1 00:00:07,220 --> 00:00:29,920 So this is the governing board meeting of the Salt Lake Arts Academy on Monday, August 17th. And we are meeting at 5.30 here at room 201. All right. Thanks everybody for coming out for the first meeting of the year. We have a number of 2 00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:36,400 potential resolutions to plot through and discuss is appropriate if there are 3 00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:42,040 questions and then move to votes. I'm going to tip my hand a little bit. My 4 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:48,480 daughter is turning 21 today and she flew home from Chicago to see us. So I have 5 00:00:48,480 --> 00:00:54,520 some incentives that are not perhaps aligned with a four-hour meeting, but we 6 00:00:54,520 --> 00:00:55,600 can see how it develops. 7 00:00:58,040 --> 00:01:02,360 So the first item on the agenda is a review and approval of minutes 8 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:09,860 from the June retreat. You'll see thanks to Deborah and no thanks to me. That we have a draft 9 00:01:09,860 --> 00:01:17,760 of those minutes that are marked pending in your packet there. I don't know if folks have 10 00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:28,280 any questions, comments, or tweaks to those, but it looked accurate and up-to-date from 11 00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:38,230 my perspective. So, if that looks good to folks, we would entertain a motion with respect 12 00:01:38,230 --> 00:01:38,730 to that. 13 00:01:39,070 --> 00:01:44,110 I make a motion to approve the minutes and I'll send a victory to all of the staff again. 14 00:01:44,110 --> 00:01:44,770 Okay. 15 00:01:51,390 --> 00:01:55,890 All in favor of the motion to approve the minutes as presented. 16 00:01:59,050 --> 00:02:02,190 Anybody? Nope, that's everybody. Nobody's abstaining unanimous. 17 00:02:02,650 --> 00:02:03,030 Lead carried. 18 00:02:05,710 --> 00:02:13,510 All right. The second item on the agenda is a proposal to amend the bylaws 19 00:02:13,510 --> 00:02:21,310 to reduce the minimum board size from nine to five trustees. I think we've had some 20 00:02:21,310 --> 00:02:24,470 We are looking to add folks to the board. 21 00:02:24,710 --> 00:02:32,570 We have next deafens who may come back on who had work conflicts last year but was approved 22 00:02:32,570 --> 00:02:37,570 to be on the board before he had to resign and I think there are several others. 23 00:02:37,770 --> 00:02:43,330 So I think this is my hope and thought is that this is likely a temporary situation but 24 00:02:43,330 --> 00:02:49,990 I do think it makes sense to have the bylaws aligned with where we actually are which would 25 00:02:49,990 --> 00:02:57,050 be, I think, six going into the start of this year, and then we just build up from there. 26 00:02:57,250 --> 00:02:59,130 So I think that's the goal. 27 00:02:59,330 --> 00:03:08,730 It's a very simple resolution as you'll see in the second set of resolutions, or here 28 00:03:08,730 --> 00:03:08,910 it is. 29 00:03:08,990 --> 00:03:09,070 Yeah. 30 00:03:09,310 --> 00:03:17,590 So it's the second page from the end, number of trustees, and this would be, say, it's 31 00:03:17,590 --> 00:03:24,450 change within the by-laws because it's it's a simple sentence in the by-laws. But are there any 32 00:03:24,450 --> 00:03:32,490 questions or comments on that? Yes. So then what would be a mature like a quorum? So it would 33 00:03:32,490 --> 00:03:37,990 just still just be three would be then a quorum. So does that mean like having a conversation between 34 00:03:39,110 --> 00:03:45,910 cord members at any time constitutes a quorum so that could get us into trouble? I'd have to do a 35 00:03:45,910 --> 00:03:47,650 a little bit more research on that. 36 00:03:48,650 --> 00:03:50,950 And I think that's a good question. 37 00:03:51,170 --> 00:03:52,750 It is a good question. 38 00:03:53,410 --> 00:03:56,050 I mean, I think that there are generally ways 39 00:03:56,050 --> 00:03:57,750 to avoid that. 40 00:03:57,990 --> 00:04:00,630 But I guess I just think in more ethnic training 41 00:04:00,630 --> 00:04:04,570 that that's a bit of a pretty clear delineation 42 00:04:04,570 --> 00:04:09,150 so that any time, like whoever to three on, 43 00:04:09,530 --> 00:04:11,710 you call it the executive committee, 44 00:04:12,130 --> 00:04:13,990 meet that would cost you that. 45 00:04:13,990 --> 00:04:19,710 Well, but actually but let's so let's be clear. There's so there's two different things one is the minimum number that we'd have 46 00:04:19,710 --> 00:04:21,130 Which would be five? 47 00:04:21,610 --> 00:04:27,610 But the second is what the board would be or which would be six in this case so it would be for any time we drop down 48 00:04:28,150 --> 00:04:30,150 It puts us in jeopardy 49 00:04:30,850 --> 00:04:36,070 I think oh yes, if we were to say if we were yes, no, no, it's absolutely a great question 50 00:04:36,070 --> 00:04:40,250 Yes, I think it's I think it's I think it's I'm sure you're concerned that feels like too small 51 00:04:44,310 --> 00:04:50,870 We don't have seven people that are currently scheduled to be on the board this term in less 52 00:04:50,870 --> 00:04:55,790 Nick Stephens were to say yes, and I don't think we have that. 53 00:04:55,850 --> 00:04:57,830 And to the five of us will be here. 54 00:04:58,030 --> 00:04:58,330 Claudia. 55 00:04:58,690 --> 00:04:59,110 Claudia. 56 00:04:59,290 --> 00:04:59,650 Oh, fantastic. 57 00:05:00,670 --> 00:05:02,190 That would be the expectation. 58 00:05:02,290 --> 00:05:09,310 So I think Nick would be, and I would be, well, I think I would be supportive of the idea 59 00:05:09,310 --> 00:05:16,010 As soon as we have sufficient to move back up to 7 or to 9, I think that's perfectly 60 00:05:16,010 --> 00:05:16,490 fine. 61 00:05:16,970 --> 00:05:23,130 I guess my thought was it is what it is right now in terms of the number of people that 62 00:05:23,130 --> 00:05:28,810 are in fact ready to serve on the board, and so I'm not sure where we end up if our 63 00:05:28,810 --> 00:05:33,350 bylaws conflict with what we actually have from a numerical perspective. 64 00:05:33,830 --> 00:05:48,070 That would be a concern for me, and I think, but I take the point that we want to then be cognizant of smaller groupings making decisions or something along those lines. 65 00:05:48,070 --> 00:05:51,570 Yeah, I mean it's, I can remember exactly what I said. 66 00:05:51,570 --> 00:05:57,350 Yeah, so more than somehow the total membership makes a quorum, maybe three members of five. 67 00:05:57,610 --> 00:06:00,390 Well, but in this case, we would have sex so it would be four, but yes. 68 00:06:00,390 --> 00:06:07,750 And then vacancies and even number of vacancies means a true majority of the entire authorized 69 00:06:07,750 --> 00:06:11,810 body is still required, not just for majority of currently active members. 70 00:06:13,710 --> 00:06:20,730 So if we define it as nine, we'd have to have five every meeting no matter what. 71 00:06:20,730 --> 00:06:33,210 I think the other question I had was in the bylaws, is any meeting of a quorum of 72 00:06:33,350 --> 00:06:42,810 the board, whether it's in a regular schedule meeting or a committee meeting or just at a 73 00:06:42,810 --> 00:06:46,550 the slards event, is that sufficient to act on, 74 00:06:46,630 --> 00:06:50,290 or does it have to be within this deliberative body? 75 00:06:50,630 --> 00:06:50,890 I think 76 00:06:55,050 --> 00:06:58,230 that would come to two. 77 00:06:58,230 --> 00:06:59,350 Yeah, that doesn't make it up. 78 00:06:59,610 --> 00:07:00,170 So what would it be? 79 00:07:00,350 --> 00:07:00,830 I think so. 80 00:07:06,090 --> 00:07:08,290 Because the minutes or two people have a conversation 81 00:07:08,290 --> 00:07:11,350 about that, that's how they sit or actionable. 82 00:07:12,650 --> 00:07:15,530 I served on the advisory committee for the liqueur commission, 83 00:07:15,730 --> 00:07:17,890 and that was why we avoided five. 84 00:07:19,990 --> 00:07:28,670 So, okay so let's talk it. I guess maybe we could just research that. I mean I'm looking at it right now. 85 00:07:29,110 --> 00:07:34,790 I guess I don't think we reduce our bylaws because we're looking for board members. I think we go find board members. 86 00:07:35,750 --> 00:07:47,530 What does it say? What's the ramification of having bylaws that say that we need to have nine when they're only six that are active. 87 00:07:50,010 --> 00:07:56,810 I don't know if I can define the ramification, but I guess in my mind, if I'm thinking about representation, there's four grades here. 88 00:07:57,310 --> 00:08:07,310 Two parents from each grade feels reasonable with additional people who are staying from the alumni perspective, like the history of Kelly Reigns, which is an incredibly valuable piece. 89 00:08:09,070 --> 00:08:12,690 So I guess I'm thinking about it more from a representation point of view. 90 00:08:14,310 --> 00:08:18,470 then while we happen to have this many people showing up, so let's change the 91 00:08:18,470 --> 00:08:25,370 bylaws. I think we should go find one. I think my concern is if the bylaws say 92 00:08:25,370 --> 00:08:35,290 nine we can't what we have five today. We have five today and six. It's based on 93 00:08:35,290 --> 00:08:38,010 on the core number of total. 94 00:08:38,570 --> 00:08:38,710 Yeah. 95 00:08:39,310 --> 00:08:42,450 So it is going to be the last 50% plus one. 96 00:08:44,700 --> 00:08:51,440 So I guess what I'm missing is the concept 97 00:08:51,440 --> 00:08:57,980 that a vacancy doesn't do violence to the by-law 98 00:08:57,980 --> 00:08:59,180 so a requirement. 99 00:09:00,060 --> 00:09:05,400 So we have maybe six or just a, yeah, I think so. 100 00:09:05,400 --> 00:09:12,040 So if we have maybe six and there are three seats unfilled, I think you're saying, can 101 00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:18,940 you actually include the three vacant seats as effective board? 102 00:09:19,140 --> 00:09:19,340 Right. 103 00:09:19,460 --> 00:09:20,020 Right, exactly. 104 00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:24,460 Or do you have to have somebody who's been elected to it, and then they're not present 105 00:09:24,460 --> 00:09:26,860 to say we have a quorum of the people by the bylaws. 106 00:09:27,980 --> 00:09:36,140 And that's, that is a, I think I'd say like that, that's me like, that makes sense. 107 00:09:36,380 --> 00:09:41,860 I absolutely understand the small board because I'm not, that makes me nervous for a lot 108 00:09:41,860 --> 00:09:42,200 of reasons. 109 00:09:42,520 --> 00:09:42,580 Yeah. 110 00:09:42,580 --> 00:09:43,380 Like we discussed earlier. 111 00:09:43,680 --> 00:09:43,860 Yeah. 112 00:09:44,320 --> 00:09:47,860 Um, we run into each other somewhere and we have one book. 113 00:09:48,100 --> 00:09:54,360 It makes, it makes activism not necessarily in the best interest of the school, a risk. 114 00:09:54,360 --> 00:10:10,380 But I agree, if the intent is to mitigate risk that we proceed with 9, 115 00:10:12,400 --> 00:10:13,020 is there going 116 00:10:13,020 --> 00:10:19,180 to be another different kind of outside activist who looks at the bylaws and similar to what 117 00:10:19,180 --> 00:10:26,320 What we're going to talk about later with the UDAR settlement says, you're not following 118 00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:32,580 that statute either, here's another, here's another unintended consequence for us. 119 00:10:32,580 --> 00:10:34,300 They invalidate every vote we've ever had. 120 00:10:34,340 --> 00:10:34,440 Exactly. 121 00:10:35,820 --> 00:10:42,440 And that's kind of the risk that I'm more worried about than the people currently in this room 122 00:10:42,440 --> 00:10:45,160 and that we would most likely recruit. 123 00:10:46,500 --> 00:10:53,380 So we could also, when I pushed it, it was more like, what are these organizations like 124 00:10:53,380 --> 00:10:59,240 UDAR going to do if we don't have it right? 125 00:10:59,960 --> 00:11:06,180 Well, can we hit the middle and go for seven so that we sort of have a protected edge 126 00:11:06,180 --> 00:11:09,080 and at least hopefully have wider representation? 127 00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:14,820 Well here's I guess I've got two potential responses. One on seven on 128 00:11:17,660 --> 00:11:34,880 seven we have a board member who may want to remain a board member that would get us back to seven with or without Nick Stephens. 129 00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:45,880 So I can leave a spot empty though can't we? We can vote the other person off the board and their term expires 130 00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:54,440 because we don't vote them back in. It does we think we have to be cool. She's staying on. No, she was on rent. She is still. 131 00:11:54,440 --> 00:12:04,240 So she's questioning whether that she wants to continue with her initial resignation. 132 00:12:05,620 --> 00:12:09,940 Which wouldn't necessarily at this point be in her hands, but I think. 133 00:12:11,800 --> 00:12:14,280 Do we have to officially do that? 134 00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:18,980 I mean, there's not, no, we do not. 135 00:12:19,340 --> 00:12:22,560 A resignation is effective when they say that I did that. 136 00:12:22,580 --> 00:12:23,820 Okay, it's currently on the board. 137 00:12:23,820 --> 00:12:31,100 She's currently off the board. She's sent me an email and said I was and she would like to come back 138 00:12:33,920 --> 00:12:42,660 Yeah, so but I guess the the concern I would have about seven is that if we if we take it from who's 139 00:12:43,680 --> 00:12:51,880 Actually on the board right now. It's six and so I don't know that seven buys us much the other thing the other possible 140 00:12:51,880 --> 00:13:00,860 answer I could or approach we might consider taking is an explicit time frame right 141 00:13:00,860 --> 00:13:05,000 there's I don't think there's any reason that we can't take a vote that says 142 00:13:05,000 --> 00:13:14,920 that for you know for the next 30 days our bylaws will reflect a minimum of 143 00:13:14,920 --> 00:13:22,880 six members of the board and after that 30 days it will reflect seven and then we 144 00:13:22,880 --> 00:13:27,500 could take a vote at the next you know let get us to the next meeting with the 145 00:13:27,500 --> 00:13:32,460 expectation that we will find we'll confirm somebody for seven and then if 146 00:13:32,460 --> 00:13:35,820 we're in a position to go to nine at that point we could also then go to nine but 147 00:13:35,820 --> 00:13:41,380 that I guess that to me sort of tries to square the circle which is that I hear 148 00:13:41,380 --> 00:13:48,120 that discomfort in the room with like moving down to five on a permanent basis or without 149 00:13:48,120 --> 00:13:55,520 a possible kind of fix to that that's like dialed in. I mean I think we can we can make 150 00:13:55,520 --> 00:14:02,400 a motion as we wish and so that to me it's not 151 00:14:04,450 --> 00:14:06,690 there's nothing there's nothing wrong with 152 00:14:06,690 --> 00:14:12,710 that. I think if we if we had nine people right now that were on the board I mean or yeah 153 00:14:12,710 --> 00:14:16,370 we had nine people that were on the board and we have a minimum of nine and then we have somebody 154 00:14:16,370 --> 00:14:23,490 resigned. That to me is different than constituting a board where our of six of six where our 155 00:14:23,490 --> 00:14:29,210 bylaws say we have to have not. I just don't know like I don't know what it like we're not in we're 156 00:14:29,210 --> 00:14:34,950 not in conformity with our bylaws at that point and I don't it that's not quite the same as being 157 00:14:34,950 --> 00:14:42,470 out of statutory compliance but it then raises some other questions about like well what did you do 158 00:14:42,470 --> 00:14:51,470 So when you want any compliance with your bylaws or something like that, that's where 159 00:14:51,470 --> 00:14:59,570 my discomfort came in and this was my thought to rectify that, which is let's make it 160 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:29,720 Other, this is a minimum, not a, not, we're not capped. We could have 21 and still have these exact same bylaws other than this. But we, but I get, but I'm uncomfortable on this other side of like, look, we have a board that we're constituting that's going to be six members. And the bylaws say we have to have nine. What are the ramifications that I haven't, I, I, I honestly, I just made me really uncomfortable. And I thought this would be a reasonable approach, but I take the feedback. 161 00:15:30,600 --> 00:15:37,580 We make a motion, we change our bylaws knowing that next month, the month after, we would hope to go. 162 00:15:37,760 --> 00:15:39,120 Well, we can do it with a hope. 163 00:15:39,600 --> 00:15:40,700 Well, we don't have to say that. 164 00:15:41,080 --> 00:15:41,220 Right. 165 00:15:41,380 --> 00:15:49,860 But we know that in this meeting, and in two months, someone comes forward with a motion with a vote expected on our agenda, and we change it. 166 00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:54,500 Or the motion now could be a sequence of things, right? 167 00:15:54,500 --> 00:16:01,080 Like you can have your, you can say that your bylaws are going to be amended in the future and so we can hardwire it in that 168 00:16:02,780 --> 00:16:07,200 Yeah, exactly that like in light of the fact that we have six members who are serving 169 00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:17,400 We are amending our bylaws for 45 days to reflect a minimum board constitution of four of six people at the end of that 45 days 170 00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:21,500 The bylaws are automatically without further 171 00:16:22,500 --> 00:16:28,740 vote amended to reflect a minimum of seven and then I love that yeah like it 172 00:16:28,740 --> 00:16:33,880 gets to work legal concerned yes you dug off of our changes at least for 173 00:16:33,880 --> 00:16:38,240 this meeting as well yeah it would be instantaneous well how many I mean so 174 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:45,240 when we have nine members we need four plus so five to make a quorum yeah that's 175 00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:51,400 all it's something that requires a two-thirds vote because it says the 176 00:16:51,400 --> 00:16:54,520 I'm filled seats as long as it still meets its quorum requirement. 177 00:16:54,900 --> 00:16:54,920 Right? 178 00:16:55,780 --> 00:16:56,200 Right? 179 00:16:56,380 --> 00:16:57,000 Which we can. 180 00:16:57,220 --> 00:16:59,500 But what we want to do is shrink it for a moment. 181 00:16:59,500 --> 00:17:00,360 For that two thirds, yeah. 182 00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:01,160 Yeah? 183 00:17:01,420 --> 00:17:04,920 And then you've built in accountability by putting it in for the rest of your meeting. 184 00:17:05,220 --> 00:17:05,240 Yeah. 185 00:17:05,240 --> 00:17:06,300 You know they answer. 186 00:17:06,360 --> 00:17:09,780 And it's a map for future. 187 00:17:09,880 --> 00:17:10,000 Yeah. 188 00:17:10,520 --> 00:17:11,400 Just 45 days. 189 00:17:11,640 --> 00:17:13,200 Like this is through our next meeting. 190 00:17:13,640 --> 00:17:14,500 That gets us through our next meeting. 191 00:17:14,620 --> 00:17:14,800 Yeah. 192 00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:20,660 And I think at that point we'll know about Nick, which would presumably get us back to seven 193 00:17:20,660 --> 00:17:24,180 we possibly have a retreat. It's not the fun. 194 00:17:26,400 --> 00:17:30,180 Yes, yes, not baking out of somebody's patio. 195 00:17:30,420 --> 00:17:32,900 It's so show. It's so show. 196 00:17:36,080 --> 00:17:41,540 So then I think this this 197 00:17:44,420 --> 00:17:49,940 vote then is going to be a little 198 00:17:49,940 --> 00:17:57,080 bit different. So that, I think that motion is kind of what I outlined. Is there, is 199 00:17:57,080 --> 00:18:00,220 somebody willing to put forward that? Oh, yes, of course. 200 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:04,280 Do we feel, 201 00:18:07,590 --> 00:18:14,430 since this kind of decision requires two-thirds of the vote, about two-third more 202 00:18:14,430 --> 00:18:24,110 vote required, but this is something that we can enact with our five person, that six board. 203 00:18:25,130 --> 00:18:35,510 It's a fair question. I think the number of people who are on the board right now is six. 204 00:18:35,510 --> 00:18:47,110 So I think we need four votes to accomplish that, but I take the point, and I don't necessarily have a dispositive answer. 205 00:18:47,690 --> 00:18:48,290 I do feel I 206 00:18:51,430 --> 00:18:51,670 see. 207 00:18:51,870 --> 00:18:53,390 I think we should just... 208 00:18:54,550 --> 00:18:56,310 We've noted many of our concerns. 209 00:18:56,530 --> 00:19:06,570 I think in order to be able to actually be a functional board for the first two months of school, we might need to just dive in and do it. 210 00:19:07,470 --> 00:19:13,210 Do you want me to have an emotion that please make a motion that we revise our current 211 00:19:13,210 --> 00:19:20,310 file laws to reduce the size of our board to six members with the provision that this 212 00:19:20,310 --> 00:19:25,470 is for a 45 day time limit at which point the membership will increase to seven. 213 00:19:26,890 --> 00:19:32,530 And just a bit of clarity a minimum it was all it was all for just a minimum yeah and 214 00:19:32,530 --> 00:19:34,590 Okay, and do we hear a second? 215 00:19:35,430 --> 00:19:36,510 I'll second it. 216 00:19:36,790 --> 00:19:37,030 Second. 217 00:19:37,910 --> 00:19:38,550 Second, put 218 00:19:45,880 --> 00:19:46,100 note. 219 00:19:48,550 --> 00:19:50,830 All those in favor of that motion? 220 00:19:55,450 --> 00:19:56,290 Is unanimous? 221 00:19:56,410 --> 00:19:57,190 The motion is passed. 222 00:20:02,860 --> 00:20:09,840 Okay, the next item is somewhat related, I think, in my mind. 223 00:20:09,840 --> 00:20:16,900 We've had historically this 30-day nominee posting requirement under the bylaws with respect 224 00:20:16,900 --> 00:20:19,540 to potential new members of the board. 225 00:20:20,880 --> 00:20:27,760 I have thought of it generally as just a trap for the unwary, not like something that 226 00:20:27,760 --> 00:20:35,040 actually, I am not familiar with anybody in our community who has like taken the opportunity 227 00:20:35,040 --> 00:20:36,680 to raise issues or otherwise. 228 00:20:37,860 --> 00:20:45,080 I also think in light of this particular next set of steps that it would be convenient 229 00:20:45,080 --> 00:20:50,540 And not to have to post for 30 days, in this particular instance, if nothing else. 230 00:20:52,200 --> 00:20:54,760 Are folks comfortable with that? 231 00:20:55,000 --> 00:21:01,080 Do they think that they see other traps that I'm not that this is a? 232 00:21:01,440 --> 00:21:09,220 This is something that is part of most board by-laws for schools. 233 00:21:09,920 --> 00:21:10,360 Good question. 234 00:21:10,500 --> 00:21:11,640 I do not know the answer for them. 235 00:21:12,420 --> 00:21:13,800 Where did we get it from? 236 00:21:15,180 --> 00:21:19,600 It's just been in our historical bylaws, possibly from 2001. 237 00:21:22,890 --> 00:21:37,250 And I think there are a lot of kind of learning process as Katie stepped back and we are 238 00:21:37,250 --> 00:21:39,310 working through some things along those lines. 239 00:21:39,310 --> 00:21:48,930 I think when we had somebody who sort of ran point over the course of years, over kind 240 00:21:48,930 --> 00:21:53,910 of the board constitution, including sort of dedicated recruitment and various other 241 00:21:53,910 --> 00:21:59,810 things, I think this functioned or was a little bit more manageable. 242 00:21:59,810 --> 00:22:09,210 I think with turnover in the board, but then also just the fact that we're trying 243 00:22:09,210 --> 00:22:13,530 to manage our own stuff, I think that this has been more problematic or challenging. 244 00:22:14,430 --> 00:22:22,470 It doesn't necessarily mean it's terrible, but I think my own view is that it is not worth 245 00:22:22,470 --> 00:22:25,710 the requirement in the bylaws. 246 00:22:25,710 --> 00:22:44,870 We could certainly put it make it part of a handbook that as a best practice we would like to do this or something like that, but again, I come back to the idea that I'd hate to have it be that have it go down contrary to our bylaws in a way that then raised issues about whether the efficacy of the appointment or something like that. 247 00:22:48,470 --> 00:22:48,950 I 248 00:22:59,380 --> 00:23:05,700 mean, I think it's just one of those like probably out layer cases where maybe you 249 00:23:05,700 --> 00:23:13,680 post it and another parent or a disease and it's like, oh, by the way, that's a sex 250 00:23:13,680 --> 00:23:14,040 offender. 251 00:23:14,340 --> 00:23:15,300 I don't know, you know? 252 00:23:15,820 --> 00:23:16,000 Yeah. 253 00:23:18,260 --> 00:23:18,900 That's true. 254 00:23:19,900 --> 00:23:25,640 And we do have a clear ability as a border to remove anybody at any time for no reason. 255 00:23:25,640 --> 00:23:27,540 So that is kind of a... 256 00:23:27,540 --> 00:23:28,540 I felt like that didn't work. 257 00:23:31,140 --> 00:23:31,740 Yep. 258 00:23:32,180 --> 00:23:33,380 I hear you. 259 00:23:33,940 --> 00:23:39,520 But I do think it would be different in the context that was partially difficult because 260 00:23:40,360 --> 00:23:46,600 of an ongoing litigation element that I think somebody who otherwise is just looking 261 00:23:46,600 --> 00:23:51,780 to join the board would not be a consideration and therefore there would be social considerations 262 00:23:51,780 --> 00:23:56,880 like there would be like I'm not saying that it would be costless. I'm also not saying I'm not sure 263 00:23:56,880 --> 00:24:05,780 that it would be manifestly different to have posted them and nominated them effectively 264 00:24:05,780 --> 00:24:10,280 from a board perspective and then attract that at least from an interpersonal dynamic. 265 00:24:22,470 --> 00:24:23,070 But 266 00:24:23,070 --> 00:24:25,270 I mean, if we're doing any kind of... 267 00:24:25,270 --> 00:24:25,670 Absolutely. 268 00:24:26,150 --> 00:24:26,470 By law. 269 00:24:26,550 --> 00:24:27,670 Oh wait, I got it. 270 00:24:27,970 --> 00:24:28,730 Okay, can we do that? 271 00:24:29,230 --> 00:24:29,630 Yeah. 272 00:24:29,870 --> 00:24:30,210 Yeah. 273 00:24:30,870 --> 00:24:31,430 I mean, I... 274 00:24:31,430 --> 00:24:32,170 There wasn't notice. 275 00:24:32,450 --> 00:24:33,630 We can't do it at this meeting. 276 00:24:34,010 --> 00:24:34,150 Okay. 277 00:24:34,230 --> 00:24:34,650 I don't think... 278 00:24:34,650 --> 00:24:35,510 I don't think we can do it. 279 00:24:35,850 --> 00:24:36,690 Yeah, absolutely. 280 00:24:37,270 --> 00:24:38,050 Yes, absolutely. 281 00:24:38,850 --> 00:24:39,250 Absolutely. 282 00:24:39,710 --> 00:24:39,870 Yeah. 283 00:24:40,290 --> 00:24:40,470 Okay. 284 00:24:40,790 --> 00:24:41,470 Thousand percent. 285 00:24:42,830 --> 00:24:44,310 Another thing that I think, 286 00:24:46,690 --> 00:24:52,310 I think, another level of uncomfortableness with two people 287 00:24:52,310 --> 00:24:55,190 in a mutual relationship also being on the board. 288 00:24:56,050 --> 00:24:57,770 Oh, yeah, also a thousand percent. 289 00:24:58,330 --> 00:25:00,050 Okay, so for, yeah. 290 00:25:05,870 --> 00:25:12,550 Do we need a school dinosaur, just to be rare Utah? 291 00:25:15,250 --> 00:25:17,150 Masked rights, besides the kids. 292 00:25:17,570 --> 00:25:23,350 So they would still be posted, the new person would still be posted on the agenda 24 hours 293 00:25:23,350 --> 00:25:23,830 in advance. 294 00:25:23,990 --> 00:25:28,610 If people are engaged enough to read our agenda, they'll be like, oh, hmm, maybe I'll 295 00:25:28,610 --> 00:25:30,830 get a hold of the board president and voice my concern. 296 00:25:31,110 --> 00:25:31,230 Sure. 297 00:25:31,710 --> 00:25:39,110 And as I say, we could also just as a board from a policy perspective, look to do a longer 298 00:25:39,110 --> 00:25:40,390 period, like whatever else. 299 00:25:40,510 --> 00:25:46,650 Again, it's just I come back to the idea that like I don't like setting ourselves up against 300 00:25:46,650 --> 00:25:53,610 in contrast to what the bylaws are looking to do. On that basis does anybody have a motion 301 00:25:53,610 --> 00:26:00,970 with respect to amending the bylaws to remove the requirement under the bylaws of a 30-day 302 00:26:00,970 --> 00:26:11,210 nominee posting requirement? Thank you. Do I hear a second? I'll second that motion. 303 00:26:16,710 --> 00:26:17,830 All those in 304 00:26:17,830 --> 00:26:23,870 In favor of the motion to amend our bylaws to remove the 30-day nominee posting requirement, 305 00:26:24,350 --> 00:26:25,110 passes unanimously. 306 00:26:25,530 --> 00:26:25,790 Thank you. 307 00:26:28,660 --> 00:26:38,000 And I have taken a note for review on bylaws is probably the right place, but just an evaluation 308 00:26:38,000 --> 00:26:46,460 of how best to reflect some lessons from this past year into our and hard code that in a way 309 00:26:58,260 --> 00:27:06,380 The next item on the agenda is an election of the board members for the 2026-2027 year. 310 00:27:07,320 --> 00:27:19,380 The slate would be Chantal, myself, Kelly, Amy, Reed, and Claudia, who is obviously 311 00:27:19,380 --> 00:27:26,940 here, not here tonight, but that is the proposed slate of members of the board. 312 00:27:27,800 --> 00:27:34,280 Do I hear a motion with respect to those six named individuals with respect to the board? 313 00:27:34,280 --> 00:27:47,220 So moved. Do we hear a second? A second. All those in favor of the ratification of the members 314 00:27:47,220 --> 00:27:50,420 of the board as constituted for the coming year. 315 00:27:52,520 --> 00:27:54,260 Okay, that was unanimous. Thank you. 316 00:28:03,680 --> 00:28:06,440 Well, there is that for a lot of things for standing in Canada. 317 00:28:07,140 --> 00:28:07,960 Yes, thank you, Kelly. 318 00:28:08,360 --> 00:28:08,560 Yeah. 319 00:28:09,180 --> 00:28:09,660 Yeah. 320 00:28:10,580 --> 00:28:14,400 It's about to expense a branding car for you as a part of you. 321 00:28:15,480 --> 00:28:15,940 Okay. 322 00:28:18,060 --> 00:28:19,020 More fundraising. 323 00:28:19,580 --> 00:28:20,640 Send back that candle. 324 00:28:21,060 --> 00:28:21,640 This one. 325 00:28:21,640 --> 00:28:29,400 But the next item on the agenda is, would be for the officers of the board. 326 00:28:30,940 --> 00:28:38,960 The proposed officers would be read as chair, myself as secretary, and Chantelle as treasurer. 327 00:28:40,340 --> 00:28:46,880 Happy to entertain discussion if there is any, otherwise we could move to a motion with respect 328 00:28:46,880 --> 00:28:47,260 to that. 329 00:28:49,080 --> 00:28:55,260 I met to approve the leadership as noted for the 26th, 27th school year. 330 00:28:56,300 --> 00:28:57,660 Okay, do I hear a second of that? 331 00:28:58,540 --> 00:29:01,520 It might be ideal if it was not somebody who was on that slide. 332 00:29:02,940 --> 00:29:04,380 Well, that would be... 333 00:29:05,260 --> 00:29:05,620 Yay! 334 00:29:08,160 --> 00:29:09,180 Yeah, speaking of soap. 335 00:29:09,360 --> 00:29:10,880 And Amy, do you, uh, do you still move? 336 00:29:11,260 --> 00:29:13,020 Oh, wait, I was in high secondings. 337 00:29:13,060 --> 00:29:14,460 Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. 338 00:29:14,680 --> 00:29:15,400 Okay, thank you. 339 00:29:15,400 --> 00:29:19,800 my cute hand. Yeah it was it was it was it was it was not captured in our 340 00:29:19,800 --> 00:29:25,200 reporter. Comparing the hand gesture. There we go. There we go. Which is a nice 341 00:29:25,200 --> 00:29:28,380 hand gesture. Yes yes it is. Let's make sure. 342 00:29:32,120 --> 00:29:37,460 Alright all in favor of that slate it is unanimous and we are approved. And with 343 00:29:37,460 --> 00:29:43,480 that, that is my cue to turn things over to our new chair. 344 00:29:43,480 --> 00:29:46,600 very exciting. Thank you. 345 00:29:49,760 --> 00:29:53,400 I'm so looking forward to the work that we're going to do this year has 346 00:29:53,400 --> 00:29:53,740 group. 347 00:29:56,840 --> 00:29:59,840 So many agenda items. All right, numbers. 348 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:11,100 Kevin, the resolution to appoint the Chief Academic Officer, Principal and Business Administrator. Debra? Oh, I was going to rest up next. 349 00:30:14,240 --> 00:30:31,360 Debra and Nicole layered as Business Administrator, consistent with our bylaws. And now that I'm no longer the chair, I can move like nobody's business. I move that we appoint Debra Candler as our Chief Administrative Officer slash Principal. And Nicole layered 350 00:30:31,360 --> 00:30:34,000 as our business administrator for the coming year. 351 00:30:35,220 --> 00:30:37,120 Thanks, do we have somebody to second that? 352 00:30:38,040 --> 00:30:38,840 Thank you guys. 353 00:30:39,280 --> 00:30:40,040 Shantel Kelly. 354 00:30:40,520 --> 00:30:40,900 Shantel. 355 00:30:41,240 --> 00:30:41,480 All right. 356 00:30:42,920 --> 00:30:43,360 Okay. 357 00:30:45,240 --> 00:30:47,080 So then you want, yeah, you can, yeah. 358 00:30:48,580 --> 00:30:49,880 Who's your official language? 359 00:30:51,040 --> 00:30:51,580 No, no. 360 00:30:51,940 --> 00:30:53,040 You're good with what, right? 361 00:30:53,040 --> 00:30:53,280 All right. 362 00:30:56,010 --> 00:31:00,930 Can we get a vote on who supports resolutions in a second? 363 00:31:08,730 --> 00:31:17,070 Okay, another discussion, especially it's kind of important with the board being in flux 364 00:31:17,070 --> 00:31:20,750 is to officially adopt a resolution that authorizes electronic meetings. 365 00:31:21,710 --> 00:31:27,810 We talked about it, we think it's possible, but again we didn't have hard-coded, so that's 366 00:31:27,810 --> 00:31:29,590 the purpose for this. 367 00:31:29,590 --> 00:31:39,150 So since Stela does require us to have a formally adopted resolution with a trustee participating 368 00:31:39,150 --> 00:31:41,910 remotely, we need to do that. 369 00:31:44,970 --> 00:31:46,950 So there is. 370 00:31:47,760 --> 00:31:53,450 It's the first one of the resolutions in the resolution packet, it's 2026 stash 3. 371 00:31:53,450 --> 00:31:54,650 I'm sure they were all minimal. 372 00:31:54,650 --> 00:31:59,710 No, no, there is that is not any sort of implied item. 373 00:31:59,970 --> 00:32:01,290 There it is. 374 00:32:04,410 --> 00:32:15,290 So resolution 2026-3 lays out the language for the bylaw as well as the rules that we would 375 00:32:15,290 --> 00:32:20,030 need to follow in order for there to be participation, especially when there's voting occurring. 376 00:32:23,450 --> 00:32:24,970 Does anyone need time to review this? 377 00:32:25,330 --> 00:32:26,030 I don't know. 378 00:32:26,170 --> 00:32:31,170 It is the third or third female. 379 00:32:36,160 --> 00:32:37,600 I should have taken a minute. 380 00:32:37,780 --> 00:32:40,180 For someone who has no voice, you should be all alone. 381 00:32:42,000 --> 00:32:46,160 And for reference, this one was just a copy 382 00:32:46,160 --> 00:32:50,760 from one that was provided by our, the attorney that we 383 00:32:50,760 --> 00:32:51,920 for perfect shadow with. 384 00:32:52,220 --> 00:32:54,960 So I think it should meet statutory items. 385 00:32:54,960 --> 00:33:16,160 and I think the one note is just kind of that anchor location, I think it's, it means that we should always have a physical meeting location for folks, anybody else who has technological limitations or otherwise to be able to come and be part in such meetings, but that allows for others to be remote. 386 00:33:16,160 --> 00:33:22,860 Well, and you know what, that might help us get, I almost think that we should promote 387 00:33:22,860 --> 00:33:28,040 that piece potentially because there might be people who go, I would love to participate, 388 00:33:28,300 --> 00:33:31,020 but I can't always be there in person. 389 00:33:32,300 --> 00:33:39,560 That we might have some really valuable parents that are like, there's a lot I can do, but 390 00:33:39,560 --> 00:33:40,540 I can't be at these meetings. 391 00:33:40,960 --> 00:33:41,340 I don't know. 392 00:33:42,160 --> 00:33:48,380 Yeah, it is, it is a modern convenience and expectation. 393 00:33:48,960 --> 00:33:50,660 It's almost like a hybrid meeting you're saying. 394 00:33:50,820 --> 00:33:55,760 Yeah, because of the lead to health hybrid, we have families who've come from as far north 395 00:33:55,760 --> 00:34:01,300 as far north as far west as West Jordan, and I don't remember how far south that was. 396 00:34:02,480 --> 00:34:03,140 I told Valley. 397 00:34:03,480 --> 00:34:09,580 And we have, yeah, so, I mean, I wouldn't drive my kid home and then drive back through traffic 398 00:34:09,580 --> 00:34:10,160 on 15. 399 00:34:10,160 --> 00:34:15,200 So it might, I mean, I would maybe think of how I want to word it, but I think it would 400 00:34:15,200 --> 00:34:20,660 be really, it might be who us to share, hey, we're now going to be running our board meetings 401 00:34:20,660 --> 00:34:21,720 hybrid style. 402 00:34:22,120 --> 00:34:26,540 So if you've always wanted to be a member or, you know, you're the wordsmith, I mean, I'm 403 00:34:26,540 --> 00:34:26,620 done. 404 00:34:26,740 --> 00:34:27,100 I'm more interested. 405 00:34:28,100 --> 00:34:28,280 Yeah. 406 00:34:28,600 --> 00:34:28,680 Good. 407 00:34:29,200 --> 00:34:29,900 I think. 408 00:34:31,200 --> 00:34:33,720 Or if you have a little face. 409 00:34:34,860 --> 00:34:35,200 Oh. 410 00:34:35,380 --> 00:34:35,400 Yeah. 411 00:34:35,400 --> 00:34:36,580 That came up pretty frequently. 412 00:34:36,820 --> 00:34:37,500 It was last couple of years. 413 00:34:37,580 --> 00:34:37,780 Yes. 414 00:34:38,320 --> 00:34:38,680 Yeah. 415 00:34:38,680 --> 00:34:43,000 Yeah, and then could you provide us a new question? 416 00:34:43,440 --> 00:34:47,140 You can't participate unless you've requested to speak and you're on the agenda. 417 00:34:47,440 --> 00:34:47,580 Yeah. 418 00:34:47,580 --> 00:34:49,140 So you can log in and listen. 419 00:34:49,380 --> 00:34:53,860 Like, because I used to do that during COVID, I would log into the board meetings for Salt 420 00:34:53,860 --> 00:34:54,520 Exeter School District. 421 00:34:54,960 --> 00:34:55,400 I don't know. 422 00:34:55,900 --> 00:34:57,360 Are you guys going to put our kids back? 423 00:34:57,480 --> 00:34:58,380 Are you keeping them out? 424 00:34:58,600 --> 00:34:59,820 Like, it was important to listen. 425 00:35:00,160 --> 00:35:02,200 Well, you don't get to participate, but you can watch. 426 00:35:03,100 --> 00:35:03,400 Yeah. 427 00:35:03,660 --> 00:35:06,680 I mean, that's clear in our rules. 428 00:35:06,680 --> 00:35:10,600 that you have to request to purchase a pin. 429 00:35:11,180 --> 00:35:12,300 So the question is, like- 430 00:35:12,300 --> 00:35:13,980 Right, so you could log in to- 431 00:35:13,980 --> 00:35:16,060 So would we expect that another outcome would be- 432 00:35:16,060 --> 00:35:20,490 I don't see this happening because again, 433 00:35:20,730 --> 00:35:23,270 we could probably count the number of times someone visited 434 00:35:23,270 --> 00:35:26,370 our board page on my hand. 435 00:35:28,450 --> 00:35:30,970 But it's something to think about, right? 436 00:35:31,710 --> 00:35:34,990 But I don't, I think the downside is not even close enough. 437 00:35:35,410 --> 00:35:37,210 What doesn't mean we may have to be on our- 438 00:35:37,210 --> 00:35:39,450 You don't all have to be on video, it can be just audio. 439 00:35:40,030 --> 00:35:42,790 Okay, then what can be stolen, but you don't? 440 00:35:44,210 --> 00:35:51,070 Yeah, I think this is an optionality that gives us this. 441 00:35:51,210 --> 00:35:57,070 I think there's some practical considerations, because I think we'll want to think about what 442 00:35:57,070 --> 00:36:04,830 the best platform is and what the controls are that we can have for circumstances. 443 00:36:07,490 --> 00:36:34,810 But I think it's, I think it's, it's just, it's 2026 and I think we just had a lot of circumstances where it was very stressful from a chair perspective to be like, oh, I really can't blame you, your kid is sick or, you know, whatever came up but like, because we can't easily do this or, you know, then, then it means that it takes you out of the equation and, you know, so I, I, that and I, and just well, well, I've got the flow. 444 00:36:34,810 --> 00:36:39,970 for just a half moment. There's two different things here. This is the first one is this standalone 445 00:36:39,970 --> 00:36:50,510 resolution, right, which is I think an appropriate way of putting it into the record. But then I thought 446 00:36:50,510 --> 00:36:55,950 that it was beneficial to memorialize the fact that we have in fact done this by putting it also into 447 00:36:55,950 --> 00:37:02,150 our bylaws so that future boards, even just looking at our bylaws, would have the exact same template 448 00:37:02,150 --> 00:37:08,510 going forward. So that's why there's there would be two succeeding kind of motions here with 449 00:37:08,510 --> 00:37:14,710 respect to that just for to answer that one before it comes up. But but I do think there's you know 450 00:37:14,710 --> 00:37:23,250 some practical work is to like that's platform how we do this but I think that it just this just 451 00:37:23,250 --> 00:37:29,550 gives us the comfort that like if we want to and we we have the right path forward we can just 452 00:37:33,550 --> 00:37:37,390 Any more questions or discussions after that? 453 00:37:40,160 --> 00:37:45,680 So I have a motion, I think that it's somewhat important in this particular instance that 454 00:37:46,350 --> 00:37:49,660 it tracks to what's been provided to everybody. 455 00:37:50,060 --> 00:37:58,340 So I would move that we adopt the resolution 2026-03 as presented to the board in its entirety. 456 00:37:59,820 --> 00:38:06,240 for, yeah, I move that we've approved that resolution as written. 457 00:38:10,260 --> 00:38:11,180 Second, 458 00:38:16,040 --> 00:38:19,220 and support. 459 00:38:20,740 --> 00:38:22,640 That's all unanimous 460 00:38:27,470 --> 00:38:29,650 in the follow-up. 461 00:38:30,210 --> 00:38:34,570 So then I would make a follow-in motion to amend our bylaws 462 00:38:34,570 --> 00:38:45,550 as set forth in resolution number 2026-04 in our packets to memorialize our 463 00:38:45,550 --> 00:38:48,690 adoption of that immediately prior resolution. 464 00:38:55,800 --> 00:38:57,040 The board may can be in 465 00:38:57,040 --> 00:39:03,250 conduct meetings like that. I am making a motion to adopt this into our 466 00:39:03,250 --> 00:39:04,470 laws as written here? 467 00:39:04,710 --> 00:39:05,430 On all second? 468 00:39:05,730 --> 00:39:06,390 Kelly will second. 469 00:39:07,670 --> 00:39:08,870 Oh, who's porch? 470 00:39:09,950 --> 00:39:12,090 I'm reading the bylaws, that's unanimous. 471 00:39:32,610 --> 00:39:34,190 Is it best to just read this? 472 00:39:34,830 --> 00:39:35,830 It's going to enter the court. 473 00:39:36,050 --> 00:39:38,470 Oh, you know, I think from an agenda perspective, 474 00:39:39,190 --> 00:39:41,610 we're going to run through the principal's report first, 475 00:39:41,910 --> 00:39:43,450 for it's worth, and then the finance report, 476 00:39:43,570 --> 00:39:45,210 and then do that one. 477 00:39:45,970 --> 00:39:46,710 Oh, that one? 478 00:39:46,870 --> 00:39:48,190 Because I didn't think they needed summaries. 479 00:39:48,330 --> 00:39:48,510 Sorry. 480 00:39:48,830 --> 00:39:49,950 That plain language piece. 481 00:39:49,950 --> 00:39:51,630 So it's just in terms of the agenda itself. 482 00:39:51,630 --> 00:39:55,370 Well, of course, I'm new to this one. 483 00:39:55,650 --> 00:39:56,130 I'm new to this one. 484 00:39:56,770 --> 00:39:58,310 It's only going to go up here. 485 00:39:59,110 --> 00:40:00,610 It is a family family. 486 00:40:00,990 --> 00:40:01,770 It's only going to go up here. 487 00:40:01,830 --> 00:40:02,370 These are good things. 488 00:40:03,030 --> 00:40:03,690 All right. 489 00:40:03,730 --> 00:40:04,470 You're glow up. 490 00:40:04,710 --> 00:40:06,410 I don't know if you saw it out there. 491 00:40:06,930 --> 00:40:08,190 But I mean, is it glow? 492 00:40:08,410 --> 00:40:10,410 I mean, glow number. 493 00:40:10,570 --> 00:40:10,870 What? 494 00:40:11,150 --> 00:40:11,970 It is so blown up. 495 00:40:12,050 --> 00:40:14,290 It's a homeless guy with a really cool kite. 496 00:40:14,490 --> 00:40:20,770 It was asking the construction guys they could help him wrap his rope around his cool kite. 497 00:40:20,770 --> 00:40:22,510 And they did. 498 00:40:22,730 --> 00:40:23,590 So they're good. 499 00:40:23,670 --> 00:40:25,650 No, it's super. 500 00:40:25,930 --> 00:40:28,790 So it's going to be great. 501 00:40:29,550 --> 00:40:31,090 It would be done on time. 502 00:40:31,250 --> 00:40:32,910 But I have to blame that on blue stakes. 503 00:40:33,150 --> 00:40:36,270 Blue stakes, if you're listening, your employees are not great. 504 00:40:37,110 --> 00:40:41,530 It took them take three to actually get the job done. 505 00:40:41,550 --> 00:40:41,810 I know. 506 00:40:44,470 --> 00:40:46,690 In fact, one watched me walk in. 507 00:40:46,750 --> 00:40:48,410 I was like, let me know if you need anything. 508 00:40:49,570 --> 00:40:55,690 The first two times, the second time I went to a parking lot, 509 00:40:58,330 --> 00:41:00,510 and then we took a picture 510 00:41:00,510 --> 00:41:04,230 and said, so does that mean this doesn't have anything? 511 00:41:04,510 --> 00:41:08,550 They said, oh no, there's stuff there, and it's like taking the first time. 512 00:41:08,630 --> 00:41:12,390 It's going to be easier to move where it is going to be because then we need it. 513 00:41:15,390 --> 00:41:18,730 So it's a few days behind schedule, but you know what? 514 00:41:18,730 --> 00:41:25,070 it's going to be so amazing. So that's the glow-up. We also added more 515 00:41:25,070 --> 00:41:29,230 poles for the hammocks because we realized that the tie-up system on the 516 00:41:30,470 --> 00:41:36,050 tree's chest wasn't enough for middle school. You guys want to test it? I think 517 00:41:36,050 --> 00:41:42,750 we could make money testing durability. Like the classic Samson I commercial with 518 00:41:42,750 --> 00:41:47,450 Um, I think that we could really, there's a very good line of teenagers for them. 519 00:41:48,410 --> 00:41:52,790 Um, and then I just want to say like, I think our faculty retreat, you guys went really 520 00:41:52,790 --> 00:41:53,050 well. 521 00:41:53,150 --> 00:41:58,350 We've hired two new staff and I just, it was really nice to see how our teachers come together 522 00:41:58,350 --> 00:42:03,750 and just really support each other and the sharing and I think we were really fabulous. 523 00:42:04,430 --> 00:42:04,970 Who did we know? 524 00:42:05,850 --> 00:42:09,470 Well, we hired, um, we replaced because we had cake Todd. 525 00:42:09,770 --> 00:42:12,030 She decided I don't want to teach him. 526 00:42:12,030 --> 00:42:21,730 So she's left teaching some for us a bit, but so we interviewed and we had so many great candidates that we decided to go ahead and hire two. 527 00:42:23,710 --> 00:42:37,550 So we can anticipate there's going to be some attrition in the next year or so and it was worth it for us to be able to lighten the load of a couple of teachers who are having to teach all four grade levels in humanities. 528 00:42:37,550 --> 00:42:41,250 so who did we hire? So we hired Heather. 529 00:42:41,970 --> 00:42:43,030 Didn't you put it in? 530 00:42:43,490 --> 00:42:47,390 It was the Heather Blakely and Deanna Sarmento. 531 00:42:47,750 --> 00:42:49,570 So yeah, fully six. 532 00:42:50,090 --> 00:42:52,070 Yeah, both were focused on five, six. 533 00:42:52,270 --> 00:42:55,010 So now we have four for seven, eight, four for five, six, 534 00:42:55,010 --> 00:42:59,750 which has really, if we just had more classrooms, 535 00:43:00,390 --> 00:43:01,770 it would just make everything better. 536 00:43:02,090 --> 00:43:02,930 But it's alright. 537 00:43:05,150 --> 00:43:07,430 We're like a big family that shares rooms. 538 00:43:07,430 --> 00:43:13,470 You know share room with your sister so yeah, it's really lovely, but it was nice 539 00:43:21,570 --> 00:43:22,730 So anyway 540 00:43:59,210 --> 00:44:02,150 I feel like we have the only you inside our building. 541 00:44:03,410 --> 00:44:05,210 I haven't had to pay for this. 542 00:44:10,300 --> 00:44:12,540 Is this going to give a brief finance report? 543 00:44:12,840 --> 00:44:13,020 Yeah. 544 00:44:13,360 --> 00:44:14,680 Because I don't have a voice. 545 00:44:16,720 --> 00:44:17,760 Nothing unexpected. 546 00:44:18,320 --> 00:44:21,960 We've only had expenditures that we've already voted on. 547 00:44:22,220 --> 00:44:25,080 We have our classroom. 548 00:44:25,800 --> 00:44:26,260 We're here. 549 00:44:26,360 --> 00:44:27,460 Can you just throw the waitress? 550 00:44:28,280 --> 00:44:31,580 I'm not sure that we voted on, that's coming in right now too. 551 00:44:32,340 --> 00:44:37,200 So this is current state, we'll have more for you guys next month. 552 00:44:37,920 --> 00:44:43,800 But if you have any questions, just email me and I will post these right now, they're 553 00:44:43,800 --> 00:44:44,620 just in the finance. 554 00:44:45,440 --> 00:44:47,940 I'll probably put the board fuller as well. 555 00:44:49,940 --> 00:44:50,780 And that's what I've got. 556 00:44:50,940 --> 00:44:51,840 Must people have questions? 557 00:44:53,710 --> 00:44:54,830 And sorry, I know it's not. 558 00:44:54,830 --> 00:44:54,850 Oh, 559 00:44:57,130 --> 00:44:59,890 I'm just sorry you're not feeling good, but... 560 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:17,740 Thank you. Okay. Oh, and the audit went quite well. Oh, yeah. Of course, we don't know until November, but everything looks pretty good. There was a new thing they asked for. 561 00:45:23,840 --> 00:45:28,940 It won't be a finding. It'll just be about the matter. Anyway, it's looking good. 562 00:45:31,160 --> 00:45:34,600 Certified last year, numbers, everything is done. 563 00:45:38,830 --> 00:45:40,130 Yeah, from regulations. 564 00:45:40,890 --> 00:45:49,960 Is the new requirement a result of legislation that came out of last year's... 565 00:45:49,960 --> 00:45:54,460 I think sometimes there are things that are adopted that aren't very well communicated, 566 00:45:55,420 --> 00:46:00,380 but they have in the audit guidelines there's what's called chapter three and they updated 567 00:46:00,380 --> 00:46:01,080 every year. 568 00:46:01,560 --> 00:46:07,380 And it looks at different things, so like we've never been asked about, well, not every year 569 00:46:07,380 --> 00:46:10,500 They don't ask about, like, parent bullying and things, 570 00:46:10,660 --> 00:46:12,120 but they did ask about that for this year. 571 00:46:12,680 --> 00:46:15,420 One of the things they had was that the staff 572 00:46:15,420 --> 00:46:17,900 was signing the code of conduct every year. 573 00:46:18,680 --> 00:46:19,820 We've talked about it, 574 00:46:20,260 --> 00:46:23,000 but we've only had them sign it on their first year. 575 00:46:23,540 --> 00:46:25,900 So now we will adopt that they sign it yearly. 576 00:46:28,750 --> 00:46:29,110 For the kids? 577 00:46:29,490 --> 00:46:30,450 For the teachers. 578 00:46:30,750 --> 00:46:31,710 For the teachers and staff. 579 00:46:32,130 --> 00:46:32,350 They're good. 580 00:46:32,790 --> 00:46:33,150 That's correct. 581 00:46:33,390 --> 00:46:34,050 So that's one question. 582 00:46:34,710 --> 00:46:36,710 All of our cents make sense to me, 583 00:46:36,710 --> 00:46:42,750 the transportation one that I'm assuming is at 62% because we paid for T-Town's transportation or something. 584 00:46:42,750 --> 00:46:45,570 No, because we paid for the UTA. 585 00:46:45,570 --> 00:46:46,310 UTA passes. 586 00:46:46,610 --> 00:46:47,390 Oh, the UTA passes. 587 00:46:47,590 --> 00:46:47,710 Okay. 588 00:46:48,210 --> 00:46:54,270 I just, the 552% feels a little anxiety-provoking on where total school expenditures. 589 00:46:54,790 --> 00:46:55,790 So that's what you're saying? 590 00:46:55,950 --> 00:46:59,590 We have 552% of what should be left. 591 00:47:00,070 --> 00:47:02,470 So we have more because we haven't spent enough. 592 00:47:02,710 --> 00:47:02,910 Okay. 593 00:47:02,910 --> 00:47:06,750 It's just because it's under the percent used problem. And so I think that's what I was confused. 594 00:47:07,390 --> 00:47:10,610 Right, but that is the, but it's in the revenues, the net revenues. 595 00:47:11,210 --> 00:47:12,630 So it's left over at the end. 596 00:47:13,010 --> 00:47:14,470 So this is a good number, not a bad number. 597 00:47:14,550 --> 00:47:15,390 Yes, it's a great one. 598 00:47:15,830 --> 00:47:16,830 Just a little startling. 599 00:47:17,790 --> 00:47:20,090 It's that $28,000. 600 00:47:20,770 --> 00:47:23,270 We're looking for $52,000. 601 00:47:23,330 --> 00:47:25,850 Because we'll spend down the rest of it right here. 602 00:47:26,190 --> 00:47:26,470 Thank you. 603 00:47:26,710 --> 00:47:30,190 The rest of it, I was like, click and write along until I got to that number. 604 00:47:31,010 --> 00:47:33,510 Okay. Thank you 605 00:47:38,370 --> 00:47:41,850 very much. Debra Nicole. All right. 606 00:47:44,210 --> 00:47:47,550 We are next item on the 607 00:47:47,550 --> 00:47:49,590 agendas to enter a closed session for. 608 00:47:53,510 --> 00:48:00,030 I sure I can just make a motion and then we can do a 609 00:48:00,030 --> 00:48:05,530 little call. I would make a motion at this point that we enter a strategy session to discuss pending or 610 00:48:05,530 --> 00:48:13,510 reasonably imminent litigation pursuant to Utah code section 52-4-205-1c. Is there a second of 611 00:48:13,510 --> 00:48:19,530 that motion? Shantel's second set and now we need to take a individual roll call vote. 612 00:48:21,330 --> 00:48:26,750 So maybe if you can go ahead. Read the credits. Yes. Kelly Gough? Yes. 613 00:48:26,750 --> 00:48:26,930 Yes. 614 00:48:27,150 --> 00:48:28,030 Can I have this doctor? 615 00:48:30,920 --> 00:48:31,420 You got to me. 616 00:48:31,680 --> 00:48:32,440 Amy Felbert, yes. 617 00:48:33,140 --> 00:48:34,320 And Greg Ostranger, yes. 618 00:48:35,680 --> 00:48:42,420 At 6.25 pm on Monday, August 17th, we are entering into closed session. 619 00:48:43,380 --> 00:48:45,800 Do you think that there are closures that are like, yes? 620 00:48:45,800 --> 00:48:46,140 So yes. 621 00:48:46,280 --> 00:48:47,260 I think that this one we're going to go. 622 00:48:47,440 --> 00:48:47,900 Thank you.