1 00:00:08,140 --> 00:00:37,780 This is the convening here of the February 7th, 2024 meeting of the Planning Commission in St. Louis Park. We will begin with roll call. Jim Benike. Here, Katie Merton. Here, Matt Eckholm. Here, Mia Devaccia. Here, Tom Weber. Here, Jan Youngquest. Next item for the agenda is the approval of minutes. We are approving the minutes from two previous meetings. 2 00:00:37,780 --> 00:00:43,980 one on December 6th and the other on December 20th. Do we have any discussion, edits, or motions? 3 00:00:44,780 --> 00:00:47,680 So moved. Seconded. 4 00:00:47,880 --> 00:00:51,560 Have a motion and a second. All those in favor of approving the minutes say aye. 5 00:00:51,880 --> 00:00:52,500 Aye. Aye. 6 00:00:52,820 --> 00:01:01,080 All opposed. That carries. Next up on the agenda is our one public hearing for the evening and I just 7 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:06,140 saw some folks coming in and just as you're coming in if you are interested in speaking at the hearing, 8 00:01:06,140 --> 00:01:11,460 there are some blue cards at that back table there with some pens feel free to fill out your name 9 00:01:12,060 --> 00:01:17,260 and all the information on there and bring it up either to Gary and Sean here and we will 10 00:01:17,260 --> 00:01:23,320 put you into the the speaking order as well. So for the folks here in the room I just want to let 11 00:01:23,320 --> 00:01:28,420 you know what we're going to do is first of all hear about the proposal from city staff then the 12 00:01:28,420 --> 00:01:34,600 commission is going to ask really clarifying questions details here and there and then we will open it up 13 00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:39,340 in the public hearing for public comments so again if you are interested in 14 00:01:39,340 --> 00:01:45,800 speaking fill out one of these blue cards and and we'll go from there so at 15 00:01:45,800 --> 00:01:52,220 that at that point this is a rezoning preliminary final plat and 16 00:01:52,220 --> 00:01:59,080 conditional use permit for 6013 and 6019 Cedar Lake Road and I will turn it over to 17 00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:04,660 city staff thank you chair members of the commission my name is Gary Morrison I'm 18 00:02:04,660 --> 00:02:09,040 The zoning administrator for the city, and I'll be presenting the applications for you tonight. 19 00:02:09,900 --> 00:02:15,200 The request that's before you is brought submitted to the city by Joshua Aaron, who's owner of the property. 20 00:02:16,260 --> 00:02:22,020 The properties are located at 6013 and 6019, Cedar Lake Road, and 21 00:02:22,020 --> 00:02:28,260 the applications before each other are rezoning of these properties from our three two family residents to our four multiple family residents. 22 00:02:29,020 --> 00:02:33,160 A preliminary and final plat of the combination of the two properties. 23 00:02:33,160 --> 00:02:38,380 The plan will be known as Cedar Heights Estates, and then a condition to use permit to construct 24 00:02:38,380 --> 00:02:39,820 a multiple family residence. 25 00:02:40,640 --> 00:02:43,400 The properties are identified on the aerial photo on the screen. 26 00:02:43,780 --> 00:02:47,280 There are four single family homes on the south side of Cedar Lake Road. 27 00:02:47,740 --> 00:02:50,800 The subject property is the two easterly property, properties. 28 00:02:51,300 --> 00:02:57,820 It's adjacent to the city's municipal water facility, and then of course the remaining two 29 00:02:57,820 --> 00:02:59,500 single family homes to the west. 30 00:02:59,500 --> 00:03:04,820 It backs up to a wetland, that's approximately 40 acres in an area, and of course single 31 00:03:04,820 --> 00:03:08,960 family homes to the north, and an office development to the east. 32 00:03:09,740 --> 00:03:14,780 The property again is on south side of Cedalic Road between Blackstone and Alabama, just west 33 00:03:14,780 --> 00:03:16,640 of the Zarathon roundabout. 34 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:21,320 Tascal was pictured at the top right corner of the screen. 35 00:03:24,830 --> 00:03:30,050 Taking a quick look at the properties, we see that they are combined, 1.69 acres total, 36 00:03:30,050 --> 00:03:33,750 However, there's about 1.27 acres of dry land. 37 00:03:34,070 --> 00:03:38,070 The remaining land is wetland, which makes up 38 00:03:38,070 --> 00:03:40,210 the southerly quarter of the property. 39 00:03:41,310 --> 00:03:43,970 A lot combined is 175 feet wide. 40 00:03:44,730 --> 00:03:47,790 Approximately 430 feet deep, and then 310 feet 41 00:03:47,790 --> 00:03:51,070 from the front property line to the wetland edge. 42 00:03:51,850 --> 00:03:53,910 The elevation change is approximately 20 feet. 43 00:03:54,370 --> 00:03:56,870 Most of that elevation change happens just about 44 00:03:56,870 --> 00:04:03,690 as you get to the white line. So the majority of the property is relatively flat until you get to about the tree lines 45 00:04:03,690 --> 00:04:05,010 then it drops substantially. 46 00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:12,000 The proposal is to build a three-story apartment building. 47 00:04:12,660 --> 00:04:21,320 It's approximately 36 feet 10 inches tall. There is a three-foot pair put on top of it which raises it to about 39 feet 10 inches. 48 00:04:22,300 --> 00:04:24,400 Maximum height allowed for the gestorist is 40 feet. 49 00:04:26,720 --> 00:04:28,700 The apartment building would contain 36 units, 50 00:04:28,700 --> 00:04:34,400 The table that's on the screen which is also included in your packet shows the breakdown of the units 51 00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:38,020 Most of the units are one bedroom or studios 52 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:42,480 There are nine two bedrooms or two bedrooms plus done combination 53 00:04:46,710 --> 00:04:50,170 Taking a quick look at the site plan. Just kind of give a quick rundown of it 54 00:04:50,170 --> 00:04:57,570 Cedar Lake Road is on the north part of the property. Of course, the wetland is highlighted in blue on the south end of the property 55 00:04:58,270 --> 00:04:59,850 Starting a Cedar Lake road. We have 56 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:05,580 Three on three parking spaces that exist today, they will be reshaped and relocated, so they will be maintained. 57 00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:17,680 The horseshoe driveway with two access points, one in the west, one to the east. Within the horseshoe, we have four additional parking spaces up by the apartment building. One of those will be handicapped. 58 00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:28,060 A driveway access will run down the west property line to provide access to the undergone parking and then three parking stalls at the very end of that driveway. 59 00:05:29,240 --> 00:05:34,840 The ground floor units will have direct access outside with paddios, interconnected with 60 00:05:34,840 --> 00:05:36,600 sidewalks on both sides of the building. 61 00:05:37,620 --> 00:05:42,700 The structure parking is below the structure, of course, and most of it is underground, as 62 00:05:43,440 --> 00:05:47,000 the north part is primarily rectangular and shape. 63 00:05:47,360 --> 00:05:52,780 However, the building itself, the apartment building that is visible above that parking structure 64 00:05:52,780 --> 00:05:59,500 is relatively straight line line, light not straight wall along the east side. 65 00:05:59,980 --> 00:06:03,840 But on the west side we have some building wall deviation, 66 00:06:04,220 --> 00:06:07,600 squeeze some elevation and further distance from the west property lines. 67 00:06:08,300 --> 00:06:13,800 Some amenity space will be provided in the space created by the apartment building 68 00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:17,580 being moved a little bit more to the east and then of course the park structure 69 00:06:17,580 --> 00:06:18,800 below it in this area. 70 00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:19,420 So, 71 00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:27,060 talking about the yards a little bit, the front yard requirement for this particular 72 00:06:27,060 --> 00:06:33,680 building is 36.9 feet, they're providing 63.5 feet, and if we look at how that relates 73 00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:37,800 to the buildings on either side, we have the two single family homes to the west, and 74 00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:41,800 the city structure to the east, we see it is set back a little further, that is to make 75 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:46,580 room for the horseshoe driveway in the parking, but also some additional landscape to enhance 76 00:06:46,580 --> 00:06:47,780 the presence on the street. 77 00:06:48,900 --> 00:06:56,520 The rear setback is 25 feet minimum and they're providing 180 feet to the rear property line and then 65 feet to the wetland. 78 00:06:57,600 --> 00:07:05,720 Side setbacks are a little more complicated to calculate. I made an attempt at explaining that in the packets before you. 79 00:07:06,340 --> 00:07:15,840 I won't go into that detail here today, other than to say that the west side, the setbacks required minimum setbacks range from 18.5 feet to 38.5 feet. 80 00:07:15,840 --> 00:07:21,860 Since we are looking at one extended wall, which is the park structure, the entire park 81 00:07:21,860 --> 00:07:27,600 structure has to meet the maximum setback of 38.5 feet, which it does, it's set at 46 feet. 82 00:07:28,600 --> 00:07:32,540 And of course, we have additional setback for that visible portion of the building above 83 00:07:32,540 --> 00:07:37,560 the ground, which shows ranges from 64 feet to 77 feet from that side property line. 84 00:07:38,620 --> 00:07:45,340 And then on the east side, we have required setbacks that range from 15 to 35 feet. 85 00:07:45,340 --> 00:07:49,780 and the building is set back from 28 to 36 feet so it meets the side setbacks are also. 86 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:56,280 The building was intentionally positioned to get us closer and meet the minimum setbacks 87 00:07:56,280 --> 00:08:02,640 on the east side so that the majority space could be preserved on the west side to provide 88 00:08:02,640 --> 00:08:07,320 more distance to the single family home to the west and of course to provide room for the 89 00:08:07,960 --> 00:08:09,860 driveway access and amenity space over there too. 90 00:08:09,860 --> 00:08:10,460 The 91 00:08:14,780 --> 00:08:17,760 minimum parking required for the development is 43 spaces. 92 00:08:18,480 --> 00:08:23,640 They are providing 51 spaces on site, 44 of those spaces are in the structure underneath 93 00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:25,060 the building, which is pictured on the right. 94 00:08:25,840 --> 00:08:31,120 There are seven parking spaces on the surface outside of the building, as noted before, three 95 00:08:31,120 --> 00:08:35,700 of them are at the end of the drive aisle on the south, four of them are in front of the 96 00:08:35,700 --> 00:08:36,220 building itself. 97 00:08:37,060 --> 00:08:41,200 There are additional three on-street parking spaces that technically count towards the 98 00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:49,260 required parking, but as noted, 43 spaces are required to provide 51 on-site, so if 99 00:08:49,260 --> 00:08:51,900 we add the three on-street parking spaces are up to 54. 100 00:08:53,480 --> 00:09:00,180 There are additional 43 bike parking spaces provided, and there are five level two electric 101 00:09:00,180 --> 00:09:04,360 vehicle charging stations provided with the capacity of adding 20 more. 102 00:09:07,950 --> 00:09:10,450 Landscaping meets code, they're required to meet 36 trees. 103 00:09:10,450 --> 00:09:14,430 They have 37 on site between the existing and proposed. 104 00:09:15,250 --> 00:09:18,730 Tree replacement calculation is summarized on the screen. 105 00:09:19,310 --> 00:09:21,130 They're removing 162 caliber inches. 106 00:09:21,710 --> 00:09:23,810 They're required to replace 89 caliber inches. 107 00:09:24,490 --> 00:09:27,850 They are actually putting in 79 caliber inches remaining 10. 108 00:09:28,490 --> 00:09:30,370 They're going to do a cash and lieu dedication, 109 00:09:30,760 --> 00:09:32,310 which totals $2,250. 110 00:09:33,200 --> 00:09:35,350 The city will use that money to plant trees 111 00:09:35,350 --> 00:09:37,210 along the right-of-way and parks in the area. 112 00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:42,060 The designed outdoor recreation area, 113 00:09:42,060 --> 00:09:45,500 Otherwise, known as Dora is required for this development. 114 00:09:45,960 --> 00:09:51,540 12% of the land has to be set aside for recreational purposes for the tenants of the building. 115 00:09:51,980 --> 00:09:54,720 They're required to have 6,644 square feet. 116 00:09:54,940 --> 00:09:59,900 They're providing 7,463 in that area is broken down in the three areas. 117 00:09:59,900 --> 00:09:59,980 You 118 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:25,020 On the screen. One is up in front of the building along Cedar Lake Road, approximately 560 feet up there. A larger area is provided on the west side of the building. 2,200 square feet. That will include a lap pool and patio area. Then on the south part of the building is the majority of space with 4,600 square feet that will be a mix of a dog run patio area and lawn for games and such. 119 00:10:33,520 --> 00:10:35,260 system on the south side of the building. 120 00:10:36,060 --> 00:10:40,240 The system is reviewed by the many how Creek Watershed District and of course the city 121 00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:41,740 and it does meet the standards. 122 00:10:42,040 --> 00:10:46,960 Some minor tweaks that need to be involved, but there's no issues or hurdles that need 123 00:10:46,960 --> 00:10:47,420 to be overcome. 124 00:10:51,700 --> 00:10:56,380 The plant, the land is currently unplatted so it has to be platted before it can be combined. 125 00:10:57,560 --> 00:11:02,720 So we're looking to act on a preliminary and final plait combined process here. 126 00:11:02,720 --> 00:11:05,440 The plat again is to be known as cedar heights of states and 127 00:11:06,500 --> 00:11:12,900 With this dedication we're asking for easements the typical utility easements around the boundary and then the 128 00:11:12,900 --> 00:11:19,540 Larger easement you see on the to the south is large enough to contain the wetland the floodplain and a 20-foot buffer 129 00:11:19,540 --> 00:11:22,240 That is required by the watershed district along the wetland ditch 130 00:11:23,740 --> 00:11:31,740 Parked edications also required at 62,100 that includes 1500 per unit for park and a trail dedication a 225 per unit 131 00:11:35,540 --> 00:11:38,560 As noted, one of the applications is a rezoning. 132 00:11:39,060 --> 00:11:41,340 Properties currently zone R32 family residents. 133 00:11:41,560 --> 00:11:43,480 Apartment buildings are not allowed in this district. 134 00:11:44,040 --> 00:11:46,800 The R32 family residents allow single family and two family. 135 00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:51,200 So in order for an apartment building to be approved on this property, 136 00:11:51,300 --> 00:11:54,040 it has to be rezoned to our four multiple family residents. 137 00:11:54,660 --> 00:11:56,560 We look at the zoning in the area. 138 00:11:57,140 --> 00:12:00,260 We see that to the north of Cedalic Road we have R2 single family. 139 00:12:00,260 --> 00:12:09,880 The four existing single family lots on the south side of Cedulate Road and the city property are zoned our three two family residents. 140 00:12:10,440 --> 00:12:17,240 There's office development to the east and commercial death development a little further east includes the Casco Home Depot area. 141 00:12:18,660 --> 00:12:23,120 Property to the south of the subject property is zoned parking open space. 142 00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:28,160 There is some R4 zoning district area a little further to the east than 143 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:29,900 contains some town homes and apartment buildings. 144 00:12:31,520 --> 00:12:34,120 Property to the west is owned industrial. 145 00:12:36,350 --> 00:12:40,790 When we look at the comprehensive plan, we see that the four residential 146 00:12:40,790 --> 00:12:46,170 properties are guided, medium density residential, the medium density residential 147 00:12:46,170 --> 00:12:51,910 corresponds with both the R3 and the R4 zoning districts, so a comprehensive plan 148 00:12:51,910 --> 00:12:53,930 amendment is not required for this rezoning. 149 00:12:58,790 --> 00:13:00,950 Within the staff report, you'll see several 150 00:13:00,950 --> 00:13:05,270 conditions that need to be met for a condition use permit. I won't go into detail in each 151 00:13:05,270 --> 00:13:11,010 of those, but it will summarize by simply stating that the staff finds that the design meets 152 00:13:11,010 --> 00:13:16,070 the code requirements. The plan is not detrimental to the health, safety, and general offer of 153 00:13:16,070 --> 00:13:22,950 the community. It is consistent with city plans and service capacity, and that includes traffic 154 00:13:22,950 --> 00:13:28,130 capacity on Cetolic Road. A lot of comments received at the neighborhood meeting were concerns 155 00:13:28,130 --> 00:13:33,470 about traffic on Cetolic Road and parking in the area. So we did look at traffic 156 00:13:33,470 --> 00:13:37,250 accounts, the history of traffic accounts on Cetolic Road. And there's two segments 157 00:13:37,250 --> 00:13:42,430 who will briefly talk about today. One segment is directly in front of the subject property. 158 00:13:42,590 --> 00:13:48,810 Another segment is further west adjacent to this one but basically extending east of Louisiana. 159 00:13:49,690 --> 00:13:54,890 But looking at this segment directly in front of this subject property, we note that the 160 00:13:54,890 --> 00:13:59,910 last traffic count was done in 2020, which is of course the COVID year and the traffic 161 00:13:59,910 --> 00:14:02,370 counts did drop considerably to 5,800. 162 00:14:03,190 --> 00:14:08,110 So we're going to look before that to get more of a trend of what's going on in Cadelic 163 00:14:08,110 --> 00:14:08,310 Road. 164 00:14:08,910 --> 00:14:12,470 Unfortunately, they're taken every four years, so we're expecting traffic on to be taken 165 00:14:12,470 --> 00:14:12,850 this summer. 166 00:14:13,790 --> 00:14:18,670 So if we look at the count before the last traffic count before 2020 was 2017, the count 167 00:14:18,670 --> 00:14:23,950 to 11,900. And as we continue to look past that every four years, we see that the traffic 168 00:14:23,950 --> 00:14:32,790 accounts have been relatively stable. However, in around 11,500, 11,900 trips per day. 169 00:14:34,250 --> 00:14:41,930 So no real change along Cedar Lake Road, this segment as we move further west, again, the 170 00:14:41,930 --> 00:14:46,770 segment that extends east of Cedar Lake Road. And I want to look at this one specifically 171 00:14:46,770 --> 00:14:51,830 because along that stretch, we did have, in this time frame, the construction of the CNL 172 00:14:51,830 --> 00:14:57,550 apartments. So it's worth seeing what impact that had on that segment. So starting 173 00:14:57,550 --> 00:14:59,150 Again, with 2009. 174 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:07,840 The traffic cons for 12,600. In 2013 the traffic cons declined a little bit to 12,200. The apartments 175 00:15:07,840 --> 00:15:12,840 were built in 2015 and then the next cons were done in 2017 and the traffic cons declined 176 00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:15,760 a little more. They went down to 11,500. 177 00:15:17,920 --> 00:15:19,900 Many things impact the traffic cons of course 178 00:15:19,900 --> 00:15:24,700 but the traffic cons are a very real indication of the activity occurring on the roads. 179 00:15:25,780 --> 00:15:32,860 So, in talking to the engineering department with a Cedalic road, which was reconstructed 180 00:15:32,860 --> 00:15:39,380 in 2019, has a design capacity of 17,230, which is a projected traffic volume in 2040. 181 00:15:40,300 --> 00:15:44,520 And so they have no concerns of a 36 unit department building being constructed on this 182 00:15:44,520 --> 00:15:44,660 site. 183 00:15:48,390 --> 00:15:51,770 A neighborhood meeting was conducted on January 30th of 2024. 184 00:15:52,630 --> 00:15:56,490 We had 18 people sign in, a few people came in during the meeting. 185 00:15:57,290 --> 00:16:01,070 comments were received and the letters that are in front of you in the staff report and also 186 00:16:01,070 --> 00:16:05,650 placed in front of you today are a really good summary of the comments that were received at that 187 00:16:05,650 --> 00:16:10,690 meeting. So I have nothing else to add other than say please look at those comments and take those 188 00:16:10,690 --> 00:16:11,430 into consideration. 189 00:16:15,420 --> 00:16:20,440 So based on the application and the study conducted by the staff, chairs recommending 190 00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:26,640 that the chair conduct and close the public hearing and is recommending motions to recommend approval 191 00:16:27,080 --> 00:16:32,540 of the submitted applications with the conditions as recommended by staff which 192 00:16:32,540 --> 00:16:35,800 includes the park and trail dedication for the preliminary and final 193 00:16:35,800 --> 00:16:36,060 plan. 194 00:16:38,500 --> 00:16:42,200 And with that I'll take any questions that you have, the applicant, 195 00:16:42,540 --> 00:16:45,660 Joshua Aaron along with Sheldon Bird Principal, architect is here to answer any 196 00:16:45,660 --> 00:16:48,900 questions that you might have. And I believe they're also prepared to talk a little 197 00:16:48,900 --> 00:16:53,060 bit more about the building itself. Thank you so much. Do any members of the 198 00:16:53,060 --> 00:16:57,280 commission have any clarifying questions before we open the public hearing. 199 00:16:58,400 --> 00:17:06,760 I have a couple, Gary, if you don't mind going back, sorry, there, that one. 200 00:17:06,940 --> 00:17:11,860 The park dedication just to confirm that 62,000 that is paid for by the developer, which I correct. 201 00:17:12,440 --> 00:17:13,760 It is paid for by the developer. 202 00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:22,480 Yes. And then the Cedar Lake Road, the construction that's coming up by Louisiana with the roundabout and all of that. 203 00:17:22,480 --> 00:17:27,600 Will that come down this far, or is that not part that doesn't affect this area, does it? 204 00:17:28,600 --> 00:17:33,800 No, this section was completed in 2015 or 2019, I think I said, 205 00:17:34,500 --> 00:17:36,100 2019, so it won't come down this far. 206 00:17:36,620 --> 00:17:41,740 And then go back to the beginning where the rendering was of the building just to confirm 207 00:17:41,740 --> 00:17:44,860 that's the view if you're on Cedar Lake Road, is that right? 208 00:17:45,380 --> 00:17:47,760 It is, and I believe the architect will have more renderings for you. 209 00:17:47,760 --> 00:17:48,180 Great. 210 00:17:50,920 --> 00:17:54,040 Great. Okay. Yeah. Commissioner DeVitio. Yeah. 211 00:17:54,180 --> 00:17:59,840 Thank you. Sorry. I just want to just clarify the rationale for the rezoning is that because 212 00:17:59,840 --> 00:18:05,360 we believe it is in line with our comprehensive plan for the city. And that's our justification. 213 00:18:07,340 --> 00:18:12,240 I correct. It is in line with the comprehensive plan, which is medium-density residential, 214 00:18:12,440 --> 00:18:17,740 which again, accompanies both the R3 and the R4 district. Now, you could find that 215 00:18:17,740 --> 00:18:32,600 That's in the current zoning R3 meets that, the comprehensive plan also, so it's up to you as to whether or not you want to just determine to take that step to the R4 zoning or keep it at the R3 because both of them are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 216 00:18:32,960 --> 00:18:33,700 Understood. Thank you. 217 00:18:35,180 --> 00:18:38,200 For the public hearing, I just want to see if the developer in 218 00:18:38,200 --> 00:18:40,760 owner, do you want to talk now or at the end after all the 219 00:18:40,760 --> 00:18:43,600 comments are in? Do you have a preference? 220 00:18:46,760 --> 00:18:47,300 Go now, do you 221 00:18:47,300 --> 00:18:50,300 want to, if you want to come up to the microphone and just say 222 00:18:50,300 --> 00:18:52,780 a few words, this should be inside the public hearing, Sean 223 00:18:52,780 --> 00:18:57,100 or no, should, either way, okay, just introduce yourself. 224 00:18:57,480 --> 00:19:03,960 And good evening, Sheldon Berg with DJR Architecture. And we've 225 00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:08,580 and working with the developer and owner for the last few months. 226 00:19:09,880 --> 00:19:14,240 A couple of things I'd like to just quickly point out, 227 00:19:14,280 --> 00:19:18,520 just as highlighting some of the introduction that Gary gave us. 228 00:19:18,980 --> 00:19:22,660 So, thank you very much. For that, I think he covered most things. 229 00:19:24,020 --> 00:19:27,660 The first thing that I'd like to talk about is sort of the why. 230 00:19:28,360 --> 00:19:32,920 For the project, Josh was owned the property for 18 years 231 00:19:32,920 --> 00:19:43,660 and operate them as rental houses in that period and you know I think through the years you sort of thought about some other ideas for the property. 232 00:19:44,300 --> 00:19:52,720 We know that the City of St. Louis Park in their comprehensive plan is looking for other ways to bring new residents to the area. 233 00:19:53,380 --> 00:19:59,140 St. Louis Park by and large is built out so we have to look for and the comprehensive plan covers this. 234 00:19:59,140 --> 00:19:59,980 new one. 235 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:24,940 We have a couple of locations for some additional housing for people as well as, obviously, places for people to work and other things. And the comprehensive plan says that they want to have them on transit corridors, places that are closer to either amenities or services and things. And I think that this property covers a lot of those bases. It's got, it's right next to the bike trail sidewalks. 236 00:20:24,940 --> 00:20:32,860 So your lake road has got transit on it, and then it's obviously close to the west end, which is just a little walk away. 237 00:20:34,520 --> 00:20:43,140 So in that regard, it checks a lot of those boxes and also gives the opportunity for people to have alternatives to take in a car. 238 00:20:43,580 --> 00:20:52,420 So they can bike walk in whatever to nearby uses to the west end and other areas or even off to Louisiana and some of those commercial notes. 239 00:20:54,080 --> 00:20:55,980 and so that's one part. 240 00:20:56,640 --> 00:21:01,760 The other is that what we've looked at doing with this project is creating 241 00:21:02,460 --> 00:21:05,640 some of the smaller scale housing that I think a lot of people are looking for. 242 00:21:05,780 --> 00:21:08,400 They honestly, you know, when people are looking at housing, 243 00:21:08,700 --> 00:21:13,820 some people don't want to live in a residence with 150 people, 200 people, whatever. 244 00:21:14,400 --> 00:21:16,700 And they maybe want some places not quite as urban. 245 00:21:17,480 --> 00:21:19,940 And I think for the, you know, in the largest part, 246 00:21:19,940 --> 00:21:25,820 St. Louis Park offers that opportunity and here specifically at this site, it offers 247 00:21:25,820 --> 00:21:32,020 that transition where you're close enough that you can go to the west and or go to Louisiana 248 00:21:32,580 --> 00:21:38,640 and get all the services that you need and yet you're in a little more smaller scale area. 249 00:21:39,140 --> 00:21:47,160 And so the three-story project that we're proposing with 36 units gives people that choice and I think 250 00:21:47,160 --> 00:21:53,700 it does so by being sensitive to the neighbors, sensitive to the neighborhood, as well. 251 00:21:54,820 --> 00:22:01,760 And as Gary had mentioned, we are within the comprehensive plan, so within the larger 252 00:22:01,760 --> 00:22:03,760 scope of the planning for the city. 253 00:22:07,020 --> 00:22:13,680 The, just to reiterate, a couple items, is that in the sighting of the building, we have 254 00:22:13,680 --> 00:22:20,900 take in special care to provide a little more distance and separation from both the single 255 00:22:20,900 --> 00:22:26,940 family house to the west, as well as from the Sierra Lake Road bikeway and things. 256 00:22:27,400 --> 00:22:35,100 And then by way of an increase in more intensive landscape along the front, given that buffer 257 00:22:35,560 --> 00:22:41,400 to the building scale as it's a three story versus the one and two stories around. 258 00:22:41,400 --> 00:22:49,960 And lastly, just a quick overview of, I think you probably saw this in the proposal. 259 00:22:50,440 --> 00:23:01,840 But the project is largely stucco with some limited-fibre cement and metal panel. 260 00:23:02,340 --> 00:23:08,360 Finishes a lot of large windows and a lot of large balconies that give a little more expansive 261 00:23:08,360 --> 00:23:13,660 of space for people to enjoy the wetlands that everybody in the neighborhood enjoys as well. 262 00:23:15,400 --> 00:23:20,980 And I think that that concludes kind of the overview of the items I wanted to just hit 263 00:23:20,980 --> 00:23:24,880 on and I can answer any questions if you have any, otherwise. 264 00:23:25,360 --> 00:23:28,040 Any commissioner or commissioner members, any questions? 265 00:23:28,820 --> 00:23:30,500 Oh, commissioner Youngquist. 266 00:23:30,500 --> 00:23:38,700 here if you could just I think is probably around the 12th or 13th page to the 267 00:23:38,700 --> 00:23:48,300 renderings just to give a quick look those for the end so they're maybe more like 268 00:23:48,300 --> 00:23:53,180 21 or 20 as he's looking for this I want folks to know who are here are watching 269 00:23:53,180 --> 00:23:57,520 that the whole proposal exists online as well if you Google St. Louis Park Planning 270 00:23:57,520 --> 00:24:04,180 commission. So this view here, I'm on that page if you go to agendas and minutes fine today's 271 00:24:04,180 --> 00:24:09,900 date, this hall is there online as well. So go ahead. Thank you. Thank you, Chair. So this is 272 00:24:09,900 --> 00:24:16,780 a view as you'd recognize from Cedar Lake Road looking back toward from the north east looking 273 00:24:16,780 --> 00:24:24,680 more southwest. We have the drive up which provides some visitor parking and other things as well as 274 00:24:24,680 --> 00:24:31,740 and a place for service vehicles if they need to stop by the UPS to stop and do drop-offs 275 00:24:31,740 --> 00:24:34,820 as not going to interrupt the traffic that's on the Zurich Road. 276 00:24:38,340 --> 00:24:44,120 Next, here just a front view, more of a straight-on view, for that pedestrian access to the site 277 00:24:44,120 --> 00:24:52,240 with the main lobby in the front there in the middle with units above so that the community 278 00:24:52,240 --> 00:24:58,680 rooms and things front, Sierra Lake Road as well as a little bit to the west side. 279 00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:11,860 Next one, Gary. And then this is a view from the, from the northwest looking, looking back toward the Southwest. That shows the drive down to the underground parking. 280 00:25:13,980 --> 00:25:29,920 And shows some of landscaping and other improvements that were making there. And then lastly, there's a view, I think, of the rear, but the backside of the building that's facing the, the wetland with the trail that walks 281 00:25:29,920 --> 00:25:36,620 around the building and connect some of the 90 spaces on the south side facing the wetland. 282 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:47,220 That's all the last thing I guess I'd mention is that the shadow study that we had done, 283 00:25:47,300 --> 00:25:49,160 which is the next page, Gary, 284 00:25:52,330 --> 00:25:58,350 shows that from the city's criteria, those two in the box there are 285 00:25:58,350 --> 00:26:03,350 the most important, where we're not getting close to neighboring buildings at the critical 286 00:26:03,350 --> 00:26:06,030 periods of the year. 287 00:26:07,610 --> 00:26:14,750 And then my final item that I add is that we do have fence screen on both east and west 288 00:26:14,750 --> 00:26:17,830 side, the west being the most important with the single family neighbor there. 289 00:26:19,930 --> 00:26:20,890 Any questions? 290 00:26:21,250 --> 00:26:22,350 We sure young guests have the question. 291 00:26:22,410 --> 00:26:24,470 Yeah, I've got a couple of clarifying questions. 292 00:26:24,470 --> 00:26:28,070 We'll start with the fencing because that's where you just left your statement. 293 00:26:28,870 --> 00:26:33,190 So the staff report says there's privacy fencing on the east and west. 294 00:26:33,950 --> 00:26:36,410 What type of material are you looking at? 295 00:26:36,730 --> 00:26:38,910 It's going to be a screen fencing. 296 00:26:39,150 --> 00:26:47,390 So it's either going to be a wood slat or maybe a metal slat or a roof slated fence, but 297 00:26:47,390 --> 00:26:48,850 it would be privacy screening. 298 00:26:48,850 --> 00:26:54,310 So they'll provide, you know, next to no vision through them. 299 00:26:54,570 --> 00:26:59,030 Right, with having the drive aisle, right, adjacent to the property to the west, that's 300 00:26:59,030 --> 00:26:59,270 important. 301 00:27:00,570 --> 00:27:04,390 Is there going to be fencing on the south side of the property to prevent people and pets 302 00:27:04,390 --> 00:27:05,750 from going into the wetland? 303 00:27:05,830 --> 00:27:08,530 There is a fence on the south side. 304 00:27:08,750 --> 00:27:14,270 It's intended, though, to be more transparent, or like a picket type fence. 305 00:27:15,190 --> 00:27:20,250 There's also a little retaining wall there, so it provides some safety for that as well. 306 00:27:20,730 --> 00:27:25,210 Okay, and then just one other question. Gary, can you go back to one of the front elevations? 307 00:27:26,690 --> 00:27:33,110 Oh, right there. So there's the landscaped area between Cedar Lake Road and the park, 308 00:27:33,270 --> 00:27:37,830 the parking spaces. It's hard to tell from these. Is there a slight berm there? 309 00:27:38,790 --> 00:27:43,510 There is a slight berm. Okay, so the landscaping will be elevated. 310 00:27:43,510 --> 00:27:46,850 Right, and then that's also true up closer to the building as well. 311 00:27:46,970 --> 00:27:49,070 There. Okay, look at that up a little. 312 00:27:50,450 --> 00:27:52,950 Yeah, I don't know if I saw any pictures. 313 00:27:53,770 --> 00:27:55,370 What's the building to the east again? 314 00:27:55,530 --> 00:27:59,450 Is it of a similar height or what it's the building to the east is the city. 315 00:28:00,150 --> 00:28:06,130 Water treatment, I think, building and it's probably, I don't know, 18, 20 feet. 316 00:28:09,250 --> 00:28:12,950 It's like a. It's it's shorter than this building, 317 00:28:12,950 --> 00:28:18,810 but it's more like a story and a half to two story because it's more of a commercial type building. 318 00:28:26,570 --> 00:28:28,650 Any other questions? Okay. 319 00:28:29,290 --> 00:28:30,230 Yes, go ahead. 320 00:28:30,370 --> 00:28:32,450 Sorry, I have actually a clarification, Gary. 321 00:28:34,010 --> 00:28:39,750 The three-story limit is that for the R4 zone or the R3 zone? 322 00:28:43,200 --> 00:28:47,440 The three stories of 40 feet is for the R4 district. 323 00:28:48,720 --> 00:28:51,940 The R3 is going to be more similar to the R1 and R2, 324 00:28:53,100 --> 00:28:54,420 30 feet to midpoint of the cable. 325 00:28:55,800 --> 00:28:58,120 I believe the R3 was 35 feet. 326 00:28:58,120 --> 00:28:59,180 35 feet to midpoint of cable. 327 00:28:59,260 --> 00:29:00,320 Two and a half stories, I think. 328 00:29:01,200 --> 00:29:02,820 Thank you. It's a five foot difference. 329 00:29:03,480 --> 00:29:04,020 Thank you. 330 00:29:04,120 --> 00:29:05,140 And thank you everybody for your patience. 331 00:29:05,260 --> 00:29:07,560 These are kind of the nitty-gritty details we have to go through 332 00:29:07,560 --> 00:29:09,900 at this stage in the approval process. 333 00:29:10,060 --> 00:29:12,560 And we are going to now open up the public hearing 334 00:29:12,560 --> 00:29:15,960 to hear from anyone who's interested in speaking. 335 00:29:15,960 --> 00:29:19,580 I just want to reiterate, this is not the final vote tonight. 336 00:29:19,860 --> 00:29:21,600 This thing does not live or die today. 337 00:29:21,880 --> 00:29:24,920 This will then go to the city council, just letting you all know. 338 00:29:25,140 --> 00:29:26,620 So these do know what the process is. 339 00:29:27,420 --> 00:29:35,760 And I just want to set some expectations that the planning commission does not have as much leverage in 340 00:29:37,500 --> 00:29:40,980 some of the things we can and can't consider on whether to approve this. 341 00:29:41,120 --> 00:29:44,020 Our task really is around whether this meets code, 342 00:29:44,020 --> 00:29:50,580 whether this meets all of those heights and all of those requirements that have 343 00:29:50,580 --> 00:29:54,200 been proposed. I'm not saying that to discourage you at all from speaking we 344 00:29:54,200 --> 00:29:58,620 absolutely want to hear from you because those will be forwarded to the 345 00:29:58,620 --> 00:29:59,280 City Council. 346 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:28,740 Absolutely, but I just wanted to manage expectations in that regard. And if you're able, please limit your comments to three minutes. So right now, at this time, as I open the public hearing, I have two comment cards. If you have any more, you can bring them to Gary or Sean, and they'll bring them up here as well, if you want to speak as well. With that, I will open the public hearing. And the first person I have here to come speak is Gary Burshide from 1604 Blackstone. Gary, are you here? Hi. 347 00:30:28,740 --> 00:30:29,660 to 348 00:30:32,990 --> 00:30:37,470 speak into the mics and hand out because sometimes and we do have that just 349 00:30:37,470 --> 00:30:43,430 you know we have the handout right? Yes thank you go for it. Before I get onto 350 00:30:43,430 --> 00:30:50,470 this I noticed the traffic counts is almost maxed out compared to like the 351 00:30:50,470 --> 00:30:57,870 2017 2019 if you look at the 2020 numbers that's the year the virus everybody 352 00:30:57,870 --> 00:31:05,290 to stay in home. So, of course, the numbers are very low. And I just wanted to say that 353 00:31:05,950 --> 00:31:13,790 seat like road is maxing out, or at least from my point of view, peak time is terrible. Anyway, 354 00:31:14,330 --> 00:31:23,490 on to the show. My name is Gary Burshite, I live at 1604 Blackstone Avenue. I've been there for 45 355 00:31:23,490 --> 00:31:31,710 years. I've seen these projects. They come, they go, and for various reasons, they die on the vine. 356 00:31:32,910 --> 00:31:40,730 The zoning, what they're proposing to go from eight units to 36 units is a one heck of a big 357 00:31:40,730 --> 00:31:49,770 step to go that high. Most of the neighborhood wouldn't care if it was eight units. For other reasons, 358 00:31:49,770 --> 00:32:01,450 The question is, how do you put 36 apartments into a unit, a piece of land? 359 00:32:02,550 --> 00:32:11,230 And how do you put the 36 units into the land of two houses that sat upon it? 360 00:32:12,470 --> 00:32:13,530 That's the big question. 361 00:32:14,270 --> 00:32:17,670 And from my point of view, it's called a sardine effect. 362 00:32:17,670 --> 00:32:22,190 You put all the little fishes into a little can, and now you stack the cans up. 363 00:32:23,450 --> 00:32:31,630 And that's how you get the high densities, which according to Zornie whatnot, if it 364 00:32:31,630 --> 00:32:34,290 was gone to R4, they can do it. 365 00:32:38,860 --> 00:32:44,710 Considering that right across the street is all residential, that's a lot of density in 366 00:32:44,710 --> 00:32:45,810 a residential area. 367 00:32:45,810 --> 00:32:56,340 But next question I have, if a builder decides to buy two adjoining properties, whether it's 368 00:32:56,340 --> 00:33:02,800 a lake forest area or westward hills, they want to take the houses down and put a 36-unit 369 00:33:02,800 --> 00:33:07,080 apartment in those two neighborhoods, would you let them do it? 370 00:33:07,720 --> 00:33:08,760 I doubt it. 371 00:33:09,940 --> 00:33:10,720 I doubt it. 372 00:33:11,020 --> 00:33:12,960 So the question is, why are you doing it to us? 373 00:33:16,420 --> 00:33:19,200 There's two major design flaws with this project. 374 00:33:19,740 --> 00:33:20,940 It's a lack of parking. 375 00:33:22,260 --> 00:33:25,860 When you consider that a lot of these units will have married couples. 376 00:33:26,560 --> 00:33:31,020 They will have a car for him, car for her, and they'll drive two different directions. 377 00:33:32,140 --> 00:33:35,060 It'll be very quickly to fill up that parking space. 378 00:33:36,360 --> 00:33:38,120 And the question then is where do they park? 379 00:33:38,580 --> 00:33:39,360 Once it's full. 380 00:33:39,960 --> 00:33:41,020 They go into the neighborhood. 381 00:33:42,100 --> 00:33:47,700 that's the only place I can go. If they have friends over on Friday night and 382 00:33:47,700 --> 00:33:55,080 everybody's home, where do they park? You're going to max it out. And you can see on 383 00:33:55,080 --> 00:34:02,760 the map there that is filled over into the neighbor's hoods. So this magical 384 00:34:02,760 --> 00:34:08,400 buffer area is broken because the neighbor is close to him. We'll have to put up 385 00:34:08,400 --> 00:34:18,660 with it. Oh yeah, Super Bowl parties coming up. A good example. The second flaw is I live 386 00:34:18,660 --> 00:34:24,040 at the bottom of that blackstone hill at 16th and blackstone. I don't know if you're 387 00:34:24,040 --> 00:34:29,200 familiar with that doubt. But when the snow is falling over a period of time, that hill 388 00:34:29,200 --> 00:34:37,760 gets really slippery. And I've seen school buses, trucks, even a snow plow trying to make 389 00:34:37,760 --> 00:34:44,760 it up the hill. The snowflows come down the hill, but not up. So to go out of that parking 390 00:34:44,760 --> 00:34:52,320 ramp, they have to go up the hill, 20 feet to get out. Once the first car spins out, 391 00:34:52,700 --> 00:34:58,400 that's it. Until they get the car out of there, nobody goes anywhere. When they get to the 392 00:34:58,400 --> 00:34:59,100 top of the hill. 393 00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:19,620 There is a snow plow, wash, because that seat like road is wide at that point. There's a lot of snow, a lot of ice, a lot of sand just coming off those plows. So once I get to the top of the hill, can they make it through? I've been up there snow blowing over the years, and that's a mess. 394 00:35:22,820 --> 00:35:29,780 If you have any final thoughts, we'd love to hear them. If you have any final thoughts, the three minutes are up, but please feel free to give us. 395 00:35:29,780 --> 00:35:41,520 Real quick, according to the 2020 census, there are 3,600 people in St. Louis Park that's living in poverty. 396 00:35:43,900 --> 00:35:54,240 But we need more reasonably priced affordable homes, not upper scale places that would run $3,000 per month. 397 00:35:54,940 --> 00:35:57,900 Most people in poverty can afford it. 398 00:35:57,900 --> 00:36:06,080 And lastly, in my opinion of zoning for the sardine, can stack projects should be denied 399 00:36:06,680 --> 00:36:09,860 because there's simply too much and too little of a space. 400 00:36:10,560 --> 00:36:16,320 The only public purpose of this project is to make money for Josh at the expense of 401 00:36:16,320 --> 00:36:16,780 our neighborhood. 402 00:36:18,080 --> 00:36:18,840 Thank you. 403 00:36:18,840 --> 00:36:21,060 Thank you, Gary, for that comment. 404 00:36:21,600 --> 00:36:24,520 And we do have your written statement as well. 405 00:36:24,520 --> 00:36:30,460 so we have that on hand here. Thomas Peterson, 6625, LA View Road. 406 00:36:33,780 --> 00:36:35,120 Good evening. Good evening. 407 00:36:36,920 --> 00:36:44,000 We have very little control over global warming as people in 60-foot lots. 408 00:36:45,460 --> 00:36:53,820 This project, if it's rezoned, I recommend you table it for a year, a year and a half until Gary 409 00:36:53,820 --> 00:36:59,900 gets the whole act together for all at St. Louis Park, rezoning all the different districts, 410 00:37:00,140 --> 00:37:02,100 getting rid of all the numbers and everything. 411 00:37:02,960 --> 00:37:10,400 And then after him and his staff look at it again, maybe we can give this a try. 412 00:37:10,780 --> 00:37:18,660 But right now I think we should table this for a year until all the zoning things get reworked. 413 00:37:18,660 --> 00:37:24,560 Second of all, the greenery of this building is zero. 414 00:37:25,840 --> 00:37:32,600 He wants to put in brackets for solar someday. 415 00:37:32,880 --> 00:37:35,640 It's the only green thing he's doing with this building. 416 00:37:36,620 --> 00:37:42,980 Planning commissions over this whole country can control global warming and how much asphalt we put down. 417 00:37:42,980 --> 00:37:51,580 If this project ever goes through, which should have a green roof, it should have 25% recycled 418 00:37:51,580 --> 00:37:53,420 materials and building it. 419 00:37:53,900 --> 00:37:57,600 It should have bird sanctuary areas and butterflies. 420 00:37:58,740 --> 00:38:04,900 Because right now, if you look at the Edgewood Industrial Park, if you block from here, from 421 00:38:04,900 --> 00:38:10,420 there, you're looking at a maximum of 5% grass. 422 00:38:10,420 --> 00:38:17,040 They took a whole swamp area and turned it into asphalt and flat top roofs. 423 00:38:18,180 --> 00:38:20,000 St. Louis Park is better than that. 424 00:38:20,120 --> 00:38:24,820 We have hundreds of units, a few blocks away that are empty. 425 00:38:26,200 --> 00:38:33,140 And if you're going to go for a high-buck building, high-buck people would like a green building. 426 00:38:34,020 --> 00:38:36,260 They're part of the sales of it. 427 00:38:36,260 --> 00:38:43,380 you can live in a green building, we take all our gray water, the new technology and reuse it, 428 00:38:44,160 --> 00:38:45,540 no water leaves the site, 429 00:38:47,580 --> 00:38:52,720 on a grass area here, so green ruffs and everything, so I think we should 430 00:38:52,720 --> 00:38:59,660 move in a whole new direction with St. Louis Park, because right now every time I walk through the 431 00:38:59,660 --> 00:39:05,800 industrial park at Edgewood, there's more of these land owners are cutting down trees. 432 00:39:07,580 --> 00:39:15,760 It's ridiculous and there's stipulations when they build these buildings they have to have trees they have to keep them up and 433 00:39:16,200 --> 00:39:18,920 There's two properties down there with no grass 434 00:39:20,420 --> 00:39:28,660 It's just asphalt and stuff in the global warming. There's this out of control and you gentlemen ladies and gentlemen have control 435 00:39:30,020 --> 00:39:34,180 Over what St. Louis Park does we have enough apartment buildings 436 00:39:34,760 --> 00:39:39,760 just matter if we want to go this route on this building and I don't think we 437 00:39:39,760 --> 00:39:46,160 should. Thank you. Appreciate your comments. Next up we have Dominique 438 00:39:46,160 --> 00:39:56,390 Vercini of 6101 Cedar Lake Road. Hi, how are you? So yes, I'm the owner of 6101 and I 439 00:39:57,320 --> 00:39:59,980 don't really personally care whether that building is built. 440 00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:29,660 I just wanted to give some opinion on I think it's a sad move. We're replacing the terms single family home with density, low density, high density. And I agree with the sardine thing. It's about packing a bunch of people. I moved here. I mean, I've lived in San Luis Park for 20 years, but I've moved there three years ago thinking, how nice, you know, those houses. I lived in apartments before. This I'm not saying that your building is not good looking. 441 00:40:29,660 --> 00:40:37,740 you know, but it's very generic. Everything looks alike. You walk in buildings. Everything looks identical. Everybody is packed together. 442 00:40:39,060 --> 00:40:41,620 No individuality. So that's one thing I wanted to say. 443 00:40:42,620 --> 00:40:50,420 I'm concerned about the wetland. I know it's there to stay. I know it cannot be destroyed or removed. 444 00:40:51,060 --> 00:40:56,360 But I see from my window the deer, the coyotes, you know the eagles. And of course it's kind of affected. 445 00:40:56,360 --> 00:41:01,780 You know, you have a bunch of people barbecuing late at night, you know, the noise, the light. 446 00:41:02,380 --> 00:41:04,020 So I wanted to mention that, too. 447 00:41:06,980 --> 00:41:14,620 And yes, it's just going to look like, you know, Lake Ahun, you know, those areas, all those big buildings. 448 00:41:14,980 --> 00:41:17,480 It looks like everywhere, you know, and a bunch. 449 00:41:17,620 --> 00:41:18,380 And people, it's true. 450 00:41:18,500 --> 00:41:20,560 People, I lived in apartments for 20 years. 451 00:41:21,060 --> 00:41:22,140 People don't stay long. 452 00:41:22,140 --> 00:41:26,620 The only people who stare at the people who can't afford having a baby they try to move out. 453 00:41:27,100 --> 00:41:31,920 These are young professionals who don't plan to have children, party, you know what I mean? 454 00:41:32,620 --> 00:41:35,260 I don't think it's an improvement for the neighborhood. 455 00:41:36,620 --> 00:41:37,060 Thank you. 456 00:41:37,240 --> 00:41:37,540 Thank you. 457 00:41:38,120 --> 00:41:39,280 Appreciate it. 458 00:41:39,420 --> 00:41:43,220 Julia Alzen, 6010 Cedar Lake Road. 459 00:41:44,220 --> 00:41:44,600 Hello. 460 00:41:45,460 --> 00:41:49,120 So my house is the one with a pretty white driveway. 461 00:41:50,240 --> 00:41:50,560 Lovely. 462 00:41:50,560 --> 00:41:55,960 So I, uh, we've got our house. Yes. So I'm literally probably, I mean, I, I realize there 463 00:41:55,960 --> 00:42:00,280 will be else is affected, but me and Tate, who's to the right, if I'm standing this way, 464 00:42:00,420 --> 00:42:04,520 he can't be here today, um, probably really get affected probably the most because I'm 465 00:42:04,520 --> 00:42:08,760 like right front and center. So my front window is going to literally face all their windows. 466 00:42:09,600 --> 00:42:15,540 We spent, we bought the house December of 19, spent a whole lot of money widening our driveway, 467 00:42:15,540 --> 00:42:21,920 which City of St. Louis Park was nice about doing so for me it's more traffic it's I'm with them 468 00:42:21,920 --> 00:42:28,100 where I know the projections look like oh we can have more traffic. I leave at 830 in the morning 469 00:42:28,100 --> 00:42:34,200 with a wide driveway and sometimes it takes me two to three minutes just to even get out of my 470 00:42:34,200 --> 00:42:40,360 driveway. Sometimes I have to take a left because I can't go right. I mean it's just and then I 471 00:42:40,360 --> 00:42:43,620 end up like spending a couple more minutes trying to get to work because I have to go through the 472 00:42:43,620 --> 00:42:47,360 west end to go back around when I can't go down Louisiana. So for me it's more 473 00:42:47,360 --> 00:42:52,760 traffic. I just spent my Sunday morning cleaning up glass off the front of my 474 00:42:52,760 --> 00:42:55,740 driveway because when people come in from the west end they drive they walk down 475 00:42:55,740 --> 00:43:01,700 my street and dump their their booze bottles all over our streets. So I spent I 476 00:43:01,700 --> 00:43:04,740 don't know like an hour on my Sunday morning clean up glass so I didn't run it 477 00:43:04,740 --> 00:43:09,400 over with my tires. So I feel like am I gonna get a little bit of that when I have 478 00:43:09,400 --> 00:43:15,260 more traffic in front of my house. I mean, hard to know. But I mean, I moved to the West End. 479 00:43:16,320 --> 00:43:20,120 I don't have a little bit of a quiet life. Even though I'm on the seat of my home, I know what I 480 00:43:20,120 --> 00:43:24,380 bought. But just adding more people for me is just going to be more traffic. I have 481 00:43:25,220 --> 00:43:30,400 in front of my house, I have what's at like the brick that's really tall that the city put up. 482 00:43:30,700 --> 00:43:34,100 I don't need people sitting over there because they're hanging out with their friends. And this 483 00:43:34,100 --> 00:43:38,860 my front yard having cigarettes and beers and stuff because it's right out front of the apartment building 484 00:43:38,860 --> 00:43:41,520 Because maybe they want to hang out with some friends and they don't want to be in their apartment building 485 00:43:41,520 --> 00:43:48,400 That's the kind of stuff that I look at and I have to look at it at my front window. So for me, that's kind of the big thing for myself. So 486 00:43:49,540 --> 00:43:51,720 Thank you. Thank you. Appreciate it 487 00:43:57,190 --> 00:44:01,030 Okay, next up. Don't sit down. Come on up 488 00:44:01,510 --> 00:44:06,050 Sue Mac is that five nine one two five nine one two cedar lake road. Yes 489 00:44:06,050 --> 00:44:10,630 So Sue Mac five nine one two cedar lake road. We've been there 15 years 490 00:44:10,630 --> 00:44:16,270 We are literally the roundabout when you're going west. 491 00:44:16,750 --> 00:44:18,630 There's four houses on that first block. 492 00:44:19,110 --> 00:44:20,270 We're the third one in. 493 00:44:20,710 --> 00:44:24,310 The only one on that block that has a driveway on Cedar Lake. 494 00:44:25,190 --> 00:44:29,250 So five years ago when they were redoing Cedar Lake, 495 00:44:30,670 --> 00:44:35,410 one of the main reasons for that area was the backup of the traffic 496 00:44:35,410 --> 00:44:37,010 because of that red light. 497 00:44:37,690 --> 00:44:43,850 it has really improved a lot until the last year or so. 498 00:44:44,150 --> 00:44:48,370 And I think it's because a lot of people are going back into the work for 499 00:44:48,370 --> 00:44:54,270 so the traffic is really picking up again on Cedar Lake at certain times of the day. 500 00:44:55,790 --> 00:44:58,850 My office, I work at home permanently now. 501 00:44:58,850 --> 00:44:59,970 So my... 502 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:29,720 Office faces Cedar Lake, kind of kitty corner towards the roundabout. There are probably three, four times a day that the traffic is backing up past the water treatment just to get around the roundabout. And that roundabout was supposed to alleviate a lot of that. The last year or so, I have noticed it has really increased my concern is, and when the roundabout was put in, we had to give up being able to turn left 503 00:45:29,720 --> 00:45:34,180 out of our driveway because of the median and we were a thousand percent 504 00:45:34,180 --> 00:45:37,860 support if you go back in the meetings I got up and I said I'm supportive of 505 00:45:37,860 --> 00:45:42,960 that because it was the best for the neighborhood the flow of traffic. I 506 00:45:42,960 --> 00:45:47,860 understand it's only 36 units but like somebody else had said that's at least 507 00:45:47,860 --> 00:45:54,080 probably 72 cars around if every if it's two people it live in a 508 00:45:54,080 --> 00:45:58,500 apartment each person probably has a car that doesn't sound like a lot but it's 509 00:45:58,500 --> 00:46:00,880 certain times of the day it could really back up. 510 00:46:02,820 --> 00:46:10,100 The fire department uses that as a thoroughfare, so I mean adding additional cars, I know 511 00:46:10,100 --> 00:46:16,180 it says that it could handle it, but if somebody who sees it all day I'm not sure. 512 00:46:16,660 --> 00:46:21,640 And then there's a lot of walkers, there's a lot of bikers, yes I know there's bike trails 513 00:46:21,640 --> 00:46:22,100 on there. 514 00:46:22,720 --> 00:46:27,760 There's still close calls. We've had a couple bicyclists get hit at the roundabout. 515 00:46:28,400 --> 00:46:32,680 Coming off the side streets, the visibility is not the greatest. 516 00:46:33,420 --> 00:46:39,520 The side streets you have, everybody has driveways, but again, those houses they could have two 517 00:46:39,520 --> 00:46:44,120 or three cars. When there's a lot of snow you go around the block like I have to go around 518 00:46:44,120 --> 00:46:49,240 the block. Oh God. I have to go around the block. And if you have people parked on the side 519 00:46:49,240 --> 00:46:54,320 a road and there's snow you can't get through. I also want to say about the 520 00:46:54,320 --> 00:47:02,140 nature life. There are so many turkeys and squirrels and chipmunks and rabbits 521 00:47:02,140 --> 00:47:07,000 especially in that area right by the water treatment center because in the 522 00:47:07,000 --> 00:47:13,140 back it's completely open. One house has been empty for a while. There is always 523 00:47:13,140 --> 00:47:17,980 turkeys in there. You put in a building like this they're going to be gone. The 524 00:47:17,980 --> 00:47:19,900 The transient population is a concern. 525 00:47:20,140 --> 00:47:23,940 One of the reasons we bought the house is because it's a single family area. 526 00:47:24,640 --> 00:47:29,960 We have how many buildings that they're cramming over where Olive Garden and all of that 527 00:47:29,960 --> 00:47:30,160 was. 528 00:47:30,360 --> 00:47:33,020 I walk over there and I'm actually really kind of surprised. 529 00:47:33,780 --> 00:47:35,720 The density over there. 530 00:47:36,320 --> 00:47:43,640 Now if they were all full all the time and there was a need for more $3,000 even $1,500 531 00:47:43,640 --> 00:47:45,400 a month apartments, I'd be fine. 532 00:47:45,400 --> 00:47:51,600 I personally, if they want, if you want to approve anything and if you want to, I'm not 533 00:47:51,600 --> 00:47:55,460 against somebody doing something better with their property, I would personally love 534 00:47:55,460 --> 00:48:02,260 to see townhouses where you're going to encourage families and not just single family, single 535 00:48:02,260 --> 00:48:07,560 two income people, our school district will do better by having more families. 536 00:48:07,560 --> 00:48:13,900 It's one of the reasons we moved here 25 years ago from Pennsylvania solely to St. Louis Park 537 00:48:13,900 --> 00:48:18,880 when we started looking to come to Minnesota because of the schools, we want to encourage 538 00:48:18,880 --> 00:48:25,760 families. More apartments are not going to encourage families. I think that's all 539 00:48:25,760 --> 00:48:33,040 I wanted to say. Yeah, I think that's it. Thank you. Thank you very much. Those are all 540 00:48:33,040 --> 00:48:38,940 the cars I have. If there's anyone else, kind of speak now for everholder. Well, no, actually 541 00:48:38,940 --> 00:48:42,980 not for everholder piece because this is going to the City Council next. You're more than 542 00:48:42,980 --> 00:48:47,760 So welcome to come up, sir, if you would mind introducing yourself and you're telling 543 00:48:47,760 --> 00:48:49,800 us your address just for the record. 544 00:48:57,040 --> 00:48:57,880 But even council. 545 00:48:58,680 --> 00:48:58,760 Okay. 546 00:49:00,660 --> 00:49:05,260 I'm going to advocate for and that's like, can you just give your name and address real quick, 547 00:49:05,260 --> 00:49:05,540 sorry. 548 00:49:05,720 --> 00:49:07,280 Oh, my name is Todd Tills. 549 00:49:07,800 --> 00:49:11,240 My address is 6-0-1-9 C-2-Lake. 550 00:49:11,320 --> 00:49:11,600 Okay, great. 551 00:49:11,600 --> 00:49:12,120 Sorry about that. 552 00:49:13,100 --> 00:49:13,300 All right. 553 00:49:15,620 --> 00:49:23,780 I'm here to advocate for moving this project to another location because I like St. Louis Park to grow. 554 00:49:25,960 --> 00:49:31,540 But the main factors against having it there is a lot of people already spoke about it, right? 555 00:49:31,980 --> 00:49:37,600 The wildlife and the wetlands, the traffic, the safety concerns, right? 556 00:49:37,780 --> 00:49:43,180 It's going to make people who don't live here, that building is going to be a target for people 557 00:49:43,180 --> 00:49:47,700 that want to go through cars, right? Try to sneak in the building and go through the 558 00:49:47,700 --> 00:49:51,760 grouges. I've seen it multiple times. 559 00:49:54,000 --> 00:49:58,580 And also there's a veteran on the oxygen tank that's 560 00:49:58,580 --> 00:49:59,900 I cannot lose this home because of this. 561 00:50:01,540 --> 00:50:10,100 And it's kind of messed up. He's been a loyal renter for probably two decades, and, um, 562 00:50:13,080 --> 00:50:20,920 beyond us that, that house is not, the landlord has not kept up with it. Is integrity, I would 563 00:50:20,920 --> 00:50:28,060 say, is reflected in all of his properties, which lacks kind of a terrible condition. 564 00:50:29,500 --> 00:50:32,100 So I, excuse me, 565 00:50:35,740 --> 00:50:46,780 as a veteran myself, I just kind of like, it hurts to see somebody end up losing for the profit of somebody who's selfish and can't take care of their own stuff. 566 00:50:48,800 --> 00:50:50,820 So yeah, traffic's a bad idea. 567 00:50:53,060 --> 00:50:58,020 I've seen cars straight up go through that roundabout and have to pull them out myself. 568 00:51:00,560 --> 00:51:11,060 Yeah, safety, major concern, and then, yeah, just who's going to be succeeding for this 569 00:51:11,060 --> 00:51:11,520 project? 570 00:51:12,180 --> 00:51:17,400 I think St. Louis Park could pick better people to make prosperous from all of this. 571 00:51:20,500 --> 00:51:23,690 Yeah, I would love to see it. 572 00:51:23,810 --> 00:51:28,910 It's beautiful, but in a different location where it could really help people. 573 00:51:30,130 --> 00:51:39,230 and not affect people that call St. Louis Park their home and force them out or like you know have 574 00:51:39,230 --> 00:51:45,670 people go through their houses and not their houses but like their garage spots right and breaking 575 00:51:45,670 --> 00:51:51,030 their cars and stuff. So I know there's an uptick in crime in St. Louis Park lately because of the 576 00:51:51,030 --> 00:51:56,830 populous growing and a lot of that is leaking from Minneapolis. So adding more people to St. Louis Park in 577 00:51:56,830 --> 00:51:59,070 in the right place would be a good idea, 578 00:51:59,290 --> 00:52:03,150 but yeah, thank you. 579 00:52:03,370 --> 00:52:03,670 Thank you. 580 00:52:04,330 --> 00:52:04,690 Thank you. 581 00:52:05,530 --> 00:52:08,010 Any other comments? 582 00:52:08,390 --> 00:52:09,470 If you have that card filled out, 583 00:52:09,590 --> 00:52:10,850 you can just bring it up here. 584 00:52:11,930 --> 00:52:13,730 Well, yeah, because we, it's just so we can 585 00:52:13,730 --> 00:52:15,190 for the record keeping on the backend. 586 00:52:15,390 --> 00:52:17,010 So introduce yourself at Gary. 587 00:52:18,070 --> 00:52:18,150 Sorry. 588 00:52:18,370 --> 00:52:19,710 Greg, Greg, sorry about that. 589 00:52:19,990 --> 00:52:20,610 Thanks for your time, everyone. 590 00:52:21,050 --> 00:52:21,750 My name is Greg. 591 00:52:21,870 --> 00:52:25,050 I own the house immediately next to the two subject 592 00:52:25,050 --> 00:52:29,190 properties there. I would just like to point out there's some pretty historic 593 00:52:29,590 --> 00:52:35,890 Elms, American Elms trees back on the lots. If any credence could be paid to those, I mean 594 00:52:35,890 --> 00:52:40,150 I know San Luis Park is subsidizing homeowners to try to maintain those trees on their own properties. 595 00:52:41,210 --> 00:52:46,310 So it does, it does seem like a bit of a waste to clear out that kind of thing. Especially 596 00:52:46,310 --> 00:52:52,650 there's one in front that I think is probably 70 to 100 years old that is really pretty and 597 00:52:52,650 --> 00:53:06,430 in good shape, and would provide some of the aesthetic and nature that we appreciate about the lot already, and some screening as well, so other than that, that's what I got. 598 00:53:06,710 --> 00:53:06,890 Thank you. 599 00:53:07,310 --> 00:53:07,890 Thank you. 600 00:53:12,570 --> 00:53:13,690 I didn't hear you. 601 00:53:13,710 --> 00:53:15,150 Is it possible to see the back fence? 602 00:53:15,570 --> 00:53:17,070 The back view, the view from the back. 603 00:53:19,860 --> 00:53:22,440 I don't think we have a rendering of what the fence will look like. 604 00:53:22,440 --> 00:53:26,840 We know it will be a fence, but we don't have a picture of what it will look like. 605 00:53:27,240 --> 00:53:29,220 Are there any other comments anyone else like to speak? 606 00:53:31,800 --> 00:53:35,080 I would love to give an opportunity to folks who haven't spoken. 607 00:53:35,320 --> 00:53:39,900 And I would just also encourage you, sir, you could submit subsequent written comments. 608 00:53:39,900 --> 00:53:42,420 This again is going to the City Council next, just so you know. 609 00:53:43,920 --> 00:53:45,640 So I'm just going to see if anyone else here. 610 00:53:47,800 --> 00:53:55,500 Okay. Well, with that, I am going to close the public hearing and turn it back to the 611 00:53:55,500 --> 00:54:01,360 commission for conversation. I think we have some conversation. So, should I bring a key? 612 00:54:03,960 --> 00:54:13,040 I guess in my mind, this project is sort of marginal. I support the idea of increasing density 613 00:54:13,040 --> 00:54:19,940 be along transit quarters, if it supports our goals of affordable housing. 614 00:54:21,460 --> 00:54:26,560 In this case, so I just wonder if the practice is just at least slightly too big. 615 00:54:27,200 --> 00:54:32,080 One indication is just the seven surface parking spots. 616 00:54:32,120 --> 00:54:38,180 I think there is possibility of overflowing in the neighborhood, that's just one indication. 617 00:54:41,760 --> 00:54:57,620 Also, for converting single family homes, you know, we're going to start liking single family homes but if we do that, you know, I would like to see in support of affordable housing and I'm not sure this project really does that. 618 00:54:57,620 --> 00:54:59,780 So I'm 619 00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:08,700 No, I'm required to vote against it unless, but I'll listen to other people's comments, too, so. Thank you, Commissioner. Anyone else? Any other comments? 620 00:55:11,060 --> 00:55:12,300 Rackle? Yeah. 621 00:55:14,480 --> 00:55:29,660 Thanks for speaking, Todd. I certainly, of the comments, because I'm generally in support of a project like this. I think that it meets the needs of what we're looking for. I think the one thing that you said that really kind of bothered me is the 622 00:55:29,660 --> 00:55:34,940 the, um, the treatment of the previous tenants and how that's being handled, I think that 623 00:55:34,940 --> 00:55:37,420 that is unfortunate. And, 624 00:55:41,600 --> 00:55:46,340 uh, however, um, I think that that does need to be brought to 625 00:55:46,340 --> 00:55:51,880 the City Council's attention because that's not a criteria on which this body can determine 626 00:55:51,880 --> 00:55:56,520 whether this passes or fails tonight. But I did want to make a mention of it and say, please 627 00:55:56,520 --> 00:56:02,380 do attend the City Council meeting and, uh, speak further on that issue. Um, otherwise, um, 628 00:56:04,420 --> 00:56:10,820 I mean, when it comes to traffic, I mean, 629 00:56:12,940 --> 00:56:16,660 this is, we have a market-based housing system 630 00:56:16,660 --> 00:56:22,560 in this country, and I know that if I'm going to choose where to live, and I know I have 631 00:56:22,560 --> 00:56:26,940 two cars or three cars, I'm not going to rent somewhere that doesn't have a place for 632 00:56:26,940 --> 00:56:28,020 me to put those cars. 633 00:56:29,640 --> 00:56:32,700 I imagine that there will be a pricing scheme on the parking. 634 00:56:32,700 --> 00:56:38,560 It's not going to be free to just bring your car in for yourself or a guest. I 635 00:56:38,560 --> 00:56:44,700 Generally, I'm not concerned by the number of parking spaces for that reason alone 636 00:56:46,260 --> 00:56:54,580 Because if if I knew that I couldn't store my private property in a place that I was I was paying for I would not live there 637 00:56:54,580 --> 00:56:59,140 And I think that that's as we know that these are market rates not affordable housing 638 00:56:59,140 --> 00:57:04,840 we're not the people who are going to be moving in or moving in here by choice, they are not going 639 00:57:04,840 --> 00:57:08,540 to be subject to, well, I need to figure out how to make this work. And I'm going to hide my car 640 00:57:08,540 --> 00:57:14,680 wherever I can. It's, you know, it's choice housing. Like, somebody's going to make the decision, 641 00:57:14,700 --> 00:57:20,760 whether or not this, the parking scheme in this building works for them. And so, um, 642 00:57:21,760 --> 00:57:25,200 that's one of the reasons why I think that, like, I think this development is fairly thoughtful. 643 00:57:25,200 --> 00:57:32,640 and I think that it's a, as we're looking at places to add more housing in St. Louis Park, 644 00:57:32,660 --> 00:57:40,240 I do think that it belongs near the west end. It belongs near places with higher traffic 645 00:57:40,240 --> 00:57:47,380 roads as opposed to interior neighborhoods. So I'm in support of this project, and that's 646 00:57:47,380 --> 00:57:47,680 all I have. 647 00:57:49,020 --> 00:57:50,260 Any other members? 648 00:57:51,160 --> 00:57:51,820 Christian Derecha? 649 00:57:52,820 --> 00:57:54,780 Yeah, I have some thoughts I'd like to share. 650 00:57:55,080 --> 00:57:57,320 I really appreciate the dialogue. 651 00:57:57,320 --> 00:57:59,940 It's really awesome to hear from people in the community. 652 00:58:01,840 --> 00:58:04,820 But I want to just react to some comments. 653 00:58:05,420 --> 00:58:11,140 I would say overall, I'm also in favor of prioritizing housing over parking. 654 00:58:11,500 --> 00:58:16,700 So when I think about, you know, if it was just, you know, parking versus this, 655 00:58:16,700 --> 00:58:22,260 I would rather pick the option to create land and space for people to live, 656 00:58:22,460 --> 00:58:23,860 rather than for our cars to live. 657 00:58:24,220 --> 00:58:28,500 And so, to me, the parking is not as a strong argument for me. 658 00:58:29,280 --> 00:58:33,300 The traffic recognized that there's probably a larger question around traffic. 659 00:58:34,000 --> 00:58:40,120 You know, say, you know, roughly there's 50 parking spots, one of the comments commented 660 00:58:40,120 --> 00:58:42,480 people leaving 10 times a day, which I think is a lot. 661 00:58:42,480 --> 00:58:49,380 500 trips a day that's like less than 4% of the total numbers if you use the 662 00:58:49,380 --> 00:58:56,800 2017 basis. That doesn't seem like an incredibly meaningful change in the 663 00:58:56,800 --> 00:59:00,780 traffic recognizing that yes okay maybe it's concentrated at certain times of 664 00:59:00,780 --> 00:59:07,260 day that feels like a little bit of a larger issue that would not be addressed 665 00:59:07,260 --> 00:59:09,980 here I don't basically I think this is kind of a drop in the bucket there. 666 00:59:11,380 --> 00:59:17,140 If there were specific constraints around how the site was designed around, we think 667 00:59:17,140 --> 00:59:21,660 that there would be backup of parking, that would be another thing, or backup of traffic, 668 00:59:21,900 --> 00:59:24,700 but I think that's not the case. 669 00:59:25,500 --> 00:59:33,420 I do want to react to some of the comments around just reiterating Commissioner Webber's 670 00:59:33,420 --> 00:59:38,960 points that, you know, I recognize this is rental, a lot of comments around single people, 671 00:59:39,300 --> 00:59:43,760 one single people are all supportive of our community too, people who don't want to have 672 00:59:43,760 --> 00:59:48,540 kids are also part of our community as well. They are also entitled to a place to live. 673 00:59:50,140 --> 00:59:55,900 And also it's not our role as planning commission to not pick up project just because we don't 674 00:59:55,900 --> 00:59:59,700 like how it looks. So, you know, I recognize those comments 675 00:59:59,700 --> 00:59:59,960 and surround. 676 01:00:01,920 --> 01:00:23,980 I think that's outside of our purview here. The one thing that I'm curious to hear thoughts from the other commissioners on is, basically, when do we find it appropriate to re-zone? I could see an argument to say the zoning of this is for R3, and thus only R3 should be here. 677 01:00:25,700 --> 01:00:33,440 Now, many of you might be aware, we are undergoing a large exercise to rezone the whole city and rethink 678 01:00:33,440 --> 01:00:39,860 these things, and so I could see an argument to say, table this until we do the re-zoning or have 679 01:00:39,860 --> 01:00:46,460 a conversation around how this fits with our future zoning plans. I think that wouldn't be unreasonable, 680 01:00:47,840 --> 01:00:53,380 but the intention of our re-zoning plans are to create opportunities for more density. 681 01:00:54,600 --> 01:01:00,080 But I could also I could see us wanting to think about this project in the context of 682 01:01:00,080 --> 01:01:00,920 that larger effort. 683 01:01:03,360 --> 01:01:10,540 And then the two pieces that I would be curious to discuss with the developer are just 684 01:01:10,540 --> 01:01:16,500 around I mean bike safety if there's something there that I don't I don't have an answer 685 01:01:16,500 --> 01:01:21,620 I don't think necessarily that there's opportunity now that there's bike parking and you know opportunities 686 01:01:21,620 --> 01:01:27,380 for people to have bikes there, but I'm not sure, is there something that can be done to address bike safety? 687 01:01:27,720 --> 01:01:33,340 And I am compelled by the support of the tree preservation as well. 688 01:01:34,000 --> 01:01:40,540 And so I would be curious to see if there is anything we could do to support maintenance of those trees. 689 01:01:40,940 --> 01:01:41,300 Yeah, 690 01:01:43,430 --> 01:01:45,770 there's any other comments from Commissioner Martin's. 691 01:01:47,640 --> 01:01:54,420 I just want to say that people are not inherently evil, nor called to a life of crime, because 692 01:01:54,420 --> 01:02:00,700 they rent. They don't need your judgment. And they are not less than you, because they 693 01:02:00,700 --> 01:02:01,120 are renters. 694 01:02:04,420 --> 01:02:04,660 Michael? 695 01:02:05,380 --> 01:02:12,160 Commissioner DeVach, I'd actually like to respond to the thought on the zoning. I think 696 01:02:12,160 --> 01:02:16,880 if this was in a vacuum, and I would tend to agree, it's like, well, we laid the zone 697 01:02:16,880 --> 01:02:19,100 and say, well, that's the rules we said. 698 01:02:19,600 --> 01:02:20,900 I think the two conditions are one. 699 01:02:21,040 --> 01:02:23,640 We know that the city of St. Louis Park has five zones, 700 01:02:23,780 --> 01:02:26,120 three of which are basically single family home districts. 701 01:02:26,980 --> 01:02:28,620 And the kind of does really, 702 01:02:29,460 --> 01:02:31,360 the whole reason we're making the change 703 01:02:31,360 --> 01:02:33,320 and rethinking how the thick is because 704 01:02:33,320 --> 01:02:34,800 when people come to our community 705 01:02:34,800 --> 01:02:36,880 and they say, what am I allowed to build on a property 706 01:02:36,880 --> 01:02:37,720 that I'm looking to buy? 707 01:02:38,260 --> 01:02:39,700 They can't actually figure it out 708 01:02:39,700 --> 01:02:41,440 because it's very confusing. 709 01:02:41,820 --> 01:02:43,840 And it was made confusing by design, 710 01:02:43,840 --> 01:02:48,500 by people in the past who were trying to rectify mistakes. 711 01:02:49,400 --> 01:02:52,940 I would say that because the second factor 712 01:02:52,940 --> 01:02:54,640 is that we have the comprehensive plan, 713 01:02:54,660 --> 01:02:57,580 we have the comprehensive plan, the 2040 St. Louis Park plan, 714 01:02:58,040 --> 01:03:00,940 and that is saying that this is a median density area. 715 01:03:01,640 --> 01:03:05,000 So part of the comprehensive plan is bringing zoning 716 01:03:05,580 --> 01:03:08,140 as it existed prior to the passage of that plan 717 01:03:08,860 --> 01:03:10,300 into compliance of that plan. 718 01:03:10,300 --> 01:03:16,840 So, while the entire city, the, we're working on the plans to bring compliance for the 719 01:03:16,840 --> 01:03:20,020 rest of the districts, this is, we already know that this is going to change. 720 01:03:20,660 --> 01:03:24,360 This is not going to be, there is not going to be an R3 in the future. 721 01:03:24,480 --> 01:03:27,380 This is going to be one of our new zones we're discussing. 722 01:03:28,120 --> 01:03:34,580 And so, I think that, I think whether it's R3 or R4 is almost a little academic because 723 01:03:34,580 --> 01:03:37,760 we know that it's going to fit into one of the zones that corresponds to medium density 724 01:03:37,760 --> 01:03:38,340 in the future. 725 01:03:38,340 --> 01:03:44,160 So, that's my thought on it, I will be open to hearing other thoughts on it as well. 726 01:03:45,800 --> 01:03:49,590 Thank you, I agree. 727 01:03:50,090 --> 01:03:54,770 There was a large effort put forward to develop the comprehensive plan. 728 01:03:55,190 --> 01:04:02,650 The 20-year vision of how we want St. Louis Park to grow and the zoning that is proposed here 729 01:04:02,650 --> 01:04:05,250 is consistent with those long-range plans. 730 01:04:05,250 --> 01:04:10,030 I would like to talk about housing in general. 731 01:04:11,390 --> 01:04:17,530 There is a housing crisis in this country, and in front of the Hanzo, there's a big issue. 732 01:04:19,250 --> 01:04:23,290 Minnesota and the rest of the country has under-produced housing. 733 01:04:23,470 --> 01:04:34,210 When there was the recession in the late 2000s, production of housing slowed down tremendously, 734 01:04:34,210 --> 01:04:41,870 But growth did not, and we are trying to make up for that lack of development of housing. 735 01:04:43,030 --> 01:04:55,150 And while this is a market rate development, there's an under supply of housing, adding any more housing is good to help for affordability of housing. 736 01:04:55,150 --> 01:04:59,970 So I appreciate folks coming out. I know you're very passionate. 737 01:05:00,000 --> 01:05:29,060 Question at about your neighborhoods, but I'm going to be voting in favor of this because it's consistent with the comprehensive plan. And it also provides missing middle housing, which we are trying to achieve, which is a step between lower density and the large apartments that you see at West stand. And that's a tough nut to crack. And I'm happy to see this being proposed here. Any other comments? 738 01:05:29,060 --> 01:05:37,120 I would just add to what Commissioner Devachia was asking you, the big question of when 739 01:05:37,120 --> 01:05:42,400 is it appropriate to rezone and just to maybe use a few fewer words in Commissioner 740 01:05:42,400 --> 01:05:48,140 Accom did, it's if it's still within alignment of the 2040 plan, then it's okay to rezone 741 01:05:48,140 --> 01:05:48,820 and this is. 742 01:05:49,520 --> 01:05:55,120 So that's why I'm okay with the rezone in question, tabling until we're done with the 743 01:05:55,740 --> 01:06:01,520 I don't see that as feasible only because I feel like we would have to table every development 744 01:06:01,520 --> 01:06:06,460 before this commission, this calendar year, and I actually think most of what will become 745 01:06:06,460 --> 01:06:09,740 before this commission is probably going to be pretty non-controversial, so I would hate 746 01:06:09,740 --> 01:06:12,420 to stop those developments as well. 747 01:06:13,260 --> 01:06:17,680 It's a very important question to ask, but I just want to let you know what my thinking is 748 01:06:18,540 --> 01:06:19,160 as well. 749 01:06:20,420 --> 01:06:24,160 And I think as we've mentioned here, just for the focus here, and I'm appreciative of you 750 01:06:24,160 --> 01:06:28,440 being here it's I think you can probably tell we're not heading in the direction that 751 01:06:28,440 --> 01:06:32,880 you a lot of people in this room want but I also want you to know that's only because 752 01:06:32,880 --> 01:06:40,080 of the parameters under which we rule. I appreciate if you think that's a cop out I also appreciate 753 01:06:40,080 --> 01:06:47,520 if you understand that that is actually our mandate and to be in contact with your members 754 01:06:47,520 --> 01:06:53,720 members of the City Council, they are very receptive to comments like we heard here today 755 01:06:53,720 --> 01:07:00,100 sometimes, apparently the comments here, but what I would say is all of these comments 756 01:07:00,100 --> 01:07:06,800 are being forwarded, and I have seen moments on this commission, which again has this limited 757 01:07:06,800 --> 01:07:14,300 scope. I have seen moments when there is input like this. There are moments where sometimes 758 01:07:14,300 --> 01:07:18,280 Sometimes the developer, sometimes the owner, and sometimes the members of the City Council, 759 01:07:18,440 --> 01:07:21,340 their own accord, decide to maybe rethink things. 760 01:07:21,740 --> 01:07:25,860 I'm not saying that will happen here, but I want you to say it is not impossible as well. 761 01:07:26,100 --> 01:07:32,240 And so I'm trying to add on a hopeful note as well for those of you who may not like what I think we're about to do. 762 01:07:32,840 --> 01:07:36,120 And so, but really thank you for being here tonight. 763 01:07:36,760 --> 01:07:42,480 If there's no other conversation, I will entertain a motion for this measure. 764 01:07:43,120 --> 01:07:44,940 or do you have, is this emotional comment? 765 01:07:44,980 --> 01:07:46,580 Oh, maybe additional comment, yeah. 766 01:07:46,580 --> 01:07:47,540 Okay, go ahead, go ahead. 767 01:07:47,720 --> 01:07:49,820 Yeah, when I was talking about parking before, 768 01:07:49,980 --> 01:07:52,960 about only seven parking lots of spots, 769 01:07:53,880 --> 01:07:57,000 it's not that I care about parking as much. 770 01:07:57,200 --> 01:07:58,440 I think there's not maybe that was the indication 771 01:07:58,440 --> 01:08:00,460 that it was the whole thing, which is kind of a little big. 772 01:08:00,760 --> 01:08:03,840 And at least my greatest possibility 773 01:08:03,840 --> 01:08:07,120 that visitor parking could overflow in the neighborhood. 774 01:08:07,480 --> 01:08:09,940 So maybe it was more of this indication, maybe it's just 775 01:08:09,940 --> 01:08:10,560 a little big. 776 01:08:12,480 --> 01:08:16,180 But riding more housing, especially a transit corridor, 777 01:08:17,760 --> 01:08:21,680 is a good goal, I support. 778 01:08:21,920 --> 01:08:23,180 But I think there are other goals. 779 01:08:23,600 --> 01:08:27,320 We also want owner occupied housing. 780 01:08:27,720 --> 01:08:29,380 I guess the house is a bit rented now, 781 01:08:29,460 --> 01:08:31,660 but at least someone could buy me at some point 782 01:08:31,660 --> 01:08:32,680 and be owner occupied. 783 01:08:33,400 --> 01:08:37,980 And another goal is housing suitable for families. 784 01:08:39,340 --> 01:08:41,940 I don't think most families typically 785 01:08:41,940 --> 01:08:51,980 want to live in a apartment building, so I think there are other goals here, so I don't 786 01:08:51,980 --> 01:08:59,710 know that we've been in a rush to do this for this one property at this point. 787 01:09:00,470 --> 01:09:01,650 Okay, thank you. 788 01:09:02,230 --> 01:09:04,870 Do I have any motions on this measure? 789 01:09:11,800 --> 01:09:15,600 I motion to, do we want to do separate motions, right? 790 01:09:15,600 --> 01:09:18,320 You can do it all right, all the different ones. 791 01:09:21,760 --> 01:09:25,040 It's your decision, how to frame those things. 792 01:09:25,040 --> 01:09:30,320 I think I'll just do one by one for simplicity. 793 01:09:30,660 --> 01:09:33,120 I'd motion to recommend approval of the application 794 01:09:33,120 --> 01:09:37,380 to Reson 60, 13, and 16, 19, Cedar Lake Road, 795 01:09:38,080 --> 01:09:39,660 from our three two family residents 796 01:09:39,660 --> 01:09:41,820 to our four multiple family residents. 797 01:09:42,520 --> 01:09:43,800 And you have notes in front of you, 798 01:09:43,860 --> 01:09:45,840 so you may have to do the other motions to this. 799 01:09:45,840 --> 01:09:52,840 Okay, that's a motion. Do we have a second second we have a motion a second all those in favor say aye 800 01:09:53,440 --> 01:09:54,760 Aye all opposed 801 01:09:55,280 --> 01:09:55,540 nay 802 01:09:56,100 --> 01:09:59,740 The motion carries is there another motion on the floor yes 803 01:10:00,750 --> 01:10:30,570 I motion to recommend approval of the application for preliminary and final plat of cedar cedar heights of states with conditions recommended by staff. Motion, do we have a second? Second. The motion in a second, all those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? Aye. Motion carries. And then there's one more. I motion to recommend approval of the application for a conditional use permit to allow a three-story 36-unit apartment building with conditions 804 01:10:30,570 --> 01:10:31,890 that's recommended by staff. 805 01:10:33,190 --> 01:10:35,550 We have a motion to, oh, was that it or? 806 01:10:36,050 --> 01:10:36,490 Yes. 807 01:10:36,690 --> 01:10:37,590 Okay. Do we have a second? 808 01:10:37,870 --> 01:10:38,250 A second. 809 01:10:38,750 --> 01:10:41,130 We have a motion and a second all those in favor say aye. 810 01:10:41,530 --> 01:10:41,910 Aye. 811 01:10:42,190 --> 01:10:42,590 Opposed? 812 01:10:43,030 --> 01:10:43,170 May. 813 01:10:43,710 --> 01:10:44,590 The motion carries. 814 01:10:45,230 --> 01:10:47,090 And that concludes this item of business. 815 01:10:47,710 --> 01:10:51,190 We do have a few other things that we're going to go through. 816 01:10:51,330 --> 01:10:52,670 You are more than welcome to state. 817 01:10:52,810 --> 01:10:53,810 It is scintillating stuff. 818 01:10:53,830 --> 01:10:54,770 I want to assure you. 819 01:10:55,330 --> 01:10:58,490 You are also free if that was what you were here for. 820 01:11:03,190 --> 01:11:09,190 This is planned to be brought to City Council for consideration on February 20th. 821 01:11:10,730 --> 01:11:16,970 And while this is the public hearing, the Council's policy is to accept testimony on items 822 01:11:16,970 --> 01:11:17,770 on the agenda. 823 01:11:18,070 --> 01:11:20,130 So if you would like to speak there as well, you may. 824 01:11:20,650 --> 01:11:24,830 But all the information that was collected during this meeting will be passed along in part 825 01:11:24,830 --> 01:11:27,210 of the package of the materials that they receive. 826 01:11:27,210 --> 01:11:32,910 And that's in this that's in this room again. It is in this in this room at six o'clock, right? Or is it it varies? 827 01:11:33,050 --> 01:11:35,510 I think six thirties that standard time. Okay. 828 01:11:36,350 --> 01:11:38,190 Thank you all for being here. I'll 829 01:11:42,160 --> 01:11:43,080 just give it a minute here. 830 01:11:43,920 --> 01:11:44,960 I'm just gonna give it a minute. 831 01:12:02,720 --> 01:12:03,000 I 832 01:12:07,880 --> 01:12:14,440 I'm going to come back to the meeting here. We only have a couple other things. Next item on the agenda is 833 01:12:14,440 --> 01:12:17,160 Is other business Gary? 834 01:12:18,380 --> 01:12:19,820 Yes, there is other business. 835 01:12:19,980 --> 01:12:21,340 Other Gary, is there any other business? 836 01:12:21,720 --> 01:12:27,480 Yes, Mr. Chair, there is other business, I'm sorry, it wasn't included in the packet 837 01:12:27,480 --> 01:12:30,260 but we sent an email out to you today. 838 01:12:30,980 --> 01:12:37,600 We do need to do a election of officers on the first meeting of the new year and so we're 839 01:12:37,600 --> 01:12:40,760 looking for folks that are interested in being the Chair and Vice Chair. 840 01:12:41,300 --> 01:12:49,280 If you could hold the election of officers today that would be wonderful and then it would be effective at your next regular meeting or next meeting. 841 01:12:49,920 --> 01:12:57,620 Well, let's start with chair. Does anyone want to volunteer or nominate someone to be chair? I'll just kind of open it up to the world. 842 01:12:58,040 --> 01:13:00,600 I like to volunteer. I wanted to nominate me at you. 843 01:13:01,580 --> 01:13:05,080 Well, that's all we can take up this whole side of the table with all of you. 844 01:13:06,340 --> 01:13:09,700 Any other nominations or volunteering? 845 01:13:11,500 --> 01:13:13,380 Well, I guess let's just make this formal then. 846 01:13:13,480 --> 01:13:17,860 All those in favor of making Commissioner DeBacha our new chair, say aye. 847 01:13:18,280 --> 01:13:18,660 Aye. 848 01:13:18,920 --> 01:13:19,000 Aye. 849 01:13:19,560 --> 01:13:19,980 All opposed? 850 01:13:21,540 --> 01:13:22,400 I'll keep it open. 851 01:13:22,680 --> 01:13:22,820 No. 852 01:13:25,040 --> 01:13:25,780 Thank you. 853 01:13:25,880 --> 01:13:30,060 Thank you all for my year as chair I've enjoyed it as well. 854 01:13:30,060 --> 01:13:37,000 So I'll do the same now for Vice Chair, do we have any volunteers or nominations open 855 01:13:37,000 --> 01:13:37,380 my care. 856 01:13:41,350 --> 01:13:41,750 I would. 857 01:13:41,950 --> 01:13:42,510 Yeah, nominate. 858 01:13:43,290 --> 01:13:43,450 Matt. 859 01:13:45,010 --> 01:13:46,310 I would second. 860 01:13:46,730 --> 01:13:49,510 I suppose I have to ask to if you accept. 861 01:13:50,110 --> 01:13:51,070 I do accept. 862 01:13:54,190 --> 01:13:58,750 I just want to also point out just for going forward that Commissioner Merton's and Commissioner 863 01:13:58,750 --> 01:14:03,070 young quiz have not served yet. I'm not saying that you shouldn't, but I'm just saying going forward. 864 01:14:03,650 --> 01:14:08,930 There is. There is a good. I'm sorry. I heard yes over here. You said no. Okay. Well, just so you know, 865 01:14:08,950 --> 01:14:12,830 there's a goal. There's a general goal that at some point you take a leadership position. So obviously 866 01:14:12,830 --> 01:14:18,270 don't worry about this here, but we would love to know that that's in your brain going forward. 867 01:14:19,010 --> 01:14:23,670 Okay. All those in favor of Commissioner Accom being our vice chair say aye. Aye. 868 01:14:23,670 --> 01:14:23,790 Aye. 869 01:14:24,150 --> 01:14:24,510 Opposed? 870 01:14:26,940 --> 01:14:27,820 OK, carries. 871 01:14:28,160 --> 01:14:28,760 I thought about it. 872 01:14:30,800 --> 01:14:32,460 Any other business, Sean? 873 01:14:32,700 --> 01:14:33,400 No other business. 874 01:14:33,920 --> 01:14:34,600 Any other communications? 875 01:14:35,040 --> 01:14:35,800 And out at this time, no. 876 01:14:36,060 --> 01:14:39,540 I accept to note that immediately following this regular meeting 877 01:14:39,540 --> 01:14:42,860 and we determined we are moving into a study session where 878 01:14:42,860 --> 01:14:45,140 we'll be discussing the zoning code update 879 01:14:45,820 --> 01:14:48,000 and expanding neighborhood housing options. 880 01:14:48,920 --> 01:14:49,060 Great. 881 01:14:49,380 --> 01:14:50,160 Anything else for anyone? 882 01:14:50,880 --> 01:14:53,100 With that, this meeting is adjourned.