[0:00] a bunch of stuff like the
[0:01] battery cage, pool lights, all this
[0:03] stuff.
[0:03] >> Then you can sell it and take pictures
[0:05] and show it to people so they can
[0:06] advertise. I That's a great deal, man.
[0:08] >> up. It comes to my house and I was like,
[0:10] "Well, now what? Who's coming to put
[0:11] these in?" And he's like,
[0:12] >> "Okay. We are ready to go.
[0:16] So
[0:17] Okay, we'll get the
[0:19] May 12th, 2026 2026 DRC going today at
[0:24] 10:00.
[0:26] Um that we've got first item on the
[0:28] agenda is a review of the proposed Taco
[0:32] Bell building site plan
[0:35] um that is proposed to go uh along 400
[0:38] East
[0:39] um there at the the Macy's
[0:42] uh next to the Macy's grocery store
[0:45] north of the existing Fizz building just
[0:48] in that parking lot area right off of I
[0:50] should say parking lot area the gravel
[0:53] area there just between
[0:56] uh Macy's parking lot and 400 East.
[0:58] Uh this is a again proposed site plan.
[1:02] DRC is the final review and approval
[1:04] body for the site plans. It is a
[1:06] permitted use within the commercial
[1:08] zone.
[1:09] Um so with that, we'll go around the DRC
[1:12] with any comments or questions that the
[1:14] DRC members will have. So I'm with
[1:16] Aspen.
[1:18] >> Will you go to page four, please?
[1:22] We just have some questions to clarify
[1:25] or sorry, maybe one more.
[1:27] Um for the parking requirements, our
[1:30] code states that it's one space per four
[1:32] seats. So if you could provide the
[1:34] occupancy
[1:36] so we can ensure that you meet our par-
[1:38] parking code, that would be very
[1:39] helpful. And then as far as landscaping,
[1:43] you guys have the code listed on the
[1:45] page and you call out the dumpster
[1:48] needing three landscape sides. Um but
[1:51] only two of the sides. That is a
[1:53] requirement that
[1:55] will need to be worked out. We will also
[1:58] need to see the detail for the trash
[2:01] enclosure to ensure that it matches the
[2:03] building.
[2:04] And then
[2:06] with the architectural renderings that
[2:09] will require a separate review by our
[2:11] architectural review committee.
[2:13] Um that can be set up anytime during the
[2:16] process. So, just let us know when you'd
[2:18] like to do that. And then with the sign
[2:21] permits or all the signs, they'll need a
[2:23] separate permit. You'll just do it
[2:25] through citizen serve just like how you
[2:27] applied for the site plan application.
[2:30] Um
[2:32] just as a heads-up. Will you go I don't
[2:34] remember what page it's on. Maybe 11 or
[2:36] 12.
[2:38] The signs.
[2:46] » And just so you know, these will be
[2:48] given in red line format. So, you you're
[2:50] more than welcome to take notes, but
[2:51] we'll send you a red line copy.
[2:53] >> Thank you.
[2:53] >> So, that's available.
[2:55] >> Appreciate that.
[2:55] >> Uh-huh.
[2:56] >> Yeah, I know.
[2:59] » Um yeah, just a heads-up for the
[3:01] monument sign. That pole will have to be
[3:04] concealed in like a pedestal and
[3:07] footing.
[3:08] But, I think that's everything from
[3:10] planning.
[3:14] » Randy, building?
[3:15] >> As far as the address assigned on there,
[3:16] is that from the original plat of when
[3:18] the
[3:19] >> It would be, yes. Probably, yeah.
[3:21] >> So, yeah. I think I'm good. I have
[3:23] nothing for me at this point.
[3:24] >> Okay.
[3:26] Jason, with public works?
[3:28] >> Yeah, I
[3:30] stopped by the site as part of came up
[3:32] here.
[3:32] >> Turn your mic on, Jason.
[3:34] >> Please. Sorry about that. Here we go.
[3:36] >> I can hear you anyway.
[3:38] >> Yeah, I I stopped by the site on the way
[3:40] up and the irrigation meters that shown
[3:42] on the property, the one that you want
[3:43] to use, it looks like it's in use right
[3:45] now. I think Macy's is using that.
[3:48] I I sent some the the meter ID numbers
[3:51] to Joyce. She's going to look into that,
[3:53] but I still think we can uh
[3:55] connect on the backside of that. It's a
[3:57] 2-in meter. I
[3:59] With your landscaping, I don't think
[4:00] you'll need more than a 1-in line.
[4:04] Uh and it also showed an RP on that
[4:06] irrigation.
[4:07] You can remove that. We don't need an RP
[4:10] on our irrigation. If it was hooked to
[4:11] culinary water, yes, that would be the
[4:13] case, but our irrigation water, we don't
[4:15] require an RP.
[4:18] And as you noticed on the plans, you did
[4:20] say we work with the city for the
[4:22] culinary meter. We can Once you get to
[4:24] that point, we'll
[4:26] figure out where that needs to go. You
[4:28] got a couple of options there
[4:30] to look at that. Sewer's going to be
[4:32] straightforward. It's just right out
[4:34] front, so I don't see any issues with anything else.
[4:38] >> So Jason, what I would say on that is
[4:40] if the if that irrigation meter is in
[4:42] place, you'll probably want to do some
[4:43] exploration on where that stuff goes
[4:46] after the meter. We know where it goes
[4:47] to get to the meter, but
[4:49] >> Yeah.
[4:49] >> the Macy's development is relying on
[4:51] that, you probably ought to make sure
[4:53] that that somebody's not just going out
[4:55] there and
[4:56] digging up a 2-in line that goes
[4:58] to all of their landscaping, that'd be
[5:00] bad. The other The other thing I would
[5:02] say is when you say the the culinary,
[5:04] you're talking size or location of
[5:05] connection.
[5:06] >> Uh location of connection and placement
[5:08] of meter.
[5:09] >> Okay, the box.
[5:10] >> Yeah.
[5:11] >> Okay.
[5:11] >> Yeah.
[5:11] >> Cuz none of it will be in our
[5:12] right-of-way, right? There's not really
[5:13] a park strip or anything that's going to
[5:15] allow for that.
[5:16] >> Yeah.
[5:17] >> Okay, thank you.
[5:18] >> Uh
[5:20] Quick question for you, Jason. Uh a few
[5:22] that I have for you on on this if you're
[5:24] done with your your comments.
[5:26] >> Yeah.
[5:27] >> Um one, they're showing a 1/2-in
[5:30] a inch and a half copper for the service
[5:33] line on there.
[5:35] I mean, copper's okay, but it may be
[5:38] better for you to do a a poly line.
[5:41] >> use plastic.
[5:42] >> Yeah, I'd be Yeah, I Sorry, I didn't see
[5:44] that. Thanks for catching that. Yeah,
[5:46] Definitely go with poly.
[5:49] Yes.
[5:51] >> That's going to be easier to install for
[5:53] that whole thing.
[5:54] Um, also, this will probably be more
[5:57] related to the building permit once it
[5:59] comes in.
[6:00] But, just so you're aware of it, there
[6:03] is going to need to be a an RP
[6:05] check valve that's with the building.
[6:08] And associated with that, there will be
[6:10] required testing that will need to be
[6:11] submitted. The the contractor who builds
[6:14] the site will have to install that and
[6:16] test that RP,
[6:18] um, and provide that testing results to
[6:21] the public works department. Um, and
[6:23] then also
[6:26] Sorry, continual testing,
[6:28] uh, just throughout after the fact. Um,
[6:30] annual testing after.
[6:31] >> I can see it looks like where the grease
[6:33] trap back off the back side there, is
[6:35] that correct?
[6:36] >> Yes, there is Yes, there's a grease trap
[6:38] installed right, um, that'll be on that
[6:41] back side there.
[6:42] Yep. So.
[6:45] Okay, anything else, Jason?
[6:47] >> No.
[6:48] >> That's all.
[6:48] >> Mike, please.
[6:50] >> Just a couple things, um
[6:53] Are we
[6:54] Is that North Orchard Lane, is that a
[6:56] city road or is that private road? I
[6:58] don't don't know what we're doing.
[7:00] >> All All these roads within here, aside
[7:02] from 400 East
[7:03] >> I assume it's private, right?
[7:05] >> Okay.
[7:06] >> Those are private.
[7:06] >> I was going to say, we would prefer a
[7:07] stop sign before you enter North Orchard
[7:10] Lane. However, we can't
[7:12] force that because it's private
[7:14] property.
[7:15] >> I think there's one shown there.
[7:16] >> Is that what that is? I couldn't tell.
[7:19] >> Yeah, there's a stop
[7:20] >> Okay, good. All right,
[7:22] perfect.
[7:23] >> There will be a
[7:25] >> Awesome.
[7:26] >> So, yeah, so there will be stop sign
[7:27] here and a no entry
[7:29] >> Okay.
[7:29] >> sign here, no entry here, and then a
[7:31] stop
[7:32] um, and then a stop sign here as it goes
[7:35] to the south.
[7:36] >> Very cool. And then, the only other
[7:37] thing I have, if you'll go to the
[7:38] landscape map
[7:41] I know we have requirements, but we've
[7:43] dealt with this in the past. Um coming
[7:46] out through the drive-up, that big tree
[7:48] that your hand was just over, both of
[7:50] those
[7:51] are, you know, obstruct view from people
[7:53] pulling out.
[7:56] And I don't love that.
[7:59] So, I don't know
[8:00] So, basically, you look at people and
[8:02] say, "I hate trees." Yes.
[8:05] But we dealt with that just barely over
[8:07] by Little Caesars and ended up tearing
[8:09] one out because we made them put it in
[8:11] and then made them tear it out. So, I
[8:12] would prefer not to have that there.
[8:14] >> Yeah, we can I say we'll add a note to
[8:16] have it just They still have to have the
[8:18] number of trees, but we can talk about
[8:20] the location of those to help
[8:21] >> They could They could pull those two and
[8:23] put them back down towards the west
[8:25] right on both of those potentially. That
[8:27] would probably be better as long as
[8:29] we're not getting
[8:30] too close to 4th East on that one that
[8:32] gets relocated. Maybe it follows the
[8:34] curve. Yeah, and it goes Yeah, along
[8:36] curve instead of
[8:38] along what they're calling Orchard Lane.
[8:40] We Also, please take those names off of
[8:42] there. Those aren't 100 North and are
[8:44] not Orchard Lane. That just confuses
[8:47] people.
[8:47] >> Yes.
[8:51] » That's all I have.
[8:52] >> Okay, sounds good.
[8:54] >> You could even label that as just
[8:55] private access or something like that or
[8:57] just access.
[8:58] That That's really what it is. It's all
[9:00] private property with access to all the
[9:01] buildings and everything around there.
[9:06] » Uh fire department didn't have We didn't
[9:08] have any issues with it.
[9:12] » Norm?
[9:13] >> Yeah, so I wanted to clarify. It looks
[9:15] like two lanes going through there. Not
[9:17] both of those are intended to be like
[9:20] drive-thru lanes right for ordering. The one lane is like a slip lane to just
[9:24] get people past if they need to jump out
[9:26] and
[9:27] go around, right? They're not
[9:28] >> It's a bypass.
[9:29] >> Okay, all right. That That was the only
[9:31] question that I had on what I had sent
[9:33] seen on the plans.
[9:37] » Okay, with that, I'll just kind of run
[9:39] through see if there's anything we
[9:40] didn't cover.
[9:43] Um
[9:44] I'll do just
[9:46] uh let's see. We already talked about
[9:49] that. Just um
[9:51] quick clarifications on on these the to
[9:54] build on Aspen's, you know, comment
[9:56] there the the trash enclosure does need
[9:58] to be similar materials to the the main
[10:01] building.
[10:02] >> Okay, we showed what currently so if you
[10:04] just use
[10:07] » It could be similar to that and that
[10:08] would be looked at with the ARC. So,
[10:10] just make sure you include that detail
[10:13] with it. And
[10:14] again, this is a very prominent location
[10:17] on that and so
[10:18] >> Can we also ask on that one and maybe
[10:21] even the tree placement that we're
[10:23] talking about moving down on the curb to
[10:25] have you add in our our sight triangle
[10:27] requirements just in dashed or dotted
[10:29] lines just to kind of show and make sure
[10:31] that the first of all that dumpster and
[10:33] then the other tree is not going to be
[10:34] in the way of a
[10:36] and I'm talking about coming out on the
[10:37] 4th East not necessarily internally
[10:39] although you could do it there as well,
[10:41] but putting a sight triangle on there
[10:42] helps us to understand that we're not
[10:44] going to have the visibility issues that
[10:46] the Lieutenant Wallace that was talking
[10:48] about.
[10:48] >> Yeah, absolutely.
[10:49] >> Okay, that'd be great.
[10:53] Okay,
[10:54] um
[10:55] >> You can find those in our in our specs
[10:57] by the way in our
[10:58] >> It's in our code under title 10.
[11:00] >> Yeah, under 10-16 standards you can find
[11:02] those in there.
[11:06] » Okay,
[11:08] um
[11:09] So, storm drain on this I recognize
[11:12] you're tying into the existing storm
[11:14] drain facility that's related to the
[11:16] overall site.
[11:17] >> Yeah.
[11:17] >> We'll just need basically confirmation
[11:20] that the that the existing pond that's
[11:22] located on the east side of the the
[11:24] Macy's building that that pond is sized
[11:27] appropriately to be able to handle the additional volume that's going to be
[11:32] generated.
[11:33] Um
[11:35] in reviewing it appears that the overall
[11:37] site intended to have this pad be able
[11:41] to serve into that retention pond, but
[11:43] we'll just need the verification that pond is adequately sized to be able
[11:47] to accommodate this additional volume.
[11:49] >> Do you know where I might be able to get
[11:51] a copy of the drainage study for that
[11:52] property?
[11:53] >> Um if the develop if the overall
[11:55] developer doesn't have it, um
[11:58] we should be able to provide that to you
[11:59] as well.
[12:00] So.
[12:02] >> Thank you.
[12:06] » Um and then for Randy mentioned it
[12:10] earlier, just the grease trap. Make sure
[12:12] you're referencing
[12:14] uh
[12:15] set our we do have a grease trap
[12:18] standard within the standard
[12:19] specifications. It's S as in Sam 5
[12:24] uh to to be able to get that.
[12:27] >> Thank you.
[12:28] >> Um
[12:30] additionally, because the
[12:33] our our city standard requires for all
[12:35] storm drain curb inlets to have a snout
[12:38] on them.
[12:39] However, because this is a private
[12:41] system, that's not required, but it's
[12:44] very recommended. Uh I just it'll help
[12:47] with long-term maintenance of that
[12:49] system um for the property owner.
[12:55] » Thank you.
[12:57] >> Um I believe
[13:01] we talked about signs.
[13:06] Uh landscaping there. Um just one
[13:09] question that was had um
[13:13] there's not intended to be any outdoor
[13:16] dining associated with the site. Is that
[13:18] correct?
[13:18] >> Correct.
[13:19] >> Okay. Um we've just seen some other
[13:22] sites have afterwards have come out and
[13:24] trucked a to picnic table outside and
[13:27] put it on the gravel. Um that does
[13:29] impact parking and that kind of stuff.
[13:31] So
[13:31] >> Yeah, Dollar Clay specifically does not
[13:34] >> Okay.
[13:37] Good to have cuz that will also help
[13:39] with your parking that we talked about.
[13:41] >> Sure, thank you.
[13:43] >> Um
[13:44] again, we've already talked about
[13:45] landscaping comments. I Oh, we didn't uh
[13:49] So, this one um maybe Aspen if you'll
[13:52] cover that.
[13:53] >> probably cover better than me.
[13:54] >> Um it just is helpful if you show the
[13:57] percentages of each material being used
[13:59] because our code requires that uh
[14:02] decorative material such as like crushed
[14:04] rock can only make up 50% of the
[14:06] landscaped area. So, you may potentially
[14:08] need to add more live plants.
[14:11] >> Okay.
[14:11] Thank you.
[14:13] >> And those don't necessarily need to be
[14:14] trees. They can be shrubs or that kind
[14:17] of thing. Okay, thank you.
[14:20] Okay,
[14:21] and I believe
[14:24] Oh, yeah.
[14:25] >> Yes. Uh Aspen mentioned this earlier
[14:27] just providing a a detail of the your
[14:29] proposed site lighting.
[14:30] >> Okay.
[14:32] Like the fixture detail?
[14:34] >> Yeah.
[14:37] Uh I already talked about the
[14:38] requirement for ERC.
[14:41] And I think that was it.
[14:43] Along there, all the comments. Anything
[14:45] else? Any other comments or questions
[14:48] that
[14:49] anyone had?
[14:53] If not, I would I would look for a
[14:55] motion.
[14:58] So
[15:00] >> John, I think there's enough hanging out
[15:01] there still with the storm drain and
[15:03] some of the other things that we've
[15:04] talked about it's probably as
[15:06] appropriate to table and have them bring
[15:07] it back when it's ready.
[15:08] >> Okay.
[15:08] >> I'll make a motion to table at this
[15:10] point in time.
[15:10] >> You got a motion to table. Is there a
[15:12] second?
[15:13] >> Second.
[15:14] >> Seconded by Randy.
[15:16] Any discussion on that motion?
[15:19] If not, all in favor, please say I.
[15:21] >> I.
[15:22] >> Any opposed?
[15:23] Okay.
[15:24] Motion passes. The application is
[15:26] tabled. We'll get a copy of these with
[15:29] There are a couple other comments we'll
[15:31] add that weren't on here. We'll get
[15:33] those added and get them sent over to
[15:34] you
[15:36] latest probably tomorrow.
[15:37] And that way you've got those to work
[15:40] um
[15:41] If you can get these turned around and
[15:43] into us within the
[15:45] So, we'll have about a week time for us
[15:47] to review it before the next DRC.
[15:50] Um our next DRC is in 2 weeks. It'd be
[15:53] the second So, the 26th approximately.
[15:56] Um so, we had those a week before then,
[15:58] we could probably get it on the next
[15:59] DRC.
[16:01] So.
[16:03] Yep.
[16:05] Okay. Uh next item on the agenda is the
[16:07] approval of the meeting minutes from
[16:09] April 14th.
[16:11] If there are any comments, I'll look for
[16:12] a motion.
[16:13] >> Y'all know I'm making a motion that we
[16:15] approve the minutes from DRC from April
[16:17] 14th, 2026.
[16:19] >> Okay. Got a motion. Is there a second?
[16:21] >> Second.
[16:21] by Alan.
[16:23] All in favor, please say I.
[16:25] >> I.
[16:26] >> Any opposed? Okay. Motion passes.
[16:30] And if there is not anything else for
[16:32] the DRC, I'll look for a motion to
[16:33] adjourn.
[16:34] >> So moved.