[0:20] the institution is requesting to
[0:22] surrender one director of
[0:23] affirmative action one director
[0:25] of alumni and government
[0:27] relations one director of
[0:28] recruitment, 112 month
[0:30] instructor, one vice chancellor
[0:31] for research innovation and
[0:33] economic development and one
[0:34] vice chancellor for enrollment
[0:35] manage those are the ones that
[0:37] are going away in return they
[0:39] will receive two assistant vice
[0:41] chancellors one compliance
[0:42] officer, one director of
[0:43] academic advising and one
[0:45] director of alumni
[0:47] relations and one director of
[0:48] public affairs
[0:49] the recommendation from the
[0:50] department of higher Education
[0:51] states the requested positions
[0:53] are necessary to support their
[0:55] evolving higher education
[0:57] environments shifting enrollment
[0:59] and financial pressures and
[1:01] changing workforce demands
[1:01] because of the because the
[1:03] request is a6 for6 swap. the
[1:05] total authorized position total
[1:06] or the total authorized
[1:08] positions for the institution is
[1:08] not changing
[1:12] right do we have any questions
[1:17] seeing none do I have a motion
[1:18] for review
[1:21] got a motion in a second any
[1:23] discussion? all those in favor
[1:24] please say aye
[1:27] opposed no motion carries item
[1:29] C. Madam Chairman, item C is a
[1:30] request from Parks Heritage and
[1:33] tourism to surrender one fiscal
[1:34] support specialist position in
[1:37] return for onec accountant one
[1:38] because the surrendered position
[1:39] has been vacant for longer than
[1:41] a year. the expected cost of
[1:42] this change is about74,000
[1:42] dollars
[1:45] and this is from special revenue
[1:47] the position will be tasked with
[1:49] reconciling construction
[1:51] projects reviewing expenditures
[1:53] and fixed asset inventory and
[1:54] records as well as supporting
[1:56] theAFer reporting requirements
[1:58] this is a one for one swap.
[1:59] there is no increase or decrease
[2:01] in the total number of positions
[2:03] at parks. OPM has recommended
[2:04] the requested swap
[2:07] right are there any questions on
[2:08] item C?
[2:10] See none do I have emotion?
[2:11] a second
[2:15] any discussion all those in
[2:18] favor please say aye all opposed
[2:19] no motion carries item D.
[2:22] madam Chairman, item d is a
[2:23] request from the governor's
[2:24] mansion commission they're
[2:25] requesting to surrender two
[2:27] positions a governor's
[2:29] maintenance manager and a
[2:31] governor's food services expert
[2:33] in return for one maintenance
[2:35] manager at an SGSo7. the
[2:37] position will require technical
[2:38] expertise and experience in the
[2:39] oversight of maintenance repair
[2:41] and preservation of the mansion.
[2:43] OPM has recommended the
[2:44] requested swap and due to the
[2:46] elimination of two positions in
[2:47] return for one there having an
[2:49] expected savings of57,000
[2:50] dollars with review
[2:51] of the request
[2:54] all right do we have any
[2:54] questions on item D?
[2:57] right seeing none do I have a
[2:58] motion for review
[3:02] got a motion in a second any
[3:03] discussion? all those in favor
[3:05] please say aye I'll oppose no
[3:09] motion carries and we'll move
[3:10] on to reports
[3:13] madam chairman the reports
[3:15] listed as items E throughh
[3:17] require no action but we'll take
[3:18] any questions if if the members
[3:18] have any.
[3:23] all right are there any
[3:25] questions on any of the reports
[3:30] seeing none is there any oh I do
[3:32] see a question uhpresentative
[3:33] meeks you're recognized in a
[3:34] second.
[3:38] was under discussion
[3:39] oh you just got it
[3:41] yep
[3:45] all right thank you thank you
[3:47] madam chair so since OPm
[3:51] is at the table just a
[3:52] related question to personnel.
[3:55] so on the audit committee over
[3:56] the the last couple of weeks
[3:57] we've had a couple incidences
[4:01] where there have been emails
[4:05] sent to change employee bank
[4:08] records and OPm has processed
[4:09] those and it's allowed for
[4:11] fraudulent activity to take
[4:13] place Basically people are
[4:14] spoofing our employees
[4:15] so I see you're nodding your
[4:16] head. it sounds like you're
[4:17] familiar with the issue can
[4:19] you give us an update on where
[4:21] you're at on making sure we're
[4:23] protecting our employees from
[4:24] that happening in the future
[4:29] Yep, you're recognized thank you
[4:31] yes sir we are aware of that
[4:32] unfortunately it has happened
[4:35] twice to my knowledge one atarks
[4:36] of tourism and one at another
[4:38] department you know recently
[4:39] we have centralized payroll
[4:41] activities and we're now doing
[4:43] all payroll activities at OPm
[4:45] versus at the various
[4:47] departments anytime we are
[4:48] implementing methods to validate
[4:50] anytime we get a change of bank
[4:52] account information. it's also
[4:53] important to know what the new
[4:55] Sparhana system employees
[4:56] themselves
[4:59] can go in and change their
[5:01] banking account information so
[5:02] we shouldn't be the employees
[5:04] should be doing that in most
[5:06] cases versus us actually getting
[5:07] the requests. So when we get the
[5:09] request we're gonna be calling
[5:10] back to make sure that this is a
[5:12] legitimate request
[5:14] stats of that point thank you I
[5:14] appreciate that
[5:20] all right any other questions?
[5:21] see none and no other
[5:22] business this meeting is
[5:22] adjourned.