[0:09] started if I could just have everyone get together.
[0:11] Are we good?
[0:15] Okay local planning agency meeting of Tuesday August 10th
[0:22] 2026 if you could call the roll?
[0:26] [Reading names] Good afternoon this meeting
[0:40] has been noticed both as an in-person meeting
[0:42] or a virtual meeting you may participate
[0:51] (Indiscernible) information for each item on the agenda
[0:53] has been and is currently available at City
[0:55] Hall and online 24 hours a day w w w sunrise fl.gov.
[0:59] Anyone interested is also invited to call 9547463434
[1:03] for additional information.
[1:05] The city has additional options for them
[1:09] to address the commission prior to the start of meeting
[1:12] we ask if anyone wanted to speak on any matters before us
[1:14] we'll maintain that list and we'll call upon speakers
[1:16] at the appropriate time.
[1:17] I also will open it up for public comment
[1:20] if anyone in person or by phone wishes
[1:23] to speak those participating by phone press five
[1:26] on the phone five star.
[1:29] All comments will be included as part
[1:30] of the public record for this meeting
[1:32] and will be considered prior to any action taken.
[1:34] When addressing us please state your name your address,
[1:36] and what you're here to speak about prior
[1:38] I said anybody on the call please mute your phones
[1:40] until you wish to speak.
[1:41] If you're experiencing technical difficulties you may call 954,
[1:44] 5784792 at any time and our staff
[1:47] is available to assist you.
[1:48] Can I have a motion can I make
[1:51] >> Motion by Commissioner Kirk seconded by Commissioner Goodall
[1:54] I'll say I.
[1:56] >> Is anyone here in the audience or by phone wishes
[1:59] to speak on any items before the LPA that are not on the agenda?
[2:02] Please raise your hand or press five star on the phone?
[2:05] Are you on the LPA?
[2:07] Or just waving to somebody.
[2:09] >> He's just waving.
[2:12] I'm okay.
[2:13] We'll have time for it, this isn't
[2:16] the time for that right now.
[2:17] But I look forward to hearing from you.
[2:19] You're welcome.
[2:20] Any hands online?
[2:22] All right I will close public discussion.
[2:26] Five A actually have a motion for five B. All in favor
[2:32] say I. K5B resolution of city sunrise Florida amended restated
[2:38] the development for phase one between city of Sunrise
[2:41] and the associates LLC providing for record for transmission,
[2:45] for management, community development
[2:48] do I have a motion a motion and a second,
[2:51] this is a public hearing come does
[2:52] anyone wish to be heard on this matter come back
[2:54] please come forward or press five star on your phone.
[2:56] Yes?
[2:57] Please state your name.
[3:01] >> Mark Douglas 2900 Northwest 125 Ave. Commissioners,
[3:08] thank you.
[3:10] So, I had an opportunity to review the development agreement
[3:16] not the development agreement, referencing the other one.
[3:21] But the item that's before you.
[3:24] And I wanted to address specifically the traffic
[3:27] because I read the report, I think that's under number six.
[3:34] And I was given somewhat short, but essentially it
[3:39] was saying that the development as Is being proposed
[3:43] of that site projects 20% reduction in traffic
[3:49] give or take.
[3:50] It doesn't really go into where the assumptions came from.
[3:54] Of course it spoke to additional things
[3:59] that may be happening relative to the change.
[4:04] And some other traffic.
[4:07] Maybe engineering things.
[4:09] And I was a little disappointed because it
[4:13] says because of the reduction in traffic,
[4:16] we don't have to do the initial inquiry relative to the effect
[4:21] on local streets and so on.
[4:27] It boggles my mind that we could build almost 2,000,000ft²
[4:32] on that site in addition to the 1400 residential units.
[4:37] And that's the commercial are you talking about with Sarah?
[4:43] >> This is West.
[4:44] Sorry.
[4:46] >> We're not going to address the arena yet we're going
[4:49] to recess the LPA.
[4:50] So we're on wisteria right now.
[4:53] >> So we're doing both at the same time?
[4:56] >> No different times come we're doing West Air right now
[5:00] and then we're going to recess the LPA there's going to be
[5:03] a broader discussion as you're pointing out on the arena which
[5:06] will be handled within the commission.
[5:08] We will recess and reopen that at the time.
[5:10] Okay.
[5:11] Sure.
[5:12] So with is right now so if you have a comment on the garage
[5:16] you can do that now.
[5:18] >> The garage issue and the way it's written talks about how
[5:24] the garage cannot be on the side of the adjoining building.
[5:30] It could be read to mean that we're
[5:32] trying to limit the developers and a five story garage.
[5:37] That could be one.
[5:39] Or the other way of reading it is you could say you could build
[5:43] a garage any size as long as it doesn't go past potentially 15ft
[5:48] which I think is the maximum you can build.
[5:51] So I just wanted to see if that could be addressed as well.
[5:54] If it's an effort to limit the garage for esthetic purpose
[5:59] relative to the size of the building,
[6:01] or is it sort of a window that --
[6:05] you know you can build it.
[6:08] Because I know we have a site plan also.
[6:12] If you can consider it that might tell us.
[6:16] >> Thank you Mr. Douglas.
[6:17] Mr. Lebowski?
[6:20] >> So Mark Lebowski senior manager,
[6:22] the item that we're talking about is development agreement
[6:26] and there's also the master plan and the site plan.
[6:28] The development agreement covers in essence the project
[6:31] and talks about generality in terms of the standards
[6:35] throughout the project.
[6:36] The specifics related to the site plan
[6:39] are handled in the site plan which is later on.
[6:42] But the question from Mr. Douglas
[6:46] related to a general statement in the intention
[6:48] is exactly how you said.
[6:50] You don't have a garage that's larger
[6:52] than the building that's next to it for an esthetic standpoint.
[6:56] And then there's other esthetic provisions which we'll discuss.
[6:59] As part of the master plan.
[7:01] >> Correct but in terms of the development it makes it clear
[7:04] that it can't be higher than the rest.
[7:06] >> Correct.
[7:06] All right any further comments or questions
[7:08] from the audience on that?
[7:10] Any comments from my colleagues?
[7:12] Commissioner Kudo?
[7:20] >> (Indiscernible)
[9:39] >> Commissioner Kudo can you make sure your mic is on?
[9:41] They can't hear you.
[9:47] >> I just want to make sure that, I hear your comments.
[9:50] But, you know, all of us know, and staff
[9:53] knows that this development is going
[9:55] to be the start of what's coming in that area.
[9:58] And we are going to make sure that it's
[10:01] going to be starting off the right way.
[10:04] Because eventually the property that's next to it
[10:08] could also be redeveloped.
[10:11] Which would be double the size of what they are starting with.
[10:14] So, I'm excited as being up here for a long period of time to see
[10:19] this really to start moving and I think, you know,
[10:24] setting this tone and setting this pace
[10:26] and making sure that staff and Shannon and her people
[10:30] are on this, seven story it's got a nice mix, it looks good,
[10:36] we are not approving some slop residential to start off,
[10:41] it's going to be very to me, very high end in that area.
[10:46] Starting from what we had with Nexus and Amli and portico.
[10:51] And now this is going to be the next new version.
[10:54] So thanks staff.
[10:56] I hear you, but, I promise you we will be all over this like
[11:02] flies on -- to make sure that it's going to be right.
[11:06] You know that.
[11:08] Yeah blueberry pie.
[11:09] That's what I meant.
[11:10] Blueberry pie.
[11:11] So thank you.
[11:12] Thank you for bringing that up.
[11:14] >> All right any further comments?
[11:15] All right, call the question.
[11:20] [Reading names]
[11:30] >> Item passes 5 to 0.
[11:31] With respect to five a with the agreement of the applicant
[11:32] and staff, what I would suggest to my colleagues is we
[11:35] will go ahead and recess the LP a and reopen five A and 12 C
[11:40] after we deal with some other issues
[11:43] since that may garner some discussion.
[11:46] Any objection to that?
[11:49] If not then I'll entertain a motion.
[11:53] >> Motion
[11:55] >> Second
[11:56] >> Motion and a second, all in favor say I. Motion --
[12:05] we will close the LP A and then open the commission.
[12:10] Thank you.