1 00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:10,640 Ready? Okay. 2 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:12,480 It's 5:00 p.m. and we're at the Canyon 3 00:00:12,480 --> 00:00:14,720 Community Center for the June 17th 4 00:00:14,720 --> 00:00:16,280 meeting of the Springdale Planning 5 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:18,720 Commission. From the town, we have Tom 6 00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:21,840 Dansie, Neil Connolly, and April Raditz. 7 00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:25,000 On the dais, we have Matt Fink, Zion 8 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:27,680 National Park representative, Rich 9 00:00:27,680 --> 00:00:30,680 Swanson, Terry Kroschinsky, myself, 10 00:00:30,680 --> 00:00:32,439 Jennifer McCullough, 11 00:00:32,439 --> 00:00:33,880 Paul Zimmerman, 12 00:00:33,880 --> 00:00:35,600 and Kosh Bhati. 13 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:38,240 Melissa Laborde and Tom Kenniston are 14 00:00:38,240 --> 00:00:40,200 not here tonight. 15 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:41,880 Kosh will be voting in tonight's 16 00:00:41,880 --> 00:00:43,720 proceedings. 17 00:00:43,720 --> 00:00:45,760 Is there a motion to approve tonight's 18 00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:47,160 agenda? 19 00:00:47,160 --> 00:00:49,120 >> I move that we approve tonight's agenda. 20 00:00:49,120 --> 00:00:51,360 >> I'll second. 21 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:53,840 >> Uh motion by Paul, second by Rich. All 22 00:00:53,840 --> 00:00:55,800 in favor? 23 00:00:55,800 --> 00:00:56,720 >> Rich, I. 24 00:00:56,720 --> 00:00:57,520 >> Terry, I. 25 00:00:57,520 --> 00:00:58,520 >> Jennifer, I. 26 00:00:58,520 --> 00:00:59,280 >> Paul, I. 27 00:00:59,280 --> 00:01:00,560 >> Kosh, I. 28 00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:02,360 >> Motion passes. 29 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:09,150 Are there any general announcements? 30 00:01:09,160 --> 00:01:09,920 » No. 31 00:01:09,920 --> 00:01:11,960 announcements tonight. Any 32 00:01:11,960 --> 00:01:13,520 declarations 33 00:01:13,520 --> 00:01:18,030 of conflict of interest? 34 00:01:18,040 --> 00:01:21,040 Okay. For tonight's meeting, 35 00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:24,600 we have two action items. 36 00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:27,840 The first action item is an application 37 00:01:27,840 --> 00:01:30,480 for a subdivision plat amendment for 38 00:01:30,480 --> 00:01:33,600 phase two of the Watchman subdivision. 39 00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:36,240 Applicant is Shawn Honaker. Staff 40 00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:38,520 contact is Neil Connolly, and Neil will 41 00:01:38,520 --> 00:01:40,800 be presenting. 42 00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:42,800 >> Thank you. 43 00:01:42,800 --> 00:01:46,440 So, as you indicated, Mr. Shawn Honaker 44 00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:50,200 has applied to amend the plat of phase 45 00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:53,440 two of the Watchman subdivision. 46 00:01:53,440 --> 00:01:55,760 Uh the Watchman subdivision is located 47 00:01:55,760 --> 00:01:57,680 on North Fork Drive. 48 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:02,120 And the proposed changes are as follows. 49 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:05,550 So, 50 00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:09,320 this is the before and after. Um 51 00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:11,880 So, firstly to adjust the location of 52 00:02:11,880 --> 00:02:15,600 the lot line between lots eight and 11. 53 00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:16,840 Uh 54 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:19,440 to adjust the building pod in lot eight 55 00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:22,480 and to add a second building pod on lot 56 00:02:22,480 --> 00:02:25,480 eight to accommodate a main house and an 57 00:02:25,480 --> 00:02:27,400 accessory building. 58 00:02:27,400 --> 00:02:28,800 And then 59 00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:30,720 also to adjust the location of the 60 00:02:30,720 --> 00:02:34,120 building pod on lot 11. 61 00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:35,640 So, 62 00:02:35,640 --> 00:02:37,600 just to give you some information or 63 00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:39,480 some explanation on what the building 64 00:02:39,480 --> 00:02:42,520 pods are. So, this subdivision includes 65 00:02:42,520 --> 00:02:45,280 building pods where the buildings are 66 00:02:45,280 --> 00:02:48,640 uh supposed to be located. Um this isn't 67 00:02:48,640 --> 00:02:50,760 the same as 68 00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:52,520 you're familiar with some subdivisions 69 00:02:52,520 --> 00:02:54,720 where there's a conservation easement 70 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:57,760 like Anasazi Plateau or 71 00:02:57,760 --> 00:03:00,720 Clara Cup where you have a building pod 72 00:03:00,720 --> 00:03:03,120 surrounded by a conservation easement. 73 00:03:03,120 --> 00:03:06,320 This is This is not that. So, 74 00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:07,200 um 75 00:03:07,200 --> 00:03:10,080 there's no conservation easement here. 76 00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:12,000 Uh but the pods were just positioned in 77 00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:14,959 location that locations that made sense 78 00:03:14,959 --> 00:03:17,320 at the time of plotting where a house 79 00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:19,480 would go. Um 80 00:03:19,480 --> 00:03:21,239 in this case though, the property owner 81 00:03:21,239 --> 00:03:23,239 would prefer to position the buildings 82 00:03:23,239 --> 00:03:24,519 differently. 83 00:03:24,519 --> 00:03:25,880 Um 84 00:03:25,880 --> 00:03:28,519 however, they would still be subject to 85 00:03:28,519 --> 00:03:31,160 the usual land use regulations. 86 00:03:31,160 --> 00:03:33,480 Um 87 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:36,239 during the engineering review of of this 88 00:03:36,239 --> 00:03:38,280 application, we had one review comment 89 00:03:38,280 --> 00:03:40,280 that came back a little bit late. It 90 00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:42,440 didn't make it into the packet. 91 00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:45,480 Um so, I'll I'll just explain that now. 92 00:03:45,480 --> 00:03:47,360 Um 93 00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:50,160 if the commission is minded to approve 94 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:54,280 the amendment, I'd recommend that this 95 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:58,360 point is is conditioned in. Um and the 96 00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:00,480 point is that the road should be shown 97 00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:01,360 as a 98 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:03,800 private street and public utility 99 00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:06,120 easement. Uh I think at the moment it's 100 00:04:06,120 --> 00:04:09,000 just shown as a public utility easement. 101 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:11,560 Um the applicant's been made aware of 102 00:04:11,560 --> 00:04:14,440 the this comment and has agreed to make 103 00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:17,280 this adjustment. So, it's just kind of a 104 00:04:17,280 --> 00:04:20,239 uh case of getting there by condition to 105 00:04:20,239 --> 00:04:21,760 secure that. 106 00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:25,000 Um the engineer, Jared Bates from 107 00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:27,919 Rosenberg, is here uh who'll be able to 108 00:04:27,919 --> 00:04:30,440 answer any questions as well if you have 109 00:04:30,440 --> 00:04:32,080 any. 110 00:04:32,080 --> 00:04:36,430 Thank you. 111 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:38,760 » Well, I'll start. Um 112 00:04:38,760 --> 00:04:40,680 So, the So, the plat included in the 113 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:43,400 package was labeled as a final plat. So, 114 00:04:43,400 --> 00:04:45,640 I assume that this is 115 00:04:45,640 --> 00:04:47,640 preliminary final together kind of thing 116 00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:49,360 that we've done in the past. 117 00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:53,760 >> So, the preliminary and final plats um 118 00:04:53,760 --> 00:04:54,760 the the 119 00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:56,880 that's usually in the process where you 120 00:04:56,880 --> 00:04:59,600 have a new subdivision. So, this is an 121 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:02,200 existing subdivision with 122 00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:04,440 some amendments within it. So, with the 123 00:05:04,440 --> 00:05:06,240 subdivision plat amendments, you don't 124 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,040 need to do the preliminary stage and 125 00:05:09,040 --> 00:05:11,440 then the final stage. You You just 126 00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:12,000 >> Just the final 127 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:13,919 >> amendments. Yeah. 128 00:05:13,919 --> 00:05:15,640 >> Um and then you were talking about the 129 00:05:15,640 --> 00:05:17,120 pods. So, 130 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:20,240 the pods don't have a significance 131 00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:23,160 relative to the town ordinances. Is that 132 00:05:23,160 --> 00:05:24,880 a true statement? 133 00:05:24,880 --> 00:05:27,000 >> Yeah, I mean I I think they were put on 134 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:31,400 the the on the plat as, you know, the 135 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:34,560 preferred locations for for buildings. 136 00:05:34,560 --> 00:05:35,840 >> Right, the developer preferred 137 00:05:35,840 --> 00:05:37,040 locations. 138 00:05:37,040 --> 00:05:41,440 >> Yeah. The The reason um the reason why 139 00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:44,280 we've instructed the applicant to to 140 00:05:44,280 --> 00:05:46,640 Well, we haven't instructed. We've 141 00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:48,200 told the applicant that if they want to 142 00:05:48,200 --> 00:05:50,320 build their houses in another location, 143 00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:52,280 they should do this amendment 144 00:05:52,280 --> 00:05:54,800 is because the deposits are there, so it 145 00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:56,800 is indicative that the the building 146 00:05:56,800 --> 00:05:59,800 should be located in those places, but 147 00:05:59,800 --> 00:06:03,320 because he wants to do something else um 148 00:06:03,320 --> 00:06:06,560 we thought it would be cleanest to to 149 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:08,800 make sure that those are moved. 150 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:10,040 Um 151 00:06:10,040 --> 00:06:12,920 but as far as the kind of land use 152 00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:14,560 requirements 153 00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:18,680 um they will all apply irrespective of 154 00:06:18,680 --> 00:06:21,360 where the pod is located. 155 00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:23,320 >> Because technically you can build out to 156 00:06:23,320 --> 00:06:25,800 that boundary, right? 157 00:06:25,800 --> 00:06:29,600 >> Exactly, yes. So So say in in other 158 00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:30,919 subdivisions where you have a 159 00:06:30,919 --> 00:06:32,720 conservation easement where 160 00:06:32,720 --> 00:06:33,200 >> Right. 161 00:06:33,200 --> 00:06:36,880 >> you can build on that on that lot, but 162 00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:39,280 not in the conservation easement. Here 163 00:06:39,280 --> 00:06:44,040 the the entire lot is this whole area. 164 00:06:44,040 --> 00:06:49,000 So it is technically you you could 165 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:51,160 build anywhere on that subject to the 166 00:06:51,160 --> 00:06:52,680 regular set back. 167 00:06:52,680 --> 00:06:57,240 >> So it may make sense to have a condition 168 00:06:57,240 --> 00:06:59,720 on 169 00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:04,360 the pod that's lot 11. 170 00:07:04,360 --> 00:07:06,840 Cuz it says that the 171 00:07:06,840 --> 00:07:09,240 it slightly encroaches the 30 cent 172 00:07:09,240 --> 00:07:11,680 percent slopes, is that correct? So 173 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:13,720 maybe condition that the building itself 174 00:07:13,720 --> 00:07:15,680 needs to avoid it. 175 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:17,600 >> Yeah, I think that's a fine condition, 176 00:07:17,600 --> 00:07:23,590 yeah. 177 00:07:23,600 --> 00:07:25,520 » But in in in any other sense, it's up to 178 00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:28,880 the developer to enforce the pods. 179 00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:30,520 >> So the yeah, the divine design 180 00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:33,960 development review will will follow and 181 00:07:33,960 --> 00:07:35,440 um 182 00:07:35,440 --> 00:07:38,080 and so as part of that process will be 183 00:07:38,080 --> 00:07:40,200 reviewing it kind of for all the regular 184 00:07:40,200 --> 00:07:42,360 standards. 185 00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:44,120 >> Then you 186 00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:46,800 uh that the that that the road that's 187 00:07:46,800 --> 00:07:49,080 listed on the map uh should be 188 00:07:49,080 --> 00:07:50,560 designated 189 00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:51,640 I don't know if it takes an official 190 00:07:51,640 --> 00:07:53,560 amendment or something as a 191 00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:57,040 um as a um public street. 192 00:07:57,040 --> 00:07:58,160 Um 193 00:07:58,160 --> 00:08:00,080 and then that there should be easements 194 00:08:00,080 --> 00:08:01,520 in that. It looks like there's already 195 00:08:01,520 --> 00:08:02,920 easements 196 00:08:02,920 --> 00:08:05,960 associated with what's now labeled as 197 00:08:05,960 --> 00:08:07,840 North Fork Drive. 198 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:10,040 Um 199 00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:11,720 So, I think 200 00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:13,840 question really is um 201 00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:17,560 are you are are we in are we expecting 202 00:08:17,560 --> 00:08:20,800 uh utility easement changes or just that 203 00:08:20,800 --> 00:08:23,120 the designation of the road itself will 204 00:08:23,120 --> 00:08:25,600 be designated as a private street? 205 00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:27,520 >> I believe it's more of a labeling thing 206 00:08:27,520 --> 00:08:30,440 and perhaps Jared could speak to that. 207 00:08:30,440 --> 00:08:33,709 Um 208 00:08:33,719 --> 00:08:35,440 » Jared Bates, Rosenberg Associates. 209 00:08:35,440 --> 00:08:37,159 Sorry, it it's kind of this is kind of 210 00:08:37,159 --> 00:08:38,760 more of a formality. So, just to 211 00:08:38,760 --> 00:08:40,400 clarify, uh 212 00:08:40,400 --> 00:08:42,919 so, lot 8 and 11, those are changed. The 213 00:08:42,919 --> 00:08:44,440 lot line is changing, but the intention 214 00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:46,240 of this plat amendment is to leave 215 00:08:46,240 --> 00:08:48,520 everything else that the the road 9 and 216 00:08:48,520 --> 00:08:49,440 10 217 00:08:49,440 --> 00:08:52,120 exactly as they were before. So, so 218 00:08:52,120 --> 00:08:54,000 typically when we do a lot of like a a 219 00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:55,920 partial plat amendment, we're not trying 220 00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:57,240 to change anything else that's under the 221 00:08:57,240 --> 00:08:58,360 lots that are not involved in the 222 00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:00,320 change. And so, what what Nels is 223 00:09:00,320 --> 00:09:01,600 referring to is, "Hey, we're the 224 00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:03,640 designation of that the the the the road 225 00:09:03,640 --> 00:09:04,800 that's there is now, we're not trying to 226 00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:06,680 change that. We just missed a label." 227 00:09:06,680 --> 00:09:08,360 Cuz I think it calls out the the 228 00:09:08,360 --> 00:09:09,600 easement, but not the street. Is that 229 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:10,120 what we're saying? 230 00:09:10,120 --> 00:09:13,160 >> I I think that's it. So, so the 231 00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:14,600 I think it's just a label that 232 00:09:14,600 --> 00:09:17,600 disappeared from the the the existing 233 00:09:17,600 --> 00:09:19,720 plat to the proposed that just needs to 234 00:09:19,720 --> 00:09:21,000 go back in. 235 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:22,800 >> Put the label back in to label it as a 236 00:09:22,800 --> 00:09:25,400 >> Yes. Yeah, just so it's so that 237 00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:25,640 it's changed. 238 00:09:25,640 --> 00:09:28,400 >> planning to add or change any uh public 239 00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:29,920 improvements at this point. 240 00:09:29,920 --> 00:09:30,640 >> No. 241 00:09:30,640 --> 00:09:33,430 >> Okay. 242 00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:36,910 Um 243 00:09:36,920 --> 00:09:38,320 When you make it a private road, I don't 244 00:09:38,320 --> 00:09:41,520 know if there's an HOA or does that 245 00:09:41,520 --> 00:09:42,880 >> Yeah, I think it's a private street now, 246 00:09:42,880 --> 00:09:44,360 isn't it? No? 247 00:09:44,360 --> 00:09:45,080 >> Yeah. 248 00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:47,080 so basically there's an HOA and in 249 00:09:47,080 --> 00:09:49,000 this case the one person owns the entire 250 00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:50,440 subdivision. 251 00:09:50,440 --> 00:09:52,200 And so yeah, the HOA will be set up to 252 00:09:52,200 --> 00:09:55,200 maintain, you know, the road and and and 253 00:09:55,200 --> 00:09:56,320 the utilities and all those all those 254 00:09:56,320 --> 00:09:57,840 sorts of things, so. 255 00:09:57,840 --> 00:09:59,520 >> Okay. I I was just curious cuz that 256 00:09:59,520 --> 00:10:01,360 means you don't need a um 257 00:10:01,360 --> 00:10:02,760 road agreement. You would have it would 258 00:10:02,760 --> 00:10:04,080 be covered by the HOA. 259 00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:06,320 >> Yeah, that's my understanding. 260 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:07,800 >> I don't know if this matters that much, 261 00:10:07,800 --> 00:10:11,280 but the pod 8A and 8B, is that just two 262 00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:13,400 options or is it two buildings? 263 00:10:13,400 --> 00:10:15,080 >> Uh there there's a guest house and a 264 00:10:15,080 --> 00:10:15,960 main house, is what I think. 265 00:10:15,960 --> 00:10:19,630 >> Okay. 266 00:10:19,640 --> 00:10:22,560 » But what we're approving here is is the 267 00:10:22,560 --> 00:10:24,200 line changes stuff. We're not actually 268 00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:26,720 approving any actual development work, 269 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:27,240 correct? 270 00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:33,790 >> Correct. 271 00:10:33,800 --> 00:10:35,280 » So in that case, we really don't 272 00:10:35,280 --> 00:10:36,480 wouldn't need to This isn't the 273 00:10:36,480 --> 00:10:38,600 appropriate place to put in anything 274 00:10:38,600 --> 00:10:40,080 about 275 00:10:40,080 --> 00:10:41,120 >> where the building site is. 276 00:10:41,120 --> 00:10:43,160 >> Yeah, like the 30% slope or anything 277 00:10:43,160 --> 00:10:43,680 like that. 278 00:10:43,680 --> 00:10:45,120 >> All of that will come in the PDR. 279 00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:46,480 >> It will be 280 00:10:46,480 --> 00:10:47,160 set up in the 281 00:10:47,160 --> 00:10:47,680 >> That makes sense. 282 00:10:47,680 --> 00:11:03,310 >> Yeah. 283 00:11:03,320 --> 00:11:07,560 » And I don't have any other questions. Um 284 00:11:07,560 --> 00:11:09,640 it all seems 285 00:11:09,640 --> 00:11:11,320 to comply 286 00:11:11,320 --> 00:11:12,440 for the 287 00:11:12,440 --> 00:11:15,280 what the application is asking for. 288 00:11:15,280 --> 00:11:16,680 >> Yeah, it seems pretty straightforward to 289 00:11:16,680 --> 00:11:21,470 me. 290 00:11:21,480 --> 00:11:22,720 » With that, I guess I move that the 291 00:11:22,720 --> 00:11:24,440 planning commission approve the proposed 292 00:11:24,440 --> 00:11:26,080 amendment to the Washington phase two 293 00:11:26,080 --> 00:11:28,000 subdivision plat discussed at the 294 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:31,720 meeting on Wednesday, June 17th, 2026. 295 00:11:31,720 --> 00:11:33,280 The motion is based on the following 296 00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:35,520 findings. The amendment preserves 297 00:11:35,520 --> 00:11:37,400 existing easements. The subdivision 298 00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:39,000 amendment is compliant with Utah 299 00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:42,160 Municipal Code 10-28-10. 300 00:11:42,160 --> 00:11:43,840 The resulting lots are compliant with 301 00:11:43,840 --> 00:11:45,840 the town's land use ordinances for 302 00:11:45,840 --> 00:11:47,920 minimum lot sizes, minimum lot widths, 303 00:11:47,920 --> 00:11:50,080 and minimum setbacks. 304 00:11:50,080 --> 00:11:52,280 The building pods avoid 30% slopes 305 00:11:52,280 --> 00:11:53,840 generally, and the access road 306 00:11:53,840 --> 00:11:55,960 traversing 30% slopes was previously 307 00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:58,640 approved by a variance. 308 00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:00,360 The plat should, however, be corrected 309 00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:02,200 to show the road is a private street and 310 00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:06,280 denote all public utility easements. 311 00:12:06,280 --> 00:12:07,800 >> I'll second. 312 00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:10,400 >> Motion by Paul, second by Terry. All in 313 00:12:10,400 --> 00:12:11,400 favor? 314 00:12:11,400 --> 00:12:12,520 >> Rich, I. 315 00:12:12,520 --> 00:12:13,200 >> Terry, I. 316 00:12:13,200 --> 00:12:14,160 >> Jennifer, I. 317 00:12:14,160 --> 00:12:15,040 >> Paul, I. 318 00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:16,160 >> Ash, I. 319 00:12:16,160 --> 00:12:19,950 >> Motion passes. 320 00:12:19,960 --> 00:12:22,480 The second action item is an application 321 00:12:22,480 --> 00:12:25,040 for a subdivision plat amendment of the 322 00:12:25,040 --> 00:12:26,240 Silver 323 00:12:26,240 --> 00:12:29,280 Bear subdivision. Applicant, Sam Patel. 324 00:12:29,280 --> 00:12:31,400 Staff contact, Mac Now Connolly and I 325 00:12:31,400 --> 00:12:33,320 will be presenting. 326 00:12:33,320 --> 00:12:35,960 >> Okay, thank you. So, another subdivision 327 00:12:35,960 --> 00:12:38,200 plat amendment. You don't get any in a 328 00:12:38,200 --> 00:12:39,640 long time, and then we get two in the 329 00:12:39,640 --> 00:12:42,320 same night. So, 330 00:12:42,320 --> 00:12:45,040 uh this application's made by Mr. Sam 331 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:46,240 Patel 332 00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:49,360 uh to amend the Silver Bear subdivision. 333 00:12:49,360 --> 00:12:53,480 So, this is a two-lot subdivision 334 00:12:53,480 --> 00:12:54,640 um 335 00:12:54,640 --> 00:12:58,240 just by the former Silver Bear rock shop 336 00:12:58,240 --> 00:13:00,440 on that property there. 337 00:13:00,440 --> 00:13:03,600 Uh the sub- Silver Bear subdivision is 338 00:13:03,600 --> 00:13:06,120 unusual because both of the lots are 339 00:13:06,120 --> 00:13:08,880 split zoned. So, if you see here, 340 00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:11,240 there's this lot here, and then there's 341 00:13:11,240 --> 00:13:12,839 this lot here. 342 00:13:12,839 --> 00:13:16,360 And the front of both lots is in the 343 00:13:16,360 --> 00:13:19,960 Village Commercial zone. The rear of 344 00:13:19,960 --> 00:13:23,680 both is in the Valley Residential zone. 345 00:13:23,680 --> 00:13:26,280 So, the purpose of this subdivision plat 346 00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:27,640 amendment 347 00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:30,240 is to 348 00:13:30,240 --> 00:13:32,360 change the line and basically draw it 349 00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:35,240 across here, so you have one 350 00:13:35,240 --> 00:13:38,680 um village commercial property and then 351 00:13:38,680 --> 00:13:40,120 one 352 00:13:40,120 --> 00:13:42,440 uh valley residential property. 353 00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:44,120 Um 354 00:13:44,120 --> 00:13:46,040 so it is 355 00:13:46,040 --> 00:13:48,040 the code doesn't actually allow the 356 00:13:48,040 --> 00:13:51,320 creation of new split zone lots. So, 357 00:13:51,320 --> 00:13:55,080 this change would actually be removing a 358 00:13:55,080 --> 00:13:56,640 non-conformity 359 00:13:56,640 --> 00:13:57,400 um 360 00:13:57,400 --> 00:13:59,440 because it would it would create those 361 00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:02,520 two single zone lots. 362 00:14:02,520 --> 00:14:03,600 Um 363 00:14:03,600 --> 00:14:06,160 the rear lot will be accessed by an 364 00:14:06,160 --> 00:14:09,600 easement, which runs across the uh 365 00:14:09,600 --> 00:14:11,880 village commercial zone, so just along 366 00:14:11,880 --> 00:14:12,920 here. 367 00:14:12,920 --> 00:14:15,440 That would that would be the the access 368 00:14:15,440 --> 00:14:18,440 for the rear lot, you can see there. 369 00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:19,880 Um 370 00:14:19,880 --> 00:14:24,240 the property has a an existing house and 371 00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:28,040 a shed on the property at the moment. 372 00:14:28,040 --> 00:14:31,080 As you can maybe see here, they straddle 373 00:14:31,080 --> 00:14:34,839 the property line. So, by relocating the 374 00:14:34,839 --> 00:14:38,200 property line there, you'd be creating 375 00:14:38,200 --> 00:14:40,080 non-complying buildings because they're 376 00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:42,720 not compliant with the setbacks. 377 00:14:42,720 --> 00:14:44,480 Um 378 00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:47,600 the owner intends to redevelop the the 379 00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:51,680 property and to demolish those buildings 380 00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:53,680 um well, the the home and the shed at 381 00:14:53,680 --> 00:14:54,760 least. 382 00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:56,600 Um 383 00:14:56,600 --> 00:14:58,240 so 384 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:00,560 um to 385 00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:02,160 yeah, to make sure we're not creating a 386 00:15:02,160 --> 00:15:04,520 new non-conforming lot, 387 00:15:04,520 --> 00:15:06,800 any approval should be conditional on 388 00:15:06,800 --> 00:15:12,640 those structures being removed prior to this being recorded. 389 00:15:12,640 --> 00:15:13,760 Um 390 00:15:13,760 --> 00:15:16,760 but otherwise, it it complies with all 391 00:15:16,760 --> 00:15:19,640 the relevant standards. 392 00:15:19,640 --> 00:15:22,760 Um so, if you if the commission's minded 393 00:15:22,760 --> 00:15:25,520 to give approval um 394 00:15:25,520 --> 00:15:27,400 I would recommend that that condition be 395 00:15:27,400 --> 00:15:30,880 included in in the approval. 396 00:15:30,880 --> 00:15:36,750 I can answer any questions you have. 397 00:15:36,760 --> 00:15:39,760 » So so again we're not approving any 398 00:15:39,760 --> 00:15:42,280 actual development work. 399 00:15:42,280 --> 00:15:43,600 That would come later. 400 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:45,800 >> Yeah it's it's moving the line 401 00:15:45,800 --> 00:15:47,520 essentially. Yeah. 402 00:15:47,520 --> 00:15:49,840 >> And 403 00:15:49,840 --> 00:15:51,320 do the demolition that would take a 404 00:15:51,320 --> 00:15:53,680 permit? 405 00:15:53,680 --> 00:15:55,800 >> Yeah so there would be a demolition 406 00:15:55,800 --> 00:15:57,120 permit 407 00:15:57,120 --> 00:15:59,000 then there would be to redevelop there 408 00:15:59,000 --> 00:16:01,400 would be the design development review 409 00:16:01,400 --> 00:16:04,560 and whatever else follows. Yeah. 410 00:16:04,560 --> 00:16:08,000 >> And as part of a demolition permit do we 411 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:20,070 require revegetation? 412 00:16:20,080 --> 00:16:22,120 » Sorry yeah. So I I think the the 413 00:16:22,120 --> 00:16:24,000 demolition permit really just covers 414 00:16:24,000 --> 00:16:25,560 removing 415 00:16:25,560 --> 00:16:27,760 aspects of a a property that would have 416 00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:30,800 required a building permit to to build 417 00:16:30,800 --> 00:16:32,240 originally. 418 00:16:32,240 --> 00:16:35,680 If if following demolition there was 419 00:16:35,680 --> 00:16:38,120 some issues with compliance 420 00:16:38,120 --> 00:16:39,720 say with landscape or something we would 421 00:16:39,720 --> 00:16:41,800 have to address that but for the 422 00:16:41,800 --> 00:16:44,680 demolition permit itself it is just a 423 00:16:44,680 --> 00:16:45,680 permit to demolish. 424 00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:47,760 >> So so it would be perhaps at the time of 425 00:16:47,760 --> 00:16:49,360 DDR 426 00:16:49,360 --> 00:16:53,360 that we would look again at the vegetation and landscaping 427 00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:55,240 requirements. 428 00:16:55,240 --> 00:16:58,200 >> Yeah so once once the DDR comes then 429 00:16:58,200 --> 00:16:59,680 you'd be looking at the the whole 430 00:16:59,680 --> 00:17:04,429 property as a whole. 431 00:17:04,439 --> 00:17:06,720 » Some other questions um 432 00:17:06,720 --> 00:17:09,720 so for the easement 433 00:17:09,720 --> 00:17:12,319 would an easement agreement be required 434 00:17:12,319 --> 00:17:13,880 or simply 435 00:17:13,880 --> 00:17:16,600 noting the easement on the plat as we've 436 00:17:16,600 --> 00:17:21,069 seen. 437 00:17:21,079 --> 00:17:22,720 » And 438 00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:26,079 just being shown on the plat is records 439 00:17:26,079 --> 00:17:29,320 that easement. So, it's it's recorded. 440 00:17:29,320 --> 00:17:30,480 >> sufficient to record the 441 00:17:30,480 --> 00:17:31,680 >> Yeah. 442 00:17:31,680 --> 00:17:33,840 >> I was just reading through 443 00:17:33,840 --> 00:17:36,960 the the the 14D and they talked about 444 00:17:36,960 --> 00:17:38,400 easements and it wasn't clear to me 445 00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:39,320 whether we 446 00:17:39,320 --> 00:17:41,000 needed agreement. 447 00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:42,280 Um 448 00:17:42,280 --> 00:17:44,200 and then there is a section in there 449 00:17:44,200 --> 00:17:45,920 that says that the 450 00:17:45,920 --> 00:17:47,960 it says that that they require quote an 451 00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:50,360 emergency vehicle access built to the 452 00:17:50,360 --> 00:17:53,320 specifications of the fire marshal. 453 00:17:53,320 --> 00:17:56,120 Um if the staff portion is longer than 454 00:17:56,120 --> 00:17:59,760 150 ft which this one is. 455 00:17:59,760 --> 00:18:01,520 that part of the subdivision or is 456 00:18:01,520 --> 00:18:03,560 that something we would handle again at 457 00:18:03,560 --> 00:18:05,200 the time of the DDR? 458 00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:10,680 >> It it's part of the subdivision, but at 30 ft width there's sufficient width 459 00:18:10,680 --> 00:18:12,440 for a a fire truck. 460 00:18:12,440 --> 00:18:15,230 >> enough. Okay. 461 00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:17,360 Um 462 00:18:17,360 --> 00:18:19,960 and then it also calls for 463 00:18:19,960 --> 00:18:21,240 um 464 00:18:21,240 --> 00:18:24,120 for you know, an all-weather surface. 465 00:18:24,120 --> 00:18:25,520 Right? And right now I think it's just 466 00:18:25,520 --> 00:18:27,680 trees and stuff there. So, 467 00:18:27,680 --> 00:18:30,080 >> Yeah, that that access doesn't exist. 468 00:18:30,080 --> 00:18:34,920 Yes, because the way the subdivision is at the moment 469 00:18:34,920 --> 00:18:37,000 there's there's no there at the at the 470 00:18:37,000 --> 00:18:39,640 moment. So, that that will have to come. 471 00:18:39,640 --> 00:18:39,880 Yeah. 472 00:18:39,880 --> 00:18:40,720 >> That would have to come with the 473 00:18:40,720 --> 00:18:41,720 subdivision? 474 00:18:41,720 --> 00:18:43,440 >> Yeah, so that would be a condition 475 00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:56,350 actually. Yeah. 476 00:18:56,360 --> 00:18:58,080 » I guess one other thing I think I I mean 477 00:18:58,080 --> 00:18:59,400 I think it makes sense, but uh you know, 478 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:01,840 with the ordinance calls for no new flag 479 00:19:01,840 --> 00:19:04,720 knock flag lots in 480 00:19:04,720 --> 00:19:06,160 the central commercial or village 481 00:19:06,160 --> 00:19:07,680 commercial zone. 482 00:19:07,680 --> 00:19:11,240 Um so, this flag lot would be not in 483 00:19:11,240 --> 00:19:13,360 village commercial zone. But the fact 484 00:19:13,360 --> 00:19:15,160 that the easement is shouldn't matter, 485 00:19:15,160 --> 00:19:16,200 right? 486 00:19:16,200 --> 00:19:19,000 >> Yeah, so that that is a good point. Um 487 00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:20,960 when I looked at that, my interpretation 488 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:25,120 was that the the flag lot is the Valley 489 00:19:25,120 --> 00:19:26,680 Residential 490 00:19:26,680 --> 00:19:29,680 lots and therefore 491 00:19:29,680 --> 00:19:31,520 doesn't does not that conflict with the 492 00:19:31,520 --> 00:19:33,160 code. That was my 493 00:19:33,160 --> 00:19:34,960 view on that. 494 00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:36,120 >> I think so, too. That's the way I read 495 00:19:36,120 --> 00:19:37,520 it. I want to make sure. 496 00:19:37,520 --> 00:19:38,440 Okay. 497 00:19:38,440 --> 00:19:44,750 Those are the questions I have. 498 00:19:44,760 --> 00:19:47,320 » Are there any other questions? 499 00:19:47,320 --> 00:19:49,640 I think without one 500 00:19:49,640 --> 00:19:51,520 condition 501 00:19:51,520 --> 00:19:55,000 it seems to be a positive amendment. 502 00:19:55,000 --> 00:19:56,240 >> Yeah, I think so. It seems pretty 503 00:19:56,240 --> 00:19:57,800 straightforward and I think it works to 504 00:19:57,800 --> 00:19:59,880 the benefit of the town and getting it 505 00:19:59,880 --> 00:20:01,440 in compliance with the 506 00:20:01,440 --> 00:20:02,480 >> Yeah, this um 507 00:20:02,480 --> 00:20:04,480 >> photo regulations. 508 00:20:04,480 --> 00:20:05,840 >> This lot was originally divided, I 509 00:20:05,840 --> 00:20:08,480 think, back in 2023. 510 00:20:08,480 --> 00:20:10,080 Um and at that time there was 511 00:20:10,080 --> 00:20:14,630 >> wasn't a rule against 512 00:20:14,640 --> 00:20:15,800 » This 513 00:20:15,800 --> 00:20:18,600 >> takes us much closer to what we're after 514 00:20:18,600 --> 00:20:21,040 um from the goals of our uh 515 00:20:21,040 --> 00:20:22,680 ordinances and and the 516 00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:24,360 >> Yeah. 517 00:20:24,360 --> 00:20:29,670 >> I think it's a good a good change. 518 00:20:29,680 --> 00:20:33,350 » Other comments? 519 00:20:33,360 --> 00:20:35,240 » Well, then I move that the Planning 520 00:20:35,240 --> 00:20:36,600 Commission approve the proposed 521 00:20:36,600 --> 00:20:38,560 amendment to the Silver Bear Subdivision 522 00:20:38,560 --> 00:20:40,520 Plat discussed at the meeting on when is 523 00:20:40,520 --> 00:20:43,880 it? June 17th, 2026, subject to a 524 00:20:43,880 --> 00:20:46,120 condition of approval necessary to avoid 525 00:20:46,120 --> 00:20:48,640 lots with non-complying minimum setbacks 526 00:20:48,640 --> 00:20:50,920 that the subdivision plat amendment must 527 00:20:50,920 --> 00:20:52,800 not be recorded until the house and shed 528 00:20:52,800 --> 00:20:54,280 are removed. 529 00:20:54,280 --> 00:20:55,880 The motion is based on the following 530 00:20:55,880 --> 00:20:58,560 findings. The subdivision amendment is 531 00:20:58,560 --> 00:21:00,640 compliant with Utah Municipal Code 532 00:21:00,640 --> 00:21:02,600 10-28-10. 533 00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:04,560 The resulting lots are complying with 534 00:21:04,560 --> 00:21:06,440 are compliant with the town's land use 535 00:21:06,440 --> 00:21:08,920 ordinance for minimum lot sizes, minimum 536 00:21:08,920 --> 00:21:11,280 lot widths, frontage requirements, as 537 00:21:11,280 --> 00:21:13,560 well as minimum setbacks for the 538 00:21:13,560 --> 00:21:15,520 um village commercial and valley 539 00:21:15,520 --> 00:21:17,640 residential zones after removal of the 540 00:21:17,640 --> 00:21:19,800 non-conforming buildings. 541 00:21:19,800 --> 00:21:21,480 The existing commercial building is 542 00:21:21,480 --> 00:21:23,280 sufficiently set back from the proposed 543 00:21:23,280 --> 00:21:25,040 new property 544 00:21:25,040 --> 00:21:26,720 and is compliant with requirements of 545 00:21:26,720 --> 00:21:28,680 the village commercial zone. 546 00:21:28,680 --> 00:21:31,120 And the rezoning of these lots brings 547 00:21:31,120 --> 00:21:32,960 this property into compliance with town 548 00:21:32,960 --> 00:21:34,960 code requirement that lots not be 549 00:21:34,960 --> 00:21:38,670 split-zoned. 550 00:21:38,680 --> 00:21:40,160 » I'll second. 551 00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:42,680 >> Motion by Paul, second by Terry. All in 552 00:21:42,680 --> 00:21:43,360 favor? 553 00:21:43,360 --> 00:21:45,280 >> I'd like to have some discussion. 554 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:47,120 Um 555 00:21:47,120 --> 00:21:49,160 you you mentioned that the requirement 556 00:21:49,160 --> 00:21:52,280 for the um subdivision plat or that the 557 00:21:52,280 --> 00:21:54,160 house and shed must be removed. I'd like 558 00:21:54,160 --> 00:21:57,320 to make sure we that that's noted that is a condition. 559 00:21:57,320 --> 00:21:59,200 >> I that's how I Yeah. 560 00:21:59,200 --> 00:22:00,920 >> It's kind of read it before you got down 561 00:22:00,920 --> 00:22:03,200 to the conditions, I think. Anyway 562 00:22:03,200 --> 00:22:07,840 >> Well, yeah, at the the motion was to approve it subject to 563 00:22:07,840 --> 00:22:09,040 a condition of approval. 564 00:22:09,040 --> 00:22:11,240 >> Okay. Okay. I'm used to the conditions 565 00:22:11,240 --> 00:22:12,200 coming after the finding. 566 00:22:12,200 --> 00:22:14,320 >> Yeah, I know. Yeah. 567 00:22:14,320 --> 00:22:15,440 >> Just want to make sure we had that 568 00:22:15,440 --> 00:22:16,120 condition in there. 569 00:22:16,120 --> 00:22:17,760 >> It is. 570 00:22:17,760 --> 00:22:21,400 >> Should we also add a condition that the 571 00:22:21,400 --> 00:22:24,840 easement must be um opened, 572 00:22:24,840 --> 00:22:28,240 cleared, and and and covered with an all 573 00:22:28,240 --> 00:22:29,840 uh weather surface for access for the 574 00:22:29,840 --> 00:22:31,920 flag lot? 575 00:22:31,920 --> 00:22:32,960 >> I mean, 576 00:22:32,960 --> 00:22:35,400 that's okay by me if we want to do that. 577 00:22:35,400 --> 00:22:37,040 >> That that was part of the plan and 578 00:22:37,040 --> 00:22:38,360 >> Yeah. 579 00:22:38,360 --> 00:22:39,920 I think it it's a necessary 580 00:22:39,920 --> 00:22:41,640 improvement, so yeah. 581 00:22:41,640 --> 00:22:43,240 >> I would add then that is a second 582 00:22:43,240 --> 00:22:46,120 condition, that the easement must be um 583 00:22:46,120 --> 00:22:49,080 cleared and um paved with an all weather 584 00:22:49,080 --> 00:22:50,600 surface per the ordinance. 585 00:22:50,600 --> 00:22:54,910 >> I'll accept that. 586 00:22:54,920 --> 00:22:57,720 » Any more discussion? 587 00:22:57,720 --> 00:22:59,280 All in favor? 588 00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:00,280 >> Rich, I. 589 00:23:00,280 --> 00:23:01,000 >> Terry, I. 590 00:23:01,000 --> 00:23:01,920 >> Jennifer, I. 591 00:23:01,920 --> 00:23:02,760 >> Paul, I. 592 00:23:02,760 --> 00:23:03,680 >> Kasha, I. 593 00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:06,040 >> Motion passes. 594 00:23:06,040 --> 00:23:08,520 Move we adjourn. 595 00:23:08,520 --> 00:23:11,320 I'll second. Motion by Paul, second by 596 00:23:11,320 --> 00:23:14,520 Terry, all in favor? Rich I, Terry I, 597 00:23:14,520 --> 00:23:17,880 Jennifer I, Paul I, Kasha I, meeting is 598 00:23:17,880 --> 00:23:20,520 adjourned.