1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,680
30,

2
00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:10,200
but it says, resulting in a required setback of 30 feet from the property line.

3
00:00:10,620 --> 00:00:27,500
Yeah, so the county code for the road setbacks is 50 feet from the center line, right? So, if Colin Barrow is 40 foot right away, we take half of that, so that's 20, right? And you take the 20 from the 50, you have 30 feet remaining.

4
00:00:27,500 --> 00:00:36,260
that goes in, so the building can't be 30 feet from.

5
00:00:36,820 --> 00:00:41,920
So it's 20 foot set back, so it's 10 feet off of the easily.

6
00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:48,460
Whichever is greater, because they say it's either 50 feet from the center line or 20 feet from the property.

7
00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:57,280
So in the case of Combera, if you have a 40 foot easement, it's 20 feet to the edge of the road,

8
00:00:57,840 --> 00:01:01,560
but they say you have to be 50 feet from the center line.

9
00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:07,420
So you have to go another 30, so you're actually 30 feet in.

10
00:01:07,540 --> 00:01:11,400
That's why this is your here, right?

11
00:01:13,140 --> 00:01:14,640
So here's Combera.

12
00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:18,220
You had to go 20 feet in, right?

13
00:01:19,620 --> 00:01:22,900
But they're still requiring it has to be 50 feet from the ceramics.

14
00:01:23,660 --> 00:01:24,720
This would be 30.

15
00:01:25,020 --> 00:01:29,040
So basically, the house is a pre-existing, non-conforming structure.

16
00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:32,220
That does not conform to current county.

17
00:01:32,300 --> 00:01:32,660
Yes.

18
00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:33,980
And we're okay with that.

19
00:01:34,540 --> 00:01:36,980
It's just, we're adding a deck to it,

20
00:01:37,100 --> 00:01:38,500
which still would be okay,

21
00:01:38,740 --> 00:01:40,800
which is concerned with the visibility.

22
00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:46,340
But if you're okay with allowing the debt, that would be it.

23
00:01:47,940 --> 00:01:50,680
I personally don't have a problem with the debt.

24
00:01:50,760 --> 00:01:56,000
I mean, looking at the vegetation, you know, and knowing that area, but, you know, some of,

25
00:01:58,100 --> 00:02:02,860
I think the debt's going to be lower than the existing vegetation on the side of Colomarrow,

26
00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:06,060
so I don't have a problem with it.

27
00:02:06,280 --> 00:02:11,140
And the visibility there and given the amount of traffic, you know, it's the clock.

28
00:02:11,700 --> 00:02:13,580
It's just down, you know, a poop in there.

29
00:02:13,580 --> 00:02:19,140
Yeah, totally interesting, but I'm just giving you my justifications on why I don't have a problem with this at all.

30
00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:22,880
Question about that emotion economy.

31
00:02:23,640 --> 00:02:27,260
Is that emotion a period of, is that the maximum height of that emotion?

32
00:02:27,440 --> 00:02:27,900
There's a pencil.

33
00:02:28,020 --> 00:02:29,240
I did sexy height.

34
00:02:29,500 --> 00:02:30,860
I think it's a bush.

35
00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:32,420
Yes, how is it going to grow?

36
00:02:32,940 --> 00:02:35,660
That's a high, I don't let it go over the fence line because of the intersection.

37
00:02:35,940 --> 00:02:36,440
It's a lot of water.

38
00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:37,980
I just make sure that you keep it there.

39
00:02:38,620 --> 00:02:42,840
I want to get it's freight train in that intersection, then where did it be on the hook floor?

40
00:02:43,320 --> 00:02:44,120
Yep, I know everything.

41
00:02:44,960 --> 00:02:51,020
Item five of the conditions talks about having landscaping not in P. then quarter.

42
00:02:56,620 --> 00:03:01,220
Which, yeah, so with that as Commissioner Ville, do you have any questions or comments?

43
00:03:01,340 --> 00:03:02,260
I like to make a motion.

44
00:03:02,780 --> 00:03:03,540
Okay, go ahead.

45
00:03:03,880 --> 00:03:06,680
I move that we adopt resolution P.C. 2.0.

46
00:03:06,680 --> 00:03:14,200
There should zero, zero, eight, proving the high variance with the steeper exemption subject

47
00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:16,260
to the recommendations by the attention.

48
00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:19,540
Hey, we have a motion, do we have a second?

49
00:03:21,300 --> 00:03:22,740
I will second it.

50
00:03:22,920 --> 00:03:23,080
Okay.

51
00:03:23,820 --> 00:03:25,680
So, I have a discussion,

52
00:03:28,100 --> 00:03:28,460
yes.

53
00:03:28,940 --> 00:03:29,860
Do you want to admit?

54
00:03:29,880 --> 00:03:32,020
We have no moment.

55
00:03:32,300 --> 00:03:32,520
Okay.

56
00:03:32,760 --> 00:03:33,940
Just for the discussion.

57
00:03:34,200 --> 00:03:34,360
Okay.

58
00:03:34,400 --> 00:03:37,000
So we have a motion in a second.

59
00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:38,540
Any further discussion?

60
00:03:38,540 --> 00:03:40,020
What's your family?

61
00:03:40,920 --> 00:03:41,220
That.

62
00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:43,120
So, for our

63
00:03:48,210 --> 00:03:49,330
certification,

64
00:03:53,340 --> 00:03:55,860
I get the cloud is unincorporated.

65
00:03:56,960 --> 00:03:58,320
I mean, then incorporated,

66
00:03:58,860 --> 00:03:59,980
that in the four zones,

67
00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:01,540
why we get such a,

68
00:04:05,550 --> 00:04:09,220
we run into this a lot in the cloud.

69
00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:13,120
The current county code

70
00:04:13,120 --> 00:04:15,140
with the setbacks,

71
00:04:17,500 --> 00:04:18,240
streets and highways,

72
00:04:22,850 --> 00:04:24,710
I understand the,

73
00:04:24,710 --> 00:04:30,630
We're created for unincorporated areas, not really taking into consideration

74
00:04:31,710 --> 00:04:36,310
City of or the town in the cloud.

75
00:04:38,510 --> 00:04:41,450
And I'm thinking about this.

76
00:04:41,450 --> 00:04:48,010
This setback obviously takes out a third of this house.

77
00:04:48,910 --> 00:04:49,750
And

78
00:04:51,800 --> 00:04:55,340
as we are doing our general plan,

79
00:04:58,940 --> 00:05:20,560
I hate to complicate things, but do we need to carve out a section in this rewrite that would apply specifically to unincorporated towns and municipalities by the Callahan, McLeod, Town, Town,

80
00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:36,060
Hornbrook that do not have their own planning departments and the setbacks would be framed

81
00:05:36,490 --> 00:05:45,760
so that we can eliminate some of these pre-existing, unconforming structures to save time

82
00:05:45,760 --> 00:05:55,700
So we don't have to have projects in the future like this coming before us, that with a common sense change in language.

83
00:05:56,400 --> 00:05:59,240
No variance would be needed here.

84
00:05:59,740 --> 00:06:05,960
Is that something, I'm just throwing it out to staff to consider because of this project.

85
00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:14,400
And as I look at setbacks, it would make sense if this were a setback coming off a highway 93, highway 97.

86
00:06:16,580 --> 00:06:21,280
coming off of the Oberlin Road. Okay, I'd get that. In the town that

87
00:06:21,280 --> 00:06:26,340
went cloud, in the town of Calen, down in Horses Creek, Happy Camp. I mean, we're

88
00:06:26,340 --> 00:06:31,820
having various issues in the town of Happy Camp right now, just like this. So maybe

89
00:06:31,820 --> 00:06:38,060
we would staff, I'm going to throw some work at you. We maybe need this phrase, some

90
00:06:38,060 --> 00:06:42,940
things a little differently in our setbacks, and these unincorporated counts. I'm just

91
00:06:42,940 --> 00:06:45,120
I wanted out there as it relates to this problem.

92
00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:47,980
It may be like we can talk about it more in the school business.

93
00:06:48,220 --> 00:06:51,700
But I want to make sure that's on the record because I foresee a lot of these.

94
00:06:51,840 --> 00:06:53,340
We've already had two and a half a can.

95
00:06:53,500 --> 00:06:54,360
We have one in the cloud.

96
00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:56,220
I'm sure we may have another one in the cloud.

97
00:06:56,620 --> 00:06:56,780
Yeah.

98
00:06:57,420 --> 00:06:58,080
It's a concern.

99
00:06:58,560 --> 00:06:58,660
I have.

100
00:06:58,660 --> 00:07:01,380
Through the chair, I'd just like to make note, right?

101
00:07:01,400 --> 00:07:05,480
As a Gem Dice, we're going to be discussing the draft-semin code for the next item.

102
00:07:05,740 --> 00:07:10,980
We have talked about this a little bit, you know, and I do think there are some reductions

103
00:07:10,980 --> 00:07:16,940
that we already have implemented in terms of the zoning, right? This is a res line. We would assume

104
00:07:16,940 --> 00:07:24,800
it's in an unincorporated town, community, not somewhere on, you know, see somewhere or whatever, right?

105
00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:27,860
So just something to be aware of as we go.

106
00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:29,840
Just trying to say stop time.

107
00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:44,100
We have an ideal. We had it worded right. This project wouldn't even be in front of us for this reason. Right. Yeah, the setbacks are really generalized right now. The coverage and moderation, but for variants for distances, setbacks, we probably wouldn't see this.

108
00:07:44,280 --> 00:07:46,640
Let's take a toast. Right. Right.

109
00:07:46,640 --> 00:07:53,440
way about it. I'm making sure of diesel but understand what we're doing today. All we're doing

110
00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:58,580
is sports. And we're not doing anything with the garage theory.

111
00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:00,960
Yeah, that's one thing front of us in our pocket.

112
00:08:01,900 --> 00:08:09,860
Okay. So that whatever transpired building department about the new garage is a separate issue.

113
00:08:09,860 --> 00:08:18,940
And I agree with, with Dusty, and the greater one role of the DJI will have gone to the deal with this is unacceptable to me.

114
00:08:19,340 --> 00:08:20,600
A lot of us have to do with staff.

115
00:08:20,720 --> 00:08:22,620
I just look at the department here.

116
00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:24,620
You guys are so understaffed as a problem.

117
00:08:25,500 --> 00:08:30,380
All of the county staffs in all of the departments are way understaffed because of funding.

118
00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:31,880
So that's the way.

119
00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:34,700
And when I'm seeing contractors, they're one works for me.

120
00:08:34,700 --> 00:08:41,700
And these wait 18 months to get a $2 million home build because of that.

121
00:08:41,700 --> 00:08:48,800
Two foot extension over this exact thing that they had to modify that building.

122
00:08:50,020 --> 00:08:50,720
That's crazy.

123
00:08:51,520 --> 00:08:52,340
Absolutely crazy.

124
00:08:53,040 --> 00:08:56,820
So are you gentlemen clear that all we're dealing with is the porch?

125
00:08:57,060 --> 00:08:57,880
Yes, sir.

126
00:08:58,120 --> 00:08:58,660
Yes, sir.

127
00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:06,820
I have one question just in its clarification also for the project of the moment, just so

128
00:09:06,820 --> 00:09:08,100
we have it on the record.

129
00:09:09,120 --> 00:09:11,440
This is my question from Mr. Felser, to remember.

130
00:09:13,830 --> 00:09:27,380
When it comes to assessing coverage of a parser, I get that it only counts root structure.

131
00:09:28,680 --> 00:09:36,600
Does it take the footprint of the foundation or does it take the area of the roof line?

132
00:09:39,840 --> 00:09:41,440
I agree with that.

133
00:09:41,820 --> 00:09:42,680
I agree with that.

134
00:09:43,120 --> 00:09:54,180
But I guess, I know I look at, I look at there being scenarios as we talk about coverage of a

135
00:09:54,180 --> 00:10:00,160
parcel, as we've been talking about our general plan, a percentage of coverage.

136
00:10:01,500 --> 00:10:13,760
And it makes me think there are times where you may want to run an E for whether sun, snow

137
00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:16,680
load, radiation, et cetera.

138
00:10:17,080 --> 00:10:24,160
I understand where it may be at advantageous to extend that out further in my mind, and

139
00:10:24,160 --> 00:10:33,120
beyond the non-ductors, I would look at the coverage being the foundation of footprint, not the roof wall and foot print.

140
00:10:33,220 --> 00:10:35,040
And I'm just putting that out there.

141
00:10:35,140 --> 00:10:36,540
That's how building does it.

142
00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:42,200
If you look at the building, they don't calculate the square footage based on the floor area.

143
00:10:42,700 --> 00:10:43,420
That's not a thought.

144
00:10:43,420 --> 00:10:43,580
That's not a thought.

145
00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:45,460
I didn't understand your question.

146
00:10:46,040 --> 00:10:46,440
Thank you.

147
00:10:46,720 --> 00:10:51,480
I did want to point out that code section that we're dealing with here.

148
00:10:51,480 --> 00:10:54,880
If you look, it's talking about every road, right?

149
00:10:55,080 --> 00:10:58,820
Anything dedicated to public use, all state roads and highways.

150
00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:01,240
So it's not just roads in the county system.

151
00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:05,180
So this 50-foot set back, this isn't like a standard in the state.

152
00:11:05,820 --> 00:11:08,280
So we want to really be careful.

153
00:11:09,040 --> 00:11:10,260
Doing very instances is one thing.

154
00:11:10,300 --> 00:11:14,420
But we want to make sure we're one of our new code

155
00:11:14,420 --> 00:11:19,380
is consistent with cow chances, you know, in the states.

156
00:11:19,380 --> 00:11:23,840
You know, requirements, so I don't know what it would make sense for us, too.

157
00:11:24,100 --> 00:11:27,440
Well, I would say, why don't we talk about, yeah, we'll talk about that on general plan.

158
00:11:27,500 --> 00:11:28,000
Yeah, yeah.

159
00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:28,560
Yeah, yeah.

160
00:11:28,580 --> 00:11:29,400
Let's talk about that.

161
00:11:29,640 --> 00:11:31,500
I'd like to call it a roll.

162
00:11:31,760 --> 00:11:32,520
I'll call it a roll.

163
00:11:32,980 --> 00:11:33,600
I'll call it a roll.

164
00:11:34,240 --> 00:11:36,200
I just have a quick question.

165
00:11:36,320 --> 00:11:44,640
Given the fact that the view issue seems to have been reduced, the skirt is kind of important

166
00:11:44,640 --> 00:11:46,360
to our architectural reference.

167
00:11:46,740 --> 00:11:47,540
We don't know.

168
00:11:48,360 --> 00:11:48,620
We don't.

169
00:11:48,620 --> 00:11:52,800
We just giving you the green light and the board you took great. Thank you.

170
00:11:53,420 --> 00:11:59,480
Yep. You can. Yeah. Um, so with that, uh, roll call vote. Commissioner Hart. Yes.

171
00:11:59,860 --> 00:12:04,540
Commissioner foul. Yes. Commissioner deal. Yes. Commissioner Lender. Yes.

172
00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:09,880
And Chairman Lender. Absolutely. Great. Okay. I think he's very much fair to you all very much.

173
00:12:10,380 --> 00:12:17,540
So moving on to old business agenda item more zoning code update. This is a preliminary public review draft.

174
00:12:18,920 --> 00:12:27,200
staff is workplace? Yes. As you know, last few months the last few meetings of the commission we have

175
00:12:27,200 --> 00:12:34,620
been going over the zoning code in detail, those edits were made based on the planning

176
00:12:34,620 --> 00:12:43,180
commissions we view. Thereafter we submitted those changes to County Council's office, Mr. Carol

177
00:12:43,180 --> 00:12:47,620
we've used them, and provided comments here.

178
00:12:47,620 --> 00:12:51,920
Those were all incorporated and sent to the consultants

179
00:12:51,920 --> 00:12:54,440
and they incorporated county council's comments.

180
00:12:54,960 --> 00:13:01,420
And this is the final product that, for your final review,

181
00:13:02,660 --> 00:13:05,080
before I joined the meeting with the Board of Supervisors,

182
00:13:05,620 --> 00:13:09,280
staff did have some additional comments

183
00:13:09,280 --> 00:13:11,060
that I would like to go over with you

184
00:13:11,060 --> 00:13:18,600
to get clarification on regarding the most recent version when you're ready.

185
00:13:19,120 --> 00:13:23,880
Yeah, real quickly before you begin, you said joint meeting with the Board of Supervisors

186
00:13:23,880 --> 00:13:26,300
has that date, it's October 20th.

187
00:13:26,560 --> 00:13:31,220
Yeah, I was going to mention it during the next slide, but I'm not sure if it's okay.

188
00:13:33,250 --> 00:13:36,670
I didn't bring the peak factor, did you bring the peak factor?

189
00:13:36,670 --> 00:13:37,930
I'll have it on the right side.

190
00:13:38,070 --> 00:13:38,170
I'll have it on the left side.

191
00:13:38,170 --> 00:13:38,750
I'll get it.

192
00:13:38,850 --> 00:13:41,270
I'll have it on the left side.

193
00:13:41,270 --> 00:13:41,890
I'll have it on the left side.

194
00:13:43,350 --> 00:13:43,870
Okay.

195
00:13:44,350 --> 00:13:45,710
And you don't have the rise.

196
00:13:46,590 --> 00:13:47,470
Yeah, I do.

197
00:13:47,810 --> 00:13:49,050
Well, I don't know why you're hurt.

198
00:13:49,250 --> 00:13:50,390
I don't have the rise of coverage.

199
00:13:51,010 --> 00:13:52,030
So it's ours.

200
00:13:52,650 --> 00:13:54,590
I got this courtesy assistant telephone.

201
00:13:57,570 --> 00:14:00,350
So my Adobe Act of that says it wants to update,

202
00:14:00,570 --> 00:14:02,250
but I have a word version on here.

203
00:14:04,350 --> 00:14:07,210
So you don't only want to update when we do a presentation,

204
00:14:07,870 --> 00:14:10,670
but there were some concerns that I wanted

205
00:14:10,670 --> 00:14:17,450
And before I feel the questions from the commission, I wanted to put it out and I never

206
00:14:17,450 --> 00:14:22,350
have a good memory, so I wrote them in the side so I would remember.

207
00:14:22,650 --> 00:14:36,010
But basically on page 52 in your PDF that you have, we have a section regarding the zoning,

208
00:14:37,150 --> 00:14:45,190
zoning clearance permits. And when I was reading it this week, preparing for our meeting

209
00:14:45,190 --> 00:14:52,550
today, if you look at the highlighted section, it's basically saying, we now are going

210
00:14:52,550 --> 00:14:58,870
to require a permit for anything anybody wants to do in the county if it's permitted. And

211
00:14:58,870 --> 00:14:59,970
I didn't think that would be the end of the day.

212
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:04,120
Attention of our commission. It's right now, it says.

213
00:15:04,700 --> 00:15:07,040
But thank you. What I'm following? 52.

214
00:15:08,740 --> 00:15:10,440
Hey, 52, look at your PDF.

215
00:15:11,180 --> 00:15:12,320
Gender packages, you be on.

216
00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:15,140
Okay. Hang on one second. Let me catch up there.

217
00:15:15,200 --> 00:15:19,860
Could there are some pages that I thought I had questions on prior to 52?

218
00:15:20,380 --> 00:15:24,020
Oh yeah, these were just things that I noticed and then we could go through anything that.

219
00:15:24,860 --> 00:15:25,860
Let me jump to 52.

220
00:15:27,060 --> 00:15:28,100
The zoning class.

221
00:15:28,100 --> 00:15:30,780
age 38, 59,

222
00:15:43,030 --> 00:15:44,650
58, 52, here we go.

223
00:15:46,830 --> 00:15:49,090
So the shots here, can you see that in our

224
00:15:49,090 --> 00:15:51,890
course or be all? Yes, okay.

225
00:16:02,680 --> 00:16:06,220
Any activity related by the zoning code?

226
00:16:06,720 --> 00:16:13,360
And I understand, I think our initial discussion in commission was, if someone has a

227
00:16:13,360 --> 00:16:16,880
huge project, they believe it's permitted, but they just want to

228
00:16:16,880 --> 00:16:22,660
before they invest a bunch of money, they come in and we could issue a zoning clearance permit,

229
00:16:22,900 --> 00:16:27,880
saying, yes, this project is permitted and they would feel better about proceeding within

230
00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:37,000
multi-million dollar project. I don't believe it was commissions intention to say any permitted use in a district requires one of these permits.

231
00:16:37,580 --> 00:16:44,180
And the way we're read is written now is the commencement of any actually I've regulated by a zoning code unless expressly

232
00:16:44,180 --> 00:16:51,320
is going to require one of these zoning permits and I went through there are no exemptions.

233
00:16:51,920 --> 00:16:54,880
So we say, unless exempted but then we don't exempt anything.

234
00:16:55,140 --> 00:17:01,490
So the consequence is every permitted use that we went through,

235
00:17:01,590 --> 00:17:03,970
let me find the actual use table.

236
00:17:03,970 --> 00:17:17,370
is that a fresh exemption referring to our plethora of items that we went down where they were

237
00:17:17,370 --> 00:17:24,370
containered necessary. I'll find another one. It's allowed by right. Yeah, what I'm referring to.

238
00:17:25,490 --> 00:17:29,490
Let me show you that table. It is referring to that table, but if you look at that table,

239
00:17:29,850 --> 00:17:33,850
the table even says it requires a zoning plan that's printed. And I don't believe that

240
00:17:34,370 --> 00:17:36,230
That was an order of tension.

241
00:17:36,490 --> 00:17:37,390
That's exactly right.

242
00:17:37,390 --> 00:17:37,590
That's right.

243
00:17:38,030 --> 00:17:42,890
I mean, that was the whole reason for going down and adding additional these are considered

244
00:17:42,890 --> 00:17:47,010
a necessary allowed by right permit not needed.

245
00:17:47,050 --> 00:17:47,330
Yep.

246
00:17:47,510 --> 00:17:51,070
And the whole intent, right, is for uses that are not expressively or they're in the gray,

247
00:17:51,390 --> 00:17:53,230
or, you know, they just need additional consideration.

248
00:17:53,870 --> 00:17:54,190
Okay.

249
00:17:54,530 --> 00:17:55,610
We're on the same page.

250
00:17:55,610 --> 00:18:00,850
I'm getting why, yeah, this language is not appropriate.

251
00:18:00,850 --> 00:18:09,610
A pro please a bowl. Yeah, if you give me one moment. These things only occur to our presentation. I have Mr. Dean's old laptop

252
00:18:11,910 --> 00:18:22,450
It's like it, but I want to hear what you next out the question for Ms. Line Zoning clearance permit is that simply a reference to

253
00:18:23,790 --> 00:18:30,550
Planning staff signs off. Yes, this is allowed correct and we don't have anything in our code right now

254
00:18:30,850 --> 00:18:35,170
that really speak. It's sort of like our planning director determinations. It's just formalizing it

255
00:18:35,170 --> 00:18:41,010
because we don't really have a set process and it's just to let folks know and you have something you know in between

256
00:18:41,010 --> 00:18:42,850
we'll review it.

257
00:18:44,270 --> 00:18:45,850
The permit move on.

258
00:18:46,770 --> 00:18:55,950
As of September 16th, 2026, this county does not issue a zoning plan that's permits.

259
00:18:59,970 --> 00:19:00,490
Right.

260
00:19:00,490 --> 00:19:06,550
existence. So maybe that language, the words there, that's exactly right.

261
00:19:06,550 --> 00:19:11,490
Need to be modified instead of it being called a permit.

262
00:19:11,630 --> 00:19:17,630
Can you feel like a certain player's review or planning director something?

263
00:19:18,230 --> 00:19:21,490
Like, is this basically like pre-concultation, right?

264
00:19:22,490 --> 00:19:28,490
Like, I tell you guys, hey, the way I read the code, this is allowed on just getting

265
00:19:29,010 --> 00:19:30,410
Yes, I think.

266
00:19:30,410 --> 00:19:32,470
The yes and the I don't need a permit.

267
00:19:32,510 --> 00:19:39,030
Right. I think like a zoning clearage review would make sense because again it's speaking to

268
00:19:39,890 --> 00:19:43,570
uses their eyes, pressively in the code, whereas is it allowed by right?

269
00:19:43,710 --> 00:19:46,310
Well you need a use permit should there be a zone change?

270
00:19:46,590 --> 00:19:51,630
It's, you know, giving that information to the applicant and formalizing it because so many times

271
00:19:51,630 --> 00:19:54,510
I dealt with this for the years I worked at the county.

272
00:19:54,510 --> 00:20:00,390
Oh, so when so approved this X amount of years ago, okay, well, where is the paperwork or the allowance for it?

273
00:20:00,610 --> 00:20:04,910
Oh, there isn't anything, right? So it's just to make sure we have some things, you know, I said back that.

274
00:20:05,750 --> 00:20:08,010
I agree with Jeff, they'll call in at a permit.

275
00:20:08,410 --> 00:20:10,150
Yeah, we'll kind of put a clearance review.

276
00:20:10,330 --> 00:20:17,410
A clearance review. I think changing the name or the name, the reference to how you're describing it.

277
00:20:17,530 --> 00:20:22,830
I don't have any problem with having it a forum, if you will, you can check these boxes.

278
00:20:23,990 --> 00:20:29,950
pre-consultation is what we do in my industry and it saves a lot of time and money on everybody's

279
00:20:29,950 --> 00:20:30,210
part.

280
00:20:31,770 --> 00:20:38,730
So, having that, I just yet another permit to mean something more regulating.

281
00:20:39,430 --> 00:20:41,170
This isn't a regulated process.

282
00:20:41,650 --> 00:20:43,170
So, I did definitely change that.

283
00:20:43,370 --> 00:20:44,850
Well, we'll rename it.

284
00:20:46,050 --> 00:20:47,230
So, good catch there.

285
00:20:47,370 --> 00:20:50,330
Here's a good example of Commissioner Fowl.

286
00:20:50,330 --> 00:20:54,590
He was a friend of the table's movement through in depth and all those meetings

287
00:20:54,590 --> 00:21:00,050
So if you look at this table, right for AG1, AG2, TPC, and open space

288
00:21:01,550 --> 00:21:07,430
Single family dwellings are permitted, right? So they shouldn't need to but according to this table

289
00:21:07,430 --> 00:21:10,990
For me, but you all they also would need to get a zoning plan is permanent

290
00:21:10,990 --> 00:21:14,570
So I'm not sure if that was the intention of the

291
00:21:15,530 --> 00:21:15,990
Dimitian

292
00:21:16,630 --> 00:21:20,170
I didn't believe it was and so I think this may have to change

293
00:21:21,210 --> 00:21:26,970
If that makes sense, right, because these are all permitted uses p means permitted by right.

294
00:21:28,030 --> 00:21:29,110
What's the table you choose?

295
00:21:29,350 --> 00:21:29,850
For the double.

296
00:21:30,370 --> 00:21:34,270
This is table 10.1-3-1.

297
00:21:34,650 --> 00:21:36,250
This would be in part five.

298
00:21:36,690 --> 00:21:38,430
What do you think that would be?

299
00:21:39,670 --> 00:21:40,190
Yeah.

300
00:21:41,070 --> 00:21:44,070
Yeah, so we would just want to modify to say a lot of by right.

301
00:21:44,070 --> 00:21:50,050
And then we would put some ink clear in the permit and then just modify the language to allow for that process to occur.

302
00:21:50,070 --> 00:21:52,650
But use is not expressively identified in the code.

303
00:21:53,950 --> 00:21:56,210
So we would that want to go through all the tables.

304
00:21:58,930 --> 00:22:00,550
And do that.

305
00:22:00,810 --> 00:22:03,630
And then I'm going to go to the permit section.

306
00:22:13,140 --> 00:22:14,780
So here's the zoning clearance permit.

307
00:22:21,700 --> 00:22:28,500
So yeah, we just want to revise maybe this to maybe indicate this is more of a voluntary thing.

308
00:22:28,500 --> 00:22:29,860
with a property owner.

309
00:22:30,000 --> 00:22:36,860
What did it specific you authorized ahead of time? So it's clear that this is a causal take note.

310
00:22:37,320 --> 00:22:42,460
You don't need to permit for everything you do now. I think it would be an uproar.

311
00:22:42,780 --> 00:22:52,640
I think it's a good process to have that documentation. I'm there referencing what we just heard, like so and so left.

312
00:22:52,640 --> 00:22:56,340
And then the child has got dropped, at least you have a review.

313
00:22:56,600 --> 00:22:58,420
I think it takes a couple of functions.

314
00:22:59,060 --> 00:23:01,420
Reviews to the, you know what he said,

315
00:23:01,640 --> 00:23:03,940
or vice versa, or additional staff,

316
00:23:04,320 --> 00:23:05,740
as well as I think it kind of

317
00:23:05,740 --> 00:23:07,560
on those sources like a tracking mechanism.

318
00:23:08,080 --> 00:23:08,840
Absolutely tiny.

319
00:23:10,360 --> 00:23:13,000
Like what you know when you work on these,

320
00:23:13,000 --> 00:23:16,760
for work structure, I see, I see good things,

321
00:23:16,860 --> 00:23:18,380
as well as making sure things are dropped.

322
00:23:18,720 --> 00:23:20,860
Well, it's not because I feel bad when, you know,

323
00:23:20,860 --> 00:23:22,520
Well, and right, like, and get dropped.

324
00:23:22,940 --> 00:23:25,240
Myself and James, we interpret things a different way.

325
00:23:25,480 --> 00:23:27,720
You know, at least that formalization would be in there.

326
00:23:27,820 --> 00:23:30,700
If someone else down the road, you know, would, oh, it's already, okay.

327
00:23:30,880 --> 00:23:31,900
Let's move forward, right?

328
00:23:32,580 --> 00:23:33,800
So, yep, no, okay.

329
00:23:33,820 --> 00:23:35,260
So I think that, okay, so-

330
00:23:35,260 --> 00:23:38,580
The commission be agreeable for us to make those modifications

331
00:23:38,580 --> 00:23:39,920
to the zone and claim it's permit.

332
00:23:40,020 --> 00:23:41,580
Because I don't believe that was your intention

333
00:23:42,260 --> 00:23:43,860
to over-regulate the calendar.

334
00:23:44,180 --> 00:23:46,860
No, it was a under-regulate, but not under-regulate,

335
00:23:46,940 --> 00:23:48,840
but make things just simplified.

336
00:23:48,840 --> 00:23:58,340
We're trying to simplify and longer I said here, I remember the discussion that took place on this.

337
00:24:00,160 --> 00:24:08,100
I think a more appropriate term may be zoning clearance approval.

338
00:24:08,960 --> 00:24:18,820
Okay, and I know within this section, it talks about the applicant providing the name,

339
00:24:18,900 --> 00:24:25,760
the location, the parcel number, the description of the activity, potential site plans

340
00:24:25,760 --> 00:24:32,620
and additional information, et cetera, that they bring to planning staff to say, my interpretation

341
00:24:32,620 --> 00:24:37,540
of the code says I don't need to use permit on allowed to buy right, but this is what I'm

342
00:24:37,540 --> 00:24:46,920
finding undoing can you confirm that and that Avenue is there as my memory serves because

343
00:24:46,920 --> 00:24:56,080
some lending entities before they will allow an entity to borrow money for construction

344
00:24:56,080 --> 00:25:03,760
building etc need just a piece of paper saying yes this is this is legal within the

345
00:25:03,760 --> 00:25:10,620
you assist you. Yeah. And so this is that avenue that you get a slain signature. Yep, a lot

346
00:25:10,620 --> 00:25:16,620
by right. Yeah, it's certainly neat that. Yeah, and that would be a voluntary as opposed to

347
00:25:17,420 --> 00:25:22,480
every person that that wants to build a home now needs it and another permit that we wouldn't want that

348
00:25:22,480 --> 00:25:30,920
to hurt. Okay. So we have to since it's been the question though that brings up is the item C

349
00:25:30,920 --> 00:25:38,360
fees. The application shall be accompanied by the required fee.

350
00:25:40,450 --> 00:25:40,890
So there's a

351
00:25:40,890 --> 00:25:45,870
fee for pre-consultation? Not for pre-application, now that's free. Well, we have one here.

352
00:25:46,390 --> 00:26:02,210
Yes. Yes. Because we're trying to eliminate or minimize the hassles of the

353
00:26:02,210 --> 00:26:07,630
came to the table or the counter and said, hey, this is what I'm planning to do, is why I understand

354
00:26:07,630 --> 00:26:15,370
I'm allowed to do by right. Do we, is it reasonable to say we need to assess a fee just for a

355
00:26:15,370 --> 00:26:19,850
consultation? I don't think so. Right. Yeah. And that would be up to the commission to decide that

356
00:26:19,850 --> 00:26:25,950
whether or not that fees appropriate. Strike C. Okay. This would be right here.

357
00:26:30,140 --> 00:26:34,140
This is part of

358
00:26:34,140 --> 00:26:37,520
The answer is back from you guys. This is just a Q&A.

359
00:26:37,820 --> 00:26:43,140
I would say the fee if anything would be minimal could really stop time.

360
00:26:43,460 --> 00:26:48,180
We would look up the parcel. We would see the zoning. We would look up the allowable uses.

361
00:26:48,640 --> 00:26:54,680
We could generate. I have an issue with the pre-consultation having a fee associated with it.

362
00:26:54,720 --> 00:26:57,800
If it requires a use permit. Yeah.

363
00:26:57,800 --> 00:27:08,080
Generally, some other permit a change in zoning requirement, et cetera, absolutely feet for a staff time.

364
00:27:08,440 --> 00:27:14,620
Simply to look and verify is what code says, this is what the opponent wants to do.

365
00:27:14,880 --> 00:27:19,220
No, a necessary, your good, go ahead and do it, I'll sign you off so you can borrow the money.

366
00:27:19,220 --> 00:27:26,920
Okay, yeah, we're it's okay to remove it, but I just as I say like if stat has to generate an official document

367
00:27:26,920 --> 00:27:32,640
Which is because it's a voluntary process it would be different because right now pre-consultation

368
00:27:32,640 --> 00:27:34,540
We don't trust it cost to make copy

369
00:27:35,500 --> 00:27:39,780
No, it's not just I don't know that it's the copies to hit it

370
00:27:39,780 --> 00:27:42,380
We have to generate an actual official

371
00:27:42,980 --> 00:27:49,020
Document right because they're gonna take hey we pre-approved, but I think it needs to we need that I think this is a point to

372
00:27:49,020 --> 00:27:53,620
because I see where you're going because it's saying it's a big development and they

373
00:27:53,620 --> 00:27:58,440
want some pre-consultation and there's a lot of research, et cetera, and then

374
00:27:58,440 --> 00:28:05,200
need to give the answer. I can see that. But if this is like, hey, I'm gonna add a

375
00:28:05,200 --> 00:28:11,700
deck and I'm in here and then they need to check some boxes. But I can see, I can see

376
00:28:12,340 --> 00:28:17,980
that they're using. Because I'm just thinking from like a developer standpoint, you're

377
00:28:17,980 --> 00:28:23,740
put in a subdivision. They get out of a lot of their questions answered potentially in this that would