1 00:01:53,040 --> 00:01:54,240 Hello and welcome to the regular 2 00:01:54,240 --> 00:01:55,360 business meeting for the District of 3 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:58,479 Squamish for Tuesday, March 17th. 4 00:01:58,479 --> 00:02:02,000 Holland squalan Squamish. As always, 5 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:03,280 we're gathered to do our work today on 6 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:04,880 the traditional unseated territory of 7 00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:07,600 the Squamish nation. Please be advised 8 00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:08,640 this council meeting is being 9 00:02:08,640 --> 00:02:10,319 livereamed, recorded, and will be 10 00:02:10,319 --> 00:02:11,840 available to the public to view on the 11 00:02:11,840 --> 00:02:13,440 District of Squamish website following 12 00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:15,360 the meeting. If you have concerns, 13 00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:16,959 please notify the corporate officer 14 00:02:16,959 --> 00:02:18,959 present at the meeting. In this case, 15 00:02:18,959 --> 00:02:21,920 that would be Miss Vlon Budau. Um, could 16 00:02:21,920 --> 00:02:23,760 I have someone move adoption of the 17 00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:25,360 agenda, please? Moved by councelor 18 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:27,200 French, second by councelor Stoner. All 19 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:30,800 in favor? Any opposed? Motion carries. 20 00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:32,720 Thank you. So, our first order of 21 00:02:32,720 --> 00:02:36,800 business uh is item 31. uh the BC 22 00:02:36,800 --> 00:02:40,239 Epilepsy Society. Um 23 00:02:40,239 --> 00:02:42,560 and I believe we have we'll be receiving 24 00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:44,480 our presentation. Roly. Oh, there you 25 00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:47,200 are. Hello. Thank you for joining us. 26 00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:48,710 >> Hello. 27 00:02:48,710 --> 00:02:48,720 » Hello. 28 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:52,959 Good evening, council. I am with the I'm 29 00:02:52,959 --> 00:02:54,560 the administrative coordinator with the 30 00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:58,080 BC Epilepsy Society. Unfortunately, our 31 00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:00,879 executive director, Dietra, was unable 32 00:03:00,879 --> 00:03:03,120 to speak today with illness. So, I'm 33 00:03:03,120 --> 00:03:05,280 still grateful for the opportunity to be 34 00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:09,200 here to rep represent our organization. 35 00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:11,680 Um, and I just like to thank you guys 36 00:03:11,680 --> 00:03:14,080 again for the opportunity to speak and 37 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:17,280 for the support of epilepsy awareness in 38 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:20,159 our community. We truly appreciate the 39 00:03:20,159 --> 00:03:22,239 leadership and the com commitment to 40 00:03:22,239 --> 00:03:24,480 help build a more informed and 41 00:03:24,480 --> 00:03:27,519 supportive um community in Squamish. 42 00:03:27,519 --> 00:03:29,599 Epilepsy is one of the most common 43 00:03:29,599 --> 00:03:31,519 neurological conditions affecting 44 00:03:31,519 --> 00:03:34,239 approximately one in a 100 people. This 45 00:03:34,239 --> 00:03:35,920 means that here in Squamish, many 46 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:37,599 individuals and family are living with 47 00:03:37,599 --> 00:03:41,040 epilepsy and contribute contributing to 48 00:03:41,040 --> 00:03:43,519 the strength and diversity of this 49 00:03:43,519 --> 00:03:45,599 community every day. with greater 50 00:03:45,599 --> 00:03:48,400 awareness and understanding. Um we're 51 00:03:48,400 --> 00:03:51,120 hoping we can create um an environment 52 00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:53,280 where people living with epilepsy feel 53 00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:55,840 supported and empowered and simple 54 00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:58,480 actions like learning about epilepsy and 55 00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:02,159 recognizing the uh epilepsy awareness 56 00:04:02,159 --> 00:04:05,599 day on March 26th will help encourage 57 00:04:05,599 --> 00:04:08,159 more open conversations making a 58 00:04:08,159 --> 00:04:10,959 meaningful and lasting impact. Your 59 00:04:10,959 --> 00:04:13,360 support helps us to build that community 60 00:04:13,360 --> 00:04:15,599 where people feel confident and safe. 61 00:04:15,599 --> 00:04:17,600 We're grateful for the partnership and 62 00:04:17,600 --> 00:04:20,479 the role to help us bring awareness. 63 00:04:20,479 --> 00:04:22,960 Thank you again for your time and 64 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:25,759 support. If anyone has any questions, 65 00:04:25,759 --> 00:04:29,040 please let me know. 66 00:04:29,040 --> 00:04:30,710 >> Thank you very much for the 67 00:04:30,710 --> 00:04:30,720 » Thank you very much for the 68 00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:33,120 presentation. Council, do we have any 69 00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:34,639 questions for our guests? We also have 70 00:04:34,639 --> 00:04:37,040 the proclamation request as it appears 71 00:04:37,040 --> 00:04:40,800 in the agenda. Um, if we're ready for if 72 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:42,560 there's no questions, I'd entertain a 73 00:04:42,560 --> 00:04:44,080 motion. 74 00:04:44,080 --> 00:04:45,840 Are you moving uh the recommendation? 75 00:04:45,840 --> 00:04:47,199 Councelor Pettingill. A second by 76 00:04:47,199 --> 00:04:48,320 Councelor French. Would you like to 77 00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:50,320 speak to it, Council Pettingill? 78 00:04:50,320 --> 00:04:53,590 >> Um, just to say uh thank you for coming 79 00:04:53,590 --> 00:04:53,600 » Um, just to say uh thank you for coming 80 00:04:53,600 --> 00:04:56,800 and presenting uh and reminding us about 81 00:04:56,800 --> 00:04:59,440 this. I think it's always good to keep 82 00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:02,560 um these things top of mind and uh it's 83 00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:05,840 a a simple and small gesture we can do 84 00:05:05,840 --> 00:05:08,400 to help with that. Thank you. 85 00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:11,360 Thank you. Any other comments on this? 86 00:05:11,360 --> 00:05:15,280 Um, happy to support this um this uh 87 00:05:15,280 --> 00:05:17,759 proclamation. I I do think it's as 88 00:05:17,759 --> 00:05:19,039 councilor Pending said, it's really 89 00:05:19,039 --> 00:05:22,240 important that we uh even through a 90 00:05:22,240 --> 00:05:26,880 small gesture like this um uh 91 00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:29,520 ensure that these these types of things 92 00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:32,800 uh and particularly EP epilepsy here 93 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:35,280 receives the recognition um that it that 94 00:05:35,280 --> 00:05:36,880 it deserves. there are people living in 95 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:40,880 our community and uh with that uh that 96 00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:43,039 have epilepsy and we may not unless we 97 00:05:43,039 --> 00:05:45,680 exp are nearby and we experience then 98 00:05:45,680 --> 00:05:47,680 they experience an an episode it's it's 99 00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:49,680 unlikely that we would necessarily be 100 00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:51,039 aware of that. So this is an opportunity 101 00:05:51,039 --> 00:05:54,400 for us to um uh to show our our support. 102 00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:56,400 I'm happy to do so. So thank you very 103 00:05:56,400 --> 00:05:57,520 much and with that I'll call the 104 00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:00,000 question. All in favor? Motion carries 105 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:02,639 unanimously. Thank you so much. Enjoy 106 00:06:02,639 --> 00:06:04,240 the rest of your evening. 107 00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:06,309 >> Thank you for your time. 108 00:06:06,309 --> 00:06:06,319 » Thank you for your time. 109 00:06:06,319 --> 00:06:09,360 Thank you. So, next we have the uh 110 00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:11,199 unscheduled public attendance. This is 111 00:06:11,199 --> 00:06:14,639 if anyone has a matter they'd like to uh 112 00:06:14,639 --> 00:06:16,479 have considered by council prior to our 113 00:06:16,479 --> 00:06:18,720 next meeting. Uh this would be 114 00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:20,880 opportunity to 115 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:22,960 put that forward. 116 00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:25,199 No takers this evening. So, we'll move 117 00:06:25,199 --> 00:06:29,680 on. Um we do not have any um public 118 00:06:29,680 --> 00:06:31,440 hearings, so we're on to the consent 119 00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:33,840 agenda. Would anyone like to pull 120 00:06:33,840 --> 00:06:37,440 anything that is in the consent agenda 121 00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:39,199 or move the consent agenda is the 122 00:06:39,199 --> 00:06:41,600 alternative? Councelor Stoner, 123 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:43,990 >> I'm going to pull items D1 and two, 124 00:06:43,990 --> 00:06:44,000 » I'm going to pull items D1 and two, 125 00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:45,759 please. 126 00:06:45,759 --> 00:06:48,309 >> Okay. Um, so we'll deal with those at 127 00:06:48,309 --> 00:06:48,319 » Okay. Um, so we'll deal with those at 128 00:06:48,319 --> 00:06:52,400 the appropriate time. Um, is there 129 00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:54,000 anyone that would like to remove the 130 00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:56,080 remainder of the consent agenda? There's 131 00:06:56,080 --> 00:06:57,199 not much left for those that aren't 132 00:06:57,199 --> 00:07:00,080 reading the moving council French second 133 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:02,639 by councelor Hamilton. All in favor? 134 00:07:02,639 --> 00:07:04,240 Motion carries. And we'll deal with 135 00:07:04,240 --> 00:07:06,000 those at the appropriate time later in 136 00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:10,000 the uh in our agenda. Uh so now we have 137 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:11,360 uh consideration of first, second, and 138 00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:12,960 third reading for the District of 139 00:07:12,960 --> 00:07:16,400 Squamish in indemnification bylaw number 140 00:07:16,400 --> 00:07:20,479 3224 2026. And we have our corporate 141 00:07:20,479 --> 00:07:22,400 officer or director of corporate 142 00:07:22,400 --> 00:07:52,629 administration uh to present to us. 143 00:07:52,639 --> 00:07:55,520 Okay. Um, happy to take a quick timeout 144 00:07:55,520 --> 00:07:58,160 if or a medium length time out if that's 145 00:07:58,160 --> 00:08:11,189 what's needed. It's coming. Okay. 146 00:08:11,199 --> 00:08:12,879 So just to buy some time without taking 147 00:08:12,879 --> 00:08:14,560 a timeout, I'm going to propose we move 148 00:08:14,560 --> 00:08:16,800 forward to we have a couple adoptions on 149 00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:20,879 the on the agenda. Uh so that's 7B1 and 150 00:08:20,879 --> 00:08:23,199 two. Um and as is our common practice, 151 00:08:23,199 --> 00:08:24,400 we don't have presentation on these. 152 00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:25,759 These are just these are ready to be 153 00:08:25,759 --> 00:08:27,840 adopted. All the uh tees have been 154 00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:30,800 crossed and eyes have been dotted. So um 155 00:08:30,800 --> 00:08:33,360 could I So the first one is District of 156 00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:37,120 Squamish zoning bylaw number 22 or 2200 157 00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:39,599 2011 amendment bylaw and this is uh 158 00:08:39,599 --> 00:08:41,919 regarding local and liquor primary 159 00:08:41,919 --> 00:08:44,159 commercial. Moved by councelor French 160 00:08:44,159 --> 00:08:45,760 second by councelor Hamilton. All in 161 00:08:45,760 --> 00:08:49,120 favor? Motion carries. Thank you. And 162 00:08:49,120 --> 00:08:52,000 the the next is District of Commerce 163 00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:54,720 zoning bylaw number 2200 2011 amendment 164 00:08:54,720 --> 00:08:58,080 bylaw regarding indoor recreation. 165 00:08:58,080 --> 00:08:59,360 Moved by councelor Ster. Second by 166 00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:01,600 councelor Hamilton. All in favor. Any 167 00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:04,959 opposed? Motion carries. 168 00:09:04,959 --> 00:09:07,120 I hope that we may have bought at least 169 00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:09,360 some time. We'll come back to There we 170 00:09:09,360 --> 00:09:15,750 go. Look at that. 171 00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:21,430 The floor is yours when you're ready. 172 00:09:21,440 --> 00:09:22,959 Uh good evening council. My name is 173 00:09:22,959 --> 00:09:24,640 Melissa Bambbleo. I'm the director of 174 00:09:24,640 --> 00:09:27,600 corporate administration. Uh today I am 175 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:29,519 presenting on District of Squamish 176 00:09:29,519 --> 00:09:33,279 indemnification bylaw number 3224 177 00:09:33,279 --> 00:09:35,360 2026. 178 00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:37,839 Uh there were changes made to the bylaw 179 00:09:37,839 --> 00:09:39,600 this morning, including the correction 180 00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:42,160 of two typos, including a reference to 181 00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:44,399 the a specific section in the local 182 00:09:44,399 --> 00:09:48,160 government act and replacing guilty with 183 00:09:48,160 --> 00:09:52,880 uh convicted in section 5.1G of the 184 00:09:52,880 --> 00:09:55,680 bylaw to more to align more closely with 185 00:09:55,680 --> 00:09:58,399 the local government act language. Uh 186 00:09:58,399 --> 00:10:00,800 the bylaw has been replaced online and 187 00:10:00,800 --> 00:10:03,519 is and the current copy is in blue in 188 00:10:03,519 --> 00:10:13,350 front of council this evening. 189 00:10:13,360 --> 00:10:15,120 Uh the bylaw in front of council this 190 00:10:15,120 --> 00:10:17,760 evening uh if it is adopted at a future 191 00:10:17,760 --> 00:10:19,519 meeting will repeal the current 192 00:10:19,519 --> 00:10:21,680 indemnification bylaw which was adopted 193 00:10:21,680 --> 00:10:24,079 in 1998 194 00:10:24,079 --> 00:10:26,800 uh 195 00:10:26,800 --> 00:10:28,640 and be replaced with the bylaw before 196 00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:30,800 council right now. Uh the purpose of an 197 00:10:30,800 --> 00:10:34,079 indemn in of an indemnification bylaw is 198 00:10:34,079 --> 00:10:36,160 to establish parameters for when the 199 00:10:36,160 --> 00:10:38,640 district will pay for and defend 200 00:10:38,640 --> 00:10:40,800 municipal officials, which is defined in 201 00:10:40,800 --> 00:10:43,279 the bylaw, from legal claims that may 202 00:10:43,279 --> 00:10:45,120 arise out of the performance of their 203 00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:47,200 duties or functions on behalf of the 204 00:10:47,200 --> 00:10:49,760 district. This could include paying for 205 00:10:49,760 --> 00:10:52,079 legal defense costs, settlements, or 206 00:10:52,079 --> 00:10:55,120 judgments, or certain penalties related 207 00:10:55,120 --> 00:10:57,920 to official duties. It does not allow 208 00:10:57,920 --> 00:10:59,839 for the district to pay for a fine that 209 00:10:59,839 --> 00:11:01,839 results from a conviction where the 210 00:11:01,839 --> 00:11:05,839 official was it at fault or had intent 211 00:11:05,839 --> 00:11:08,320 and examples of this may be fraud or 212 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:12,160 knowing knowingly violating legislation. 213 00:11:12,160 --> 00:11:13,920 The bylaw will establish clear 214 00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:16,079 expectations as to when the district 215 00:11:16,079 --> 00:11:18,240 must be notified that a legal matter has 216 00:11:18,240 --> 00:11:21,279 arisen which can be found in section 4.2 217 00:11:21,279 --> 00:11:23,120 of the bylaw. 218 00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:25,600 Uh the bylaw also sets limits on when 219 00:11:25,600 --> 00:11:28,240 municipal officials will not be 220 00:11:28,240 --> 00:11:30,320 indemnified under section five of the 221 00:11:30,320 --> 00:11:32,560 bylaw which include if there is a 222 00:11:32,560 --> 00:11:34,399 conviction where there is a finding of 223 00:11:34,399 --> 00:11:43,269 negligence or willful misconduct. 224 00:11:43,279 --> 00:11:44,880 Uh next section is legislative 225 00:11:44,880 --> 00:11:47,279 alignment. The content of the bylaw has 226 00:11:47,279 --> 00:11:49,279 been drafted to align with language in 227 00:11:49,279 --> 00:11:51,440 the local government act, specifically 228 00:11:51,440 --> 00:11:55,680 sections 738 and 740. 229 00:11:55,680 --> 00:11:57,200 This includes the definition of 230 00:11:57,200 --> 00:12:00,240 indemnity. The definition of municipal 231 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:03,600 official, limits on indemnification for 232 00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:05,680 the following. When a finding has been 233 00:12:05,680 --> 00:12:08,079 made related to dishonesty, gross 234 00:12:08,079 --> 00:12:10,320 negligence, malicious or willful 235 00:12:10,320 --> 00:12:12,639 misconduct has been made against a 236 00:12:12,639 --> 00:12:14,720 municipal official. And this is section 237 00:12:14,720 --> 00:12:16,880 5.1A. 238 00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:21,120 Uh and and limits on on indemnification 239 00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:23,120 when a municipal official has been 240 00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:25,680 convicted of an offense that is not a 241 00:12:25,680 --> 00:12:28,880 strict or absolute liability offense. 242 00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:32,000 This is section 5.1G in the bylaw and in 243 00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:34,560 the definition of indemnity. 244 00:12:34,560 --> 00:12:36,000 There's also alignment with the 245 00:12:36,000 --> 00:12:37,839 community charter including in the 246 00:12:37,839 --> 00:12:40,480 limits of indemnification section 247 00:12:40,480 --> 00:12:42,480 including breach of confidentiality 248 00:12:42,480 --> 00:12:45,920 under section 117 and this is section 249 00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:49,279 5.1E of the bylaw and disqualification 250 00:12:49,279 --> 00:12:52,800 from holding office under section 111 251 00:12:52,800 --> 00:13:01,190 section 1.5F of the bylaw. 252 00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:03,760 And that includes my presentation this 253 00:13:03,760 --> 00:13:06,240 evening. Thank you. 254 00:13:06,240 --> 00:13:07,590 >> Thank you very much for the 255 00:13:07,590 --> 00:13:07,600 » Thank you very much for the 256 00:13:07,600 --> 00:13:10,959 presentation. Council questions 257 00:13:10,959 --> 00:13:12,880 on this. 258 00:13:12,880 --> 00:13:14,870 >> Go ahead, Councelor Penning. 259 00:13:14,870 --> 00:13:14,880 » Go ahead, Councelor Penning. 260 00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:16,790 >> So, how does this work with insurance 261 00:13:16,790 --> 00:13:16,800 » So, how does this work with insurance 262 00:13:16,800 --> 00:13:18,959 companies who would I believe typically 263 00:13:18,959 --> 00:13:22,480 be the ultimate payers? Were there a a 264 00:13:22,480 --> 00:13:26,000 judgment against someone who is 265 00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:28,880 I I presume covered by this? uh like 266 00:13:28,880 --> 00:13:30,560 does the fact that we have this bylaw 267 00:13:30,560 --> 00:13:34,160 then obligate the insurance companies to 268 00:13:34,160 --> 00:13:37,760 provide that to anyone in our an 269 00:13:37,760 --> 00:13:39,680 organization they're insuring or is it 270 00:13:39,680 --> 00:13:41,519 still ultimately up to an insurance 271 00:13:41,519 --> 00:13:43,200 company 272 00:13:43,200 --> 00:13:45,600 how things proceed or what happens or 273 00:13:45,600 --> 00:13:49,680 can you speak to that a bit 274 00:13:49,680 --> 00:13:52,069 >> uh through the mayor u the so the 275 00:13:52,069 --> 00:13:52,079 » uh through the mayor u the so the 276 00:13:52,079 --> 00:13:53,760 district's municipal insurance company 277 00:13:53,760 --> 00:13:56,000 is the municipal insurance association 278 00:13:56,000 --> 00:13:58,880 of BC and they handle very specific 279 00:13:58,880 --> 00:14:01,279 claims for us. And when a claim is 280 00:14:01,279 --> 00:14:04,160 passed to MIABC, 281 00:14:04,160 --> 00:14:06,800 they handle every aspect of that claim. 282 00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:09,040 So, prior to accepting a claim, they 283 00:14:09,040 --> 00:14:10,959 make a determination whether it fits 284 00:14:10,959 --> 00:14:13,199 within the scope of our municipal 285 00:14:13,199 --> 00:14:15,600 coverage. 286 00:14:15,600 --> 00:14:18,079 If a situation was to arise where there 287 00:14:18,079 --> 00:14:20,720 may be a conflict with our bylaw, I'm 288 00:14:20,720 --> 00:14:22,720 sure they would be flagging that in 289 00:14:22,720 --> 00:14:26,240 advance of accepting the um accepting 290 00:14:26,240 --> 00:14:28,800 the claim or uh representing the 291 00:14:28,800 --> 00:14:31,040 district. Uh but I have not seen a 292 00:14:31,040 --> 00:14:32,720 specific example like the one you've 293 00:14:32,720 --> 00:14:35,990 referenced. 294 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:38,480 » Thank you. You have a followup. Yeah, 295 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:40,320 just sort of big picture wine because I 296 00:14:40,320 --> 00:14:43,120 I had been I had the impression that as 297 00:14:43,120 --> 00:14:44,800 elected officials we in particular had 298 00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:46,880 very little protection against even our 299 00:14:46,880 --> 00:14:51,680 own mistakes. Um uh this implies there's 300 00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:54,800 something more. Uh, am I correct though 301 00:14:54,800 --> 00:15:01,670 in thinking that um this doesn't really 302 00:15:01,680 --> 00:15:03,360 I I guess maybe can you just speak a 303 00:15:03,360 --> 00:15:06,639 little more to sort of where there is 304 00:15:06,639 --> 00:15:08,480 some protection available if if some 305 00:15:08,480 --> 00:15:09,839 like it's clear if you do something 306 00:15:09,839 --> 00:15:13,040 willfully wrong you're not protected but 307 00:15:13,040 --> 00:15:14,480 if you're sort of doing things with the 308 00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:16,800 best intent best of intentions on what 309 00:15:16,800 --> 00:15:22,310 are the still the limitations in this 310 00:15:22,320 --> 00:15:23,680 » uh through the mayor, I actually brought 311 00:15:23,680 --> 00:15:26,320 a couple of examples that I can speak to 312 00:15:26,320 --> 00:15:28,399 and hopefully that will help frame it a 313 00:15:28,399 --> 00:15:30,399 little bit because it to be honest, the 314 00:15:30,399 --> 00:15:32,079 language in the legislation isn't always 315 00:15:32,079 --> 00:15:34,399 clear and it is confusing and I had to 316 00:15:34,399 --> 00:15:35,839 do a fair bit of research to wrap my 317 00:15:35,839 --> 00:15:37,920 head around this. So, uh if you'll be 318 00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:39,199 patient with me, I'll find a few 319 00:15:39,199 --> 00:15:43,279 examples here and read them out. 320 00:15:43,279 --> 00:15:46,160 Uh the first example is a municipal 321 00:15:46,160 --> 00:15:48,240 official is convicted of knowingly 322 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:52,079 falsifying records. So in this situation 323 00:15:52,079 --> 00:15:56,079 uh this is a is uh the municipality 324 00:15:56,079 --> 00:15:58,240 cannot pay the fine. So if they were 325 00:15:58,240 --> 00:16:00,000 convicted and there was a fine issued 326 00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:02,720 the municipality could not pay the fine. 327 00:16:02,720 --> 00:16:04,480 However, 328 00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:06,800 it could the council does or council and 329 00:16:06,800 --> 00:16:08,480 the district does have discretion to pay 330 00:16:08,480 --> 00:16:10,000 some of the legal fees that may be 331 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:13,199 associated in the determination of 332 00:16:13,199 --> 00:16:16,240 whether there was a conviction. 333 00:16:16,240 --> 00:16:19,120 Does that makes some clarity? Okay, I'll 334 00:16:19,120 --> 00:16:21,839 go into the next one. Uh, a counselor is 335 00:16:21,839 --> 00:16:24,959 fined under an environmental statute for 336 00:16:24,959 --> 00:16:28,320 an inadvertent regulatory breach despite 337 00:16:28,320 --> 00:16:30,720 acting responsibly. So, there's another 338 00:16:30,720 --> 00:16:34,160 fine issued in this case. Uh, there was 339 00:16:34,160 --> 00:16:37,600 uh there wasn't intent, so the 340 00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:41,040 municipality may pay the fine. 341 00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:42,959 Does that provide some clarity? Is it 342 00:16:42,959 --> 00:16:45,600 more confusing? 343 00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:47,030 >> Like any good example, it may have 344 00:16:47,030 --> 00:16:47,040 » Like any good example, it may have 345 00:16:47,040 --> 00:16:48,880 triggered a few questions. So we'll I'll 346 00:16:48,880 --> 00:16:50,959 go back to councelor Pettingill. 347 00:16:50,959 --> 00:16:52,790 >> Yeah, that one is a little confusing in 348 00:16:52,790 --> 00:16:52,800 » Yeah, that one is a little confusing in 349 00:16:52,800 --> 00:16:56,720 that we have no individual ability to do 350 00:16:56,720 --> 00:16:58,240 an environmental action or whatever 351 00:16:58,240 --> 00:17:01,600 direct one. So the the word a counselor 352 00:17:01,600 --> 00:17:03,839 like is implicit and this is actually 353 00:17:03,839 --> 00:17:05,679 the council and their majority vote and 354 00:17:05,679 --> 00:17:07,839 and it's the the group that's protected 355 00:17:07,839 --> 00:17:09,839 or is there some case where an 356 00:17:09,839 --> 00:17:12,559 individual is is somehow 357 00:17:12,559 --> 00:17:13,679 which seems like an impossible 358 00:17:13,679 --> 00:17:16,000 situation? You could replace counselor 359 00:17:16,000 --> 00:17:18,000 with municipal official as defined by 360 00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:20,240 the bylaw, 361 00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:21,829 >> but you're right. No individual 362 00:17:21,829 --> 00:17:21,839 » but you're right. No individual 363 00:17:21,839 --> 00:17:24,799 counselor has a specific authority to 364 00:17:24,799 --> 00:17:26,799 take an individual action. So that would 365 00:17:26,799 --> 00:17:30,000 likely be the counselors in that would 366 00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:32,080 likely be a multiple. I share your 367 00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:36,400 assessment with that. Um 368 00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:39,840 I was curious I thank you for the 369 00:17:39,840 --> 00:17:42,960 examples. Those were help. Yeah. Well, I 370 00:17:42,960 --> 00:17:45,520 know I know it's a it's it is a 371 00:17:45,520 --> 00:17:47,280 challenging 372 00:17:47,280 --> 00:17:48,720 topic. I think it's just got a lot of 373 00:17:48,720 --> 00:17:51,760 new a lot of whatifs is to it. But I was 374 00:17:51,760 --> 00:17:53,679 wondering you sorry in your presentation 375 00:17:53,679 --> 00:17:55,120 it spoke to how it relates to community 376 00:17:55,120 --> 00:17:59,360 charter and and legislation broadly. Um 377 00:17:59,360 --> 00:18:01,440 how does where does the code of conduct 378 00:18:01,440 --> 00:18:04,640 sit in this? Like I understand there's 379 00:18:04,640 --> 00:18:07,679 these, you know, if there's a fine paid 380 00:18:07,679 --> 00:18:09,600 or a guilty or someone, you know, in 381 00:18:09,600 --> 00:18:12,160 other jurisdictions, but was there a 382 00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:15,360 lens to do we rely on those 383 00:18:15,360 --> 00:18:17,600 uh mechanisms for this or does the code 384 00:18:17,600 --> 00:18:19,600 of conduct bump into it feels like we're 385 00:18:19,600 --> 00:18:22,240 starting to that there's some overlap 386 00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:24,320 potentially? How are we thinking about 387 00:18:24,320 --> 00:18:27,760 that or or can you add some can you 388 00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:30,320 orient me on that? 389 00:18:30,320 --> 00:18:32,710 >> That's a good question. Um the 390 00:18:32,710 --> 00:18:32,720 » That's a good question. Um the 391 00:18:32,720 --> 00:18:34,960 indemnification bylaw is specifically if 392 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:36,799 there's a legal claim against the 393 00:18:36,799 --> 00:18:39,360 district. So it's moved past the point 394 00:18:39,360 --> 00:18:41,280 where 395 00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:43,919 uh council in the district is dealing 396 00:18:43,919 --> 00:18:48,000 with um a breach of 397 00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:50,960 conduct in house and it's moved into the 398 00:18:50,960 --> 00:18:53,600 legal fear sphere. So it there is a 399 00:18:53,600 --> 00:18:57,120 fairly clear line between them I would 400 00:18:57,120 --> 00:18:59,440 say. 401 00:18:59,440 --> 00:19:01,750 >> Okay. Thank you. That's helpful. 402 00:19:01,750 --> 00:19:01,760 » Okay. Thank you. That's helpful. 403 00:19:01,760 --> 00:19:04,640 Um, councelor Hamilton. Yeah, go ahead. 404 00:19:04,640 --> 00:19:07,270 >> Yeah, thanks very much. It's interesting 405 00:19:07,270 --> 00:19:07,280 » Yeah, thanks very much. It's interesting 406 00:19:07,280 --> 00:19:10,240 that the the this bylaw has an 407 00:19:10,240 --> 00:19:12,480 interesting combination of council that 408 00:19:12,480 --> 00:19:15,360 the municipal officer includes council 409 00:19:15,360 --> 00:19:18,880 and employees of the municipality. 410 00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:24,320 Um and in terms of municipal employees, 411 00:19:24,320 --> 00:19:28,960 uh I can certainly I see the logic uh 412 00:19:28,960 --> 00:19:32,000 for in part three 413 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:33,840 um 414 00:19:33,840 --> 00:19:37,039 the determination of payment of the 415 00:19:37,039 --> 00:19:39,440 indemnification amounts 416 00:19:39,440 --> 00:19:41,600 um is determined by the chief 417 00:19:41,600 --> 00:19:44,720 administrative officer, the CIO um and 418 00:19:44,720 --> 00:19:48,320 the CIO being the head of the district. 419 00:19:48,320 --> 00:19:49,760 That makes sense in terms of the 420 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:53,440 municipal officers. Does that make sense 421 00:19:53,440 --> 00:19:57,360 as well in terms of council? 422 00:19:57,360 --> 00:20:02,640 Does that is there um 423 00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:06,720 are there other instances where the CAO 424 00:20:06,720 --> 00:20:08,480 has determination 425 00:20:08,480 --> 00:20:10,559 over council? When I think of the code 426 00:20:10,559 --> 00:20:13,440 of conduct bylaw, for example, council 427 00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:15,600 regulates, council's 428 00:20:15,600 --> 00:20:18,799 um within that bylaw, council makes 429 00:20:18,799 --> 00:20:22,640 decisions. So I guess the question is 430 00:20:22,640 --> 00:20:25,520 within other indemnification 431 00:20:25,520 --> 00:20:27,039 bylaws, 432 00:20:27,039 --> 00:20:32,000 is it common practice to have the CEO uh 433 00:20:32,000 --> 00:20:36,720 be a deciding uh uh determinated 434 00:20:36,720 --> 00:20:40,960 determinating body on damages, awards, 435 00:20:40,960 --> 00:20:42,960 fines, penalties, and what reasonable 436 00:20:42,960 --> 00:20:50,630 costs will be paid um for council. 437 00:20:50,640 --> 00:20:52,720 Many of the other bylaws that we looked 438 00:20:52,720 --> 00:20:54,480 at when we were doing the research for 439 00:20:54,480 --> 00:20:57,440 this left that more open-ended. It ended 440 00:20:57,440 --> 00:21:01,039 at as uh out of pockets out of pocket 441 00:21:01,039 --> 00:21:04,720 costs and uh 442 00:21:04,720 --> 00:21:07,039 some included 443 00:21:07,039 --> 00:21:09,280 the word reasonable. However, there we 444 00:21:09,280 --> 00:21:12,000 didn't find any that specified a 445 00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:13,919 specific individual that would determine 446 00:21:13,919 --> 00:21:17,840 that. I will say though that we do have 447 00:21:17,840 --> 00:21:21,200 in the code of conduct bylaw, the CEO is 448 00:21:21,200 --> 00:21:22,880 the person that makes determinations 449 00:21:22,880 --> 00:21:26,640 about um legal fees. If council needs to 450 00:21:26,640 --> 00:21:28,960 uh seek legal advice, it needs to go 451 00:21:28,960 --> 00:21:30,960 through the CEO. So, we do have a little 452 00:21:30,960 --> 00:21:42,630 bit of a precedent there for that. 453 00:21:42,640 --> 00:21:44,640 Okay. 454 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:47,360 So what role 455 00:21:47,360 --> 00:21:48,880 um 456 00:21:48,880 --> 00:21:53,120 what role does council play if any in 457 00:21:53,120 --> 00:21:56,549 determining 458 00:21:56,559 --> 00:21:58,799 whether council 459 00:21:58,799 --> 00:22:01,679 pursues or 460 00:22:01,679 --> 00:22:04,880 um determines the level of 461 00:22:04,880 --> 00:22:06,640 indemnification 462 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:11,520 that another counselor will be 463 00:22:11,520 --> 00:22:14,799 um awarded and awarded isn't the right 464 00:22:14,799 --> 00:22:17,280 word here, but what determining that 465 00:22:17,280 --> 00:22:19,919 reasonable level of cost because at some 466 00:22:19,919 --> 00:22:21,919 point in time somebody might get into a 467 00:22:21,919 --> 00:22:25,200 legal dispute and 468 00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:27,280 more and more money might need to go 469 00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:29,360 down that road. 470 00:22:29,360 --> 00:22:31,840 Does council play any role in that or 471 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:40,710 does that sit purely with the CEO? 472 00:22:40,720 --> 00:22:43,679 uh can if there is a legal claim that 473 00:22:43,679 --> 00:22:46,400 fits the parameters of the bylaw if it 474 00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:50,240 is adopted uh all the costs associated 475 00:22:50,240 --> 00:22:53,280 with that in within reason would be 476 00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:55,600 covered because of the indemnification 477 00:22:55,600 --> 00:22:58,640 bylaw. So there isn't a 478 00:22:58,640 --> 00:23:02,480 threshold for when a legal claim needs 479 00:23:02,480 --> 00:23:05,679 to come to council for approval. I will 480 00:23:05,679 --> 00:23:08,960 say that if a legal claim doesn't fit 481 00:23:08,960 --> 00:23:12,480 the parameters of this bylaw, 482 00:23:12,480 --> 00:23:14,320 council has the discretion through the 483 00:23:14,320 --> 00:23:18,720 local government act to um direct direct 484 00:23:18,720 --> 00:23:20,559 that the legal claim is indemnified 485 00:23:20,559 --> 00:23:25,990 through council resolution. 486 00:23:26,000 --> 00:23:28,400 » Okay. Thanks. I didn't realize that 487 00:23:28,400 --> 00:23:31,280 overarching piece of the local 488 00:23:31,280 --> 00:23:34,640 government act. That's good to know. And 489 00:23:34,640 --> 00:23:38,000 yeah, the my my question my my point 490 00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:40,880 here is that discussion of what's 491 00:23:40,880 --> 00:23:44,880 reasonable and the determination of what 492 00:23:44,880 --> 00:23:47,760 is reasonable when the C when a CEO and 493 00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:51,120 this is not about our CEO. This is about 494 00:23:51,120 --> 00:23:54,320 power dynamics that get set up within 495 00:23:54,320 --> 00:23:57,919 councils and between the CEO because the 496 00:23:57,919 --> 00:24:01,360 CEO can be um 497 00:24:01,360 --> 00:24:06,320 either um they can be put in a position 498 00:24:06,320 --> 00:24:08,000 where 499 00:24:08,000 --> 00:24:10,960 they are undermined by their council and 500 00:24:10,960 --> 00:24:13,520 a CIO can undermine their council. That 501 00:24:13,520 --> 00:24:18,240 power dynamic can happen. Um, and I'm 502 00:24:18,240 --> 00:24:21,360 reflecting here on whether this can 503 00:24:21,360 --> 00:24:23,200 contribute to that power dynamic in a 504 00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:25,919 potential sticky sticky situation. Um, 505 00:24:25,919 --> 00:24:27,200 but I don't think I have a better 506 00:24:27,200 --> 00:24:30,640 solution. Um, and with the coverage of 507 00:24:30,640 --> 00:24:33,279 the local government act that the 508 00:24:33,279 --> 00:24:35,760 council can step in and indemnify, I'm 509 00:24:35,760 --> 00:24:37,919 comfortable with the CIO being in this 510 00:24:37,919 --> 00:24:39,440 role here. 511 00:24:39,440 --> 00:24:41,110 >> Would you like to comment on that, Miss 512 00:24:41,110 --> 00:24:41,120 » Would you like to comment on that, Miss 513 00:24:41,120 --> 00:24:44,080 Gundy or? 514 00:24:44,080 --> 00:24:46,470 >> Sure. Yeah. And just before we do that, 515 00:24:46,470 --> 00:24:46,480 » Sure. Yeah. And just before we do that, 516 00:24:46,480 --> 00:24:48,799 we'll take a there's been a an ask for a 517 00:24:48,799 --> 00:24:52,720 quick timeout. I just um in that section 518 00:24:52,720 --> 00:24:56,159 where it does say reasonable. I I've 519 00:24:56,159 --> 00:24:58,240 always ch I know the language is there 520 00:24:58,240 --> 00:25:01,520 to provide some flexibility and I just 521 00:25:01,520 --> 00:25:03,760 but for 522 00:25:03,760 --> 00:25:06,240 all the for all the reasons I I just 523 00:25:06,240 --> 00:25:08,799 wondered about the use of reasonable 524 00:25:08,799 --> 00:25:10,640 because it doesn't imply that everyone 525 00:25:10,640 --> 00:25:13,840 involved in it is is that. So, I'm just 526 00:25:13,840 --> 00:25:17,279 curious on if that's the best the best 527 00:25:17,279 --> 00:25:19,360 um language for that. Although, I 528 00:25:19,360 --> 00:25:22,320 understand why you'd want to put some 529 00:25:22,320 --> 00:25:24,400 reasonable limits on it. It's just hard 530 00:25:24,400 --> 00:25:26,640 to see it framed that way. So, um I'll 531 00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:29,200 wait for a reply till after after this, 532 00:25:29,200 --> 00:25:30,880 but maybe I'll just flush council, see 533 00:25:30,880 --> 00:25:32,159 if there's any other questions just to 534 00:25:32,159 --> 00:25:34,559 make sure that we're um we don't require 535 00:25:34,559 --> 00:25:36,080 another timeout on this matter. Go 536 00:25:36,080 --> 00:25:38,080 ahead, councelor Penning. Yeah, just 537 00:25:38,080 --> 00:25:42,080 sort of thinking of um I guess my 538 00:25:42,080 --> 00:25:43,600 understanding of conflict of interest is 539 00:25:43,600 --> 00:25:45,440 it's on us individually to decide and 540 00:25:45,440 --> 00:25:47,520 declare if we have a conflict. If we're 541 00:25:47,520 --> 00:25:51,600 unsure, it's on us to individually seek 542 00:25:51,600 --> 00:25:54,159 and and pay for legal counsel to get 543 00:25:54,159 --> 00:25:56,799 that advice if we feel we're we're 544 00:25:56,799 --> 00:26:01,279 unsure. Um, and whether we do or not, 545 00:26:01,279 --> 00:26:04,080 uh, if we proceed in good faith and 546 00:26:04,080 --> 00:26:05,760 believing we're doing the right thing, 547 00:26:05,760 --> 00:26:07,840 but then it turns out we were actually 548 00:26:07,840 --> 00:26:11,520 offside. I had previously understood, we 549 00:26:11,520 --> 00:26:12,799 would bear all the consequences 550 00:26:12,799 --> 00:26:15,440 individually of that. When I see this, 551 00:26:15,440 --> 00:26:18,080 this makes it seems like, you know, you 552 00:26:18,080 --> 00:26:20,159 could sort of, well, I'm doing the best 553 00:26:20,159 --> 00:26:22,400 I can. I don't have money to to have a 554 00:26:22,400 --> 00:26:24,720 lawyer, and I'll be indemnified at the 555 00:26:24,720 --> 00:26:26,960 end of the day if it doesn't work out. I 556 00:26:26,960 --> 00:26:28,159 don't think that's what this is trying 557 00:26:28,159 --> 00:26:29,840 to say, but that's what it seems to say. 558 00:26:29,840 --> 00:26:33,760 I'm just I'm looking for a way to 559 00:26:33,760 --> 00:26:35,919 understand why that case would be 560 00:26:35,919 --> 00:26:38,159 excluded from indemnification if you 561 00:26:38,159 --> 00:26:42,159 were acting in the best, you know, with 562 00:26:42,159 --> 00:26:45,120 the best of intents, but it went south. 563 00:26:45,120 --> 00:26:47,120 Why would this like I don't in the 564 00:26:47,120 --> 00:26:49,200 exclusions, it's not clear or the limits 565 00:26:49,200 --> 00:26:58,310 why that would not be covered. 566 00:26:58,320 --> 00:27:00,559 Sorry, I I I'm not following the 567 00:27:00,559 --> 00:27:02,960 question. Could you provide the specific 568 00:27:02,960 --> 00:27:05,120 section or 569 00:27:05,120 --> 00:27:07,669 >> Well, I guess sort of say, you know, 570 00:27:07,669 --> 00:27:07,679 » Well, I guess sort of say, you know, 571 00:27:07,679 --> 00:27:11,200 there's an issue comes up. I decided to 572 00:27:11,200 --> 00:27:13,360 vote on it or do whatever. I I thought I 573 00:27:13,360 --> 00:27:14,880 didn't have a conflict of interest, so I 574 00:27:14,880 --> 00:27:17,279 was proceeding what I thought was 575 00:27:17,279 --> 00:27:19,120 correctly. Turns out at the end of the 576 00:27:19,120 --> 00:27:21,919 day, uh someone some court or whatever 577 00:27:21,919 --> 00:27:24,080 body decides I was wrong. there's some 578 00:27:24,080 --> 00:27:27,600 liability coming to me. I had thought I 579 00:27:27,600 --> 00:27:29,120 was stuck with that liability before 580 00:27:29,120 --> 00:27:34,720 today. Um reading hearing the discussion 581 00:27:34,720 --> 00:27:37,360 like when I look at the the limits this 582 00:27:37,360 --> 00:27:39,200 seems to say I would be covered. I would 583 00:27:39,200 --> 00:27:41,279 be indemnified in that case but I don't 584 00:27:41,279 --> 00:27:43,919 think that's what this is saying. So I'm 585 00:27:43,919 --> 00:27:46,320 trying to understand why is that case 586 00:27:46,320 --> 00:27:47,909 >> Could you point to the side of this 587 00:27:47,909 --> 00:27:47,919 » Could you point to the side of this 588 00:27:47,919 --> 00:27:49,830 >> sorry could you just point to the 589 00:27:49,830 --> 00:27:49,840 » sorry could you just point to the 590 00:27:49,840 --> 00:27:52,080 section that you've is that just sort of 591 00:27:52,080 --> 00:27:53,679 a general takeaway or is there a 592 00:27:53,679 --> 00:27:55,360 specific section 593 00:27:55,360 --> 00:27:57,110 >> the limits on indemnification there's 594 00:27:57,110 --> 00:27:57,120 » the limits on indemnification there's 595 00:27:57,120 --> 00:27:59,919 nothing that says a counselor uh found 596 00:27:59,919 --> 00:28:02,880 offside on conflict of interest is not 597 00:28:02,880 --> 00:28:04,480 indemn or does not qualify for 598 00:28:04,480 --> 00:28:06,559 indemnification there's nothing along 599 00:28:06,559 --> 00:28:09,600 that sense so I'm trying to understand 600 00:28:09,600 --> 00:28:13,919 um why again it's my understanding 601 00:28:13,919 --> 00:28:15,440 this case would not be covered by this, 602 00:28:15,440 --> 00:28:16,720 but I don't. 603 00:28:16,720 --> 00:28:18,310 >> Okay. So, we have a question around 604 00:28:18,310 --> 00:28:18,320 » Okay. So, we have a question around 605 00:28:18,320 --> 00:28:19,760 conflict of interest. We can put this in 606 00:28:19,760 --> 00:28:21,520 the after timeout. I don't know if that 607 00:28:21,520 --> 00:28:24,159 or do you have a reply for the for how 608 00:28:24,159 --> 00:28:26,960 that fits or would you like to group 609 00:28:26,960 --> 00:28:30,240 that with the timeout matters? 610 00:28:30,240 --> 00:28:31,830 >> Group that with the timeout matters and 611 00:28:31,830 --> 00:28:31,840 » Group that with the timeout matters and 612 00:28:31,840 --> 00:28:33,360 I'll have a crafted answer. 613 00:28:33,360 --> 00:28:34,710 >> Okay. No, that's fine. And then I've got 614 00:28:34,710 --> 00:28:34,720 » Okay. No, that's fine. And then I've got 615 00:28:34,720 --> 00:28:36,720 Councelor Stoner and then I'd like then 616 00:28:36,720 --> 00:28:38,640 we'll we'll go to the staff timeout. 617 00:28:38,640 --> 00:28:40,399 We'll come back for another pass at 618 00:28:40,399 --> 00:28:42,720 this. Councelor Stoner, go ahead. Yeah, 619 00:28:42,720 --> 00:28:44,399 thanks to the chair. I think just I 620 00:28:44,399 --> 00:28:46,880 wanted to add some reflections on the 621 00:28:46,880 --> 00:28:48,880 word reasonable which I appreciate is 622 00:28:48,880 --> 00:28:50,880 not defined um and is really difficult 623 00:28:50,880 --> 00:28:53,200 to define especially in this context. I 624 00:28:53,200 --> 00:28:56,480 think um from a process in a procedure 625 00:28:56,480 --> 00:28:58,480 perspective I think reasonable is often 626 00:28:58,480 --> 00:29:02,080 defined when you go out and seek 627 00:29:02,080 --> 00:29:05,440 um like quotes for a legal cost for 628 00:29:05,440 --> 00:29:07,039 example. And so I think adding some 629 00:29:07,039 --> 00:29:08,799 discretion there by using the word 630 00:29:08,799 --> 00:29:11,360 reasonable I think is fine. I think in 631 00:29:11,360 --> 00:29:13,279 our procurement processes, we have ways 632 00:29:13,279 --> 00:29:15,120 to guard rail against what is 633 00:29:15,120 --> 00:29:18,159 reasonable. Um, and I just think it like 634 00:29:18,159 --> 00:29:20,880 taking out that word makes this bylaw 635 00:29:20,880 --> 00:29:22,159 really challenging to me and trying to 636 00:29:22,159 --> 00:29:23,679 define it, I think, is near impossible. 637 00:29:23,679 --> 00:29:25,200 So, I think there's other components of 638 00:29:25,200 --> 00:29:27,039 our process in our system that help 639 00:29:27,039 --> 00:29:30,640 guardrail the definition of reasonable. 640 00:29:30,640 --> 00:29:33,269 >> Thank you for that. Um, and the last one 641 00:29:33,269 --> 00:29:33,279 » Thank you for that. Um, and the last one 642 00:29:33,279 --> 00:29:34,880 of the other pieces that I have is just 643 00:29:34,880 --> 00:29:36,640 I I I do want to ask a question around 644 00:29:36,640 --> 00:29:40,559 the uh in section 5.2F to F is it says 645 00:29:40,559 --> 00:29:42,399 the provisions of this bylaw shall not 646 00:29:42,399 --> 00:29:44,480 apply to a motion of center by the 647 00:29:44,480 --> 00:29:45,760 district of Squamish Council. So I'm 648 00:29:45,760 --> 00:29:47,679 just curious on how that interplays here 649 00:29:47,679 --> 00:29:49,840 and to I was expecting that as part of 650 00:29:49,840 --> 00:29:51,919 the answer from the code of conduct 651 00:29:51,919 --> 00:29:55,919 piece maybe. So I you know because uh 652 00:29:55,919 --> 00:29:57,919 censure is something that could flow 653 00:29:57,919 --> 00:29:59,760 from the code of conduct. So that's sort 654 00:29:59,760 --> 00:30:01,200 of where I was one of the things I was 655 00:30:01,200 --> 00:30:02,480 trying to get at with that question but 656 00:30:02,480 --> 00:30:04,640 I'll leave that till after the time the 657 00:30:04,640 --> 00:30:06,320 timeout. Anything else before we go? 658 00:30:06,320 --> 00:30:08,559 Councelor Hamilton, go ahead. 659 00:30:08,559 --> 00:30:10,870 >> Maybe just confirming. So I read through 660 00:30:10,870 --> 00:30:10,880 » Maybe just confirming. So I read through 661 00:30:10,880 --> 00:30:13,760 the LGA and I think uh Miss Vonlutoo, 662 00:30:13,760 --> 00:30:15,919 the section you were referring to was 663 00:30:15,919 --> 00:30:18,960 section uh 742 664 00:30:18,960 --> 00:30:20,880 A2, 665 00:30:20,880 --> 00:30:22,880 the municipal officials ability. If you 666 00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:24,240 could just confirm that on the timeout 667 00:30:24,240 --> 00:30:27,279 and then we'll be on the same page. 668 00:30:27,279 --> 00:30:33,510 >> That's 5.3 in the uh B. 669 00:30:33,520 --> 00:30:35,120 We're going to grant the timeout and 670 00:30:35,120 --> 00:30:36,960 then we will uh we'll address that 671 00:30:36,960 --> 00:30:38,159 because there's an easy answer for that 672 00:30:38,159 --> 00:30:41,600 one. So, um I feel like five minutes is 673 00:30:41,600 --> 00:30:44,080 the minimum for for for this. Would you 674 00:30:44,080 --> 00:30:46,000 like 10? 675 00:30:46,000 --> 00:30:47,440 10. Let's take 10. We'll take a 676 00:30:47,440 --> 00:30:50,720 10-minute break and we'll reconvene at 677 00:30:50,720 --> 00:40:03,030 uh 6:42. 678 00:40:03,040 --> 00:40:04,960 All right, welcome back. We're back from 679 00:40:04,960 --> 00:40:08,800 a quick um timeout for staff. So, I will 680 00:40:08,800 --> 00:40:13,920 go to to to CEO Glendy. 681 00:40:13,920 --> 00:40:15,430 >> Thank you. through the mayor. Uh I will 682 00:40:15,430 --> 00:40:15,440 » Thank you. through the mayor. Uh I will 683 00:40:15,440 --> 00:40:18,160 answer the question about the CEO um 684 00:40:18,160 --> 00:40:19,839 being 685 00:40:19,839 --> 00:40:21,760 uh the determiner of the reasonable 686 00:40:21,760 --> 00:40:24,160 costs in section 3. Uh it's a great 687 00:40:24,160 --> 00:40:26,560 question. Um 688 00:40:26,560 --> 00:40:28,400 the purpose of that is financial 689 00:40:28,400 --> 00:40:31,520 control. And so the suggestion is to 690 00:40:31,520 --> 00:40:33,920 prevent it being a one-on-one with CEO 691 00:40:33,920 --> 00:40:37,200 and council is to include uh or amend 692 00:40:37,200 --> 00:40:39,520 this bylaw first three readings of the 693 00:40:39,520 --> 00:40:42,079 amendment to include with and CFO and 694 00:40:42,079 --> 00:40:44,160 chief financial officer and then that 695 00:40:44,160 --> 00:40:45,920 way there's the a financial control with 696 00:40:45,920 --> 00:40:48,400 a second signature or the second person 697 00:40:48,400 --> 00:40:50,960 vetting the costs that then get approved 698 00:40:50,960 --> 00:40:53,839 by MIBC or not. So that is a solution 699 00:40:53,839 --> 00:40:57,119 for that and that's the answer for that 700 00:40:57,119 --> 00:40:59,839 one and I will do the chair pass it back 701 00:40:59,839 --> 00:41:01,839 to Miss Vonto for the other answers. 702 00:41:01,839 --> 00:41:05,430 >> Okay. So just um on that one does anyone 703 00:41:05,430 --> 00:41:05,440 » Okay. So just um on that one does anyone 704 00:41:05,440 --> 00:41:07,599 have questions about that response and 705 00:41:07,599 --> 00:41:09,280 thank you for the for a suggestion that 706 00:41:09,280 --> 00:41:10,960 addresses the concern. I'll just go to 707 00:41:10,960 --> 00:41:12,160 councelor Hamilton. I think it was your 708 00:41:12,160 --> 00:41:14,079 question that sort of took us down this 709 00:41:14,079 --> 00:41:16,800 path. 710 00:41:16,800 --> 00:41:20,630 >> Yeah thanks. Um 711 00:41:20,630 --> 00:41:20,640 » Yeah thanks. Um 712 00:41:20,640 --> 00:41:22,960 I think my concern was in in many ways 713 00:41:22,960 --> 00:41:25,200 addressed by the 714 00:41:25,200 --> 00:41:29,920 clearer understanding of section uh 5.3. 715 00:41:29,920 --> 00:41:33,359 Uh but I do think that uh adding a 716 00:41:33,359 --> 00:41:36,000 signature here or adding a a partner in 717 00:41:36,000 --> 00:41:38,960 the determination uh I think makes the 718 00:41:38,960 --> 00:41:40,640 whole bylaw stronger and makes our 719 00:41:40,640 --> 00:41:43,280 policies and procedures stronger. Uh so 720 00:41:43,280 --> 00:41:46,560 yeah, I would certainly u I'll make a 721 00:41:46,560 --> 00:41:50,000 motion to add that if if needed. 722 00:41:50,000 --> 00:41:51,589 >> Okay, we'll deal with that when we we 723 00:41:51,589 --> 00:41:51,599 » Okay, we'll deal with that when we we 724 00:41:51,599 --> 00:41:54,160 get there. Um thank you for that. Um 725 00:41:54,160 --> 00:41:56,240 anyone else on this particular piece, 726 00:41:56,240 --> 00:41:59,119 Councelor Penning? So does this imply 727 00:41:59,119 --> 00:42:01,839 that as part of our budget uh that 728 00:42:01,839 --> 00:42:05,040 somewhere there's a legal envelope there 729 00:42:05,040 --> 00:42:06,640 going forward we might be a bit more 730 00:42:06,640 --> 00:42:08,960 explicit of like this is the bucket we 731 00:42:08,960 --> 00:42:12,240 have for the CFO and CIO to possibly 732 00:42:12,240 --> 00:42:13,520 address these things for the coming year 733 00:42:13,520 --> 00:42:17,040 and so council sort of uh approves an 734 00:42:17,040 --> 00:42:20,319 envelope annually and and then sort of 735 00:42:20,319 --> 00:42:22,720 within that envelope would apply this 736 00:42:22,720 --> 00:42:26,550 bylaw 737 00:42:26,560 --> 00:42:29,680 Oh yeah, whoever would like to speak to 738 00:42:29,680 --> 00:42:32,880 uh I guess how we allocate legal into 739 00:42:32,880 --> 00:42:34,400 our budgeting. 740 00:42:34,400 --> 00:42:36,630 >> Uh 741 00:42:36,630 --> 00:42:36,640 » Uh 742 00:42:36,640 --> 00:42:39,119 corporate uh administration has a 743 00:42:39,119 --> 00:42:42,319 general legal bucket that we uh set 744 00:42:42,319 --> 00:42:44,480 aside annually to cover all legal costs 745 00:42:44,480 --> 00:42:46,720 that are associated with the dis or most 746 00:42:46,720 --> 00:42:48,319 of the legal claims that are associated 747 00:42:48,319 --> 00:42:51,359 with the district. And at the moment 748 00:42:51,359 --> 00:42:54,960 we've never had an issue with uh 749 00:42:54,960 --> 00:43:00,470 overruns from that budget 750 00:43:00,480 --> 00:43:02,400 » and any expenditure even under this 751 00:43:02,400 --> 00:43:04,800 would need to be inside of the budgeted 752 00:43:04,800 --> 00:43:07,760 amount just to state the 753 00:43:07,760 --> 00:43:09,839 further that point. Um any other 754 00:43:09,839 --> 00:43:11,440 questions on on this before we go back 755 00:43:11,440 --> 00:43:13,040 for the answer on the second question 756 00:43:13,040 --> 00:43:14,160 which I'm forgetting what it was at this 757 00:43:14,160 --> 00:43:16,720 point. Oh go ahead councelor son. Uh, 758 00:43:16,720 --> 00:43:18,240 can I just seek some clarity on the 759 00:43:18,240 --> 00:43:19,839 proposed amendment and how that would 760 00:43:19,839 --> 00:43:21,440 intersect with our general procurement 761 00:43:21,440 --> 00:43:24,160 policies and so like there's a threshold 762 00:43:24,160 --> 00:43:26,000 like I don't want to make this an overly 763 00:43:26,000 --> 00:43:28,800 cumbersome process and we already 764 00:43:28,800 --> 00:43:31,200 require multiple signatures on larger 765 00:43:31,200 --> 00:43:32,640 expenses. So I'm just curious if this 766 00:43:32,640 --> 00:43:34,400 just feels like a redundancy to an 767 00:43:34,400 --> 00:43:37,760 existing parallel process that would be 768 00:43:37,760 --> 00:43:41,119 highlighted or initiated anyways out of 769 00:43:41,119 --> 00:43:44,150 this. 770 00:43:44,160 --> 00:43:47,280 the current um I'm trying to think of 771 00:43:47,280 --> 00:43:49,839 the bylaw is is it the delegation bylaw 772 00:43:49,839 --> 00:43:53,200 that refers to spending authority 773 00:43:53,200 --> 00:43:55,920 indicates that um all general managers 774 00:43:55,920 --> 00:43:57,440 have a certain threshold which includes 775 00:43:57,440 --> 00:44:00,400 the CFO after which the CEO has 776 00:44:00,400 --> 00:44:03,200 discretion up to basically the budget. 777 00:44:03,200 --> 00:44:07,119 Um, I think if we're talking about 778 00:44:07,119 --> 00:44:09,440 like part of this is essentially what is 779 00:44:09,440 --> 00:44:13,200 reasonable to be indemnified by MIAC or 780 00:44:13,200 --> 00:44:16,640 indemnified by the district. Um, if 781 00:44:16,640 --> 00:44:18,319 there's a concern about a power 782 00:44:18,319 --> 00:44:21,040 discrepancy with the 783 00:44:21,040 --> 00:44:23,839 one person agreeing to the amount, then 784 00:44:23,839 --> 00:44:26,240 adding a second signature provides that 785 00:44:26,240 --> 00:44:28,640 financial control and eliminates that 786 00:44:28,640 --> 00:44:30,800 power discrepancy which with this 787 00:44:30,800 --> 00:44:32,880 particular bylaw doesn't exist in a 788 00:44:32,880 --> 00:44:36,880 process in our procurement policy. 789 00:44:36,880 --> 00:44:39,829 >> Thank you for that context. Um I will go 790 00:44:39,829 --> 00:44:39,839 » Thank you for that context. Um I will go 791 00:44:39,839 --> 00:44:41,599 to staff now to answer on the second 792 00:44:41,599 --> 00:44:43,040 question which I've forgotten what it 793 00:44:43,040 --> 00:44:45,599 was but I'll go to you. 794 00:44:45,599 --> 00:44:47,589 >> Uh the second question I believe was 795 00:44:47,589 --> 00:44:47,599 » Uh the second question I believe was 796 00:44:47,599 --> 00:44:51,760 around conflict of interest and if a 797 00:44:51,760 --> 00:44:54,480 council member would be indemnified if 798 00:44:54,480 --> 00:44:58,560 they inadvertently 799 00:44:58,560 --> 00:45:01,280 have a legal claim arising from a 800 00:45:01,280 --> 00:45:04,319 conflict of interest scenario. Is that 801 00:45:04,319 --> 00:45:07,040 my understand? Is that correct? Uh, I 802 00:45:07,040 --> 00:45:08,400 believe councelor Penning, does that 803 00:45:08,400 --> 00:45:10,400 capture your your concern? You're asking 804 00:45:10,400 --> 00:45:13,280 about the about this piece around 805 00:45:13,280 --> 00:45:15,359 conflict. 806 00:45:15,359 --> 00:45:16,390 >> Well, let's take the answer and we'll 807 00:45:16,390 --> 00:45:16,400 » Well, let's take the answer and we'll 808 00:45:16,400 --> 00:45:17,920 see if it addresses your concern. Does 809 00:45:17,920 --> 00:45:21,030 that 810 00:45:21,040 --> 00:45:21,440 » Okay. 811 00:45:21,440 --> 00:45:24,309 >> Okay. Uh, the first thing I'd like to 812 00:45:24,309 --> 00:45:24,319 » Okay. Uh, the first thing I'd like to 813 00:45:24,319 --> 00:45:26,400 state is that the purpose of the 814 00:45:26,400 --> 00:45:28,720 indemnification bylaw is to protect 815 00:45:28,720 --> 00:45:30,480 officials, 816 00:45:30,480 --> 00:45:32,560 you included, that who are acting in 817 00:45:32,560 --> 00:45:35,520 good faith while doing their jobs. 818 00:45:35,520 --> 00:45:37,680 uh it's to prevent and then some of the 819 00:45:37,680 --> 00:45:40,560 restrictions in the bylaw are to prevent 820 00:45:40,560 --> 00:45:42,640 the use of public money for shielding 821 00:45:42,640 --> 00:45:46,640 personal misconduct. So it's I think the 822 00:45:46,640 --> 00:45:48,640 key word around this is acting in good 823 00:45:48,640 --> 00:45:50,880 faith. 824 00:45:50,880 --> 00:45:52,800 Um and then in terms of the conflict of 825 00:45:52,800 --> 00:45:55,839 interest component 826 00:45:55,839 --> 00:45:58,480 the limits on indemnification. 827 00:45:58,480 --> 00:46:02,319 So this is what uh the district will not 828 00:46:02,319 --> 00:46:04,400 cover in terms of legal claims and 829 00:46:04,400 --> 00:46:06,800 conflict of interest is not included in 830 00:46:06,800 --> 00:46:09,119 here and it's important to note that 831 00:46:09,119 --> 00:46:11,599 most of these elements except for a 832 00:46:11,599 --> 00:46:14,640 couple are u directly from the 833 00:46:14,640 --> 00:46:17,040 legislation. So council has the 834 00:46:17,040 --> 00:46:20,079 discretion to be more restrictive and 835 00:46:20,079 --> 00:46:22,240 limit more 836 00:46:22,240 --> 00:46:24,079 limit the number of things that will be 837 00:46:24,079 --> 00:46:25,760 covered through the indemnification 838 00:46:25,760 --> 00:46:28,000 bylaw. So, right now, the way it's 839 00:46:28,000 --> 00:46:29,520 written, 840 00:46:29,520 --> 00:46:32,400 conflict of interest claims would likely 841 00:46:32,400 --> 00:46:34,319 be covered. Unless there's a conviction 842 00:46:34,319 --> 00:46:36,880 and there's a fine issued, then the 843 00:46:36,880 --> 00:46:41,760 district couldn't pay the fine. Um, 844 00:46:41,760 --> 00:46:44,240 council has the discretion though to 845 00:46:44,240 --> 00:46:47,040 totally eliminate covering conflict of 846 00:46:47,040 --> 00:46:49,359 interest claims that may arise by 847 00:46:49,359 --> 00:46:52,319 including that in this section. Is that 848 00:46:52,319 --> 00:46:53,760 clear? 849 00:46:53,760 --> 00:46:56,069 >> I think so. So I think one of the risks 850 00:46:56,069 --> 00:46:56,079 » I think so. So I think one of the risks 851 00:46:56,079 --> 00:46:59,599 that happens in the in can one of the 852 00:46:59,599 --> 00:47:01,200 risks that exists in these roles is 853 00:47:01,200 --> 00:47:03,520 someone could bring at any point in time 854 00:47:03,520 --> 00:47:07,359 a conflict of interest um matter forward 855 00:47:07,359 --> 00:47:09,040 uh even if it was frivolous I would need 856 00:47:09,040 --> 00:47:11,359 to go through a a legal process and I 857 00:47:11,359 --> 00:47:14,720 think there's a difference between um h 858 00:47:14,720 --> 00:47:19,040 being um having that happen and it 859 00:47:19,040 --> 00:47:22,000 ultimately being not coming to uh being 860 00:47:22,000 --> 00:47:23,599 dismissed or coming to some other 861 00:47:23,599 --> 00:47:25,359 conclusion. usion versus oh yeah there 862 00:47:25,359 --> 00:47:26,319 was a conflict here and there's a 863 00:47:26,319 --> 00:47:27,680 penalty and if there's a penalty then 864 00:47:27,680 --> 00:47:29,520 our indemnification wouldn't apply. Is 865 00:47:29,520 --> 00:47:32,560 that correct? 866 00:47:32,560 --> 00:47:36,150 >> That's my understanding. Yes. So that's 867 00:47:36,150 --> 00:47:36,160 » That's my understanding. Yes. So that's 868 00:47:36,160 --> 00:47:39,599 the sa the safety the safety net here 869 00:47:39,599 --> 00:47:41,680 and I think it's 870 00:47:41,680 --> 00:47:44,800 I think that's reasonable and I think 871 00:47:44,800 --> 00:47:46,400 without that sitting in these seats 872 00:47:46,400 --> 00:47:49,280 becomes even harder than it than it is 873 00:47:49,280 --> 00:47:55,359 because we're open to um um to this to 874 00:47:55,359 --> 00:47:59,270 this risk that could just 875 00:47:59,280 --> 00:48:00,800 you know I don't know how else to it's 876 00:48:00,800 --> 00:48:03,040 it's it's not appropriate I think to be 877 00:48:03,040 --> 00:48:05,040 exposed to that to that risk unless you 878 00:48:05,040 --> 00:48:08,240 did something that was ultimately found 879 00:48:08,240 --> 00:48:10,480 guilty for and and there's a penalty and 880 00:48:10,480 --> 00:48:12,319 I think that this addresses addresses 881 00:48:12,319 --> 00:48:13,440 that. I'll go to you councelor Penning 882 00:48:13,440 --> 00:48:15,440 then I've got councelor Stoner. 883 00:48:15,440 --> 00:48:17,510 >> Yeah, maybe not a topic of discussion 884 00:48:17,510 --> 00:48:17,520 » Yeah, maybe not a topic of discussion 885 00:48:17,520 --> 00:48:19,520 for tonight but it seems to me it might 886 00:48:19,520 --> 00:48:22,000 make more sense for us to set aside a 887 00:48:22,000 --> 00:48:26,319 bit of a funds where if you are unsure 888 00:48:26,319 --> 00:48:29,119 there's some support to get that uh as a 889 00:48:29,119 --> 00:48:31,839 counselor a clear legal advice on 890 00:48:31,839 --> 00:48:33,920 conflict. So you're, you know, you're 891 00:48:33,920 --> 00:48:35,359 not sort of saying, "Oh, maybe I can 892 00:48:35,359 --> 00:48:37,040 take a risk and try and do my best 893 00:48:37,040 --> 00:48:39,200 without a lawyer, which seems to be sort 894 00:48:39,200 --> 00:48:40,480 of where this is pushing us and 895 00:48:40,480 --> 00:48:42,240 hopefully we'll catch it on the back end 896 00:48:42,240 --> 00:48:44,400 as opposed to like actually have a very 897 00:48:44,400 --> 00:48:46,400 high standard and maybe less 898 00:48:46,400 --> 00:48:48,400 indemnification if you're offsite on 899 00:48:48,400 --> 00:48:50,319 conflict because you would have had the 900 00:48:50,319 --> 00:48:52,720 ability to check in with legal at the 901 00:48:52,720 --> 00:48:54,800 start before doing anything wrong." But 902 00:48:54,800 --> 00:48:57,359 I think um yeah, thank you for that. I I 903 00:48:57,359 --> 00:48:59,520 have seen some uh renumeration bylaws 904 00:48:59,520 --> 00:49:02,800 that that include the ability to to use 905 00:49:02,800 --> 00:49:05,359 some discretionary funds for or some 906 00:49:05,359 --> 00:49:10,160 funds for um uh a conflict conflict of 907 00:49:10,160 --> 00:49:12,880 interest consult legal consult or 908 00:49:12,880 --> 00:49:13,920 something like that up to a certain 909 00:49:13,920 --> 00:49:16,000 amount. So I think that's where that I 910 00:49:16,000 --> 00:49:18,240 like that suggestion but I think that is 911 00:49:18,240 --> 00:49:20,800 um is is important but is outside of 912 00:49:20,800 --> 00:49:22,720 this obviously it'll interact with this. 913 00:49:22,720 --> 00:49:24,160 Do you have thoughts on this? 914 00:49:24,160 --> 00:49:27,270 >> I do. So, I I don't have the language in 915 00:49:27,270 --> 00:49:27,280 » I do. So, I I don't have the language in 916 00:49:27,280 --> 00:49:28,800 front of me exactly, but the code of 917 00:49:28,800 --> 00:49:31,359 conduct bylaw does allow for counselors 918 00:49:31,359 --> 00:49:34,240 to seek approval from the CAO for a 919 00:49:34,240 --> 00:49:35,839 legal opinion if it's related to 920 00:49:35,839 --> 00:49:38,480 conflict of interest. So, that language 921 00:49:38,480 --> 00:49:40,240 is written into the code of conduct by 922 00:49:40,240 --> 00:49:46,150 law and the intention isn't to 923 00:49:46,160 --> 00:49:48,640 have all matters, you know, if they're 924 00:49:48,640 --> 00:49:52,079 if they're tangent tangential, 925 00:49:52,079 --> 00:49:53,760 uh, go for a legal opinion. But if 926 00:49:53,760 --> 00:49:57,520 someone is truly concerned, there is an 927 00:49:57,520 --> 00:49:59,520 avenue through the code of conduct bylaw 928 00:49:59,520 --> 00:50:02,160 to seek a legal opinion that is covered 929 00:50:02,160 --> 00:50:04,319 by the district. 930 00:50:04,319 --> 00:50:07,430 >> Okay. Um, councelor Stoner, I I think 931 00:50:07,430 --> 00:50:07,440 » Okay. Um, councelor Stoner, I I think 932 00:50:07,440 --> 00:50:09,440 you're next to my speaker's list. 933 00:50:09,440 --> 00:50:11,750 >> Yeah. Just trying to consider this 934 00:50:11,750 --> 00:50:11,760 » Yeah. Just trying to consider this 935 00:50:11,760 --> 00:50:14,160 component around conflict of interest on 936 00:50:14,160 --> 00:50:17,760 the limitations list 5.1b 937 00:50:17,760 --> 00:50:19,280 specifically says willfully acted 938 00:50:19,280 --> 00:50:20,559 contrary to the terms of their 939 00:50:20,559 --> 00:50:23,119 employment. Um, and I had originally 940 00:50:23,119 --> 00:50:25,280 flagged that because that's employment 941 00:50:25,280 --> 00:50:28,559 is generally a difficult word for those 942 00:50:28,559 --> 00:50:30,079 on this side of the table because we're 943 00:50:30,079 --> 00:50:32,240 not technically employees. 944 00:50:32,240 --> 00:50:36,480 Um, and so I wonder if it's worth adding 945 00:50:36,480 --> 00:50:38,880 in a bullet around like willfully acted 946 00:50:38,880 --> 00:50:40,640 contrary to the terms of their oath of 947 00:50:40,640 --> 00:50:43,920 office or in contrary to the community 948 00:50:43,920 --> 00:50:47,119 charter or the code of conduct to kind 949 00:50:47,119 --> 00:50:48,880 of capture 950 00:50:48,880 --> 00:50:51,359 that component. And I I don't know if 951 00:50:51,359 --> 00:50:53,760 I'm ready to propose that today off the 952 00:50:53,760 --> 00:50:55,119 fly because I haven't thought through 953 00:50:55,119 --> 00:50:56,960 the potential negative implications 954 00:50:56,960 --> 00:50:58,480 thereof. 955 00:50:58,480 --> 00:51:01,599 Um but I wonder if there's if staff have 956 00:51:01,599 --> 00:51:03,119 any thoughts around that like weighing 957 00:51:03,119 --> 00:51:06,559 of contrary or like willfully acted 958 00:51:06,559 --> 00:51:07,599 contrary to the terms of their 959 00:51:07,599 --> 00:51:10,880 employment and how that can be reflected 960 00:51:10,880 --> 00:51:13,280 or if it is already reflected in the 961 00:51:13,280 --> 00:51:16,240 other language there for council members 962 00:51:16,240 --> 00:51:23,990 who are not employees. 963 00:51:24,000 --> 00:51:32,069 Uh the number was 5.1B. 964 00:51:32,079 --> 00:51:32,559 » I don't know. 965 00:51:32,559 --> 00:51:34,790 >> I mean I do think that 5.1A maybe just 966 00:51:34,790 --> 00:51:34,800 » I mean I do think that 5.1A maybe just 967 00:51:34,800 --> 00:51:37,280 does it like been guilty of dishonesty, 968 00:51:37,280 --> 00:51:39,119 gross negligence, malicious or willful 969 00:51:39,119 --> 00:51:42,480 misconduct is maybe sufficient. 970 00:51:42,480 --> 00:51:47,109 Um, 971 00:51:47,119 --> 00:51:48,640 but that's maybe more for my council 972 00:51:48,640 --> 00:51:51,359 colleagues to consider if they feel like 973 00:51:51,359 --> 00:51:53,119 that is sufficient and strong enough 974 00:51:53,119 --> 00:51:55,119 given the other avenues that we have as 975 00:51:55,119 --> 00:51:57,119 well with code of conduct. 976 00:51:57,119 --> 00:51:57,750 >> Oh, 977 00:51:57,750 --> 00:51:57,760 » Oh, 978 00:51:57,760 --> 00:51:59,510 >> layered in here. 979 00:51:59,510 --> 00:51:59,520 » layered in here. 980 00:51:59,520 --> 00:52:01,990 >> Uh, yeah, when I was reading that that 981 00:52:01,990 --> 00:52:02,000 » Uh, yeah, when I was reading that that 982 00:52:02,000 --> 00:52:04,480 this document that piece felt like it 983 00:52:04,480 --> 00:52:06,400 didn't apply to me. it applied to the 984 00:52:06,400 --> 00:52:09,599 the employee piece, but there's also 985 00:52:09,599 --> 00:52:11,359 nothing that really separates out those 986 00:52:11,359 --> 00:52:14,400 categories in the document itself. So, 987 00:52:14,400 --> 00:52:16,559 is that sort of the in the intent there? 988 00:52:16,559 --> 00:52:18,800 It's not meant to cover 989 00:52:18,800 --> 00:52:20,559 I know I agree with the spirit of it, 990 00:52:20,559 --> 00:52:22,800 but just the letter of it really seems 991 00:52:22,800 --> 00:52:24,880 to speak more towards employees than um 992 00:52:24,880 --> 00:52:27,200 elected officials. 993 00:52:27,200 --> 00:52:28,630 >> Through the mayor, I would agree that it 994 00:52:28,630 --> 00:52:28,640 » Through the mayor, I would agree that it 995 00:52:28,640 --> 00:52:30,160 speaks more towards employees than 996 00:52:30,160 --> 00:52:31,920 elected officials and there is a 997 00:52:31,920 --> 00:52:35,599 differentiation there. 998 00:52:35,599 --> 00:52:38,640 Okay. And I don't think that this is a 999 00:52:38,640 --> 00:52:42,160 these matters are large enough uh 1000 00:52:42,160 --> 00:52:43,920 or or that we need two separate like we 1001 00:52:43,920 --> 00:52:45,680 don't need two separate versions of this 1002 00:52:45,680 --> 00:52:48,079 to cover like to parse that out. I think 1003 00:52:48,079 --> 00:52:50,319 this makes good sense to me that some 1004 00:52:50,319 --> 00:52:52,319 pieces the wording is just not for us. 1005 00:52:52,319 --> 00:52:54,880 The wordings for staff. Um any other 1006 00:52:54,880 --> 00:52:57,440 questions 1007 00:52:57,440 --> 00:53:00,400 on this? 1008 00:53:00,400 --> 00:53:01,920 Um 1009 00:53:01,920 --> 00:53:03,359 I'm going to look to councelor Hamilton. 1010 00:53:03,359 --> 00:53:06,000 I think we might be ready for a motion 1011 00:53:06,000 --> 00:53:08,480 that may 1012 00:53:08,480 --> 00:53:11,910 >> amendment. So I will um move the staff 1013 00:53:11,910 --> 00:53:11,920 » amendment. So I will um move the staff 1014 00:53:11,920 --> 00:53:13,440 recommendation that the district of 1015 00:53:13,440 --> 00:53:16,480 Squamish identification bylaw be given 1016 00:53:16,480 --> 00:53:18,000 first, 1017 00:53:18,000 --> 00:53:20,160 second and third readings with the 1018 00:53:20,160 --> 00:53:22,880 addition of 1019 00:53:22,880 --> 00:53:24,559 uh 1020 00:53:24,559 --> 00:53:29,119 and CFO or and chief financial officer 1021 00:53:29,119 --> 00:53:31,520 after chief administrative officer in 1022 00:53:31,520 --> 00:53:43,270 section three. 1023 00:53:43,280 --> 00:53:45,520 Okay. Um, are you seconding that that 1024 00:53:45,520 --> 00:53:48,720 motion? And um I like to minute taker. 1025 00:53:48,720 --> 00:53:51,119 Does that was that clear? Okay. Uh, go 1026 00:53:51,119 --> 00:53:53,200 ahead, counselor. 1027 00:53:53,200 --> 00:53:55,990 >> Thanks very much. Um, 1028 00:53:55,990 --> 00:53:56,000 » Thanks very much. Um, 1029 00:53:56,000 --> 00:54:00,240 this the indemnification bylaw. Uh, I 1030 00:54:00,240 --> 00:54:02,160 think this is a really important piece 1031 00:54:02,160 --> 00:54:05,119 of our municipal framework. Uh, and like 1032 00:54:05,119 --> 00:54:07,520 so many things in my first term here on 1033 00:54:07,520 --> 00:54:10,319 council, um, you didn't really didn't 1034 00:54:10,319 --> 00:54:11,920 really reflect on how important these 1035 00:54:11,920 --> 00:54:14,160 things are until you read it in the 1036 00:54:14,160 --> 00:54:16,480 bylaw and think about all of the ways 1037 00:54:16,480 --> 00:54:22,079 that things can go, um, uh, sideways for 1038 00:54:22,079 --> 00:54:24,800 for all kinds of various reasons. And I 1039 00:54:24,800 --> 00:54:27,920 think it's important that we have um a 1040 00:54:27,920 --> 00:54:31,839 bylaw that helps us and supports 1041 00:54:31,839 --> 00:54:34,559 employees and counselors in the event 1042 00:54:34,559 --> 00:54:39,280 that there is some under the honest and 1043 00:54:39,280 --> 00:54:41,760 um in under the honest carrying out of 1044 00:54:41,760 --> 00:54:45,920 their duties uh happen to fall into uh 1045 00:54:45,920 --> 00:54:48,480 some kind of legal dispute. Um and then 1046 00:54:48,480 --> 00:54:51,119 if they are guilty of those uh offenses 1047 00:54:51,119 --> 00:54:53,520 that they are held uh to account. I 1048 00:54:53,520 --> 00:54:54,880 think it's important that we have that 1049 00:54:54,880 --> 00:54:56,640 and I absolutely recognize it's 1050 00:54:56,640 --> 00:54:58,480 difficult to define those things and 1051 00:54:58,480 --> 00:55:00,480 that's why we're here tonight and I 1052 00:55:00,480 --> 00:55:02,480 think this bylaw does a pretty good job 1053 00:55:02,480 --> 00:55:06,960 of defining them as best we can. Thanks. 1054 00:55:06,960 --> 00:55:08,470 >> Thank you. Other comment I'll go to the 1055 00:55:08,470 --> 00:55:08,480 » Thank you. Other comment I'll go to the 1056 00:55:08,480 --> 00:55:10,000 secondary and then I'll go around. Go 1057 00:55:10,000 --> 00:55:12,160 ahead. 1058 00:55:12,160 --> 00:55:15,119 Uh it's important that bylaws like this 1059 00:55:15,119 --> 00:55:19,839 get regular review and um I'm happy that 1060 00:55:19,839 --> 00:55:22,880 uh this one is in front of us getting 1061 00:55:22,880 --> 00:55:25,440 the modernization that um it's being 1062 00:55:25,440 --> 00:55:29,680 given and a little bit of um extra 1063 00:55:29,680 --> 00:55:32,800 spice. Thank you um councelor Hamilton 1064 00:55:32,800 --> 00:55:34,800 and and the rest of council for the 1065 00:55:34,800 --> 00:55:37,040 discussion to um to get us to the place 1066 00:55:37,040 --> 00:55:39,280 we're recognizing adding the CFO in 1067 00:55:39,280 --> 00:55:42,800 section 3 is um a prudent thing to do. 1068 00:55:42,800 --> 00:55:46,000 Um and um thank you staff for the good 1069 00:55:46,000 --> 00:55:48,319 work to get this in front of us. 1070 00:55:48,319 --> 00:55:50,150 >> Thank you councelor Steart. 1071 00:55:50,150 --> 00:55:50,160 » Thank you councelor Steart. 1072 00:55:50,160 --> 00:55:51,670 >> Yeah, thank you the chair. Happy to 1073 00:55:51,670 --> 00:55:51,680 » Yeah, thank you the chair. Happy to 1074 00:55:51,680 --> 00:55:53,599 support the motion on the floor uh and 1075 00:55:53,599 --> 00:55:56,079 the updated bylaw in front of us. I 1076 00:55:56,079 --> 00:55:57,359 think it's important to note that this 1077 00:55:57,359 --> 00:55:59,440 is not necessarily new identification 1078 00:55:59,440 --> 00:56:01,599 that we're providing to council and 1079 00:56:01,599 --> 00:56:04,240 staff. It's an update to a bylaw that is 1080 00:56:04,240 --> 00:56:06,480 was originally written in 1998 and 1081 00:56:06,480 --> 00:56:08,079 brings it, as councelor French said, up 1082 00:56:08,079 --> 00:56:09,839 to more modern standards and reflects 1083 00:56:09,839 --> 00:56:11,200 the current wording in the local 1084 00:56:11,200 --> 00:56:12,319 government act and the community 1085 00:56:12,319 --> 00:56:15,119 charter. Um, so I think this is just 1086 00:56:15,119 --> 00:56:17,200 good prudence on our part to make sure 1087 00:56:17,200 --> 00:56:19,520 that our bylaws are up to date and 1088 00:56:19,520 --> 00:56:22,160 reflective of current practices. 1089 00:56:22,160 --> 00:56:24,230 >> Thank you for that, Councelor Penning. 1090 00:56:24,230 --> 00:56:24,240 » Thank you for that, Councelor Penning. 1091 00:56:24,240 --> 00:56:25,839 Yeah, I think I'm going to support this. 1092 00:56:25,839 --> 00:56:27,599 I think I'm I'm a bit intrigued by my 1093 00:56:27,599 --> 00:56:29,520 colleagues comment, you know, whether or 1094 00:56:29,520 --> 00:56:32,480 not we would limit indemnification for 1095 00:56:32,480 --> 00:56:34,160 when there's a code of conduct or oath 1096 00:56:34,160 --> 00:56:35,920 of office violation, those two in 1097 00:56:35,920 --> 00:56:39,680 particular. Um, and I guess, you know, 1098 00:56:39,680 --> 00:56:41,680 part of me is like, yes, if you've 1099 00:56:41,680 --> 00:56:43,760 willfully violated those things, I don't 1100 00:56:43,760 --> 00:56:46,799 think we should be indemnifying you, but 1101 00:56:46,799 --> 00:56:48,960 I'm not sure there's a case where you 1102 00:56:48,960 --> 00:56:51,119 only violated those where you would need 1103 00:56:51,119 --> 00:56:53,280 indemnifica. like it may be a 1104 00:56:53,280 --> 00:56:56,240 non-existent use case. And so that's why 1105 00:56:56,240 --> 00:56:57,680 I'm not sure if that's one to push on, 1106 00:56:57,680 --> 00:57:00,240 but um I'll just sort of flag and maybe 1107 00:57:00,240 --> 00:57:02,640 if staff has a moment to sort of see is 1108 00:57:02,640 --> 00:57:05,119 this even a real thing because I I do 1109 00:57:05,119 --> 00:57:06,960 feel a bit uncomfortable with the idea 1110 00:57:06,960 --> 00:57:09,359 of I guess I'm looking for some 1111 00:57:09,359 --> 00:57:11,440 alignment like if you've acted contrary 1112 00:57:11,440 --> 00:57:13,599 to the terms of your employment or your 1113 00:57:13,599 --> 00:57:17,040 oath of office or your code of conduct 1114 00:57:17,040 --> 00:57:20,160 maybe makes a little more sense. Um, I 1115 00:57:20,160 --> 00:57:21,680 guess I'll leave it there for now, but 1116 00:57:21,680 --> 00:57:23,359 that's the one piece I'm struggling with 1117 00:57:23,359 --> 00:57:25,119 a little bit. 1118 00:57:25,119 --> 00:57:28,069 >> Thank you. Any other comments? Um, just 1119 00:57:28,069 --> 00:57:28,079 » Thank you. Any other comments? Um, just 1120 00:57:28,079 --> 00:57:31,359 in in reply, I think the um uh the 1121 00:57:31,359 --> 00:57:33,760 answers I I for for me personally, the 1122 00:57:33,760 --> 00:57:35,520 the answers that I received from staff 1123 00:57:35,520 --> 00:57:37,040 were this is really that external thing. 1124 00:57:37,040 --> 00:57:39,359 So, when it goes past a code of conduct 1125 00:57:39,359 --> 00:57:41,119 and I think if you violate your oath of 1126 00:57:41,119 --> 00:57:42,799 office, it's these other processes that 1127 00:57:42,799 --> 00:57:45,440 would do that would determine that. So, 1128 00:57:45,440 --> 00:57:47,920 um I'm I'm comfortable with where we 1129 00:57:47,920 --> 00:57:51,440 are. I do think that um as councelor 1130 00:57:51,440 --> 00:57:55,440 Stoner um stated uh this is a an update 1131 00:57:55,440 --> 00:58:00,880 to a very old uh bylaw and the um the 1132 00:58:00,880 --> 00:58:03,119 legislation that it relates to has has 1133 00:58:03,119 --> 00:58:04,640 changed in that time and this is a 1134 00:58:04,640 --> 00:58:08,000 modernization. I think it's important to 1135 00:58:08,000 --> 00:58:11,040 um for folks to to understand that this 1136 00:58:11,040 --> 00:58:15,760 isn't this isn't about creating a a 1137 00:58:15,760 --> 00:58:17,599 shield for elected officials that have 1138 00:58:17,599 --> 00:58:19,920 done something that is off that is 1139 00:58:19,920 --> 00:58:24,480 offside or in this case illegal. Uh by 1140 00:58:24,480 --> 00:58:27,680 um uh it's about ensuring that we uh 1141 00:58:27,680 --> 00:58:31,359 that these seats are and these roles are 1142 00:58:31,359 --> 00:58:32,720 reasonable things that people could be 1143 00:58:32,720 --> 00:58:34,319 expected to participate in. And I think 1144 00:58:34,319 --> 00:58:36,160 without the reasonable protections that 1145 00:58:36,160 --> 00:58:38,160 this provides, I would have a very hard 1146 00:58:38,160 --> 00:58:41,920 time um sitting in these in these seats 1147 00:58:41,920 --> 00:58:44,400 uh without these these protections. But 1148 00:58:44,400 --> 00:58:46,799 again, this does not provide uh 1149 00:58:46,799 --> 00:58:49,760 protections um uh where folks have 1150 00:58:49,760 --> 00:58:54,240 clearly gone into the uh um uh clearly 1151 00:58:54,240 --> 00:58:57,599 offside. Uh so happy to to support this 1152 00:58:57,599 --> 00:59:02,160 and um I do think that after uh if this 1153 00:59:02,160 --> 00:59:05,200 when this gets used I would expect to 1154 00:59:05,200 --> 00:59:07,119 I'm happy that it sat for so long in so 1155 00:59:07,119 --> 00:59:08,400 much as it doesn't feel like it's been 1156 00:59:08,400 --> 00:59:10,480 used very often. So, I'd imagine that 1157 00:59:10,480 --> 00:59:12,319 going forward if this does get used that 1158 00:59:12,319 --> 00:59:15,680 that um it continues to be to be refined 1159 00:59:15,680 --> 00:59:17,680 uh to ensure that it's not that it's 1160 00:59:17,680 --> 00:59:21,040 performing its duty and um and not more 1161 00:59:21,040 --> 00:59:23,200 than it's intended to, which is the 1162 00:59:23,200 --> 00:59:24,960 which I think is really important. With 1163 00:59:24,960 --> 00:59:26,160 that, I'll call the question. All in 1164 00:59:26,160 --> 00:59:27,680 favor? 1165 00:59:27,680 --> 01:00:15,109 Motion carries unanimously. Thank you. 1166 01:00:15,119 --> 01:00:16,960 So, our next order of business is 1167 01:00:16,960 --> 01:00:19,920 section uh 8A1 1168 01:00:19,920 --> 01:00:21,920 uh landback task force terms of 1169 01:00:21,920 --> 01:00:25,119 reference and appointments. So, staff 1170 01:00:25,119 --> 01:00:26,640 are just getting set up for the 1171 01:00:26,640 --> 01:00:28,880 presentation and we'll get underway when 1172 01:00:28,880 --> 01:00:50,309 they're ready to do so. 1173 01:00:50,319 --> 01:00:52,880 The floor is yours when you're ready. 1174 01:00:52,880 --> 01:00:54,549 >> Uh, thank you very much to the chair. 1175 01:00:54,549 --> 01:00:54,559 » Uh, thank you very much to the chair. 1176 01:00:54,559 --> 01:00:57,599 Good evening, council public who uh are 1177 01:00:57,599 --> 01:00:59,760 watching online and in the audience. My 1178 01:00:59,760 --> 01:01:01,440 name is Linda Glende. I'm the chief 1179 01:01:01,440 --> 01:01:02,960 administrative officer here at the 1180 01:01:02,960 --> 01:01:06,400 district. Uh I am joined by Ms. Asia 1181 01:01:06,400 --> 01:01:08,319 Peterson who will introduce herself in a 1182 01:01:08,319 --> 01:01:11,040 moment and we are presenting about the 1183 01:01:11,040 --> 01:01:13,599 landback task force which is a priority 1184 01:01:13,599 --> 01:01:15,359 activity in the memorandum of 1185 01:01:15,359 --> 01:01:19,520 understanding with Squamish Nation. 1186 01:01:19,520 --> 01:01:21,680 Hello um mayor and council. My name is 1187 01:01:21,680 --> 01:01:23,440 Asia Peterson and I'm the projects and 1188 01:01:23,440 --> 01:01:26,640 research coordinator. privileged to be 1189 01:01:26,640 --> 01:01:28,559 here tonight and honored to be working 1190 01:01:28,559 --> 01:01:30,319 on the traditional unseated territory of 1191 01:01:30,319 --> 01:01:33,990 the Squamish people. 1192 01:01:34,000 --> 01:01:36,720 Thank you. So, as Linda mentioned, we 1193 01:01:36,720 --> 01:01:38,880 are here tonight to present on the 1194 01:01:38,880 --> 01:01:41,359 proposed terms of reference and to seek 1195 01:01:41,359 --> 01:01:42,960 three appointments to the landback task 1196 01:01:42,960 --> 01:01:46,000 force. On March 4th, Squamish Netian 1197 01:01:46,000 --> 01:01:47,680 Council approved the terms of reference 1198 01:01:47,680 --> 01:01:49,760 that you'll see and appointed three of 1199 01:01:49,760 --> 01:01:51,200 their own council members to join the 1200 01:01:51,200 --> 01:01:55,359 task force as well. Next, Uh just a bit 1201 01:01:55,359 --> 01:01:56,799 of background on this report that I'll 1202 01:01:56,799 --> 01:01:59,920 highlight. In 2018, council formally 1203 01:01:59,920 --> 01:02:02,559 recognized the United N um nations 1204 01:02:02,559 --> 01:02:04,799 declaration on the rights of indigenous 1205 01:02:04,799 --> 01:02:07,200 people, otherwise known as UNRIP. And in 1206 01:02:07,200 --> 01:02:08,799 building on our own relationship with 1207 01:02:08,799 --> 01:02:12,079 Squamish Nation in 2023, council signed 1208 01:02:12,079 --> 01:02:15,280 the Wima Squomish Protocol Agreement, 1209 01:02:15,280 --> 01:02:17,200 which led to the development and signing 1210 01:02:17,200 --> 01:02:18,880 of the memorandum of understanding 1211 01:02:18,880 --> 01:02:21,839 between the two governments in 2025. So 1212 01:02:21,839 --> 01:02:24,160 this built on a long um history between 1213 01:02:24,160 --> 01:02:25,920 the partnership of the partnership with 1214 01:02:25,920 --> 01:02:28,160 Squamish Nation and was a significant 1215 01:02:28,160 --> 01:02:30,240 step forward in our rec reconciliation 1216 01:02:30,240 --> 01:02:32,880 journey. The establishment of a landback 1217 01:02:32,880 --> 01:02:35,359 task force was identified as a priority 1218 01:02:35,359 --> 01:02:40,630 activity in theou. 1219 01:02:40,640 --> 01:02:43,520 In both the protocol agreement and theou 1220 01:02:43,520 --> 01:02:45,280 principles are outlined to help guide 1221 01:02:45,280 --> 01:02:47,200 this work in an intentional way. So I 1222 01:02:47,200 --> 01:02:48,559 just wanted to highlight them here 1223 01:02:48,559 --> 01:02:51,760 before we begin. Listen and engage. 1224 01:02:51,760 --> 01:02:54,079 Follow the ways of the Skomish. 1225 01:02:54,079 --> 01:02:56,319 Genuinely care. Learn the advice of the 1226 01:02:56,319 --> 01:02:58,480 Skomeish. The people go through it 1227 01:02:58,480 --> 01:03:00,000 together. 1228 01:03:00,000 --> 01:03:01,599 And protect the rights and title of the 1229 01:03:01,599 --> 01:03:04,400 Skomeish. 1230 01:03:04,400 --> 01:03:06,160 So before we review the details of the 1231 01:03:06,160 --> 01:03:08,079 terms of reference, I wanted to take a 1232 01:03:08,079 --> 01:03:09,520 minute to highlight the concept of 1233 01:03:09,520 --> 01:03:12,160 landback. This is an intentional term 1234 01:03:12,160 --> 01:03:14,240 that we use. Landback is a 1235 01:03:14,240 --> 01:03:16,400 reconciliationdriven initiative that 1236 01:03:16,400 --> 01:03:18,400 acknowledges the impacts of colonization 1237 01:03:18,400 --> 01:03:21,359 on indigenous people. It aims to restore 1238 01:03:21,359 --> 01:03:23,920 governance, stewardship, and cultural 1239 01:03:23,920 --> 01:03:26,960 connections to land. So in this context, 1240 01:03:26,960 --> 01:03:29,839 landback is referenced in theou and it 1241 01:03:29,839 --> 01:03:31,760 means exploring possibilities for the 1242 01:03:31,760 --> 01:03:34,240 return or the co-management of public 1243 01:03:34,240 --> 01:03:36,880 lands in a way in a way that respects 1244 01:03:36,880 --> 01:03:38,880 Squamish nation rights and title. 1245 01:03:38,880 --> 01:03:40,480 Landback is not a threat to private 1246 01:03:40,480 --> 01:03:42,960 property. It's about reconciliation and 1247 01:03:42,960 --> 01:03:44,960 moving forward together. It's not about 1248 01:03:44,960 --> 01:03:48,870 exclusion. 1249 01:03:48,880 --> 01:03:50,480 Um, so in turning to the terms of 1250 01:03:50,480 --> 01:03:52,559 reference, as I mentioned earlier, the 1251 01:03:52,559 --> 01:03:53,680 task force will have three 1252 01:03:53,680 --> 01:03:55,680 representatives from each government. 1253 01:03:55,680 --> 01:03:57,440 Squamish Nation appointed all three of 1254 01:03:57,440 --> 01:03:59,280 the Squamish Valley counselors earlier 1255 01:03:59,280 --> 01:04:02,160 this month. Diana Lewis, Anthony Joseph, 1256 01:04:02,160 --> 01:04:04,640 and Johnny Williams. The terms of 1257 01:04:04,640 --> 01:04:06,319 reference outlines that this is a 1258 01:04:06,319 --> 01:04:08,480 timelmited task force. It will exist 1259 01:04:08,480 --> 01:04:11,359 until 2028 or until project deliverables 1260 01:04:11,359 --> 01:04:13,520 have been met and the task force will 1261 01:04:13,520 --> 01:04:17,119 meet on a quarterly basis. 1262 01:04:17,119 --> 01:04:19,920 So now I just wanted to highlight um the 1263 01:04:19,920 --> 01:04:23,520 structure of the task force. This um 1264 01:04:23,520 --> 01:04:25,280 graphic is an overview of what the 1265 01:04:25,280 --> 01:04:27,359 structure will look like. Staff from 1266 01:04:27,359 --> 01:04:29,039 both organizations will provide the 1267 01:04:29,039 --> 01:04:31,119 research, administrative and technical 1268 01:04:31,119 --> 01:04:33,280 support and will develop work plans for 1269 01:04:33,280 --> 01:04:36,000 task force approval. The task force will 1270 01:04:36,000 --> 01:04:38,480 inform, advise and engage the community 1271 01:04:38,480 --> 01:04:40,240 on this work and then all 1272 01:04:40,240 --> 01:04:42,000 recommendations will go to both 1273 01:04:42,000 --> 01:04:44,000 respective councils for final 1274 01:04:44,000 --> 01:04:49,430 independent deliberation and decision-m 1275 01:04:49,440 --> 01:04:50,960 I now wanted to highlight some of the 1276 01:04:50,960 --> 01:04:52,480 roles and responsibilities of the task 1277 01:04:52,480 --> 01:04:55,520 force. Really the function of the task 1278 01:04:55,520 --> 01:04:57,359 force is to serve as a coordinated 1279 01:04:57,359 --> 01:04:59,119 research and engagement mechanism 1280 01:04:59,119 --> 01:05:01,280 between the two governments. It's to 1281 01:05:01,280 --> 01:05:03,200 coordinate research efforts looking into 1282 01:05:03,200 --> 01:05:05,599 landback opportunities. 1283 01:05:05,599 --> 01:05:07,760 So once the task force is established, 1284 01:05:07,760 --> 01:05:09,599 they'll approve work plans and a 1285 01:05:09,599 --> 01:05:11,839 communications and engagement plan. The 1286 01:05:11,839 --> 01:05:13,760 task force will review and analyze the 1287 01:05:13,760 --> 01:05:16,240 research that staff produces. They'll 1288 01:05:16,240 --> 01:05:18,000 provide guidance on community engagement 1289 01:05:18,000 --> 01:05:20,480 and dialogue opportunities. And then 1290 01:05:20,480 --> 01:05:22,160 based on the on this research and 1291 01:05:22,160 --> 01:05:24,079 community engagement process, the task 1292 01:05:24,079 --> 01:05:25,760 force will make recommendations on a 1293 01:05:25,760 --> 01:05:27,920 framework. Those recommendations would 1294 01:05:27,920 --> 01:05:29,839 go up to each council independently for 1295 01:05:29,839 --> 01:05:32,880 consideration and decision-m. The task 1296 01:05:32,880 --> 01:05:34,559 force itself does not have 1297 01:05:34,559 --> 01:05:37,599 decision-making authority. 1298 01:05:37,599 --> 01:05:40,400 Next slide. 1299 01:05:40,400 --> 01:05:42,720 So in terms of the scope at this time, 1300 01:05:42,720 --> 01:05:44,720 the scope of the task force is limited 1301 01:05:44,720 --> 01:05:47,280 to exploring, researching and engaging 1302 01:05:47,280 --> 01:05:49,520 district residents and Squamish people 1303 01:05:49,520 --> 01:05:52,079 on the topic of landback. Some of the 1304 01:05:52,079 --> 01:05:54,240 areas areas that the task force could 1305 01:05:54,240 --> 01:05:56,960 explore include the nation's historic 1306 01:05:56,960 --> 01:05:59,520 continued connection to their to their 1307 01:05:59,520 --> 01:06:02,240 traditional territory, reestablishing 1308 01:06:02,240 --> 01:06:04,000 cultural and linguistic connections to 1309 01:06:04,000 --> 01:06:06,000 the land, 1310 01:06:06,000 --> 01:06:08,319 um ways to enable shared decision-m or 1311 01:06:08,319 --> 01:06:11,039 co-management of lands, potential policy 1312 01:06:11,039 --> 01:06:12,640 updates, 1313 01:06:12,640 --> 01:06:14,880 ways to support or advocate for Squamish 1314 01:06:14,880 --> 01:06:17,520 Nation as it relates to crown land, and 1315 01:06:17,520 --> 01:06:19,039 any other initiatives that might be 1316 01:06:19,039 --> 01:06:20,960 identified. One thing that we should 1317 01:06:20,960 --> 01:06:23,039 emphasize is that private property is 1318 01:06:23,039 --> 01:06:24,559 not involved with the scope of this task 1319 01:06:24,559 --> 01:06:28,150 force. 1320 01:06:28,160 --> 01:06:29,920 So, some of the examples that the task 1321 01:06:29,920 --> 01:06:31,200 force could consider making 1322 01:06:31,200 --> 01:06:33,680 recommendations related to are things 1323 01:06:33,680 --> 01:06:35,760 like co-management of parks and 1324 01:06:35,760 --> 01:06:38,400 protected areas, restoring original 1325 01:06:38,400 --> 01:06:41,280 place names, granting exclusive access 1326 01:06:41,280 --> 01:06:44,319 to cultural sites for Scoomish people, 1327 01:06:44,319 --> 01:06:46,319 facilitating access to traditional 1328 01:06:46,319 --> 01:06:48,880 harvesting sites, 1329 01:06:48,880 --> 01:06:50,720 um exploring opportunities to recommend 1330 01:06:50,720 --> 01:06:52,480 policy updates for district land 1331 01:06:52,480 --> 01:06:55,039 dispositions or leases. Again, these are 1332 01:06:55,039 --> 01:06:56,960 just some examples. There'll be other 1333 01:06:56,960 --> 01:06:58,400 opportunities that haven't been 1334 01:06:58,400 --> 01:07:01,829 identified yet. 1335 01:07:01,839 --> 01:07:04,319 So, finally, um, community learning and 1336 01:07:04,319 --> 01:07:06,240 dialogue opportunities are central to 1337 01:07:06,240 --> 01:07:08,480 this work. We know that these topics are 1338 01:07:08,480 --> 01:07:10,960 complex and nuanced. So, as a first 1339 01:07:10,960 --> 01:07:12,640 step, we're focused on providing 1340 01:07:12,640 --> 01:07:14,880 community learning opportunities. We'll 1341 01:07:14,880 --> 01:07:16,559 be providing a ton of resources on our 1342 01:07:16,559 --> 01:07:18,319 website and leveraging our library's 1343 01:07:18,319 --> 01:07:20,240 capacity to support residents in better 1344 01:07:20,240 --> 01:07:22,559 understanding these topics. A 1345 01:07:22,559 --> 01:07:24,400 comprehensive trauma-informed committee 1346 01:07:24,400 --> 01:07:26,319 engagement plan will also be shared and 1347 01:07:26,319 --> 01:07:29,599 approved by the task force. 1348 01:07:29,599 --> 01:07:31,680 So, in returning to the recommendations 1349 01:07:31,680 --> 01:07:34,079 for consideration, we'll leave it here. 1350 01:07:34,079 --> 01:07:35,760 Thank you for your time and we're happy 1351 01:07:35,760 --> 01:07:39,920 to answer any questions you have. 1352 01:07:39,920 --> 01:07:42,789 >> Thank you very much. Council, do you 1353 01:07:42,789 --> 01:07:42,799 » Thank you very much. Council, do you 1354 01:07:42,799 --> 01:07:45,200 have questions for our staff at this 1355 01:07:45,200 --> 01:07:48,079 time? 1356 01:07:48,079 --> 01:07:51,589 >> Councelor French. 1357 01:07:51,599 --> 01:07:54,559 U thanks Mayor Herford. Um think that 1358 01:07:54,559 --> 01:07:56,720 this is a a bit of a housekeeping 1359 01:07:56,720 --> 01:08:01,680 question. Um with the meetings that are 1360 01:08:01,680 --> 01:08:04,559 expected to be ahead of us um held in 1361 01:08:04,559 --> 01:08:07,520 spaces provided by each organization as 1362 01:08:07,520 --> 01:08:08,960 we see in the report, I'm I'm guessing 1363 01:08:08,960 --> 01:08:10,960 the district space will likely be this 1364 01:08:10,960 --> 01:08:13,920 chamber or within u municipal hall. And 1365 01:08:13,920 --> 01:08:15,359 I'm wondering has the Squamish Nation 1366 01:08:15,359 --> 01:08:17,679 indicated their space of choice? Is it 1367 01:08:17,679 --> 01:08:22,480 Totem Hall or another location? is is is 1368 01:08:22,480 --> 01:08:25,920 there um maybe an indication that the 1369 01:08:25,920 --> 01:08:27,440 Squamish Nation would like meetings to 1370 01:08:27,440 --> 01:08:29,359 be held in North Vancouver? Can you give 1371 01:08:29,359 --> 01:08:32,000 us any insight into that? 1372 01:08:32,000 --> 01:08:34,309 >> Oh, sorry. Thank you. Through the chair. 1373 01:08:34,309 --> 01:08:34,319 » Oh, sorry. Thank you. Through the chair. 1374 01:08:34,319 --> 01:08:37,520 Um I think since all of the um appointed 1375 01:08:37,520 --> 01:08:39,279 members from Squamish Nation are from 1376 01:08:39,279 --> 01:08:42,640 Squamish Valley, Totem Hall would likely 1377 01:08:42,640 --> 01:08:47,269 be the space to convene. 1378 01:08:47,279 --> 01:08:49,359 Thank you for that very practical 1379 01:08:49,359 --> 01:08:52,799 consideration. Uh councelor Stoner, 1380 01:08:52,799 --> 01:08:54,950 >> thank you chair uh and thanks to staff 1381 01:08:54,950 --> 01:08:54,960 » thank you chair uh and thanks to staff 1382 01:08:54,960 --> 01:08:57,120 for the very clear presentation and 1383 01:08:57,120 --> 01:09:00,880 report in our package this evening. Um 1384 01:09:00,880 --> 01:09:02,640 you mentioned that it's a time limited 1385 01:09:02,640 --> 01:09:06,480 task force to 2028 or until such time 1386 01:09:06,480 --> 01:09:09,679 that the task force has completed its 1387 01:09:09,679 --> 01:09:12,560 outcomes. Um I'm just wondering if you 1388 01:09:12,560 --> 01:09:15,279 can speak to why 2028 was selected as 1389 01:09:15,279 --> 01:09:17,520 kind of the end date. 1390 01:09:17,520 --> 01:09:20,470 >> Yeah, through the chair. Um the 2028 1391 01:09:20,470 --> 01:09:20,480 » Yeah, through the chair. Um the 2028 1392 01:09:20,480 --> 01:09:22,640 deadline was selected because that's 1393 01:09:22,640 --> 01:09:24,239 where we've identified priorities in 1394 01:09:24,239 --> 01:09:28,159 theou. It was from 25 2025 to 2028. So 1395 01:09:28,159 --> 01:09:30,560 we put that timeline on it to align with 1396 01:09:30,560 --> 01:09:35,430 theou. 1397 01:09:35,440 --> 01:09:38,080 » Thank you councelor Penning. Yeah, just 1398 01:09:38,080 --> 01:09:40,080 curious if you can remind us because 1399 01:09:40,080 --> 01:09:42,799 we've also committed to meet council to 1400 01:09:42,799 --> 01:09:44,719 council with Squamish Nation more 1401 01:09:44,719 --> 01:09:47,759 frequently if if we know um sort of how 1402 01:09:47,759 --> 01:09:50,640 that um intersects with this and would 1403 01:09:50,640 --> 01:09:54,080 this task force uh sort of report when 1404 01:09:54,080 --> 01:09:55,920 the broader council council meetings or 1405 01:09:55,920 --> 01:09:58,320 does it more come to our individual sort 1406 01:09:58,320 --> 01:10:00,080 of staff and councils and sort of 1407 01:10:00,080 --> 01:10:02,960 separate from the the more the broaderou 1408 01:10:02,960 --> 01:10:07,750 council council meetings. 1409 01:10:07,760 --> 01:10:09,120 Thank you for the question through the 1410 01:10:09,120 --> 01:10:12,880 chair. Um I would say it's it's both and 1411 01:10:12,880 --> 01:10:15,760 um that there will be times when staff 1412 01:10:15,760 --> 01:10:17,520 come to council and council needs to 1413 01:10:17,520 --> 01:10:19,440 make their own decision in district 1414 01:10:19,440 --> 01:10:21,120 chambers as an example and same with 1415 01:10:21,120 --> 01:10:23,520 Squamish Nation Council and the 1416 01:10:23,520 --> 01:10:25,280 opportunity for the Lambback task force 1417 01:10:25,280 --> 01:10:28,159 themselves to present to both councils 1418 01:10:28,159 --> 01:10:30,400 at the same time would likely prove 1419 01:10:30,400 --> 01:10:34,149 fruitful. 1420 01:10:34,159 --> 01:10:36,800 » Okay. Um any other questions for staff? 1421 01:10:36,800 --> 01:10:38,960 Councelor Stoner. 1422 01:10:38,960 --> 01:10:41,350 >> Yeah, thank you through the chair. Uh 1423 01:10:41,350 --> 01:10:41,360 » Yeah, thank you through the chair. Uh 1424 01:10:41,360 --> 01:10:43,280 also appreciate the clarity on the focus 1425 01:10:43,280 --> 01:10:46,560 here on public lands. Um I'm curious if 1426 01:10:46,560 --> 01:10:48,800 there's been any dialogue amongst staff 1427 01:10:48,800 --> 01:10:50,239 in the development of the terms of 1428 01:10:50,239 --> 01:10:53,760 reference of inviting other orders of 1429 01:10:53,760 --> 01:10:55,520 government in. Much of the public land 1430 01:10:55,520 --> 01:10:57,280 that exists within the boundaries of the 1431 01:10:57,280 --> 01:11:00,080 District of Squamish are crown lands. Um 1432 01:11:00,080 --> 01:11:02,159 and so how do we start to address this 1433 01:11:02,159 --> 01:11:04,480 conversation or is that a topic for the 1434 01:11:04,480 --> 01:11:07,600 task force to do um of what that looks 1435 01:11:07,600 --> 01:11:09,360 like? 1436 01:11:09,360 --> 01:11:10,790 >> Thank you. Through the chair, I would 1437 01:11:10,790 --> 01:11:10,800 » Thank you. Through the chair, I would 1438 01:11:10,800 --> 01:11:13,280 say it's the latter. So at this point, 1439 01:11:13,280 --> 01:11:15,199 staff are bringing terms of reference 1440 01:11:15,199 --> 01:11:18,000 for each council to approve. Following 1441 01:11:18,000 --> 01:11:20,000 that, the task force themselves would 1442 01:11:20,000 --> 01:11:23,040 would commence that work. 1443 01:11:23,040 --> 01:11:25,440 Um and just and 1444 01:11:25,440 --> 01:11:28,480 I think that point is is is very 1445 01:11:28,480 --> 01:11:31,040 important and in the in the terms of 1446 01:11:31,040 --> 01:11:35,280 reference and scope uh the second bullet 1447 01:11:35,280 --> 01:11:36,800 point from the bottom I guess is the way 1448 01:11:36,800 --> 01:11:38,400 to describe that it's not numbered 1449 01:11:38,400 --> 01:11:39,840 support or advocate for scholar nation 1450 01:11:39,840 --> 01:11:42,159 as it relates to crown land dispositions 1451 01:11:42,159 --> 01:11:43,840 that doesn't quite cover the the 1452 01:11:43,840 --> 01:11:46,719 totality of the interacting with the uh 1453 01:11:46,719 --> 01:11:48,800 crown more broadly but there's um 1454 01:11:48,800 --> 01:11:50,400 definitely sort of recognition of that 1455 01:11:50,400 --> 01:11:52,159 there but I do think much of the terms 1456 01:11:52,159 --> 01:11:56,159 of reference um uh I would expect the 1457 01:11:56,159 --> 01:11:58,239 group jointly to look at this together 1458 01:11:58,239 --> 01:11:59,760 and see if there's room to move at this 1459 01:11:59,760 --> 01:12:04,159 point. Any changes to the to the um to 1460 01:12:04,159 --> 01:12:06,320 the terms of reference uh would need to 1461 01:12:06,320 --> 01:12:08,320 be negotiated with the Squamish Nation. 1462 01:12:08,320 --> 01:12:11,040 I do think this the task force is the 1463 01:12:11,040 --> 01:12:12,719 best mechanism to sort recommend 1464 01:12:12,719 --> 01:12:14,880 whatever those changes would be back to 1465 01:12:14,880 --> 01:12:18,640 their joint to their their own um board 1466 01:12:18,640 --> 01:12:20,960 or governance structure. 1467 01:12:20,960 --> 01:12:22,880 Um, 1468 01:12:22,880 --> 01:12:26,480 I'm not seeing any further hands for 1469 01:12:26,480 --> 01:12:29,600 questions. So, I would like to I will 1470 01:12:29,600 --> 01:12:32,000 move uh that council approve the terms 1471 01:12:32,000 --> 01:12:33,840 of reference for the landback task force 1472 01:12:33,840 --> 01:12:35,679 and appoint three members of council to 1473 01:12:35,679 --> 01:12:37,679 serve on the landback task force as 1474 01:12:37,679 --> 01:12:39,760 follows. Mayor Hurford, councelor 1475 01:12:39,760 --> 01:12:41,760 Stoner, and councelor Anderson. And I'll 1476 01:12:41,760 --> 01:12:43,920 speak to it if it's seconded. Second by 1477 01:12:43,920 --> 01:12:47,440 councelor French. Thank you. I think um 1478 01:12:47,440 --> 01:12:51,920 this is incredibly um important work. Um 1479 01:12:51,920 --> 01:12:55,199 and I'm going to read directly from the 1480 01:12:55,199 --> 01:12:57,440 um from the terms of reference. The 1481 01:12:57,440 --> 01:12:59,520 Lambach task force exists to research, 1482 01:12:59,520 --> 01:13:01,040 learn, and engage both District of 1483 01:13:01,040 --> 01:13:04,560 Squamish residents and Squamish people 1484 01:13:04,560 --> 01:13:06,640 on the concept of landback. Its primary 1485 01:13:06,640 --> 01:13:08,480 goal is to develop a framework for land 1486 01:13:08,480 --> 01:13:10,239 back in the District of Squamish, 1487 01:13:10,239 --> 01:13:11,840 including policy considerations for 1488 01:13:11,840 --> 01:13:13,600 future public land dispositions by the 1489 01:13:13,600 --> 01:13:15,760 District of Squamish and joint use of 1490 01:13:15,760 --> 01:13:19,199 district lands. I think this is in um 1491 01:13:19,199 --> 01:13:23,520 incredibly important that we um 1492 01:13:23,520 --> 01:13:26,400 that we have this dialogue with uh the 1493 01:13:26,400 --> 01:13:28,880 Squam with the Squamish Nation directly 1494 01:13:28,880 --> 01:13:33,520 and with our community around what um 1495 01:13:33,520 --> 01:13:35,280 what this is and what it isn't. We've 1496 01:13:35,280 --> 01:13:36,480 heard a little bit in the presentation 1497 01:13:36,480 --> 01:13:39,760 around what this what this uh isn't in 1498 01:13:39,760 --> 01:13:42,560 it is not something that's um and we do 1499 01:13:42,560 --> 01:13:45,679 not have the juris the the entity itself 1500 01:13:45,679 --> 01:13:47,600 the task force does not have jur does 1501 01:13:47,600 --> 01:13:51,440 not have decision making uh um in power 1502 01:13:51,440 --> 01:13:54,560 in and of itself and neither does this 1503 01:13:54,560 --> 01:13:56,880 group have decision-making power around 1504 01:13:56,880 --> 01:13:59,360 uh private private land. This is not 1505 01:13:59,360 --> 01:14:01,360 what it's what it's about. But there are 1506 01:14:01,360 --> 01:14:05,199 some very um uh meaningful conversations 1507 01:14:05,199 --> 01:14:07,280 to be had and in a good way and those 1508 01:14:07,280 --> 01:14:08,719 need to be shared with the community and 1509 01:14:08,719 --> 01:14:12,080 that is a lot of uh of what this is in 1510 01:14:12,080 --> 01:14:14,159 in my mind and I've heard some fear in 1511 01:14:14,159 --> 01:14:16,960 the in the community um and around the 1512 01:14:16,960 --> 01:14:19,120 the province and country around around 1513 01:14:19,120 --> 01:14:22,880 this and I really uh my expectation is 1514 01:14:22,880 --> 01:14:26,239 this can be a vehicle to fill those um 1515 01:14:26,239 --> 01:14:28,640 uh to fill those gaps uh in 1516 01:14:28,640 --> 01:14:31,840 understanding that uh folks have uh 1517 01:14:31,840 --> 01:14:34,159 often filled themselves with with fear. 1518 01:14:34,159 --> 01:14:37,840 So, this is um a really important piece 1519 01:14:37,840 --> 01:14:40,640 uh of work and and I really think back 1520 01:14:40,640 --> 01:14:42,960 to the protocol agreement where we 1521 01:14:42,960 --> 01:14:45,679 committed to as a as a group in this 1522 01:14:45,679 --> 01:14:47,360 room and as a community to listen and 1523 01:14:47,360 --> 01:14:49,120 engage to follow the ways of the 1524 01:14:49,120 --> 01:14:51,920 Squamish, to genuinely care, to learn 1525 01:14:51,920 --> 01:14:54,159 the advice of the Squamish. And I love 1526 01:14:54,159 --> 01:14:55,520 this one, the people go through it 1527 01:14:55,520 --> 01:14:57,520 together. We are all going through this 1528 01:14:57,520 --> 01:14:59,600 together as a community. the residents 1529 01:14:59,600 --> 01:15:03,679 of Squamish and the and uh the Squamish 1530 01:15:03,679 --> 01:15:05,760 Okme. We're going through this together 1531 01:15:05,760 --> 01:15:08,080 and I think it's this is a together part 1532 01:15:08,080 --> 01:15:09,920 of that as well as protecting the rights 1533 01:15:09,920 --> 01:15:11,600 and title of the Squamish. So, I look 1534 01:15:11,600 --> 01:15:16,159 forward to um to um working uh with 1535 01:15:16,159 --> 01:15:17,760 Squamish Nation and my colleagues on 1536 01:15:17,760 --> 01:15:20,080 this and um thank you to everybody 1537 01:15:20,080 --> 01:15:24,400 involved to get us to this point. Um I 1538 01:15:24,400 --> 01:15:28,880 I um I do think that having a table to 1539 01:15:28,880 --> 01:15:31,840 sit at to discuss these matters with our 1540 01:15:31,840 --> 01:15:33,679 uh neighbors at this at the Squamish 1541 01:15:33,679 --> 01:15:36,080 Nation um is incredibly important and 1542 01:15:36,080 --> 01:15:37,360 likely at any point in time, but 1543 01:15:37,360 --> 01:15:38,960 particularly at this point in time. So 1544 01:15:38,960 --> 01:15:40,560 I'm thankful for the creation of this 1545 01:15:40,560 --> 01:15:42,800 initiative and look forward to doing the 1546 01:15:42,800 --> 01:15:45,920 work. I will other comments on this. 1547 01:15:45,920 --> 01:15:47,440 Councelor French. 1548 01:15:47,440 --> 01:15:49,189 >> Thanks, Mayor Herford. Um this is 1549 01:15:49,189 --> 01:15:49,199 » Thanks, Mayor Herford. Um this is 1550 01:15:49,199 --> 01:15:51,679 exciting tonight. Uh the task force has 1551 01:15:51,679 --> 01:15:54,239 an important historical mission ahead 1552 01:15:54,239 --> 01:15:56,080 and coming into this meeting tonight 1553 01:15:56,080 --> 01:15:58,640 I've had some mixed feedback on this 1554 01:15:58,640 --> 01:16:01,440 task force from many people and 1555 01:16:01,440 --> 01:16:04,000 surprisingly to me a little bit people 1556 01:16:04,000 --> 01:16:07,760 from all over the province. Um, many 1557 01:16:07,760 --> 01:16:10,400 eyes are on Squamish tonight with this 1558 01:16:10,400 --> 01:16:13,440 decision and uh and this recommendation 1559 01:16:13,440 --> 01:16:15,600 and this motion. 1560 01:16:15,600 --> 01:16:17,520 And what I've discovered over the last 1561 01:16:17,520 --> 01:16:19,520 couple of days in going through the 1562 01:16:19,520 --> 01:16:22,239 feedback that I've seen is uh those who 1563 01:16:22,239 --> 01:16:25,199 get what we're up to, they truly get it. 1564 01:16:25,199 --> 01:16:27,360 Those who don't, in my opinion, are 1565 01:16:27,360 --> 01:16:29,360 mainly driven by fear, feelings of 1566 01:16:29,360 --> 01:16:31,600 superiority, and a belief that there's 1567 01:16:31,600 --> 01:16:34,880 no historical wrongs to be reconciled. I 1568 01:16:34,880 --> 01:16:37,440 fully disagree with that. There are 1569 01:16:37,440 --> 01:16:40,400 wrongs to be corrected. And part of what 1570 01:16:40,400 --> 01:16:42,719 we're doing tonight is taking that on. 1571 01:16:42,719 --> 01:16:44,400 The path that we're continuing on with 1572 01:16:44,400 --> 01:16:46,400 the Squamish nation feels minimal. When 1573 01:16:46,400 --> 01:16:49,280 I think about my white European 1574 01:16:49,280 --> 01:16:52,320 ancestors who came here, claimed these 1575 01:16:52,320 --> 01:16:54,239 lands, and introduced the human 1576 01:16:54,239 --> 01:16:56,960 construct that we call private property. 1577 01:16:56,960 --> 01:16:58,719 And the newcomers to this place then 1578 01:16:58,719 --> 01:17:00,719 tried to assimilate the Skoish people 1579 01:17:00,719 --> 01:17:04,159 into European ways using what I think 1580 01:17:04,159 --> 01:17:07,040 are cruel tactics. And many people agree 1581 01:17:07,040 --> 01:17:09,679 with me on that. With no ability to undo 1582 01:17:09,679 --> 01:17:11,440 the historical hurt brought to the 1583 01:17:11,440 --> 01:17:13,520 people who lived here for thousands of 1584 01:17:13,520 --> 01:17:16,960 years before my ancestors arrived, I see 1585 01:17:16,960 --> 01:17:19,600 this task force as a small step along a 1586 01:17:19,600 --> 01:17:22,640 path that we're meant to be on until we 1587 01:17:22,640 --> 01:17:24,960 can all collectively agree that true 1588 01:17:24,960 --> 01:17:27,520 reconciliation has been achieved with 1589 01:17:27,520 --> 01:17:30,560 the Squamish people. Councelor Lewis 1590 01:17:30,560 --> 01:17:33,760 told me a few days ago that she's stoked 1591 01:17:33,760 --> 01:17:37,040 about the work of this task force and 1592 01:17:37,040 --> 01:17:39,760 she's keen to learn who's appointed to 1593 01:17:39,760 --> 01:17:41,760 the task force to represent the District 1594 01:17:41,760 --> 01:17:43,840 of Squamish. We've achieved that I I 1595 01:17:43,840 --> 01:17:46,239 think or we're about to confirm that 1596 01:17:46,239 --> 01:17:49,040 tonight. And I want to add that 1597 01:17:49,040 --> 01:17:51,360 transparency through this process is 1598 01:17:51,360 --> 01:17:53,760 important to me individually. And I've 1599 01:17:53,760 --> 01:17:55,440 heard from many in our community that 1600 01:17:55,440 --> 01:17:57,600 transparency with this process is vital 1601 01:17:57,600 --> 01:18:01,040 to them as well. I pledge to do all that 1602 01:18:01,040 --> 01:18:03,440 I can to promote public education 1603 01:18:03,440 --> 01:18:05,600 through this process and to keep the 1604 01:18:05,600 --> 01:18:08,080 work of the task force as transparent as 1605 01:18:08,080 --> 01:18:11,280 it possibly um can. 1606 01:18:11,280 --> 01:18:14,480 And when my time in this seat comes to 1607 01:18:14,480 --> 01:18:16,719 an end, I expect that I will point to 1608 01:18:16,719 --> 01:18:19,199 the work of this task force as a high 1609 01:18:19,199 --> 01:18:21,760 point in my political experience. I 1610 01:18:21,760 --> 01:18:24,480 support the recommended appointments and 1611 01:18:24,480 --> 01:18:26,960 um any one of the elected officials I 1612 01:18:26,960 --> 01:18:28,320 believe in this room tonight would 1613 01:18:28,320 --> 01:18:29,760 suitably represent the District of 1614 01:18:29,760 --> 01:18:32,400 Squamish on this task force. I'm happy 1615 01:18:32,400 --> 01:18:33,920 that we've selected the three that we 1616 01:18:33,920 --> 01:18:35,600 have. I support the motion in front of 1617 01:18:35,600 --> 01:18:36,880 us. 1618 01:18:36,880 --> 01:18:38,229 >> Thank you very much, Councelor French. 1619 01:18:38,229 --> 01:18:38,239 » Thank you very much, Councelor French. 1620 01:18:38,239 --> 01:18:40,480 Councelor Sto. 1621 01:18:40,480 --> 01:18:42,640 Yeah, thank you to the chair. Uh, happy 1622 01:18:42,640 --> 01:18:46,560 to support this motion this evening. Um, 1623 01:18:46,560 --> 01:18:48,320 and I think back to even when we just 1624 01:18:48,320 --> 01:18:52,080 signed theou in mid July, the context 1625 01:18:52,080 --> 01:18:54,320 was very different. Um, it was before 1626 01:18:54,320 --> 01:18:56,719 the Kawashan tribes decision court case 1627 01:18:56,719 --> 01:18:59,360 came forward. Um, and there was a real 1628 01:18:59,360 --> 01:19:01,600 pivot in the provincial, let alone the 1629 01:19:01,600 --> 01:19:04,080 national narrative around the path of 1630 01:19:04,080 --> 01:19:05,760 reconciliation. 1631 01:19:05,760 --> 01:19:08,400 Um, I think as I continue to reflect and 1632 01:19:08,400 --> 01:19:13,440 and hear the concerns uh that are 1633 01:19:13,440 --> 01:19:18,159 emerging and I think um some of them are 1634 01:19:18,159 --> 01:19:20,080 they're definitely they feel like valid 1635 01:19:20,080 --> 01:19:22,000 concerns for many folks because there's 1636 01:19:22,000 --> 01:19:24,239 a lot of uncertainty. I actually think 1637 01:19:24,239 --> 01:19:26,000 what this task force does and our 1638 01:19:26,000 --> 01:19:27,360 continued commitment to recon 1639 01:19:27,360 --> 01:19:30,560 reconciliation does is actually 1640 01:19:30,560 --> 01:19:33,199 open up the opportunity for dialogue, 1641 01:19:33,199 --> 01:19:35,520 for understanding, for education, 1642 01:19:35,520 --> 01:19:38,080 learning, and sharing. And that is what 1643 01:19:38,080 --> 01:19:41,199 our community does best across both 1644 01:19:41,199 --> 01:19:43,679 Squamish residents as well as the Scoish 1645 01:19:43,679 --> 01:19:46,880 people. Um, as Mayor Hurford reiterated, 1646 01:19:46,880 --> 01:19:48,400 I think one of the most appropriate 1647 01:19:48,400 --> 01:19:51,760 components of the principles of theou 1648 01:19:51,760 --> 01:19:53,440 that applies here is that the people go 1649 01:19:53,440 --> 01:19:55,679 through it together. We are all in this 1650 01:19:55,679 --> 01:19:57,520 together and we're trying to find our 1651 01:19:57,520 --> 01:19:59,760 way through it. I'd be lying if I said 1652 01:19:59,760 --> 01:20:01,920 we all knew the answers. But to 1653 01:20:01,920 --> 01:20:04,320 councelor French's point, I think our 1654 01:20:04,320 --> 01:20:07,360 council, our staff, our community, and 1655 01:20:07,360 --> 01:20:08,560 I've heard this from the Squamish 1656 01:20:08,560 --> 01:20:11,840 Nation, this task force is committed to 1657 01:20:11,840 --> 01:20:14,480 transparency, to engagement, to 1658 01:20:14,480 --> 01:20:16,480 research, and shared learning, 1659 01:20:16,480 --> 01:20:18,239 developing a framework that we can all 1660 01:20:18,239 --> 01:20:20,320 feel comfortable with to move us forward 1661 01:20:20,320 --> 01:20:24,239 on a stronger foundation. Um, because we 1662 01:20:24,239 --> 01:20:25,840 are all going to be here together no 1663 01:20:25,840 --> 01:20:27,679 matter what. we can either battle it out 1664 01:20:27,679 --> 01:20:30,480 in court or we can build strong working 1665 01:20:30,480 --> 01:20:32,960 relationships and move forward together, 1666 01:20:32,960 --> 01:20:35,040 show up represented to the province 1667 01:20:35,040 --> 01:20:37,440 together as opposed to apart. And I 1668 01:20:37,440 --> 01:20:38,480 think that's the piece that we're 1669 01:20:38,480 --> 01:20:41,120 looking for in this work. Um, and I'm 1670 01:20:41,120 --> 01:20:42,800 honored to take it on on behalf of 1671 01:20:42,800 --> 01:20:44,800 council of community and with community 1672 01:20:44,800 --> 01:20:48,239 and with council and our staff. 1673 01:20:48,239 --> 01:20:49,430 >> Thank you for that, Councelor S. 1674 01:20:49,430 --> 01:20:49,440 » Thank you for that, Councelor S. 1675 01:20:49,440 --> 01:20:51,760 Councelor Anderson. 1676 01:20:51,760 --> 01:20:54,390 >> Thank you, Mayor Herford. Uh it will be 1677 01:20:54,390 --> 01:20:54,400 » Thank you, Mayor Herford. Uh it will be 1678 01:20:54,400 --> 01:20:56,960 a great privilege and responsibility to 1679 01:20:56,960 --> 01:20:59,199 be serving on this task force. I am 1680 01:20:59,199 --> 01:21:02,400 looking forward to to fulfill the 1681 01:21:02,400 --> 01:21:04,080 principle that's outlined in the snap 1682 01:21:04,080 --> 01:21:05,360 presentation tonight. One of those 1683 01:21:05,360 --> 01:21:07,679 principles, listen and engage. And I'm 1684 01:21:07,679 --> 01:21:09,040 going to be learning how to pronounce 1685 01:21:09,040 --> 01:21:10,960 that in the Squamish language. But 1686 01:21:10,960 --> 01:21:13,760 that's one that leaps out for me. Uh we 1687 01:21:13,760 --> 01:21:16,000 need in response to community interest 1688 01:21:16,000 --> 01:21:17,920 as well. Of course, I see this I'm 1689 01:21:17,920 --> 01:21:19,280 looking forward to a process of 1690 01:21:19,280 --> 01:21:21,920 exploration as well as an educational 1691 01:21:21,920 --> 01:21:26,159 process. Um I councelor French has so 1692 01:21:26,159 --> 01:21:28,640 eloquently uh reminded us that or 1693 01:21:28,640 --> 01:21:31,040 pointed out that many eyes will be on 1694 01:21:31,040 --> 01:21:35,280 Squamish. So uh it will be important for 1695 01:21:35,280 --> 01:21:37,520 a learning process 1696 01:21:37,520 --> 01:21:39,600 important for other communities and 1697 01:21:39,600 --> 01:21:42,239 agencies well beyond Squamish. So this 1698 01:21:42,239 --> 01:21:45,280 is an added responsibility that uh I 1699 01:21:45,280 --> 01:21:47,600 look forward to facing. Thank you very 1700 01:21:47,600 --> 01:21:48,960 much. 1701 01:21:48,960 --> 01:21:50,709 >> Thank you, Councelor Penning. 1702 01:21:50,709 --> 01:21:50,719 » Thank you, Councelor Penning. 1703 01:21:50,719 --> 01:21:52,709 >> Yeah, thank you. Uh happy to support the 1704 01:21:52,709 --> 01:21:52,719 » Yeah, thank you. Uh happy to support the 1705 01:21:52,719 --> 01:21:55,679 motion. Um just reflecting on a few 1706 01:21:55,679 --> 01:21:58,320 things. I was never really a a huge fan 1707 01:21:58,320 --> 01:22:00,400 of the the Harper government, but in 1708 01:22:00,400 --> 01:22:03,679 2008 uh that government uh apologized 1709 01:22:03,679 --> 01:22:06,000 for the residential school system and 1710 01:22:06,000 --> 01:22:08,719 later a couple years later adopted uh 1711 01:22:08,719 --> 01:22:10,080 United Nation Declaration on the Rights 1712 01:22:10,080 --> 01:22:11,600 of Indigenous Peoples with with a small 1713 01:22:11,600 --> 01:22:14,239 caveat. But then in 2016, the Liberal 1714 01:22:14,239 --> 01:22:15,360 government, I guess the other side of 1715 01:22:15,360 --> 01:22:17,280 the aisle, you might say, uh fully 1716 01:22:17,280 --> 01:22:21,840 endorsed it. Um and so you know 1717 01:22:21,840 --> 01:22:23,920 colonialism and our history and how we 1718 01:22:23,920 --> 01:22:26,000 move forward is something that Canada 1719 01:22:26,000 --> 01:22:28,320 has been grappling with for a long time. 1720 01:22:28,320 --> 01:22:31,600 Um our democratically elected national 1721 01:22:31,600 --> 01:22:33,679 governments from both sides of the aisle 1722 01:22:33,679 --> 01:22:36,560 seem to support when you sort of read um 1723 01:22:36,560 --> 01:22:38,639 the text of of what they were doing and 1724 01:22:38,639 --> 01:22:40,159 why they were doing it. It is, I think, 1725 01:22:40,159 --> 01:22:42,080 as my colleague pointed out, 1726 01:22:42,080 --> 01:22:43,600 understanding, there's a more 1727 01:22:43,600 --> 01:22:45,040 constructive way than battling things 1728 01:22:45,040 --> 01:22:46,719 out in court. When we try and understand 1729 01:22:46,719 --> 01:22:48,880 and see each other's each others as 1730 01:22:48,880 --> 01:22:50,800 human beings and trying to understand 1731 01:22:50,800 --> 01:22:52,320 what we all need and how we can best 1732 01:22:52,320 --> 01:22:54,159 move forward together, that's kind of 1733 01:22:54,159 --> 01:22:55,760 the path to success. And that's what I 1734 01:22:55,760 --> 01:22:57,679 really see is sort of the common element 1735 01:22:57,679 --> 01:22:59,040 between these different governments and 1736 01:22:59,040 --> 01:23:01,199 these different documents that we're all 1737 01:23:01,199 --> 01:23:02,800 trying to work towards. And I I think 1738 01:23:02,800 --> 01:23:05,600 that applies here, too. I'm really proud 1739 01:23:05,600 --> 01:23:07,199 of our community every day on the 1740 01:23:07,199 --> 01:23:08,719 National Day for Truth and 1741 01:23:08,719 --> 01:23:10,480 Reconciliation. I see all the the orange 1742 01:23:10,480 --> 01:23:13,520 shirts uh uh walking down the street 1743 01:23:13,520 --> 01:23:15,760 together. And I think this is just sort 1744 01:23:15,760 --> 01:23:18,159 of that next step. There is a whole lot 1745 01:23:18,159 --> 01:23:20,480 of fear I think born out of a whole lot 1746 01:23:20,480 --> 01:23:22,880 of information uh misinformation and 1747 01:23:22,880 --> 01:23:25,520 political opportunism uh which is really 1748 01:23:25,520 --> 01:23:27,040 quite frustrating. But I think this is a 1749 01:23:27,040 --> 01:23:29,040 fantastic opportunity to have some 1750 01:23:29,040 --> 01:23:31,360 really great conversation that I think 1751 01:23:31,360 --> 01:23:33,840 uh should make things better for for 1752 01:23:33,840 --> 01:23:35,199 everyone at the end of the day. I think 1753 01:23:35,199 --> 01:23:37,760 this is a path of and it is the 1754 01:23:37,760 --> 01:23:39,520 underlying goal of how do we make this a 1755 01:23:39,520 --> 01:23:40,880 better place for everybody and I think 1756 01:23:40,880 --> 01:23:42,800 that's really what this is all about. 1757 01:23:42,800 --> 01:23:45,280 Um, and so I know this is something that 1758 01:23:45,280 --> 01:23:46,960 our our whole council has felt 1759 01:23:46,960 --> 01:23:48,960 passionate about and it's pretty hard to 1760 01:23:48,960 --> 01:23:51,040 to I think we all sort of would would 1761 01:23:51,040 --> 01:23:52,800 have liked to be in the room, but even 1762 01:23:52,800 --> 01:23:55,760 if we're not in the room, um, we'll be 1763 01:23:55,760 --> 01:23:57,920 finding other ways to support these 1764 01:23:57,920 --> 01:24:00,880 absolutely critical efforts. Um, with 1765 01:24:00,880 --> 01:24:02,320 that out of the way, just one small 1766 01:24:02,320 --> 01:24:04,320 thing. I I do see that the budget for 1767 01:24:04,320 --> 01:24:07,120 this is part of our broader memorandum 1768 01:24:07,120 --> 01:24:10,080 of understanding uh, budget. I I do sort 1769 01:24:10,080 --> 01:24:11,679 of wonder and maybe the task force needs 1770 01:24:11,679 --> 01:24:13,280 to ask for this, but if if there's a bit 1771 01:24:13,280 --> 01:24:15,679 of a a clear number that this task force 1772 01:24:15,679 --> 01:24:17,600 sort of had to sort of scope like how 1773 01:24:17,600 --> 01:24:19,280 far they can go in terms of having these 1774 01:24:19,280 --> 01:24:21,520 community conversations and so on. Just 1775 01:24:21,520 --> 01:24:23,040 a small thought as I read through the 1776 01:24:23,040 --> 01:24:25,440 report, but otherwise um very happy to 1777 01:24:25,440 --> 01:24:27,360 support this and uh thank you to the 1778 01:24:27,360 --> 01:24:29,760 colleagues that will be leading this. 1779 01:24:29,760 --> 01:24:32,790 >> Thank you, Councelor Hamilton. 1780 01:24:32,790 --> 01:24:32,800 » Thank you, Councelor Hamilton. 1781 01:24:32,800 --> 01:24:34,550 >> Yeah, thanks very much. I'm very happy 1782 01:24:34,550 --> 01:24:34,560 » Yeah, thanks very much. I'm very happy 1783 01:24:34,560 --> 01:24:37,120 to be supporting this motion. This is 1784 01:24:37,120 --> 01:24:40,000 extraordinarily important work. Um, and 1785 01:24:40,000 --> 01:24:41,600 I am extraordinarily grateful to my 1786 01:24:41,600 --> 01:24:43,520 colleagues who are willing to take it on 1787 01:24:43,520 --> 01:24:46,560 as members of the task force. Um, and 1788 01:24:46,560 --> 01:24:49,840 I'm really grateful to staff for helping 1789 01:24:49,840 --> 01:24:53,199 get the councils uh to this point. I 1790 01:24:53,199 --> 01:24:55,760 think staff play a vital and pivotal 1791 01:24:55,760 --> 01:24:59,520 role um in having our councils be uh 1792 01:24:59,520 --> 01:25:03,440 able to have uh constructive, careful 1793 01:25:03,440 --> 01:25:05,280 conversations, delicate and challenging 1794 01:25:05,280 --> 01:25:07,520 conversations with each other. Um and so 1795 01:25:07,520 --> 01:25:10,000 I think this task force is really a 1796 01:25:10,000 --> 01:25:12,400 culmination of a lot of staff work um to 1797 01:25:12,400 --> 01:25:13,600 be able to have challenging and 1798 01:25:13,600 --> 01:25:15,520 difficult conversations uh with each 1799 01:25:15,520 --> 01:25:19,440 other in uh open and um receptive ways. 1800 01:25:19,440 --> 01:25:20,880 So, thank you to my colleagues for 1801 01:25:20,880 --> 01:25:24,000 taking this on. Um, and I certainly 1802 01:25:24,000 --> 01:25:26,400 would look forward to hearing uh as the 1803 01:25:26,400 --> 01:25:29,360 task force progresses. 1804 01:25:29,360 --> 01:25:32,229 >> Thank you very much. Um, and thank you 1805 01:25:32,229 --> 01:25:32,239 » Thank you very much. Um, and thank you 1806 01:25:32,239 --> 01:25:33,760 uh council for all the thoughtful 1807 01:25:33,760 --> 01:25:35,920 comments. I I would love to riff on each 1808 01:25:35,920 --> 01:25:38,320 of of the the themes that have emerged 1809 01:25:38,320 --> 01:25:41,120 here. Um, and I do think that uh really 1810 01:25:41,120 --> 01:25:44,560 highlights the uh importance of this uh 1811 01:25:44,560 --> 01:25:48,159 of this work. So um we will this this is 1812 01:25:48,159 --> 01:25:50,960 uh clearly not the but uh not the last 1813 01:25:50,960 --> 01:25:52,560 touch point for the for this. So we'll 1814 01:25:52,560 --> 01:25:55,199 save uh my comments for the next time 1815 01:25:55,199 --> 01:25:57,120 these matters are before us. I'll call 1816 01:25:57,120 --> 01:25:59,679 the question. All in favor? 1817 01:25:59,679 --> 01:26:01,600 Motion carries unanimously. Thank you 1818 01:26:01,600 --> 01:26:06,080 very much. Thank you for all your work. 1819 01:26:06,080 --> 01:26:09,520 Um, so next, uh, we don't have any late 1820 01:26:09,520 --> 01:26:12,639 agenda items or, uh, but or 1821 01:26:12,639 --> 01:26:14,800 correspondence action requested, but we 1822 01:26:14,800 --> 01:26:16,560 do have items referred from the consent 1823 01:26:16,560 --> 01:26:19,760 agenda. So, we're on to 11 1824 01:26:19,760 --> 01:26:23,520 uh C, I think, is what both of those 1825 01:26:23,520 --> 01:26:26,880 are. So, Councelor Stoner, um, you 1826 01:26:26,880 --> 01:26:30,159 pulled 6D1. So, this is the five-year 1827 01:26:30,159 --> 01:26:33,520 the STR review. And just to orient 1828 01:26:33,520 --> 01:26:36,480 everyone, I know council knows this. Uh 1829 01:26:36,480 --> 01:26:39,120 for the most part, we don't um with 1830 01:26:39,120 --> 01:26:41,360 these pieces where we have a a memo from 1831 01:26:41,360 --> 01:26:44,400 staff uh come through. We don't have the 1832 01:26:44,400 --> 01:26:47,760 staff uh available to answer answer 1833 01:26:47,760 --> 01:26:49,440 questions. So if we have questions that 1834 01:26:49,440 --> 01:26:51,920 are more uh involved, we could refer 1835 01:26:51,920 --> 01:26:53,360 these to a future meeting to dig into 1836 01:26:53,360 --> 01:26:56,320 them further. Um but uh just with that 1837 01:26:56,320 --> 01:26:58,560 caveat, I will I will turn over to you 1838 01:26:58,560 --> 01:27:00,960 to get us started, councelor Soner. 1839 01:27:00,960 --> 01:27:03,199 Yeah, thank you uh through the chair. I 1840 01:27:03,199 --> 01:27:04,880 was going to refer this to a future 1841 01:27:04,880 --> 01:27:06,800 committee the whole for future for 1842 01:27:06,800 --> 01:27:08,320 further discussion and if that's 1843 01:27:08,320 --> 01:27:09,679 seconded I'll speak to it. 1844 01:27:09,679 --> 01:27:11,110 >> I'll second it and do you want to go 1845 01:27:11,110 --> 01:27:11,120 » I'll second it and do you want to go 1846 01:27:11,120 --> 01:27:12,400 ahead? 1847 01:27:12,400 --> 01:27:14,390 >> Yeah. Uh and thanks for supporting 1848 01:27:14,390 --> 01:27:14,400 » Yeah. Uh and thanks for supporting 1849 01:27:14,400 --> 01:27:15,600 seconding it before I actually 1850 01:27:15,600 --> 01:27:17,360 articulated why I would like to discuss 1851 01:27:17,360 --> 01:27:19,840 it further. Um but there are some 1852 01:27:19,840 --> 01:27:23,199 components in the report uh that were 1853 01:27:23,199 --> 01:27:25,040 that flagged me that I think are just 1854 01:27:25,040 --> 01:27:26,320 worthy of some further council 1855 01:27:26,320 --> 01:27:28,880 deliberation. in particular, um it is 1856 01:27:28,880 --> 01:27:31,360 the suggestion that we continue to 1857 01:27:31,360 --> 01:27:34,400 encourage folks to reapply 1858 01:27:34,400 --> 01:27:36,719 for temporary use permits after their 1859 01:27:36,719 --> 01:27:40,560 six years. Um so under the legislation, 1860 01:27:40,560 --> 01:27:44,320 uh you technically can um reapply for a 1861 01:27:44,320 --> 01:27:47,040 TUP under a new application. 1862 01:27:47,040 --> 01:27:49,040 It's not generally our practice to do 1863 01:27:49,040 --> 01:27:51,760 so. Um and I it I think that that's 1864 01:27:51,760 --> 01:27:53,520 worthy of some council deliberation as 1865 01:27:53,520 --> 01:27:55,280 to whether that is that is practice that 1866 01:27:55,280 --> 01:27:57,600 we want to um address. And then we also 1867 01:27:57,600 --> 01:27:59,600 got some late correspondences today from 1868 01:27:59,600 --> 01:28:03,440 tourism Squamish uh that would also 1869 01:28:03,440 --> 01:28:05,760 amplify um I think a further dialogue 1870 01:28:05,760 --> 01:28:08,719 around our short-term rental regulation 1871 01:28:08,719 --> 01:28:11,040 policy. 1872 01:28:11,040 --> 01:28:14,950 >> Thank you. Um yeah, the thank you for 1873 01:28:14,950 --> 01:28:14,960 » Thank you. Um yeah, the thank you for 1874 01:28:14,960 --> 01:28:18,159 that. the the broader the TU issue here 1875 01:28:18,159 --> 01:28:20,320 is is broader I think than obviously 1876 01:28:20,320 --> 01:28:23,679 than just this use of t of t and I think 1877 01:28:23,679 --> 01:28:26,480 that with that in mind just whether this 1878 01:28:26,480 --> 01:28:30,080 is the um the preferred mechanism and I 1879 01:28:30,080 --> 01:28:31,840 get that that's likely a future action 1880 01:28:31,840 --> 01:28:33,280 thing that's not something that we have 1881 01:28:33,280 --> 01:28:35,280 in our work plans but I'd really like to 1882 01:28:35,280 --> 01:28:38,480 have a discussion around um around that 1883 01:28:38,480 --> 01:28:40,400 and I think this is such an impactful 1884 01:28:40,400 --> 01:28:42,080 piece for the community that it does 1885 01:28:42,080 --> 01:28:45,040 deserve more space than uh and I know 1886 01:28:45,040 --> 01:28:46,880 it's going to take more those sort of 1887 01:28:46,880 --> 01:28:49,199 future action items piece make make good 1888 01:28:49,199 --> 01:28:50,480 sense, but I do think we should spend a 1889 01:28:50,480 --> 01:28:52,480 little bit more um time with this and 1890 01:28:52,480 --> 01:28:54,400 address some of those or discuss some of 1891 01:28:54,400 --> 01:28:56,480 those issues. I'll go to you c did I see 1892 01:28:56,480 --> 01:28:58,480 a hand? No, you don't have to. You 1893 01:28:58,480 --> 01:29:01,199 can't. Councelor Penn is that your hand? 1894 01:29:01,199 --> 01:29:02,950 >> Yeah, I appreciate this coming back and 1895 01:29:02,950 --> 01:29:02,960 » Yeah, I appreciate this coming back and 1896 01:29:02,960 --> 01:29:06,000 just one thought maybe to uh for staff 1897 01:29:06,000 --> 01:29:08,080 to think about or for us to think about 1898 01:29:08,080 --> 01:29:09,679 when it comes back. I know there's been 1899 01:29:09,679 --> 01:29:12,719 some question or concern about uh has 1900 01:29:12,719 --> 01:29:14,800 this policy how many units has it 1901 01:29:14,800 --> 01:29:17,920 returned to the long-term rental market. 1902 01:29:17,920 --> 01:29:20,320 Um I think that is one aspect or in my 1903 01:29:20,320 --> 01:29:22,159 mind one aspect or one goal. The other 1904 01:29:22,159 --> 01:29:24,080 piece of it at least one other piece of 1905 01:29:24,080 --> 01:29:28,960 it for me was um you know if if a a home 1906 01:29:28,960 --> 01:29:32,560 can be a revenue generator um does that 1907 01:29:32,560 --> 01:29:34,400 then raise the price and sort of force 1908 01:29:34,400 --> 01:29:37,199 everyone to either do that or pay a very 1909 01:29:37,199 --> 01:29:39,120 high price for a home? And so it's it's 1910 01:29:39,120 --> 01:29:43,280 not just about returning uh units to the 1911 01:29:43,280 --> 01:29:45,440 long-term market, but what it does to 1912 01:29:45,440 --> 01:29:47,360 affordability. And we have many things 1913 01:29:47,360 --> 01:29:48,639 pushing affordability in different 1914 01:29:48,639 --> 01:29:51,440 directions. So not thinking that's, you 1915 01:29:51,440 --> 01:29:53,440 know, there's one magic solution here, 1916 01:29:53,440 --> 01:29:56,239 but um if there are any additional 1917 01:29:56,239 --> 01:29:59,040 thoughts or new information about uh the 1918 01:29:59,040 --> 01:30:01,600 push and pull there in terms of the 1919 01:30:01,600 --> 01:30:04,560 affordability of a home, um that may be 1920 01:30:04,560 --> 01:30:08,000 useful for our next discussion. 1921 01:30:08,000 --> 01:30:11,120 Thank you. Um just another piece of this 1922 01:30:11,120 --> 01:30:14,400 is the um the fees are meant uh I'm 1923 01:30:14,400 --> 01:30:15,920 curious to dig into the fees a little 1924 01:30:15,920 --> 01:30:20,080 bit. the um the fees revenue were uh 1925 01:30:20,080 --> 01:30:22,400 generally 156,800 1926 01:30:22,400 --> 01:30:26,560 and the annual um expenses to administer 1927 01:30:26,560 --> 01:30:29,199 the program were at 145,000 and it did 1928 01:30:29,199 --> 01:30:30,560 say that the third party monitoring 1929 01:30:30,560 --> 01:30:32,159 services dropped out of that and I just 1930 01:30:32,159 --> 01:30:35,440 I want to understand that better and if 1931 01:30:35,440 --> 01:30:37,520 inside of that cost recovery piece and 1932 01:30:37,520 --> 01:30:39,520 that's pretty close to the line with the 1933 01:30:39,520 --> 01:30:41,600 numbers that are there um just how we're 1934 01:30:41,600 --> 01:30:44,960 distributing those uh those uh fees 1935 01:30:44,960 --> 01:30:46,800 inside of that I I think are is worth 1936 01:30:46,800 --> 01:30:48,080 some. So, I'd like to dig into that 1937 01:30:48,080 --> 01:30:50,400 little piece a little bit as well, but 1938 01:30:50,400 --> 01:30:52,880 that is for a future meeting, which is 1939 01:30:52,880 --> 01:30:54,480 exactly what the resolution is. So, with 1940 01:30:54,480 --> 01:30:55,520 that, I'm going to call the question. 1941 01:30:55,520 --> 01:30:57,280 All in favor? Motion carries 1942 01:30:57,280 --> 01:30:59,760 unanimously. Thank you. And then back to 1943 01:30:59,760 --> 01:31:03,600 you, Councelor Stoner. Item 62. 1944 01:31:03,600 --> 01:31:05,910 >> Um, and I'm going to move receipt of 1945 01:31:05,910 --> 01:31:05,920 » Um, and I'm going to move receipt of 1946 01:31:05,920 --> 01:31:08,639 this memo uh because I just want to 1947 01:31:08,639 --> 01:31:10,320 speak to it and highlight it. 1948 01:31:10,320 --> 01:31:11,510 >> Is there a second for the motion? 1949 01:31:11,510 --> 01:31:11,520 » Is there a second for the motion? 1950 01:31:11,520 --> 01:31:14,159 Councelor French. Go ahead, Councelor S. 1951 01:31:14,159 --> 01:31:16,390 >> Uh, yeah. Thanks. I couldn't help myself 1952 01:31:16,390 --> 01:31:16,400 » Uh, yeah. Thanks. I couldn't help myself 1953 01:31:16,400 --> 01:31:17,840 but to pull this one because I think 1954 01:31:17,840 --> 01:31:19,280 that there's some really great numbers 1955 01:31:19,280 --> 01:31:22,880 in this memo which speaks to uh the uh 1956 01:31:22,880 --> 01:31:24,880 expansion of the evolve eBike share 1957 01:31:24,880 --> 01:31:27,199 program which we launched last summer. 1958 01:31:27,199 --> 01:31:30,400 So in just 166 days of its first year of 1959 01:31:30,400 --> 01:31:32,719 operation, there were across 54 bikes 1960 01:31:32,719 --> 01:31:36,400 were deployed from 18 locations that saw 1961 01:31:36,400 --> 01:31:38,400 1,318 1962 01:31:38,400 --> 01:31:41,840 unique riders for a total trip of total 1963 01:31:41,840 --> 01:31:44,480 number of trips of 3,96 1964 01:31:44,480 --> 01:31:49,360 over those 166 days. Um so BCAA who runs 1965 01:31:49,360 --> 01:31:52,239 the evolve program is looking to expand 1966 01:31:52,239 --> 01:31:54,560 uh to an additional basic almost 1967 01:31:54,560 --> 01:31:56,400 doubling their locations to 33 new 1968 01:31:56,400 --> 01:31:58,000 locations extending into Gabali 1969 01:31:58,000 --> 01:31:59,679 Highlands, Oceanfront, Brackendale and 1970 01:31:59,679 --> 01:32:01,920 Mammqu uh and providing a new 1971 01:32:01,920 --> 01:32:03,920 opportunity for folks not just ride on 1972 01:32:03,920 --> 01:32:05,920 ebikes but also on e- scooters. And I 1973 01:32:05,920 --> 01:32:07,840 think that this is a fantastic 1974 01:32:07,840 --> 01:32:09,280 opportunity for our community to have 1975 01:32:09,280 --> 01:32:11,840 different forms of transportation um and 1976 01:32:11,840 --> 01:32:15,040 micro transportation across our 1977 01:32:15,040 --> 01:32:19,199 very spread out community. 1978 01:32:19,199 --> 01:32:22,790 >> Other comments on this council penning? 1979 01:32:22,790 --> 01:32:22,800 » Other comments on this council penning? 1980 01:32:22,800 --> 01:32:24,870 >> Yeah, I was very happy to see this. I 1981 01:32:24,870 --> 01:32:24,880 » Yeah, I was very happy to see this. I 1982 01:32:24,880 --> 01:32:26,400 think it was in the first week or two 1983 01:32:26,400 --> 01:32:29,040 after launch uh which was not meant to 1984 01:32:29,040 --> 01:32:32,159 go past the mamquam. I saw uh folks at 1985 01:32:32,159 --> 01:32:34,000 the bag with a you know a pile of bikes 1986 01:32:34,000 --> 01:32:35,600 cuz they they'd ridden the bikes to the 1987 01:32:35,600 --> 01:32:37,120 bag and then they I guess rode them back 1988 01:32:37,120 --> 01:32:39,760 downtown or wherever. Uh so having this 1989 01:32:39,760 --> 01:32:41,520 uh available stops available in the 1990 01:32:41,520 --> 01:32:44,480 whole community I think is uh is a great 1991 01:32:44,480 --> 01:32:48,480 thing. Um uh sort of curious and ex 1992 01:32:48,480 --> 01:32:50,159 really curious to see how the the 1993 01:32:50,159 --> 01:32:53,760 scooters go. U I'm sort of wondering if 1994 01:32:53,760 --> 01:32:55,920 those stay more localized. That's just a 1995 01:32:55,920 --> 01:32:59,679 curiosity. Uh just a slight tangent. I I 1996 01:32:59,679 --> 01:33:02,560 saw I think an email that the um the on 1997 01:33:02,560 --> 01:33:05,040 demand transit service is starting to 1998 01:33:05,040 --> 01:33:07,679 and and so there's a lot of really uh 1999 01:33:07,679 --> 01:33:09,520 exciting things uh and I have people 2000 01:33:09,520 --> 01:33:11,679 asking for for more already for the on 2001 01:33:11,679 --> 01:33:14,320 demand. So it's great to see these 2002 01:33:14,320 --> 01:33:17,040 things uh moving forward. 2003 01:33:17,040 --> 01:33:19,830 >> Thank you. Any other comments on this? 2004 01:33:19,830 --> 01:33:19,840 » Thank you. Any other comments on this? 2005 01:33:19,840 --> 01:33:23,350 >> Um I'm going to say yes to those 2006 01:33:23,350 --> 01:33:23,360 » Um I'm going to say yes to those 2007 01:33:23,360 --> 01:33:24,960 comments that I've heard already around 2008 01:33:24,960 --> 01:33:26,800 the table. This really remarkable 2009 01:33:26,800 --> 01:33:32,400 success here. I think um Squamish um in 2010 01:33:32,400 --> 01:33:34,239 various initiatives hasn't quite been 2011 01:33:34,239 --> 01:33:36,639 the right size to support some other 2012 01:33:36,639 --> 01:33:39,760 initiatives around asomely like car 2013 01:33:39,760 --> 01:33:42,400 share as a you know we all know the the 2014 01:33:42,400 --> 01:33:45,440 challenges but to see something um 2015 01:33:45,440 --> 01:33:47,360 really be such a good fit for our 2016 01:33:47,360 --> 01:33:50,239 community is really is really great and 2017 01:33:50,239 --> 01:33:52,639 uh it shows when there is a there when 2018 01:33:52,639 --> 01:33:54,320 there is a fit that works for people 2019 01:33:54,320 --> 01:33:57,840 people will use it. those uh 1,318 2020 01:33:57,840 --> 01:34:00,880 unique riders uh is that's a lot of 2021 01:34:00,880 --> 01:34:03,679 people. That's impressive. And that is 2022 01:34:03,679 --> 01:34:07,120 with only uh 54 ebikes in 18 locations. 2023 01:34:07,120 --> 01:34:10,800 So, I'm really looking forward to uh 2024 01:34:10,800 --> 01:34:13,040 seeing and and feeling how the community 2025 01:34:13,040 --> 01:34:17,360 feels when there's um far more uh both 2026 01:34:17,360 --> 01:34:20,080 locations and and bikes available. And 2027 01:34:20,080 --> 01:34:22,239 one of the pieces that uh should jump 2028 01:34:22,239 --> 01:34:25,440 out to everyone that reads this report 2029 01:34:25,440 --> 01:34:27,440 uh not that there may be a line up for 2030 01:34:27,440 --> 01:34:29,280 people to read this report is under the 2031 01:34:29,280 --> 01:34:30,960 budget section. I'm going to read the 2032 01:34:30,960 --> 01:34:33,360 very first section. The partnership does 2033 01:34:33,360 --> 01:34:38,149 not cost the district money. 2034 01:34:38,159 --> 01:34:41,679 Remarkable. So happy to support. Of 2035 01:34:41,679 --> 01:34:44,960 course, we have uh folks uh do need to 2036 01:34:44,960 --> 01:34:47,360 uh on our team that do need to do some 2037 01:34:47,360 --> 01:34:48,560 what have been described as sort of 2038 01:34:48,560 --> 01:34:51,280 light touches around uh some some 2039 01:34:51,280 --> 01:34:54,000 planning uh for these, but essentially 2040 01:34:54,000 --> 01:34:56,800 the operations of these um do not cost 2041 01:34:56,800 --> 01:34:58,960 the district money and that's really 2042 01:34:58,960 --> 01:35:02,560 remarkable. Um, 2043 01:35:02,560 --> 01:35:04,800 oh, and a little side note that there 2044 01:35:04,800 --> 01:35:07,199 are uh the bikes and the scooters both 2045 01:35:07,199 --> 01:35:10,400 have uh GPS enabled and any that go 2046 01:35:10,400 --> 01:35:14,000 astray are found and returned to so uh 2047 01:35:14,000 --> 01:35:16,159 there has not been a a lost piece. Thank 2048 01:35:16,159 --> 01:35:18,320 you for that. Um I'll call the question. 2049 01:35:18,320 --> 01:35:21,600 All in favor? Motion carries. Thank you. 2050 01:35:21,600 --> 01:35:24,560 I think those were the two pieces 2051 01:35:24,560 --> 01:35:27,440 um left. So now uh we don't have any 2052 01:35:27,440 --> 01:35:29,679 business arising from the minutes. We 2053 01:35:29,679 --> 01:35:32,320 have no notice of motion. Open question 2054 01:35:32,320 --> 01:35:34,080 period. Clarification related to agenda 2055 01:35:34,080 --> 01:35:36,159 items. Is there anybody in the audience 2056 01:35:36,159 --> 01:35:37,679 this evening that has a question of 2057 01:35:37,679 --> 01:35:42,239 clarity for council? Um seeing none, uh 2058 01:35:42,239 --> 01:35:44,560 council or staff announcements. Go 2059 01:35:44,560 --> 01:35:46,000 ahead. 2060 01:35:46,000 --> 01:35:47,430 >> Uh thanks Mayor Herford. I wanted to 2061 01:35:47,430 --> 01:35:47,440 » Uh thanks Mayor Herford. I wanted to 2062 01:35:47,440 --> 01:35:49,040 share that on Wednesday, March 4th, I 2063 01:35:49,040 --> 01:35:51,120 attended a youth council event at House 2064 01:35:51,120 --> 01:35:53,520 Sound Secondary. Some of my colleagues 2065 01:35:53,520 --> 01:35:55,120 might want to pick up where I leave off 2066 01:35:55,120 --> 01:35:57,120 on this. Uh thank you to councelor 2067 01:35:57,120 --> 01:36:00,000 Stoner, Petting Gill, and Greenlaw for 2068 01:36:00,000 --> 01:36:02,719 uh the work that um you did to prepare 2069 01:36:02,719 --> 01:36:05,120 for the night and just generally your 2070 01:36:05,120 --> 01:36:07,440 work with youth youth council. Uh there 2071 01:36:07,440 --> 01:36:11,920 were uh no Squamish has some very bright 2072 01:36:11,920 --> 01:36:14,800 young people who are engaged and 2073 01:36:14,800 --> 01:36:16,719 actively working to make Squamish more 2074 01:36:16,719 --> 01:36:20,480 inclusive and uh offer a wider range of 2075 01:36:20,480 --> 01:36:22,960 things for all young people to do. I was 2076 01:36:22,960 --> 01:36:25,360 impressed. the future is definitely 2077 01:36:25,360 --> 01:36:27,360 bright. 2078 01:36:27,360 --> 01:36:28,790 >> Thank you for that. I would agree with 2079 01:36:28,790 --> 01:36:28,800 » Thank you for that. I would agree with 2080 01:36:28,800 --> 01:36:32,960 that assessment. Uh councelor Anderson, 2081 01:36:32,960 --> 01:36:36,390 >> thank you. Um the Railway Museum of BC 2082 01:36:36,390 --> 01:36:36,400 » thank you. Um the Railway Museum of BC 2083 01:36:36,400 --> 01:36:39,920 is hosting a seat to sky model train and 2084 01:36:39,920 --> 01:36:42,159 hobby show. It's an annual affair and 2085 01:36:42,159 --> 01:36:44,080 I've been to a few of them already. 2086 01:36:44,080 --> 01:36:46,159 It'll be taking place this weekend, 2087 01:36:46,159 --> 01:36:48,080 Saturday and Sunday, March 21st and 2088 01:36:48,080 --> 01:36:50,639 22nd. Fun for the whole family, says the 2089 01:36:50,639 --> 01:36:53,520 ad. And that is certainly true. uh model 2090 01:36:53,520 --> 01:36:56,159 train layouts of all scales, opportunity 2091 01:36:56,159 --> 01:36:58,480 to climb onto the Royal Hudson or engine 2092 01:36:58,480 --> 01:37:00,480 number two and other artifacts in the 2093 01:37:00,480 --> 01:37:02,800 railway park. People can ride the 2094 01:37:02,800 --> 01:37:05,760 museum's Bud Rail passenger car, be 2095 01:37:05,760 --> 01:37:08,480 going up and down the track. Railway is 2096 01:37:08,480 --> 01:37:11,280 topical these days and certainly in 2097 01:37:11,280 --> 01:37:13,920 Squamish. And railway modelers are not 2098 01:37:13,920 --> 01:37:17,119 only enthusiasts, rail fans, they are 2099 01:37:17,119 --> 01:37:19,040 experts with broad knowledge of the 2100 01:37:19,040 --> 01:37:21,920 history, technology and possibilities of 2101 01:37:21,920 --> 01:37:24,400 railway transportation. So anybody's 2102 01:37:24,400 --> 01:37:27,199 curiosity will be satisfied at this uh 2103 01:37:27,199 --> 01:37:29,280 train and hobby model train and hobby 2104 01:37:29,280 --> 01:37:31,199 show taking place this weekend. Thank 2105 01:37:31,199 --> 01:37:33,440 you. 2106 01:37:33,440 --> 01:37:36,550 >> Thank you for that. Um other go ahead 2107 01:37:36,550 --> 01:37:36,560 » Thank you for that. Um other go ahead 2108 01:37:36,560 --> 01:37:38,000 councelor Penniguel. 2109 01:37:38,000 --> 01:37:41,510 >> Yeah, two things. one uh just we have an 2110 01:37:41,510 --> 01:37:41,520 » Yeah, two things. one uh just we have an 2111 01:37:41,520 --> 01:37:44,159 endocrinologist now in town uh 2112 01:37:44,159 --> 01:37:47,440 regularly. So as a diabetic um I always 2113 01:37:47,440 --> 01:37:49,520 had to do my calls remotely or sometimes 2114 01:37:49,520 --> 01:37:51,679 they come to the drop-in center. I I 2115 01:37:51,679 --> 01:37:54,159 think I think I was the first patient on 2116 01:37:54,159 --> 01:37:57,040 their first day. So it is a 2117 01:37:57,040 --> 01:37:59,760 endocrinologist that uh is typically in 2118 01:37:59,760 --> 01:38:01,440 the city but they they have an office 2119 01:38:01,440 --> 01:38:03,760 here now. And so for anyone uh 2120 01:38:03,760 --> 01:38:06,000 struggling with diabetes and so on, um I 2121 01:38:06,000 --> 01:38:08,560 I think it's sort of I know there's a 2122 01:38:08,560 --> 01:38:10,159 lot of challenges that comes come with 2123 01:38:10,159 --> 01:38:12,480 growth uh but but seeing more services 2124 01:38:12,480 --> 01:38:14,239 like this I I think uh make the 2125 01:38:14,239 --> 01:38:15,840 community a lot better. So that was 2126 01:38:15,840 --> 01:38:18,239 great to see. Um and then I also just 2127 01:38:18,239 --> 01:38:20,159 wanted to had an opportunity with my 2128 01:38:20,159 --> 01:38:22,960 partner to go to the uh the fashion show 2129 01:38:22,960 --> 01:38:26,080 at House Sound. It was a fundraiser for 2130 01:38:26,080 --> 01:38:30,320 uh prom and uh a really great show. Um, 2131 01:38:30,320 --> 01:38:32,159 it it hurt a little bit to hear some of 2132 01:38:32,159 --> 01:38:33,520 the giggles and laughs at some of the 2133 01:38:33,520 --> 01:38:35,600 outfits that, you know, I think we wore 2134 01:38:35,600 --> 01:38:39,440 and we thought were cool, but it was uh 2135 01:38:39,440 --> 01:38:41,520 it was a really great event. So, thank 2136 01:38:41,520 --> 01:38:46,629 you to everyone who uh put that on. 2137 01:38:46,639 --> 01:38:48,480 » You have to submit some photos to 2138 01:38:48,480 --> 01:38:52,159 document this. Um, councelor Stoner. 2139 01:38:52,159 --> 01:38:53,669 >> Yeah, thanks to the chair. I'm going to 2140 01:38:53,669 --> 01:38:53,679 » Yeah, thanks to the chair. I'm going to 2141 01:38:53,679 --> 01:38:55,600 look forward a little bit uh later this 2142 01:38:55,600 --> 01:38:57,679 week. We will be welcoming welcoming a 2143 01:38:57,679 --> 01:39:00,400 delegation um of local government 2144 01:39:00,400 --> 01:39:03,119 officials from Zambia here in Squamish 2145 01:39:03,119 --> 01:39:04,880 as part of the partnership and municipal 2146 01:39:04,880 --> 01:39:06,719 innovation women in local leadership 2147 01:39:06,719 --> 01:39:08,000 program that we've been involved with 2148 01:39:08,000 --> 01:39:09,199 through the federation of Canadian 2149 01:39:09,199 --> 01:39:12,080 municies and global affairs Canada. I'm 2150 01:39:12,080 --> 01:39:13,360 actually not sure how many folks we'll 2151 01:39:13,360 --> 01:39:15,199 be welcoming from Zambia but there'll be 2152 01:39:15,199 --> 01:39:17,440 a group of folks uh who have traveled 2153 01:39:17,440 --> 01:39:20,480 this way. Um and the PMI will project is 2154 01:39:20,480 --> 01:39:22,080 really focused on achieving gender 2155 01:39:22,080 --> 01:39:23,920 parity in local councils and ensuring 2156 01:39:23,920 --> 01:39:26,719 inclusive approaches to service delivery 2157 01:39:26,719 --> 01:39:30,080 um uh in in all the work that we do. And 2158 01:39:30,080 --> 01:39:31,679 so we have been partnered with the local 2159 01:39:31,679 --> 01:39:34,239 government association of Zambia um and 2160 01:39:34,239 --> 01:39:35,840 we've had the opportunity for some 2161 01:39:35,840 --> 01:39:38,239 myself and some staff members to go down 2162 01:39:38,239 --> 01:39:39,760 um and work with the folks on the ground 2163 01:39:39,760 --> 01:39:41,440 in Zambia and this is a chance for them 2164 01:39:41,440 --> 01:39:43,840 to come here uh and share some of the 2165 01:39:43,840 --> 01:39:46,000 learnings in both directions. So, uh, 2166 01:39:46,000 --> 01:39:48,960 really excited to welcome them. Uh, and 2167 01:39:48,960 --> 01:39:51,679 then also another 2168 01:39:51,679 --> 01:39:54,080 component for youth council to flag and 2169 01:39:54,080 --> 01:39:55,840 mark on your calendars at the end of 2170 01:39:55,840 --> 01:39:58,239 April, Squamish Youth Council will be 2171 01:39:58,239 --> 01:40:01,440 putting on a one-day event called Rise, 2172 01:40:01,440 --> 01:40:03,119 uh, which the description says, "The 2173 01:40:03,119 --> 01:40:04,639 Rise Youth Summit is an Inerson event 2174 01:40:04,639 --> 01:40:06,000 where young people come together to 2175 01:40:06,000 --> 01:40:07,920 share ideas, learn new skills, and 2176 01:40:07,920 --> 01:40:09,840 ignite their passion for making a dis a 2177 01:40:09,840 --> 01:40:11,440 difference. expect awesome speakers, 2178 01:40:11,440 --> 01:40:12,960 interactive workshops, and tons of 2179 01:40:12,960 --> 01:40:15,119 opportunities to network with peers who 2180 01:40:15,119 --> 01:40:17,119 are just as driven as you are. And 2181 01:40:17,119 --> 01:40:18,880 there's currently a call out for 2182 01:40:18,880 --> 01:40:23,679 speakers, um either uh keynote speakers 2183 01:40:23,679 --> 01:40:25,600 or folks who might want to deliver some 2184 01:40:25,600 --> 01:40:28,560 workshops at this event. Um, and they 2185 01:40:28,560 --> 01:40:30,560 are looking for folks who have skills or 2186 01:40:30,560 --> 01:40:32,960 experiences to share that fit the areas 2187 01:40:32,960 --> 01:40:34,880 of health and wellness, real life skills 2188 01:40:34,880 --> 01:40:36,560 such as budgeting, cooking, mending, 2189 01:40:36,560 --> 01:40:38,639 navigating taxes, leases, and other 2190 01:40:38,639 --> 01:40:41,600 adultting basics as well as business and 2191 01:40:41,600 --> 01:40:43,840 career basics. So, if anybody has any 2192 01:40:43,840 --> 01:40:45,600 ideas on who would be a great speaker 2193 01:40:45,600 --> 01:40:48,080 for youth council uh in their youth 2194 01:40:48,080 --> 01:40:50,400 summit um who would like to share some 2195 01:40:50,400 --> 01:40:52,719 tips and tricks on how to be an 2196 01:40:52,719 --> 01:40:55,119 effective adult, I could sit in on a few 2197 01:40:55,119 --> 01:40:57,199 of those. Um but uh there's an 2198 01:40:57,199 --> 01:40:58,960 application form so um happy to share 2199 01:40:58,960 --> 01:41:00,400 that with council if you feel like you 2200 01:41:00,400 --> 01:41:01,679 would like to pass it on to someone. 2201 01:41:01,679 --> 01:41:04,400 Thanks. 2202 01:41:04,400 --> 01:41:08,709 >> Okay. Any other comments? Um 2203 01:41:08,709 --> 01:41:08,719 » Okay. Any other comments? Um 2204 01:41:08,719 --> 01:41:10,880 so um 2205 01:41:10,880 --> 01:41:13,760 also attended the uh the youth council 2206 01:41:13,760 --> 01:41:16,800 uh event uh and making the case for 2207 01:41:16,800 --> 01:41:20,639 local businesses to uh I would say cater 2208 01:41:20,639 --> 01:41:24,239 to uh youth and the benefits of doing 2209 01:41:24,239 --> 01:41:25,840 that including suggestions around hours 2210 01:41:25,840 --> 01:41:27,440 of operation and so on. It was great to 2211 01:41:27,440 --> 01:41:31,600 sort of see them really um uh um 2212 01:41:31,600 --> 01:41:33,520 articulating what they'd like to see and 2213 01:41:33,520 --> 01:41:37,840 not and and being brave to uh really ask 2214 01:41:37,840 --> 01:41:39,280 for it directly from the business 2215 01:41:39,280 --> 01:41:42,000 community. So, um it was great. Uh and 2216 01:41:42,000 --> 01:41:44,639 I'd like to thank both the the youth 2217 01:41:44,639 --> 01:41:47,119 council members for their continued work 2218 01:41:47,119 --> 01:41:49,520 and advocating for 2219 01:41:49,520 --> 01:41:50,960 um the things they'd like to see in the 2220 01:41:50,960 --> 01:41:52,800 community and to our business community 2221 01:41:52,800 --> 01:41:54,719 for responding. It was really 2222 01:41:54,719 --> 01:41:58,560 remarkable. We know that uh um just 2223 01:41:58,560 --> 01:42:01,040 running a business is 2224 01:42:01,040 --> 01:42:02,800 is very demanding and it's very 2225 01:42:02,800 --> 01:42:05,280 challenging times to be in business and 2226 01:42:05,280 --> 01:42:08,159 there was a big chunk of the business 2227 01:42:08,159 --> 01:42:11,280 community came out to um to be part of 2228 01:42:11,280 --> 01:42:14,239 the part of the event and um I think 2229 01:42:14,239 --> 01:42:16,960 that's a great response to the to the 2230 01:42:16,960 --> 01:42:18,639 youth in the community uh asking for 2231 01:42:18,639 --> 01:42:21,679 that. So, um, and we've already heard 2232 01:42:21,679 --> 01:42:23,040 some foreshadowing of what's coming 2233 01:42:23,040 --> 01:42:25,440 ahead, uh, with with youth council. So, 2234 01:42:25,440 --> 01:42:28,560 I look forward to, um, to seeing that. 2235 01:42:28,560 --> 01:42:32,960 Um, since we were last here, um, I, uh, 2236 01:42:32,960 --> 01:42:36,800 had opportunity to, um, we have a, I'm 2237 01:42:36,800 --> 01:42:38,639 going to use air quotes, a monthly 2238 01:42:38,639 --> 01:42:41,199 meeting with, uh, the mayors and chairs 2239 01:42:41,199 --> 01:42:44,560 in the Cedr 2240 01:42:44,560 --> 01:42:47,199 um, that seems to happen every couple 2241 01:42:47,199 --> 01:42:48,800 months with everyone's with everyone's 2242 01:42:48,800 --> 01:42:53,520 schedule. Um, so, uh, was this the week 2243 01:42:53,520 --> 01:42:56,000 week before last? Um 2244 01:42:56,000 --> 01:42:59,679 we got together in Whistler uh with um 2245 01:42:59,679 --> 01:43:04,080 we had um uh Mike Richmond, mayor of 2246 01:43:04,080 --> 01:43:06,000 Peton, Jack Crompson, Mayor Whistler, 2247 01:43:06,000 --> 01:43:08,400 myself, we had uh Patrick Wiler joined 2248 01:43:08,400 --> 01:43:10,239 us for the conversation and he brought 2249 01:43:10,239 --> 01:43:14,639 with him um uh Gregor Robertson uh who 2250 01:43:14,639 --> 01:43:18,080 is the um go through his portfolio here 2251 01:43:18,080 --> 01:43:19,360 is the Minister of Housing and 2252 01:43:19,360 --> 01:43:21,119 Infrastructure and Minister responsible 2253 01:43:21,119 --> 01:43:23,600 for Pacific Economic Development Canada. 2254 01:43:23,600 --> 01:43:27,360 So when I think about um the needs and 2255 01:43:27,360 --> 01:43:30,159 uh concerns of CD sky, he's a critical 2256 01:43:30,159 --> 01:43:32,800 uh player here and it was great to um 2257 01:43:32,800 --> 01:43:35,040 very thankful for um our MP Patrick 2258 01:43:35,040 --> 01:43:38,000 Wiler who does uh this is one of many 2259 01:43:38,000 --> 01:43:39,760 examples of him bringing folks together 2260 01:43:39,760 --> 01:43:42,719 and bringing the uh important um 2261 01:43:42,719 --> 01:43:44,560 ministers from his uh from his 2262 01:43:44,560 --> 01:43:49,520 government to community. And um and I 2263 01:43:49,520 --> 01:43:52,320 was I um 2264 01:43:52,320 --> 01:43:55,440 Mr. Robinson was very uh engaged and 2265 01:43:55,440 --> 01:43:56,880 very knowledgeable about the moving 2266 01:43:56,880 --> 01:43:58,560 pieces down to like a surprising level 2267 01:43:58,560 --> 01:44:00,400 of detail happening in the ca in the 2268 01:44:00,400 --> 01:44:03,360 ceda sky. So um many of the concerns 2269 01:44:03,360 --> 01:44:05,840 that we uh we have a lot of things that 2270 01:44:05,840 --> 01:44:07,920 are in our direct control uh in this 2271 01:44:07,920 --> 01:44:10,800 room but a lot of things the community 2272 01:44:10,800 --> 01:44:14,080 comes to us for require this um this 2273 01:44:14,080 --> 01:44:17,679 advocacy piece and um it's hard to sort 2274 01:44:17,679 --> 01:44:20,080 of highlight those places and times it's 2275 01:44:20,080 --> 01:44:21,679 happening outside of direct letters and 2276 01:44:21,679 --> 01:44:23,920 so on but uh this is a great opportunity 2277 01:44:23,920 --> 01:44:27,920 and um I think we uh also showed great 2278 01:44:27,920 --> 01:44:29,679 unity in the in the seed of sky around 2279 01:44:29,679 --> 01:44:31,199 what the concerns 2280 01:44:31,199 --> 01:44:34,639 uh are so um thankful for that for that 2281 01:44:34,639 --> 01:44:38,719 opportunity and um and for Minister 2282 01:44:38,719 --> 01:44:42,639 Robertson's time and um so of course the 2283 01:44:42,639 --> 01:44:44,320 the devil's in the detail. I didn't 2284 01:44:44,320 --> 01:44:45,840 leave there with a giant check or you 2285 01:44:45,840 --> 01:44:47,280 know all the any of those matters 2286 01:44:47,280 --> 01:44:50,480 resolved but um we are on the uh and 2287 01:44:50,480 --> 01:44:52,960 will continue to be on the uh federal 2288 01:44:52,960 --> 01:44:59,440 radar. Um I um last week I spent um a 2289 01:44:59,440 --> 01:45:01,040 few days with my elected official 2290 01:45:01,040 --> 01:45:03,199 colleagues at the at the local 2291 01:45:03,199 --> 01:45:06,159 government leadership academy uh which 2292 01:45:06,159 --> 01:45:09,520 is um an important initiative supported 2293 01:45:09,520 --> 01:45:12,320 by the province to really make us be 2294 01:45:12,320 --> 01:45:15,040 effective in these roles or uh aspires 2295 01:45:15,040 --> 01:45:18,400 to at any rate. And it was great to I 2296 01:45:18,400 --> 01:45:19,600 always enjoy spending time with my 2297 01:45:19,600 --> 01:45:21,360 colleagues from around the the province. 2298 01:45:21,360 --> 01:45:23,520 There was a lot of given where we are in 2299 01:45:23,520 --> 01:45:25,760 the term, there was a lot of reflection 2300 01:45:25,760 --> 01:45:28,480 and I I was really struck by how open 2301 01:45:28,480 --> 01:45:31,360 everyone was to share their uh you know 2302 01:45:31,360 --> 01:45:34,000 the strikes and gutters of this of this 2303 01:45:34,000 --> 01:45:38,480 work um and um and lessons learned and 2304 01:45:38,480 --> 01:45:43,600 um and uh and so on. So um excellent 2305 01:45:43,600 --> 01:45:45,840 opportunity and just um again I'd like 2306 01:45:45,840 --> 01:45:47,360 to really thank everyone that was 2307 01:45:47,360 --> 01:45:49,840 involved. There was also um I think a 2308 01:45:49,840 --> 01:45:52,000 highlight for us maybe locally would be 2309 01:45:52,000 --> 01:45:54,880 there was a presentation but from the 2310 01:45:54,880 --> 01:45:59,840 SLRD. Uh so Chair Ford was there uh RCAO 2311 01:45:59,840 --> 01:46:04,880 uh was there um uh and um and the there 2312 01:46:04,880 --> 01:46:07,199 was also um one of the staff members 2313 01:46:07,199 --> 01:46:10,000 working on the um the guide book to 2314 01:46:10,000 --> 01:46:13,280 reconciliation was uh was the the topic 2315 01:46:13,280 --> 01:46:14,560 and it was great to share that with 2316 01:46:14,560 --> 01:46:17,600 folks from around the the province. Um 2317 01:46:17,600 --> 01:46:21,760 and um yeah, it was it was quite surreal 2318 01:46:21,760 --> 01:46:23,600 to sort of be sitting in in the in the 2319 01:46:23,600 --> 01:46:25,199 audience as someone that sits at the 2320 01:46:25,199 --> 01:46:27,760 table that that um was there and just 2321 01:46:27,760 --> 01:46:29,520 listening to the discussion and the 2322 01:46:29,520 --> 01:46:31,520 context is just so varied for this work 2323 01:46:31,520 --> 01:46:33,440 around around the province. We've had 2324 01:46:33,440 --> 01:46:35,040 some discussion around on this topic 2325 01:46:35,040 --> 01:46:36,960 already in this in this room today and 2326 01:46:36,960 --> 01:46:40,159 it's it's different uh everywhere you 2327 01:46:40,159 --> 01:46:42,639 go. So I thought um yeah that was a 2328 01:46:42,639 --> 01:46:44,800 great a great session and um it was good 2329 01:46:44,800 --> 01:46:46,320 to see that work sort of highlighted in 2330 01:46:46,320 --> 01:46:50,000 that way. Um, I could go on, but I am 2331 01:46:50,000 --> 01:46:53,360 very excited about um uh the Zambia 2332 01:46:53,360 --> 01:46:56,480 delegation uh this week and um look 2333 01:46:56,480 --> 01:46:58,560 forward to spending some time uh some 2334 01:46:58,560 --> 01:47:01,440 time with them and uh I enjoy showing 2335 01:47:01,440 --> 01:47:03,920 off uh our community and the more I get 2336 01:47:03,920 --> 01:47:07,600 in the more time I spend in this role uh 2337 01:47:07,600 --> 01:47:10,480 I enjoy showing uh folks from around the 2338 01:47:10,480 --> 01:47:15,199 world in uh local government um not just 2339 01:47:15,199 --> 01:47:16,560 the beautiful bits that you show your 2340 01:47:16,560 --> 01:47:17,920 friend when you're when they come to 2341 01:47:17,920 --> 01:47:19,199 your community, you're like, "Oh, we 2342 01:47:19,199 --> 01:47:20,719 also have this and this." Like this is 2343 01:47:20,719 --> 01:47:23,040 the totality of it and also our where 2344 01:47:23,040 --> 01:47:25,040 our challenges are. So, look forward to 2345 01:47:25,040 --> 01:47:27,119 having those honest conversations um 2346 01:47:27,119 --> 01:47:31,440 going forward. Um and that's I see no 2347 01:47:31,440 --> 01:47:34,960 other hands for this piece. So, um we 2348 01:47:34,960 --> 01:47:36,800 don't have a motion to close. We don't 2349 01:47:36,800 --> 01:47:38,239 have any in camera announcements. I'll 2350 01:47:38,239 --> 01:47:39,679 be looking for Yes. Councelor Stoner, 2351 01:47:39,679 --> 01:47:41,280 can I help you? 2352 01:47:41,280 --> 01:47:43,990 >> I would move uh that the meeting be 2353 01:47:43,990 --> 01:47:44,000 » I would move uh that the meeting be 2354 01:47:44,000 --> 01:47:46,000 terminated. Uh, councelor French, I 2355 01:47:46,000 --> 01:47:47,600 believe you're seconding that. Uh, I 2356 01:47:47,600 --> 01:47:50,159 think I always feel funny calling the 2357 01:47:50,159 --> 01:47:51,280 question even on this one. I think we'd 2358 01:47:51,280 --> 01:47:52,800 all like to terminate the meeting. So, 2359 01:47:52,800 --> 01:47:56,080 all in favor, motion carries. Now, 2360 01:47:56,080 --> 01:47:57,600 council, if you were keeping score, 2361 01:47:57,600 --> 01:47:59,119 we're actually not done our work today. 2362 01:47:59,119 --> 01:48:01,199 We did not make it through the totality 2363 01:48:01,199 --> 01:48:04,080 of our closed meeting that we had uh 2364 01:48:04,080 --> 01:48:05,840 scheduled to conclude prior to this 2365 01:48:05,840 --> 01:48:08,400 meeting. So, we'll take a we'll 2366 01:48:08,400 --> 01:48:12,800 reconvene that meeting in um 15 minutes. 2367 01:48:12,800 --> 01:48:14,719 uh will reconvene our special close 2368 01:48:14,719 --> 01:48:17,440 meeting. So stretch your legs, but 2369 01:48:17,440 --> 01:48:20,960 you're not done yet.