[0:10] Thank you.
[0:13] All right, we'll get the
[0:16] See where you August 11th
[0:19] DRC meetings kicked off and going. It is
[0:22] 10:00 a.m. So
[0:24] First item of a business um
[0:29] If that's okay with the DRC, we may
[0:31] adjust the the order of the agenda cuz
[0:34] we do have the applicant here for the
[0:35] Scenic Ridge plat phase E preliminary.
[0:38] Is there any concern with moving that up
[0:41] first to review?
[0:42] >> No, let's move him up.
[0:43] >> Okay.
[0:44] Sounds good. So the first item we'll
[0:47] review is the Scenic Ridge subdivision
[0:51] phase E.
[0:52] Um this is part of the
[0:55] Scenic Ridge the last the final
[0:58] uh phase that we'll start reviewing
[1:00] relate to this project. It's up on the
[1:02] East Bench off of 1200 East and 450
[1:05] South.
[1:07] Um
[1:08] phase currently under
[1:10] that we're reviewing today is the the
[1:12] red section indicated here.
[1:15] Um
[1:15] there's three proposed lots and then the largest eight lot associated with
[1:19] this this phase.
[1:22] Um
[1:22] this is a preliminary review of this
[1:25] application.
[1:26] Um and so the DRC's role today is to
[1:30] provide a recommendation to Planning
[1:31] Commission.
[1:33] Um some background on it. This
[1:36] subdivision all the improvements have
[1:38] currently been
[1:40] uh
[1:41] constructed. Um
[1:43] and the utilities are stubbed to the
[1:46] lots as um were previously so um again
[1:50] all infrastructure has been installed.
[1:52] This is just a review of of the plats
[1:54] and phases related to this site.
[1:57] So um with that the DRC with any
[2:00] thoughts or comments or questions that
[2:02] we may have. So,
[2:04] starting with Aspen with planning.
[2:07] >> I don't have any comments.
[2:08] >> Okay.
[2:09] Randy with building?
[2:11] >> I've got three addresses on this, but I
[2:13] know it's realized it's just preliminary
[2:15] at this point, but that is ready. So,
[2:17] other than that, I have no comments.
[2:18] >> Okay. We'll add those to it. So,
[2:21] Ryan with fire?
[2:22] >> No, these improvements are already in,
[2:24] so there's nothing else.
[2:25] >> Okay.
[2:26] Jason?
[2:27] >> I don't have any comments, and
[2:29] we'll just chime in on redlines as
[2:30] needed.
[2:31] >> Okay.
[2:32] Uh there's not a whole lot of comments
[2:34] on here. I'll kind of just start with
[2:35] the plat.
[2:36] Um
[2:37] just a verification and check on the
[2:39] boundary description.
[2:41] Um
[2:42] to make sure that the section ties seem
[2:45] a little off, so we just wanted to check
[2:46] those, make sure we're good there.
[2:48] is a note that needs to be
[2:49] included on all plats.
[2:51] Um basically just saying the contractor
[2:54] needs to understand that um
[2:58] that all ins- uh improvements need to be
[3:01] installed according to San San Clemente
[3:03] standards and specifications.
[3:05] Um
[3:07] I'll probably address this next comment
[3:09] on the following sheet. It could
[3:11] illustrate it a little better.
[3:13] Right now shown on the the plat itself
[3:17] is
[3:18] just these three lots being split off
[3:21] from the main lot.
[3:22] Um
[3:24] typically when there's a fourth when
[3:26] there's a parcel remaining after the
[3:30] rest of it that's not going to be
[3:31] installed, the entirety of the project
[3:34] needs to be included within the plat
[3:35] itself.
[3:36] And so, it's something we
[3:39] um
[3:40] we do need to confirm a little bit. I'd
[3:42] work with you on that and this nail a
[3:43] little bit on the including that in the
[3:48] entirety of the project of that lot
[3:51] within the plat itself.
[3:53] Um so otherwise it remains a parcel that's still a
[3:58] single parcel being split into four
[4:00] lots. And um
[4:04] when that and one one's building lot as
[4:06] well when they're all improved finalized
[4:09] lots they typically include it on the
[4:11] plat itself.
[4:12] So we'll need to work on work through
[4:15] that with you on this one.
[4:17] >> something that
[4:20] Josh
[4:21] who put in the lot with
[4:23] >> Yes.
[4:25] Yep. So uh basically this plat sheet
[4:28] would just expand a little bit and
[4:30] include the entire boundary for for
[4:33] yours. So.
[4:36] just for the record the question was
[4:38] is who addresses that and that would be
[4:41] the the engineer and the surveyor doing
[4:43] the project.
[4:46] Okay other than that I don't there's
[4:48] only one other comment um
[4:51] it's regarding the the channel behind
[4:53] there.
[4:54] Um with this phase going in
[4:56] um we do need to coordinate on
[4:59] making sure that facility is is
[5:01] installed. Whether it's the channel
[5:03] itself
[5:04] or which is the city's responsibility or
[5:08] the pipe which um
[5:10] for the development agreement would need
[5:12] to be installed. So we just need to work
[5:13] and make sure that that's that's getting
[5:15] done with this phase.
[5:19] Other than that I don't believe we had
[5:21] any other
[5:22] comments.
[5:28] No.
[5:33] Okay.
[5:34] Um
[5:35] with that if there any other comments or
[5:37] thoughts
[5:41] seeing none I would would look for a
[5:43] motion.
[5:48] » I'll make the motion we move it forward
[5:50] to the planning commission based on the
[5:52] red lines being addressed.
[5:53] >> Okay.
[5:54] I have a motion. Is there a second?
[5:56] >> I'll second that.
[5:57] >> Second by Randy.
[5:59] Any
[6:00] thoughts or comments on the motion?
[6:03] No?
[6:04] All in favor, please say aye.
[6:06] >> Aye.
[6:06] >> Any opposed?
[6:08] Okay. Motion passes. Um we'll get these
[6:10] sent over to you and work on on that
[6:12] plan. So,
[6:13] thank you, Neil.
[6:15] Um
[6:16] next item on the agenda. Are you here
[6:19] with the vet clinic?
[6:19] >> Yes.
[6:20] >> Maybe we'll So, okay, we'll jump the vet
[6:22] clinic up as well cuz we have there.
[6:25] So, next item on the agenda we'll it
[6:28] will review is review the Santaquin Vet
[6:31] Clinic.
[6:32] This is a site plan
[6:34] um
[6:35] located on the west side of town
[6:37] adjacent to the Santaquin Peaks
[6:39] Industrial
[6:40] uh subdivision.
[6:42] This is not it's adjacent to it, so just
[6:46] kind of to the to the east of the
[6:49] subdivision that was installed a couple
[6:51] years ago. Um another point of reference
[6:53] is the TPW site, which is kind of north
[6:55] and and east of of this site.
[6:59] Um this is a site plan application. Um
[7:02] so, the DRC is the final approval body
[7:04] for for this application.
[7:07] Um
[7:08] and
[7:10] yeah, with that with that we'll go
[7:12] around DRC with any thoughts or
[7:13] comments. All right, Leslie.
[7:15] >> Will we go to the landscaping page on
[7:17] page nine, please?
[7:18] >> Mhm.
[7:20] >> Some additional landscaping needs to be
[7:22] shown. Uh for example, the spaces right
[7:24] behind the building. We need to know
[7:26] like what material's being used because
[7:29] the whole site must be landscaped. Uh we
[7:31] also need a data table provided to show
[7:34] that 8% of the site is being landscaped.
[7:38] Um keep in mind that 50% of landscape
[7:41] materials needs to be live plant
[7:43] material. That's measured at the full
[7:45] plant maturity.
[7:47] And then around the trash enclosure, we
[7:49] need to require four shrubs per three
[7:51] sides.
[7:53] And then same with the plant island,
[7:55] some shrubs need to be included in that
[7:56] as well.
[7:59] >> Ashton, if I can maybe piggyback on that
[8:00] a little bit. Uh
[8:02] can you help us understand uh directly
[8:04] behind the building? Do you have any
[8:06] plans there for either driveways or
[8:08] walkways or
[8:10] Right right where the the cursor is,
[8:11] right in between the parking and the
[8:12] building. Is there plans for that or
[8:15] >> Uh
[8:16] I'd have to check.
[8:19] I'm not sure yet.
[8:21] >> Is that Is the light on the microphone
[8:23] on?
[8:24] >> Turn the little green light on.
[8:25] >> All right, there we go. Okay, I'm not
[8:28] sure on that. I know that they do want
[8:30] to
[8:31] uh access from the parking lot back
[8:33] there obviously to the basement of the
[8:35] building. So
[8:35] >> Perfect. Yeah, if if if you can just
[8:37] show some If you can show that and then
[8:39] as Ashton talked about, and really the
[8:41] landscaping is is that access road to
[8:44] the north cuz everything down below will
[8:46] be kind of a future phase, but you know,
[8:48] the area immediately behind I mean,
[8:50] you've shown everything on the sides and
[8:52] the front, but that whole area that he's
[8:54] highlighting is is really what we're
[8:56] honing in on on the landscaping
[8:57] requirement. But any other details about
[8:59] access and things like that will will
[9:01] really help us to to you know,
[9:04] understand what what the plan is for the
[9:05] site.
[9:06] >> Can I ask a question there? I mean, a
[9:08] lot of vet clinics use stalls or
[9:10] something for
[9:12] It doesn't make sense to require
[9:13] landscaping if they're going to rip it
[9:15] out and put
[9:16] future enclosures for there for animal
[9:18] care. You know what I mean? Is there
[9:19] going to be stalls back there? And
[9:21] that's something we're going to need to
[9:21] ask the the vet. Does he have horse
[9:24] stalls or pens or kennels for dogs? It
[9:27] makes no sense to require them to
[9:28] landscape it and spend that money to rip
[9:31] it out and put a kennel there.
[9:32] >> Well, and I guess that's the thing is is
[9:34] we need to know what the plan is cuz if
[9:35] right now if it's all just going to be
[9:37] kind of blank and vague vacant, then our
[9:38] code requires that it be, you know, uh
[9:41] improved to some point. Now, it may not
[9:43] be
[9:44] landscaping,
[9:45] um
[9:46] uh in the traditional sense, but at
[9:47] least have some sort of a ground cover
[9:49] so that it's not just, you know, uh
[9:51] raw.
[9:52] >> I just don't want to see him be required
[9:54] to put all these trees and shrubs if
[9:55] he's going to put kennels there and have
[9:57] to rip it all out. There's no sense
[9:58] wasting money.
[9:59] >> We'll show what the plan is. We'll talk
[10:01] with the architect and the vet, so see
[10:03] what they want. So.
[10:04] >> And if their plan is to do that in the
[10:05] future, then for the time being they
[10:07] need to do something to treat the ground
[10:08] so that it's not just weeds.
[10:12] Right, but this is This is a site plan
[10:15] for an improvement.
[10:19] » Okay. Anything else, Aspen?
[10:22] >> Just on the site plan on page two,
[10:24] um if you'll just continue the
[10:26] pedestrian access for the future trail
[10:28] that will run along Summit Ridge
[10:30] Parkway.
[10:35] Oh, and then your parking stalls in the
[10:36] back, they're only 18 ft, which we
[10:39] allow, but it has to have a 5-ft wide
[10:41] landscaped area or a 6-ft wide sidewalk.
[10:44] >> Okay.
[10:45] >> So, just keep that in mind.
[10:48] And that's everything.
[10:50] >> Okay.
[10:51] Randy, it's building?
[10:53] >> I don't have anything at this point, so.
[10:55] >> Okay.
[10:56] Ryan?
[10:57] >> I know that there's a fire hydrant that
[10:59] you show more on the southeast corner of
[11:01] that.
[11:02] Uh I know John and I have discussed that
[11:04] there's one potentially already going to
[11:06] the north.
[11:08] >> Yeah. So, on that
[11:10] So, part of
[11:12] um
[11:13] the agreement was that we did need to
[11:14] provide a fire hydrant for the site.
[11:17] Right now, the fire hydrant's it's been
[11:20] stubbed out, pipe has been stubbed out
[11:21] of the out of the We've connected the
[11:24] 10-in line and stubbed it to about right
[11:26] here. We haven't brought the fire
[11:27] hydrant up just because we wanted to
[11:29] make sure we weren't conflicting with
[11:30] the site plan.
[11:32] Okay, so we're
[11:34] right now where the pipes currently
[11:36] extended is roughly in this area.
[11:39] And so with that, if we have a fire
[11:41] hydrant here in this location,
[11:44] um the thought is that we wouldn't need
[11:46] to install this fire hydrant or the
[11:49] applicant wouldn't be required required
[11:51] to install that fire hydrant as part of
[11:53] their site plan.
[11:55] >> Okay.
[11:56] >> so long as that's within 100 ft, which
[11:59] we can do that, that fire hydrant
[12:01] wouldn't be needed.
[12:02] >> Correct. You don't have to put two that
[12:04] close together.
[12:04] >> Okay.
[12:05] >> Yep.
[12:08] So.
[12:09] Hey, anything else, Ryan?
[12:11] >> No.
[12:11] >> Okay. Jason?
[12:13] >> I don't have anything to add except I
[12:14] think we need to add a note um
[12:17] for just architectural renderings, when
[12:19] she get that ready, just give that to us
[12:21] and and uh because of this being
[12:25] uh
[12:26] kind of a specific industrial site with
[12:28] uh
[12:29] the specific agreement that
[12:31] uh is there with the city, we'll review
[12:33] it kind of more internally. There's not
[12:34] necessarily you know, official ARC
[12:37] review, but any anytime you get that rendering
[12:40] uh ready to go, send it to us and we'll work with with you on that.
[12:45] >> Okay.
[12:45] >> Um that's a redline. I don't think that
[12:47] made it there, so we
[12:47] >> It did not.
[12:48] >> add for AR or architectural review.
[12:52] Um but on top of the redlines that you
[12:54] have, I don't have any have anything
[12:55] more to say.
[12:57] >> Okay, we'll go through these here real
[12:59] quick, anything that we haven't covered.
[13:01] Um
[13:02] and just comment on the the dimension of
[13:05] parking stalls, making sure those meet
[13:07] our code there. Um it seems like they
[13:10] may be a little short. Is that
[13:13] correct?
[13:14] >> Well, yeah, cuz if we allow the 18 in
[13:16] today,
[13:17] either the lines are
[13:18] >> We'll have to have sort of landscaping
[13:20] or sidewalk here, 6-ft sidewalk there,
[13:21] so.
[13:23] We've already talked about access to the
[13:24] building from that parking lot.
[13:27] Um
[13:28] And that access there, it's really just
[13:30] striping
[13:31] for that connection cuz you're able to
[13:33] come right up necessary to the property
[13:35] line. And then as we get that trail
[13:38] built, there'll be a connection at that
[13:40] point.
[13:43] » And will you just label this triangle
[13:45] piece that's not necessarily getting
[13:47] constructed out just as a future phase?
[13:49] >> Okay.
[13:50] Or whatever that yeah.
[13:52] >> Whatever it's going to be.
[13:53] >> it's planned to be future phase. But
[13:56] just so it's clear on there.
[13:57] >> Hey John, and in that
[13:59] what they he's labeled as pond one,
[14:00] that's serving the the entirety of the
[14:02] project or just the the first phase if you will?
[14:07] >> Right now it's designed to take all of
[14:08] the storm water from the parking lots
[14:10] and everything and store it there. It
[14:12] flows in and into a curb inlet down here
[14:15] in this corner and then dumps in.
[14:17] >> Okay.
[14:17] >> So if there's
[14:19] >> So is that going to have to be developed
[14:20] that would need to be resized?
[14:22] >> Resized.
[14:22] >> Okay. And I do know what and I guess you
[14:25] have a red line on it, but I I think you
[14:26] showed a pipe
[14:28] going from that pond just just uh
[14:31] >> That's correct. That's right here.
[14:32] >> Just going onto the Yeah, we we we can't
[14:35] have that. Uh you got to keep the the
[14:37] storm water completely on site and
[14:40] controlled on site. You can't have a
[14:41] pipe that just is
[14:43] put you know, shooting that water off
[14:45] onto the adjacent property which
[14:46] happens.
[14:46] >> Yeah, so that would be the overflow
[14:49] meaning the rim of that box once that
[14:51] pond fills completely then what's spill
[14:53] over into that box. There's no lower the bottom of the pond
[14:58] isn't flowing out of that. It's just
[15:01] when it starts to overflow so it doesn't
[15:03] go over into all that wall that we have
[15:06] there that it gets captured by that box
[15:08] and then is conveyed under.
[15:10] >> So yeah, regardless of that, you you
[15:12] can't have a pipe that's overflowing off
[15:14] into the adjacent property. If if an
[15:16] event gets big enough that it naturally
[15:18] overflows then that's that's going to be
[15:20] a
[15:21] I you know, I would just worry about the
[15:22] retaining wall.
[15:23] The structural integrity of the
[15:24] retaining wall having water just go onto
[15:27] that, but
[15:28] >> Whether it's say yeah.
[15:30] >> No, it can't be necessary pipe. If they
[15:32] want to do some surface improvements
[15:34] after to to get it there,
[15:36] um that would be adequate on that.
[15:38] >> Okay.
[15:42] um let's see. Going to this, the other
[15:44] comment is we can provide you updated
[15:47] GIS cuz this is something that actually
[15:48] was just installed within the last
[15:49] month. We'll send you updated GIS with
[15:52] the fire line that we talked about
[15:54] earlier, the fire hydrant line, and the
[15:58] uh culinary connection. It's actually
[16:00] 2-in connection that's been installed
[16:02] there.
[16:02] >> Okay.
[16:05] » Um one other item we wanted to discuss
[16:08] is the sump location. Um
[16:12] this is a sump that
[16:13] captures what's coming off of Summit
[16:15] Ridge Parkway. We just like to um
[16:19] coordinate uh the location of that.
[16:21] Where it's located is um
[16:24] provides maintenance struggles down in
[16:27] the future for it wherever need to. We'd
[16:29] rather prefer that to be outside the the
[16:33] uh
[16:33] asphalt there for the drive approach.
[16:36] Um and to relocate that and push it
[16:38] either further kind of north so it's out
[16:40] of there. Um south it gets kind of
[16:42] complicated with utilities. Uh maybe a
[16:44] little spot here, but as you said, we
[16:47] would probably help participate in the
[16:48] construction of that.
[16:49] >> Okay.
[16:50] >> So, but if we can just update that to
[16:52] show getting it out of the park strip out of that drive
[16:55] approach.
[16:59] Um let's see.
[17:01] If I talked about that, that's the
[17:03] outfall.
[17:06] I believe and that's the landscaping
[17:08] comments. I believe that's it.
[17:11] So,
[17:13] that's all the comments we've got on
[17:15] this. If there's any others,
[17:17] um
[17:18] I look forward to any other thoughts or
[17:20] questions on this.
[17:24] » Thanks, Scott.
[17:25] >> Okay.
[17:28] If not, I would look for a motion.
[17:33] » John, I think with the uncertainty of
[17:34] what's happening behind the building
[17:35] with the landscaping or or walkways or
[17:39] potential stalls for animals or
[17:41] whatever, uh I think there's a little
[17:42] bit more information we need to be able
[17:44] to approve this site a motion that we
[17:46] table this site plan.
[17:47] >> Okay.
[17:48] Got a motion to table. Is there a
[17:50] second?
[17:53] » I'll second that.
[17:54] >> Seconded by Ryan.
[17:56] Any discussion on that?
[17:59] If not, we'll go to vote. All in favor
[18:01] of tabling, please say I.
[18:02] >> I.
[18:03] >> Any opposed?
[18:04] Okay, motion passes.
[18:06] We'll get these sent over to you again
[18:08] so you can make the those corrections.
[18:10] So. Okay. Thank you.
[18:14] Final item on the agenda is uh review of
[18:17] the Tanner Flats
[18:20] phase five subdivision.
[18:23] Um this is
[18:26] um south of what's currently being
[18:29] constructed. Um so this is you know,
[18:31] I'll back up a little bit. This is
[18:32] Summer Ridge Parkway. Tanner Flats is
[18:34] located on the the east side of Summer
[18:36] Ridge Parkway.
[18:38] Um and that let's say they've had a
[18:40] couple of phases they've been under
[18:42] construction over the last two or three
[18:43] years.
[18:44] Um this is the fourth phase of it.
[18:47] Um and there'll be one more phase after
[18:50] that.
[18:51] Um
[18:53] Excuse me. So, this is a final
[18:55] subdivision application. So, the DRC is
[18:58] the final approval body for this.
[19:01] So, that will go around. Aspen?
[19:04] >> Uh just some cleanup items. As you can
[19:07] see on the cover page it says phase
[19:09] four. If we can correct that to say
[19:10] phase five. And then just a reminder
[19:13] with the park requirements, currently
[19:16] you've been issued 44 building permits.
[19:19] Um you just need to be aware 64 more
[19:21] park improvements need to be done and
[19:23] then no more building permits can be
[19:25] issued until all the parks are done at
[19:27] 104.
[19:30] So.
[19:30] >> So, and they have begun construction on park improvements now, but they still
[19:36] have 20 or so building permits to pull
[19:38] before that kicks in.
[19:40] Okay?
[19:41] >> Um I think that's everything from
[19:42] planning.
[19:43] >> Okay. Randy?
[19:46] >> I went I remember going through this the
[19:48] addressing on this, but I don't know
[19:50] whether I got it into this file, but
[19:52] we'll get on there and get it to them.
[19:54] >> Yep.
[19:55] >> Okay.
[19:56] Other than that, nothing.
[19:57] >> Okay. Ryan?
[19:58] >> No, I don't have anything.
[19:59] >> Okay. Jason?
[20:01] >> I don't have anything either.
[20:02] >> Okay.
[20:03] Um there's one I'm going to point out.
[20:07] For the most part, everything weren't
[20:08] any other major uh comments on it. Um
[20:13] there's one that's
[20:15] uh
[20:15] does need to be addressed. It's on the
[20:17] plan and profiles regarding the storm
[20:19] drain.
[20:20] Um
[20:22] right now as it's currently the design
[20:26] doesn't match the preliminary approval
[20:29] that was done. Um
[20:32] and even the amended approval that was
[20:35] done a couple about a year and a half or
[20:37] so ago.
[20:38] Um
[20:39] right here on this sheet the storm drain
[20:43] would drain back to uh
[20:46] it drains away from the storm drain
[20:49] retention basin that we talked about
[20:50] earlier. And so there would be an
[20:52] outfall somewhere on the south side of
[20:55] the project. So, this does need to be
[20:57] corrected uh to more closely match the
[21:00] preliminary design and to make sure
[21:02] we're not sending storm drain
[21:05] back uh where it shouldn't be going.
[21:08] So, and then there's a
[21:11] one of the plan views doesn't match the
[21:13] profile
[21:14] on there. So, those are those are really all the
[21:22] only comments that we have on this on
[21:24] this set of plans.
[21:30] So, is there any other comments,
[21:32] thoughts, or
[21:33] questions on it?
[21:35] All right.
[21:38] If not, I would look for a motion.
[21:42] » I'll make a motion to conditionally
[21:44] approve Tanner Flats phase five final
[21:47] review once all redlines are addressed.
[21:49] >> Okay.
[21:51] We have a motion. Is there a second?
[21:53] >> I'll second that.
[21:54] >> Seconded by Randy.
[21:56] Any thoughts on the motion or
[21:57] discussion?
[21:59] Seeing none, we'll go to vote. All in
[22:00] favor, please say aye.
[22:02] >> Aye.
[22:03] >> Any opposed? Okay.
[22:05] Motion passes.
[22:06] Um
[22:07] move on with that. Sounds good.
[22:10] Last item on the agenda is uh approval
[22:13] of the meeting minutes from July 28th
[22:16] DRC meeting.
[22:19] >> I'll make a motion to approve the
[22:20] meeting minutes of July 28th, 2026 for
[22:23] DRC.
[22:25] >> Is there a second?
[22:26] >> Second.
[22:26] >> Seconded by Ryan.
[22:28] All in favor, please say aye.
[22:30] >> Aye.
[22:31] >> Any opposed?
[22:32] Okay. Minutes are approved.
[22:34] And if there's not anything else needed
[22:37] but to discuss by the DRC, I'll look for
[22:39] a motion to adjourn.
[22:40] >> So moved.
[22:42] >> We are adjourned at 10:22.