1 00:00:05,420 --> 00:00:17,420 All right, I've got 630 on the dot, so we will call to order the finding commission, regular meeting for September 14, 2016. We'll start with the roll call. 2 00:00:17,420 --> 00:00:29,920 Eric Warner, Richard Craig, Josh Canabi, Patrick Costerman, we know Doug is out today, Gabrielle 3 00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:34,540 Braley, and Michelle Petterson here. 4 00:00:37,270 --> 00:00:42,790 All right, so our local, then we'll start with the introduction of our members. 5 00:00:43,470 --> 00:00:44,930 Sure she can start with our introductions. 6 00:00:45,390 --> 00:00:46,030 We just off. 7 00:00:46,030 --> 00:00:46,690 Thank you. 8 00:00:47,910 --> 00:00:50,730 We're excited to introduce Chris Holland. 9 00:00:51,590 --> 00:00:55,050 He comes to us from the City of Mary's Tool. 10 00:00:55,230 --> 00:00:59,290 And he has our new planning manager from the City. 11 00:00:59,890 --> 00:01:02,390 So he comes to us with quite a bit of experience. 12 00:01:03,690 --> 00:01:07,490 Mary's Bill is a good-sized city with a lot of growth. 13 00:01:07,810 --> 00:01:11,250 So he has been a fan for about 20 plus years. 14 00:01:11,250 --> 00:01:16,050 25 years with Mary's Will, two weeks away, so I'm going to listen here. 15 00:01:16,930 --> 00:01:19,570 So Chris, do you want to just say a few words by yourself? 16 00:01:19,830 --> 00:01:20,030 Sure. 17 00:01:20,830 --> 00:01:28,190 So Chris Holland, born and raised an average, I said, I, my first planning job, I got a degree 18 00:01:28,190 --> 00:01:33,990 from Eastern Washington University in urban region planning, and my first planning job was actually 19 00:01:33,990 --> 00:01:37,330 with Mary from Triumph, I was at it for two meters in her. 20 00:01:37,330 --> 00:01:41,310 I moved over to Mary'sville and gradually worked my way up as a finding manager. 21 00:01:41,490 --> 00:01:44,230 I was a finding manager for, I could get at the last 16 years there. 22 00:01:45,490 --> 00:01:49,590 So, as far as land use reviews and things like that go, 23 00:01:50,130 --> 00:01:52,330 I'm pretty experienced, I think. 24 00:01:53,190 --> 00:01:57,490 Over the last four years, I permitted over 5 million square feet of industrial space 25 00:01:57,490 --> 00:02:01,610 and in Mary'sville and all sorts of choppy centers. 26 00:02:02,890 --> 00:02:06,150 A lot of dealers that code amendments and all that. 27 00:02:07,050 --> 00:02:13,250 So anyways, I hope to bring my experience to the stand with and help the traditional way I can. 28 00:02:13,390 --> 00:02:15,870 It's great to be here, you know, all of you. 29 00:02:16,090 --> 00:02:17,990 My pretty client, which means it is my seven weeks. 30 00:02:19,270 --> 00:02:20,170 Thank you very much. 31 00:02:20,650 --> 00:02:20,870 Welcome. 32 00:02:22,310 --> 00:02:27,960 Yeah, we were pretty excited to have Chris join us. 33 00:02:28,340 --> 00:02:34,620 We did this side to change the senior plan and position to the planning and planning manager 34 00:02:34,620 --> 00:02:45,360 to help us with some transitional planning and transitional staffing, so we're excited to have it. 35 00:02:46,580 --> 00:02:50,820 You'll be seeing a lot more of you as a year goes on. 36 00:02:53,790 --> 00:02:53,970 All right. 37 00:02:55,940 --> 00:02:56,600 Let's see. 38 00:02:56,680 --> 00:02:57,640 Public request and comments. 39 00:02:57,880 --> 00:02:58,580 Anybody online? 40 00:02:58,760 --> 00:02:59,180 I do not. 41 00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:00,580 I have nobody in the room. 42 00:03:02,120 --> 00:03:03,040 Promote the minutes. 43 00:03:03,220 --> 00:03:04,920 Plenty commission meeting minutes. 44 00:03:04,920 --> 00:03:11,580 From 7.13, 20.26, are there any additions, corrections, additions? 45 00:03:12,300 --> 00:03:12,860 Everybody love it. 46 00:03:15,630 --> 00:03:18,410 There are motion to accept the minutes as written. 47 00:03:20,010 --> 00:03:21,110 I make a motion. 48 00:03:22,030 --> 00:03:24,170 Set the minutes as written. 49 00:03:24,390 --> 00:03:28,450 So we have motion to accept the final commission minutes as written. 50 00:03:28,730 --> 00:03:29,430 You have a second. 51 00:03:30,650 --> 00:03:31,030 Oh, I'm bigger. 52 00:03:31,750 --> 00:03:33,170 But I'm in your post. 53 00:03:34,430 --> 00:03:34,590 All right. 54 00:03:34,590 --> 00:03:38,930 We will accept the financial mission minutes for 7, 13, 20, 20, 20, 55 00:03:42,040 --> 00:03:43,540 Un-init business. 56 00:03:43,940 --> 00:03:46,560 So I don't have anything to miss it for unfinished business. 57 00:03:47,400 --> 00:03:51,040 So we can roll into our new business, starting with the legislative code 58 00:03:51,040 --> 00:03:51,800 amendments. 59 00:03:52,540 --> 00:03:53,040 Board of Fisher. 60 00:03:53,500 --> 00:03:54,080 Thank you. 61 00:03:57,460 --> 00:04:01,560 Just to, just to back up just a little bit of unfinished business. 62 00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:08,440 we're still working on in climate change work that you've been discussing the last couple months. 63 00:04:09,800 --> 00:04:14,480 So probably we've been bringing stuff back to you in terms of policies and that October. 64 00:04:15,880 --> 00:04:20,440 So you're not done with that, but these are not so work to do, just get in a break that's 65 00:04:20,440 --> 00:04:29,360 loud. So new business, what we're doing is, hopefully finishing out some of the last pieces of 66 00:04:29,360 --> 00:04:35,900 municipal code of the project. We have about four pieces that has left and now we're going 67 00:04:35,900 --> 00:04:43,140 to talk about the legislative code of admit and the parking code of admit that. So I did break 68 00:04:43,140 --> 00:04:47,180 and break them down into two different presentations but they're going to be in your packet 69 00:04:47,180 --> 00:04:59,340 and this is what I'm really glad we're processing them at the same time. However, they're not 70 00:04:59,340 --> 00:05:06,680 time. So if we want to process a legislative member full differently from the party, we can 71 00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:13,340 do that. As you may recall, some of them because that we've had in the past had to be processed 72 00:05:13,340 --> 00:05:17,710 together, because it was a lot of interplay between them. That's not the case with these two. 73 00:05:20,280 --> 00:05:28,240 So Audrey has put up the presentation and you should have a copy of the presentation in front of you. 74 00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:31,960 So make a little easier for you to follow along with. 75 00:05:32,860 --> 00:05:36,500 And so as we sit on the agenda, 76 00:05:36,660 --> 00:05:39,300 we're going to start with our legislative code amendments. 77 00:05:40,520 --> 00:05:50,520 Our legislative code amendments are really a procedural code pretty much in terms of how do we process changes to our 78 00:05:50,520 --> 00:05:53,940 or municipal code in those type of things. 79 00:05:55,180 --> 00:06:00,620 So the legislative code on it, we've broken it into five different sub-sexuals. 80 00:06:01,580 --> 00:06:05,720 The first one is our zoning and unified development code amendment. 81 00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:08,580 So it's basically how do we amend the code? 82 00:06:08,820 --> 00:06:11,320 Most of you have been through this process. 83 00:06:12,260 --> 00:06:15,140 A lot to last two and a half years, so we shouldn't be surprised. 84 00:06:15,840 --> 00:06:16,500 We're doing that. 85 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:20,440 And then the comprehensive plan and then the process. 86 00:06:20,860 --> 00:06:24,060 And you may recall we adopted the compound in 2024. 87 00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:28,020 And that was a quite a lengthy process. 88 00:06:28,900 --> 00:06:32,790 But the code really couldn't spell out all the steps that we need to do to 89 00:06:33,300 --> 00:06:37,180 adopt any amendments to our code and our pipeline. 90 00:06:38,480 --> 00:06:40,760 The next one is annexations. 91 00:06:41,420 --> 00:06:44,880 The city doesn't has a process, a lot of annexations 92 00:06:44,880 --> 00:06:50,740 in the last few years, I think we've had one annexation in the eight years, eight and 93 00:06:50,740 --> 00:06:57,940 half years I've been here. We have another one that's potentially coming our way, and so the 94 00:06:57,940 --> 00:07:04,000 annexation process really describes only one process, and the multiple processes that are 95 00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:07,000 allowed by state law, because it's one that's used the most. 96 00:07:09,340 --> 00:07:14,070 So, specific reasons and development agreements are in this code package. 97 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:22,700 We're going to have this necessarily legislative, and they were, some of these were getting a little mixed up in our existing code, so we broke them out, 98 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:27,060 and so each one has its own set of rules and processes to follow. 99 00:07:27,460 --> 00:07:29,980 There's probably some overlap in terms of those. 100 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:37,940 Processes, but at least we're not confusing. Is this a kind of movement and is this a result, you know, those type of thing? 101 00:07:38,400 --> 00:07:42,060 Which we have those type of conversations in the past. 102 00:07:43,060 --> 00:07:52,520 So the intent is to really separate and have distinct consequences for each one, and so it helps eliminate a lot of confusion. 103 00:07:54,660 --> 00:08:00,400 So, the existing code, as you've been recall, we're moving with a lot of this leftover 104 00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:02,080 to handle 18. 105 00:08:02,320 --> 00:08:04,100 I need to do a five-development code. 106 00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:05,520 This is no different. 107 00:08:06,740 --> 00:08:12,140 You can see we have an existing 17155156 and 158. 108 00:08:12,160 --> 00:08:14,720 It really touched the lot of these legislative changes. 109 00:08:15,460 --> 00:08:19,960 The site specific reasons were invented in the code of maintenance process for 110 00:08:19,960 --> 00:08:28,980 So we talk about codependence and type of that results or map changes and it was really messy and so another reason why they're separating it out. 111 00:08:29,420 --> 00:08:34,940 And then development and treatments were elsewhere in the coded multiple places. 112 00:08:36,580 --> 00:08:41,000 So what you're going to see here in this is the general provision. 113 00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:46,960 includes the legislative actions and then the site specific 114 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:51,000 resource development payments as part of the permitting process. 115 00:08:54,040 --> 00:08:57,580 I don't know if I'll be recall but we did redo the permit process. 116 00:08:57,900 --> 00:09:00,040 That was one of our very first things that we did in the United 117 00:09:00,040 --> 00:09:06,500 Development Code and we identified those specific items of the council 118 00:09:06,500 --> 00:09:09,280 had a forwarding over and that was the site specific 119 00:09:09,280 --> 00:09:13,720 reasons for the development of the climate. And those are really the only two permit 120 00:09:13,720 --> 00:09:20,500 actions they have action, because it really is they have discretion over those actions, 121 00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:26,280 whereas other permit decisions are, if it makes code, we have to improve them. And so those 122 00:09:26,280 --> 00:09:29,080 were the type 1, 2, and 3s. 123 00:09:31,140 --> 00:09:36,380 So I'm going to go through the legislative code amendment and each one 124 00:09:38,440 --> 00:09:44,560 And if you want to ask questions in between you can, otherwise we could go through it until I get to be in. 125 00:09:44,580 --> 00:09:46,780 Valerie, I'm comfortable with you now. 126 00:09:47,740 --> 00:09:53,860 So the first legislative code event that we have before you is the code implement process itself. 127 00:09:55,260 --> 00:10:02,600 But if there's a picture on our website that has our municipal code on it, you can see there's 18 pedals in there. 128 00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:08,460 But this section really focuses on Title 17 and Title 18. 129 00:10:11,080 --> 00:10:23,620 So just to clarify, you're like, oh, we're moving everything over to 18. Why are we keeping 17? Title 17, we're keeping me because at the end of all of this will be the shoreline regulations and also be separate. 130 00:10:24,460 --> 00:10:27,720 And so we have to keep that title as well. 131 00:10:27,720 --> 00:10:34,740 I have some kind of general questions I laid out that's pretty similar to all of the five 132 00:10:34,740 --> 00:10:35,280 sections. 133 00:10:35,560 --> 00:10:37,560 It's really who can initiate an amendment? 134 00:10:39,660 --> 00:10:40,480 Code amendments? 135 00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:44,100 And we'll put in our component amendments. 136 00:10:44,220 --> 00:10:45,300 These are public documents. 137 00:10:45,640 --> 00:10:56,660 They are created and adopted by the Council policies of what are community wants and we'll be 138 00:10:57,400 --> 00:11:02,260 What is in the policies and guidance of our component? 139 00:11:03,060 --> 00:11:06,640 And it should reflect that in the component process, 140 00:11:07,180 --> 00:11:10,500 and the intent is to reflect the desires of the community. 141 00:11:11,140 --> 00:11:16,440 As a planning commission, you can sort of sign our appointed 142 00:11:16,440 --> 00:11:20,660 to be those representatives of our community to bring in 143 00:11:22,060 --> 00:11:25,000 concerns or thoughts or comments or anything like that 144 00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:27,920 that will help guide the development of these codes. 145 00:11:30,120 --> 00:11:31,460 So why do we do them? 146 00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:34,160 We have a lot of reasons why code events happen. 147 00:11:34,660 --> 00:11:36,480 Cones are not typically, 148 00:11:37,140 --> 00:11:38,520 let's get us a static. 149 00:11:38,780 --> 00:11:42,420 They're pretty stable, but there are reasons to change codes. 150 00:11:43,640 --> 00:11:46,120 That has, you've experienced a lot of this 151 00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:47,080 over the last few years, 152 00:11:47,260 --> 00:11:48,760 where I keep saying, the state's still this, 153 00:11:48,880 --> 00:11:49,680 we gotta do this. 154 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:52,100 That was just a second point, 155 00:11:52,100 --> 00:11:58,680 interest conference last week and they were talking about over the last five years, the 156 00:11:58,680 --> 00:12:06,380 legislature has adopted like 27 housing bills. So a lot of work, a lot of changes in a 157 00:12:06,380 --> 00:12:12,120 lot. And so we do a lot of work to implement those cuts when we're here, but it's 158 00:12:12,120 --> 00:12:22,080 state regulations or federal regulations or implementing policies of a complaint. So there's 159 00:12:22,080 --> 00:12:30,940 The code itself has a list of the criteria for approval of the code of minutes. 160 00:12:31,960 --> 00:12:38,260 When you see your findings of that, then it's typically attached to the tail end of 161 00:12:38,260 --> 00:12:39,040 our ordinances. 162 00:12:39,620 --> 00:12:41,600 There's a section in it that says criteria. 163 00:12:42,340 --> 00:12:43,620 And we list those criteria. 164 00:12:44,900 --> 00:12:49,560 And when you're adopting, or if you should say adopting, when you're recommending a adoption 165 00:12:49,560 --> 00:12:54,060 to the city council that criteria is really important. 166 00:12:54,780 --> 00:12:59,380 You know, we drafted for you, but if you have changes or suggestions, that's what we want to use. 167 00:13:01,600 --> 00:13:08,480 So, and they really, um, are around consistency with the public health and safety, 168 00:13:09,100 --> 00:13:11,720 say, lost federal laws and public policies. 169 00:13:13,720 --> 00:13:16,200 And then finally, what is the process? 170 00:13:16,200 --> 00:13:16,900 So, 171 00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:26,680 for the Title 17 and Title 18, you're always still still the planning commission. 172 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:33,920 So the planning commission, as I mentioned, your job is really to review that and make comments 173 00:13:33,920 --> 00:13:39,540 and suggestions about, what is the effect on the community, what are you hearing from the community? 174 00:13:39,860 --> 00:13:42,940 What do you want the city to look like in five years or 10 years? 175 00:13:43,300 --> 00:13:47,380 And that's really what your job is to make that recommendation. 176 00:13:47,380 --> 00:13:50,680 And then those recommendations go to the council. 177 00:13:51,940 --> 00:13:53,920 And when I say for the most part, that's what you do. 178 00:13:54,100 --> 00:13:58,520 Because there are sections of the municipal code, you know, 179 00:13:58,520 --> 00:14:00,380 at Title 1, 4, 8, whatever. 180 00:14:01,340 --> 00:14:03,640 Those amendments, who go directly to council, 181 00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:06,160 enable their own public hearing. 182 00:14:06,660 --> 00:14:12,100 But the built environment is a lot of what you look at as planning delicious. 183 00:14:12,100 --> 00:14:13,120 You 184 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:19,140 have any questions about COVID-19 185 00:14:21,420 --> 00:14:24,440 in your old life, or some of some of some of the 186 00:14:24,440 --> 00:14:24,580 things. 187 00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:32,100 The next one is the coppire, and it really has something very similar, and I'm not going 188 00:14:32,100 --> 00:14:37,740 to go through all the details on this because there's almost verbatim, but one of the things 189 00:14:37,740 --> 00:14:43,540 that's important is when we look at our coppire, our coppire is a 20-year look into 190 00:14:43,540 --> 00:14:48,120 the future, and we have to update the coppire every time. 191 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:53,420 We have a periodic review of the five-year period, and then the full review of the ten you did. 192 00:14:53,960 --> 00:14:56,900 But given that it's still not meant to be a static document. 193 00:14:57,680 --> 00:14:59,980 It is meant to be... 194 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:06,020 The change and updated to follow the desires of the keeping and how we want to see it grow. 195 00:15:07,180 --> 00:15:11,680 So state law says that we can't abandon our content more than once a year. 196 00:15:12,900 --> 00:15:18,500 You know, a good cycle for minor amendments, as usually about every two years or so. 197 00:15:21,400 --> 00:15:26,120 But we do have the mandate to the five year of the ten year time. 198 00:15:26,120 --> 00:15:44,080 What I wanted to show you was that we have this content process, it's a two-step process, and the flow truck, though, we added some flow trucks to this section, because people had so many questions to fuse about the process. 199 00:15:44,420 --> 00:15:52,940 You know, it's written out in the code. It's a lot easier for some people to look at a flow truck than it is to read, you know, having a bureaucratic code. 200 00:15:53,660 --> 00:15:55,800 So we wanted to try and make that easier. 201 00:15:56,460 --> 00:15:59,420 So the first step in that process is the dotted. 202 00:16:01,400 --> 00:16:04,120 I don't know how perfect you've probably been through the dotted process, 203 00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:08,420 but we didn't do it the last couple years because we were already in the midst 204 00:16:08,420 --> 00:16:09,780 of a co-plan update. 205 00:16:10,660 --> 00:16:14,120 But the dotted is an opportunity for the public to 206 00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:19,700 formally request changes to either the codependent process, 207 00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:25,940 and we are in the process of opening up that dot get right now. 208 00:16:26,740 --> 00:16:32,580 And we've we sent it out for two months to allow for people to suggest changes. 209 00:16:33,260 --> 00:16:46,120 And then we take those changes or those requests that we analyze and consider how does it trick with a 210 00:16:46,120 --> 00:17:01,180 And then we bring us forward, we click about, we bring forward to the planning commission and you have an opportunity to review those and comment on and make recommendations whether this is something 211 00:17:01,180 --> 00:17:08,380 of a viable project or a viable request that we should do something with or maybe it's not 212 00:17:08,380 --> 00:17:16,220 something that we want to pursue at this time. And then we take that recommendation to the 213 00:17:16,220 --> 00:17:23,540 Council and then the Council holds a hearing on the document I'm going to ask. So that document 214 00:17:23,540 --> 00:17:31,280 includes the public requests, as I said, but also the city can come from staff, become from 215 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:37,500 the planning commission, and so it can include all requests for amendments. So if the council 216 00:17:37,500 --> 00:17:45,680 approves that, gocket list, this is where some people get confused. It's not approval of the request. 217 00:17:46,740 --> 00:17:52,140 It's an approval of that request to move forward as part of the complement of the process. 218 00:17:53,440 --> 00:17:58,660 So then, because of the initial review that we do, it's like, is this something we should 219 00:17:58,660 --> 00:18:00,100 do or is this not something we did? 220 00:18:00,440 --> 00:18:06,860 We don't put the amount of the energy and analysis into the bucket that we do to the 221 00:18:06,860 --> 00:18:07,200 complement. 222 00:18:08,260 --> 00:18:14,900 And so, if it gets put on the final bucket, that means all of those items are going to get 223 00:18:14,900 --> 00:18:21,220 the in-depth evaluation, analysis, and recommendations to the plan and permission. 224 00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:27,720 And then we go through that whole compound process where we do analysis, we can see if I 225 00:18:27,720 --> 00:18:33,960 reviewed a statement or a bit of policy I've reviewed on it, but I can mention the public hearing, 226 00:18:34,660 --> 00:18:40,120 make sure our recommendation and then it goes to council, council, holds the public hearing, 227 00:18:40,120 --> 00:18:41,400 and then makes a final decision. 228 00:18:42,260 --> 00:18:44,360 So that's kind of a big picture. 229 00:18:44,360 --> 00:18:52,460 That process could take several years or one of the smaller in between years, you know, 230 00:18:52,520 --> 00:18:56,560 that could take about a year to get through that whole cycle. 231 00:18:58,340 --> 00:19:00,280 You may have seen stuff at the county level. 232 00:19:00,400 --> 00:19:01,740 They take a couple years. 233 00:19:02,040 --> 00:19:04,560 They usually have really big issues on their document. 234 00:19:05,280 --> 00:19:06,800 So that could take a while. 235 00:19:08,860 --> 00:19:11,280 So that's kind of a complicated process. 236 00:19:13,520 --> 00:19:15,590 There are more questions on that. 237 00:19:18,110 --> 00:19:20,810 You're also smarter though. 238 00:19:21,890 --> 00:19:25,130 So the next one I've got is annexations. 239 00:19:26,210 --> 00:19:31,450 The planning commission may sometimes get involved with annexations and may not 240 00:19:31,450 --> 00:19:32,330 other times. 241 00:19:33,050 --> 00:19:43,410 As you may recall with the content of amendment, we adopted pre-zoning for a Rubin 242 00:19:43,410 --> 00:19:52,890 assist it with the proposed zoning in that area, don't have to go through the planning 243 00:19:52,890 --> 00:19:58,950 commission process, but if they're proposing changes to the cloud plan, maybe they're changing 244 00:19:58,950 --> 00:20:01,070 the zoning to their changing, 245 00:20:04,030 --> 00:20:08,490 the land use designation for the cloud plan, all that has to 246 00:20:08,490 --> 00:20:16,330 through that content process. And so you may see requests that are part of an annexation. 247 00:20:18,510 --> 00:20:26,160 annexation, as I mentioned, we had the state has several types of annexation, 248 00:20:26,320 --> 00:20:33,360 or code is focused mostly on the petition method. And the petition method is where you have certain 249 00:20:33,360 --> 00:20:41,420 percent of the property owners that own either 10% of the assessed value within that 250 00:20:41,420 --> 00:20:49,320 but within that expectation or 60%. So you can say the 10% or the 60% petition. So the 251 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:58,480 initial one is 10%. So you'd have to get 10% of the property owners valuation. 252 00:21:02,460 --> 00:21:03,300 That's 253 00:21:03,300 --> 00:21:06,980 those people who own 10% of the valuation. 254 00:21:10,370 --> 00:21:12,950 That's clear, because it gets a little confusing 255 00:21:12,950 --> 00:21:18,970 to the public's inputs. So that goes forward. They submit that and then that goes to the council. 256 00:21:19,430 --> 00:21:24,450 The council holds a public meeting on that and considers whether or not they wish to 257 00:21:24,450 --> 00:21:32,890 move to proceed with the annexation. annexations are always council discretion. They can 258 00:21:32,890 --> 00:21:36,430 prove it or not approve it at any point in this process. 259 00:21:38,050 --> 00:21:42,850 So after that public meeting and say they accept the petition, 260 00:21:43,510 --> 00:21:48,490 the 10% then it goes back to the developer or property 261 00:21:48,490 --> 00:21:50,450 on whoever is proposed to you. 262 00:21:50,710 --> 00:21:56,690 Then they have to get 60% of the assessed value for the signatures. 263 00:21:57,730 --> 00:22:02,970 And then it goes after that, it goes to a public hearing with the council. 264 00:22:04,110 --> 00:22:10,830 If the council accepts it at that time, they approved typically a resolution that goes. 265 00:22:12,230 --> 00:22:17,030 It's excuse me, it's a resolution of the city's intent to annex. 266 00:22:17,450 --> 00:22:19,110 And that goes to the boundary of the board. 267 00:22:20,190 --> 00:22:24,710 The boundary of the board, it's the most kind of boundary of the board, has two options. 268 00:22:24,710 --> 00:22:29,690 They look at it and say, yes, it's a success. 269 00:22:32,700 --> 00:22:40,880 And we don't need to have a hearing on it and we can send a letter to our support. Or they can decide to hold their own public hearing and go through that process. 270 00:22:41,480 --> 00:22:50,000 The last annexation we had, it was a pop-up, an idiot, one property owner was within 271 00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:56,880 the side, our urban growth area, and the boundary of the board declined to do a hearing 272 00:22:56,880 --> 00:22:59,980 and just sent us a letter saying, yes, go ahead and report. 273 00:23:01,180 --> 00:23:03,600 But it really is up to them, they give to me that decision. 274 00:23:03,600 --> 00:23:11,880 And once the boundary viewboard reviews it, it goes back to the council and then the council 275 00:23:11,880 --> 00:23:15,960 adopts an ordinance, accepting the annexation. 276 00:23:18,020 --> 00:23:23,100 So at that point, the council is not obligated to accept it, they could still deny it at 277 00:23:23,100 --> 00:23:30,980 that point, but it's quite a waste to the process, but they do have got that right. 278 00:23:32,640 --> 00:23:44,260 And then what's the ordinance adopted? Then it goes through and we have to notify the state when you set it back to the county and all of the legal boundaries of the city get changed. 279 00:23:45,480 --> 00:23:47,060 So it's quite an end up the process. 280 00:23:48,420 --> 00:23:54,240 It can take, I think the last one we did, it took a little over a year to do. 281 00:23:55,100 --> 00:23:57,000 And it was a pretty simple one. 282 00:23:57,460 --> 00:24:01,380 There's a lot of work at a finding, or at this level, 283 00:24:01,560 --> 00:24:07,540 at a state level, to try and find easier ways 284 00:24:07,540 --> 00:24:09,380 to do that annexation. 285 00:24:09,900 --> 00:24:11,960 The intent of the Gross Management Act 286 00:24:11,960 --> 00:24:15,240 is that our urban group values, the city, 287 00:24:15,440 --> 00:24:19,260 annexes up to our urban group values, not beyond the exit. 288 00:24:20,000 --> 00:24:23,140 A lot of cities are not annexing those areas. 289 00:24:24,480 --> 00:24:29,120 There's a lot of reasons for that, a lot of financial reasons for that. 290 00:24:30,200 --> 00:24:38,360 So there is some talk of the administrative level about user ways to want to make the process easier. 291 00:24:39,300 --> 00:24:43,140 And then is there a way to make it a little more financially viable? 292 00:24:44,490 --> 00:24:50,570 which was a who determines the urban growth area or what determines the urban 293 00:24:50,570 --> 00:24:56,550 areas of the city. Is that the state? Is the state say this is how far you 294 00:24:56,550 --> 00:25:07,610 can go or question. So when the growth of natural act was adopted, I think the 295 00:25:07,610 --> 00:25:12,910 First, initialist was 1990, and then there was a big fall of 2001. 296 00:25:14,450 --> 00:25:21,890 So after GMA was adopted, all the cities and counties got together and really looked 297 00:25:21,890 --> 00:25:25,810 at our boundaries and potential growth. 298 00:25:26,790 --> 00:25:29,930 So 1990, what is that 30 years ago? 299 00:25:29,930 --> 00:25:37,250 Those urban growth boundaries were set then, okay, one time, one, two, five, four. 300 00:25:37,730 --> 00:25:42,390 And what's happened is through that document process that we talked about in the top line. 301 00:25:42,670 --> 00:25:47,610 There's ways to request amendments to the urban growth boundaries. 302 00:25:48,470 --> 00:25:49,450 It's not easy. 303 00:25:50,630 --> 00:25:52,730 We have another layer of planning. 304 00:25:53,470 --> 00:25:55,590 You may recall when we were doing the top line. 305 00:25:55,590 --> 00:26:01,470 So, start with a group management app, and then it goes to a regional planning of a very 306 00:26:01,470 --> 00:26:07,450 process of transportation, and it's true that you just have a regional council, but it goes 307 00:26:07,450 --> 00:26:14,190 down to countywide, excuse me, pointing policies, and then it comes down to the city. 308 00:26:14,710 --> 00:26:20,530 So, there's a lot of regional and countywide policies that talk about when you can change 309 00:26:20,530 --> 00:26:34,190 those urban buildings and then we can't. And really is that maintaining the growth within the cities and not having, you know, a spillover into the regional, the rural areas. 310 00:26:35,450 --> 00:26:43,250 So those are, those are, an amendment requested a county level to change those urban buildings. 311 00:26:44,090 --> 00:26:52,490 So, an excitation can only be done within that urban closed area that is currently in place. 312 00:26:52,970 --> 00:26:59,750 Yeah, somebody could apply for it, but we wouldn't process it, we wouldn't recommend it, but that way to live. 313 00:27:03,360 --> 00:27:04,880 State law did change. 314 00:27:05,960 --> 00:27:12,400 Don't worry about the last year, you're going to allow for easier transfer of urban properties. 315 00:27:12,400 --> 00:27:18,960 This is a good example, we considered this this year. 316 00:27:19,840 --> 00:27:26,280 Our northern urban growth boundary, where shank is, when it goes down to pioneer highway. 317 00:27:27,020 --> 00:27:32,860 It's really difficult for us to get sewer out there, because of topography to inflow. 318 00:27:35,100 --> 00:27:40,420 So, maybe we should submit a request to change that urban growth boundary, 319 00:27:40,420 --> 00:27:46,820 and push it over to the east where it's easier. So, yeah, we got 64 of them, you know, 320 00:27:47,420 --> 00:27:55,580 but 32 and I'll let that make sense to do that. We decided not to do that this year, 321 00:27:55,740 --> 00:28:01,100 maybe something that the city might want to consider either of the five year update of the 10 year. 322 00:28:02,280 --> 00:28:05,600 But the state allowed for equal transfer. 323 00:28:07,040 --> 00:28:12,560 right yeah so there's some little bit of flexibility that's coming to 324 00:28:12,560 --> 00:28:22,040 some of the state laws I don't I don't expect that they will allow for expansion 325 00:28:22,040 --> 00:28:33,060 of UGA's in this next cycle. The push at the state level has been up, not out. 326 00:28:33,060 --> 00:28:40,380 Yeah. And you see that a lot with the last conference update that they really were pushing 327 00:28:41,960 --> 00:28:46,140 population in our transportation corridors. You know, we're putting a lot of money into 328 00:28:47,220 --> 00:28:53,060 rapid transit the sounder and all of that. So that's what it really pushed a lot of the 329 00:28:53,060 --> 00:28:53,900 world. 330 00:28:59,660 --> 00:29:04,240 I do want to note that I just want to make it clear that this, 331 00:29:07,560 --> 00:29:08,480 well, chart has 332 00:29:08,480 --> 00:29:15,780 a couple of years ago, because it's so 60% of the property owners. It means 360% of the 333 00:29:15,780 --> 00:29:21,700 system value. So Mickey and her office is making some changes to their settings and how 334 00:29:21,700 --> 00:29:28,800 quite yet. So what I was telling you about the evaluation and what's on the chart for 335 00:29:28,800 --> 00:29:29,260 the different. 336 00:29:36,260 --> 00:29:44,280 So now the next couple are the type 4 council improvements. The 337 00:29:44,280 --> 00:29:49,620 first one we've got for you is the site specific results. And let's have the 338 00:29:49,620 --> 00:29:55,120 intensity to confuse the public. There are two types of results. There's a 339 00:29:55,120 --> 00:29:59,920 It feels like it's hot in the middle. That's where if you are somebody 340 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:13,300 Passing for change in ZOMA and co-authentic dimension of a piece of property. So it goes with a co-planet amendment, for an example. 341 00:30:13,840 --> 00:30:24,480 Somebody has a commercial piece of property, and she said it. I'm just making this happen. And they want that to be changed to residential. 342 00:30:25,620 --> 00:30:32,480 That's the compliment because you're changing the land use designation from one being put another thing. 343 00:30:33,500 --> 00:30:47,240 A site specific reason and why this is that it falls into a more of the permanent level process is if you're requesting a reason that is consistent with the compliment. 344 00:30:48,380 --> 00:30:55,060 So, I just took a snippet out of the comp plan, some of this graphic, thank you, read it. 345 00:30:55,280 --> 00:31:02,120 So, we have load and see residential, we have medium-down see residential, and you can see this two different zoning. 346 00:31:02,240 --> 00:31:07,180 So, let's just take the type one, the load and see residential. There's two zoning districts in there. 347 00:31:07,180 --> 00:31:11,260 We have it both forms of homo and a nine six-cell. 348 00:31:12,300 --> 00:31:19,540 So a scientific reason would be if somebody had a 12-folder zone property and they wanted to 349 00:31:19,540 --> 00:31:21,680 resort to a nine six. 350 00:31:22,860 --> 00:31:31,580 That doesn't require a change in the context of this patient in the same, but they're changing the zoning designation. 351 00:31:31,580 --> 00:31:36,450 Now there's so lot of different rules that you can't do, you know, 352 00:31:36,700 --> 00:31:40,040 reasons and isolation of each other and all that type of stuff. 353 00:31:40,660 --> 00:31:46,200 But that really is the difference between site-specific and content. 354 00:31:48,750 --> 00:31:55,350 This used to be more common prior to the growth management at when I first started planning. 355 00:31:55,750 --> 00:31:56,610 I don't know about Chris. 356 00:31:56,610 --> 00:32:07,030 Our content, our live content, the math was totally different than our own math, where I worked. 357 00:32:07,850 --> 00:32:11,310 There was no consistency between that. 358 00:32:12,430 --> 00:32:17,130 So, so those type of reasons happen a little bit more often. 359 00:32:17,770 --> 00:32:22,030 Now, with the graph management act that say they have to be consistent with each other, 360 00:32:24,430 --> 00:32:24,870 more rare. 361 00:32:24,870 --> 00:32:31,250 I don't, I don't think that process decides to submit the result in 15 years. 362 00:32:32,330 --> 00:32:33,530 I think it's going to quite well. 363 00:32:37,060 --> 00:32:39,080 So that is a permanent process. 364 00:32:40,340 --> 00:32:45,560 It goes, that process would go through a planning commission review and recommendation, 365 00:32:46,140 --> 00:32:49,160 and then with the Council final action on that. 366 00:32:49,160 --> 00:32:51,360 So that's why it's a type for it. 367 00:32:51,480 --> 00:32:56,160 Again, anything that changes your comp plan for your zoning, anything like that is always 368 00:32:56,160 --> 00:32:59,320 to go to the council at the end of the day. 369 00:33:00,800 --> 00:33:03,020 And then the next one is a development agreement. 370 00:33:05,820 --> 00:33:12,540 A development agreement is really focused on one particular project. 371 00:33:12,880 --> 00:33:16,980 Maybe multiple lots, but it's a project that's being done by the developer. 372 00:33:17,560 --> 00:33:22,380 And it is a creation of a contract between that developer and the city. 373 00:33:22,600 --> 00:33:27,180 We're signing this agreement, says this is what you're going to be allowed to do on this property. 374 00:33:27,180 --> 00:33:33,460 This is how you're going to develop that property, and this is how long this agreement is going to last. 375 00:33:33,900 --> 00:33:34,880 It gets recorded. 376 00:33:36,980 --> 00:33:39,840 It goes through the planning and it goes to the council. 377 00:33:40,700 --> 00:33:42,620 And then it gets recorded and it gets the property. 378 00:33:43,220 --> 00:33:46,100 So it doesn't go with the developer, it goes with the land. 379 00:33:46,720 --> 00:33:55,520 So the developer comes in and they want to do, you know, ABC development, each and they sell it. 380 00:33:55,520 --> 00:34:02,180 that contract goes with it. You may have heard it on news, there was a bunch of stuff about 381 00:34:02,180 --> 00:34:08,550 city of Clellum. They had a developmental degree in it. It was, well, I think they signed it for 382 00:34:09,720 --> 00:34:17,010 20 years. It was a long time and it was previous councils then a bit signed it. 383 00:34:18,920 --> 00:34:24,180 And then the developer, a new developer came in and wanted to pick up that developmental 384 00:34:24,180 --> 00:34:30,060 event and the city clearly all didn't want that anymore. And the court in the event of 385 00:34:30,060 --> 00:34:33,760 going to court and the court said, you signed this contract, this is a really, really 386 00:34:33,760 --> 00:34:44,380 binding to the contract, and you have to audit it. So cities that give a little more cautious about 387 00:34:44,380 --> 00:34:50,340 signing some of these agreements. And if they are doing that, we're just talking with my 388 00:34:50,340 --> 00:34:54,220 finder, it appears, they're talking about maybe keeping those data 389 00:34:54,220 --> 00:34:56,080 in the round of about the open print. 390 00:34:57,700 --> 00:35:01,280 So there's advantages to both sides. 391 00:35:02,220 --> 00:35:04,140 You hear from developers all the time that they 392 00:35:05,680 --> 00:35:09,680 want predictability and they want certainty. 393 00:35:10,200 --> 00:35:11,860 Developing agreements do that. 394 00:35:12,020 --> 00:35:16,620 It allows for a phased project or a product or phased 395 00:35:16,620 --> 00:35:24,700 over multiple years. It provides some certainty for a development that they come in and 396 00:35:24,700 --> 00:35:28,860 they start a project, but it might take, you know, three or four years to go through it 397 00:35:28,860 --> 00:35:31,660 at five years to go through it. He gives them that certainty. 398 00:35:32,940 --> 00:35:38,220 So the sensitivity is just benefits because we can ask for, it's a negotiation, that's a contract. 399 00:35:38,340 --> 00:35:43,860 We can ask for different things. We may ask for, you know, better. 400 00:35:43,860 --> 00:35:48,980 And only standards, I shouldn't say that. 401 00:35:49,340 --> 00:35:52,220 Architectural standards, or more open space, 402 00:35:53,000 --> 00:35:56,920 fluctuation of uses, you know, as long as they're allowed to be mental. 403 00:35:58,180 --> 00:36:03,220 So there's benefits to both sides, but it also needs to be just very carefully considered. 404 00:36:05,300 --> 00:36:09,000 Because once that document is signed, it's binding. 405 00:36:13,890 --> 00:36:17,030 And that's another reason why it's a kind of forward, because it's a contract. 406 00:36:17,030 --> 00:36:22,950 and so Council are the only ones that can bind the city to the decision. 407 00:36:26,580 --> 00:36:30,860 Okay, so that gets me through the sections of the phone. 408 00:36:31,220 --> 00:36:35,000 There are some other sections that I didn't have in the presentation. 409 00:36:35,760 --> 00:36:38,160 There's a test to do with cleaning up definitions, 410 00:36:38,900 --> 00:36:41,260 moving up the nations around and up the type of things. 411 00:36:42,340 --> 00:36:45,240 So we have two options with this one. 412 00:36:45,240 --> 00:36:49,220 I mean, we didn't, we didn't, we didn't, we didn't want to be fun. 413 00:36:49,640 --> 00:36:52,820 And I think, you know, as, you know, the introduction. 414 00:36:53,480 --> 00:36:56,140 But as I mentioned before, it's a very precise role. 415 00:36:56,680 --> 00:36:59,720 It's a heavily-related role, a regulated role. 416 00:37:00,220 --> 00:37:00,940 Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. 417 00:37:00,940 --> 00:37:03,460 The RCW is on, but in the back. 418 00:37:03,860 --> 00:37:05,580 So, you know, we've got the revised codes, 419 00:37:05,720 --> 00:37:06,760 Washington, and Washington, and Washington. 420 00:37:06,760 --> 00:37:09,040 It's state last on how we used to be fun. 421 00:37:09,620 --> 00:37:13,380 So, we have an option, option one. 422 00:37:13,380 --> 00:37:23,560 So as we can bring it back again for a second reading for a new option too, we can bring it back for another reading but also for the public hearing of the same time. 423 00:37:25,960 --> 00:37:26,580 So what's that? 424 00:37:26,580 --> 00:37:29,960 I'm going to open it up to the additional questions. 425 00:37:30,000 --> 00:37:35,100 General circumstances, or thoughts on how you'd like to proceed. 426 00:37:36,940 --> 00:37:42,160 Let's go. The commissioner. So there's any questions about the federal material? 427 00:37:46,710 --> 00:37:47,510 No problems. 428 00:37:49,210 --> 00:37:56,270 Do you have details on what specific is changing as on your third slide that briefly covers it? 429 00:37:56,870 --> 00:38:04,490 But pretty much what you were covering is to give us a better understanding of each one of the 430 00:38:04,490 --> 00:38:06,770 effects. So, 431 00:38:12,780 --> 00:38:15,700 this we are deleting old codes and writing 432 00:38:15,700 --> 00:38:20,960 only once and we're rewriting everything so that it is reader friendly. 433 00:38:21,660 --> 00:38:28,300 It's not a lot of, it's a kind of text-free changes, it's more of its procedural, 434 00:38:28,500 --> 00:38:34,380 making sure that it was closed correctly in that pedestal. So, I'm happy to provide 435 00:38:34,380 --> 00:38:46,740 more detail on that next time, but I also have what you'll see in the, so if you go to 436 00:38:46,740 --> 00:38:49,900 exhibit a pinch 21, the same way, but 437 00:38:52,780 --> 00:38:56,860 we have two highlighters that we use on these code 438 00:38:56,860 --> 00:39:07,100 limits. One has kind of a yellow highlighter that brings out significant issues and then the 439 00:39:07,100 --> 00:39:17,240 So we don't have any yellow highlighters in these ones because it's mostly procedural and it has to do with 440 00:39:17,240 --> 00:39:23,980 What section of code did we move it from or what are we doing or if it was consistent with 441 00:39:24,740 --> 00:39:35,280 You know other procedures just looking at page 27 of 75 under the docket and it says those consolidates to make a proposal and that good 442 00:39:36,380 --> 00:39:39,940 So the section that was also rewritten in the clarity. 443 00:39:40,840 --> 00:39:43,560 So there's not a lot of significant changes. 444 00:39:43,900 --> 00:39:48,280 There's more making the code clear, 445 00:39:50,160 --> 00:39:52,980 dividing out some of the conflicting sections. 446 00:39:54,080 --> 00:39:55,180 So if you take a look at that, 447 00:39:57,740 --> 00:40:02,940 that's we purposely didn't do the track changes on use codes 448 00:40:02,940 --> 00:40:07,600 because it would have been a nightmare, but it would have been changed. 449 00:40:08,840 --> 00:40:16,940 But like in the, if you go to the parking code, 450 00:40:18,620 --> 00:40:20,920 just give me a hand, just show me the difference. 451 00:40:22,280 --> 00:40:27,400 We have quite a few proposed changes, and there's some yellow highlighters in here. 452 00:40:27,960 --> 00:40:32,460 Those are yellow highlighters, are policy issues that we need to work through. 453 00:40:40,040 --> 00:40:40,060 Yeah. 454 00:40:40,180 --> 00:40:45,380 Let's take my comment to be heard by if we move forward through a public hearing, would your 455 00:40:45,380 --> 00:40:46,960 presentation be similar? 456 00:40:48,100 --> 00:40:51,160 Because I'm always concerned, what's the public going to see with this? 457 00:40:51,320 --> 00:40:54,160 Like, are you telling me a whole bunch of policy change? 458 00:40:54,440 --> 00:40:56,280 What do you want me to get out of it? 459 00:40:56,560 --> 00:40:59,660 And I know you discussed the process, right? 460 00:41:00,140 --> 00:41:01,180 We're changing the process. 461 00:41:01,500 --> 00:41:01,660 Yeah. 462 00:41:01,780 --> 00:41:04,820 So I do like how the slides are set up to show the process. 463 00:41:04,820 --> 00:41:13,270 I don't know if I'm kind of stuck on what we would get from a public to say that works and that doesn't work or it's just like 464 00:41:13,270 --> 00:41:14,670 Do's overdoing 465 00:41:16,330 --> 00:41:17,870 That's kind of a 466 00:41:17,870 --> 00:41:19,870 We'll kind of deep back 467 00:41:19,870 --> 00:41:21,730 We'll walk from the 468 00:41:21,730 --> 00:41:23,490 Public right over here 469 00:41:26,120 --> 00:41:33,460 So the process is laid out pretty much by state law that we have to do and most time we've been making that in a reader for me 470 00:41:34,860 --> 00:41:35,380 so 471 00:41:36,620 --> 00:41:44,440 One, we have to hold a public hearing because it's a change to the municipal code that is part of the year by development curve. 472 00:41:45,220 --> 00:41:49,440 Two, I would be looking for some of these processes that don't make sense. 473 00:41:49,940 --> 00:41:51,040 It's not clear. 474 00:41:53,460 --> 00:42:00,760 There's some changes that should be added to the steps of the amendment process. 475 00:42:02,260 --> 00:42:17,240 So I'd be looking for those type of, we can't change the general practice of how do we do it in a minute, but we could certainly add additional detail if it's not clear. 476 00:42:18,960 --> 00:42:26,480 We came reword the criteria if that's not clear enough in terms of what you review it is. 477 00:42:29,300 --> 00:42:32,440 Sometimes, when we have this language about, 478 00:42:33,240 --> 00:42:34,560 it has to be, you know, 479 00:42:34,700 --> 00:42:37,020 that's to protect what I help well for and say things. 480 00:42:37,340 --> 00:42:38,900 I'm just showing that as an example. 481 00:42:39,700 --> 00:42:44,340 You know, maybe there's some desire to expand on that. 482 00:42:44,340 --> 00:42:45,380 What does that mean? 483 00:42:46,480 --> 00:42:49,300 You know, does that help? 484 00:42:49,800 --> 00:42:51,480 The process is going to stay the same. 485 00:42:52,120 --> 00:42:52,660 It's just happening. 486 00:42:52,660 --> 00:42:54,300 I think that's the process. 487 00:42:54,300 --> 00:43:00,200 The process is nothing like what changed from how we currently do things to what we're 488 00:43:00,200 --> 00:43:04,460 proposing for the change because the only change it's really obvious is like we're going 489 00:43:04,460 --> 00:43:10,360 from 17 with 18, that's just the big change, but the process itself has not changed. 490 00:43:12,300 --> 00:43:19,820 It's clearly a language, I guess one of the most significant changes, like I said was putting 491 00:43:19,820 --> 00:43:22,000 the each one of these in their own section. 492 00:43:25,660 --> 00:43:29,780 Separating out the codependent process from the 493 00:43:31,140 --> 00:43:32,060 resoul process. 494 00:43:35,360 --> 00:43:36,600 Is it all mixed sense? 495 00:43:37,060 --> 00:43:37,300 You know what I'm saying? 496 00:43:37,960 --> 00:43:39,600 I like how you have it laid out. 497 00:43:39,840 --> 00:43:42,040 I'm just looking for what would change. 498 00:43:42,640 --> 00:43:43,280 That's not the change. 499 00:43:43,400 --> 00:43:46,620 I think that's where, like, an explanation of front or something, 500 00:43:47,020 --> 00:43:49,180 that didn't really change except when from 1718, 501 00:43:49,400 --> 00:43:51,540 I'm going to go through things that like this. 502 00:43:51,540 --> 00:43:53,120 And here's not a book. 503 00:44:01,690 --> 00:44:04,150 I provide more detail for you on that. 504 00:44:07,300 --> 00:44:08,580 I guess you're looking for our option. 505 00:44:08,760 --> 00:44:09,380 We're going to go. 506 00:44:09,560 --> 00:44:12,800 Yeah, I'm happy if you want to have a greater discussion 507 00:44:12,800 --> 00:44:14,460 about that next time. 508 00:44:14,960 --> 00:44:16,040 We can do that. 509 00:44:17,060 --> 00:44:18,820 Or we could do that with a public hearing. 510 00:44:19,000 --> 00:44:20,580 And so to you, how you want to proceed? 511 00:44:23,560 --> 00:44:25,220 I would probably go with the public hearing 512 00:44:25,220 --> 00:44:27,080 but I'll let everybody else. 513 00:44:27,680 --> 00:44:29,060 I feel the same way. 514 00:44:29,500 --> 00:44:31,440 I think we could do it at the same time. 515 00:44:33,260 --> 00:44:37,440 I don't think we'll get a whole lot more out of re-reviewing this. 516 00:44:39,080 --> 00:44:42,060 We probably more of the same, but I think we go into public hearing. 517 00:44:43,000 --> 00:44:45,820 Then we sell our opportunity to ask questions if we have... 518 00:44:45,820 --> 00:44:46,360 Of course. 519 00:44:46,880 --> 00:44:56,720 And you have to always have the option to continue that public hearing as well. 520 00:44:57,100 --> 00:44:57,220 Right? 521 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:06,060 You know, as much time as you need to review it and be comfortable with it. 522 00:45:07,040 --> 00:45:26,080 And I think public hearing would be good, but as Patrick was saying, I agree that to try to get more detail on what change, because most of the criteria is just saying that it's some vastly rewritten, but we can't see what the differences and what the benefits are. 523 00:45:27,000 --> 00:45:30,580 is what I was kind of looking for. 524 00:45:43,800 --> 00:45:45,400 I also don't want to slow down the process either. 525 00:45:45,580 --> 00:45:49,260 So I think it's going to go to public areas. Just keep it moving forward. 526 00:45:51,140 --> 00:45:51,480 There we go. 527 00:45:53,800 --> 00:45:54,080 Okay. 528 00:45:54,520 --> 00:45:58,260 So we're going to go ahead and move forward with the public hearing. 529 00:45:58,460 --> 00:46:00,320 You'd like more detail on what changes. 530 00:46:00,780 --> 00:46:05,640 And then I just heard about what is the benefits of the changes. 531 00:46:07,540 --> 00:46:12,440 So, that's what I'll put together for you in the next video just. 532 00:46:12,860 --> 00:46:13,760 Pretty good. 533 00:46:14,120 --> 00:46:15,060 That worked for you. 534 00:46:16,780 --> 00:46:16,980 Okay. 535 00:46:28,240 --> 00:46:31,100 So that wrapped up that one, and next we'll go into the $40 minute. 536 00:46:40,780 --> 00:46:42,640 Parking because it's a little more complicated. 537 00:46:43,340 --> 00:46:44,140 That's okay. 538 00:46:48,080 --> 00:46:53,060 So in general, the parking contaminants were pulling that same format. 539 00:46:55,980 --> 00:46:59,800 We're following the same guidance that we have had before. 540 00:47:01,060 --> 00:47:05,440 It's not this entire municipal code process of simplifying the language, 541 00:47:05,920 --> 00:47:10,400 the legalizing language, maybe a reader friendly. 542 00:47:12,880 --> 00:47:17,060 One of the goals that we need to look at with the preppy code is, 543 00:47:17,960 --> 00:47:19,540 you have to find the balance. 544 00:47:20,260 --> 00:47:30,340 And this, this is where it gets probably a little trickier between, we have a left parking over parking under parking. 545 00:47:30,500 --> 00:47:36,580 We're trying to find that sweet spot in the parking regulations based on different uses. 546 00:47:36,580 --> 00:47:46,680 So, this code really talks about the parking stall standards, was a dimensional required 547 00:47:46,680 --> 00:47:55,760 of parking lot development standards, as well as the number of stalls per use. 548 00:47:57,500 --> 00:48:01,940 One of the things that we are looking at there is many landscape links in the live 549 00:48:01,940 --> 00:48:08,960 protection, so that all the landscaping of one section and you don't have landscaping 550 00:48:08,960 --> 00:48:09,960 in the parking. 551 00:48:12,780 --> 00:48:15,600 So we are looking at that. 552 00:48:18,910 --> 00:48:23,170 One of our goals, as I mentioned, is to simplify 553 00:48:23,170 --> 00:48:28,750 the code as much as possible, and so parking itself. So in the legislative code, we added 554 00:48:28,750 --> 00:48:33,830 flow of trust to help people understand the process, here we've been trying to add some tables. 555 00:48:33,830 --> 00:48:38,830 to help can elicit the general damage, 556 00:48:39,470 --> 00:48:39,890 not different, 557 00:48:41,970 --> 00:48:43,590 but the dimension standards. 558 00:48:44,950 --> 00:48:47,610 So what you have here is we added a table, 559 00:48:48,730 --> 00:48:49,990 and let me see if I can, 560 00:48:50,250 --> 00:48:54,230 that's going to be in your packet, 561 00:48:54,430 --> 00:48:56,170 the summary, it's on page 49, 562 00:48:58,490 --> 00:49:00,250 but for any of you who are quoted, 563 00:49:00,250 --> 00:49:03,250 So it's on page 60 of 75. 564 00:49:06,870 --> 00:49:10,770 In the parking code, you are seeing some trap changes in some comments 565 00:49:10,770 --> 00:49:13,770 because we had it reviewed by our senior attorney. 566 00:49:14,010 --> 00:49:16,390 And I think Chris, we have some comments in for the question. 567 00:49:17,730 --> 00:49:21,490 So you can see that this one requires kind of a more 568 00:49:22,350 --> 00:49:27,350 unconcidivation before we proceed to adhering on this one. 569 00:49:28,950 --> 00:49:32,130 But the dimensional standards, we're trying to consolidate 570 00:49:32,130 --> 00:49:38,250 into one spot. So it has our regular parking standards. As a residential standards and it has 571 00:49:38,250 --> 00:49:45,610 our non-residential standards. One of the things that we made some small minor changes to when 572 00:49:45,610 --> 00:49:50,510 we were doing the missing metal housing, you might remember there was a state lot of change that said 573 00:49:50,510 --> 00:50:01,230 you couldn't, that the parking still had to be 8 by 18 where our code was 8 to help by 18. So we had 574 00:50:01,230 --> 00:50:07,010 of a parking column. And then we also added in the accessible parking 575 00:50:07,010 --> 00:50:12,870 and state numbers. I don't think that's right now in our code and stuff 576 00:50:12,870 --> 00:50:20,830 that we are crushingly talking to people about. So those are a couple of new items 577 00:50:20,830 --> 00:50:22,930 that we added to the eventual standards. 578 00:50:25,940 --> 00:50:28,860 They review our parking amendment. 579 00:50:31,100 --> 00:50:31,620 There's some things 580 00:50:31,620 --> 00:50:40,140 So it happened pretty regularly in the city in our planning department when projects come through. 581 00:50:40,620 --> 00:50:46,600 There's a section that comes in and allows for developers to ask for deviations or reductions. 582 00:50:47,120 --> 00:50:56,000 And we get this pretty, it's a pretty common request when we have an immediate and large size projects. 583 00:50:57,080 --> 00:50:59,460 And they asked to reduce the amount of parking. 584 00:51:00,380 --> 00:51:01,940 And we have two ways to do that. 585 00:51:02,160 --> 00:51:03,920 We can have them do a parking step, 586 00:51:05,260 --> 00:51:10,000 based on their particular use and 587 00:51:10,760 --> 00:51:11,940 projection of parking, 588 00:51:12,340 --> 00:51:13,680 projection of traffic. 589 00:51:15,180 --> 00:51:18,120 And we also have the ability to reduce 590 00:51:18,120 --> 00:51:24,040 the parking stop by the Institute of 591 00:51:24,040 --> 00:51:33,360 traffic engineers. We always just call it the ITE manual. And that's a really big manual. It has a 592 00:51:33,360 --> 00:51:40,220 summary of all these different uses. And I don't have like shopping malls, and then they 593 00:51:40,220 --> 00:51:45,380 could have minor shopping malls. I mean, it's a big box, a big book. Now, it has all these different 594 00:51:45,380 --> 00:51:52,600 uses that you could take down. And kind of nationalized standard number of installs or trips, 595 00:51:52,600 --> 00:51:56,160 legal trips that are generated by these type of uses. 596 00:51:58,690 --> 00:52:03,250 What we have found over the years is that our parking count 597 00:52:03,250 --> 00:52:08,730 is almost always higher than the ITE manual. 598 00:52:09,430 --> 00:52:13,590 And so we see reductions happen in quite a bit from that. 599 00:52:15,320 --> 00:52:18,400 So if the approach is that we're doing these reductions, 600 00:52:19,500 --> 00:52:22,140 then maybe we should be looking at our parking standards 601 00:52:22,140 --> 00:52:26,060 and see if they are too high and should be adjust those. 602 00:52:26,920 --> 00:52:29,980 So that's one of the items that we gave to the... 603 00:52:30,000 --> 00:52:39,740 It's on us for us to look at the parking, our parking stand and the relationship to the ITE manual to see where we fit. 604 00:52:41,040 --> 00:52:51,120 And that's that whole discussion at the very beginning of, like, how do we find the balance between what our codes are, what the ITE manuals are, you know. 605 00:52:51,860 --> 00:52:55,100 We don't want to over park the site, but we don't want to under park it either. 606 00:52:56,480 --> 00:53:03,380 So, do you have data on deviations then? Because if you say the contractors are given the deviations, 607 00:53:03,980 --> 00:53:08,260 they're actually asking for how those deviations would affect. 608 00:53:10,480 --> 00:53:13,240 Are they asking for like bigger spaces, smaller spaces? 609 00:53:13,280 --> 00:53:15,340 Smaller? Always smaller. Always smaller. 610 00:53:16,080 --> 00:53:16,180 Yeah. 611 00:53:16,180 --> 00:53:17,340 So they could fit more in. 612 00:53:17,540 --> 00:53:18,040 Yeah. 613 00:53:19,120 --> 00:53:25,020 I can put together a kind of summary of the deviations over the last five years of the next week. 614 00:53:25,020 --> 00:53:27,080 I think that'd be a great data point. 615 00:53:27,260 --> 00:53:35,120 But we've got to know what everybody's asking for versus what we're saying, the restrictions are. 616 00:53:35,340 --> 00:53:37,320 Okay. Yeah, that's a lot of time. 617 00:53:37,780 --> 00:53:39,220 That's an easy one. 618 00:53:39,260 --> 00:53:40,900 I want to be as well. 619 00:53:48,000 --> 00:53:50,220 The packet, there's a table. 620 00:53:51,580 --> 00:53:52,860 It's quite a big table. 621 00:53:54,720 --> 00:53:56,720 And that table has the uses. 622 00:53:57,820 --> 00:53:59,960 It has what the existing code is. 623 00:53:59,960 --> 00:54:05,340 has what the proposed code is and what the differences. 624 00:54:08,380 --> 00:54:11,740 So if you look at page 51 of 75, 625 00:54:12,940 --> 00:54:14,660 this looks like this building. 626 00:54:16,360 --> 00:54:19,180 And so that goes for real. 627 00:54:20,000 --> 00:54:21,060 All of the changes. 628 00:54:23,200 --> 00:54:25,540 And some of them are new uses. 629 00:54:26,220 --> 00:54:27,260 Some of them are changed. 630 00:54:27,800 --> 00:54:28,980 Some of them were deleted. 631 00:54:28,980 --> 00:54:39,500 deleted from the headband changed, but this is really kind of the bulk of what the changes are in a parking. 632 00:54:41,560 --> 00:54:42,120 So 633 00:54:44,580 --> 00:54:47,740 is that the actual table that you sent in? 634 00:54:48,180 --> 00:54:49,300 Yeah, okay. 635 00:54:50,360 --> 00:54:51,480 So we shouldn't look through this. 636 00:54:52,160 --> 00:54:59,440 We could go through this a little bit more or you can take the next month and really kind of do a deep dive into it. 637 00:55:00,740 --> 00:55:05,780 I think this is one part of the book about discussions in my life. 638 00:55:08,260 --> 00:55:14,840 In terms of the code amendment itself, there are some new sections or amended sections that we have. 639 00:55:15,440 --> 00:55:18,720 We added a section on our, or excuse me, electric vehicles. 640 00:55:19,020 --> 00:55:20,840 We didn't have that in a code before. 641 00:55:22,840 --> 00:55:26,820 That's obviously a new technology since the last time the code is updated. 642 00:55:26,820 --> 00:55:35,300 So there's information in there in terms of it's allowed as a one to one. 643 00:55:35,760 --> 00:55:42,660 So if you're required to have 10 parking spaces and you put two of those as electric vehicles is still only 10 spaces. 644 00:55:43,440 --> 00:55:44,880 So it's inclusive of those. 645 00:55:45,760 --> 00:55:48,520 There's three different levels for electric vehicles. 646 00:55:49,060 --> 00:55:50,740 There's level one through three. 647 00:55:51,040 --> 00:55:55,120 And basically is following how fast those vehicles charge. 648 00:55:55,120 --> 00:56:06,900 So level 1 is a slow level 2 is a medium and level 3 is a really fast charging, but there's some restrictions on where the fast charging can go. 649 00:56:06,900 --> 00:56:11,460 This was an interesting thing. I didn't know anything about this until it was two years 650 00:56:11,460 --> 00:56:20,300 night. Some of those fast chargers over heap, I guess, and can cost fires if we didn't 651 00:56:20,300 --> 00:56:27,360 can find space. So that's why there's only allowed in open parking lots and not in the ground 652 00:56:27,360 --> 00:56:35,100 facility. So there's a whole section on that. There's a new section on temporary parking. 653 00:56:35,100 --> 00:56:42,340 This is some things, this is a section that we added specifically because of the issues 654 00:56:42,340 --> 00:56:48,180 that were experienced over the last few years with special events, some of our parks 655 00:56:48,180 --> 00:56:49,600 and it will overflow parking. 656 00:56:50,780 --> 00:57:01,440 So we want to provide some flexibility to allow temporary parking or early to find events. 657 00:57:01,440 --> 00:57:12,800 It's a special event, whether it's to be a private event, to be a intelligent event, as well as some of our parks. 658 00:57:13,500 --> 00:57:21,660 You have been to Heritage Park when some of the games have been over, and there's like parking everywhere. 659 00:57:21,660 --> 00:57:28,900 You know, along levers around on the fields itself, it gets a little crazy, so we want 660 00:57:28,900 --> 00:57:31,620 to be able to allow some flexibility there. 661 00:57:33,740 --> 00:57:43,480 And then the down-to-how mixed use districts has had working requirements and other sections 662 00:57:43,480 --> 00:57:49,280 of the codes, so we're just going to consolidate all of the parts into that one particular place. 663 00:57:49,280 --> 00:57:52,120 We didn't make any changes, major changes to that, 664 00:57:52,720 --> 00:57:56,440 but we did pull it over from different parts of the code. 665 00:57:59,630 --> 00:58:03,470 There are some existing sections of the code 666 00:58:03,470 --> 00:58:06,990 that I would really like to highlight for you. 667 00:58:07,090 --> 00:58:09,530 So you know that we didn't get rid of these. 668 00:58:12,350 --> 00:58:14,810 So there's an upstream parking requirements 669 00:58:14,810 --> 00:58:18,750 in terms of how far away the parking styles 670 00:58:18,750 --> 00:58:25,710 have to be from the use, or that's into the code that's existing, I think it can't 671 00:58:25,710 --> 00:58:30,810 be any more than five hundred feet from the original use, and so a lot of these were just 672 00:58:30,810 --> 00:58:36,090 reworked into the flying language. We have joint use and shared property ingredients. 673 00:58:38,470 --> 00:58:38,970 So that 674 00:58:38,970 --> 00:58:46,930 could be where you have mixed use projects or really a good example of this, where you have maybe 675 00:58:46,930 --> 00:58:54,350 have a date-time use, even use, and instead of having both a date-time and even, which 676 00:58:54,350 --> 00:59:00,190 you could like double your parking requirements, it allows you to be sure parking. 677 00:59:03,650 --> 00:59:11,590 We have, we still have a parking administration, administrative parking on that, but even though 678 00:59:11,590 --> 00:59:23,690 We are looking at ITE Danielas head of the base for a parking and maybe times when administrative amendments might be necessary through a parking study. 679 00:59:24,450 --> 00:59:35,550 We also several years ago adopted an inception to allow for preservation of critical areas or trees. 680 00:59:35,550 --> 00:59:46,050 And so we're pulling, we're keeping that section, and then just standard loading areas and vehicle access. 681 00:59:47,690 --> 00:59:52,490 We just included that in the code again, just cleaned up the way we entered it. 682 00:59:55,340 --> 00:59:58,400 So that's kind of a summary of the ordinance itself. 683 00:59:58,880 --> 00:59:59,980 I'm truly excited. 684 01:00:00,000 --> 01:00:17,540 You guys should probably get into the details of that big table. So, it's up to you. If you want to take this home as far as working, and you guys do pretty good at that, if you want to get into the details of that table, let's say thing. 685 01:00:18,600 --> 01:00:31,850 I would recommend that we continue into October as part of these work sessions style and I don't think I just don't think we're ready to hold a public hearing on this yet. 686 01:00:36,840 --> 01:00:41,400 I'm happy to follow your answer's recommendations if you like the public comments. 687 01:00:42,020 --> 01:00:47,420 First, to consider that it's probably your deliberations if you do that as well. 688 01:00:47,420 --> 01:00:52,420 I know we did that a couple times with some of the email, let's say. 689 01:00:55,380 --> 01:00:56,660 Oh, Patricia heard that. 690 01:00:56,760 --> 01:00:57,780 I'd like to have questions. 691 01:00:58,280 --> 01:00:59,520 I'd like to have questions. 692 01:00:59,880 --> 01:01:00,760 I'd like to go around. 693 01:01:01,220 --> 01:01:02,060 I'd like to have questions. 694 01:01:02,060 --> 01:01:03,120 I'd like to have questions. 695 01:01:03,980 --> 01:01:04,160 I'd like to have questions. 696 01:01:04,900 --> 01:01:04,980 Yep. 697 01:01:05,880 --> 01:01:06,960 So Patricia, 698 01:01:10,440 --> 01:01:16,680 with ITE, is there anything that is specific to Stample? 699 01:01:16,680 --> 01:01:23,060 has there been any parking studies, anything outside of ITE that's specific to Stanley? 700 01:01:23,960 --> 01:01:35,620 The ITE is not jurisdictional, it is, it may look at all these different projects 701 01:01:35,620 --> 01:01:40,400 or whatever, it will come up with these kind of natural standards, 702 01:01:42,560 --> 01:01:47,840 we have some specific projects 703 01:01:47,840 --> 01:01:52,640 So parking studies that I could hold data from that. 704 01:01:53,060 --> 01:01:57,120 And as I, after Andre sent this out, 705 01:01:57,320 --> 01:01:59,060 I just heard drive and walk. 706 01:02:00,040 --> 01:02:03,380 And there's a big difference between personal and residential. 707 01:02:04,060 --> 01:02:06,300 And I think on the residential side, 708 01:02:07,080 --> 01:02:15,340 I honestly feel that we are under requiring parking 709 01:02:15,340 --> 01:02:22,620 because of how many cars are to drive ways, how much street parking is being used, and that is in 710 01:02:22,620 --> 01:02:29,040 every residential neighborhood. And as I was looking through the table, I'm seeing that okay, 711 01:02:30,660 --> 01:02:37,360 that there's a little bit of reduction, but for the most part it stays the same, where first I think that's a 712 01:02:37,360 --> 01:02:44,100 a little bit of a mistake. So, and, and the wise ask you, there's, there's anything specific to 713 01:02:44,100 --> 01:02:50,800 city of Stanwood, because I think Stanwood is very unique, where the ITE manual is not 714 01:02:52,060 --> 01:02:58,860 focused on us. And I think it's because Stanwood, we have restaurants and grocery stores, but 715 01:02:58,860 --> 01:03:03,880 some of these that run in Costa Rica, or Target, or Walmart, everybody has to drive out of town, 716 01:03:03,880 --> 01:03:11,520 which is fine, but there's so many houses that have cars, further I think because of the housing 717 01:03:11,520 --> 01:03:18,960 crisis, I think that people are staying more multi-generational and kids are staying in houses 718 01:03:18,960 --> 01:03:26,800 longer, so there's a lot more people staying in houses, and as a drove around Stanwood around 719 01:03:26,800 --> 01:03:29,200 and we'll just say the Cedar Home area. 720 01:03:29,940 --> 01:03:34,120 I see that, there's houses that people are parking on their lawns 721 01:03:34,120 --> 01:03:36,520 because there's no parking on the street available 722 01:03:36,520 --> 01:03:39,160 and there's so many people that live there. 723 01:03:39,160 --> 01:03:41,820 I see driveways that have four or five cars 724 01:03:41,820 --> 01:03:43,720 and then additional cars on the street. 725 01:03:44,500 --> 01:03:52,020 So I think that is a great time to look at parking in a hole 726 01:03:52,020 --> 01:03:54,980 but more on the residential side than I think we're going to 727 01:03:54,980 --> 01:04:02,820 we're going to have to look at that longer. Secondly, on the EV side, I like where you're doing 728 01:04:02,820 --> 01:04:09,560 different stages, but also I think that should have a category for EV ready in civil states 729 01:04:09,560 --> 01:04:16,540 that I work in with other jurisdictions. They have a requirement for EV ready, so that basically 730 01:04:16,540 --> 01:04:23,700 the wiring is there and up to the developer or future need that they can put in a sort of level 731 01:04:23,700 --> 01:04:26,380 chargert, what do I think is good to try to do? 732 01:04:26,400 --> 01:04:31,860 Yeah, one more thing, we didn't put in a requirement for any stations. 733 01:04:33,200 --> 01:04:41,680 Now, the building code requires all new buildings, like residential, all of the garages 734 01:04:41,680 --> 01:04:47,800 are being embedded in the building that they handle, but we didn't put in with the parking lots. 735 01:04:48,280 --> 01:04:50,140 Is that something that you're interested in? 736 01:04:50,140 --> 01:04:53,180 I think of the commercial side where you have to kind of look at that. 737 01:04:55,380 --> 01:05:00,880 Yeah, so state law requires certain number of eating stations. And then I thought we had 738 01:05:00,880 --> 01:05:06,880 reference CRCW and the co-dependent dot go back and forth. Yeah, I thought that should look at that. 739 01:05:07,340 --> 01:05:12,360 But anyways, it's really specific. I'm wondering what it's based on the used category 740 01:05:13,340 --> 01:05:19,840 and then when it's required. So we have to follow state law and as far as 741 01:05:19,840 --> 01:05:25,040 you in a commercial business. So we make sure we look at that as part of the 742 01:05:25,040 --> 01:05:29,500 review and approval process. As far as residential is concerned, unfortunately, 743 01:05:30,400 --> 01:05:34,880 the legislature is tired of hands. You can only require two parking stalls per second. 744 01:05:35,740 --> 01:05:43,200 But as we're reviewing that, we can adjust that. That's part of why we're having these discussions. 745 01:05:43,200 --> 01:05:43,560 Well, 746 01:05:48,060 --> 01:06:08,320 they were just talking about this as a binder and just talking, so like there was a code or a law, a bill that was being considered during the last legislative session that applies to cities greater than it gets 30,000, so we're not there yet. 747 01:06:08,320 --> 01:06:28,360 But they also represent it as we're just saying that bill's going to come back and it will be in the 27th session whether you're looking at really restricting the members, the stalls that a city can fire. 748 01:06:31,300 --> 01:06:36,440 So currently, the state law says we can't require more than two. 749 01:06:36,700 --> 01:06:42,300 Two, you have to allow for tandem parking, and you can only require one for any of you. 750 01:06:44,660 --> 01:06:47,360 And so that's what the code is in many of the shared access. 751 01:06:47,820 --> 01:06:49,160 What is the state law? 752 01:06:49,160 --> 01:06:52,740 So other areas we're looking at reducing it. 753 01:06:53,320 --> 01:06:55,760 So due places we're being reduced. 754 01:06:56,960 --> 01:06:58,300 There's other categories. 755 01:06:58,300 --> 01:07:03,040 There's dwelling in a city family, yes, that's staying up to there's no change to that. 756 01:07:03,860 --> 01:07:05,880 But, and I'm not an expert at it. 757 01:07:06,200 --> 01:07:06,320 I'm just... 758 01:07:06,320 --> 01:07:06,600 Okay. 759 01:07:07,020 --> 01:07:09,600 Drive around, going, there's a lot of people in this family. 760 01:07:09,800 --> 01:07:10,280 Yes. 761 01:07:10,440 --> 01:07:12,000 They don't use their surroundings either. 762 01:07:12,320 --> 01:07:13,880 So, for starters, for storage. 763 01:07:16,580 --> 01:07:19,720 I have to say, in my neighborhood, I've come here with a few people 764 01:07:20,660 --> 01:07:22,680 that are quite kind of in my garage. 765 01:07:23,480 --> 01:07:26,800 So, what I'll do is, we'll do a semi-a-versus state law, 766 01:07:26,800 --> 01:07:29,800 requirements and pull those bills and bring those. 767 01:07:30,790 --> 01:07:33,290 And then we'll also 768 01:07:36,580 --> 01:07:50,480 try to predict from our association, Washington State's and municipal research of, you know, where we think that's going to go with the 27th legislative. 769 01:07:56,280 --> 01:08:04,280 I think your problem addresses, they did fix that, the requirement is for a minimum, not a max of that. 770 01:08:04,600 --> 01:08:10,080 Because you're talking about, you know, it's like, yeah, there's a minimum of two parking spaces, but I need sex. 771 01:08:10,740 --> 01:08:12,900 And it says if the maximum is not addressed. 772 01:08:15,060 --> 01:08:32,850 I think the minimum needs to be what that further, because that's we're seeing more and more people with a single family at home and how many family homes have more than two cars. 773 01:08:33,570 --> 01:09:02,670 And I try to take that kind of, okay, a single family dwelling, like, okay, two cars, right, no change there, but there's people in the backyard cars, so that's where the, that's a state law, right, so we can't, we can't, we can't, we can't, we can't, we can't, we can't, we can't, we can't, we can't, so we do require the 20 video for the distance between the garage and the right way to allow it for a partner. 774 01:09:02,850 --> 01:09:09,250 the rest of the way in addition to the garage problems because the garage should be utilized 775 01:09:09,250 --> 01:09:10,290 before you go. 776 01:09:10,410 --> 01:09:11,130 Technically, it's happening. 777 01:09:11,130 --> 01:09:14,070 And you can't obstruct the sidewalk and all of the stuff they're doing. 778 01:09:14,210 --> 01:09:18,370 So it's the state saying it's a maximum of two cars per single family hole. 779 01:09:18,670 --> 01:09:24,690 And we can't require more than two per unit, but it seems like a unit in Max and 780 01:09:24,690 --> 01:09:25,930 what they in the unit. 781 01:09:25,990 --> 01:09:29,970 No, they can have big and provides lunches they like, but they're not going to, but they're 782 01:09:29,970 --> 01:09:30,490 going to. 783 01:09:30,510 --> 01:09:30,770 Yeah. 784 01:09:30,770 --> 01:09:38,450 It's what we also see too, which, and I think I made some notes in the codependent, is those 785 01:09:39,310 --> 01:09:46,250 town-home units and things like that, their garage doors on it is why it is what a park install 786 01:09:46,250 --> 01:09:53,590 should be. And then a lot of times they'll have like their hot water heater or stitters or 787 01:09:53,590 --> 01:09:58,210 the door that opens right into it and can't even actually really park a car and because it's not 788 01:09:58,210 --> 01:10:03,970 because of the other things that are in there, so when the reviewing building from there, 789 01:10:04,070 --> 01:10:10,130 it's what you need to take that into consideration as well and say, no, your garage needs to 790 01:10:10,130 --> 01:10:13,930 meet the minimum standards for the hard two vehicles. 791 01:10:16,940 --> 01:10:19,140 So, and again, I think, I think I need 792 01:10:19,140 --> 01:10:21,800 some notes in the combinator that, 793 01:10:24,230 --> 01:10:31,330 so as a suggestion to, so when we're reviewing stuff, we can go, 794 01:10:31,330 --> 01:10:45,850 you have to plan this. I see that same exact name, okay. So that's there. Then how does it look around the mixed use areas? 795 01:10:46,150 --> 01:10:53,370 Is that parking over under? Is that real crowded? That's one thing that you haven't really analyzed. 796 01:10:55,130 --> 01:10:56,110 I think we'll look at there. 797 01:10:56,110 --> 01:11:03,070 For me, I drove around the multi-use, around taco time, 798 01:11:03,430 --> 01:11:07,370 and I'm going to go to that area before coming here. 799 01:11:09,090 --> 01:11:11,590 And the parking lot seemed to be a little fuller, 800 01:11:11,890 --> 01:11:15,050 but not overly, not, I didn't think it was that bad, 801 01:11:16,010 --> 01:11:16,890 but that's a beautiful one. 802 01:11:17,110 --> 01:11:20,230 Yeah, we haven't received any complaints about that. 803 01:11:20,290 --> 01:11:22,750 I mean, it used to be a sea of parking 804 01:11:23,370 --> 01:11:31,010 before those next few buildings went in, you know, have all of the property had, I mean, 805 01:11:31,150 --> 01:11:38,770 the bank, when they did that, they had the foresight to do parking, to do parking 806 01:11:38,770 --> 01:11:46,450 in the greenlands along all of those. So, you know, you still have, like, just a bunch of empty parking 807 01:11:46,450 --> 01:11:54,490 to know they're being used and let's say they're probably around 80% full. So I don't think 808 01:11:54,490 --> 01:12:02,090 they're under part but they are not like in them. Yeah, I mean you can't always get a front row 809 01:12:02,090 --> 01:12:09,590 seat, right? Yeah. But there's a future product. I think is it called Viking Millage where 810 01:12:09,590 --> 01:12:15,570 that's no longer going to be in this specific building of apartments, right? Yes, so they have to 811 01:12:15,570 --> 01:12:17,970 part of the department, Sam, part of the town homes, 812 01:12:18,170 --> 01:12:19,690 and that part of the commercial uses. 813 01:12:21,490 --> 01:12:26,290 So the cyber-considering, at least when we reviewed it, 814 01:12:26,530 --> 01:12:29,410 they're utilizing the garage as an apartment space, 815 01:12:29,510 --> 01:12:30,870 and there's no street parking, 816 01:12:31,770 --> 01:12:36,390 which our promise back then was nobody ever does that. 817 01:12:36,650 --> 01:12:37,570 Yeah, they have a pocket. 818 01:12:38,310 --> 01:12:40,610 Alex, I'm working part of the market part, 819 01:12:40,810 --> 01:12:42,670 don't think I'm going to return or whatever else. 820 01:12:42,670 --> 01:12:43,810 So yeah, I don't know what's true. 821 01:12:44,450 --> 01:12:44,990 Yeah, I do. 822 01:12:46,610 --> 01:12:48,350 This is a tough subject, 823 01:12:52,880 --> 01:12:54,180 because some of the bigger cities 824 01:12:56,740 --> 01:13:00,480 are like, you know, they're reducing significantly 825 01:13:00,480 --> 01:13:01,800 in the parking environment. 826 01:13:02,860 --> 01:13:04,500 But one of the suburban cities, 827 01:13:04,800 --> 01:13:06,220 recently, the playground, because I've been talking 828 01:13:06,220 --> 01:13:08,620 up there, they're struggling with this as well. 829 01:13:09,920 --> 01:13:13,240 Because, you know, this is not a one-size-fits-all 830 01:13:13,240 --> 01:13:19,760 I guess the state's trying to teach it as a one-size-fits-all, but it's really not. 831 01:13:20,280 --> 01:13:26,600 So urban has a lot of different parking needs, like downtown Seattle. 832 01:13:27,640 --> 01:13:33,740 We don't have, I mean, we want to be a walkable community, but we're not, you know, people don't 833 01:13:33,740 --> 01:13:35,700 walk to the store here, right? 834 01:13:35,700 --> 01:13:42,100 Yeah, they get that card and they go to Hague, so if we go to, you know, PLC, right? 835 01:13:42,700 --> 01:13:47,060 We're working out a walkability, we're working out, you know, telling you if it gets to 836 01:13:47,060 --> 01:13:47,860 our sidewalks. 837 01:13:49,060 --> 01:13:53,840 But people typically, you know, like a, you know, according to their mom to the grocery store 838 01:13:53,840 --> 01:13:56,820 and all their, you know, the grocery stuff. 839 01:13:57,380 --> 01:14:00,600 And as a bedroom community, everybody's driving to work. 840 01:14:03,780 --> 01:14:03,900 Yeah. 841 01:14:04,860 --> 01:14:05,200 Yeah. 842 01:14:05,200 --> 01:14:09,120 I think it's just unfortunate that they legislate with sports this month. 843 01:14:09,380 --> 01:14:23,780 It's all, it's just, we're not Seattle, you know, we're not ever, you know, anything like that and so like, yeah, it's disappointing that, you know, 844 01:14:24,520 --> 01:14:34,020 in Mary's, but we had a change in for three to two, we required three minimum for the single family and to have to take that away. 845 01:14:34,020 --> 01:14:43,340 One thing that we do, but really closely on is if the road has parking on and to stator the driveways to make sure that we can maximize the on street parking. 846 01:14:44,200 --> 01:14:56,840 So it's something to consider to live the road section that allows for parking on and that we when the reviewing a plan set to make sure that these driveways are offset some can actually park on the street. 847 01:14:57,220 --> 01:14:59,980 It worries they, you know, sometimes they kind of combine in. 848 01:15:00,000 --> 01:15:03,900 And there's on that room to, yeah, maybe, actually, right at the point, we asked that. 849 01:15:04,620 --> 01:15:15,000 So we also, when we were working on our engineering standards, we're looking at the side of the street that has the fire hydrant. 850 01:15:15,880 --> 01:15:21,980 And there's a parking lot on the other side. Yeah, because otherwise, you're doing this and sitting on it to the offset. 851 01:15:27,120 --> 01:15:40,310 So I guess the bottom line is there still is local control over parking, but there's some limited areas where the state is saying, you have to do this. 852 01:15:41,810 --> 01:15:52,910 And I anticipate we're hearing that the development committee is kind of really hard with the max legislative session to try to reduce parking for residential even more. 853 01:15:54,380 --> 01:15:59,200 So don't be surprised, would you just learn about that from us? 854 01:15:59,820 --> 01:16:06,060 Yeah, so in the first week, it married a woman allow for tan and party to count as a stall. 855 01:16:06,940 --> 01:16:09,080 And now the state says, you have to allow. 856 01:16:09,320 --> 01:16:12,640 And tan can be more than two. It can be a line of five. 857 01:16:13,260 --> 01:16:16,620 And it's like, well, that doesn't really work. 858 01:16:17,540 --> 01:16:19,860 You know, so it's even two. 859 01:16:19,920 --> 01:16:21,700 I haven't seen work successfully. 860 01:16:22,980 --> 01:16:27,660 So, basically, people have a 10-in garage and they've been into that for, you know, whatever 861 01:16:27,660 --> 01:16:29,380 they're strogians, right? 862 01:16:30,880 --> 01:16:35,460 If they use their garage and all, they use it for the front, but people don't like it. 863 01:16:35,760 --> 01:16:36,180 I'm going to. 864 01:16:36,220 --> 01:16:37,020 Music or cars? 865 01:16:37,400 --> 01:16:37,520 Yeah. 866 01:16:44,850 --> 01:16:48,090 So, it's almost why note, 867 01:16:50,360 --> 01:16:55,600 this is the required, it's almost like just reference the RCC of what 868 01:16:55,600 --> 01:17:00,380 state requires and then almost have like a city recommendation is okay the state says too 869 01:17:00,380 --> 01:17:12,260 but we say we recommend for or what have you but it's yeah it's kind of sad but it 870 01:17:12,260 --> 01:17:18,040 residential parking of a problem here I think our job as the planning commission is the note 871 01:17:18,040 --> 01:17:25,580 as not the city experts that this is the problem and just give me feedback from the community 872 01:17:25,580 --> 01:17:31,080 to the staff. Because another thing I noticed with that was like, do you talk about all the extra 873 01:17:31,080 --> 01:17:35,800 parking, people parking on grass and all that stuff? People are parking on the stop signs, 874 01:17:36,100 --> 01:17:42,400 right at the corner. There's no 50 foot buffer. If there's sidewalk, there's a curb, there's a car. 875 01:17:43,920 --> 01:17:47,800 Yeah. Yeah, there's a couple neighborhoods like a little drive through that some people park right 876 01:17:47,800 --> 01:17:54,520 up to the crosswalks. And so if you're coming, can't see you, you know, somebody if they're walking. 877 01:17:54,520 --> 01:18:17,740 Yes, according, it's just like they'll just pop out, you know, especially kids with e-bikes, yeah, and that's even more dangerous and yeah, 878 01:18:22,440 --> 01:18:22,620 yeah, we all 879 01:18:22,620 --> 01:18:28,460 home for all what are those going to be part of the story or behind the 880 01:18:28,460 --> 01:18:33,960 commercial. Yeah, I did one thing that we can do and what I've done in the past 881 01:18:34,740 --> 01:18:39,780 on town home projects and other ones is that actually they have you know 882 01:18:39,780 --> 01:18:44,140 said CC and ours that specifically stayed at the garage I'll be utilized for 883 01:18:44,140 --> 01:18:48,580 parking and so then there's some tea fan thing you can actually do something 884 01:18:48,580 --> 01:18:55,420 coursemen or whoever the president of the HOA or whatever else has the opportunity to do that 885 01:18:55,420 --> 01:19:00,240 coursemen, so they're not taking up three or a parking in their lawn or things like that, 886 01:19:00,560 --> 01:19:08,000 so that's one, one tool that we can realize, that's a four-party in our code scum and it's an restriction 887 01:19:08,000 --> 01:19:16,460 on. So HOA, that's what we're looking for. So we have to be in our code of bill because we do not 888 01:19:16,460 --> 01:19:18,480 course CCNARS. 889 01:19:22,280 --> 01:19:25,840 I had a development where 890 01:19:27,920 --> 01:19:34,640 it was built in the early 90s, you know, fire department 891 01:19:34,640 --> 01:19:44,240 controlled the width of the streets, and there's CCNARS said no one's street parking, 892 01:19:44,880 --> 01:19:45,940 That's my neighbor. 893 01:19:47,320 --> 01:19:47,800 Yeah. 894 01:19:48,760 --> 01:19:50,460 But of course, the city can't enforce that. 895 01:19:51,780 --> 01:19:54,060 But they have a very active, for one association. 896 01:19:54,680 --> 01:19:55,480 And they did. 897 01:19:56,220 --> 01:19:58,420 And we got complaints on both sides. 898 01:19:59,480 --> 01:20:00,140 And we're neutral. 899 01:20:04,520 --> 01:20:05,000 Yeah. 900 01:20:07,140 --> 01:20:07,340 Yeah. 901 01:20:07,340 --> 01:20:07,380 Yeah. 902 01:20:07,700 --> 01:20:09,940 Especially neighborhoods that have to make narrow roads. 903 01:20:10,160 --> 01:20:11,740 And if everybody has to park on one side, 904 01:20:11,740 --> 01:20:13,600 It's a seat, isn't it? 905 01:20:14,440 --> 01:20:15,400 It's quite a card. 906 01:20:16,000 --> 01:20:16,440 I don't know. 907 01:20:16,440 --> 01:20:18,960 It's the widest roads, probably. 908 01:20:19,260 --> 01:20:21,080 Instead of camera and show you. 909 01:20:22,000 --> 01:20:22,380 Yeah. 910 01:20:22,600 --> 01:20:23,500 That has one. 911 01:20:23,960 --> 01:20:24,900 I don't know. 912 01:20:25,360 --> 01:20:26,240 Street parking. 913 01:20:27,620 --> 01:20:27,880 More. 914 01:20:28,060 --> 01:20:28,840 I think. 915 01:20:29,400 --> 01:20:31,760 Visitors can park from to 72 hours. 916 01:20:31,980 --> 01:20:32,420 But residents. 917 01:20:33,020 --> 01:20:33,380 I know. 918 01:20:33,880 --> 01:20:35,240 Park on the street. 919 01:20:35,800 --> 01:20:37,020 We ran into that. 920 01:20:37,220 --> 01:20:39,060 We got letters for a lot. 921 01:20:39,540 --> 01:20:41,400 And I always thought, how can they. 922 01:20:41,400 --> 01:20:46,400 How can they control, it's a public streets, they don't own the street. 923 01:20:46,920 --> 01:20:48,900 So how can they enforce that? 924 01:20:49,040 --> 01:20:50,380 It just makes all that stupid. 925 01:20:51,140 --> 01:20:52,720 If I want to park on a public road, 926 01:20:53,200 --> 01:20:57,700 and there's no sign that prohibits me to a park 927 01:20:57,700 --> 01:21:02,420 how can an HOA actually tell you you can't park a car on the street? 928 01:21:02,960 --> 01:21:03,980 Makes sense. 929 01:21:05,680 --> 01:21:06,380 I mean, I'm sure. 930 01:21:06,900 --> 01:21:07,520 You could. 931 01:21:07,700 --> 01:21:09,600 Yeah, I don't know the legal... 932 01:21:17,440 --> 01:21:29,700 And it's not even in the CC and R. It's in the rules of regulations. So, yeah, yeah, it's kind of kind of, kind of if you eat the blood, you know, by the way. 933 01:21:29,700 --> 01:21:37,060 and the folks park in too close to stop signs and sidewalks and things like that's an 934 01:21:37,060 --> 01:21:41,380 enforcement issue and the first thing to do is to then take it on those types of things 935 01:21:41,960 --> 01:21:47,960 and you know that's just what the restrictive parking does it makes people through that 936 01:21:47,960 --> 01:21:49,620 because it's the only place they can more. 937 01:21:53,430 --> 01:21:57,150 Well I'm hearing residential parking is one of 938 01:21:57,150 --> 01:22:01,950 your key issues and that's kind of what it sounds like all like residential 939 01:22:01,950 --> 01:22:06,610 the problem. I don't think mixed use is the problem. Yeah, I'm not hearing that. I'm not hearing 940 01:22:06,610 --> 01:22:15,390 I'm like, you know, the commercial spaces. Downtown is working fairly. And so, you know, 941 01:22:15,650 --> 01:22:20,130 you know, the two little historic downtown that we have, especially the other between 942 01:22:21,510 --> 01:22:27,390 88th and 84th, you know, the dining room parking, and we have the big parking lot in life. So those 943 01:22:27,390 --> 01:22:29,970 Businesses don't, they're not required to you. 944 01:22:31,000 --> 01:22:32,400 Provided additional parking. 945 01:22:34,790 --> 01:22:39,790 So you must be working fine. So there's some, you know, the short-down 946 01:22:39,790 --> 01:22:45,790 hands, like in with the brick brand, you know, we do have that parking lot. That's behind the old 947 01:22:45,790 --> 01:22:53,690 bank building. So I'm not hearing that those are concerns for you guys. And I would go back to the 948 01:22:53,690 --> 01:23:05,470 I use. I think it's going to be interesting what Cedar Hold Commons is, which is say, operational because they were asking for reduction at 300. 949 01:23:06,710 --> 01:23:08,270 Renered 80 parking stalls. 950 01:23:08,670 --> 01:23:10,070 It was 300 something. 951 01:23:10,330 --> 01:23:11,430 I remember it being that high. 952 01:23:11,670 --> 01:23:12,790 Yeah, it was a large amount. 953 01:23:14,570 --> 01:23:19,990 But just, and I don't know what ultimately was approved because what their building is definitely different than what we reviewed. 954 01:23:21,650 --> 01:23:29,130 So I don't know what the council ultimately agreed upon in a group. 955 01:23:30,130 --> 01:23:36,930 Yeah, that's one that we have to monitor pretty carefully to see how that is going to be. 956 01:23:36,930 --> 01:23:37,530 Yeah, 957 01:23:39,850 --> 01:23:57,090 but I know that we have two deviations up at the Hankins area where we went to approve the IT manual for those two issues, but I'm also working pretty well with that. 958 01:23:57,090 --> 01:24:01,950 So how you can buy it, probably about 80% next, you know, 959 01:24:02,070 --> 01:24:04,350 in terms of parking, and there's still a little bit there. 960 01:24:07,810 --> 01:24:11,110 But those are really, those are pretty good 961 01:24:11,110 --> 01:24:12,970 to say the whole thing, you know, the site share parking 962 01:24:12,970 --> 01:24:18,330 with it now, arbitrary property line, but affected 963 01:24:18,330 --> 01:24:20,530 those areas are being parked. 964 01:24:23,170 --> 01:24:26,470 I'm going to send their occupancy rates 100%. 965 01:24:26,470 --> 01:24:27,830 I'm very units up there. 966 01:24:27,870 --> 01:24:28,250 I don't know. 967 01:24:28,250 --> 01:24:34,310 I know they first built in, they had a waiting list, but the economy's different now, so I don't 968 01:24:34,310 --> 01:24:36,120 I don't know if they have they can choose to fail. 969 01:24:38,170 --> 01:24:41,430 Is there a background of marketing, does that mean you're out? 970 01:24:42,330 --> 01:24:42,870 Yeah. 971 01:24:43,050 --> 01:24:47,470 I know the first few years they did this had a waiting list, the people couldn't get into them. 972 01:24:47,850 --> 01:24:53,770 The first one that was built 20 years ago, that one has the colors. 973 01:24:54,450 --> 01:24:54,810 Yes. 974 01:24:54,810 --> 01:25:05,450 That one has first floor parking, so they've covered their parking, but I don't think I've ever seen people part of the outside of that structure. 975 01:25:07,330 --> 01:25:08,610 Yeah, yeah, they do have a lot of work. 976 01:25:15,320 --> 01:25:15,800 Okay. 977 01:25:16,320 --> 01:25:17,840 So I guess you need to say yes. 978 01:25:18,360 --> 01:25:21,860 These are, yeah, these are the edits we're still working through on this one. 979 01:25:21,860 --> 01:25:24,360 But it's, this is a close tool of the human. 980 01:25:24,760 --> 01:25:27,000 We set to work on the sense. 981 01:25:27,140 --> 01:25:31,680 The lower kind of sounds like residential practice is an important issue. 982 01:25:33,400 --> 01:25:35,280 A little bit deeper into this. 983 01:25:35,320 --> 01:25:41,400 Figure out really what our legal authority is on the residential side. 984 01:25:43,180 --> 01:25:48,620 Because the states really get involved more and more with lead use issues. 985 01:25:51,400 --> 01:26:03,240 So there's a consistent thing coming out of the builders that Parking is one of the issues with affordable housing. 986 01:26:04,360 --> 01:26:09,200 So that's hitting a lot of airtime at the legislature. 987 01:26:10,100 --> 01:26:12,080 I was out parking in a quarter of the housing. 988 01:26:12,100 --> 01:26:17,080 Well they're saying requiring a lot of excess Parking is increasing the cost of housing. 989 01:26:17,080 --> 01:26:21,660 There's a lot of sizes larger for lesser animal and our lesser square footage. 990 01:26:22,440 --> 01:26:29,580 And if you'd like for instance, if we provide three packet cells for a residential unit, 991 01:26:29,920 --> 01:26:38,120 you know, takes a land area, cost a bill that takes away from household units. 992 01:26:39,080 --> 01:26:41,860 Like, there's no increase in the cost of maintenance, yeah. 993 01:26:42,740 --> 01:26:46,840 And is there a way to tie it to the number of bedrooms, 994 01:26:47,380 --> 01:26:49,460 curses, single-family home? 995 01:26:49,580 --> 01:26:51,760 Because it's in here, it's in single-family home, 996 01:26:52,300 --> 01:26:55,340 but if you're seeing four or five bedroom homes, 997 01:26:55,780 --> 01:26:58,920 a little kids grow up and start driving and have cars, 998 01:26:59,520 --> 01:27:00,220 et cetera, et cetera. 999 01:27:00,540 --> 01:27:03,520 I don't know, I just don't know, I just don't know that we have a problem. 1000 01:27:04,200 --> 01:27:07,180 I don't know, but you know, I have to say, 1001 01:27:07,180 --> 01:27:14,700 around the three sisters that are as far or less, right, and they're all a year and a half 1002 01:27:14,700 --> 01:27:15,420 of each other. 1003 01:27:15,880 --> 01:27:21,600 So there was a tie when I was a 16-year-old and we all had our memories, because I was the last 1004 01:27:21,600 --> 01:27:22,920 one of the group. 1005 01:27:23,860 --> 01:27:29,280 You know, we had like, by Christ of the House, I wasn't having to write my own book, and we all 1006 01:27:29,280 --> 01:27:29,840 had to work. 1007 01:27:30,000 --> 01:27:34,320 We all had to pay for our cards, and we all had to pay for our insurance before we can get 1008 01:27:35,820 --> 01:27:39,300 That was what I was looking for. 1009 01:27:42,410 --> 01:27:46,450 So that lasted one about three or four years. 1010 01:27:48,530 --> 01:27:49,630 That happens with families. 1011 01:27:51,070 --> 01:27:51,630 Yeah. 1012 01:27:51,630 --> 01:27:53,890 Well, maybe a little longer now though. 1013 01:27:54,570 --> 01:27:55,130 Yeah. 1014 01:27:55,170 --> 01:27:55,670 That's true. 1015 01:27:56,770 --> 01:27:57,070 Yeah. 1016 01:27:57,070 --> 01:27:58,310 Just with, I think a lot longer. 1017 01:27:58,870 --> 01:27:59,010 Yeah. 1018 01:28:00,370 --> 01:28:00,670 Yeah. 1019 01:28:01,910 --> 01:28:03,430 And then a moment that I wasn't, 1020 01:28:06,390 --> 01:28:06,410 Yeah. 1021 01:28:07,550 --> 01:28:08,110 Yeah. 1022 01:28:08,810 --> 01:28:09,050 Yeah. 1023 01:28:09,670 --> 01:28:09,830 Yeah. 1024 01:28:10,030 --> 01:28:10,350 I'm sure. 1025 01:28:14,100 --> 01:28:14,380 All right. 1026 01:28:14,500 --> 01:28:17,500 Well, I have a couple pages of notes on the package. 1027 01:28:19,160 --> 01:28:28,580 So what I would suggest is we'll take these notes and we'll look into these a little bit more. 1028 01:28:28,660 --> 01:28:36,280 I would recommend that you guys to look at that table, that matrix, and bring to the October meeting. 1029 01:28:36,280 --> 01:28:47,460 You know, your thoughts on the, I guess the ratio, most of it's like a ratio of square footage to 1030 01:28:47,460 --> 01:28:51,160 party or even counts can you know if you need anything with the 1031 01:28:55,510 --> 01:28:57,230 reader reach out to us during a month. 1032 01:28:57,370 --> 01:29:04,230 If you have more questions or comments, so we'll bring that back to you after all. 1033 01:29:08,710 --> 01:29:14,510 Thanks, New Businesses. Good there. Mr. Linney is business. I have nothing on the agenda. 1034 01:29:16,710 --> 01:29:21,390 Item made is recent council action on commission items, the permitted piece matrix and 1035 01:29:21,390 --> 01:29:23,110 developers had ones. 1036 01:29:24,610 --> 01:29:30,570 We took that to the first reading. I think I will do and do two. Some scheduling issues that 1037 01:29:30,570 --> 01:29:38,050 I've had and some other issues. We are going to the next council meeting with the second 1038 01:29:38,050 --> 01:29:44,050 reading. So we are hopeful to have that with some of the work. 1039 01:29:47,530 --> 01:29:55,360 So hopefully we'll, oh, criminal at the, at the second reading, or if they have any changes to probably be minor. 1040 01:29:55,600 --> 01:29:57,720 And then that would be the first reading. 1041 01:29:58,220 --> 01:29:59,640 Excuse me, first meeting you on October. 1042 01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:04,260 So, that should get approved fairly soon. 1043 01:30:06,370 --> 01:30:10,610 On the upcoming events, the 2027, don't pre-insist plan amendment. 1044 01:30:12,950 --> 01:30:20,790 You may recall, I had talked about getting that ready for the funding commission to do an introduction to it, 1045 01:30:21,670 --> 01:30:26,410 but we did decide to move forward with opening a packet. 1046 01:30:26,410 --> 01:30:28,430 So that bucket is open. 1047 01:30:28,890 --> 01:30:36,650 So we're pushing back the introduction to the component until after if we receive any applications for the bucket. 1048 01:30:37,230 --> 01:30:42,470 So it's more likely something that you're going to see in early 2027. 1049 01:30:43,090 --> 01:30:48,330 May remember, we have been calling it the 2026, a compliment on that, and now we're changing 1050 01:30:48,330 --> 01:30:58,490 this to the 2027. But at the multi-modal level of service that you had, well, does she probably 1051 01:30:58,490 --> 01:31:04,670 have it? But the topics that we discussed a couple of times here in the money condition, that 1052 01:31:04,670 --> 01:31:14,810 be part of that academic material moving forward. We also know, we've been working with a 1053 01:31:14,810 --> 01:31:21,930 couple of the owners of some affordable housing projects here in the stand and ones by 1054 01:31:21,930 --> 01:31:34,650 have passed by the way and they have projects that have crossed over property lines and we found 1055 01:31:34,650 --> 01:31:36,790 that when we were like talking to them, 1056 01:31:37,610 --> 01:31:40,050 that part of their parking lots were in, 1057 01:31:40,050 --> 01:31:41,190 like, so you'll have a residential, 1058 01:31:42,570 --> 01:31:44,990 but their buildings are in localite faith on money. 1059 01:31:45,390 --> 01:31:48,250 So we have some clean up, a little reason to clean up, 1060 01:31:48,330 --> 01:31:51,990 so we're going to do, we need to change those, 1061 01:31:51,990 --> 01:31:54,750 so that everything is in a multi-family zone. 1062 01:31:55,310 --> 01:31:57,050 That is a compound amendment and reason 1063 01:31:57,050 --> 01:31:59,510 because we're changing it for a single-family 1064 01:31:59,510 --> 01:32:00,590 to a multi-family zone. 1065 01:32:00,870 --> 01:32:03,670 So we have a couple of those that we're going to be bringing 1066 01:32:03,670 --> 01:32:07,030 forward hopefully they'll be pretty straightforward. 1067 01:32:09,750 --> 01:32:11,990 So, and then with us that might come forward 1068 01:32:11,990 --> 01:32:15,730 out of the public request for changes for the topic. 1069 01:32:17,870 --> 01:32:20,670 So it's currently 27. Yeah, I think 1070 01:32:20,670 --> 01:32:28,390 I'm probably genuinely sure we should be able to have at least a summary of what those changes 1071 01:32:28,390 --> 01:32:33,010 why they distribute memory and think that we'll see it in a moment. 1072 01:32:34,250 --> 01:32:36,930 Yeah. So I think the back itself is through the internet of America. 1073 01:32:36,930 --> 01:32:40,370 It gives us to some of the put together in the cellulose. 1074 01:32:47,180 --> 01:32:49,500 I think it's too well. I am 10 for the journey. 1075 01:32:53,500 --> 01:32:55,130 We have a motion to adjourn for the media. 1076 01:32:56,180 --> 01:32:57,720 Go to your second. 1077 01:32:58,260 --> 01:32:58,600 Well, sorry. 1078 01:32:59,040 --> 01:32:59,440 And second. 1079 01:32:59,820 --> 01:33:00,760 And your adjourn. 1080 01:33:01,000 --> 01:33:02,240 Thank you. 1081 01:33:02,460 --> 01:33:03,480 I was going to tell the story. 1082 01:33:05,080 --> 01:33:06,880 It was a little different. 1083 01:33:06,880 --> 01:33:17,000 But learned a ton about, you know, trust land and peace out of the way and all that, but they have the same thing.