1 00:00:03,470 --> 00:00:09,790 Okay, we'll call the meeting in the water. Good morning. Good afternoon. Roll call, please. 2 00:00:11,390 --> 00:00:17,330 Director Shua, here. Director Keegan. Here. Director Creman. 3 00:00:18,090 --> 00:00:25,670 Here. Director Lizaid. Here. Director Santos. Director Varella. Here. 4 00:00:26,050 --> 00:00:29,430 Chair, Mr. Mara. All right. We have all members present. Great. 5 00:00:30,750 --> 00:00:34,150 Thank you, Madam Clerk, we'll move right along to the Pleasure of Allegiance, Director of 6 00:00:34,150 --> 00:00:35,470 Aurella, would you please lead us? 7 00:00:36,790 --> 00:00:38,110 Be an honor, thank you, sir. 8 00:00:39,650 --> 00:00:47,090 I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic, of 9 00:00:47,090 --> 00:00:52,910 which is standing one nation under guard of the guard, the indivisible, visible, with liberty 10 00:00:52,910 --> 00:00:54,470 and justice for us. 11 00:00:58,470 --> 00:01:07,810 Thank you, Director Verella. We'll move right along to time open for public comment on any item that's not on the agenda today. 12 00:01:08,190 --> 00:01:13,970 So now's the time that the public is welcome to address us on any issue that is not on our agenda today. 13 00:01:14,650 --> 00:01:17,410 Do we have any any requests? 14 00:01:17,790 --> 00:01:23,110 Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have one member of the public who has raised his hand, Roland L. 15 00:01:24,450 --> 00:01:25,870 Roland L. Good afternoon. 16 00:01:29,380 --> 00:01:33,280 Good afternoon Mr. Chair, I'm both members. 17 00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:36,100 How much time do I have here is the two-three minutes? 18 00:01:36,500 --> 00:01:37,440 Three minutes, there we go. 19 00:01:37,640 --> 00:01:38,640 Three minutes for several minutes. 20 00:01:39,420 --> 00:01:44,900 So, what I'd like to do is to follow up on the comments I made yesterday at Council. 21 00:01:45,500 --> 00:01:45,740 Is that? 22 00:01:46,500 --> 00:01:48,900 I don't know how long you people have been here, 23 00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:52,240 but I've been through this before with what's going on in the weekend. 24 00:01:52,420 --> 00:01:54,680 It's been back in 1986, okay? 25 00:01:54,680 --> 00:02:01,460 It took the, you drain the dam, you took it down, and then we have the tree, you're drought. 26 00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:08,360 Rationing was just up to the brutal, our rape went through the roof. 27 00:02:09,640 --> 00:02:11,860 The water company said, you went bankrupt. 28 00:02:12,740 --> 00:02:15,200 The two marinas, I don't know whether it came back. 29 00:02:15,340 --> 00:02:17,840 The two marinas also went bankrupt. 30 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:27,180 And you know, I remember seeing the, you know, the justice of the doctor lying on the side of the late, you know, 25 years ago. 31 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:33,940 But the reason I'm addressing you is, why are you doing what you are doing? 32 00:02:34,980 --> 00:02:43,100 I've been for the last five years, I've been up multiple community meetings, I've been contacting your staff and telling you there's a solution out there. 33 00:02:43,100 --> 00:02:46,460 There's an Italian company called Trevi. 34 00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:51,720 The website is drv.spa.com. 35 00:02:52,420 --> 00:02:54,120 We'll do this for business. 36 00:02:55,140 --> 00:02:59,100 There is the material dam in Iraq. 37 00:03:00,100 --> 00:03:04,480 They are fixing, you know, trailers, who's leaking dams in China. 38 00:03:05,660 --> 00:03:06,680 They have the technology. 39 00:03:06,680 --> 00:03:14,480 right now, the fixing the Herbert Hoover jetty, I think, is in a Jacksonville. 40 00:03:14,940 --> 00:03:19,640 They can do this for a fraction of the cost of what you're proposing here. 41 00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:30,980 It'll be a permanent fix and we will get our reservoir back probably within 818 to maybe 24, 24, 24 months. 42 00:03:30,980 --> 00:03:37,460 So, my question to you is, if you don't know who these people are, go to the U.S. Army 43 00:03:37,460 --> 00:03:42,660 Corps of Engineers, whoever will this multiple contracts to these people, all over the world, 44 00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:50,460 and ask them if they think that it will be reasonable for you to reach out to these people 45 00:03:50,460 --> 00:04:00,960 and come up with a solution that gonna get us out of this mess we are in right now at the 46 00:04:00,960 --> 00:04:04,280 Thank you. Thank you, sir. 47 00:04:09,150 --> 00:04:12,030 I have Mr. Chair. I have no other hands raised at this time. 48 00:04:12,690 --> 00:04:14,850 Okay. All right. Then we'll go to our agenda. 49 00:04:16,310 --> 00:04:20,310 I'd like staff to ask the Army Corps. I know they're involved in the project. 50 00:04:20,530 --> 00:04:22,490 They should be told us about this. 51 00:04:23,550 --> 00:04:27,850 To make an inquiry regarding Mr. Roland's suggestion. 52 00:04:28,750 --> 00:04:30,590 So we'll move right along to 2.1, 53 00:04:30,590 --> 00:04:34,090 for Technical Reservoir's Banschen Project, workshop topics. 54 00:04:35,450 --> 00:04:37,810 It's an informational item, we start with Chris. 55 00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:40,920 Thank you very much, madam. 56 00:04:41,140 --> 00:04:41,540 Good afternoon. 57 00:04:42,780 --> 00:04:45,940 I am here to present some information on the 58 00:04:45,940 --> 00:04:48,500 Technical Reservoir Extension Project that will hopefully 59 00:04:48,500 --> 00:04:51,380 help to board in its discussions upcoming 60 00:04:51,380 --> 00:04:52,840 for the wide range of processes, 61 00:04:53,100 --> 00:04:54,800 as well as the budgetary process of reporting. 62 00:04:55,440 --> 00:04:57,300 I will share my screen to get the presentation. 63 00:04:58,180 --> 00:04:59,980 And then although I will be giving the presentation, 64 00:05:03,540 --> 00:05:04,100 So, 65 00:05:08,540 --> 00:05:29,720 we'll be talking about the Chamber of Res Morse branching project today. So, these are policy decisions that the board should need to make in the upcoming months regarding the Chamber of Res Morse branching project. Where does the particular project fit into our overall water supply and ask for plan? 66 00:05:29,980 --> 00:05:38,980 As we move forward, are there three different triggers that the Board would like to then have us bring the project back to you for an update on. 67 00:05:39,960 --> 00:05:41,180 We do have our CIT process. 68 00:05:41,980 --> 00:05:42,740 We do our following. 69 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:49,460 However, because this is a high profile project, there may be some additional points of discussion or, you know, 70 00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:51,880 basically as the project evolves a little bit more. 71 00:05:51,900 --> 00:05:56,600 You may want more frequent updates than our typically given the CIT process. 72 00:05:56,600 --> 00:06:03,340 So it was important to illuminate any of those and possibly set them up for the Y4 to 73 00:06:03,340 --> 00:06:08,000 S4 recording committee to review for actor football org and then what level of partnership 74 00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:11,800 participation should be assumed for the financial planning purposes? 75 00:06:12,180 --> 00:06:15,740 On my next slide I believe a couple of slides down the road will show if you want to write scenario 76 00:06:15,740 --> 00:06:21,320 that we currently have for the face case for FY22 which does have an assumption of 20% partnership. 77 00:06:21,320 --> 00:06:27,620 And that was said in FY 19, but of course, I'm going to work in liberating on the budget process this year. 78 00:06:27,980 --> 00:06:34,260 It's the board's purview at the policy level to decide what target we should have for partnering and moving forward. 79 00:06:35,900 --> 00:06:41,460 Just from a perspective, the large board's infrastructure program where we received our prop one grant. 80 00:06:42,120 --> 00:06:47,640 The benefits for the project that we very much wear up and then enhance the environmental habitat for strategies, 81 00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:53,560 in enhanced water supply, of course emergency water supply. In increasing the reliability of the 82 00:06:53,560 --> 00:06:57,620 Delta, resulting in the second dose of water supply issues of water quality, and then of course 83 00:06:57,620 --> 00:07:02,820 we do have a reduction of blood potential for downstream communities, disadvantaged communities, specifically. 84 00:07:04,840 --> 00:07:12,700 I believe the horn saw a boost, I believe it was January 12th, we kind of cost history estimate for 85 00:07:12,700 --> 00:07:15,700 cost as a history for the project where we started 2017. 86 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:20,340 I've got it to here in 2020, so I won't spend a lot of time on it, but just know that the 87 00:07:20,340 --> 00:07:26,160 2.5 billion dollar estimate that's currently projected is what we have in our C.I.P. 88 00:07:26,300 --> 00:07:27,640 and by just moving forward. 89 00:07:29,460 --> 00:07:33,020 And then the main discussion is to help talk about water rates. 90 00:07:33,400 --> 00:07:40,400 Right now, as I mentioned, the base case is at 9.6% for a zone that we need to and I, 91 00:07:40,400 --> 00:07:42,780 That's projecting for the next eight years. 92 00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:45,040 We've got 20% partnership participation. 93 00:07:45,840 --> 00:07:47,820 We are affecting on getting a wifio loan. 94 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:50,420 We have been invited, I believe, just yesterday, 95 00:07:51,700 --> 00:07:56,520 with the EGA release, the press release saying that we had officially been received an 96 00:07:56,520 --> 00:07:57,540 invitation to participate. 97 00:07:58,580 --> 00:08:02,680 And we were originally waitlisted, but now we have been officially invited to apply for wifio. 98 00:08:03,180 --> 00:08:04,300 So we are pursuing with it. 99 00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:09,400 As you can see, whether or not we received wifio does have a substantial impact on the 100 00:08:09,400 --> 00:08:15,960 to water rates associated with the project, we listed a vast kind of, you can see a 101 00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:20,040 curve of different partnership, participation levels and how they might impact the 102 00:08:20,040 --> 00:08:23,560 water rates. The two and a half percent is kind of the minimal participation 103 00:08:23,560 --> 00:08:26,840 from San Bernardo County. They are actually able to increase their participation 104 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:32,340 up to 10 percent, but the two and a half percent you can see that if we were not able 105 00:08:32,340 --> 00:08:37,000 to get any other partnerships, we would be at about 10.2 percent as opposed to the 9.6 106 00:08:37,000 --> 00:08:40,780 percent this year. Or if with you didn't come through, we'd be able to let them percent. 107 00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:45,680 That's kind of the worst-case scenario range. Best-case scenario in terms of partnership 108 00:08:45,680 --> 00:08:51,640 participation, we've model 30 and a half percent. That's one scenario. We would facilitate 109 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:57,580 transfers through the San Luis Reservoir. We believe that in a dry year, we could reliably 110 00:08:57,580 --> 00:09:01,800 transfer about 50,000 acre feet, which is where that number comes from, and we'll share a little bit 111 00:09:01,800 --> 00:09:06,500 more in the upcoming slides. But, you know, theoretically, you can increase that partnership level 112 00:09:06,500 --> 00:09:09,860 even more, but it would potentially reduce value 113 00:09:09,860 --> 00:09:11,160 water share of that water. 114 00:09:11,920 --> 00:09:13,800 And then, of course, there is the base case scenario, 115 00:09:14,040 --> 00:09:16,620 which they aren't covered yesterday for rate setting 116 00:09:16,620 --> 00:09:18,640 or where there is, or if you can not base case, 117 00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:23,660 but non-protaco case for the rate of the state 1,5%. 118 00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:28,580 In terms of funding, heavily, the board is also familiar. 119 00:09:28,820 --> 00:09:30,580 And you are looking for a way to be alone 120 00:09:30,580 --> 00:09:33,500 in about 45%, 49% of the product, which is the maximum. 121 00:09:34,060 --> 00:09:36,680 We'll be doing long-term bonds for not 30% roughly. 122 00:09:36,680 --> 00:09:38,520 and then we do have all this of the grant. 123 00:09:39,380 --> 00:09:43,540 In the partnership scenario that will be outlined in today's 50,000 acre feet, 124 00:09:43,860 --> 00:09:48,720 that would equate to about $900,000 and $10,000,000, which is about 36 percent 125 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:50,240 of the overall project cost. 126 00:09:53,340 --> 00:09:55,580 In terms of different partnership structures and options, 127 00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:57,780 we've got four that we've identified. 128 00:09:58,620 --> 00:09:59,860 There is the option where we basically... 129 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:11,840 I think that's a simple ownership of the facility, and then we form a purpose to actually sell the water to the correctal rights. There is a JPA structure, which I can believe the board's money with from the law's precarious sites, et cetera. 130 00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:27,800 Partnerships with private entities, those key pretty tight, and you have been looking into potential key three scenarios, although it looks as though the greatest potential for a key three will be through finance and record, we are looking for other entities to possibly partner and move forward. 131 00:10:27,800 --> 00:10:30,140 as well as partnerships with federal or state agencies. 132 00:10:30,980 --> 00:10:33,680 DWR is actually currently a partner in the project 133 00:10:33,680 --> 00:10:37,600 through the WISP grant, but there is also the USB organization. 134 00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:39,740 We have had discussions with them. 135 00:10:39,940 --> 00:10:43,900 In a similar scenario that we looked at our JPEO company plan, 136 00:10:44,140 --> 00:10:48,740 where they may actually own and instruct the portion of the project, 137 00:10:48,760 --> 00:10:50,860 and then at least that back to us over time, 138 00:10:50,860 --> 00:10:53,300 kind of in a rent to own scenario. 139 00:10:55,750 --> 00:11:02,330 So, the example we're talking about is 50,000 acre feet, basically, as you look at the difference, 140 00:11:03,090 --> 00:11:08,050 in stradation of this reservoir picture, the 35,000 acre feet is dedicated storage for our 141 00:11:08,050 --> 00:11:09,110 list of benefits. 142 00:11:09,710 --> 00:11:12,990 That's the number that we've been negotiating back and forth with fish and wildlife, 143 00:11:12,990 --> 00:11:16,190 California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Department of Water Resources, 144 00:11:16,910 --> 00:11:19,110 for the better part of the, probably a year now. 145 00:11:19,390 --> 00:11:24,210 We found a got to a number that we could talk with was originally set at 55,000 acre feet 146 00:11:24,210 --> 00:11:28,910 But we were able to, through our negotiation, get a down to about 35,000 acre fee. 147 00:11:29,310 --> 00:11:33,530 That is why we do feel comfortable now that we would have about 50,000 acre fee available. 148 00:11:33,890 --> 00:11:39,390 Our partnership is one of the scenario, including 55,000 acre fee for San Bernardo and San Bernardo, 149 00:11:39,510 --> 00:11:41,410 to use basically for our benefit. 150 00:11:44,540 --> 00:11:48,280 In this scenario, when we're talking about transfers through the San Luis Resport, 151 00:11:48,900 --> 00:11:54,280 we have about 50,000 acre fee that we could see right for the transfer, even in dry years, 152 00:11:54,280 --> 00:11:58,960 are out of station through the S, state water project, or the Central Valley project, 153 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:03,600 though obviously those descendants were as well. In wet years, we would take water out of San 154 00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:07,280 Lois, put it into take a reservoir, and then in dry years, it would be a virtual 155 00:12:07,280 --> 00:12:11,340 transfer so that's when we send the cash line back to San Lois. We wouldn't actually send water 156 00:12:11,340 --> 00:12:15,700 back to San Lois, but we would be able to facilitate transfers through San Lois to other 157 00:12:15,700 --> 00:12:20,940 partners. This is just one scenario, depending on the partner that we're engaged with, 158 00:12:20,940 --> 00:12:24,340 There are other transverse scenarios or other ways to obtain water that would have been 159 00:12:24,340 --> 00:12:30,280 looked at deliveries to common customers, possibly sending water down the south, you know, 160 00:12:30,320 --> 00:12:32,500 to pass the current through semi-traffic. 161 00:12:32,640 --> 00:12:37,720 A lot of different scenarios, but this one is easily as digestible you can see, it's a pretty 162 00:12:37,720 --> 00:12:39,560 big chunk of water at 50,000 acre feet. 163 00:12:39,820 --> 00:12:42,740 So this is just one of the things that we've been kind of looking at. 164 00:12:43,240 --> 00:12:46,360 Some of the feedback that we've gotten when we presented the water storage, it's a laboratory 165 00:12:46,360 --> 00:12:50,640 committee, but even though this was one scenario, we did want to do any of the 166 00:12:50,640 --> 00:12:53,160 specialized partner pitches, which we are doing. 167 00:12:53,500 --> 00:12:58,200 We're currently actually looking into getting a sales and marketing firm on board that 168 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:02,940 would specialize in this type of pitch, so as we go out to potential partners, we want to 169 00:13:02,940 --> 00:13:08,000 customize our pitch to each of the individual organizations and FTEs to make sure they're 170 00:13:08,000 --> 00:13:11,940 getting the maximum benefit from project and they see the benefit in it for them. 171 00:13:13,960 --> 00:13:20,840 Based on this scenario, you're looking at costs. These are unadvertised, capital, construction costs. 172 00:13:20,840 --> 00:13:24,420 This is not necessarily an investment, but it's an operation fast as well. 173 00:13:24,700 --> 00:13:28,400 This is just once an area, as we said, if you look at what it's in it for the partners, 174 00:13:28,640 --> 00:13:35,040 the cost rate, or put at 50,000 acre feet, is about 18,800 per acre foot. 175 00:13:35,060 --> 00:13:39,820 We'll compare that in a future slide, some of the other projects out there, of course, the 176 00:13:39,820 --> 00:13:40,840 advertised cost. 177 00:13:40,960 --> 00:13:45,340 I believe that as we get out, of course, 233 with the debt service as well as we don't 178 00:13:45,340 --> 00:13:45,780 have. 179 00:13:45,900 --> 00:13:49,480 I think for about 10% share of quates to about $13 million. 180 00:13:49,480 --> 00:13:53,680 I think you have Darren on the line to help explain those numbers a little bit more 181 00:13:53,680 --> 00:13:55,080 depending on what must be going back. 182 00:13:55,360 --> 00:13:57,980 That's just kind of, like I said, one scenario brought over to you. 183 00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:03,780 So we have looked at other different types of projects. 184 00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:10,120 What we have here is just the cost for either feet of a non-advertised capital cost. 185 00:14:10,460 --> 00:14:13,620 You can see that the tickle reservoir expansion is the highest. 186 00:14:14,220 --> 00:14:19,060 However, that is because each of the different projects has their own pros and cons. 187 00:14:19,060 --> 00:14:22,740 For groundwater banking, for example, I believe the board is familiar with our scientific 188 00:14:22,740 --> 00:14:23,540 public bank. 189 00:14:23,880 --> 00:14:26,220 There are certain take limitations. 190 00:14:27,060 --> 00:14:33,640 We do in critical dry years have some, how shall we say, difficult at times, getting 191 00:14:33,640 --> 00:14:34,580 our water back. 192 00:14:35,160 --> 00:14:39,520 So from that water, one of you, obviously, particularly in county, is about fake benefits 193 00:14:39,520 --> 00:14:40,460 to us. 194 00:14:41,020 --> 00:14:44,200 So that increase cost may be worth it. 195 00:14:44,260 --> 00:14:48,220 For some of our other partners, we're going to look at what makes sense for them. 196 00:14:48,220 --> 00:14:52,620 How can the flexibility of our water system benefit them as well? 197 00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:58,380 And so these costs are just, you know, kind of so that you can judge as we look at our overall water supply portfolio. 198 00:14:59,180 --> 00:14:59,880 How do you like it? 199 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:02,880 We look together our supply of moving forward. 200 00:15:06,020 --> 00:15:32,300 Prior to schedule, this is the schedule we're currently on, release of our environmental documentation draft this year, finalized about 2023 so that we can get our permits throughout 2024 and go to construction in 2025. This is a very aggressive schedule, permitting is always the lot of hard these days. I think everyone is familiar with the permitting process to Anderson is undergoing. So, you know, the time to actually get out to construction could slip a little bit. 201 00:15:32,460 --> 00:15:34,300 And it does not jeopardize our whistle funding. 202 00:15:34,960 --> 00:15:38,300 And in terms of increase in cost due to construction delay, 203 00:15:38,640 --> 00:15:41,800 we believe that our number of $2.5 billion, currently 204 00:15:41,800 --> 00:15:43,520 had enough contingency presence, 205 00:15:45,320 --> 00:15:47,560 that even the significant delay to the start of construction, 206 00:15:48,100 --> 00:15:50,720 wouldn't necessarily increase the overall project cost. 207 00:15:53,100 --> 00:15:54,540 Just to show you this slide again after, 208 00:15:55,120 --> 00:15:57,500 you've had a chance to look at some of the partnerships scenarios. 209 00:15:59,200 --> 00:16:01,960 We can come back to this as we have our discussions, 210 00:16:01,960 --> 00:16:04,320 But this is just once again the race. 211 00:16:07,880 --> 00:16:11,080 In terms of what can the Chaco do or what could the Chaco do? 212 00:16:11,420 --> 00:16:14,080 It definitely increases our operational flexibility. 213 00:16:14,620 --> 00:16:16,840 It's local in storage capacity. 214 00:16:17,580 --> 00:16:21,000 It would be by far the largest reservoir that the value water has. 215 00:16:21,340 --> 00:16:25,060 All 10 of our existing reservoirs to fit within the footprint of the Chaco. 216 00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:31,280 It would give us a place to put important water contract supplies when we have extra supply. 217 00:16:31,280 --> 00:16:38,660 We won't lose that water, we won't need to sell it on the spot market when the market is advantageous to do so. 218 00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:41,060 And then we can use it during a drought now. 219 00:16:41,500 --> 00:16:47,920 Of course, the reservoir is a renewable source of water, but it doesn't need to have water to actually put in it. 220 00:16:48,180 --> 00:16:57,840 So if we were drawing upon it for a straight 1-2 drying years, there probably wouldn't be a lot of water left for a third or fourth year depending on how long the drought is. 221 00:16:57,840 --> 00:17:01,600 It also, of course, provides you around flow to the free downstream of the reservoir. 222 00:17:01,820 --> 00:17:05,840 It's about the blood production that's been talked about, you know, environmentally speaking, 223 00:17:06,260 --> 00:17:10,800 that is actually the biggest benefit that was awarded through the whistle portion of the grant. 224 00:17:11,260 --> 00:17:12,740 So it's a big loss. 225 00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:17,220 What doesn't the chamber do, or what won't it do if it is implemented? 226 00:17:18,080 --> 00:17:22,660 We're not going to have a significant reduction in water shortage severity during prolonged drought. 227 00:17:22,760 --> 00:17:26,960 So as I said, on the coronavirus drought, it'll definitely be there for us to draw from, 228 00:17:26,960 --> 00:17:33,960 But as you get into the out years if the droughts are extended in duration of take will obviously be dry at that point 229 00:17:33,960 --> 00:17:39,560 So there is no long term drought supply and then there's not really any new water supply 230 00:17:39,560 --> 00:17:42,980 We're going to take the RCP or C.R. Project 231 00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:46,740 Allocations when we have additional allocations and putting it into 232 00:17:47,640 --> 00:17:52,460 The decor is more so it's already our water so we're at that's a place that we can park it and not lose it 233 00:17:52,460 --> 00:17:55,300 And we will have some water from the local watershed 234 00:17:55,300 --> 00:17:59,920 But it's kind of a low yield watershed, so we're only looking, and we're still fine 235 00:17:59,920 --> 00:18:03,700 between the modeling, but the yield and the watershed is not very much probably six to 236 00:18:03,700 --> 00:18:06,640 nine thousand acre feet maximum, and that's in the left here. 237 00:18:07,060 --> 00:18:10,140 Paul, Paul, may I, through the chair, may I ask you a question about that? 238 00:18:10,900 --> 00:18:18,060 But as of what, for the recycling plant, isn't that just 5,000 itself, the graffiti here? 239 00:18:23,940 --> 00:18:29,300 The expert at a pure fine project is in the neighborhood of 10,000 a 240 00:18:29,300 --> 00:18:33,360 computer year for the whole project or just tell about so. 241 00:18:33,540 --> 00:18:37,220 Just tell about so I think I'll end up being 9,000 by the time it's all 242 00:18:37,220 --> 00:18:37,920 said and done. 243 00:18:38,080 --> 00:18:38,360 A perfectly. 244 00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:39,580 Yeah. 245 00:18:39,580 --> 00:18:40,020 Okay. 246 00:18:40,180 --> 00:18:40,760 Thank you. 247 00:18:44,710 --> 00:18:47,490 And so just some of the things with making cool into the 248 00:18:47,930 --> 00:18:52,850 Obviously, you can take what is one of several water storage infrastructure projects or moving forward. 249 00:18:53,370 --> 00:18:56,710 The board is aware of LVP insights and has participation goals there. 250 00:18:57,190 --> 00:18:59,670 So there are a lot of projects out there on the panel. 251 00:18:59,790 --> 00:19:03,230 We do a lot of technical partners to kind of look at all of the different options. 252 00:19:03,290 --> 00:19:04,950 You know, kind of turning over all the different rocks. 253 00:19:05,130 --> 00:19:08,850 So we are one of several, you know, relatively kind of marketplace at this point. 254 00:19:09,130 --> 00:19:16,970 And I mentioned to you, I have a nice capital risk cost of restboard storage is about ATA for our partners in the scenario that we look at. 255 00:19:16,970 --> 00:19:44,720 But generally speaking, some of them will be 80,000 in $20,000 in April, but and then of course the end all increase in the North County W2 and the high groundwater charge ranges 8.5 is actually without the Jacob, I'll be right along with 11% if we had minimal partnership participation did not proceed with the other plan, not believe we're going to end with a refresher on some of the board policy discussions that we want to have. 256 00:19:45,040 --> 00:19:48,280 You know, it doesn't make sense to continue doing food, take a rest of our expansion project, 257 00:19:48,440 --> 00:19:49,960 you know, the water supply must be passed, and that's the plan. 258 00:19:50,820 --> 00:19:55,740 One of the three tools and triggers is we would like us to come back and then what level of partnership 259 00:19:56,500 --> 00:19:58,980 participation should we use from a financial planning perspective. 260 00:19:59,740 --> 00:19:59,980 And that's all. 261 00:20:08,900 --> 00:20:14,140 Thank you, Chris. 262 00:20:25,770 --> 00:20:30,670 We done with, with, with, with, with, staff presentation. 263 00:20:31,810 --> 00:20:37,990 Correct. And all the questions. Okay, all right. We can let roll in and take this question, and then, 264 00:20:37,990 --> 00:20:41,190 will get with the board. Roll it. 265 00:20:44,490 --> 00:20:47,970 Thank you Mr. Trey and this is not a question, this is a comment. 266 00:20:49,850 --> 00:20:55,110 Okay. I mean, you see, oh, you got 30 quotes, I guess. Okay. 267 00:20:56,010 --> 00:21:02,670 Yes, thank you. So you have to be reasonable here. You can't just come up with this thing up to $200 268 00:21:02,670 --> 00:21:10,770 billion dollars. And you know, and you look at the 20k to take a full of storage. I mean, 269 00:21:10,770 --> 00:21:18,050 the numbers just don't matter if it doesn't pass out. It's a wrong project. So my recommendation 270 00:21:18,050 --> 00:21:23,630 to you, if you want to go to the private sector, don't go wrong telling them, oh yeah, you know, 271 00:21:23,770 --> 00:21:30,750 yeah, they are the iron, you got this exact billions of dollars. Have them look. This is what we want to 272 00:21:31,410 --> 00:21:37,670 what is your best idea? You basically give them a car to blast. And the best arrangement 273 00:21:37,670 --> 00:21:43,610 that you can possibly have, both from your point of view, and our point of view, which is the 274 00:21:43,610 --> 00:21:49,610 people who paying for all that at the end of the day, is you basically give them a confession. 275 00:21:50,010 --> 00:21:57,930 It's either 30, 50, or 99 years or whatever. And basically, here is the land, and you go around 276 00:21:57,930 --> 00:22:06,090 willing whatever it is that you want to do, to build it, you pay for it, and you maintain 277 00:22:06,090 --> 00:22:12,130 it, and we will pay you back for whatever service it is that you provide and do it. 278 00:22:12,130 --> 00:22:15,030 That's the best arrangement you can for today go for. 279 00:22:15,190 --> 00:22:19,930 God go to these people with whatever project it is that you're confident to come up with. 280 00:22:20,230 --> 00:22:23,490 That's my two sets. Thank you. Thank you, Roland. I just 281 00:22:23,490 --> 00:22:25,610 Roland's talking about a P3. 282 00:22:27,750 --> 00:22:29,670 Okay, questions then. 283 00:22:33,340 --> 00:22:33,800 Start. 284 00:22:34,940 --> 00:22:36,260 Start to show it. 285 00:22:36,260 --> 00:22:37,240 Thank you chair. 286 00:22:38,400 --> 00:22:45,900 I like us to have to explain this partnership options a little bit more. 287 00:22:46,980 --> 00:22:50,900 I've particularly the ones with partnership with private entities. 288 00:22:50,980 --> 00:22:52,660 I think that's what our. 289 00:22:58,320 --> 00:23:06,180 So, in the, on the slide, says form partnership with private entities to invest in capacity and sell their benefits to others. 290 00:23:06,680 --> 00:23:10,220 So I'm not sure how does this work like to understand it better. 291 00:23:10,660 --> 00:23:14,680 And also that partnership with federal or state agencies. 292 00:23:14,680 --> 00:23:24,920 I assume this is not other water management agency, this is the federal government and 293 00:23:24,920 --> 00:23:30,860 stake of the government, so how does that work with the partnership that we're thinking about? 294 00:23:35,750 --> 00:23:36,870 Sorry, it's the long mute. 295 00:23:37,550 --> 00:23:41,030 So let me go to an easy one of the partnerships with federal or state agencies. 296 00:23:41,330 --> 00:23:46,570 As I mentioned, DWR through the state of California has contributed to the product already for 297 00:23:46,570 --> 00:23:52,390 emergency supply benefit. What we can go to you is a full benefit that's basically pre-payed 298 00:23:52,390 --> 00:23:59,430 for in the times of emergency to stay control on that resource. It can be deployed most likely 299 00:23:59,430 --> 00:24:03,250 within our own county because that's where it's the easiest to get. And as that benefit is 300 00:24:03,250 --> 00:24:09,170 drawn upon, eventually we'll run after it's basically pre-payed only for a certain amount. They can 301 00:24:09,170 --> 00:24:10,910 and then read out and pay for more. 302 00:24:11,370 --> 00:24:15,130 In theory, outside of the was a program, 303 00:24:15,450 --> 00:24:18,630 we could approach DWR about whether they'd like 304 00:24:18,630 --> 00:24:21,270 a larger share of that emergency supply benefit. 305 00:24:21,530 --> 00:24:24,090 I believe the governor is very keen on crafting 306 00:24:24,090 --> 00:24:27,350 an emergency supply net based on the results 307 00:24:27,350 --> 00:24:28,870 of the last draft moving forward. 308 00:24:29,150 --> 00:24:31,070 So they are looking for emergency water supply. 309 00:24:31,570 --> 00:24:35,050 The cash with that is if we are releasing portions 310 00:24:35,050 --> 00:24:38,490 or selling portions of our emergency supply 311 00:24:38,490 --> 00:24:45,330 to the state, it wouldn't be available for operation, however, if we're saying that we're gonna 312 00:24:45,330 --> 00:24:51,270 let you pre-pay for, let's say, 20,000 acre feet a year, that 20,000 acre feet is dedicated, 313 00:24:51,410 --> 00:24:55,630 it must be in the reservoir, it cannot be taken out, so we can't transfer water in and out. 314 00:24:56,410 --> 00:24:59,810 From the federal perspective, I think I briefly talked about, 315 00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:07,220 U.S. B.R. The fact that they do own our potato pumping fund right now, and we are actually paying for it over time. 316 00:25:07,560 --> 00:25:13,960 A similar scenario could be thought about where we would, as part of the project, be constructing a pump station and conduit. 317 00:25:14,560 --> 00:25:23,420 If we could make any agreement with the United States Bureau of Reformation, they could actually let that out for construction pay for it out front. 318 00:25:23,420 --> 00:25:27,280 and then through the normal mechanisms of repaint, and as we have, as we have with the 319 00:25:27,280 --> 00:25:31,640 shape of a public plan, we could theoretically then paint them back over time for that asset. 320 00:25:32,100 --> 00:25:36,320 That will be a portion of the projects, you know, equating to the cost of the consultation 321 00:25:36,320 --> 00:25:43,500 of the conduit. There is additional potential to actually sell them space in the reservoir or 322 00:25:43,500 --> 00:25:48,660 a dedicated portion of the reservoir. That does come with some challenges, there's some water rights, 323 00:25:48,660 --> 00:25:53,320 There is some obligation that currently doesn't exist for U.S. 324 00:25:53,340 --> 00:25:57,260 Bureau of the Federal Government in that area, but they may be wary to undertake. 325 00:25:57,980 --> 00:26:03,420 So the cleanest path for that kind of partnership at a federal level is through the consultation in conduit. 326 00:26:04,020 --> 00:26:11,240 In terms of partnerships with private entities, I think everyone is aware of what a P3 is at this point. 327 00:26:11,240 --> 00:26:18,120 We were approached initially, but I want to say, get eight to ten months ago about a financing 328 00:26:18,120 --> 00:26:23,820 P3 that had looked into the project and knew about the whistful order and how it was structured 329 00:26:23,820 --> 00:26:30,740 in some of the different restrictions that were in place in terms of private ownership, and they 330 00:26:30,740 --> 00:26:37,280 thought that really the best way to move forward is through a financing P3 portion, right? 331 00:26:37,280 --> 00:26:43,060 productivity finance. If we're getting with you, that doesn't really make sense for us, but we are 332 00:26:43,060 --> 00:26:48,560 talking to Joe Jacobson, who worked with us on our P3 for our Advanced Certification Center, 333 00:26:49,440 --> 00:26:56,100 initiative moved forward on what types of different P3s might be structured for, you know, 334 00:26:56,240 --> 00:27:04,080 design, operation maintenance, and of the actual press board movement forward. I believe we have not 335 00:27:04,080 --> 00:27:08,320 And then you saw a hitch right now, but there is at least one scenario where there is a Southern California 336 00:27:08,320 --> 00:27:15,420 Reservoir that was built by a private entity and is in their own partnership with a local public agency. 337 00:27:16,180 --> 00:27:23,800 Charlie may have additional information about that and she has talked to Jill and in terms of partnerships by a third party with the 338 00:27:23,800 --> 00:27:28,660 Cultural Rights, that is where we would basically, we would construct the Reservoir out front, 339 00:27:28,660 --> 00:27:40,640 Depending on when a partner wanted to come in and execute their agreement, they would be purchasing a certain amount of water for storage, right, in the in the in the rest work. 340 00:27:40,960 --> 00:27:48,140 So let's say that we had 130,000, 130,000 HP, 30 or 140,000 HP, 35,000 subside. 341 00:27:48,140 --> 00:27:54,660 What's left of that 85, 95,000 would be ours to do with what we wanted in conjunction with 342 00:27:54,660 --> 00:27:59,460 Tempening Academy, of course, and we could be ready to sell, okay, and come up with a agreement 343 00:27:59,460 --> 00:28:04,400 where we would say in certain types of years, we would have an available water supply, 344 00:28:04,540 --> 00:28:09,860 which you would basically contract to purchase. Almost like we do with the state and CBK, 345 00:28:10,180 --> 00:28:16,380 where we have an allocation every year that we've contracted for and depending on the water scenario 346 00:28:16,380 --> 00:28:22,200 conditions we receive a portion of that allocation. So those are some of the different contractal rights 347 00:28:22,200 --> 00:28:29,540 that would be necessary or could be structured. We are still looking into what types of agreements 348 00:28:29,540 --> 00:28:34,360 or partnerships are partners interested in or a potential partners interested in because of 349 00:28:34,360 --> 00:28:40,620 course we want to make the project as attractive as can be. We don't want to define ourselves to a 350 00:28:40,620 --> 00:28:45,180 very separate criteria which may just automatically eliminate some types of partnerships with 351 00:28:45,180 --> 00:28:50,160 because one of the open-minded ones comes to looking at it, but actually, this is a very 352 00:28:50,160 --> 00:28:50,920 wonderful book. 353 00:28:55,240 --> 00:29:00,040 Thank you, Chris, for that detailed explanation. Just one follow-up. 354 00:29:01,460 --> 00:29:10,140 So, this P3 type of partnership. So, when we say sell their benefits to others and their 355 00:29:10,140 --> 00:29:18,860 others can be us. So, through their finance and structure, they own certain volume of water 356 00:29:18,860 --> 00:29:22,000 and then we purchased water from them when we needed. 357 00:29:22,460 --> 00:29:23,040 Is that correct? 358 00:29:23,780 --> 00:29:28,660 We would sell that water back to us, or if we were not in need of it, you know, basically 359 00:29:28,660 --> 00:29:33,520 if we wanted to just have a portion of the allocation, they could then sell that water 360 00:29:33,520 --> 00:29:35,820 on the open market to a different party. 361 00:29:36,380 --> 00:29:39,600 Now, you know, it's a little bit difficult, because as the private constituency 362 00:29:39,600 --> 00:29:42,860 correct now, the water kind of flows one way close from San Luis, 363 00:29:43,080 --> 00:29:45,880 we could directly work from the rest of the work into our system. 364 00:29:45,880 --> 00:29:49,640 So if they were then going to sell that water to a different party, 365 00:29:50,600 --> 00:29:56,040 they might need some changes to the climate structure that is currently in place. 366 00:29:56,440 --> 00:29:59,840 Especially since I believe that the Jekyll Pandu... 367 00:30:27,220 --> 00:30:29,820 Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. 368 00:30:29,820 --> 00:30:36,160 when I first read this uh others I did not include us as part of the others so that's 369 00:30:36,160 --> 00:30:41,380 keep thinking of others really others and I thought oh there's that work I don't think you will 370 00:30:41,380 --> 00:30:49,720 work at least it's not going to work in an easy manner yeah yeah yeah so thank you 371 00:30:50,960 --> 00:30:55,200 okay next I don't see any 372 00:30:58,430 --> 00:30:58,730 uh 373 00:30:58,730 --> 00:30:59,670 up their hand, raise. 374 00:31:01,930 --> 00:31:02,610 Director Keegan. 375 00:31:03,310 --> 00:31:03,930 Third, Keegan. 376 00:31:05,550 --> 00:31:06,450 Thank you very much. 377 00:31:06,870 --> 00:31:09,590 And thank you, Chris, for a very thorough presentation. 378 00:31:12,170 --> 00:31:13,770 So complicated. 379 00:31:13,770 --> 00:31:15,090 Very complicated. 380 00:31:18,600 --> 00:31:25,140 You know, I think that one of the things that concerns me 381 00:31:26,020 --> 00:31:31,320 is the issues with the part, not that we couldn't mitigate 382 00:31:31,320 --> 00:31:39,160 those or deal with them appropriately. But I feel like it adds another layer of regulatory issues. 383 00:31:39,940 --> 00:31:47,120 Sometimes even there's financial issues associated with impacts to parks and how the parks 384 00:31:47,120 --> 00:31:56,120 were originally purchased and things like that. How deep have our discussions been? The staff 385 00:31:56,120 --> 00:31:58,080 report mentions that we've had discussions, 386 00:32:00,640 --> 00:32:02,660 but I'm going to say one of the fatal flaws, 387 00:32:03,260 --> 00:32:07,160 but what are the issues that are sort of being brought forward that you think you're going 388 00:32:07,160 --> 00:32:08,340 to be particularly a challenge? 389 00:32:09,040 --> 00:32:13,960 So we have talk to staff, both at the higher level of state level, at low level of some 390 00:32:13,960 --> 00:32:19,720 local staff, on what's in the potential improvements might be necessary in order to make this 391 00:32:19,720 --> 00:32:22,320 available for proper four state parks. 392 00:32:22,320 --> 00:32:27,540 What we're doing right now is talking to state parks about some of the different restrictions during the place. 393 00:32:27,820 --> 00:32:32,220 For what we can discern, what we're getting from state parks and people council. 394 00:32:33,280 --> 00:32:38,140 If you do eliminate a portion of the park, that portion of land is no longer part of it. 395 00:32:38,300 --> 00:32:40,220 It's easy to be a state evacuation area. 396 00:32:40,700 --> 00:32:45,980 And if it is a state evacuation area, there are some different restrictions that come along with that. 397 00:32:46,060 --> 00:32:49,300 I mean, obviously, as a recreation area, ask the live recreation purposes. 398 00:32:49,300 --> 00:32:54,140 It also has to be as an industry, right, so it does have to be management of that evacuation area. 399 00:32:54,820 --> 00:33:02,200 So, from the terms of just being as simple as where kind of the land swap is not quite that simple. 400 00:33:02,600 --> 00:33:07,600 That's why the option that we're actually presenting right now is the 2.5 billion dollar option, 401 00:33:07,600 --> 00:33:11,220 which is actually the downstream location with a person gap, right? 402 00:33:11,500 --> 00:33:17,580 If we were to make the part of the upstream location, that's actually a net savings for the product of about $2 million. 403 00:33:17,580 --> 00:33:25,000 We know that it's not an easy one, which is why we haven't put it in there as the base base scenario at this point 404 00:33:25,000 --> 00:33:33,860 Because it is one that takes some discussion to take parts and it will probably take some creative solutions in terms of our land management and land acquisition 405 00:33:33,860 --> 00:33:40,420 So it actually gets that that agreement to be automated if necessary. 406 00:33:41,280 --> 00:33:47,780 Well, it sounds like from what you're saying that we not only could be inviting additional 407 00:33:47,780 --> 00:33:52,420 regulatory oversight above and beyond just the mechanics of trying to work out the 408 00:33:52,420 --> 00:33:55,680 deal, but that that's something that could potentially be on the drawing. 409 00:33:55,700 --> 00:33:56,680 That is correct. 410 00:34:00,160 --> 00:34:06,720 Okay, so the devil will be in the details in terms of dealing with that. 411 00:34:06,720 --> 00:34:18,440 The letter from the Sierra Club questioned the timing of the EIR and suggested that we're 412 00:34:18,440 --> 00:34:24,540 being a little aggressive in our schedule and I know what things like environmental documents 413 00:34:24,540 --> 00:34:27,800 it's always what comes first, the chicken or the egg, right? 414 00:34:28,360 --> 00:34:36,700 And I think we have some lessons from Anderson where we needed additional studies to 415 00:34:36,700 --> 00:34:43,020 tell us very significant things about, you know, the project, particularly the subsurface 416 00:34:43,020 --> 00:34:46,140 conditions, the existing condition of the dam. 417 00:34:47,880 --> 00:34:54,040 Can you explain a little further as to, you know, why we want to go in the direction 418 00:34:54,040 --> 00:34:58,620 that we're going in as opposed to what the Sierra Club may be suggesting? 419 00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:09,260 I'm sure, so obviously, there is a requirement in the water source of the program, brain, it says that we need to produce a graph, the IAR, why we need to produce here. 420 00:35:09,620 --> 00:35:25,320 That is to secure our $407 million funding, at least until we get to the full reward section. That is one of the three requirements. The other is a feasibility report, as well as a commitment to funding up to 75% of the non-state benefits. 421 00:35:25,320 --> 00:35:31,480 In terms of producing the UNR, we have that outside of the UNR, the policies in terms of 422 00:35:31,480 --> 00:35:36,540 a very respectful analysis of what's required to this first phase of our new 423 00:35:36,540 --> 00:35:36,840 system. 424 00:35:36,920 --> 00:35:39,100 We're doing our environmental analysis as well. 425 00:35:39,360 --> 00:35:42,680 We're going out and doing our annual surveys to see who we're going to have required 426 00:35:42,680 --> 00:35:46,040 to be at the different impacts to some of the affected speech keys. 427 00:35:46,280 --> 00:35:51,060 As well as our cultural survey, it's kind of the normal pace of operations when it comes 428 00:35:51,060 --> 00:35:54,940 to exploration and the EIR production. 429 00:35:55,740 --> 00:35:58,580 Of course, I would say that because of the first time 430 00:35:58,580 --> 00:36:01,000 training, what was really lost is the ability 431 00:36:01,000 --> 00:36:03,180 to go through an extended planning phase. 432 00:36:04,220 --> 00:36:06,820 But in this circumstance, this part is a little bit unique. 433 00:36:07,520 --> 00:36:09,960 They did kind of go through some preliminary planning 434 00:36:09,960 --> 00:36:11,820 15 years ago when they looked at where 435 00:36:11,820 --> 00:36:13,920 the different those boards could be situated. 436 00:36:14,700 --> 00:36:18,160 So this kind of the research of an existing project 437 00:36:18,160 --> 00:36:23,020 this kind of shell. In addition, at 2017, we actually went through a piece of 438 00:36:23,020 --> 00:36:27,720 liberty analysis in order to restart application for our first investment 439 00:36:27,720 --> 00:36:32,440 program. And we're basically, you know, being to these significantly 440 00:36:32,440 --> 00:36:36,920 feasible at that point, it's basically crossing keys, dotting eyes before we get our 441 00:36:36,920 --> 00:36:40,360 full piece of liberty determination. So I would say that we're actually taking this 442 00:36:41,160 --> 00:36:45,980 in the proper order and with all new care and diligence, the real question will 443 00:36:45,980 --> 00:36:49,100 We found the types of continents that we get from our record, right? 444 00:36:49,560 --> 00:36:54,800 Depending on the number and substance of the continents that come in, we could take us 445 00:36:54,800 --> 00:36:56,720 along with the finalized or finalized ones. 446 00:36:56,900 --> 00:37:01,420 And we're not trying to the part before the force, you know, we've got what we have in terms 447 00:37:01,420 --> 00:37:07,760 of schedule is aggressive schedule, but it's also reflecting on the fact that we are 448 00:37:07,760 --> 00:37:10,800 engaging with our regular agency's all-written. 449 00:37:11,840 --> 00:37:17,100 California, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, it is actually a part of the process, not just the regulatory agency. 450 00:37:17,520 --> 00:37:20,480 We are actually talking to the National Leadership Service right now. 451 00:37:20,960 --> 00:37:24,520 When we engage the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to see if they have a conference, right? 452 00:37:24,560 --> 00:37:28,240 It would be lessons that we wanted from Anderson to the United States people approach. 453 00:37:28,700 --> 00:37:32,600 But what we were taking forward right now and we're hoping that's going to take evidence in the company process. 454 00:37:33,460 --> 00:37:41,060 Ultimately, you know, we need to put our money where an office has to get to a company to make sure that we actually can get those things in the time of fashion. 455 00:37:41,060 --> 00:37:44,900 And that is one of the largest dumping lots of them comes to a lot of our watershed 456 00:37:44,900 --> 00:37:49,800 projects in NR, the Ancicycle Problem, so we're keenly aware of that, and we know 457 00:37:49,800 --> 00:37:54,760 what the large hurdle is above us, which is why I mentioned, but even if you have a significant 458 00:37:54,760 --> 00:37:59,960 delay to the starter construction, I think the current cost estimate will not significantly 459 00:37:59,960 --> 00:38:04,860 increase because we have a couple of different levers before to help bring those costs back now. 460 00:38:04,860 --> 00:38:08,660 Well, so we all know how to hope spring's eternal, right? 461 00:38:10,040 --> 00:38:11,920 Thank you for that detailed response. 462 00:38:12,980 --> 00:38:19,130 Just sort of one follow-up question to that, which would be, you know, 463 00:38:19,250 --> 00:38:22,350 we were talking about decision points, right? 464 00:38:22,350 --> 00:38:25,690 And so going through this, 465 00:38:26,110 --> 00:38:29,570 draft ER process at this time, 466 00:38:29,570 --> 00:38:37,470 could allow us a decision point based on what comes to the surface, both in terms of the 467 00:38:37,470 --> 00:38:43,990 additional planning and engineering work that's going to happen as part of that effort, 468 00:38:44,870 --> 00:38:50,650 but also in terms of the responses that we receive to that draft. 469 00:38:51,870 --> 00:38:56,550 So I guess that's something that I would be interested in. 470 00:38:56,550 --> 00:39:07,830 I think that that to be a very logical decision point for the board to really be thinking about our level of interest at that point. 471 00:39:08,610 --> 00:39:09,870 So, thank you very much. 472 00:39:12,460 --> 00:39:13,240 Through the chair. 473 00:39:14,300 --> 00:39:14,940 The right to be running. 474 00:39:17,080 --> 00:39:18,040 Thank you. 475 00:39:18,880 --> 00:39:24,060 So, I was one of the members that we bought a story to explore toward committee. 476 00:39:26,300 --> 00:39:29,220 We've heard each of these meetings most recently. 477 00:39:30,180 --> 00:39:40,440 from all groups, environmental groups, potential P3 partners that have come to the committee, 478 00:39:41,960 --> 00:39:48,240 and from all the various agencies that are interested in wanting to build this project 479 00:39:48,240 --> 00:39:53,080 or to minimize it or not build it at all. We've heard it all. 480 00:39:53,080 --> 00:39:59,400 But what I'm concerned about is the current price of water. 481 00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:09,600 On the spot market that we are currently paying for, and it's exploding. And whether or not you're aware, 482 00:40:09,600 --> 00:40:18,140 But California water is now being exchanged, being traded on the open exchange market, through 483 00:40:18,140 --> 00:40:19,720 Chicago Market and time. 484 00:40:20,460 --> 00:40:26,600 And it's one of the most explosive opportunities to buy water and hold it. 485 00:40:26,900 --> 00:40:32,660 Certain public employee retirement service groups are investing in California water. 486 00:40:32,660 --> 00:40:39,180 to hedge against future costs so that they have an asset that they enter and can sell 487 00:40:39,180 --> 00:40:43,680 to what are utilities such as Valley Water and others up and down the state of California. 488 00:40:45,060 --> 00:40:49,060 California Water is a hot commodity product. 489 00:40:51,320 --> 00:40:59,120 Here, Valley Water are only hitch against these future increases and costs that we have to 490 00:40:59,120 --> 00:40:59,400 pay. 491 00:40:59,400 --> 00:41:16,120 We have no choice, is to continue to find resources to build resources, to storm one, to offer some kind of respite against attitude, to buy, continue to buy water of the smart market, and we probably will have to even then. 492 00:41:16,120 --> 00:41:25,860 At the same time, continuing our expansion of water recycling water purification, potential 493 00:41:25,860 --> 00:41:34,500 desolination, the continuation of conservation levels, and hearing from many of the 494 00:41:34,500 --> 00:41:39,840 electives that are on the water commission meeting that I listened in on today. 495 00:41:41,100 --> 00:41:48,020 Our advocating, we must find ways to keep our water reach low, to continue to offer affordable 496 00:41:48,020 --> 00:41:53,300 water to be agricultural communities, and what about the mandated housing that the state 497 00:41:53,300 --> 00:41:59,080 of California is insisting that we build, and what about the water supply, who that? 498 00:41:59,080 --> 00:42:14,080 And the only reason where some come with I'm the director of is your moron for 4,000 housing youths in the city of Morgan, the other than you 4,000 499 00:42:15,820 --> 00:42:23,420 And there's black clothes not going to be involved in that. No one's going to be involved. The state is bad and it's up and down the state. 500 00:42:23,420 --> 00:42:34,660 So, what that being said, I don't really think we have no option, other than to continue developing the chapter. 501 00:42:35,480 --> 00:42:42,560 Now, we have options. We can consider downsizing the size of the facility. 502 00:42:44,040 --> 00:42:48,620 We can do the same with Anderson. We could look at options that we currently have. 503 00:42:48,620 --> 00:42:57,400 But we must build storage for the future, as we continue with all the other water supplies, 504 00:42:57,640 --> 00:43:01,200 sustainable options that we are looking at. 505 00:43:01,480 --> 00:43:07,200 The cost of water is increasing, so when is it a good time to buy a house? 506 00:43:07,980 --> 00:43:12,320 Right now, when is it a good time to invest in water infrastructure? 507 00:43:13,620 --> 00:43:14,380 Right now. 508 00:43:14,380 --> 00:43:20,540 So, that's my opinion and I think it's important that we continue the conversation to bring 509 00:43:20,540 --> 00:43:24,600 Pachea going to the forest with my colleagues. 510 00:43:24,700 --> 00:43:25,140 Director. 511 00:43:25,300 --> 00:43:26,000 Thank you, Director. 512 00:43:26,300 --> 00:43:26,680 Next one. 513 00:43:27,060 --> 00:43:28,140 Director, was that in the Vice Chair? 514 00:43:28,580 --> 00:43:30,360 Director, was that in the Vice Chair? 515 00:43:36,430 --> 00:43:42,010 Chris could just go over again the slide that talked about the financing plan. 516 00:43:43,290 --> 00:43:47,570 I did quite follow the funding sources diagram to the allocation of finance. 517 00:43:48,350 --> 00:43:53,170 I'll pull it back up and then I'll actually take it to Charlie and if she's going to be the best source of info. 518 00:44:00,180 --> 00:44:02,280 Is this a sign you're talking about for her? 519 00:44:02,620 --> 00:44:02,680 Yes. 520 00:44:04,120 --> 00:44:04,820 Charlie, take away. 521 00:44:06,930 --> 00:44:09,310 Good afternoon, chair members of the board. 522 00:44:09,490 --> 00:44:12,410 I'm Sean Lee's son, treasuring the officer for value water. 523 00:44:12,450 --> 00:44:12,990 Good afternoon. 524 00:44:13,710 --> 00:44:14,970 Could you please? 525 00:44:15,670 --> 00:44:18,130 Maybe a lot of way I'm with the question is. 526 00:44:18,630 --> 00:44:21,410 So I see two scenarios there. 527 00:44:21,410 --> 00:44:29,790 actually my slide on the allocation of funding has writing in the report and the report. 528 00:44:32,910 --> 00:44:43,130 Okay, so you're talking about the, okay, it seems like the process slide is missing some. 529 00:44:43,130 --> 00:44:47,070 Yeah, it shows correctly on mine, but I'm going to see if I can get it up. 530 00:44:47,710 --> 00:44:48,590 So, okay, hang on with that. 531 00:44:48,590 --> 00:44:56,550 And while you're doing that, my question is, the funding sources, how does that relate to allocation of funding? 532 00:44:57,990 --> 00:44:59,810 Okay, Chris, I've got this right now. 533 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:03,560 I'm sorry for my screen if you want to stop here. I can share my screen. 534 00:45:05,340 --> 00:45:11,820 Okay, so I can speak to it more clearly. So okay, let me just explain this graph. Can everyone see it now? 535 00:45:13,220 --> 00:45:22,140 Yes? Yes. On the left hand side of the graph, it's dealing with the funding sources are. So we have three major funding sources. 536 00:45:22,140 --> 00:45:27,040 The WIFI alone, which is a low-cost federal loan, that we're going to be actively pursuing, 537 00:45:28,280 --> 00:45:34,720 and of course the WISIT grant, and the funder grant would have to issue long-term bonds to pay for it. 538 00:45:34,840 --> 00:45:40,760 So that's the funding sources. On the next to us, so this is probably the entire project, right? 539 00:45:41,440 --> 00:45:47,360 So this may be, then, you know, so this may then be, at least at the debt financing portions, 540 00:45:47,360 --> 00:45:51,440 then we'll be allocated to partners if we get partners. 541 00:45:51,780 --> 00:45:55,600 So that's what the charge on the right-hand side is trying to demonstrate. 542 00:45:56,380 --> 00:46:03,460 Right? So in order, and this is the charge on the right-hand side is demonstrating that partners, 543 00:46:04,040 --> 00:46:07,660 in the previous line, Chris has talked about that once in their rail, 544 00:46:07,960 --> 00:46:14,140 is that we would try to sell 50,000 acre feet or 36% of the reservoir, right? 545 00:46:14,140 --> 00:46:20,440 And when you take that into, just you know, a mathematical equation that equals about 91, 546 00:46:21,020 --> 00:46:25,440 91 billion dollars, 36 percent of the entire project. And so, 547 00:46:25,500 --> 00:46:28,700 so does that really get rid of the funds? 548 00:46:29,540 --> 00:46:35,140 No, so that means that partners will be paying a share of any debt financing. 549 00:46:35,980 --> 00:46:43,320 So, in this, for example, in this scenario, we're trying to present is the entire debt financing, 550 00:46:43,320 --> 00:46:49,640 You know, the RIP the alone and long-term debt, the total financing cost is 3.8 billion, 551 00:46:50,020 --> 00:46:56,440 and that's principal interest, advertised over at 30 or 35 years, and the average annual 552 00:46:56,440 --> 00:47:03,200 debt service is around $81 billion. So that means that potentially the other partners would be responsible 553 00:47:03,200 --> 00:47:10,020 for a 36% of that 81 billion annual debt service properly speaking, right? So, so this is attempting to 554 00:47:10,020 --> 00:47:12,840 there with the cost implications might look like. 555 00:47:13,460 --> 00:47:15,540 Now, it may be a different scenario. 556 00:47:15,780 --> 00:47:17,900 For example, the partners may want to structure 557 00:47:17,900 --> 00:47:20,700 their own financing and come up with cash 558 00:47:20,700 --> 00:47:23,540 to pay for the project up front, that may be an unnecessary. 559 00:47:24,200 --> 00:47:27,140 But nevertheless, this picture is just trying to show you 560 00:47:27,140 --> 00:47:30,140 if we were to arrange the entire financing for the project 561 00:47:30,140 --> 00:47:32,020 and just bring partners on to bear 562 00:47:32,020 --> 00:47:34,200 the portion of that cost within what look like. 563 00:47:34,560 --> 00:47:36,280 And that's the scenario, for example, 564 00:47:36,360 --> 00:47:38,760 where you have been in discussion with San Daniel, 565 00:47:38,760 --> 00:47:46,700 where they would like us to arrange all of the financing and they just, you know, the invoice for two and a half percent or ten percent or whatever the auction would want to exercise. 566 00:47:47,160 --> 00:47:48,340 Does that answer your question? 567 00:47:49,000 --> 00:47:50,840 Yeah, none of that makes sense. 568 00:47:51,320 --> 00:48:05,600 We're basically going to get all the money and then have partners to help pay us back or their share of the principle of interest based upon what their share of the water they're going to be receiving. 569 00:48:05,600 --> 00:48:15,640 All right, in this and there, that would be true, but I'm saying that, you know, there could be other scenarios where the partner wants to do their own financing or bring up with right 570 00:48:15,640 --> 00:48:27,460 Your own cash and then would look a little bit different. Nevertheless, that year is so that it would still be paying for up to 36% of the total project cost. However, it's finance whether it's cash or through us or some other means. 571 00:48:27,460 --> 00:48:36,640 So we need to, we need to, this scenario, you're suggesting that our partners, our partners, are going to equal 36 percent. 572 00:48:38,700 --> 00:48:39,120 And okay. 573 00:48:39,540 --> 00:48:44,540 And we don't know who our partners are or what they're going to be willing to come up with. 574 00:48:45,080 --> 00:48:51,100 That, that is what is going to be under discussion met by person, Garth and others. Yes. 575 00:48:52,040 --> 00:48:53,600 With partners. Yes. 576 00:48:54,120 --> 00:48:56,760 This is what we would be going after. 577 00:48:59,800 --> 00:49:11,440 What are we going to, but over on the blue side we've got the San Benito and our workers together for 44%. 578 00:49:11,440 --> 00:49:19,600 That's not, that's not a partner that's over in the 66% San Benito is in with us on this 44%. 579 00:49:19,600 --> 00:49:20,020 Yes. 580 00:49:20,180 --> 00:49:21,200 It's not the real capacity. 581 00:49:21,560 --> 00:49:26,820 We have an MOU with San Benito, where they are interesting participating in two and a half 582 00:49:26,820 --> 00:49:30,760 percent to start with an option to increase that up to 10 percent. 583 00:49:31,960 --> 00:49:34,260 Of that 44 percent. 584 00:49:34,500 --> 00:49:36,580 Of the 44, right, right, right, right. 585 00:49:36,760 --> 00:49:39,440 And like I said, the partners are, 586 00:49:42,740 --> 00:49:44,700 yet to be the type of, we're shouldn't open a prayer. 587 00:49:45,060 --> 00:49:45,200 Yeah. 588 00:49:45,340 --> 00:49:45,960 We need to do that. 589 00:49:46,260 --> 00:49:52,480 But if we, I mean, our costs and our liability, our dead service, 590 00:49:52,480 --> 00:49:55,880 could be the total if we don't get any partners. 591 00:49:56,980 --> 00:49:57,720 That's correct. 592 00:50:00,690 --> 00:50:05,500 All right. Thank you. Vice chair. 593 00:50:06,480 --> 00:50:07,760 Oh, thank you chair. 594 00:50:10,180 --> 00:50:16,000 Meet staff to talk a little bit about. I understand that there might be infrastructure bill. 595 00:50:18,600 --> 00:50:22,040 Where this could play in the infrastructure bill. 596 00:50:22,880 --> 00:50:28,100 I've heard as low as $1 trillion to as much as $10 trillion. 597 00:50:29,260 --> 00:50:30,280 with the team. 598 00:50:30,880 --> 00:50:39,100 I'm going to ask John Roach and talk about what he knows about the infrastructure bill that's currently being drafted and what any potential might be or about water. 599 00:50:39,900 --> 00:50:42,040 So benefit and it's all those fun. 600 00:50:43,200 --> 00:50:46,780 And you please repeat the question, Vice Chair, was that the regard of the federal side? 601 00:50:47,580 --> 00:50:47,640 Yes. 602 00:50:48,740 --> 00:50:56,880 Well, well, both, I understand that we're covering their potentially, I've heard that there might be more than a dollar. 603 00:50:56,880 --> 00:50:58,340 but it's coming here. 604 00:50:58,580 --> 00:50:59,320 Is that accurate? 605 00:51:00,420 --> 00:51:01,300 Well, I really am. 606 00:51:01,420 --> 00:51:04,240 I've heard the number of trillion from Credible Health. 607 00:51:04,620 --> 00:51:04,720 Come on. 608 00:51:04,800 --> 00:51:05,440 Oh, no. 609 00:51:05,720 --> 00:51:06,700 Thank you for the question. 610 00:51:06,920 --> 00:51:09,680 I'm going to defer to our room on our state side 611 00:51:09,680 --> 00:51:11,860 to see if you can provide anything there on this state. 612 00:51:12,460 --> 00:51:14,100 And then as far as the federal side, 613 00:51:14,400 --> 00:51:15,060 I'll follow up on that. 614 00:51:17,980 --> 00:51:19,320 I'd like to have to. 615 00:51:20,900 --> 00:51:21,700 Good afternoon. 616 00:51:23,780 --> 00:51:27,860 We're regarding the state side, the opportunities 617 00:51:27,860 --> 00:51:42,820 from funding of a dam project are very low, almost none. In fact, in a $2 billion early action budget 618 00:51:42,820 --> 00:51:51,040 proposal that was released last week by the Senate Pro-Tem's office based specifically state 619 00:51:51,040 --> 00:51:57,880 non-down projects, low-hanging fruit that could be executed quickly for drought response. 620 00:51:58,580 --> 00:52:02,960 That's a $2 billion package, none of it will include dam funding. 621 00:52:04,440 --> 00:52:10,880 Valleywater is advocating for dam safety funding through bonds that are, there are two major 622 00:52:10,880 --> 00:52:15,860 bond bills moving through the legislature now, one of the Senate and one of the assembly, 623 00:52:15,860 --> 00:52:25,620 and we are advocating for seismic retrofit of dams funding and but ultimately for the 624 00:52:25,620 --> 00:52:31,740 Pachinko project there doesn't seem to be very much opportunity except for through the existing 625 00:52:31,740 --> 00:52:45,600 water storage investment program through the California Water Commission. That's the 626 00:52:45,600 --> 00:52:58,000 up to $496 million. Those funds are only going to be made available as other wisdom, allocated 627 00:52:58,000 --> 00:53:06,960 projects, actually withdraw, and make their funds available for a second solicitation. 628 00:53:06,960 --> 00:53:10,120 And so, as a matter of fact, I think that happened. 629 00:53:10,300 --> 00:53:12,400 You're ready with Temperance Flaps, as an example. 630 00:53:12,800 --> 00:53:13,520 It didn't really happen. 631 00:53:13,580 --> 00:53:15,060 It did happen with Temperance Flaps. 632 00:53:15,980 --> 00:53:18,980 And basically what the Water Commission decided to do 633 00:53:18,980 --> 00:53:24,040 was to allocate 46 million to two groundwater projects. 634 00:53:24,220 --> 00:53:26,960 They didn't receive full funding through the first solicitation. 635 00:53:27,660 --> 00:53:33,320 And then to allocate $61 million to an inflation adjustment 636 00:53:33,320 --> 00:53:35,860 for the existing wizard funded projects 637 00:53:35,860 --> 00:53:42,400 of which Pacheco received $12 million additional, and then finally, $64 million has been 638 00:53:42,400 --> 00:53:50,580 held for a second solicitation, which Valley Water could pursue either for Pacheco and 639 00:53:50,580 --> 00:53:57,780 or Anderson. So, but that's just $64 million. However, if some other visit on the project were 640 00:53:57,780 --> 00:54:05,480 to not meet the deadline of January 1st, 2022 for released withdrawal today are 75% of 641 00:54:05,480 --> 00:54:09,480 their non-state funding and a feasibility study. If they can't meet those requirements, 642 00:54:10,100 --> 00:54:17,700 then there might be more money available for reallocation. However, all of that is an uncertainty 643 00:54:17,700 --> 00:54:24,460 at this point. Thank you, Bart. And then on the federal side, Vice Chair. As far as the infrastructure 644 00:54:24,460 --> 00:54:26,160 You're building a year mark funding opportunities. 645 00:54:26,480 --> 00:54:30,960 Our best chance of funds for Pacheco's understanding is the infrastructure package. 646 00:54:31,240 --> 00:54:35,880 And we are advocating for that, of course, and we'd like to include funding for any new storage 647 00:54:35,880 --> 00:54:37,660 or I'm sorry, new water storage projects. 648 00:54:38,360 --> 00:54:41,840 There could be a new pop this could be our new pot of funding to replace the WINX storage 649 00:54:41,840 --> 00:54:46,700 funding, but we still need to go through the feasibility determination process in order to be eligible. 650 00:54:47,360 --> 00:54:50,700 While this infrastructure bill may provide an opportunity for your marks, we don't 651 00:54:50,700 --> 00:54:51,080 know yet. 652 00:54:51,080 --> 00:54:53,060 and negotiate some going on, but as I mentioned, 653 00:54:53,280 --> 00:54:54,480 we are of our course trying to advocate 654 00:54:54,480 --> 00:54:56,240 for the inclusion of the Jacob already. 655 00:54:58,980 --> 00:54:59,960 All right, so I'm glad, guys. 656 00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:03,880 I guess they have sent to the board and say, maybe we should move this in that highest legislative 657 00:55:04,440 --> 00:55:13,990 priority, at least on the federal side. You know, now's the time to do it. And one of the thoughts I mean, I can 658 00:55:13,990 --> 00:55:19,510 put in a form of emotion to make this a question. One can think of a higher priority than this, I'd 659 00:55:19,510 --> 00:55:29,090 want to know. Well, let's hold the motions, but we can certainly entertain it, but let's just hold them 660 00:55:30,650 --> 00:55:31,580 But definitely. 661 00:55:32,650 --> 00:55:33,390 I'll show you. 662 00:55:33,550 --> 00:55:35,230 No, don't show it out, either. 663 00:55:36,630 --> 00:55:39,430 We didn't go to slide 11. 664 00:55:59,000 --> 00:56:05,600 Is this exactly comparing apples and oranges and I'll explain why I'm talking about this? 665 00:56:05,960 --> 00:56:10,420 Aren't you going to be a back in the mill or a back? 666 00:56:10,780 --> 00:56:15,160 It's more the same problem of water stored in that we can't get back. 667 00:56:15,160 --> 00:56:21,700 I think every board member who's here willing to do a first-low challenge is saved by 668 00:56:21,700 --> 00:56:22,020 Greens. 669 00:56:22,120 --> 00:56:29,940 So I'd say I'll make the comment that that's not campus and orgies at all and also we 670 00:56:29,940 --> 00:56:31,620 have known our out of the counties. 671 00:56:31,980 --> 00:56:36,900 So if you look at the pre-benefit of emergency water in case of an earthquake which we all 672 00:56:38,660 --> 00:56:46,340 So MacMolan, A-Bak, and lots of the parents don't help us all out of MacMolan, says my help us. 673 00:56:47,180 --> 00:56:52,980 And I think that's actually a good project, so I just want to make that out of the county, it's pretty far away. 674 00:56:53,900 --> 00:57:00,580 And not every thing, emergency water is not the same as normal water, I know that sounds crazy. 675 00:57:00,580 --> 00:57:09,580 But we know, we know Earthquakes, we know there can be an accident in the Delta, where saltwater floods, and so I would say, 676 00:57:10,820 --> 00:57:13,740 class only is not our only way we look at things. 677 00:57:15,440 --> 00:57:18,900 So that's 11, and then if we go to poor team, 678 00:57:22,250 --> 00:57:25,750 in the recent 80 comments, if you can start to debate, it's never seen this slide before. 679 00:57:26,410 --> 00:57:28,990 I looked at our last place in the game once in a year. 680 00:57:29,570 --> 00:57:35,390 So on this slide, what also is missing is the benefits, the disadvantage, the 681 00:57:35,390 --> 00:57:40,990 communities, which I think is one of our social injustice, goals, or, you know, is a 682 00:57:40,990 --> 00:57:43,430 plug-in foliage and see that's important. 683 00:57:44,450 --> 00:57:47,550 Also, no new water supplies, not afterwards. 684 00:57:48,050 --> 00:57:51,190 I mean, it would be applicable to how well you would do. 685 00:57:51,190 --> 00:57:58,170 So, there's actually some new water supplies, and the second is, it's climate change. 686 00:57:58,770 --> 00:58:04,130 Believers, we all know that there's going to be more precipitation, less snow-tastic. 687 00:58:04,490 --> 00:58:08,810 So, we're not going to be able to have the snow-tastic, the same kind of storage it would be. 688 00:58:09,050 --> 00:58:12,070 So, that water is going to run off the less there's new storage. 689 00:58:13,350 --> 00:58:19,810 So, this has been taken into account climate change, which I think we all agree on. 690 00:58:19,810 --> 00:58:31,370 So no new water supply, not exactly true, missing disadvantaged community protection and emergency storage. 691 00:58:35,840 --> 00:58:41,160 So let's go talk about, sorry, I got a lot to say, but I'm trying to keep the shorter. 692 00:58:42,760 --> 00:58:49,760 Is this issue around the parks that directed to you and said, you know, $200 billion is also a big number. 693 00:58:51,080 --> 00:59:01,800 And I think we heard from Boston State Senator Kevierro that she's very much in favor as other people are at the recreational backfills. 694 00:59:01,940 --> 00:59:05,160 What are the benefits in this area? 695 00:59:06,400 --> 00:59:07,540 Was that the slide? 696 00:59:08,320 --> 00:59:08,840 What's the slide? 697 00:59:09,260 --> 00:59:13,100 This is what we've opened with because you are absolutely correct. 698 00:59:13,260 --> 00:59:15,980 There are benefits basically inherent to value water. 699 00:59:15,980 --> 00:59:18,760 One of them is flood protection to disadvantaged communities, 700 00:59:19,060 --> 00:59:21,780 as well as basic emergency water supply. 701 00:59:22,500 --> 00:59:24,900 These, these, oh, I got the water quality problem. 702 00:59:25,360 --> 00:59:25,760 Right there. 703 00:59:26,240 --> 00:59:27,080 Not in that slide. 704 00:59:27,680 --> 00:59:27,800 Yeah. 705 00:59:28,100 --> 00:59:31,080 And basically, the benefit is absolutely emergency water 706 00:59:31,080 --> 00:59:32,080 is taking county. 707 00:59:32,540 --> 00:59:34,320 And that's a benefit that's unique to us. 708 00:59:34,380 --> 00:59:35,400 And we're talking partners. 709 00:59:35,860 --> 00:59:37,580 Some of those other benefits don't kind of say they don't 710 00:59:37,580 --> 00:59:40,080 work, but they may have their own unique benefits as well. 711 00:59:41,500 --> 00:59:41,680 Yeah. 712 00:59:41,960 --> 00:59:45,120 So just want to bring out these benefits, 713 00:59:45,120 --> 00:59:47,220 because these benefits were not as a presentation. 714 00:59:49,360 --> 00:59:51,040 And we know that things are getting tougher 715 00:59:51,040 --> 00:59:52,640 to get water across the Delta. 716 00:59:53,800 --> 00:59:56,760 And if you can store it in above normal years, 717 00:59:57,080 --> 00:59:59,900 or because there's no harm, issue that we're not going to do. 718 01:00:00,000 --> 01:00:06,060 We'll be able to have the snowpacks as our netflix store. So I just want to bring those up to back to the parks issue. 719 01:00:07,260 --> 01:00:16,220 Maybe that also can be gotten to legislative priorities because I know my students with the head of the parks, who used to be the head of the water commission arm. 720 01:00:16,440 --> 01:00:21,780 This might be looked at very favorably. Good, because issues around can be felt. 721 01:00:22,620 --> 01:00:26,780 But we keep, that's all I have to say for now. So I love to hear what other directors have to say. 722 01:00:26,780 --> 01:00:28,540 Thank you Vice Chair, good comments. 723 01:00:29,200 --> 01:00:31,940 But I got direct the Santos followed by direct the Liza. 724 01:00:38,380 --> 01:00:38,960 Thank you, Tony. 725 01:00:40,200 --> 01:00:44,100 You know, all the colleagues here has made some good points. 726 01:00:44,460 --> 01:00:45,060 There's no question. 727 01:00:45,620 --> 01:00:47,080 You know, let's go back to reality. 728 01:00:47,840 --> 01:00:52,120 I really support what Vice Chair Cremon has said, 729 01:00:52,340 --> 01:00:54,440 of course, and Director Verella, especially 730 01:00:54,440 --> 01:00:57,380 Director Verella, on about costs and issues. 731 01:00:57,900 --> 01:00:59,580 Today, you know, everything's about costs. 732 01:00:59,580 --> 01:01:06,180 But let's go back with the C-19 liquid as cause society today. We've got robins, killings, 733 01:01:06,380 --> 01:01:10,920 I can go on and on. It's just increasing every single day when you have an issue. 734 01:01:11,520 --> 01:01:15,700 Let's go back years ago when there was a fuel shortage. And the same thing happened. 735 01:01:16,480 --> 01:01:21,660 Could you imagine a society without water? So we don't seem to want to address that issue 736 01:01:21,660 --> 01:01:28,340 where we pay more damage control and you noble pay triple. So I understand what people have 737 01:01:28,340 --> 01:01:31,000 concerned by cost, but that's not my motivation. 738 01:01:31,700 --> 01:01:35,420 My motivation is that we have a source of water for now 739 01:01:35,420 --> 01:01:37,060 and the next generation that I've repeated 740 01:01:37,060 --> 01:01:40,240 the same conversation and you'll pay more in damage control. 741 01:01:40,540 --> 01:01:42,980 20 years today, some of us are gone. 742 01:01:43,440 --> 01:01:45,420 That generation is going to look back and say, 743 01:01:45,420 --> 01:01:48,120 you know those men and women that were elected during that time, 744 01:01:48,440 --> 01:01:51,180 they stood up and they made sure that we had water. 745 01:01:51,940 --> 01:01:53,880 Because right now folks were in a drought. 746 01:01:54,780 --> 01:01:56,320 And as John just got through saying, 747 01:01:56,320 --> 01:02:01,620 look at the cost that's being elevated right now. I don't see anybody talking about the options 748 01:02:01,620 --> 01:02:07,660 if you don't have water. That dam was built for a reason and people like ourselves somehow let it 749 01:02:07,660 --> 01:02:14,060 go to waste or whatever or fall down because they didn't want to subdivide with finances. Well, 750 01:02:15,080 --> 01:02:20,200 Anderson's going to be down for 10 years. Hello and I keep on hearing for different groups. 751 01:02:20,200 --> 01:02:23,380 to keep on telling me about water conservation, I agree. 752 01:02:23,960 --> 01:02:26,960 But if you don't have water, how are you going to conserve? 753 01:02:27,740 --> 01:02:31,780 So we better wake up and realize that's not about us here today. 754 01:02:32,040 --> 01:02:37,560 It's how do we guarantee the future for the young cremants and Michelle's 755 01:02:37,560 --> 01:02:41,560 grandchild and Tony's grandkids and my family and everyone else. 756 01:02:41,660 --> 01:02:42,760 I got mine. 757 01:02:43,720 --> 01:02:49,280 If that cost is going to cause you hesitation, it doesn't cost me because we'll pay way 758 01:02:49,280 --> 01:02:54,400 as John said, what's going on right now, why are people buying water because they know they 759 01:02:54,400 --> 01:02:58,460 can sell it and make nothing but money? And that's our business. And we must take care 760 01:02:58,460 --> 01:03:06,300 of the residents who pay the tax. We are in a drought. Hello, everybody here. We are in a drought. 761 01:03:07,720 --> 01:03:13,300 So we need to make sure there is water. No one comes up in any option if there's no water 762 01:03:13,300 --> 01:03:18,420 in this society will destroy itself if we don't have a source. Now there's other issues we can 763 01:03:18,420 --> 01:03:22,960 doing, counter-costal so on, the public can speed those up to make sure we have a good 764 01:03:22,960 --> 01:03:30,120 supply. I have no problem with that. But this Bacheco is a necessity. It's an alternate source, 765 01:03:30,280 --> 01:03:35,320 it's a emergency source, and it's water that has run it out to the ocean and we're not allowing 766 01:03:35,320 --> 01:03:41,100 it. We've got to stop it now before we pay way more damage control. Take this seriously as I know 767 01:03:41,100 --> 01:03:46,600 you all are when you all have good questions. But don't let this go as the people before us did. 768 01:03:47,460 --> 01:03:54,460 I'm not for that. If you want to be one-fifth day economy in California, then you've got 769 01:03:54,460 --> 01:04:00,360 to have water. To have the firm for C-19. To have the food that we eat. We've got to work 770 01:04:00,360 --> 01:04:04,780 together to make sure there's a source of water for the rest generation. So this is not a 771 01:04:04,780 --> 01:04:10,340 political speech, it's reality. I'm for this project 100%. There's other things we can do before 772 01:04:10,340 --> 01:04:16,200 that. I got no problem. This water storage committee is then a great job and we've got it all to you. 773 01:04:16,800 --> 01:04:22,680 I have no problem taking the insuendos or maybe said on the cost of this net 774 01:04:22,680 --> 01:04:27,500 But when you don't have water, we're going to see a society that will tear each other to pieces and 775 01:04:27,500 --> 01:04:32,000 Look at places and you know all we got to do is just bring the folks out from Israel out here 776 01:04:32,000 --> 01:04:34,020 They'll tell you how to grow stuff in desert 777 01:04:34,020 --> 01:04:41,860 We keep on forgetting about the experts, so we need to get to get together and all this different people who call in 778 01:04:41,860 --> 01:04:43,840 But they really don't know about reality. 779 01:04:45,280 --> 01:04:49,220 I've lived through disasters and my career, 780 01:04:49,680 --> 01:04:52,020 and at home when I lost everything through floods and so on. 781 01:04:52,260 --> 01:04:54,080 Today we've got to recapture that water. 782 01:04:54,420 --> 01:04:56,720 And right now we're trying to make deals for recycling. 783 01:04:57,120 --> 01:04:58,700 Look at the problems we're going through. 784 01:04:58,920 --> 01:04:59,860 Just to make sure. 785 01:05:00,000 --> 01:05:10,100 This Santa Clara County residents have a source of water. And I would commend everybody here to invest in ourselves to have water. So thank you. 786 01:05:12,470 --> 01:05:15,450 Thank you, Director Santos. Director Lizard? 787 01:05:18,550 --> 01:05:26,970 Chris, are we on track, we're complying with the January 1st, 2020 regulations under the 788 01:05:26,970 --> 01:05:27,830 WISP funding? 789 01:05:28,350 --> 01:05:33,510 I'm particularly concerned about that we have to have 75% of the non-public benefit 790 01:05:33,510 --> 01:05:35,370 cost share of the project. 791 01:05:37,090 --> 01:05:38,770 So, as I mentioned, there are three components. 792 01:05:39,010 --> 01:05:41,590 Two of them are easily on the hand. 793 01:05:41,950 --> 01:05:42,850 Yeah, this slammed up. 794 01:05:42,970 --> 01:05:44,070 I'm just worried about the last. 795 01:05:44,070 --> 01:05:50,590 And that basically what we need is a commitment from the board to fund 75% of the non-state benefits. 796 01:05:51,370 --> 01:05:53,550 And it's up to the board, how do you get one of the right that commitment? 797 01:05:53,550 --> 01:05:58,070 But if you're looking for partnerships in hand, then for 25% of the product, 798 01:05:58,350 --> 01:06:04,850 then we're not on target, but if the board is comfortable saying that regardless of how partnership discussions go, 799 01:06:05,230 --> 01:06:10,870 you guys are willing to fund 75% of the non-state benefit, then yes, we could do that today. 800 01:06:11,790 --> 01:06:13,870 And how much is that? 801 01:06:14,890 --> 01:06:19,570 So that would be about a one and a half billion dollars in our current estimate, I believe. 802 01:06:20,170 --> 01:06:25,080 Because you have about almost 500,000 or 500 million in prop 1 grant, 803 01:06:25,810 --> 01:06:28,040 subtracted from the two and a half billion overall costs. 804 01:06:28,710 --> 01:06:30,850 So you're living at 75% of two billion dollars. 805 01:06:34,320 --> 01:06:37,480 And that two billion is today's dollar, right? 806 01:06:39,220 --> 01:06:43,400 But today, as in 2020, I'm at 2020, I'm at 2019. 807 01:06:44,360 --> 01:06:46,240 It's actually escalated to the midpoint of construction. 808 01:06:46,980 --> 01:06:48,260 So it's real. 809 01:06:48,680 --> 01:06:53,920 In terms of, it's not going to get more expensive just because we decided we're going to call 2020 $28. 810 01:06:55,160 --> 01:06:55,440 Okay. 811 01:06:57,100 --> 01:06:57,700 Thank you. 812 01:06:58,500 --> 01:07:04,940 But that's 75 is whatever, whatever combination we have like with your loans and so on, right? 813 01:07:04,940 --> 01:07:11,020 Correct, we can basically all we have to do is make the commitment to fund that if we get with you for 49% 814 01:07:11,020 --> 01:07:18,180 That's our personal funding mechanism. Okay, additional partners that end up funding, you know 50 or 60% of the project. That's our business. 815 01:07:18,680 --> 01:07:22,380 All right, so I thought I thought with me it was not in the 75% 816 01:07:23,860 --> 01:07:31,180 With it is just a funding mechanism. It's not an actual allocation of additional money, right? Right, so we'll cost mom. So we 817 01:07:44,760 --> 01:07:59,940 So if we said 75% that includes loans and so on, that's a commitment that will comply and then we have to worry about how that's paid like, you know, if you get a loan, how are we going to pay for that? 818 01:07:59,940 --> 01:08:07,300 correct. Okay. Directil is not anything further for now. No, no, that was it. Thanks. 819 01:08:07,640 --> 01:08:11,400 No problem. Let's see. Anybody else I have a few questions myself. 820 01:08:13,160 --> 01:08:13,400 Sorry? 821 01:08:15,000 --> 01:08:20,260 Okay. Let me ask a few questions and then I get to the vice chair. 822 01:08:20,940 --> 01:08:25,940 I want to remind people that, you know, when energy brown, 823 01:08:26,720 --> 01:08:33,940 fat 90% of the budget to get us where we are today, people freaked out, people were jumping 824 01:08:33,940 --> 01:08:41,980 out of out of one story, buildings, going nuts, nobody was not only were they running 825 01:08:41,980 --> 01:08:50,120 around with heron fire and so on, but people were going nuts. Some of them were to the 826 01:08:50,120 --> 01:08:56,720 that's how bad it was. But where would we be today if that hadn't happened? So I want to remind 827 01:08:56,720 --> 01:09:04,540 people that looking at cost isn't the only thing that we have to worry about. Yeah, we've got to look 828 01:09:04,540 --> 01:09:10,720 at cost, but that's a given. I hear people talking about cost just like, you know, the water commission, 829 01:09:11,100 --> 01:09:16,400 every single person that told us, we should go after federal funding. Like, we wouldn't have thought 830 01:09:16,400 --> 01:09:22,880 about that. Thank God, they suggested it. You know, so we won't worry, you know, you got 831 01:09:22,880 --> 01:09:30,800 to worry about cost. Oh, nobody wants rates to be raised. Those were all a given. But 832 01:09:30,800 --> 01:09:36,160 like I said, you know, if we had not been, for people to do the hard lifting, like the 833 01:09:36,160 --> 01:09:42,540 recticentals mentioned, if Edmigie Brown had not stood up to everybody who's the only 834 01:09:42,540 --> 01:09:50,100 God that has done it since then. Nobody's done it since then. But that's why where we are 835 01:09:50,100 --> 01:09:57,860 because nobody has had the courage to do it and we know it's got to be done. Like the 836 01:09:57,860 --> 01:09:59,880 The central says, we have... 837 01:10:01,520 --> 01:10:26,240 But our responsibility is to the future. And I always, you know, I always say, this is why I always say, we are now, where those folks, Epigee Brown, direct the land ahead, those folks then that created all of the infrastructure that we enjoy and benefit from today, that's where we are now. 838 01:10:26,240 --> 01:10:30,440 That infrastructure is coming to an end. 839 01:10:31,440 --> 01:10:34,340 The population has tripled since then, 840 01:10:34,860 --> 01:10:36,340 and so in a different situation, 841 01:10:37,240 --> 01:10:43,200 but the obligation as I see is the same as the one they had, 842 01:10:43,660 --> 01:10:49,440 which was to worry about people that will be here in two generations from now. 843 01:10:50,080 --> 01:10:52,320 So I think we got to look at it that way. 844 01:10:52,320 --> 01:10:59,400 And I understand we have to talk about numbers and of course we will, but but you know, we have to put this in perspective. 845 01:11:00,260 --> 01:11:03,940 Everybody wants to talk about COVID. Oh, well, that's going on now. 846 01:11:05,200 --> 01:11:10,980 Let's, you know, a year ago, nobody imagined we would be dealing with COVID. 847 01:11:12,060 --> 01:11:19,760 So, we don't know what will happen years from now, but what we do know is as we have tried to tell people, 848 01:11:19,760 --> 01:11:23,660 There is no new source of water. 849 01:11:24,540 --> 01:11:26,880 We have to deal with the situation as it is now. 850 01:11:27,180 --> 01:11:30,480 And remember the reason why we even considered that 851 01:11:30,480 --> 01:11:38,060 Pachekal was an efficient solution is because when we had 852 01:11:38,060 --> 01:11:41,720 the reason why our storage capacity is where it is, 853 01:11:42,000 --> 01:11:46,160 down south, is because of one or two very wet years 854 01:11:46,160 --> 01:11:55,360 During a new, we're still benefiting from that, from that rain years later, so that's the idea of a 855 01:11:55,360 --> 01:12:04,420 Pachicle that when we have wet years, we could collect it, then we could store it, and then we have it, and that provides from years now. 856 01:12:04,980 --> 01:12:10,440 So just to put it perspective what it is, and remind ourselves, why we're even considering this stuff. 857 01:12:11,480 --> 01:12:21,400 Now, we obviously have already laid out the reasons for it, and so, and so, I think we 858 01:12:21,400 --> 01:12:25,240 got to look at how we present some of these things. 859 01:12:26,920 --> 01:12:36,140 Inforicists, on our numbers, we should talk about what the bottom line is for us as a district, 860 01:12:37,100 --> 01:12:44,080 And then try and get that. So what I mean is if you look at the water-raise structure 861 01:12:44,080 --> 01:12:50,500 that we've laid out, we've said, with Pacheco, it'll be 1% 1% increase of rates for 862 01:12:50,500 --> 01:12:56,600 the next, whatever 100 years. Well, I think we have to say that that's not what's going 863 01:12:56,600 --> 01:13:00,640 to happen because we're going to have to do alternatives. We're going to have to go 864 01:13:00,640 --> 01:13:05,720 after partnerships. We're going to have to do something else. And then that's the 865 01:13:05,720 --> 01:13:13,720 that's our commitment as a district. If that doesn't happen, then we can't do it. I think that's what we need to do today. 866 01:13:14,220 --> 01:13:24,220 It's to say, lay down exactly what we're willing, what it is that we are willing to do as a bottom line 867 01:13:24,220 --> 01:13:31,420 and then try and find that. If it doesn't come to fruition, then we can't do it. 868 01:13:31,420 --> 01:13:38,260 I think we've got time for that approach to lay down what the foundation will be 869 01:13:38,260 --> 01:13:45,640 look. This is how far we're willing to go. We think we can go and then work on 870 01:13:45,640 --> 01:13:50,740 that. Whatever combination that is, we still not sure how successful we'll be 871 01:13:50,740 --> 01:13:56,060 a partnerships. I think we'll be very successful with partnerships because there 872 01:13:56,060 --> 01:14:01,300 are a lot of value organizations that really need the kind of stories that we 873 01:14:01,300 --> 01:14:07,640 provide. I mean, if we think we're in a bad boat, they're in a much worse boat and they're 874 01:14:07,640 --> 01:14:14,540 in much greater the need than we have to storage. And so I think that's what we need to do with 875 01:14:14,540 --> 01:14:21,900 lay down what the bottom line is. We are not willing to pay this amount of water rates. We're only 876 01:14:21,900 --> 01:14:29,200 willing to do this much. And so on, I think if we do that, we'd be more comfortable talking to our 877 01:14:29,200 --> 01:14:32,920 community and our constituents about what the commitment is. 878 01:14:33,080 --> 01:14:38,240 And then when we compare the benefits and the costs, 879 01:14:38,800 --> 01:14:41,000 I think it will make more sense to people. 880 01:14:41,380 --> 01:14:46,260 But we got to remind ourselves, what the folks before us did, 881 01:14:46,500 --> 01:14:50,240 they had the courage to say, yeah, we know it's going to cost. 882 01:14:50,760 --> 01:14:54,640 But again, cost, there's two sides of the legion cost. 883 01:14:55,100 --> 01:14:57,380 One is what it's going to cost to do. 884 01:14:57,380 --> 01:14:59,900 And the other one is what it's going to cost NOT! 885 01:15:00,680 --> 01:15:29,960 And we never put that up. When we did the report to the city council, we never told them, what's it going to cost? Was Silicon Valley? Silicon Valley? Not to have water. What's that going to cost? What's it going to cost with Google and all these guys? Apple and all these folks are not serviced. What's that going to cost? When people can't watch the hands, you got to take a bath once a week and so on. 886 01:15:30,000 --> 01:15:38,180 What is that cost? I think we have to spend some time determining what that is and all these charts 887 01:15:38,180 --> 01:15:43,220 Or to be right next to this chart. It's gonna cost as much. We ought to say yeah 888 01:15:43,220 --> 01:15:49,300 This is what it's gonna what is it cost you to take a shower once a week instead of daily or whenever you want or whenever you need 889 01:15:49,300 --> 01:15:51,100 This is what it's gonna cost 890 01:15:51,100 --> 01:15:57,740 Okay, that's what I think we got it. We got to start talking about so that we could look at this in the right frame of mind 891 01:15:57,740 --> 01:15:59,540 Anyway, that's my two cents 892 01:16:00,260 --> 01:16:02,340 Vice chair was next 893 01:16:05,380 --> 01:16:19,380 is usual. I'm so my thunder. I was really looking at the last time of a big project like this came on it's a big water project like you mentioned. It passed by and I was reading some of the old news articles. 894 01:16:20,060 --> 01:16:32,560 There was so much opposition. It passed by 20 million votes cast 174,000. That was the margin real small margin on that and people raised the same things. 895 01:16:32,580 --> 01:16:39,660 Aren't we happy now that our four mothers and four fathers did that and you'll never find one of those no votes around you 896 01:16:39,660 --> 01:16:44,820 Nobody will ever admit it. They voted against that. If they were alive. Yeah 897 01:16:44,820 --> 01:16:49,060 So I know it's tough because we're facing this short you know 898 01:16:49,060 --> 01:16:55,610 I always you know at me I always complain about we do things at water time and doing something to me on water time 899 01:16:56,420 --> 01:17:01,340 The benefits of doing that are you don't look at this short term where it rates now today 900 01:17:01,340 --> 01:17:03,440 And if you look at what's going to happen in the future, 901 01:17:04,120 --> 01:17:06,300 you know, at the water commission today, 902 01:17:06,940 --> 01:17:09,360 someone who is a suit, I think it was 903 01:17:09,360 --> 01:17:11,640 the last guy who's Councilwoman Maria, 904 01:17:12,160 --> 01:17:15,300 Ristau said, well, if you look at the cost of not doing 905 01:17:15,300 --> 01:17:17,440 could shake away, you're not adding in there, 906 01:17:17,680 --> 01:17:19,440 is what's going to be the cost of the alternative 907 01:17:19,440 --> 01:17:23,620 going to buy stuff on this market, rationing, 908 01:17:23,920 --> 01:17:25,500 companies leaving, et cetera? 909 01:17:27,300 --> 01:17:35,000 So, I grew a direct rest of Mara, and as of now, I support this project, even though it's painful. 910 01:17:40,810 --> 01:17:41,950 Man, click, we have it. 911 01:17:42,390 --> 01:17:42,470 Okay. 912 01:17:49,060 --> 01:17:50,580 Oh, Mr. Gary raises hand. 913 01:17:51,620 --> 01:17:53,060 Yes, good afternoon, Andy. 914 01:17:57,430 --> 01:17:57,910 Are you muted? 915 01:17:59,770 --> 01:18:00,050 Okay. 916 01:18:00,750 --> 01:18:01,210 Good afternoon. 917 01:18:02,770 --> 01:18:03,090 Okay. 918 01:18:03,370 --> 01:18:06,810 Thanks for having me in recognizing me. 919 01:18:06,810 --> 01:18:12,230 You know, Senator Water Company is a pre-pick stakeholder in Santa Clara Valley Water 920 01:18:12,230 --> 01:18:18,290 District Valley Water, we're the largest retailers, so our rate payers essentially purchase 921 01:18:18,290 --> 01:18:21,470 half the water provided by Valley Water. 922 01:18:21,710 --> 01:18:22,810 So what do we have? 923 01:18:22,870 --> 01:18:27,530 We have a great strong interest in how water rates are impacted by infrastructure. 924 01:18:27,810 --> 01:18:32,210 Now I'll be the first one to tell you, we have to have a resilient water supply and we have 925 01:18:32,210 --> 01:18:34,670 to make investment in infrastructure. 926 01:18:36,050 --> 01:18:42,970 But when we see the increases in the cost of this project, you know, it looks like it's approaching 927 01:18:42,970 --> 01:18:52,890 on economic and that's that's today into the future, at a 2.5% adder to our 8.5% sort of into 928 01:18:52,890 --> 01:18:59,050 the future of water rate, that's pretty substantial for a project that creates very little 929 01:18:59,050 --> 01:19:06,990 water, branded ads, flexibility ads, and storage, and my sense is that investment could be 930 01:19:06,990 --> 01:19:13,610 better made in new water supplies, expanding, direct foldable, indirect foldable. We use 931 01:19:13,610 --> 01:19:18,050 investment in the most precarious, which, by the way, is north of the pumps north of 932 01:19:18,050 --> 01:19:25,290 Delta, and provides an avenue to bring valley water supplies into the county, even with 933 01:19:25,290 --> 01:19:33,250 interruptions to the pumps even if you know water fix doesn't happen. So a lot of advantages 934 01:19:33,250 --> 01:19:40,850 there and perhaps a bigger participation in that project could be a bigger benefit. This may 935 01:19:40,850 --> 01:19:46,970 be a viable project at some time. You know it's in something sort of to perhaps keep on a back 936 01:19:46,970 --> 01:19:52,210 burner but if you look at the way water demand is going now and the district's draft of water 937 01:19:52,210 --> 01:19:57,970 and plan is showing, you know, a decline in the expectation of water of men and, and that's what 938 01:19:57,970 --> 01:19:58,810 E.C. is well. 939 01:20:00,000 --> 01:20:13,560 The timing for this project may not be right, and it's a pretty expensive risk to take, particularly when you look at the need for other partners to kind of come through to, you know, make it even reasonably at now. 940 01:20:13,560 --> 01:20:19,340 So I want the board to really consider that, you know, half the county is put in the 941 01:20:19,340 --> 01:20:22,960 build for this through some of the water company and half to the other retailers. 942 01:20:23,500 --> 01:20:26,940 There's a lot of other beneficiaries downstream, whether it's environmental benefits, 943 01:20:27,280 --> 01:20:30,900 political benefits, that aren't really, that aren't really paid into the project. 944 01:20:31,340 --> 01:20:35,500 And so perhaps if there's some other ways to finance it and get the actual capital and 945 01:20:35,500 --> 01:20:39,640 get service costs off of the water rate payers, it looks a little better. 946 01:20:39,780 --> 01:20:42,720 But right now, it does not look like an economic project to me. 947 01:20:42,720 --> 01:20:44,700 Thanks. Thank you. 948 01:20:48,110 --> 01:20:54,270 Can I ask staff, is it true that there's no increase in supply? 949 01:20:55,070 --> 01:21:00,450 I mean, if you look at, if you just look back at the weather, 950 01:21:02,330 --> 01:21:07,030 even if you have one or two dry years at a five or ten, 951 01:21:07,870 --> 01:21:14,650 and you have substantial storage capacity that can pick up some of that supply 952 01:21:14,650 --> 01:21:19,690 that nobody's going to use that's going to go to waste. How much is that? Isn't that new supply? 953 01:21:19,970 --> 01:21:24,670 Isn't new supply water that you're not capturing? Is that new? 954 01:21:27,230 --> 01:21:28,350 New? I'm going to ask. I mean, 955 01:21:28,590 --> 01:21:33,690 water that isn't going to end up in the ocean? Isn't that new? 956 01:21:35,960 --> 01:21:37,160 I'm going to ask a meter or 957 01:21:37,160 --> 01:21:41,560 to participate and talk about how we model our water supplies. 958 01:21:42,120 --> 01:21:42,500 Thank you. 959 01:21:47,010 --> 01:21:50,530 Or maybe I could, maybe I could, or be sure, say I'm on. 960 01:21:51,630 --> 01:21:52,830 Okay, thank you, Sam. 961 01:21:53,050 --> 01:21:54,790 I was going to say I could, I could answer them. 962 01:21:55,590 --> 01:21:59,990 Oh, if you'd like to, you could both answer them. 963 01:22:00,030 --> 01:22:08,450 I'm, I'd say, I'm with a senior water resources specialist with the water supply and planning 964 01:22:08,450 --> 01:22:16,950 unit. And so the way we look at Pacheco, it's really a surface water thing. The surface 965 01:22:16,950 --> 01:22:22,990 water that does go in there, the majority of that goes to the fish benefits. So the added 966 01:22:22,990 --> 01:22:29,070 space that this reservoir is creating is for us to think are existing important water contracts 967 01:22:29,070 --> 01:22:37,550 of ice. So you're saying that no rain falls in there and no rain will be captured. And 968 01:22:37,550 --> 01:22:44,610 So when we have a real wet year, we're not going to capture more rain and the storage isn't 969 01:22:44,610 --> 01:22:45,630 going to increase. 970 01:22:47,230 --> 01:22:48,370 Is that what we're saying? 971 01:22:50,790 --> 01:22:55,390 Well, I don't care who benefits because the risk don't benefit from that, we're still 972 01:22:55,390 --> 01:22:56,570 going to provide it anyway. 973 01:22:58,330 --> 01:23:06,090 So is there an increase in water supply in a rain year, in a very wet year, taken in a 974 01:23:06,090 --> 01:23:12,590 year, like we've had before, where we had the capacity to store more water down south. 975 01:23:13,490 --> 01:23:14,530 What does that give us? 976 01:23:14,730 --> 01:23:17,510 Why do we would provide to fish then, yeah? 977 01:23:17,930 --> 01:23:23,690 Doesn't matter who we provide it to, because, you know, my point is, this more water. 978 01:23:25,170 --> 01:23:27,050 What we do with it is a different issue. 979 01:23:27,490 --> 01:23:30,050 My point is, that's new water. 980 01:23:31,090 --> 01:23:35,370 Water that we lose now, but then we'll capture 981 01:23:35,370 --> 01:23:39,070 Because of what we've done is new water. 982 01:23:41,880 --> 01:23:47,400 I mean, it doesn't matter what we do with it. We're going to have it to do something with like drink it 983 01:23:48,260 --> 01:23:55,200 But it's all provided to the fish or whatever, but it's new water, but right now it's lost 984 01:23:56,540 --> 01:24:00,760 So, you know, maybe we need a new definition. I don't know 985 01:24:00,760 --> 01:24:08,680 But isn't that true? I mean, when we had a linear wet years, that's how we got the savings to put it in our water bag 986 01:24:09,340 --> 01:24:17,320 That's what we got the water from. I mean, we didn't just, you know, start paying for more water to bank. We got a lot of it because we had 987 01:24:17,960 --> 01:24:32,480 What years I was here. I remember every every time we had a meeting it was it was storming outside. It was a wet year. It's overwhelmingly wet. Two years back to back elineal and that's how we put it we put away a lot of that water 988 01:24:33,800 --> 01:24:37,840 in in the bank. So I don't you know, why why are we talking about? 989 01:24:38,460 --> 01:24:44,940 What the capacity is, it's an increase in capacity, which means we capture water, that would have been lost. 990 01:24:46,280 --> 01:24:50,700 Why don't we call that new water? Because it is, it's new water to us. 991 01:24:52,380 --> 01:24:55,320 You know, I don't know, maybe a new definition. 992 01:24:56,800 --> 01:24:59,340 Captured water, I don't know, newly captured water. 993 01:25:00,000 --> 01:25:04,280 Increasing supply, because of the storage capacity. 994 01:25:07,420 --> 01:25:09,460 So I don't, I mean, 995 01:25:11,880 --> 01:25:14,960 am I, am I, am I, is that an illusion or, 996 01:25:18,130 --> 01:25:19,610 or are we looking at it differently? 997 01:25:23,260 --> 01:25:23,740 Third sense. 998 01:25:25,000 --> 01:25:33,620 Yeah, thank you, Mr. Chair. Yeah, not to turn on Samantha here, just it's a matter of, no, no, no, I'm saying for myself. 999 01:25:33,620 --> 01:25:39,620 And everything you're saying to him, I agree with 100%, let's go back to Anderson, when we 1000 01:25:39,620 --> 01:25:44,320 have people complain, well, the water, you know, Anderson should have held more in blah, blah, blah, 1001 01:25:44,680 --> 01:25:48,120 just think of Anderson wasn't there in the coyote flood. 1002 01:25:48,580 --> 01:25:54,540 We're not talking 4,000 CSFs, we're talking 25,000 if it wasn't there. 1003 01:25:54,820 --> 01:26:00,820 When the pioneers came here, this valley was underwater, and that's where the people before 1004 01:26:00,820 --> 01:26:09,500 We're doing things with fishing and whatever have you and feeding your animals and so we built a van for one reason to store water to supplement all these things 1005 01:26:09,500 --> 01:26:16,900 It helps reduce the flood as well as provide water and so everything is Tony saying is I'm just saying that's a common sense issue 1006 01:26:16,900 --> 01:26:22,300 Right now that water's coming down and it's not going in to 1007 01:26:22,300 --> 01:26:28,180 But check goes that should be it's going to soap lake and that's increasing and then the water is always to watch the bill 1008 01:26:28,180 --> 01:26:32,180 you name it to the ocean we're losing it so we want to recapture it was built there in the 1009 01:26:32,180 --> 01:26:37,580 beginning for that same reason and you can get water comes up on the top of Merced all the way 1010 01:26:37,580 --> 01:26:43,700 down so we need to capture that water it's such a just a common sense issue and you know it's so 1011 01:26:43,700 --> 01:26:48,700 hard to have new dams that either get anything so we have one that's there I just for me personally 1012 01:26:48,700 --> 01:26:53,600 and I'm sure other people have the same feeling why lose something that was there it was there 1013 01:26:53,600 --> 01:26:58,700 purpose to augment water supply and to make sure we have enough and we've got to continue 1014 01:26:58,700 --> 01:27:04,600 with that. Don't lose this because it's we are not able to get new dams today in California 1015 01:27:04,600 --> 01:27:08,940 because of all the infighting, all the different opinions whatever have you. So we've got to keep 1016 01:27:08,940 --> 01:27:14,420 what we got because we'll never get that chance again. So I should hope that's the way of recapturing. 1017 01:27:14,860 --> 01:27:21,140 It's a water source and again, it's for the generation that comes after us. It's our obligation to 1018 01:27:21,140 --> 01:27:25,060 Make sure there's water and like Tony said, let's take a look at all the costs and see what 1019 01:27:25,060 --> 01:27:25,680 could do. 1020 01:27:25,920 --> 01:27:30,320 Look at all the grants, wifey and all the different things and proposition one put them all 1021 01:27:30,320 --> 01:27:30,560 together. 1022 01:27:30,820 --> 01:27:35,140 But today, as the water storage committee has said, partnerships is the only way we're going 1023 01:27:35,140 --> 01:27:36,260 to make it. 1024 01:27:36,260 --> 01:27:38,000 San Jose will have to learn the hard way either. 1025 01:27:38,140 --> 01:27:42,460 They're going to be educated and understand what we're doing because other cities do. 1026 01:27:43,220 --> 01:27:46,520 And we all have the same constituents and Tony said, over and over and over and over. 1027 01:27:46,680 --> 01:27:48,460 It's our obligation to give them water. 1028 01:27:48,720 --> 01:27:49,360 One more time. 1029 01:27:49,360 --> 01:27:55,400 I'm not trying to get a scary picture of society, but I'll tell you, without water, you could imagine. 1030 01:27:55,900 --> 01:28:01,840 And when I hear a person from the Senate, the water company speak and so on, that's what I don't want to hear. 1031 01:28:02,200 --> 01:28:07,020 Because like Tony said, we got to stand up today and make these hard decisions to make sure there's water. 1032 01:28:07,300 --> 01:28:08,240 We've got ours. 1033 01:28:08,620 --> 01:28:12,140 It's the same as today in housing, when I go to meetings, people get up and they go, 1034 01:28:12,240 --> 01:28:17,160 we don't want no more housing and I look at them and I understand the feeling, but then I tell myself, 1035 01:28:17,160 --> 01:28:21,020 How can I tell young people that they can't have the dream that I had? 1036 01:28:21,540 --> 01:28:22,160 I can't. 1037 01:28:22,940 --> 01:28:23,180 I can't. 1038 01:28:23,900 --> 01:28:25,760 I've got to be there and make sure they have water. 1039 01:28:26,020 --> 01:28:27,120 Make sure they have housing. 1040 01:28:27,620 --> 01:28:28,680 They shouldn't live in a creek. 1041 01:28:29,480 --> 01:28:31,580 They should have the same opportunities I have. 1042 01:28:31,860 --> 01:28:32,920 And what's the big issue today? 1043 01:28:33,920 --> 01:28:37,820 Well, if we all should have been, we can make housing and other things a little more reasonable. 1044 01:28:38,320 --> 01:28:39,980 Everybody needs the American dream. 1045 01:28:40,300 --> 01:28:42,420 But first of all, no matter what we do, 1046 01:28:42,420 --> 01:28:48,700 to get folks out of the creek, to bring a quality, you gotta have water. Don't let this opportunity 1047 01:28:48,700 --> 01:28:54,580 slide by folks in regardless of the cost. It's an obligation we have to be neglected to make sure 1048 01:28:54,580 --> 01:28:56,700 our people have water. Thank you. 1049 01:29:03,880 --> 01:29:10,260 Directed with that? Yes, thank you. I'm struggling with 1050 01:29:12,860 --> 01:29:20,900 the new normal of climate change and other investments. So the new normal is what 1051 01:29:20,900 --> 01:29:25,660 we're living in and what we've been living in to the past 10 years. And that's a 1052 01:29:25,660 --> 01:29:32,260 drought. You can have all the storage in the world to pass it if you don't have water 1053 01:29:32,260 --> 01:29:40,240 to put it in the in the reservoir. So my question to step is in the last 20 years. 1054 01:29:41,280 --> 01:29:49,340 to get back the director as the mayor's point the last 20 years look at it. How many times have we 1055 01:29:52,470 --> 01:29:59,550 had went years lost water in the last 20 years how many times have we lost? 1056 01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:07,080 Water, uh, as opposed to being able to put it in the ground or bank it, instead my traffic. 1057 01:30:07,780 --> 01:30:14,960 And we truly lost water, as a gone out to the ocean, or have we been able to bank our contract amount, 1058 01:30:15,480 --> 01:30:19,340 or put it in the ground, uh, in went year. 1059 01:30:29,140 --> 01:30:32,300 I've, uh, attempted to get that question and we might have to answer to a little bit further. 1060 01:30:32,300 --> 01:30:37,900 So, and various times, especially when it's what, you know, as a chair-missionist, 1061 01:30:37,900 --> 01:30:43,340 with a number of things like that, there's significant flows to the bay, and so the 1062 01:30:43,340 --> 01:30:47,060 question would be, is, would you have the infrastructure, or would other things actually 1063 01:30:47,060 --> 01:30:53,780 have been available for us to pull them in, the windows of that time frame are very short, making 1064 01:30:53,780 --> 01:30:57,820 sure that you have the capacity or the infrastructure to capture some of those, and the timing 1065 01:30:57,820 --> 01:31:05,180 it as few and far between. So, just going off of memory here and maybe Steph could help me out 1066 01:31:05,980 --> 01:31:10,820 on with some actual numbers here. When it was very wet, when there's, you know, I hate to say, 1067 01:31:11,600 --> 01:31:15,240 we'll let's not bring up flooding or 2017 or anything like that, but at certain times there is 1068 01:31:15,240 --> 01:31:21,920 available. There is a lot of water available and a lot of it does float to various places. That being said, 1069 01:31:22,200 --> 01:31:27,220 capturing certain flows and being able to do certain things or being able to capture all of it 1070 01:31:27,220 --> 01:31:33,400 are very difficult and very difficult for us to make sure that we have the right places at 1071 01:31:33,400 --> 01:31:37,200 the right time to pull them in. So a lot of the times we're talking about here that would 1072 01:31:37,200 --> 01:31:43,500 be what we'll call the article 21 that the extra water or the things that may be available 1073 01:31:43,500 --> 01:31:48,100 when there are higher flows in the Delta or other places and there are small windows of when 1074 01:31:48,100 --> 01:31:53,820 you can take advantage of it. We've been trying to take advantage of that in the past and where 1075 01:31:53,820 --> 01:31:56,260 their advantages like that in the future with climate change. 1076 01:31:56,520 --> 01:32:02,100 The modeling shows that it's less and less, but it does show that eventually, you know, 1077 01:32:02,200 --> 01:32:05,720 that particular work others would be able to capture and track some of that. 1078 01:32:06,160 --> 01:32:11,580 But you are correct director that it is a smaller and smaller window and we really are just 1079 01:32:11,580 --> 01:32:17,600 trying to capture those final last drops that aren't, let's say earmark for the environment 1080 01:32:17,600 --> 01:32:21,440 and are above and beyond what would normally flow to the bay. 1081 01:32:21,440 --> 01:32:24,940 I don't know staff would like to help me out on many of the numbers. 1082 01:32:25,360 --> 01:32:25,500 Yes. 1083 01:32:25,940 --> 01:32:27,000 It's on May. 1084 01:32:27,400 --> 01:32:27,920 Good job. 1085 01:32:28,340 --> 01:32:28,940 Circulazard. 1086 01:32:29,120 --> 01:32:30,280 Vincent, deputy for Washington. 1087 01:32:30,420 --> 01:32:31,280 Good afternoon, Vincent. 1088 01:32:31,440 --> 01:32:36,260 My understanding is that the question is, how often, in some period of time historically, 1089 01:32:36,680 --> 01:32:40,660 have we been unable to exercise the opportunity to capture excess water? 1090 01:32:41,440 --> 01:32:47,620 There are two answers that one is the modeling theoretical modeling and one is the 1091 01:32:47,620 --> 01:32:51,360 actual dates where we had surplus water available to us. 1092 01:32:51,360 --> 01:32:57,820 But we couldn't take delivery and store that because we did not have the available volume of storage. 1093 01:32:58,620 --> 01:33:04,000 So for the, I think we'll probably need to research out the more to make sure we can actually respond. 1094 01:33:04,540 --> 01:33:16,320 But the general question, Cindy, how are important water manager has some of the plans and thoughts on what years and how often anecdotally we've been able to capture or not capture that surplus water. 1095 01:33:16,320 --> 01:33:19,440 My understanding is most time we have been, 1096 01:33:19,440 --> 01:33:21,060 but there may be a few incidents that we have been. 1097 01:33:21,580 --> 01:33:23,500 And after that, I'd like to see if sand has 1098 01:33:23,500 --> 01:33:25,360 some perspective on our modeling. 1099 01:33:25,720 --> 01:33:28,240 The theoretical, 40 years, I believe, 1100 01:33:28,260 --> 01:33:29,700 40 something years of data, half 1101 01:33:29,700 --> 01:33:31,560 and that could occur in the model. 1102 01:33:32,320 --> 01:33:34,600 So that, if it's a meaningful church, 1103 01:33:34,780 --> 01:33:36,040 I'd like to turn the floor to send it to you. 1104 01:33:38,660 --> 01:33:41,600 Yeah, so I don't have the specific dates. 1105 01:33:41,620 --> 01:33:42,800 I'd have to research them. 1106 01:33:42,980 --> 01:33:45,400 But in based on my memory over the past 10 years, 1107 01:33:45,400 --> 01:33:51,180 have in a couple of years, the white years, where we were not able to take the flood flows 1108 01:33:51,180 --> 01:33:57,300 article 21 water in that area, and they had spoken about because we didn't have a place to 1109 01:33:57,300 --> 01:34:04,200 story. And we did lose some carrier, we did still carry over that we had stored in San Luis Reservoir 1110 01:34:05,000 --> 01:34:11,700 during a wet year, during a wet winter once or twice because we didn't have a place to put it. 1111 01:34:11,700 --> 01:34:22,780 So it does happen if the future results in more intense winters and periods where precipitation 1112 01:34:22,780 --> 01:34:28,880 is concentrated, then that could happen more frequently, if we invest in the Delta Command 1113 01:34:28,880 --> 01:34:32,860 facility, that could happen more frequently as well. 1114 01:34:34,740 --> 01:34:40,340 So thank you very much. That's what I thought based on what I've read, 1115 01:34:40,340 --> 01:34:46,500 is that it isn't that we're because we don't have storage. We're losing water to the bay, 1116 01:34:46,640 --> 01:34:52,660 we're losing this opportunity. It's it's slim and it's getting slimmer particularly with the new normal. 1117 01:34:52,660 --> 01:34:56,120 So having said that, what, 1118 01:34:58,180 --> 01:34:59,980 what, how much more? 1119 01:35:00,000 --> 01:35:18,880 On an interest in most precarious, could we get, if it's valid, you know, storage capacity, what we would be able to store there, if we took the investment, we were going to make it to check it out and move it into an investment into most precarious. 1120 01:35:21,000 --> 01:35:25,320 Are we even able to buy more space in most precarious at this point? 1121 01:35:28,480 --> 01:35:37,100 We do have those precursors team on the call, and right now we've been primarily looking at those precursors to the operational flexibility of the deafening sense for line. 1122 01:35:37,880 --> 01:35:42,400 But there is a belief still opportunity to increase storage. 1123 01:35:43,300 --> 01:35:47,440 The dedicated storage in LVED was for Carol's expansion project. 1124 01:35:48,620 --> 01:35:50,660 It is a little bit different. 1125 01:35:51,220 --> 01:35:53,260 The location is north of Delta. 1126 01:35:53,920 --> 01:36:02,020 So it's not, obviously the storage is always valuable, but I just want to just mention that it's so difficult to have direct apples to apples comparison. 1127 01:36:02,660 --> 01:36:09,520 But we do have opportunity to invest further in the LDE dedicated storage. 1128 01:36:10,360 --> 01:36:12,300 And with that Sam, I see you're online. 1129 01:36:12,440 --> 01:36:14,220 You're going to be able to have anything to add to that. 1130 01:36:16,740 --> 01:36:19,540 Yes, we can invest further in it. 1131 01:36:19,540 --> 01:36:22,720 reaching the same if we're hoping for 100,000 1132 01:36:22,720 --> 01:36:25,880 acre feet of valley water storage space. 1133 01:36:26,540 --> 01:36:28,360 We couldn't reach that same amount, 1134 01:36:28,540 --> 01:36:29,980 although what I've been hearing is we are 1135 01:36:29,980 --> 01:36:31,940 hoping for partnerships in Bacheco. 1136 01:36:32,960 --> 01:36:36,320 So we could potentially match it, match it, 1137 01:36:36,400 --> 01:36:39,540 uh, apologies, match the storage that we get in 1138 01:36:39,540 --> 01:36:40,300 when we can't remember. 1139 01:36:41,060 --> 01:36:42,900 But that all depends on how much we were 1140 01:36:42,900 --> 01:36:44,060 holding out in Bacheco. 1141 01:36:45,900 --> 01:36:48,620 Right. And to the point about it, 1142 01:36:48,620 --> 01:36:53,540 want to do Delta, it bypasses the pumps because of the transfer of Bethany pipeline, 1143 01:36:55,760 --> 01:36:55,760 right? 1144 01:36:57,640 --> 01:37:00,060 So there is a Bethany transfer. 1145 01:37:02,400 --> 01:37:03,400 And that's why I'm in favor. 1146 01:37:04,860 --> 01:37:10,820 So, you know, like I said, this is where I'm struggling with, you know, 1147 01:37:11,000 --> 01:37:12,940 wet ears that aren't going to be happening. 1148 01:37:12,940 --> 01:37:20,600 They'll be happening, but history shows that we haven't been losing that abilities to store. 1149 01:37:21,380 --> 01:37:27,840 We could boost our investment in low-specarols, but what it was supposed to get the same amount 1150 01:37:27,840 --> 01:37:30,680 at a Chaco, at a less cost. 1151 01:37:31,400 --> 01:37:37,420 And then whatever other money we didn't put into the Chaco, we just put into recycled water 1152 01:37:37,940 --> 01:37:42,320 and boost that capacity and talk about new water, tell me there's your new water. 1153 01:37:42,320 --> 01:37:47,440 Yeah, well, you know, you know, this is where I'm struggling, you know, I know it's not 1154 01:37:47,440 --> 01:37:47,700 apples. 1155 01:37:47,700 --> 01:37:50,100 The struggle we've been having with the city of San Jose. 1156 01:37:50,760 --> 01:37:55,880 But what it's, but it's, you know, I think we have a real opportunity with the most 1157 01:37:55,880 --> 01:38:05,800 of the carols and it's, it just seems to make more sense for the investment they are for 1158 01:38:05,800 --> 01:38:12,300 the amount of storage we would get, particularly if we're going to look for partners to, you 1159 01:38:12,300 --> 01:38:14,880 that we will have available to us in the checkup. 1160 01:38:15,560 --> 01:38:18,880 So at this point, I'm still listening, studying, 1161 01:38:19,560 --> 01:38:23,320 and I just wanted to voice my struggles and my concerns 1162 01:38:23,900 --> 01:38:27,960 about investing here versus most most precarious. 1163 01:38:28,160 --> 01:38:29,820 We're doubling our investment in post precarious. 1164 01:38:31,420 --> 01:38:36,080 And just the correction, I'm not opposed to the precarious. 1165 01:38:38,600 --> 01:38:40,080 Well, I can see that. 1166 01:38:40,180 --> 01:38:42,320 What I was saying is that, you know, 1167 01:38:42,320 --> 01:38:45,580 their new water can be made at a recycled water, 1168 01:38:45,900 --> 01:38:49,600 but if we switch the investment from Chaco to Losta Terrace, 1169 01:38:50,600 --> 01:38:52,740 we could potentially get the same additional storage 1170 01:38:52,740 --> 01:38:56,200 that we want, and maybe at a cheaper cost. 1171 01:38:57,020 --> 01:38:59,260 And like I said, we can have all the storage in the world, 1172 01:38:59,420 --> 01:39:02,320 but if we don't have the water to put in it, 1173 01:39:02,460 --> 01:39:04,860 and with climate change and new normal, 1174 01:39:05,660 --> 01:39:07,140 you know, I'm just wondering, 1175 01:39:08,120 --> 01:39:10,580 Losta Terrace is gonna happen when the word involves or not, 1176 01:39:10,580 --> 01:39:17,220 But, you know, for us to lead on Cacheco when we could get the same banking for the 1177 01:39:17,220 --> 01:39:21,820 bucket out of, or similar, at a part-ringing loss of care, so it's going to happen anyway. 1178 01:39:22,600 --> 01:39:26,580 I just think that's a more attractive group of go. 1179 01:39:26,580 --> 01:39:27,420 That may be. 1180 01:39:28,560 --> 01:39:29,360 Do you have any other centres? 1181 01:39:32,190 --> 01:39:32,430 What? 1182 01:39:33,130 --> 01:39:33,350 What? 1183 01:39:33,350 --> 01:39:33,770 Oh, I'm sorry. 1184 01:39:33,950 --> 01:39:34,270 Yes. 1185 01:39:34,750 --> 01:39:35,790 Somebody else go ahead, Tom. 1186 01:39:36,290 --> 01:39:37,130 Would the vice chair next? 1187 01:39:37,730 --> 01:39:38,170 I'm sorry. 1188 01:39:38,270 --> 01:39:38,710 Yeah, go ahead. 1189 01:39:38,930 --> 01:39:39,610 I'm sorry. 1190 01:39:39,890 --> 01:39:40,610 Vice chair next. 1191 01:39:40,610 --> 01:39:41,350 You're 1192 01:39:44,290 --> 01:39:45,690 on mute by sugar. 1193 01:39:47,290 --> 01:39:48,890 You're on mute. 1194 01:39:48,890 --> 01:39:49,670 You're on mute. 1195 01:39:49,670 --> 01:39:49,910 You're on mute. 1196 01:39:50,410 --> 01:39:50,750 You're on mute. 1197 01:39:50,750 --> 01:39:53,050 A couple of comments on this. 1198 01:39:53,190 --> 01:39:56,290 I think the unorl is just natural. 1199 01:39:56,830 --> 01:39:59,870 The unorl is everything. 1200 01:40:00,000 --> 01:40:06,260 I'll see this, it's about volatility, you know, when are winter's drier summer, is it cool? 1201 01:40:07,120 --> 01:40:21,660 And that's the challenge, you know, especially with more precipitation, the biggest thing I know in the modeling for the conveyance project is the snow tap melting sooner. 1202 01:40:21,660 --> 01:40:28,100 And that actually reduces the storage, so we're going to see more spills, not less spills. 1203 01:40:29,620 --> 01:40:35,200 And in a way, our storage is going down, whether it be on the state side is a federal side. 1204 01:40:36,060 --> 01:40:40,700 So even if we did this project, it's not like an additional storage, it's just kind of working contract. 1205 01:40:41,120 --> 01:40:43,860 That's, we're keeping pace with number one. 1206 01:40:43,860 --> 01:40:50,300 So that's what the models from DSA, they spent a lot more money on it than we have. 1207 01:40:50,600 --> 01:40:55,700 Number two is respect the article, 21, I think the article is staff, but if there's a detailed 1208 01:40:55,700 --> 01:41:05,600 article article on article 21, it may have been no book, April 5th, 2018, about article 21. 1209 01:41:05,600 --> 01:41:13,680 And they talk about how it's because of the flashiness, but you know pictures of, you know, 1210 01:41:14,040 --> 01:41:17,980 Sacramento and other places flooding all the time, that's what happens with Art of the 21. 1211 01:41:18,940 --> 01:41:20,360 So we don't need it every year. 1212 01:41:20,660 --> 01:41:23,640 It's just enough years to fill it. 1213 01:41:24,560 --> 01:41:33,020 With respect to our game, demand projections, it's interesting that, you know, we have one set of demand projections. 1214 01:41:33,020 --> 01:41:38,840 historical is staff told us that the meeting that just happened before, but the elected 1215 01:41:38,840 --> 01:41:44,320 almost uniformly said otherwise that they said the man will be going up because of the 1216 01:41:44,320 --> 01:41:51,900 arena numbers and other needs which from what I heard are not part of our model. We basically 1217 01:41:51,900 --> 01:41:54,080 take historical numbers. 1218 01:41:56,360 --> 01:41:59,520 So there might be some issues and is it really going down whether we need 1219 01:41:59,520 --> 01:42:04,020 are not so. And the final thing is, I think there's still a lot of 1220 01:42:04,020 --> 01:42:09,280 cost and certainty in Las Vicaris. Another water district director emailed me 1221 01:42:09,280 --> 01:42:15,300 today saying he thinks the costs are really two X. What they're saying and he 1222 01:42:15,300 --> 01:42:19,980 gave a detailed explanation of what the reimbursements will be, which isn't 1223 01:42:19,980 --> 01:42:24,340 part of the model that's been shared. So how do the Las Vicaris is a 1224 01:42:24,340 --> 01:42:27,180 And I support it, but not PNC. 1225 01:42:30,310 --> 01:42:31,250 Eric Santos? 1226 01:42:32,170 --> 01:42:32,850 Yes, Mr. Chair. 1227 01:42:32,930 --> 01:42:33,630 Thank you. 1228 01:42:33,770 --> 01:42:37,950 To the point of director Lizat speaking on us for Kerosene, 1229 01:42:38,090 --> 01:42:39,250 that it's going to be a done deal. 1230 01:42:39,810 --> 01:42:40,590 I don't disagree. 1231 01:42:42,330 --> 01:42:44,930 The water storage committee has taken a look at this very carefully. 1232 01:42:45,810 --> 01:42:48,190 And as one member, I support that. 1233 01:42:48,410 --> 01:42:50,890 It's the words, the other words you use about recycling, 1234 01:42:51,210 --> 01:42:55,150 so I don't disagree where you take the funding and just put it over there. 1235 01:42:55,150 --> 01:42:59,210 over there is going to be partnerships also. That's why I don't want to lose sight with the 1236 01:42:59,210 --> 01:43:03,990 Pacheco. Let's keep on pursuing the potential partnership because of the benefits it brings. 1237 01:43:04,490 --> 01:43:09,850 But I do agree with you and their storage committee is discussed as very clearly. I really believe 1238 01:43:09,850 --> 01:43:15,890 the list of the kiddos is a good, another good partnership and I believe regulatory and with the 1239 01:43:15,890 --> 01:43:20,890 state and everything is going to be done. So we have a great opportunity and I know that we're 1240 01:43:20,890 --> 01:43:25,910 supporting that not we haven't taken official vote but I would agree with you and I think 1241 01:43:25,910 --> 01:43:30,150 other board members here for the same we should tap into that to make sure our generation 1242 01:43:30,150 --> 01:43:38,670 has a supply all the time but again please we need to take a look at state federal infrastructure 1243 01:43:38,670 --> 01:43:42,870 all these things are going on we got a chance and then with private partnerships to make 1244 01:43:42,870 --> 01:43:47,790 the Czecho reality also but the priority would be yeah I think we should go over there and hook 1245 01:43:47,790 --> 01:43:53,470 but let's forget us due to the partnerships that I believe have enough pool. I think statewide 1246 01:43:53,470 --> 01:43:58,720 politically-wise it's going to go and we need to be part of it. 1247 01:43:58,800 --> 01:44:01,080 Director of the Red Love, the Duke. 1248 01:44:02,420 --> 01:44:06,100 Thank you. So, I want to start with the China and on that as well as the 1249 01:44:06,100 --> 01:44:11,560 graphic schools. We've had through our water storage committee meetings. We have multiple meetings 1250 01:44:11,560 --> 01:44:17,180 where their staff and their leadership attend our meeting and give us constant updates 1251 01:44:17,180 --> 01:44:22,360 as to where they are and the questions that we ask in the reference to cost sharing, etc. 1252 01:44:23,240 --> 01:44:28,680 You know, everything is a work in progress. We're all working through these issues in our 1253 01:44:28,680 --> 01:44:35,020 different service areas. But we look at it, I guess I'm speaking for myself and I think I'm 1254 01:44:35,020 --> 01:44:40,920 speaking for the committee that this would be an ideal continuation of a partnership agreement 1255 01:44:40,920 --> 01:44:48,080 across the campus. Any water storage agreement that's on the table today, inside of 1256 01:44:48,080 --> 01:44:53,840 outside Santa Clara County, we must look at it and consider it. You know, we talked 1257 01:44:53,840 --> 01:44:58,600 about sites, we want to be part of the governance, if that's going to be the case to be part 1258 01:44:58,600 --> 01:44:59,200 of that project. 1259 01:45:00,000 --> 01:45:24,760 These are happening up and down the state. When we attend the Assembly's Delta Mendoza Water Authority, which are primarily central valley water managers, irrigation districts, and agriculture, we listen to all their issues in regards to the sigma and all the different water costs that they're incurring for the farmers, et cetera, from current county up to Sacramento and beyond. 1260 01:45:24,760 --> 01:45:31,540 So, we have a really good understanding as to what's going on with cost and water supply and partnerships. 1261 01:45:32,800 --> 01:45:37,840 So, I think from our perspective, we continue the conversation with the Loss of Kettos, 1262 01:45:38,360 --> 01:45:42,880 and moving towards an ideal working relationship with that organization. 1263 01:45:43,560 --> 01:45:45,980 There are fine group of people that work with, but they're just like us. 1264 01:45:46,240 --> 01:45:46,940 They're no different. 1265 01:45:47,720 --> 01:45:53,120 We're in a competitive market, and we're all looking to maybe, I'll do the other guy. 1266 01:45:54,260 --> 01:45:56,840 But the bottom is, we all have to fly ball together. 1267 01:45:57,760 --> 01:45:57,860 We have to. 1268 01:45:57,860 --> 01:45:58,820 We have no choice. 1269 01:45:59,420 --> 01:46:00,500 Well, we do have a choice. 1270 01:46:01,080 --> 01:46:02,120 But it's not a good choice. 1271 01:46:02,480 --> 01:46:03,960 To have to pay for many of these opportunities, 1272 01:46:04,900 --> 01:46:06,480 I wouldn't support that at all. 1273 01:46:07,000 --> 01:46:07,840 We need these partnerships. 1274 01:46:08,000 --> 01:46:09,120 We want to encourage them. 1275 01:46:10,460 --> 01:46:13,120 And support 100%. 1276 01:46:14,460 --> 01:46:16,040 That's my position. 1277 01:46:17,660 --> 01:46:18,360 Derek Deschua. 1278 01:46:19,920 --> 01:46:20,480 Thank you, Chair. 1279 01:46:20,480 --> 01:46:31,940 I appreciate hearing my colleagues comment, I think they're all very good, and I just 1280 01:46:31,940 --> 01:46:39,040 want to add one more thing that talking about planning for the future, this is our 1281 01:46:39,040 --> 01:47:02,440 And in the 1931, or I think 31, that people in this county doing the depression, the greatest depression of United States history, voted to tax themselves to build all these reservoirs. 1282 01:47:02,440 --> 01:47:05,440 So this is in addition to the chair, 1283 01:47:05,620 --> 01:47:07,640 I just mentioned about how the governor at the time 1284 01:47:07,640 --> 01:47:09,280 and then built everything for the California. 1285 01:47:09,820 --> 01:47:13,040 But then we're seeing the county doing the depression 1286 01:47:13,040 --> 01:47:17,760 people voted to tax themselves so that we have 1287 01:47:17,760 --> 01:47:20,520 Anderson Reservoir, Colorado Reservoir, 1288 01:47:20,720 --> 01:47:25,920 all that recharge pump and the entire system. 1289 01:47:27,180 --> 01:47:29,220 As I said, when I talk to people, 1290 01:47:29,220 --> 01:47:31,260 I always tell people that it's not me 1291 01:47:31,260 --> 01:47:38,420 more about, I don't think I'll live to the date, when we don't have water, but then we're 1292 01:47:38,420 --> 01:47:47,480 really planning for our children and children. So with that said, I just want to provide 1293 01:47:47,480 --> 01:47:56,440 my personal opinion about these board policy decisions that staff asks us to bring it to some 1294 01:47:56,440 --> 01:48:03,300 of, uh, I guess conclusion. Uh, so staff asks us that, uh, can, can we have that slide 1295 01:48:03,300 --> 01:48:04,680 sound? This is the last slide. 1296 01:48:09,460 --> 01:48:13,240 Okay. So first, first bullet is, does it make sense to 1297 01:48:13,240 --> 01:48:18,320 continue including particular reservoir, uh, in one of the supply mass plants? So my personal opinion is, 1298 01:48:18,620 --> 01:48:24,060 yes. Uh, and then, are there, uh, predetermined triggers that require that project be, uh, 1299 01:48:24,180 --> 01:48:30,520 re validated by the board of directors, uh, time partnership, uh, cost schedule, etc. I would say, 1300 01:48:30,520 --> 01:48:56,340 of the above, and in addition to the annual monitoring and plant form, while there is a schedule building that, look at that, look at while there's a plant master plant every year, but then in between anything that's staff consider it's a key factor. 1301 01:48:56,340 --> 01:49:01,820 the board should get a briefing and discussion on that. 1302 01:49:02,760 --> 01:49:07,600 And then the third vote, what level of partnership participation should be assumed for financial 1303 01:49:07,600 --> 01:49:08,780 planning purposes. 1304 01:49:10,520 --> 01:49:18,820 I would recommend that for the particular reservoir that's putting a 1305 01:49:20,990 --> 01:49:21,970 assumption has more 1306 01:49:21,970 --> 01:49:28,490 on the conservative side, because if we're committed to doing 1307 01:49:28,490 --> 01:49:38,390 this project, we should not, I mean, I would say it's my personal opinion that painting a nicer picture 1308 01:49:38,390 --> 01:49:50,710 at this time, I think it may mislead our constituents that I would prefer that a more conservative 1309 01:49:50,710 --> 01:49:58,290 assumption be putting to the financial planning for the financial planning purpose, but also 1310 01:49:58,290 --> 01:49:59,810 So that I think... 1311 01:50:00,000 --> 01:50:25,660 I think that going back to chair's comment earlier that we need to have a discussion about what is the rate that we're willing to pay so that all these opportunities that all the board members just talked about can be looked at. 1312 01:50:25,660 --> 01:50:36,000 that if the money that's invested for a Pacheco, maybe it can be divided into other parts. 1313 01:50:37,240 --> 01:50:47,020 So no matter what this future is going to look like, it goes back to Chair's comment earlier that what is that 1314 01:50:47,020 --> 01:50:53,340 receiving of rates that we are willing to support. 1315 01:50:54,400 --> 01:51:02,220 So I would request that's part of the discussion on the ongoing basis. 1316 01:51:02,820 --> 01:51:09,460 So that would be my personal opinion related to staff as these board policy decisions. 1317 01:51:11,100 --> 01:51:11,720 Thank you. 1318 01:51:11,720 --> 01:51:12,960 Thank you, Director Shua. 1319 01:51:12,960 --> 01:51:14,820 But I think that's a good idea. 1320 01:51:15,040 --> 01:51:19,440 I'll just start from this trip one and go through the list 1321 01:51:19,440 --> 01:51:20,920 and then we can get some feedback. 1322 01:51:21,340 --> 01:51:30,840 But let me just ask, it staff might have some feeling 1323 01:51:30,840 --> 01:51:34,000 about what level of partnership participation 1324 01:51:38,000 --> 01:51:40,760 will lower water rates significantly, 1325 01:51:41,700 --> 01:51:46,360 or if you could give us some indication of what the number might be. 1326 01:51:47,080 --> 01:51:50,660 If you can, I know this is, you know, all the cuff is hard for you to do. 1327 01:51:50,700 --> 01:51:55,540 I don't know if they're in, you guys have discussed this. 1328 01:51:59,050 --> 01:52:04,670 Director of Jamera, the Christians have the slide that shows the sort of the sliding scale. 1329 01:52:05,070 --> 01:52:05,090 Yes. 1330 01:52:05,090 --> 01:52:10,170 Well, we have with the rate projection increases in the North Counties on W2 with different 1331 01:52:10,170 --> 01:52:15,170 levels of partnership participation. Right there in the middle of this slide shows the current 1332 01:52:15,170 --> 01:52:23,310 assumption that's included in the staff recommendation for F522. It seems 20%. Partnership 1333 01:52:23,310 --> 01:52:27,810 participation and that was based on board of directions from a couple of years ago hasn't 1334 01:52:27,810 --> 01:52:35,330 changed since then and that's what derives the 9.6% rate projection that we currently have. 1335 01:52:35,330 --> 01:52:45,330 Now, if we were to go higher, you see the end of the scale there is 38.5%, and that would take that rate projection down to 8.8%. 1336 01:52:46,550 --> 01:52:56,770 And so you can kind of get a feel for the difference that that higher level of partnership participation would make if that helps answer that question. 1337 01:52:56,770 --> 01:53:06,050 It does. Thank you. Yeah, I wanted it for the discussion, so I thank you. I think that we all see then we can all see that. 1338 01:53:06,410 --> 01:53:20,950 Okay, so if I made let me go through with that as I direct to sure suggested and get some feedback we have we can go back to that list on page two or 17 there on the attachment. 1339 01:53:20,950 --> 01:53:25,450 So, let's start with Director Morella and I'll just go down the line, how's that? 1340 01:53:29,710 --> 01:53:30,730 Director Morella, you're on mute. 1341 01:53:31,030 --> 01:53:31,650 Okay, got it. 1342 01:53:31,670 --> 01:53:32,110 Thank you. 1343 01:53:32,330 --> 01:53:32,590 That's sure. 1344 01:53:32,830 --> 01:53:38,050 Listen, first and foremost, I think it's quite obvious to face on my previous statements that 1345 01:53:38,050 --> 01:53:43,870 I'm 100% for this project and I think it's important that we take that position. 1346 01:53:44,770 --> 01:53:47,630 Are you asking me to go through each one of these bullet points on the board? 1347 01:53:47,810 --> 01:53:48,790 What do you want? 1348 01:53:49,090 --> 01:53:49,270 Yes. 1349 01:53:52,370 --> 01:53:54,990 Whatever you say, it could be yes or no, it could be whatever you say. 1350 01:53:54,990 --> 01:53:56,410 No problem. 1351 01:53:57,590 --> 01:54:00,870 Where does the particular reservoir expansion project get into the water supply master plan? 1352 01:54:01,490 --> 01:54:04,310 I think it should be one of the top priority issues on the master plan. 1353 01:54:05,150 --> 01:54:10,070 The pre-determined triggers that require the project revalidated by the Board of Directors, 1354 01:54:10,590 --> 01:54:12,610 time, partnership, participation, cost, schedule, etc. 1355 01:54:12,990 --> 01:54:16,310 I think that's what we've just been discussing for the last potential hour. 1356 01:54:16,750 --> 01:54:17,030 So yes. 1357 01:54:17,830 --> 01:54:22,070 And one level of partnership participation should be assumed for financial planning purposes. 1358 01:54:22,070 --> 01:54:40,010 Again, continuation of discussion that we're having with the community, with our public hearings as we did today with the water commission, to continue that process and have the final discussion and meet as we will be making those decisions, but I support all in front of us as to move this project forward. 1359 01:54:40,910 --> 01:54:42,250 Thank you. Director Kiga. 1360 01:54:42,250 --> 01:54:43,030 First 1361 01:54:46,390 --> 01:54:59,710 I'd like to thank staff for a very comprehensive presentation and for thank my fellow board members for a good discussion on this topic. 1362 01:55:00,180 --> 01:55:30,160 This is obviously a very important potential project to the district, and I think we have all expressed interest in the project and at the same time understanding that the devil is in the details, and so I think in particular, we all have to feel responsibility because the board members that are going to be involved with implementation of this project are not 1363 01:55:30,160 --> 01:55:35,940 to be the same board members that are here today and saying let's go forward with this. 1364 01:55:36,600 --> 01:55:45,020 So, I do think that the Bichaco Reservoir Expansion Project belongs in our current 1365 01:55:45,020 --> 01:55:52,840 water supply master plan. And I also think that we need more information, 1366 01:55:52,840 --> 01:56:19,520 It's given us good information, but we really need to know more of the details, the permitting issues, the part simplifications, the cost, and so that's already moving in that direction, and that's a positive thing, and so that's part of what I really think is going to be important to bring back to the board as more information becomes available. 1367 01:56:19,520 --> 01:56:26,640 And, you know, I don't really, I don't really have a, a good sense of what level of partner 1368 01:56:26,640 --> 01:56:34,940 participation should be assumed that this time, I think, you know, I'm going to ask staff 1369 01:56:34,940 --> 01:56:38,400 to use their best judgment in terms of doing that. 1370 01:56:38,760 --> 01:56:49,500 I certainly just want to make clear, I think it would be very premature to, for us to say that 1371 01:56:49,500 --> 01:56:53,580 that we're not interested in pursuing this project or that they're not going to budget for. 1372 01:56:53,680 --> 01:56:58,900 And I agree with the comments about what we hear from the water commission. 1373 01:56:59,160 --> 01:57:03,320 We've all been, you know, word representatives of the water commission. 1374 01:57:03,840 --> 01:57:06,400 Some of you right now, some of us in the past. 1375 01:57:07,040 --> 01:57:09,440 And what we always hear is, well, we want you to do this. 1376 01:57:09,600 --> 01:57:12,800 And we want recycled water and want environmental enhancements. 1377 01:57:12,800 --> 01:57:14,520 And we want, you know, a gazillion things. 1378 01:57:15,060 --> 01:57:16,760 And we don't want to pay any more money. 1379 01:57:16,760 --> 01:57:25,200 and those are incompatible goals and so and also it's it's short-term thinking to just be 1380 01:57:25,200 --> 01:57:32,160 looking at we want to keep water rates as low as possible when we need to ensure that we have a 1381 01:57:32,160 --> 01:57:41,420 supply for the future including having the ability to you know have water supply for you know 1382 01:57:42,380 --> 01:57:48,860 housing, housing for that next generation, and also to be able to support, you know, a healthy 1383 01:57:48,860 --> 01:57:54,540 economy and having employers staying in the area. So those are my thoughts at this time. 1384 01:57:54,720 --> 01:57:55,420 So thank you. 1385 01:57:56,120 --> 01:57:57,560 Thank you, thank you. There at the TV. 1386 01:57:58,420 --> 01:58:02,880 Yeah, thank you Mr. Chair. Yeah, the first two is yes, and then the last one is the board 1387 01:58:02,880 --> 01:58:07,520 board determines we're going to continue getting information and look at what the best 1388 01:58:07,520 --> 01:58:09,220 partnership that we need to seek. 1389 01:58:10,660 --> 01:58:16,000 Director Lizard, thank you, Director Santos, Director Santos, Director Lizard. 1390 01:58:17,160 --> 01:58:24,400 Yes, so the first one, yeah, but I'd like to staff to come back with a memo. 1391 01:58:25,900 --> 01:58:27,180 So make this a BMR. 1392 01:58:27,800 --> 01:58:34,840 I like to know what the last 20 to 40 years had shown, but let's just do 20 make it easy. 1393 01:58:34,840 --> 01:58:53,140 I show them with regard to those wet years when we allegedly lost the ability to store as much as we wanted to and how many acre feet did we, in fact, not only not able to store or to be lose. 1394 01:58:53,140 --> 01:59:07,460 And then, secondarily, what would be the tipping point on our partnership participation, 1395 01:59:08,640 --> 01:59:17,940 where I think Cindy alluded to this, where if our partnership participation was high, 1396 01:59:17,940 --> 01:59:27,420 And then we would have the ability ourselves to access the storage of a Jacob that we could get in 1397 01:59:27,420 --> 01:59:30,480 most of the carols if we invested heavily in most of the carols. 1398 01:59:30,740 --> 01:59:38,780 So where's that tipping point of partnership participation where we have the exact same storage 1399 01:59:38,780 --> 01:59:45,640 and most of the carols if we could get it versus what the amount of storage we would have if we had 1400 01:59:45,640 --> 01:59:48,040 high partnership participation. 1401 01:59:49,560 --> 01:59:52,840 So that was a yes for number one without that request for information. 1402 01:59:54,020 --> 01:59:59,880 Number two, the triggers I'd like to see to bring back information to us would be aware. 1403 02:00:00,000 --> 02:00:07,320 The partnership participation, whether it's lower-high, and then the costs, whether they were increasing or decreasing. 1404 02:00:08,960 --> 02:00:14,360 And you know how that affected our investment level. 1405 02:00:14,920 --> 02:00:24,000 And then the level of partnership participation to be assumed. I think staff has assumed conservative, which is where you are right now. 1406 02:00:24,000 --> 02:00:29,120 And I think that's probably good for now. 1407 02:00:29,420 --> 02:00:34,460 I think we obviously, what is higher level of partnership 1408 02:00:34,460 --> 02:00:35,960 participation is possible. 1409 02:00:36,760 --> 02:00:38,280 But as far as assuming right now, 1410 02:00:38,460 --> 02:00:43,000 I think it needs to be conservative as the staff has suggested. 1411 02:00:43,760 --> 02:00:45,860 Thank you. 1412 02:00:45,880 --> 02:00:47,340 Thank you, Director Lizard. 1413 02:00:48,600 --> 02:00:49,120 Thank you. 1414 02:00:52,370 --> 02:00:53,050 Okay. 1415 02:00:53,470 --> 02:00:54,070 A vice chair? 1416 02:00:58,260 --> 02:01:00,020 Are you sure you're on mute? 1417 02:01:00,280 --> 02:01:01,260 I know, I know, I know. 1418 02:01:02,280 --> 02:01:05,000 So the answer to the questions doesn't make sense to include 1419 02:01:05,000 --> 02:01:07,560 in the master plan, yes. 1420 02:01:08,460 --> 02:01:10,560 Are there predetermined triggers? 1421 02:01:12,660 --> 02:01:14,600 I'm not sure we have to set those up front, 1422 02:01:14,840 --> 02:01:18,240 but I think we need to frequently bring this back. 1423 02:01:18,260 --> 02:01:22,460 I think to me, it would be, you know, at the end of the day, 1424 02:01:22,660 --> 02:01:26,240 it's about costs of our share. 1425 02:01:26,240 --> 02:01:30,760 So that's both a combination of the share, the cost of the project, 1426 02:01:32,880 --> 02:01:39,620 and I want to talk about that in a second, and what partners we get, what level of participants would be assumed. 1427 02:01:39,980 --> 02:01:48,240 You know, I think something like 30% I think director, maybe director or else I think, I think staff's pretty conservative on that. 1428 02:01:48,240 --> 02:01:54,140 To me, I'd like to couple this with kind of moving our legislative priority, some priorities, 1429 02:01:54,500 --> 02:01:59,260 we go get some look at infrastructure money, because that will lower cost. 1430 02:01:59,680 --> 02:02:02,900 Discussions with the state are how we can grab some of these costs. 1431 02:02:03,280 --> 02:02:09,340 Prop one projects and look at who else is not going to make it, because there are some other people that might not make it. 1432 02:02:09,420 --> 02:02:14,820 And then move out the part discussion as a priority, because we can say $200 million, 1433 02:02:15,280 --> 02:02:21,320 and we can be a hero of these communities by providing recreation that would be great. 1434 02:02:21,740 --> 02:02:28,520 And then with respect to the partnership discussions, I'd like us to start reporting those 1435 02:02:28,520 --> 02:02:32,740 on a monthly basis. So we know where things are going, maybe every other report meeting, we have an 1436 02:02:32,740 --> 02:02:38,500 item on this. So that's what I have, and I'm maybe made the last step on the form of emotion, 1437 02:02:38,700 --> 02:02:44,080 look at some future. Thank you, Vice Chair. So yeah, you requested to make motion. 1438 02:02:44,080 --> 02:02:50,220 and I think that were to show it did, so I'll give back to you and I basically agree with 1439 02:02:50,220 --> 02:02:56,160 the vice chair, although I think that the level of partnership participation should be 1440 02:02:56,160 --> 02:03:05,360 increased pretty significantly. I'd like to see it at at the 30% to 38%, but maybe 30% is okay. 1441 02:03:06,080 --> 02:03:11,340 Now for two reasons, one is if we don't have the adequate partnerships, I don't think we should 1442 02:03:11,340 --> 02:03:22,440 the project. Secondly, I don't think that is positive for us to carry and what I think 1443 02:03:22,440 --> 02:03:32,980 is a two conservative number on our water rate projections. People react to those projections 1444 02:03:33,960 --> 02:03:40,200 and what I'm hearing is that they're not really realistic but with respect to this particular 1445 02:03:40,200 --> 02:03:48,260 But not only that, like I said, if we can't reach greater partnership participation, we probably shouldn't do this project. 1446 02:03:48,560 --> 02:03:52,820 I mean, it's just, it's just too heavy to live for us. 1447 02:03:53,840 --> 02:03:55,160 So those are my comments. 1448 02:03:56,380 --> 02:04:01,860 And so I'll take advice chairs to take the first shot at emotion. 1449 02:04:02,920 --> 02:04:04,080 And then we'll take it from there. 1450 02:04:04,140 --> 02:04:05,720 People want to mend it and so on. 1451 02:04:06,160 --> 02:04:08,000 We can, I'm happy to call on everybody. 1452 02:04:08,000 --> 02:04:09,940 So, vice chair, you can start. 1453 02:04:10,200 --> 02:04:11,960 Well, actually, director is way ahead of motion. 1454 02:04:12,200 --> 02:04:13,000 Okay, director. 1455 02:04:13,520 --> 02:04:14,380 Okay, director. 1456 02:04:14,800 --> 02:04:15,120 Director. 1457 02:04:17,360 --> 02:04:19,120 I don't have a motion. 1458 02:04:20,000 --> 02:04:21,400 I was just expressing my. 1459 02:04:22,340 --> 02:04:23,100 So, I'm fine. 1460 02:04:25,610 --> 02:04:26,130 Good, vice chair. 1461 02:04:26,130 --> 02:04:26,790 You need a motion. 1462 02:04:27,150 --> 02:04:29,030 Or is it just direction to staff? 1463 02:04:31,520 --> 02:04:32,020 Oh, on the direction. 1464 02:04:32,220 --> 02:04:32,860 We could. 1465 02:04:33,080 --> 02:04:35,680 I'm saying, you know, I was at 30 and director. 1466 02:04:36,320 --> 02:04:37,640 Chair, Mr. Mary's at 38. 1467 02:04:37,760 --> 02:04:40,420 Maybe we can split the difference on 35. 1468 02:04:40,420 --> 02:04:40,960 35. 1469 02:04:42,000 --> 02:04:42,080 Yeah. 1470 02:04:42,220 --> 02:04:43,320 That's something like that. 1471 02:04:43,540 --> 02:04:44,300 Or 34. 1472 02:04:45,240 --> 02:04:46,020 That's actually the level. 1473 02:04:47,240 --> 02:04:53,460 And I just direction the staff on the federal infrastructure is the highest legislative 1474 02:04:53,460 --> 02:04:59,940 priority that we have along with prop one funds, park discussion, and... 1475 02:05:01,600 --> 02:05:05,160 I guess we can make a director direction to staff. 1476 02:05:05,500 --> 02:05:11,780 Yeah, we don't need a motion, you're right. I mean, at this point, the only reason we all thought 1477 02:05:11,780 --> 02:05:16,960 mentioned a motion is just so that clearly people, the community gets where we're going. 1478 02:05:17,340 --> 02:05:20,120 But that's true. Yeah, and I see the CEO once. 1479 02:05:20,400 --> 02:05:29,360 I just want to, earlier I said that my suggestion is that we're hot. 1480 02:05:29,360 --> 02:05:35,700 our financial planning assumption will be should be more on the conservative side. 1481 02:05:36,560 --> 02:05:41,360 So if we're right now it's 20% probably conservative. 1482 02:05:42,160 --> 02:05:46,580 It doesn't mean we're not a full force pursuing partnership opportunities. 1483 02:05:47,420 --> 02:05:51,360 But then I think raising this partnership assumption, 1484 02:05:52,520 --> 02:05:58,620 even though it's telling a better picture on the water rate for the future, 1485 02:05:58,620 --> 02:06:15,140 However, it seems to me that it's hurting, it's part of your work, our determination to do this project. 1486 02:06:17,020 --> 02:06:27,360 And I think it's come back to the analysis that you mentioned earlier that what is the water rate? 1487 02:06:27,360 --> 02:06:32,380 overall, with all these opportunities, what is the water rate that we're willing to look with? 1488 02:06:33,400 --> 02:06:40,880 So, my suggestion is that's not giving fixed direction to staff. I mean, we can have various 1489 02:06:40,880 --> 02:06:48,360 scenarios. I just think that's a better result. And then what I heard from all the board members 1490 02:06:48,360 --> 02:06:53,520 that how important this future water supply is, whether it's from Pacheco or from Laos 1491 02:06:53,520 --> 02:06:58,660 carries off on recyclable water. So that's my two cents. 1492 02:06:58,760 --> 02:07:02,980 Okay, no, I appreciate it. Thank you. So the CEO wanted to chime in? 1493 02:07:08,240 --> 02:07:11,600 Yes, you know, I just wanted to make sure I summarize. I think what we heard, I think 1494 02:07:11,600 --> 02:07:17,080 direction of staff is really fair. I don't know that emotion is needed. I mean, because very clear 1495 02:07:17,080 --> 02:07:21,900 that we've heard that the board is very supportive of the project moving forward. I think we've 1496 02:07:21,900 --> 02:07:26,200 have been very clear that they want us to pursue any and all infrastructure funding at the 1497 02:07:26,200 --> 02:07:30,400 state as well as federal level. You will definitely be working very hard to pursue everything 1498 02:07:30,400 --> 02:07:37,160 we can and propose Biden at infrastructure bill, etc. I think I definitely heard of 35% as 1499 02:07:37,160 --> 02:07:42,120 over looking at. So we will bring that forward as it relates to the rates of the session on the next 1500 02:07:42,120 --> 02:07:46,680 decision. I believe this will be the board will be the 27th. I would like to bear in the scene to 1501 02:07:46,680 --> 02:07:52,120 turn that around by the stop and the machine which I think is tomorrow. I think that maybe a challenge 1502 02:07:52,120 --> 02:07:58,480 but yeah and Darren can we confirm can we do that by tomorrow? Well no we won't do it by the 1503 02:07:58,480 --> 02:08:07,280 27. I didn't want to open it. And then clearly in terms of the partnership discussions we will 1504 02:08:07,280 --> 02:08:11,380 make sure we are bringing that information back. We'll probably start with the water storage 1505 02:08:11,380 --> 02:08:16,260 smart to our committee so we can make sure we're having a conversation and then be able to push it 1506 02:08:16,260 --> 02:08:22,520 back to the board. So I think that's summarizing everything that I've heard. I think if I missed 1507 02:08:22,520 --> 02:08:28,080 anything, you know, I look to the chair to the board members that I think the direction has been 1508 02:08:28,080 --> 02:08:30,420 very clear and I think we can respond accordingly. 1509 02:08:34,310 --> 02:08:36,650 Thank you. Okay, if there's nothing further, 1510 02:08:36,850 --> 02:08:43,690 I think we've had a great discussion. Thanks staff for the heavy lifting. I've been very clear 1511 02:08:43,690 --> 02:08:49,310 and I think it's very helpful to the community when staff is as prepared as we are 1512 02:08:49,310 --> 02:08:55,910 with respect to the numbers and exactly where we are in the development of the plan. 1513 02:08:56,430 --> 02:09:01,150 So thank you very much. I know it's a lot of work. We really do appreciate it. We know what it takes 1514 02:09:01,150 --> 02:09:09,670 and we do appreciate it. So thank you and awful lot for everybody being prepared and helping us out. 1515 02:09:10,610 --> 02:09:16,470 If there's nothing further from the board, then we'll go into closed session at this point. 1516 02:09:17,330 --> 02:09:23,030 We do have one item, so let's move into closed session now. 1517 02:26:05,140 --> 02:26:14,020 Okay, we're back. We've got a session before the directors, and we have council, tell us what we did, it didn't do. 1518 02:26:15,140 --> 02:26:15,780 Good afternoon, chair. 1519 02:26:16,360 --> 02:26:30,180 Good afternoon, chair. This is Joseph Miranda, assistant district council. Reporting on agenda item number 2.2, the board met in closed session with legal council to receive real property negotiations. 1520 02:26:30,180 --> 02:26:38,200 direction and pursuant to government code section 54956.8 the board provided direction 1521 02:26:38,200 --> 02:26:44,040 this year. Thank you. Thank you council. So we are 1522 02:26:49,800 --> 02:26:52,160 adjourned please. 1523 02:26:58,030 --> 02:26:59,950 Okay, so we're going to adjourn 1524 02:27:00,750 --> 02:27:08,830 tomorrow night at 7 o'clock to tomorrow evening at 7 p.m. we'll talk about water rates 1525 02:27:10,190 --> 02:27:11,190 And I'm glad you.