[This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person -- it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.]

[0:00] Planning is on me. Please.
[0:04] I have a agenda.
[0:12] So, do I have a
[0:16] motion?
[0:19] I'll make a motion and we accept the agenda.
[0:58] we're going to have discussion and possible recommendation of approval to the Board of
[1:03] County Commissioners regarding more time on data center development.
[1:08] So, we've done the pie click role, we have done solar energy facilities, but just because
[1:17] there's been still a major issue in data centers, and again, it can be extended if there's
[1:24] showing progress. Maybe it's time to put fears of people in the community to rest and see if
[1:31] we want to make a formal recommendation to our Board of Commissioners to implement a
[1:38] more 21 data center development. For reasons of water, power, infrastructure, protection of
[1:50] There's a very numerous number of reasons why that you can all enumerate if you so choose to put forward any motion.
[1:59] Are you up to more discussion?
[2:02] I think one
[2:06] thing,
[2:10] because it's important to actually have it on the agenda.
[2:15] Even if we didn't all that go ahead and start our 180 day time limit on it.
[2:21] It's on the agenda. It's been discussed. It's been suggested.
[2:24] so I would make a motion that we recommend a moratorium on any data center
[2:34] applications. We recommend it to the county commissioners to initiate that at any
[2:43] time they see fit.
[2:47] That's the motion gives her a second.
[2:50] second.
[2:53] Seconded.
[2:54] Motion by Corey.
[2:55] Seconded by Jean.
[2:56] Anyone in favor?
[2:57] Aye.
[2:58] Aye.
[2:58] Rahul Palos.
[3:02] And now we have a discussion of an amendment to the Land Use
[3:05] Ordnance Section 14.94040.
[3:10] NUSAN specified to incorporate noise regulations and welfare zones.
[3:14] Now, we did part of the work on this in the work meeting.
[3:20] I don't know if we've got a document that we feel comfortable in moving forward, but
[3:27] the motion wrap issue is feeling on that one.
[3:31] We put it all out of the input to Heidi, we gave her a lot of suggestions, I think we're
[3:37] there.
[3:37] We just have the form of document for us to honor you.
[3:40] Yeah, I think we needed it in that we need to see it in the phone document before we go any further on that, but I think all the work that we've done on there, I think we're I think we're 99% there. I would just like to see it actually in ordinance form before we move any forward on that.
[4:00] Okay, the other thing is this kicks it down the road,
[4:03] commissioner, you know, that we have it as well,
[4:07] but we're not immersed in down the road
[4:10] for a work meeting and recommendation
[4:13] to have for public hearing as public,
[4:15] where it will be in the next,
[4:17] but that would be in August, right?
[4:20] Yeah, I think we just put it on,
[4:22] we'll have it in for the,
[4:25] we're ready for the next public hearing.
[4:28] I don't have a hearing, I don't think we'd probably just have to approve it.
[4:32] We have to get approved, and then it will go to public hearing.
[4:34] So I think we have to have a public hearing, and it has to be 30 days.
[4:40] So if we have our meeting in August, and then it has to be 30 days, so we need to figure
[4:46] out.
[4:48] I'm open to, there's no discussion, it's just a discussion, a possible, and we don't have
[4:54] to.
[4:55] Hi, do you do a lot of the discussion that we came up with in the waiting that we came up with today?
[5:01] I find that a...
[5:04] So let's just put it on our agenda for the next meeting to go ahead and adopt the elements or recommend it.
[5:11] So then we can start, we can put it on our public hearing.
[5:18] and move it to public hearing for us and can we have the public hearing in August?
[5:27] Even though we don't have a formal document in front of us,
[5:30] since we know what it is, we just have to put it all together.
[5:33] What's your feeling?
[5:41] Right here, the timing won't work.
[5:44] We would have to have to be the public hearing on being September.
[5:49] Okay.
[5:49] If you're not going to do it in August, we have to get the document out, have a public hearing,
[5:54] or have an extra meeting from one item, meet for 15 minutes, or just, I don't think it's that critical
[6:02] to you. I think the fact that we have, I think, September for it to actually go to public hearing,
[6:08] I think, is fine.
[6:10] But then it's still a commissioner, public hearing, too.
[6:13] So I believe it's a government year.
[6:15] It's again around a lot. Are you still getting that?
[6:18] But as long as we've got something in motion, we're pretty good.
[6:21] Heidi, Heidi, do you recommend it?
[6:24] We can give Linda the public hearing information
[6:27] to the same times I posted, so that as soon as you guys
[6:32] say, yeah, let's recommend it, it can instantly get posted.
[6:36] Yeah.
[6:37] I think that's a good idea.
[6:38] Yeah, in August.
[6:39] OK.
[6:40] Yeah.
[6:42] OK, that was just for discussion.
[6:44] So now the next item on the agenda is approval and June minutes.
[6:50] I read them off 36 summer pages of them, which were very, very well done by the way.
[6:58] Thank you.
[7:00] Any motion?
[7:02] Anybody else read them?
[7:05] Well, I'll be out there.
[7:06] I'll go ahead.
[7:08] I'll make a motion to accept the minutes.
[7:11] I read them.
[7:12] I was very old. Are you doing all the judgments? Or are you separating them? I'm mostly like June work meetings.
[7:22] I also probably should be separated, but don't you?
[7:24] Just set June then. So yeah, I don't know if June minutes.
[7:28] It's like all of the changes that come this is all.
[7:30] First, making it would have been the actual planning of the meeting.
[7:33] So that's the one, I think, for 36 pages. So...
[7:37] Sure, I just made a motion. Is there a second?
[8:10] I'll make a motion that we approve the June 10th work with the minutes.
[8:17] The second, second, second by Joanne.
[8:20] I hope they were safe.
[8:21] All right.
[8:21] All right.
[8:22] Okay, motion carries.
[8:23] Now I need a motion for the June 24th taking.
[8:27] Wasn't that June 24th?
[8:29] Work meeting minutes.
[8:31] I missed the first few minutes of that meeting, so I want to make a motion on that one.
[8:37] I can make a motion that we accept the minutes for the meeting.
[8:41] Okay, more should my Joanna miss her second.
[8:44] That's the second.
[8:45] I'll stick at my Rick, all in favor say hi.
[8:48] Hi.
[8:49] Hi.
[8:49] Okay, any opposed?
[8:51] Motion carries.
[8:52] Any other business now?
[8:53] I did briefly talk to me about just a question she had.
[8:59] And I think it's pretty slow that I told her maybe another business just to alert
[9:05] I learned a lot, and for one, our funny condition of her thinking on this, and I think she's right on board.
[9:12] So, just give high just a minute to tell you what her thoughts were.
[9:16] Not only motion, just more information for your benefit, and we'll go from there.
[9:22] So, I had a gentleman approach me about even a power service or something.
[9:33] He has power to pivot out there, but the power that's at those pivot isn't enough to
[9:38] run the pump that he wants, and it's too far a stretch for Rocky Mountain to go and take
[9:44] it from there.
[9:45] So he would like to come, we have overhead power, this is along so far lane, he would go down
[9:55] that's lines, but it would be overhead.
[10:01] It's not development, it's far ground, we will have
[10:04] him son in at the day good staying, it's for agricultural use only. Are you guys okay with that?
[10:12] Overhead power ran for agricultural use.
[10:18] You play a lot out there. Absolutely not. Yeah, I's never done
[10:23] anywhere else in your daughter. So his reasoning was it's it's by an ask tell
[10:29] irrigation pond and they're irrigation pond so there is water lines that would
[10:34] have to be I mean it's not just something easy. I just wondered what it's for
[10:40] agricultural use if they have a sign of apathy but is that something. So it's not
[10:46] subdivision it's not in our subdivision it is not. So I have found power it's just
[10:55] The problem is, is kind of the intent of our ordinance to move everything to underground
[11:02] was to move everything to underground, and I mean, I definitely feel for a way.
[11:11] That doesn't last day to development.
[11:14] It does say development, so but it also states infrastructure.
[11:19] And so really it's an infrastructure, it's just an online problem we have is in 10 years
[11:28] down the road, we're 20 years down the road when they're not finding it anymore, they
[11:33] want to develop it and put houses on it, they're going to be able to say, well you have to
[11:39] to take that whole line down,
[11:42] put it all under ground.
[11:43] I don't have to go underground from that point,
[11:45] but.
[11:46] Yeah, and so I don't know if that's a really hard one.
[11:51] I mean, I bring a map up and somebody can kind of
[11:54] see the map, well, help a little bit.
[12:00] What is okay here, it's already on the side of the road,
[12:03] so no, we don't have to go through the road or anything.
[12:05] We go down the fence line, this is his property,
[12:09] the only place that he could have.
[12:10] How many bottles is it?
[12:11] I didn't ask him, so we're expecting him.
[12:15] About 40 acres of Marshall's orchard.
[12:17] So it would be 13,000 out of 20 feet.
[12:19] It would be able to come on to his property here the whole way.
[12:28] I'm one of six, but I would say no.
[12:31] I would say no, I would say no.
[12:35] So how do he's doing underground on his face?
[12:41] Just pull overhead to get to him?
[12:43] Was that correct?
[12:43] Right, so he's doing underground on.
[12:46] Oh, underground on his, so how much of it?
[12:49] How much are we talking about overhead?
[12:51] So that's the overhead, where do you see that yellow?
[12:54] And it's to get to these three spots put it in.
[12:59] He's going to do underground, right?
[13:03] It has to go underground to do that a bit.
[13:06] Yeah.
[13:07] And he has, he's like I said, here he has these pivots here.
[13:11] It's to get these spots in between that the pivots don't
[13:14] I don't get that the pump isn't enough to heal up on water to these three spots.
[13:20] Generally the very first email he said?
[13:23] I just had a time to think that the water should burn the cost of pulls these days.
[13:29] That's what it's worth.
[13:30] I don't think I would be able to.
[13:30] The pulse already burned.
[13:32] Isn't that as am I told you?
[13:34] There's one on the side.
[13:35] It's worth it.
[13:36] He just needs to put one pull in to bring it all over and even go under the rest of his
[13:40] property.
[13:41] Yeah.
[13:42] I think it's not really a cost, and it's more that they're worried about digging around them.
[13:48] Our rights that are right there, they probably don't understand something.
[13:52] Well, they're not going to use blue snakes probably because it's in their property.
[13:56] It's the lines that I'm sure that they're worried about.
[14:01] Even with that, I would still say, I would still say no.
[14:08] It's also a cosmetic or beauty thing for our county.
[14:12] I just question if we're trying to protect this and do this for the farmers, I mean, this
[14:19] is a farmer.
[14:21] They're just...
[14:22] They completely agree.
[14:23] I know exactly why you're...
[14:25] Yeah, we want to protect agriculture, but here we are not helping something to maintain
[14:32] agriculture.
[14:34] You can see these three pivot fields around.
[14:36] So
[14:39] I'm not saying that, you know, in 20 years it might, it could be developed, but when we have a statement on there, like you said, for only that use.
[14:51] So if they did decide to do that then...
[14:55] What I know is I took a mile of...
[15:00] I have a lot of underground conduct in my form. And even I had an agreement where I paid for everything. And I still said, I want to do this myself. I don't want anyone else to join on to document. I'm paying for it. I don't want my neighbor after I paid for it to be able to come. The guy would not guarantee to me, even after I paid for it, that they would not allow someone to join on. Because it was some major three things. It was some large lines.
[15:30] And they made me put the larger line out there because they knew somebody's going to hook on to it.
[15:36] And it's not that much worse. I don't know why he would not want it just going to grab.
[15:41] It's just kind of like the initial lines.
[15:44] Well, in his, in his, in his very first humility, it's been to me, Cody, Heidi, and Mike.
[15:51] He states that there's access water sources on the east side of the highway, creating much difficult,
[15:58] to go underground to power. So, well, I mean, that,
[16:06] I mean, you're,
[16:10] can we see that
[16:11] after again? Is this the only alternative?
[16:14] Well, I think if the ordinance says for development, and V9, I think he could come back on us
[16:22] to
[16:24] get what he wants. I mean, I think if he wanted to push the issue, because we deny it,
[16:29] I think that he could come back on us, where in our ordinance is the development.
[16:35] This isn't for developments, for agricultural use, I think we want to be really careful
[16:41] right there.
[16:42] Plus, he's being sensitive to axed-ells, water line and not wanting to come in there.
[16:49] And I guess on the building side of things, when they do a power service, for agricultural
[16:54] use, they sign that saying that's what it is for.
[16:57] So, if all of a sudden they want to build a house out there...
[17:02] So, can we put it as a temporary power run?
[17:07] If we listed it as a temporary agricultural use,
[17:11] that would be very, very, very clear that that's what it was for.
[17:15] Well, I don't know on when permitsize how that would work,
[17:19] because we just run it through those powers.
[17:22] I think just on our approval,
[17:23] So if we, if we approved it on a temporary agricultural,
[17:33] I almost say exemption is the,
[17:36] is the little group we're really looking for, if we put something in there to really
[17:42] show up the fact that it's not going to be, this isn't the permanent power that, you know,
[17:48] five years now the road to you, you know, put it in.
[17:53] Should be signs of these things, it's for ad use.
[17:56] Yeah.
[17:57] No, for development.
[17:58] I just fear that if our ordinance states for development,
[18:02] and this is for ad use, and he wanted to press the issue,
[18:05] if we deny it.
[18:07] Yeah.
[18:07] Or if you would be, it would be sticky for sure.
[18:11] Very.
[18:11] I mean, if the planning commission is nice,
[18:13] then he can always go to the board of adjustments.
[18:18] I don't want to make things harder on somebody to do it, but we want to, you know, I very
[18:27] much understand that, you know, we want to be sensitive and complimentary to our agricultural
[18:36] users as we possibly can here.
[18:38] So, can I play the devil's advocate?
[18:42] The devil outlawing is still the owned by Rocky Mountain Fowler Drift.
[18:47] It wouldn't be just his...
[18:51] What are we going to do if there's a dairy besides, okay,
[18:57] we're going to build a milking bar.
[19:01] It's agricultural.
[19:03] So, do we let him go overhead?
[19:04] This isn't our head. It's overhead to his property, but it's underground, on his property.
[19:13] But the functioner, we allow someone else, from point A to point B, to do it, if it were a dairy barn,
[19:21] or if it was a coral or a rebar.
[19:23] My opinion, Jean, is we are not sending a precedent here.
[19:26] I think we always look at case by case.
[19:31] We do have a lot of things on it.
[19:34] If you remember, over between Rhode Island and Southern Green, and we told those guys,
[19:41] no, you have to go underground from the pole, and we went back and forth, and then finally
[19:46] we were like, well, you know, we were kind of wrong here.
[19:50] Yes, you can go across the canal overhead, and then you can go underground from there.
[19:55] So I think this is definitely one of those that we should use on that, and that was development and we're talking about agriculture here, so
[20:09] Back to your milk farm story.
[20:11] That would be development.
[20:14] Okay, well, and he just seems like with the new hands, sorry, honey, I just was going to break this affidavit on the power services
[20:24] is the distance that your firm
[20:25] and certified electrical service requests
[20:27] is solely for use of agricultural law.
[20:30] It will be used exclusively for agricultural purposes,
[20:34] including but not limited to farming operations,
[20:36] irrigation, livestock care,
[20:38] and other related agricultural activities.
[20:40] I further certify that power service will not be used
[20:43] for residential recreational or re-living commercial,
[20:46] non-agricultural or industrial purpose
[20:48] unless zoning approval,
[20:50] for I believe a lot has been obtained.
[20:55] So, all right, I mean I do feel a lot better with that, we sign that, and then we just have to hope to, you know, in 20 years or 10 years when none of us are here anymore and somebody comes in and wants to change that to a building lot that they're going to have to stick to their guns on.
[21:16] We're trying to change that as well, having said that, if we go ahead and approve it.
[21:26] Can we put on an agenda while we're doing the land use, that we just put all power,
[21:35] all utilities for this day, and we'll be under vote, like every other municipality said,
[21:42] I've got a little several states and nobody has stopped above ground anymore.
[21:47] I think if it didn't say development, you'd be more right to deny it.
[21:52] But where it says development, I fear, I mean, I'm not perfect.
[21:56] You guys make the final decision.
[21:59] I'm just saying, let's go.
[22:01] We're not making a decision.
[22:02] We're not approving anything.
[22:03] We're just getting some counsel, if you will,
[22:08] to hide who has some strong feelings of it.
[22:13] It's good we don't know the person, so we're not, you know, we're not pregnant.
[22:17] I don't think so.
[22:19] What I would hope on it isn't matter.
[22:21] Today is the first day.
[22:22] This journey is on our next deal.
[22:25] Can we discuss a moment that will require all the utilities to be placed on the ground?
[22:32] I think that's the reason why we had to keep out in power in the room when we had that discussion because they had the major supply or oil power.
[22:41] I worked really hard to try and get us a meeting with Rocky Mountain Power.
[22:45] I mean, really, really hard. I twisted arms. I did everything I could.
[22:48] And the answer that came down from the talk was, we will not talk to me with confer with
[23:01] counsel with any other way you could possibly constern conversation with us on what we
[23:08] do.
[23:09] Absolutely not, and they said, we will follow your rules, whatever you want.
[23:21] That's the lower, that's the lower.
[23:23] Well, general consensus, how do you think user best judgment?
[23:27] I think you've gotten some counsel from some here.
[23:30] I think there's some concern by two.
[23:33] I am actually comfortable with what you're doing,
[23:35] because he's on his property.
[23:38] His property he is underground.
[23:41] But to be honest, how do you make the diagram for Rocky Mountain
[23:45] that shows exactly where and then yeah if we could get like a Google shot with it and show
[23:51] where the poles would be like it one line diagram that shows actually from my phone so I'll see
[23:57] if he's got it. I think if we did that and I'm with Jean I would be I would be okay if we went forward
[24:08] along this one same thing with Jean if we go back into the ordinance and even if we even if we just
[24:16] take out the word development and it just says all utilities will be on your
[24:22] ground period end of story. That's that solves our quandary on that. We hope that
[24:28] I'm a gender-defined smoke.
[24:32] No, that'll have to be a public hearing also because it's
[24:37] not going down here. But I think it's something that we need to do so. Let me just
[24:48] disability, but if you're doing a development, I know from this personal fact, if you do
[24:54] a development in a progressive city today, if you have overhead lines that are currently
[25:02] there in order to get approval for a subcudism, you have to take them down and bury them if
[25:06] they're even there like that.
[25:08] And that's in cities, for sure.
[25:10] So that's just there.
[25:19] Okay. That's for another day now. My question is, we have two things that we did not quite get to on the matrix.
[25:27] Do you want to just quickly finish that? So do you have something to take home?
[25:32] I mean, let's start with the idea that was going to be like this.
[25:35] Yes, Jim has let's spend a few more minutes on education cluster.
[25:43] Different scope, but we're not being enough to learn a clear value between institutional
[25:48] types.
[25:49] So we have education training, training, educational or charter school.
[25:54] They are different, but what do you think about the use of education?
[25:59] It's not that
[26:06] all you are doing or not, do you want to make better completely different,
[26:11] particularly, is that really different?
[26:17] Let me just quickly read this on a charter school defined by Cross Reference to 53G Utah State
[26:24] Code.
[26:25] No explicit zone classification was stated in the original amount of ordinance that would be with
[26:30] our own stuff.
[26:31] Classification inferred from the compatible treatment of community-building public or private and churches or places of worship committed in R1
[26:40] R2, B, C, and PF.
[26:43] Conditional in A zone recommend county turning confirmed before adoption, including whether charter schools should be treated identical.
[26:52] The public schools under any existing county policy not captured in this ordinance.
[26:57] So that's what it's recommended to us.
[26:59] So public school, what we don't have, we wouldn't have one of those in the county.
[27:09] In our matrix now that's permitted, there's public schools.
[27:14] In any zone?
[27:16] Anything but industrial?
[27:21] Yeah, I mean on all of them, you know, I think we need to be a little longer.
[27:27] All that public is this education or training services.
[27:31] That could have a charter school, it could have a training vocation, somebody could set up a school and think well-being or whatever.
[27:41] Yeah, I think so.
[27:42] Well, as a princess, you don't really want to do residence for the time, right?
[27:47] Yeah, the same thing with the charter school.
[27:50] I'm not sure that you put that in an R-A1.
[27:56] I mean, I wouldn't.
[27:58] I would say not allowed in an RA1, but a charter school could be conditional use in RA2.
[28:07] In the RA2, just remember, with a charter school, you have lots and lots of traffic.
[28:12] Yeah, you've got a lot of kids coming and going.
[28:15] So even at that, you've got a lot of size.
[28:19] You know, when you're going to have a lot of traffic.
[28:24] I mean, I think very least they have to be able to be under conditional use.
[28:32] So I went low, I think, do you know the law in the R.A.1?
[28:37] R.A.2 conditional.
[28:38] Uh-huh.
[28:39] The rest are okay.
[28:40] The rest are okay.
[28:41] What about a trade or vocational?
[28:44] Just in business commercial?
[28:46] I would think so.
[28:48] I would say maybe conditional use of an axonal law.
[28:51] So I'll give you an example.
[28:53] How about what's the way to name it?
[28:54] Going into gestures that are going into Dinesden's that's got the well-in-shop there. Yeah
[29:03] Some small cards came down to do some work there and you want to come in and get a permit for that would we allow it in agriculture?
[29:12] Yeah, I think I think we do. I think all three of those should be allowed in agriculture. I think they should have a
[29:25] That's a good one, it's a school, it doesn't say like an apprenticeship, it's a physical building
[29:33] school I would think.
[29:35] It's like vocational, it's like construction, schooling, different trade type stuff.
[29:42] I think that that's actually a good place to put it is in an ax on the Neymar space, you've
[29:48] that noise and dust and all those kind of things.
[29:50] So if you're going to play it somewhere,
[29:52] it's probably a better place to actually put these
[29:54] like, I think so.
[29:56] So you are all piece of agriculture, all of them.
[30:00] That's what I think.
[30:04] Okay, so I have educational training services, P&R,
[30:08] or culture, C&R1, C&R2, P&P, and public facilities, P&M, that's just commercial.
[30:16] Oh, I heard that. So you can repeat them again, and this is training and vocational.
[30:19] First one, educational training. P&M, okay. C&R1, C&R2, P&M, this is commercial, P&P, and public facilities.
[30:29] I wish it could be an industrial tool, just for the future, if we had that on the standard,
[30:36] it sounds exactly so.
[30:38] Okay.
[30:39] And then let's go to trade and local.
[30:40] Okay, sure.
[30:41] PNP and Ag, nothing in I1, nothing in I2P and business commercial, C and industrial P and public facilities.
[30:50] What was it in BC?
[30:51] C, permitted. C on the desk. No, it was permitted in B.C. C, conditional and industrial.
[31:01] I think we put permitted in industrial also on that. And then P, actually, like we got
[31:07] it. Okay. And then let's do the last one just so we don't have to make a mistake.
[31:11] Okay. C in nothing on C only to P and business commercial and P in public.
[31:21] And did we not have a P and we had a culture for charter school?
[31:27] Was conditional for that?
[31:29] Conditional for that.
[31:30] Conditional for that?
[31:30] And then did we want to do conditional on the R.A.?
[31:35] Not anymore, I think.
[31:37] No, I said no.
[31:38] R.A. is a conditional.
[31:41] Conditional there.
[31:42] That is his commercial P.
[31:43] Conditional on R2.
[31:44] That's what I've got.
[31:45] Okay.
[31:46] P and not P and B.C.
[31:48] And P and P.F.
[31:55] And this is an easier. The definition was public facilities on. It's listed as a land use, not as a designation, not a land use, so we've
[32:11] got in here.
[32:15] Okay.
[32:16] Okay.
[32:20] Okay.
[32:21] So, what about that?
[32:23] Okay, so do you have any questions?
[32:25] Bring this again to our next work menu.
[32:28] And we have our owner and in there,
[32:30] Heidi and Heather, that is again the matrix.
[32:33] I'll review on the 12.
[32:37] Right, 12.
[32:40] And any others that you want us to go into on the inferred,
[32:44] maybe all of you read the document,
[32:46] or go through the document for additional inferred
[32:49] about the critical ones.
[32:50] and we'll see how we feel about those.
[32:53] So I'm going to go through that and compare with my notes here because I have a whole bunch
[32:57] of them.
[33:00] I was thinking of one document just, there was so many of them but I'll go through it with
[33:06] this, I'll go through it on that page and make notes and we'll talk about that next
[33:12] page.
[33:13] Okay.
[33:13] We'll still do matrix.
[33:17] And I think a lot of the noise, and I would also, when before you bring it to our meeting and maybe later to that one, it's a bit of a turning.
[33:29] Yeah, because that's one of the biggest questions that I think we're going to have is that if we're just want to make sure that however we've got to put together, we just want to make sure it's...
[33:39] It's right in the news that she's comfortable with the language.
[33:43] The reference to what that problem, I mean, can you just be clear again quickly about what we're coming to the next meeting with?
[33:54] We're going to do the matrix.
[33:56] Yes.
[33:56] So we're going to see Gene how, what we said today, your AI, and it treats it.
[34:02] Yeah, okay, and then there is the other sheet that there's one thing, there's seven of these plus in third.
[34:09] You know, they covered 20 of them that he pulled out is critical.
[34:13] So you're going to go back through and look at the rest of the inferred ones and compare it to talk about those.
[34:20] We're also going to go up as a solo.
[34:22] You're going to confirm what's if you've looked at some that we can find in one of them.
[34:25] Yeah, if any of us would confirm if we were to do that.
[34:28] before we get to do this over or so.
[34:30] We're going to solve it.
[34:32] So, we don't have an hour and a half.
[34:36] You can look at it,
[34:38] and maybe if you read it and have major comments about it.
[34:44] So I can put it on the agenda.
[34:46] The other one.
[34:47] The other one.
[34:47] The other one.
[34:47] The other one.
[34:48] The other one.
[34:49] The other one.
[34:50] The other one.
[34:51] It's amazing to get something to get us through.
[34:53] Well, that's fine.
[34:55] One thing, so we can show proof that we are working on the solar.
[34:59] Can we put it where we will hand in the definition
[35:02] and the matrix of the solar in a Mexican?
[35:06] That way, no one could come back and say,
[35:10] no, you just put them on a turn, you haven't been working on it.
[35:12] If we have a lot part of it, we could at least have a discussion
[35:16] on that part.
[35:16] We've added to our matrix.
[35:18] Yes, that's part of the problem.
[35:20] it's not in the matrix. So, also, you said that we're going to go, we're going to take all of these,
[35:27] and we're going to go alphabetical now instead of this. So, if that's what you all want,
[35:34] I personally think the idea is way better. It's just so much easier to find alphabetical so you're not
[35:41] confused about uses. Would you mind re-alphabetizing and then we can just send this out and I can print it
[35:49] I'm going to call my girlfriend and then do that, do that, do that, do that, or that is.
[35:53] Uh-huh.
[35:54] It'd be hard for me to hear it to you, as you really say.
[35:57] Let's see, look.
[35:58] Well, would you please say, let me put these items
[36:01] and alphabetize it.
[36:03] We'll say, that's a great idea.
[36:06] Tell me how to ask.
[36:07] Exactly.
[36:09] So it feels endless.
[36:11] Because I'm not probably a reader of any way,
[36:13] but one of the things that I loved about the other document
[36:16] that you had on there,
[36:18] It was this document here, they are all alphabetical orders, so it made it so much easier
[36:25] to go through.
[36:26] The fiber I was looking for, and so what I did is all these changes of the 20 some odd
[36:33] that we did tonight, then I'll get this out, and I hope that it will say confirmed on the
[36:40] ones we've done compared to the other, and that's the theory, and if it does, then we'll
[36:47] One other question I wanted to put out to you, too, is on the solar energy facilities
[36:54] ordinance, it is a draft.
[36:56] So all of you is not for public use or comment that will come with public hearing.
[37:03] So please don't set a copy out or somebody else for it.
[37:07] It's for our use only at this point it is in draft form.
[37:12] Okay.
[37:14] Are we having a work meeting before our regular meeting on the board?
[37:17] That's going to be standard.
[37:19] We have so much to get through.
[37:22] I think that's just going to be standard practice.
[37:24] Plus it helps.
[37:25] Heather, I open it.
[37:28] Yeah.
[37:28] So you didn't bring the dose?
[37:29] I should.
[37:29] Are we going to be doing any other work meetings?
[37:32] Well, I have to see.
[37:34] I'm concerned about the overtime for Heidi and the overtime for Heather.
[37:38] That's concerned from that office.
[37:40] So, I think it's just now that standard practice.
[37:45] I'm going to have to pay you double.
[37:46] I want to pay you double.
[37:47] There's a lot of money to give you.
[37:49] How much money do you have?
[37:50] I have a promotion to return.
[37:53] I'll make the motion to return.
[37:55] Okay, jean makes the motion.
[37:57] I'll pay you double.
[37:58] I'll pay you double.
[37:59] Bye.