[0:01] All right. Good morning everyone. This
is our regular staff meeting of Tuesday,
[0:06] September the 8th. Call the meeting to
order. Um under announcements.
[0:14] So on August 18th, 2026, there was a
primary ballot measure asking shall the
[0:19] Sheridan County Senior Citizen Service
District be established.
[0:23] And per Wyoming statute 18-15-103,
the Sharon Mort County Commissioners
[0:30] need to enter that fact that the
election vote was in favor of
[0:33] establishing the district. Please let
the minutes reflect this statement.
[0:39] Moving on to warrant review and
approval. Um Ashley, anything of note
[0:43] this morning?
>> No matter.
[0:45] » Thank you.
Ask if there are any questions on page
[0:50] one of six.
2
[0:58] 3
[1:01] 4
[1:05] 5
[1:10] and six.
[1:14] » Okay. I would look for a motion if there
are no questions on boards.
[1:20] » Yes. I move to approve the warrants as
presented.
[1:23] » Second.
>> Have a motion and a second. Any
[1:25] discussion?
All those in favor, please signify by
[1:28] saying I.
>> Those opposed? Motion carries. Move into
[1:33] staff and elect reports. Good morning.
[1:41] » Madam chair, members of the board.
So, uh, your planning commission met,
[1:47] uh, last Tuesday, September 3rd. They
had three items. Uh,
[1:56] 4J ranch reszone
80acre proposal on the upper road,
[2:04] Paradise Park, North Park. Uh they voted
to recommend the dial with that item.
[2:14] Pegasus utility easement vacation. It
was recommended for approval
[2:19] was simply a utility out out. We have
lots of those. So people own a couple
[2:25] lots. They want to build across lots. So
with input from the utilities and the
[2:33] powder group that was recommended
uh 3T Enterprises uh access easement u
[2:43] there's a 60 foot wide access easement
that goes into their storage units up up
[2:52] the hill here and uh they're meeting to
install some gates for security purposes
[2:58] and that was also recommended for
approval. Um, city staff was had
[3:07] different comments on that one. Um, the
uh utilities folks, water, etc. They
[3:15] they were okay with it.
Fire dis I'm sorry, fire marshall, he
[3:20] was sort of okay with it and the
planning office was not okay with it. So
[3:26] » you have variety of comments
>> the planning commission saw bit to go in
[3:36] I don't have the dates that you'll see
them but they'll be coming. Uh the
[3:41] conley's uh have resubmitted an
application for a preliminary plat on
[3:48] off of high road that I consider
earlier. They've uh dropped a lot.
[3:55] They're down to six lots and uh no
variance request for this one. So, we'll
[4:01] see how that goes. So, it'll be a while
before you see that one, probably
[4:05] December likely. So, um
the uh joint planning area update uh
[4:13] project uh kickoff meeting was last
Friday. uh
[4:18] uh reviewed the uh project scope,
schedule, budget, etc. Um clarified uh
[4:26] consult the client roles and uh talk a
bit about communication engagements
[4:32] strategies.
We may be looking at a advisory
[4:36] committee where folks would appoint
folks to to be on that from from the
[4:41] citizens
as well as the city would likely appoint
[4:46] people to that as well. So haven't
settled on that strategy yet, but I
[4:52] wouldn't be surprised we do that. So
anyway, about it.
[4:57] » Any questions for Mark?
>> Thank you.
[5:03] Coco
[5:09] morning county engineer just a couple
FYI things. Uh we have a road and bridge
[5:17] mechanic or mechanic turned into
resation. So we're looking for
[5:23] » Yeah, Ryan was good. Yeah, he was a good
but took employment other places.
[5:29] Uh we got our nationwide permits from
the core 13 and 27 for the clean burn
[5:35] project. So it's out advertised for
we're advertising I think first
[5:38] advertising the paper today for about
three beats. I think we bids October
[5:44] 10th or there
so
[5:49] uh road bridge is out doing some more
graveling. went to spot growling last
[5:53] week and then they're I think they're
graveling on road on the east end of
[5:57] road this week. So
that's that's about all
[6:02] » questions for Madam Chair.
>> Yeah.
[6:05] » Um Ken, I know we talked about this uh
not too long ago, but at some point in
[6:09] the near future, could we kind of get an
update on uh the Willow Avenue area?
[6:13] » Sure. Yeah, we're still kind of
wrestling with that narrow rightway on
[6:18] that north end, but we should have
something maybe the recommendation
[6:23] maybe. What do you guys want to do go
going forward? But that two blocks, it's
[6:28] the counties.
[6:32] » People are getting through there using
it quite a bit. Pretty a lot of people
[6:37] using it,
>> but we haven't fixed any of the drainage
[6:42] issues.
>> Yeah. Right. Right. Okay.
[6:46] » Any other questions?
>> Madam Chair, I just I uh went through
[6:50] Key Tone Road last night um and and just
like to let the road bridge know that
[6:55] both ends where they did the work on
that. It's way better than it was.
[6:59] Obviously, we're not going to go all the
way through there, but but the the both
[7:03] ends where they rebuilt the road and
regraveled it, big improvement. probably
[7:09] people will get quite a bit farther
before they get stuck.
[7:14] » But uh
>> yeah, double-edged sword.
[7:17] » Yeah. Yeah. But it is it is a nice
improvement on both ends.
[7:23] » I'll pass it along.
>> Thank you.
[7:26] » Thank you, Ken. Um Ashley, anything else
for us this time?
[7:32] Diana? Nope. For later. Okay. Jesse.
>> No, Madam Chair.
[7:36] » Robert,
[7:45] » morning. Robert Gail, Shering County
Airport Manager. Um, just wanted to
[7:49] provide the board uh with an update on
conversations with Sky West in regard to
[7:54] capacity. We've uh it's definitely been
a a conversation for quite a while and
[8:00] dove back into it here recently. And I I
guess just to provide a recap um in
[8:06] March we took a look at projections um
where we were sitting and with the uh
[8:11] theou we hold with the state we did have
that amendment updating those numbers um
[8:16] we were able to lower the contract m
maximum substantially was just how we
[8:21] were performing and um essentially
that's that's how we budgeted for air
[8:27] service based off that contract maximum
and I think we did have a little bit
[8:30] extra in there this here just with that
avenue hadn't been signed by the
[8:34] attorney general's office yet and we
have rising fuel costs. So, um that's
[8:40] how we had things budgeted. Um this
summer we've performed great. Um and
[8:47] here recently revisited that with Sky
West and um took another look at their
[8:52] projections and um they've they've
basically got that contract maximum
[8:58] close to a third of what we even had in
March. um so we've discussed looking at
[9:04] um adding an aircraft.
>> Um
[9:09] let them know that uh appetite for
budgeting anything further probably
[9:13] wouldn't be there and I think the state
agreed on their end as well too. Um but
[9:18] with where those contract maximums are
are at they feel like they can add
[9:23] capacity and with how we're performing.
Um, also with that, uh, with
[9:28] efficiencies gained and the economies of
scale, bringing more aircraft into here,
[9:32] um, we also discussed dropping the
blockout rate back, fixed cost by about
[9:36] 1.75%.
So they bring more aircraft in here,
[9:39] it's going to be a little cheaper per
flight hour. Um, so what I'd like to
[9:44] recommend is moving forward to um an
additional four flights a week starting
[9:50] in January
and then um towards that peak season uh
[9:55] beginning of that peak season in May,
June, bumping up to three flights daily.
[9:59] Um Sky West fully thinks we can support
it and it's not going to affect what's
[10:04] budgeted. Um anything past that contract
maximum Sky West picks up. Um,
[10:13] so I don't know if there needs to be
formal action taken or if that's just an
[10:16] administrative decision and you guys are
good with me just reaching out to Sky
[10:19] West, but that's that's what I would
recommend doing. Um, it's there's
[10:23] there's not any risk there.
>> And I I don't think Clint unless since
[10:27] the change in the budget, it would be
administrative. Um,
[10:31] » an extra flight's fantastic.
>> Outstanding.
[10:35] » Great news. I think we've certainly been
patient on building this up and we're at
[10:39] a point where yeah, we can definitely
add that in and uh it's not going to
[10:43] change what we've what we've had
planned.
[10:45] » Okay, any questions for Robert?
>> Great.
[10:51] » And then uh another item that I wanted
to touch on was um
[10:56] proposals um or or discuss uh looking at
proposals that kind of go outside of
[11:01] what we have defined as far as leasing.
Um, right now we have our business park,
[11:07] the executive hangers area. Um, we've
got those incorporated, the leasing
[11:11] rules, and occasionally I I get a
proposal tossed out or an idea tossed
[11:16] out on something that kind of goes
outside of that. Um, I had one come up
[11:20] here recently and now um, looks like the
party really wants to move forward with
[11:24] doing something that's kind of outside
of those leasing rules and essentially
[11:28] be north of where the executive hanger
area is at. Um,
[11:35] long term or in our master plan and that
would be like an executive hanger phase
[11:38] 2 area. Um got that identified but
there's no record of survey. There's no
[11:44] infrastructure there, electric, water,
sewer, gas, roadway. Um but I got
[11:50] somebody that wants to build there and
they're willing to take that
[11:53] infrastructure to that area um
just with uh kind of negotiating on um
[12:00] maybe I would say more favorable leasing
terms. um doing a 40-year agreement and
[12:06] um calling it kind of undeveloped land
since there is no infrastructure there.
[12:11] So doing a little bit of a lower ground
lease rate
[12:14] certainly works out well for both
parties because getting that
[12:17] infrastructure there is expensive for
the airport. So if they're willing to do
[12:20] it on their own dime that's great. Um,
I think our leasing rules have really
[12:27] covered a good transparent way to to uh
for everybody to view these proposals.
[12:34] So, I I guess we don't really have
something like that to define if we want
[12:37] to move forward other than I was
thinking maybe we asked this party to
[12:41] give us a formal proposal and we still
could um publish it online, publish it
[12:47] in the in the paper and hold a public
hearing so anybody could comment on it
[12:50] if they wanted to. Um I don't know if
there's any thoughts on feelings on that
[12:56] but um I could certainly see moving
forward with this project.
[13:00] » So Madam Chair, so how far north is it?
Just across the taxi way there up to
[13:05] Airport Road or is it further west and
north on that more undeveloped stuff?
[13:10] » So we we kind of have that developed
area that's further south. They've got
[13:14] the Sheridan Pilots hanger. Then we've
got some county um box hangers. They
[13:19] just want to go north of that. So
they're okay.
[13:22] » Yeah. So they want to extend.
>> Okay. I thought it was north of Big Horn
[13:25] Airways building is where
>> it's kind of out in that stretch, but
[13:30] still um
>> getting all that infrastructure extended
[13:33] to start developing that area is quite
costly and they're willing to do it. So
[13:38] » Okay. Yeah. I'd say we to see a formal
proposal.
[13:42] And then Robert, um,
>> it's been a busy summer, but I was
[13:48] curious, has the committee met? We had
that committee that was looking at the
[13:54] agreements,
>> the kind of had to put those on hold if
[13:58] we, you know, with
>> we came pretty short staff this winter
[14:03] and all the projects came off. I just
haven't
[14:06] » Well, the FAA here and Yeah. Yeah.
>> Yeah. Okay. So, it's certainly on the
[14:10] radar, but it's something we had to jump
back to yet.
[14:13] » Okay.
>> And then just wanted to let you guys
[14:16] know I'll be attending the airline
rendevous in Jacksonville um leaving
[14:20] town uh tomorrow midday. They'll be out
of the office the rest of the week. And
[14:26] then I also know you guys received a
letter on offering additional services
[14:30] up the airport. That's something I just
haven't been able to digest yet or
[14:34] unravel yet to hear. So, believe you
guys got a letter.
[14:39] That's all I got.
>> Okay. Any questions for Robert?
[14:43] » Appreciate the updates. Safe travels.
>> Amy,
[14:48] good morning. Good morning.
[14:58] » Hey, good chair. Morning commissioners.
Uh Amy Long, library director.
[15:06] uh have a couple of announcements for
you this morning. You do have a handout
[15:11] that I also emailed out. I did catch one
correction that I will correct and email
[15:17] this morning. Uh the Bulmer Branch
Library is going to be closing for a
[15:23] short period of time in order to
uh collapse the timeline for the
[15:29] renovations. Um, this is driven by the
deadlines for the reimbursement grant
[15:35] that we're receiving through the state
library. Uh, the grant is the Wyoming
[15:41] library multi-purpose community facility
program subgrant. Uh, which is why you
[15:46] have it in your handout. Um, just to
give you the dates, they're up at the
[15:50] top of your handout. So, the key dates
for the closure are September 19th
[15:55] through 26th. It will be a full closure
where we pause all services. And this is
[16:00] because we have to pull all of the books
off of the shelves in the fiction
[16:04] section, move the shelving into the
children's area, and then put all of the
[16:09] books back up because we would like to
keep as much of the collection available
[16:13] and circulating as possible, and they
have to be in order. Um, and then we
[16:18] will reopen for limited services. um
opening the youth services desk as our
[16:24] main circulation point. Um those
services will be very similar to what we
[16:29] had available during COVID which was
holds pickup ill account services
[16:34] checking in and out um as much as we
can. We'll be fetching books both from
[16:39] the inner circle which is uh the
non-fiction collection that's still
[16:42] available um that staff have been
fetching so far as well as the fiction
[16:46] and children's collections. Um and then
uh November 9th through 13th once the
[16:54] renovations are completed in the adult
colle in the adult section, we will uh
[16:59] put up all the shelves, get all of the
collection back on the shelves. Um so
[17:03] we'll be fully closed during that
portion so we can concentrate on that
[17:07] and then we'll reopen to full services
with a fully renovated Fulmer Library on
[17:12] November 16th. Um then after that uh I
don't have the exact date uh to start
[17:19] yet because that depends on the
subcontractor schedule for starting the
[17:23] slab work in the Wyoming room but then
the Wyoming room renovation would begin.
[17:28] Um the Wyoming room portion of the
renovation is separate from the grant
[17:32] and so it can start after the grant
deadlines are finished. Um, and that was
[17:39] uh the one correction I saw under grant
information details. Bullet three, the
[17:45] award for 1.75 million was secured for
all four branches. Um, and their library
[17:51] renovations. It was library specific,
which is why the Wyoming room was not
[17:55] included. That's an archive. It has a
different kind of purpose than a
[17:59] library, so it didn't qualify for the
grant. Um
[18:04] uh additionally
uh you might be wondering what about the
[18:08] elevator? We have been in contact with
the technician uh that serves the whole
[18:12] region,
the only technician that serves the
[18:16] whole region of our particular elevator.
Um and we are trying to get them
[18:20] scheduled during this closure period so
that hopefully we reopen with a
[18:24] functioning elevator as well. Um,
additionally, this document is hopefully
[18:31] also going to serve for anyone who's
answering the phones of the county in
[18:35] case you guys get questions. It provides
phone numbers for specific um questions
[18:42] around accounts or events and people
they can contact via email or phone
[18:47] number so that they can get right to the
person that they might need to answer
[18:51] their question. as well as some
frequently asked questions um pointing
[18:55] them to a a very quick script that they
could answer. Um and so that is on the
[19:02] closure. Additionally, Story is the only
small branch that had an issue with the
[19:07] renovation. We are at we have fixed the
issue with the lighting and the ceiling.
[19:14] Um and we are hoping to do the
substantial completion walk this week.
[19:17] It hasn't been scheduled yet, but it
should happen this week with Arette at
[19:21] Odell. Um, and so they should be knocked
on Laminate. Um, it should be open next
[19:30] week. Um, they do have their furniture.
It has been in top offic's um, warehouse
[19:35] and so that should also arrive as soon
as we do the substantial completion. So
[19:40] that story would be open and
operational. They have been operating
[19:43] out of their other spaces. Um and the
other two smaller branches have had
[19:48] their furniture and have been operating.
Um and they would not be impacted by
[19:52] this closure. Also, homebound delivery
would not be impacted by this closure.
[19:57] Um and so that is the Fulmer closure.
The other announcement I just wanted to
[20:03] make is that our part-time employee um
out in Claremont, we were just about to
[20:08] open for our additional hours, but um
that person did need to resign due to an
[20:14] unforeseen um issue that that is
perfectly reasonable um reason for that.
[20:20] Um so I will have to repost that
position, but they did provide really
[20:24] great feedback on the hours and schedule
and so I think we'll get a lot more
[20:28] tapers based on their feedback. So, we
will be posting that in their newsletter
[20:32] and in the branch and during this
closure will be a great opportunity to
[20:36] get that position filled and um try to
extend those hours again hopefully in
[20:41] October. Um also uh my administrative
assistant accepted a position
[20:47] internally. So, I will be hiring a
part-time administrative assistant in
[20:51] Fulmer also during this time. So, uh
just to let you know those were also
[20:56] happening. Any questions?
Yeah. Any questions for Amy? Appreciate
[21:01] the updates. Yeah.
No, no, no questions. Thank you.
[21:06] » Thanks for being here this morning.
Absolutely. Thank you.
[21:09] » Good luck with all the construction.
[21:13] » All right. Uh Eric,
[21:25] Eric, maintenance. Uh just giving you
guys a heads up. We did have a crew
[21:30] member here but in his for his
retirement at the end of the month. So
[21:35] we are advertising for that replacement.
>> Any questions for
[21:43] » thanks for the hit that appreciate it.
[21:50] Kelly.
[22:06] » Good morning, Madam Chair,
Commissioners. Levi Demia, Shar Sheriff.
[22:10] Um, just to give you a heads up as well,
we had a a control operator who had to
[22:14] leave uh move back to uh out of state
for family reasons. So, we'll be
[22:19] advertising for a position for that for
a control room operator. And we had a
[22:24] detention deputy after 15 years of being
with the sheriff's office. She's been
[22:28] working very hard to get her counseling
license and and was able to do that,
[22:34] finish all of that about a year ago, has
been kind of doing some part-time work
[22:37] and she's to the point where she's going
to go do that full-time and so she has
[22:41] uh moved on to do that. So, we'll be um
advertising for a position for that as
[22:45] well. So,
>> congrats to her. Yeah, that's great. Any
[22:49] questions for Sheriff?
Okay, thanks Lee. I appreciate it. Quit
[22:56] chamber.
>> Madam chair, commissioners. Um, just a
[23:00] heads up. I'll be up on Thursday and
then next week the auditors will be in
[23:04] building on
[23:08] Jennings. Um, I've got some family
coming in this week, so I'll be in and
[23:12] out.
>> Mr. Rzy,
[23:15] » it's just going to be a busy day today.
Three meetings, so I'll be out. Yeah,
[23:23] » I'll be out Thursday. Have to take my
wife to Billings for a medical
[23:27] appointment.
>> Okay.
[23:28] » Other than that, I'm around.
>> Mr. Right.
[23:30] » Nothing at the moment.
>> I don't have anything either. We will
[23:35] move on to item five. Consider a word of
a bid for the design build addition and
[23:40] renovation of the public defending
building. Call on Cameron Deministrative
[23:44] director.
>> Commissioners. Um we opened up the bit
[23:49] for this um building. It's the building
right in the north of the county
[23:55] attorney's office. Um
it was designed uh to go out for the
[24:01] public defender office space. Um we
received five bids. Um just for the
[24:06] record, I'm just going to read off those
uh totals. And it's this is in the order
[24:12] that they were received, not in the
order of any other reason. FDL
[24:17] Consulting LLC with Odell Construction
was 59,550.
[24:22] Roadhouse um construction with Ironsburg
architecture was 112,400.
[24:29] Dick Anderson construction with the
Evolve Architecture was 110,363.
[24:35] venue in construction with the rent
design group was $110,919.50
[24:43] and in your app construction with QC10
architects was 49,100.
[24:51] Um there were some other add-ons in a
few of these bids for uh geotechnical
[24:57] reports and asbestous and topography. I
put that up and um put them on as as
[25:03] needed. But at this point the the goal
was we had to have a design. Um we have
[25:09] to go ahead and our goal was to add
space um about 800 so square feet to the
[25:16] south side of that building. And a lot
of the cost of this is just the design
[25:22] construction. This does not include any
of the actual removal. So not single
[25:27] mail going into it. Um if we go ahead
and expand out uh just be prepared that
[25:34] uh the city and with code we will have
to update the older section of the
[25:39] building. So at this point I'm not
necessarily going to I didn't submit a
[25:43] memo and saying which one um I would go
with but there is quite a discrepancy in
[25:49] the bids. Uh they were all consistent in
the sense they covered every aspect that
[25:56] I requested. Um, so this isn't about
quality of submissions. This is really
[26:03] just passing on to you. You've had a
chance to look at the documents. So I'll
[26:07] just stand for any questions at this
time.
[26:11] » Any questions for Cameron? Um, Cameron,
I know we talked about kind of that
[26:17] increased cost of construction because
we need to get it up to code and there
[26:22] had been recommendations from some of
the contractors it sounds like about
[26:28] just dozing it, starting from scratch.
Um,
[26:34] I I guess I would just open it up for
that conversation. Um, I feel like Well,
[26:39] I'll just open that up.
>> I don't care. Yes, there there was a
[26:43] question multiple questions raised
during the pre-bid meeting.
[26:48] » Um if you looked at the existing
building as it is right now, it was
[26:53] built in seconds and so there is some
slope to it. If you're trying to add on,
[27:00] let's say
ft of brand new construction, you have
[27:06] to bring the other side up to code as
well.
[27:09] There was a lot of um I guess concern
and for each of them they they said yeah
[27:15] the easiest way is to tear down the
other and just put up what you want. So
[27:20] right now it's about 1,100 square feet.
If you add 800 that's 1,900. So
[27:25] remodeling the old couldn't cost as much
as tearing down and starting from
[27:29] scratch on a blank slate. So that was
comments that were received by bidtors.
[27:36] » So
I'm just having
[27:40] perfect world. Would we ever want more
than 1,900 square feet? Would
[27:46] would this change
or would that be a bare minimum? Would
[27:51] we outgrow that in five years?
>> Madam Chair, um if you look at just the
[27:57] attorney's office next door, there's two
floors. So if you look at other
[28:00] buildings, there's multiple floors. If
you are going to say in 5 years, oh, we
[28:07] we want to increase this, then you just
wasted the money to build it at,900 ft.
[28:13] If your goal is to do a two level right
from the start, then you probably should
[28:18] do a two floors right from the start,
>> right?
[28:22] But for right now in the public
defenders space, um, with the number of
[28:29] staff they have,
they could fit. Um, but I'm not saying
[28:35] what society is doing, but the sheer
volume of increases at case loads.
[28:42] » Yeah, I could see the state adding more
staff in the future.
[28:50] comments, questions,
>> Madam Chair.
[28:53] » Yeah, Commissioner.
>> At the risk of being blunt, I'm not for
[28:56] any of these.
[29:01] » Okay. And why? Can you follow up with
that, Commissioner Ray, for me?
[29:06] » I can follow.
>> What's your thinking? I'm I'm I'm
[29:09] thinking that we uh
know Eric under the bus, but I'm
[29:14] thinking internally we put fresh coats
of paint, we clean, we maybe put new
[29:21] flooring down, we spruce it up, and we
try to work internally to make it a
[29:28] usable space. Not necessarily for the
public defender, but we move people
[29:34] around to get people where they have
enough room, whether it is another
[29:41] department that moves over there and
then public defenders move into their
[29:45] space.
>> But the idea of spending
[29:49] north of half a million dollars to
I mean all these numbers are just for
[29:55] design, right?
The actual construction,
[30:01] I'm guessing, is going to be half a
million at least. So, I'm not in favor
[30:05] of doing any of
any of that. I think we need to work
[30:09] with what we have just to be
conservative with our funds.
[30:14] » Okay.
>> Moments. Yeah.
[30:18] » Um, you know, it appears to me
statutoily we're required to provide an
[30:23] office for the public defenders.
certainly doesn't say that it has to be
[30:27] 1,900 square feet. That that facility
over there. Um I went over with Cameron
[30:34] and Commissioner Jennings this morning
and we looked at it certainly wasn't
[30:38] nearly as bad as I was led to believe
that it was going to be. Um and I think
[30:44] it's it's fairly habitable with like
Commissioner Wright said, certainly it
[30:48] needs a good cleaning. It needs some
paint. Um probably
[30:53] different flooring put in the put in it.
Um maybe a petition put in between the
[30:59] front entryway and the office there. It
would be a lot more minor than than the
[31:06] amount of money that we'd be spending.
We simply I just I agree with
[31:12] Commissioner Wright in the fact that we
didn't we didn't acquire that property
[31:17] so that we could tear it down and spend
a half a million dollars there. So, I'm
[31:23] in in agreement with Commissioner Wright
and and looking and that we still we
[31:28] continue to look at all the options of
what we have for space in the courthouse
[31:33] as opposed to space over there for like
Commissioner Wright said maybe moving
[31:37] some people around or something of that
nature.
[31:46] Madam Chair,
>> um, you know, I actually, uh, just like
[31:51] Commissioner Siddle said, I was
picturing this building my mind because
[31:55] I've only ever seen pictures. Uh,
walking in it, it really is not in as
[32:00] bad a shape as I thought it was. And so
I I'm more for along the lines of
[32:06] agreeing as to let's let's do a little
bit of sprucing up. Let's see what we
[32:10] can do with it. And then maybe down the
road, you know, a year or so or five
[32:15] years, it's if it's not working, then we
discuss something along that lines and
[32:20] maybe we start preparing for that and
>> in 5 years or whatever, we we look
[32:27] again.
>> I
[32:30] I personally would uh you know, it's a
great location next to the attorney's
[32:36] office, close to the courthouse. Um,
I'd like to think that we're designing
[32:41] something that
fits us in 2550 years. Um, and I I don't
[32:48] know if we have a vision of that at this
point. Um,
[32:53] yeah.
[32:58] Any other comments,
Cameron? Any other comments?
[33:05] I guess my only comment manager my
comment is um
[33:11] » these vendors put a lot of work into
this. We asked them to submit what
[33:18] was requested. They did everything
correctly. Um but yeah, the costs are
[33:24] going to be extensive with this. They're
not trying to sugarcoat it.
[33:29] But if I had to recommend any of the
five could have done it. So, I just want
[33:34] to be on the record that each of these
entities did what I asked them to do.
[33:46] » So,
I'm I'm sensing we're not making a
[33:50] motion for any of these today.
[33:56] » That's my story.
[34:01] » Quick.
Okay. Um, I guess do we we want a motion
[34:10] to
or or I guess it's a head nod to Cameron
[34:14] to look at costs for paint carpet.
[34:20] » Madam Chair,
>> just to be clear, you want me to contact
[34:24] all five and say we are not proceeding
with this project?
[34:29] » Would we need a motion to that effect?
wouldn't have to. You're just giving
[34:34] direction to your employee.
You could if you'd like. You know,
[34:39] you're not prohibited from
>> that is the sense I'm getting, Cry,
[34:45] since no one's going to speak up.
>> Thank you. And that's for um the rest
[34:52] get you some estimates.
>> All right. Our next item is executive
[34:59] session uh pursuant to state statute
16-4-45A3
[35:04] matters concerning litigation. And I'd
look for a motion.
[35:08] » Madam Chair,
>> yes.
[35:09] » Move to convene executive session
pursuant to W statute 16-4-40583
[35:17] concerning the litigation.
>> Second. We have a motion and a second.
[35:23] All those in favor signify by saying I.
I
[35:26] » opposed. Motion carries. We'll move into
executive session. Thanks, folks.
[35:41] I'll let her get the door first. Sorry.
>> Good.
[35:46] » All right.
>> Madam Chair, I move to reconvene into
[35:49] regular session.
>> Second.
[35:51] » Motion in a second. All those in favor
signify by saying I. I those opposed
[35:55] motion carries with that we are ajourned
at 9:42