Board of Commissioners Meeting - Sales Tax Referendum

Sampson County, NC · · More Sampson County, NC meetings · More North Carolina meetings

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.

These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:01] Uh resolution um regarding the additional
[0:05] 1/2 cent for local sales tax. This time I'm going to turn it over to
[0:09] my gentleman on the right. I think we're going to start with you, sir.
[0:13] It's on you. >> All right. Good evening, commissioners.
[0:15] Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Uh I'm Kyle Kimble, the county attorney.
[0:18] I'm just going to provide a brief uh background and kind of legal authority
[0:23] of how we get to the resolution for what we're uh proposing tonight. Um
[0:29] in the 2026 [clears throat] Appropriations Act that was passed in
[0:32] July by the General Assembly and the governor,
[0:34] um it created a new four to four Article 43 alpha of
[0:40] Chapter 105. Chapter 105 is taxation. So, North Carolina General Statute
[0:44] Chapter 105. Um 43 alpha is county sales and use tax for public education. And
[0:51] this was created specifically for and only for Sampson County based on this
[0:55] year's Appropriations Act. Other counties may get it in the future, but
[0:59] for this year it's Sampson County alone. Uh
[1:01] it's specifically Chapter 105 Section 513.1 through .4.
[1:07] Um it allows uh the opportunity to obtain additional
[1:11] source of revenue for which to meet public education needs. So, again, I'll
[1:15] talk about that in a second, but it's it's directly going to public education.
[1:19] Uh 513.2 [clears throat]
[1:21] talks about the levy. So, the only way to get there is via a referendum. So,
[1:26] what the vote on tonight is really dealing with the resolution to do a
[1:29] referendum for this November. Um the Board of Commissioners may direct
[1:34] the County Board of Elections to conduct an advisory referendum on the question
[1:38] whether or not to levy a local sales and use tax up to a rate of 1/2%.
[1:44] So, the the applicable rate that can be
[1:47] approved via this is a one is in the increments of 1/4%. So, essentially what
[1:53] that means is the county board can approve a 1/4%
[1:57] uh increase or 1/2 % increase up to 1/2 being
[2:01] maximum. Um so, that's what the uh you know, decision point is tonight
[2:06] is to what level to go for it and and I know the resolution does have a 1/2 %
[2:10] currently. Um we did confirm that with via the Department of Revenue from the
[2:15] state. The state actually contacted us right after the Appropriations Act was
[2:19] passed about this very uh new article and the levy of this new sales and use
[2:25] tax. Um they did confirm that yes, 1/2 is the
[2:28] maximum and you can go directly to 1/2. Senator Jackson's office confirmed that
[2:32] as well as the actual lawyer who drafted this uh very provision via the article
[2:38] uh 43 that we we we conferred with. Uh the article provides for a specific
[2:44] ballot question, which the uh Board of Elections will uh put forth if approved.
[2:49] And the authority is then uh once it if approved via the vote in the
[2:55] it'll then come back to the Board of Commissioners, who by resolution can
[2:59] then authorize the levy of a tax. If approved via the referendum, um
[3:05] the most likely start date for this would be, according to the Department of
[3:09] Revenue, July of 2027 would be the earliest, essentially. So, if approved
[3:15] via this election, July 1st, 2027, the levy would start, right? So, levy would
[3:21] start on the on sales and use tax for the county. Um
[3:25] uses. So, 5-13.4 discusses the actual uses that that will come from this tax
[3:32] money. So, it can be used for two main purposes, public school capital outlay
[3:38] purposes that are specifically defined in general statute that defined in
[3:42] general statute 115 C 426 F or to retire any indent indebtedness incurred by the
[3:50] county for the same purpose. So, capital outlay, just think of it as is your big
[3:54] projects, right? Land acquisition for schools, playgrounds, athletic fields,
[3:58] etc. Construction, renovation, replacement of buildings and structures,
[4:03] furnitures, fixtures and furnitures for the schools. Um it can be also for
[4:10] acquisition of school buses as fleet, acquisition of activity buses supporting
[4:14] the education side, public education. The number two there under use is public
[4:19] school operating expenses. Um so, it's really capital outlay
[4:25] for new projects, existing projects, existing existing debt from buildings
[4:29] already purchased, renovations already made, or that public school operating
[4:33] expenses. Um and so, that's kind of the background on the brand new article that
[4:37] was uh uh
[4:39] put forth via the general assembly and the governor. And I'll turn it over to
[4:42] Mr. Vann for the more >> Thank you, sir. And
[4:45] um Mr. Chairman and Commissioners, I have
[4:47] just a couple of other points, and a couple of these may be redundant with
[4:51] the resolution itself, but I think these are helpful uh to mention.
[4:55] The additional 1/2% sales tax would generate approximately $4 million in
[5:00] annual revenue. And um one way this could be thought about is
[5:05] it would be equivalent to 5 and 1/2 cents. If that amount of money were
[5:10] needed to be generated, it would take 5 and 1/2 cents
[5:13] um added to the property tax levy rate. Uh we currently have about $104 million
[5:20] in debt for prior school buildings construction.
[5:24] Um if this additional sales tax were passed,
[5:27] this means the overall rate in Sampson County would go from 7% to 7 and 1/2%
[5:34] sales tax. The sales tax applies to anyone
[5:38] purchasing goods and services in the county, not just home or property owners
[5:42] in Sampson. And um
[5:46] of course, Kyle mentioned the other points as well. So, um we just
[5:50] appreciate uh the consideration for these board members uh
[5:54] as far as moving forward.
[5:58] » All right.
[6:00] At this time I'm going to read the resolution of the Sampson County Board
[6:04] of Commissioners directing the County Board of Election to conduct a
[6:07] referendum with referendum whether to levy an additional 1/2%
[6:13] county sales and use tax to prioritize payment of existing K-12 public school
[6:20] indebtedness. Whereas the Sampson County Board of
[6:22] Commissioners recognizes that the Sampson County student population
[6:26] represents the future of our great county, state, and country.
[6:31] And therefore every incentive must be taken to support maintaining safe and
[6:36] structurally sound environment that fosters student success. And whereas the
[6:41] Sampson County Board of Commissioners recognize that service responsibilities
[6:44] and demands associated with the county's continuing growth have increased at a
[6:49] rate that is outpacing the county's revenue. And whereas the Sampson County
[6:54] Board of Commissioners recognizes that the
[6:57] county's current school debt services to be exclusive of 1 million that is
[7:02] primarily being paid for by property tax revenue. And whereas the state of North
[7:07] Carolina General Assembly and Governor passed the 2026 Appropriations Act
[7:12] creating a new Article 43A
[7:16] with the NC Chapter 105 that specifically grants Sampson County
[7:20] an opportunity to obtain additional revenue via a local sales and use tax
[7:26] increase to support public education needs. And whereas in light of the new
[7:31] statutory authority the Sampson County Board of Commissioners unanimously favor
[7:35] a 1/2 % local sales tax and use options as
[7:40] opposed to depending solely on property taxes as a source of revenue of meeting
[7:46] K through 12 public schools debt service. And whereas the
[7:51] acceptable revenues generated by 1/2 % local sales and use tax is approx-
[7:58] approximately $4 million annually, which would equivalent to 5 and 1/2
[8:03] cents if added to the property tax levy rate. And whereas the Sampson
[8:09] County Board of Commissioners are unanimous in favor of prioritizing any
[8:13] additional revenues gained by a 1/2% sales tax and use tax increase
[8:19] to service existing school debt previously incurred for constructional
[8:24] projects. And now, therefore, be it resolved the Sampson County Board of
[8:29] Commissioners directs the Sampson County Board of
[8:32] Elections to conduct a referendum in the upcoming November the 3rd, 2026
[8:37] election on whether the county should levy an additional 1/2% local
[8:43] sales and use tax to be utilized and for the primary purpose of existing school
[8:49] indebtedness for the public schools buildings in
[8:52] ordinances with NCGS 105-513.3.
[8:59] That the Sampson County Board of Commissioners directs the Sampson County
[9:02] Board of of Elections to formulate a ballot question
[9:06] for the referendum utilization utilizing the language provided in NCGS 105-513.2.
[9:15] That Sampson County Board of Commissioners directs the Sampson County
[9:18] Manager to educate and inform the public
[9:22] regardless regarding all aspects of this resolution and the upcoming special
[9:26] election on this matter. Adopted this day of August 2026, 3rd day
[9:31] of August. C. O. Ammons, Chairman.
[9:37] » Mr. Chairman, I'd just like to take a moment to
[9:40] inform the public that this would not be possible if it were not for Senator
[9:45] Brent Jackson uh in his work at uh at the General
[9:49] Assembly getting this approved for Sampson
[9:52] County. Uh the other year when we had the
[9:56] financial issues uh where we did have to adjust the tax rate to 68 cent from 62
[10:02] and 1/2 cent. Most of the people who commented on
[10:06] social media or in private would often say they would rather see a sales tax
[10:11] increase than a property tax increase. Well, that wasn't an option we had then.
[10:17] Uh this is now an option thanks to Senator Jackson. The county's needs are
[10:22] always going to be there. They're not going to
[10:25] go away and the the needs of the schools are not going to go away.
[10:29] So, uh I want to thank Senator Jackson for his work in getting this option
[10:34] available to us, but it cannot be it will not be possible without the support
[10:39] of the voters of Sampson County. So, uh Mr. Chairman, I just encourage
[10:45] uh us that we put this forward before the voters of Sampson County and that
[10:49] all five of us do our due diligence in educating and encouraging our
[10:54] constituents to support the resolution because this half a cent just think
[11:01] about it. A half a cent. If you spend a dollar,
[11:04] that's just a half a penny. For every $100 you spend, that would be
[11:10] 50 cent. Our children are worth 50 cent. Our
[11:15] children are worth a half a penny. So, I would encourage you to encourage your
[11:20] neighbors that this is a item worthy of our support. Uh Mr. Chairman, I make a
[11:26] motion that we adopt the resolution. >> Second.
[11:30] » The motion has a second. All in favor?
[11:35] Resolution is approved.