1 00:00:24,140 --> 00:00:51,060 6-0-1, we're going to call our special meeting to consider setting a tax rate. Tonight, city of spring, valley, village, ethanol, you do a roll call, please. Mayor David Domini. Here. Councilmember Allen Carvinder. Here. Councilmember Steve Bass. Councilmember John Lisenby. Here by Zoom. Councilmember Joy McCormick. Here. Councilmember Mark Taylor. Here. Mayor, we have a point. 2 00:00:51,060 --> 00:00:57,530 Council member Bass is walking through the door right now so you can count him 3 00:00:57,530 --> 00:00:58,730 present as well. 4 00:01:03,410 --> 00:01:06,730 Now we're going to let you come in here within the one minute 5 00:01:06,730 --> 00:01:07,990 time frame. You're out today. 6 00:01:10,850 --> 00:01:14,210 Okay John, do you want to reach your charger? 7 00:01:14,810 --> 00:01:19,270 First item tonight is just a presentation of the draft budget for fiscal year 8 00:01:21,290 --> 00:01:29,290 This is 99% what we brought to you in June, so we haven't made much change. 9 00:01:29,550 --> 00:01:33,390 There have been some minor adjustments as we got some updated costs on a few items. 10 00:01:34,430 --> 00:01:38,870 The only major change would be a personnel change. 11 00:01:38,870 --> 00:01:49,130 We typically set a recommendation for a COLA based on the June over June to June. 12 00:01:49,410 --> 00:01:52,050 A CIP, they calculated a little late 13 00:01:54,320 --> 00:01:55,640 CIP was, 14 00:01:58,420 --> 00:02:01,480 so we did recommend an increase in the COLA 15 00:02:01,800 --> 00:02:03,220 for employees at 3.9. 16 00:02:08,910 --> 00:02:16,620 This covers non-police, employees all the police outside of the captain's 17 00:02:26,180 --> 00:02:27,020 pay scale based 18 00:02:27,020 --> 00:02:28,540 on the competitive nature. 19 00:02:38,980 --> 00:02:53,590 Unfortunately, we have recommended before, just to go over some of the compensation benefit changes an increase in the 457 and from 2% to 3%. 20 00:02:55,030 --> 00:02:57,450 457 was originally adopted as an increase 21 00:03:21,610 --> 00:03:22,790 in 10%. 22 00:03:22,790 --> 00:03:23,790 Yeah, 23 00:03:26,970 --> 00:03:27,570 you can take those benefits. 24 00:03:29,880 --> 00:03:43,980 benefits. So, for example, Susan, a good job explaining earlier, if the employee is worth is the cost of their benefits is $2,000, that we take out the 500 for the employee because we cover our employees 100%. 25 00:03:43,980 --> 00:03:58,780 And then right now we cover 55% of that remaining $1,500. This would increase it to 65%. So not a huge amount, but enough to show that we're thinking about the fact that the cost of healthcare is going up goes 26 00:04:37,530 --> 00:04:44,750 Okay okay, I don't worry and then. So 27 00:04:49,740 --> 00:04:52,560 those are the those are the only changes to staff 28 00:04:52,560 --> 00:04:57,880 as a whole. Like I said before, the salaries, we're looking, we look to please differently 29 00:04:57,880 --> 00:05:01,820 because we're trying to maintain a place in the market. Still not going to be the highest 30 00:05:01,820 --> 00:05:05,900 paid. Obviously, employees, we can't compete with everything. Some of the other organizations 31 00:05:05,900 --> 00:05:10,640 are doing it, but we did want to find a more competitive, we have lost employees to shoot 32 00:05:10,640 --> 00:05:20,700 at other departments. And then trying to keep an equitable cola for our, the balance of 33 00:05:20,700 --> 00:05:26,600 our employees and then across the board for police and for see how public works would 34 00:05:26,600 --> 00:05:34,500 be the 10% increase in the healthcare coverage for dependents and of 1% increase in the 35 00:05:34,500 --> 00:05:36,350 four times. 36 00:05:36,530 --> 00:05:43,570 So the additional cost that we on that half a percent is going to be approximately $11,000 37 00:05:43,570 --> 00:05:44,270 to the general fund. 38 00:05:49,960 --> 00:05:54,320 I like the 457, but just for historical purposes. 39 00:05:55,360 --> 00:06:02,710 We did that because we paired back what we were doing with TMRS. 40 00:06:03,050 --> 00:06:04,830 It had nothing to do with the assessor's committee. 41 00:06:05,090 --> 00:06:06,250 Three outplays, and that came from me. 42 00:06:06,530 --> 00:06:06,910 I apologize. 43 00:06:09,270 --> 00:06:12,190 The benefits for the employees come with HSA. 44 00:06:12,890 --> 00:06:14,870 We don't have HSA. 45 00:06:14,870 --> 00:06:20,030 So we're part of a pool with two other cities, 46 00:06:20,030 --> 00:06:27,970 the fire department and the water authority and so we go out as a group. HSAs have 47 00:06:27,970 --> 00:06:30,290 been discussed but I don't think there's been the support. 48 00:06:32,860 --> 00:06:33,420 It's not a hot 49 00:06:33,420 --> 00:06:35,100 deductible plan that would rate at HSA. 50 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:41,400 We have our we maintain our cost at a 51 00:06:41,400 --> 00:06:48,460 decent level because we change providers almost as good from a cost benefit 52 00:06:48,460 --> 00:06:51,000 if it announces, but it's not good for your doctor. 53 00:06:52,600 --> 00:07:01,720 You do try to maintain at least an 85% over on providers, so lose 54 00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:05,640 a doctor, but it's 55 00:07:05,640 --> 00:07:07,620 still having to go to a new system, and I'm 56 00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:11,180 learning that right now with my own. 57 00:07:17,180 --> 00:07:23,300 So they'll start meeting in September because it run by the water authorities and the others. 58 00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:25,120 They're on a calendar year, none of this. 59 00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:32,520 I think we budgeted 10% increase. 60 00:07:33,140 --> 00:07:36,900 We didn't go the full, we thought, because we've had a good shot of keeping it lower. 61 00:07:41,920 --> 00:07:42,540 And then 62 00:07:45,620 --> 00:07:55,070 capital items continuing to, so 63 00:08:05,180 --> 00:08:06,100 this year was probably a place 64 00:08:06,100 --> 00:08:08,480 being held traffic improvements, hummed it, depil the station, 65 00:08:09,240 --> 00:08:12,780 tamulated pedestrian brakes underway, and Merlin Courtspring on the circle. 66 00:08:15,140 --> 00:08:19,300 Next year, we're looking at east-west crows. We had our kick-out meeting with them last week 67 00:08:19,870 --> 00:08:22,460 with the residents. So now it's dark soon. 68 00:08:24,700 --> 00:08:28,600 By May, for a while, the Circle of Echo Valley capital 69 00:08:28,600 --> 00:08:32,620 of a cruise building in design. 70 00:08:37,380 --> 00:08:40,500 Replacement to new patrol vehicles, we talked about before, 71 00:08:40,760 --> 00:08:42,400 we're switching to Durango's this year, 72 00:08:42,560 --> 00:08:44,140 which is showing us the sizeable savings, 73 00:08:44,840 --> 00:08:47,080 the vehicles, the system cheap lane, 74 00:08:47,720 --> 00:08:50,200 and it's a very research on what's available out there. 75 00:08:54,790 --> 00:08:56,190 A bit worth pick up truck, 76 00:08:56,530 --> 00:09:01,210 the car only vehicles for the infrastructure, 77 00:09:04,710 --> 00:09:05,930 updates to our servers, 78 00:09:06,230 --> 00:09:07,330 or wireless access and points. 79 00:09:07,770 --> 00:09:11,450 Continuation America, we have everything on us. 80 00:09:19,240 --> 00:09:22,240 A plot is, you know, we're a city that provides basic services 81 00:09:22,240 --> 00:09:33,140 we try to provide this really well and as far as continue trying to do and then it'll be a later item but all this is with a half-cent reduction question. 82 00:09:38,140 --> 00:09:44,560 I'd like to have two areas I'd like to cover. One is thank you for preparing this. It gives me a lot better feel. 83 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:49,200 We've made a lot of positive move from 84 00:09:51,790 --> 00:09:59,230 number of years of work and all if I were making good strides to take care of our employees without breaking the bank. 85 00:09:59,230 --> 00:10:09,330 I would like to look at from a more long-term prospect here is the capital 86 00:10:09,330 --> 00:10:17,830 items and our fund balance. So we're going in and stripping out, proposing I 87 00:10:17,830 --> 00:10:23,430 think roughly three million of our fund balance, general fund. 88 00:10:26,110 --> 00:10:26,990 And then I want 89 00:10:26,990 --> 00:10:37,770 So looking at that number, versus replenishment, I want to make sure that we're prudent in our 90 00:10:37,770 --> 00:10:44,430 spin-down of the general fund balance. And we're that's comfortable. 91 00:10:45,290 --> 00:10:50,130 And so I kind of want to look at the page where you've got the five-year CIP plan 92 00:10:50,830 --> 00:10:56,970 and get a little explanation about what that means and how that impacts our fund 93 00:10:56,970 --> 00:10:58,830 balance over time. 94 00:11:03,480 --> 00:11:10,820 So maybe we're not selling more bonds. No our goal has been to 95 00:11:10,820 --> 00:11:15,980 use and what I've kind of the direction I've been given is built up this 96 00:11:15,980 --> 00:11:24,320 huge savings account. Let's show the citizens we're using their money and we're not 97 00:11:24,320 --> 00:11:26,480 up our capital projects are last but we 98 00:11:31,000 --> 00:11:33,220 all the road projects come off or 99 00:11:35,490 --> 00:11:36,670 survey we did a couple 100 00:11:36,670 --> 00:11:38,310 years ago combined with where 101 00:11:41,890 --> 00:11:45,030 I know that I'm really looking at the numbers okay and I want to 102 00:11:45,030 --> 00:11:52,090 know how far are we comfortable spending that down what is the static amount that we want in the 103 00:11:52,090 --> 00:12:02,130 fund balance before we're like we got a problem we need to raise taxes we have I think our policy 104 00:12:02,130 --> 00:12:08,490 is 90 days. Well, but can we, but just to be clear, right? They're just talking about 105 00:12:08,490 --> 00:12:13,090 the general reserve for operating spends, but I think we need to be looking at, not just, 106 00:12:13,230 --> 00:12:16,770 you know, looking at that, you're looking at like what money we have set aside for actual 107 00:12:17,350 --> 00:12:22,270 capital improvements moving forward, yes? Well, because we're going to be spending more 108 00:12:22,270 --> 00:12:26,830 in capital improvements than we're setting aside for capital improvements every year. 109 00:12:30,190 --> 00:12:31,050 So we're 110 00:12:31,050 --> 00:12:32,290 I want to know what that looks like. 111 00:12:32,770 --> 00:12:38,830 Yeah, and not had to do that because we sold bonds and we had to do all that. 112 00:12:39,770 --> 00:12:44,430 The last few projects we've done outside of Bride and Place have been cash that Bride 113 00:12:44,430 --> 00:12:45,730 and Place was our last bond fund. 114 00:12:48,090 --> 00:12:53,490 But the goal was to get it down that having 10, 11 million in the bank was too much. 115 00:12:53,970 --> 00:12:56,090 We had these projects, let's start looking at those projects. 116 00:12:56,590 --> 00:13:00,650 Now all you're adopting on the five-year plan is next year, that's the only one you're 117 00:13:00,650 --> 00:13:07,470 I don't understand. This is a very, I'm not talking about this year. I'm looking for a very practical look out there. 118 00:13:07,530 --> 00:13:17,730 We know that probably around at this rate, probably around year four or five, we're going to have to depending on how what are, you know, 119 00:13:17,870 --> 00:13:25,050 we go to the audit and we carry money over. That's typically how we keep it going, that we'll have to look inside. 120 00:13:26,390 --> 00:13:34,710 Our is our pace not that we can continue or do or do we need to put together a package? Is there a bond bag? Is that a possibility? 121 00:13:35,250 --> 00:13:42,530 What's the what's the magic number right now for the proposed FY27 budget at 122 00:13:45,060 --> 00:13:46,360 25% which is 123 00:13:49,500 --> 00:13:52,720 $7 almost $3.8 million of unrestricted. 124 00:13:52,720 --> 00:13:53,500 under restrictive on 125 00:13:55,740 --> 00:14:00,620 the sheet that in the budget for the general from summary page, we're 126 00:14:00,620 --> 00:14:06,960 projecting at the end of that fly 27. That's the three using $3 million of fund balance. 127 00:14:07,160 --> 00:14:16,050 We would have 10.25 percent is 3.7. So we're still 7 million over at the end of next year? 128 00:14:16,250 --> 00:14:23,270 We have 7 million over that 25 percent. Okay, we're 25 percent of our budget is 3.8 million. 129 00:14:27,770 --> 00:14:32,030 That's kind of what the policy is, it's really operating expenses. 130 00:14:32,630 --> 00:14:38,050 You would drop out capital items, vehicles, whatever. 131 00:14:38,670 --> 00:14:45,880 The idea is worst case scenario, we could pay our bills for four months and be fine. 132 00:14:45,980 --> 00:14:51,580 If all of a sudden, every tax dried up and every fee dried up, we could operate for four 133 00:14:51,580 --> 00:14:53,520 months and try to get back on track without... 134 00:14:56,020 --> 00:14:59,800 So we have that that's the three points that we don't have 135 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:29,980 But it always stays there. Historically, where have we kept it? What's the number? I just really want to know. We don't want to go block keeping it around 10 to 11 and that 10 to 11 million range. We just we haven't been a couple million, but then by what we contribute and what we carry over the following year, we're staying pretty even for FY 24. It was a hundred and nineteen point. 136 00:15:29,980 --> 00:15:31,620 29% 25 137 00:15:34,470 --> 00:15:37,970 like 120 some percent this 138 00:15:40,530 --> 00:15:43,670 is an actual budget. So right now we cover fully 139 00:15:48,560 --> 00:15:51,640 another another way to look at it too is like in this budget 140 00:15:52,460 --> 00:16:02,640 We're spending proposing to spend one billion almost 3.2 million upon balance in the general month and then 141 00:16:03,740 --> 00:16:09,760 It's like 800 and some thousand utility fund of 700 some thousand utility fund balance 142 00:16:10,500 --> 00:16:16,980 So that is $3.8 million, but the CIP for this year. 143 00:16:20,070 --> 00:16:22,770 Well, I guess what I'll say is we can't keep that rate 144 00:16:22,770 --> 00:16:24,350 or spending up at some point. 145 00:16:25,090 --> 00:16:27,570 It's going to, I mean, that's where I'm going to go. 146 00:16:27,570 --> 00:16:30,250 At some point we would have to borrow money again on the next big project. 147 00:16:30,870 --> 00:16:33,290 I mean, we've been in the position of having all of this money 148 00:16:33,290 --> 00:16:39,390 because when those bonds were floated, we did a huge section of the city 149 00:16:39,390 --> 00:16:43,230 And the decision was made that we weren't going to do it all in one fell swoop 150 00:16:43,230 --> 00:16:48,170 So it wasn't going to be one year of construction or two years of construction that we were going to phase that out 151 00:16:48,170 --> 00:16:52,870 So we kind of sat on that reserve of bond money for 152 00:16:52,870 --> 00:16:57,790 Well, it's not the bond money you're sitting on because the bond money is spent what you've been sitting on is 153 00:16:58,350 --> 00:16:59,890 ex-revenues have been coming in 154 00:17:00,670 --> 00:17:06,870 And your building up your savings account every year of cash that comes in from taxes, but we have had a fund 155 00:17:06,870 --> 00:17:10,630 And we've had had money from the bond until like a year ago. 156 00:17:11,210 --> 00:17:11,930 We had money. 157 00:17:12,030 --> 00:17:12,350 Yeah, yeah. 158 00:17:12,350 --> 00:17:14,070 But that's an arbitrage on it. 159 00:17:14,070 --> 00:17:14,710 A portion of it. 160 00:17:14,850 --> 00:17:14,970 Yeah. 161 00:17:15,190 --> 00:17:15,410 Right. 162 00:17:15,410 --> 00:17:16,390 But we have been with them. 163 00:17:16,550 --> 00:17:16,690 Yeah. 164 00:17:16,810 --> 00:17:20,670 But we've had this other huge pile of cash in the savings account. 165 00:17:21,070 --> 00:17:35,610 But talking about the burn rate, FY27 is proposed at $0.39 million on CIP, FY28 is 5.3 million. 166 00:17:36,170 --> 00:17:37,390 This is for the CIP. 167 00:17:37,390 --> 00:17:41,050 Where does that leave our fund balance? That's what I want to know. I just want to know like 168 00:17:41,050 --> 00:17:46,690 we have one more year of on this five year CIP plan a very similar 169 00:17:46,690 --> 00:17:55,170 expense 5.0 million versus 5.3. Then the FY29 is 2.8. But where does that 170 00:17:55,170 --> 00:17:58,350 like I'm not I'm I'm just trying to make it simple and 171 00:17:58,350 --> 00:18:03,670 how much is left after the how much is like that 10 11 weeks after 20 when we buy 172 00:18:03,670 --> 00:18:06,410 the boat and the lighthouse how much money 173 00:18:06,410 --> 00:18:11,610 on our big spend, so after we've spent 5 million and 5.3 million, how much money we have left 174 00:18:11,610 --> 00:18:13,890 in our journal fund balance? 175 00:18:16,620 --> 00:18:21,880 At the end of 527 proposed, we're looking at a little bit over 10 million 176 00:18:21,880 --> 00:18:28,880 dollars. And then the next year, we need to spend 5.3 and CIT. But remember, part of that's coming from 177 00:18:28,880 --> 00:18:34,120 utility fund, part of it's coming from the general fund. And each year, when we do the budget, 178 00:18:34,120 --> 00:18:39,040 it, like in that example, where we need three million from the General Fund of Unbalanced, 179 00:18:39,460 --> 00:18:44,820 the total spend of this that's allocated to the General Fund is over four million. 180 00:18:45,380 --> 00:18:52,660 Because we have almost a million dollars of excess revenue versus excess operating expenses 181 00:18:53,150 --> 00:18:54,900 in FY27's budget. 182 00:18:55,980 --> 00:18:57,500 So we're using some of that. 183 00:18:57,500 --> 00:19:00,280 We're trying to save their 10-year bill. 184 00:19:00,400 --> 00:19:01,200 I understand. 185 00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:08,420 If I made our bill, a million of it's going to be money that we had, that we're having 186 00:19:08,420 --> 00:19:08,920 current. 187 00:19:09,260 --> 00:19:10,780 That we're raising out of our current money. 188 00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:14,200 There's a certain amount coming out of a utility fund. 189 00:19:14,980 --> 00:19:17,600 That's not part of the general fund balance. 190 00:19:17,880 --> 00:19:18,820 Yeah, because like each one of them. 191 00:19:18,820 --> 00:19:19,780 How much is that? 192 00:19:20,360 --> 00:19:25,160 For each item, it says like what percentage of utility fund, what percentage of general fund? 193 00:19:25,920 --> 00:19:31,480 So just looking at this quick numbers can be kind of like a quick answer if we were at a 194 00:19:31,480 --> 00:19:37,920 little bit over 10 million at the end of FY27 and then we needed to spend $5.3 million 195 00:19:37,920 --> 00:19:42,960 in FY28, you'd be like last 5 million, well no, because we're probably going to have 196 00:19:42,960 --> 00:19:44,020 a million in excess. 197 00:19:44,880 --> 00:19:45,820 So we're down to 4, right? 198 00:19:46,100 --> 00:19:47,900 No, that adds to that. 199 00:19:48,100 --> 00:19:53,480 Now we're at 6 million and then some of the total funds, so I would say by the end of FY28 200 00:19:53,480 --> 00:19:58,220 We would still be between $78 million of general fund. 201 00:20:01,450 --> 00:20:10,090 We had, so before the bonds were issued, the money that council had talked about building 202 00:20:10,090 --> 00:20:16,250 into the tax rate, the capital improvement projects, started at $1.5 million, and at some 203 00:20:16,250 --> 00:20:22,170 point after that, I don't remember the duration of years, it was increased to $175. 204 00:20:22,170 --> 00:20:28,470 And then when the idea of flugging the bonds for the election came about, we were trying 205 00:20:28,470 --> 00:20:34,510 to understand how much of that 1.75 that's available within the budget that we baked 206 00:20:34,510 --> 00:20:39,010 into the tax rate, how much of that did we want to use to fund bonds. 207 00:20:39,590 --> 00:20:43,370 And the decision was made, I forget what the number was, but it wasn't all of it. 208 00:20:43,490 --> 00:20:49,330 We weren't going to borrow enough money to have to pay each year 1.75 for those bonds. 209 00:20:49,330 --> 00:20:55,690 So it was there was a delta in there and I forget exactly what the delta was it was seven or eight hundred thousand dollars, but 210 00:20:56,250 --> 00:21:01,410 Following if we followed that pattern, right that that was still baked into the tax rate 211 00:21:01,410 --> 00:21:06,190 Which for the most part it has been baked into the tax rate because we haven't adjusted the tax rate 212 00:21:06,190 --> 00:21:12,770 But those bonds have been paid off so every year after those bonds are being paid off and less money is going to pay the debt 213 00:21:12,770 --> 00:21:18,290 That's more money in the general fund with with that amount that was built into the tax rate 214 00:21:18,290 --> 00:21:27,230 So I would have to assume after we've paid all the bonds off that we issued, that we would still have somewhere in the neighborhood of 1.75 million that's baked into that tax rate. 215 00:21:27,850 --> 00:21:28,770 Is that not accurate? 216 00:21:29,750 --> 00:21:30,350 I would think so. 217 00:21:31,210 --> 00:21:31,970 What we can do. 218 00:21:32,090 --> 00:21:33,990 It's something's baked into that tax rate. 219 00:21:34,550 --> 00:21:37,610 There's no way that evaporated because we're not paying dead. 220 00:21:37,990 --> 00:21:41,710 We're not paying the same debt on those bonds last year that we paid ten years ago. 221 00:21:41,710 --> 00:21:52,270 So there's money baked into that tax rate that will fund capital improvements, we just need to know what that amount is after we've done the projects on the five-year plan. 222 00:21:52,650 --> 00:22:00,330 Typically, the vast, this current year and the proposed year, it's near million dollars 223 00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:05,480 based on current expenditures. 224 00:22:06,180 --> 00:22:10,120 What's our debt service a year on our current bond? 225 00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:18,420 1.8. 226 00:22:25,980 --> 00:22:26,740 And how long does that go? 227 00:22:27,360 --> 00:22:28,540 That's not a revenue bond. 228 00:22:34,980 --> 00:22:38,080 Wait, what's the, what's the length of a bond? 229 00:22:47,340 --> 00:22:48,800 Yeah, last year, it was in 2013. 230 00:22:50,200 --> 00:22:53,340 But it greatly drops off at 2036. 231 00:22:53,920 --> 00:22:54,700 It's almost cut in half. 232 00:22:56,260 --> 00:23:00,510 We got to have a sub two percent. 233 00:23:01,110 --> 00:23:01,550 Yeah, that's right. 234 00:23:04,680 --> 00:23:05,840 Well, what will we do? 235 00:23:07,080 --> 00:23:07,860 Yeah, say my concern. 236 00:23:08,160 --> 00:23:10,860 I don't want, I don't want to plan five years. 237 00:23:13,480 --> 00:23:16,800 It's the same question about lowering the tax rate, right? 238 00:23:16,980 --> 00:23:20,300 I mean, you want to take into consideration what we're doing. 239 00:23:20,860 --> 00:23:23,700 But you also don't want to lower to a point where in three years you wake up 240 00:23:23,700 --> 00:23:25,660 and you're not entering enough to hit your projects, 241 00:23:26,100 --> 00:23:28,560 and then you've got to look at raising it again. 242 00:23:29,260 --> 00:23:32,940 I think the big question is, okay, so what was Brighton? 243 00:23:33,300 --> 00:23:34,060 Brighton was what? 244 00:23:34,660 --> 00:23:36,060 We paid what for Brighton? 245 00:23:38,350 --> 00:23:39,450 You have last year's COP. 246 00:23:47,320 --> 00:23:49,420 Brighton had to be one of the single largest. 247 00:23:49,420 --> 00:23:50,620 Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, that's right. 248 00:23:50,840 --> 00:23:53,600 Like right now, what we're doing these last two years 249 00:23:53,600 --> 00:23:55,940 is we're going through, we're getting the scraps. 250 00:23:56,660 --> 00:23:58,060 We're getting these little sections of roads 251 00:23:58,560 --> 00:24:02,260 that have had problems where either they're just small 252 00:24:02,260 --> 00:24:04,960 cul-de-sacs, or a part of it was done 10 years ago, 253 00:24:05,060 --> 00:24:06,480 but for some reason, as far as it makes them, 254 00:24:06,480 --> 00:24:07,180 we're going to fix it. 255 00:24:07,900 --> 00:24:10,080 Are we doing this about $7.5 million? 256 00:24:10,520 --> 00:24:13,760 OK, and that's seven point, that is a project 257 00:24:13,760 --> 00:24:17,920 that we are not going to be around to see done again. 258 00:24:17,920 --> 00:24:20,580 and that's a 30-year-old project. 259 00:24:20,900 --> 00:24:23,020 At a minimum, that's a 30-year-old project. 260 00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:27,240 So I'm like, what thing is that there 261 00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:29,600 were looking at five years out, six years out, 262 00:24:29,720 --> 00:24:33,500 eight years out, that's going to require $10 million. 263 00:24:33,980 --> 00:24:35,500 And if it did require $10 million, 264 00:24:36,020 --> 00:24:37,960 I think what we would do the same thing 265 00:24:37,960 --> 00:24:39,640 that we did 10 years ago, which was, 266 00:24:39,980 --> 00:24:41,160 we'd be looking at floating debt. 267 00:24:41,840 --> 00:24:44,860 I agree with you today, but we need to know how much money 268 00:24:44,860 --> 00:24:51,020 We have to do small capital improvement projects, but anything large that's coming in the next 10 or 15 years 269 00:24:51,020 --> 00:24:58,300 I don't see how we wouldn't issue debt to cover that as opposed to continuing to take money and put it in the bank as if we're gonna 270 00:24:58,300 --> 00:25:00,820 They cash for all of that. We could work on a 271 00:25:01,620 --> 00:25:02,020 projection 272 00:25:03,100 --> 00:25:05,120 For for the next couple of years I mean 273 00:25:05,120 --> 00:25:11,380 Part of the estimating but based on kind of historically what we end of the year with and carry it over 274 00:25:11,380 --> 00:25:13,960 It would be like a door-to-door assessment. 275 00:25:14,660 --> 00:25:20,260 I would say, can you overlay the assessment that we have to know, just like Alan said, 276 00:25:20,740 --> 00:25:24,060 what big things are staying out there that will need to be. 277 00:25:24,060 --> 00:25:24,740 Windsor next big. 278 00:25:26,520 --> 00:25:32,580 No, and not just that, but how do we, because the makeup of this is going to change, 279 00:25:32,840 --> 00:25:37,660 because it's constantly changing, the council members and the mayor, and I'm like, 280 00:25:37,660 --> 00:25:42,920 So, what is the strategy for paying for capital projects moving forward? 281 00:25:43,580 --> 00:25:48,080 I mean, that was the issue 20 years ago when the whole thing started was, are we going 282 00:25:48,080 --> 00:25:48,680 to pay cash? 283 00:25:48,900 --> 00:25:49,560 We're going to do bonds. 284 00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:54,600 And the first go around, bonds didn't, we didn't do it, and then went around again. 285 00:25:54,900 --> 00:25:56,780 You'll guess the second time, right? 286 00:25:57,200 --> 00:26:01,580 We issue three sets of bonds for all of these projects and the residents said, yes, that's 287 00:26:01,580 --> 00:26:02,180 what we want to do. 288 00:26:02,180 --> 00:26:09,640 I think the City of Spring Valley Village is in a position today in moving forward that 289 00:26:09,640 --> 00:26:13,220 the residents would support financing large capital improvement projects. 290 00:26:13,460 --> 00:26:17,580 We wouldn't be trying to do that with cash that we acquired over the course of 10 or 15 291 00:26:17,580 --> 00:26:17,920 years. 292 00:26:18,700 --> 00:26:20,060 But I don't disagree with you. 293 00:26:20,200 --> 00:26:27,420 My point of tonight is I would like to see a schedule that shows me based on this, based 294 00:26:27,420 --> 00:26:36,120 upon how much revenue growth that we've had and based upon these numbers, what number do 295 00:26:36,120 --> 00:26:36,840 we get down to? 296 00:26:36,920 --> 00:26:42,160 Yeah, I think you take page 51 and at the very bottom you put end-of-year fund balance 297 00:26:43,580 --> 00:26:50,420 and then, well, you'd put addition from general budget, you know, revenues over expenses there's 298 00:26:50,420 --> 00:26:56,900 going to be some profit and then you'll get an end-of-year fund balance, it'll be an estimate 299 00:26:56,900 --> 00:26:59,920 But you know, that's what you do if I've your plan. That's what I think 300 00:27:00,500 --> 00:27:07,540 Page 51 used to have two three lines two three lines at the end and that'll get you a fun balance of every every year 301 00:27:07,540 --> 00:27:13,920 Because I think we want to be able to going forward have that documented so that we can make a 302 00:27:14,780 --> 00:27:21,100 Decision about what's the number that we don't want to go below? I don't want to get down to 3.8 million 303 00:27:21,900 --> 00:27:26,860 I might want twice that. I mean, you guys might want to do it in a half time. I mean, whatever 304 00:27:26,860 --> 00:27:31,420 that never happens. Yeah, but if it's something I'm saying may come up and you've got to go do it. 305 00:27:32,420 --> 00:27:39,420 You want to be able to have some room. So even if you have to handle something, you're not tipping 306 00:27:39,420 --> 00:27:40,460 below your minimum. 307 00:27:43,700 --> 00:27:45,180 I don't think that impacts. 308 00:27:52,690 --> 00:27:55,910 I see these big numbers and I'm getting a little 309 00:27:55,910 --> 00:27:58,750 nervous thinking about what the implications are. 310 00:27:59,090 --> 00:28:06,530 So I would only ask about the tax rate, I mean we're talking about low in the overall scheme 311 00:28:06,530 --> 00:28:07,150 of things. 312 00:28:07,830 --> 00:28:12,990 What do you think that are the residents, the constituents, people in the city, really 313 00:28:12,990 --> 00:28:18,930 think about that if they come back to them in three years for a hike, where the lowest 314 00:28:18,930 --> 00:28:24,130 around right now, my thought process, and I'm not saying this is what I'm standing up to, 315 00:28:24,130 --> 00:28:30,130 It would be to leave the tax rate where it is and let's keep that money coming in just to do what we're talking about a rainy day 316 00:28:30,130 --> 00:28:36,750 Fund rather than lower the tax rate come back and two to three years and get it back again. I have one question about that 317 00:28:36,750 --> 00:28:45,170 Is not I saw in there then no new tax rate was like 3.9 for we had to lower it a little bit 318 00:28:45,990 --> 00:28:50,150 We had to come down just because of our the growth we've had in our tax base 319 00:28:50,570 --> 00:28:58,370 So, but it would so it would be, you know, 3.4, 2.4, and then revenue rate is 0.3, 320 00:29:04,810 --> 00:29:06,210 3.4, 4.4. 321 00:29:06,210 --> 00:29:11,390 Yeah, it's real close, but it's 3.9, 4.4, and change. 322 00:29:11,610 --> 00:29:15,330 And then you could, we could dedicate that difference to the capital. 323 00:29:17,070 --> 00:29:17,450 What's that? 324 00:29:19,950 --> 00:29:20,210 What's that? 325 00:29:21,050 --> 00:29:21,290 80. 326 00:29:21,890 --> 00:29:22,310 80? 327 00:29:24,840 --> 00:29:26,360 80, about 80 thousand dollars. 328 00:29:27,100 --> 00:29:28,160 There's no way we're going. 329 00:29:28,160 --> 00:29:32,120 I understand the rationale of, hey, we're lowering in and then we're raising, I'm like, 330 00:29:32,300 --> 00:29:37,220 we're not going to be raising the tax rate half a cent to try to get $80,000 capital. 331 00:29:37,300 --> 00:29:38,740 But that's the thing too, right? 332 00:29:38,840 --> 00:29:44,220 I mean, $80,000, this kind of discussion last year, $80,000 is all, I mean, realistically, 333 00:29:44,560 --> 00:29:50,340 spread across 1,200 homes and some businesses is- 334 00:29:50,340 --> 00:29:54,560 I could use that same rationale to say, hey, I should just take another $100 from every resident. 335 00:29:55,000 --> 00:29:57,180 Let's just take it up to 0.42. 336 00:29:57,180 --> 00:29:59,980 I want a wise guy that you... 337 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:04,480 Should I see two people in the advises against lower. 338 00:30:06,720 --> 00:30:31,960 Chapter two. But it's I like it would have to be lowered. Right. Can you remind me we held it. See? Or did we? I like to get that start where we show. Would our type. It has been flat for the last three years. Okay. Verses. Other villages were way looks like a heart. Oh yeah. Right. I that's, I always liked that graphic. I'm just saying. Especially. 339 00:30:31,960 --> 00:30:35,380 soon we, you know, in September to show kind of where we are, 340 00:30:37,680 --> 00:30:39,500 I just, I, you know, we, 341 00:30:39,540 --> 00:30:44,900 we had, we talked about measures. We had a previous mayor that wanted to see that line 342 00:30:44,900 --> 00:30:49,980 go down. We've had a previous, previous mayor that said, be cautious and let's try to 343 00:30:49,980 --> 00:30:54,260 hold that number before we start getting to a place where we have a heartbeat for like these 344 00:30:54,260 --> 00:31:00,380 images. But I think lowering the tax rate to even say that we're lowering the tax rate to 345 00:31:00,380 --> 00:31:06,500 me that would be like we're coming forward saying we want point two eight and I'm like we're 346 00:31:06,500 --> 00:31:13,640 not saying that we're saying half a cent and the idea behind that is is every other taxing 347 00:31:13,640 --> 00:31:19,020 authority is taking a greater percentage every year and every resident in spring valley 348 00:31:19,020 --> 00:31:24,000 I'd be hard pressed to find someone who's appraisal didn't go up so even with the rate the same 349 00:31:24,000 --> 00:31:29,520 We're clawing more money out of everybody and we are we are we are the healthy village 350 00:31:30,000 --> 00:31:34,120 We got night we got it over 90 days of general reserves 351 00:31:34,120 --> 00:31:37,700 But you got to look at why we're healthy and one of them is because we don't lower the tax rate 352 00:31:38,200 --> 00:31:44,620 But again every year I wouldn't say we're really lowering the tax rate to me lower in the tax rate would be like trying the tax rate 353 00:31:44,620 --> 00:31:45,720 We're not lowering the taxes 354 00:31:47,080 --> 00:31:52,140 Which has been the complaint from the rest since forever right like oh, that's great 355 00:31:52,140 --> 00:31:58,680 you dropped it a half percent. It doesn't really help me. I'm still paying out more than 356 00:31:58,680 --> 00:32:02,600 I paid last year. You're still getting more of my money. Okay. Let me show the last year 357 00:32:02,600 --> 00:32:09,360 of this year, we're not breaking your 8% and commercial we're not about 3% and the total 358 00:32:09,360 --> 00:32:10,960 overall net percent. 359 00:32:13,140 --> 00:32:16,420 For the city. That's what I mean for our, that's your saying in general. 360 00:32:18,590 --> 00:32:26,980 And we can leave it at, you know, Council can leave it at 3.9, but 39 cents for next 361 00:32:26,980 --> 00:32:31,040 year's well you know we talked about that before is we haven't lowered it in a 362 00:32:31,040 --> 00:32:36,100 couple of years it's just you know this right works with what we're trying to do 363 00:32:36,100 --> 00:32:40,480 it fits in the budget and then maybe bring it down and then you stay stay 364 00:32:40,480 --> 00:32:45,280 stable for a couple of years because rates are I mean this is not an area that's 365 00:32:45,280 --> 00:32:54,100 going to drop. I tend to be in line with Steve that going and lowering it to 366 00:32:54,100 --> 00:32:59,540 whatever the state mandate to level is without having to have a public hearing 3.94 or whatever 367 00:32:59,540 --> 00:33:09,110 the number is. Because it's not going to be meaningful to our residents but cumulatively it's 368 00:33:09,110 --> 00:33:17,260 more meaningful to us, maybe to the city and I think the rationale is, you know, we don't want to 369 00:33:17,260 --> 00:33:24,840 issue new bonds until we have to and we have that excess revenue and it allows us to afford more 370 00:33:24,840 --> 00:33:31,460 project. And I would say that's true if we're reducing it to some or not. We're 371 00:33:31,460 --> 00:33:37,160 reducing it $80,000 in total in one budget. It is cumulative. I mean, let's 372 00:33:39,400 --> 00:33:40,040 go back 373 00:33:40,040 --> 00:33:44,640 to just general questions about other budget items. Does anybody have any other 374 00:33:44,640 --> 00:33:50,560 questions? Is there more that you want to present? Well, that's said that we we'd had 375 00:33:50,560 --> 00:33:54,240 a pretty good discussion about it in June and I just want to go over the changes 376 00:34:18,860 --> 00:34:23,520 is that we added to it and make sure we reached out to all the other senior administrators 377 00:34:23,520 --> 00:34:27,400 this afternoon. Okay, because I don't want to start playing that game like we're playing 378 00:34:27,400 --> 00:34:34,120 with painting with... You know, you can't help it as I... I mean, we came out with the number 379 00:34:34,120 --> 00:34:37,120 on our own, and then we wanted to see where we sat. 380 00:34:42,080 --> 00:34:45,280 Okay, well... I don't need any more 381 00:34:45,280 --> 00:34:47,340 discussion. I will entertain a budget. 382 00:34:49,630 --> 00:34:53,670 No motion needed for the first discussion. We're 383 00:34:53,670 --> 00:34:58,050 not voting on anything. No, that's not on the budget's knee. We'll take this. We'll put 384 00:34:58,050 --> 00:35:04,530 together kind of of a projection of kind of what we think about the tax. The tax is next. 385 00:35:04,970 --> 00:35:09,550 Okay. We have to need 2.2. We have to put it on. Sorry. So the next one will adopt 386 00:35:11,510 --> 00:35:16,150 acceptance of the rates and then the third one will be discussion on the actual matter. 387 00:35:16,750 --> 00:35:22,530 All right. So the draft budget's been presented, consideration, possible action concerning, 388 00:35:22,530 --> 00:35:28,730 that we have no new revenue tax rate and a voter approval tax rate at fiscal year 389 00:35:28,730 --> 00:35:35,030 2027. So that is the 3.9 for? 390 00:35:35,530 --> 00:35:42,110 Yes, this is just that worksheet we included in your packets, the truth and taxation 391 00:35:43,110 --> 00:35:48,970 that goes over all the numbers that was finalized with the help of the tax assessor's office. 392 00:35:48,970 --> 00:35:52,330 So we just, this is just a motion, basically, 393 00:35:52,510 --> 00:35:55,490 accepting, accepting, accepting, accepting, accepting what it is. 394 00:35:55,930 --> 00:35:58,570 Okay. So, any, you want to go ahead and, 395 00:35:59,050 --> 00:36:02,890 please. Okay. I make a motion to accept, 396 00:36:03,210 --> 00:36:08,230 this is the school year 2026, 2027, no new revenue tax rate at, 397 00:36:09,510 --> 00:36:10,770 do I say this here? 398 00:36:10,910 --> 00:36:13,350 It is 0.39. 399 00:36:13,350 --> 00:36:19,070 point three, nine, four, four, three, four per $100 valuation and the voter approval tax 400 00:36:19,070 --> 00:36:22,630 rate at point four, seven, two, one, two, four. 401 00:36:29,460 --> 00:36:30,000 All in favor? 402 00:36:30,680 --> 00:36:30,880 All right. 403 00:36:31,520 --> 00:36:31,680 All right. 404 00:36:31,840 --> 00:36:32,160 Any opposed? 405 00:36:32,740 --> 00:36:32,820 Nope. 406 00:36:33,460 --> 00:36:33,580 Okay. 407 00:36:33,880 --> 00:36:34,380 That's accepted. 408 00:36:35,020 --> 00:36:35,540 All right. 409 00:36:35,800 --> 00:36:37,160 Item number 2.3. 410 00:36:38,740 --> 00:36:47,520 Proposing a tax rate per $100 valuation to 50 years beginning October 1st, 2026, ending 411 00:37:06,360 --> 00:37:19,900 I would move that we leave the proposed tax rate where it is and not lower it except we're mandated by the state. 412 00:37:22,440 --> 00:37:30,340 There is a there is a mandate from the state that we have to go down right. Yeah. So that's the number. Yes, it's so you avoid an election. Right. 413 00:37:33,710 --> 00:37:34,070 That's right. 414 00:37:37,330 --> 00:37:42,110 So is that what you're. That's right. Yes, that's what was it. We just stay where we are except for the mandated decrease. 415 00:37:42,110 --> 00:37:43,490 somebody want to talk about? 416 00:37:48,190 --> 00:37:53,450 I'll second it. That's fine. We can have some discussion. Okay, okay. I'll second it so you're 417 00:37:53,450 --> 00:37:54,050 excessive. Okay. 418 00:37:56,130 --> 00:37:58,150 I want three notes. Okay. 419 00:38:01,990 --> 00:38:04,470 Well, I guess we should have a vote on it. 420 00:38:06,480 --> 00:38:07,480 So just to be 421 00:38:07,480 --> 00:38:14,140 just clarify. Are you on? Can we hear you? Make sure we can hear you? Yeah. Can you? Can you? Yeah. 422 00:38:16,280 --> 00:38:25,160 My comment is the point 394 or 390, we're talking about $60,000 or $80,000, it's pretty 423 00:38:25,160 --> 00:38:31,300 minimal and I understand that having to go back in future years and go to higher rate 424 00:38:31,630 --> 00:38:32,780 is never a good thing. 425 00:38:34,600 --> 00:38:42,560 So if it's got to go to 394, that's okay, but I think it's all pretty marginal at this 426 00:38:42,560 --> 00:38:47,140 point in time. If I had to go through and cut out 60 grand out of our budget to make it 427 00:38:47,140 --> 00:38:49,920 a three, that's not too hard to do. 428 00:38:52,020 --> 00:38:56,140 No, but it's not necessary either. Yeah, and I'm good 429 00:38:56,140 --> 00:39:01,220 either way. And, you know, for our residents, you're exactly right. Their values have been 430 00:39:01,220 --> 00:39:11,780 going up far greater than any, you know, point point, you know, a half a cent tax. So it's 431 00:39:11,780 --> 00:39:17,140 It's important that we operate our city in a way that provides a benefit to our homeowners. 432 00:39:18,820 --> 00:39:22,360 And as long as we keep that as our priority, I think we're in good shape. 433 00:39:23,760 --> 00:39:25,280 Okay. Mark, you got anything? 434 00:39:25,780 --> 00:39:31,540 Just one clarification. Our budget assumes the point 39 flat. 435 00:39:31,760 --> 00:39:40,920 Yes, so if council sets a higher rate, we would add that extra to our capital budget. 436 00:39:44,040 --> 00:40:01,610 Okay, I think a lot of us optics be great to show a tax decrease but I think I'm I mean technically we're cutting taxes ever so slightly right? 437 00:40:01,610 --> 00:40:10,970 by the state mandated formula, point 0.0, never mind. 438 00:40:11,150 --> 00:40:18,670 I mean it's from like, we're talking about 0.395 to 0.699 or something like that. 439 00:40:18,910 --> 00:40:24,630 Providing great service, great police, great administration, great roads. 440 00:40:25,590 --> 00:40:27,130 We're in a good job for the citizens. 441 00:40:28,730 --> 00:40:35,870 I don't like paying my taxes either, very much, but I'm happy to be sitting in spring 442 00:40:35,870 --> 00:40:42,510 valley, so I'm going to call the question all in favor of the motion. 443 00:40:47,870 --> 00:40:48,330 All abstain. 444 00:40:50,690 --> 00:40:51,390 I don't want to vote no. 445 00:40:52,990 --> 00:40:57,090 Okay, so I guess item 2.4 becomes unnecessary. 446 00:40:57,810 --> 00:40:59,670 No, 2.4 is just a budget. 447 00:40:59,670 --> 00:41:03,190 public here, public here, public here for the budget. We still have a public here for the budget. 448 00:41:03,410 --> 00:41:09,710 Okay. All right. It's the right possible action concerning time, place, and public 449 00:41:09,710 --> 00:41:19,110 here for the fiscal year 2027 proposed budget. And for 20 October, 2026, September, 2027. 450 00:41:20,070 --> 00:41:27,830 And the time, is there a proposed date for that? It would be September 22nd, 2026, at 6 p.m. 451 00:41:29,050 --> 00:41:35,130 I make a motion to hold we need to sorry we need to go back to item 2.3 because it 452 00:41:35,130 --> 00:41:37,410 only need to be a real call vote okay 453 00:41:39,740 --> 00:41:43,420 on the proposed right Jasmine would you please 454 00:41:43,420 --> 00:41:52,680 do a vote council member Steve Bass yes council member Allen Carpenter present 455 00:41:56,630 --> 00:42:03,930 Councilmember John listen be yes Councilmember Joy McCormick yes Councilmember Mark Taylor. Yes. Sorry. 456 00:42:10,260 --> 00:42:10,860 Do we say so? 457 00:42:10,940 --> 00:42:12,460 30 seconds. That's all right. 458 00:42:13,940 --> 00:42:21,980 So that'll be the only one you're hearing. Okay back to 2.4. Do we need a we need a motion? 459 00:42:21,980 --> 00:42:31,980 Okay, I make a motion that we hold our public hearing on September 22, 2026 at 6 a.m. at the Spring Valley Village City Hall. 460 00:42:32,540 --> 00:42:40,440 I'll second. All in favor? I have a motion for adjournment. 461 00:42:40,440 --> 00:42:41,020 Tell me. 462 00:42:41,360 --> 00:42:42,000 Say good. 463 00:42:42,840 --> 00:42:43,480 My favorite. 464 00:42:44,600 --> 00:42:44,760 Yeah. 465 00:42:45,500 --> 00:42:46,020 It's gas. 466 00:42:46,120 --> 00:42:47,440 Thank you all for putting a... 467 00:42:48,200 --> 00:42:48,600 What's up?