,140 --> 00:04:16,500 Wow, that's pretty terrific. 56 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:17,700 What a board. 57 00:04:18,300 --> 00:04:19,000 For once. 58 00:04:19,160 --> 00:04:20,160 We're going to have a different day. 59 00:04:20,220 --> 00:04:20,560 Right. 60 00:04:21,540 --> 00:04:25,540 Well, congratulations to Tara and the staff. 61 00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:28,300 That was a huge endeavor. 62 00:04:28,940 --> 00:04:31,720 Well, they were novelas these minutes. 63 00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:32,680 They really were. 64 00:04:33,060 --> 00:04:36,040 The members of the public just to appreciate this, 65 00:04:36,060 --> 00:04:37,820 when we were doing Zoom meetings, 66 00:04:38,400 --> 00:04:39,920 under the governor's requirements, 67 00:04:40,320 --> 00:04:43,560 those meetings had to actually be transcribed word for word. 68 00:04:44,100 --> 00:04:45,320 So you can imagine, 69 00:04:45,320 --> 00:04:47,160 Every man can be massive. 70 00:04:47,780 --> 00:04:54,160 He's minutes were and people from the village had to put them together and revise them and edit them and it was a huge endeavor. 71 00:04:55,000 --> 00:04:59,800 So we have finally caught up and our hats off to our staff for being able to do it. 72 00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:15,240 No, so minutes are supposed to be released to the public within two weeks. There's no time for him to approve them, but if there's a foil request and we have a draft ready, we have to release the draft. 73 00:05:15,540 --> 00:05:16,380 Even though he may not be approved. 74 00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:20,440 Even though there not be, and there's nothing in the law that requires that minutes be approved. 75 00:05:20,820 --> 00:05:22,000 Thank you. 76 00:05:22,740 --> 00:05:26,460 Okay, our first matter is seven Bobbi Elaine. 77 00:05:27,020 --> 00:05:28,080 Is that on? 78 00:05:30,960 --> 00:05:32,020 Go into here. 79 00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:32,620 Yes, it's on. 80 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:33,540 Okay, good. 81 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:39,240 Any additional information regarding that application? 82 00:05:39,700 --> 00:05:42,080 Is the applicant going to? 83 00:05:42,300 --> 00:05:44,500 I had a conversation with their engineer. 84 00:05:45,560 --> 00:05:50,320 He has moved on from the practice to another municipality, actually. 85 00:05:51,360 --> 00:05:55,360 And he said, he will follow up on it, that was last week, Thursday. 86 00:05:56,320 --> 00:05:56,760 It's the wait. 87 00:05:56,940 --> 00:05:57,900 But Michael, what's the problem? 88 00:05:58,060 --> 00:06:01,820 He's the Stonewater Management issue that we are waiting for. 89 00:06:02,100 --> 00:06:04,980 Because I remember, this was last time we addressed this, 90 00:06:05,240 --> 00:06:05,840 was when he looked over. 91 00:06:05,980 --> 00:06:06,280 Yeah. 92 00:06:06,420 --> 00:06:07,700 And I thought we had it. 93 00:06:07,980 --> 00:06:08,160 It's close. 94 00:06:08,300 --> 00:06:13,420 There are some technical items that AI engineers are asking for, 95 00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:17,600 which may alter the Stonewater Management. 96 00:06:17,600 --> 00:06:27,760 I've read the James Memo today and the Memo was written when sometimes in October, and nobody from the applicant responded to any of that. 97 00:06:27,760 --> 00:06:32,060 That's how long we've been trying to obtain this information. 98 00:06:32,700 --> 00:06:40,840 The applicant has consulted with other engineers, but legally other engineers cannot take over someone else's design. 99 00:06:40,840 --> 00:06:50,300 As the same question, so I just as drew to the application, how long can we drag this on without having to go back to the square one? 100 00:06:50,680 --> 00:06:55,440 Yeah, there's no legal requirement. I think our practices, we won't really go beyond six months. 101 00:06:56,160 --> 00:07:03,700 And then the board, if the board feels, it's necessary, we can require them to re-nodes if it's been, you know, a substantial amount of time. 102 00:07:03,700 --> 00:07:10,040 because my concern is that, you know, if you go for six months, and that is no more public 103 00:07:10,040 --> 00:07:12,480 careing, is it open or has been closed? 104 00:07:12,540 --> 00:07:14,160 It's still open, or it's been adjourned. 105 00:07:14,840 --> 00:07:15,620 Yeah, we schedule it. 106 00:07:15,620 --> 00:07:16,220 Also, it is. 107 00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:19,680 Some people come as they can still come back and, okay, then I'm fine. 108 00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:25,400 But we would require him to re-notice at this point, since it has been, since September, I think. 109 00:07:25,740 --> 00:07:31,700 I think one of the issues, though, that you raised was that if a new engineer has to come 110 00:07:31,700 --> 00:07:38,400 board, they have to resumit, they have to resumit the site plan, a new, not only that, but it 111 00:07:38,400 --> 00:07:42,160 has to be a whole new design, it cannot be the same design. 112 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:43,020 Oh is that so? 113 00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:43,600 Yes. 114 00:07:44,060 --> 00:07:44,860 It's a variation of the design. 115 00:07:44,980 --> 00:07:45,500 Yep. 116 00:07:45,740 --> 00:07:52,780 If one engineer designs it, that is proprietary and historical data under their license, so they 117 00:07:52,780 --> 00:07:53,140 cannot. 118 00:07:53,220 --> 00:07:53,500 Why? 119 00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:59,580 Why doesn't the old engineer just enter into a waiver agreement with the new engineer and just 120 00:07:59,580 --> 00:08:06,740 his rights to, I'm not a dirty claim, so I don't know, and I'm not getting in the middle of 121 00:08:06,740 --> 00:08:08,520 the whole owner and their professional. 122 00:08:08,800 --> 00:08:08,980 I know. 123 00:08:09,260 --> 00:08:14,140 But it's like, you know, they should either finish up the application or withdraw it and 124 00:08:14,140 --> 00:08:15,580 resumide it. 125 00:08:16,060 --> 00:08:21,060 See, if you can get them to the next month's meeting, if they're not going to do anything 126 00:08:21,060 --> 00:08:26,360 by next month, then I think we should have a discussion about, you know, maybe taking it off 127 00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:34,600 agenda until they resummit it. Okay, 32 Lincoln Avenue. New 128 00:08:34,600 --> 00:08:35,700 matter on? 129 00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:40,820 How are you? How are the holidays? 130 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:44,780 Happy New Year. Happy New Year. 131 00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:46,000 Nice. 132 00:08:46,340 --> 00:08:47,400 It's a new year. 133 00:08:48,940 --> 00:08:49,900 Yeah, right. 134 00:08:52,940 --> 00:08:54,780 We're not going to wait too for this one to start. 135 00:08:55,120 --> 00:08:58,640 We're going to wait for this one to start. 136 00:08:58,640 --> 00:08:58,780 Yeah. 137 00:09:52,560 --> 00:09:57,820 I want to watch the Michigan game. You're not part of the FLH system, are you? 138 00:09:57,820 --> 00:09:58,900 That's it. 139 00:10:02,280 --> 00:10:08,020 This could be a cable, if everything's a cable. Particularly, it's up to 140 00:10:10,700 --> 00:10:13,600 me. Hello, Fred. Going Fred. 141 00:10:14,720 --> 00:10:20,240 Okay, so they got one screen going. Well, can we start, can we start? 142 00:10:20,240 --> 00:10:26,160 Yeah, can we start the other screen? So you can see it. You really can't see that it's great, right? 143 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:33,500 We can, we can, we can, yeah, I think it's it's hard for our colleagues on the other side. 144 00:10:33,900 --> 00:10:34,160 Thank you. 145 00:10:34,700 --> 00:10:37,600 I think you can move it, John. 146 00:10:39,040 --> 00:10:41,160 We could move. 147 00:10:41,300 --> 00:10:42,180 We could move. 148 00:10:43,300 --> 00:10:43,920 We could move. 149 00:10:44,100 --> 00:10:45,640 We could go sit at that there. 150 00:10:47,500 --> 00:10:48,120 All right, that's good. 151 00:10:48,440 --> 00:10:49,660 Okay, we can see that's good enough. 152 00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:51,760 That's what Jeff can use. 153 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:52,720 The professionals do. 154 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:53,140 All right. 155 00:10:54,400 --> 00:10:54,660 That's fine. 156 00:11:01,860 --> 00:11:02,260 Okay. 157 00:11:03,640 --> 00:11:08,060 So this is the third you're linking to Avenue, which is the fairly new houses. 158 00:11:08,300 --> 00:11:09,140 Do you start mine? 159 00:11:09,380 --> 00:11:09,620 I'm sorry. 160 00:11:10,260 --> 00:11:10,880 We want to go. 161 00:11:11,520 --> 00:11:12,160 No, I'm good. 162 00:11:14,560 --> 00:11:16,060 Okay, so this is the front of the house. 163 00:11:16,120 --> 00:11:19,060 It's not linking to Avenue, which you all know is on the scenic overly district. 164 00:11:19,900 --> 00:11:21,880 And it's, you really can't park on the street. 165 00:11:23,520 --> 00:11:28,060 So it has landscaping, 166 00:11:30,260 --> 00:11:40,560 looking out at Lincoln Avenue, it has the fence in the hedge, it has the one-lane driveway coming in right now that's kind of two parking spaces or it could be a catering. 167 00:11:41,240 --> 00:11:42,460 So that's where they have right now. 168 00:11:42,840 --> 00:11:48,420 But it's very difficult when people come to their house and then other people come, you can't turn around. 169 00:11:48,700 --> 00:11:53,360 So if you park in it, you can't turn around so you have to back down the driveway onto Lincoln Avenue, 170 00:11:54,060 --> 00:11:56,760 which after living there a couple of years has become a problem. 171 00:11:57,780 --> 00:12:01,260 So what they want to do, and this is from the road, what we want to do is 172 00:12:01,260 --> 00:12:05,840 fan out the driveway after you come in and then just fan it out and make that spot 173 00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:11,120 bigger so that you can park cars pull it closer to the side yard 174 00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:13,600 and then you can be able to turn around to somebody's park there 175 00:12:13,600 --> 00:12:16,800 also so you can get it out of the garage and you can turn around. 176 00:12:16,800 --> 00:12:22,960 So John, this is from Nami's second, not the fact that they have lack of parking. 177 00:12:24,120 --> 00:12:28,120 More of issuers and access to the main road in an hour. 178 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:31,460 The biggest issue is backing out onto it. 179 00:12:31,520 --> 00:12:32,500 It's a safety issue. 180 00:12:33,100 --> 00:12:33,700 It's a safety issue. 181 00:12:33,960 --> 00:12:37,120 And the way the driveway is, if you have cars parked, you have to back down the driveway. 182 00:12:37,680 --> 00:12:43,020 So they were trying to move the park cars over a little further so that when somebody goes 183 00:12:43,020 --> 00:12:45,960 or you try to get out, you can turn around and not have to back down the driveway. 184 00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:53,580 And knowing that the two times I've been there to put the sign up and down, and I've had back out the driveway during the day, it is a challenging driveway to get out of. 185 00:12:54,820 --> 00:12:55,820 So that's the phone. 186 00:13:00,820 --> 00:13:05,780 Yeah, so what would that mean in terms of expanding the parking spot? 187 00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:37,140 I think this is what they wanted to do. 188 00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:43,080 So we're proposing to do, right? This is the line of the existing. 189 00:13:46,220 --> 00:13:55,300 We're proposing to do is take this 21-foot piece and push it out 11 feet, just like half of a car length. 190 00:13:55,740 --> 00:14:01,160 So we can push it in and then we're just going to angle this piece so that you have more room just swing around. 191 00:14:01,400 --> 00:14:07,300 So this way the cars are parked further in and then you can back out and go out and somebody's here, they can tack and then go out of the driveway. 192 00:14:07,960 --> 00:14:11,140 That drive is a two-car drive from the straight to the house, is it? 193 00:14:11,140 --> 00:14:14,140 It's really not too lame at the road. It fans out. 194 00:14:16,180 --> 00:14:18,340 You can't park too car side by side in this piece of it. 195 00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:18,780 At the beginning. 196 00:14:19,260 --> 00:14:19,780 Double one. 197 00:14:19,980 --> 00:14:22,500 It was a single one and then it fans out. 198 00:14:23,060 --> 00:14:25,640 Was that something as part of... 199 00:14:25,640 --> 00:14:26,680 Because this is not new. 200 00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:28,020 I mean, this is not new. 201 00:14:28,100 --> 00:14:29,400 This house was of what two years old? 202 00:14:29,460 --> 00:14:31,140 Was this a part of the... 203 00:14:32,400 --> 00:14:35,060 All the approval did we ask for a narrow driveway? 204 00:14:35,180 --> 00:14:37,600 Well, normally you do. Well, normally somebody does. 205 00:14:38,120 --> 00:14:41,180 because normally when you're doing a new house if you like a most new house in Rybrook 206 00:14:41,180 --> 00:14:43,300 you usually have a one-lane drive with that in fans out 207 00:14:43,300 --> 00:14:48,140 right because you don't like the approach from the road to be too wide you kind of want 208 00:14:48,140 --> 00:14:53,040 to fan out we want to make sure drivers in Rybrook are good so they can back down their 209 00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:59,580 driver they can. That's not the case with me my my is a two two two yeah your house was built 210 00:15:01,460 --> 00:15:05,420 You're a belt, you're a belt. I mean, most ribo houses that are older. Yes. 211 00:15:05,980 --> 00:15:12,000 With the two car garage, have a two-lane driveway. But if you look at most of the newer homes, they don't. Okay. 212 00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:21,560 Some do, but most don't. So this house because it was a larger lot. You kind of have the area closer to it. It was designed with kind of from the road approach, one lane, and then a fan's out. 213 00:15:22,320 --> 00:15:27,560 And our problem really isn't at the road being narrow. It's really the space by the house to turn around. 214 00:15:27,560 --> 00:15:33,560 So I'm not sure that like a two-lane wide driveway, the road is really going to help us. 215 00:15:34,320 --> 00:15:35,500 But we really need more space at the house. 216 00:15:35,580 --> 00:15:41,140 Yeah, it's the house with regard and Rinkon Avenue, slightly under the curve. 217 00:15:42,220 --> 00:15:43,580 It's before a tall car. 218 00:15:43,740 --> 00:15:45,780 So it's right before and you're wrapped in the park. 219 00:15:46,220 --> 00:15:47,440 Rinkon Avenue does curve. 220 00:15:47,640 --> 00:15:48,200 It does curve. 221 00:15:48,300 --> 00:15:52,940 So when you're backing out the cars coming from the hodge, you don't see as well as the ones coming from us. 222 00:15:53,180 --> 00:15:53,580 Exactly. 223 00:15:54,240 --> 00:15:56,160 And those are the ones that are going to hit you as you're back now. 224 00:15:56,160 --> 00:15:57,020 It's really good. 225 00:15:57,020 --> 00:16:00,120 This is on the right side, so come in from the hot, yeah. 226 00:16:00,620 --> 00:16:01,120 Yeah, okay. 227 00:16:01,240 --> 00:16:03,340 So I mean, the subject here was 228 00:16:03,340 --> 00:16:06,100 pushed closer to the house or you're further from the road. 229 00:16:06,460 --> 00:16:08,480 We tried to keep it out of the buffer as far as we could, 230 00:16:10,360 --> 00:16:12,480 but it's difficult to do. 231 00:16:20,800 --> 00:16:22,600 And any additional screening, 232 00:16:23,360 --> 00:16:24,380 to Shrevery, any detail? 233 00:16:24,380 --> 00:16:26,660 I mean, I know on the letter, it said, 234 00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:30,020 I have to look at if the increase of the driveway 235 00:16:31,340 --> 00:16:33,300 affected those trees, which I need to put on there. 236 00:16:33,300 --> 00:16:37,040 But we will, right now the house is well-lanskated from the road. 237 00:16:37,960 --> 00:16:41,180 We could put a little bit of landscaping along the parking spot if we. 238 00:16:41,180 --> 00:16:42,920 It's a little bit more. 239 00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:43,660 It's just a little bit more. 240 00:16:43,660 --> 00:16:46,580 Isn't the issue like this is a designated scenic road? 241 00:16:47,020 --> 00:16:52,200 So that actually there is a vegetated buffer requirement that actually cuts through the new 242 00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:53,120 parking place. 243 00:16:53,500 --> 00:16:55,640 Right, it cuts through a five feet of the parking space. 244 00:16:56,740 --> 00:17:00,940 But if you look at the pictures of the house, the vegetation really is by the road closer 245 00:17:00,940 --> 00:17:02,500 with the fence and all the plantings. 246 00:17:02,500 --> 00:17:07,040 So, we can always add more. 247 00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:10,800 So, where is the scenic, just remind me, where is it? 248 00:17:10,800 --> 00:17:14,920 So, it's not just five feet, it's not just 10 feet. 249 00:17:15,200 --> 00:17:17,120 Yeah, right, it's 10 feet. 250 00:17:17,840 --> 00:17:20,360 Yeah, you're an important 10 feet in the scenic over. 251 00:17:21,080 --> 00:17:23,960 So, it's not bad, so, it's not bad. 252 00:17:24,100 --> 00:17:28,760 So, we could add, like right now, it's heavily kind of with the fence and landscaping along 253 00:17:28,760 --> 00:17:29,100 the fence. 254 00:17:29,220 --> 00:17:31,060 They've got some layers of it, and then there's some trees. 255 00:17:31,060 --> 00:17:35,000 We have to verify those trees or one of the trees might have to move over. 256 00:17:36,200 --> 00:17:39,700 So we will at the landscape into the plant. 257 00:17:39,960 --> 00:17:42,660 That's what they are and we can't add. 258 00:17:43,280 --> 00:17:44,340 You can take our. 259 00:17:44,800 --> 00:17:47,080 My name is Malik Samad. 260 00:17:47,100 --> 00:17:48,240 I was the builder. 261 00:17:48,340 --> 00:17:51,040 I did five houses in Raibrook. 262 00:17:52,140 --> 00:17:58,260 And Mr. Martinez willing to plan more landscaping to hide the parking. 263 00:17:58,260 --> 00:18:02,040 and then we have private hatch all along the fence that we can increase. 264 00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:11,860 So, um, um, positive that let's say once we move and they put the, they put the body and the side of the house. 265 00:18:12,260 --> 00:18:18,660 We don't see it as much obvious like now because they're going to be shaded by plants by, by shrub. 266 00:18:18,760 --> 00:18:21,920 Is that we're going to plant along the, the new end of the driveway. 267 00:18:23,980 --> 00:18:33,340 And Sarah, would as your opinion as far as screening is concerned, better it's feasible and not feasible. 268 00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:37,220 I think it is feasible to add additional screening. 269 00:18:37,800 --> 00:18:44,000 I would like to see if those pinox have to be relocated, because that might dictate what we then 270 00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:47,600 screen with further, because they will eventually be shaded. 271 00:18:50,580 --> 00:18:58,120 When I looked at this application when it was presented to us, first time, I had a concern 272 00:18:58,920 --> 00:19:06,260 of the President setting, but I took a ride, and because if you looked through the application 273 00:19:06,260 --> 00:19:10,920 the way it was presented the first time, there was no mention there at all about the safety issue 274 00:19:10,920 --> 00:19:15,520 and the degree of difficulty of getting out on the drive and on the major road, it was kind 275 00:19:15,520 --> 00:19:20,980 presented as, you know, my family is coming over and I need additional parking space. 276 00:19:22,320 --> 00:19:29,340 And I did not have the positivity reaction to that at the time, but now looking at this 277 00:19:29,340 --> 00:19:35,060 and the fact of where the house is located and I agree with Mr. Skala that it's kind of very, 278 00:19:35,220 --> 00:19:44,980 very difficult to get out of that driveway onto the main road. Especially coming from the 279 00:19:45,580 --> 00:19:59,700 we love to speak about that, don't we? It's not, it's not, yeah, so I think my reaction to it is, you know, as long as it's safety related. 280 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:10,940 He's not the permanent parking, he's more for a kind of turning vehicle or an, so you can go, you know, front out, and with the proper screening, you know. 281 00:20:10,940 --> 00:20:14,860 But again, he's up to the zoning board, really, to the ranch of variance. 282 00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:20,960 Yeah, I also drove, I drive past it every day and I think Talcott actually is right there, right? 283 00:20:21,520 --> 00:20:23,420 It creates even more. 284 00:20:24,380 --> 00:20:28,300 Yeah. So it's just bad, it's a bad interest, it is. 285 00:20:28,300 --> 00:20:30,440 It's really not going to address the speed limit, it's the other way. 286 00:20:30,460 --> 00:20:35,380 Well, that's slow-censure, but even if they did, it still is still a difficult place. 287 00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:40,960 I was always under the impression that there was some safety involved. 288 00:20:41,740 --> 00:20:45,260 And frankly, I don't think the scenic overlay will be disturbed in any way. 289 00:20:45,280 --> 00:20:51,340 I think it will be enhanced by adding additional screening and depending on the kind of planning that you use. 290 00:20:51,760 --> 00:20:55,080 So you're killing two birds with one stone, I think. 291 00:20:55,080 --> 00:20:55,700 I hope anything. 292 00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:56,880 What's his thought in landscape? 293 00:20:57,160 --> 00:21:00,360 Nobody will notice he got bigger because it's really close to the house and it's kind 294 00:21:00,360 --> 00:21:00,640 of pushing. 295 00:21:05,060 --> 00:21:09,200 I might be the minority and I'm sensitive to the safety issues, for sure. 296 00:21:09,740 --> 00:21:12,600 But let me just point out all the scene in highways and ride book are major roads. 297 00:21:12,640 --> 00:21:18,460 You're talking King Street, Ridge Street, Lincoln Avenue, Anderson Hill Road. 298 00:21:18,500 --> 00:21:21,460 They're all major roads, people speed on all those roads. 299 00:21:22,680 --> 00:21:28,640 We're not the zoning board, but if I was on the zoning board I would be thinking about 300 00:21:28,640 --> 00:21:33,640 the precedent because that's the same argument anybody. I mean why not want to just make 301 00:21:33,640 --> 00:21:35,860 the driveway double white, wouldn't start. 302 00:21:37,900 --> 00:21:40,480 Double white, wouldn't help this turn. But I mean 303 00:21:40,480 --> 00:21:44,080 you've got the ability to turn. The driveway that you've got gives you the ability to turn. 304 00:21:44,100 --> 00:21:48,080 You're looking for more parking. We're looking to move the parking over so you can turn 305 00:21:48,080 --> 00:21:52,800 when cars are parked. You have the ability, if you parked, for instance, in the garage, 306 00:21:52,980 --> 00:21:57,880 you have the ability to turn. You're looking for more parking. We're actually, 307 00:21:57,880 --> 00:22:01,200 I mean, we're creating the exact two spaces we have. 308 00:22:01,340 --> 00:22:03,740 We're just pushing them 11 feet further back, 309 00:22:03,800 --> 00:22:04,820 so that when you pull out of the garage, 310 00:22:04,960 --> 00:22:07,140 if cars are parked, you can actually turn around, 311 00:22:07,140 --> 00:22:09,100 or somebody else came, they could turn around. 312 00:22:09,720 --> 00:22:10,720 No, they could be at that. 313 00:22:12,280 --> 00:22:13,640 I'd like, like, like, like, like, 314 00:22:13,640 --> 00:22:15,380 I'd all think making the driveway too lane-wise 315 00:22:15,380 --> 00:22:17,320 from the road is a better for the scene 316 00:22:17,320 --> 00:22:18,080 to go over Lake District. 317 00:22:18,760 --> 00:22:21,340 Well, let me ask you a question, if there's clearly 318 00:22:21,340 --> 00:22:23,480 a problem if there are more than two cars there. 319 00:22:24,140 --> 00:22:26,340 But if you have two cars there, 320 00:22:27,820 --> 00:22:30,980 is that manageable, just with two cars. 321 00:22:31,080 --> 00:22:32,920 You have two cars there, you're backing down the driveway. 322 00:22:32,980 --> 00:22:34,060 You're still backing down the driveway. 323 00:22:34,180 --> 00:22:35,840 If you're going out of the garage, you're backing down the driveway. 324 00:22:35,980 --> 00:22:37,700 Please, don't go on the number of cars. 325 00:22:37,760 --> 00:22:39,260 It's a single family car. 326 00:22:39,600 --> 00:22:43,040 You have two parking spaces in the garage, two parking spaces on the driveway. 327 00:22:43,360 --> 00:22:46,780 So I think if you stop pushing the number of cars, 328 00:22:46,780 --> 00:22:51,840 parking spaces needed for the cars, you're going right into his bucket. 329 00:22:53,950 --> 00:22:58,110 And I think the issue here as far as I see it is safety. 330 00:22:58,650 --> 00:22:59,670 It's based on the chart of cars. 331 00:22:59,710 --> 00:23:01,330 It's made to measure it. 332 00:23:02,510 --> 00:23:06,530 But not, you know, if we are proving this because the applicant needs two additional parts, 333 00:23:06,530 --> 00:23:10,310 it's based in the fact that he's probably going to park six far the right now, 334 00:23:11,050 --> 00:23:12,770 that you're going to lose me on that one. 335 00:23:13,650 --> 00:23:17,450 We're taking the two spaces, shoving them 11 feet over so you can actually get out of the garage 336 00:23:17,450 --> 00:23:18,630 and turn around of cars of cars. 337 00:23:19,530 --> 00:23:22,590 Well, I think that's where the safety issue. 338 00:23:22,590 --> 00:23:26,170 And that I think is what's driving the sentiments 339 00:23:26,170 --> 00:23:29,350 and favor of your application is that there is now. 340 00:23:29,410 --> 00:23:32,430 Now there could be a lot of properties 341 00:23:33,130 --> 00:23:35,330 that have the same problem. 342 00:23:35,950 --> 00:23:37,850 And if they were to get before the board 343 00:23:37,850 --> 00:23:40,530 to make a viable safety argument, 344 00:23:40,790 --> 00:23:42,370 we would probably be very sympathetic, 345 00:23:42,670 --> 00:23:44,270 notwithstanding the scenic overlaid. 346 00:23:44,350 --> 00:23:45,890 I mean, we get a lot of applications 347 00:23:45,890 --> 00:23:47,730 involving the scenic overlaid district 348 00:23:47,730 --> 00:23:49,490 where we don't even know why they're here. 349 00:23:49,490 --> 00:23:53,810 Because I have to say, because I have to co-organize it. 350 00:23:54,490 --> 00:23:58,330 But I think it's not sacrosanct. 351 00:23:59,630 --> 00:24:03,390 It is assessed on an individualized basis. 352 00:24:05,630 --> 00:24:08,670 You're going to have to make the argument 353 00:24:08,670 --> 00:24:13,310 to the ZBA that are not just safety reasons 354 00:24:13,310 --> 00:24:16,790 that are seriously implicated here. 355 00:24:17,950 --> 00:24:23,110 because Don, you know, raises the issue that they will raise, which is, if all you 356 00:24:23,110 --> 00:24:26,590 want to do increase the number of parking spaces, well, that's everyone's problem. 357 00:24:27,650 --> 00:24:33,310 And they shouldn't relax the code, the zoning code for that. 358 00:24:33,610 --> 00:24:41,670 But if you can make a safety-related argument, then I think that would be much more compelling. 359 00:24:42,530 --> 00:24:47,750 I haven't actually myself gone to that area, I think other colleagues have. 360 00:24:48,010 --> 00:24:49,630 You know, I credit their opinions. 361 00:24:50,630 --> 00:24:56,410 If it's low, if the property is located in an area where there could be a distancing problem, 362 00:24:56,650 --> 00:24:57,810 a site-distance problem. 363 00:24:58,510 --> 00:24:59,850 Well, that's an individual. 364 00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:06,640 I think procedurally what we're going to do is we're going to refer the matter to the ZBA for next month. 365 00:25:07,300 --> 00:25:11,500 And we're also going to schedule a public hearing. Now when does the ZBA actually meet? 366 00:25:13,260 --> 00:25:22,780 Okay, so theoretically, theoretically we've got a determination from the ZBA in advance of our public hearing so that we can move forward without delaying the application. 367 00:25:26,530 --> 00:25:30,070 Okay, so I guess we should do the referral resolution first. 368 00:25:31,600 --> 00:25:43,480 Do a quick little summary, whereas an application was submitted for safe plan approval for the extension of a driveway to create two conforming parking spaces located a 32-link an avenue. 369 00:25:44,540 --> 00:25:53,760 In the scenic roads overly district and the R12 zoning district and whereas pursuant to the building inspectors notice of disapproval did November 28, 2022. 370 00:25:53,760 --> 00:25:56,880 The following variances are required for the proposed plans. 371 00:25:57,180 --> 00:25:59,860 A 10-foot scenic roads overly district, 372 00:25:59,940 --> 00:26:06,140 vegetative buffer setback variants where the minimum required scenic roads overly district vegetative buffer setback 373 00:26:06,140 --> 00:26:09,200 is 35 feet pursuant to village code. 374 00:26:10,020 --> 00:26:14,600 And whereas the applicant wishes to apply to the ride brook zone board of appeals for the above variance 375 00:26:14,600 --> 00:26:19,500 rather than modify the project to conform to the above reference sections of the village code. 376 00:26:19,500 --> 00:26:25,660 And whereas the planning board reviewed and considered the application and is January 12, 2020 meeting and 377 00:26:25,660 --> 00:26:36,550 Whereas the proposed action is a take to action under Seeker now therefore be it resolved that for the reason stated here in the village of Ryebrook planning board here by refers the application listed in here 378 00:26:37,240 --> 00:26:39,760 listed here in to the zoning board of appeals 379 00:26:40,820 --> 00:26:41,440 any 380 00:26:42,760 --> 00:26:47,000 Any modifications concerns additions to that resolution 381 00:26:47,620 --> 00:26:54,700 If not, can I have a motion without endorsing it without endorsing it without endorsing it? 382 00:26:54,700 --> 00:27:01,240 I was going to actually take that out and I last time we referred something to the ZBA. 383 00:27:01,440 --> 00:27:03,160 This was my error. 384 00:27:03,640 --> 00:27:08,680 The planning board had expressed kind of a favor of the variance and the zoning board. 385 00:27:08,680 --> 00:27:10,700 They have to evaluate it on their five criteria. 386 00:27:11,360 --> 00:27:15,760 So I think the best strategy going forward is unless there are blatant planning concerns 387 00:27:15,760 --> 00:27:17,420 that you'd like to express in the resolution, 388 00:27:17,980 --> 00:27:19,880 we should not state whether or not the planning board, 389 00:27:20,100 --> 00:27:21,860 favors or disfavors the variance. 390 00:27:22,480 --> 00:27:23,020 So no comment. 391 00:27:23,020 --> 00:27:26,060 You know what I'm saying without, yeah, no endorsement. 392 00:27:26,400 --> 00:27:27,120 Without endorsement. 393 00:27:27,440 --> 00:27:27,500 Yep. 394 00:27:27,520 --> 00:27:30,340 We're just gonna work for, we're just gonna work for. 395 00:27:30,740 --> 00:27:38,220 Okay, so that's the language is as you indicated. 396 00:27:38,580 --> 00:27:40,280 They indicated, yeah, I had left a blank 397 00:27:40,280 --> 00:27:43,100 for any planning issues, but I took that blank out 398 00:27:43,100 --> 00:27:43,660 from the draft. 399 00:27:44,000 --> 00:27:45,560 So straightforward, just like I read. 400 00:27:47,180 --> 00:27:50,620 Okay, can I have a motion this second to a second? 401 00:27:50,620 --> 00:27:51,120 So move. 402 00:27:56,300 --> 00:27:56,920 Mr. Gazan. 403 00:27:57,340 --> 00:27:57,680 Yes. 404 00:27:57,920 --> 00:27:58,460 Mr. Crom. 405 00:27:58,680 --> 00:28:00,000 Yes. Mr. Mendelssohn. 406 00:28:00,060 --> 00:28:01,360 Yes. Mr. Redner. Yes. 407 00:28:01,360 --> 00:28:01,840 Mr. Richmond. 408 00:28:02,200 --> 00:28:02,340 Yes. 409 00:28:02,520 --> 00:28:02,820 Michelle. 410 00:28:03,440 --> 00:28:03,480 Yes. 411 00:28:03,480 --> 00:28:04,480 Chairman Gomez. Yes. 412 00:28:04,620 --> 00:28:05,400 Thank you. 413 00:28:05,820 --> 00:28:12,240 And now we have a motion, a resolution to schedule the public hearing for next month. 414 00:28:12,560 --> 00:28:13,420 So Sarah, I'm sorry. 415 00:28:14,220 --> 00:28:24,580 Whereas in application for site plan approval has been submitted for the expansion of a driveway at the property located at 32 Lincoln Avenue in the village of Rybrook. 416 00:28:24,760 --> 00:28:38,160 Now therefore, be it resolved the planning board of the village of Rybrook will hold a public hearing on February 9, 2023 at 6.30 pm in village hall or in a virtual format as may be determined depending on public health concerns. 417 00:28:38,160 --> 00:28:47,160 It further resolved that the applicant is hereby directed to comply with section 250-40 of the village code regarding notification of the public hearing. 418 00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:54,020 Okay, I was there any modifications. Let's move. Okay, second. 419 00:28:58,280 --> 00:28:58,680 Mr. Gerson. 420 00:28:59,280 --> 00:28:59,520 Yes. 421 00:28:59,560 --> 00:29:00,040 Mr. Crom. 422 00:29:00,360 --> 00:29:01,360 Yes. Mr. Mendelsen. 423 00:29:02,360 --> 00:29:02,540 Yes. 424 00:29:02,760 --> 00:29:03,040 Mr. Gerson. 425 00:29:03,320 --> 00:29:03,540 Yes. 426 00:29:04,740 --> 00:29:05,260 Chairman Gilman. 427 00:29:05,680 --> 00:29:06,560 Yes. Thank you. 428 00:29:06,960 --> 00:29:11,700 I would like to follow up on a question on this notification. 429 00:29:12,720 --> 00:29:13,900 I know there is two weeks. 430 00:29:14,500 --> 00:29:19,120 Is it that the neighbors have to receive the letter like two weeks in advance? 431 00:29:20,080 --> 00:29:27,020 I was reading some material for tonight's meeting and one of the neighbors sent us an email 432 00:29:27,020 --> 00:29:31,400 where she was pointing out that she did not receive the notification of the meeting, 433 00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:40,460 popular hearing until about day early day one day before the meeting of the hearings on the 434 00:29:40,460 --> 00:29:46,640 agenda for tonight. So there's no I'm just asking you generally there's a you have to 435 00:29:46,640 --> 00:29:51,600 send them 10 you have to send them 10 days before there's a postmark. Yes. 436 00:30:00,540 --> 00:30:12,880 Postmark 10 days. So if she got it one day before, that's just the mail. But it's, you know, there are, there's a postmark, there's the lady went through the whole process explaining where the letter was mail got a statement. 437 00:30:13,840 --> 00:30:24,520 And I just don't want to be, I said, you know, when we scheduled these, so it is a 10 days postmark 10 days and there's no requirement that you may, no requirement that you mail it from in state. 438 00:30:24,680 --> 00:30:29,400 I mean, so that's why we have the newspaper, that's why we have the signing properties. 439 00:30:29,400 --> 00:30:35,720 So there's other things we try and do to account for those errors, but sometimes it just happens like that 440 00:30:35,720 --> 00:30:38,180 Yeah, I know what you're talking about 441 00:30:39,840 --> 00:30:45,460 Okay, our next item is a 44 Rock Ridge Drive 442 00:31:10,110 --> 00:31:10,710 The 443 00:32:42,230 --> 00:32:45,570 design engineer on the project at 44 Rock Ridge Drive 444 00:32:48,330 --> 00:32:50,570 Currently, the site has is 445 00:32:52,390 --> 00:32:59,610 We have access via black top driveway in this area. There are no padios in the rear. 446 00:33:02,430 --> 00:33:03,300 How do I clear this? 447 00:33:09,600 --> 00:33:11,280 Let's see that at all 448 00:33:11,280 --> 00:33:11,980 Excuse me. 449 00:33:26,140 --> 00:33:28,480 Is there any way of swinging that a little bit further? 450 00:33:32,510 --> 00:33:32,970 No 451 00:33:35,130 --> 00:33:41,540 That's better. Much better. It's better. Thank you. Do you see a check? Yeah, okay 452 00:33:41,540 --> 00:33:49,080 So, existing conditions on a lot, there is an existing deck in the rear, composite deck 453 00:33:49,080 --> 00:33:56,380 with steps, there's a front porch, a driveway, and then a walkway access to the front door, 454 00:33:57,200 --> 00:34:03,160 existing conditions are shown on the left-hand side in this area, and then proposed, 455 00:34:08,660 --> 00:34:08,660 we're 456 00:34:08,660 --> 00:34:14,680 eight foot wide at the entrance to the driveway, and then another 457 00:34:15,360 --> 00:34:19,300 apron, three foot wide at the entrance to the garage. 458 00:34:22,750 --> 00:34:23,510 What do you mean by 459 00:34:23,510 --> 00:34:30,010 driver apron? What's an apron to a driver? It's like a walkway out of asphalt. It's 460 00:34:30,010 --> 00:34:35,050 like pavers or some type of cobblestone belt and rock. In this case we're 461 00:34:35,050 --> 00:34:44,690 closing pavers as the as the apron in addition we wanted to add two walkways to access the 462 00:34:44,690 --> 00:34:52,890 rear of the property we have a proposed paver walkway on over here on the right side of 463 00:34:52,890 --> 00:34:59,970 and then we have a proposed P-Grabble bed surrounding a blue. 464 00:35:01,100 --> 00:35:18,380 There's a proposed paper walkway on the left side of the home and a proposed patio of 398 square feet, with a associated stormwater management and landscaping, which I'm going to get to 465 00:35:25,170 --> 00:35:26,730 now. 466 00:35:47,640 --> 00:35:56,460 On the right side of the home, separating the front of the home from the rear, there'll be a white PVC fence, 467 00:35:56,460 --> 00:36:05,380 with black posts, that'll be separating the front from the rear on the right side and 468 00:36:11,240 --> 00:36:11,560 rear 469 00:36:11,560 --> 00:36:12,080 deck. 470 00:36:12,660 --> 00:36:17,500 We're going to be adding steps down to the proposed patio, which are going to be tracks 471 00:36:17,500 --> 00:36:24,990 or composite decking with a pebble stone gray finish to match the existing. 472 00:36:31,440 --> 00:36:36,800 Then we're going to have the blue stone paper walkway on the left side of the home, surrounded 473 00:36:36,800 --> 00:36:40,300 by P gravel bed, which will resemble this picture here. 474 00:36:48,670 --> 00:36:52,390 This is the pavers that I was talking about for the aprons, 475 00:36:53,050 --> 00:36:57,030 as well as the paver walkway on the right side of the home. 476 00:36:57,290 --> 00:36:59,910 They're going to go with an on-exnatural Cambridge pavers. 477 00:37:11,390 --> 00:37:13,910 The patio will be done with thermal blue stone. 478 00:37:14,590 --> 00:37:15,670 As a finish, 479 00:37:22,750 --> 00:37:25,530 here's another picture of the rear patio stone. 480 00:37:25,530 --> 00:37:26,170 And 481 00:37:30,390 --> 00:37:47,690 there will be some permeable synthetic turf proposed as part of this project, which will go in the rear of the property in this corner here, as a play area. 482 00:37:51,830 --> 00:37:58,870 The reason that you use in the papers and the turf, is it to get around the percentage 483 00:37:58,870 --> 00:38:03,470 of the impervious surface to be within the code regulation? 484 00:38:04,170 --> 00:38:04,750 No, actually. 485 00:38:04,750 --> 00:38:06,750 Or is it just for the aesthetics of… 486 00:38:06,750 --> 00:38:08,510 It's for the aesthetics only. 487 00:38:08,830 --> 00:38:16,870 If we were considering papers to be impervious, would you still be within the percentage 488 00:38:16,870 --> 00:38:19,290 of within the core of the requirement, 489 00:38:19,490 --> 00:38:22,190 so much of the impervious surface on front, you can have. 490 00:38:22,710 --> 00:38:25,710 Right, so if the pavers were considered pervious, 491 00:38:26,370 --> 00:38:27,830 then we would meet the requirement. 492 00:38:28,170 --> 00:38:30,950 But I did not consider the pavers as being pervious. 493 00:38:30,970 --> 00:38:33,970 I considered them as impervious for purposes of the application. 494 00:38:34,910 --> 00:38:38,730 And since we are within 100 feet of the water course 495 00:38:38,730 --> 00:38:42,930 in the rear, that's what triggered us 496 00:38:42,930 --> 00:38:45,110 to have to come present to the planning board. 497 00:38:45,110 --> 00:38:56,250 And the existing asphalt driver would remain asphalt, or you would say, yeah, the driver would remain asphalt with the exception of the aprons, but you can drive on the paper. 498 00:38:56,350 --> 00:39:13,580 Correct. Yes. It's not going to look very, it's going to look kind of like there are a number of homes that have it's like a picture frame. Yeah, okay, all right, it's a so how much in the way of additional impervious surface, are we talking about? 499 00:39:15,500 --> 00:39:20,800 So, the total additional impervious surface is, 500 00:39:34,590 --> 00:39:54,190 here at the schematic of existing impervious areas, versus proposed, and existing, we have 3,561 square feet of impervious area, and proposed, we have 4,329, so there's an addition. 501 00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:14,120 National 768 square feet of impervious being proposed as part of the application. And we did receive comments from Mr. 502 00:40:14,220 --> 00:40:25,500 Noak and hand over. And we didn't get a chance to address them yet, but we are going to take those into consideration. 503 00:40:25,500 --> 00:40:32,180 revisit the plan and try and reduce some of this disturbance that we have in the rear due to 504 00:40:32,180 --> 00:40:37,780 stormwater management. So since we are required to capture all impervious surfaces on the 505 00:40:37,780 --> 00:40:43,740 lot, we have to install a stormwater and the front of the property is higher than the rear. 506 00:40:44,300 --> 00:40:52,640 So some areas of the home can be captured by bringing the water to the front, but some will 507 00:40:52,640 --> 00:41:00,100 have to get captured in the rear, and I'm going to do my best to balance that out to decrease 508 00:41:00,100 --> 00:41:05,100 the amount of disturbance in the rear, which was one of the concerns that I saw based off 509 00:41:05,100 --> 00:41:05,680 the comments. 510 00:41:06,760 --> 00:41:10,920 Now, Sarah, this is a wetland area. 511 00:41:11,100 --> 00:41:12,280 Where's the wetland buffer? 512 00:41:13,100 --> 00:41:15,120 The wetland buffer goes through. 513 00:41:15,160 --> 00:41:17,620 The house is mostly contained within it. 514 00:41:17,940 --> 00:41:21,840 I think it's like right along the front door. 515 00:41:21,840 --> 00:41:25,220 there's a small portion of the front of the house that's not in it. 516 00:41:25,380 --> 00:41:29,040 Yeah, there it is, right, that line that goes through the footprint of the house. 517 00:41:29,500 --> 00:41:29,840 All right, 518 00:41:32,820 --> 00:41:34,440 so when it comes to stormwater, 519 00:41:34,680 --> 00:41:39,000 I mean, what do you, what do you do? The whole thing, the whole backyard is, 520 00:41:39,000 --> 00:41:41,640 and I correct the whole backyard is in the wetland buffer? 521 00:41:42,280 --> 00:41:46,400 Yes, but the board needs to understand why this property is in the wetland buffer. 522 00:41:47,340 --> 00:41:50,400 All the way at the far back, there's a retaining wall. 523 00:41:50,400 --> 00:41:56,840 right great and that was what like eight feet high or six feet high. It's a stone rubble wool. There's a 524 00:41:56,840 --> 00:41:59,220 There's a brook that comes down from 525 00:41:59,220 --> 00:42:04,180 metal arc and King Street and comes down and it's basically drainage channel 526 00:42:04,180 --> 00:42:09,700 So that's why this house is essentially in a wetland buffer because if you do 527 00:42:09,700 --> 00:42:17,160 Man made natural added on to over the years. It's there. It's a brook it flows even on a blue sky day 528 00:42:17,160 --> 00:42:22,120 It's got water in it, but this property is actually 8-feet higher than the level of brook. 529 00:42:22,880 --> 00:42:27,640 But in technicality because the brook is there, there's a 100-foot wet land buffer. 530 00:42:28,040 --> 00:42:33,760 But this property is actually 8-feet higher than so roughly, I'm just saying. 531 00:42:33,840 --> 00:42:38,920 So what in general, when it comes to storm water, would you recommend the sounds like you 532 00:42:38,920 --> 00:42:45,780 could, you know, if you're actually above what the buffer is, it's sort of a faux buffer. 533 00:42:46,300 --> 00:42:50,860 So the house is really higher than whatever the wetland would be. 534 00:42:51,160 --> 00:42:58,700 So how would you drain the water that attaches to that part of the house with it? 535 00:42:58,720 --> 00:43:01,900 Well, and that's what we were talking about on the phone the other day. 536 00:43:02,680 --> 00:43:10,620 There are certain things that we're going to look for, especially the driveway is going to go into the wetland, the buffer area because driveway comes down. 537 00:43:11,220 --> 00:43:14,020 Okay, so we're going to look for pre-treatment of the water. 538 00:43:14,020 --> 00:43:16,560 Could that we need a water, it goes into the stormwater system, 539 00:43:16,880 --> 00:43:19,500 at least your oils and your great gets captured out. 540 00:43:19,760 --> 00:43:21,180 So things like that are going to be done. 541 00:43:21,480 --> 00:43:23,460 Porsan of the house, Google towards the front. 542 00:43:24,520 --> 00:43:26,880 Resta house is just going to have to go in the back. 543 00:43:27,120 --> 00:43:30,440 There's just no way, okay, but we're going to try to 544 00:43:30,440 --> 00:43:33,720 balance that out equally and try to do our best to get as much 545 00:43:33,720 --> 00:43:38,160 out of the buffer as we possibly can to try not to disturb 546 00:43:38,160 --> 00:43:39,960 the buffer as much as possible. 547 00:43:40,400 --> 00:43:42,540 All right, and as far as mitigation, Sarah, 548 00:43:42,540 --> 00:43:50,540 what based on the, I guess, well, there's 700 feet of additional impervious surface, but 549 00:43:50,540 --> 00:43:56,880 how much of that, how much of that is relevant to the mitigation ratio for the wetland, 550 00:43:56,920 --> 00:44:02,740 because not all the, is that with that 700, because some of it is actually in front of the house, 551 00:44:03,400 --> 00:44:08,160 which wouldn't be, which wouldn't impact the wetland. So how much of the buffer 552 00:44:10,560 --> 00:44:18,820 Yeah, and that was the number that we had asked for, a verification of how much actual disturbance is in the wetland buffer, that number wasn't on the plan. 553 00:44:19,260 --> 00:44:28,360 So once that has been indicated, but like you said, I would assume it's slightly under 700, so we're looking at probably 1200 square feet of mitigation that's required. 554 00:44:28,980 --> 00:44:31,360 But we'll verify that when we get that calculation. 555 00:44:31,940 --> 00:44:36,660 Assuming it is, is there a place to put that mitigate those mitigations for the challenges? 556 00:44:43,620 --> 00:44:47,070 I apologize. It's one to one now. It's no longer two to one. 557 00:44:47,520 --> 00:44:47,920 Correct. 558 00:44:47,920 --> 00:44:48,560 Get in the buffer. 559 00:44:48,740 --> 00:44:50,860 We just changed it. 560 00:44:50,960 --> 00:44:51,540 How did that happen? 561 00:44:51,880 --> 00:44:52,880 And it's put my mind. 562 00:44:54,340 --> 00:44:56,060 It should have come to us, right? 563 00:44:56,620 --> 00:44:57,240 It did. 564 00:44:57,460 --> 00:44:58,400 Thank you guys. 565 00:44:58,680 --> 00:44:59,080 You guys. 566 00:45:02,700 --> 00:45:18,640 The way that it was, it actually didn't make sense because actual wetland disturbance had to be mitigated at one to one, but buffer disturbance, which is outside of the wetland, we're requiring two to one. 567 00:45:19,840 --> 00:45:21,860 We wanted to make a consistent. 568 00:45:22,360 --> 00:45:24,880 I was caught by surprise for a minute. 569 00:45:25,740 --> 00:45:30,600 So we'll probably need roughly 600 square feet, which I believe they will be able to be. 570 00:45:30,680 --> 00:45:36,460 And I'll also add that they have a very robust mitigation planting plan with wetland species that is very appropriate. 571 00:45:39,620 --> 00:45:40,740 Any questions? 572 00:45:41,280 --> 00:45:42,100 What's with the applicant? 573 00:45:43,480 --> 00:45:46,200 I have a question about directed to you. 574 00:45:46,300 --> 00:45:51,460 Who's issue is it with regard to what type of material is used for the apron? 575 00:45:51,880 --> 00:45:52,200 At the end of the slide? 576 00:45:52,200 --> 00:45:52,780 At the end of the slide? 577 00:45:53,560 --> 00:45:55,240 Is that the ARB that decides that? 578 00:45:56,120 --> 00:46:02,840 There's no variance trigger by that pathway on the right. 579 00:46:02,960 --> 00:46:06,080 It's very close to the boundary line there. 580 00:46:06,200 --> 00:46:07,180 There's no variance issue there. 581 00:46:07,180 --> 00:46:08,460 Not structure. 582 00:46:10,240 --> 00:46:15,080 Point flat patios like that, or flat walkways right up against the property line. 583 00:46:17,840 --> 00:46:22,360 As far as screening goes, the entire perimeter of the property is currently planted 584 00:46:22,360 --> 00:46:29,640 with our variety too, so screening isn't an issue as is, and we're only enhancing that 585 00:46:29,640 --> 00:46:31,300 with the proposed plantings. 586 00:46:33,990 --> 00:46:44,130 Okay. If there are no other questions for the applicant or staff here, why don't we 587 00:46:44,130 --> 00:46:49,170 schedule a public hearing to schedule for this matter for next month? 588 00:46:51,070 --> 00:46:52,270 Sorry you are the con. 589 00:46:53,930 --> 00:46:57,990 Whereas applications for approval of a site plan and wetlands permit for the construction 590 00:46:57,990 --> 00:47:04,250 of a patio, bluestone walkway, paper walkway, driveway, aprons, stormwater system and landscaping 591 00:47:04,250 --> 00:47:07,590 has been cemented for the property at 44 Rock Ridge Drive. 592 00:47:08,150 --> 00:47:12,030 Now, therefore, it be resolved, the planning board of the Village of Ryebrook will hold a public hearing 593 00:47:12,030 --> 00:47:19,370 on February 9, 2023 at 630 in Village Hall, or in a virtual format as may be deemed depending on 594 00:47:19,370 --> 00:47:22,370 public health concerns to consider the above reference application. 595 00:47:22,370 --> 00:47:31,710 The further resolve that the applicant is hereby directed to comply with section 250-40 of the village code regarding notification of the public hearing. 596 00:47:32,170 --> 00:47:35,470 Can I have a motion this second to adopt a resolution? 597 00:47:38,770 --> 00:47:39,510 Mr. Grazam. 598 00:47:39,870 --> 00:47:40,150 Yes. 599 00:47:40,170 --> 00:47:40,670 Mr. Carham. 600 00:47:41,290 --> 00:47:41,950 Mr. Mendelsan. 601 00:47:42,210 --> 00:47:42,770 Yes. 602 00:47:43,430 --> 00:47:43,850 Mr. Ritchman. 603 00:47:43,870 --> 00:47:44,130 Yes. 604 00:47:45,470 --> 00:47:46,290 Chairman Goodman. 605 00:47:46,430 --> 00:47:47,610 Yes. Thank you. 606 00:47:48,130 --> 00:47:48,510 Thank you. 607 00:47:48,970 --> 00:47:49,750 Thank you. 608 00:47:49,750 --> 00:47:50,410 Nice job, President. 609 00:47:59,260 --> 00:48:01,840 Okay, and last matter. 610 00:48:02,400 --> 00:48:06,500 Actually, before we get to the last matter, I just want to bring something to everyone's attention. 611 00:48:07,200 --> 00:48:14,660 I tried, last time we did a training session, we talked about adding language to the resolutions that would become standard to enforcement. 612 00:48:15,560 --> 00:48:24,260 And so, I tried it out for Bobby Lane, and I just figured, well, it's a short agenda. Maybe I could just read you the two clauses I added and we can see. 613 00:48:24,260 --> 00:48:29,260 that I thought was beautiful. Finally, I said there was a little bite. 614 00:48:30,760 --> 00:48:31,980 Okay, what really did anyone? 615 00:48:34,540 --> 00:48:38,440 I read it this afternoon and I was going through the material. 616 00:48:41,040 --> 00:48:44,040 I was away for a long time, so come on. 617 00:48:44,720 --> 00:48:45,300 I don't know, I'm a pro. 618 00:48:45,400 --> 00:48:51,780 It's, I added two resolve clauses at the very end of the resolution that I'm hoping to make standard. 619 00:48:51,780 --> 00:48:59,840 They read, be it further resolved, all construction shall be in performance, in a shall be performed in accordance with all proof plans, 620 00:49:00,300 --> 00:49:06,180 and land use approvals and you approve amendments there too and feel changes authorized and improved by the building inspector, 621 00:49:06,320 --> 00:49:09,900 the superintendent of public work, slash village engineer or their designate. 622 00:49:10,700 --> 00:49:19,760 Any applicant who violates this resolution may be issued a stop work order and summons in accordance with the provisions of chapter 91 of the code of the Village of Ryebrook. 623 00:49:19,760 --> 00:49:21,560 Be it further resolved that this resolution 624 00:49:21,560 --> 00:49:25,200 sells to proceed conflicting provisions of the village code? 625 00:49:25,620 --> 00:49:26,040 Oh, sure. 626 00:49:26,920 --> 00:49:29,700 Should it be as authorized by the building inspector, 627 00:49:29,860 --> 00:49:31,340 superintendent, et cetera, in writing? 628 00:49:32,420 --> 00:49:35,320 So that someone doesn't say, hey, I talked to Mike, 629 00:49:35,440 --> 00:49:36,640 and he said it was fine. 630 00:49:37,460 --> 00:49:40,900 Or, that's not a objection to that. 631 00:49:41,480 --> 00:49:42,020 That's fine. 632 00:49:42,480 --> 00:49:45,640 I like that provision, too, more than the other one, 633 00:49:47,060 --> 00:49:49,580 because some of these field changes now become 634 00:49:49,580 --> 00:49:52,960 matter of record and they are proved so we are not surprised 635 00:49:52,960 --> 00:49:55,220 all right 636 00:49:55,220 --> 00:49:55,720 i also 637 00:49:56,460 --> 00:49:57,300 read this part 638 00:49:57,300 --> 00:49:59,920 i also said during construction of the building 639 00:50:00,000 --> 00:50:29,460 Building Inspector, Superintendent of Public Works, Sash Village Engineer, may authorize upon written request of the applicant minor changes to the approved site plan. Such minor modification shall be consistent with their design and intent of the approved site plan, the architect or engineer of record shall submit the approved changes on a set of as-built plans, which plans shall be maintained in the permanent file of the building department. All changes to the site plan, other than minor changes described here in, shall require approval of a site plan amendment by the planning board. 640 00:50:30,200 --> 00:50:32,060 That's the one I really like. 641 00:50:32,820 --> 00:50:36,220 Yes, I think that's the only way to work on it. 642 00:50:36,760 --> 00:50:37,180 That's fine. 643 00:50:37,440 --> 00:50:42,000 I actually have a question about the very last resolutions, 644 00:50:42,480 --> 00:50:46,740 which is that this resolution shall supersede conflicting provisions of the village code. 645 00:50:47,360 --> 00:50:53,360 Do we know whether it does, and if it does, do we have the authority to provide the code? 646 00:50:53,360 --> 00:51:09,520 Okay, yeah, so you can do, like if you were to condition, this resolution does not, but let's say you put a condition in that's maybe maybe that condition is technically from you could do whatever the condition is you could do it the code allows you to do it 647 00:51:09,520 --> 00:51:16,460 But as condition of this site plan you are prohibited from doing it, then that in that case this resolution would govern 648 00:51:17,060 --> 00:51:21,200 like a pump location like a pump location right if the pump location 649 00:51:21,200 --> 00:51:25,740 complies with the setback you can put it in you know you can put it wherever it 650 00:51:25,740 --> 00:51:30,140 will comply with the setback but of this board says it's going to go in this 651 00:51:30,140 --> 00:51:33,760 location and it's going to be screened with very specific things will then 652 00:51:33,760 --> 00:51:38,780 not write this resolution is more detailed than the code so it's not technically 653 00:51:38,780 --> 00:51:41,520 conflict, but it would govern. 654 00:51:42,380 --> 00:51:47,960 Okay, I just want to make sure a lot, but yeah, I think you've done a really good job in 655 00:51:47,960 --> 00:51:49,340 rapid these things. 656 00:51:49,480 --> 00:51:52,100 You know, this is when engineer tries to be a lawyer. 657 00:51:53,820 --> 00:51:57,200 Court is approved by the Board, Village Board. 658 00:51:57,660 --> 00:52:02,500 And here, if I read this correctly, we can almost make a modification without the Village 659 00:52:02,500 --> 00:52:03,180 Board's approval. 660 00:52:03,300 --> 00:52:05,520 Like we are pulling aside amendments to the court. 661 00:52:05,520 --> 00:52:12,380 Well, you can, you cannot use your power, your approval power to modify the code. 662 00:52:12,620 --> 00:52:18,680 What you can do is issue conditions that are relevant to the application at hand. 663 00:52:18,700 --> 00:52:22,200 The course says 10 feet, and we said no, it has to be 6. 664 00:52:23,160 --> 00:52:28,940 But you're going, the 6 feet would be justified through your conversation and evidence in the record. 665 00:52:28,940 --> 00:52:32,300 Um, you know, that's why you're going to do it. 666 00:52:32,520 --> 00:52:39,080 We, your legal counsel wouldn't let you arbitrarily put in a random condition, you know, 667 00:52:39,260 --> 00:52:43,060 or go forward with something that's out of the scope of your jurisdiction. 668 00:52:43,580 --> 00:52:47,860 So you can't go and start, you know, using this resolution to modify. 669 00:52:49,800 --> 00:52:51,920 Do you count to a drill not to let us go? 670 00:52:52,280 --> 00:52:53,220 Okay, thank you. 671 00:52:53,480 --> 00:52:53,840 Thank you. 672 00:52:54,520 --> 00:53:00,100 You know, I added that last resolved clause about the conflict because I know we had talked 673 00:53:00,100 --> 00:53:04,760 about the power of this resolution and to make people aware that they need to be reading 674 00:53:04,760 --> 00:53:05,700 the resolutions. 675 00:53:05,940 --> 00:53:10,940 They need to keep this close at hand because it's going to have in some cases specific 676 00:53:10,940 --> 00:53:11,520 conditions. 677 00:53:11,920 --> 00:53:19,780 And actually, this gives me an opportunity of, you know, in our discussion about the resolution 678 00:53:19,780 --> 00:53:27,180 highlighting these two clauses and emphasizing them for the better for the applicants that 679 00:53:27,180 --> 00:53:28,460 were washing them basically. 680 00:53:30,480 --> 00:53:34,680 And this resolution would have been very helpful, this language, you know, application 681 00:53:34,680 --> 00:53:36,360 that we have a few months back. 682 00:53:36,540 --> 00:53:38,500 That's what you're saying. 683 00:53:38,800 --> 00:53:39,000 All right. 684 00:53:39,540 --> 00:53:40,440 I mean, there's no learning. 685 00:53:41,160 --> 00:53:41,620 All right. 686 00:53:42,880 --> 00:53:43,260 All right. 687 00:53:43,260 --> 00:53:44,140 I like this. 688 00:53:44,420 --> 00:53:44,680 All right. 689 00:53:45,180 --> 00:53:45,720 All right. 690 00:53:46,080 --> 00:53:46,600 All right. 691 00:53:46,880 --> 00:53:47,240 All right. 692 00:53:47,240 --> 00:53:48,280 It's a little better. 693 00:53:49,740 --> 00:53:50,560 I know that's good. 694 00:53:51,060 --> 00:53:52,360 Thank you very much. 695 00:53:53,000 --> 00:53:53,120 Thank you. 696 00:53:53,160 --> 00:53:53,900 That was great. 697 00:53:56,500 --> 00:53:56,760 OK. 698 00:53:57,720 --> 00:54:01,300 We have, while we're at it, Drew, 699 00:54:01,840 --> 00:54:04,260 why don't you explain this local law. 700 00:54:04,620 --> 00:54:06,440 It sort of makes sense to me. 701 00:54:09,100 --> 00:54:10,040 explain it anyway. 702 00:54:13,750 --> 00:54:14,430 You're so smart. 703 00:54:14,790 --> 00:54:17,350 It's much easier to read than the law itself. 704 00:54:20,350 --> 00:54:46,970 It is a technical law, and that the reason for that is because, you know, we want to make sure that the requirements currently, like oil tanks and fuel burning equipment, the regulated in two locations. You have regulated in chapter 162, but then we specifically have generators, permanent stem, and by generators, regulated in the zoning code, which is the reason that this is before you. 705 00:54:46,970 --> 00:54:50,350 because we have to modify a provision of the zoning code. 706 00:54:50,750 --> 00:54:59,970 What this law does is it now regulates all oil and gas burning equipment just like 707 00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:00,900 The generators. 708 00:55:01,700 --> 00:55:02,140 Oh, it smokes. 709 00:55:02,760 --> 00:55:03,380 That's right. 710 00:55:04,240 --> 00:55:04,980 That's right. 711 00:55:05,060 --> 00:55:05,080 That's right. 712 00:55:05,080 --> 00:55:05,560 Oh, wow. 713 00:55:06,200 --> 00:55:06,500 Okay. 714 00:55:06,620 --> 00:55:07,480 That's thanks. 715 00:55:08,080 --> 00:55:09,180 Staying here for a little while. 716 00:55:09,520 --> 00:55:11,040 You need to draw out your explanation. 717 00:55:11,400 --> 00:55:12,540 Are we in the buffer or the weather? 718 00:55:13,480 --> 00:55:14,700 Might be after this. 719 00:55:15,340 --> 00:55:15,600 Yeah. 720 00:55:16,320 --> 00:55:22,200 So what this, this language should look familiar because it does come up when we regulate generators. 721 00:55:22,720 --> 00:55:26,520 One thing that will change is we had added. 722 00:55:26,520 --> 00:55:35,940 at the placement of permanent stand by generators placed for multi-family uses in residential 723 00:55:35,940 --> 00:55:41,380 districts will now require site plan and they previously didn't. So this is kind of Mickey 724 00:55:41,380 --> 00:55:46,940 is those brain child where he was reviewing these permits and realizing that people weren't 725 00:55:46,940 --> 00:55:52,400 being treated fairly for generators but yet you weren't subject to the same standards for 726 00:55:52,400 --> 00:55:57,380 oil tank in your yard and didn't make any sense. So this law kind of cleans up the code 727 00:55:57,380 --> 00:56:02,520 and make sure that all this type of equipment is all being treated fairly and that the 728 00:56:02,520 --> 00:56:10,820 language in chapter 162 mimics the language in section 250-4.1 and I'm only modifying 729 00:56:10,820 --> 00:56:16,760 for the zoning code you're only only modifying that one adding that one word that multi-family 730 00:56:16,760 --> 00:56:20,240 use everything else in that section remains the same. 731 00:56:20,540 --> 00:56:26,820 I'm surprised that hasn't been a regulation, a multi, you know, multi-family applicants 732 00:56:26,820 --> 00:56:29,460 can put these generators wherever they want, basically. 733 00:56:29,600 --> 00:56:29,760 Right. 734 00:56:29,940 --> 00:56:31,580 Well, not wherever they want, right. 735 00:56:31,640 --> 00:56:37,920 There are still requirements in subsection B, but now they're going to require site plan 736 00:56:37,920 --> 00:56:43,580 a little bit more regulation for those types of uses that seem to make sense. 737 00:56:43,580 --> 00:56:47,000 It doesn't make sense to me anyway, because we deal with the safety issue. 738 00:56:49,980 --> 00:56:52,060 Hasn't changed the requirement for single family norms? 739 00:56:52,460 --> 00:56:55,120 It does not change the requirement for single family homes. 740 00:56:55,760 --> 00:56:57,120 So, you single family from that? 741 00:56:57,120 --> 00:57:00,100 You can install with that any site plan up to work, correct? 742 00:57:00,300 --> 00:57:00,780 Correct. 743 00:57:01,300 --> 00:57:04,220 You know, there are still standards, but... 744 00:57:05,000 --> 00:57:07,360 And remind me, are you fresh, my memory, Mike? 745 00:57:07,360 --> 00:57:10,840 Would the single family on a size of a tank, for example? 746 00:57:10,840 --> 00:57:16,900 is there is a maximum tank that an applicant or not that like a homeowner can 747 00:57:16,900 --> 00:57:23,730 he store. No, our code doesn't govern the size of tank. I mean if you want to 748 00:57:23,730 --> 00:57:28,450 500 gallon tank or a thousand gallon tank, that's up to you. So if you want 25 hours 749 00:57:28,450 --> 00:57:32,250 a run tank, 48 hours a run tank. Not for the maximum. Let's say somebody wants to stole 750 00:57:32,250 --> 00:57:38,430 a 10,000 gallon oil tank on the single property, on the single family property, they 751 00:57:38,430 --> 00:57:44,390 do that? No, because then you trigger what's just kind of health department approvals and permitting 752 00:57:44,390 --> 00:57:45,950 for tanks over certain sides. 753 00:57:50,730 --> 00:57:54,010 But health department regulates tanks over 1100 gallons. 754 00:57:54,050 --> 00:58:01,850 Okay, all right, okay, thank you. And residential oil tanks only allowed to be a 550 internally, 755 00:58:01,850 --> 00:58:09,030 But now there's three, thirty-gown tanks, so you're allowed to go up to two, three, thirty tanks inside a house. 756 00:58:09,450 --> 00:58:12,010 So anything over that, you have to get out the apartment room. 757 00:58:14,250 --> 00:58:18,230 There's a few different materials out there. There's iron tanks. 758 00:58:21,090 --> 00:58:26,110 There are fiberglass tanks. There are hybrid tanks that are plastic and galvanized. 759 00:58:26,470 --> 00:58:27,850 There's a multitude of tanks. 760 00:58:28,910 --> 00:58:35,750 Board Justice Library just installed a fiberglass tank, so if you'll tank, so in this multitude of tanks. 761 00:58:37,910 --> 00:58:45,130 All right, so is there a resolution associated with this? 762 00:58:45,370 --> 00:58:48,870 Yes, there is a report and recommendation in the agenda. 763 00:58:49,910 --> 00:58:52,930 One two review it with us. 764 00:58:54,440 --> 00:58:56,100 This is where I regret getting lengthy. 765 00:58:59,160 --> 00:59:02,620 Resolution authorizing submission of a report and recommendation to the 766 00:59:02,620 --> 00:59:07,440 Ryebrook Board of Trustees and a local law to amend Chapter 162 and Chapter 250 767 00:59:07,440 --> 00:59:11,980 Section 4.1 of the code as a village of Ryebrook concerning construction and 768 00:59:11,980 --> 00:59:16,900 installation of oil burning equipment, gas burning equipment, that's in 769 00:59:16,900 --> 00:59:22,000 twice. And fuel storage tanks. For the resolve that the Ryebrook 770 00:59:22,000 --> 00:59:25,720 planning board hereby submits the attached report and recommendation to the 771 00:59:25,720 --> 00:59:31,640 book Board of Trustees in the proposal of the law, a Mending Chapter 162, in Chapter 250, 772 00:59:32,120 --> 00:59:36,760 Section 4.1 of the Code of the Village of Ryebrook, concerning construction and installation 773 00:59:36,760 --> 00:59:40,360 of oil burning equipment, gas burning equipment, and fuel storage tanks. 774 00:59:40,900 --> 00:59:44,700 And be it for the resolve that the Planning Board Chairman is here by authorized to finalize 775 00:59:44,700 --> 00:59:49,460 the Attach Report and Recommendation in consultation with the Village Council to accurately 776 00:59:49,460 --> 00:59:55,160 reflect the Planning Board's discussion at his January 12th, 2023 meeting prior to such a report 777 00:59:55,160 --> 00:59:58,840 and recommendation being forwarded to the Board of Trustees and Belgiumers. 778 01:00:14,260 --> 01:00:32,900 We have a report and recommendation, right? Yes, we do. So this is the first resolution. Then I go into the actual report and recommendation, where I write, I wrote an overview of the law, which pretty much is consistent with the summary. I just provided. So I can read it if you'd all like, but spare you. 779 01:00:35,260 --> 01:00:43,480 It was pretty much what I had just, yeah, just a little bit more detail about the specifics. 780 01:00:44,760 --> 01:00:52,920 And then we get to the discussion, the planning board discussed the provisions of the local law at its January 12th, 2023 meeting during which the village council provided input. 781 01:00:53,440 --> 01:00:56,960 The planning board provided the following comments on the proposed local law. 782 01:00:57,060 --> 01:01:01,740 It seems like the comments that we're receiving is pretty much just a general favor of legislation. 783 01:01:02,460 --> 01:01:04,500 I think the law is proposed. 784 01:01:05,040 --> 01:01:06,780 Yeah, make sense. 785 01:01:08,100 --> 01:01:12,560 Just sort of curiosity between the single family homes and the multi-family homes. 786 01:01:13,220 --> 01:01:17,740 What's the difference between the two that they're treated differently under our code? 787 01:01:19,420 --> 01:01:19,740 Are they? 788 01:01:20,640 --> 01:01:22,440 Say that single family and two family? 789 01:01:22,480 --> 01:01:28,400 I mean, why wouldn't the single family be included among the regulated actors here? 790 01:01:28,400 --> 01:01:36,940 Well, so single family and two family homes are, they're still regulations, but it does not amount to site plan requirements. 791 01:01:37,220 --> 01:01:47,420 Now, the idea is that there's more happening for multifamily buildings, more parking to account for more windows to be concerned about landscaping. 792 01:01:47,420 --> 01:01:58,380 So when you're installing a standby generator, there's more elements that should be looked at and evaluated to make sure it's going in the right place to have the minimal impact. 793 01:01:58,380 --> 01:01:59,400 to make sense. 794 01:02:02,100 --> 01:02:10,360 All right, can I have a motion and a second to adopt the resolution as presented by Council? 795 01:02:12,520 --> 01:02:13,960 Okay, second. 796 01:02:17,650 --> 01:02:18,370 Mr. Grasant. 797 01:02:18,530 --> 01:02:18,930 Yes. 798 01:02:19,130 --> 01:02:19,850 Yes. 799 01:02:20,030 --> 01:02:20,710 Mr. Mendelssohn. 800 01:02:20,730 --> 01:02:21,010 Yes. 801 01:02:21,010 --> 01:02:21,150 Yes. 802 01:02:21,150 --> 01:02:21,630 Mr. Mendelssohn. 803 01:02:21,630 --> 01:02:21,810 Yes. 804 01:02:24,130 --> 01:02:31,830 And then we need and then the resolution directing our report and recommendation to the Board of Trustees. 805 01:02:37,910 --> 01:02:38,510 Yes. 806 01:02:39,490 --> 01:02:39,710 Yes. 807 01:02:40,030 --> 01:02:40,370 Mr. Mendoza. 808 01:02:40,970 --> 01:02:41,550 Mr. Redner. 809 01:02:41,930 --> 01:02:42,490 Yes, Mr. Richman. 810 01:02:42,890 --> 01:02:44,330 Yes, Mr. Chairman Goodman. 811 01:02:45,710 --> 01:02:46,610 Good night, good Lord. 812 01:02:47,870 --> 01:02:48,310 Good morning. 813 01:02:48,850 --> 01:02:50,730 The record, good morning. 814 01:02:51,190 --> 01:02:52,650 You got a football game. 815 01:02:53,490 --> 01:02:54,270 Let go of basketball. 816 01:02:54,950 --> 01:02:55,590 It's not a football game. 817 01:02:55,590 --> 01:02:56,390 Is there no football games? 818 01:02:57,070 --> 01:02:57,270 Yeah. 819 01:02:59,550 --> 01:03:00,570 There are some very dangerous games. 820 01:03:00,670 --> 01:03:02,310 I can't remember. 821 01:03:02,310 --> 01:03:04,310 Well, we're going to check in close the meeting. 822 01:03:04,890 --> 01:03:05,150 Yeah? 823 01:03:05,150 --> 01:03:05,530 Yeah. 824 01:03:05,710 --> 01:03:07,090 We're going to check in close the meeting? 825 01:03:07,330 --> 01:03:07,450 Yeah. 826 01:03:07,450 --> 01:03:08,910 We're going to check in. 827 01:03:09,150 --> 01:03:09,470 On favor? 828 01:03:09,850 --> 01:03:10,210 Hi. 829 01:03:11,930 --> 01:03:13,510 I bought it after doing so. 830 01:03:13,990 --> 01:03:14,090 Yes.