1 00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:02,159 Want to welcome everybody out to the 2 00:00:02,159 --> 00:00:03,919 planning and zoning commission meeting 3 00:00:03,919 --> 00:00:07,359 for May 6th. We'll start off the 4 00:00:07,359 --> 00:00:09,120 meeting. I've asked Commissioner Warick 5 00:00:09,120 --> 00:00:11,599 to lead us in the pledge of allegiance. 6 00:00:11,599 --> 00:00:14,789 >> I'll arise. 7 00:00:14,799 --> 00:00:18,000 » I pledge aliance to the flag of the 8 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:20,080 United States of America 9 00:00:20,080 --> 00:00:23,039 >> and to the republic for which it stands. 10 00:00:23,039 --> 00:00:26,560 One nation under God, indivisible, with 11 00:00:26,560 --> 00:00:31,830 liberty and justice for all. 12 00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:34,160 Thank you, Shauna. 13 00:00:34,160 --> 00:00:38,399 Um, our first order of business is the 14 00:00:38,399 --> 00:00:42,239 minutes. Um, we Casey sent out the 15 00:00:42,239 --> 00:00:43,840 correct minutes later in the day. So, 16 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:44,960 have everybody had a chance to look at 17 00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:48,399 those? Um, do I have a Has anybody 18 00:00:48,399 --> 00:00:50,239 reviewed it? And can I get a motion? 19 00:00:50,239 --> 00:00:51,520 >> I have looked at that. I'll make a 20 00:00:51,520 --> 00:00:54,079 motion we approve the minutes. 21 00:00:54,079 --> 00:00:55,039 >> Second. 22 00:00:55,039 --> 00:00:57,360 >> I have a motion to second. All in favor? 23 00:00:57,360 --> 00:00:57,840 I. 24 00:00:57,840 --> 00:00:59,680 >> Any opposed? 25 00:00:59,680 --> 00:01:04,080 So those can be recorded. Um our first 26 00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:06,560 um item of business, these are both 27 00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:08,240 public hearings, but the first one is 28 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:11,360 the station 61 Argyle subdivision 29 00:01:11,360 --> 00:01:14,479 substation zone change. 30 00:01:14,479 --> 00:01:16,560 All right. Uh we're going to keep this 31 00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:18,320 pretty simple and straightforward. So 32 00:01:18,320 --> 00:01:19,840 this is property. I don't know if you 33 00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:22,159 recently saw the groundbreaking uh for 34 00:01:22,159 --> 00:01:23,600 the new fire station that's going to be 35 00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:25,119 going here as well as a substation 36 00:01:25,119 --> 00:01:27,840 that's uh going to be on the corner that 37 00:01:27,840 --> 00:01:34,479 southwest corner. Um as part of this the site plan was reviewed and it was 38 00:01:34,479 --> 00:01:36,880 noted that there are some parts of the 39 00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:39,119 site that are still zoned either 40 00:01:39,119 --> 00:01:45,119 residential office or uh R16 I believe. 41 00:01:45,119 --> 00:01:48,079 And so in order to proceed with that, uh 42 00:01:48,079 --> 00:01:49,680 there was a condition placed on the site 43 00:01:49,680 --> 00:01:53,439 plan approval that the entire site be uh 44 00:01:53,439 --> 00:01:56,000 reszoned to the public facility zone. So 45 00:01:56,000 --> 00:02:00,000 that's what's being uh proposed here. 46 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:02,960 >> Okay. 47 00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:04,399 >> Questions for staff? 48 00:02:04,399 --> 00:02:06,799 >> I have a question. 49 00:02:06,799 --> 00:02:09,990 Why 50 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:12,000 didn't Why was this not addressed 51 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:14,560 beforehand? You've gone in there, tore 52 00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:15,680 down the buildings, you bought 53 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:19,440 properties to and the fire station's 54 00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:22,319 going in, and now you're coming to us to 55 00:02:22,319 --> 00:02:25,760 change the zoning on it 56 00:02:25,760 --> 00:02:30,160 when you've already gone ahead and done 57 00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:34,080 a substantial amount of work. 58 00:02:34,080 --> 00:02:37,920 >> Why would the city not change the zoning 59 00:02:37,920 --> 00:02:40,160 first? 60 00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:42,400 I think that's one of the the benefits 61 00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:44,959 that it's city- owned property. It's a 62 00:02:44,959 --> 00:02:46,480 city project 63 00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:48,239 >> and the city would be the one that would 64 00:02:48,239 --> 00:02:50,720 approve the zoning. So, it was kind of 65 00:02:50,720 --> 00:02:54,480 the always the intent for that to uh be 66 00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:57,360 zoned so that they could you fire 67 00:02:57,360 --> 00:02:57,840 station. 68 00:02:57,840 --> 00:02:58,640 >> David, maybe 69 00:02:58,640 --> 00:03:00,720 >> we could double check, but I believe 70 00:03:00,720 --> 00:03:03,680 municipal services are permitted uses in 71 00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:06,480 most zones. Um, and the history of this 72 00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:08,640 is interesting because the majority of 73 00:03:08,640 --> 00:03:10,800 the fire station is on property that's 74 00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:13,840 already the public facility zone 75 00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:15,840 ability to buy additional properties as 76 00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:17,680 they became available. And in some 77 00:03:17,680 --> 00:03:23,519 cases, we were able to buy backyards of adjacent properties to kind of square 78 00:03:23,519 --> 00:03:26,480 off uh the project. 79 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:28,720 But that was an early comment from our 80 00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:30,959 department when it first came up with 81 00:03:30,959 --> 00:03:33,200 the concept, you know, that we needed to 82 00:03:33,200 --> 00:03:35,840 do a zoning cleanup to address that. 83 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:39,840 >> So, I guess it kind of bugs it bugs me a 84 00:03:39,840 --> 00:03:41,599 bit. Why didn't you do that in the first 85 00:03:41,599 --> 00:03:43,360 hand 86 00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:46,000 and then go ahead and do your thing? 87 00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:48,400 Because it's understood that's it's 88 00:03:48,400 --> 00:03:50,720 probably going to happen. And is the 89 00:03:50,720 --> 00:03:52,720 city just rather going to say it's 90 00:03:52,720 --> 00:03:54,959 easier to ask for forgiveness than for 91 00:03:54,959 --> 00:03:56,400 permission? 92 00:03:56,400 --> 00:03:58,080 Not that we couldn't really shut it 93 00:03:58,080 --> 00:04:01,360 down, but 94 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:03,040 >> I think a lot of it might have to do 95 00:04:03,040 --> 00:04:05,920 with timing of the development and since 96 00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:06,879 the most of the fight, 97 00:04:06,879 --> 00:04:08,720 >> but the city had timing. They've known 98 00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:10,480 way ahead of time. They could have come 99 00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:13,680 and cleared zoning up a long time ago. 100 00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:16,160 >> Okay. All I'm saying is that the the 101 00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:19,359 timing can sometimes lead to uh an 102 00:04:19,359 --> 00:04:22,079 increase in costs and so those costs 103 00:04:22,079 --> 00:04:24,320 would be paid by the taxpayer. So the 104 00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:26,080 city's always trying to use those funds 105 00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:29,600 efficiently. And so since the city is 106 00:04:29,600 --> 00:04:32,720 the one approving it and building it and 107 00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:35,040 everything, it was all it's all the same 108 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:37,360 group that's doing that, 109 00:04:37,360 --> 00:04:40,080 >> right? Okay. Well, sorry, but that that 110 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:42,320 sounds a little underhanded that you 111 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:46,080 like, oh, we're going to skirt around 112 00:04:46,080 --> 00:04:48,960 this to save us some money. Well, it's 113 00:04:48,960 --> 00:04:51,120 not saving this. It's saving the city, 114 00:04:51,120 --> 00:04:54,479 which is in turn saving the taxpayer, 115 00:04:54,479 --> 00:04:55,040 >> right? 116 00:04:55,040 --> 00:04:57,759 >> Not using those funds kind of uh 117 00:04:57,759 --> 00:05:00,720 wastefully, using it more efficiently. 118 00:05:00,720 --> 00:05:02,560 >> Okay. 119 00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:04,320 >> It doesn't seem like that big a deal to 120 00:05:04,320 --> 00:05:07,199 me. It seems like you you do something 121 00:05:07,199 --> 00:05:08,960 in good faith and then you come and 122 00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:11,840 clean up the technicalities. That's my 123 00:05:11,840 --> 00:05:16,390 personal opinion on that. 124 00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:18,400 Well, is is it in good faith when they 125 00:05:18,400 --> 00:05:20,400 do everything beforehand and then come 126 00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:21,919 up to clean it up after the fact? 127 00:05:21,919 --> 00:05:23,360 >> Well, when you look at the majority, you 128 00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:25,600 can see on the zoning map, the majority 129 00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:28,720 of it, 90% of well, 80% of it is already 130 00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:30,960 a public facility where the senior 131 00:05:30,960 --> 00:05:31,840 center was. 132 00:05:31,840 --> 00:05:32,240 >> Okay. 133 00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:34,320 >> So, it's zoned correctly. The area 134 00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:35,840 you're expressing a concern about would 135 00:05:35,840 --> 00:05:38,800 be the RORO, which allows that use, or 136 00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:41,120 the R15, which I don't know if it does 137 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:43,520 or not. 138 00:05:43,520 --> 00:05:48,800 Yeah. Yeah. And both um RO and um R16 139 00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:50,560 uh municipal facilities required for 140 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:54,479 local service are permitted uses. 141 00:05:54,479 --> 00:05:56,479 >> So it's really just a a cleanup of the 142 00:05:56,479 --> 00:05:58,560 map so that it matches what's there. 143 00:05:58,560 --> 00:05:59,280 >> Okay. 144 00:05:59,280 --> 00:06:01,039 >> So it was all So what you're saying is 145 00:06:01,039 --> 00:06:03,039 it's it's already permitted so it's 146 00:06:03,039 --> 00:06:05,280 legal in that area but 147 00:06:05,280 --> 00:06:08,400 >> to but it's best to change it to the 148 00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:10,479 public facilities be all. We could do it 149 00:06:10,479 --> 00:06:12,400 without the cleanup, but let's clean it 150 00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:13,440 up. So, 151 00:06:13,440 --> 00:06:14,560 >> gotcha. 152 00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:16,080 >> So, 153 00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:17,680 Oh, Dave, do you have more to say on 154 00:06:17,680 --> 00:06:19,759 that? 155 00:06:19,759 --> 00:06:20,880 >> No. 156 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:24,479 >> On the substation, um, we have a we have 157 00:06:24,479 --> 00:06:27,360 a substation there already, right? 158 00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:29,600 There's a a substation on the property 159 00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:31,440 already that's being moved and enlarged. 160 00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:32,960 Is or is what's 161 00:06:32,960 --> 00:06:34,800 >> I just What's going on with that? Yeah. 162 00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:36,960 So, that is being uh relocated as part 163 00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:40,080 of this project to that southwest corner 164 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:41,199 of the block 165 00:06:41,199 --> 00:06:43,120 >> just to make room for the the fire 166 00:06:43,120 --> 00:06:45,120 station or is it being enlarged or 167 00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:46,720 what's what's the reason for it being 168 00:06:46,720 --> 00:06:47,759 relocated is what I'm wondering. 169 00:06:47,759 --> 00:06:50,800 >> No. Uh both. So, it needed to be redone 170 00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:55,440 and upsized anyways for more current 171 00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:59,440 uh uses or load from the city. But um 172 00:06:59,440 --> 00:07:01,280 they in fact they wanted to do it like a 173 00:07:01,280 --> 00:07:03,440 year ago, but instead knowing the fire 174 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:05,759 station might come. It was let's move it 175 00:07:05,759 --> 00:07:07,759 out of the way and put it more in a 176 00:07:07,759 --> 00:07:10,160 proper location instead of in the center 177 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:14,080 of the block. So it needed to be redone. 178 00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:18,080 Um but they did move it to a better 179 00:07:18,080 --> 00:07:19,840 access even for them for the power 180 00:07:19,840 --> 00:07:21,440 department and stuff. But 181 00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:22,960 >> I was just curious about as as I was 182 00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:25,039 reviewing this. Yeah, it was both kind 183 00:07:25,039 --> 00:07:25,599 of. But 184 00:07:25,599 --> 00:07:27,919 >> and then on the I couldn't it was blurry 185 00:07:27,919 --> 00:07:30,000 on the site plan that we have exhibit 186 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:34,479 two. Um what is what's the route like? 187 00:07:34,479 --> 00:07:38,000 Which way are the fire trucks? What are 188 00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:39,599 they going to go out onto second or they 189 00:07:39,599 --> 00:07:41,199 going to go out onto center street? 190 00:07:41,199 --> 00:07:43,840 >> They'll go out on second. 191 00:07:43,840 --> 00:07:47,919 they prefer to come out more on the 192 00:07:47,919 --> 00:07:50,080 less busy road, like more of a 193 00:07:50,080 --> 00:07:52,400 residential road, then get on to the 194 00:07:52,400 --> 00:07:56,400 major collectors. Um, current one on 400 195 00:07:56,400 --> 00:07:58,319 North, I think from what I've heard from 196 00:07:58,319 --> 00:08:00,319 them is they have a lot of trouble 197 00:08:00,319 --> 00:08:02,560 leaving that fire station because 400 198 00:08:02,560 --> 00:08:04,240 North is so busy 199 00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:06,000 >> and so they don't want to go out on 200 00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:08,560 center because once it it gets even 201 00:08:08,560 --> 00:08:10,800 busier, it creates an issue for the 202 00:08:10,800 --> 00:08:12,800 firefighters. I was just curious about 203 00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:14,080 that. In my mind, I was thinking they'd 204 00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:15,360 want to go out on a bigger road, but 205 00:08:15,360 --> 00:08:15,840 that makes sense. 206 00:08:15,840 --> 00:08:17,520 >> Yeah. Don't they all don't they exit out 207 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:19,280 to Main Street right now? They don't 208 00:08:19,280 --> 00:08:20,400 exit onto 400, 209 00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:22,560 >> but they're saying that's a problem. 210 00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:23,840 >> Yeah, they're saying actually on Main 211 00:08:23,840 --> 00:08:24,160 Street. 212 00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:26,080 >> Main Street right there on 400 and Main 213 00:08:26,080 --> 00:08:28,479 Street. Yeah, but it's Main Street's so 214 00:08:28,479 --> 00:08:31,280 busy and Yeah. Sorry, guys. Thanks for 215 00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:34,389 correction. 216 00:08:34,399 --> 00:08:35,599 » Thanks. I was just curious about those 217 00:08:35,599 --> 00:08:37,680 things. 218 00:08:37,680 --> 00:08:41,200 >> Any other questions for staff? 219 00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:43,919 Thank you. This is a public hearing. So, 220 00:08:43,919 --> 00:08:45,920 if anybody's here to have comments on 221 00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:48,720 this topic, we'd love to hear you. Um, 222 00:08:48,720 --> 00:08:50,320 keep if you'd come up and introduce 223 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:52,240 yourself on the microphone and keep your 224 00:08:52,240 --> 00:08:54,640 comments about 3 minutes, we'll open 225 00:08:54,640 --> 00:08:56,800 that up. 226 00:08:56,800 --> 00:09:00,240 Okay. Seeing no people, none, we'll 227 00:09:00,240 --> 00:09:02,800 close the public hearing. 228 00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:05,440 Do we have any other discussions amongst 229 00:09:05,440 --> 00:09:07,519 oursel? 230 00:09:07,519 --> 00:09:08,800 >> Seems strict to me. 231 00:09:08,800 --> 00:09:11,839 >> Okay. I would entertain a motion. Um, 232 00:09:11,839 --> 00:09:15,670 this is a 233 00:09:15,680 --> 00:09:18,160 um, 234 00:09:18,160 --> 00:09:19,519 this is recommending for approval, 235 00:09:19,519 --> 00:09:19,920 right? 236 00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:20,240 >> Mhm. 237 00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:20,959 >> Yep. 238 00:09:20,959 --> 00:09:22,959 >> I'll make the motion. I move to 239 00:09:22,959 --> 00:09:24,480 recommend approval of the proposed 240 00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:27,440 station 61 Argyle substation zone change 241 00:09:27,440 --> 00:09:29,440 based on the findings. The proposal is 242 00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:32,880 consistent with the city's general plan, land plan, use designation of 243 00:09:32,880 --> 00:09:34,800 public facilities. 244 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:36,000 >> Okay. I have a motion. Do I have a 245 00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:36,560 second? 246 00:09:36,560 --> 00:09:37,839 >> Second. 247 00:09:37,839 --> 00:09:39,680 >> Motion second. All in favor? 248 00:09:39,680 --> 00:09:40,480 >> I. 249 00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:41,680 >> Any opposed? 250 00:09:41,680 --> 00:09:42,560 >> I 251 00:09:42,560 --> 00:09:45,839 >> nay. 252 00:09:45,839 --> 00:09:50,240 >> Okay. So, that vote will go to the uh 253 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:52,720 council for their 254 00:09:52,720 --> 00:09:55,519 review and their meeting. Um the second 255 00:09:55,519 --> 00:09:58,800 agenda item is 256 00:09:58,800 --> 00:10:02,240 Sorry, I've lost my There it is. 257 00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:02,880 >> This is a zoning 258 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:04,959 >> Arrowhead commercial. 259 00:10:04,959 --> 00:10:06,880 >> Yes, this is a zoning map amendment as 260 00:10:06,880 --> 00:10:08,800 well. Uh a little different in nature 261 00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:10,880 than the first one you looked at. Um 262 00:10:10,880 --> 00:10:13,600 just for orientation purposes, uh 263 00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:17,760 Arrowhead Trail, um Delmonte Road right 264 00:10:17,760 --> 00:10:20,959 here, Arrowhead Subdivision, 265 00:10:20,959 --> 00:10:22,640 um 266 00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:25,360 Sky Meadows subdivision. Uh let's go to 267 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:27,680 the next slide. 268 00:10:27,680 --> 00:10:29,760 So on the right, you see the general 269 00:10:29,760 --> 00:10:31,680 plan anticipates a commercial use on the 270 00:10:31,680 --> 00:10:33,839 corner. The zoning reflects an existing 271 00:10:33,839 --> 00:10:37,120 commercial use um on the corner. the 272 00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:38,959 applicant. Um, unfortunately, he did 273 00:10:38,959 --> 00:10:41,360 call us this afternoon u right before 274 00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:42,800 the meeting and had a conflict and 275 00:10:42,800 --> 00:10:45,519 couldn't make it tonight. Um, but he uh 276 00:10:45,519 --> 00:10:51,839 does send his regards and would like to see a recommendation um out of the planning commission tonight even 277 00:10:51,839 --> 00:10:53,839 though he couldn't make it. Um, let's go 278 00:10:53,839 --> 00:10:56,160 to the next slide. 279 00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:58,000 This is their request. It was included 280 00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:00,240 in your packet. Uh, in a nutshell, 281 00:11:00,240 --> 00:11:01,839 there's two residential lots that are 282 00:11:01,839 --> 00:11:04,160 part of the Arrowhead subdivision um 283 00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:06,480 that they would like to absorb into the 284 00:11:06,480 --> 00:11:09,440 existing commercial corner and they have 285 00:11:09,440 --> 00:11:11,680 a number of of reasons why they feel it 286 00:11:11,680 --> 00:11:14,160 would be appropriate to do so. Um, the 287 00:11:14,160 --> 00:11:16,320 DRC did look at this request and in the 288 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:18,720 findings the motion you'll see um the 289 00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:20,800 recommendation that the the development 290 00:11:20,800 --> 00:11:23,200 review committee um provided. Let's go 291 00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:25,760 to the next slide. So this is how this 292 00:11:25,760 --> 00:11:27,760 the preliminary plat for the subdivision 293 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:29,680 was approved. 294 00:11:29,680 --> 00:11:32,560 Again this is Arrowhead Trail Delmani. 295 00:11:32,560 --> 00:11:35,200 Um these are all platted lots. The last 296 00:11:35,200 --> 00:11:38,000 phase is phase six which would be this 297 00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:41,200 um west part of the property. The two 298 00:11:41,200 --> 00:11:43,279 lots in question are these deep 299 00:11:43,279 --> 00:11:45,600 residential lots right here. 300 00:11:45,600 --> 00:11:47,440 >> This is the existing commercial corner. 301 00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:48,640 Let's go to the next slide. Oh 302 00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:51,279 >> Brent, hello for a second. 303 00:11:51,279 --> 00:11:54,480 >> So my understand they want to take 304 00:11:54,480 --> 00:11:55,760 a commercial lot. 305 00:11:55,760 --> 00:11:57,200 >> Wrong way. 306 00:11:57,200 --> 00:11:59,839 >> Blinding myself. The commercial lot add 307 00:11:59,839 --> 00:12:01,680 more commercial and but this commercial 308 00:12:01,680 --> 00:12:03,839 is off the main road and kind of hard to 309 00:12:03,839 --> 00:12:05,279 get to, 310 00:12:05,279 --> 00:12:06,480 >> but they want to change it from 311 00:12:06,480 --> 00:12:10,000 residential to commercial. 312 00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:10,800 >> Yeah. So, 313 00:12:10,800 --> 00:12:12,560 >> I get where you're going. 314 00:12:12,560 --> 00:12:15,120 they have had interest in the property 315 00:12:15,120 --> 00:12:17,200 and one thing that staff did recommend 316 00:12:17,200 --> 00:12:19,519 when when we get to the conditions is 317 00:12:19,519 --> 00:12:21,200 we'd still like them to pursue the 318 00:12:21,200 --> 00:12:23,120 option with you do to have approval for 319 00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:25,200 a ride in right out here. There is a 320 00:12:25,200 --> 00:12:26,639 spacing requirement from the 321 00:12:26,639 --> 00:12:29,279 intersection. Um most likely we wouldn't 322 00:12:29,279 --> 00:12:31,120 allow an access off of here because of 323 00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:33,519 the proximity of these two intersections 324 00:12:33,519 --> 00:12:35,519 and so their primary access could be 325 00:12:35,519 --> 00:12:38,079 here or if you do would allow a 326 00:12:38,079 --> 00:12:40,079 potential ride in right out at that 327 00:12:40,079 --> 00:12:40,800 location. 328 00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:42,240 >> Interesting. Okay, there's one clear on 329 00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:42,959 that. 330 00:12:42,959 --> 00:12:43,760 >> Does the 331 00:12:43,760 --> 00:12:44,800 >> I got you. 332 00:12:44,800 --> 00:12:46,480 >> These two extra properties to the 333 00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:49,120 commercial, does that increase the 334 00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:51,440 probability for you dot to allow the 335 00:12:51,440 --> 00:12:53,920 access? 336 00:12:53,920 --> 00:12:56,079 >> I would say yes in the sense that it 337 00:12:56,079 --> 00:12:58,800 Well, no. 338 00:12:58,800 --> 00:12:59,519 >> Sorry, I'll 339 00:12:59,519 --> 00:13:00,639 >> because I know they're kind of st 340 00:13:00,639 --> 00:13:01,760 they're stingy on their 341 00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:03,920 >> picture. I I'll let Josh speak to it, 342 00:13:03,920 --> 00:13:06,720 but my off-the- cuff answer would be 343 00:13:06,720 --> 00:13:09,120 your front edge isn't changing, so you 344 00:13:09,120 --> 00:13:10,560 still have the same distance to play 345 00:13:10,560 --> 00:13:11,680 with here. 346 00:13:11,680 --> 00:13:12,240 >> Okay. 347 00:13:12,240 --> 00:13:13,839 >> So, I I think it's just a matter of 348 00:13:13,839 --> 00:13:15,920 spacing. 349 00:13:15,920 --> 00:13:18,240 >> Yeah, I think you're right. U DOT's 350 00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:24,079 requirement for this road is um 660 ft 351 00:13:24,079 --> 00:13:26,480 >> access. So, I think that's about where 352 00:13:26,480 --> 00:13:28,959 they're at. But it may 353 00:13:28,959 --> 00:13:31,040 >> I think in DRC it was discussed may make 354 00:13:31,040 --> 00:13:32,720 it a little bit easier to put an access 355 00:13:32,720 --> 00:13:34,560 in there. They got some more room to 356 00:13:34,560 --> 00:13:39,910 come straight on. But 357 00:13:39,920 --> 00:13:43,040 um let's go to the next slide. 358 00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:45,600 So, this is the proposed amendment that 359 00:13:45,600 --> 00:13:47,680 they'd like to make if the zone change 360 00:13:47,680 --> 00:13:50,880 is approved by the city council is you'd 361 00:13:50,880 --> 00:13:54,399 then have two larger um more rectangular 362 00:13:54,399 --> 00:13:56,399 shaped commercial lots that they could 363 00:13:56,399 --> 00:13:59,680 work with. Um it's my understanding that 364 00:13:59,680 --> 00:14:01,680 the corner lots already purchased are 365 00:14:01,680 --> 00:14:04,560 under contract and that that purchaser 366 00:14:04,560 --> 00:14:07,040 is potentially looking at this one. Um 367 00:14:07,040 --> 00:14:09,279 and if they're not interested then um 368 00:14:09,279 --> 00:14:11,120 the applicant in did indicate they've 369 00:14:11,120 --> 00:14:14,160 got other interested parties uh in this 370 00:14:14,160 --> 00:14:17,279 potential piece here. Um let's go to the 371 00:14:17,279 --> 00:14:19,760 next slide. So once again this is the 372 00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:22,320 existing commercial the area outlined 373 00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:24,880 and highlighted in red is the additional 374 00:14:24,880 --> 00:14:27,519 just under an acre of area that they 375 00:14:27,519 --> 00:14:30,240 would like to add um to commercial to 376 00:14:30,240 --> 00:14:32,399 expand that commercial corner. So in the 377 00:14:32,399 --> 00:14:34,240 staff report uh we kind of highlighted 378 00:14:34,240 --> 00:14:35,519 it would increase the area to 379 00:14:35,519 --> 00:14:39,600 approximately 4 acres in size. We do uh 380 00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:41,680 recommend or recognize that the general 381 00:14:41,680 --> 00:14:45,199 plan um let's go to the next slide. The 382 00:14:45,199 --> 00:14:46,880 general plan does designate the 383 00:14:46,880 --> 00:14:50,000 commercial as uh excuse me the corner as 384 00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:53,600 commercial. I'll slow down. Um 385 00:14:53,600 --> 00:14:55,040 the development review committee 386 00:14:55,040 --> 00:14:57,120 recognized that uh it's an expansion of 387 00:14:57,120 --> 00:15:00,000 a conveniently located commercial area. 388 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:02,000 Finding number three that it'll provide 389 00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:04,079 uh services to the residents of Spanish 390 00:15:04,079 --> 00:15:05,760 Fork and potentially expand the city 391 00:15:05,760 --> 00:15:09,360 sales tax base. Four, that is promotion 392 00:15:09,360 --> 00:15:11,199 of a commercial area at a major 393 00:15:11,199 --> 00:15:13,680 intersection. Um there are an arrowhead 394 00:15:13,680 --> 00:15:16,560 trail. Five, that is adequately sized to 395 00:15:16,560 --> 00:15:18,320 minimize the potential impacts on the 396 00:15:18,320 --> 00:15:21,120 residential area. And then the condition 397 00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:23,600 um this was added during um the 398 00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:25,680 discussion of access to the property. 399 00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:28,000 The development review committee did add 400 00:15:28,000 --> 00:15:29,920 this on the recommendation to you for 401 00:15:29,920 --> 00:15:32,240 your consideration and that reads that 402 00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:34,720 the applicant would basically uh do 403 00:15:34,720 --> 00:15:38,079 further research with UDOT as far as all 404 00:15:38,079 --> 00:15:40,320 potential accesses for the property 405 00:15:40,320 --> 00:15:43,279 specifically though off of uh Arrowhead 406 00:15:43,279 --> 00:15:46,639 Trail and then um at a later stage that 407 00:15:46,639 --> 00:15:48,560 could be finalized as far as cross 408 00:15:48,560 --> 00:15:50,959 access easements and placements so it 409 00:15:50,959 --> 00:15:52,720 can be enjoyed and shared by both 410 00:15:52,720 --> 00:15:54,560 properties. 411 00:15:54,560 --> 00:15:56,320 Um, 412 00:15:56,320 --> 00:15:58,079 we did advertise this for a public 413 00:15:58,079 --> 00:16:00,480 hearing. Uh, is there any questions for 414 00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:01,440 staff? 415 00:16:01,440 --> 00:16:03,759 >> I have a couple questions. First, on 416 00:16:03,759 --> 00:16:05,199 that slide, you're just on the 417 00:16:05,199 --> 00:16:08,320 conditions. What does that 418 00:16:08,320 --> 00:16:10,480 tie the applicant to do when it says 419 00:16:10,480 --> 00:16:13,120 that the applicant explore prospects of 420 00:16:13,120 --> 00:16:15,279 having access to the subject property? 421 00:16:15,279 --> 00:16:17,199 What I mean, that doesn't I don't see 422 00:16:17,199 --> 00:16:19,680 that as binding. What does that mean to 423 00:16:19,680 --> 00:16:21,920 explore? My understanding is any 424 00:16:21,920 --> 00:16:24,079 conversations we have with UD do usually 425 00:16:24,079 --> 00:16:27,199 involve the municipality as well. And so 426 00:16:27,199 --> 00:16:31,040 I think it's just a strong reminder that 427 00:16:31,040 --> 00:16:32,639 it'd be in their best interest to have 428 00:16:32,639 --> 00:16:34,320 that conversation before the city 429 00:16:34,320 --> 00:16:37,600 council meeting. Um so that can be uh 430 00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:39,199 known as to whether or not it's an 431 00:16:39,199 --> 00:16:40,000 option. 432 00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:40,480 >> Okay. 433 00:16:40,480 --> 00:16:42,560 >> I know they've had some preliminary 434 00:16:42,560 --> 00:16:44,079 discussions, but I don't know the 435 00:16:44,079 --> 00:16:45,440 process that they'll need to go through 436 00:16:45,440 --> 00:16:49,360 to get um more of a firm answer from you 437 00:16:49,360 --> 00:16:51,600 do. it's in their favor. It's beneficial 438 00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:55,040 for them if they can get it. So, they're incentivized to do that. I just 439 00:16:55,040 --> 00:16:56,480 was the terminology seemed a little 440 00:16:56,480 --> 00:16:58,240 weird to me. So, 441 00:16:58,240 --> 00:17:00,320 >> yeah, part of the debate was some 442 00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:02,000 members of the DRC felt it'd be 443 00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:04,480 appropriate to address it at the plat 444 00:17:04,480 --> 00:17:07,280 level. Uh and others felt that while 445 00:17:07,280 --> 00:17:09,039 we're at the zone change level, we might 446 00:17:09,039 --> 00:17:11,280 as well uh tackle that question. 447 00:17:11,280 --> 00:17:13,199 >> Okay. And then the other question I had 448 00:17:13,199 --> 00:17:14,640 was if you go back a couple slides to 449 00:17:14,640 --> 00:17:16,079 where we show that that one right there. 450 00:17:16,079 --> 00:17:19,120 No. So, when we went over this, I and I 451 00:17:19,120 --> 00:17:21,919 don't think this is the case. Um, these 452 00:17:21,919 --> 00:17:24,000 all these lots look like they're fairly 453 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:26,480 good size. We've often had developers 454 00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:28,960 add in these oddshaped 455 00:17:28,960 --> 00:17:32,720 um lots to increase the lot size, the 456 00:17:32,720 --> 00:17:34,400 square footage size to get the zoning 457 00:17:34,400 --> 00:17:38,480 they want. Um, did these put them over 458 00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:40,080 when we're going through that first 459 00:17:40,080 --> 00:17:42,240 sizing of their their lots? 460 00:17:42,240 --> 00:17:45,440 >> No. And they're adequate size. Good qu a 461 00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:47,840 good I can't speak tonight. That was a 462 00:17:47,840 --> 00:17:49,520 good question. That was a catch that our 463 00:17:49,520 --> 00:17:52,160 city manager Seth Parin had as well at 464 00:17:52,160 --> 00:17:55,039 the DRC. And so after the DRC we reran 465 00:17:55,039 --> 00:17:56,880 the numbers as far as their average lot 466 00:17:56,880 --> 00:17:58,880 size for the subdivision. 467 00:17:58,880 --> 00:18:00,799 >> And uh let me find it. It's in the 468 00:18:00,799 --> 00:18:03,919 report. Um 469 00:18:03,919 --> 00:18:07,200 they were 12,34 square ft after the 470 00:18:07,200 --> 00:18:08,160 exclusion of that. 471 00:18:08,160 --> 00:18:09,280 >> What were they before? 472 00:18:09,280 --> 00:18:11,520 >> Uh higher than that, but the minimum 473 00:18:11,520 --> 00:18:12,960 they need to be is the 12,000. still 474 00:18:12,960 --> 00:18:15,760 within the still above the minimum. 475 00:18:15,760 --> 00:18:17,760 >> Yeah. I don't know if you know what size 476 00:18:17,760 --> 00:18:19,280 is this. I'm just kind of curious the 477 00:18:19,280 --> 00:18:20,400 And this is going to be an actual 478 00:18:20,400 --> 00:18:22,000 residentially. 479 00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:24,480 >> I don't think we have that exact number. 480 00:18:24,480 --> 00:18:30,240 Um let's go back a slide. One more. 481 00:18:30,240 --> 00:18:31,440 >> It's right there. 482 00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:32,320 >> Good luck. 483 00:18:32,320 --> 00:18:34,400 >> 32 484 00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:36,720 behind that on you. 485 00:18:36,720 --> 00:18:38,880 >> Looks like it's over 13,000 square feet. 486 00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:39,760 >> Okay. I see anything. 487 00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:40,960 >> Stay on that slide because I have a 488 00:18:40,960 --> 00:18:42,559 question about that. Can I Can I 489 00:18:42,559 --> 00:18:45,120 >> These are both pretty large but awkward 490 00:18:45,120 --> 00:18:47,919 shape, but this one is closer to the 491 00:18:47,919 --> 00:18:49,120 average size. They're just about a 492 00:18:49,120 --> 00:18:50,880 thousand over. Okay. 493 00:18:50,880 --> 00:18:52,720 >> So, this development's been here for a 494 00:18:52,720 --> 00:18:54,880 long time. Where did the homes start 495 00:18:54,880 --> 00:18:56,880 here and why are there not homes built 496 00:18:56,880 --> 00:18:57,280 on? 497 00:18:57,280 --> 00:18:59,760 >> So, that phase has not been recorded 498 00:18:59,760 --> 00:19:03,039 yet. Um, when they if we can go to the 499 00:19:03,039 --> 00:19:04,720 interactive map, 500 00:19:04,720 --> 00:19:05,679 >> this is new. 501 00:19:05,679 --> 00:19:07,440 >> So, when they approved the preliminary 502 00:19:07,440 --> 00:19:09,840 plat for the Arrowhead subdivision, I 503 00:19:09,840 --> 00:19:12,080 believe it had six phases. They've 504 00:19:12,080 --> 00:19:15,440 recorded phases one through five and 505 00:19:15,440 --> 00:19:18,559 phase six. Um I believe when they 506 00:19:18,559 --> 00:19:20,400 submitted both Josh and I noticed that 507 00:19:20,400 --> 00:19:22,640 they had some changes with with 508 00:19:22,640 --> 00:19:24,799 potential lines for this commercial and 509 00:19:24,799 --> 00:19:26,640 that's when the conversation started as 510 00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:28,559 far as their desire to reszone it. So 511 00:19:28,559 --> 00:19:30,880 you can see this area right here. This 512 00:19:30,880 --> 00:19:33,120 is the unplatted phase six. These are 513 00:19:33,120 --> 00:19:34,880 phases one through five. If you zoom 514 00:19:34,880 --> 00:19:38,549 out. 515 00:19:38,559 --> 00:19:41,440 Yeah. So all of this is phases one 516 00:19:41,440 --> 00:19:44,080 through five and then this unplatted 517 00:19:44,080 --> 00:19:46,640 portion remainder that's phase six that 518 00:19:46,640 --> 00:19:48,880 they would ultimately button up once 519 00:19:48,880 --> 00:19:51,280 they have a an answer on 520 00:19:51,280 --> 00:19:53,520 >> uh the zoning and a few other uh issues 521 00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:54,640 they're working through. 522 00:19:54,640 --> 00:19:55,679 >> Okay. 523 00:19:55,679 --> 00:19:59,120 >> I was oriented I was looking at this 524 00:19:59,120 --> 00:20:00,799 wrong. Okay. 525 00:20:00,799 --> 00:20:02,640 >> And it seems clear from the plan I see 526 00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:06,799 but no plan no changes to any plans for 527 00:20:06,799 --> 00:20:08,960 anything like that. No changes to the 528 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:10,640 remainder of it. Just those two 529 00:20:10,640 --> 00:20:10,880 properties. 530 00:20:10,880 --> 00:20:12,400 >> Just those two properties. No road 531 00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:13,200 changes there. 532 00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:13,760 >> Correct. 533 00:20:13,760 --> 00:20:16,559 >> Existing. 534 00:20:16,559 --> 00:20:19,679 >> Any other questions for staff? 535 00:20:19,679 --> 00:20:20,320 >> Thank you. 536 00:20:20,320 --> 00:20:23,669 >> Thanks, Brandon. 537 00:20:23,679 --> 00:20:25,200 » Okay. So, this is also a public hearing. 538 00:20:25,200 --> 00:20:27,840 If anybody's here to uh talk on this 539 00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:31,760 subject, we'd love to hear from you. 540 00:20:31,760 --> 00:20:33,679 please state your name and go from 541 00:20:33,679 --> 00:20:34,799 there. 542 00:20:34,799 --> 00:20:37,360 >> Arlon Al and I live just to the west. my 543 00:20:37,360 --> 00:20:40,720 property borders that exact spot through 544 00:20:40,720 --> 00:20:44,000 there. And I'm not opposed to this 545 00:20:44,000 --> 00:20:48,240 change. I just want to make sure that 546 00:20:48,240 --> 00:20:50,799 we get a good fence up along there. You 547 00:20:50,799 --> 00:20:52,720 know, I have 548 00:20:52,720 --> 00:20:54,960 ditches that carry one to two feet of 549 00:20:54,960 --> 00:20:57,360 water. And I don't want, you know, 550 00:20:57,360 --> 00:20:59,679 problems with people coming over. And 551 00:20:59,679 --> 00:21:02,080 that, you know, that includes all of 552 00:21:02,080 --> 00:21:04,400 that phase six. 553 00:21:04,400 --> 00:21:07,280 I would like to see a permanent good 554 00:21:07,280 --> 00:21:10,559 fence along through there. Um, and also 555 00:21:10,559 --> 00:21:13,039 I would like to 556 00:21:13,039 --> 00:21:17,039 know for sure where that boundary is. 557 00:21:17,039 --> 00:21:20,880 Um, I know that in the past 558 00:21:20,880 --> 00:21:23,360 some of my property has been annexed 559 00:21:23,360 --> 00:21:25,919 into the city because it was recorded 560 00:21:25,919 --> 00:21:28,400 not recorded wrong but just didn't they 561 00:21:28,400 --> 00:21:32,000 didn't look close enough into the deeds. 562 00:21:32,000 --> 00:21:35,280 And so it's been surveyed incorrectly a 563 00:21:35,280 --> 00:21:37,679 couple of different times. So I just 564 00:21:37,679 --> 00:21:39,919 want to make sure all the surveying 565 00:21:39,919 --> 00:21:43,990 everything is on 566 00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:46,960 and that would be my only concern. 567 00:21:46,960 --> 00:21:48,400 >> Could could we go back to interactive 568 00:21:48,400 --> 00:21:50,559 map? Armen, which is your property if 569 00:21:50,559 --> 00:21:51,600 you can. 570 00:21:51,600 --> 00:21:56,960 >> Um, so all the way along there 571 00:21:56,960 --> 00:21:59,440 from Yep. all the way along through 572 00:21:59,440 --> 00:22:00,000 there. 573 00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:05,919 >> Okay. So it's about 1,000 ft through there. 574 00:22:05,919 --> 00:22:07,600 >> That's where the canal is, right? 575 00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:07,919 >> Yes. 576 00:22:07,919 --> 00:22:09,679 >> Right along the canal. 577 00:22:09,679 --> 00:22:11,919 >> Is the canal on yours or 578 00:22:11,919 --> 00:22:15,200 >> the canal? Both sides are on mine and 579 00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:17,520 you're outside of the city boundaries 580 00:22:17,520 --> 00:22:18,080 >> or at least 581 00:22:18,080 --> 00:22:22,159 >> Well, that's what there's about 582 00:22:22,159 --> 00:22:26,559 15 feet of that top half, maybe 20 feet 583 00:22:26,559 --> 00:22:28,720 that got annexed into the city. And 584 00:22:28,720 --> 00:22:31,440 that's when I say just everybody didn't 585 00:22:31,440 --> 00:22:34,080 look at the correct 586 00:22:34,080 --> 00:22:36,320 um documents 587 00:22:36,320 --> 00:22:40,559 and so some of mine on that top is in 588 00:22:40,559 --> 00:22:43,280 the city but most all of it is in the 589 00:22:43,280 --> 00:22:44,559 county. 590 00:22:44,559 --> 00:22:46,720 >> Okay. 591 00:22:46,720 --> 00:22:49,760 So, um, the issue of the fence along 592 00:22:49,760 --> 00:22:51,280 commercial property, we'd require a 593 00:22:51,280 --> 00:22:52,880 masonry fence, splitting it from 594 00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:55,360 residential, a six foot high masonry 595 00:22:55,360 --> 00:22:57,679 fence. Against the rest of those 596 00:22:57,679 --> 00:22:59,520 residential lots, though, that would be 597 00:22:59,520 --> 00:23:00,960 up to the property owner or we're going 598 00:23:00,960 --> 00:23:03,360 to require the developer to run a fence 599 00:23:03,360 --> 00:23:05,520 along the boundary line. I don't 600 00:23:05,520 --> 00:23:06,640 remember how that was approved. 601 00:23:06,640 --> 00:23:08,159 >> Me neither. 602 00:23:08,159 --> 00:23:10,720 >> And see, I can't run a fence along 603 00:23:10,720 --> 00:23:11,440 there, 604 00:23:11,440 --> 00:23:12,000 >> right? 605 00:23:12,000 --> 00:23:14,240 >> Because it's an easement, a canal 606 00:23:14,240 --> 00:23:16,960 easement. So, I am trying to work 607 00:23:16,960 --> 00:23:19,679 something out with Suncor, 608 00:23:19,679 --> 00:23:22,640 you know, to even if I have to pay for 609 00:23:22,640 --> 00:23:25,840 the fence or something, maybe picking up 610 00:23:25,840 --> 00:23:28,799 a couple of feet of that property along 611 00:23:28,799 --> 00:23:30,799 through there. So, I could put a fence 612 00:23:30,799 --> 00:23:32,320 in 613 00:23:32,320 --> 00:23:34,960 >> on the rest of that or, you know, maybe 614 00:23:34,960 --> 00:23:36,640 split the difference or something with 615 00:23:36,640 --> 00:23:38,159 them. 616 00:23:38,159 --> 00:23:40,880 >> But, we have been in talks a little bit 617 00:23:40,880 --> 00:23:41,760 about it. 618 00:23:41,760 --> 00:23:44,240 >> Okay. But my concern is, you know, I 619 00:23:44,240 --> 00:23:47,919 just don't want problems with anybody 620 00:23:47,919 --> 00:23:48,799 getting hurt. 621 00:23:48,799 --> 00:23:49,760 >> Sure. 622 00:23:49,760 --> 00:23:51,840 >> It did 623 00:23:51,840 --> 00:23:54,640 have a fence. It wasn't a real good 624 00:23:54,640 --> 00:23:57,360 fence before all this started. 625 00:23:57,360 --> 00:23:58,400 >> Okay. 626 00:23:58,400 --> 00:23:59,039 >> So, 627 00:23:59,039 --> 00:24:00,400 >> Brandon, do you have a comment to make 628 00:24:00,400 --> 00:24:02,559 along about the fence? 629 00:24:02,559 --> 00:24:05,679 Oh, I was just going to say um with 630 00:24:05,679 --> 00:24:07,520 master plan developments, it's not 631 00:24:07,520 --> 00:24:11,120 uncommon to look at exterior uh property 632 00:24:11,120 --> 00:24:14,159 lines and either have uniform fencing or 633 00:24:14,159 --> 00:24:16,720 safety fencing. Um so that's something 634 00:24:16,720 --> 00:24:20,000 we can dig into the preliminary plat um 635 00:24:20,000 --> 00:24:22,000 and see what was discussed and approved 636 00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:24,320 as far as that West property. I think 637 00:24:24,320 --> 00:24:26,720 it's very reasonable to to continue 638 00:24:26,720 --> 00:24:29,039 those discussions and even if it came 639 00:24:29,039 --> 00:24:30,880 down to shared cost of fencing, it it'd 640 00:24:30,880 --> 00:24:32,080 be appropriate to have some kind of 641 00:24:32,080 --> 00:24:33,679 fencing on that west side. 642 00:24:33,679 --> 00:24:34,159 >> Great. 643 00:24:34,159 --> 00:24:36,320 >> Thanks for bringing that up. 644 00:24:36,320 --> 00:24:37,360 >> Against the commercial, there will be a 645 00:24:37,360 --> 00:24:38,960 mason for sure. 646 00:24:38,960 --> 00:24:39,760 >> Yeah. So, 647 00:24:39,760 --> 00:24:40,640 >> and then it'll be against the 648 00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:41,840 residential you are going to look into 649 00:24:41,840 --> 00:24:43,440 and get some feedback on that. 650 00:24:43,440 --> 00:24:46,880 >> Yeah. So as part of um the buffering 651 00:24:46,880 --> 00:24:48,640 from the commercial to the residential 652 00:24:48,640 --> 00:24:51,360 use, we have the setback, we have the 653 00:24:51,360 --> 00:24:53,360 landscaping and then in addition to that 654 00:24:53,360 --> 00:24:54,720 we have the masonry wall. 655 00:24:54,720 --> 00:24:58,640 >> Yeah. Okay. And then what about the uh 656 00:24:58,640 --> 00:25:02,880 the property line? That was uh Mr. Al's 657 00:25:02,880 --> 00:25:04,400 second question. 658 00:25:04,400 --> 00:25:08,559 >> Um that's one we can look into. It's interesting looking at the county 659 00:25:08,559 --> 00:25:11,200 data here. Josh, if you don't mind 660 00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:14,159 zooming in kind of right here and then 661 00:25:14,159 --> 00:25:17,039 maybe turn the zoning on. I can see what 662 00:25:17,039 --> 00:25:20,720 he's saying in that. And then go ahead 663 00:25:20,720 --> 00:25:23,120 and turn it off again. You can see the 664 00:25:23,120 --> 00:25:24,559 city line here, but then we've got 665 00:25:24,559 --> 00:25:26,480 multiple property lines. So that one is 666 00:25:26,480 --> 00:25:29,120 owned by Mr. All. What about this this 667 00:25:29,120 --> 00:25:30,320 skinny one here? 668 00:25:30,320 --> 00:25:33,039 >> That's owned by by me also. 669 00:25:33,039 --> 00:25:34,559 >> Yeah, that's another one. And then 670 00:25:34,559 --> 00:25:39,510 Sunrock starts right here. 671 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:42,320 So there is an odd uh 672 00:25:42,320 --> 00:25:44,159 >> overlap 673 00:25:44,159 --> 00:25:47,760 >> with the with the annexation. 674 00:25:47,760 --> 00:25:50,559 >> So we we'd be happy to look into that. 675 00:25:50,559 --> 00:25:53,120 >> But anything 676 00:25:53,120 --> 00:25:57,360 between Alts property and commercial is 677 00:25:57,360 --> 00:25:59,919 going to have to have a masonry fence. 678 00:25:59,919 --> 00:26:00,400 >> Yes. 679 00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:01,279 >> Yeah. 680 00:26:01,279 --> 00:26:04,960 >> And with with the final plat um these 681 00:26:04,960 --> 00:26:08,080 issues will be confirmed. Um because the 682 00:26:08,080 --> 00:26:09,760 county will require any applicable 683 00:26:09,760 --> 00:26:12,080 property owners to sign the plat and 684 00:26:12,080 --> 00:26:15,360 both our department or our jurisdiction 685 00:26:15,360 --> 00:26:17,919 and the county both uh look at the 686 00:26:17,919 --> 00:26:19,760 boundary descriptions of the plats to 687 00:26:19,760 --> 00:26:21,360 make sure there's no gaps, overlaps, 688 00:26:21,360 --> 00:26:24,559 things of that nature. Um and so we'll 689 00:26:24,559 --> 00:26:26,880 definitely look into this and see see 690 00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:28,240 what we can do. 691 00:26:28,240 --> 00:26:28,880 >> All right. 692 00:26:28,880 --> 00:26:29,840 >> Very good. Thank you. 693 00:26:29,840 --> 00:26:33,039 >> Okay. Thanks. 694 00:26:33,039 --> 00:26:35,600 >> Anybody else? 695 00:26:35,600 --> 00:26:38,400 Okay, we'll close the public hearing. 696 00:26:38,400 --> 00:26:40,559 Um, 697 00:26:40,559 --> 00:26:42,480 anybody have any further points to 698 00:26:42,480 --> 00:26:44,240 discuss? 699 00:26:44,240 --> 00:26:46,240 >> The thing that seems awkward to me is 700 00:26:46,240 --> 00:26:48,240 turning into a residential neighborhood 701 00:26:48,240 --> 00:26:52,080 to turn into the commercial, 702 00:26:52,080 --> 00:26:54,080 but I don't know. What do you guys 703 00:26:54,080 --> 00:26:54,720 think? 704 00:26:54,720 --> 00:26:55,919 >> I think it's a better use of the 705 00:26:55,919 --> 00:26:58,880 property to go commercial than those 706 00:26:58,880 --> 00:27:02,720 lots as they're designated there. 707 00:27:02,720 --> 00:27:04,640 >> I agree with that. Visually looking at 708 00:27:04,640 --> 00:27:07,120 the size that I mean when we look at 709 00:27:07,120 --> 00:27:08,960 that property it is a strange sort of 710 00:27:08,960 --> 00:27:11,520 shape. I can see how it's uh equal to 711 00:27:11,520 --> 00:27:12,960 the other property or roughly equal to 712 00:27:12,960 --> 00:27:15,600 the other property that's development 713 00:27:15,600 --> 00:27:17,200 seems like it makes sense and like from 714 00:27:17,200 --> 00:27:19,120 a commercial perspective regardless of 715 00:27:19,120 --> 00:27:21,360 the ingress that's right along Arrowhead 716 00:27:21,360 --> 00:27:23,679 Trail that's kind of a key location. We 717 00:27:23,679 --> 00:27:25,120 add a little more commercial there. Feel 718 00:27:25,120 --> 00:27:26,559 pretty darn good about that. 719 00:27:26,559 --> 00:27:31,120 >> Yeah. Okay. I would be I'd happy to 720 00:27:31,120 --> 00:27:32,559 entertain a motion if anybody wants to 721 00:27:32,559 --> 00:27:37,909 offer one. 722 00:27:37,919 --> 00:27:39,840 » I'll make a motion that we recommend the 723 00:27:39,840 --> 00:27:42,640 approval of this commercial zone change 724 00:27:42,640 --> 00:27:44,880 based on the following findings and 725 00:27:44,880 --> 00:27:46,880 subject to the following conditions as 726 00:27:46,880 --> 00:27:48,799 listed right there. 727 00:27:48,799 --> 00:27:50,480 >> I'll second that. 728 00:27:50,480 --> 00:27:52,400 >> I have a motion to second. All in favor? 729 00:27:52,400 --> 00:27:53,200 >> I. 730 00:27:53,200 --> 00:27:55,520 >> Any opposed? 731 00:27:55,520 --> 00:27:59,919 >> Okay. Thank you. Um, 732 00:27:59,919 --> 00:28:03,039 our next item of business is uh we have 733 00:28:03,039 --> 00:28:05,840 two project signage plans. The first one 734 00:28:05,840 --> 00:28:08,880 is a Maverick convenience store. 735 00:28:08,880 --> 00:28:11,039 >> Sorry, I'm just going to steal a moment. 736 00:28:11,039 --> 00:28:13,919 Um, just wanted to publicly thank uh Ian 737 00:28:13,919 --> 00:28:16,159 as he comes up to present these next two 738 00:28:16,159 --> 00:28:16,880 items. 739 00:28:16,880 --> 00:28:18,399 >> You're still my Thunderman. 740 00:28:18,399 --> 00:28:22,080 >> Sorry, I'll sit back down. 741 00:28:22,080 --> 00:28:25,279 >> Um, Ian has worked with the city for two 742 00:28:25,279 --> 00:28:26,399 years, I believe. 743 00:28:26,399 --> 00:28:27,279 >> Yeah. 744 00:28:27,279 --> 00:28:29,520 um and some adventures in life have 745 00:28:29,520 --> 00:28:31,600 taken him to another state and so 746 00:28:31,600 --> 00:28:33,760 shortly he'll be uh leaving his 747 00:28:33,760 --> 00:28:36,000 employment with with the city and and 748 00:28:36,000 --> 00:28:37,840 heading off to Colorado. But we just 749 00:28:37,840 --> 00:28:40,159 wanted to thank Ian uh for all the 750 00:28:40,159 --> 00:28:42,320 things that he's done for uh the city 751 00:28:42,320 --> 00:28:45,120 and the community in the the short time 752 00:28:45,120 --> 00:28:46,640 that he's been with us. We've definitely 753 00:28:46,640 --> 00:28:48,799 enjoyed working with Ian and having him 754 00:28:48,799 --> 00:28:53,029 on the staff. 755 00:28:53,039 --> 00:28:58,870 emotional 756 00:28:58,880 --> 00:29:00,320 can't feel so emotional before you talk 757 00:29:00,320 --> 00:29:01,840 about something like signage, right? 758 00:29:01,840 --> 00:29:04,080 Something so exciting. 759 00:29:04,080 --> 00:29:08,320 >> Okay, so we're talking signs specific. 760 00:29:08,320 --> 00:29:10,640 We're talking project signage plans 761 00:29:10,640 --> 00:29:12,000 tonight. This is actually the first one 762 00:29:12,000 --> 00:29:15,279 I've done um since being a Spanish fork, 763 00:29:15,279 --> 00:29:17,919 so fitting that it's on my last planning 764 00:29:17,919 --> 00:29:21,120 commission. Um, so I guess just for for 765 00:29:21,120 --> 00:29:25,120 reference here, um, this is our standard 766 00:29:25,120 --> 00:29:28,720 signage code for um, 767 00:29:28,720 --> 00:29:31,120 what criteria 768 00:29:31,120 --> 00:29:33,279 um, sites 769 00:29:33,279 --> 00:29:35,919 um, the signage that a site can have um, 770 00:29:35,919 --> 00:29:37,679 without having to go through an approval 771 00:29:37,679 --> 00:29:38,960 process like this. They still have to 772 00:29:38,960 --> 00:29:40,799 make application and they're reviewed by 773 00:29:40,799 --> 00:29:43,919 staff administratively and approved. But 774 00:29:43,919 --> 00:29:47,679 um as you can see here a a to not have 775 00:29:47,679 --> 00:29:48,960 to go through a project signage plan. 776 00:29:48,960 --> 00:29:52,000 You can have a monument sign um or a 777 00:29:52,000 --> 00:29:53,679 freestanding sign and you can have one 778 00:29:53,679 --> 00:29:56,799 per street frontage. So if it has one 779 00:29:56,799 --> 00:29:58,080 street frontage, you can have one. If it 780 00:29:58,080 --> 00:29:59,520 has a corner lot, you could have one on 781 00:29:59,520 --> 00:30:02,880 each um street frontage essentially. Um 782 00:30:02,880 --> 00:30:05,039 as well as there's a few other criteria 783 00:30:05,039 --> 00:30:10,640 here like copy area and height, etc., Um, so that's just kind of the 784 00:30:10,640 --> 00:30:13,919 standard sign plan application. There's 785 00:30:13,919 --> 00:30:15,360 also wall signs, which I didn't include 786 00:30:15,360 --> 00:30:17,039 in this. If you go to the next one, 787 00:30:17,039 --> 00:30:18,640 Josh. 788 00:30:18,640 --> 00:30:22,880 So, this is the um newly approved uh 789 00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:25,919 project signage plan code. So, the idea 790 00:30:25,919 --> 00:30:27,440 with the project signage plan is it's an 791 00:30:27,440 --> 00:30:30,640 application um that a property owner can 792 00:30:30,640 --> 00:30:33,279 apply for. Um, they have to meet this 793 00:30:33,279 --> 00:30:35,600 criteria though that you see here. uh 794 00:30:35,600 --> 00:30:38,080 they have to be at least four acres in 795 00:30:38,080 --> 00:30:42,159 size um or have 50,000 uh square feet of 796 00:30:42,159 --> 00:30:44,080 building space. So, it can be multiple 797 00:30:44,080 --> 00:30:45,600 buildings. Doesn't have to be just one, 798 00:30:45,600 --> 00:30:49,039 but if they're within 400 feet of uh the 799 00:30:49,039 --> 00:30:53,520 interstate of the of an I-15 interstate 800 00:30:53,520 --> 00:30:55,919 uh interchange and the rightway right 801 00:30:55,919 --> 00:30:58,159 ofway of that interchange, which was 802 00:30:58,159 --> 00:31:00,080 fleshed out by Councilman Marshall last 803 00:31:00,080 --> 00:31:03,679 night, um then that building space 804 00:31:03,679 --> 00:31:06,640 requirement is waved. Um, but the whole 805 00:31:06,640 --> 00:31:09,200 point here being someone could apply to 806 00:31:09,200 --> 00:31:11,200 have signage that doesn't conform to the 807 00:31:11,200 --> 00:31:13,200 what we would normally just approve 808 00:31:13,200 --> 00:31:14,559 administratively or review 809 00:31:14,559 --> 00:31:17,120 administratively, I should say. Um, so 810 00:31:17,120 --> 00:31:20,399 this could be extra height, more signs, 811 00:31:20,399 --> 00:31:23,360 it could be um extra copy area, 812 00:31:23,360 --> 00:31:25,360 something like that. Uh, Canyon Creek, 813 00:31:25,360 --> 00:31:27,520 it's a popular one, lots of signage on 814 00:31:27,520 --> 00:31:29,039 Canyon Creek. They have a project 815 00:31:29,039 --> 00:31:31,520 signage plan. Um, and the idea is it 816 00:31:31,520 --> 00:31:32,799 comes to the planning commission and 817 00:31:32,799 --> 00:31:34,960 then it come goes to the the council for 818 00:31:34,960 --> 00:31:37,519 approval. If you go to the next slide. 819 00:31:37,519 --> 00:31:39,120 So, the first one we're talking about 820 00:31:39,120 --> 00:31:42,000 today is um what we're going to call the 821 00:31:42,000 --> 00:31:45,200 Maverick. It's the Maverick site here. 822 00:31:45,200 --> 00:31:46,720 Um, 823 00:31:46,720 --> 00:31:50,880 it's um in total somewhere in the 824 00:31:50,880 --> 00:31:53,600 ballpark of sevenish acres, I believe. 825 00:31:53,600 --> 00:31:56,240 Um, I might be off on that by a by a 826 00:31:56,240 --> 00:31:58,720 smidge. Um, and if you go to the next 827 00:31:58,720 --> 00:32:01,360 slide, this is what's existing on the 828 00:32:01,360 --> 00:32:03,440 site today. It's currently the car 829 00:32:03,440 --> 00:32:05,760 dealership. They have um a couple of 830 00:32:05,760 --> 00:32:08,720 freestanding signs already out there on 831 00:32:08,720 --> 00:32:10,320 the frontage that are going to be 832 00:32:10,320 --> 00:32:14,080 removed. If you go to the next slide, so 833 00:32:14,080 --> 00:32:16,640 this is their overall signage plan. So 834 00:32:16,640 --> 00:32:18,159 there's kind of chaotic. There's a lot 835 00:32:18,159 --> 00:32:20,159 of signs here. Most of these totally 836 00:32:20,159 --> 00:32:22,960 fine, conform just like normal. Um, 837 00:32:22,960 --> 00:32:24,799 wouldn't necessarily need any kind of 838 00:32:24,799 --> 00:32:26,960 project signage plan. There are just a 839 00:32:26,960 --> 00:32:30,640 couple of them that um that don't 840 00:32:30,640 --> 00:32:34,159 necessarily conform um to our our normal 841 00:32:34,159 --> 00:32:36,960 standards. Um 842 00:32:36,960 --> 00:32:40,159 it's going to be signs 843 00:32:40,159 --> 00:32:42,640 one here which if you go to the next 844 00:32:42,640 --> 00:32:44,159 slide, 845 00:32:44,159 --> 00:32:47,039 this is sign one. Um they are requesting 846 00:32:47,039 --> 00:32:50,159 80 feet in height. The limit or the uh 847 00:32:50,159 --> 00:32:53,039 um our normal requirement is 35 feet in 848 00:32:53,039 --> 00:32:56,399 height. Um, and it has with when you 849 00:32:56,399 --> 00:32:58,720 combine all three of those signs 850 00:32:58,720 --> 00:33:02,320 together, it has about 1,200 square feet 851 00:33:02,320 --> 00:33:05,440 of copy area. Um, so that's combination 852 00:33:05,440 --> 00:33:08,320 of all of those. Um, if you go to the 853 00:33:08,320 --> 00:33:10,320 next slide, it'll look very similar, but 854 00:33:10,320 --> 00:33:11,760 this is the other sign that doesn't 855 00:33:11,760 --> 00:33:13,919 necessarily conform just from a copy 856 00:33:13,919 --> 00:33:15,360 area standpoint. It's actually only 30 857 00:33:15,360 --> 00:33:17,519 feet tall, so it is within the height 858 00:33:17,519 --> 00:33:21,600 requirement. Um, but it has 859 00:33:21,600 --> 00:33:24,320 I have the number here. 860 00:33:24,320 --> 00:33:27,519 211 square feet of copy area. I think on 861 00:33:27,519 --> 00:33:30,159 the sheet it says 194. I did the math 862 00:33:30,159 --> 00:33:33,440 again today. It came to 211. Um so at 863 00:33:33,440 --> 00:33:35,120 least from my calculations and I'm no 864 00:33:35,120 --> 00:33:36,799 mathematician but I think it's a little 865 00:33:36,799 --> 00:33:38,640 bit over. Um but regardless that would 866 00:33:38,640 --> 00:33:41,600 be our second um freestanding sign on 867 00:33:41,600 --> 00:33:43,760 the same frontage. So that's over the 868 00:33:43,760 --> 00:33:45,600 requirement in terms of freestanding 869 00:33:45,600 --> 00:33:48,080 signs. Um and then if you go to the next 870 00:33:48,080 --> 00:33:51,200 slide, the only other one is um this 871 00:33:51,200 --> 00:33:52,880 scales sign. This is actually not on the 872 00:33:52,880 --> 00:33:55,279 frontage. It's uh kind of set back, but 873 00:33:55,279 --> 00:33:57,360 it still is another freestanding sign. 874 00:33:57,360 --> 00:34:01,519 Um it's about 21 and a half ft tall. Um 875 00:34:01,519 --> 00:34:07,200 with 108 square ft of copy area. Um so 876 00:34:07,200 --> 00:34:09,440 all in all, that's the signage that 877 00:34:09,440 --> 00:34:11,520 Maverick is proposing. That's why they 878 00:34:11,520 --> 00:34:14,159 need the project signage plan. 879 00:34:14,159 --> 00:34:15,919 >> And the overall height of that one is 880 00:34:15,919 --> 00:34:16,320 what? 881 00:34:16,320 --> 00:34:21,520 >> 21 ft. some roughly 21 feet and four and 882 00:34:21,520 --> 00:34:23,280 a half inches or something like that. 883 00:34:23,280 --> 00:34:25,200 >> But that one's not on the frontage. 884 00:34:25,200 --> 00:34:26,800 That's back within the property. 885 00:34:26,800 --> 00:34:29,679 >> Yeah, it still is um another 886 00:34:29,679 --> 00:34:31,599 freestanding sign though. So it means 887 00:34:31,599 --> 00:34:33,520 they are asking for three instead of the 888 00:34:33,520 --> 00:34:35,599 what we would allow for is one on the 889 00:34:35,599 --> 00:34:36,879 property. Um 890 00:34:36,879 --> 00:34:37,919 >> two 891 00:34:37,919 --> 00:34:39,440 >> or two because you're right, it's a 892 00:34:39,440 --> 00:34:41,919 corner. Um so this would be the the 893 00:34:41,919 --> 00:34:43,119 third one even though it's not on the 894 00:34:43,119 --> 00:34:47,679 front edge, it's set back. Um, but those 895 00:34:47,679 --> 00:34:48,879 are those are kind of the three signs. 896 00:34:48,879 --> 00:34:50,159 If you go to the next slide, I think I 897 00:34:50,159 --> 00:34:52,240 have something else. Oh, here's like a 898 00:34:52,240 --> 00:34:53,919 visual rendering. It's really hard to 899 00:34:53,919 --> 00:34:56,560 see um of what the sign would look like. 900 00:34:56,560 --> 00:34:59,599 Uh if so, if you're heading northbound, 901 00:34:59,599 --> 00:35:01,680 that's the sign there. If you're heading 902 00:35:01,680 --> 00:35:03,359 southbound, I think that's the sign 903 00:35:03,359 --> 00:35:05,760 there. Um 904 00:35:05,760 --> 00:35:07,440 so that's that's a rendering of what 905 00:35:07,440 --> 00:35:09,599 that 80 foot tall sign would look like. 906 00:35:09,599 --> 00:35:11,520 Um if you go to the next slide, 907 00:35:11,520 --> 00:35:14,240 >> a question about that. the the cat scale 908 00:35:14,240 --> 00:35:16,160 sign. I assume I mean I don't know that 909 00:35:16,160 --> 00:35:17,520 you're including this, but I I would 910 00:35:17,520 --> 00:35:19,200 assume we can't see that from 911 00:35:19,200 --> 00:35:21,200 >> Yeah, that one's only that's only 21 and 912 00:35:21,200 --> 00:35:23,599 a half ft tallish. That one is 913 00:35:23,599 --> 00:35:25,280 >> would be obscured by the height of 914 00:35:25,280 --> 00:35:26,640 >> Yeah. And even you can't see the other 915 00:35:26,640 --> 00:35:28,240 one either, I don't think, in this the 916 00:35:28,240 --> 00:35:31,520 30 foot tall other Maverick pole sign. 917 00:35:31,520 --> 00:35:33,599 >> That's also just too short to see. 918 00:35:33,599 --> 00:35:35,040 >> So that's the only one you can see is 919 00:35:35,040 --> 00:35:36,240 that that 80 foot tall and I believe 920 00:35:36,240 --> 00:35:38,079 that's why they're requesting it. Um the 921 00:35:38,079 --> 00:35:39,359 applicants here though and they'd be 922 00:35:39,359 --> 00:35:40,800 happy to talk about kind of the the 923 00:35:40,800 --> 00:35:42,960 signage on the property. Um, if you go 924 00:35:42,960 --> 00:35:44,000 to the next slide, I don't remember if I 925 00:35:44,000 --> 00:35:46,000 have anything else. Oh. Um, so that's 926 00:35:46,000 --> 00:35:48,560 the motion. Just a simple motion, but 927 00:35:48,560 --> 00:35:50,160 um, yeah, that's what they're proposing. 928 00:35:50,160 --> 00:35:51,440 Sorry, there's a lot of numbers and 929 00:35:51,440 --> 00:35:52,800 signs there. If you go all the way back 930 00:35:52,800 --> 00:35:55,280 to the the kind of overall Yeah, that 931 00:35:55,280 --> 00:35:57,839 thing. So sign one, this is Main Street. 932 00:35:57,839 --> 00:36:00,320 Sign one, which is the 80 foot one. Sign 933 00:36:00,320 --> 00:36:03,520 two, this one is 30 feet. And then sign 934 00:36:03,520 --> 00:36:05,599 12 is the scales one set back a little 935 00:36:05,599 --> 00:36:08,720 bit further. 936 00:36:08,720 --> 00:36:09,680 And then these are all 937 00:36:09,680 --> 00:36:13,119 >> So sign one is two signs facing 938 00:36:13,119 --> 00:36:14,640 >> northbound and southbound. 939 00:36:14,640 --> 00:36:16,320 >> It's the same sign. Yeah. Yeah. Same 940 00:36:16,320 --> 00:36:19,359 sign facing the two directions. Yeah. 941 00:36:19,359 --> 00:36:20,720 >> And then Yeah. Don't There's a lot of 942 00:36:20,720 --> 00:36:22,000 other signs here. They all meet the 943 00:36:22,000 --> 00:36:23,839 code. They all They're all totally fine. 944 00:36:23,839 --> 00:36:27,359 Just directional signs. 945 00:36:27,359 --> 00:36:28,960 >> The site map to show us where because 946 00:36:28,960 --> 00:36:32,240 didn't the first show where maybe it's 947 00:36:32,240 --> 00:36:34,400 the next one. There's existing signs on 948 00:36:34,400 --> 00:36:35,760 this property, right? 949 00:36:35,760 --> 00:36:36,880 >> Yes. Correct. 950 00:36:36,880 --> 00:36:37,280 >> Um 951 00:36:37,280 --> 00:36:38,880 >> the dealership signs. Yeah, the 952 00:36:38,880 --> 00:36:40,640 dealership signs didn't show it what 953 00:36:40,640 --> 00:36:43,440 they were in one of the that one 954 00:36:43,440 --> 00:36:44,640 existing card. 955 00:36:44,640 --> 00:36:46,880 >> How how tall are those existing signs 956 00:36:46,880 --> 00:36:47,920 that 957 00:36:47,920 --> 00:36:49,040 >> you know I actually don't have a 958 00:36:49,040 --> 00:36:51,200 measurement for those. 959 00:36:51,200 --> 00:36:56,079 >> 47 ft. 960 00:36:56,079 --> 00:37:00,230 Okay. 961 00:37:00,240 --> 00:37:02,160 So, we have two signs there that are 47 962 00:37:02,160 --> 00:37:05,119 feet existing. 963 00:37:05,119 --> 00:37:09,359 >> Are they both 47 ft? The ship sign's 47 964 00:37:09,359 --> 00:37:10,400 sign's a little bit shorter. 965 00:37:10,400 --> 00:37:12,320 >> Gotcha. Yeah, that's what I figured. 966 00:37:12,320 --> 00:37:16,160 >> And our existing sign code is the height 967 00:37:16,160 --> 00:37:17,599 is 35 ft. 968 00:37:17,599 --> 00:37:20,960 >> 35 ft for a freestanding sign. Yeah. 969 00:37:20,960 --> 00:37:22,320 And then we'll get into monument signs 970 00:37:22,320 --> 00:37:23,680 at the next one. There's not really any 971 00:37:23,680 --> 00:37:24,960 monument signs here, 972 00:37:24,960 --> 00:37:27,280 >> but this this 973 00:37:27,280 --> 00:37:29,040 gas station, Maverick, is going to be 974 00:37:29,040 --> 00:37:31,280 trying to draw people off the freeway. 975 00:37:31,280 --> 00:37:33,280 And we have an overpass right there. 976 00:37:33,280 --> 00:37:34,800 >> Yep. 977 00:37:34,800 --> 00:37:37,200 And they're taking over the whole like 978 00:37:37,200 --> 00:37:39,920 Doug Smith is going away and Naverick's 979 00:37:39,920 --> 00:37:42,240 taking over the whole 980 00:37:42,240 --> 00:37:42,880 parcel. 981 00:37:42,880 --> 00:37:44,640 >> I could have the the applicants maybe 982 00:37:44,640 --> 00:37:46,560 speak to some of those. 983 00:37:46,560 --> 00:37:47,359 >> No, 984 00:37:47,359 --> 00:37:48,240 >> not all of it. 985 00:37:48,240 --> 00:37:50,000 >> Dealings a little bit more in detail 986 00:37:50,000 --> 00:37:50,960 potentially. 987 00:37:50,960 --> 00:37:53,040 >> Thought it was part of it. 988 00:37:53,040 --> 00:37:53,440 >> Okay. 989 00:37:53,440 --> 00:37:54,000 >> One day, right? 990 00:37:54,000 --> 00:37:57,440 >> We'll ask that later. 991 00:37:57,440 --> 00:38:00,720 >> Other questions for staff? So, you're 992 00:38:00,720 --> 00:38:05,359 going to have one one sign, the big one, 993 00:38:05,359 --> 00:38:09,680 that they're going to face towards the 994 00:38:09,680 --> 00:38:11,760 freeway. 995 00:38:11,760 --> 00:38:13,520 >> Yeah. So, to draw from the freeway, 996 00:38:13,520 --> 00:38:14,560 >> my understanding is this one is going to 997 00:38:14,560 --> 00:38:15,920 be the one that's most visible from the 998 00:38:15,920 --> 00:38:18,160 freeway. This one, I don't know exactly 999 00:38:18,160 --> 00:38:19,359 what the visibility is going to look 1000 00:38:19,359 --> 00:38:20,960 like. There's there's not a rendering of 1001 00:38:20,960 --> 00:38:22,480 this one, I don't believe. This one will 1002 00:38:22,480 --> 00:38:23,920 I think the idea is for it to be more 1003 00:38:23,920 --> 00:38:26,160 local road kind of visibility on Main 1004 00:38:26,160 --> 00:38:28,800 Street there. And this one, this one's 1005 00:38:28,800 --> 00:38:30,320 going to be 1006 00:38:30,320 --> 00:38:31,280 >> 80 feet tall. 1007 00:38:31,280 --> 00:38:32,320 >> 80 feet. 1008 00:38:32,320 --> 00:38:34,240 >> And then what about the other one was 1009 00:38:34,240 --> 00:38:34,880 30? 1010 00:38:34,880 --> 00:38:36,640 >> Yeah. 30t tall. 1011 00:38:36,640 --> 00:38:39,280 >> And that's within the codes. 1012 00:38:39,280 --> 00:38:42,000 >> Yeah. So that one would wise it did, but 1013 00:38:42,000 --> 00:38:42,880 not not 1014 00:38:42,880 --> 00:38:46,480 >> copy size. Y had bigger. based off my 1015 00:38:46,480 --> 00:38:49,520 math um which 1016 00:38:49,520 --> 00:38:52,079 feel free to um correct me but I came to 1017 00:38:52,079 --> 00:38:53,760 211 1018 00:38:53,760 --> 00:38:55,680 um square feet and I believe the maximum 1019 00:38:55,680 --> 00:38:58,640 is 200 square feet of copy area 1020 00:38:58,640 --> 00:38:59,839 >> that's what's allowed 1021 00:38:59,839 --> 00:39:01,520 >> yeah so that would be that allowed 1022 00:39:01,520 --> 00:39:04,400 normally to 35 height of 35 ft 200 1023 00:39:04,400 --> 00:39:05,520 square feet of copy area 1024 00:39:05,520 --> 00:39:08,240 >> so for comparison Canyon Creek we have 1025 00:39:08,240 --> 00:39:10,720 some with very large sign what's the 1026 00:39:10,720 --> 00:39:13,040 size of that just so I can 1027 00:39:13,040 --> 00:39:17,520 >> so you've got a 100 foot sign a 65 foot 1028 00:39:17,520 --> 00:39:20,160 sign, a 51 foot sign, and a 45 foot 1029 00:39:20,160 --> 00:39:20,640 sign. 1030 00:39:20,640 --> 00:39:21,040 >> Okay. 1031 00:39:21,040 --> 00:39:23,119 >> Um and then they have a number of 1032 00:39:23,119 --> 00:39:25,520 monument signs and other signage as well 1033 00:39:25,520 --> 00:39:27,359 on site, but those are kind of the big 1034 00:39:27,359 --> 00:39:28,640 >> But the main thing we want to know is 1035 00:39:28,640 --> 00:39:30,560 Canyon Creek has one that's that's 1036 00:39:30,560 --> 00:39:32,400 higher than the eight what's they're 1037 00:39:32,400 --> 00:39:33,520 asking at the 80. 1038 00:39:33,520 --> 00:39:35,839 >> Yeah. And those are very substantially I 1039 00:39:35,839 --> 00:39:37,920 guess similarly adjacent to 15. 1040 00:39:37,920 --> 00:39:39,359 Actually, maybe a little further off of 1041 00:39:39,359 --> 00:39:40,000 15, right? 1042 00:39:40,000 --> 00:39:41,040 >> Yeah. Yeah. I think 1043 00:39:41,040 --> 00:39:42,880 >> I think the tallest one is over by 1044 00:39:42,880 --> 00:39:45,280 Hedro, which is kind of right by I-15 1045 00:39:45,280 --> 00:39:47,359 and Highway 6, 1046 00:39:47,359 --> 00:39:47,839 >> right? 1047 00:39:47,839 --> 00:39:50,560 >> And then just a an additional plug, I 1048 00:39:50,560 --> 00:39:52,079 don't recall who was on the planning 1049 00:39:52,079 --> 00:39:53,680 commission the last time we looked at 1050 00:39:53,680 --> 00:39:55,359 the project signage plan. I believe it 1051 00:39:55,359 --> 00:39:57,920 was the hospital that we looked at. 1052 00:39:57,920 --> 00:39:58,240 >> Yeah, 1053 00:39:58,240 --> 00:39:59,599 >> I'm seeing a few heads. 1054 00:39:59,599 --> 00:40:02,800 >> We looked at that Cane Creek sign also. 1055 00:40:02,800 --> 00:40:03,839 >> Yeah, correct. 1056 00:40:03,839 --> 00:40:05,599 >> And then Ian, before you step away, 1057 00:40:05,599 --> 00:40:07,200 maybe if you don't mind, just go over 1058 00:40:07,200 --> 00:40:09,040 the criteria that we're generally 1059 00:40:09,040 --> 00:40:11,760 looking at. It's on the slide with the 1060 00:40:11,760 --> 00:40:12,160 >> Yeah. 1061 00:40:12,160 --> 00:40:14,560 >> text amendment. 1062 00:40:14,560 --> 00:40:18,710 >> Go back a couple. 1063 00:40:18,720 --> 00:40:23,119 » Yes. So, um, this, like I said, is a 1064 00:40:23,119 --> 00:40:25,359 recommendation to the council. Um, and 1065 00:40:25,359 --> 00:40:28,079 it's your job and the council's job to 1066 00:40:28,079 --> 00:40:30,960 just consider the impacts uh of these 1067 00:40:30,960 --> 00:40:33,440 proposed signs on surrounding property 1068 00:40:33,440 --> 00:40:37,200 owners, which the Maverick site has uh a 1069 00:40:37,200 --> 00:40:41,359 PDM steel to the northwest. Is it? 1070 00:40:41,359 --> 00:40:41,760 >> Yeah. 1071 00:40:41,760 --> 00:40:44,800 >> West. Um, it's got Main Street there 1072 00:40:44,800 --> 00:40:47,760 along the east. It's got the highway 1073 00:40:47,760 --> 00:40:49,200 there to the south and then it's got a 1074 00:40:49,200 --> 00:40:53,200 public street to the north. Um 1075 00:40:53,200 --> 00:40:55,920 uh and then just considering the the 1076 00:40:55,920 --> 00:40:58,480 potential uh commerce that the proposed 1077 00:40:58,480 --> 00:41:01,040 signage could create and the visibility 1078 00:41:01,040 --> 00:41:03,520 from from highways. So like I said, this 1079 00:41:03,520 --> 00:41:06,720 is recommendation to the council. Um 1080 00:41:06,720 --> 00:41:08,880 just like all project signage plans. 1081 00:41:08,880 --> 00:41:11,760 >> Uh did you say it would block some 1082 00:41:11,760 --> 00:41:14,240 visibility to these signs would block 1083 00:41:14,240 --> 00:41:16,640 some visibility? I don't know if they 1084 00:41:16,640 --> 00:41:18,079 >> surrounding 1085 00:41:18,079 --> 00:41:19,359 >> I don't think they're going to block any 1086 00:41:19,359 --> 00:41:22,079 visibility from anything. Um, if you go 1087 00:41:22,079 --> 00:41:25,040 to the rendering, maybe 1088 00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:29,430 you can see. 1089 00:41:29,440 --> 00:41:31,839 Yeah. So, that's it's really it's it's 1090 00:41:31,839 --> 00:41:34,319 quite small, but this is this is the 1091 00:41:34,319 --> 00:41:36,000 signage here. So, I don't I don't 1092 00:41:36,000 --> 00:41:37,680 believe it's impeding anything any other 1093 00:41:37,680 --> 00:41:41,119 signage or or or businesses. And then I 1094 00:41:41,119 --> 00:41:44,079 think it's this one 1095 00:41:44,079 --> 00:41:46,400 looking southbound. 1096 00:41:46,400 --> 00:41:48,240 >> I assume there's no consideration 1097 00:41:48,240 --> 00:41:49,599 airport. Obviously, if we're talking 1098 00:41:49,599 --> 00:41:51,280 about the signs at Canyon Creek being 1099 00:41:51,280 --> 00:41:53,280 larger here, there's no concerns from 1100 00:41:53,280 --> 00:41:54,960 the airport or anything like that. 1101 00:41:54,960 --> 00:41:56,880 >> Um, no, I don't I don't believe so. I do 1102 00:41:56,880 --> 00:41:59,119 need to check with Christian on that. 1103 00:41:59,119 --> 00:42:02,319 Um, but my understanding is is no. 1104 00:42:02,319 --> 00:42:05,520 Christian's the airport manager. 1105 00:42:05,520 --> 00:42:07,119 >> I'm a pilot. 1106 00:42:07,119 --> 00:42:08,000 >> Oh, there you go. Perfect. 1107 00:42:08,000 --> 00:42:10,640 >> That's not These aren't even close. 1108 00:42:10,640 --> 00:42:12,640 Not even close on the the descent path 1109 00:42:12,640 --> 00:42:14,000 on the other side is a lot higher 1110 00:42:14,000 --> 00:42:15,760 anyway. You wouldn't have any FAA issues 1111 00:42:15,760 --> 00:42:16,640 on this side. 1112 00:42:16,640 --> 00:42:18,960 >> Just a reminder all comments if we can 1113 00:42:18,960 --> 00:42:21,920 do them at the microphone so our many 1114 00:42:21,920 --> 00:42:24,800 viewers at home can catch it. 1115 00:42:24,800 --> 00:42:26,880 >> So 1116 00:42:26,880 --> 00:42:30,640 my question would be if this is approved 1117 00:42:30,640 --> 00:42:31,920 80 foot sign there you've already 1118 00:42:31,920 --> 00:42:34,319 approved 100 foot or whatever up to 1119 00:42:34,319 --> 00:42:36,880 Canyan Creek. So the kind of already 1120 00:42:36,880 --> 00:42:41,839 opened the floodgates here, but what if 1121 00:42:41,839 --> 00:42:44,640 I don't know Humphrey Welding's across 1122 00:42:44,640 --> 00:42:47,280 the street besides they want an 80 foot 1123 00:42:47,280 --> 00:42:52,319 sign somebody else? Are we opening up? 1124 00:42:52,319 --> 00:42:54,800 >> Totally up to your discretion. 1125 00:42:54,800 --> 00:42:58,160 >> I mean because if we we allow one, we've 1126 00:42:58,160 --> 00:43:00,960 already allowed some. failed another one 1127 00:43:00,960 --> 00:43:02,960 and then you deny some is the city going 1128 00:43:02,960 --> 00:43:05,680 to become liable. 1129 00:43:05,680 --> 00:43:07,839 >> I don't believe Humphrey Welding is 4 1130 00:43:07,839 --> 00:43:10,079 acres in size. 1131 00:43:10,079 --> 00:43:11,119 >> No, there's there's a 1132 00:43:11,119 --> 00:43:12,880 >> you're looking at 4 acre sites or 1133 00:43:12,880 --> 00:43:13,440 larger. 1134 00:43:13,440 --> 00:43:17,119 >> Yeah, but there there could be you're establishing a precedent, 1135 00:43:17,119 --> 00:43:19,440 >> but you got PDM behind them 1136 00:43:19,440 --> 00:43:21,440 >> and the way the code is written is it's 1137 00:43:21,440 --> 00:43:25,599 not a it's not a a standard that is 1138 00:43:25,599 --> 00:43:27,760 given. It's still at the discretion of 1139 00:43:27,760 --> 00:43:29,920 the council. 1140 00:43:29,920 --> 00:43:30,800 But does that open 1141 00:43:30,800 --> 00:43:32,800 >> It's not given by right. It's it's it's 1142 00:43:32,800 --> 00:43:33,280 okay. 1143 00:43:33,280 --> 00:43:36,640 >> It's discretionary. But does that become 1144 00:43:36,640 --> 00:43:40,000 a possible lawsuit to the city because 1145 00:43:40,000 --> 00:43:42,800 they're allowing one 1146 00:43:42,800 --> 00:43:46,800 property and not another property? 1147 00:43:46,800 --> 00:43:50,079 >> I don't believe it would in the sense 1148 00:43:50,079 --> 00:43:54,560 that this was discussed last night. Um, 1149 00:43:54,560 --> 00:43:57,680 as far as amendments to the code, um, 1150 00:43:57,680 --> 00:43:59,839 our legal team was involved in the 1151 00:43:59,839 --> 00:44:02,640 review of of the code and we have not 1152 00:44:02,640 --> 00:44:05,200 heard any concerns, uh, from them as far 1153 00:44:05,200 --> 00:44:07,680 as having this as an option for 1154 00:44:07,680 --> 00:44:19,030 qualifying sites. 1155 00:44:19,040 --> 00:44:21,599 » Okay. 1156 00:44:21,599 --> 00:44:23,200 >> Thank you, Ian. Of course, 1157 00:44:23,200 --> 00:44:25,680 >> as always, it was very well done. You 1158 00:44:25,680 --> 00:44:27,040 pulled the information out that Paul is 1159 00:44:27,040 --> 00:44:28,160 trying to stump you on. You had it right 1160 00:44:28,160 --> 00:44:29,760 there for you. Good job. 1161 00:44:29,760 --> 00:44:31,119 >> Thank you. Thank you again. 1162 00:44:31,119 --> 00:44:32,319 >> Um, did the applicant want to come up 1163 00:44:32,319 --> 00:44:37,270 and address anything on this topic? 1164 00:44:37,280 --> 00:44:39,440 » Good evening. My name is Rick Magnus and 1165 00:44:39,440 --> 00:44:42,480 I am the consulting engineer for this 1166 00:44:42,480 --> 00:44:45,280 project, this Maverick project. And a 1167 00:44:45,280 --> 00:44:47,119 couple things first in the audience, I 1168 00:44:47,119 --> 00:44:50,079 have uh Mr. Rich Pigot who represents 1169 00:44:50,079 --> 00:44:53,440 Maverick on this on this project. I 1170 00:44:53,440 --> 00:44:55,359 think you can hear some Dave Smith 1171 00:44:55,359 --> 00:44:58,319 people here too which I haven't really 1172 00:44:58,319 --> 00:45:00,640 met or discuss or talked to before. But 1173 00:45:00,640 --> 00:45:03,599 then I also have my colleague uh Sheamus 1174 00:45:03,599 --> 00:45:05,680 and once again my name is Rick Magnus 1175 00:45:05,680 --> 00:45:08,240 with AWA Engineering 1176 00:45:08,240 --> 00:45:10,000 2010 1177 00:45:10,000 --> 00:45:13,040 uh North Redwood Road Salt Lake City 1178 00:45:13,040 --> 00:45:15,359 Utah. And if you want to know anything 1179 00:45:15,359 --> 00:45:18,560 more about me you can ask. Um, so a 1180 00:45:18,560 --> 00:45:20,800 couple of things. This the parcel that 1181 00:45:20,800 --> 00:45:25,119 will be uh purchased by Maverick is just 1182 00:45:25,119 --> 00:45:27,680 over 7 acres, 7 and a half. And then we 1183 00:45:27,680 --> 00:45:31,200 are going to be um subdividing that 1184 00:45:31,200 --> 00:45:33,680 property. And the property that Maverick 1185 00:45:33,680 --> 00:45:37,119 sits on is just over four acres and then 1186 00:45:37,119 --> 00:45:39,040 the remainder parcel be give or take 1187 00:45:39,040 --> 00:45:40,960 three acres. So just to kind of give to 1188 00:45:40,960 --> 00:45:44,319 you an idea of how that's going to work 1189 00:45:44,319 --> 00:45:47,760 out. If am I able to move the slides or 1190 00:45:47,760 --> 00:45:50,160 do you guys move the slides? 1191 00:45:50,160 --> 00:45:54,240 >> Oh my don't get me near that thing. 1192 00:45:54,240 --> 00:45:59,349 >> Um 1193 00:45:59,359 --> 00:46:01,280 » you're still recording. So yeah, if we 1194 00:46:01,280 --> 00:46:03,119 could just go back to the the front of 1195 00:46:03,119 --> 00:46:06,319 this. So this is this is the this 1196 00:46:06,319 --> 00:46:10,560 reflects the just over 4 acre parcel 1197 00:46:10,560 --> 00:46:13,280 that will be occupied by Maverick. I 1198 00:46:13,280 --> 00:46:16,400 know it's kind of faint, but here you 1199 00:46:16,400 --> 00:46:19,280 have the store location. Here you have 1200 00:46:19,280 --> 00:46:21,440 what's called the fourcourt. That's 1201 00:46:21,440 --> 00:46:24,720 where regular passengers, pickup trucks 1202 00:46:24,720 --> 00:46:27,200 kind of go. And then back here will be 1203 00:46:27,200 --> 00:46:31,839 where the larger um trucks will go. And 1204 00:46:31,839 --> 00:46:34,400 so you have kind of a good circulation 1205 00:46:34,400 --> 00:46:37,119 pattern just off of the roadway. The 1206 00:46:37,119 --> 00:46:38,800 reason why I'm showing you the site plan 1207 00:46:38,800 --> 00:46:42,160 is, as Ian pointed out, there's three 1208 00:46:42,160 --> 00:46:44,400 sign locations. Even though this looks 1209 00:46:44,400 --> 00:46:46,560 like the little guy, he's actually the 1210 00:46:46,560 --> 00:46:49,440 big guy. We just couldn't fit him there. 1211 00:46:49,440 --> 00:46:51,440 And then this is the one up on the 1212 00:46:51,440 --> 00:46:55,920 corner. And if we would just love to we 1213 00:46:55,920 --> 00:46:59,040 we'll just have the square footage of 1214 00:46:59,040 --> 00:47:02,720 the sign meet your code at 200 square 1215 00:47:02,720 --> 00:47:04,400 feet. we're a little bit over like a 1216 00:47:04,400 --> 00:47:07,440 211. So, we'll just make it comply with 1217 00:47:07,440 --> 00:47:10,319 codes so that we don't really have to, 1218 00:47:10,319 --> 00:47:12,319 you know, you can just consider that. 1219 00:47:12,319 --> 00:47:14,560 The reason why this sign is located 1220 00:47:14,560 --> 00:47:17,119 here, and I know it appears it's two 1221 00:47:17,119 --> 00:47:20,960 signs on one frontage, but we considered 1222 00:47:20,960 --> 00:47:24,079 and what we talked about with staff is 1223 00:47:24,079 --> 00:47:27,680 having the frontage actually be the I-15 1224 00:47:27,680 --> 00:47:32,000 rightway that runs along there and use 1225 00:47:32,000 --> 00:47:34,400 that as one of the frontages. So, right 1226 00:47:34,400 --> 00:47:39,359 along here is I15 right away. So, the 1227 00:47:39,359 --> 00:47:41,839 way that the 1228 00:47:41,839 --> 00:47:44,079 um the text amendment was written and 1229 00:47:44,079 --> 00:47:46,720 approved by your uh city council last 1230 00:47:46,720 --> 00:47:50,720 night, it talks about a 400 ft distance 1231 00:47:50,720 --> 00:47:53,359 from an interchange 1232 00:47:53,359 --> 00:47:57,839 to I-15. So, it's right within the realm 1233 00:47:57,839 --> 00:48:00,560 of the interchange where that 400 foot 1234 00:48:00,560 --> 00:48:04,800 would would apply, not up and down I-15. 1235 00:48:04,800 --> 00:48:08,319 If that kind of lends any um discussion 1236 00:48:08,319 --> 00:48:10,880 or comfort to you, could we go to the 1237 00:48:10,880 --> 00:48:13,599 next slide, please? 1238 00:48:13,599 --> 00:48:16,160 Also, while we're doing that, I want to 1239 00:48:16,160 --> 00:48:18,560 just I got to thank your staff. Your 1240 00:48:18,560 --> 00:48:20,640 staff, you have a wonderful staff here 1241 00:48:20,640 --> 00:48:23,520 at the city. I'm sorry to hear that Ian 1242 00:48:23,520 --> 00:48:25,359 wants to go to Colorado, man. Maybe we 1243 00:48:25,359 --> 00:48:29,359 can throw in a last minute um will I get 1244 00:48:29,359 --> 00:48:31,680 deliver donuts to you every week or 1245 00:48:31,680 --> 00:48:33,040 something. Maybe that'll keep you here. 1246 00:48:33,040 --> 00:48:35,680 I don't know. So, this is the this is 1247 00:48:35,680 --> 00:48:38,400 the signage that we're looking for the 1248 00:48:38,400 --> 00:48:41,440 height increase as well as the square 1249 00:48:41,440 --> 00:48:44,880 footage increase. Once again, this is up 1250 00:48:44,880 --> 00:48:47,359 against I15 1251 00:48:47,359 --> 00:48:50,559 and the way and the configuration of the 1252 00:48:50,559 --> 00:48:53,599 interchange makes it so that the height 1253 00:48:53,599 --> 00:48:58,480 is kind of a necessary thing. And I'll show you in the next slide, if you 1254 00:48:58,480 --> 00:49:01,119 will. 1255 00:49:01,119 --> 00:49:04,079 I'm afraid this that that shows the sign 1256 00:49:04,079 --> 00:49:05,599 that we're going to put on the very 1257 00:49:05,599 --> 00:49:09,200 north um the north corner so that it 1258 00:49:09,200 --> 00:49:11,920 will comply with your code. So, we'll 1259 00:49:11,920 --> 00:49:14,720 shave off the uh the 11 square ft uh 1260 00:49:14,720 --> 00:49:17,440 calculations so that it meets your code. 1261 00:49:17,440 --> 00:49:20,319 Next slide, please. This slide is 1262 00:49:20,319 --> 00:49:23,920 actually located once again on the south 1263 00:49:23,920 --> 00:49:27,119 basically the southwest 1264 00:49:27,119 --> 00:49:31,599 corner interior well interior to the 1265 00:49:31,599 --> 00:49:36,720 site. um it pro it's it's just as high 1266 00:49:36,720 --> 00:49:39,599 as it's not even as high as our fuel 1267 00:49:39,599 --> 00:49:43,280 canopy for the larger trucks. And all it 1268 00:49:43,280 --> 00:49:44,960 does is it indicates I don't know if 1269 00:49:44,960 --> 00:49:47,119 you're familiar with interstate rules 1270 00:49:47,119 --> 00:49:49,680 that trucks need to that travel on the 1271 00:49:49,680 --> 00:49:51,839 interstate they need to weigh themselves 1272 00:49:51,839 --> 00:49:54,480 every once in a while. CAT scale is the 1273 00:49:54,480 --> 00:49:56,000 largest 1274 00:49:56,000 --> 00:49:59,040 worldwide as far as scale programs that 1275 00:49:59,040 --> 00:50:04,319 weigh and um so that's just identifying 1276 00:50:04,319 --> 00:50:06,319 the entrance to that scale that they're 1277 00:50:06,319 --> 00:50:09,040 going to use. So that's something that 1278 00:50:09,040 --> 00:50:11,359 um the orientation of it should not even 1279 00:50:11,359 --> 00:50:12,960 affect 1280 00:50:12,960 --> 00:50:16,319 uh you know I-15 travelers and it's well 1281 00:50:16,319 --> 00:50:19,200 interior of the other perimeter streets. 1282 00:50:19,200 --> 00:50:21,599 So I wanted to just cover that. If you 1283 00:50:21,599 --> 00:50:23,920 go to the next slide. So, here's 1284 00:50:23,920 --> 00:50:25,760 something I wanted to just discuss just 1285 00:50:25,760 --> 00:50:28,800 a little bit. It's I I I want you to 1286 00:50:28,800 --> 00:50:30,880 know that usually companies just don't 1287 00:50:30,880 --> 00:50:33,119 go throw a big old sign up because they 1288 00:50:33,119 --> 00:50:35,920 want to because costs per square feet as 1289 00:50:35,920 --> 00:50:39,680 you increase the height become very 1290 00:50:39,680 --> 00:50:42,800 expensive as you go higher and higher. 1291 00:50:42,800 --> 00:50:47,359 The reason for the 80 um the 80 foot 1292 00:50:47,359 --> 00:50:50,160 high sign and Ian described it very 1293 00:50:50,160 --> 00:50:52,880 well. this little guy here, which you 1294 00:50:52,880 --> 00:50:55,440 know, you're trying to see this as you 1295 00:50:55,440 --> 00:50:58,000 are driving southbound. 1296 00:50:58,000 --> 00:51:01,440 The the importance of a sign when it's 1297 00:51:01,440 --> 00:51:05,119 adjacent to a rideway or a street is you 1298 00:51:05,119 --> 00:51:07,599 consider the speed of the vehicles that 1299 00:51:07,599 --> 00:51:11,040 are on the road, where the accesses are 1300 00:51:11,040 --> 00:51:14,480 to then exit, and then are you giving 1301 00:51:14,480 --> 00:51:19,920 enough distance time for a safe approach 1302 00:51:19,920 --> 00:51:24,720 to exit or um to exit either side. So 1303 00:51:24,720 --> 00:51:26,880 the northbound, what's interesting is 1304 00:51:26,880 --> 00:51:32,079 here on the southbound, this picture is taken 1305 00:51:32,079 --> 00:51:35,119 just a little bit before the the exit, 1306 00:51:35,119 --> 00:51:37,040 but it's to show you that about this 1307 00:51:37,040 --> 00:51:40,000 point is where a driver needs to decide, 1308 00:51:40,000 --> 00:51:44,240 oh, I see the fuel changers and now I 1309 00:51:44,240 --> 00:51:48,000 can make start to make my approach to be 1310 00:51:48,000 --> 00:51:50,480 in the right hand lane and make that 1311 00:51:50,480 --> 00:51:53,839 exit, which um 1312 00:51:53,839 --> 00:51:56,079 which we also show in the plan view up 1313 00:51:56,079 --> 00:52:00,079 here. Up here is where these exits are. 1314 00:52:00,079 --> 00:52:01,760 I just show you the exits. I don't show 1315 00:52:01,760 --> 00:52:03,599 you the distances needed to make that 1316 00:52:03,599 --> 00:52:06,640 decision. Here, once again, on the 1317 00:52:06,640 --> 00:52:08,800 northbound, we're showing you where the 1318 00:52:08,800 --> 00:52:12,160 exit is. Much further back, almost down 1319 00:52:12,160 --> 00:52:14,960 here, is where you're going to need to 1320 00:52:14,960 --> 00:52:17,040 start making a decision to get on there. 1321 00:52:17,040 --> 00:52:20,400 And once again, the 80 foot doesn't 1322 00:52:20,400 --> 00:52:22,640 really is just giving notice that, hey, 1323 00:52:22,640 --> 00:52:23,920 here's where you're going to need to 1324 00:52:23,920 --> 00:52:26,720 make a decision and get and get and make 1325 00:52:26,720 --> 00:52:31,200 it so you don't pass that exit. Um, 1326 00:52:31,200 --> 00:52:33,520 of course, these the fuel price 1327 00:52:33,520 --> 00:52:35,680 changers, they're not they don't they're 1328 00:52:35,680 --> 00:52:38,559 not continuous. They just are price 1329 00:52:38,559 --> 00:52:41,280 changers. They will change when fuel 1330 00:52:41,280 --> 00:52:44,880 price changes. So, you may see that once 1331 00:52:44,880 --> 00:52:46,960 a day, but will you notice it? Not 1332 00:52:46,960 --> 00:52:49,920 really. Um, that will just be an 1333 00:52:49,920 --> 00:52:52,160 identifier that there is something there 1334 00:52:52,160 --> 00:52:56,000 for for them to exit off of. So, I 1335 00:52:56,000 --> 00:52:57,839 wanted to explain that a little bit, why 1336 00:52:57,839 --> 00:53:00,000 those photos were taken at the position 1337 00:53:00,000 --> 00:53:02,240 that they were when you're looking at 1338 00:53:02,240 --> 00:53:05,440 that. And of course with this concave 1339 00:53:05,440 --> 00:53:08,000 inter uh interchange that you've got, 1340 00:53:08,000 --> 00:53:10,480 that's why the orientation of the sign 1341 00:53:10,480 --> 00:53:14,400 is kind of at a 45 degree uh so they can 1342 00:53:14,400 --> 00:53:18,400 orient and reach the visibility of those 1343 00:53:18,400 --> 00:53:20,720 um those vehicles that are traveling 1344 00:53:20,720 --> 00:53:23,040 northbound and southbound. 1345 00:53:23,040 --> 00:53:23,920 >> Great. 1346 00:53:23,920 --> 00:53:30,079 >> Um and then if we go to what is the last slide. Yeah, I like I like 1347 00:53:30,079 --> 00:53:32,000 this slide a lot. if you'll show that 1348 00:53:32,000 --> 00:53:34,559 slide again. Yeah, I like that slide. 1349 00:53:34,559 --> 00:53:37,680 So, anyway, I'm just we concur with 1350 00:53:37,680 --> 00:53:41,200 staff recommendations and I'm here just 1351 00:53:41,200 --> 00:53:42,960 to answer any questions that you may 1352 00:53:42,960 --> 00:53:44,480 have. 1353 00:53:44,480 --> 00:53:48,079 >> Does any have any questions? 1354 00:53:48,079 --> 00:53:54,470 >> Thank you. 1355 00:53:54,480 --> 00:53:56,559 » Now, we've heard from staff and then had 1356 00:53:56,559 --> 00:53:58,800 it repeated with the applicant. Do you 1357 00:53:58,800 --> 00:54:01,359 have any comments from the 1358 00:54:01,359 --> 00:54:03,520 commissioners? 1359 00:54:03,520 --> 00:54:06,960 >> Uh, I can see 1360 00:54:06,960 --> 00:54:08,720 how you guys were talking about like 1361 00:54:08,720 --> 00:54:10,559 yes, this kind of sets a precedent. So 1362 00:54:10,559 --> 00:54:12,720 like we asked how tall Canyon Creek was. 1363 00:54:12,720 --> 00:54:14,160 That one kind of set it. But then if 1364 00:54:14,160 --> 00:54:16,400 we're like, okay, 1365 00:54:16,400 --> 00:54:19,680 how tall is Canyon Creek and 1366 00:54:19,680 --> 00:54:24,079 Maverick? Okay, then we can give then we 1367 00:54:24,079 --> 00:54:26,480 can approve some other taller signs in 1368 00:54:26,480 --> 00:54:28,800 the same kind of configuration. 1369 00:54:28,800 --> 00:54:33,599 It does open the door wider. Uh I really 1370 00:54:33,599 --> 00:54:35,599 I take a lot of road trips and I look 1371 00:54:35,599 --> 00:54:38,000 for maverick signs 1372 00:54:38,000 --> 00:54:40,400 and I like to have them tall so that I 1373 00:54:40,400 --> 00:54:41,920 can see them with enough time to get 1374 00:54:41,920 --> 00:54:46,240 over to move over. So I think it I I 1375 00:54:46,240 --> 00:54:47,599 think it makes sense and I would 1376 00:54:47,599 --> 00:54:49,599 recommend it. 1377 00:54:49,599 --> 00:54:51,359 And this one, as this one does have, 1378 00:54:51,359 --> 00:54:52,960 like Brandon was stating, it does have 1379 00:54:52,960 --> 00:54:54,559 some criteria built into it. 1380 00:54:54,559 --> 00:54:55,119 >> Yeah, I like that. 1381 00:54:55,119 --> 00:54:57,680 >> And it still leaves the decision making 1382 00:54:57,680 --> 00:54:59,520 in the council's hands. 1383 00:54:59,520 --> 00:55:01,280 >> So, it's it's not a by right thing, 1384 00:55:01,280 --> 00:55:02,400 which 1385 00:55:02,400 --> 00:55:06,079 >> I like. And I and I I don't I also do 1386 00:55:06,079 --> 00:55:08,960 not like broad changes um for sight 1387 00:55:08,960 --> 00:55:11,760 specific problems, but this one with the 1388 00:55:11,760 --> 00:55:16,400 configuration of I-15 along that area, 1389 00:55:16,400 --> 00:55:18,640 the height is kind of needed for that 1390 00:55:18,640 --> 00:55:20,880 area. Not kind of, it's very much needed 1391 00:55:20,880 --> 00:55:22,880 for that area. 1392 00:55:22,880 --> 00:55:24,720 And if the applicant changing one to 1393 00:55:24,720 --> 00:55:27,920 comply, then that's a that's a good step 1394 00:55:27,920 --> 00:55:30,160 forward, too. 1395 00:55:30,160 --> 00:55:32,000 Um, 1396 00:55:32,000 --> 00:55:34,160 I don't like the height of it. I'm fine 1397 00:55:34,160 --> 00:55:36,240 with the the scale sign. It's in within 1398 00:55:36,240 --> 00:55:39,839 the property and that that's like, yeah, 1399 00:55:39,839 --> 00:55:43,760 necessary needed, but um 1400 00:55:43,760 --> 00:55:45,680 I don't like the precedence of the 1401 00:55:45,680 --> 00:55:48,240 height of the sign. 1402 00:55:48,240 --> 00:55:52,720 Not that I'm against it because 1403 00:55:52,720 --> 00:55:55,920 I can see the necessity for it. And 1404 00:55:55,920 --> 00:55:57,280 we've got other signs throughout the 1405 00:55:57,280 --> 00:55:59,280 city. I've been at other communities and 1406 00:55:59,280 --> 00:56:03,359 drive through and and they don't allow 1407 00:56:03,359 --> 00:56:05,520 those things. It's very nice because you 1408 00:56:05,520 --> 00:56:09,599 lose that sight pollution, 1409 00:56:09,599 --> 00:56:12,240 but 1410 00:56:12,240 --> 00:56:14,799 we've we're way behind that here in this 1411 00:56:14,799 --> 00:56:21,200 area in our county and this city. So, um 1412 00:56:21,200 --> 00:56:23,599 yeah, that's all I got to say. 1413 00:56:23,599 --> 00:56:26,160 >> I think I'm I'm with Sean. I like I mean 1414 00:56:26,160 --> 00:56:28,559 no none of us want to go outside but I 1415 00:56:28,559 --> 00:56:29,760 think it makes sense where they put it 1416 00:56:29,760 --> 00:56:32,000 on the property and with I-15 it makes 1417 00:56:32,000 --> 00:56:34,000 sense to me. 1418 00:56:34,000 --> 00:56:35,440 >> Okay. 1419 00:56:35,440 --> 00:56:37,440 >> Uh thanks everybody. Enjoy the comments. 1420 00:56:37,440 --> 00:56:40,480 >> I have one other thing to say. I I mean 1421 00:56:40,480 --> 00:56:43,040 going along with opens the door. Our 1422 00:56:43,040 --> 00:56:45,359 very next one is 1423 00:56:45,359 --> 00:56:48,319 another really tall sign proposal 1424 00:56:48,319 --> 00:56:50,240 right right by it. Mhm. 1425 00:56:50,240 --> 00:56:53,520 >> So, is that what we're Is that are we 1426 00:56:53,520 --> 00:56:55,119 wanting to open this door? Is this 1427 00:56:55,119 --> 00:57:00,950 something that we feel good with? 1428 00:57:00,960 --> 00:57:02,799 » Dave, you seem like you're uncomfortable 1429 00:57:02,799 --> 00:57:03,040 with 1430 00:57:03,040 --> 00:57:04,960 >> I'm uncomfortable with it because but I 1431 00:57:04,960 --> 00:57:06,799 think the doors 1432 00:57:06,799 --> 00:57:10,480 already been pressed wide open because 1433 00:57:10,480 --> 00:57:12,880 they've allowed other properties to do 1434 00:57:12,880 --> 00:57:15,760 it. So, I 1435 00:57:15,760 --> 00:57:17,839 you know, if it was the first one, I'd 1436 00:57:17,839 --> 00:57:19,760 say no. 1437 00:57:19,760 --> 00:57:21,839 um where it's already been allowed and 1438 00:57:21,839 --> 00:57:25,040 we're behind the gun on this. I 1439 00:57:25,040 --> 00:57:27,040 Yeah. 1440 00:57:27,040 --> 00:57:32,230 Um, I do 1441 00:57:32,240 --> 00:57:34,559 in my core I believe the property owner 1442 00:57:34,559 --> 00:57:35,760 should be able to do what they want to 1443 00:57:35,760 --> 00:57:38,160 do with their properties and stuff 1444 00:57:38,160 --> 00:57:42,549 >> and 1445 00:57:42,559 --> 00:57:43,599 um, 1446 00:57:43,599 --> 00:57:45,119 >> as long as it doesn't impact others 1447 00:57:45,119 --> 00:57:47,440 negatively, which your comment about 1448 00:57:47,440 --> 00:57:49,200 sight pollution does impact. 1449 00:57:49,200 --> 00:57:50,799 >> I mean, that's that's my main thing. I 1450 00:57:50,799 --> 00:57:52,799 mean, because you cannot drive down I-15 1451 00:57:52,799 --> 00:57:55,599 without seeing signs and 1452 00:57:55,599 --> 00:57:58,720 >> billboards and whatnot and then you go 1453 00:57:58,720 --> 00:58:00,319 to certain other communities and they 1454 00:58:00,319 --> 00:58:07,599 don't have billboards and and it's it's nice. It's not as 1455 00:58:07,599 --> 00:58:09,599 convenient because you don't know what's 1456 00:58:09,599 --> 00:58:12,160 coming up all the time, 1457 00:58:12,160 --> 00:58:15,520 but um we are where we're at right now. 1458 00:58:15,520 --> 00:58:16,480 So, 1459 00:58:16,480 --> 00:58:16,960 >> yeah, 1460 00:58:16,960 --> 00:58:19,040 >> good comments. 1461 00:58:19,040 --> 00:58:20,640 Um, 1462 00:58:20,640 --> 00:58:23,359 so these these 1463 00:58:23,359 --> 00:58:26,000 this applies probably to both the the 1464 00:58:26,000 --> 00:58:28,559 topics we're going to hear about. 1465 00:58:28,559 --> 00:58:33,839 Um, they both comply with the same the wordage that was put in the verbiage 1466 00:58:33,839 --> 00:58:36,640 that was put into the amendment. 1467 00:58:36,640 --> 00:58:38,640 Um, 1468 00:58:38,640 --> 00:58:40,000 both these fall underneath those same 1469 00:58:40,000 --> 00:58:40,880 criterias. 1470 00:58:40,880 --> 00:58:42,400 >> The the next one you're going to see 1471 00:58:42,400 --> 00:58:45,440 actually would have complied without any 1472 00:58:45,440 --> 00:58:48,079 kind of amendment required. Um just the 1473 00:58:48,079 --> 00:58:49,599 Maverick site was a 1474 00:58:49,599 --> 00:58:51,200 >> okay 1475 00:58:51,200 --> 00:58:51,920 little off. 1476 00:58:51,920 --> 00:58:54,720 >> No, thank you for that clarification. 1477 00:58:54,720 --> 00:58:57,440 Any other comments? 1478 00:58:57,440 --> 00:59:00,400 >> I'll entertain a motion. 1479 00:59:00,400 --> 00:59:06,549 I think would be 1480 00:59:06,559 --> 00:59:09,520 recommending the text change for 1481 00:59:09,520 --> 00:59:10,559 approval. 1482 00:59:10,559 --> 00:59:10,960 >> Correct. 1483 00:59:10,960 --> 00:59:13,599 >> Sorry, not the text change. Um it'd be 1484 00:59:13,599 --> 00:59:15,359 the project signage plan. 1485 00:59:15,359 --> 00:59:17,440 >> Oh, okay. I move to recommend approval 1486 00:59:17,440 --> 00:59:20,160 of the proposed Maverick project signage 1487 00:59:20,160 --> 00:59:23,359 plan. Thanks for typing that out for us. 1488 00:59:23,359 --> 00:59:24,720 >> I love it when they do that. I have a 1489 00:59:24,720 --> 00:59:26,000 motion. Do I have a second? 1490 00:59:26,000 --> 00:59:26,640 >> Second. 1491 00:59:26,640 --> 00:59:28,720 >> I have a motion to second. All in favor? 1492 00:59:28,720 --> 00:59:29,440 >> I. 1493 00:59:29,440 --> 00:59:31,839 >> Any oppose? 1494 00:59:31,839 --> 00:59:32,880 >> Okay. Thank you. 1495 00:59:32,880 --> 00:59:37,829 >> Thank you very much. Thank you. 1496 00:59:37,839 --> 00:59:40,160 » Okay. Okay, sticking with the theme, 1497 00:59:40,160 --> 00:59:44,960 we're up now roughly 2940 north, 200 1498 00:59:44,960 --> 00:59:48,960 east. Um, this is the 1499 00:59:48,960 --> 00:59:51,920 soon to be 2700 North, 2700 North 1500 00:59:51,920 --> 00:59:55,440 interchange. Um, if you go to the next 1501 00:59:55,440 --> 00:59:59,680 slide. So, this is the um this is the 1502 00:59:59,680 --> 01:00:02,400 new proposed Doug Smith site. So you can 1503 01:00:02,400 --> 01:00:05,280 see a theme cross over maybe from the 1504 01:00:05,280 --> 01:00:09,440 last Maverick site to this one. Um so 1505 01:00:09,440 --> 01:00:14,559 here they are proposing a few signs. Um 1506 01:00:14,559 --> 01:00:18,000 same kind of criteria as before. Um so 1507 01:00:18,000 --> 01:00:19,760 first I'll go over the the pole signs 1508 01:00:19,760 --> 01:00:22,640 that they are proposing and then I'll 1509 01:00:22,640 --> 01:00:24,240 touch on the monument signs because we 1510 01:00:24,240 --> 01:00:27,119 didn't have to touch on that before. 1511 01:00:27,119 --> 01:00:31,119 So they are Doug Smith is proposing um 1512 01:00:31,119 --> 01:00:34,319 four freestanding pole signs um but they 1513 01:00:34,319 --> 01:00:36,240 are a little bit shorter than um at 1514 01:00:36,240 --> 01:00:37,520 least the tallest one we saw with 1515 01:00:37,520 --> 01:00:40,319 Maverick. Um there are two freestanding 1516 01:00:40,319 --> 01:00:42,960 pole signs that are proposed to be 50 1517 01:00:42,960 --> 01:00:46,559 feet. Those are the two that are going 1518 01:00:46,559 --> 01:00:49,359 to be along I15 there. So those are 1519 01:00:49,359 --> 01:00:52,880 going to be 50 feet. Um one and then the 1520 01:00:52,880 --> 01:00:54,559 other two are going to be roughly 20 1521 01:00:54,559 --> 01:00:57,280 feet. Um I think one's 21 feet and the 1522 01:00:57,280 --> 01:01:01,040 other's 20 feet. Um they and all of 1523 01:01:01,040 --> 01:01:03,520 these combined and those two, sorry, are 1524 01:01:03,520 --> 01:01:05,280 on the uh those two are on the south 1525 01:01:05,280 --> 01:01:07,839 side here. Um which will be like a 1526 01:01:07,839 --> 01:01:11,119 there's going to be like a axis into the 1527 01:01:11,119 --> 01:01:14,880 property from the south there. Um 1528 01:01:14,880 --> 01:01:17,119 respectively, these signs have copy 1529 01:01:17,119 --> 01:01:21,760 areas of 158 square feet and 225 square 1530 01:01:21,760 --> 01:01:25,599 ft for the bigger ones. Those are their copy areas, the ones that are on 1531 01:01:25,599 --> 01:01:27,760 the I-15. 1532 01:01:27,760 --> 01:01:30,720 Um, and then 42 feet and 53.5 square 1533 01:01:30,720 --> 01:01:34,799 feet for the other ones. Um, so that's 1534 01:01:34,799 --> 01:01:37,680 those are their um poll signs um that 1535 01:01:37,680 --> 01:01:39,520 they're proposing. So the tallest going 1536 01:01:39,520 --> 01:01:42,640 to be 50 and the largest copy area one 1537 01:01:42,640 --> 01:01:45,440 is going to be have 225 square feet of 1538 01:01:45,440 --> 01:01:48,400 copy area. Um, 1539 01:01:48,400 --> 01:01:51,599 now let's touch on maybe the monument 1540 01:01:51,599 --> 01:01:57,119 signs. Um so monument sign criteria um 1541 01:01:57,119 --> 01:01:58,960 is that if we were looking at just 1542 01:01:58,960 --> 01:02:01,599 standard code what we require is one 1543 01:02:01,599 --> 01:02:05,200 foot high pedestal um not exceed 5t in 1544 01:02:05,200 --> 01:02:06,960 height above the pedestal and have a 1545 01:02:06,960 --> 01:02:10,400 copy area of 48 square feet or less. So 1546 01:02:10,400 --> 01:02:13,359 that's the just the standard um monument 1547 01:02:13,359 --> 01:02:15,760 sign kind of requirement that we would 1548 01:02:15,760 --> 01:02:17,359 go off of if they someone was not 1549 01:02:17,359 --> 01:02:21,440 proposing a project signage plan. Um, 1550 01:02:21,440 --> 01:02:27,119 this site is proposing to have a few 1551 01:02:27,119 --> 01:02:30,160 monument signs as well. Um, they're 11 1552 01:02:30,160 --> 01:02:35,119 feet with a copy area of 66 ft, 10 feet 1553 01:02:35,119 --> 01:02:37,119 with a copy area of 53 and a half square 1554 01:02:37,119 --> 01:02:40,000 feet. Another one at 10 feet with a copy 1555 01:02:40,000 --> 01:02:44,400 area of 32.3 ft. Um, and then 20 feet 1556 01:02:44,400 --> 01:02:48,640 with a copy area of 48.9 square ft. Um, 1557 01:02:48,640 --> 01:02:50,640 and those are going to be mostly up 1558 01:02:50,640 --> 01:02:53,119 here. And then there will be one down 1559 01:02:53,119 --> 01:02:58,240 here with the other signs. Um, 1560 01:02:58,240 --> 01:03:00,400 so those ones are they're a little bit 1561 01:03:00,400 --> 01:03:03,200 taller than what we would normally, 1562 01:03:03,200 --> 01:03:04,640 you know, what we would normally say a 1563 01:03:04,640 --> 01:03:06,079 site could have for a monument sign. 1564 01:03:06,079 --> 01:03:08,480 Have a little bit more copy area than 1565 01:03:08,480 --> 01:03:12,480 what we would also normally say. Um, but 1566 01:03:12,480 --> 01:03:13,520 in general, that's what they're 1567 01:03:13,520 --> 01:03:16,319 proposing. If you go to the next slide, 1568 01:03:16,319 --> 01:03:20,079 um, here we have all those signs. So, 1569 01:03:20,079 --> 01:03:24,559 the tall ones are going to be sign one 1570 01:03:24,559 --> 01:03:27,839 and sign two. Those are the 50 foot tall 1571 01:03:27,839 --> 01:03:30,240 signs. So, a Chevy one and a Chrysler 1572 01:03:30,240 --> 01:03:34,799 Jeep Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram sign. Um, 1573 01:03:34,799 --> 01:03:36,319 and then this is one of the 20 foot tall 1574 01:03:36,319 --> 01:03:38,160 pole signs. There will be two of these, 1575 01:03:38,160 --> 01:03:40,240 I believe, is the idea. One will be 10 1576 01:03:40,240 --> 01:03:42,799 feet and one will be 20 feet. And then 1577 01:03:42,799 --> 01:03:44,160 this one will be 20 feet. And this will 1578 01:03:44,160 --> 01:03:50,390 be 10 feet. And this will be 1579 01:03:50,400 --> 01:03:53,039 which one is sign three? Sorry, there's 1580 01:03:53,039 --> 01:03:54,880 so many. I've been looking at a lot of 1581 01:03:54,880 --> 01:03:58,079 sign stuff recently. That one will be 11 1582 01:03:58,079 --> 01:04:00,480 ft. 1583 01:04:00,480 --> 01:04:03,440 So, lot of numbers there. I really do 1584 01:04:03,440 --> 01:04:06,240 apologize. Um, 1585 01:04:06,240 --> 01:04:08,240 this one, like I mentioned, would have 1586 01:04:08,240 --> 01:04:10,160 met the code before the amendment also 1587 01:04:10,160 --> 01:04:14,559 because we require um 50,000 square feet 1588 01:04:14,559 --> 01:04:17,680 of building space. This one, this site 1589 01:04:17,680 --> 01:04:20,400 in general will have a combined 57,000 1590 01:04:20,400 --> 01:04:22,640 square feet of building space roughly. 1591 01:04:22,640 --> 01:04:25,520 Um, and it's over 9 acres, so it meets 1592 01:04:25,520 --> 01:04:27,680 the both acreage and building space 1593 01:04:27,680 --> 01:04:32,079 requirement. So the 400 feet to an I-15 1594 01:04:32,079 --> 01:04:34,319 interchange right ofway is not 1595 01:04:34,319 --> 01:04:36,480 necessarily needed for this. It would 1596 01:04:36,480 --> 01:04:38,960 have met the requirement regardless. 1597 01:04:38,960 --> 01:04:41,760 >> Okay. So what is over 1598 01:04:41,760 --> 01:04:44,240 uh the which of the you gave us a whole 1599 01:04:44,240 --> 01:04:46,400 bunch of I know I'm sorry numbers. So 1600 01:04:46,400 --> 01:04:48,319 what makes it so they can't do this by 1601 01:04:48,319 --> 01:04:50,880 right besides the height the two tall 1602 01:04:50,880 --> 01:04:51,359 ones. 1603 01:04:51,359 --> 01:04:53,599 >> Yeah, great question. Um one of them is 1604 01:04:53,599 --> 01:04:56,559 over in copy area. I think it's sign two 1605 01:04:56,559 --> 01:04:58,880 is 225 square feet of copy area I 1606 01:04:58,880 --> 01:05:01,680 believe and instead of 200 precisely. 1607 01:05:01,680 --> 01:05:06,240 >> Um and then the monument signs are um 1608 01:05:06,240 --> 01:05:08,160 almost all of them are taller than what 1609 01:05:08,160 --> 01:05:10,400 we would require and some of them are 1610 01:05:10,400 --> 01:05:14,480 over in copy area by 20 or 30 square 1611 01:05:14,480 --> 01:05:16,079 feet roughly. 1612 01:05:16,079 --> 01:05:17,839 >> How much how much taller are they than 1613 01:05:17,839 --> 01:05:18,880 they should be? 1614 01:05:18,880 --> 01:05:20,240 >> Let's see which one's the I think the 1615 01:05:20,240 --> 01:05:24,880 tallest one is 20 feet. So that would be 1616 01:05:24,880 --> 01:05:26,559 14 feet higher than what we would 1617 01:05:26,559 --> 01:05:27,760 normally require because it would 1618 01:05:27,760 --> 01:05:28,000 normally 1619 01:05:28,000 --> 01:05:31,119 >> Which one are you 20 foot? I'm wondering 1620 01:05:31,119 --> 01:05:32,559 if that would be more of a freestanding 1621 01:05:32,559 --> 01:05:33,039 sign. 1622 01:05:33,039 --> 01:05:33,680 >> I think this one, 1623 01:05:33,680 --> 01:05:34,799 >> not a monument sign. 1624 01:05:34,799 --> 01:05:38,000 >> I I see it as a monument sign. I 1625 01:05:38,000 --> 01:05:40,640 >> I guess it's up to inter interpretation 1626 01:05:40,640 --> 01:05:42,799 to a degree. 1627 01:05:42,799 --> 01:05:46,799 Is there a is there a reason why they're 1628 01:05:46,799 --> 01:05:50,319 needing them taller above code above 1629 01:05:50,319 --> 01:05:53,440 what's that is a great question I would 1630 01:05:53,440 --> 01:05:56,160 ask the the applicant maybe um I don't 1631 01:05:56,160 --> 01:05:58,640 know if I have a a great answer to that 1632 01:05:58,640 --> 01:06:00,400 um 1633 01:06:00,400 --> 01:06:06,160 but visibility I would assume um 1634 01:06:06,160 --> 01:06:10,160 >> and all those are going along 1635 01:06:10,160 --> 01:06:12,319 they're going along well I that road. I 1636 01:06:12,319 --> 01:06:14,480 don't know what that road number is, but 1637 01:06:14,480 --> 01:06:14,880 the 1638 01:06:14,880 --> 01:06:15,280 >> which one? 1639 01:06:15,280 --> 01:06:17,280 >> The east west road on the north side of 1640 01:06:17,280 --> 01:06:18,000 the property, right? 1641 01:06:18,000 --> 01:06:19,200 >> 2940. 1642 01:06:19,200 --> 01:06:19,599 >> Yeah. 1643 01:06:19,599 --> 01:06:22,240 So, that's 2940 north. So, three 1644 01:06:22,240 --> 01:06:23,839 of them are up there. I think they're 1645 01:06:23,839 --> 01:06:25,760 all 10 ft in height. Let me confirm 1646 01:06:25,760 --> 01:06:26,240 that. 1647 01:06:26,240 --> 01:06:28,000 >> That's Yep. Those are all 1648 01:06:28,000 --> 01:06:30,160 >> That's right at the new interchange. 1649 01:06:30,160 --> 01:06:32,079 >> All that. So, just to the new down. 1650 01:06:32,079 --> 01:06:33,280 >> New interchange is at the south. 1651 01:06:33,280 --> 01:06:34,480 >> Yeah. Sorry. New interchange is right 1652 01:06:34,480 --> 01:06:37,599 there. 29 because that's 2700 north. Um 1653 01:06:37,599 --> 01:06:39,039 yeah, these are all going to be 10 feet 1654 01:06:39,039 --> 01:06:43,349 tall up here. 1655 01:06:43,359 --> 01:06:45,200 And then you do have the elevation 1656 01:06:45,200 --> 01:06:48,640 change with the new offramp that you can 1657 01:06:48,640 --> 01:06:52,079 see the angle coming through. 1658 01:06:52,079 --> 01:06:54,559 >> I apologize for all the the numbers and 1659 01:06:54,559 --> 01:06:55,280 >> it's good. 1660 01:06:55,280 --> 01:06:56,960 >> I didn't hear Brander's comment. What 1661 01:06:56,960 --> 01:06:57,920 were you 1662 01:06:57,920 --> 01:06:59,520 >> Sorry, I don't have a pointer so I'm 1663 01:06:59,520 --> 01:07:03,839 just kind of randomly gesturing but um 1664 01:07:03,839 --> 01:07:06,079 Ian a second ago was talking about the 1665 01:07:06,079 --> 01:07:09,760 visibility. So this is the offramp right 1666 01:07:09,760 --> 01:07:13,280 here. So as it approaches I think 1667 01:07:13,280 --> 01:07:15,839 they're calling it dry creek parkway 1668 01:07:15,839 --> 01:07:18,559 interchange. So that this is the 1669 01:07:18,559 --> 01:07:20,880 elevated point here. So you have 1670 01:07:20,880 --> 01:07:22,799 frontage down here, frontage up here, 1671 01:07:22,799 --> 01:07:27,760 frontage here. Um and so that's probably 1672 01:07:27,760 --> 01:07:29,599 that's my thought as far as the 1673 01:07:29,599 --> 01:07:31,280 increased height for that sign is just 1674 01:07:31,280 --> 01:07:33,280 the obstruction that you're going to get 1675 01:07:33,280 --> 01:07:35,760 with the offramp and the interchange. 1676 01:07:35,760 --> 01:07:37,599 What is this property? There's a wedge 1677 01:07:37,599 --> 01:07:39,680 shape right here. 1678 01:07:39,680 --> 01:07:40,559 >> Detention basin. 1679 01:07:40,559 --> 01:07:42,559 >> It's a retention basin. 1680 01:07:42,559 --> 01:07:45,920 >> Yeah, owns it. 1681 01:07:45,920 --> 01:07:47,920 >> So, we want people to focus on the 1682 01:07:47,920 --> 01:07:50,160 beautiful new car dealerships and not on 1683 01:07:50,160 --> 01:07:53,280 the bas. So 1684 01:07:53,280 --> 01:07:56,559 question I guess what's 1685 01:07:56,559 --> 01:08:01,200 how standard are these heights 1686 01:08:01,200 --> 01:08:05,119 and areas of the signs with other 1687 01:08:05,119 --> 01:08:07,599 communities with the other cities along 1688 01:08:07,599 --> 01:08:10,720 the front here? Are we pretty standard 1689 01:08:10,720 --> 01:08:12,880 and so 1690 01:08:12,880 --> 01:08:15,039 with what you know you see in 1691 01:08:15,039 --> 01:08:18,159 Springville, Provo, Oram 1692 01:08:18,159 --> 01:08:22,719 or do we know? Um, I don't 1693 01:08:22,719 --> 01:08:26,640 want to go too off on a tangent. Um, 1694 01:08:26,640 --> 01:08:28,400 historically 1695 01:08:28,400 --> 01:08:32,080 that changes over time. And I think 1696 01:08:32,080 --> 01:08:33,920 something you commented about with 1697 01:08:33,920 --> 01:08:36,719 Maverick is certain cities have certain 1698 01:08:36,719 --> 01:08:39,600 values or things that they prioritize. 1699 01:08:39,600 --> 01:08:41,920 Um, obviously there's many communities, 1700 01:08:41,920 --> 01:08:43,600 especially in the Midwest, where it's 1701 01:08:43,600 --> 01:08:46,560 very appropriate to have high, tall, 1702 01:08:46,560 --> 01:08:49,279 visible signage. Uh, other communities 1703 01:08:49,279 --> 01:08:52,000 value the visibility for high-profile 1704 01:08:52,000 --> 01:08:55,679 sites like this one along I-15. Um, but 1705 01:08:55,679 --> 01:08:57,440 I think if you were to do a poll of 1706 01:08:57,440 --> 01:08:59,279 cities along the Wasatch front, you'd 1707 01:08:59,279 --> 01:09:02,400 probably get a wide variety. And I would 1708 01:09:02,400 --> 01:09:04,560 guess that our 35 foot is probably on 1709 01:09:04,560 --> 01:09:06,719 the shorter side 1710 01:09:06,719 --> 01:09:08,799 for many communities, but some 1711 01:09:08,799 --> 01:09:10,480 communities over time have grad 1712 01:09:10,480 --> 01:09:13,199 gradually shifted away from taller signs 1713 01:09:13,199 --> 01:09:16,000 except for in what they usually look as 1714 01:09:16,000 --> 01:09:19,199 regional commercial uh locations that 1715 01:09:19,199 --> 01:09:21,199 the commercial there is intended to draw 1716 01:09:21,199 --> 01:09:24,239 in uh traffic versus like a neighborhood 1717 01:09:24,239 --> 01:09:26,560 commercial store that might be like your 1718 01:09:26,560 --> 01:09:29,040 neighborhood Walmart where it may not 1719 01:09:29,040 --> 01:09:31,759 necessarily need as much signage or as 1720 01:09:31,759 --> 01:09:34,799 visible signage um for their for their 1721 01:09:34,799 --> 01:09:35,679 business. 1722 01:09:35,679 --> 01:09:44,709 >> Yeah, I understand that. 1723 01:09:44,719 --> 01:09:46,239 » Do we want to hear from the applicant? 1724 01:09:46,239 --> 01:09:47,679 Ask some of the questions about the size 1725 01:09:47,679 --> 01:09:48,719 of the signs. 1726 01:09:48,719 --> 01:09:53,749 >> Thanks, guys. 1727 01:09:53,759 --> 01:09:54,880 » How are you guys tonight? 1728 01:09:54,880 --> 01:09:55,199 >> Good. 1729 01:09:55,199 --> 01:09:57,199 >> I'm Brandon Lundine. with Diversified 1730 01:09:57,199 --> 01:09:59,679 Design Services, out of Murray, um, home 1731 01:09:59,679 --> 01:10:02,640 of a lot of car dealerships. And here 1732 01:10:02,640 --> 01:10:04,800 here's the issue with this site. We have 1733 01:10:04,800 --> 01:10:07,679 a new offramp that comes off. And 1734 01:10:07,679 --> 01:10:09,199 essentially, when the offramp comes off, 1735 01:10:09,199 --> 01:10:12,320 it raises 24 ft. Our new two buildings 1736 01:10:12,320 --> 01:10:15,440 we're putting there are only about 25 ft 1737 01:10:15,440 --> 01:10:17,040 tall. 1738 01:10:17,040 --> 01:10:18,239 So, you'll never see the building 1739 01:10:18,239 --> 01:10:20,480 signage. So, we've proposed and worked 1740 01:10:20,480 --> 01:10:22,719 with the manufacturers to put their 1741 01:10:22,719 --> 01:10:25,840 standard 50-ft sign. The Chevrolet sign 1742 01:10:25,840 --> 01:10:27,920 will be the farthest north in the corner 1743 01:10:27,920 --> 01:10:29,360 and it's essentially the sign that's 1744 01:10:29,360 --> 01:10:30,640 over here at Doug Smith now. It's the 1745 01:10:30,640 --> 01:10:32,640 same sign. It's 47 feet. We're just 1746 01:10:32,640 --> 01:10:34,159 going to move it over to there. So, that 1747 01:10:34,159 --> 01:10:36,239 one's already 47. That's at Doug Smith 1748 01:10:36,239 --> 01:10:39,760 now. And then we have another sign that 1749 01:10:39,760 --> 01:10:42,800 will be for Chrysler, Dodge, um, and 1750 01:10:42,800 --> 01:10:46,640 Jeep. And, uh, that sign will be just 1751 01:10:46,640 --> 01:10:48,960 further down I-15. But by going to 50 1752 01:10:48,960 --> 01:10:50,480 ft, what that allows is when someone's 1753 01:10:50,480 --> 01:10:51,600 coming north, because right now if 1754 01:10:51,600 --> 01:10:53,040 you're coming if you're heading north on 1755 01:10:53,040 --> 01:10:55,040 I-15, you can't even see the site and 1756 01:10:55,040 --> 01:10:56,159 you won't even know the buildings are 1757 01:10:56,159 --> 01:10:57,760 there. Because if you come south and 1758 01:10:57,760 --> 01:10:59,280 look for where Dolly's is, you don't 1759 01:10:59,280 --> 01:11:00,719 even know Dolly's is there until bam, 1760 01:11:00,719 --> 01:11:01,600 you're right there at the Ford 1761 01:11:01,600 --> 01:11:03,360 dealership. So what we want to do is do 1762 01:11:03,360 --> 01:11:05,840 a 50-ft sign. So that will put our top 1763 01:11:05,840 --> 01:11:08,960 of our sign is roughly 30 foot above the 1764 01:11:08,960 --> 01:11:11,199 finished grade at the at the over at the 1765 01:11:11,199 --> 01:11:12,960 interchange. I'm not sure if they're 1766 01:11:12,960 --> 01:11:14,719 going to be doing walls or sound walls 1767 01:11:14,719 --> 01:11:16,080 or whatnot, but we wanted to get above 1768 01:11:16,080 --> 01:11:18,320 that. So either coming north or south, 1769 01:11:18,320 --> 01:11:19,520 you can see where the Doug Smith 1770 01:11:19,520 --> 01:11:21,199 dealerships are. And then there's 1771 01:11:21,199 --> 01:11:24,560 another set of of signage that Ian was 1772 01:11:24,560 --> 01:11:26,159 talking about. As you come off the 1773 01:11:26,159 --> 01:11:29,040 freeway, we have three 20 foot signs 1774 01:11:29,040 --> 01:11:32,000 that would be set back behind that pond 1775 01:11:32,000 --> 01:11:33,520 that's there. We'll have three signs 1776 01:11:33,520 --> 01:11:35,360 there. There's one for there's one for 1777 01:11:35,360 --> 01:11:38,239 Chevrolet. Jeep has a freestanding and 1778 01:11:38,239 --> 01:11:40,640 then Chrysler, Dodge, and Ram are the 1779 01:11:40,640 --> 01:11:42,719 other sign. So there's three there. And 1780 01:11:42,719 --> 01:11:45,440 then we just per the per the 1781 01:11:45,440 --> 01:11:46,880 recommendations of the de of the 1782 01:11:46,880 --> 01:11:49,120 manufacturer on the north side we have 1783 01:11:49,120 --> 01:11:52,640 three monument signs along 2950 or 2970 1784 01:11:52,640 --> 01:11:55,120 there just as the other entrance way 1785 01:11:55,120 --> 01:11:57,280 comes into the property. 1786 01:11:57,280 --> 01:11:59,280 >> We essentially have a road that comes in 1787 01:11:59,280 --> 01:12:01,520 jogs to the right jogs left and heads 1788 01:12:01,520 --> 01:12:03,120 north and goes clear across the property 1789 01:12:03,120 --> 01:12:04,719 and both dealerships are located right 1790 01:12:04,719 --> 01:12:05,440 there. 1791 01:12:05,440 --> 01:12:07,760 >> Are the signs on your south end by just 1792 01:12:07,760 --> 01:12:10,159 over the re retention pond are they the 1793 01:12:10,159 --> 01:12:11,440 same that would be on the north end? 1794 01:12:11,440 --> 01:12:13,440 They're they're about 100 ft behind the 1795 01:12:13,440 --> 01:12:14,880 pond, but they're over here in this 1796 01:12:14,880 --> 01:12:15,199 area. 1797 01:12:15,199 --> 01:12:16,480 >> Yeah. But are they duplicated on the 1798 01:12:16,480 --> 01:12:18,000 north side? Is that the same signs? 1799 01:12:18,000 --> 01:12:19,440 >> No. No, those signs not duplicated. The 1800 01:12:19,440 --> 01:12:21,840 320 foot signs would be right here. 1801 01:12:21,840 --> 01:12:22,159 >> Mhm. 1802 01:12:22,159 --> 01:12:23,920 >> So when you came off the offramp, you'd 1803 01:12:23,920 --> 01:12:25,120 be able to look over and say, "Oh, okay. 1804 01:12:25,120 --> 01:12:26,719 There's where the dealers are." And then 1805 01:12:26,719 --> 01:12:28,320 we have the smaller monument signs that 1806 01:12:28,320 --> 01:12:29,520 are up on the north end. Okay. 1807 01:12:29,520 --> 01:12:30,719 >> That are 10 ft. 1808 01:12:30,719 --> 01:12:34,400 >> But you're the big tall attractive signs 1809 01:12:34,400 --> 01:12:35,520 going to be 1810 01:12:35,520 --> 01:12:36,560 >> Yep. There's two of them. 1811 01:12:36,560 --> 01:12:37,120 >> Two of them. 1812 01:12:37,120 --> 01:12:38,800 >> Yep. They're two 50-footers. 1813 01:12:38,800 --> 01:12:41,440 >> So you can see them. And there's already 1814 01:12:41,440 --> 01:12:44,640 a 50-footer at the Doug Smith that's on 1815 01:12:44,640 --> 01:12:45,520 the north side right now. 1816 01:12:45,520 --> 01:12:46,719 >> It'll be the same sign that's that's 1817 01:12:46,719 --> 01:12:47,440 over. 1818 01:12:47,440 --> 01:12:50,080 >> And is it 1819 01:12:50,080 --> 01:12:51,679 >> you talk about the surface area of the 1820 01:12:51,679 --> 01:12:54,480 signs? Is it the same size? We're not 1821 01:12:54,480 --> 01:12:55,520 making it bigger. 1822 01:12:55,520 --> 01:12:56,239 >> It's the same sign. 1823 01:12:56,239 --> 01:12:56,960 >> It's the exact same. 1824 01:12:56,960 --> 01:12:58,400 >> Yeah, it'll be the same sign. And then 1825 01:12:58,400 --> 01:13:01,040 the the one for Chrysler, Dodge, Ram, 1826 01:13:01,040 --> 01:13:02,719 and Jeep is slightly larger because it's 1827 01:13:02,719 --> 01:13:04,560 got four different manufacturers on it. 1828 01:13:04,560 --> 01:13:06,080 That's why it's a little bit larger. 1829 01:13:06,080 --> 01:13:10,159 >> But it's only at 20 ft. No, that one's that one's the one that's in 1830 01:13:10,159 --> 01:13:12,480 the middle about right here. 1831 01:13:12,480 --> 01:13:13,760 >> It's the second 50. 1832 01:13:13,760 --> 01:13:15,199 >> Oh, that's the So, we got Chevrolet up 1833 01:13:15,199 --> 01:13:17,040 here. Then we got Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, 1834 01:13:17,040 --> 01:13:19,360 and Ram midway down before you get to 1835 01:13:19,360 --> 01:13:20,000 the offram. 1836 01:13:20,000 --> 01:13:22,480 >> It's the one that Ian said was 225 1837 01:13:22,480 --> 01:13:23,199 square ft. 1838 01:13:23,199 --> 01:13:24,480 >> Right. Yeah, it's a little larger. 1839 01:13:24,480 --> 01:13:26,080 >> That's why I asked that question. Yeah, 1840 01:13:26,080 --> 01:13:27,760 that makes sense. But it's got four, 1841 01:13:27,760 --> 01:13:29,600 >> but it's because it's separated into 1842 01:13:29,600 --> 01:13:32,080 it's it's in reality, it's multiple 1843 01:13:32,080 --> 01:13:34,320 signs on one post. Correct. 1844 01:13:34,320 --> 01:13:36,880 >> It's one sign with four dealers on it. 1845 01:13:36,880 --> 01:13:38,960 Correct. That's that's what's depicted. 1846 01:13:38,960 --> 01:13:39,600 >> Yeah. 1847 01:13:39,600 --> 01:13:40,480 >> Okay. 1848 01:13:40,480 --> 01:13:42,320 >> That both answers are right. 1849 01:13:42,320 --> 01:13:44,320 >> Yes. 1850 01:13:44,320 --> 01:13:46,640 >> Would it fit to if we said that's got to 1851 01:13:46,640 --> 01:13:48,960 be at 200 square feet? 1852 01:13:48,960 --> 01:13:51,199 >> Um those are those are just the 1853 01:13:51,199 --> 01:13:53,120 manufacturers. That's their signage. I 1854 01:13:53,120 --> 01:13:54,320 could see if they can change it, but 1855 01:13:54,320 --> 01:13:55,840 that's their recommended size and they 1856 01:13:55,840 --> 01:13:57,600 have already designed for their 1857 01:13:57,600 --> 01:13:58,560 projects. Okay. 1858 01:13:58,560 --> 01:13:59,760 >> And then you guys were talking about 1859 01:13:59,760 --> 01:14:02,000 other cities and whatnot. So the 1860 01:14:02,000 --> 01:14:04,400 monument signs that we're doing the up 1861 01:14:04,400 --> 01:14:06,800 top here. If you go through Heber, which 1862 01:14:06,800 --> 01:14:08,960 is pretty tight on their signage stuff, 1863 01:14:08,960 --> 01:14:10,480 that's the same signs they have in front 1864 01:14:10,480 --> 01:14:11,760 of the car that are there. The 1865 01:14:11,760 --> 01:14:13,600 freestanding Jeep, the freestanding 1866 01:14:13,600 --> 01:14:14,239 >> Uhhuh. 1867 01:14:14,239 --> 01:14:16,640 >> uh Chrysler Dodge and Ram. So it's 1868 01:14:16,640 --> 01:14:18,400 basically the same same design package 1869 01:14:18,400 --> 01:14:20,560 they have right there along Highway 40 1870 01:14:20,560 --> 01:14:23,440 >> going through there. 1871 01:14:23,440 --> 01:14:24,400 >> All right. So I 1872 01:14:24,400 --> 01:14:26,400 >> like I said, being from Murray, I've got 1873 01:14:26,400 --> 01:14:28,320 dealership signs all over the place and 1874 01:14:28,320 --> 01:14:30,000 they vary all over the place. We're not 1875 01:14:30,000 --> 01:14:30,800 trying to duplicate. 1876 01:14:30,800 --> 01:14:31,840 >> We aren't kind of in it. 1877 01:14:31,840 --> 01:14:33,280 >> That's why I keep bringing it up, but 1878 01:14:33,280 --> 01:14:35,840 it's the heights. I don't, you know, the 1879 01:14:35,840 --> 01:14:38,400 other signs 20 ft, whatever. 1880 01:14:38,400 --> 01:14:39,600 >> One other thing we've got to contend 1881 01:14:39,600 --> 01:14:41,679 with, too, as far as visuals, we we have 1882 01:14:41,679 --> 01:14:43,840 the Chevrolet sign here, and then about 1883 01:14:43,840 --> 01:14:46,719 right here, we have a 48 foot billboard 1884 01:14:46,719 --> 01:14:49,760 sign. It's the one that's existing. 1885 01:14:49,760 --> 01:14:52,080 >> So, we're trying to be able to see the 1886 01:14:52,080 --> 01:14:54,080 our sign. So, you're not that's on a 1887 01:14:54,080 --> 01:14:55,679 visual impact on both of ours either 1888 01:14:55,679 --> 01:14:57,920 direction, south or north. 1889 01:14:57,920 --> 01:15:00,000 So we have pretty good visual coming 1890 01:15:00,000 --> 01:15:02,159 from coming south and it's the project 1891 01:15:02,159 --> 01:15:04,800 because it starts down here basically at 1892 01:15:04,800 --> 01:15:06,480 the same level as our finished floor but 1893 01:15:06,480 --> 01:15:09,679 then as it comes up 24 ft. If you're 1894 01:15:09,679 --> 01:15:10,960 going north you can't even really see 1895 01:15:10,960 --> 01:15:12,640 that piece of property that's there. So 1896 01:15:12,640 --> 01:15:14,080 we're just trying to get a visual 1897 01:15:14,080 --> 01:15:15,840 barrier above that so people can say hey 1898 01:15:15,840 --> 01:15:17,120 this is where I got to get off to get to 1899 01:15:17,120 --> 01:15:21,750 the dealerships. 1900 01:15:21,760 --> 01:15:22,480 » So 1901 01:15:22,480 --> 01:15:25,280 >> any other questions? 1902 01:15:25,280 --> 01:15:25,600 >> Thank you. 1903 01:15:25,600 --> 01:15:27,840 >> Okay. Not a problem. Thank you. Thanks. 1904 01:15:27,840 --> 01:15:30,159 >> So, my comments just to start this off 1905 01:15:30,159 --> 01:15:32,159 is I the the 1906 01:15:32,159 --> 01:15:35,199 >> Oh, one more. Sorry, I didn't see I 1907 01:15:35,199 --> 01:15:37,440 >> one one comment about the 225 ft on the 1908 01:15:37,440 --> 01:15:39,600 copy on that big sign for the the 1909 01:15:39,600 --> 01:15:42,960 Chrysler sign, it is dictated to a point 1910 01:15:42,960 --> 01:15:44,880 by the manufacturers. And secondly, 1911 01:15:44,880 --> 01:15:47,199 because it's four individual signs, if 1912 01:15:47,199 --> 01:15:50,400 we reduce that copy by 25 ft, it might 1913 01:15:50,400 --> 01:15:52,480 not seem very significant, but because 1914 01:15:52,480 --> 01:15:54,080 we have to fit four brands on 1915 01:15:54,080 --> 01:15:55,520 essentially the same copy that we have 1916 01:15:55,520 --> 01:15:57,679 to put Chev, that makes it pretty 1917 01:15:57,679 --> 01:15:59,600 difficult if we lose some of that extra 1918 01:15:59,600 --> 01:16:01,760 square footage on the copy. So, I'd beg 1919 01:16:01,760 --> 01:16:04,320 you to not reduce the copy on that so 1920 01:16:04,320 --> 01:16:06,159 that we can make sure that those brands 1921 01:16:06,159 --> 01:16:08,640 are as visible as the Chev brand. 1922 01:16:08,640 --> 01:16:11,920 >> Thanks. 1923 01:16:11,920 --> 01:16:14,400 So, with the the 1924 01:16:14,400 --> 01:16:18,480 um tall signs, I those seem to be to me 1925 01:16:18,480 --> 01:16:22,320 they're not as big of an issue as I just 1926 01:16:22,320 --> 01:16:23,920 don't know how we call a 20ft sign a 1927 01:16:23,920 --> 01:16:26,960 monument sign. That seems like it's a 1928 01:16:26,960 --> 01:16:29,520 >> it's probably that might have been my 1929 01:16:29,520 --> 01:16:31,760 poor interpretation of looking at it. 1930 01:16:31,760 --> 01:16:33,360 When I think of a monument sign, I think 1931 01:16:33,360 --> 01:16:35,840 of a rectangle like that. But I could 1932 01:16:35,840 --> 01:16:38,159 see how that's a you could call that a 1933 01:16:38,159 --> 01:16:39,679 freestanding sign also. But then aren't 1934 01:16:39,679 --> 01:16:41,040 we getting over the number that we'd 1935 01:16:41,040 --> 01:16:43,199 allow per site? 1936 01:16:43,199 --> 01:16:43,920 >> Well, 1937 01:16:43,920 --> 01:16:45,679 >> no, because that's the whole purpose of 1938 01:16:45,679 --> 01:16:47,600 the project signage plan. 1939 01:16:47,600 --> 01:16:49,120 >> And so if you look at this site, you 1940 01:16:49,120 --> 01:16:50,800 could argue they've got three frontages. 1941 01:16:50,800 --> 01:16:52,560 So in essence, they could have three 1942 01:16:52,560 --> 01:16:55,120 pole signs. And so in this case, you've 1943 01:16:55,120 --> 01:16:57,360 got two potentially on 1944 01:16:57,360 --> 01:17:00,960 >> two on, one on the south. 1945 01:17:00,960 --> 01:17:02,159 >> Uh I heard that there were 1946 01:17:02,159 --> 01:17:04,080 >> excuse me, three on the south and then 1947 01:17:04,080 --> 01:17:04,480 >> yeah, 1948 01:17:04,480 --> 01:17:06,719 >> none on the north. So that corner one 1949 01:17:06,719 --> 01:17:07,600 you could effectively 1950 01:17:07,600 --> 01:17:09,440 >> the three on the north are how big? 1951 01:17:09,440 --> 01:17:10,880 >> Those are the 10 monuments. 1952 01:17:10,880 --> 01:17:12,800 >> Still 10 feet which is over our six 1953 01:17:12,800 --> 01:17:13,120 feet. 1954 01:17:13,120 --> 01:17:13,920 >> Six foot. Yeah. 1955 01:17:13,920 --> 01:17:15,040 >> Yeah. 1956 01:17:15,040 --> 01:17:16,480 >> So we have every one of the monument 1957 01:17:16,480 --> 01:17:18,560 signs does not comply with our current 1958 01:17:18,560 --> 01:17:19,360 standard. 1959 01:17:19,360 --> 01:17:21,280 >> Correct. 1960 01:17:21,280 --> 01:17:23,520 >> And so if they're monument signs now now 1961 01:17:23,520 --> 01:17:24,800 if the 20 foot How many of the 20 1962 01:17:24,800 --> 01:17:27,280 footers do we have? Just the one. 1963 01:17:27,280 --> 01:17:30,239 >> Three. All along the south. 1964 01:17:30,239 --> 01:17:30,560 >> Yes. 1965 01:17:30,560 --> 01:17:33,600 >> Yeah. By the retention pond. So that's 1966 01:17:33,600 --> 01:17:36,159 we'd allow one. to the south will be the 1967 01:17:36,159 --> 01:17:38,400 Jeep. The smaller Chevrolet is shown up 1968 01:17:38,400 --> 01:17:40,880 in the upper left right hand corner and 1969 01:17:40,880 --> 01:17:44,159 then a shorter version of the one on the 1970 01:17:44,159 --> 01:17:45,280 lower. 1971 01:17:45,280 --> 01:17:46,320 >> The shorter version of this 1972 01:17:46,320 --> 01:17:48,400 >> and that would be the pull sign. The one 1973 01:17:48,400 --> 01:17:49,600 next would be pulling and the one up 1974 01:17:49,600 --> 01:17:50,400 there. 1975 01:17:50,400 --> 01:17:52,320 >> So Brandon, is my understanding you're 1976 01:17:52,320 --> 01:17:53,679 saying there'd be one allowed. Are you 1977 01:17:53,679 --> 01:17:55,199 saying there's three allowed on each 1978 01:17:55,199 --> 01:17:56,800 property line? 1979 01:17:56,800 --> 01:17:58,719 >> No. The way the code's currently written 1980 01:17:58,719 --> 01:18:01,360 is you get one per frontage. And so on 1981 01:18:01,360 --> 01:18:03,360 this site, you could argue that it get 1982 01:18:03,360 --> 01:18:07,199 has three frontages. the 2700, the 2900, 1983 01:18:07,199 --> 01:18:10,400 and I-15. And so then the request is 1984 01:18:10,400 --> 01:18:12,239 exactly why the project signage plan 1985 01:18:12,239 --> 01:18:14,719 language is is an option is when they 1986 01:18:14,719 --> 01:18:17,679 want either additional signs, 1987 01:18:17,679 --> 01:18:20,000 larger square foot copy area, or the 1988 01:18:20,000 --> 01:18:22,320 height. But one of the things with with 1989 01:18:22,320 --> 01:18:24,239 the code is it does allow additional 1990 01:18:24,239 --> 01:18:25,600 signs. 1991 01:18:25,600 --> 01:18:27,520 >> Sure. But what we're saying is, what I'm 1992 01:18:27,520 --> 01:18:29,520 saying is 1993 01:18:29,520 --> 01:18:33,440 we essentially have five that are 1994 01:18:33,440 --> 01:18:34,560 uh 1995 01:18:34,560 --> 01:18:35,040 >> they need 1996 01:18:35,040 --> 01:18:36,719 >> three on the south end and the two on 1997 01:18:36,719 --> 01:18:40,320 I-15 when by by their property use they 1998 01:18:40,320 --> 01:18:42,960 have three by right for lack of a better 1999 01:18:42,960 --> 01:18:43,440 word. 2000 01:18:43,440 --> 01:18:45,440 >> Page real fast. 2001 01:18:45,440 --> 01:18:47,040 I'm just wondering if we could shorten 2002 01:18:47,040 --> 01:18:48,880 those other 20 the 20footers on the 2003 01:18:48,880 --> 01:18:50,640 south end and still accomplish it since 2004 01:18:50,640 --> 01:18:51,679 the only thing between them and the 2005 01:18:51,679 --> 01:18:54,320 freeway or the off-ramp is a retention 2006 01:18:54,320 --> 01:18:58,320 pond which has no height to it. 2007 01:18:58,320 --> 01:19:02,550 >> Let's go to the next slide. 2008 01:19:02,560 --> 01:19:05,040 » Sorry, I want to see the 20footers. 2009 01:19:05,040 --> 01:19:09,760 Sorry, Josh. That is these ones here. 2010 01:19:09,760 --> 01:19:12,000 So that's one. So that's my 2011 01:19:12,000 --> 01:19:13,360 understanding is there is one 10 foot 2012 01:19:13,360 --> 01:19:15,120 and one 20 foot version of that same 2013 01:19:15,120 --> 01:19:18,080 sign that you just pointed at. And then 2014 01:19:18,080 --> 01:19:20,960 >> Oh yeah. And then this is 20 feet. And 2015 01:19:20,960 --> 01:19:23,040 then this is 20 feet. 2016 01:19:23,040 --> 01:19:24,080 >> So 20. 2017 01:19:24,080 --> 01:19:25,760 >> Go to the next one. Can I borrow that? 2018 01:19:25,760 --> 01:19:26,640 >> You sure can. 2019 01:19:26,640 --> 01:19:30,400 >> Thank you. Okay. So these guys are 10. 2020 01:19:30,400 --> 01:19:32,719 So they are over 2021 01:19:32,719 --> 01:19:33,440 >> by four feet. 2022 01:19:33,440 --> 01:19:34,640 Yep. 2023 01:19:34,640 --> 01:19:38,320 >> These guys are 20. They're over by 2024 01:19:38,320 --> 01:19:38,880 >> 14. 2025 01:19:38,880 --> 01:19:40,159 >> Oh. Well, if we're calling them 2026 01:19:40,159 --> 01:19:41,199 freestanding signs, 2027 01:19:41,199 --> 01:19:42,320 >> they're not over. Yeah, 2028 01:19:42,320 --> 01:19:43,600 >> one of them would be allowed. 2029 01:19:43,600 --> 01:19:45,199 >> Okay. But only one of them would be 2030 01:19:45,199 --> 01:19:47,600 allowed. Correct. 2031 01:19:47,600 --> 01:19:49,920 >> Because then we have two more up here. 2032 01:19:49,920 --> 01:19:51,600 >> Yeah, that's that would be my 2033 01:19:51,600 --> 01:19:52,320 understanding. 2034 01:19:52,320 --> 01:19:56,560 >> We kind of have five where there's it's 2035 01:19:56,560 --> 01:19:59,600 kind of two over. Correct. Because 2036 01:19:59,600 --> 01:20:01,440 there's three fun frontages that can 2037 01:20:01,440 --> 01:20:02,960 have tall signs. 2038 01:20:02,960 --> 01:20:04,320 >> Yeah, that's that's a good way of 2039 01:20:04,320 --> 01:20:05,520 looking at it, I think. Yeah. 2040 01:20:05,520 --> 01:20:08,320 >> Okay. Uh, 2041 01:20:08,320 --> 01:20:11,120 I'm wondering I I'm I'm just trying 2042 01:20:11,120 --> 01:20:12,880 throwing out ideas, but I'm wondering if 2043 01:20:12,880 --> 01:20:16,480 there's a way to make a 20 foot high 2044 01:20:16,480 --> 01:20:19,600 sign that has all three of those those 2045 01:20:19,600 --> 01:20:25,040 manufact uh brands on them or 2046 01:20:25,040 --> 01:20:26,800 I'm also wondering like what's the big 2047 01:20:26,800 --> 01:20:29,679 deal? What's the impact or I don't know. 2048 01:20:29,679 --> 01:20:32,400 Yeah, just just one comment too that 2049 01:20:32,400 --> 01:20:35,760 there are two different stores to get to 2050 01:20:35,760 --> 01:20:37,679 rather than just one. It is one 2051 01:20:37,679 --> 01:20:39,600 location, but two stores. 2052 01:20:39,600 --> 01:20:40,320 >> Gotcha. 2053 01:20:40,320 --> 01:20:43,360 >> Um and then as you come down that hill 2054 01:20:43,360 --> 01:20:46,080 on the new off-ramp and entering onto 2055 01:20:46,080 --> 01:20:47,840 that road, 2056 01:20:47,840 --> 01:20:51,120 the height of those signs would be at 2057 01:20:51,120 --> 01:20:54,080 eye level because of the downgrade 2058 01:20:54,080 --> 01:20:55,840 coming at it. If that makes sense. 2059 01:20:55,840 --> 01:20:58,080 >> Yeah. 2060 01:20:58,080 --> 01:21:05,750 >> Thank you. 2061 01:21:05,760 --> 01:21:07,280 One more time. 2062 01:21:07,280 --> 01:21:09,120 >> Yeah. Amaz unlimited. 2063 01:21:09,120 --> 01:21:12,320 >> Do these need to be 10 ft that you said 2064 01:21:12,320 --> 01:21:14,640 that these are 10 ft because that's the 2065 01:21:14,640 --> 01:21:16,880 manufacturer standard and 2066 01:21:16,880 --> 01:21:19,280 >> recommendation. They do have the 2067 01:21:19,280 --> 01:21:20,159 recommendation is 2068 01:21:20,159 --> 01:21:23,040 >> right. So we could ask for those to be 2069 01:21:23,040 --> 01:21:25,280 shorter if it's if we're trying to 2070 01:21:25,280 --> 01:21:28,640 comply if there's a not a 2071 01:21:28,640 --> 01:21:34,800 compelling reason to h I don't know. 2072 01:21:34,800 --> 01:21:37,440 >> So, I'm just gonna think out loud here, 2073 01:21:37,440 --> 01:21:39,600 but if you were to 2074 01:21:39,600 --> 01:21:44,320 you got two buildings, 2075 01:21:44,320 --> 01:21:46,719 two different entities here, if they 2076 01:21:46,719 --> 01:21:49,840 were to split the properties up, they 2077 01:21:49,840 --> 01:21:52,400 would have be able to put more signage 2078 01:21:52,400 --> 01:21:54,239 in. 2079 01:21:54,239 --> 01:21:56,000 That's 2080 01:21:56,000 --> 01:21:57,920 >> the way it's the way it's written versus 2081 01:21:57,920 --> 01:22:00,159 one property. So, I think that's 2082 01:22:00,159 --> 01:22:03,440 something we need to address. I do like, 2083 01:22:03,440 --> 01:22:08,880 you know, these signs along here, 2084 01:22:08,880 --> 01:22:11,760 they're more for right in front of you, 2085 01:22:11,760 --> 01:22:14,960 not drawing traffic from long distance 2086 01:22:14,960 --> 01:22:18,159 where these ones are to be attractive to 2087 01:22:18,159 --> 01:22:21,520 from the freeway. 2088 01:22:21,520 --> 01:22:23,280 So, 2089 01:22:23,280 --> 01:22:25,120 you know, 2090 01:22:25,120 --> 01:22:27,120 um, 2091 01:22:27,120 --> 01:22:29,920 same with these are just they're not 2092 01:22:29,920 --> 01:22:31,280 going to be seen from the freeway, but 2093 01:22:31,280 --> 01:22:32,960 they're going to alert people. This is 2094 01:22:32,960 --> 01:22:34,080 where you need to come in if you're 2095 01:22:34,080 --> 01:22:39,920 going to Jeep, Dodge, whatever. So, 2096 01:22:39,920 --> 01:22:52,470 you know, 2097 01:22:52,480 --> 01:22:54,719 If we could get a concession on to put 2098 01:22:54,719 --> 01:22:59,040 those a little bit lower, would that be 2099 01:22:59,040 --> 01:23:00,080 >> at least two of them? That's what I 2100 01:23:00,080 --> 01:23:01,199 would think. 2101 01:23:01,199 --> 01:23:02,320 >> Lower two of them. 2102 01:23:02,320 --> 01:23:05,750 >> Mhm. 2103 01:23:05,760 --> 01:23:08,560 » For for whatever it's worth. I do the 2104 01:23:08,560 --> 01:23:10,960 real estate for the Smiths. We have 2105 01:23:10,960 --> 01:23:12,960 tried to solve a location problem for 2106 01:23:12,960 --> 01:23:15,760 seven years. We tried to expand. We 2107 01:23:15,760 --> 01:23:17,840 tried to buy some PDM steel land that 2108 01:23:17,840 --> 01:23:19,199 went nowhere. We tried to buy the 2109 01:23:19,199 --> 01:23:21,760 junkyard behind the dealership. 2110 01:23:21,760 --> 01:23:23,520 I mean, I knocked on the door of the old 2111 01:23:23,520 --> 01:23:25,520 lady down there in Nephi. That didn't go 2112 01:23:25,520 --> 01:23:26,960 anywhere. We tried to move across the 2113 01:23:26,960 --> 01:23:28,400 street to the north. That wasn't going 2114 01:23:28,400 --> 01:23:30,239 to work. We tried to go across the 2115 01:23:30,239 --> 01:23:32,880 street to the east. That didn't work. 2116 01:23:32,880 --> 01:23:35,040 We've really tried to solve this. From a 2117 01:23:35,040 --> 01:23:37,440 real estate standpoint, this is not an 2118 01:23:37,440 --> 01:23:39,920 ideal site because we have to go over a 2119 01:23:39,920 --> 01:23:42,960 creek. We have a detention basin that 2120 01:23:42,960 --> 01:23:45,040 cut out two acres. When we first started 2121 01:23:45,040 --> 01:23:46,320 talking to Steven Wade's group, we 2122 01:23:46,320 --> 01:23:47,600 thought we were going to get 12 and it 2123 01:23:47,600 --> 01:23:49,280 was going to work really well. We could 2124 01:23:49,280 --> 01:23:51,520 have done with probably four to six foot 2125 01:23:51,520 --> 01:23:53,120 monument signs coming down the road. 2126 01:23:53,120 --> 01:23:54,480 That would have worked, but we don't own 2127 01:23:54,480 --> 01:23:57,199 the frontage UD do, which puts us at a 2128 01:23:57,199 --> 01:23:59,120 disadvantage. So, we have when people 2129 01:23:59,120 --> 01:24:00,880 come down off of that deceleration lane 2130 01:24:00,880 --> 01:24:02,800 and come down and start heading west, 2131 01:24:02,800 --> 01:24:04,800 they're looking north. I mean, Brandon, 2132 01:24:04,800 --> 01:24:07,360 what is it like a couple hundred feet? 2133 01:24:07,360 --> 01:24:09,360 >> They're looking a couple hundred feet to 2134 01:24:09,360 --> 01:24:11,679 see in where those signs are. If we have 2135 01:24:11,679 --> 01:24:13,600 those signs reduced from 20 feet, the 2136 01:24:13,600 --> 01:24:15,840 visibility options for the population to 2137 01:24:15,840 --> 01:24:17,440 come down that street, they're not going 2138 01:24:17,440 --> 01:24:19,600 to see us very well. We wouldn't push 2139 01:24:19,600 --> 01:24:21,760 for an exception to the ordinance if it 2140 01:24:21,760 --> 01:24:24,159 wasn't pretty legitimate. And people 2141 01:24:24,159 --> 01:24:25,679 need to see those signs because they're 2142 01:24:25,679 --> 01:24:26,800 only going to see the sign of the 2143 01:24:26,800 --> 01:24:28,080 Chrysler building. They're not going to 2144 01:24:28,080 --> 01:24:31,679 see the Chev building. So, u and then 2145 01:24:31,679 --> 01:24:33,520 the manufacturers have their specific 2146 01:24:33,520 --> 01:24:34,880 requirements. That's why we're asking 2147 01:24:34,880 --> 01:24:37,040 for a concession. I think if we can 2148 01:24:37,040 --> 01:24:39,040 offer a concession that would be 2149 01:24:39,040 --> 01:24:40,960 legitimate, would really work well, I 2150 01:24:40,960 --> 01:24:42,400 think we could reduce the height of 2151 01:24:42,400 --> 01:24:43,840 those signs on the north side, those 2152 01:24:43,840 --> 01:24:45,280 monuments, I think we could take those 2153 01:24:45,280 --> 01:24:47,920 probably to 6 ft and and that would be 2154 01:24:47,920 --> 01:24:49,840 more than sufficient. But to reduce 2155 01:24:49,840 --> 01:24:52,080 those signs coming down looking across 2156 01:24:52,080 --> 01:24:55,920 the pond, across the creek, 20 feet is 2157 01:24:55,920 --> 01:24:59,360 really important to us if if hopefully I 2158 01:24:59,360 --> 01:25:01,440 made that point. Well, 2159 01:25:01,440 --> 01:25:06,070 >> thanks. 2160 01:25:06,080 --> 01:25:07,600 That makes me feel better if that one 2161 01:25:07,600 --> 01:25:10,000 side was 2162 01:25:10,000 --> 01:25:12,159 >> agreed. 2163 01:25:12,159 --> 01:25:15,440 I I can see I can see the good reasoning 2164 01:25:15,440 --> 01:25:23,510 for it. I could support that. 2165 01:25:23,520 --> 01:25:24,560 » Any other comments? 2166 01:25:24,560 --> 01:25:26,719 >> No more. 2167 01:25:26,719 --> 01:25:28,800 >> Um, that's all our comments. I'll 2168 01:25:28,800 --> 01:25:30,880 entertain a motion from staff, sorry, 2169 01:25:30,880 --> 01:25:33,199 from the commission. I don't care what 2170 01:25:33,199 --> 01:25:35,920 staff thinks. 2171 01:25:35,920 --> 01:25:39,120 >> We don't want a motion from staff. 2172 01:25:39,120 --> 01:25:41,199 >> I move we recommend for approval of the 2173 01:25:41,199 --> 01:25:44,880 proposed signage for Doug Smith Autolex 2174 01:25:44,880 --> 01:25:46,159 >> with the 2175 01:25:46,159 --> 01:25:48,480 >> with condition 2176 01:25:48,480 --> 01:25:50,239 >> the lower 2177 01:25:50,239 --> 01:25:52,639 six foot on the north 2178 01:25:52,639 --> 01:25:54,239 >> property line 2179 01:25:54,239 --> 01:25:57,120 >> with the six foot on the north side. 2180 01:25:57,120 --> 01:26:00,639 >> Second motion second. All in favor? I 2181 01:26:00,639 --> 01:26:02,159 >> I any 2182 01:26:02,159 --> 01:26:05,920 >> opposed? Okay. Thank you. 2183 01:26:05,920 --> 01:26:08,000 >> Thanks for the conversation. 2184 01:26:08,000 --> 01:26:09,520 >> Thanks. 2185 01:26:09,520 --> 01:26:12,550 >> Um 2186 01:26:12,560 --> 01:26:14,880 anything before I motion to adjourn the 2187 01:26:14,880 --> 01:26:15,360 meeting? 2188 01:26:15,360 --> 01:26:17,760 >> Uh just once again a plug for next 2189 01:26:17,760 --> 01:26:21,120 Tuesday night. Um I don't have the time 2190 01:26:21,120 --> 01:26:23,199 in front of me. Anybody know? 2191 01:26:23,199 --> 01:26:26,159 >> I think it said 5:30 to 8:30. 30. Uh 2192 01:26:26,159 --> 01:26:28,000 we'll have some training by our legal 2193 01:26:28,000 --> 01:26:29,600 council and then there will be a 2194 01:26:29,600 --> 01:26:32,000 discussion on a proposal in the river 2195 01:26:32,000 --> 01:26:33,040 bottoms. 2196 01:26:33,040 --> 01:26:34,719 >> Okay. Thank you. 2197 01:26:34,719 --> 01:26:35,920 >> Just here in this room or 2198 01:26:35,920 --> 01:26:37,679 >> dinner will be provided. I believe we're 2199 01:26:37,679 --> 01:26:39,280 going to meet in that room. 2200 01:26:39,280 --> 01:26:39,920 >> Yeah. 2201 01:26:39,920 --> 01:26:42,880 >> I just one other thing is Brandon you 2202 01:26:42,880 --> 01:26:45,199 said thanks to Ian but we I think all of 2203 01:26:45,199 --> 01:26:46,480 us commissioners 2204 01:26:46,480 --> 01:26:47,199 >> 100% 2205 01:26:47,199 --> 01:26:49,040 >> we're grateful for you too and we wish 2206 01:26:49,040 --> 01:26:52,560 you we wish you well but darn it sad 2207 01:26:52,560 --> 01:26:53,440 you're leaving us. 2208 01:26:53,440 --> 01:26:54,960 >> Yep. I haven't gotten to know you very 2209 01:26:54,960 --> 01:26:56,480 well, but wish you well. 2210 01:26:56,480 --> 01:26:57,840 >> Thank you guys. It's been a pleasure to 2211 01:26:57,840 --> 01:27:00,000 get to know all of you. Really liked it. 2212 01:27:00,000 --> 01:27:02,480 I love Spanish Fork. This place will 2213 01:27:02,480 --> 01:27:04,400 stay in my heart for a long time for 2214 01:27:04,400 --> 01:27:05,760 sure. 2215 01:27:05,760 --> 01:27:08,800 >> Good. Thank you. Okay, our next uh topic 2216 01:27:08,800 --> 01:27:10,400 is to adjourn the meeting. Do I have a 2217 01:27:10,400 --> 01:27:11,280 motion on that? 2218 01:27:11,280 --> 01:27:12,480 >> So moved. 2219 01:27:12,480 --> 01:27:13,760 >> Second. 2220 01:27:13,760 --> 01:27:15,679 >> Motion second. All in favor? I 2221 01:27:15,679 --> 01:27:16,880 >> I 2222 01:27:16,880 --> 01:27:20,080 >> Thank you.