1 00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:13,440 Okay. 2 00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:15,720 We will go ahead and get started then. 3 00:00:15,720 --> 00:00:16,400 >> [clears throat] 4 00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:18,480 >> Welcome everyone tonight to Santaquin 5 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:20,000 City Planning Commission meeting. It's 6 00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:22,400 Tuesday, June 9th, 2026. We're getting 7 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:24,600 started at 7:01 8 00:00:24,600 --> 00:00:26,840 tonight. 9 00:00:26,840 --> 00:00:28,120 All right, before we get started, would 10 00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:30,480 anyone like to uh open us up with a 11 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:37,630 thought or an invocation tonight? 12 00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:41,870 » Be happy to, please. 13 00:00:41,880 --> 00:00:43,120 Our dear heavenly Father, we're grateful 14 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:44,360 for this day. We're grateful for the 15 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:46,760 opportunity to gather as a Planning 16 00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:49,560 Commission and residents of Santaquin, 17 00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:51,600 and we pray that thy spirit will guide 18 00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:53,680 our discussion this evening, and 19 00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:55,160 we pray that 20 00:00:55,160 --> 00:00:56,440 we can 21 00:00:56,440 --> 00:00:58,320 be mindful of the important topics that 22 00:00:58,320 --> 00:00:59,880 we'll discuss, and 23 00:00:59,880 --> 00:01:03,200 we're grateful to live in this community and for our 24 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:04,519 friends and neighbors that make this a 25 00:01:04,519 --> 00:01:06,240 great place to live, and we say this in 26 00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:08,480 the name of Jesus Christ. Amen. 27 00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:10,480 >> Thank you, Commissioner Johnson. 28 00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:12,440 Okay, would anyone like to lead us in 29 00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:16,350 the Pledge of Allegiance tonight? 30 00:01:16,360 --> 00:01:17,480 » I'll lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance 31 00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:18,120 tonight. 32 00:01:18,120 --> 00:01:19,440 Please stand. 33 00:01:19,440 --> 00:01:22,120 And people pledge after me. 34 00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:24,240 >> I pledge allegiance to the flag 35 00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:26,600 >> of the United States of America, 36 00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:29,280 and to the republic for which it stands, 37 00:01:29,280 --> 00:01:32,560 one nation under God, indivisible, with 38 00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:36,276 liberty and justice for all. 39 00:01:36,286 --> 00:01:36,880 » [clears throat] 40 00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:39,960 >> Thank you, Commissioner Hoffman. 41 00:01:39,960 --> 00:01:43,190 Okay. 42 00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:45,320 Um here is the agenda for tonight. 43 00:01:45,320 --> 00:01:47,480 Before we get started with uh the main 44 00:01:47,480 --> 00:01:49,120 part of the agenda, we will have a 45 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:50,680 public forum. So, for those of you in 46 00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:51,720 attendance tonight, that's your 47 00:01:51,720 --> 00:01:55,760 opportunity to address the commission um 48 00:01:55,760 --> 00:01:56,840 about anything that might be on your 49 00:01:56,840 --> 00:01:58,600 mind. Now, keep in mind that we do have 50 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:00,200 two public hearings on the agenda. So, 51 00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:01,680 if you have comments related to either 52 00:02:01,680 --> 00:02:03,280 of those public hearings, hang on to 53 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:04,360 them and we'll get it we'll give you a 54 00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:05,520 chance to comment when we get to those 55 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:06,800 public hearings. 56 00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:08,039 Um but, if there's anything else you'd 57 00:02:08,039 --> 00:02:09,720 like to bring before the commission, now 58 00:02:09,720 --> 00:02:11,200 would be the time to do it. So, I'll 59 00:02:11,200 --> 00:02:13,560 open the public forum at 7:03 and invite 60 00:02:13,560 --> 00:02:18,790 any comments if anyone would like to. 61 00:02:18,800 --> 00:02:21,160 Okay. 62 00:02:21,160 --> 00:02:23,000 If not, we will then close the public 63 00:02:23,000 --> 00:02:28,790 forum at 7:03. Thank you. 64 00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:30,920 All right. 65 00:02:30,920 --> 00:02:32,720 We can move on now to agenda item number 66 00:02:32,720 --> 00:02:34,560 one. This is a proposed rezone of 67 00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:38,360 approximately 2.5 acres located at 13460 68 00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:44,310 South State Road 198. 69 00:02:44,320 --> 00:02:44,920 » Okay, 70 00:02:44,920 --> 00:02:47,880 this rezone 71 00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:50,640 brought by an applicant to a adjacent 72 00:02:50,640 --> 00:02:54,560 to open a minor home occupation here by Sunset 73 00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:55,600 Terrace. 74 00:02:55,600 --> 00:02:57,280 Currently, it's zone residential 75 00:02:57,280 --> 00:02:58,560 agricultural. 76 00:02:58,560 --> 00:02:59,920 They want to make it residential 77 00:02:59,920 --> 00:03:01,600 commercial zone. 78 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:05,160 Um currently, the zone does allow for a 79 00:03:05,160 --> 00:03:07,560 home occupation. Um they want to 80 00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:09,320 eventually move to 81 00:03:09,320 --> 00:03:11,480 a commercial daycare and so, 82 00:03:11,480 --> 00:03:14,920 residential commercial would allow for 83 00:03:14,920 --> 00:03:15,640 Um 84 00:03:15,640 --> 00:03:18,360 just to keep in mind, if it is rezone to 85 00:03:18,360 --> 00:03:20,120 residential commercial, there would be 86 00:03:20,120 --> 00:03:21,720 additional uses allowed that aren't 87 00:03:21,720 --> 00:03:23,120 currently allowed in a residential 88 00:03:23,120 --> 00:03:24,400 agricultural 89 00:03:24,400 --> 00:03:25,519 zone. 90 00:03:25,519 --> 00:03:30,990 Um all four of these tables 91 00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:32,600 Examples would include like 92 00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:34,519 multi-family, 93 00:03:34,519 --> 00:03:36,160 golf courses, 94 00:03:36,160 --> 00:03:38,959 adult specialty establishments, 95 00:03:38,959 --> 00:03:42,360 and private residences 96 00:03:42,360 --> 00:03:44,600 that would be allowed. And then, as far 97 00:03:44,600 --> 00:03:46,120 as 98 00:03:46,120 --> 00:03:47,959 how that matches with our future land 99 00:03:47,959 --> 00:03:49,360 use map, 100 00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:51,120 um 101 00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:53,120 it is part of agricultural heritage 102 00:03:53,120 --> 00:03:57,270 area. 103 00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:01,440 Their commercial is nearby, so it still 104 00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:07,030 makes sense that it is 105 00:04:07,040 --> 00:04:08,000 This is 106 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:09,640 the area right here. It's just this 107 00:04:09,640 --> 00:04:11,880 private place. It's just 108 00:04:11,880 --> 00:04:21,229 east of the storage units. 109 00:04:21,239 --> 00:04:23,280 We also have a 110 00:04:23,280 --> 00:04:25,720 that condition attached to that area. 111 00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:28,360 It is over there. 112 00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:29,400 And 113 00:04:29,400 --> 00:04:31,160 I think we have some of the applications 114 00:04:31,160 --> 00:04:41,510 to look at. 115 00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:42,800 » And if I could add 116 00:04:42,800 --> 00:04:43,880 >> Please finish your 117 00:04:43,880 --> 00:04:45,919 >> Um yeah, thank you so much, Aspen. She's 118 00:04:45,919 --> 00:04:47,960 done a great job at at animal analyzing 119 00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:49,280 this property and working with the 120 00:04:49,280 --> 00:04:52,919 applicant. Um so, and just as Aspen had 121 00:04:52,919 --> 00:04:55,200 indicated, please um understand that 122 00:04:55,200 --> 00:04:56,600 though that the applicant is kind of 123 00:04:56,600 --> 00:04:59,840 intending um the change for a specific 124 00:04:59,840 --> 00:05:02,160 use, that we want to look at the full 125 00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:04,480 buffet of uses and the allowances under 126 00:05:04,480 --> 00:05:08,160 the RC um did district. And so, as 127 00:05:08,160 --> 00:05:10,600 staff, we would we would ask that you 128 00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:11,640 kind of take that into your 129 00:05:11,640 --> 00:05:13,080 consideration from a long-term 130 00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:16,880 perspective. Would one of those uses um 131 00:05:16,880 --> 00:05:18,960 be appropriate not not be be appropriate 132 00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:21,960 for the area. Um and in looking at the 133 00:05:21,960 --> 00:05:25,160 future land land use map of the area, 134 00:05:25,160 --> 00:05:26,640 it's a little confusing cuz it shows 135 00:05:26,640 --> 00:05:28,000 commercial right next to it where the 136 00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:29,640 storage units are, but this property is 137 00:05:29,640 --> 00:05:32,200 actually designated as as um 138 00:05:32,200 --> 00:05:35,960 heritage agriculture. Now, um the future 139 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:41,800 land use map is simply a guide um as as you look at making zoning 140 00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:43,080 decisions, so it's not something you 141 00:05:43,080 --> 00:05:46,480 have to um align 100%, but it but it is 142 00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:48,560 kind of showing what the intent was back 143 00:05:48,560 --> 00:05:51,280 in in 2022 that we do believe that the 144 00:05:51,280 --> 00:05:54,400 use for a daycare most likely would be 145 00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:55,840 appropriate there if they had if they 146 00:05:55,840 --> 00:05:58,160 were able to meet the 147 00:05:58,160 --> 00:06:00,120 any requirements under our home 148 00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:01,880 occupation code. 149 00:06:01,880 --> 00:06:03,840 Just look at it from the the guys from a 150 00:06:03,840 --> 00:06:06,720 long-term perspective and 151 00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:09,280 if you apply the RC district, 152 00:06:09,280 --> 00:06:11,480 it does that it does that is that an 153 00:06:11,480 --> 00:06:13,080 appropriate destination for the 154 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:15,000 property? 155 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:16,240 >> All right, thank you. Aspen, thanks 156 00:06:16,240 --> 00:06:17,360 Morgan. 157 00:06:17,360 --> 00:06:20,000 Um the applicant's here tonight. 158 00:06:20,000 --> 00:06:21,800 Is there anything you'd like to add to 159 00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:23,800 the presentation? 160 00:06:23,800 --> 00:06:25,000 >> No, that's good. 161 00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:25,960 >> Okay. 162 00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:27,280 All right, we do have a public hearing 163 00:06:27,280 --> 00:06:28,640 on this agenda item tonight. So, we'll 164 00:06:28,640 --> 00:06:30,000 go ahead and move into that public 165 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:31,560 hearing now. We'll open the public 166 00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:34,080 hearing at 7:07 and invite any comments 167 00:06:34,080 --> 00:06:36,120 if anyone would like to comment on this 168 00:06:36,120 --> 00:06:40,350 agenda item. 169 00:06:40,360 --> 00:06:41,680 Okay, would you step up to the podium 170 00:06:41,680 --> 00:06:43,160 and state your name for us? 171 00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:47,630 >> I am Laura Decker. 172 00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:48,600 » Sorry, I didn't catch that. Would you 173 00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:49,520 state your name again? 174 00:06:49,520 --> 00:06:50,280 >> Laura Decker. 175 00:06:50,280 --> 00:06:51,080 >> Thank you. 176 00:06:51,080 --> 00:06:53,840 >> So, we live between the storage units. 177 00:06:53,840 --> 00:06:55,440 Our house is between the storage units 178 00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:57,200 and this proposed 179 00:06:57,200 --> 00:06:59,080 Um and I don't have any problems with 180 00:06:59,080 --> 00:07:00,280 them being 181 00:07:00,280 --> 00:07:02,840 changing zoning. That's not about that. 182 00:07:02,840 --> 00:07:06,320 My problem and I have spoke with 183 00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:10,720 30 people on this is the 184 00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:12,640 road in front of the house 185 00:07:12,640 --> 00:07:13,720 um 186 00:07:13,720 --> 00:07:15,800 the highway and it's a state road and I 187 00:07:15,800 --> 00:07:17,720 understand that you know, you guys don't 188 00:07:17,720 --> 00:07:20,800 control that. But if we're going to have 189 00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:22,640 businesses along there, 190 00:07:22,640 --> 00:07:24,680 that road needs to be slowed down. 191 00:07:24,680 --> 00:07:26,120 It needs to be slowed down even if you 192 00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:28,840 don't if you don't approve this. 193 00:07:28,840 --> 00:07:30,760 So, 194 00:07:30,760 --> 00:07:32,560 um every road every other road in 195 00:07:32,560 --> 00:07:34,880 Santaquin City is 35 196 00:07:34,880 --> 00:07:38,280 and that one is 45 and it hits 50 right 197 00:07:38,280 --> 00:07:40,280 at my house. 198 00:07:40,280 --> 00:07:43,840 And most of the time it's 70. So. 199 00:07:43,840 --> 00:07:46,400 That's my only complaint. 200 00:07:46,400 --> 00:07:47,920 And if there's anything you can do about 201 00:07:47,920 --> 00:07:50,600 it before there's commercial zoning 202 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:51,720 there 203 00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:53,560 that road needs to be slowed down. 204 00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:55,840 They'll appreciate it. 205 00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:57,200 The people with the storage sheds will 206 00:07:57,200 --> 00:07:59,120 appreciate it. 207 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:00,200 I don't know if the trucks will 208 00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:02,320 appreciate it, but 209 00:08:02,320 --> 00:08:05,360 the the cops will make more money. 210 00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:06,360 So, 211 00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:07,760 that's the only thing I have to say. So, 212 00:08:07,760 --> 00:08:09,320 if there's anything you can do about it, 213 00:08:09,320 --> 00:08:11,360 I would appreciate it. 214 00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:11,920 Thank you. 215 00:08:11,920 --> 00:08:14,520 >> Thank you. Thanks for comments. Um any 216 00:08:14,520 --> 00:08:15,919 other comments tonight for the public 217 00:08:15,919 --> 00:08:17,150 hearing? 218 00:08:17,150 --> 00:08:19,510 >> [clears throat] 219 00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:21,680 » Okay, in that case we will close the 220 00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:24,040 public hearing at 7:09 and we can move 221 00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:26,400 into discussion on this agenda item. Uh 222 00:08:26,400 --> 00:08:28,640 commissioners, thoughts or questions 223 00:08:28,640 --> 00:08:34,270 that we need to discuss? 224 00:08:34,280 --> 00:08:35,400 » Yeah, Commissioner Wood, I have a 225 00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:37,000 problem with the RC zone right there 226 00:08:37,000 --> 00:08:39,919 myself because as we discussed 227 00:08:39,919 --> 00:08:43,200 almost everything we've zoned RC ends up 228 00:08:43,200 --> 00:08:44,920 not being what we originally zoned it 229 00:08:44,920 --> 00:08:45,920 to. 230 00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:49,000 Um if it is allowed to have 231 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:51,320 a daycare as is, I don't see the purpose 232 00:08:51,320 --> 00:08:53,760 of a rezone. Um you can have a minor or 233 00:08:53,760 --> 00:08:55,880 a major home occupation. Then if you 234 00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:58,160 decide to go commercial or 235 00:08:58,160 --> 00:08:59,760 a 236 00:08:59,760 --> 00:09:02,040 um dance studio or whatever the plan is, 237 00:09:02,040 --> 00:09:04,360 you can zone commercial at that time. 238 00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:05,960 But I would be against a 239 00:09:05,960 --> 00:09:08,520 rezone to residential commercial 240 00:09:08,520 --> 00:09:10,920 because of all the different uses 241 00:09:10,920 --> 00:09:13,560 allowed for that 242 00:09:13,560 --> 00:09:16,040 um RC zone and uh some of those would 243 00:09:16,040 --> 00:09:17,880 not be appropriate there in my opinion. 244 00:09:17,880 --> 00:09:22,190 So. 245 00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:24,160 » Yeah, thank you. Commissioner Hoffman. 246 00:09:24,160 --> 00:09:26,720 >> Um that's obviously the concern that we 247 00:09:26,720 --> 00:09:28,800 were talking about up front, right? 248 00:09:28,800 --> 00:09:30,511 That Morgan mentioned. So, that's 249 00:09:30,511 --> 00:09:31,480 [clears throat] certainly something to 250 00:09:31,480 --> 00:09:33,800 keep in mind. Um 251 00:09:33,800 --> 00:09:35,520 this is the table that shows what would 252 00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:37,680 be allowed in that zone. What would or 253 00:09:37,680 --> 00:09:52,350 would not be allowed in that zone. 254 00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:54,080 » And from what I can see to to have the 255 00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:56,040 daycare, they can do as a a home 256 00:09:56,040 --> 00:09:57,760 occupation currently. 257 00:09:57,760 --> 00:09:59,480 Met minor or major as long as they meet 258 00:09:59,480 --> 00:10:01,480 the conditions correct. 259 00:10:01,480 --> 00:10:01,800 >> Right. 260 00:10:01,800 --> 00:10:02,760 >> So. 261 00:10:02,760 --> 00:10:04,120 Yeah, and then at the time they wanted 262 00:10:04,120 --> 00:10:06,160 to move it to commercial use and change 263 00:10:06,160 --> 00:10:09,320 it to a commercial use. Um I would vote 264 00:10:09,320 --> 00:10:11,800 in favor of the C1 zone there 265 00:10:11,800 --> 00:10:14,680 over the RC zone. 266 00:10:14,680 --> 00:10:17,040 >> And C1 does allow a commercial daycare 267 00:10:17,040 --> 00:10:17,560 facility? 268 00:10:17,560 --> 00:10:21,710 >> It does. 269 00:10:21,720 --> 00:10:23,520 » Yeah, that's a good point. I um given 270 00:10:23,520 --> 00:10:24,840 the 271 00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:26,040 um 272 00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:27,080 the plans that were mentioned, I think 273 00:10:27,080 --> 00:10:28,240 that would probably be a more 274 00:10:28,240 --> 00:10:30,880 appropriate way to proceed. 275 00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:32,280 Um I agree with Commissioner Hoffman on 276 00:10:32,280 --> 00:10:33,640 that. 277 00:10:33,640 --> 00:10:36,040 Um 278 00:10:36,040 --> 00:10:38,160 I had a question uh stepping back, not 279 00:10:38,160 --> 00:10:40,360 necessarily with regard to uh the RC 280 00:10:40,360 --> 00:10:42,240 zone, but with regard to the application 281 00:10:42,240 --> 00:10:43,600 itself. Um 282 00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:44,920 the code states that the owner of the 283 00:10:44,920 --> 00:10:48,200 property is allowed to request a rezone. 284 00:10:48,200 --> 00:10:50,120 Um but I I was a little bit confused 285 00:10:50,120 --> 00:10:51,160 about 286 00:10:51,160 --> 00:10:51,960 um 287 00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:53,360 how that works here because the memo 288 00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:55,200 stated that the application was being 289 00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:57,839 made by Shayla Jenkins, but then the 290 00:10:57,839 --> 00:11:00,240 application itself um has the Johnsons 291 00:11:00,240 --> 00:11:02,680 on there. So, can we clarify who owns 292 00:11:02,680 --> 00:11:04,720 the property and who is um actually 293 00:11:04,720 --> 00:11:07,560 applying for the rezone? 294 00:11:07,560 --> 00:11:08,520 >> Do you want 295 00:11:08,520 --> 00:11:15,710 >> Yeah. 296 00:11:15,720 --> 00:11:17,640 Hi. My name is Dustin Johnson. 297 00:11:17,640 --> 00:11:18,120 >> Thanks. 298 00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:20,680 >> Yes. Um so 299 00:11:20,680 --> 00:11:21,880 um 300 00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:25,440 Shayla Jenkins is my sister and then my 301 00:11:25,440 --> 00:11:27,960 brother Ty Johnson and my other brother 302 00:11:27,960 --> 00:11:32,040 Dallin Johnson and their wives um 303 00:11:32,040 --> 00:11:34,520 are all eight of us bought the property 304 00:11:34,520 --> 00:11:37,000 together. So, as far as that is, um 305 00:11:37,000 --> 00:11:40,160 Shell is the one in residence um and 306 00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:42,080 thus the applicant. 307 00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:44,840 Uh name listed on the applicant. Um it 308 00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:47,360 to speak further on the residential 309 00:11:47,360 --> 00:11:50,720 commercial, the reason for that, the uh 310 00:11:50,720 --> 00:11:52,400 residential commercial zoning would 311 00:11:52,400 --> 00:11:56,200 allow a smooth conversion. Um my brother 312 00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:58,560 in American Fork tried to do go from 313 00:11:58,560 --> 00:12:00,880 residential and convert to a commercial. 314 00:12:00,880 --> 00:12:02,400 He's directly neighboring a commercial 315 00:12:02,400 --> 00:12:05,800 district. Um the city required him to 316 00:12:05,800 --> 00:12:08,320 rezone and then go through the 317 00:12:08,320 --> 00:12:10,520 application process and required them to 318 00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:13,160 shut down their daycare for several 319 00:12:13,160 --> 00:12:14,840 months, which 320 00:12:14,840 --> 00:12:16,520 obviously, if you have daycare kids, 321 00:12:16,520 --> 00:12:18,360 like you need your daycare kids being 322 00:12:18,360 --> 00:12:20,640 watched. And so, any sort of termination 323 00:12:20,640 --> 00:12:24,880 of service would cause um 324 00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:26,960 uh all the like the daycare kids to 325 00:12:26,960 --> 00:12:28,880 leave to find another alternative in the 326 00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:31,600 interim. So, that's the reason mostly to 327 00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:34,040 provide a smooth transition without risk 328 00:12:34,040 --> 00:12:34,920 of 329 00:12:34,920 --> 00:12:36,440 getting shut down for any length of 330 00:12:36,440 --> 00:12:37,480 time. 331 00:12:37,480 --> 00:12:40,480 Um obviously, if we can accomplish a 332 00:12:40,480 --> 00:12:43,720 smooth conversion process um 333 00:12:43,720 --> 00:12:46,320 and using just a residential and then 334 00:12:46,320 --> 00:12:48,839 later rezoning to a commercial, uh that 335 00:12:48,839 --> 00:12:50,280 works as well. So, we're happy to do 336 00:12:50,280 --> 00:12:52,200 whatever you guys want to we just 337 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:53,800 thought it residential commercial would 338 00:12:53,800 --> 00:12:56,120 be easier. 339 00:12:56,120 --> 00:12:58,480 Um less applications and less processes 340 00:12:58,480 --> 00:12:59,680 involved. So. 341 00:12:59,680 --> 00:13:00,160 >> Okay. 342 00:13:00,160 --> 00:13:00,480 >> Thank you. 343 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:07,030 >> Thanks for clarifying that. 344 00:13:07,040 --> 00:13:08,720 » Do we know what that process is going 345 00:13:08,720 --> 00:13:10,120 from residential to commercial and what 346 00:13:10,120 --> 00:13:12,360 that would require them to do? 347 00:13:12,360 --> 00:13:14,040 >> If they were to go from 348 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:15,600 residential to a commercial 349 00:13:15,600 --> 00:13:17,120 >> And if that would require a shut down, 350 00:13:17,120 --> 00:13:17,440 do we know that? 351 00:13:17,440 --> 00:13:19,360 >> good question. Um staff, can you weigh 352 00:13:19,360 --> 00:13:21,960 in on that at all? Do you um 353 00:13:21,960 --> 00:13:23,360 can you address that concern? 354 00:13:23,360 --> 00:13:25,720 >> Um the only thing that would So, if they 355 00:13:25,720 --> 00:13:27,600 right now under the code, they're 356 00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:30,600 allowed a home-based daycare. And so, if 357 00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:32,600 they establish that and met met our home 358 00:13:32,600 --> 00:13:36,240 occupation allowances, then that that 359 00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:38,000 could run. And then what they would do 360 00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:39,920 is they would apply for the the 361 00:13:39,920 --> 00:13:42,840 commercial district. And then really I 362 00:13:42,840 --> 00:13:44,480 would see like construction activity if 363 00:13:44,480 --> 00:13:46,640 they needed to bring in infrastructure 364 00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:48,720 cuz once you build commercial, the 365 00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:50,320 infrastructure requirements do do kick 366 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:53,160 in. I think the question would be if you 367 00:13:53,160 --> 00:13:55,720 go from a residential have a home-based 368 00:13:55,720 --> 00:13:57,520 occupation, 369 00:13:57,520 --> 00:13:59,880 does that home home-based occupations is 370 00:13:59,880 --> 00:14:01,920 it still allowed under a commercial 371 00:14:01,920 --> 00:14:05,160 zoning? And so, that's something that we 372 00:14:05,160 --> 00:14:07,560 could ask our our city attorney to see 373 00:14:07,560 --> 00:14:10,840 if there would be any issue with that. 374 00:14:10,840 --> 00:14:12,760 You know, if they So, I would say it 375 00:14:12,760 --> 00:14:14,320 would be more of a timing thing if they 376 00:14:14,320 --> 00:14:16,120 wanted to 377 00:14:16,120 --> 00:14:17,560 go under construction and build out 378 00:14:17,560 --> 00:14:19,640 those improvements that they line that 379 00:14:19,640 --> 00:14:21,240 up from a time 380 00:14:21,240 --> 00:14:23,760 line standpoint with when they apply for 381 00:14:23,760 --> 00:14:25,720 the zoning. So, it would really be kind 382 00:14:25,720 --> 00:14:27,680 of a matter of the applicant 383 00:14:27,680 --> 00:14:29,320 knowing when they wanted to make that 384 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:31,120 conversion from a home-based to a 385 00:14:31,120 --> 00:14:33,640 commercial daycare and then just setting 386 00:14:33,640 --> 00:14:34,920 it up with their commercial cuz if 387 00:14:34,920 --> 00:14:36,760 they're going under construction anyway, 388 00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:38,280 then there's going to be most likely 389 00:14:38,280 --> 00:14:40,120 some sort of delay if they take the 390 00:14:40,120 --> 00:14:41,480 building down and build a full-fledged 391 00:14:41,480 --> 00:14:43,000 commercial building or if they convert 392 00:14:43,000 --> 00:14:46,000 the house into a meeting commercial 393 00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:47,880 code, there's going to be quite a bit of 394 00:14:47,880 --> 00:14:50,560 improvements required regardless and it 395 00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:52,520 would most likely be hard to stay open 396 00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:54,200 under construction 397 00:14:54,200 --> 00:14:55,760 activity at that level. 398 00:14:55,760 --> 00:14:57,160 >> Either way, I would think. 399 00:14:57,160 --> 00:14:59,360 >> Yeah. 400 00:14:59,360 --> 00:15:11,430 >> Okay, thank you. 401 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:13,120 All right, commissioners, any other 402 00:15:13,120 --> 00:15:21,350 thoughts on this application? 403 00:15:21,360 --> 00:15:22,960 » Just as a reminder that you're making a 404 00:15:22,960 --> 00:15:29,830 recommendation to the city council 405 00:15:29,840 --> 00:15:40,150 » All right, thanks Aspen. 406 00:15:40,160 --> 00:15:41,880 Okay, if there's nothing else we'd like 407 00:15:41,880 --> 00:15:44,440 to discuss, is anyone 408 00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:46,960 thinking about a motion 409 00:15:46,960 --> 00:15:48,800 with regard to this recommendation that 410 00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:51,440 we need to make to the city council? 411 00:15:51,440 --> 00:15:53,120 >> I'm ready to make a motion. 412 00:15:53,120 --> 00:15:54,320 >> All right. 413 00:15:54,320 --> 00:15:55,680 >> If there's nobody else has anything to 414 00:15:55,680 --> 00:15:58,750 say. 415 00:15:58,760 --> 00:16:01,200 » I have Sorry, I'm just looking at the 416 00:16:01,200 --> 00:16:02,920 application again. 417 00:16:02,920 --> 00:16:04,600 The there's modifications they listed in 418 00:16:04,600 --> 00:16:06,520 here, would those be allowed under the 419 00:16:06,520 --> 00:16:08,800 current residential 420 00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:09,840 code? 421 00:16:09,840 --> 00:16:12,480 The ADA compliance, 422 00:16:12,480 --> 00:16:13,960 the kitchen grade kitchen hood, the 423 00:16:13,960 --> 00:16:15,760 commercial grade kitchen hoods, 424 00:16:15,760 --> 00:16:16,760 the illuminated exit signs, fire 425 00:16:16,760 --> 00:16:18,600 extinguishers, 426 00:16:18,600 --> 00:16:19,760 um 427 00:16:19,760 --> 00:16:21,080 that type of stuff, is that allowed in 428 00:16:21,080 --> 00:16:22,400 the in the residential zone or is that 429 00:16:22,400 --> 00:16:24,440 going to be cause a problem for them try 430 00:16:24,440 --> 00:16:26,720 to move their business forward? 431 00:16:26,720 --> 00:16:28,440 >> They may be allowed to like have those 432 00:16:28,440 --> 00:16:30,760 things in their home occupation. The 433 00:16:30,760 --> 00:16:32,480 difference would be like if they want to 434 00:16:32,480 --> 00:16:36,120 move to allowing more like kids or like 435 00:16:36,120 --> 00:16:38,520 sessions in their daycare, that's when 436 00:16:38,520 --> 00:16:40,080 it has to jump to the commercial, which 437 00:16:40,080 --> 00:16:41,520 is not allowed in residential 438 00:16:41,520 --> 00:16:43,440 agriculture. 439 00:16:43,440 --> 00:16:45,200 >> Okay. 440 00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:46,160 >> Does that answer your question? 441 00:16:46,160 --> 00:16:47,560 >> It does, thank you. Yeah. 442 00:16:47,560 --> 00:16:48,880 >> And as I understood, that was the point 443 00:16:48,880 --> 00:16:50,120 where they were going to make those 444 00:16:50,120 --> 00:16:51,680 improvements so to facilitate the 445 00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:55,030 commercial transition. 446 00:16:55,040 --> 00:16:56,280 » That was in the that was in phase one. 447 00:16:56,280 --> 00:16:57,520 Those things were in phase one. 448 00:16:57,520 --> 00:16:58,680 >> Oh, okay. 449 00:16:58,680 --> 00:17:03,390 >> So. 450 00:17:03,400 --> 00:17:05,160 » Even even with the residential home 451 00:17:05,160 --> 00:17:06,199 based 452 00:17:06,199 --> 00:17:07,760 daycare, and we could check with the 453 00:17:07,760 --> 00:17:09,040 building department, but there there 454 00:17:09,040 --> 00:17:11,720 still may need to be some sort of 455 00:17:11,720 --> 00:17:14,160 upgrades if there's a ADA and things of 456 00:17:14,160 --> 00:17:16,079 that nature. And we're happy to we can 457 00:17:16,079 --> 00:17:18,120 research that and and get back to you 458 00:17:18,120 --> 00:17:20,199 kind of the the upgrades for a 459 00:17:20,199 --> 00:17:22,120 residential home-based daycare to a 460 00:17:22,120 --> 00:17:23,680 full-fledged commercial if if you'd 461 00:17:23,680 --> 00:17:25,120 like. We'd happy to get that information 462 00:17:25,120 --> 00:17:26,240 for you. 463 00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:27,680 >> I'm just I feel like there's questions 464 00:17:27,680 --> 00:17:29,200 here. I'm wondering if we need to push 465 00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:32,040 this to another meeting with some extra 466 00:17:32,040 --> 00:17:32,640 information. 467 00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:34,680 >> on the RC or not. What's before us is 468 00:17:34,680 --> 00:17:36,400 they want to rezone the RC and that's 469 00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:38,960 it. So, we either send a 470 00:17:38,960 --> 00:17:42,400 recommendation for approval or denial. 471 00:17:42,400 --> 00:17:44,240 So. 472 00:17:44,240 --> 00:17:44,640 >> You could you 473 00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:46,040 >> That's it. If they want to rezone to 474 00:17:46,040 --> 00:17:47,280 something else and they'll have to bring 475 00:17:47,280 --> 00:17:49,720 that to us again. 476 00:17:49,720 --> 00:17:50,480 >> Okay. 477 00:17:50,480 --> 00:17:51,520 >> Yeah, and I think that's the primary 478 00:17:51,520 --> 00:17:54,440 issue is keeping in mind that the rezone 479 00:17:54,440 --> 00:17:56,440 is the issue that we're looking at. 480 00:17:56,440 --> 00:17:59,040 There's um a lot of plans that go along 481 00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:00,600 with that and what they intend to do 482 00:18:00,600 --> 00:18:02,000 after the rezone, but their primary 483 00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:02,800 issue is the rezone. 484 00:18:02,800 --> 00:18:07,840 >> Right. This is only the rezone to from residential ag to residential 485 00:18:07,840 --> 00:18:08,400 commercial. 486 00:18:08,400 --> 00:18:09,920 >> I guess my my question was with the with 487 00:18:09,920 --> 00:18:11,680 the questions that we have 488 00:18:11,680 --> 00:18:14,280 it was is the is it going to be a 489 00:18:14,280 --> 00:18:16,800 um a burden for them to go from 490 00:18:16,800 --> 00:18:18,000 residential to commercial. We talked 491 00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:19,560 about that. We don't necessarily have a 492 00:18:19,560 --> 00:18:22,160 clear answer yet. And that would affect 493 00:18:22,160 --> 00:18:23,640 my decision 494 00:18:23,640 --> 00:18:25,120 at this point. That's that's my only 495 00:18:25,120 --> 00:18:26,120 question there. 496 00:18:26,120 --> 00:18:28,240 >> You sure? Sure may add to that. 497 00:18:28,240 --> 00:18:30,200 >> Um so um there there there would be 498 00:18:30,200 --> 00:18:32,360 differences. So, once they got a 499 00:18:32,360 --> 00:18:34,120 commercial designation and did a 500 00:18:34,120 --> 00:18:36,800 full-fledged um commercial daycare, 501 00:18:36,800 --> 00:18:39,240 um there's site improvements um like 502 00:18:39,240 --> 00:18:41,880 parking lot landscaping. Um you do have 503 00:18:41,880 --> 00:18:44,800 UDot to uh to contend with because 504 00:18:44,800 --> 00:18:46,320 that's that's the right away they would 505 00:18:46,320 --> 00:18:48,440 access on. So, access improvements cuz 506 00:18:48,440 --> 00:18:49,600 you're moving from a residential 507 00:18:49,600 --> 00:18:51,640 category to commercial category. There 508 00:18:51,640 --> 00:18:53,480 may need to be a turn lane. So, I I 509 00:18:53,480 --> 00:18:56,160 don't know exactly every item, but yeah, 510 00:18:56,160 --> 00:18:58,640 I would anticipate a commercial like any 511 00:18:58,640 --> 00:19:00,600 commercial business you would have to 512 00:19:00,600 --> 00:19:02,240 meet that the commercial standards for 513 00:19:02,240 --> 00:19:03,920 our site plan landscaping lighting. 514 00:19:03,920 --> 00:19:05,280 >> Looking at that parcel, there's a lot of 515 00:19:05,280 --> 00:19:06,720 infrastructure that needs to be brought 516 00:19:06,720 --> 00:19:08,080 down in that area as well for 517 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:10,480 commercial. So. 518 00:19:10,480 --> 00:19:11,000 >> But again, I think [clears throat] they 519 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:12,400 would have to do all of those same 520 00:19:12,400 --> 00:19:16,360 things whether the zone is um RC or C1, 521 00:19:16,360 --> 00:19:17,000 for example. 522 00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:17,360 >> That's correct. 523 00:19:17,360 --> 00:19:19,560 >> Right? It comes with the the conversion 524 00:19:19,560 --> 00:19:21,680 to the commercial business. 525 00:19:21,680 --> 00:19:22,480 >> Whether it's 526 00:19:22,480 --> 00:19:23,600 either zone. Okay. 527 00:19:23,600 --> 00:19:24,920 >> Yeah, not necessarily the zone. 528 00:19:24,920 --> 00:19:30,830 >> That's clarifying. Thank you. 529 00:19:30,840 --> 00:19:32,360 » Any other discussion on that before we 530 00:19:32,360 --> 00:19:32,760 move forward? 531 00:19:32,760 --> 00:19:37,280 >> Well, as for me, like I said before, I'm all for C1 if they want to make it a 532 00:19:37,280 --> 00:19:38,480 home occupation and when they're ready 533 00:19:38,480 --> 00:19:40,800 convert it to C1, but I'm just I'm not a 534 00:19:40,800 --> 00:19:42,320 fan of the RC right there. There's just 535 00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:43,920 too many 536 00:19:43,920 --> 00:19:45,360 different things that are not 537 00:19:45,360 --> 00:19:47,000 appropriate there. So. 538 00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:50,910 >> Yeah, I think I agree on that. 539 00:19:50,920 --> 00:19:52,880 » Can I ask a question? Isn't it 540 00:19:52,880 --> 00:19:54,960 commercial across the street? 541 00:19:54,960 --> 00:19:56,200 >> It is. It's C1. 542 00:19:56,200 --> 00:19:58,240 >> Okay, so you have C1 543 00:19:58,240 --> 00:20:00,240 >> I I apologize I apologize. If you want 544 00:20:00,240 --> 00:20:02,800 to allow comment, well, it has to cuz we 545 00:20:02,800 --> 00:20:06,000 can't pick it up in the record. That's why. 546 00:20:06,000 --> 00:20:09,160 >> This shows the zoning map as is and 547 00:20:09,160 --> 00:20:13,830 what the proposed zoning would be. So. 548 00:20:13,840 --> 00:20:17,190 » Yeah, it's commercial. 549 00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:22,230 But the area around it is 550 00:20:22,240 --> 00:20:24,560 » It would make sense to match then the C1 551 00:20:24,560 --> 00:20:26,120 not RC. 552 00:20:26,120 --> 00:20:36,230 >> Yeah, I think so, too. 553 00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:38,480 All right, Commissioner Hoffman. 554 00:20:38,480 --> 00:20:40,240 >> Uh Commissioner Wood, I'd like to make a 555 00:20:40,240 --> 00:20:41,400 motion to forward a negative 556 00:20:41,400 --> 00:20:43,000 recommendation to the City Council for 557 00:20:43,000 --> 00:20:45,240 the rezoning of approximately 2.5 acres 558 00:20:45,240 --> 00:20:47,280 of parcel number 30 559 00:20:47,280 --> 00:20:49,440 .091.0047 560 00:20:49,440 --> 00:20:51,280 from residential agricultural zone to 561 00:20:51,280 --> 00:20:53,640 residential commercial zone. 562 00:20:53,640 --> 00:20:55,120 >> Okay, we have a motion by Commissioner 563 00:20:55,120 --> 00:20:59,150 Hoffman. Do we have a second? 564 00:20:59,160 --> 00:21:00,040 » I'll second. 565 00:21:00,040 --> 00:21:01,320 >> Second by Commissioner Christopher. Any 566 00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:02,960 further discussion on that before we 567 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:04,440 vote? 568 00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:05,520 Um 569 00:21:05,520 --> 00:21:07,760 would it be appropriate to in the motion 570 00:21:07,760 --> 00:21:10,790 that um um 571 00:21:10,800 --> 00:21:12,080 » We can discuss that after. 572 00:21:12,080 --> 00:21:13,680 >> Yeah, that's fair. 573 00:21:13,680 --> 00:21:14,600 Okay. 574 00:21:14,600 --> 00:21:16,640 >> This is only for this RC zone, so let's 575 00:21:16,640 --> 00:21:18,800 discuss that after we vote and see where 576 00:21:18,800 --> 00:21:19,720 it goes. 577 00:21:19,720 --> 00:21:21,000 >> Okay. 578 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:22,160 So, we've got a motion, we've got a 579 00:21:22,160 --> 00:21:23,480 second. Um 580 00:21:23,480 --> 00:21:26,200 let's vote. Commissioner Russell. 581 00:21:26,200 --> 00:21:26,960 >> Yes. 582 00:21:26,960 --> 00:21:27,680 >> Commissioner Christopher. 583 00:21:27,680 --> 00:21:28,200 >> Yes. 584 00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:29,040 >> Commissioner Hoffman. 585 00:21:29,040 --> 00:21:29,480 >> Yes. 586 00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:30,080 >> Commissioner Wood. 587 00:21:30,080 --> 00:21:30,400 >> Yes. 588 00:21:30,400 --> 00:21:31,280 >> Commissioner Johnson. 589 00:21:31,280 --> 00:21:32,240 >> Yes. 590 00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:33,640 >> Okay, that is forwarded with a negative 591 00:21:33,640 --> 00:21:35,960 recommendation um on the conversion to 592 00:21:35,960 --> 00:21:39,400 the RC zone and it is unanimous. 593 00:21:39,400 --> 00:21:40,600 Um 594 00:21:40,600 --> 00:21:41,760 Okay, thank you. 595 00:21:41,760 --> 00:21:43,200 >> Yeah, with that, that's what I'd like to 596 00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:45,520 say is is uh do your do your home 597 00:21:45,520 --> 00:21:47,480 occupation, come back when you're ready 598 00:21:47,480 --> 00:21:49,000 to make it commercial. 599 00:21:49,000 --> 00:21:51,320 Uh bring back a as a C1 and I don't 600 00:21:51,320 --> 00:21:52,600 think you'll have a problem with that 601 00:21:52,600 --> 00:21:54,680 cuz it will match everything around it. 602 00:21:54,680 --> 00:21:55,880 And that that's appropriate for that 603 00:21:55,880 --> 00:21:58,160 area and and we can we can work with I 604 00:21:58,160 --> 00:21:59,400 can work with that. I don't know about 605 00:21:59,400 --> 00:21:59,680 Cass. 606 00:21:59,680 --> 00:22:00,920 >> I feel a lot better about that, too. 607 00:22:00,920 --> 00:22:01,800 Yeah. 608 00:22:01,800 --> 00:22:03,760 >> Yeah. 609 00:22:03,760 --> 00:22:06,400 >> All right, thank you. 610 00:22:06,400 --> 00:22:09,990 Okay. 611 00:22:10,000 --> 00:22:14,320 Let's move on now to agenda item number two. Um 612 00:22:14,320 --> 00:22:16,760 This is a proposed code amendment 613 00:22:16,760 --> 00:22:18,360 regarding single-family residential 614 00:22:18,360 --> 00:22:22,910 landscaping requirements. 615 00:22:22,920 --> 00:22:25,280 » Okay, for this code amendment it would 616 00:22:25,280 --> 00:22:28,440 affect section 10.52.20 617 00:22:28,440 --> 00:22:31,080 and 10.32.30. 618 00:22:31,080 --> 00:22:33,000 This is coming from the state just 619 00:22:33,000 --> 00:22:36,680 complying with the changes they made. Um 620 00:22:36,680 --> 00:22:38,680 it's not removing the landscaping 621 00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:41,440 requirement, it's just we 622 00:22:41,440 --> 00:22:43,960 it won't prevent receiving a certificate 623 00:22:43,960 --> 00:22:45,840 of occupancy. Residents are still 624 00:22:45,840 --> 00:22:49,000 expected to have front and side yard 625 00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:51,600 landscaping, maintain weeds, keep 626 00:22:51,600 --> 00:22:53,520 control of dust and erosion and all of 627 00:22:53,520 --> 00:22:54,960 those things. 628 00:22:54,960 --> 00:22:56,800 There's just 629 00:22:56,800 --> 00:22:59,000 we can't keep a certificate of occupancy 630 00:22:59,000 --> 00:23:03,030 if they don't have that in place yet. 631 00:23:03,040 --> 00:23:04,480 » So, it's mostly in alignment with state 632 00:23:04,480 --> 00:23:05,160 code, right? 633 00:23:05,160 --> 00:23:05,995 >> Yeah. 634 00:23:05,995 --> 00:23:09,070 >> [clears throat] 635 00:23:09,080 --> 00:23:10,280 » All right, there's the amendment right 636 00:23:10,280 --> 00:23:11,960 there. It's pretty simple as far as code 637 00:23:11,960 --> 00:23:13,360 amendments go. 638 00:23:13,360 --> 00:23:15,480 Um 639 00:23:15,480 --> 00:23:17,160 Okay, we do have a public hearing uh 640 00:23:17,160 --> 00:23:18,760 associated with this agenda item as well 641 00:23:18,760 --> 00:23:21,000 because it is a code amendment. So, 642 00:23:21,000 --> 00:23:22,360 let's go ahead and move forward with 643 00:23:22,360 --> 00:23:24,000 that now. I'll open the public hearing 644 00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:27,000 on this agenda item at 7:24 and invite 645 00:23:27,000 --> 00:23:28,240 any comments if anyone would like to 646 00:23:28,240 --> 00:23:30,160 make any comments about this code 647 00:23:30,160 --> 00:23:33,150 amendment. 648 00:23:33,160 --> 00:23:34,920 Okay, if not, then we will close the 649 00:23:34,920 --> 00:23:37,680 public hearing at 7:24 and we can move 650 00:23:37,680 --> 00:23:39,360 into discussion. 651 00:23:39,360 --> 00:23:41,040 Commissioners, complying with state 652 00:23:41,040 --> 00:23:43,480 code, what do you think? 653 00:23:43,480 --> 00:23:45,120 >> Uh you know, my choice only question I 654 00:23:45,120 --> 00:23:49,160 have is is uh the paragraph below 655 00:23:49,160 --> 00:23:50,600 your red line, 656 00:23:50,600 --> 00:23:53,160 it says, "If a cash bond is paid, then 657 00:23:53,160 --> 00:23:55,040 the land- landscaping improvement shall 658 00:23:55,040 --> 00:23:57,000 be complete by the end of the following 659 00:23:57,000 --> 00:23:58,520 irrigation season." 660 00:23:58,520 --> 00:24:00,560 Um do we even have to have that in there 661 00:24:00,560 --> 00:24:03,160 if we can't take a cash bond in lieu of 662 00:24:03,160 --> 00:24:05,760 completion? 663 00:24:05,760 --> 00:24:07,520 If we're not going to make them complete 664 00:24:07,520 --> 00:24:09,360 or bond for it, 665 00:24:09,360 --> 00:24:10,840 do we have to have that requirement in 666 00:24:10,840 --> 00:24:12,120 there? 667 00:24:12,120 --> 00:24:14,240 >> I know like on engineering projects, 668 00:24:14,240 --> 00:24:16,960 there's some aspect that they can bond 669 00:24:16,960 --> 00:24:19,080 for, so I would want to double-check 670 00:24:19,080 --> 00:24:20,520 that with Megan or John. 671 00:24:20,520 --> 00:24:21,840 >> I was just curious if that was relevant 672 00:24:21,840 --> 00:24:24,120 or not or we're going to remove the the 673 00:24:24,120 --> 00:24:25,680 bond for that for the housing 674 00:24:25,680 --> 00:24:26,880 requirements. 675 00:24:26,880 --> 00:24:27,760 >> We uh 676 00:24:27,760 --> 00:24:30,840 we did send this out for review and um 677 00:24:30,840 --> 00:24:32,040 it it seemed like engineering was 678 00:24:32,040 --> 00:24:33,120 comfortable 679 00:24:33,120 --> 00:24:34,400 with that, but we can direct them 680 00:24:34,400 --> 00:24:35,960 specifically to that part. 681 00:24:35,960 --> 00:24:37,000 >> I don't have a problem with that. I just 682 00:24:37,000 --> 00:24:38,360 don't want it to be a 683 00:24:38,360 --> 00:24:40,000 have it be in there for no reason. 684 00:24:40,000 --> 00:24:43,320 >> Right, it's kind of confusing. Right. 685 00:24:43,320 --> 00:24:45,800 >> Yeah, good question. 686 00:24:45,800 --> 00:24:49,510 Any other questions about this one? 687 00:24:49,520 --> 00:24:52,600 Okay. Um we do need to make a 688 00:24:52,600 --> 00:24:55,440 recommendation to the city council. 689 00:24:55,440 --> 00:25:00,710 Would anyone like to make a motion? 690 00:25:00,720 --> 00:25:03,320 » I'll make a proposal that we recommend 691 00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:05,880 the adjustments as 692 00:25:05,880 --> 00:25:08,240 um outlined in this redline. 693 00:25:08,240 --> 00:25:09,400 >> Okay, we have a motion by Commissioner 694 00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:11,560 Christopher. Do we have a second? 695 00:25:11,560 --> 00:25:12,800 >> I'll second that. 696 00:25:12,800 --> 00:25:14,320 >> Second by Commissioner Hoffman. Any 697 00:25:14,320 --> 00:25:17,360 further discussion before we vote? 698 00:25:17,360 --> 00:25:19,160 Okay, let's vote. Uh Commissioner 699 00:25:19,160 --> 00:25:19,960 Johnson. 700 00:25:19,960 --> 00:25:20,400 >> Yes. 701 00:25:20,400 --> 00:25:21,640 >> Commissioner Wood. Yes. Commissioner 702 00:25:21,640 --> 00:25:22,200 Hoffman. 703 00:25:22,200 --> 00:25:22,600 >> Yes. 704 00:25:22,600 --> 00:25:23,400 >> Commissioner Christopher. 705 00:25:23,400 --> 00:25:23,760 >> Yes. 706 00:25:23,760 --> 00:25:24,440 >> Commissioner Russell. 707 00:25:24,440 --> 00:25:25,120 >> Yes. 708 00:25:25,120 --> 00:25:27,200 >> Okay, that is forwarded uh as is with a 709 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:28,720 positive recommendation and it did 710 00:25:28,720 --> 00:25:30,960 unanimously. 711 00:25:30,960 --> 00:25:33,040 Okay. 712 00:25:33,040 --> 00:25:34,720 Thank you. Moving on to agenda item 713 00:25:34,720 --> 00:25:36,840 number three. This is 714 00:25:36,840 --> 00:25:40,000 a preliminary subdivision plan review 715 00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:40,840 um 716 00:25:40,840 --> 00:25:43,520 for the 130 South Church Street two-lot 717 00:25:43,520 --> 00:25:55,630 subdivision. 718 00:25:55,640 --> 00:25:58,240 » Subdivision, it's just north of like the 719 00:25:58,240 --> 00:26:01,600 AmSource commercial subdivision. Um it 720 00:26:01,600 --> 00:26:03,760 would be part of the R10 zone. It's 721 00:26:03,760 --> 00:26:06,080 approximately 9.124 722 00:26:06,080 --> 00:26:07,600 acres. 723 00:26:07,600 --> 00:26:09,870 Um 724 00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:12,080 There 725 00:26:12,080 --> 00:26:15,200 the main focus their the main focus is 726 00:26:15,200 --> 00:26:17,000 building a church which would be part of 727 00:26:17,000 --> 00:26:18,440 phase one and then there's a couple 728 00:26:18,440 --> 00:26:20,640 additional lots that would be phase two. 729 00:26:20,640 --> 00:26:23,120 That's future development um but they 730 00:26:23,120 --> 00:26:24,600 would need to meet the standards of the 731 00:26:24,600 --> 00:26:29,360 R10 zone. And then on April 14th, the 732 00:26:29,360 --> 00:26:32,200 DRC reviewed the preliminary plans and 733 00:26:32,200 --> 00:26:35,240 forwarded a favorable recommendation 734 00:26:35,240 --> 00:26:37,160 to the planning commission that with the 735 00:26:37,160 --> 00:26:39,560 condition that redlines be addressed. 736 00:26:39,560 --> 00:26:40,840 Um 737 00:26:40,840 --> 00:26:43,600 the redlines have been addressed. They 738 00:26:43,600 --> 00:26:45,240 meet the requirements of the R10 zone. 739 00:26:45,240 --> 00:26:46,680 They meet all engineering and public 740 00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:48,520 work requirements and the city standard 741 00:26:48,520 --> 00:26:50,720 specifications and drawings. 742 00:26:50,720 --> 00:26:51,880 Um 743 00:26:51,880 --> 00:26:52,920 and then 744 00:26:52,920 --> 00:26:59,910 this is the location. 745 00:26:59,920 --> 00:27:01,800 There's an overview, so with the 746 00:27:01,800 --> 00:27:04,720 preliminary plan, lot one would be the 747 00:27:04,720 --> 00:27:07,520 main focus in the first phase of their 748 00:27:07,520 --> 00:27:17,470 development. 749 00:27:17,480 --> 00:27:19,320 And then, I'm happy to pull up any other 750 00:27:19,320 --> 00:27:20,920 section of the plans if you have 751 00:27:20,920 --> 00:27:22,000 questions. 752 00:27:22,000 --> 00:27:23,920 >> Thanks. 753 00:27:23,920 --> 00:27:25,240 I have a question just looking at this 754 00:27:25,240 --> 00:27:27,080 map. So, we have 755 00:27:27,080 --> 00:27:29,160 a single large lot that's being divided 756 00:27:29,160 --> 00:27:30,800 into two lots, right? Lot one and the 757 00:27:30,800 --> 00:27:31,960 remaining. 758 00:27:31,960 --> 00:27:32,400 >> Correct. 759 00:27:32,400 --> 00:27:33,920 >> Um 760 00:27:33,920 --> 00:27:36,440 where that road um 761 00:27:36,440 --> 00:27:39,160 connecting to lot one bisects the other 762 00:27:39,160 --> 00:27:41,160 unallocated pieces, is there any issue 763 00:27:41,160 --> 00:27:42,200 with that? 764 00:27:42,200 --> 00:27:44,120 Um 765 00:27:44,120 --> 00:27:46,160 I mean, it it sort of de facto creates a 766 00:27:46,160 --> 00:27:49,080 separate lot on that top right corner. 767 00:27:49,080 --> 00:27:50,440 But, that wouldn't be necessarily 768 00:27:50,440 --> 00:27:53,920 included in the subdivision. Does that 769 00:27:53,920 --> 00:27:54,680 >> It will be 770 00:27:54,680 --> 00:27:56,040 >> I'm asking, and does it even is it even 771 00:27:56,040 --> 00:27:58,120 a concern? 772 00:27:58,120 --> 00:28:00,840 >> No, I mean, no I not necessarily cuz 773 00:28:00,840 --> 00:28:01,880 they still have to put in all the 774 00:28:01,880 --> 00:28:03,880 infrastructure for that like cul-de-sac, 775 00:28:03,880 --> 00:28:06,640 the road, and they do plan to develop 776 00:28:06,640 --> 00:28:09,760 those future phases. They just 777 00:28:09,760 --> 00:28:11,960 are working out some things, but they 778 00:28:11,960 --> 00:28:13,600 want to move forward with the church. 779 00:28:13,600 --> 00:28:16,000 >> Right. But, this is So, this would leave 780 00:28:16,000 --> 00:28:17,880 a single lot that's divided into two 781 00:28:17,880 --> 00:28:20,320 pieces. 782 00:28:20,320 --> 00:28:23,240 Right? Is that an issue? 783 00:28:23,240 --> 00:28:26,830 >> No. 784 00:28:26,840 --> 00:28:27,880 » Seems weird, but 785 00:28:27,880 --> 00:28:28,640 >> Yeah. 786 00:28:28,640 --> 00:28:30,320 >> if there's no, you know, issue with 787 00:28:30,320 --> 00:28:32,040 doing that with a single lot, then 788 00:28:32,040 --> 00:28:33,640 >> But, my understanding is when those lots 789 00:28:33,640 --> 00:28:36,120 develop, they come in for a phase. 790 00:28:36,120 --> 00:28:36,520 >> Yeah. 791 00:28:36,520 --> 00:28:38,840 >> Um plot for that. It'd be a final plot. 792 00:28:38,840 --> 00:28:40,400 >> I'm sure they would. I just wasn't sure 793 00:28:40,400 --> 00:28:42,200 if we could even record a lot that isn't 794 00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:43,320 contiguous. You know what I mean? 795 00:28:43,320 --> 00:28:43,720 >> Yeah. 796 00:28:43,720 --> 00:28:45,640 I see what he's saying. I mean, 797 00:28:45,640 --> 00:28:47,280 the same parcel will only be on the on 798 00:28:47,280 --> 00:28:48,760 the north and the south side of that 799 00:28:48,760 --> 00:28:49,080 cliff. 800 00:28:49,080 --> 00:28:50,600 >> Right. 801 00:28:50,600 --> 00:28:51,760 I mean, physically those are two 802 00:28:51,760 --> 00:28:53,520 separate parcels now, but they they 803 00:28:53,520 --> 00:28:54,840 haven't been subdivided yet. 804 00:28:54,840 --> 00:28:56,360 >> And they'll be listed under one parcel 805 00:28:56,360 --> 00:28:56,880 number. 806 00:28:56,880 --> 00:28:58,360 >> I just wasn't sure if that is something 807 00:28:58,360 --> 00:29:02,870 that can be done. 808 00:29:02,880 --> 00:29:04,720 » Yeah, um so we're Yeah, we're 809 00:29:04,720 --> 00:29:07,520 comfortable with the I mean, the what what they would do is just do a 810 00:29:07,520 --> 00:29:09,440 final plat when those get get developed 811 00:29:09,440 --> 00:29:10,960 and that's um 812 00:29:10,960 --> 00:29:12,160 they're they're going to have all the 813 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:14,080 same infrastructure requirements and so 814 00:29:14,080 --> 00:29:15,360 there's nothing that would allow them 815 00:29:15,360 --> 00:29:16,880 just to go and like build houses on. 816 00:29:16,880 --> 00:29:18,120 They'd have to go through the platting 817 00:29:18,120 --> 00:29:20,400 process. What this does is provides the 818 00:29:20,400 --> 00:29:22,360 ability for lot one to move forward, so 819 00:29:22,360 --> 00:29:26,240 the church can submit building permits. 820 00:29:26,240 --> 00:29:28,040 >> It's kind of similar to like Santaquin 821 00:29:28,040 --> 00:29:30,480 Ridge Estates how it was broken up into 822 00:29:30,480 --> 00:29:33,320 different phases and things. 823 00:29:33,320 --> 00:29:34,480 >> Yeah, I don't have a problem with it. 824 00:29:34,480 --> 00:29:35,800 Like I said, it just seemed strange to 825 00:29:35,800 --> 00:29:37,720 be breaking up a single lot into 826 00:29:37,720 --> 00:29:39,080 multiple pieces without doing the 827 00:29:39,080 --> 00:29:40,640 subdivision yet. 828 00:29:40,640 --> 00:29:43,030 But 829 00:29:43,040 --> 00:29:44,600 Okay, thank you. 830 00:29:44,600 --> 00:29:47,080 >> One thing I had a question on is is that 831 00:29:47,080 --> 00:29:48,320 in the cul-de-sac is that the only 832 00:29:48,320 --> 00:29:50,880 entrance point to that parking lot? 833 00:29:50,880 --> 00:29:52,280 >> No, they have to have two points of 834 00:29:52,280 --> 00:29:54,000 access, so the other one would be from 835 00:29:54,000 --> 00:29:55,600 the 130 South. 836 00:29:55,600 --> 00:29:56,280 >> Okay. 837 00:29:56,280 --> 00:29:57,480 >> There's just some really I don't know if 838 00:29:57,480 --> 00:29:58,440 you've been over there, but there's some 839 00:29:58,440 --> 00:30:01,400 really steep grades up on 130 South up 840 00:30:01,400 --> 00:30:02,120 onto that. 841 00:30:02,120 --> 00:30:02,560 >> Right. 842 00:30:02,560 --> 00:30:04,040 >> So, yeah, it's going to be tough to 843 00:30:04,040 --> 00:30:05,160 access that. 844 00:30:05,160 --> 00:30:07,960 >> That was my my thought. It would 845 00:30:07,960 --> 00:30:09,960 preferably not be on Highland Drive. 846 00:30:09,960 --> 00:30:11,280 >> But I think it shows on their grading 847 00:30:11,280 --> 00:30:15,840 sheet as well. There's some pretty good grades there. 848 00:30:15,840 --> 00:30:16,880 >> You have to factor in when they 849 00:30:16,880 --> 00:30:18,880 eventually change the freeway and 850 00:30:18,880 --> 00:30:19,840 everything as well. 851 00:30:19,840 --> 00:30:32,470 >> Right. 852 00:30:32,480 --> 00:30:33,560 » Yeah, the other driveway approach will 853 00:30:33,560 --> 00:30:35,240 be right on that property line, looks 854 00:30:35,240 --> 00:30:38,430 like. 855 00:30:38,440 --> 00:30:41,150 Right there it is. 856 00:30:41,160 --> 00:30:41,600 Yep. 857 00:30:41,600 --> 00:30:42,200 >> Yeah, I see it now. 858 00:30:42,200 --> 00:30:42,960 >> Right. 859 00:30:42,960 --> 00:30:43,960 there. 860 00:30:43,960 --> 00:30:45,240 >> Yep, you can see that little note right 861 00:30:45,240 --> 00:30:49,190 there says there. 862 00:30:49,200 --> 00:30:50,800 Your driver installed a driver approach 863 00:30:50,800 --> 00:30:51,560 there. 864 00:30:51,560 --> 00:31:01,510 >> All right. 865 00:31:01,520 --> 00:31:02,000 Okay. 866 00:31:02,000 --> 00:31:09,470 >> You can see it on this one. 867 00:31:09,480 --> 00:31:15,190 » Is that final? 868 00:31:15,200 --> 00:31:15,720 » Yeah. 869 00:31:15,720 --> 00:31:16,760 >> Okay. 870 00:31:16,760 --> 00:31:17,960 >> So, I think it's still pretty steep 871 00:31:17,960 --> 00:31:18,240 there. 872 00:31:18,240 --> 00:31:19,560 >> It's still pretty steep, yeah, but 873 00:31:19,560 --> 00:31:20,480 that's something you have to look out 874 00:31:20,480 --> 00:31:22,760 when they do the development and if 875 00:31:22,760 --> 00:31:26,150 >> Right. 876 00:31:26,160 --> 00:31:27,520 Okay. 877 00:31:27,520 --> 00:31:28,440 What else do we need to talk about with 878 00:31:28,440 --> 00:31:36,550 regard to this one? 879 00:31:36,560 --> 00:31:37,800 Planning Commission is the land use 880 00:31:37,800 --> 00:31:39,840 authority on preliminary plan reviews, 881 00:31:39,840 --> 00:31:41,240 so we are 882 00:31:41,240 --> 00:31:43,920 being asked to approve or deny the 883 00:31:43,920 --> 00:31:48,990 request. 884 00:31:49,000 --> 00:31:50,360 » I make a motion that we approve this 885 00:31:50,360 --> 00:31:52,720 request. 886 00:31:52,720 --> 00:31:54,080 >> Okay, we have a motion to approve by 887 00:31:54,080 --> 00:31:55,080 Commissioner Christopher. Do we have a 888 00:31:55,080 --> 00:31:56,280 second? 889 00:31:56,280 --> 00:31:57,080 >> I'll second that. 890 00:31:57,080 --> 00:32:00,320 >> Seconded by Commissioner Johnson. Um 891 00:32:00,320 --> 00:32:01,360 Question before we move forward. The 892 00:32:01,360 --> 00:32:03,120 recommendation The recommended motion 893 00:32:03,120 --> 00:32:05,360 was to conditionally approve. Um what 894 00:32:05,360 --> 00:32:06,760 conditions did staff have in mind for 895 00:32:06,760 --> 00:32:09,470 that? 896 00:32:09,480 --> 00:32:10,840 » So, I think that was 897 00:32:10,840 --> 00:32:12,120 >> The recommended motion was to 898 00:32:12,120 --> 00:32:14,000 conditionally approve the preliminary 899 00:32:14,000 --> 00:32:15,640 plans, and so I was just curious what 900 00:32:15,640 --> 00:32:19,830 conditions you had in mind. 901 00:32:19,840 --> 00:32:22,160 » I think that was just left by the state 902 00:32:22,160 --> 00:32:23,200 because 903 00:32:23,200 --> 00:32:24,480 Uh 904 00:32:24,480 --> 00:32:27,400 DRC, they had the conditions that the 905 00:32:27,400 --> 00:32:29,280 red lines be addressed. So, sorry about 906 00:32:29,280 --> 00:32:30,840 that. 907 00:32:30,840 --> 00:32:32,200 Yeah. 908 00:32:32,200 --> 00:32:35,200 >> I didn't have any conditions in mind, so 909 00:32:35,200 --> 00:32:37,360 Okay. So, we have a motion and we have a 910 00:32:37,360 --> 00:32:38,840 second. 911 00:32:38,840 --> 00:32:40,360 Let's proceed with a vote. Commissioner 912 00:32:40,360 --> 00:32:41,040 Russell. 913 00:32:41,040 --> 00:32:41,520 >> Yes. 914 00:32:41,520 --> 00:32:42,320 >> Commissioner Christopher. 915 00:32:42,320 --> 00:32:42,840 >> Yes. 916 00:32:42,840 --> 00:32:43,640 >> Commissioner Hotman. 917 00:32:43,640 --> 00:32:44,040 >> Yes. 918 00:32:44,040 --> 00:32:45,280 >> Commissioner Wood. Yes. Commissioner 919 00:32:45,280 --> 00:32:45,880 Johnson. 920 00:32:45,880 --> 00:32:46,600 >> Yes. 921 00:32:46,600 --> 00:32:48,640 >> Okay, thank you. That preliminary plan 922 00:32:48,640 --> 00:32:54,510 is approved, and it is unanimous. 923 00:32:54,520 --> 00:32:57,000 All right, that brings us to agenda item 924 00:32:57,000 --> 00:32:59,040 number four. We need to approve the 925 00:32:59,040 --> 00:33:00,320 minutes from our last meeting, which was 926 00:33:00,320 --> 00:33:03,160 on May 12th, 2026. 927 00:33:03,160 --> 00:33:05,680 Any discussion on those minutes before 928 00:33:05,680 --> 00:33:08,830 we proceed? 929 00:33:08,840 --> 00:33:10,680 And if not, would anyone like to make a 930 00:33:10,680 --> 00:33:13,080 motion? 931 00:33:13,080 --> 00:33:14,240 >> I'll make the motion that we approve 932 00:33:14,240 --> 00:33:15,280 those minutes. 933 00:33:15,280 --> 00:33:16,400 >> Okay, thank you. We have a motion to 934 00:33:16,400 --> 00:33:17,920 approve the minutes by Commissioner 935 00:33:17,920 --> 00:33:22,430 Christopher. Do we have a second? 936 00:33:22,440 --> 00:33:24,360 » I'll second. 937 00:33:24,360 --> 00:33:26,120 >> You're good. 938 00:33:26,120 --> 00:33:27,400 >> Second by Commissioner Russell. 939 00:33:27,400 --> 00:33:27,800 >> Yep. 940 00:33:27,800 --> 00:33:29,160 >> Okay. 941 00:33:29,160 --> 00:33:31,920 All in favor of approving those minutes. 942 00:33:31,920 --> 00:33:32,960 >> Yes. 943 00:33:32,960 --> 00:33:34,480 >> Anyone opposed? 944 00:33:34,480 --> 00:33:37,520 Okay, the minutes from May 20th 945 00:33:37,520 --> 00:33:38,640 May 12th 946 00:33:38,640 --> 00:33:41,640 are approved, and it is unanimous. 947 00:33:41,640 --> 00:33:43,840 All right, thank you. That brings us to 948 00:33:43,840 --> 00:33:48,270 staff reports. 949 00:33:48,280 --> 00:33:50,160 » The next planning commission would 950 00:33:50,160 --> 00:33:54,400 potentially be some code amendments. Um 951 00:33:54,400 --> 00:33:56,120 Most of the other applic- applications 952 00:33:56,120 --> 00:33:58,120 we have are commercial and are only 953 00:33:58,120 --> 00:34:01,040 through the DRC. 954 00:34:01,040 --> 00:34:03,040 Do you have anything? 955 00:34:03,040 --> 00:34:04,560 >> Okay, sounds fun. We will look forward 956 00:34:04,560 --> 00:34:05,000 to it. 957 00:34:05,000 --> 00:34:05,520 >> Yeah. 958 00:34:05,520 --> 00:34:06,720 >> Thank you. 959 00:34:06,720 --> 00:34:08,639 Okay, um that brings us to the end, my 960 00:34:08,639 --> 00:34:11,679 friends. Shall we adjourn? 961 00:34:11,679 --> 00:34:12,840 And would anyone like to make a motion 962 00:34:12,840 --> 00:34:13,520 to adjourn? 963 00:34:13,520 --> 00:34:15,720 >> I'll so