1 00:00:08,144 --> 00:00:14,743 Good morning and good morning everyone welcome committee members staff presenters 2 00:00:14,743 --> 00:00:20,824 and all who are watching live from TVW to the September 17th Senate housing 3 00:00:20,824 --> 00:00:25,463 committee meeting we have a full agenda of presentters today for our work 4 00:00:25,463 --> 00:00:30,024 session on affordable housing production and financing we're going to start with 5 00:00:30,024 --> 00:00:34,384 a discussion on housing, production gaps and development trends followed by an 6 00:00:35,392 --> 00:00:40,432 For on the starter home demonstration program, then we will finish with presentations on housing 7 00:00:40,432 --> 00:00:46,832 affordability trends and financing issues. So I would like to begin and welcome our first presenter, 8 00:00:46,832 --> 00:00:51,231 Matthew Gardner, who will be joining us virtually from principal and chief economist, 9 00:00:51,231 --> 00:00:55,231 Gardner Economics, to give us an overview of Washington State housing production trends. 10 00:00:55,871 --> 00:00:57,631 Good morning, Matthew. Are you there? 11 00:00:58,752 --> 00:01:00,031 I am. Can you hear me? 12 00:01:00,768 --> 00:01:03,048 We can, well, we can see your presentation, 13 00:01:03,048 --> 00:01:04,968 which is, I think, what we would like to see. 14 00:01:04,968 --> 00:01:07,567 So welcome, and go ahead and get started. 15 00:01:07,567 --> 00:01:08,808 Far better than seeing me, sir. 16 00:01:08,808 --> 00:01:11,128 Come on, Chairman, members of the committee, 17 00:01:11,128 --> 00:01:13,808 thank you for the opportunity to speak today. 18 00:01:13,808 --> 00:01:16,087 Washington's housing affordability crisis, 19 00:01:16,087 --> 00:01:19,007 it's fundamentally a supply-side problem 20 00:01:19,007 --> 00:01:21,608 compounded by cost and delays 21 00:01:21,608 --> 00:01:24,087 in both nominal and real terms. 22 00:01:24,087 --> 00:01:27,608 Home price about pasting comes for more than two decades, 23 00:01:27,608 --> 00:01:28,768 nearly half. 24 00:01:28,512 --> 00:01:33,311 of Washington's renters are cost-burdened and homeownership has slipped out of the reach 25 00:01:33,311 --> 00:01:37,871 in almost every county and certainly in every major city in the state. Today I want to be 26 00:01:37,871 --> 00:01:42,352 expanding on a few the slides that I recently presented at the Association of 27 00:01:42,352 --> 00:01:47,871 Washington Cities annual conference. Next slide please. As you all know, 28 00:01:47,871 --> 00:01:52,992 Washington needs roughly 1 to 1.1 million new homes over the next 20 years, about 29 00:01:57,424 --> 00:01:59,224 We're not hitting that mark. 30 00:01:59,224 --> 00:02:02,543 Our FM data shows permits peaking in 2022, 31 00:02:02,543 --> 00:02:08,024 but falling since with a cumulative decline of 31%. 32 00:02:08,024 --> 00:02:09,783 Next slide, please. 33 00:02:09,783 --> 00:02:14,024 Now, shown here, completions kept climbing through 2024, 34 00:02:14,024 --> 00:02:17,104 which is serious high of over 53,000 that year, 35 00:02:17,104 --> 00:02:19,943 even as permits issued that same year 36 00:02:19,943 --> 00:02:22,424 had already fallen to just over 40, 000. 37 00:02:22,424 --> 00:02:24,743 Now that's not a contradiction. 38 00:02:24,687 --> 00:02:31,728 It's a 2021 and 2022 permit surge, finally landing the finished homes on a like primarily 39 00:02:31,728 --> 00:02:37,487 seen in the multi-family sector, meaning that today's relatively solid completion numbers 40 00:02:37,487 --> 00:02:43,168 are largely an echo of permitting from three years ago and not evidence that the pipeline 41 00:02:43,168 --> 00:02:49,247 today is healthy. Demilitations you see in yellow add a further but quieter drag. 42 00:02:50,912 --> 00:02:58,032 demolish units equal about 6.7% of completions, so the net housing stock consistently runs 43 00:02:58,032 --> 00:03:04,032 below gross completions. Now, it is important to note that net production of housing units 44 00:03:04,032 --> 00:03:16,431 has only cleared that 50,000 mark once since 1919. Next slide, please. 45 00:03:10,304 --> 00:03:16,104 However, the single-family share of total permits has fallen from about 48.7 percent 46 00:03:16,104 --> 00:03:23,304 in the 1990s to 41.5 percent today, and that's shrinking exactly the product most first-time 47 00:03:23,304 --> 00:03:30,544 buyers prefer, even as accessory-dwelling permits, a genuine reform success story grew 48 00:03:36,991 --> 00:03:43,752 On average, 5,500 permits do not become starts in any one year, while around 9% of permits 49 00:03:43,752 --> 00:03:45,352 are delayed or abandoned. 50 00:03:45,352 --> 00:03:49,872 Now, there's several reasons that can cause a project to be delayed, or indeed abandoned 51 00:03:49,872 --> 00:03:52,831 completely, and I've outlined some of them here. 52 00:03:52,831 --> 00:03:54,912 Firstly, permits can expire, 53 00:03:54,912 --> 00:04:00,991 and one can infer that some have the permitted but not completed gap is stalled constructions. 54 00:04:00,991 --> 00:04:02,991 It's permits that have lapped outright. 55 00:04:02,975 --> 00:04:09,295 Two, the math stops working. If costs and or revenue expectations increase or the permit 56 00:04:09,295 --> 00:04:15,536 sits in review, a project can go from profitable to underwater before a shovel has ever hit 57 00:04:15,536 --> 00:04:16,536 the ground. 58 00:04:16,536 --> 00:04:22,495 Third, litigation. It's a real issue. Even though an underlying permit was validly issued, 59 00:04:26,160 --> 00:04:29,680 for pre-development activity is insufficient. 60 00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:32,920 Now, if the market calls during the permitting process, 61 00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:34,480 a project may never break round. 62 00:04:34,480 --> 00:04:38,959 Now this is specifically true in the multi-family arena. 63 00:04:38,959 --> 00:04:41,439 Five site conditions, geotechnical problems, 64 00:04:41,439 --> 00:04:44,639 wetland, critical area findings, contamination, 65 00:04:44,639 --> 00:04:47,920 anything that arises during final engineering 66 00:04:47,920 --> 00:04:50,480 or preconstruction that can cause a delay 67 00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:52,040 or possible abandonment. 68 00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:54,920 And finally, the vested rights doctrine. 69 00:04:54,815 --> 00:05:01,456 Developers had a rational incentive to apply for permits before any anticipated code changes 70 00:05:01,456 --> 00:05:06,656 or rezoning is implemented that could harm their development, allowing them to secure more 71 00:05:06,656 --> 00:05:14,415 favorable terms in essence, even if they don't yet have firm plans or financing to build immediately. 72 00:05:14,415 --> 00:05:19,456 So as you can clearly see, the challenges that our states builders face are significant. 73 00:05:21,632 --> 00:05:25,791 although housing production is heavily concentrated in the central Puget Sound. 74 00:05:26,160 --> 00:05:32,639 The other 36 counties within our state face issues with housing supply, affordability and 75 00:05:32,639 --> 00:05:33,639 under-production. 76 00:05:33,639 --> 00:05:38,560 And there are numerous forces impacting housing and I've outlined some of them here that 77 00:05:38,560 --> 00:05:43,600 include staffing shortfalls, infrastructure constraints, a lack of workforce-priced 78 00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:47,839 housing, and a decline in manufactured housing production. 79 00:05:47,839 --> 00:05:52,120 These are all real issues that face our county's leaders. 80 00:05:52,911 --> 00:05:58,752 Now, my latest housing affordability index suggested a household making account is median 81 00:05:58,752 --> 00:06:04,432 income was able to afford to purchase a median priced house in just five counties in our 82 00:06:04,432 --> 00:06:06,872 state in the second quarter of this year. 83 00:06:06,872 --> 00:06:07,872 Next slide, please. 84 00:06:07,872 --> 00:06:13,672 And when we make modest adjustments to incomes, home prices and down payments, a first-time 85 00:06:13,672 --> 00:06:19,552 buyer was only able technically afford buy a home in one county, Garfield. 86 00:06:19,552 --> 00:06:20,951 Next, slide please 87 00:06:21,375 --> 00:06:26,016 Although I certainly appreciate the efforts to be made by both the House and Senate in 88 00:06:26,016 --> 00:06:31,216 passing significant legislation to try and address the crisis that we face, I believe 89 00:06:31,216 --> 00:06:33,495 that more can and should be done. 90 00:06:33,495 --> 00:06:38,935 Now, some of the recommendations you see here do overlap with those put forward by the 91 00:06:38,935 --> 00:06:43,495 state's several building associations, but I hope that they may still stimulate additional 92 00:06:43,495 --> 00:06:44,495 discussion. 93 00:06:46,064 --> 00:06:51,504 Now, a permit freeze. A freeze of this length carries real trade-offs in climate-goal alignment, 94 00:06:51,504 --> 00:06:56,423 insurance ratings, construction, defect exposure that make it important for the legislature 95 00:06:56,423 --> 00:07:01,343 to weigh explicitly rather than to treat them as simply costless. 96 00:07:01,343 --> 00:07:02,343 However... 97 00:07:02,271 --> 00:07:08,031 If a total freeze is not palatable, then the legislature should at least set a predictable 98 00:07:08,031 --> 00:07:13,552 cost-disclosed cadence for code updates. The Energy Code alone accounts for over a third 99 00:07:13,552 --> 00:07:19,552 of states' entire regulatory cost premium over other states. A decade-long freeze on the 100 00:07:24,144 --> 00:07:29,704 Washington has had a state surplus property program in place since 1993 and is brought 101 00:07:29,704 --> 00:07:35,783 in again in 2023, so the mechanism exists, but the record doesn't. 102 00:07:35,783 --> 00:07:41,783 Our thought should be made to pairing the existing statute with a dedicated matching grant fund. 103 00:07:41,783 --> 00:07:47,223 You can model this on California's comparable program and a statutory disposal timeline. 104 00:07:47,223 --> 00:07:50,704 Here's why I think we've got some fairly low hanging fruit. 105 00:07:51,791 --> 00:07:57,232 We also look at piloting a taxable revolving construction loan fund to link construction 106 00:07:57,232 --> 00:07:58,992 capital at below market rates. 107 00:07:58,992 --> 00:08:04,752 Now, unlike the state's tax exempt bond program, taxable debt is not bound by federal income 108 00:08:04,752 --> 00:08:05,752 restriction rules. 109 00:08:05,752 --> 00:08:10,591 Now that lets this tool reach out into the conventional multifamily world. 110 00:08:10,591 --> 00:08:21,632 That's where most of the State's unit gap exists, and not just income restricted deals. 111 00:08:16,208 --> 00:08:20,848 Now of note is the change in the test for eligibility means that right now there will 112 00:08:20,848 --> 00:08:25,648 be more projects chasing the same scarce bond volume cap. 113 00:08:25,648 --> 00:08:28,687 Now there's a way I think we could certainly push that forward. 114 00:08:28,687 --> 00:08:34,607 Next slide please. A dedicated targeted capital funding with conditions to water, 115 00:08:34,607 --> 00:08:38,927 sewer, road capacity as well in high growth rural counties. 116 00:08:39,519 --> 00:08:46,000 Let's say House Bill 2269 we know manages that part of the wastewater program this funding might 117 00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:51,120 otherwise need to address and that allows the capital program to focus on where it's actually 118 00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:58,320 needed. Warner systems which GMA treats far more permissively than the sewer and road capacity broadly 119 00:09:04,432 --> 00:09:07,432 State law already lets counties expand UGA's 120 00:09:07,432 --> 00:09:11,312 when buildable lands reviews show insufficient capacity. 121 00:09:11,312 --> 00:09:14,351 The process is slow and it's litigation prone. 122 00:09:14,351 --> 00:09:18,351 And the law's own default response to capacity shortfall, 123 00:09:18,351 --> 00:09:19,831 where it is more intensive use 124 00:09:19,831 --> 00:09:22,272 within the existing boundaries itself, 125 00:09:22,272 --> 00:09:24,272 not an expansion of them. 126 00:09:24,272 --> 00:09:27,392 And for counties that have already demonstrated a shortfall 127 00:09:27,392 --> 00:09:30,351 even after fall within boundary measures, 128 00:09:30,432 --> 00:09:35,631 I think the legislature should reduce growth management hearing board exposure and set 129 00:09:35,631 --> 00:09:41,471 a faster decision timeline, preparing any expansion with a TDR rights requirement, and 130 00:09:41,471 --> 00:09:43,751 that could offset the loss of resource land. 131 00:09:43,751 --> 00:09:49,711 In addition to this, we would be rewriting the burnable lands analysis, which in my opinion 132 00:09:49,711 --> 00:09:51,792 is fatally flawed. 133 00:09:51,792 --> 00:09:52,792 Next slide, please. 134 00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:05,519 But for example, if House Bill 1491's set-aside requirement ends up quietly suppressing production 135 00:10:05,519 --> 00:10:09,360 and not encouraging it, when it shows up in the data within a couple of years, 136 00:10:09,360 --> 00:10:15,039 rather than only becoming visible once or any once, and also could be in place for a decade. 137 00:10:15,039 --> 00:10:20,320 So the recommendation is to look closely and watch what's actually happening. 138 00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:25,360 Not that it's already a problem, but we really need to, I think, keep a better tab. 139 00:10:25,855 --> 00:10:29,056 on how these laws are being implemented if they are 140 00:10:29,056 --> 00:10:32,336 being implicated at all, relative to zoning changes. 141 00:10:32,336 --> 00:10:37,056 And that's the end of my slides. Senators, Washington's housing shortage, 142 00:10:37,056 --> 00:10:40,336 it's a production problem, not a demand problem. 143 00:10:40,336 --> 00:10:43,696 Production is being constrained on two fronts concurrently, 144 00:10:43,696 --> 00:10:48,255 cost and time. Both have worsened over the past five years, 145 00:10:48,255 --> 00:10:52,495 even as the state's own housing need assessments have grown. 146 00:10:52,192 --> 00:10:57,871 and both sit within the legislation's direct control in ways population growth and interest rates do 147 00:10:57,871 --> 00:11:03,792 not. The reforms I've shared with you would address the supply side of this crisis directly 148 00:11:03,792 --> 00:11:10,032 at every stage from land availability, through permitting, to construction and in most cases 149 00:11:10,032 --> 00:11:14,751 echo what the state's building industry has already asked the legislature to do. 150 00:11:19,631 --> 00:11:24,951 Thank you so much Matthew for that illuminating and alarming presentation that you've shared with us 151 00:11:25,192 --> 00:11:29,871 We have other house or Senate members of the housing committee that are here virtually 152 00:11:29,871 --> 00:11:32,231 And for those of you that would like to ask a question 153 00:11:32,231 --> 00:11:36,511 I'll just ask that. You raise your hand so that we can see you and we will call on you first 154 00:11:36,511 --> 00:11:40,471 I have on the screen senator Solomon followed by senator Gildon 155 00:11:41,672 --> 00:11:43,672 Thank You Matthew that was 156 00:11:44,432 --> 00:11:49,471 a lot in there and create it very fast. You mentioned one thing that was working. 157 00:11:49,471 --> 00:11:54,032 You'd mentioned the number 2000. Can you mention that again? I didn't catch it. 158 00:11:54,032 --> 00:11:59,951 I'm sorry. Well, you said there was one bright spot. Oh, yes. Right now, if you look at ADUs. 159 00:12:01,152 --> 00:12:04,991 So, accessory dwelling units. And those are something here. 160 00:12:05,504 --> 00:12:11,183 relatively recent, but we've really seen that take off very significantly, mainly in King 161 00:12:11,183 --> 00:12:16,783 and Snowish counties. But we have seen permit applications rise very, very dramatically 162 00:12:16,783 --> 00:12:18,783 in that one particular sector. 163 00:12:18,783 --> 00:12:21,583 And did you say about 2,000 applications? 164 00:12:21,583 --> 00:12:27,344 Just over 2.000 state, yes. Am I not sound like a lot, it's up from three in 2010. 165 00:12:28,543 --> 00:12:28,943 Amazing. 166 00:12:33,039 --> 00:12:37,399 Thank you, Madam Chair. Mr. Brother, thank you for the presentation. There was a lot, 167 00:12:37,399 --> 00:12:42,399 I wish we could have spent a whole hour on your presentation and go through the details. 168 00:12:42,399 --> 00:12:47,879 Of your recommendations, I'm curious, which of the recommendations do you believe would 169 00:12:47,879 --> 00:12:53,519 have the most effect on increasing supply in Washington State? 170 00:12:53,519 --> 00:12:57,120 Permit speed and predictability. I think for a 171 00:12:57,120 --> 00:13:00,879 lot of people, don't you understand what we're going to get? 172 00:13:00,895 --> 00:13:06,535 The understanding that for a builder, the interest rate clock starts well before a shovels 173 00:13:06,535 --> 00:13:13,135 put in the dirt, and so as time goes on the interests of crews and all the builder can 174 00:13:13,135 --> 00:13:16,015 really do is put that on to the end unit price. 175 00:13:16,351 --> 00:13:20,672 And so, if we can get speedier permit applications approved, 176 00:13:20,672 --> 00:13:22,312 if you can actually get some, 177 00:13:22,312 --> 00:13:26,552 if it could not change permitting halfway through the process, 178 00:13:26,552 --> 00:13:29,951 that is something which I know would certainly help 179 00:13:29,951 --> 00:13:31,792 a builder's because that does not put on this plan 180 00:13:31,792 --> 00:13:34,272 to do one thing, it's build housing. 181 00:13:34,272 --> 00:13:36,192 They're not, I don't think it requires them. 182 00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:40,159 Commons for the doctorate to tell you all that if they're not building, there's a reason why they 183 00:13:40,159 --> 00:13:45,120 are not built in. And most of it today is based around cost. They know how much it's going to 184 00:13:45,120 --> 00:13:49,840 cost them to build a house. However, if the market cannot accept that, we're talking about market 185 00:13:49,840 --> 00:13:53,519 rate products specifically, they won't build it. It doesn't mean they aren't going build 186 00:13:53,519 --> 00:13:57,679 it down to the goodness of their hearts. So the more we can make permitting predictable 187 00:13:57,679 --> 00:14:03,279 and speedy for them, that is the way I believe we could make an immediate impact. 188 00:14:05,183 --> 00:14:06,464 Thank you. Senator Alvarado. 189 00:14:08,144 --> 00:14:15,344 Thank You. And thank you for this presentation. I appreciate that you're focusing on what 190 00:14:15,344 --> 00:14:24,864 Washington can do. It would be helpful though if you can spend a minute or two and talk about 191 00:14:24,864 --> 00:14:29,984 some of the broader headwinds that are facing housing development. 192 00:14:31,135 --> 00:14:36,176 Because we have done a significant amount of regulatory reform in the legislature over the 193 00:14:36,176 --> 00:14:43,056 last few years, and we are not seeing the outcomes of that. So, to fire us to do more, 194 00:14:43,056 --> 00:14:47,056 if you could talk a little bit about... 195 00:14:45,296 --> 00:14:49,635 There are some factors, including high interest rates, you know, 196 00:14:49,635 --> 00:14:53,936 war overseas is driving the cost of construction, 197 00:14:53,936 --> 00:14:56,535 significantly impacting labor. 198 00:14:56,535 --> 00:15:00,275 We do know that Seattle in particular, but across the state, 199 00:15:00,275 --> 00:15:03,375 because of the housing boom in the 2000s, 200 00:15:03,375 --> 00:15:08,015 was having a vacancy rate and a softening in rent 201 00:15:09,312 --> 00:15:12,432 causes investors to not see a lot of rent growth. 202 00:15:12,432 --> 00:15:15,072 Therefore, they throttle on investment. 203 00:15:15,072 --> 00:15:19,672 So can you talk a little bit about those broader level trends 204 00:15:19,672 --> 00:15:22,792 and why in sight of the fact that we might not 205 00:15:22,792 --> 00:15:25,072 see the fruits of our labor, we should continue 206 00:15:25,072 --> 00:15:27,631 to make these regulatory changes? 207 00:15:27,631 --> 00:15:28,631 Thank you. 208 00:15:28,368 --> 00:15:33,967 Well, thank you, Senator. Great question. And you are right. The best I can describe it would be 209 00:15:33,967 --> 00:15:39,327 for a builder. There are four cost centres, they worry about. That's what goes into 210 00:15:39,327 --> 00:15:47,248 build a home. One, land. Two, labour. Three, regulations, and four materials. Let's run through 211 00:15:47,248 --> 00:15:58,207 them very quickly, Land. 3.7% of the state's total land is within the UGA, that we know. 212 00:15:54,751 --> 00:15:57,471 And so, where we live it land, what does that do? 213 00:15:57,471 --> 00:16:00,192 Well, by the very nature of it, it's going to push up land values. 214 00:16:00,192 --> 00:16:02,192 And you mentioned Seattle specifically. 215 00:16:02,192 --> 00:16:05,631 Well Seattle, quite frankly, is suffering from a decision. 216 00:16:05,631 --> 00:16:07,471 It made in 1924. 217 00:16:07,471 --> 00:16:09,152 It was the first comprehensive plan. 218 00:16:09,152 --> 00:16:11,072 So what you've done is you really built out the city. 219 00:16:11,072 --> 00:16:12,672 And, so there is very little land. 220 00:16:12,672 --> 00:16:15,312 In order to build or on an up zone, 221 00:16:15,312 --> 00:16:18,111 what can you do is, you have to tear down what's there. 222 00:16:18,336 --> 00:16:23,696 to replace it. Well, you're paying retail for the land value. That's, again, one example. 223 00:16:23,696 --> 00:16:30,255 So, land is expensive. Labour, as you absolutely have directly mentioned, a lot of our construction 224 00:16:30,255 --> 00:16:34,416 labour is, I mean, from the immigrant labour, and a lotta builders have been telling me that 225 00:16:35,216 --> 00:16:39,135 they've got crews not arriving, not showing up, because they're worried that ice might be there, 226 00:16:39,135 --> 00:16:44,735 even though those crews are totally permitted and allowed to work in the United States. 227 00:16:48,224 --> 00:16:54,224 Again, as mentioned, because I've lost a lot of other things, I'm looking at PVC pipe right now. 228 00:16:54,224 --> 00:17:00,543 The reason being is that pipe perfectly correlates to oil prices, and so we've seen a big jump in 229 00:17:00,543 --> 00:17:05,824 that copper steel aluminum tariffs lumber. The Canadian software lumber tariff is still in place. 230 00:17:05,824 --> 00:17:18,064 So all these type of effects come into play. And finally, is the regulatory burden. 231 00:17:10,880 --> 00:17:16,720 Now, Counties do vary fairly dramatically in that respect, but it is still a lot of money 232 00:17:16,720 --> 00:17:21,200 to get upon it. So, what a build would do. Those are four things. Look at those four costs. 233 00:17:21,200 --> 00:17:26,799 He knows interest rates are higher now than they were. 234 00:17:24,144 --> 00:17:29,423 It's very true. They've also got to have some skin in the game. You can borrow 62, 63% of total 235 00:17:29,423 --> 00:17:35,183 costs. So they're just being far more cautious today than they ever have been. And so those four 236 00:17:35,183 --> 00:17:41,423 corners are there. Yes, the legislature should be applauding because they have a lot of new laws 237 00:17:41,423 --> 00:17:46,064 on the books to try and help. But especially today, as you mentioned about interest rates and 238 00:17:46,064 --> 00:17:51,743 mortgage rates, when you've got the yield on 10-year treasure, it's now knocking on 5%. That 239 00:17:53,663 --> 00:17:58,463 That's going to be very hard to equate what a builder would need to sell or rent for 240 00:17:59,743 --> 00:18:04,304 relative to incomes. So yes, we've even seen incomes rising, but the offset's not there. 241 00:18:04,304 --> 00:18:08,384 And quite frankly, going forward, I expect the terminal rate, let's say on the 30-year 242 00:18:09,584 --> 00:18:13,344 mortgage, probably going around 6%. So we're not going 243 00:18:13,344 --> 00:18:17,104 to see the days of sub-3% financing again for a mortgage. 244 00:18:17,104 --> 00:18:23,503 So, yes you've done a lot. 245 00:18:18,736 --> 00:18:22,256 I think it's not what can be done and also implementing some of the laws, as I mentioned 246 00:18:22,256 --> 00:18:27,375 earlier, in my comments, that you have put in place. Because if we don't do that, 247 00:18:27,935 --> 00:18:32,256 we're going to have a big problem in terms of attracting businesses to move to our state. 248 00:18:33,536 --> 00:18:36,496 Thank you for that. Do I see a follow-up question, Senator Laddo? 249 00:18:37,536 --> 00:18:40,016 Thank, thank you so much, Chair Beitman. And thank 250 00:18:41,711 --> 00:18:46,751 quick answer to all of the opinions that I saw and I mean, which I talked to you quickly. 251 00:18:47,551 --> 00:18:52,271 No, it's great. Thank you. One last thing. Can you touch a little bit about the 252 00:18:54,112 --> 00:19:03,711 kind of cyclical nature of development in general as projects get built and there becomes 253 00:19:05,152 --> 00:19:11,632 supply expansion, it takes time to fill units. And during those time, investors are not seeing 254 00:19:11,632 --> 00:19:16,592 as much growth and predictability, so they might throttle. Can you talk a little bit about that? 255 00:19:16,592 --> 00:19:19,872 Because you know there was absorption post 2020 boom. 256 00:19:20,511 --> 00:19:28,511 Right. Anyway, if you imagine supply and demand on a line over time really being offsetting 257 00:19:31,855 --> 00:19:36,655 let's say today, it's going to take time for the supply to catch up with it, so you are always 258 00:19:36,655 --> 00:19:41,695 playing catch-up. We also fully understand that it works in cycles and it is the economic cycle, 259 00:19:42,256 --> 00:19:45,615 the next expectation at some point, if we're not starting soon, and we are going 260 00:19:45,615 --> 00:19:51,615 to have a turn down in the economy and that will come into place. So it really is a timing 261 00:19:51,615 --> 00:19:57,455 factor as much as anything else. The oversupply of apartments that you mentioned, again very accurately, 262 00:20:01,167 --> 00:20:06,647 You have to go back to the financial crisis, as we were coming out of it, the only money 263 00:20:06,647 --> 00:20:10,768 you could borrow, which would build apartments, it wasn't condominiums, certainly, and not 264 00:20:10,768 --> 00:20:11,768 really a single family. 265 00:20:11,768 --> 00:20:15,407 So the world became an apartment developer, but the lag is significant. 266 00:20:15,407 --> 00:20:20,887 So because of that, we had a boom in apartment development occurring, you're quite right, 267 00:20:20,887 --> 00:20:25,048 so supply, exceeded demand, rents were compressed, so we've already started to see... 268 00:20:25,392 --> 00:20:29,592 major slowdown in permitting of multifamily buildings, which 269 00:20:29,592 --> 00:20:33,392 allows that supply distance by the catch up. And then we'll see 270 00:20:33,392 --> 00:20:37,352 again. So really, it is that sign curve. Thank you. More than 271 00:20:37,352 --> 00:20:39,392 anything else, I'd say that's the reason behind it. 272 00:20:39,536 --> 00:20:43,256 Thank you so much, and I know you could talk to us 273 00:20:43,256 --> 00:20:44,655 for a lot longer, Matthew, 274 00:20:44,655 --> 00:20:46,455 and we appreciate your conciseness 275 00:20:46,455 --> 00:20:47,895 because of the work before the committee. 276 00:20:47,895 --> 00:20:49,415 We only have so many time, 277 00:20:49,415 --> 00:20:52,415 but I do encourage committee members to reach out to Matthew 278 00:20:52,415 --> 00:20:53,895 if they have additional questions. 279 00:20:53,895 --> 00:20:55,576 I think that my office will be doing that, 280 00:20:55,576 --> 00:20:56,655 so thank you for joining us, 281 00:20:56,655 --> 00:20:58,375 thank for the valuable information, 282 00:20:58,375 --> 00:21:01,415 and the presentation is available in our CAP system. 283 00:21:01,415 --> 00:21:03,135 Now I'd like to move, thank, you. 284 00:21:03,135 --> 00:21:06,576 We'll move on to a panel on development perspectives. 285 00:21:06,576 --> 00:21:08,536 I'm gonna invite the next panel, 286 00:21:08,847 --> 00:21:12,847 in person to come up, that way we can switch from person 287 00:21:12,847 --> 00:21:14,768 to person in a timely fashion. 288 00:21:14,768 --> 00:21:18,567 So we have Andrea Smiley, legislative director 289 00:21:18,567 --> 00:21:21,728 from the Building Industry Association of Washington. 290 00:21:21,728 --> 00:21:24,448 We also have Dylan Slaughter, Slooter, 291 00:21:24,448 --> 00:21:27,248 State Policy Manager, Master Builders Association 292 00:21:27,248 --> 00:21:30,167 of King and Snohomish County, and we 293 00:21:30,167 --> 00:21:32,807 have Ryan Donahue, Vice President of Advocacy 294 00:21:32,807 --> 00:21:35,367 for Habitat for Humanity, Seattle, King, 295 00:21:35,367 --> 00:21:37,367 and Kiditas Counties. 296 00:21:37,327 --> 00:21:40,847 Good morning, Andrea, would you like to start? Sure. 297 00:21:42,655 --> 00:21:47,455 Good morning, Andrea Smiley here on behalf of the Building Industry Association of Washington. 298 00:21:47,455 --> 00:21:52,496 As many of you may know, we represent the residential construction industry. We have about 8,300 members 299 00:21:52,496 --> 00:21:59,135 and about 150,000 workers across the state. I will say over the last seven years of my career 300 00:21:59,135 --> 00:22:04,016 and thousands of conversations I've had with experts both in the field, academic and 301 00:22:04,016 --> 00:22:09,536 economist, everything and also to kind of echo what Matthew Gardner just said, 302 00:22:12,112 --> 00:22:17,071 how if we want housing affordability we must start with with increasing access to 303 00:22:17,071 --> 00:22:25,511 buildable land and a lot of what Matthew had said is very correct the 3.7% of 304 00:22:25,511 --> 00:22:32,672 our land being in the UGA is really where we're seeing the 305 00:22:32,319 --> 00:22:40,720 the issues come to the forefront. Right now, our state is expecting that all of our growth is 306 00:22:40,720 --> 00:22:46,720 going to be put into those urban growth areas. However, housing often competes with other interests 307 00:22:46,720 --> 00:22:52,160 such as critical areas, office, commercial, industrial, all the things that make, you know, 308 00:22:53,680 --> 00:23:01,039 And so the result is less buildable land, fewer housing units, and more and higher housing prices. 309 00:23:01,039 --> 00:23:07,599 And, so, there is a common misconception that vacant land means that it's build-able. 310 00:23:07,599 --> 00:23:14,960 Kind of following in the same theme as Matthew Gardner, a lot of our members tell us that 311 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:17,640 the remaining land is too expensive to develop. 312 00:23:22,607 --> 00:23:28,448 more plentiful than not that they are essentially lots that are unable to be 313 00:23:28,448 --> 00:23:31,548 developed and that takes away from the amount of billable and 314 00:23:31,548 --> 00:23:38,147 that is available. And so there's really two types of like land segments that I 315 00:23:38,147 --> 00:23:42,347 would kind of put development in. There's a permit ready lot or a not permit 316 00:23:42,347 --> 00:23:45,647 ready law and the major difference there is that you don't really have to deal 317 00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:55,380 that you know come with a not permitted or not permit ready lot and so when you 318 00:23:55,380 --> 00:23:59,839 can as much as possible get the land that's already has everything that 319 00:23:59,839 --> 00:24:03,400 you need and really at the end of the day all you needed a building permit that 320 00:24:03,400 --> 00:24:11,839 is the best scenario and I will say that it is also the lowest amount of time 321 00:24:11,839 --> 00:24:16,599 that takes to complete the project whereas it's the Project Permits that 322 00:24:18,288 --> 00:24:23,248 the delay and ad cost. Again, that's the approvals, the utilities, roads, everything that you need 323 00:24:23,248 --> 00:24:31,167 in order to build a house and have the person be able to live in it. And so I wanted to kind of 324 00:24:31,167 --> 00:24:36,607 show a report from our National Association of Home Builders that basically reiterates what 325 00:24:36,607 --> 00:24:41,167 we've been hearing across the state where, and I just kind highlighted those, I won't go through 326 00:24:46,592 --> 00:24:50,592 the real bottleneck in permitting is tied to land. 327 00:24:50,592 --> 00:24:56,592 And, sorry, here we go. 328 00:24:56,592 --> 00:24:58,592 The areas of opportunity. 329 00:24:58,592 --> 00:25:00,592 So for permit ready. 330 00:25:00,688 --> 00:25:03,768 Pauseing the residential energy code would do a lot. 331 00:25:03,768 --> 00:25:07,928 This last session we had recommended a 10-year pause. 332 00:25:07,928 --> 00:25:11,208 We've been stakeholdering that for the last, I would say, 333 00:25:11,208 --> 00:25:15,248 two to three months and have come up with a new idea of allowing 334 00:25:15,248 --> 00:25:17,208 the next energy to go into effect. 335 00:25:17,208 --> 00:25:22,567 And essentially after that happens, you pause it and let builders 336 00:25:22,567 --> 00:25:25,167 build for essentially two cycles or six years. 337 00:25:25,167 --> 00:25:29,488 And the idea is to have a period of stability where 338 00:25:29,663 --> 00:25:34,284 You can just kind of bang out production as fast as possible and then 339 00:25:34,943 --> 00:25:40,064 Secondarily to that establishing an annual cap on impact and development fees similar to rent control 340 00:25:40,584 --> 00:25:44,064 You got to really make the cost inputs predictable 341 00:25:44,663 --> 00:25:51,624 And then clarifying permitting authority for state and local governments. I think that there's an huge issue right now with state agencies 342 00:25:52,263 --> 00:25:54,864 and special-purpose districts feeling like they have 343 00:25:57,488 --> 00:26:04,167 I guess, more power over the decision-making process than they actually do. 344 00:26:04,167 --> 00:26:10,807 And turning to non-permit-ready lots, I will say, following a lot of the comments from 345 00:26:10,807 --> 00:26:14,488 previous speakers, that infrastructure unlocks more units. 346 00:26:18,912 --> 00:26:25,912 to offset some of the costs that our members have to deal with would be super super helpful in driving down costs as well as 347 00:26:25,912 --> 00:26:32,912 setting uniform design standards such as roadway standards that would help out a lot with annexations 348 00:26:32,912 --> 00:26:38,912 and costs across the state and then of course limiting discretionary studies, mitigations, et cetera. 349 00:26:38,912 --> 00:26:45,912 There are so many issues right now with shrubstep, white oak, a lotta critical areas, storm land or storm water, 350 00:26:47,983 --> 00:26:52,304 We don't really think about in the housing development 351 00:26:52,304 --> 00:26:53,503 unless you're actually in it. 352 00:26:53,503 --> 00:26:57,463 And so those are the most, 353 00:26:57,463 --> 00:27:02,463 from what we see most fruitful ideas for reform. 354 00:27:02,503 --> 00:27:06,503 And we are constantly updating our research center, 355 00:27:06,503 --> 00:27:07,943 the Washington Center for Housing Studies. 356 00:27:07,943 --> 00:27:12,943 So definitely recommend that you check out our website 357 00:27:13,423 --> 00:27:16,304 and yeah, thank you so much. 358 00:27:16,319 --> 00:27:25,559 Thank you, Andrea, and I'm going to ask my committee members to pause on their questions until the next two speakers are complete and we have Dylan to talk about for-profit development. 359 00:27:27,839 --> 00:27:35,720 Thank You, Chair Babin. Members of the committee, I am Dylan Sluter, State Government Affairs Manager at the Master Builders Association of King and Sonomish Counties, obviously some of 360 00:27:35,720 --> 00:27:39,119 the larger development areas in the Puget Sound that we represent. 361 00:27:40,319 --> 00:27:42,440 Today I wanted to focus on one simple question. 362 00:27:42,655 --> 00:27:47,596 How do we turn the housing Washington has and allows on paper to homes that actually 363 00:27:47,596 --> 00:27:51,435 have built? 364 00:27:51,435 --> 00:27:53,556 Washington needs more than 50,000 homes per year. 365 00:27:53,556 --> 00:27:55,195 We've seen that data. 366 00:27:55,195 --> 00:27:59,076 That's not our data, that's the state's data but that is not just a planning goal. 367 00:27:59,076 --> 00:28:01,996 That is actually a production challenge. 368 00:28:03,983 --> 00:28:08,983 Our outside of the state and local control where labor materials barring rates things like that 369 00:28:08,983 --> 00:28:13,903 But there are policies that we should focus on that are choices that the State and the local governments can make 370 00:28:14,263 --> 00:28:16,344 permitting development standards local fees 371 00:28:16,784 --> 00:28:20,824 infrastructure the process and time and uncertainty that it takes to get to the 372 00:28:20,824 --> 00:28:25,423 Process and so the practical question is are we focusing enough on the parts that? 373 00:28:25,423 --> 00:28:28,223 We can control and that caused those delay and cost? 374 00:28:30,448 --> 00:28:33,887 Here's part of the capacity that doesn't equate to production always 375 00:28:33,887 --> 00:28:38,288 And I think Matthew touched on a little bit looking at the buildable lens analysis things like that 376 00:28:38,607 --> 00:28:41,807 Just because on paper it looks like there's playing capacity 377 00:28:41,968 --> 00:28:45,607 Does not mean that we're going to have a feasible product that works there 378 00:28:46,167 --> 00:28:50,327 There's all these different systems in place Andrea touched upon it folks before me did as well 379 00:28:50,367 --> 00:28:52,607 but basically housing is sort of 380 00:28:53,327 --> 00:28:55,407 one product governed by many systems 381 00:28:56,624 --> 00:29:02,544 And here's some of the systems we talked about, land availability and planning, zoning development standards, all of these things are 382 00:29:03,104 --> 00:29:07,144 What a builder goes into when they're thinking about project feasibility? 383 00:29:07,144 --> 00:29:13,743 I think the problem when we think about the system is that not one individual rule itself prohibits housing 384 00:29:13,743 --> 00:29:18,463 But the cumulative system can make it infeasible, especially when it doesn't work together 385 00:29:20,384 --> 00:29:25,624 So let's talk about this. Here's a real-life example a member provided. This is 386 00:29:26,672 --> 00:29:34,991 South King County jurisdiction within a UGA some excess property and owner had they were looking to redevelop and provide some homes 387 00:29:35,551 --> 00:29:37,852 It was middle housing. This is our townhome units 388 00:29:39,503 --> 00:29:43,544 There was zoning capacity for up to 20 units in this area 389 00:29:43,903 --> 00:29:49,824 This the city itself states they wanted alley oriented form for this which is an interesting concept 390 00:29:49,824 --> 00:29:54,084 So the original design the roadway around it is actually an alleyway 391 00:29:54,423 --> 00:29:57,304 But it meets all of the the definitions of a street 392 00:29:57,304 --> 00:30:03,463 It has a 20 foot width and the problem with this when they took it to the jurisdiction is that 393 00:30:04,144 --> 00:30:06,144 alleys though are preferred 394 00:30:05,983 --> 00:30:08,903 can not be vehicle access for the fire code. 395 00:30:08,903 --> 00:30:10,743 So this does not work. 396 00:30:10,743 --> 00:30:13,223 They had to go back and do a redesign, 397 00:30:13,223 --> 00:30:16,344 and basically the city asked them to put a street in. 398 00:30:16,344 --> 00:30:17,624 And so they put it public street, 399 00:30:17,624 --> 00:30:19,304 and at least half a Street. 400 00:30:19,304 --> 00:30:20,864 And if you would dedicate the right of way, 401 00:30:20,864 --> 00:30:22,544 add all the infrastructure, the landscaping, 402 00:30:22,544 --> 00:30:24,584 the sidewalks, then required with that, 403 00:30:24,584 --> 00:30:26,983 there's still a challenge that the Fire Code 404 00:30:26,983 --> 00:30:27,824 couldn't be met. 405 00:30:27,824 --> 00:30:30,064 And even though you add this public Street 406 00:30:30,064 --> 00:30:33,023 and still can potentially achieve those 20 units, 407 00:30:33,359 --> 00:30:37,359 there's the units inside towards the top that actually don't meet the fire access 408 00:30:37,359 --> 00:30:41,359 when it comes to the hose length which is 150 feet. So again, codes that seem to 409 00:30:41,359 --> 00:30:43,359 not be working together. 410 00:30:43,359 --> 00:30:49,359 So, again back to drawing board, here's another redesign. Okay, so now we have 411 00:30:49,359 --> 00:30:53,359 the entire thing having a roadway around it, but then 412 00:30:53,359 --> 00:30:57,359 there is now another requirement that units have to be 413 00:30:57,647 --> 00:31:03,488 on either public open space or the street and on the right side you can see this got brought 414 00:31:03,488 --> 00:31:08,928 down to 16 units but at the top right those units up top couldn't front onto either the 415 00:31:08,928 --> 00:31:14,688 public opened space because the back lot and the geometry and configurations couldn t fit that. 416 00:31:14,688 --> 00:31:18,768 So we added more infrastructure, we lost some units and those costs couldn 417 00:31:24,672 --> 00:31:27,071 They looked at other things such as like unit lot drives, 418 00:31:27,071 --> 00:31:30,672 but those have a max capacity of nine lots per drive. 419 00:31:30,672 --> 00:31:31,511 That didn't work. 420 00:31:31,511 --> 00:31:36,672 A shared driveway may only reach max for residential lots. 421 00:31:36,672 --> 00:31:38,432 So then they ended up with this configuration 422 00:31:38,432 --> 00:31:40,471 that actually went away from middle housing, 423 00:31:40,471 --> 00:31:42,432 went to single family lots, 424 00:31:42,432 --> 00:31:44,511 and this also didn' t work with 425 00:31:44,928 --> 00:31:48,228 They added the road access they tried to provide the frontage they did all of this 426 00:31:48,228 --> 00:31:52,907 But now these lots are very small difficult to manage and if you see up top that open space 427 00:31:52,988 --> 00:31:59,028 That was originally designed to be their stormwater vault is now shrunk and they thought they would run into storm water issues with this 428 00:31:59,748 --> 00:32:04,827 Ultimately the owner decided this isn't feasible. This doesn't make sense even though they try to work with the city 429 00:32:04,827 --> 00:32:10,708 I even saw from this project. They tried do cottage styles a numerous different issues, but 430 00:32:11,200 --> 00:32:16,160 Ultimately, what happens is, while the codes themselves don't say we outright donít allow 431 00:32:16,160 --> 00:32:20,640 this type of housing, when they work together, they doníst work well, and you end up with 432 00:32:20,640 --> 00:32:25,279 a project that potentially 20 homes that could have been supplied, this site is still not 433 00:32:25,279 --> 00:32:26,279 developed. 434 00:32:26,279 --> 00:32:30,680 And so, these are some of the issues I wanted to highlight, that just because we have capacity 435 00:32:30,680 --> 00:32:33,200 doesníd mean it equates to production. 436 00:32:39,215 --> 00:32:43,135 What these fragmented systems can be and just because this 437 00:32:43,855 --> 00:32:47,736 Example had to do with fire and roads and different access issues 438 00:32:48,016 --> 00:32:55,935 It could be a different project with the same system of question do the rules work together to produce the housing they collectively supposedly allow 439 00:32:56,655 --> 00:33:00,935 And that issue is again a system issue. It's not an isolated rule 440 00:33:02,160 --> 00:33:05,240 So here's a question that I think is worth asking that 441 00:33:05,240 --> 00:33:07,680 I wanted to ask the committee and folks today. 442 00:33:07,680 --> 00:33:11,000 If we were designing a housing production system today 443 00:33:11,000 --> 00:33:12,880 to meet Washington's goals, 444 00:33:12,880 --> 00:33:15,599 would we design the system we have now? 445 00:33:16,720 --> 00:33:18,680 I don't believe so. 446 00:33:18,680 --> 00:33:21,519 We need to build the systems that builds the homes. 447 00:33:21,519 --> 00:33:24,440 And this is not necessarily a fault of 448 00:33:24,799 --> 00:33:29,759 who designed the system. It wasn't one person. This was years and decades that evolved 449 00:33:29,759 --> 00:33:35,119 of one legitimate objective or another that created this huge process that's difficult to manage. 450 00:33:35,119 --> 00:33:38,559 I'm not suggesting we completely start from scratch and start over. I am suggesting 451 00:33:38,559 --> 00:33:43,119 we start thinking about how we design backwards from our goals and the outcome we want which are 452 00:33:43,119 --> 00:33:50,319 homes being built. So what's some near term solutions we can talk about? We've got a simplified land 453 00:33:50,943 --> 00:33:53,463 I think one of our priorities is raising the short 454 00:33:53,463 --> 00:33:56,023 plat threshold of 30 units within UGA's. 455 00:33:56,023 --> 00:33:57,624 That aligns with the CPA laws. 456 00:33:57,624 --> 00:34:01,564 That allows folks to use an administrative pathway, 457 00:34:01,564 --> 00:34:04,263 which we think can save up to 50% of time. 458 00:34:04,263 --> 00:34:07,104 Stabilize the building code as folks have discussed. 459 00:34:07,104 --> 00:34:09,864 This brings an opportunity for predictability, 460 00:34:09,864 --> 00:34:11,983 reduces regulatory churn, and allows 461 00:34:11,983 --> 00:34:14,903 folks catch up on the shortage that we have now. 462 00:34:14,903 --> 00:34:16,864 Create permitting certainty. 463 00:34:16,864 --> 00:34:19,184 Talk about clear and objective standards 464 00:34:20,864 --> 00:34:25,864 and strengthening the opportunity for licensed professionals to use their stamp as approval. 465 00:34:25,864 --> 00:34:30,864 Looking at peer reviews and limiting them when they are redundant in ad cost. 466 00:34:30,864 --> 00:34:32,864 And then obviously opposing new cost to housing. 467 00:34:32,864 --> 00:34:37,864 I think adding more costs when we're already so constrained, 468 00:34:37,864 --> 00:34:40,864 when you go through different regulations, as we talked about, this is a system. 469 00:34:40,864 --> 00:34:42,864 Multiple things can interact in different ways. 470 00:34:42,864 --> 00:34:44,864 Let's start thinking about this holistically as you 471 00:34:44,864 --> 00:34:46,864 go though builds the session and as 472 00:34:46,864 --> 00:34:49,864 you consider things, look at it through the lens of what does this mean for housing? 473 00:34:50,416 --> 00:34:56,096 And then for the long term, I think this is sort of a broad concept I wanted to introduce. 474 00:34:56,096 --> 00:34:57,936 Let's play them for production. 475 00:34:57,936 --> 00:35:02,576 Let us look at how we can look a capacity that land is serviceable, developable and likely 476 00:35:02,576 --> 00:35:06,335 to deliver homes, standardize what we came with the basics. 477 00:35:06,335 --> 00:35:11,536 Look at the things that are repeatable that we consistently do across multiple steps so 478 00:35:11,536 --> 00:35:20,255 that have these standardized checklists and things to go through the process more efficiently. 479 00:35:15,664 --> 00:35:20,463 coordinate the path. We've got one project to go through multiple systems. Let's coordinate 480 00:35:20,463 --> 00:35:31,583 and get a consolidated answer from the government. Make land housing ready. 481 00:35:24,800 --> 00:35:28,800 infrastructure is one of the hardest problems we're dealing with, as Andrea and folks before us. 482 00:35:28,800 --> 00:35:33,199 Let's start planning infrastructure and tying it to sites that are likely to be developed. 483 00:35:33,199 --> 00:35:37,039 And then let's measure what gets built. Let us look at the full production pathway. 484 00:35:37,840 --> 00:35:41,920 Ultimately, we see things, maybe 50 to 90s in place, things like that, but that's part of 485 00:35:41,920 --> 00:35:44,400 the data. I think we need to start looking collectively at all the 486 00:35:44,400 --> 00:35:51,280 data so that we can clearly address those barriers and those issues throughout the pipeline. 487 00:35:51,967 --> 00:35:58,947 and then that's sort of my closing but I just wanted to say that it impacts we believe everyone deserves a place to call home and 488 00:35:59,407 --> 00:36:06,668 I think the question I have is how do we create a clear more coordinated more predictable path from land to home? 489 00:36:07,447 --> 00:36:13,568 Because aplace to Call Home ultimately depends on a system capable of delivering one. Thank you 490 00:36:14,351 --> 00:36:16,351 Well, I feel like I should give you an applause, Dylan. 491 00:36:16,351 --> 00:36:19,351 Thank you very much for that. 492 00:36:19,351 --> 00:36:24,351 There was a very frustrating example that you showed, and I know that it's replicated in City across City. 493 00:36:24,351 --> 00:36:26,351 We'll talk more about that during the Q&A. 494 00:36:26,351 --> 00:36:27,351 Senator Solomon, 495 00:36:27,351 --> 00:36:29,351 I've asked folks if they could wait until the last presenter. 496 00:36:29,351 --> 00:36:30,351 Would that be okay? 497 00:36:30,351 --> 00:36:31,351 We have one more, 498 00:36:31,351 --> 00:36:32,351 and then I'll open it up for questions. 499 00:36:32,351 --> 00:36:33,351 Okay. 500 00:36:33,351 --> 00:36:34,351 All right. 501 00:36:34,351 --> 00:36:37,351 Ryan Donahue to talk about non-profit housing development. 502 00:36:37,351 --> 00:36:38,351 Good morning. 503 00:36:38,351 --> 00:36:39,351 Good Morning. 504 00:36:43,856 --> 00:36:46,695 President of Advocacy at Habitat Friminity, Seattle King, 505 00:36:46,695 --> 00:36:48,195 and Kittitas Counties. 506 00:36:49,487 --> 00:36:50,927 Hey, look at that. 507 00:36:50,927 --> 00:36:52,128 All right. 508 00:36:52,128 --> 00:36:54,768 So really excited to be able to have the opportunity 509 00:36:54,768 --> 00:36:58,487 to talk a little bit about who we are and the work that we do here. 510 00:36:58,487 --> 00:37:01,648 I'm sure many of you are familiar with Habitat for Humanity, 511 00:37:01,648 --> 00:37:04,447 if only because you've heard my voice talk about it 512 00:37:04,447 --> 00:37:06,327 quite a few times. 513 00:37:06,327 --> 00:37:07,967 But more importantly, what we did was 514 00:37:07,967 --> 00:37:10,847 we build permanently affordable homeownership opportunities 515 00:37:10,847 --> 00:37:15,088 for families all across Washington who are low income and below. 516 00:37:15,088 --> 00:37:20,248 In order to qualify for one of our homes, you have to be earning 80% or below area meeting income. 517 00:37:20,248 --> 00:37:22,887 So we're talking about your local barista. 518 00:37:22,887 --> 00:37:24,447 We're talk about a home health aid. 519 00:37:24,447 --> 00:37:30,967 We are talking a city staff member or the folks that work in our non-profits that help our communities run. 520 00:37:30,967 --> 00:37:37,128 Essentially, we are talkin about the essential workers that make our community continue to survive. 521 00:37:38,896 --> 00:37:42,516 Home ownership in the model we use is something called permanent affordability 522 00:37:42,936 --> 00:37:48,576 So we used a one-time investment that stays with the home in order to ensure permanent 523 00:37:48,655 --> 00:37:53,155 Affordability we's a long-term renewable ground lease that makes sure that that one time investment 524 00:37:53,536 --> 00:37:56,016 That we get whether it's from the state from The City 525 00:37:56,351 --> 00:38:04,112 Or, more often than not, as we'll hear a little bit more, both end up actually helping keep that home affordable into the long term. 526 00:38:04,112 --> 00:38:08,992 As I said, we are 100% home ownership, and the other thing I'll note is we actually, 527 00:38:08,992 --> 00:38:13,311 at our affiliate, have over 309 homes in our pipeline in King and 528 00:38:13,311 --> 00:38:15,871 Kittitas County over the next five years alone. 529 00:38:15,871 --> 00:38:20,632 This last year we built 54 homes, built and sold 54 home. 530 00:38:20,632 --> 00:38:22,552 This next year, our fiscal year. 531 00:38:25,391 --> 00:38:32,592 five, which is a lot needless to say, but I want to talk a little bit about some of 532 00:38:32,592 --> 00:38:36,751 how we're going to get to that 85 and the way that we are able to actually do that. 533 00:38:39,295 --> 00:38:43,536 I want to start off really by saying thank you to all of you, especially for those of 534 00:38:43,536 --> 00:38:49,615 you who were here in 2023 that voted to support the capital budget, which I believe everybody did 535 00:38:49,615 --> 00:38:57,135 that year, because this project was included as one of the appropriations in there at six 536 00:38:57,135 --> 00:39:02,416 million dollars. So of that 30 million dollar total development cost, six million of 537 00:39:05,088 --> 00:39:11,527 But I do want to take a quick second to kind of recognize what this project also represents. 538 00:39:11,527 --> 00:39:19,728 There has never been an affordable home ownership project that Habitat has done anywhere in the United States, this size are larger. 539 00:39:19,728 --> 00:39:22,927 This is actually a historically large project 540 00:39:22,927 --> 00:39:28,407 that really hadn't ever been done with a single family home, 58 units. 541 00:39:28,407 --> 00:39:30,608 As I said, in this neighborhood where it's built. 542 00:39:30,880 --> 00:39:37,679 the Columbia City, the average condos are roughly around $600,000 in order to purchase that. 543 00:39:37,679 --> 00:39:42,400 If you're going to purchased one of our homes at this project, you are starting off at either 544 00:39:42,400 --> 00:39:49,840 around 165 to $285, 000, depending on what size of home you building. This project took about four 545 00:39:52,751 --> 00:39:57,152 And it's important to note, right, that this was kind of a one-time thing. 546 00:39:57,152 --> 00:39:59,192 We'd never been able, we hadn't ever done this before. 547 00:39:59,192 --> 00:40:01,992 We look forward to continuing to do these type of projects. 548 00:40:01,992 --> 00:40:05,751 You also have the pro forma for this project in the book. 549 00:40:05,751 --> 00:40:07,231 I believe we submitted that. 550 00:40:07,231 --> 00:40:09,831 I'm assuming that that's, you guys have that somewhere, at least I hope so. 551 00:40:10,304 --> 00:40:17,704 I wanted to compare it though to another project that we have going on this one is floral Avenue is what we're currently calling it 552 00:40:17,704 --> 00:40:21,864 I'm sure I can't imagine any of you guys can guess where it is in Cleallam, but 553 00:40:23,184 --> 00:40:26,943 More specifically this is a project. That's gonna be 16 units in cleallum 554 00:40:27,384 --> 00:40:29,384 We're comparing the two because 555 00:40:30,143 --> 00:40:38,224 one thing I really kind of want to lean in here is that local housing subsidy and the state housing trust fund component of it 556 00:40:38,815 --> 00:40:42,815 When we are trying to do projects in, for example, the City of Seattle, 557 00:40:42,815 --> 00:40:49,536 we're lucky that there are a number of different local funding sources that are able to help maximize those projects and maximize 558 00:40:49,536 --> 00:40:54,815 those dollars available to us, whether it's through things like mandatory housing affordability, 559 00:40:54,815 --> 00:41:00,655 or the Seattle housing levy, or even the jumpstart tax. 560 00:41:00,784 --> 00:41:06,063 Any of those things all help make housing more, or make affordable housing possible. 561 00:41:06,063 --> 00:41:09,063 I should say help fund affordable, housing in the city of Seattle. 562 00:41:09,063 --> 00:41:14,664 That means the state doesn't necessarily have to lean in as much on those projects. 563 00:41:14,664 --> 00:41:22,903 As I noted before, you all allocated $6 million to the Liberty Commons project out of a $30 million allocation. 564 00:41:22,903 --> 00:41:29,664 What we ask for when we asked for funding in a project like Cleolm is significantly more in proportion to what the project is. 565 00:41:30,159 --> 00:41:35,440 ultimately what we need because they don't have the local funding sources available to them. 566 00:41:35,440 --> 00:41:40,119 Ultimately, when there's no local housing funder, the state ends up becoming that local 567 00:41:40,119 --> 00:41:42,559 housing funder. 568 00:41:42,559 --> 00:41:46,880 Coming back to Liberty Commons for a second, I want to know a little bit here. 569 00:41:46,880 --> 00:41:51,320 First off, as you can see, we were able to obtain the land in 2022. 570 00:41:51,320 --> 00:41:57,280 We purchased it off the open market outright, and we're able build a couple years later. 571 00:41:59,152 --> 00:42:02,351 was because of design review this is something that you all have actually 572 00:42:02,351 --> 00:42:06,192 helped address already so thank you but one thing in particular I do want to 573 00:42:06,192 --> 00:42:08,431 note was we actually had to work with the city of 574 00:42:08,431 --> 00:42:10,672 Seattle and our partners some of which 575 00:42:10,672 --> 00:42:14,351 right here at the table to help get a ordinance passed at 576 00:42:14,351 --> 00:42:17,791 the City level to be able to emphasize that and make sure 577 00:42:17,791 --> 00:42:19,791 that we were able be to get through some 578 00:42:19,791 --> 00:42:23,231 of the design-review problems another thing that's really important to 579 00:42:24,208 --> 00:42:26,208 is funding at scale. 580 00:42:26,208 --> 00:42:28,367 When we start talking about affordable housing funding, 581 00:42:28,367 --> 00:42:29,527 especially when we're looking at 582 00:42:29,527 --> 00:42:30,927 when this project moved forward, 583 00:42:30,927 --> 00:42:33,288 which was 2022, 2023, 584 00:42:33,288 --> 00:42:36,327 it's important to remember what the funding was available 585 00:42:36,327 --> 00:42:38,967 for affordable home ownership at that point in time. 586 00:42:38,967 --> 00:42:40,487 It was significantly less. 587 00:42:40,487 --> 00:42:42,047 I've been here seven years, 588 00:42:42,047 --> 00:42:44,367 and I remember seven, seven year ago, 589 00:42:44,367 --> 00:42:46,407 we were lucky in the home-ownership space 590 00:42:46,407 --> 00:42:49,728 to get about two to three million dollars a year. 591 00:42:50,271 --> 00:42:54,992 That's obviously gone up now and I want to thank all of you for doing this and helping 592 00:42:54,992 --> 00:42:57,512 to be able to make that more possible. 593 00:42:57,512 --> 00:43:03,552 But the reality is, is that even in 2023, the funding wasn't at scale enough to actually 594 00:43:03,552 --> 00:43:07,271 award a project like Liberty Commons, a regular award. 595 00:43:07,271 --> 00:43:09,472 So we had to go for a direct appropriation. 596 00:43:09,472 --> 00:43:13,152 We appreciate the fact that you all gave us that direct appropriations, but we'd rather 597 00:43:13,152 --> 00:43:15,992 compete with everybody else to get that. 598 00:43:19,824 --> 00:43:23,764 to do that. A couple of other things really to highlight before we move on to 599 00:43:23,764 --> 00:43:29,764 the next slide here is first off that sales tax per home notation there that's 600 00:43:29,764 --> 00:43:35,403 the added cost per her home that had to be allocated in order to 601 00:43:35,403 --> 00:43:39,123 be or that basically the homeowner ended up still having to pay for in 602 00:43:39,123 --> 00:43:42,403 order be able to mitigate that 603 00:43:40,960 --> 00:43:45,960 So, for example, on this project itself, it was roughly $2.1 million. 604 00:43:45,960 --> 00:43:54,599 And again, you all allocated $6 million, so a third of that ended up coming right back to the state in sales tax. 605 00:43:55,280 --> 00:44:00,599 So we'll just note that the other thing I'll note is because we had to get a construction loan on this 606 00:44:00,599 --> 00:44:07,119 It actually cost us almost a million dollars eight hundred and fifty thousand dollars in interest loan interest rates alone 607 00:44:07,559 --> 00:44:12,480 Just to be able to give this project done so we can be about to close on the mortgages and be 608 00:44:12,480 --> 00:44:14,480 able clothes on that loan 609 00:44:14,480 --> 00:44:17,480 Both of those things cost additional funding 610 00:44:17,840 --> 00:44:21,400 So the question is what is that we could do to change the math here? 611 00:44:22,128 --> 00:44:29,068 First off substantial and predictable capital we simply need more money particularly for affordable homeownership 612 00:44:29,068 --> 00:44:31,648 And it needs to be sized at scale in order to 613 00:44:31,648 --> 00:44:33,887 Be able to continue to produce that we need 614 00:44:33,887 --> 00:44:38,447 More local funding flexibility don't make it so the state is the only option to 615 00:44:38,447 --> 00:44:40,168 Be be able get funding options. We need to 616 00:44:40,168 --> 00:44:42,768 Be available to use access local governments as well 617 00:44:43,519 --> 00:44:49,360 a revolving construction loan fund to be able to reduce the cost of interest rates that we're having to pay in order to 618 00:44:49,360 --> 00:44:55,039 be to get these construction loans and then also take a look at sales and use tax and 619 00:44:55,599 --> 00:44:59,760 acknowledge that or and realize that there's a lot of entities that don't have to necessarily 620 00:45:00,400 --> 00:45:04,159 pay sales in use taxes when it's for public goods. That's not the case when 621 00:45:04,159 --> 00:45:07,360 it comes to affordable housing that's the way we can bring more affordable 622 00:45:07,360 --> 00:45:11,280 housing online at a quicker rate. So thank you very much. 623 00:45:13,135 --> 00:45:16,416 I know my info is up there but I'm sure we'll take questions for any of us. 624 00:45:16,416 --> 00:45:19,056 Yes, we will. Okay, committee members, 625 00:45:19,056 --> 00:45:23,856 we have some time for questions. Senator Solomon, did you want to start with your question for Dylan? 626 00:45:30,335 --> 00:45:36,016 Yeah, sorry, I got mute. Dylan, thank you for your presentation. I was just wondering, 627 00:45:43,248 --> 00:45:46,248 about the plant that was not ultimately built. 628 00:45:46,248 --> 00:45:48,608 Does the fire code vary by city? 629 00:45:48,608 --> 00:45:52,327 I just don't understand why there's this back and forth. 630 00:45:52,327 --> 00:45:54,327 Is there a lack of clarity in the code 631 00:45:54,327 --> 00:45:57,307 and is there build that could help that? 632 00:46:01,295 --> 00:46:06,335 Thanks for the question. I think in this example, it was just a multitude of different code issues 633 00:46:06,335 --> 00:46:12,016 that were difficult on a constrained site. You know, if the alleyway was allowed to be the fire 634 00:46:12,016 --> 00:46:17,695 access, which I thing was a local discretion option, that the ally could have fit the required 635 00:46:17,695 --> 00:46:21,856 standards within the Fire Code to beat that access. And my understanding from the builder I worked 636 00:46:24,768 --> 00:46:29,007 that was the case but the city didn't allow that even though they preferred alleys so that 637 00:46:29,007 --> 00:46:33,648 was one of the issues they tried to work around but without changes for these codes to actually 638 00:46:33,648 --> 00:46:37,007 work together like if you're going to have that preference I think you should allow those 639 00:46:37,007 --> 00:46:40,768 access opportunities especially if your building to the standard. So that 640 00:46:40,768 --> 00:46:45,007 was I the major issue and then the frontage issues as well was difficult to deal with on this sort 641 00:46:51,423 --> 00:46:55,824 policy not working with the fire code was the conflict that ultimately killed it. 642 00:46:58,063 --> 00:46:59,264 Follow-up, Senator Solomon? 643 00:46:59,983 --> 00:47:06,143 It's just interesting that you mentioned that the city had the ability to authorize the idea, 644 00:47:06,143 --> 00:47:10,063 but didn't. I just think maybe that's something we should drill down on in the future. 645 00:47:10,063 --> 00:47:11,664 I sent you an email already, Dylan. 646 00:47:11,664 --> 00:47:12,463 Okay, thank you. 647 00:47:13,664 --> 00:47:14,943 Thank you, senator Gaynor. 648 00:47:20,992 --> 00:47:26,512 I've been, I guess in 24 years that I have been in county and state government. 649 00:47:26,512 --> 00:47:33,152 I had continually heard issues relating to regulations and as Matthew mentioned, 650 00:47:33,791 --> 00:47:40,751 the housing problem started back in the 90s. So could you highlight either some of the regulations 651 00:47:40,751 --> 00:47:46,271 that have recently been passed that may have actually been helpful or things that you would 652 00:47:54,960 --> 00:48:02,400 Yeah, well, there are a lot of things. I probably could write an entire dissertation, but I 653 00:48:02,639 --> 00:48:08,480 Think probably first and foremost is focus is refocusing on modernizing the Growth Management Act 654 00:48:08,480 --> 00:48:10,920 I think that there's a lotta things in that that are 655 00:48:11,800 --> 00:48:17,880 opportunities for being able not just to speed up process or speed-up construction projects, 656 00:48:17,880 --> 00:48:21,460 but also be able to alleviate some of the 657 00:48:22,032 --> 00:48:31,552 I guess discretion and the lack of understanding of who has authority and who's lane is really 658 00:48:31,552 --> 00:48:41,152 who is lane, right? So like in my presentation I mentioned that some state agencies and some 659 00:48:41,152 --> 00:48:45,632 special purpose districts feel like they have more power over the end permit decision than they 660 00:48:49,648 --> 00:48:57,887 A lot of times our local governments are not, I guess, given the I don't know what the right 661 00:48:57,887 --> 00:49:03,327 word is, but basically they're kind of caught between the middle of the project, the Project 662 00:49:03,327 --> 00:49:08,927 Advocate and another third party, right? And so how do we ensure that there's a mechanism 663 00:49:08,927 --> 00:49:13,088 in place to control some of that? We have a member issue in Clark County right now where 664 00:49:15,824 --> 00:49:26,704 pretty interesting in their interpretation on a fire access gate for a pool and really it's the 665 00:49:26,704 --> 00:49:31,423 local government that's allowed to decide how to deal with that issue. They just don't feel like 666 00:49:31,423 --> 00:49:37,503 they are empowered to do that right now. So thank you. Does anyone else have anything they want to add? 667 00:49:39,952 --> 00:49:46,592 I guess answering the other side of the question, this is Ryan Donahue with Habitat again, the 668 00:49:47,184 --> 00:49:50,344 Some of the good regulations, if you count them as good, or if 669 00:49:50,344 --> 00:49:53,224 you counted them is regulations I'm not entirely sure. 670 00:49:53,224 --> 00:49:55,143 But I would actually point specifically to some of 671 00:49:55,143 --> 00:49:57,344 the parking reforms that have been done. 672 00:49:57,344 --> 00:49:59,503 Minimizing the requirements for parking, I 673 00:49:59,503 --> 00:50:01,664 would point to sum of requirements 674 00:50:01,664 --> 00:50:05,824 for ground floor mixed use changes, some 675 00:50:05,824 --> 00:50:07,503 of work that's been there. 676 00:50:07,503 --> 00:50:09,704 As being another example of things that 677 00:50:09,704 --> 00:50:10,744 have actually helped out, 678 00:50:10,744 --> 00:50:14,583 I'd point in middle housing as well, HB 1110, 679 00:50:14,583 --> 00:50:16,384 as wells actually ULS reform as 680 00:50:16,559 --> 00:50:22,659 And being able to really kind of be in some of those things that have been done especially over the last few years that 681 00:50:22,659 --> 00:50:24,659 Have been quite helpful 682 00:50:25,079 --> 00:50:27,079 Go ahead Dylan. I 683 00:50:27,079 --> 00:50:30,199 Encourage Ryan on those issues especially things like unit lots of division 684 00:50:30,199 --> 00:50:32,639 We've seen be used to provide that ownership project. 685 00:50:32,639 --> 00:50:34,639 I just wanted to highlight 686 00:50:34,032 --> 00:50:38,431 the lack of standardization, one issue that a lot of our folks are facing. 687 00:50:38,431 --> 00:50:41,231 So in King County, when you're dealing with stormwater mitigation, 688 00:50:41,231 --> 00:50:43,072 they sort of have their own rule set and do their 689 00:50:43,072 --> 00:50:46,831 own things. So like proprietary systems to deal with the mitigation 690 00:50:46,831 --> 00:50:57,231 that ecology has tested, invented, and say work well. 691 00:50:50,400 --> 00:50:55,559 Some of those King County wouldn't allow on their own and I think if we're going to have ecology testing and vetting these 692 00:50:55,559 --> 00:50:55,760 I 693 00:50:55,760 --> 00:50:59,400 think that should be sort of a top-down approach to say if these work they should 694 00:50:59,400 --> 00:51:02,599 Be able to work everywhere and allows that flexibility it allows 695 00:51:02,599 --> 00:51:09,480 That innovation to happen and ask a clarifying question. Yeah, are you saying that ecology has vetted a certain stormwater management? 696 00:51:09,880 --> 00:51:15,960 Yes things and Seattle saying we've got our own thing. We're not going use that one. King county. Okay. 697 00:51:17,327 --> 00:51:20,927 That's a good example, thank you. 698 00:51:20,927 --> 00:51:22,487 Senator Elvarado, do you have a question? 699 00:51:22,487 --> 00:51:25,648 No, okay, well that's good because we're running out of time. 700 00:51:25,648 --> 00:51:33,728 But I do want to just say the example that you gave was really helpful to see that plot of land and 701 00:51:33,728 --> 00:51:39,608 the multiple iterations that that landowner was going through in order to get homes to the market. 702 00:51:40,735 --> 00:51:46,576 there is discretion from the city and they're making an active policy choice and that policy 703 00:51:46,576 --> 00:51:53,295 choice is resulting in less homes being built in a city. And we have cities that tell us we need 704 00:51:53,295 --> 00:51:57,775 we needs more homes and we needed to build more home and yet we had policies like this where it 705 00:51:57,775 --> 00:52:03,775 literally is a choice. We could have a pro housing approach as a local government. 706 00:52:04,143 --> 00:52:07,264 and have all of those different, the fire department 707 00:52:07,264 --> 00:52:08,943 and the city planners coming together to say, 708 00:52:08,943 --> 00:52:10,463 how do we get to a yes? 709 00:52:10,463 --> 00:52:12,864 And how can we partner with you to get these homes 710 00:52:12,864 --> 00:52:15,423 on the market because what ultimately will happen 711 00:52:15,423 --> 00:52:18,063 is that lot is going to sit there, make it, 712 00:52:18,063 --> 00:52:20,784 or they're going build a multi-million dollar mansion, 713 00:52:20,784 --> 00:52:22,463 McMansion on it. 714 00:52:22,463 --> 00:52:23,344 And in that case, 715 00:52:23,344 --> 00:52:25,184 the City is giving up 20 homes. 716 00:52:25,184 --> 00:52:28,304 It could be more affordable for a single family home, 717 00:52:28,304 --> 00:52:32,143 which I think is antithetical to most of our goals here 718 00:52:33,920 --> 00:52:38,679 And I appreciate the comments that you made, Ryan, about bills and legislation. 719 00:52:38,679 --> 00:52:43,599 I would point to we have had legislation proposing workforce revolving loan funds. 720 00:52:43,599 --> 00:52:44,519 We actually passed that bill. 721 00:52:44,519 --> 00:52:46,719 That was a Mari Levitt bill multiple years ago. 722 00:52:46,719 --> 00:52:48,400 It has never been funded. 723 00:52:48,400 --> 00:52:53,760 We've also had a bill that gave a sales tax exemption for affordable housing construction. 724 00:52:53,760 --> 00:52:56,199 I'd love to see that applied more broadly. 725 00:52:56,199 --> 00:52:58,199 That bill did not pass. 726 00:52:58,199 --> 00:53:02,920 Yeah, it did pass, so the specific barriers that 727 00:53:03,248 --> 00:53:09,208 the legislature has worked on but not funded and considered and not passed. 728 00:53:09,208 --> 00:53:14,527 The point being we can take action and appreciate you all coming forward with potential solutions. 729 00:53:14,527 --> 00:53:15,728 We will take note of that. 730 00:53:15,728 --> 00:53:19,128 We look forward to partnering with you on this issue of making sure we all have more housing. 731 00:53:19,128 --> 00:53:23,887 And with that, we're going to move to the next panel because we are getting low on time. 732 00:53:24,224 --> 00:53:29,463 But welcome. We have two presenters, Chris Hermans and Marty Koestra, and they're going 733 00:53:29,463 --> 00:53:34,224 to provide us with an update on starter home demonstration program of the Washington starter 734 00:53:34,224 --> 00:53:37,224 home plan. Good morning. Welcome. Please begin. 735 00:53:38,672 --> 00:53:44,992 Thank you Madam Chair and community members. We're excited to be able to provide you an update 736 00:53:45,552 --> 00:53:52,992 around the starter home plan since we last met with you and into coma in July and so 737 00:53:55,487 --> 00:54:01,407 getting an overview of where we are with the demonstration program along with some other work 738 00:54:01,407 --> 00:54:07,487 that's underway and then I will spend a few minutes just talking about update on the financing 739 00:54:08,367 --> 00:54:12,608 that we're looking to try to inspire related to offset construction. 740 00:54:18,672 --> 00:54:44,672 So we're going to quickly go through is is giving you an update on what's happened when since we last saw you in July as Chris said we are definitely wanting to update you on the demonstration program and the financing programs and also what we've been doing as it relates to the response and long term recovery of the fires that have occurred again in Washington state. Next slide, please. 741 00:54:48,192 --> 00:55:04,192 Based on where we are at, related to understanding the long-term recovery, we're staying in close contact with communities called Viltride, Spokane leadership, organizations there, developers, builders, the AIA and others. 742 00:55:04,719 --> 00:55:08,619 trying to make sure that everything that we have learned over the years from no 743 00:55:08,619 --> 00:55:13,860 honor fires out to Dina, certainly the experience post Katrina and how 744 00:55:13,860 --> 00:55:18,900 offsite methodologies and the starter home plan fits into that recovery 745 00:55:18,900 --> 00:55:21,780 strategy, including the use of pre approved. 746 00:55:21,903 --> 00:55:25,143 permit ready plans, the townhouse competition 747 00:55:25,143 --> 00:55:28,503 that Chris has led, and other strategies, 748 00:55:28,503 --> 00:55:32,184 including the use of what we call micro factories, 749 00:55:32,184 --> 00:55:36,264 rather than needing to establish one or two large factories. 750 00:55:36,264 --> 00:55:38,583 How can we use a satellite and hub strategy 751 00:55:38,583 --> 00:55:43,583 or a smaller, basically, micro factory strategy 752 00:55:44,143 --> 00:55:46,903 in community, keeping economic development, 753 00:55:46,903 --> 00:55:50,664 economic benefit in the community and leveraging offsite? 754 00:55:51,280 --> 00:56:09,280 We also talked specifically with you in July about how the use of offsite front loads some cost issues and what that does in terms of creating a financing strategy challenge and we will share with 755 00:56:20,880 --> 00:56:23,079 program. So let's go to the next slide. 756 00:56:25,119 --> 00:56:31,760 So the demonstration program will start with us releasing the RFP out to 757 00:56:31,760 --> 00:56:33,639 communities and developers. 758 00:56:34,063 --> 00:56:39,664 You can imagine that there have been a number of folks reaching out to us from across the state 759 00:56:39,664 --> 00:56:45,423 with potential projects. We're starting to even see more of the habitat affiliates in various 760 00:56:45,423 --> 00:56:52,864 pockets throughout the State acquiring larger parcels of land, community land trusts as well, 761 00:56:53,503 --> 00:56:57,184 and then developers of course who are private developers who 762 00:57:03,344 --> 00:57:10,824 now secured and properly catalogued and categorized at commerce. Snap the Spokane 763 00:57:10,824 --> 00:57:15,583 neighborhood action partners will be the fiscal intermediary and of course the 764 00:57:15,583 --> 00:57:21,384 ship will help administer that. We're looking for two sites, two distinct 765 00:57:21,384 --> 00:57:26,744 jurisdictions, 30 to 44 sale homes. Again, we're targeting low and moderate 766 00:57:29,856 --> 00:57:33,376 Each site will test a different off-site methodology. 767 00:57:33,376 --> 00:57:36,815 It could be full-on 3D volumetric boxes, 768 00:57:36,815 --> 00:57:39,976 or a panelized construction, 769 00:57:39,976 --> 00:57:43,416 or some hybrid thereof alongside stick fame, 770 00:57:43,416 --> 00:57:46,536 because we actually do want to be able to test 771 00:57:46,536 --> 00:57:49,775 all of the assumptions that have been made. 772 00:57:49,791 --> 00:57:55,952 And so we will be using the Housing Future Center at the University of Washington to actually 773 00:57:55,952 --> 00:58:01,472 monitor and evaluate and do all of the R&D related work that goes along with this. 774 00:58:02,512 --> 00:58:03,711 Next slide, please. 775 00:58:06,431 --> 00:58:11,952 So what will we measure? Well, first of all, we want to get to a better understanding of 776 00:58:16,576 --> 00:58:24,096 A lot of times what we see as developers and others looking at first-cost only, we know that 777 00:58:24,079 --> 00:58:26,980 Until we get to standardized plans, until we 778 00:58:26,980 --> 00:58:35,119 get the repeatability volume purchasing, that there may be a 10% up to 10 percent premium 779 00:58:35,119 --> 00:58:39,440 for using off-site methodologies in the first cost. 780 00:58:39,440 --> 00:58:46,159 However, when we factor in time and time to market, time delivery, I think you just heard 781 00:58:46,159 --> 00:58:53,440 from one of your parties that, there was 850k in interest on a project that was done. 782 00:58:53,487 --> 00:59:03,487 We seek to better understand what the fully loaded costs are, and of course, we're looking at scale and quality and waste. 783 00:59:03,487 --> 00:59:12,487 There are a lot of things that we are learning about how use of offsite methodologies can improve our sustainability practices and our reduction in waste, etc. 784 00:59:12,976 --> 00:59:20,175 So, we hope to have the first comparative data available to review Q4-2027, 785 00:59:20,815 --> 00:59:27,615 and we certainly are looking forward to moving forward with this demonstration program, 786 00:59:27,615 --> 00:59:33,536 a task force is being seated that will do all the evaluations and final decisions 787 00:59:34,096 --> 00:59:42,815 in the 1st quarter of next year. 788 00:59:36,431 --> 01:00:00,431 We're also about ready to release. We hope by the time housing Washington comes around the first phase of our work with community attributes on the economic impact study that will elucidate very clearly where we see the starter home plan contributing to the revenue base and revenue opportunities for the state and local communities. 789 01:00:05,711 --> 01:00:20,711 As electives are very keenly aware of a lot of these things, as you struggle with the revenue issues, we just want to make them very plain and clear so that you can actually process them and see how investments might make a difference. 790 01:00:20,711 --> 01:00:24,711 Next slide, please. 791 01:00:24,711 --> 01:00:27,711 And I think this is where Chris picks up. 792 01:00:27,920 --> 01:00:50,920 It is and as we talked about just a kind of a reminder when we met in July with you at craft contracting one of the key things that we're working on simultaneously to the demonstration program is for the first time to work in putting together financing program and products that work for offset construction. 793 01:00:57,519 --> 01:01:02,519 of a home's building cost for offsite construction 794 01:01:03,559 --> 01:01:06,840 is in the factory and currently low lenders. 795 01:01:06,840 --> 01:01:11,840 And we had a design session with six banks in May 796 01:01:11,840 --> 01:01:16,840 and none of them have an existing program or product 797 01:01:17,119 --> 01:01:18,719 that funds off site. 798 01:01:18,719 --> 01:01:20,760 So we have been at the same time working 799 01:01:20,760 --> 01:01:22,960 with the finance commission, 800 01:01:22,960 --> 01:01:26,199 modeled after our conversations and programs 801 01:01:26,735 --> 01:01:33,135 in Colorado, in Oregon, and California, Tulsa and other places in the country that's looking 802 01:01:33,135 --> 01:01:41,056 to incentivize both developers to build using offset construction, as well as lenders to 803 01:01:41,056 --> 01:01:52,976 get engaged in factory capacity. So next slide. We're excited to just note that at the August 804 01:01:53,391 --> 01:02:15,391 Finance Commission meeting, the board has approved two allocations and the first allocation is $10 million for what we're just generally describing as a catalyst fund that specifically would be administered by an area CDFI. 805 01:02:22,672 --> 01:02:24,672 specifically to 806 01:02:25,983 --> 01:02:32,943 provide seed capital and that down payment assistance to the factory to utilize penalizer 807 01:02:32,943 --> 01:02:41,664 modular construction methods. Again, with public financing, the target will be 50 to 80 percent 808 01:02:41,664 --> 01:02:50,864 AMI and allows for shared equity and 50 year affordability. The second tranche is $10 million, 809 01:02:55,280 --> 01:03:10,280 We're looking to use finance commission's capital to bring in conventional construction lenders as because we do not currently have an existing program or product. 810 01:03:10,280 --> 01:03:24,280 There's a lot of concern or caution on the part of private lenders to get into this financing. So the goal is ultimately to create revolving loan product that would incentivize. 811 01:03:24,496 --> 01:03:32,056 both nonprofits and, but specifically, small, lot mission line developers building missing 812 01:03:32,056 --> 01:03:39,735 middle housing to utilize offset construction with this particular program and product. 813 01:03:39,735 --> 01:03:47,655 And it would be a recyclable, recycled capital, and but it's done in combination with 814 01:03:49,119 --> 01:04:08,119 Trying to standardize designs master permitting and ultimately to aggregate off site construction demand. So that in fact, we're trying to build factory capacity and a predictable pipeline for them to be able to go from one shift to two and three shifts. 815 01:04:18,576 --> 01:04:32,576 The private market will in fact have an opportunity to see that this is actually a de-risking proposition and that they will get involved with their own products. 816 01:04:32,576 --> 01:04:43,576 So right now we are continuing to work with the finance commission and putting the structures in place. We have a draft. 817 01:04:43,576 --> 01:04:47,576 I'm going to ask you to try to wrap it up. 818 01:04:47,568 --> 01:04:49,568 And we're, yeah, we were next slide. 819 01:04:52,143 --> 01:05:01,023 This is our last slide. Ultimately, we think that where we need the legislature and what makes all of 820 01:05:01,023 --> 01:05:11,583 this repeatable is that if we are able to pass permit ready plans with SB 6015, my introduction, 821 01:05:11,583 --> 01:05:16,224 if were able through resource, LNI, and local jurisdictions to be able 822 01:05:19,664 --> 01:05:36,423 For both permit ready plans and factory built housing that will be in a place to aggregate that demand in order to be able to accelerate attainable starter homes for working families across Washington State and we'll just end with 823 01:05:37,503 --> 01:06:05,503 We understand the current revenue constraints for the state of Washington, and there is an opportunity to do a capital budget appropriation that matches the finance commission's program related investments, as we've seen in other states, that would be a huge lift, but it is not something that we are requiring or that will be required for these programs to move forward. 824 01:06:07,152 --> 01:06:19,152 Thank you so much, Chris and Marty. Thank, you. So much. It was very exciting to hear the work that you've done and those specific asks and how they relate to creating more start homes. Do we have any questions from the committee? 825 01:06:22,152 --> 01:06:25,152 All right, looks like we don't. We'll keep trying along. 826 01:06:25,152 --> 01:06:28,152 Thank. You so, Marty and Chris will look forward to talking with you more. 827 01:06:29,327 --> 01:06:34,447 Okay, with that, we will move to our last subject for the agenda today, which is housing 828 01:06:34,447 --> 01:06:41,327 affordability trends and financing. We are very lucky today to have an overview of affordability 829 01:06:41,327 --> 01:06:47,728 trends by Chris Collier, the director of government relations housing authority of Snohomish County. 830 01:06:47,728 --> 01:06:50,208 Good morning, Chris. I haven't seen you in a while. It's good to 831 01:06:50,208 --> 01:06:53,728 have you back before the committee. Good to see you, Madam Chair, members of the 832 01:06:53,728 --> 01:06:55,967 committee, thank you so much. Am I coming through? Okay. 833 01:06:56,623 --> 01:06:57,623 You are great. 834 01:06:57,623 --> 01:06:58,623 Okay. 835 01:06:58,623 --> 01:07:03,983 Okay, I'm joining you from Eastern Washington, Washington DC, where I am here representing 836 01:07:03,983 --> 01:07:07,744 both the Association of Washington Housing Authorities, on which I co-chair the Legislative 837 01:07:07,744 --> 01:07:12,143 Committee and the American Planning Association, in Washington chapter where i co share their 838 01:07:12,143 --> 01:07:13,704 legislative committee as well. 839 01:07:13,704 --> 01:07:18,903 So I' m here to really put an exclamation point as we round out the session on all of 840 01:07:18,903 --> 01:07:19,903 the presenters ahead. 841 01:07:19,903 --> 01:07:23,423 I think that you will find in the next 10 minutes that I have, and I'll try to keep to 842 01:07:25,775 --> 01:07:37,775 Again, or an exclamation point on the information that was shared in the presentations proceeding. So let me share my screen very quickly and is that visible to everybody, especially online. 843 01:07:37,775 --> 01:07:39,775 It is true. Okay. Very good. 844 01:07:39,775 --> 01:07:42,775 So here's my presentation. I'll get right into it. 845 01:07:46,016 --> 01:07:49,936 data from OFM. Here is the number of homes versus the 846 01:07:49,936 --> 01:07:52,096 number households that were built in Snohomish County in 847 01:07:52,096 --> 01:07:56,896 green year by year per OFF. We built 1,106 more housing units in 848 01:07:56,896 --> 01:07:59,536 Snuhomich County than new households either moved or 849 01:07:59,536 --> 01:08:04,576 reformed to, you know, in Sinohamish county in that year. 850 01:08:04,576 --> 01:08:07,376 This adds up, the housing unit does not get pushed over, that is 851 01:08:07,376 --> 01:08:11,775 unsold or un-rented in 2004. This ends up into a surplus. If we 852 01:08:12,864 --> 01:08:18,384 zero in the year 2000. We add up to a healthy surplus of housing that continues to be added 853 01:08:18,384 --> 01:08:22,863 to year by year and this indicates that people have choice. There are options whether to rent 854 01:08:22,863 --> 01:08:27,663 to own or something else in Snomish County if you're forming a household here. This changes 855 01:08:31,600 --> 01:08:38,340 significant increase in immigration to Snohomish County in this period to functionally zero by 2019 the rebound 856 01:08:39,159 --> 01:08:43,319 from Mr. Gardner's presentation was primarily apartment construction as he covered 857 01:08:44,220 --> 01:08:50,020 So we remain in a period of acute scarcity in ownership housing. What did this do to price in? 858 01:08:51,380 --> 01:08:58,619 Brown is the median sale price for a single family detached home in all Snuhomich County adjusted for inflation from 859 01:08:58,840 --> 01:09:00,840 2000 to 2025 860 01:09:01,296 --> 01:09:05,735 We have a high water market of $831,000 in 2024. 861 01:09:05,735 --> 01:09:08,615 Again, this is adjusted for inflation. 862 01:09:08,615 --> 01:09:11,576 Now, most of us are not buying homes with all cash. 863 01:09:11,576 --> 01:09:15,456 We need to get a bank loan, so let's put 10 percent down on this home, 864 01:09:15,456 --> 01:09:17,655 which is the majority sale product in 865 01:09:17,655 --> 01:09:18,655 Sonoma County, by the way, 866 01:09:18,655 --> 01:09:20,815 about 80 percent of our homes sold, 867 01:09:20,815 --> 01:09:23,136 our housing stock is single-family detached. 868 01:09:23,136 --> 01:09:25,536 Let's go to 10% down payment on 869 01:09:25,536 --> 01:09:29,015 a 30-year fixed rate mortgage with the annualized annual interest rate. 870 01:09:29,167 --> 01:09:34,608 property taxes and insurance included, and you get this yellow line. This is the required income 871 01:09:34,608 --> 01:09:39,807 for a household to obtain this median house, right? The final piece of the puzzle is a debt 872 01:09:39,807 --> 01:09:45,408 to income ratio of 33%, above which the bank says you're an unsafe lending prospect, 873 01:09:45,408 --> 01:09:50,847 right. The reason that that jump happens in 2021 is interest rates going from two to six, 874 01:09:54,463 --> 01:10:00,823 What this line I like to say is that you must be this tall to ride line for housing ownership in Snohomish County. 875 01:10:00,823 --> 01:10:04,003 This is from the financial perspective. How tall are we? 876 01:10:04,003 --> 01:10:13,463 In purple, but inflation adjusted median household income in snohamish county. The problem starts here. It rolls downhill from here to town homes to condominiums to apartments. 877 01:10:13,463 --> 01:10:19,783 Just for context, the average rent for an apartment in Sonohama County again adjusted for inflation in green. 878 01:10:20,591 --> 01:10:24,311 This is how asking rents look like in Snohomish County. 879 01:10:24,311 --> 01:10:26,152 Back to Mr. Gardner's presentation, 880 01:10:26,152 --> 01:10:28,391 the dearth of or rather the, the oversupply, 881 01:10:28,391 --> 01:10:32,351 not overupply the production of apartment units. 882 01:10:32,351 --> 01:10:34,112 In Snuhomich County has had an impact 883 01:10:34,112 --> 01:10:36,591 on the actually asking price for apartments. 884 01:10:36,591 --> 01:10:38,631 Ownership housing is not the same story. 885 01:10:38,631 --> 01:10:41,231 In the appendix packet that I sent 886 01:10:41,231 --> 01:10:43,231 that should be in your materials, 887 01:10:43,231 --> 01:10:44,471 you'll see that production 888 01:10:44,471 --> 01:10:47,192 of ownership housing has been quite low and remain so. 889 01:10:47,192 --> 01:10:49,671 So I can corroborate his data with my own. 890 01:10:50,079 --> 01:11:06,079 Um, let's look at declining affordable home ownership. Now, I'm looking at all ownership options in Snohomish County from 2000 to 2025 year and how many homes of any type from single family down to a mobile home park home sold for less than $100,000 again adjusted for inflation. 891 01:11:10,752 --> 01:11:17,311 You go to $200,000 to 300, 000, 300 to 400, 00, dollars of sales, you start to see a 892 01:11:17,311 --> 01:11:21,952 story emerge when your 10,00 units sold in the year 2000 were well below that number 893 01:11:22,832 --> 01:11:32,832 in 2025. We continue with 10 groups of sale price up to 900,0000 to one million dollar homes, 894 01:11:32,832 --> 01:11:36,591 a story emerges that we are selling the same number of homes 895 01:11:37,296 --> 01:11:42,855 Today, as we were in the depths of the recession and the wake of a great financial crisis, 896 01:11:42,855 --> 01:11:47,536 and there were reasons to this for time that I won't go into in detail, but certainly it 897 01:11:47,536 --> 01:11:50,895 is a struggle to find a place to buy a period. 898 01:11:50,895 --> 01:11:56,176 And also the makeup through the lens of sale price of these homes has changed dramatically. 899 01:11:56,176 --> 01:12:00,216 The final piece of puzzle is homes that sell for over $1 million in red at the top of 900 01:12:00,216 --> 01:12:05,216 the bar chart. 901 01:12:01,119 --> 01:12:05,079 that today 20% of everything that you can own 902 01:12:05,079 --> 01:12:09,600 in Snohomish County sells for over $1 million, everything. 903 01:12:09,600 --> 01:12:11,079 This is data from the county assessor. 904 01:12:11,079 --> 01:12:13,520 It is a true census of every single sale 905 01:12:13,520 --> 01:12:16,640 of any property in all of Snuhomich County. 906 01:12:17,680 --> 01:12:22,720 So this is an ancillary to the proceeding slide. 907 01:12:22,720 --> 01:12:24,159 Let's look at who can afford it. 908 01:12:24,159 --> 01:12:26,399 In the Seattle Metro, Snhomuch, King, Pierce County, 909 01:12:26,399 --> 01:12:30,000 how many workers make over 240,000 dollars? 910 01:12:29,935 --> 01:12:34,975 216 to $240,000 in their current occupation, the median wage for their 911 01:12:34,975 --> 01:12:40,655 current occupations is in this band of income. And we go down the scale to the 912 01:12:40,655 --> 01:12:45,615 final piece, about $57,00 a year. This is not what everybody makes. 913 01:12:45,615 --> 01:12:48,735 This if you stick in your current profession, this is what you will make 914 01:12:48,735 --> 01:12:51,935 in the middle of your profession. It's from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 915 01:12:55,119 --> 01:13:06,119 This data is from 2025. Let's look at the, uh, you must be this tall to ride line for 2025 force in how much county single family homes require one eighty eight hundred and eighty thousand dollars of household income. 916 01:13:06,119 --> 01:13:14,119 You see the rest down to apartments. If you don't want to pay more than 30% of your income for the average apartment is in the homeless county. You need to make this much. 917 01:13:14,119 --> 01:13:16,119 Only less than 2% 918 01:13:23,488 --> 01:13:26,368 if you open it up to town homes and condominiums of which they are very few. 919 01:13:27,007 --> 01:13:29,728 Only 40 percent of the region's workforce could afford to rent 920 01:13:29,728 --> 01:13:34,847 affordably something somewhere in Snohomish County. You may be renting in Stanwood and driving 921 01:13:34,847 --> 01:13:39,488 all the way to Seattle where your job is, but you can rent it affordly. In any case, 922 01:13:39,488 --> 01:13:42,847 about 60 percent or 1.2 million people in the Seattle metro could 923 01:13:42,847 --> 01:13:47,167 afford it to do neither of those things on their own. But dual income, yes indeed, 924 01:13:52,688 --> 01:13:55,307 Even combining incomes of two incomes 925 01:13:55,307 --> 01:13:57,707 of $57,000 in the middle of your career 926 01:13:57,707 --> 01:13:59,828 in your 30s and 40s, you will be able 927 01:13:59,828 --> 01:14:00,667 to rent affordably, 928 01:14:00,667 --> 01:14:02,347 you'll not be to own anything. 929 01:14:02,347 --> 01:14:03,307 This is the rent trap. 930 01:14:03,307 --> 01:14:05,387 This the proof of the put proof 931 01:14:05,387 --> 01:14:07,868 in that statement of rental trap, 932 01:14:07,868 --> 01:14:09,148 rounding out my presentation. 933 01:14:09,148 --> 01:14:10,667 What has this done to the workforce? 934 01:14:10,667 --> 01:14:12,467 Where does the work force live? 935 01:14:12,467 --> 01:14:14,387 In Snohomish County, 936 01:14:14,387 --> 01:14:17,228 going from a cardinal directions on the x-axis 937 01:14:17,228 --> 01:14:18,707 and the number of people on 938 01:14:19,391 --> 01:14:23,372 Why access the less than 10 mile trips. This is how many people? 939 01:14:24,431 --> 01:14:28,471 New people we added just in how much counties workforce the people that are working there today 940 01:14:29,131 --> 01:14:32,851 Who are coming from less and 10 miles from where their home is to where there workplaces? 941 01:14:34,811 --> 01:14:40,152 You see the directions then 10 to 24 miles this is your 10-24 mile trip from home to work each way 942 01:14:40,731 --> 01:14:42,731 25 to 50 miles 943 01:14:42,731 --> 01:14:44,731 50 Miles or greater 944 01:14:44,815 --> 01:14:54,815 Two stories that I want to call out here in my remediating time is that we gained 6200 new workers that are coming to Snohomish County today from over 50 miles from the south. 945 01:14:54,815 --> 01:15:01,815 If you look at five south of Seattle and it's a parking lot, this is why because of the reverse commute has. 946 01:15:01,583 --> 01:15:03,884 not been such a reverse community anymore. 947 01:15:03,884 --> 01:15:06,123 The second thing that I'll call out is from the east. 948 01:15:06,123 --> 01:15:08,304 I'm looking at Senator Gaynor Wenatchee, 949 01:15:08,304 --> 01:15:10,444 Representative Burnett, who I spoke with 950 01:15:10,444 --> 01:15:12,703 and said, Chelan County is now a bedroom community. 951 01:15:12,703 --> 01:15:14,944 Everybody lives here and now trucks over the mountains. 952 01:15:14,944 --> 01:15:16,844 This is the proof of that data 953 01:15:16,844 --> 01:15:21,844 that 4,176 estimated new people are coming to work 954 01:15:21,844 --> 01:15:23,743 in Snohomish County from over 955 01:15:23,743 --> 01:15:26,944 the Cascade Mountains from Chelin County and other places. 956 01:15:26,944 --> 01:15:29,503 Again, there is more detailed information in the packet 957 01:15:31,087 --> 01:15:35,927 time. This is the impact of the presentation that you have seen today, much of which I 958 01:15:35,927 --> 01:15:40,047 agree with. I am available for questions, I welcome any opportunities to continue this 959 01:15:40,047 --> 01:15:44,927 discussion in more dynamic fashion. And thank you very much. 960 01:15:44,927 --> 01:15:49,568 Thank you, Chris, for that lightning round of pieces of information for us. 961 01:15:49,568 --> 01:15:52,648 I know that senators probably are processing. First up, 962 01:15:52,648 --> 01:15:54,568 I have Senator Alvarado. Please go. 963 01:15:55,695 --> 01:16:04,695 Thank you, Madam Chair and thanks Chris for that presentation. I think it really illustrates the housing gap at the lowest income level. 964 01:16:04,695 --> 01:16:10,695 And can we talk a little bit about we know that it takes something. 965 01:16:11,136 --> 01:16:15,235 to deliver housing for that majority population 966 01:16:15,235 --> 01:16:17,176 that is left out of the market. 967 01:16:17,176 --> 01:16:19,376 Can you talk a little bit about what you're seeing 968 01:16:19,376 --> 01:16:22,416 at the federal level and as a housing authority 969 01:16:22,416 --> 01:16:25,735 for the backbone of operating subsidy 970 01:16:25,735 --> 01:16:29,296 that it takes to make that housing available to folks? 971 01:16:29,296 --> 01:16:30,735 Yes, right now it's not how much county 972 01:16:30,735 --> 01:16:32,536 the main source of Operating Subsidies 973 01:16:32,536 --> 01:16:36,095 taking a Housing Choice voucher or a Section 8 voucher 974 01:16:36,095 --> 01:16:39,336 and assigning it to a specific unit, that unit. 975 01:16:39,216 --> 01:16:42,815 now has 70% of its rent paid by that voucher. 976 01:16:42,815 --> 01:16:47,775 There is a statutory limit on, for most housing authorities where they cannot 977 01:16:47,775 --> 01:16:50,176 project base, as it's called, over 20% 978 01:16:50,176 --> 01:16:53,695 of their voucher portfolio in physical units, 979 01:16:53,695 --> 01:16:56,815 where then the voucher is assigned again to a unit, not a household who can take it 980 01:16:56,815 --> 01:17:00,336 wherever they wish. There has been great discussion 981 01:17:04,431 --> 01:17:16,431 Allowing that that is right now. That is the source for operating subsidy. Other sources are few and far between and I would basically call them unicorns. I wish that I had better news, but that 982 01:17:16,431 --> 01:17:28,431 is a very difficult limit that we have as we look at our assignments, our goals of zero to 50% am I housing, even higher than that, perhaps. 983 01:17:35,279 --> 01:17:37,680 Thank you. Any other questions for Chris? 984 01:17:40,207 --> 01:17:41,707 I don't see any. 985 01:17:41,707 --> 01:17:43,988 Chris, I know that you gave us some appendices 986 01:17:43,988 --> 01:17:46,427 in your presentation, so that's available for folks. 987 01:17:46,427 --> 01:17:47,908 I knew that was a lot of information. 988 01:17:47,908 --> 01:17:50,028 One of the challenges we have is we wanna get 989 01:17:50,028 --> 01:17:51,868 a comprehensive overview of these topics, 990 01:17:51,868 --> 01:17:52,988 and I now that it can be hard, 991 01:17:52,988 --> 01:17:55,087 because you're getting a lotta information very quickly, 992 01:17:55,087 --> 01:17:57,188 but I do encourage folks to take a look at that, 993 01:17:57,188 --> 01:17:58,868 and then also reach out to Chris 994 01:17:58,868 --> 01:18:00,427 if you have follow-up questions. 995 01:18:00,427 --> 01:18:01,908 Chris thank you so much for your work, 996 01:18:01,908 --> 01:18:04,547 and your vast knowledge, and all of your advocacy. 997 01:18:04,547 --> 01:18:06,467 We really appreciate you being here. 998 01:18:06,467 --> 01:18:07,307 Thank you, sir. 999 01:18:07,307 --> 01:18:08,148 Thank-you. 1000 01:18:08,576 --> 01:18:14,015 Okay, and now we will move on to an overview of lending framework and financing barriers. 1001 01:18:14,015 --> 01:18:18,296 We've got a couple presenters who will be visiting us virtually. 1002 01:18:18,296 --> 01:18:23,015 Staff, do we have them ready on Zoom? 1003 01:18:23,015 --> 01:18:29,136 While you're getting them in the Zoom room, we've Don Costa, EVP, Chief Home Lending Officer 1004 01:18:29,136 --> 01:18:34,456 for First Security Bank and member of the Washington Mortgage Bankers Association. 1005 01:18:36,207 --> 01:18:41,207 Bradenburg, EVP, Chief Lending Officer of Cashmere Valley Bank and member of the Washington 1006 01:18:41,207 --> 01:18:43,207 Bakers Association. 1007 01:18:43,207 --> 01:18:46,207 All right, good morning. 1008 01:18:46,207 --> 01:18:49,207 Who would like to start? 1009 01:18:48,368 --> 01:18:55,167 My stuff's on the screen. So I guess I'll start. All right. You're in the mistake of responding to some questions from just a foot. 1010 01:18:55,167 --> 01:19:01,007 Jessica Worskew. And so here I am today. I'm not a professional at this, but I will do my best. 1011 01:19:01,007 --> 01:19:05,087 I just like to thank all the senators for the efforts here. 1012 01:19:05,087 --> 01:19:11,807 I want to say everybody for House Bill 1110, the ADU Bill 1337. It was really some great work. 1013 01:19:13,055 --> 01:19:16,655 And I want to thank the presenters ahead of me. 1014 01:19:16,655 --> 01:19:20,015 I know Matthew Gardner, so I wanted to give a shout out to him 1015 01:19:20,015 --> 01:19:22,416 and really appreciate the information he's given there. 1016 01:19:23,775 --> 01:19:28,095 Maybe I'd only add to Matthew's pieces if you think that it's been kind of dire 1017 01:19:28,095 --> 01:19:31,055 on the new construction building. I'll look right now. 1018 01:19:31,055 --> 01:19:32,735 I think you can, you know, 1019 01:19:32,735 --> 01:19:40,895 you haven't seen anything. 1020 01:19:34,496 --> 01:19:36,775 to about what you're gonna see really starting today 1021 01:19:36,775 --> 01:19:39,136 and maybe for the next six months. 1022 01:19:39,136 --> 01:19:41,615 I can tell you, we do two kinds of lending here. 1023 01:19:41,615 --> 01:19:44,615 We do spec lending, which is lending to builders, 1024 01:19:44,615 --> 01:19:47,055 which mostly what we spoke about so far. 1025 01:19:47,055 --> 01:19:49,256 And we also do custom construction lending 1026 01:19:49,256 --> 01:19:52,735 which if you wanted to have a home built by a builder, 1027 01:19:52,735 --> 01:19:55,456 we would lend you the money to do that. 1028 01:19:55,456 --> 01:19:58,296 Our business has taken a pretty dramatic downturn 1029 01:19:58,296 --> 01:20:01,095 over the last few months of the builders just saying, 1030 01:20:01,095 --> 01:20:02,536 we can't afford to build. 1031 01:20:03,823 --> 01:20:08,463 We're exiting this for now until some later date. 1032 01:20:08,463 --> 01:20:12,384 And I think there's going to be some pretty devastating consequences there. 1033 01:20:12,384 --> 01:20:17,823 Trying not to repeat stuff that everybody else and so many of the other people have said is I 1034 01:20:17,823 --> 01:20:23,743 think just time is money, time as risk. And what I would say is that I 1035 01:20:23,743 --> 01:20:29,264 think a fault in the building process is a sequential view of how it's done. 1036 01:20:33,695 --> 01:20:37,055 I develop. I ask for a bill need permit. 1037 01:20:37,055 --> 01:20:38,015 I build. 1038 01:20:38,239 --> 01:20:42,140 And I just think things can be done at the same time, 1039 01:20:42,140 --> 01:20:44,500 as opposed to one after the other. 1040 01:20:44,500 --> 01:20:47,100 And it could probably shorten the timeframe of build 1041 01:20:47,100 --> 01:20:49,340 to build maybe in half or more. 1042 01:20:49,340 --> 01:20:52,420 If there's anyone here representing Grace Harbor area, 1043 01:20:52,420 --> 01:20:54,060 I'd like to give them a shout out. 1044 01:20:54,060 --> 01:20:57,899 There's a really success story down that way called Seabrook. 1045 01:20:58,899 --> 01:21:01,420 They will actually allow a builder to get 1046 01:21:01,420 --> 01:21:05,260 their lots segregated during the development process. 1047 01:21:05,260 --> 01:21:06,859 They can actually start building homes 1048 01:21:07,792 --> 01:21:13,372 process and they're able to get homes built in a much more timely manner and I 1049 01:21:13,372 --> 01:21:17,652 only point that I point them out is that some county that maybe the committee 1050 01:21:17,652 --> 01:21:22,851 could look at to see the good things that that they are doing. I think another 1051 01:21:22,851 --> 01:21:29,152 challenge is as I've said is the cost of permitting is extremely expensive and 1052 01:21:29,152 --> 01:21:35,351 one of the things we just work on a five unit town home here for a builder. 1053 01:21:33,935 --> 01:21:50,935 And they decided to pass. This is in Seattle. It's a $1.2 million home as it sits today. The developer was putting five town homes on that project, each selling for about $800,000. So it's taking, you know, one home, making it five. 1054 01:22:03,439 --> 01:22:12,239 affordable housing and however there is a MHAF mandatory housing affordability fee that 1055 01:22:12,239 --> 01:22:18,159 builder would have to pay of $125,000 on top of everything else that they're paying and 1056 01:22:18,159 --> 01:22:22,520 it just made the project not feasible and the builder passed. 1057 01:22:27,712 --> 01:22:34,752 should probably be eliminated if you're in low land value areas which there are MHA fees 1058 01:22:34,752 --> 01:22:40,431 in the low-land value area and or maybe you've capped the sales price and say if 1059 01:22:40,431 --> 01:22:47,872 you were to keep your sales prices below a certain amount you will not have to pay these fees because 1060 01:22:47,872 --> 01:22:53,391 it doesn't make a lot of sense to paying you know low income housing fees on low 1061 01:22:57,904 --> 01:23:00,304 Next slide, modular housing. 1062 01:23:00,304 --> 01:23:05,463 I think one of the folks to talk spoke about that and we do modular 1063 01:23:05,463 --> 01:23:08,863 housing, so the rest of slides will be mostly custom construction. 1064 01:23:08,863 --> 01:23:11,304 This will not be developer or builder loans. 1065 01:23:11,304 --> 01:23:12,904 This'll be loans to consumers. 1066 01:23:12,904 --> 01:23:15,064 We provide modular 1067 01:23:15,064 --> 01:23:16,104 housing loans 1068 01:23:16,104 --> 01:23:21,144 to consumer. This is where consumer would want a modular home built for themselves. 1069 01:23:21,144 --> 01:23:23,304 We have some really nice financial, 1070 01:23:23,304 --> 01:23:25,783 modular housings treated just like a stick built home. 1071 01:23:25,783 --> 01:23:27,623 It's a great way to build a house. 1072 01:23:27,775 --> 01:23:32,576 I'm sorry. I've seen hands up. Do I need to? No, I mean, ask my committee members to wait. 1073 01:23:32,576 --> 01:23:35,176 We're just going to let you finish your slides and then we'll open up our questions. 1074 01:23:35,176 --> 01:23:35,935 But I got you guys. 1075 01:23:36,735 --> 01:23:42,775 We have some great financing for a consumer that wants to build a modular home. 1076 01:23:42,775 --> 01:23:46,775 They could come in with as little as three and a half percent down up front. 1077 01:23:46,775 --> 01:23:52,336 We will pay for the building costs through the loan and it actually works really well. 1078 01:23:52,336 --> 01:23:53,336 It is limited. 1079 01:23:53,336 --> 01:23:54,336 I'll say that. 1080 01:23:54,336 --> 01:23:57,256 We're one of the specialists in the state. 1081 01:23:57,256 --> 01:24:01,256 It's very much a bank or maybe credit union product because the interest rate risk for 1082 01:24:06,319 --> 01:24:08,619 We can handle that within our balance sheets, 1083 01:24:08,619 --> 01:24:11,899 but most blenders, just standard letters cannot do that. 1084 01:24:11,899 --> 01:24:14,500 So we love the product, 1085 01:24:14,500 --> 01:24:17,859 but we're fearful of the project, and here's why. 1086 01:24:18,939 --> 01:24:20,859 The hole was built in a factory. 1087 01:24:20,880 --> 01:24:26,800 And what happens is that some of the, the large manufacturer home dealers, 1088 01:24:26,800 --> 01:24:31,359 the mobile home dealer that say that have modular financing, not such a big deal. 1089 01:24:31,359 --> 01:24:37,159 But there are others who want significant deposits upfront from the consumer. 1090 01:24:37,159 --> 01:24:39,880 And they're building these home in a factory. 1091 01:24:39,880 --> 01:24:44,560 You can't tell what, you know, two by sixes are our borrowers, what? 1092 01:24:44,560 --> 01:24:48,279 Walls are borrowers versus other borrowers. 1093 01:24:49,296 --> 01:24:55,296 when you're advancing these funds, but there's nothing at the home site, you've had a lot of risk. 1094 01:24:55,296 --> 01:25:03,055 In some of these modular dealers will want up to half over time, half of the loan or the customer 1095 01:25:03,695 --> 01:25:08,015 funds to be paid to them before there is even one piece of wood at that house. 1096 01:25:08,975 --> 01:25:15,136 And so we have experienced some pretty devastating losses. We have in person our bank, 1097 01:25:16,735 --> 01:25:22,176 where they're having modular homes built, but unfortunately, the modular builder, 1098 01:25:23,216 --> 01:25:30,256 their finances weren't in line, and they ended up filing bankruptcy. And the bankruptcy court says, 1099 01:25:30,975 --> 01:25:35,775 we don't know what two by sixes are yours, borrower. We don t know that walls are yours. 1100 01:25:35,775 --> 01:25:41,855 I'm sorry, you're just out. In real extreme cases, we actually had one borrower who advanced 1101 01:25:44,543 --> 01:25:51,344 manifest this builder, modular builder and lost it all. And we've had a number of them happen that 1102 01:25:51,344 --> 01:25:57,904 way and so we're very, we will do these loans to some of the manufacturer home dealers, 1103 01:25:57,904 --> 01:26:03,184 but we'll worry about doing it to others because we have no idea what financial shape these dealers 1104 01:26:04,608 --> 01:26:08,688 And so I put a couple of recommendations down. 1105 01:26:08,688 --> 01:26:10,967 Maybe there's bill to performance bonds, 1106 01:26:10,967 --> 01:26:14,688 maybe requirements, maybe they're required 1107 01:26:14,688 --> 01:26:17,287 to maybe have escrow, the money in escrows, 1108 01:26:17,287 --> 01:26:21,408 and we can then, once the walls and stuff 1109 01:26:21,408 --> 01:26:23,648 are delivered to the site, we could fund off of there. 1110 01:26:23,648 --> 01:26:28,287 So that way we're going to identify what's their stuff. 1111 01:26:28,287 --> 01:26:30,728 And, you know, let's just. 1112 01:26:30,623 --> 01:26:34,703 in the factory itself, but it is a good product. 1113 01:26:34,703 --> 01:26:35,904 It does save money. 1114 01:26:35,904 --> 01:26:37,423 It's just a lot of risk with the way 1115 01:26:37,423 --> 01:26:39,463 that deposits are being handled. 1116 01:26:39,463 --> 01:26:41,463 Manufacturing housing, we're actually 1117 01:26:41,463 --> 01:26:43,104 the state's largest lender. 1118 01:26:43,104 --> 01:26:45,863 And you can see that the financing options, 1119 01:26:45,863 --> 01:26:49,743 we have VA financing, 3.5% down financing. 1120 01:26:49,743 --> 01:26:51,743 5% Down to Financing. 1121 01:26:51,984 --> 01:26:58,984 We have a great draw process in place that allows consumers to to come out of pocket with very little money 1122 01:26:58,984 --> 01:27:02,783 It is a really great product of keeping values low 1123 01:27:02,783 --> 01:27:09,463 I would say we mostly see it is as far as custom construction and go-ons go in the rural areas 1124 01:27:09,463 --> 01:27:14,304 I think I'd like to see maybe that this is only an opening up for maybe 1125 01:27:15,104 --> 01:27:18,184 Cities and instead of just allowing stick belt 1126 01:27:18,184 --> 01:27:21,503 Maybe they allow manufactured housing if you haven't been in a matter 1127 01:27:21,583 --> 01:27:28,304 factory house, late house home lately, you'd be shocked how nice some of them are and maybe a 1128 01:27:28,304 --> 01:27:34,304 lot of a more. So my recommendation would be to think about pushing on zoning where maybe 1129 01:27:34,304 --> 01:27:39,583 a double wide manufactured home, which looks very similar to a single family home would 1130 01:27:39,583 --> 01:27:48,064 be allowed in those different areas. And then regarding the ADU pieces, I would think the number 1131 01:27:49,391 --> 01:27:51,851 First of all, it is working and they are being built. 1132 01:27:51,851 --> 01:27:55,271 I think that's due to the house bill that was passed. 1133 01:27:55,271 --> 01:28:00,712 I do think you do have some municipalities that are fighting you if it was this committee. 1134 01:28:00,712 --> 01:28:07,072 They seem to come up with new coverage rules, tree ordinances, different things that basically 1135 01:28:07,072 --> 01:28:15,351 seems to be from a builder's perspective trying to reduce the amount of ADUs that were being 1136 01:28:15,351 --> 01:28:16,351 built in their cities. 1137 01:28:18,015 --> 01:28:24,595 And I think the number one thing I recommend is, is what's happening is is when you're 1138 01:28:24,595 --> 01:28:27,775 building these ADUs, you, to be, 1139 01:28:27,775 --> 01:28:31,435 you condominiumize the lot and to 1140 01:28:31,435 --> 01:28:33,796 be able to sell them individually. 1141 01:28:33,796 --> 01:28:40,515 The challenge was that condiment is a lot expensive and sometimes it limits 1142 01:28:40,515 --> 01:28:43,036 the financing that a borrower can get. 1143 01:28:43,036 --> 01:28:47,595 It also sometimes limits the numbers of ADU's that can be built on the home. 1144 01:28:47,631 --> 01:28:53,952 on the property. So, for instance, when you're doing a condaminomized type of ADU project, 1145 01:28:53,952 --> 01:29:00,112 you really don't want to go over three. Now, the ADu house bill allows up to six, 1146 01:29:00,112 --> 01:29:04,511 or the middle housing bill, allows us up six ADUs, but you won't wanna do that when 1147 01:29:04,511 --> 01:29:09,072 you are condaminomizing the lots, because you'll lose your financing that the consumers can have. 1148 01:29:13,872 --> 01:29:25,872 Change those into unit lot subdivisions where you're actually having just a standard lot and that just keeps the takeout financing wide open. There are no condo fees. 1149 01:29:25,872 --> 01:29:36,872 There's no, you know, all the costs that go into putting the homeowners associations together. All of the reviews that have to be done and you really getting to the same place. 1150 01:29:43,807 --> 01:29:46,307 I can, if I unit lot subdivision it, I 1151 01:29:46,307 --> 01:29:47,688 can sell the same house on the 1152 01:29:47,688 --> 01:29:49,747 same basically lot. And it's just 1153 01:29:49,747 --> 01:29:51,887 this legal definition that is a 1154 01:29:51,887 --> 01:29:54,047 differentiator that really makes it 1155 01:29:54,047 --> 01:29:56,448 difficult. What I like about the 1156 01:29:56,448 --> 01:29:58,608 unit lots subdivision, it covers both 1157 01:29:58,608 --> 01:30:02,368 the house bill 1110 and the 8u 1337. 1158 01:30:02,368 --> 01:30:04,728 You kind of kill two birds with one stone. 1159 01:30:05,328 --> 01:30:13,207 That's why thank you done. Thank you so much. All right. I'm gonna go to senator Gainerd followed by senator Alvarado senator gainer 1160 01:30:14,448 --> 01:30:16,448 Thank You madam chair, so 1161 01:30:18,087 --> 01:30:21,408 Don I did look up what the manufacturer and 1162 01:30:22,087 --> 01:30:24,047 For housing affordability. 1163 01:30:24,047 --> 01:30:31,007 I mean in other words, you're trying to make it more expensive by providing money for affordable housing 1164 01:30:32,688 --> 01:30:37,007 not so much on the manufacturer this was on that on 1165 01:30:37,007 --> 01:30:39,228 the mandatory housing. Oh yeah, mandatory 1166 01:30:39,228 --> 01:30:41,448 housing you're making it more expensive even 1167 01:30:41,448 --> 01:30:44,807 affordable homes to support affordable 1168 01:30:44,807 --> 01:30:47,448 homes. Okay, I just when I looked up what it 1169 01:30:47,448 --> 01:30:49,927 was. That was my application. Yes. All right. 1170 01:30:49,927 --> 01:30:53,807 Thank you. Senator Alvarado. Thank 1171 01:30:53,807 --> 01:30:54,807 you 1172 01:30:55,199 --> 01:31:00,800 It's interesting that you brought up mandatory housing affordability. It is the City of Seattle's 1173 01:31:00,800 --> 01:31:07,279 second most effective program at building housing for low-income people and had built 1174 01:31:08,800 --> 01:31:12,720 3,600 homes with 5,000 in the pipeline. 1175 01:31:14,159 --> 01:31:19,840 It also interesting you that brought it up from a banker's perspective because of all of the costs 1176 01:31:22,079 --> 01:31:28,800 known and predictable cost that hasn't changed over many years. I'm wondering if you can talk a 1177 01:31:28,800 --> 01:31:36,479 little bit more about other costs, whether the cost of capital or investor appetite, 1178 01:31:36,479 --> 01:31:43,760 other things that are actually fluctuating and changing project viability. Because again, 1179 01:31:43,760 --> 01:31:49,199 that one affordability program has been baked into the code for many 1180 01:31:51,376 --> 01:31:56,095 I agree. This is a affordable housing in our state. Yeah, I'd agree it's just that I think that 1181 01:31:56,095 --> 01:32:03,216 I would recommend that maybe there's a cap on a price cap that it instead of doing it on 1182 01:32:03,216 --> 01:32:10,336 a $500,000 home, for example, which is affordable, housing is maybe it starts that that comes in when 1183 01:32:10,336 --> 01:32:15,216 that's $1 million home or a nine hundred thousand dollar home. It just seems kind of, you know, 1184 01:32:21,231 --> 01:32:29,372 And it could have gone up and we provide, you know, the five more unit for more units. So that was it. I don't think get rid of it, but 1185 01:32:30,528 --> 01:32:34,608 I would just say the biggest cost is time, 1186 01:32:34,608 --> 01:32:36,568 and then time is risk, you know, 1187 01:32:36,568 --> 01:32:37,768 because all of a sudden you think 1188 01:32:37,768 --> 01:32:39,927 you're going into one market versus the other. 1189 01:32:39,927 --> 01:32:43,007 I think there are a lot of permitting fees, 1190 01:32:43,007 --> 01:32:44,368 sewer connection fees. 1191 01:32:44,368 --> 01:32:46,768 Sometimes the city will say, 1192 01:32:46,768 --> 01:32:49,087 you can't connect where you are at today 1193 01:32:49,087 --> 01:32:51,448 and it's 25 feet off the property. 1194 01:32:51,448 --> 01:32:54,648 We're gonna want a line improvement of 110 feet. 1195 01:32:54,768 --> 01:32:59,648 on the other side for you to be able to connect to water. 1196 01:32:59,648 --> 01:33:01,807 There's a lot of times there's delays of months 1197 01:33:01,807 --> 01:33:05,528 on a completed home where the utilities folks aren't able 1198 01:33:05,528 --> 01:33:08,448 to get out and get that utilities connected. 1199 01:33:08,448 --> 01:33:11,328 And just it's just really on that timing delays. 1200 01:33:11,328 --> 01:33:15,368 Yeah, the permitting fees are somewhat kind of well known 1201 01:33:15,368 --> 01:33:17,047 to, you know, and you kind 1202 01:33:17,047 --> 01:33:18,608 of know what you're going into there. 1203 01:33:18,608 --> 01:33:22,127 I would say the thing would be is, for instance, 1204 01:33:22,271 --> 01:33:27,712 sidewalk improvements. There was no sidewalk there to begin with, and now they want a sidewalk, 1205 01:33:27,712 --> 01:33:36,032 and that 100% of that cost is applied to that builder slash that owner, whereas that sidewalk 1206 01:33:36,032 --> 01:33:41,311 I would argue will be used by many. And I think clearly improvements you see, I 1207 01:33:41,311 --> 01:33:46,112 would think some of those costs could be maybe shared by the community as opposed to being taxed 1208 01:33:51,216 --> 01:33:56,136 Thank you. I actually do have a bill on the sidewalk permitted thing. My question is 1209 01:33:56,496 --> 01:34:03,655 You mentioned Seabrick is able they were able to build during the application process somehow. It could you expand on it? 1210 01:34:03,695 --> 01:34:08,775 Yeah, basically what they seem to allow allowing him to do is kind of work 1211 01:34:09,095 --> 01:34:14,456 You know the building and the development all happen in kind more at the same time 1212 01:34:14,935 --> 01:34:20,095 So what happens is is they are letting them get they've got their development permit 1213 01:34:20,815 --> 01:34:27,376 and then instead of making them finish the last sidewalk and the whole development process, 1214 01:34:27,376 --> 01:34:33,296 for example, they're saying it's close enough now that we're going to allow you to segregate 1215 01:34:33,296 --> 01:34:39,615 it into lots. And then at the same time, we'll allow to get a building permit and actually start 1216 01:34:39,615 --> 01:34:45,855 building, even though the development project isn't completely signed off. So they are shorting 1217 01:34:50,863 --> 01:34:51,863 Thank you. 1218 01:34:51,863 --> 01:34:52,863 Thank You. 1219 01:34:52,863 --> 01:34:57,663 Well, thank you so much, Don, for kind of lifting up the lid on the financing side of 1220 01:34:57,663 --> 01:34:58,663 this. 1221 01:34:58,663 --> 01:35:02,224 It's not something that we typically delve deeply into in the housing committee, but 1222 01:35:02,224 --> 01:35:06,423 it is something obviously linked and important for us to understand. 1223 01:35:06,423 --> 01:35:08,684 I know it was just an overview. 1224 01:35:08,684 --> 01:35:12,543 We could learn a lot more, and I do appreciate your insight and being taking time out of 1225 01:35:12,543 --> 01:35:20,703 your data talk to us, so you can tell Jessica Fortesky that you did a good job. 1226 01:35:16,448 --> 01:35:33,448 Yeah, you can do whatever you would like. We have another speaker who's going to talk about financing. So you are welcome to sit in and listen to that conversation. Okay. Thank you, Don. And with that, we will hear from Steve from cashmere Valley Bank. 1227 01:35:33,448 --> 01:35:36,448 Thank You Steve for joining us as well. Please proceed. 1228 01:35:42,944 --> 01:35:48,543 go over to top of what Don had to add on financing and the difficulties between 1229 01:35:48,543 --> 01:35:54,184 around the 80 moose and with lots of our homes. I can hit some top top line 1230 01:35:54,184 --> 01:35:57,463 numbers about like mortgage production estate, but I'm not sure that's exactly 1231 01:35:57,463 --> 01:36:01,423 what we need to be looking for in this moment. So I kind of leave that up to 1232 01:36:01,423 --> 01:36:04,384 you, Madam Chair, if you want to hear those numbers or if 1233 01:36:04,384 --> 01:36:07,264 you just want a press on. 1234 01:36:05,680 --> 01:36:15,880 Um, sure, some of those top line numbers and then I thought it was interesting, the financing challenges around factory built. If you have anything to add on that, that would be useful. 1235 01:36:16,399 --> 01:36:16,920 The, 1236 01:36:18,239 --> 01:36:34,720 The having to fund on the factory bill, so having some fun on 30, 40%, but we told them out and have no improvements on a lot. It's, it's just not something of traditional construction financing ever really anticipated. 1237 01:36:35,119 --> 01:36:44,119 And you can develop a program around it, but the regulators, you know, pretty high scrutiny on that. 1238 01:36:44,119 --> 01:36:50,119 And rightly so, because, like, on said, we can't have a builder in the Midwest have 1239 01:36:50,119 --> 01:36:56,119 a factory that goes bankrupt or say by a tornado and you've got really no. 1240 01:36:56,119 --> 01:37:00,119 So it's, it is a risk for the bank. 1241 01:37:00,463 --> 01:37:07,264 Is it possible to have like an insurance that the factory belt can cover a certain cost or a 1242 01:37:07,264 --> 01:37:10,463 lean on the property? Is there any? I don't have a lean 1243 01:37:10,463 --> 01:37:16,384 on a property, but you've only got the value of a bird and you could have if you got, you know, 1244 01:37:16,384 --> 01:37:23,184 we've got a billion dollars, $100,000, like you run, funded $150, or $200, 000 to get the 1245 01:37:28,688 --> 01:37:35,688 actual flower after the event and you have that's what I understand. 1246 01:37:35,688 --> 01:37:45,387 And then could you get any, could require them to have some version of builder risk, maybe, but they probably will just go to the next test. 1247 01:37:45,387 --> 01:37:47,887 It was, it was bank doesn't require. 1248 01:37:47,887 --> 01:37:49,087 Sure. 1249 01:37:49,087 --> 01:37:54,188 Okay, and then any top line trends that you had that. You're seeing in your community. 1250 01:37:54,479 --> 01:38:00,079 And then I'll have to Senator Gaynor if he has any specific questions because I know you're in his neck of the woods. 1251 01:38:00,079 --> 01:38:02,720 But yeah, we hear a hometown, I see him all the time in the school dance. 1252 01:38:03,680 --> 01:38:04,479 How are you serving? 1253 01:38:08,000 --> 01:38:12,880 If we just want to talk 2025, this top high level mortgage origination data. 1254 01:38:15,279 --> 01:38:19,600 There were 175,441 mortgages originally in Washington. 1255 01:38:21,072 --> 01:38:28,072 of them, 78,515 were for a principal residence purchase. 1256 01:38:28,072 --> 01:38:33,072 So, and the other ones are broken out, cash out home improvements. 1257 01:38:33,072 --> 01:38:38,072 You know, we finance the system long, not a lot of activity like that. 1258 01:38:38,072 --> 01:38:40,072 People have went wrong with 3% noise. 1259 01:38:40,072 --> 01:38:41,072 So. 1260 01:38:41,952 --> 01:38:49,952 The banking sector is meeting the needs of the people who can't qualify and talk a lot about the affordable benefits. 1261 01:38:49,952 --> 01:38:52,952 And we have the same challenge. 1262 01:38:52,952 --> 01:38:57,952 We're showing them does this, which is where we went for principle that that everybody else had. 1263 01:38:57,952 --> 01:39:05,952 You have to earn 20 30 40% over the way into accounting to do a little for the moving sale price home. 1264 01:39:05,952 --> 01:39:09,952 And both prices are up 5%. 1265 01:39:09,904 --> 01:39:17,764 for 2025 or 2026 and that 5% is enough to permanently price the median wage 1266 01:39:17,764 --> 01:39:24,024 or a completely out of everyone. So we're very cognizant of that. Are you 1267 01:39:24,024 --> 01:39:27,984 seeing any trends? Oh I have Senator Gaynor. Senator 1268 01:39:27,984 --> 01:39:31,463 Gayner go ahead and then I'll ask my question. 1269 01:39:30,832 --> 01:39:41,832 Thank you, Madam Chair, and see if I was just going to, I think you're kind of touching on what we've had the discussion before about how people are getting priced out of the market. I mean, just the slight increases. 1270 01:39:41,832 --> 01:39:54,832 How many people or once again, you know, left out, of, the, uh, purchasing opportunity. So do you want to talk to some of trends that you are seeing, like, in and around the. 1271 01:40:00,416 --> 01:40:14,416 So, again, Flint County, we have some very expensive land because there's very little other private lands. So there is land values for building law almost double here, which can be in Franklin and Benton County. 1272 01:40:21,311 --> 01:40:33,311 So what it when is available is expensive and then we're in primarily agriculture based economy show the median household income for trying to count according to the Census Bureau is just over 99,000. 1273 01:40:33,311 --> 01:40:40,311 We have to make a hundred and fifty two thousand dollars to be able to afford the medium sales price from. 1274 01:40:40,311 --> 01:40:44,311 So there is a vast. 1275 01:40:44,311 --> 01:40:45,311 Yeah, I mean. 1276 01:40:45,311 --> 01:40:49,311 It's, and it's there as from the banking sector you're okay. 1277 01:40:50,159 --> 01:41:02,159 50 year mortgage book at today's rates that literally only drops the payment by about $400, but the individual that's not enough to help. 1278 01:41:02,159 --> 01:41:09,159 So it's, you know, when we talk last year Keith and I watch it through that presentation. 1279 01:41:16,384 --> 01:41:20,064 There's nothing we're going to do about in the ground available land shrine town. 1280 01:41:20,064 --> 01:41:22,944 It's, I mean, the Forest Service isn't going about that forest, 1281 01:41:22,944 --> 01:41:27,904 and we should make. So it's in all of everything that grows, you know. 1282 01:41:28,703 --> 01:41:32,783 More flexible term for the bank and sector sure, but they just end up 1283 01:41:33,984 --> 01:41:37,984 locking those people in between two or three times in interest over 50 years of what they 1284 01:41:41,551 --> 01:41:46,551 It needs to be in all of everyone who has tried to address some of these. 1285 01:41:46,551 --> 01:41:51,551 Some of them are so structural, they may not be an offensive. 1286 01:41:51,551 --> 01:41:54,551 Any other questions from committee members? 1287 01:41:54,551 --> 01:41:57,551 All right. Now I'll ask mine. 1288 01:41:57,551 --> 01:42:00,551 Are you seeing and maybe you can't elaborate on this, 1289 01:42:00,551 --> 01:42:04,551 but one of the presenters before you talked about more people on the east side of 1290 01:42:04,551 --> 01:42:07,551 the mountains buying and then commuting. 1291 01:42:08,176 --> 01:42:15,935 Longer distances for works. Are you seeing folks that are kind of coming from outside of your area to buy and actually having to commute? 1292 01:42:16,895 --> 01:42:23,216 People landing here usually are working fully remote. That's more, but could it task counting? 1293 01:42:23,216 --> 01:42:25,216 You know, Rosalinda Bay? Okay. 1294 01:42:26,095 --> 01:42:29,055 It's, I mean, it's two hours and ten minutes down from Seattle. 1295 01:42:29,456 --> 01:42:35,296 Thank you, that's all for the good day. Yeah. But it, you know it was closer to 75 minutes to happy minutes. 1296 01:42:37,072 --> 01:42:39,072 Okay. 1297 01:42:39,072 --> 01:42:43,072 Okay, we have a presence over there, and we are seeing it. 1298 01:42:43,072 --> 01:42:48,072 I have approved loans for people that work in downtown Seattle. 1299 01:42:48,072 --> 01:42:49,072 Yeah. 1300 01:42:49,072 --> 01:42:50,072 I'm in residence. 1301 01:42:50,072 --> 01:42:52,072 We play all around for someone. 1302 01:42:52,072 --> 01:42:53,072 And then those are people 1303 01:42:53,072 --> 01:42:57,072 that potentially could have incomes reflected of the county King County 1304 01:42:57,072 --> 01:43:02,072 and be able to be meet the loan requirements for a home in your area, 1305 01:43:02,072 --> 01:43:06,072 which will then put pressure on your community members who are being priced out. 1306 01:43:06,623 --> 01:43:13,184 as well so okay well thank you for sharing that overview and that information was nice to have 1307 01:43:13,184 --> 01:43:17,743 the committee be able to just ask some questions of you so we appreciate that and thank 1308 01:43:17,743 --> 01:43:22,064 you both panelists on this topic oh senator gainer did you have one last question 1309 01:43:23,264 --> 01:43:28,463 actually if i could just add a comment you know what we've seen in our area that some of the 1310 01:43:34,239 --> 01:43:40,079 complicates that the housing availability issue. That's one of the bigger issues that even like 1311 01:43:40,079 --> 01:43:46,239 I know Leavenworth is a big place where a number of people have come that they're consuming homes 1312 01:43:46,239 --> 01:43:52,079 without you know taking basically taking them off the market for for locals. So that's probably 1313 01:43:52,079 --> 01:43:59,199 more of an impact that we're seeing because people do have the money but not from the affordable 1314 01:44:03,184 --> 01:44:10,184 Okay, well, thank you again, and we will move to our next speaker who is Lauren McGowan. 1315 01:44:10,184 --> 01:44:15,184 She's the Executive Director of the Local Initiative Support Corporation. 1316 01:44:15,184 --> 01:44:18,184 Is she available? Oh, you're here in person. 1317 01:44:18,184 --> 01:44:21,184 Hello, Lauren. Thank you so much for being here. 1318 01:44:21,184 --> 01:44:26,184 Awesome. Thanks, Madam Chair, members of The Committee. 1319 01:44:26,184 --> 01:44:30,184 Again, my name is Laura McGown, Executive director of LISC. 1320 01:44:30,511 --> 01:44:36,511 Elisk is a national community development organization and CDFI, and we work here in Washington to 1321 01:44:36,511 --> 01:44:42,192 accelerate housing and economic justice. As you've heard from all of our panelists today, 1322 01:44:42,752 --> 01:44:47,391 we all know there's a huge need for more affordable housing, more funding is needed, 1323 01:44:47,391 --> 01:44:52,992 and face extraordinary challenges, particularly coming from the federal level right now. 1324 01:44:53,199 --> 01:44:59,439 And so today I want to talk a little bit about some of the ways that we are working directly 1325 01:44:59,439 --> 01:45:06,600 to increase the capacity of developers on the ground to really leverage many of 1326 01:45:06,600 --> 01:45:09,760 the policies you all have passed in recent years. 1327 01:45:14,032 --> 01:45:17,271 absolutely need more funding to do this work. 1328 01:45:17,271 --> 01:45:22,752 And we think that there are some bridges and tools 1329 01:45:22,752 --> 01:45:25,992 that we can use to better link and connect the dots 1330 01:45:25,992 --> 01:45:30,551 between all of the work that is being done across the state. 1331 01:45:30,551 --> 01:45:31,952 One of ways that, we have seen this 1332 01:45:31,952 --> 01:45:33,712 work happen is through, what we call, 1333 01:45:33,712 --> 01:45:35,671 the list housing accelerator. 1334 01:45:35,671 --> 01:45:38,511 It's a partnership with the Amazon Housing Fund 1335 01:45:38,511 --> 01:45:43,992 to support emerging for-profit and nonprofit developers. 1336 01:45:43,855 --> 01:45:50,336 It's an 18-month-long fellowship program that provides deep technical assistance combined 1337 01:45:50,336 --> 01:45:53,895 with access to low-cost capital. 1338 01:45:53,895 --> 01:46:00,855 And from this project, we have seen more than 50 organizations and fellows come through 1339 01:46:00,855 --> 01:46:07,456 accessing over $18 million, thousands of hours of training, and most importantly, more 1340 01:46:13,184 --> 01:46:17,984 Perhaps most importantly from this though is what we have seen is it is not just our emerging 1341 01:46:17,984 --> 01:46:26,623 developers. It is our housing ecosystem that really requires us to think better and in a more 1342 01:46:26,623 --> 01:46:30,944 coordinated way about what folks need. 1343 01:46:31,231 --> 01:46:37,351 Oftentimes what we're seeing with these developers is really well-intentioned policies and funding 1344 01:46:38,231 --> 01:46:42,952 Get into the hands of folks early on but often a project gets stuck 1345 01:46:42,952 --> 01:46:49,712 So that could look like a college or a church that has land but doesn't know how to turn it into housing a 1346 01:46:49,992 --> 01:46:52,952 Project that is a public award, but may not be able to 1347 01:46:53,231 --> 01:46:57,631 access that award and that cash for many months. 1348 01:46:57,631 --> 01:47:02,671 A balance sheet of a developer that is unable to really 1349 01:47:02,671 --> 01:47:09,712 show a lender that they are able to build and be trustworthy 1350 01:47:09,712 --> 01:47:12,112 of additional financing. 1351 01:47:12,112 --> 01:47:13,872 So there's just a ton of barriers, 1352 01:47:13,872 --> 01:47:16,431 both in the project side, as well as 1353 01:47:16,431 --> 01:47:20,152 in organizational side that oftentimes getting in 1354 01:47:20,152 --> 01:47:21,152 the way. 1355 01:47:21,296 --> 01:47:27,296 This is where technical assistance, capacity building and really creative financing tools 1356 01:47:27,296 --> 01:47:32,895 can come into play to help accelerate housing production across our state. 1357 01:47:33,904 --> 01:47:40,904 So, you know, again, bottom line, we need more funding and we all recognize the environment that we're in. 1358 01:47:40,904 --> 01:47:44,904 So a few things that believe we can do together. 1359 01:47:44,904 --> 01:47:48,904 One is to turn more land into housing. 1360 01:47:48,904 --> 01:47:53,904 We all know that there's been a lot of work around faith-based organizations to do that. 1361 01:47:53,904 --> 01:47:59,904 The state legislature commissioned a report for community colleges a 1362 01:47:59,904 --> 01:48:02,904 few years back to look at how to use their land. 1363 01:48:03,503 --> 01:48:09,623 And the reality is there are opportunities, but we need to make the connections between 1364 01:48:09,623 --> 01:48:11,703 those land opportunities. 1365 01:48:11,703 --> 01:48:17,823 The developers who have the ability to develop that land and the financing. 1366 01:48:17,823 --> 01:48:22,623 And that's where CDFIs and intermediaries like a list or an enterprise can really help 1367 01:48:22,623 --> 01:48:25,184 to bridge some of those barriers. 1368 01:48:25,184 --> 01:48:26,304 But we've got to fund it. 1369 01:48:26,304 --> 01:48:31,743 We've gotta be able to, make that work happen so that we're not just leaving promising 1370 01:48:32,720 --> 01:48:40,279 on the table. We need to make sure that we are keeping funded projects moving. You heard 1371 01:48:40,279 --> 01:48:47,239 earlier from Ryan Habitat about projects maybe getting an initial appropriation but taking 1372 01:48:49,712 --> 01:48:54,551 In the meantime, there's so much work that needs to be done. 1373 01:48:54,551 --> 01:48:56,792 There's costs that are incurred. 1374 01:48:56,792 --> 01:48:59,952 So we've got to do more, not only to coordinate, 1375 01:48:59,952 --> 01:49:02,912 but to ensure that if one piece of the funding puzzle 1376 01:49:02,912 --> 01:49:08,112 is there, that we're able to leverage other pieces. 1377 01:49:08,112 --> 01:49:11,792 As a CDFI at LISC, we have access to national capital 1378 01:49:11,792 --> 01:49:13,471 that can bring into Washington, and we 1379 01:49:13,471 --> 01:49:15,231 want to bring in to Washington. 1380 01:49:18,992 --> 01:49:23,992 to leverage that with the local funding that exists. 1381 01:49:24,591 --> 01:49:28,431 Simply for things like we don't have contracts in place 1382 01:49:28,431 --> 01:49:30,231 through some of our state agencies. 1383 01:49:30,231 --> 01:49:34,551 So there are ways even without significant additional funds 1384 01:49:34,551 --> 01:49:37,712 that we can keep projects moving faster. 1385 01:49:38,591 --> 01:49:41,192 We need to invest in developers and in the owners. 1386 01:49:41,192 --> 01:49:43,792 Yes, we need more land. 1387 01:49:43,792 --> 01:49:47,391 Yes we needed access to additional resources. 1388 01:49:47,823 --> 01:49:55,184 our ecosystem really requires that we continue to invest in both the nonprofit and for-profit 1389 01:49:55,184 --> 01:49:58,783 mission-aligned developers. One of the things that that 1390 01:49:58,783 --> 01:50:03,984 we are seeing is that, we've got a lot of folks who have been developing for a long time who are 1391 01:50:03,984 --> 01:50:09,823 really struggling with their portfolios and so looking at how we do asset management 1392 01:50:17,136 --> 01:50:24,336 a healthy ecosystem and more housing on the ground is really essential. 1393 01:50:24,735 --> 01:50:27,496 As I mentioned, there are private dollars out there. 1394 01:50:27,496 --> 01:50:30,095 We've got to do more to link the public and private sectors 1395 01:50:30,095 --> 01:50:35,015 together to leverage the funding that exists. 1396 01:50:35,015 --> 01:50:37,176 And then, as you've heard from some of my colleagues, 1397 01:50:37,176 --> 01:50:39,055 really thinking about some 1398 01:50:39,055 --> 01:50:41,456 of the ways in which we provide additional 1399 01:50:41,456 --> 01:50:45,615 down-to-payment assistance and long-term subsidies 1400 01:50:45,615 --> 01:50:49,416 for the lowest-income earners is super essential. 1401 01:50:50,688 --> 01:50:53,387 A lot of this is about connecting the dots, right? 1402 01:50:53,387 --> 01:50:56,948 How do we take training that is happening 1403 01:50:56,948 --> 01:50:58,307 in one part of the state and ensure 1404 01:50:58,307 --> 01:51:00,148 it's happening in other parts? 1405 01:51:00,148 --> 01:51:05,068 How we look at the land and opportunities that exist 1406 01:51:05,068 --> 01:51:07,387 where maybe we've written a report as a state, 1407 01:51:07,387 --> 01:51:11,268 we have outlined what the capacity issues are. 1408 01:51:11,268 --> 01:51:13,667 We've got to act on some of those things. 1409 01:51:15,087 --> 01:51:17,847 Many of you have heard about the Black Home Initiative, 1410 01:51:17,847 --> 01:51:20,608 a model in the Puget Sound region, 1411 01:51:20,608 --> 01:51:24,448 that is really brought together a lot of the ecosystem partners. 1412 01:51:24,448 --> 01:51:26,728 We've had a lotta learnings through that, 1413 01:51:26,728 --> 01:51:30,448 and one of them is that building 1414 01:51:30,448 --> 01:51:35,408 a deeply affordable home ownership projects is challenging, 1415 01:51:35,408 --> 01:51:36,807 but it's not impossible. 1416 01:51:36,807 --> 01:51:39,047 It's about bringing those partners together, 1417 01:51:39,047 --> 01:51:44,127 connecting the dots, and then leveraging the capital that exists. 1418 01:51:44,832 --> 01:51:47,511 That can be done in a number of ways. 1419 01:51:47,511 --> 01:51:51,032 Thinking about where we can better use 1420 01:51:51,032 --> 01:51:54,351 revolving loan funds, guarantees, 1421 01:51:54,351 --> 01:51:57,192 and flexible financing is something that 1422 01:51:57,192 --> 01:51:59,431 we're thinking about every day in order to 1423 01:51:59,431 --> 01:52:01,872 unlock some of the capital that exists 1424 01:52:01,872 --> 01:52:06,872 and we'd be really happy to talk to members of this committee 1425 01:52:06,912 --> 01:52:09,112 and others to think about how we do that in 1426 01:52:09,112 --> 01:52:11,912 a more scaled way so that we 1427 01:52:11,912 --> 01:52:13,192 can begin to meet some 1428 01:52:14,384 --> 01:52:19,064 goals. You all have done a lot. We've got a 1429 01:52:19,064 --> 01:52:24,863 lot more work to do. The challenge is coming from the federal level cannot be 1430 01:52:24,863 --> 01:52:30,583 understated and yet this is one of the regions that has the smartest and most 1431 01:52:30,583 --> 01:52:36,123 talented people in the country and so I feel 1432 01:52:36,368 --> 01:52:40,207 you know, deeply passionate about how we connect these dots, 1433 01:52:40,207 --> 01:52:44,368 bring people together, really unlock the opportunities that currently exist. 1434 01:52:45,408 --> 01:52:51,328 Thank you. Thank You Lauren. Do we have any questions from committee members 1435 01:52:51,887 --> 01:52:57,967 of the few that we left? No? Okay. 1436 01:52:57,967 --> 01:52:59,648 Well, thank you so much for your time. 1437 01:52:59,648 --> 01:53:01,087 Thank you for being here today. 1438 01:53:01,087 --> 01:53:02,967 I want to thank all the staff that are here, 1439 01:53:02,967 --> 01:53:05,967 making this meeting happen for all of you there, virtual. 1440 01:53:05,967 --> 01:53:08,287 We want just thank them that we have a full house here 1441 01:53:08,287 --> 01:53:09,608 in person in the room. 1442 01:53:09,608 --> 01:53:12,287 And thank for my committee members that were able to attend. 1443 01:53:12,287 --> 01:53:15,167 I hope that this was informative and educational. 1444 01:53:15,167 --> 01:53:18,568 And I know some of it was very fast to do appreciate that. 1445 01:53:18,568 --> 01:53:21,287 But I look forward to seeing you in-person 1446 01:53:21,287 --> 01:53:24,728 and for the rest of that, we are adjourned. 1447 01:53:24,728 --> 01:53:25,568 Thank-you.