1
00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:32,080
Good evening. I'd like to call to order the City of Spring Hill Municipal Planning Commission meeting for the August 24th, 2026 work session. The time is 5.30 p.m. There are seven members on this commission and all are present with the exception of Commissioner Rondo. We're joined tonight by our planning assistant, Miss Alexis Salas and our city attorney, Mr. Patrick Carter and our senior planner, Mr. Moron. The work session is an opportunity for the planning commission to review applications and have discussions with the submitters. There's no voting tonight.

2
00:00:32,080 --> 00:00:38,540
On each agenda item staff will give their report and then representatives for that item will have the opportunity to come to the podium and

3
00:00:38,540 --> 00:00:45,440
discuss those items or provide any pertinent information to the planning commission. There are copies of the agenda on the podium in the back.

4
00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:50,580
Audience members wishing to speak to a non-agenda item will have the opportunity in just a moment.

5
00:00:51,140 --> 00:00:58,320
Audience members wishing to speak to an agenda item will have the opportunity when we reach that item and will have five minutes to address the planning commission.

6
00:00:58,320 --> 00:00:59,960
No rebuttal marks are permitted.

7
00:01:00,740 --> 00:01:04,220
For those of you who are not able to attend the in-person meetings, please submit your

8
00:01:04,220 --> 00:01:09,940
public comments regarding agenda and non-agenda items to PCPubliccomment at SpringHillTN.org.

9
00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:13,980
At this time do we have any audience members that wish to address the commission regarding

10
00:01:13,980 --> 00:01:15,560
any non-agenda items?

11
00:01:16,460 --> 00:01:17,200
I don't see any.

12
00:01:18,580 --> 00:01:25,300
Now we'll move to item E. Draft, August 10, 2026, Planning Commission Regular Meeting

13
00:01:25,300 --> 00:01:30,480
minutes. These have already been provided to all the members. Are there any comments or questions regarding the minutes?

14
00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:36,320
Okay. Then we'll move to item F for the bond packet, Mr. Goats.

15
00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:45,540
Good evening. We'll go see how pay project manager. For the bonds tonight, everything's

16
00:01:46,620 --> 00:01:52,880
typical, nothing out of the ordinary except for item six or nine. They're a little different.

17
00:01:52,880 --> 00:02:00,540
All right, not all improvements were completed by the developer, so they have submitted cash to the city for us to complete.

18
00:02:01,460 --> 00:02:04,840
Everything else has been walked by city staff and signed off on.

19
00:02:05,460 --> 00:02:06,860
Happy to answer any questions.

20
00:02:07,700 --> 00:02:10,820
Commissioner, do you have any questions or comments on the bond packet?

21
00:02:11,940 --> 00:02:12,580
All right, thank you, sir.

22
00:02:14,020 --> 00:02:16,940
Is there any public comment regarding any of the bonds?

23
00:02:16,940 --> 00:02:31,860
I don't see any with that we'll move to item G, Old Business, FPL 2093-2026 submitted by SEC for legacy point phase one,

24
00:02:32,020 --> 00:02:34,500
lot 10 section 2A, Ms. Burke.

25
00:02:35,760 --> 00:02:44,300
Thank you. Request, the applicant is requesting final plot approval for 23 lots, roadways, and the related infrastructure, property, description, and history.

26
00:02:44,300 --> 00:02:51,760
This final plat was scheduled for the Planning Commission work session on July 27th, 2026, but was deferred because the applicant was not in attendance.

27
00:02:52,600 --> 00:03:03,160
The legacy point plan development was approved on March 22nd, 2023. Since its approval, the PD has been amended four times to revise phasing conditions of approval and development standards.

28
00:03:03,860 --> 00:03:06,960
The most recent amendment was approved on June 16th, 2025.

29
00:03:08,120 --> 00:03:17,020
PDF 1476-2023 and PPL 1475-2023 were approved on October 9th, 2023, and the Planning Commission

30
00:03:17,020 --> 00:03:23,600
subsequently approved FPL 1557-2024 on April 8th, 2024, for those nine lots.

31
00:03:24,260 --> 00:03:29,080
The revised final plat was later recorded on August 27th, 2024, to address lot lines and

32
00:03:29,080 --> 00:03:30,900
create an additional lot, which is lot 10.

33
00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:39,440
On December 8th, 2025, the Planning Commission approved FPL 1970-2025 and Phase 1A, PDF,

34
00:03:39,960 --> 00:03:47,160
1524-2023 and PPO 1550-2024 was approved by the Planning Commission on February 12th, 2024.

35
00:03:48,100 --> 00:03:53,980
The applicant is now requesting final plot approval for a portion of the previously approved Phase 1A

36
00:03:53,980 --> 00:03:58,660
to establish 23 residential lots based on the available sewer allocation.

37
00:03:58,660 --> 00:04:02,100
Out of the 23 lots, 15 are detached single-family.

38
00:04:02,460 --> 00:04:07,500
Staff is unable to determine how their remaining lots are intended to be developed based on the submitted plans.

39
00:04:07,880 --> 00:04:15,880
Please provide additional information identifying the proposed use of each remaining lot, including the lot number and type of residential units anticipated.

40
00:04:16,780 --> 00:04:21,240
The proposed final plat is generally consistent with the approved preliminary plat.

41
00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:26,940
The primary difference is the lot numbering, which has changed as a result of multiple

42
00:04:26,940 --> 00:04:28,720
resubdivision plots that they are doing.

43
00:04:29,740 --> 00:04:30,520
Spring Hill Rising.

44
00:04:31,060 --> 00:04:34,560
Spring Hill Rising designates this property as a Community Commerce Center.

45
00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:39,020
Community Commerce areas provide regional commercial services for Spring Hill and neighboring

46
00:04:39,020 --> 00:04:39,640
communities.

47
00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:45,480
Primary future land uses include professional and regional offices, restaurants, large-scale

48
00:04:45,480 --> 00:04:50,760
retail, municipal services, community centers, automobile-oriented services, transportation

49
00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:53,380
and large-scale entertainment venues.

50
00:04:54,240 --> 00:04:56,300
Multi-family residential development is identified

51
00:04:56,300 --> 00:04:57,680
as a secondary land use.

52
00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:00,360
Access and site circulation.

53
00:05:01,020 --> 00:05:04,860
Access to the development is provided by the previously established rights of way

54
00:05:04,860 --> 00:05:07,280
for legacy point trail, vibe, street, and bistro lane.

55
00:05:08,060 --> 00:05:11,060
This final plat proposes additional 50-foot wide local streets

56
00:05:11,060 --> 00:05:14,420
and 20-foot wide private alleys to provide internal circulation.

57
00:05:15,340 --> 00:05:17,720
The 15 proposed single-family lots will be accessed

58
00:05:17,720 --> 00:05:19,300
from an extension of bistro lane.

59
00:05:20,460 --> 00:05:24,900
Streets and sidewalks. All proposed local streets include five and a half foot sidewalks

60
00:05:24,900 --> 00:05:29,780
and two 11 foot travel lanes within a 50 foot public right-of-way. The proposed private

61
00:05:29,780 --> 00:05:34,160
alleys will be located within 20 foot private right-of-way. Both right-of-way widths are

62
00:05:34,160 --> 00:05:40,260
consistent with the approved Lexi Point pattern book. Utilities, stormwater and sanitary sewer

63
00:05:40,260 --> 00:05:44,280
infrastructure will initially be located within easements that are intended to become public

64
00:05:44,280 --> 00:05:47,420
rights away, as future phases of the development are completed.

65
00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:53,900
For this phase, the applicant is requesting 22,684 gallons per day of sewer allocation.

66
00:05:54,640 --> 00:05:58,380
For clarity, please provide an illustration that outlines the exact boundaries for each

67
00:05:58,380 --> 00:05:59,380
phase slash subphase.

68
00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:01,960
Sewer allocations are shown in the table below.

69
00:06:02,820 --> 00:06:07,660
Summary, staff met with the applicant on July 8, 2026, to review the proposed final plat.

70
00:06:08,340 --> 00:06:11,940
All previous staff comments have been addressed, except for the allocation of the town home

71
00:06:11,940 --> 00:06:12,220
lots.

72
00:06:12,220 --> 00:06:17,400
The additional comments that have been identified shall be addressed with revision deadline number two.

73
00:06:17,640 --> 00:06:18,500
That concludes my report.

74
00:06:19,280 --> 00:06:20,140
Thank you, Ms. Vark.

75
00:06:20,240 --> 00:06:22,540
Is there a representative here for this item?

76
00:06:26,230 --> 00:06:30,570
Good evening, my name is Osama, with the SEC 850, middle Tennessee Boulevard in Marvusboro.

77
00:06:30,770 --> 00:06:33,470
I'm here to represent the applicant and happy to answer any questions.

78
00:06:35,050 --> 00:06:39,310
I've been in contact with the planning department about the clarity about the town homes.

79
00:06:39,690 --> 00:06:43,690
Usually, the location of the touch units is addressed with the HBR plat.

80
00:06:43,690 --> 00:06:50,430
later on after this plot is approved, my client is intended to prepare an HBR

81
00:06:50,430 --> 00:06:56,650
plot to show each town home location and how those lots are divided up for the

82
00:06:56,650 --> 00:07:00,890
individual units for that attached and we've done the same practice on the phase,

83
00:07:00,890 --> 00:07:05,150
the other phase for the quads on lot 12 where we recorded the final plot then we

84
00:07:05,150 --> 00:07:10,670
came with the HBR plot it's just when we asked about the HBR plot it's not

85
00:07:10,670 --> 00:07:19,030
something that the planning will review it's being done by that Tony and then recorded then the recorded version will be provided to the planning department after that.

86
00:07:19,490 --> 00:07:21,270
Okay, thank you.

87
00:07:22,810 --> 00:07:31,450
Mr. Moore, not this may be a question for you, but I'm sure they're going to do everything exactly like they said they will, but just for the sake of protected protections for the city.

88
00:07:31,450 --> 00:07:39,170
like what would those those lots not being specified the the density or the what's

89
00:07:39,170 --> 00:07:45,870
going to be put on there what is the protection for the city on that so under ordnance 2529

90
00:07:45,870 --> 00:07:50,810
they like see point was given an allocation and out of that master allocation

91
00:07:52,990 --> 00:07:57,350
gallons per day I forget the exact number 36,000 maybe was given to

92
00:07:57,350 --> 00:08:04,470
asked in woods and they have submitted a letter how they're going to allocate that portion

93
00:08:04,470 --> 00:08:09,030
of the overall legacy point so that's what's really going to limit how many units are going

94
00:08:09,030 --> 00:08:09,410
to be on.

95
00:08:10,670 --> 00:08:12,110
Okay, it works for me.

96
00:08:13,410 --> 00:08:16,690
Commissioners, do you have any questions or comments are

97
00:08:18,740 --> 00:08:19,680
you all okay with putting this

98
00:08:19,680 --> 00:08:20,180
on consent?

99
00:08:23,490 --> 00:08:23,690
Okay.

100
00:08:23,890 --> 00:08:24,250
Thank you, sir.

101
00:08:24,590 --> 00:08:24,970
Thank you.

102
00:08:25,670 --> 00:08:27,430
Is there any public comment for this item?

103
00:08:28,970 --> 00:08:29,270
Okay.

104
00:08:29,470 --> 00:08:29,930
I don't see any.

105
00:08:29,930 --> 00:08:43,090
They'll move to H, Item New Business, Item 1, PPL 2118-2026, submitted by Goodwin Mills and Kaywood for Spring Hill Commerce Center, Phase 1, Lot 1.

106
00:08:43,850 --> 00:08:45,390
Mr. Pavlik?

107
00:08:46,170 --> 00:08:47,050
Thank you.

108
00:08:48,070 --> 00:08:48,750
Request.

109
00:08:49,390 --> 00:08:57,870
The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to extend a new public road south of the existing realignment of Jim Warren Road and across Rutherford Creek.

110
00:08:58,770 --> 00:09:05,690
property, description and history. The site abuts the east side of I-65. This area was historically

111
00:09:05,690 --> 00:09:11,270
farmland while the northeast and southern portions are still wooded. The overall site is in both

112
00:09:11,270 --> 00:09:16,370
Murray County and Williamson County. As Rutherford Creek passes through the site, significant portions

113
00:09:16,370 --> 00:09:22,330
of the preliminary plat are within special flood hazard areas. The Spring Hill Commerce Center planned

114
00:09:22,330 --> 00:09:26,390
development previously known as South Nashville Commerce Center and Project

115
00:09:26,390 --> 00:09:35,530
Suitcase was approved under PDP 1323-2022 by Ordinance 22-26 in January 2023

116
00:09:35,530 --> 00:09:41,550
rezoning the site to PDI-2 and establishing vision book regulations and conditions

117
00:09:41,550 --> 00:09:48,090
of approval. Bulk area and zoning requirements. There are no details outlining the

118
00:09:48,090 --> 00:09:52,790
reconfigurations of the lots. This preliminary plat does not propose new lots,

119
00:09:53,090 --> 00:09:57,730
dimensional standards listed below are for reference. However, new lots shall

120
00:09:57,730 --> 00:10:01,550
meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the PD dimensional standards.

121
00:10:01,950 --> 00:10:04,230
These are shown in the table on the staff report.

122
00:10:06,570 --> 00:10:08,930
Streets and sidewalks, a new

123
00:10:08,930 --> 00:10:12,710
public road south of the existing realignment of Jim Warren Road is proposed,

124
00:10:13,090 --> 00:10:17,850
including a bridge over Rutherford Creek. The road culminates in a cul-de-sac. The

125
00:10:17,850 --> 00:10:22,350
The new portion of right-of-way under this preliminary plot is approximately 108 feet wide

126
00:10:22,350 --> 00:10:26,290
at its narrowest and approximately 310 feet wide at its widest.

127
00:10:26,830 --> 00:10:33,330
This width exceeds the minimum right-of-way width set forth both in the UDC and the SHCC

128
00:10:33,330 --> 00:10:33,970
vision book.

129
00:10:34,630 --> 00:10:36,350
Sidewalks in street lighting are not proposed.

130
00:10:36,830 --> 00:10:39,510
This is consistent with the pattern book and development agreement.

131
00:10:40,150 --> 00:10:43,230
The proposed road network is consistent with the overall PD plan.

132
00:10:43,750 --> 00:10:45,750
It would complete the north-south roadway connection.

133
00:10:46,930 --> 00:10:53,410
Summary. Staff is met with the applicant on July 8th and August 12th, 2026, and all previously

134
00:10:53,410 --> 00:10:57,890
identified comments have been addressed. The preliminary plan establishes a new public

135
00:10:57,890 --> 00:11:03,250
roadway and bridge consistent with the SHCC plan development approvals, the development agreement,

136
00:11:03,570 --> 00:11:08,370
and the pattern book. Any additional comments from the work session should be addressed by revision

137
00:11:08,370 --> 00:11:13,590
deadline number two. This concludes my report. Thank you. Is there a representative for this item?

138
00:11:21,970 --> 00:11:29,550
and are all the, is everything that they mentioned in the report? Is your client okay with

139
00:11:29,550 --> 00:11:36,010
that sorry? Yes ma'am. Okay. Commissioner she have any questions or comments? Is everyone okay with

140
00:11:36,010 --> 00:11:40,850
the spin on consent? All right thank you sir. Thank you. Is there any public comment for this item?

141
00:11:42,810 --> 00:11:50,970
We'll move to item 2, SPM 2136-2026 submitted by Jonathan Edwards for 5414 Main Street Quick

142
00:11:50,970 --> 00:11:55,870
Mart for site plan approval to extend a public access easement.

143
00:11:56,310 --> 00:11:56,690
Mr. Morin.

144
00:11:57,530 --> 00:11:57,970
Thank you.

145
00:11:58,630 --> 00:12:03,930
The applicant is requesting site plan approval to extend and connect to an existing public

146
00:12:03,930 --> 00:12:08,250
access easement located south west of the Quick Mart site.

147
00:12:08,250 --> 00:12:14,730
easement currently provides secondary access to racetrack, RB's, S-MDNL, and star

148
00:12:14,730 --> 00:12:22,010
bugs. Based on the request, I'm going to focus on access and site circulation. The

149
00:12:22,010 --> 00:12:26,450
existing business has two access points to Main Street. Both are in-gress,

150
00:12:26,590 --> 00:12:32,310
egress points located at the northeast and southwest edges of the property. There are

151
00:12:32,310 --> 00:12:38,210
two way access aisles on both sides of fuel canopy. There is another two way

152
00:12:38,210 --> 00:12:43,370
access aisle from the main building to the north east access point to main street.

153
00:12:44,010 --> 00:12:48,730
The last two way access is to the west of the main building that directs traffic to the

154
00:12:48,730 --> 00:12:52,850
rear of the building, presumably for trash pickup.

155
00:12:53,950 --> 00:12:59,050
The access aisle to the west of the canopy is one way to the south.

156
00:13:00,370 --> 00:13:04,810
The abutting parcels do have different grades making the connection more challenging.

157
00:13:04,810 --> 00:13:15,270
The grade changes 8.8%, an 8.8% slope can significantly affect site distance, depending

158
00:13:15,270 --> 00:13:17,610
upon how the grade changes.

159
00:13:18,390 --> 00:13:23,530
Any off-site grading would require an agreement with all the budding property owners affected

160
00:13:23,530 --> 00:13:24,550
prior to construction.

161
00:13:25,990 --> 00:13:34,630
If cross-axis is allowed, it would be right in, right out only, signed with a directional

162
00:13:34,630 --> 00:13:40,910
curb island to limit traffic direction. Also, if cross-axis easement is allowed, the property

163
00:13:40,910 --> 00:13:47,990
owners must, from the UDC, one, record an easement allowing cross-axis to and from properties

164
00:13:47,990 --> 00:13:55,710
served by the joint use driveways and cross-axis easement. Two, any pre-existing driveways must

165
00:13:55,710 --> 00:14:00,770
be closed and eliminated after construction of the joint use driveway. And three,

166
00:14:03,730 --> 00:14:03,730
record

167
00:14:03,730 --> 00:14:06,410
and maintenance responsibilities of each property owner.

168
00:14:07,490 --> 00:14:09,310
Staff would like planning commission feedback

169
00:14:09,310 --> 00:14:11,710
on the above items specifically item two.

170
00:14:13,290 --> 00:14:13,830
Discussion.

171
00:14:14,250 --> 00:14:16,470
Staff brought attention to the narrow width

172
00:14:16,690 --> 00:14:18,850
of the existing public access easement.

173
00:14:19,430 --> 00:14:22,030
As a result, the applicant is proposing

174
00:14:22,030 --> 00:14:24,610
to widen the public access easement.

175
00:14:25,490 --> 00:14:27,050
However, this causes concern

176
00:14:27,050 --> 00:14:29,210
because it is on a neighboring property.

177
00:14:30,790 --> 00:14:32,950
Any change to the public access easement

178
00:14:32,950 --> 00:14:38,370
can only be made with a consent of the property owner, staff request the applicant provide

179
00:14:38,630 --> 00:14:45,190
an update on discussions with the neighboring property owner, and also grading changes

180
00:14:45,190 --> 00:14:50,430
to reduce the slope of the potential connection would impact the neighboring property that

181
00:14:50,430 --> 00:14:52,930
would also require consent prior to construction.

182
00:14:54,490 --> 00:14:59,870
A few outstanding items, neighbor consent for the easement widened.

183
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:25,820
Meeting, neighbor consent for grading impacts, kind of an analysis of the 8.8% grade, updated site plans showing driveway closures, if required, in revised circulation plan, demonstrating safe right in, right out movement. Lastly, a draft, cross access easement and maintenance agreement. That concludes my report.

184
00:15:28,240 --> 00:15:38,320
They're representative, I don't see one, however I am open to discussing this and giving

185
00:15:38,320 --> 00:15:48,120
feedback to Mr. Morena's or to the city staff has requested, yes, Mr. Moreno.

186
00:15:48,120 --> 00:16:01,900
Just asking the, seeing pre-existing driveways would be closed, so then would the only eagre in and out from there be this through the Starbucks, they're both of them to Main Street would be closed?

187
00:16:05,180 --> 00:16:15,720
That appears to be what the UDC calls for but it does say that at the time of development and one could argue that that time has passed.

188
00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:18,360
So that's what I was hoping to get a little more feedback on.

189
00:16:22,380 --> 00:16:29,020
Yeah, I think considering it times when Starbucks is probably really busy, it's like the only

190
00:16:29,020 --> 00:16:35,480
way in and out through people trying to get out of a Starbucks drive through is challenging.

191
00:16:36,040 --> 00:16:47,120
And then the other just wondering what the future of the rear access looks like as far as that

192
00:16:47,120 --> 00:16:50,820
that being an additional way for them to have access.

193
00:16:54,020 --> 00:16:54,880
Mayor Fitterer.

194
00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:55,780
Thank you, Chair.

195
00:16:56,000 --> 00:16:59,880
When the crossings north building that has the Aspen

196
00:16:59,880 --> 00:17:01,240
dental and the Starbucks was approved,

197
00:17:01,500 --> 00:17:03,840
I mean, we stub this out to the property line in hopes

198
00:17:03,840 --> 00:17:06,100
of facilitating future connectivity.

199
00:17:06,540 --> 00:17:09,580
So now that we have somebody asking to do that eight years later,

200
00:17:10,380 --> 00:17:11,480
help facilitate it.

201
00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:15,200
I agree.

202
00:17:15,540 --> 00:17:21,600
And I tend to think I would lean towards not closing the exits

203
00:17:21,600 --> 00:17:30,340
But it's on to 31, I do appreciate how closing that might reduce traffic on 31 and momentarily.

204
00:17:32,220 --> 00:17:38,740
But I am also concerned about, I think we mentioned, or you mentioned about fuel trucks,

205
00:17:38,880 --> 00:17:44,780
like how is that going to cause an issue for them if they have a whole different entrance

206
00:17:44,780 --> 00:17:45,200
point?

207
00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:52,000
It absolutely will they won't be able to access the site through the public access

208
00:17:52,000 --> 00:17:53,540
easement. Okay.

209
00:17:57,080 --> 00:18:00,960
Then I tend to personally and I want to hear y'all's feedback as well

210
00:18:00,960 --> 00:18:07,280
but I tend to lean towards letting those access on to 31 stay open. Okay. Okay.

211
00:18:09,790 --> 00:18:10,070
Well

212
00:18:10,070 --> 00:18:15,490
typically we don't put it on consent or put it on the agenda but considering this isn't

213
00:18:16,050 --> 00:18:20,330
an ongoing development and that kind of thing they may not be aware I don't know but

214
00:18:21,790 --> 00:18:24,010
Would y'all be okay with putting this on consent?

215
00:18:25,070 --> 00:18:26,550
Yeah, okay, me too.

216
00:18:26,710 --> 00:18:27,410
Yes, Mr. Moore, yeah.

217
00:18:27,730 --> 00:18:30,810
I could certainly pass on the comments

218
00:18:30,810 --> 00:18:34,300
to the applicant in the next meeting day.

219
00:18:34,660 --> 00:18:35,320
Okay, awesome.

220
00:18:36,280 --> 00:18:37,800
Okay, we'll put that on consent.

221
00:18:38,140 --> 00:18:40,320
Is there any public comment?

222
00:18:40,700 --> 00:18:43,240
I don't see any other business.

223
00:18:43,520 --> 00:18:45,820
There is none, round table commissioners.

224
00:18:45,960 --> 00:18:46,700
Do you have anything to say?

225
00:18:47,240 --> 00:18:47,680
Okay,

226
00:18:50,370 --> 00:18:52,550
staff, it's not on the agenda

227
00:18:52,550 --> 00:18:55,710
of it? Is there any comments, staff? No. Okay, meeting adjourned.