[0:00] I love it. [snorts]
[0:13] [music]
[0:18] » Love it.
[0:19] >> Welcome to the Santa Quinn Planning
[0:21] Commission meeting.
[0:24] [laughter]
[0:26] » We should do that every time.
[0:31] Love it. Love it.
[0:35] » All righty. We ready to go?
[0:38] >> All right. We'd like to welcome
[0:39] everybody to our Santa Quinn Planning
[0:41] Commission meeting on August 25th, 2026.
[0:45] We would like to start with an
[0:47] invocation or in inspirational thought.
[0:49] Would anybody like to do that for us
[0:51] today?
[0:58] I have one.
[0:59] >> You have one? Okay.
[1:04] » Yes, I have one. Just one second. Just
[1:07] an inspirational thought. Um,
[1:12] unfortunately, Dolly Parton passed away
[1:15] today. I don't know if you guys heard
[1:17] that.
[1:19] >> That's not really, but she's
[1:20] inspirational in many ways and she's
[1:22] done a lot of development in her life.
[1:24] She's built out Dollywood. she's done so
[1:27] much and so she's an inspiration to a
[1:29] lot of people. But um so I just wanted
[1:32] to quote a quote from her
[1:35] and I'm trying to pull it up.
[1:40] » It's amazing all the charity work that
[1:42] she did that she didn't get a lot of
[1:45] accolades for.
[1:47] >> Yeah. Yeah.
[1:50] Um
[1:52] sorry I thought it was just right here
[1:53] and it's not. Um
[1:57] it was something to the effect that um
[2:01] life can be hard but don't let it harden
[2:03] your heart and I think that can apply to
[2:06] all aspects of life that can apply to
[2:09] that land development cities codes
[2:12] politics especially um but it said let
[2:15] the let it strengthen the muscles around
[2:18] your heart not harden the heart itself
[2:20] so
[2:22] >> there's my thought for the night
[2:24] >> thank you very Would anyone like to lead
[2:26] us in the pledge of allegiance?
[2:28] >> I'll do that.
[2:32] [clears throat]
[2:33] >> I aliance to the flag of the United
[2:36] States of America and to the republic
[2:39] for which it stands. One nation under
[2:42] God, indivisible, with liberty and
[2:45] justice for all.
[2:54] righty. Our agenda for tonight is uh
[2:57] a public forum. Then we'll have a
[3:00] discussion and possible action
[3:03] um on the following. A public hearing
[3:07] and action regarding restricting bulk fuel storage in
[3:10] residential zones and then we'll approve
[3:12] our meeting minutes for July 28th.
[3:16] Do we have anything else that we need to
[3:18] add to that agenda or can we
[3:23] » Did you have something to add to the
[3:25] agenda?
[3:26] >> Yeah, everybody's good with the agenda
[3:27] the way it is.
[3:28] >> Mhm.
[3:29] >> Okay. All right. We'll begin with our
[3:31] public forum at 7:04.
[3:37] Anybody want to say anything?
[3:41] Hold the crowds back.
[3:44] All right, we will end our public forum
[3:47] at 7:04. And now we'd like to start our
[3:50] discussion on Oh, I guess we have to
[3:52] have the public hearing first.
[3:55] We'll start our public hearing for um
[3:57] item number one, action regarding
[3:59] restricting bulk fuel storage in
[4:00] residential zones.
[4:03] Anybody want to comment on that?
[4:07] >> Great. Thanks so much. If if you'd like,
[4:09] I'm happy just to um go through an
[4:12] amendment. You probably recognize the um the item we talked about um
[4:20] prohibiting the storage of um fuel 150
[4:24] gallons or more residential districts.
[4:26] So, this is one of those it's been um
[4:28] you know, it went through the planning
[4:30] commission under recommendation of
[4:32] approval and then um you know, in
[4:35] speaking kind of with the the the
[4:36] leadership being the city manager um the
[4:39] assistant city manager and the city
[4:41] attorney um they felt like we needed to
[4:43] make um a few more changes. How it was
[4:45] written before, it was more of kind of a
[4:48] standard where it was restricted under
[4:50] the table, no more than 150 gallons.
[4:52] what the um city uh attorney um and uh
[4:56] and Jason really felt that it should be
[4:58] turned more into a use and so we created
[5:00] a bulk fuel storage use and so that's
[5:04] what was put in uh in the table and
[5:06] actually today so u as far as that goes
[5:09] there's a definition it's pretty simple
[5:11] that that we provided if you look at the
[5:13] amendments and then under um each of the
[5:16] tables for the residential districts
[5:18] it's a use bulk fuel storage and then
[5:20] it's a non-permitted use or a prohib I'm
[5:23] sorry a non yeah a non-permitted use or
[5:26] prohibited use. Um so in talking with um with with with the city manager um he
[5:34] felt that um we needed to go a little
[5:37] bit further because there are some
[5:39] properties that are zoned residential
[5:41] but are actually historically used
[5:43] agriculturally. And he said how it's
[5:45] written right now um potentially it
[5:47] could impact those operations. And so
[5:51] even though like we feel like how the
[5:52] code's written, it it it won't disrupt
[5:55] that agricultural use, but he wanted to
[5:58] ensure that it was crystal clear in the
[6:00] code. And so today, I've been kind of
[6:02] going back and forth, city manager and
[6:04] our city attorney. Um and so I have a
[6:06] few amendments. Um, so if you do
[6:09] recommend a positive um
[6:13] recommendation to the the city council,
[6:16] we'd like it to be with the
[6:19] consideration of some some new language.
[6:21] And so this is the staff report that you
[6:24] received. Um, and the blue is what was
[6:29] in the staff report. The red is what was
[6:31] added working with the attorney and the
[6:33] city manager today. Um, so we have a a
[6:37] few spaces where where it was provided
[6:39] and so the
[6:43] yeah the definition I can pull we pull
[6:45] up the definition. So we do uh because
[6:47] first let me pull up the definition for
[6:50] bulk fuel storage.
[6:53] Let's see where do we place that?
[6:57] That's under the ordinance. Just one
[6:59] second.
[7:11] Okay. So this is the definition. So this
[7:14] was the or the the definition that was
[7:16] provided in your packet. So it's bulk
[7:18] fuel storage of gasoline used fuel,
[7:20] kerosene or other liquid fuel in one or
[7:23] more tanks or containers having a
[7:25] combined capacity greater than 150
[7:27] gallons on a single parcel. Bulk fuel
[7:29] storage does not include fuel contained
[7:31] within the factoryinstalled tank of an
[7:34] operable motor vehicle or or equipment.
[7:36] And so it's um essentially if you have
[7:40] um storage of fuel, it's going to cap it
[7:42] on 150 gallons. It's the same um ba
[7:47] basic impact that that it had in the
[7:49] last code. It just clarifies it and it
[7:52] makes it as as a use. So that's the
[7:54] definition.
[7:56] And then
[8:01] this document,
[8:03] yeah, this word document, this is the staff report, but then we added in
[8:07] the red to really ensure and make it
[8:10] crystal clear that it um will not impact
[8:14] currently operating agricultural
[8:17] businesses that are in residential
[8:18] districts. So the first um is the home
[8:21] occupation section. So the home
[8:23] occupation section just under the the
[8:25] prohibited um uses under that code we
[8:30] had simply just bulk fuel storage. Now
[8:33] we provide a little bit more
[8:34] clarification except so it's bulk fuel
[8:36] storage except when accessory and
[8:38] incidental to a lawfully established
[8:40] agricultural operation conducted on
[8:42] residentially zoned property. Fuels
[8:44] stored under this exception shall be
[8:46] used solely to support the agricultural
[8:48] operation. It should not be sold or
[8:50] dispensed for any unrelated purpose. So
[8:54] just making it clear, we're not going to
[8:57] have an impact to our agricultural u
[8:59] businesses. And then under the use
[9:02] table. So this is um the language that
[9:06] we'll then put throughout all the
[9:08] residential uh tables, but we just had
[9:10] time to put it in this as an example in
[9:13] the staff report. So if approved, we
[9:16] would then duplicate this in the rest of
[9:18] those residential um use tables. So the
[9:21] first one is the bulk fuel storage. Um
[9:24] and so accept agricultural bulk fuel
[9:27] storage as provided below. And so that's
[9:30] where we have the N. It's a
[9:31] non-permitted use for residential. But
[9:33] below that is the carve out for
[9:36] agricultural uses in residentially zoned
[9:39] properties. So bulk fuel storage
[9:40] agricultural um bulk fuel storage that
[9:43] is accessory and incidental to lawfully
[9:46] establish agricultural operation
[9:48] conducted on the property. Fuel stored
[9:50] under this provision shall be used
[9:52] solely to operate vehicles, machinery
[9:54] and equipment used in that agricultural
[9:55] operation. and it shall not be offered
[9:57] for sale distribution for use outside of
[10:00] the agricult agricultural operation. All
[10:04] storage shall comply with applicable
[10:06] fire building and environmental
[10:07] standards. So even an agricultural use,
[10:11] if there's large amounts of fuel, they
[10:13] still have to meet building code for for
[10:14] safety and whatnot. But that's the
[10:16] provision that would um kind of
[10:18] safeguard our agricultural uses. So
[10:21] should have the same impact. just makes
[10:23] it really crystal clear and uh you know
[10:26] should meet kind of what our city
[10:28] manager and our um city city attorney
[10:31] want in terms of just making sure that
[10:33] our agriculture uses are safeguarded
[10:35] while still providing kind of the public
[10:37] safety feature for our home occupation
[10:39] so we're not having large amounts of
[10:41] fuel associated with with just a general
[10:43] home occupation.
[10:45] Um and that is is everything from staff.
[10:48] So the red hopefully that's clear the
[10:50] red is what was added today. The blue is
[10:52] what was in your staff report.
[10:55] Happy to entertain any questions.
[11:01] » Lots of questions. Anybody else have
[11:03] lots of questions?
[11:05] >> All right. Do we allow propane tanks for
[11:07] houses in the city?
[11:09] >> Um, this wouldn't affect anything with propane tanks that are under the
[11:14] 150 um gallon,
[11:18] >> right? So,
[11:19] >> but what if I had a 250gallon tank?
[11:22] >> So, if you had one that was already
[11:24] established and and approved through the
[11:26] building permit process, then this this
[11:29] wouldn't affect anything that's already
[11:30] established. But, um,
[11:33] yeah, this would affect something 150
[11:37] gallons or more.
[11:38] >> Okay. What about fuel oil? Like if
[11:41] somebody had a wanted to build a hotel
[11:43] and run it on a heat it with fuel oil,
[11:46] this would affect them also, right? for
[11:47] a you say hotel,
[11:49] >> right?
[11:49] >> Um, so this would only impact
[11:51] residential.
[11:52] >> Okay. What if it was like an apartment
[11:55] building that wanted to run on fuel oil
[11:57] and heat for heating the apartment? I
[11:59] know that's antiquated stuff. I'm just
[12:02] >> bringing up questions that came to my
[12:04] mind.
[12:04] >> Right. Right. from a commercial
[12:06] standpoint. So, if um um this wouldn't
[12:08] impact a a a commercial use, this is um
[12:12] specifically written um to target just
[12:15] residential zones. Um and so any of
[12:18] those residential, the R8, I think the
[12:20] R10, the R15, it would impact those. So
[12:24] the idea is like your tra traditional
[12:26] single family um you know having large
[12:29] amounts of of uh storage of fuel like
[12:33] inside inside the garage that that
[12:35] that's where it would it would it would
[12:36] have an impact.
[12:38] >> Okay.
[12:38] >> The fire department already has like a
[12:40] permit that you have to go through if
[12:42] you wanted [clears throat] so they would
[12:45] be involved in a situation like that if
[12:46] it came up.
[12:47] >> Okay. So a lot of people in this area,
[12:50] not everybody, but a lot of people would
[12:52] subscribe to the fact that they would
[12:54] are trying to u be self-reliant.
[12:59] And so to be self-reliant, a lot of
[13:01] times they will store some things up and
[13:04] that would may include fuel. Wouldn't it
[13:07] be better to go through a permitting
[13:10] process and a process of safety
[13:13] regulation instead of just outright
[13:16] banning it?
[13:18] Um, so it it it really depends on on on
[13:21] what the process was. So when we went
[13:22] through um we met with like our public
[13:24] works and our our fire official and they
[13:28] felt like the 150 galon would still
[13:30] provide um folks enough enough storage
[13:33] if they had four-wheelers and things of
[13:35] that nature on site for a residential
[13:37] use. what our concern is and and we we
[13:40] had um we have received requests for
[13:43] this in the past, but folks that want to
[13:46] sell fuel as a home occupation. And so
[13:48] that that that that is a use that that we have seen and that um has been
[13:53] requested in the past. And so that that is of of concern because it's kind
[13:57] of making a potentially like a a a gas
[14:01] station in in a residential district,
[14:03] but you know, not not official gas
[14:05] station, but we we didn't we didn't want
[14:07] um to to blur lines like we we felt like
[14:10] that was a good use that we wanted to
[14:13] take out of the the home occupation
[14:14] section.
[14:16] So that's that's
[14:18] >> I would agree with with that in in
[14:20] saying you cannot sell fuel out of a
[14:23] household or a
[14:24] >> or a domestic dwelling if you want to
[14:27] put it that way. But to limit people and
[14:31] take away their choice to be able to
[14:34] store enough fuel for themselves and
[14:35] their family in case of an emergency
[14:40] I think is a negative.
[14:43] So, and I can see where we'd want to do
[14:45] it safely.
[14:47] Um,
[14:52] I I I don't like the way it's worded
[14:54] personally. So, I
[14:58] And I
[14:58] >> Do Do you feel that um I mean, is there a number of of gallons or a
[15:04] circumstance in which you feel like um
[15:07] it it it could it could be allowed?
[15:10] Well, one, we I think this is being
[15:13] driven by safety.
[15:15] So, I think we need to come up with a
[15:16] way to put some regulation around it
[15:19] where it's safe. But,
[15:22] you know, uh, having moved here from
[15:25] Missouri, there are a lot of, um, towns
[15:28] where the outskirts of town, people will
[15:30] have a, you know, a 1500 gallon propane tank so that they can make it
[15:37] through the entire year if they need to.
[15:39] And I would think we'd want to provide
[15:40] our citizens the same option here to be
[15:43] able to have something like that if if
[15:45] they so choose. I'm not saying everybody
[15:48] wants that, but taking away someone's
[15:51] freedom of choice is something that I
[15:53] don't like. Saying, "Hey,
[15:56] we want you to be safe in our community,
[15:59] I think that's reasonable, but just
[16:01] taking the choice away, I I don't agree
[16:04] with." And maybe I'm looking at it
[16:05] wrong. if anybody,
[16:07] you know, I'm just these are all
[16:10] thoughts that came to my mind as I was
[16:11] reading through the agenda packet for
[16:13] tonight. And so, um,
[16:17] I I don't want my neighbor to improperly
[16:20] store,
[16:21] you know, 500 gallons of gasoline right
[16:24] next to my property, but I don't want to
[16:26] take his right away to be able to do
[16:28] that if
[16:30] he's being safe about it.
[16:33] So,
[16:35] it's kind of a catch 22, I guess, is
[16:37] what I'm saying.
[16:38] >> Yeah.
[16:39] >> So, I that that that's all I wanted to
[16:41] bring up about it.
[16:42] >> I think you're saying it's okay to store
[16:44] that much and they're saying they don't
[16:46] want people to be distributing it and
[16:49] selling it and then it's like how much
[16:53] it's kind of they're kind of mixing in a
[16:55] way, right?
[16:56] >> I And I Yeah, I think I think you're
[16:58] right and that and that's that's a
[17:00] really good point. I I think what I mean
[17:02] if the concern is just generally for
[17:04] like the personal use um and that's like
[17:07] when we talk to the fire department like that's what we're asking was what
[17:11] from from like a a personal use like
[17:13] what what tends to be kind of kind of
[17:16] like like the upper limit of what
[17:18] someone if someone has a lot of ATVs and trucks just for the personal use and
[17:23] the the feeling was like 150 gallon is
[17:25] would get you u would get mo most people
[17:29] what what what they needed. did. Um, but
[17:31] going above that, like the the thought
[17:34] was like then potentially you're you
[17:36] might be getting into more of a
[17:38] commercial capacity where someone could,
[17:40] you know, be be using that for a
[17:42] business or commercial purpose.
[17:44] >> Um, one option to look at is instead of
[17:48] looking at just the the storage or like
[17:51] now it's more of like an umbrella, it's
[17:53] like the personal use and it's home
[17:55] occupations. Um, we could start by just
[17:58] limiting it specifically to a home
[18:01] occupation as opposed to just the the general storage. Um, and so if
[18:07] that's a route that the planning
[18:09] commission feels more comfortable with,
[18:10] we we could we could look at that that
[18:13] as well. Um,
[18:14] >> it's already not allowed as a home
[18:16] occupation. If you go to the home
[18:18] occupation chapter, right above, it says
[18:21] that you can't have um chemicals and
[18:25] different things above like household
[18:27] quantities
[18:29] under the the home occupation section,
[18:33] >> right? H it talks about.
[18:36] >> So what's driving this change?
[18:40] >> Why why are we putting this forward?
[18:42] just to make it ve very clear that you you know because we we we do we have
[18:46] had requests for um home occupations to sell fuel.
[18:52] >> Well, we've also had requests not for
[18:54] home occupations too for really large
[18:57] quantities that didn't necessarily have
[18:59] to do with agricultural purposes.
[19:01] >> Yeah. So, do we want to just make this
[19:04] clear that in a home occupation that's
[19:07] not allowed and then leave the the code
[19:10] the same otherwise? I don't know if the
[19:12] code already says 150 gallons. I'm I'm
[19:15] kind of shocked at that. But um
[19:19] >> doesn't currently say the 150 gallons.
[19:21] >> It does not currently.
[19:22] >> Okay.
[19:24] That that's what the definition of. Um
[19:26] so it's a new definition bulk fuel
[19:28] storage and then it's defined as 150
[19:31] gallons or more.
[19:33] >> In the previous planning commission,
[19:35] there was a code amendment to talk about
[19:37] the 150 gallons and it got a positive
[19:39] recommendation. But before it went to
[19:41] city council, it's been rewritten as
[19:43] what you've seen tonight.
[19:44] >> Yeah.
[19:48] So I I think that's that's up for your
[19:50] deliberation. Um if you like how it's
[19:53] written right now, it would impact folks
[19:56] that want to store above. Um so we I
[19:59] mean like I said before, this was vetted
[20:01] through kind of our our fire department
[20:03] and and our public works and that we
[20:05] they felt like that that was a pretty
[20:06] good upper limit of what someone would
[20:08] want to store. Yeah,
[20:09] >> it does does not impact the the tank
[20:11] capacity so of your vehicle. And so that
[20:14] would be in addition to um if you feel like that goes too far, you could
[20:20] make it very specific to just the home
[20:22] occupation use and just you know fuel
[20:25] sales, you know, anything that that's
[20:28] stored above 150. I mean, we could
[20:30] target that. I would think we we would
[20:31] want to look at that maybe maybe a a
[20:35] little bit more and and and come come
[20:36] back to you if if that's if that was the
[20:38] consensus of the planning commission. So
[20:40] you have you have a lot of options you
[20:42] could recommend as proposed tonight. You
[20:45] could kick it back to staff with the
[20:48] direction that you you want it to be
[20:50] more narrowly focused on on home
[20:52] occupations as opposed to to storage.
[20:55] Um, if if you do
[20:58] if if there is a concern, well, I'm
[21:01] trying to think too, like if someone
[21:02] does for a storage purpose for their own
[21:05] personal needs, if they want to store
[21:09] like 500 gallons of fuel, we probably
[21:12] would want to talk to the the fire
[21:13] marshall and see if there's a permit
[21:14] process or something like that.
[21:16] >> Yeah, totally.
[21:17] >> There there there is. Okay.
[21:20] >> Under age. Yeah. So says any home
[21:23] occupation which entails the use of
[21:24] chemicals exceeding typical household
[21:27] quantities, pesticides, and flammable
[21:29] combustible materials, including any
[21:31] other process or business where current
[21:33] adopted building fire codes would
[21:34] require an operational permit.
[21:37] >> So that's a that's a home occupation.
[21:39] What if somebody just wanted it for
[21:40] their personal use?
[21:41] >> I think a home is the operational permit
[21:42] the fire permit. Is that the name of the
[21:44] fire permit?
[21:44] >> The operational permit. They'd also have
[21:46] to go through the fire marshall and get
[21:47] that approved
[21:48] >> if it was for personal use also. Yeah,
[21:49] correct. That makes sense. I understand
[21:51] that. Anybody else have any thoughts?
[21:55] Sorry, I'm
[21:57] pestering everybody with this.
[21:59] >> Has staff looked at um [clears throat]
[22:01] other cities around us the same size out
[22:04] of state? Have we done extensive
[22:06] research on what other cities our same
[22:09] size are doing compared to like um
[22:13] Missouri or other places? you know, like
[22:16] I just wonder if we have done enough of
[22:18] our own due diligence of what other
[22:19] cities the same size are doing the same.
[22:22] Well,
[22:24] >> um, so we we haven't done a I I would
[22:27] say like a big dive into what other
[22:30] cities are doing. Um, because this um
[22:32] really kind of stemmed out of requests
[22:34] that we were receiving as staff from people in the community. Um, so we
[22:40] could um look at that if if you wanted
[22:43] like we we'd be happy to to to look at
[22:46] what other Utah cities are doing. I
[22:48] mean, if there's something in Missouri,
[22:49] too, we could look there, but probably
[22:51] from a state code perspective, we'd want
[22:53] to look at uh Utah communities. Um, but
[22:56] I I would think I from just general, we
[23:00] have researched a lot of home occupation
[23:02] ordinances and I that's something I've
[23:04] personally done a lot throughout my
[23:06] career. Typically I you don't see fuel
[23:08] sales out out of home occupations. So I
[23:10] think we would be pretty in line if we
[23:12] just restricted that if if the
[23:14] commission felt comfortable at least
[23:17] with that approach, you know, making it
[23:19] very clear home occupations, you can't
[23:21] sell fuel, you can't have large
[23:23] quantities of fuel for your your home occupation. I I think that
[23:27] puts us in a in a pretty good uh spot,
[23:29] at least kind of going with a starting
[23:30] point. And then there's the operational
[23:32] permit. It sounds like if someone wanted
[23:34] to have bulk fuel storage for um their
[23:38] per personal use, then they they would
[23:40] have to go through an operational
[23:41] permit, probably through the fire
[23:42] department.
[23:44] And we I I we could find out more
[23:46] details of what the operational permit
[23:47] is, but that that's that that's what my
[23:51] best guess is is that it would be
[23:52] through the the fire department.
[23:56] >> There was a concern that came up last
[23:57] time. I think you guys did a really good
[23:58] job of getting to the bottom of that one
[24:01] and and making that that not a concern
[24:03] anymore. But I do like this this new
[24:05] direction of of limiting the commercial
[24:09] use while also having a permit for
[24:11] personal storage. I think that's
[24:13] probably a better approach.
[24:14] >> Okay.
[24:17] » So, if there's can we exclude propane
[24:19] tanks if somebody wanted to run their
[24:21] house on propane?
[24:23] Would we want to add an exclusion in
[24:25] there for that? Um, yeah. Um, the plan
[24:28] commission can make any recommendation
[24:29] you'd like to the city council. What what we could do if you'd like, we
[24:32] could do some some research on the
[24:34] propane um um aspect specifically and
[24:37] then come back with a draft that targets
[24:41] just the home occupation and leaves out
[24:44] more of the personal storage since the
[24:46] operational permit is already written
[24:48] into H. But then we can talk with the
[24:51] fire department and understand clearly
[24:52] what the the the H operational permit
[24:55] is. I I think that sounds like the a
[24:57] permit they would get through the fire
[24:59] department because it's chemical based.
[25:00] It's it's flammable fuels.
[25:04] >> So, we we could um we we we could do
[25:06] that. So, if you if you wanted to pass a
[25:08] motion to continue the item to the to
[25:11] the next meeting, that'd give us some
[25:12] time to to do some research and uh and
[25:15] come back to you
[25:17] if if that if that's the route. It seems
[25:20] like from nodding heads that's kind of
[25:22] the direction you want you want to go.
[25:23] Any other discussion or
[25:26] points to be made?
[25:29] All right. We'll be looking for a motion
[25:30] on how to go forward with this.
[25:35] » I propose that we continue until the
[25:38] next meeting and and and look at some
[25:39] different language.
[25:43] » I'll second.
[25:45] >> Okay.
[25:46] Um
[25:48] we will continue
[25:50] that discussion later and look to staff
[25:53] to make recommendations that are more in
[25:55] line with the discussion we've had
[25:56] tonight.
[25:58] >> Yeah. And then um you just since you had
[26:01] a second, I would just um call for a
[26:03] vote.
[26:05] >> Call for a vote on that. Yes.
[26:07] >> We need to call for a vote on that.
[26:10] >> All [laughter]
[26:11] those that are in favor?
[26:14] >> Yes.
[26:15] Yes.
[26:16] >> Yes.
[26:17] >> Any opposed?
[26:19] >> Okay, that's that's unanimous. Yeah.
[26:21] Well, we're happy to do that. That's
[26:22] great. Great direction. Um and so we'll
[26:25] look at the um making it specific to
[26:28] home occupations. We'll look at what the
[26:30] operational permit does for the storage
[26:32] and then we'll look at the specificity
[26:34] around um propane tanks and what what
[26:36] other community communities do with
[26:38] propane tanks.
[26:38] >> Okay.
[26:39] >> Yeah.
[26:40] I would I would add also don't um have
[26:44] it include what's in fuel tanks already
[26:47] like in trailers or or in vehicles. Were
[26:51] you saying that that might be included
[26:52] in the
[26:52] >> No, it's not. So, under the definition,
[26:54] it it calls out it it breaks that out.
[26:57] Yeah. If you have a if you have a tank
[26:58] as part of your your vehicle, that
[27:01] doesn't um it's not part of the
[27:04] >> Perfect. I wanted to I thought you said
[27:05] it did and I'm like, let's let's take
[27:07] that out. I was worried about that, too.
[27:09] And I saw that it had a note in there if
[27:10] your vehicle has a tank in it, it
[27:12] doesn't count that.
[27:13] >> Okay, perfect. Or trailer, cuz some
[27:16] trailers hold fuel and stuff like that.
[27:19] So,
[27:19] >> yeah. Okay. Yeah, then we we we could uh
[27:22] we'll probably need to expand the
[27:24] definition then
[27:26] >> for [snorts]
[27:27] >> under the TR. Does it have the trailer,
[27:29] too?
[27:31] >> Well, we I'll I'll look at that and
[27:33] we'll we'll make sure it takes that into
[27:36] account. And one note in section two
[27:38] severability
[27:40] uh it says impair of invalidate. I think
[27:42] it's supposed to be or
[27:45] and and just
[27:49] >> I don't know if that's something that
[27:50] got maybe I'm reading it wrong and maybe
[27:53] it needs to be of but um just in case
[27:57] that got repeated through the document
[27:59] somehow just so you guys know.
[28:08] I apologize. Can Can you point that
[28:10] section that that part out?
[28:12] >> Yeah. Let's see.
[28:17] Uh judgment third third sentence.
[28:21] Judgment shall not affect impair of
[28:24] invalidate the remainder of this
[28:25] ordinance. I think it's supposed to be
[28:27] impair or invalidate. Okay.
[28:29] >> Just something that I saw when I was
[28:31] reading through it tonight.
[28:36] Uh
[28:39] okay.
[28:40] Um next item up is meeting minutes
[28:43] approval for July 28, 2026.
[28:48] Do we have any corrections?
[28:56] » Do we need to make a motion for that?
[28:58] >> Yep. A motion second. Would someone like
[29:00] to motion the uh make a motion on those
[29:03] meeting minutes?
[29:05] >> I'll make a motion to approve the
[29:06] meeting.
[29:09] >> I second.
[29:10] >> All righty. All those in favor?
[29:13] >> Yes.
[29:14] >> Any opposed?
[29:17] Okay.
[29:20] Um
[29:22] staff reports. Do we need to discuss
[29:23] anything else?
[29:27] Um, we sent uh the planning commission
[29:29] um for the fall conference. Just let us
[29:31] know if you'd like us to sign you up. Th
[29:32] those are um usually pretty
[29:34] entertaining. They have everything from
[29:36] park designs to transportation to just
[29:39] general land use.
[29:41] A lot a lot of the issues that we're
[29:42] going to deal with u throughout this next year are going to be covered
[29:45] in that in that conference. So, let us
[29:47] know. We'd love to uh to get you signed
[29:49] up. And um you know, in other cities
[29:52] like if if commissioners were going, we just carpool. So, if you need a ride,
[29:56] we we got you covered. But, um yeah,
[29:58] just email I think Gwen sent it. So,
[30:00] email Gwen and we'll make sure we get
[30:02] those uh
[30:03] >> I got the email go check my dates.
[30:06] >> Yeah, no problem.
[30:07] >> Yeah, thank you.
[30:08] >> Yep.
[30:09] >> Anything else?
[30:10] >> That's it.
[30:14] Oh. Um, yeah, if you can I'm h we're
[30:17] happy you guys you guys showed up, but
[30:19] yeah, if you let us know um as if you if
[30:21] you can't show up as soon as possible,
[30:24] it it it helps us. I I don't think we've
[30:26] ever fallen below a quorum. So, we we've
[30:28] been pretty good. I've been in other
[30:29] cities where where we did and it's
[30:32] especially have applicants showing up.
[30:33] So, the sooner we know the the better
[30:36] helps us plan. So, just thank you for um
[30:38] all all the work you guys do. Appreciate
[30:41] it.
[30:44] All right. Looking for a motion for the
[30:46] next item on our agenda.
[30:49] A motion
[30:50] you I make a motion to adjurnn at 7:31.