1 00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:13,920 Thank you. 2 00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:18,520 Okay, we'll get the June 9th DRC 3 00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:22,040 meeting started and it's 10:00 a.m. 4 00:00:22,040 --> 00:00:24,280 Um rolling right into it. The first item 5 00:00:24,280 --> 00:00:27,120 on the agenda is review of the 6 00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:29,240 site plan for proposed Taco Bell 7 00:00:29,240 --> 00:00:33,120 restaurant. This is a second review of 8 00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:36,360 this application. Um it was tabled back 9 00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:39,160 in May um due to some comments they had 10 00:00:39,160 --> 00:00:40,640 to work through and do. So, this is 11 00:00:40,640 --> 00:00:42,760 their resubmittal on there. 12 00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:44,120 Um 13 00:00:44,120 --> 00:00:48,870 and as I said before, this is a 14 00:00:48,880 --> 00:00:51,360 uh site plan application. The DRC is the 15 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:53,960 final approval body for this as a 16 00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:56,960 uh permitted use which within this zone. 17 00:00:56,960 --> 00:01:00,240 So, just a kind of 18 00:01:00,240 --> 00:01:01,640 little bit more background. It is 19 00:01:01,640 --> 00:01:04,280 located on the west side of the Macy's 20 00:01:04,280 --> 00:01:05,640 parking lot 21 00:01:05,640 --> 00:01:08,080 um directly north of the the Fizz 22 00:01:08,080 --> 00:01:10,320 building and 23 00:01:10,320 --> 00:01:11,280 um 24 00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:13,000 it's the vacant lot that a lot of people 25 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:15,200 park in there. So, 26 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:18,360 with that, um we'll 27 00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:20,520 again, kind of the main comments that 28 00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:22,800 they had to address was related to storm 29 00:01:22,800 --> 00:01:26,640 drain and parking from previously. Um 30 00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:28,440 so, we'll just go around and see if 31 00:01:28,440 --> 00:01:30,160 there's any other comments from the the 32 00:01:30,160 --> 00:01:32,680 DRC and we'll cover those things. 33 00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:36,320 We do have online via Zoom Brian Kemp 34 00:01:36,320 --> 00:01:38,400 who is representing the the applicant on 35 00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:40,280 this one. So, 36 00:01:40,280 --> 00:01:42,880 Randy, if you have any comments? 37 00:01:42,880 --> 00:01:43,800 >> Nope, I'm good. 38 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:44,760 >> Okay. 39 00:01:44,760 --> 00:01:45,960 >> Great, thank you. Morgan? 40 00:01:45,960 --> 00:01:47,320 >> Yeah, there's a few things from the 41 00:01:47,320 --> 00:01:48,960 community development department. In 42 00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:50,480 analyzing the parking code, it looks 43 00:01:50,480 --> 00:01:51,520 like 44 00:01:51,520 --> 00:01:52,600 we're 45 00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:55,280 four spaces short of what's required. In 46 00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:57,840 the code, it speaks about the the 47 00:01:57,840 --> 00:02:00,400 requirement. It's one space per four 48 00:02:00,400 --> 00:02:02,840 seats including outdoor seating or one 49 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:06,360 space per 125 sq ft of gross floor area, 50 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:07,960 whichever is greater. So, the 51 00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:09,399 requirement is that we go off of 52 00:02:09,399 --> 00:02:12,160 whichever is greater. And when we take 53 00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:14,120 the square footage 54 00:02:14,120 --> 00:02:17,440 methodology, it translates to 18 55 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:19,360 spaces. And so, we would need to try to 56 00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:21,680 pick up four more spaces. In a previous 57 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:23,320 site plan, 58 00:02:23,320 --> 00:02:24,920 I believe is the initial submittal 59 00:02:24,920 --> 00:02:27,280 showed three spaces 60 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:29,280 just 61 00:02:29,280 --> 00:02:30,120 Yeah, 62 00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:32,120 just just south of where the dumpster 63 00:02:32,120 --> 00:02:33,360 area is. 64 00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:35,160 And so, if you we were able to bring 65 00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:37,959 those back and find a way to add another 66 00:02:37,959 --> 00:02:39,520 space, then that would get us to the 67 00:02:39,520 --> 00:02:44,800 minimum requirement. And so, I would kind of recommend to 68 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:47,080 the applicant, you know, looking at that 69 00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:48,560 dumpster area. 70 00:02:48,560 --> 00:02:52,040 If you're able to pull that up further 71 00:02:52,040 --> 00:02:54,640 into the site, and so, probably is going 72 00:02:54,640 --> 00:02:56,320 in like west. 73 00:02:56,320 --> 00:02:57,640 Then you might be able to pick up a 74 00:02:57,640 --> 00:02:59,360 couple spaces 75 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:01,880 to the rear of the dumpster. And so, and 76 00:03:01,880 --> 00:03:04,040 maybe even just angling the dumpster 77 00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:05,400 itself would allow you to fit more 78 00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:06,760 spaces. But kind of looking in that 79 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:08,160 area, 80 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:09,880 you'd probably be able to be able to 81 00:03:09,880 --> 00:03:14,110 pick up those those four spaces. 82 00:03:14,120 --> 00:03:15,760 » Any question on that, Brian? 83 00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:17,120 >> No, thanks for the comment. And I know 84 00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:18,040 that 85 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:20,160 my co-worker Nicole reached out to the 86 00:03:20,160 --> 00:03:22,959 planning staff and discussed this 87 00:03:22,959 --> 00:03:24,760 early on. I can't remember exactly what 88 00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:25,880 she 89 00:03:25,880 --> 00:03:28,440 talked with with someone about that. 90 00:03:28,440 --> 00:03:30,440 I'll revisit that conversation. Yeah, 91 00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:32,000 with the added island there to screen 92 00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:34,080 the trash dumpster, we had to get rid of 93 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:35,840 one space. Um 94 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:37,400 And I thought my calculation was right 95 00:03:37,400 --> 00:03:38,600 that we could get rid of those, but 96 00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:41,000 maybe I looked at that incorrectly. So, 97 00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:42,400 we'll revisit that. 98 00:03:42,400 --> 00:03:43,080 >> Yeah, so the code 99 00:03:43,080 --> 00:03:45,000 >> Let me know if I have any questions. 100 00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:47,000 >> No, I appreciate that. The code, 101 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:49,600 if you look at it, it's it has the two 102 00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:51,800 options, but it's which which are 103 00:03:51,800 --> 00:03:52,519 >> or greater 104 00:03:52,519 --> 00:03:54,000 >> is greater. And so, 105 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:54,400 >> Got you. 106 00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:56,880 >> Yeah, at this methodology was lower then 107 00:03:56,880 --> 00:03:58,440 we would go off the greater of the gross 108 00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:00,360 floor area and so that's that's what we 109 00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:01,480 did. 110 00:04:01,480 --> 00:04:03,880 The other was the 111 00:04:03,880 --> 00:04:05,760 kind of the dumpster landscaping you did 112 00:04:05,760 --> 00:04:07,400 provide back 113 00:04:07,400 --> 00:04:09,959 the the landscaping area just south of 114 00:04:09,959 --> 00:04:11,280 the dumpster 115 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:12,520 but I believe that needs to be 116 00:04:12,520 --> 00:04:14,040 landscaped with shrubs. I don't think 117 00:04:14,040 --> 00:04:15,520 that was identified in the landscaping 118 00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:17,400 plan. So just just look at that make 119 00:04:17,400 --> 00:04:20,079 sure that that little area meets the 120 00:04:20,079 --> 00:04:21,840 minimum. 121 00:04:21,840 --> 00:04:24,760 >> Okay, perfect. 122 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:27,000 >> Anything else Morgan? 123 00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:28,560 Jason? 124 00:04:28,560 --> 00:04:30,919 >> Just as we discussed the the pressurized 125 00:04:30,919 --> 00:04:33,680 irrigation meter last time it looked 126 00:04:33,680 --> 00:04:34,640 like 127 00:04:34,640 --> 00:04:37,280 when I when I was down there that Macy's 128 00:04:37,280 --> 00:04:39,160 has hooked up to that meter and is using 129 00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:40,480 it for their 130 00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:42,440 irrigation now 131 00:04:42,440 --> 00:04:44,040 and I noticed on the plans here that it 132 00:04:44,040 --> 00:04:45,760 doesn't really show an irrigation meter 133 00:04:45,760 --> 00:04:47,320 so I don't know if we're planning on 134 00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:49,480 hooking to the culinary to provide that 135 00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:51,160 outside watering 136 00:04:51,160 --> 00:04:53,160 and if we are 137 00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:54,960 you know, do we need to will we will 138 00:04:54,960 --> 00:04:57,000 have to provide some type of a backflow 139 00:04:57,000 --> 00:04:59,240 on it. 140 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:01,440 >> Do you have a comment on that Brian on 141 00:05:01,440 --> 00:05:04,160 >> Yeah, it's on the landscaping plans. 142 00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:05,919 We show the 143 00:05:05,919 --> 00:05:09,200 irrigation and the meter. 144 00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:10,800 I think the last time we had a comment 145 00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:12,720 was to remove the RPZ from that cuz 146 00:05:12,720 --> 00:05:14,640 we're hooking to the culinary line. 147 00:05:14,640 --> 00:05:16,560 I'm sorry hooking to the irrigation 148 00:05:16,560 --> 00:05:17,680 line. 149 00:05:17,680 --> 00:05:21,600 So we took the RPZ off of that. 150 00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:24,680 Did I not include that in the submittal? 151 00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:25,840 irrigation plans 152 00:05:25,840 --> 00:05:32,750 >> landscaping 153 00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:34,320 » I was just looking on the other plan 154 00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:35,960 that showed the water meter and the 155 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:38,160 sewer connection. 156 00:05:38,160 --> 00:05:41,040 >> Gotcha. Yeah, those are the private utilities. I must have 157 00:05:41,040 --> 00:05:42,680 forgotten to put the irrigation plan in 158 00:05:42,680 --> 00:05:44,400 that set when I submitted it to you. I'm 159 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:45,120 so sorry. 160 00:05:45,120 --> 00:05:47,560 >> We do not have that so 161 00:05:47,560 --> 00:05:49,720 again, just making sure that we're if 162 00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:51,160 you're if you do have that included in 163 00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:52,680 the landscaping plan, that's that's 164 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:53,480 fine. 165 00:05:53,480 --> 00:05:54,320 >> Yep. 166 00:05:54,320 --> 00:05:56,040 >> We just need to make sure 167 00:05:56,040 --> 00:05:59,000 we know when and where that's that meter 168 00:05:59,000 --> 00:05:59,920 is going to be set and where you're 169 00:05:59,920 --> 00:06:02,120 going to make that connection. So, I 170 00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:05,160 know there is that existing meter 171 00:06:05,160 --> 00:06:08,520 in what's are you planning on connecting 172 00:06:08,520 --> 00:06:11,400 after the Macy's meter or 173 00:06:11,400 --> 00:06:12,720 um 174 00:06:12,720 --> 00:06:14,720 >> Uh I think so and I think there was a 175 00:06:14,720 --> 00:06:16,040 comment last time that we needed to 176 00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:17,960 explore what was connected to that 177 00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:20,080 meter. Um that's something that we 178 00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:22,200 probably have a contractor do 179 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:24,240 and deal with that in the field. 180 00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:26,160 Um cuz I don't know if we've got a way 181 00:06:26,160 --> 00:06:28,400 of figuring that out 182 00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:30,440 in advance. 183 00:06:30,440 --> 00:06:31,640 >> So, it 184 00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:34,160 says we should be able to do that. Don't 185 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:35,919 have any major concern with doing that, 186 00:06:35,919 --> 00:06:36,480 so. 187 00:06:36,480 --> 00:06:38,480 >> No, that that would work. 188 00:06:38,480 --> 00:06:39,440 >> Okay. 189 00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:40,080 >> And then chair 190 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:41,120 >> Thank you. 191 00:06:41,120 --> 00:06:42,919 >> J- just yeah, while we're on like 192 00:06:42,919 --> 00:06:44,360 irrigation, 193 00:06:44,360 --> 00:06:46,880 um there is a requirement that the turf 194 00:06:46,880 --> 00:06:49,320 area cannot be more than 35% of the 195 00:06:49,320 --> 00:06:51,400 total landscaped area. And so, we'll 196 00:06:51,400 --> 00:06:53,040 need to have that clarified in the 197 00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:55,160 landscaping plans, the the the 198 00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:57,320 calculation for that and it kind of kind 199 00:06:57,320 --> 00:06:59,440 of broken out. It appears that 200 00:06:59,440 --> 00:07:00,120 um 201 00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:02,560 it it's it's quite a bit more, um but it 202 00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:05,640 was hard to to kind of tell um what was 203 00:07:05,640 --> 00:07:07,560 turf and what what's not. 204 00:07:07,560 --> 00:07:10,760 So, it's at the 35% cap on the landscape 205 00:07:10,760 --> 00:07:12,240 area. 206 00:07:12,240 --> 00:07:14,080 >> Okay. 207 00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:15,600 >> I apologize I didn't hear that very 208 00:07:15,600 --> 00:07:17,240 well. I'm assuming you guys will mark up 209 00:07:17,240 --> 00:07:18,720 these comments like you did last time 210 00:07:18,720 --> 00:07:19,840 and we can address them. 211 00:07:19,840 --> 00:07:22,400 >> Yeah, the the comment was that the 212 00:07:22,400 --> 00:07:25,560 overall turf area exceeds what our code 213 00:07:25,560 --> 00:07:26,880 will allow. 214 00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:29,200 Um our code currently limits the amount 215 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:31,960 of turf to 35%. 216 00:07:31,960 --> 00:07:34,240 And um so, that would just have to be 217 00:07:34,240 --> 00:07:36,160 adjusted and make sure we're 218 00:07:36,160 --> 00:07:37,320 in compliance with that. 219 00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:39,240 >> So, John, to clarify, we can't tell 220 00:07:39,240 --> 00:07:41,160 whether it exceeds. It's hard to to know 221 00:07:41,160 --> 00:07:42,240 what the 222 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:44,440 what's being turf and which isn't. So, 223 00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:46,800 we we just need that to include that in 224 00:07:46,800 --> 00:07:48,840 a either in a table or a note or 225 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:50,440 something that says this is how much is 226 00:07:50,440 --> 00:07:52,400 turf, this is how much is cobble or 227 00:07:52,400 --> 00:07:53,800 whatever else is planned there, right? 228 00:07:53,800 --> 00:07:56,480 So, it it it appears that it may exceed, but we 229 00:07:56,480 --> 00:07:57,440 don't know that. 230 00:07:57,440 --> 00:07:59,280 >> Yeah, and and we did include include a 231 00:07:59,280 --> 00:08:02,800 note on the sheet the legend sheet. 232 00:08:02,800 --> 00:08:04,960 >> Okay. 233 00:08:04,960 --> 00:08:06,680 Otherwise, you want if it's not turf, 234 00:08:06,680 --> 00:08:08,600 you want it to be cobble or something 235 00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:09,320 similar. 236 00:08:09,320 --> 00:08:11,640 >> You just can't exceed 35% of turf. We 237 00:08:11,640 --> 00:08:13,360 don't we don't have an interpretation or 238 00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:15,200 a preference of what we want. You just 239 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:17,200 can't the code is you can't have more 240 00:08:17,200 --> 00:08:20,480 than 35% turf of the landscaped area. 241 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:21,680 >> Okay. 242 00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:24,120 >> Sounds good. 243 00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:25,480 >> Okay, Mike. 244 00:08:25,480 --> 00:08:27,040 Police. 245 00:08:27,040 --> 00:08:29,600 >> Nothing. They moved the trees back and I 246 00:08:29,600 --> 00:08:30,960 believe they're set back far enough it 247 00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:32,680 won't be a 248 00:08:32,680 --> 00:08:33,599 issue anymore. 249 00:08:33,599 --> 00:08:35,000 >> Okay. 250 00:08:35,000 --> 00:08:36,520 Alan, fire. 251 00:08:36,520 --> 00:08:39,360 >> Uh we had nothing with the fire 252 00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:40,440 department. 253 00:08:40,440 --> 00:08:41,440 >> Okay. 254 00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:42,640 Norm, administration. 255 00:08:42,640 --> 00:08:45,160 >> Yeah, so just having driven recently 256 00:08:45,160 --> 00:08:47,240 through a development that's not this 257 00:08:47,240 --> 00:08:49,839 development but in another town, 258 00:08:49,839 --> 00:08:50,800 um 259 00:08:50,800 --> 00:08:52,360 I wonder if it would be prudent to have 260 00:08:52,360 --> 00:08:54,360 not only the trees but the but some 261 00:08:54,360 --> 00:08:56,240 sight triangles added on there for the 262 00:08:56,240 --> 00:08:57,839 where the dumpster is. 263 00:08:57,839 --> 00:08:59,120 I'm concerned that that dumpster is 264 00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:04,400 going to be way high up in the air and potentially be a visible uh uh uh um 265 00:09:04,400 --> 00:09:06,480 obscurity to 266 00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:08,120 a sight distance on that. 267 00:09:08,120 --> 00:09:08,640 >> He's 268 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:10,480 >> On that corner going in right there. 269 00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:11,600 >> These trying to 270 00:09:11,600 --> 00:09:12,880 >> got it already on there. 271 00:09:12,880 --> 00:09:13,640 >> Yep. 272 00:09:13,640 --> 00:09:15,280 >> Okay. All right. All right, I didn't see 273 00:09:15,280 --> 00:09:18,000 that, but thank you for for 274 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:20,800 Okay, that's great. 275 00:09:20,800 --> 00:09:21,440 Thank you. 276 00:09:21,440 --> 00:09:22,640 >> Yep. 277 00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:23,800 >> Sir. 278 00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:25,520 >> Listen here. 279 00:09:25,520 --> 00:09:26,920 >> I don't have anything else, Joe. 280 00:09:26,920 --> 00:09:29,120 >> Okay. 281 00:09:29,120 --> 00:09:31,080 >> Sounds like the the plans were short 282 00:09:31,080 --> 00:09:32,200 landscaping. Is that what I'm 283 00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:33,640 understanding? We didn't get receive the 284 00:09:33,640 --> 00:09:34,640 landscaping plans. 285 00:09:34,640 --> 00:09:35,600 >> The irrigation plans. 286 00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:37,040 >> Irrigation plans. Okay. 287 00:09:37,040 --> 00:09:38,720 >> Yeah, I'm so sorry. I must have just 288 00:09:38,720 --> 00:09:39,920 forgotten to put that in the set of 289 00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:41,760 plans. We get them All that stuff is 290 00:09:41,760 --> 00:09:43,600 designed separately and I must have just 291 00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:45,080 forgotten to grab it and and attach it 292 00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:46,080 to this. 293 00:09:46,080 --> 00:09:47,880 It was included last time. 294 00:09:47,880 --> 00:09:49,400 And I had the uh 295 00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:51,600 landscape architect that we hired for 296 00:09:51,600 --> 00:09:54,080 this remove the RPZ off of the sprinkler 297 00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:55,120 line 298 00:09:55,120 --> 00:09:57,120 since it was connected to the sprinkler 299 00:09:57,120 --> 00:09:57,760 uh 300 00:09:57,760 --> 00:10:02,990 irrigation line that the city provides. 301 00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:04,440 So, that was that was my mistake. I 302 00:10:04,440 --> 00:10:05,360 apologize. 303 00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:06,760 >> Same. 304 00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:08,440 Um 305 00:10:08,440 --> 00:10:11,160 one other just note that 306 00:10:11,160 --> 00:10:11,920 um 307 00:10:11,920 --> 00:10:14,120 the uh it's not included in this plan 308 00:10:14,120 --> 00:10:15,680 set, but previously, but it's a 309 00:10:15,680 --> 00:10:19,480 continuing comment that um ARC still 310 00:10:19,480 --> 00:10:21,640 needs to review the architectural plans 311 00:10:21,640 --> 00:10:23,040 for the site. 312 00:10:23,040 --> 00:10:23,360 >> Correct. 313 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:25,480 >> Um and just whenever you're 314 00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:27,880 um ready to have those submitted to 315 00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:30,280 review, we can get that scheduled. 316 00:10:30,280 --> 00:10:32,720 >> Perfect. Thank you so much. 317 00:10:32,720 --> 00:10:34,880 >> Um I'm just double-checking here. Make 318 00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:36,160 sure we covered all the redline 319 00:10:36,160 --> 00:10:43,430 comments. Yep, parking. 320 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:45,960 And irrigation. 321 00:10:45,960 --> 00:10:52,550 I believe that. 322 00:10:52,560 --> 00:10:53,640 » Then we'll add some shrubs to that 323 00:10:53,640 --> 00:10:54,600 little island there. 324 00:10:54,600 --> 00:10:55,800 >> Yep. 325 00:10:55,800 --> 00:10:56,320 Okay. 326 00:10:56,320 --> 00:11:00,790 >> Easy enough. 327 00:11:00,800 --> 00:11:03,160 » Um coming at the lawn, I believe that's 328 00:11:03,160 --> 00:11:05,080 it. So, 329 00:11:05,080 --> 00:11:06,600 Okay. 330 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:08,480 Um with that 331 00:11:08,480 --> 00:11:11,080 >> I have a I have a question or a thought. 332 00:11:11,080 --> 00:11:12,920 This site plan does not approve any 333 00:11:12,920 --> 00:11:14,680 signage, right? Signage is done on a 334 00:11:14,680 --> 00:11:16,560 separate permit. 335 00:11:16,560 --> 00:11:18,600 So, please be aware that that that is 336 00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:20,640 separate to and including if you exceed 337 00:11:20,640 --> 00:11:22,360 the number of signs on different sides 338 00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:24,839 of buildings. That's that's similar to 339 00:11:24,839 --> 00:11:27,760 the ARC with the with the elevations and 340 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:29,520 stuff. That is a separate process. So, 341 00:11:29,520 --> 00:11:31,000 make sure that you recognize that this 342 00:11:31,000 --> 00:11:33,680 site plan does not approve any signage 343 00:11:33,680 --> 00:11:36,000 on the building or otherwise. 344 00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:38,000 >> Correct. Yeah, and Aspen's been great 345 00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:39,440 helping me get through some of those 346 00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:41,040 requirements there, too. So, I 347 00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:45,510 appreciate that. 348 00:11:45,520 --> 00:11:48,000 » Okay, there's not any other comments or 349 00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:49,520 questions? 350 00:11:49,520 --> 00:11:52,240 I would look for a motion. Again, DRC is 351 00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:55,760 the uh final approval body for this 352 00:11:55,760 --> 00:11:56,920 uh application. 353 00:11:56,920 --> 00:11:58,640 >> So, I have a question on not having the 354 00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:00,640 full plan set. How do we How do we 355 00:12:00,640 --> 00:12:02,160 approve that 356 00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:05,320 without having the irrigation plans? How does that 357 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:08,000 >> So, we do 358 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:08,280 That's a 359 00:12:08,280 --> 00:12:09,560 >> going to say I I'd get that to you 360 00:12:09,560 --> 00:12:11,760 today. I'm so sorry. 361 00:12:11,760 --> 00:12:13,880 Doesn't help. I'm I'm I'm guessing we'll 362 00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:15,280 probably have to come back since I 363 00:12:15,280 --> 00:12:16,200 forgot a sheet. 364 00:12:16,200 --> 00:12:17,640 >> Well, wait. We do need the parking 365 00:12:17,640 --> 00:12:19,560 added, the the four spaces. I don't know 366 00:12:19,560 --> 00:12:21,520 if we can do that as a conditional 367 00:12:21,520 --> 00:12:23,240 approval or if we would rather have that 368 00:12:23,240 --> 00:12:24,840 come back as a 369 00:12:24,840 --> 00:12:28,400 >> I To I guess the question would be is 370 00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:31,080 who is specifically applies to. 371 00:12:31,080 --> 00:12:33,520 So, if there's Again, if there's one 372 00:12:33,520 --> 00:12:36,240 department that is respon- that would be 373 00:12:36,240 --> 00:12:38,520 responsible following through on that, 374 00:12:38,520 --> 00:12:40,520 then potentially could be 375 00:12:40,520 --> 00:12:41,118 uh 376 00:12:41,118 --> 00:12:41,280 >> [snorts] 377 00:12:41,280 --> 00:12:44,160 >> conditionally approved. Um 378 00:12:44,160 --> 00:12:46,120 with working through that. Otherwise, it 379 00:12:46,120 --> 00:12:47,960 would need to come back to the full body 380 00:12:47,960 --> 00:12:48,640 to review. 381 00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:50,000 >> So, Morgan, I have a question on that. 382 00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:52,880 They could [snorts] also try to seek a 383 00:12:52,880 --> 00:12:57,360 shared parking agreement, right? With the Macy's or Is that a 384 00:12:57,360 --> 00:12:59,040 possibility, but that goes to planning 385 00:12:59,040 --> 00:13:00,240 commission, right? 386 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:01,280 >> That is a possibility we could do. 387 00:13:01,280 --> 00:13:02,600 >> So, so there are a couple of avenues 388 00:13:02,600 --> 00:13:04,000 that they could take that we're unsure 389 00:13:04,000 --> 00:13:05,560 of at this point in time. If they can't 390 00:13:05,560 --> 00:13:10,520 come up with the other four stalls, then we still have to to 391 00:13:10,520 --> 00:13:12,120 um have it go to planning commission if 392 00:13:12,120 --> 00:13:13,680 they try to do a a shared parking 393 00:13:13,680 --> 00:13:14,520 agreement. 394 00:13:14,520 --> 00:13:15,520 >> Yeah, that's correct. 395 00:13:15,520 --> 00:13:17,520 >> So, with that, I would make a motion to 396 00:13:17,520 --> 00:13:19,240 table. 397 00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:21,960 >> Okay, we have motion to table. 398 00:13:21,960 --> 00:13:23,160 >> Second the motion. 399 00:13:23,160 --> 00:13:24,880 >> Second by Morgan. 400 00:13:24,880 --> 00:13:28,360 >> Any conversation on motion? 401 00:13:28,360 --> 00:13:30,080 Seeing none, we'll to vote. All in favor 402 00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:31,480 of tabling, please say aye. 403 00:13:31,480 --> 00:13:32,280 >> Aye. 404 00:13:32,280 --> 00:13:35,520 >> Any opposed? Okay, motion's tabled. 405 00:13:35,520 --> 00:13:37,240 Uh we'll get these comments back to you, 406 00:13:37,240 --> 00:13:38,440 Brian. 407 00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:39,040 Um 408 00:13:39,040 --> 00:13:41,480 and you work with with Morgan and Aspen 409 00:13:41,480 --> 00:13:44,280 on uh some of the parking items related 410 00:13:44,280 --> 00:13:45,560 to that. So. 411 00:13:45,560 --> 00:13:47,160 >> Perfect. Thank you all very much. I 412 00:13:47,160 --> 00:13:48,200 appreciate your time. 413 00:13:48,200 --> 00:13:49,880 >> Yep, thank you. 414 00:13:49,880 --> 00:13:50,640 >> Have a great day. 415 00:13:50,640 --> 00:13:53,430 >> You too. 416 00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:54,960 Okay. 417 00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:55,800 Um 418 00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:58,760 with that, because we're 419 00:13:58,760 --> 00:14:01,560 no longer need to be on Zoom, I think 420 00:14:01,560 --> 00:14:03,040 we'll 421 00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:05,240 close that down, just so I don't have to 422 00:14:05,240 --> 00:14:10,550 babysit that. 423 00:14:10,560 --> 00:14:13,480 Okay, the next item on the agenda, 424 00:14:13,480 --> 00:14:16,600 this is an old traffic control request 425 00:14:16,600 --> 00:14:19,600 um from last year. 426 00:14:19,600 --> 00:14:21,880 Uh 427 00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:24,720 there was there's a resident um here 428 00:14:24,720 --> 00:14:26,440 that indicated there was some concern 429 00:14:26,440 --> 00:14:31,000 with uh speeding and vehicles going up 430 00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:33,320 Canyon Road, and they're requesting some 431 00:14:33,320 --> 00:14:35,000 sort of traffic control device such as a 432 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:37,560 speed bump or uh something along those 433 00:14:37,560 --> 00:14:40,560 lines to help slow people down. 434 00:14:40,560 --> 00:14:44,800 Um we did do a an traffic analysis last 435 00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:48,560 fall, early fall, late uh late summer 436 00:14:48,560 --> 00:14:51,280 um to try to catch that. There were some 437 00:14:51,280 --> 00:14:53,839 elements there that may 438 00:14:53,839 --> 00:14:56,160 that they were concerned with um that 439 00:14:56,160 --> 00:14:59,880 were expressed on uh 440 00:14:59,880 --> 00:15:01,640 the timing of that traffic study that 441 00:15:01,640 --> 00:15:02,960 was done. 442 00:15:02,960 --> 00:15:08,200 And so, to help capture a weekend uh 443 00:15:08,200 --> 00:15:10,560 you know, trip, catch in weekend holiday 444 00:15:10,560 --> 00:15:13,080 traffic going up San Joaquin Canyon 445 00:15:13,080 --> 00:15:15,700 there to see what, you know, the 446 00:15:15,700 --> 00:15:16,480 [clears throat] 447 00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:19,560 traffic impact is was in on there. We 448 00:15:19,560 --> 00:15:21,080 postponed 449 00:15:21,080 --> 00:15:22,280 uh 450 00:15:22,280 --> 00:15:23,960 doing any action on this one until we 451 00:15:23,960 --> 00:15:26,680 could get that traffic study completed. 452 00:15:26,680 --> 00:15:29,400 We did place out traffic counters over 453 00:15:29,400 --> 00:15:30,600 the 454 00:15:30,600 --> 00:15:32,880 Memorial Day weekend. 455 00:15:32,880 --> 00:15:35,960 And as as a part of the study and found 456 00:15:35,960 --> 00:15:38,320 that we're 457 00:15:38,320 --> 00:15:42,560 roughly about 1,700 cars total for the 458 00:15:42,560 --> 00:15:45,120 week that the study was being completed. 459 00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:48,240 Um, that traffic study I'll pull up here 460 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:51,440 real quick. So you can kind of see 461 00:15:51,440 --> 00:15:54,280 um, some of the numbers. 462 00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:56,800 Um, 463 00:15:56,800 --> 00:15:59,200 to [snorts] point out the average 464 00:15:59,200 --> 00:16:00,480 uh, 465 00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:02,760 annual daily trip count for this, so the 466 00:16:02,760 --> 00:16:07,600 daily trip count was 235 over that week. 467 00:16:07,600 --> 00:16:09,960 Um, again, there were 1,600 468 00:16:09,960 --> 00:16:11,600 vehicles 469 00:16:11,600 --> 00:16:14,320 over that week that went up to it. 470 00:16:14,320 --> 00:16:15,640 Um, 471 00:16:15,640 --> 00:16:19,520 and one thing that was found out with 472 00:16:19,520 --> 00:16:22,640 this with this traffic study is that 473 00:16:22,640 --> 00:16:25,920 most vehicles are exceeding the 25 mph 474 00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:28,760 speed limit up through there. 475 00:16:28,760 --> 00:16:30,320 Um, 476 00:16:30,320 --> 00:16:32,720 however, with that said, 477 00:16:32,720 --> 00:16:34,000 um, 478 00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:38,480 per the MUTCD, the Manual on Uniform Traffic 479 00:16:38,480 --> 00:16:40,080 Control Devices, 480 00:16:40,080 --> 00:16:43,000 the volume of vehicles doesn't warrant 481 00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:44,160 any 482 00:16:44,160 --> 00:16:46,400 traffic control devices. 483 00:16:46,400 --> 00:16:48,000 Just because of the the volume of 484 00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:51,560 traffic is is relatively low. 485 00:16:51,560 --> 00:16:53,880 It's actually low and doesn't require 486 00:16:53,880 --> 00:16:58,160 any of those devices installed. 487 00:16:58,160 --> 00:16:59,839 Uh, with that said, 488 00:16:59,839 --> 00:17:01,400 based on this, it does appear that 489 00:17:01,400 --> 00:17:04,199 people are speeding on that road. 490 00:17:04,199 --> 00:17:08,319 Um, just so you're aware, to try to help 491 00:17:08,319 --> 00:17:09,920 take out any 492 00:17:09,920 --> 00:17:12,600 driveway traffic or 493 00:17:12,600 --> 00:17:15,400 and to eliminate potential any vehicle 494 00:17:15,400 --> 00:17:17,839 traffic from the intersection and the 495 00:17:17,839 --> 00:17:20,640 subdivision here to the north. 496 00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:23,360 We did place the traffic counters 497 00:17:23,360 --> 00:17:26,680 in this area, just to the north and west 498 00:17:26,680 --> 00:17:30,160 of the um the this is our booster pump 499 00:17:30,160 --> 00:17:32,360 station, and then the end of the curve 500 00:17:32,360 --> 00:17:35,360 ends right here. And so, this was to to 501 00:17:35,360 --> 00:17:38,280 help capture specifically 502 00:17:38,280 --> 00:17:41,800 canyon traffic um related to that. So, 503 00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:43,520 we are seeing that 504 00:17:43,520 --> 00:17:45,520 um we did see that people are speeding 505 00:17:45,520 --> 00:17:47,600 up through here. Um 506 00:17:47,600 --> 00:17:52,640 but the the amount of vehicles is not 507 00:17:52,640 --> 00:17:54,212 uh is pretty low. 508 00:17:54,212 --> 00:17:54,720 >> [snorts] 509 00:17:54,720 --> 00:17:57,400 >> So, um 510 00:17:57,400 --> 00:18:00,480 with that, um I'll go around the DRC. If 511 00:18:00,480 --> 00:18:02,160 there's any comments, thoughts, or 512 00:18:02,160 --> 00:18:04,200 questions on this, again, this was the 513 00:18:04,200 --> 00:18:07,000 original request was for speed bumps up 514 00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:08,880 through there. Um 515 00:18:08,880 --> 00:18:11,040 which, based on this study, I don't 516 00:18:11,040 --> 00:18:12,880 speed bumps are speed bumps aren't 517 00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:14,960 warranted, and I don't think it'd be a 518 00:18:14,960 --> 00:18:16,840 wise decision to place speed bumps up in 519 00:18:16,840 --> 00:18:19,240 this area. But with that said, we'll 520 00:18:19,240 --> 00:18:20,880 open it up to the DRC for any thoughts 521 00:18:20,880 --> 00:18:24,590 or comments. 522 00:18:24,600 --> 00:18:26,200 » John, most of the vehicles, if I'm 523 00:18:26,200 --> 00:18:28,560 reading this chart right, are below the 524 00:18:28,560 --> 00:18:30,120 10 over 525 00:18:30,120 --> 00:18:31,480 speed limit, correct? 526 00:18:31,480 --> 00:18:32,600 >> Yes. 527 00:18:32,600 --> 00:18:34,040 >> And 528 00:18:34,040 --> 00:18:35,480 uh correct me if I'm wrong, you guys 529 00:18:35,480 --> 00:18:36,920 might know, but I believe that's a 530 00:18:36,920 --> 00:18:39,200 actually on a grade downhill right 531 00:18:39,200 --> 00:18:39,760 there. 532 00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:40,240 >> Yes, it 533 00:18:40,240 --> 00:18:42,200 >> So, people are typically, especially if 534 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:43,560 they're pulling trailers up to camp or 535 00:18:43,560 --> 00:18:45,280 whatever, going to pick up speed and try 536 00:18:45,280 --> 00:18:47,000 to be slowing down about that point. 537 00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:47,960 >> Mhm. 538 00:18:47,960 --> 00:18:50,560 >> Um I'm I I agree with you that I don't 539 00:18:50,560 --> 00:18:52,960 think speed bumps would be the answer 540 00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:54,040 there. 541 00:18:54,040 --> 00:18:54,680 Um 542 00:18:54,680 --> 00:18:56,760 I know that we have a flashing stop sign 543 00:18:56,760 --> 00:18:58,480 right there at that next intersection, 544 00:18:58,480 --> 00:19:00,480 so people are stopping. 545 00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:03,200 Um I just I get people are speeding, but 546 00:19:03,200 --> 00:19:04,480 I don't think that it's like an 547 00:19:04,480 --> 00:19:06,440 egregious speed. 548 00:19:06,440 --> 00:19:07,640 Um 549 00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:10,080 and that that's just my opinion on it. 550 00:19:10,080 --> 00:19:12,120 >> Mhm. 551 00:19:12,120 --> 00:19:12,720 Okay. 552 00:19:12,720 --> 00:19:14,640 >> Are there other maybe like smaller 553 00:19:14,640 --> 00:19:16,600 measures that the city can do? Like one 554 00:19:16,600 --> 00:19:18,480 of those electronic signs that could 555 00:19:18,480 --> 00:19:20,120 flash cuz if it's more of just a 556 00:19:20,120 --> 00:19:22,240 speeding issue is there something I 557 00:19:22,240 --> 00:19:23,440 guess 558 00:19:23,440 --> 00:19:25,360 just like on a lighter end that that the 559 00:19:25,360 --> 00:19:28,880 city could could do for seeing like a I don't I don't I don't know what the 560 00:19:28,880 --> 00:19:31,200 percentile was but if you're seeing like 561 00:19:31,200 --> 00:19:33,680 the majority of people are speeding 562 00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:36,920 you know, 10 miles plus 563 00:19:36,920 --> 00:19:39,560 you know, it is striping is or some sort 564 00:19:39,560 --> 00:19:41,120 of sign in the future that that we could 565 00:19:41,120 --> 00:19:43,520 add that could kind of just help to to 566 00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:44,800 bring that that number down a little 567 00:19:44,800 --> 00:19:46,440 bit. I say that just cuz this isn't a 568 00:19:46,440 --> 00:19:48,000 recreation area. I could see there be 569 00:19:48,000 --> 00:19:49,640 mountain bikers, hikers. 570 00:19:49,640 --> 00:19:50,000 >> Mhm. 571 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:51,840 >> If you don't have sidewalks that you 572 00:19:51,840 --> 00:19:53,423 know, could could be using the the 573 00:19:53,423 --> 00:19:55,520 [clears throat] roadway as well. 574 00:19:55,520 --> 00:19:58,560 >> Um well, additional signage um 575 00:19:58,560 --> 00:20:00,720 you you can and say a lot of times you 576 00:20:00,720 --> 00:20:02,720 can put up additional signage. The only 577 00:20:02,720 --> 00:20:04,760 concern with that that comes up with is 578 00:20:04,760 --> 00:20:06,240 sign fatigue. 579 00:20:06,240 --> 00:20:09,560 Um you start putting up too many signs 580 00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:11,280 people just stop paying attention to 581 00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:14,280 signs. And so, um 582 00:20:14,280 --> 00:20:16,680 again, there's the a possibility. I 583 00:20:16,680 --> 00:20:19,680 think there's already speed limit sign 584 00:20:19,680 --> 00:20:21,400 up in this area. If I remember 585 00:20:21,400 --> 00:20:22,680 correctly, as you're heading up the 586 00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:24,520 canyon, there's a speed limit sign 587 00:20:24,520 --> 00:20:27,440 already there to help 588 00:20:27,440 --> 00:20:29,000 notify the traveling public what the 589 00:20:29,000 --> 00:20:30,400 speed limit is. 590 00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:31,640 If you 591 00:20:31,640 --> 00:20:34,200 go and you do put in a flashing speed 592 00:20:34,200 --> 00:20:36,120 limit sign, something similar to what we 593 00:20:36,120 --> 00:20:38,440 have down 594 00:20:38,440 --> 00:20:39,200 uh 595 00:20:39,200 --> 00:20:42,360 just off of 500 South and 200 West, 300 596 00:20:42,360 --> 00:20:44,120 West that intersection 597 00:20:44,120 --> 00:20:49,960 um down through there, um we do have a flashing speed limit sign. 598 00:20:49,960 --> 00:20:52,320 >> Has that made a difference? 599 00:20:52,320 --> 00:20:55,600 >> It I think it does but in 600 00:20:55,600 --> 00:20:57,640 my opinion is those flashing speed limit 601 00:20:57,640 --> 00:20:59,240 signs are more for when you have a speed 602 00:20:59,240 --> 00:21:00,920 limit change. 603 00:21:00,920 --> 00:21:02,320 You know, to notify people, "Hey, the 604 00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:04,040 speed limit actually drops down." But in 605 00:21:04,040 --> 00:21:05,960 this section, it doesn't change. It's 606 00:21:05,960 --> 00:21:08,000 the same. 607 00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:08,680 It 608 00:21:08,680 --> 00:21:11,480 So, I think a speed limit sign 609 00:21:11,480 --> 00:21:13,000 serves the same purpose as a flashing 610 00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:15,400 speed limit sign. That's just 611 00:21:15,400 --> 00:21:18,840 kind of based on police departments 612 00:21:18,840 --> 00:21:20,920 I don't know, experiences those will 613 00:21:20,920 --> 00:21:23,280 help when it changes to say, "Hey, just 614 00:21:23,280 --> 00:21:25,160 remember the speed limit lowers here." 615 00:21:25,160 --> 00:21:27,040 But, it's not going to keep them from 616 00:21:27,040 --> 00:21:29,200 speeding or not speeding. 617 00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:31,400 >> Correct. Yeah. And someone I say I think 618 00:21:31,400 --> 00:21:33,280 the biggest element Mike hit on there 619 00:21:33,280 --> 00:21:35,840 earlier is the the fact that it is a 620 00:21:35,840 --> 00:21:41,480 downhill incline at that point. Um and 621 00:21:41,480 --> 00:21:43,040 uh there 622 00:21:43,040 --> 00:21:44,960 I say it's not excessive speeding as 623 00:21:44,960 --> 00:21:47,520 Mike said. Um 624 00:21:47,520 --> 00:21:50,040 but for the purposes of this of the the 625 00:21:50,040 --> 00:21:51,360 DRC 626 00:21:51,360 --> 00:21:52,760 um 627 00:21:52,760 --> 00:21:53,320 uh 628 00:21:53,320 --> 00:21:54,600 enforcement and that kind of stuff, 629 00:21:54,600 --> 00:21:56,720 that's a whole another element, whole 630 00:21:56,720 --> 00:21:59,120 other thing that can be taken care of uh 631 00:21:59,120 --> 00:22:00,880 aside from this. But, again, this is 632 00:22:00,880 --> 00:22:03,360 specifically for some sort of traffic 633 00:22:03,360 --> 00:22:04,680 control. 634 00:22:04,680 --> 00:22:06,560 Um I I 635 00:22:06,560 --> 00:22:08,880 agree with Mike. I think the flashing 636 00:22:08,880 --> 00:22:12,440 signs um 637 00:22:12,440 --> 00:22:14,840 serve a purpose, which I don't think 638 00:22:14,840 --> 00:22:17,120 this specific area would would fit that 639 00:22:17,120 --> 00:22:17,600 purpose. 640 00:22:17,600 --> 00:22:18,400 >> Yeah. 641 00:22:18,400 --> 00:22:19,880 and I I I guess and that that's 642 00:22:19,880 --> 00:22:22,360 totally fine. Um I was thinking more of 643 00:22:22,360 --> 00:22:23,600 um 644 00:22:23,600 --> 00:22:25,480 so, this might sit outside of that. This 645 00:22:25,480 --> 00:22:28,240 could just be an area to look at as um 646 00:22:28,240 --> 00:22:30,400 get more of your foot traffic or your 647 00:22:30,400 --> 00:22:32,440 cycle traffic. I I've driven up there a 648 00:22:32,440 --> 00:22:34,440 bunch of times. I always see runners 649 00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:36,600 or or uh bikers on the road. And so, 650 00:22:36,600 --> 00:22:38,720 that that may be an area as we start to 651 00:22:38,720 --> 00:22:41,080 see that like that more pedestrian 652 00:22:41,080 --> 00:22:43,040 cyclists increase where they're they're 653 00:22:43,040 --> 00:22:44,440 sharing the the roadway. There's not a 654 00:22:44,440 --> 00:22:46,880 sidewalk. Where um 655 00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:48,600 you know, just watching the speeds and 656 00:22:48,600 --> 00:22:50,360 if if we are seeing that problem 657 00:22:50,360 --> 00:22:53,280 increasing, like doing something up there could could be wise. 658 00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:55,280 >> Yep. I'd say we can 659 00:22:55,280 --> 00:23:00,720 uh we we will pay attention to that and keep an eye on it. But, for For for 660 00:23:00,720 --> 00:23:02,960 this purpose um 661 00:23:02,960 --> 00:23:06,080 and It is an action item by the DRC. 662 00:23:06,080 --> 00:23:08,400 And so, um if we don't feel it is 663 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:12,000 needed, I'd look for a motion on that. 664 00:23:12,000 --> 00:23:13,400 >> You all know I make a motion that we 665 00:23:13,400 --> 00:23:16,560 deny the traffic control request. 666 00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:16,840 >> Okay. 667 00:23:16,840 --> 00:23:19,000 >> I'll second it. Second. 668 00:23:19,000 --> 00:23:21,360 >> Any discussion on the motion? 669 00:23:21,360 --> 00:23:24,360 See none. All in favor, please say I. 670 00:23:24,360 --> 00:23:24,920 >> I. 671 00:23:24,920 --> 00:23:28,280 >> Any opposed? Okay, motion passes. 672 00:23:28,280 --> 00:23:30,640 Uh the last item on the agenda was a 673 00:23:30,640 --> 00:23:33,120 review of the meeting minutes from May 674 00:23:33,120 --> 00:23:34,560 12th. 675 00:23:34,560 --> 00:23:37,360 Um there's no comments on those minutes. 676 00:23:37,360 --> 00:23:39,320 I'd look for a motion. 677 00:23:39,320 --> 00:23:40,480 >> I'll make a motion to approve the 678 00:23:40,480 --> 00:23:41,366 minutes 679 00:23:41,366 --> 00:23:41,440 >> [snorts] 680 00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:41,640 >> Okay. 681 00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:43,320 >> of the May 12th meeting. 682 00:23:43,320 --> 00:23:44,680 >> Got a motion to approve. Is there a 683 00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:44,920 second? 684 00:23:44,920 --> 00:23:45,760 >> I'll second it. 685 00:23:45,760 --> 00:23:47,480 >> Second by Alan. 686 00:23:47,480 --> 00:23:49,200 Any comments? 687 00:23:49,200 --> 00:23:51,440 See none. All in favor, please say I. 688 00:23:51,440 --> 00:23:52,520 >> I. 689 00:23:52,520 --> 00:23:54,280 >> Any opposed? 690 00:23:54,280 --> 00:23:55,200 Okay. 691 00:23:55,200 --> 00:23:57,480 There's anything else needed by the DRC, 692 00:23:57,480 --> 00:23:59,320 I'd look for a motion to adjourn. 693 00:23:59,320 --> 00:24:00,440 >> So moved. 694 00:24:00,440 --> 00:24:03,000 >> Sounds good. We are adjourned at 10:24. 695 00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:14,430 Thank you, everybody. 696 00:24:14,440 --> 00:24:16,840 » That's good.