1 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:39,320 And it's the wrong video 2 00:01:42,079 --> 00:01:50,159 front and center. This is a group activity. Let us call to order the 3 00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:53,680 meeting. of the comprehensive plan implementation 4 00:01:52,320 --> 00:02:00,320 committee. >> Yeah, today is September 5 00:01:58,240 --> 00:02:07,119 » and uh we always start an agenda review 6 00:02:04,799 --> 00:02:13,280 in case there are any folks from the public who are joining us. Don't see 7 00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:21,280 anyone today does join we will welcome them. Um, is there anything 8 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:28,640 agenda that needs to be adjusted in any way? I don't think so. But 9 00:02:25,520 --> 00:02:35,440 all right. Um, so let's start off with the 10 00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:39,680 administ which is um we sent around the August 10th 11 00:02:37,519 --> 00:02:46,000 meeting minutes. There is one little that it's been 12 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:52,560 pointed out needs to be corrected. Um I think three times it's the mixed 13 00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:57,680 transitional zone is referred to as the TMU 14 00:02:54,080 --> 00:03:03,519 transitional mixed use. It ain't at least it's not not that's not what we 15 00:03:00,560 --> 00:03:10,480 proposed the mixed transitional zone and we refer 16 00:03:06,239 --> 00:03:16,239 to it in abbreviation as the MT proposed with that correct um do people 17 00:03:13,760 --> 00:03:22,000 approve of that of those minutes? >> Yes. 18 00:03:18,239 --> 00:03:25,640 » Thank you very much. Um so as corrected 19 00:03:26,319 --> 00:03:36,640 The only thing in terms of upcoming dates obviously this Thursday we have a 20 00:03:32,319 --> 00:03:43,280 on Rico the 13th. I know Pam can >> 10th I think. 21 00:03:38,239 --> 00:03:49,760 » Oh yes last month. That's right. Yes. Um so the 10th and I think Pam can't be 22 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:59,120 there but I is able. Yeah. Great. The three of us. Um, 23 00:03:52,159 --> 00:04:04,159 and next month our meeting is when the hell is it? 24 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:06,799 » Oh, it should be accurate. If you want to check that, too. I should have 25 00:04:05,439 --> 00:04:13,680 updated the web page. >> Let's see. It I 26 00:04:09,840 --> 00:04:16,720 It's the 5th, right? First Monday, >> but it's from I think we're from 3:00 to 27 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:19,040 5:30. >> 3:30. 28 00:04:17,359 --> 00:04:22,000 » Yeah. 5. >> Okay. 29 00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:25,600 » Yeah. so that you guys could be before um conservation. That's right. That's 30 00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:29,040 right. >> 10. 31 00:04:26,880 --> 00:04:34,479 » That's October 5th. >> There you are. 3:30 to 5:00 in the 32 00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:38,720 conference room. >> And 33 00:04:36,320 --> 00:04:48,000 Pam, are you away at that point or not? You're here. Okay, great. 34 00:04:42,560 --> 00:04:53,560 » So, those are items and um we can jump right into 35 00:04:50,560 --> 00:04:53,560 Um, 36 00:04:55,440 --> 00:05:07,520 Sky circulated notes the last workshop. Hopefully we all reviewed them. 37 00:05:04,639 --> 00:05:14,680 Nothing to think. There were certain visions that were made. Um, and there 38 00:05:10,880 --> 00:05:14,680 were some questions. 39 00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:19,520 » Yeah, not a whole lot. Evelyn put these together for me. Thank gosh for Evelyn. 40 00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:25,680 » Great. >> Um, and I feel new planning and codes 41 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:28,960 coordinator office. Uh, she started at the beginning of last week and I think 42 00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:34,560 you may be the only one who hasn't met her, Pete. 43 00:05:31,759 --> 00:05:42,400 » Everyone else has. >> She's going to be at the workshop. 44 00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:49,039 » You will be into the deep end. >> She is like a a revamped version of 45 00:05:44,960 --> 00:05:52,960 Irene's position. Um, so doing was doing but also doing more on top of that as 46 00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:56,560 well. Um, because part of Irene's job was doing passports and we felt that 47 00:05:54,400 --> 00:06:00,880 there was a stronger need for more and planning. Um, so her position is a new 48 00:05:59,199 --> 00:06:05,280 position but it incorporates the things that Irene did. So um, minutes sent to 49 00:06:03,520 --> 00:06:07,840 Evelyn posting. 50 00:06:05,919 --> 00:06:12,319 » Yeah. Yeah, website postings, which is mostly just you, you know, doing things. 51 00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:18,800 » Please take my she was part of a meeting that I thought 52 00:06:15,039 --> 00:06:23,199 I was gonna be having one person and she this new person came and 53 00:06:21,039 --> 00:06:27,120 » and she was doing this and >> yeah, she's going right now because 54 00:06:25,440 --> 00:06:28,960 we're really hoping for code support from her if possible. 55 00:06:28,639 --> 00:06:33,960 » Yes. >> Um because he is a oneman 56 00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:33,960 » in the 57 00:06:34,560 --> 00:06:38,720 » She wanted it. She wanted it. I said, "Do you want to go to planning?" You 58 00:06:37,919 --> 00:06:41,039 know, like you don't have to go to planning board. You can do minutes off 59 00:06:39,840 --> 00:06:42,560 the recording. She's like, "Oh, I might want to." And she's like, "Oh, this 60 00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:45,759 one." >> Y did these notes and it was kind of 61 00:06:44,319 --> 00:06:48,639 funny actually. We had to make some kind of like looking over it together because 62 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:52,400 they actually didn't out of this meeting. We found 63 00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:55,199 » Marilyn had said she wanted to make sure that they discussed the residential 64 00:06:53,520 --> 00:07:00,960 zones at a future date which was anticipated, but I then they wanted 65 00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:05,520 follow-up questions answered, >> but I couldn't find anything else. But 66 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:13,479 before we move on discussion of the resident, what does that mean? The 67 00:07:08,560 --> 00:07:13,479 planning board did that. They reviewed 68 00:07:15,199 --> 00:07:18,880 » of the uses >> like we haven't done the residential 69 00:07:17,360 --> 00:07:21,440 zones as part of the use table and I think she was just wanting to make sure 70 00:07:20,160 --> 00:07:24,160 that would happen. >> Yeah. 71 00:07:22,880 --> 00:07:27,199 » Oh, you guys don't have to do that. Yeah, we had been doing it one way at 72 00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:32,080 the end of July and then we had shifted it and so I think she was just wasn't 73 00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:35,120 everyone the rest of the table was good and she would still get a chance 74 00:07:33,360 --> 00:07:37,680 » just to have an eye on it. That's right. Good. Good. 75 00:07:36,479 --> 00:07:40,880 » So I think Yeah, because I was like, "Oh, I think we're shifting them and it 76 00:07:39,919 --> 00:07:46,800 was really just the uses." >> Uses. That's right. 77 00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:53,840 » Yeah. Yeah. Great. Okay. Preparation for this Thursday's workshop 78 00:07:50,240 --> 00:08:02,919 is the center of what we're doing. Um, and Skye's memo, which I don't have 79 00:07:57,840 --> 00:08:02,919 printed, but it's in my 80 00:08:04,479 --> 00:08:13,360 It does, you know, the way you've sky is helpful 81 00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:17,960 that um I think toward the very end of it, 82 00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:17,960 you 83 00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:25,759 a little bit less systematic in going because you probably got bored. Oh, 84 00:08:23,039 --> 00:08:27,680 where through the um I think the very end. Let's see. 85 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:29,680 » Oh, a BD. >> Yeah. 86 00:08:28,319 --> 00:08:35,599 » Where I was kind of like, >> yeah, a little bit less thorough, but 87 00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:43,360 was helpful to me to that all of those different points were 88 00:08:38,719 --> 00:08:48,080 touched upon and don't the same way. And it's important that we 89 00:08:45,279 --> 00:08:52,399 do. Um uh so 90 00:08:50,959 --> 00:08:55,120 we're just trying to make sure that you know we're not pushing the planning 91 00:08:54,480 --> 00:09:00,560 board to have >> that's right feelings. We're trying when 92 00:08:57,200 --> 00:09:03,680 it comes to it's more >> right that it's addressing these things. 93 00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:06,880 It's Yeah. >> Please discuss 94 00:09:06,720 --> 00:09:13,040 if >> a property a parcel is in three 95 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:17,200 different zones. How was that decision to made? You know, it's 96 00:09:15,600 --> 00:09:19,920 » Oh, if there's anywhere I did, do you feel that I didn't give the same amount 97 00:09:19,279 --> 00:09:26,320 of information? >> Let's go through it. You know my unless 98 00:09:23,760 --> 00:09:29,680 you go through something systematically, you're gonna miss something. 99 00:09:27,519 --> 00:09:35,600 » Yep. Absolutely. >> Bodies that we've so well. 100 00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:39,040 » Want the memo up on the screen. >> But he's got it in front of them. 101 00:09:37,920 --> 00:09:40,880 » Yeah. However you want to do it. >> Yeah. 102 00:09:39,279 --> 00:09:43,880 » It's your tool to use. >> Yeah. 103 00:09:45,279 --> 00:09:50,399 » And first let me just say, you know, I'm sure all of us have reviewed this. Is 104 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:55,839 there any sort of preliminary stuff that anybody wants to say? 105 00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:57,200 I I appreciated the thoroughess. >> Yeah. 106 00:09:56,640 --> 00:10:01,920 » Yeah. >> I think we just need to make notes 107 00:09:59,519 --> 00:10:07,000 items. CPIC wants to talk. >> That's right. Yep. That's right. I think 108 00:10:03,279 --> 00:10:07,000 that makes sense. Y 109 00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:15,920 » both our town manager and assistant manager 110 00:10:13,519 --> 00:10:20,320 were in the back of that team through the whole thing. And I think Mark 111 00:10:17,519 --> 00:10:23,680 Jonathan made a comeback once or twice. >> Yep. 112 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:27,440 » But I think they've in fact a little extra help. 113 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:33,120 » Yeah. There's it there's a level of we're all in this which I think is very 114 00:10:30,320 --> 00:10:38,000 helpful. Committed to coming to the planning for workshops. 115 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:43,519 » So we're we're you know we've dealt the lower village the middle village and 116 00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:47,519 now we're getting to I don't even know if we've dealt with the middle village. 117 00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:51,920 Did we? find they kind of touched on Dairy 118 00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:55,680 Queen, but >> there wasn't 119 00:10:53,839 --> 00:10:56,640 wanted to fight for that. >> Yeah. 120 00:10:56,079 --> 00:10:59,600 » Throughout it, >> what it is 121 00:10:57,360 --> 00:11:04,240 » and um >> and Marilyn 122 00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:08,480 mostly about the as a general thing rather than the 123 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:13,519 specificity of Middle Village. Yeah. um when we kind of talked back and like 124 00:11:11,920 --> 00:11:17,839 maybe this is a reason not to combine them to consider 125 00:11:15,839 --> 00:11:22,079 » um but I didn't feel like there was any noted that they and lower village the 126 00:11:20,959 --> 00:11:25,760 uses and boundaries >> we have not 127 00:11:22,959 --> 00:11:29,279 » no we have that noted for them >> they did you know I can't think of 128 00:11:28,079 --> 00:11:36,560 anything that was brought up >> y 129 00:11:30,079 --> 00:11:43,079 » um moving on to um what is currently um which in recode is suggested to be 130 00:11:39,360 --> 00:11:43,079 named the upper village. 131 00:11:43,680 --> 00:11:52,160 Looking at boundary changes um 132 00:11:50,079 --> 00:11:58,560 to keep lot versus multiple uh zones and that's 133 00:11:55,600 --> 00:12:08,639 aligns with zoning and assess and each and every parcel 134 00:12:03,200 --> 00:12:15,839 and the owner. Um, just see if there's if there's anything that we want to 135 00:12:12,880 --> 00:12:20,279 sort of or add to in our commentary. 136 00:12:24,560 --> 00:12:32,639 Anything pop up for you, Sky, as we >> No, I felt that these all made sense. 137 00:12:29,600 --> 00:12:35,760 I've got the zoning map up. Um the U432A 138 00:12:35,279 --> 00:12:41,200 » Yeah. >> Um 139 00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:47,639 it is, you know, I think you could argue that's, you know, kind of both in um R1, 140 00:12:48,480 --> 00:12:56,560 but also this this is there's a walking path through here. Y so a good portion 141 00:12:52,880 --> 00:12:59,360 of this of conservation on it. Yeah. 142 00:12:57,360 --> 00:13:03,600 » Um so I'm not super concerned about that lot quite honestly. Um and the port 143 00:13:02,160 --> 00:13:09,839 potentially it could be sort of buildable is in um VC. So I think UV 144 00:13:07,839 --> 00:13:15,920 makes sense and it looks like it's majority% is in in VC right now. Yeah. 145 00:13:13,600 --> 00:13:23,120 » Like or like like three maybe so maybe 2% you know in in VC and there's you 146 00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:27,040 know 38 here and I can't do math. So yeah. 147 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:30,399 » Um so I think that that makes sense. Um you know I have no issues with that 148 00:13:29,040 --> 00:13:33,440 proposal. And there's no effect. 149 00:13:32,320 --> 00:13:40,720 » Yeah. >> Could somebody look at it and argue 150 00:13:37,920 --> 00:13:44,160 it really needs to change? They want to make a change. 151 00:13:42,240 --> 00:13:48,160 » Well, zoning changes should be based on the comp plan. So if someone were beyond 152 00:13:46,639 --> 00:13:54,160 what we're suggesting, I'd want to know how it aligns with the comp plan board 153 00:13:50,639 --> 00:13:58,440 were to say really strong, which I quite honestly don't really 154 00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:06,160 makes more sense to you do UV, but if they felt really strongly, I mean to 155 00:14:04,720 --> 00:14:08,959 have >> prepared for a thing that that you don't 156 00:14:08,320 --> 00:14:11,120 expect. >> I don't think this is going to be one of 157 00:14:10,560 --> 00:14:16,240 them, but >> great. So on Main Street in that way is 158 00:14:15,199 --> 00:14:19,040 quite odd. It is, >> is it not? 159 00:14:16,959 --> 00:14:21,839 » It's a strange It's a strange lot. It's this little Actually, I wonder if you 160 00:14:21,120 --> 00:14:24,560 can. >> It looks like it's about what, 12 ft 161 00:14:23,760 --> 00:14:27,760 wide. >> It's definitely a back lot. You can't 162 00:14:26,079 --> 00:14:32,480 really see it from here. I'm sorry. I'm very bad about using the underlying base 163 00:14:29,839 --> 00:14:35,920 layer. Um, you can put that on. Oh, that's not what I meant to do. 164 00:14:34,000 --> 00:14:39,279 » Um, but you know, that's a perfect visual. I mean, we don't even need to 165 00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:43,920 Yeah, that's >> work. 166 00:14:40,959 --> 00:14:49,199 So with just with that little piece. >> So you can see Yeah. It's like the back. 167 00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:54,079 This is a ravine through here. >> Right. Just cannot imagine that this is 168 00:14:52,160 --> 00:14:58,680 actually like a developable lot. >> Yeah. And at this point your f 169 00:14:59,199 --> 00:15:06,880 uses. So uses aren't mentioned. >> Yep. So I think we just 170 00:15:05,440 --> 00:15:11,600 » Yeah. Quite honestly, I haven't been putting uses in the because it did a lot 171 00:15:09,120 --> 00:15:16,720 of work to create. So, I haven't felt the need to recreate that in the memos 172 00:15:14,399 --> 00:15:22,760 and use the comparisons and stuff to review it that way. But, I felt that it 173 00:15:18,320 --> 00:15:22,760 was probably a waste of my time. 174 00:15:25,760 --> 00:15:33,760 Um, Hubard Lane. Yep. >> Yeah. 175 00:15:30,720 --> 00:15:38,160 Potentially Chuck's house. Just joking. Um but it is a portion of the highlands. 176 00:15:36,560 --> 00:15:40,560 Um one of their biggest >> right? 177 00:15:38,639 --> 00:15:43,360 » Yeah. Well, no. It's probably >> Isn't he topsome? 178 00:15:41,760 --> 00:15:45,120 » Is he is you're right. I was thinking that they 179 00:15:43,839 --> 00:15:48,480 » he's got seos management. >> Yeah, I know. He's got a lot 180 00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:51,759 » I think. You're right. He is. I was thinking I was saying, "Oh, no, it isn't 181 00:15:50,240 --> 00:15:55,040 because I was under the I was like, "Oh, Highlands is owned by Greece management 182 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:58,800 or something." >> But he owns bombs. 183 00:15:57,120 --> 00:16:01,920 » Yep. Yep. Yep. >> But um this is where a lot of those 184 00:16:00,560 --> 00:16:04,880 walking trails are, too. there's got to be some sort of conservation easements 185 00:16:03,680 --> 00:16:07,600 on this. So once again, I don't think this is very developable. 186 00:16:06,560 --> 00:16:11,519 » Um, >> you know, and it doesn't seem like 187 00:16:09,120 --> 00:16:15,680 anyone's probably. So I think this is proposed to go all MUL, which makes 188 00:16:13,759 --> 00:16:19,839 sense to me. The only one who could potentially try to develop this would be 189 00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:23,040 Walleski, and he's developed in MUL, so that would be 190 00:16:20,800 --> 00:16:25,519 » the ideal zoning for him anyway. Yeah, that one seems pretty simple to me. 191 00:16:24,639 --> 00:16:29,440 » Yeah. >> Okay, two down. 192 00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:31,920 » I like how you say that. Looks simple to me. Yeah, 193 00:16:31,120 --> 00:16:35,600 » there you go. >> There they are. 194 00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:39,360 » Okay. 107 Main Street. >> That is uh this one. It's just because 195 00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:42,480 there's a very small portion of it in this one also seems very simple. 196 00:16:40,959 --> 00:16:45,759 » Yeah, that's dealership. >> That is Yeah, I think Nissan. Yep, 197 00:16:44,240 --> 00:16:50,800 that's Nissan. >> Um so that one's such a small 198 00:16:48,399 --> 00:16:56,959 » Yeah. So it's it's uh upper village. >> It seems that the zone follows the river 199 00:16:53,680 --> 00:17:00,720 um you know existing. So just getting rid of that. 200 00:16:59,040 --> 00:17:05,520 And >> so next we have 201 00:17:03,040 --> 00:17:07,600 » this one which is Toyota. >> Y 202 00:17:05,839 --> 00:17:11,199 » and I think that's just going all UV which once again the portion of it 203 00:17:09,120 --> 00:17:14,720 they're using is in the VC >> just all becomes UV sounds fine to me. I 204 00:17:13,679 --> 00:17:17,199 doubt they're going to get to the back of that. So that's 115 main is it? 205 00:17:16,959 --> 00:17:20,319 » Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. 206 00:17:18,799 --> 00:17:27,360 » Okay. Any >> before we go too far is there not 207 00:17:24,079 --> 00:17:30,720 changes to that road state road coming in there? Yeah, but they're probably 208 00:17:28,880 --> 00:17:32,559 within the um right ofway because it's a huge right ofway. 209 00:17:32,160 --> 00:17:36,320 » Okay. >> So, I don't think they're going outside. 210 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:40,880 » At that point, it's already four lanes. >> Um it goes down to two right here. It's 211 00:17:39,280 --> 00:17:42,720 two here. >> Okay. 212 00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:46,080 » Yeah, it's two through here, which they are widening, but it's I I cannot 213 00:17:44,960 --> 00:17:49,760 imagine that's not going to happen within the right of way. They've got a 214 00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:51,840 big right of way there. So, I don't think that'll impact this. 215 00:17:51,360 --> 00:17:55,360 » Okay. >> It's not going to be making it easier to 216 00:17:53,360 --> 00:17:59,840 get an entrance onto that road as I will say. They'd never approve of that. Yeah, 217 00:17:57,120 --> 00:18:01,919 » you'd have to access off of Lee. >> Um, 218 00:18:00,320 --> 00:18:05,200 » okay. Super off street. >> There's no way next to the CMP corridor, 219 00:18:04,799 --> 00:18:08,880 right? >> Yeah. Yep. So, I I think that that's 220 00:18:07,280 --> 00:18:11,520 just, you know, Puyo owns the land. They're not doing anything with it. I 221 00:18:10,400 --> 00:18:14,799 don't see them doing anything. I mean, you know, maybe they'll add something. 222 00:18:12,799 --> 00:18:18,880 They added like a but they they added like a service shop back here over 223 00:18:17,120 --> 00:18:22,559 existing impervious. That was the most recent thing they've come through for. 224 00:18:20,640 --> 00:18:25,280 Um, so it doesn't necessarily seem like they need more space. You know, the most 225 00:18:23,919 --> 00:18:29,520 I could see them doing is saying that they want to have another parking lot to 226 00:18:27,280 --> 00:18:33,039 have cars on it, but you know, >> it'd still be entrance off Main Street. 227 00:18:31,360 --> 00:18:37,840 » It' still be entrance off Main Street. And, you know, they made them buffer 228 00:18:36,240 --> 00:18:40,720 » when they did this, so I assume it'd be similar. So, once again, I'm not 229 00:18:39,200 --> 00:18:44,880 concerned about that one. >> Okay, on to the next one. 100 Monroe 230 00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:48,080 Lane. >> Yeah, this is just an instance where the 231 00:18:46,559 --> 00:18:52,480 fact that this lot is a very strange lot. Um, it's currently the front part 232 00:18:51,039 --> 00:18:58,000 of it is in BC. I mean, I think it's like l literally their driveway. Um, and 233 00:18:56,080 --> 00:19:02,799 it's just going to all be in R1, which, you know, it does kind of break up the 234 00:18:59,679 --> 00:19:08,000 zoning along Main Street, but I think is >> fine because we keep saying it's better 235 00:19:04,799 --> 00:19:11,440 if zones match lot lines. >> Yeah. 236 00:19:08,400 --> 00:19:19,039 » Um because it's just >> Yeah. It's literally just this here. 237 00:19:15,520 --> 00:19:22,640 » So, that little piece that interjects out toward Main Street will be R1. Yes. 238 00:19:22,080 --> 00:19:29,480 » Yeah. >> Yeah. 239 00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:29,480 » Peculiar, but makes sense. 240 00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:34,720 » Yeah. I can't see another thing that makes more sense on that one. You know, 241 00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:39,440 it's just kind of a backlot >> and you know what we're doing is, you 242 00:19:36,799 --> 00:19:44,240 know, it's what makes sense to us and then the planning board will discuss it 243 00:19:41,120 --> 00:19:44,880 and us makes sense to the assessor and the 244 00:19:44,559 --> 00:19:49,039 » Yeah. >> Yeah. I didn't seem to have a big issue 245 00:19:46,640 --> 00:19:54,160 with those, but yeah. >> Um, and then this one is the CMP. Um, 246 00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:58,400 it's just going to get all put in CC, but I don't think it has any meaningful 247 00:19:55,840 --> 00:20:05,520 impact because >> it's a substation. Yeah. So, if you 248 00:20:03,039 --> 00:20:10,080 So, it's going to stay in commercial corridor, 249 00:20:07,120 --> 00:20:11,360 which it's this. Oh, no. Sorry, that's the wrong one. 250 00:20:10,880 --> 00:20:14,480 » It's this. >> Yeah, you keep that up. I'm going to 251 00:20:12,640 --> 00:20:20,000 need that bucket to >> Sorry, 252 00:20:16,080 --> 00:20:24,400 I cannot uh handle like uh first person video games. So, I understand. I 253 00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:29,120 apologize. Um so, yeah, it's like the substation back there. They own a lot of 254 00:20:26,240 --> 00:20:35,039 land through there. So, some of what is currently the commercial corridor 255 00:20:31,760 --> 00:20:40,720 is going away. Um in terms of it's going to be the master plan district, but the 256 00:20:38,559 --> 00:20:43,520 but the majority of it's going to be right. 257 00:20:41,039 --> 00:20:48,720 » Nope. Thank you. That's a typo. That should have been MPD because it would be 258 00:20:46,400 --> 00:20:52,080 part of the MPD in the C in the Thank you, Susan. 259 00:20:50,080 --> 00:20:55,320 » I'm pretty sure. I'll I'll pull it up really quick. 260 00:20:55,520 --> 00:21:00,200 » I think we can clarify that for them, but 261 00:21:01,440 --> 00:21:04,760 let's see. 262 00:21:06,559 --> 00:21:12,000 » I think I've been struggling with it because the name doesn't feel finalized 263 00:21:09,440 --> 00:21:16,080 to me, quite honestly. uh because you know we've all talked about that. No, 264 00:21:13,280 --> 00:21:22,640 it'll be become MPD. So, we'll need to clarify that. Um 265 00:21:19,360 --> 00:21:25,919 MPD, not CC. >> Okay, great. 266 00:21:24,080 --> 00:21:30,440 » Or whatever it ends up getting called. >> Yeah, the Kirkers. 267 00:21:30,480 --> 00:21:41,360 Um, but it's and and it's the only because we always talked about having 268 00:21:37,679 --> 00:21:45,960 zones zone names reflect what's happening there. 269 00:21:42,960 --> 00:21:45,960 » And 270 00:21:46,080 --> 00:21:56,240 there's no other zone where that's happening, right? That that 271 00:21:54,000 --> 00:22:02,320 doesn't apply anywhere else in the town center zones. 272 00:21:59,200 --> 00:22:05,840 So, you know, it's not a sexy name. I think it's a confusing name. 273 00:22:05,039 --> 00:22:09,840 » Something. >> Yeah. It's just confusing because they 274 00:22:07,840 --> 00:22:14,080 have the same acronym. So, the master plan development and the master plan 275 00:22:12,000 --> 00:22:21,520 district are both MPD. >> So, has has anybody given sort of 276 00:22:17,360 --> 00:22:26,400 » three minutes of thought to that matter? I have and I can't come up with darn 277 00:22:24,559 --> 00:22:30,640 thing. I'm so sorry. you know, >> I don't know enough about it to 278 00:22:29,120 --> 00:22:35,120 to be creative >> because right now we're calling it the 279 00:22:32,240 --> 00:22:39,200 master plan district and we want to scrap that name so that there's no 280 00:22:37,360 --> 00:22:45,159 confusion with the master plan development 281 00:22:40,960 --> 00:22:45,159 which is you know 282 00:22:45,360 --> 00:22:56,720 happens whenever there's a 6 acre plus in the town center I'll simply 283 00:22:54,000 --> 00:23:00,960 take the word plan and it So it's two words instead of three 284 00:22:59,679 --> 00:23:03,840 » like master district. >> Yes. 285 00:23:02,240 --> 00:23:10,679 » I think that would be confusing to people. Implies it's the quintessential 286 00:23:07,679 --> 00:23:10,679 zone. 287 00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:18,640 » We could master district zone. >> We could call it a PCD. 288 00:23:16,240 --> 00:23:22,799 » I had a great idea that shut down. I can tell. All right. 289 00:23:20,960 --> 00:23:26,799 » That's true. And in in the beginning we were calling 290 00:23:24,720 --> 00:23:33,440 it the crooer district. We've always you know euphemistically referred to it 291 00:23:30,640 --> 00:23:39,840 because everybody knows that that's what >> is if and when 292 00:23:36,000 --> 00:23:43,919 » sells it then then it's not >> Yeah. It should have I mean it seems to 293 00:23:41,919 --> 00:23:49,600 me something like >> commercial reuse commercial 294 00:23:47,440 --> 00:23:53,120 » commercial development stone. >> Yeah. Um, 295 00:23:50,720 --> 00:23:57,760 » I think that getting some sort of reuse or something could could be beneficial 296 00:23:55,760 --> 00:24:01,919 to it potentially. I feel like I said I was going to ask my team and then I 297 00:23:58,960 --> 00:24:05,120 forgot so I've written it again. >> Completely commercial, right? They're 298 00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:08,159 » noial maybe. 299 00:24:05,440 --> 00:24:12,440 » Was it mixed resial mixed juice? Mixed juice um reuse 300 00:24:13,520 --> 00:24:20,080 the mur but that's pretty similar. I'm a little hesitant of mixed use because we 301 00:24:18,240 --> 00:24:21,679 currently have a mixeduse commercial, >> right? 302 00:24:20,400 --> 00:24:23,679 » And I worry if we do >> mixeduse limited. 303 00:24:22,960 --> 00:24:26,480 » Yeah, exactly. >> There's a bunch of mixed use. 304 00:24:24,799 --> 00:24:30,559 » There's a bunch of mixed use. So, >> what did they do in SWAR? What they call 305 00:24:29,679 --> 00:24:32,159 stuff down there? >> I don't know what those zones are 306 00:24:31,760 --> 00:24:39,799 called. >> Yeah, I don't know. 307 00:24:35,600 --> 00:24:39,799 » Expanded use. 308 00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:46,559 » We're checking out Scar Bro for a second. So, we're taking a little pause. 309 00:24:43,760 --> 00:24:50,039 I knew we're going to see little pause. >> That's called cheating. 310 00:24:50,400 --> 00:24:58,159 » This is what we do in planning is we take things from other town 311 00:24:57,200 --> 00:25:01,799 » something somewhere >> many times. Scarboro. 312 00:25:02,320 --> 00:25:07,360 » Uh does anyone know where it is? Oh, it's probably this. 313 00:25:06,559 --> 00:25:10,799 » Yeah. >> CPD. 314 00:25:08,320 --> 00:25:13,799 » CPD Crossroads Plan Development District. 315 00:25:13,919 --> 00:25:16,919 Huh? 316 00:25:17,679 --> 00:25:22,360 » Topsome planned development district. 317 00:25:23,760 --> 00:25:29,120 » I worry about planned development when we currently have planned commercial, 318 00:25:27,120 --> 00:25:33,039 planned residential and planned mixed use which are staying in. The question 319 00:25:31,200 --> 00:25:36,080 is just how they'll be interacted with in the 320 00:25:34,400 --> 00:25:42,760 » center zones. >> Um, 321 00:25:38,159 --> 00:25:42,760 » see master plan there and we're 322 00:25:43,760 --> 00:25:52,840 Uh what about the VPD grand planned development? 323 00:25:49,520 --> 00:25:52,840 » I mean 324 00:25:53,120 --> 00:25:59,039 they have the crossroads. >> Yeah. 325 00:25:57,120 --> 00:26:02,240 » Um you know which is kind of them trying to which is there. It does connect two 326 00:26:01,120 --> 00:26:06,960 parts of their town. >> Yeah. And in terms of the Crooked 327 00:26:05,279 --> 00:26:13,600 District, it's bisected by the the CMP. 328 00:26:10,880 --> 00:26:18,880 » Yeah. And and there's a significant impact by 295. 329 00:26:16,240 --> 00:26:21,919 » Y it's like, you know, people talk about there being a new exit 330 00:26:21,279 --> 00:26:28,679 » Mhm. >> ramp. 331 00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:28,679 » So 295 development 332 00:26:30,159 --> 00:26:35,279 » area. >> I'm trying to avoid the word road. Not 333 00:26:34,000 --> 00:26:39,200 exactly sure why, but >> Yeah. No, no, that's fair. Yeah, it is 334 00:26:36,960 --> 00:26:41,919 expected that it would connect 196 and 2011 if it were developed. 335 00:26:40,799 --> 00:26:44,919 » Yeah. >> Um 336 00:26:44,960 --> 00:26:49,080 » is the word area 337 00:26:49,279 --> 00:26:53,640 enough open enough 338 00:26:56,240 --> 00:27:05,200 whether it's commercial area or composite area. 339 00:27:02,000 --> 00:27:09,039 So it would connect 295 and 196, but it also connects it 2011 340 00:27:08,000 --> 00:27:12,720 » to 196 >> to 196 341 00:27:11,039 --> 00:27:17,760 » though. And so those are without being highways, those are local 342 00:27:16,400 --> 00:27:21,600 access roads. >> I would say they're even more than 343 00:27:19,039 --> 00:27:26,080 local. Like those are state roads. >> So 2011 and 196 344 00:27:24,320 --> 00:27:30,799 » and it's fair to assume that those are not going to change. 345 00:27:27,120 --> 00:27:36,559 » No, that's right. Okay. I am not necessarily saying this is my 346 00:27:33,360 --> 00:27:41,000 final suggestion but I just had the idea of center planned district 347 00:27:41,360 --> 00:27:49,600 » and I came up with CPD but what was the connector planned district? Yeah, center 348 00:27:46,240 --> 00:27:54,480 plan center planned district. >> The nice thing about center is it needs 349 00:27:52,080 --> 00:27:56,880 more flexibility for what's going to get connected to what else. 350 00:27:56,480 --> 00:28:02,640 » Yeah. >> Down the road. Yeah, that's that's my 351 00:27:58,880 --> 00:28:06,720 idea right now. So that yeah, I think that's probably the best we've come up 352 00:28:04,240 --> 00:28:12,399 with. And if we can talk the planning board out of village center 353 00:28:09,919 --> 00:28:15,200 and let it become upper village, then you don't have confusion between the 354 00:28:14,559 --> 00:28:16,640 centers. >> Exactly. 355 00:28:15,760 --> 00:28:20,399 » Right. Right. >> Yeah. Maybe keep that one in your pocket 356 00:28:18,080 --> 00:28:23,840 until after we've had this conversation. >> Okay. If any signing board members are 357 00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:26,159 watching, take it into account. >> That's the best yet. Okay. Thank you, 358 00:28:25,360 --> 00:28:29,360 Sky. >> Mhm. Well, there's nothing like a little 359 00:28:28,640 --> 00:28:33,279 brainstorming. >> She She gets a raise. 360 00:28:30,960 --> 00:28:38,240 » Oh, yeah. Okay. >> All right. So, let's move on now to the 361 00:28:35,039 --> 00:28:43,919 next bullet. Is boundary changes due to existing use or character. 362 00:28:41,840 --> 00:28:49,520 So, we're looking at the school bus depot, Six Eagle's Way, 363 00:28:47,200 --> 00:28:56,799 and that's the Yep. Right there. We don't have any fronting on Main Street 364 00:28:52,320 --> 00:28:59,760 » and so um it abuts the light industrial. We're suggesting that it stay in light 365 00:28:59,200 --> 00:29:02,480 industrial. >> It moved to light industrial. It's 366 00:29:01,120 --> 00:29:04,240 currently in BC. >> Ah 367 00:29:02,960 --> 00:29:06,399 » did I say stay? >> No. 368 00:29:04,640 --> 00:29:11,039 » No. Okay. >> Umuh. 369 00:29:09,039 --> 00:29:14,640 So what we were suggesting that it go into light industrial, right? 370 00:29:13,120 --> 00:29:17,600 » Yep. >> I shouldn't say go into it is currently. 371 00:29:17,279 --> 00:29:19,679 No. >> No. What is it currently? 372 00:29:19,039 --> 00:29:22,559 » BC. >> BC. Okay. 373 00:29:20,559 --> 00:29:26,399 » So, this is the center zones map. It's carved out there. 374 00:29:24,799 --> 00:29:29,919 » And this is the current zoning map. It's in BC. So, this is an instance where you 375 00:29:28,640 --> 00:29:35,120 guys aren't trying to take something into the center zones. You're going, you 376 00:29:31,440 --> 00:29:38,320 know what, this misuse is existing. It's doing its thing. It's doing something 377 00:29:36,559 --> 00:29:41,360 important, but it fits better with LII, which it abuts, 378 00:29:40,159 --> 00:29:47,279 » which I would agree with. >> Okay. 379 00:29:44,159 --> 00:29:50,640 So, this isn't a bullet where CPIC has to speak up. It's It's 380 00:29:49,200 --> 00:29:53,760 » No, no, it's currently correct. You don't need to say anything. 381 00:29:51,520 --> 00:29:58,080 » Okay. Okay. Good. Yeah, I see. I see. >> Proposed to be zoned LI and recode due 382 00:29:55,600 --> 00:29:59,679 to use being more compatible with LA. No, you're good. You don't need to say a 383 00:29:59,279 --> 00:30:02,960 thing. >> Okay. 384 00:30:01,360 --> 00:30:10,880 Okay. So, 125 Main Street is next, which is 385 00:30:07,440 --> 00:30:16,240 MPD and the child care center, I think. 386 00:30:14,080 --> 00:30:19,919 Um, yes, it's a daycare and Bureau of Motor Vehicles are seeing some typos in 387 00:30:17,919 --> 00:30:22,919 this memo now. >> Um, 388 00:30:23,840 --> 00:30:31,919 and yeah, this one seems to me to make sense. Um, I said that it's proposed to 389 00:30:29,360 --> 00:30:37,520 be zoned UV and recode due to compatible use and location on Main Street. Uses 390 00:30:34,080 --> 00:30:40,559 remain permitted in UV. Um, >> Y. So, it doesn't change any uses. 391 00:30:40,080 --> 00:30:44,640 » Yep. >> Yeah. And so if you guys are good with 392 00:30:43,200 --> 00:30:48,080 that, you don't need, you know, you could say that you support it. You could 393 00:30:46,559 --> 00:30:51,200 add that you support it and you think it makes sense. 394 00:30:49,039 --> 00:30:55,279 » These are the other two lots. And I know we've talked about Napa before. And I do 395 00:30:52,960 --> 00:31:00,240 want to apologize because I misunderstood 396 00:30:56,960 --> 00:31:02,880 this and thought that the that this was Napa 397 00:31:01,279 --> 00:31:04,559 » up here and that it was the top one. >> Uhhuh. 398 00:31:03,279 --> 00:31:09,760 » This is Napa here. >> Oh. So, I will just say that if you were 399 00:31:07,679 --> 00:31:13,360 to say we don't want Napa, I think you would need to This is a vacant lot 400 00:31:12,320 --> 00:31:16,559 currently. >> Um, it is a buildable lot. I'm not 401 00:31:15,039 --> 00:31:21,360 really sure why no one's built on it, but it is a developable lot. It's 402 00:31:18,640 --> 00:31:25,679 meeting frontage and lot size minimums. >> Um, 403 00:31:22,960 --> 00:31:28,399 and so I did want you to be aware of that. I know we've talked about Napa a 404 00:31:27,039 --> 00:31:31,520 lot and I had said, "Yeah, I think that makes a lot of sense, but I didn't feel 405 00:31:29,679 --> 00:31:34,559 right, you know, not giving you guys this realization that I had had that 406 00:31:32,880 --> 00:31:38,320 Napa was not the top." Yeah. >> And you wouldn't just be saving the top 407 00:31:36,080 --> 00:31:42,159 off. You would be cutting out probably a developable lot. 408 00:31:40,320 --> 00:31:45,519 » That's interesting. So, let's look at Yeah. What's currently So, that's 409 00:31:44,480 --> 00:31:50,600 vacant. >> Yep. Yep. Close your eyes, Chuck. 410 00:31:51,120 --> 00:31:59,760 I don't know if I can. >> Um, it's just out in front of Precast. 411 00:31:57,519 --> 00:32:05,440 It's this lot, so it's like flat. Do we know who owns it? Um, it is listed as 412 00:32:02,960 --> 00:32:08,080 owned by >> that LLC. 413 00:32:06,960 --> 00:32:12,159 » Um, no. >> Terrence H. Gray. I've not heard of him 414 00:32:11,120 --> 00:32:16,799 or met him. >> Okay. Yeah. 415 00:32:13,600 --> 00:32:19,120 » Help me. What's What's the White Side? >> This is pre-cast of Maine. 416 00:32:18,799 --> 00:32:23,039 » Okay. >> And that is Li. 417 00:32:20,960 --> 00:32:26,159 » I'm just a reference. Good. >> Yes, that is Li. No one's No one's 418 00:32:24,960 --> 00:32:30,960 suggesting that change. >> Yeah. 419 00:32:27,840 --> 00:32:35,519 So given that, that's an interesting kind of little boo boo that we now have 420 00:32:32,880 --> 00:32:43,919 to consider. And what we've been talking about is how right across the street is 421 00:32:39,279 --> 00:32:51,039 R1. It's a completely residential y um development. It's not going to change. 422 00:32:46,640 --> 00:32:58,480 and more compatible with a residential area is upper village I think in terms 423 00:32:54,720 --> 00:33:03,919 of uses and development standards. 424 00:32:59,360 --> 00:33:11,760 » Mhm. And I will say that Napa as a use remains allowable. Yeah. Um, and 425 00:33:09,519 --> 00:33:15,600 and because what we're I think what we've always said is, you know, what's 426 00:33:13,519 --> 00:33:19,440 on that lot right now doesn't mean it's going to be on that lot in 25 years. 427 00:33:18,720 --> 00:33:23,039 » Um, >> yeah, thinking that it was the top of 428 00:33:20,880 --> 00:33:26,320 it, it made more sense to me. Okay, you know, pair it off. But realizing it was 429 00:33:24,960 --> 00:33:28,559 in the middle and there was a there was a 430 00:33:26,960 --> 00:33:32,720 » vacant lot that was probably trying to be grabbed, it made me kind of go, hm. 431 00:33:30,720 --> 00:33:36,240 » Yeah. I will say the building is certainly not allowable in UV unless 432 00:33:34,399 --> 00:33:41,080 you're to allow the workshop building. So there is that but you know 433 00:33:41,760 --> 00:33:48,519 so it's difficult. Yeah. So right now 434 00:33:49,039 --> 00:33:55,600 the lot is currently located in LI and it butts Main Street located across the 435 00:33:54,000 --> 00:34:00,880 street from residential neighborhood. the proposed to be zoned upper village 436 00:33:58,720 --> 00:34:05,360 in Rico due to location on Main Street and across from the residential 437 00:34:02,399 --> 00:34:08,560 neighborhood. Use remains permitted but not the building to me. 438 00:34:06,799 --> 00:34:11,359 » I did not get into building types here. >> Yeah, 439 00:34:09,440 --> 00:34:12,960 » it was a little bit beyond me I feel, you know, quite honestly. 440 00:34:12,560 --> 00:34:16,800 » Yeah. >> Um but looking at it, we're not allowed 441 00:34:15,359 --> 00:34:18,800 to do the workshop building and I'm guessing that's what this would 442 00:34:17,760 --> 00:34:25,520 probably. >> Yeah. But there's a place further on and 443 00:34:23,440 --> 00:34:31,760 I didn't you know print this out and make notes but there is a place where in 444 00:34:28,399 --> 00:34:36,159 the current code there is nonconformance going on and it's not just in the cooker 445 00:34:33,520 --> 00:34:40,320 zone you know so it's not like we're creating 446 00:34:37,679 --> 00:34:45,520 nonconformity where there isn't any and it's rare 447 00:34:41,599 --> 00:34:49,760 » it's rare so what do people think can we live with the nonconformity of a 448 00:34:48,320 --> 00:34:53,280 building. >> I think the only thing that's hard about 449 00:34:51,200 --> 00:34:58,480 this, I'll just note, is you're it's not currently in UV or in BC. You're 450 00:34:56,320 --> 00:35:05,280 proposing to grab these three lots >> from lot light industrial 451 00:35:02,000 --> 00:35:10,320 » and impose building regulations on them. Um, one of which, 452 00:35:06,960 --> 00:35:14,320 » you know, would not probably need it. I I genuinely actually don't really know 453 00:35:11,760 --> 00:35:18,000 how this one this is the thing that's been this probably meets village type 454 00:35:16,880 --> 00:35:21,200 building type. Yeah. >> So, I guess you could not bring it up. 455 00:35:20,000 --> 00:35:24,720 If they bring it up and they're concerned, you could kind of choose to 456 00:35:22,480 --> 00:35:26,720 go with the flow or you could choose to push for it. 457 00:35:25,520 --> 00:35:30,079 » Yeah. >> Who who would be hurt 458 00:35:29,359 --> 00:35:33,760 » by >> make by making a change? 459 00:35:31,839 --> 00:35:36,320 » Napa. >> They become the building become 460 00:35:35,359 --> 00:35:38,960 non-conforming. >> Yeah. 461 00:35:36,640 --> 00:35:41,599 » Which impacts what they can do >> moving forward. 462 00:35:39,839 --> 00:35:47,599 » Moving forward. Yeah. >> What if you just 463 00:35:44,000 --> 00:35:51,680 either either let all three of them stay in LI. Yeah. 464 00:35:49,040 --> 00:35:53,680 » Or only take the BMV and the daycare center. 465 00:35:52,320 --> 00:35:56,720 » I think that would be the answer. I think if you're going to let Napa stay 466 00:35:54,960 --> 00:36:00,720 in LA, you have to let the one above it stay in Li, but I do think you have an 467 00:35:58,800 --> 00:36:05,359 argument for BMV and daycare, quite honestly. Um, it's already across from 468 00:36:03,520 --> 00:36:07,440 the VC. It kind of makes it a nice square. 469 00:36:06,240 --> 00:36:10,400 » Um, >> and as I said, it is just, you know, 470 00:36:09,040 --> 00:36:14,240 that's what's listed. They could choose to just go okay and not bring it up. 471 00:36:12,720 --> 00:36:18,880 They could bring it up. I don't know, you know. But the other piece is because 472 00:36:17,440 --> 00:36:25,440 I mean and I don't know how to think about this, but if I lived in the 473 00:36:22,079 --> 00:36:28,400 residential area across the street, what would be better for my me and my 474 00:36:27,760 --> 00:36:35,560 neighbors? >> Yep. And there's schools nearby, you 475 00:36:30,560 --> 00:36:35,560 know. So it is difficult. I think 476 00:36:36,240 --> 00:36:41,760 » everything in pink there is. Yeah. >> Right. 477 00:36:39,280 --> 00:36:45,520 » So most of the across the road from residential is Ly already. 478 00:36:43,680 --> 00:36:51,440 » Right. Right. Yeah. >> So, what we'd be trying to do is do we 479 00:36:49,119 --> 00:36:56,040 have something in the comp plan that kind of suggests that this is something 480 00:36:52,720 --> 00:36:56,040 people want? 481 00:36:57,520 --> 00:37:09,280 » I think what what is what is in there now is and what might come in to that 482 00:37:05,040 --> 00:37:14,079 northernmost parcel. Um it it's all stuff that you could say might 483 00:37:11,520 --> 00:37:20,079 contribute to a walkable community, a walkable area. You know, it's a busy 484 00:37:17,520 --> 00:37:25,960 road, but you've got people live a lot of people living in that residential 485 00:37:21,760 --> 00:37:25,960 neighborhood. And 486 00:37:26,640 --> 00:37:34,880 » I think a Napa store uh 487 00:37:32,640 --> 00:37:37,760 » there's a daycare center. You know this this 488 00:37:35,359 --> 00:37:40,160 » I I think the BMV and the daycare I don't think they'd be hurt building 489 00:37:39,040 --> 00:37:44,000 wise. I think that probably meets building village building regulations or 490 00:37:42,560 --> 00:37:46,640 it wouldn't be too hard to change it. You know 491 00:37:44,880 --> 00:37:51,200 » I think the Napa is definitely a bit more. So, I guess I would say if you 492 00:37:49,040 --> 00:37:55,040 guys are going to like push on that with the planning board, it might be good to 493 00:37:52,960 --> 00:37:58,240 find just somewhere in the in the comp plan that suggests it could be a good 494 00:37:56,640 --> 00:38:01,920 idea. You know, you don't have to necessarily I I doubt you'll find 495 00:38:00,000 --> 00:38:05,760 something that says reszone these three lots. Yeah. 496 00:38:03,040 --> 00:38:09,920 » You know, but that would probably be >> my thought and suggestion. 497 00:38:08,400 --> 00:38:15,440 I just was looking to see if there was anything on that specific area and it 498 00:38:12,160 --> 00:38:20,480 wasn't in the site future neighborhoods. Yeah. Um because the UV because I guess 499 00:38:18,720 --> 00:38:28,400 that's one thing to keep in mind is the portion of um Upper Village that gets 500 00:38:24,720 --> 00:38:31,839 talked about is not there. Um it only goes up to 501 00:38:30,560 --> 00:38:35,760 the top of Toyota. >> Yeah. So 502 00:38:34,079 --> 00:38:38,000 I think those are things to consider. >> Yeah. 503 00:38:36,400 --> 00:38:41,440 » I'm not saying you have to necessarily tell them to drop it. More just being 504 00:38:40,000 --> 00:38:45,680 prepared to discuss it. >> Yeah. And I think it's not something 505 00:38:43,280 --> 00:38:52,560 that I feel strongly about. My only feelings are, you know, that it seems to 506 00:38:48,640 --> 00:39:00,480 be a supportive a a a decision to support the residential 507 00:38:56,880 --> 00:39:06,240 neighborhood to have that across the road be zoned as a village 508 00:39:03,839 --> 00:39:11,920 that that that the the development that would take place, you know, in the 509 00:39:09,280 --> 00:39:18,440 future would be more compatible with that residential neighborhood. But I 510 00:39:14,240 --> 00:39:18,440 don't feel strongly about it. So, 511 00:39:19,520 --> 00:39:25,280 » I just was checking the neighborhoods to see if there's anything. It's kind of an 512 00:39:23,359 --> 00:39:28,720 empty area when it comes to the map actually. 513 00:39:26,240 --> 00:39:34,240 » Right. The neighborhoods was an interesting process because, you know, 514 00:39:31,440 --> 00:39:37,760 the neighborhoods were listed and then other people said, "Well, where's my 515 00:39:35,680 --> 00:39:40,720 neighborhood?" Because everybody loves their 516 00:39:38,960 --> 00:39:44,160 neighborhood. And it was it was wonderful to sort of see how 517 00:39:42,640 --> 00:39:47,119 » I remember when I moved to Portland, they have all these neighborhoods listed 518 00:39:45,520 --> 00:39:50,160 on Google Maps now of all these different locations and there were 519 00:39:48,560 --> 00:39:52,400 certain people being like this is like crazy, you know, that's not real and 520 00:39:52,000 --> 00:39:55,680 stuff. >> Yeah, they're making stuff up here. 521 00:39:54,000 --> 00:40:01,280 » Yeah, exactly. But I always found it helpful. I don't see it. It would be 522 00:39:58,720 --> 00:40:05,920 part of conceivably of Upper Village. >> Um which is not 523 00:40:03,920 --> 00:40:10,400 » I'm not seeing in mind. Um, so 524 00:40:08,480 --> 00:40:14,320 » honestly I I don't think that that's something we're gonna have 525 00:40:12,560 --> 00:40:17,520 » um we're gonna try to weigh in on. >> Okay. 526 00:40:14,720 --> 00:40:19,599 » We could have a comment about what we did. 527 00:40:17,920 --> 00:40:23,200 » If they bring it up as a question, I'll say if CPIC wants to weigh in, you could 528 00:40:21,760 --> 00:40:25,520 make your comment and then if they go they don't think that's compelling. 529 00:40:24,560 --> 00:40:28,240 » Yeah. Great. >> Okay. Good. Good. I just wanted to give 530 00:40:27,680 --> 00:40:33,599 you the information. >> I have a question unrelated to the 531 00:40:31,040 --> 00:40:37,680 residential stuff. Was that originally military housing? 532 00:40:35,119 --> 00:40:42,480 » I don't think so. No, >> just the annex. 533 00:40:38,880 --> 00:40:45,040 » Yeah, just the annex. Um the Liberty Circle and Parliament. 534 00:40:44,079 --> 00:40:47,920 » Yeah. >> Okay. 535 00:40:45,680 --> 00:40:49,280 » Because this was the base over here. >> Okay. 536 00:40:48,720 --> 00:40:51,920 » Um >> I just find it interesting that there's 537 00:40:51,040 --> 00:40:56,400 that residential. >> It is interesting just sitting there. 538 00:40:53,839 --> 00:41:01,520 » And they have slightly weird sewage too. Um they were like septic for a while and 539 00:40:59,280 --> 00:41:05,359 then sewer got extended to them and they've got kind of like they have they 540 00:41:02,880 --> 00:41:09,839 own like tanks and pumps. Um, >> do you know if was that um what is it 541 00:41:07,520 --> 00:41:12,240 called? Um, a CRD. >> A PRD. 542 00:41:10,960 --> 00:41:15,040 » PRD. PRD. Sorry. >> I don't think so. Tom's never brought 543 00:41:13,839 --> 00:41:18,800 this one up. >> Um, Thompson Crossing um is a PRD. 544 00:41:18,480 --> 00:41:22,480 » Yeah. >> Um, and Highland Green, those are the 545 00:41:20,079 --> 00:41:24,480 two PRDs we know of. PMD, Planned Mixed Use Development, has never been used. 546 00:41:24,079 --> 00:41:28,960 » Yeah. >> And PCD is, you know, a lot of the mall 547 00:41:26,400 --> 00:41:33,839 and stuff. Um, >> so I don't think so. I know. It is an 548 00:41:31,920 --> 00:41:36,480 interesting little neighborhood. Yeah. Um, and I don't have a whole lot of 549 00:41:35,599 --> 00:41:39,839 history on that. >> I have never I've not driven through 550 00:41:37,760 --> 00:41:44,160 there, but I think I will one day just to see what it looks like because when I 551 00:41:41,520 --> 00:41:48,480 when we got up here and we drove down >> to the school and looked, I said, 552 00:41:45,520 --> 00:41:54,079 "That's that's that's enlisted housing." >> I had no idea. I said, "That's enlisted 553 00:41:50,640 --> 00:41:58,880 housing. I have seen it before." Right. Right. And then I started up the area. 554 00:41:56,880 --> 00:42:02,079 » It's much nicer, I would say, than Parliament Circle. Yeah. 555 00:42:00,240 --> 00:42:05,119 » Um, Parliament Circle's still officer housing. You never know. Be careful what 556 00:42:03,760 --> 00:42:10,480 you say, young man. >> Well, it's just I think we can all say 557 00:42:06,960 --> 00:42:13,760 that Parliament Circle is housing that was built by the Navy. 558 00:42:11,680 --> 00:42:18,560 » It's old military housing that has probably not been a 559 00:42:16,560 --> 00:42:22,880 » and it wasn't probably necessarily built with longevity in mind. You know, 560 00:42:20,960 --> 00:42:25,119 » military people live could live in some really shitty housing. 561 00:42:24,079 --> 00:42:29,200 » Yeah. >> And you know, it's not like people can't 562 00:42:26,960 --> 00:42:32,880 make a home there. It's just it has its issues and we've had complaints from 563 00:42:30,640 --> 00:42:36,319 people before. you know, um these are, you know, like little ranchy houses. I 564 00:42:34,960 --> 00:42:38,400 can show you a street view of it really quick. 565 00:42:36,640 --> 00:42:41,359 » They bought 50 homes in there. >> Yeah, it's kind of a nice little 566 00:42:39,599 --> 00:42:44,560 neighborhood, I think, honestly. Um >> Oh, look at that. 567 00:42:42,160 --> 00:42:46,400 » Yeah, it's it's it's it's good one. >> Yeah. So, these are like pretty nice 568 00:42:45,839 --> 00:42:49,839 houses. >> I think the lots are like a quarter 569 00:42:48,880 --> 00:42:54,680 acre. >> Yeah. 570 00:42:51,359 --> 00:42:54,680 » It's not military. 571 00:42:54,880 --> 00:42:59,599 » We got >> I didn't think it was military. 572 00:42:57,599 --> 00:43:01,920 » It's just some neighborhood. I It might be kind of old. I don't know. 573 00:43:01,440 --> 00:43:05,440 » Yeah. >> Um I'm really not I'm not totally up to 574 00:43:04,880 --> 00:43:10,960 » interesting >> snuff or speed on this. 575 00:43:08,560 --> 00:43:17,359 » But I think we're ready to move on >> to um let's see where are we? Um we're 576 00:43:15,520 --> 00:43:24,720 looking at mixed transitional now. We're done. We're done with Upper Village. 577 00:43:20,880 --> 00:43:29,680 » So let's look at mixed transitional. >> First we're looking at boundaries, I 578 00:43:26,800 --> 00:43:33,280 think. So yeah, because there wasn't all of the changes to mix transitional due 579 00:43:31,839 --> 00:43:38,960 to, you know, >> context use, etc., etc., I just did the 580 00:43:36,400 --> 00:43:44,000 two zones. So the first one is this area up here, 581 00:43:40,480 --> 00:43:48,119 » um, that takes from the village center. 582 00:43:45,119 --> 00:43:48,119 » Yeah. 583 00:43:54,800 --> 00:44:02,240 » Two. So that's um currently VIP. Yeah. 584 00:43:59,599 --> 00:44:08,000 » VIP over link. Um one of the uses is currently prohibited. One of them is uh 585 00:44:06,160 --> 00:44:12,960 » yeah. So currently >> it it it goes better for them. 586 00:44:10,240 --> 00:44:18,079 » I don't know how they do with they probably don't meet form quite honestly. 587 00:44:15,839 --> 00:44:21,359 Um because that's probably a suburban storefront. I don't know. Maybe it could 588 00:44:19,920 --> 00:44:27,119 be classified as warehouse. I'm not sure. Um, I think that, but I think 589 00:44:25,119 --> 00:44:30,480 what's difficult is that >> I think it's hard to kind of preempt 590 00:44:28,880 --> 00:44:35,200 these discussions with form when we haven't really gotten into form deeply. 591 00:44:32,880 --> 00:44:38,000 So, I speak about this with you guys. I don't think that it's probably super 592 00:44:36,560 --> 00:44:41,599 helpful for us to try to get it because the planning board needs to talk about 593 00:44:39,920 --> 00:44:44,480 » these things when we get to article 2 and form and I really need to have 594 00:44:43,040 --> 00:44:48,720 Leslie at that meeting. So, I need to know multiple months in advance 595 00:44:46,240 --> 00:44:51,440 » that we're going to do that. She is >> and we have to stick with that schedule, 596 00:44:50,880 --> 00:44:54,960 » you know. Yeah. >> If we Yeah. line her up. 597 00:44:53,440 --> 00:45:00,640 » Uhhuh. >> Um so that one's not too bad. Um 598 00:44:58,400 --> 00:45:02,560 » the next one, three, Union Park Road is the credit union. 599 00:45:02,000 --> 00:45:07,119 » Yep. >> Um 600 00:45:04,720 --> 00:45:09,920 » which uh probably means village >> and then so it it activates the 601 00:45:09,040 --> 00:45:14,720 drive-thru thing. >> Yeah, it has the drive-thru. Um and I 602 00:45:12,560 --> 00:45:20,560 don't quite know, but it would apply to either zone, I think. So, 603 00:45:17,440 --> 00:45:26,560 » um, you know, >> I've driven Newton Park Road, 604 00:45:23,839 --> 00:45:29,280 went through there several times. >> It's nice in there. 605 00:45:27,839 --> 00:45:31,680 » Mhm. Yeah. >> Where where the trees are, the builder 606 00:45:31,200 --> 00:45:35,119 set. >> Yep. Yep. 607 00:45:34,000 --> 00:45:38,880 » It's a nice little >> And it's in the back of the building, so 608 00:45:36,800 --> 00:45:42,319 they'd probably be fine. Honestly, the drive-through regulations need like I 609 00:45:40,560 --> 00:45:46,160 think another look over, and Tom isn't ready to kind of say this is needs 610 00:45:43,839 --> 00:45:51,440 something or not. Um because I think maybe the frontage is messing him up a 611 00:45:48,079 --> 00:45:54,160 bit too. So I'm kind of not getting into it. It would apply to either zone and I 612 00:45:53,040 --> 00:45:56,640 don't think it's meaningfully different between them. 613 00:45:55,119 --> 00:45:58,160 » Maybe it is and maybe that would be a consideration. 614 00:45:57,599 --> 00:46:01,520 » Yeah. >> But in which case I would guess we would 615 00:45:59,760 --> 00:46:07,960 be more forgiving of drive-throughs in a mixed transitional zone than probably 616 00:46:04,000 --> 00:46:07,960 the upper village. 617 00:46:08,720 --> 00:46:12,400 But maybe not. >> Say that again. 618 00:46:10,800 --> 00:46:15,680 » If there was going to be differences in how we were 619 00:46:13,200 --> 00:46:18,560 » Yeah. uh doing drive-throughs. I was guessed that it would be a little bit 620 00:46:16,960 --> 00:46:21,280 more forgiving in the mixed transitional than the upper village. 621 00:46:19,680 --> 00:46:23,839 » Yeah. Due to the >> Yeah, that's what I was 622 00:46:22,400 --> 00:46:26,319 » I don't know if I don't think it is written that way necessarily. I'm just 623 00:46:25,200 --> 00:46:32,079 saying >> conceptually if it was if it was I would 624 00:46:30,480 --> 00:46:34,960 see it going in that direction and see the scales tipping in that direction 625 00:46:33,680 --> 00:46:38,720 personally. >> Any thoughts before we move on to the 626 00:46:37,040 --> 00:46:41,839 next? So, we've dealt with two Union Park 627 00:46:40,240 --> 00:46:46,640 Road, three Union Park Road, and now we're on to four Union Park Road. Um, 628 00:46:45,520 --> 00:46:52,880 » oh, yeah, this one does. >> Office building lot use is professional 629 00:46:50,160 --> 00:46:57,119 office and dwelling multif family. The multif family remains permitted and the 630 00:46:54,960 --> 00:47:00,640 office becomes conditional. >> I wanted to talk about that. I don't 631 00:46:59,200 --> 00:47:05,920 really know why we have office conditional in MT. Um, and I maybe, you 632 00:47:04,720 --> 00:47:10,800 know, should have considered this when we did it, but it 633 00:47:09,119 --> 00:47:16,240 I don't know if it's, you know, we're allowing light industrial in that zone. 634 00:47:13,520 --> 00:47:21,760 So, it seems to me that office should potentially just be allowed because also 635 00:47:18,240 --> 00:47:25,839 over on the MT on Park Drive, Stantech is a professional office. So, we've got 636 00:47:23,359 --> 00:47:29,040 at least two in the MT, right? >> Um, and that is something you guys could 637 00:47:27,440 --> 00:47:32,480 bring up and say, we looked at the memo, we noticed there was two conditionals. 638 00:47:31,040 --> 00:47:35,200 We think that this should maybe be permitted. So, let's 639 00:47:33,920 --> 00:47:40,000 » not to tell you what to do. Just >> No, no, but that that makes complete 640 00:47:36,800 --> 00:47:42,800 sense, but um so you're saying it should be permitted. 641 00:47:40,640 --> 00:47:46,000 » It seems maybe it should to me. Um I think and this is why I think it's been 642 00:47:44,319 --> 00:47:48,960 helpful to do these things this way because you get to the specific. 643 00:47:48,079 --> 00:47:53,839 » So, um >> are we looking at commercial? 644 00:47:50,880 --> 00:47:57,040 » I think it's office >> service. Service. 645 00:47:55,680 --> 00:48:00,920 » Yeah. Sorry, it's not perfect yet. >> Yeah, we are service. 646 00:48:03,040 --> 00:48:07,680 office >> especially. Yeah. So I think we went 647 00:48:05,760 --> 00:48:10,960 with conditional potentially because lab research facility is conditional but 648 00:48:09,520 --> 00:48:14,560 currently professional office is permitted in that zone. So yeah 649 00:48:12,800 --> 00:48:18,800 » to me that kind of >> I feel like maybe that was an oversight 650 00:48:16,160 --> 00:48:23,119 on my part and potentially we should >> two different shades of gray two 651 00:48:20,400 --> 00:48:28,240 different shades of gray. >> But when you say lab in a research 652 00:48:26,000 --> 00:48:32,000 facility to me that's quite different than an office building. Yeah, they all 653 00:48:30,079 --> 00:48:35,119 got put under one thing. And I think when we talked about this, I remember 654 00:48:33,359 --> 00:48:40,480 Rick was here last time and he >> Why? Why? Why do you think they're 655 00:48:37,520 --> 00:48:45,920 » I guess because there's nothing particularly that could possibly be 656 00:48:42,640 --> 00:48:51,760 dangerous in an office building, but there could be in a lab in a facility. 657 00:48:49,920 --> 00:48:57,520 » I think the thing I would say about that is usually there are other entities that 658 00:48:53,920 --> 00:49:02,880 govern that and that's not our like the state does that, you know. Um, my fiance 659 00:49:00,640 --> 00:49:06,480 is the planner in Brunswick and the hospital just brought in a new like 660 00:49:04,640 --> 00:49:09,599 they're doing a cancer care something. They're putting that in and helped to 661 00:49:07,680 --> 00:49:14,079 permit that and they're doing some sort of radiation therapy and it was kind of 662 00:49:12,400 --> 00:49:17,359 running down, you know, is there going to be an issue with this and they were 663 00:49:15,599 --> 00:49:22,480 just like it's governed by this thing, you know. Um, and I think it was. So, I 664 00:49:20,319 --> 00:49:26,400 say that to say that I think >> we're really more concerned about the 665 00:49:24,000 --> 00:49:29,839 externalities of it, parking, access. I think a lab research facility is pretty 666 00:49:28,160 --> 00:49:33,440 similar to an office in terms of those which is why they were lumped together 667 00:49:31,839 --> 00:49:36,400 » and since it's permitted there and we're allowing light industrial which could 668 00:49:34,880 --> 00:49:40,720 have dangerous >> things it doesn't necessarily make sense 669 00:49:38,800 --> 00:49:45,920 to me to have that one be conditional. >> Okay. 670 00:49:42,720 --> 00:49:48,720 » She's with Okay. Good. So I'm looking at the because there are couple of 671 00:49:48,160 --> 00:49:52,319 different >> Yep. 672 00:49:49,280 --> 00:49:56,960 » use table things here. >> Grab that decision. 673 00:49:54,559 --> 00:50:01,680 Well, that was saying something. So, I >> Yeah, I mean, under that, we have not 674 00:49:58,960 --> 00:50:05,760 actually gotten up to reviewing the service uses. 675 00:50:03,839 --> 00:50:12,400 » So, we're right on target. We're right on schedule here. Um, so under office, 676 00:50:08,559 --> 00:50:17,440 what we're suggesting is that in the mixed 677 00:50:14,079 --> 00:50:22,160 transitional, it says MV, no MT, mixed transitional, that it's conditional that 678 00:50:19,680 --> 00:50:26,720 we're suggesting that it be permitted. >> Are we all in agreement? office 679 00:50:24,319 --> 00:50:28,480 permitted in >> the lady green shirt. 680 00:50:28,079 --> 00:50:31,680 » Okay. >> Okay. I would suggest if you guys are 681 00:50:30,640 --> 00:50:34,079 okay to >> to bring that up to the planning board. 682 00:50:33,520 --> 00:50:36,720 » Yeah. >> Um 683 00:50:35,040 --> 00:50:40,400 » and just say that >> you know we caught it. But I think 684 00:50:38,559 --> 00:50:43,200 that'll be the easiest way and I'll tell them I support it. But I think if it 685 00:50:41,680 --> 00:50:48,400 comes from you as your part of your meeting that makes the most sense. And 686 00:50:45,839 --> 00:50:53,119 so let's look at all of those just while we're there at office. So it's permitted 687 00:50:50,800 --> 00:50:56,960 in the lower village. It's conditional in the middle village which does make 688 00:50:54,960 --> 00:51:03,760 sense but it's permitted in the upper village 689 00:50:59,680 --> 00:51:06,960 in the commercial mixed use. So currently I'm looking at the 690 00:51:05,599 --> 00:51:09,760 comparison one and do you guys want me to pull that up? I don't have it but I 691 00:51:08,640 --> 00:51:15,400 can. Yeah. >> Um let's find it. Um, 692 00:51:17,440 --> 00:51:22,760 » yeah, it seems to be easier to do workshops actually. 693 00:51:24,640 --> 00:51:31,599 » Yeah, we Yeah, it breaks them all out. Professional office, lab research, 694 00:51:28,880 --> 00:51:35,599 medical clinic, and office buildings as accessory uses. 695 00:51:32,800 --> 00:51:41,240 » Yeah. So, here we can see what falls underneath it. Um, did I go past it? No. 696 00:51:42,160 --> 00:51:50,800 So here's office. Um, so currently how I see it is, you know, we're I was kind of 697 00:51:48,079 --> 00:51:53,760 what caught me about the MT is the fact that professional office is currently 698 00:51:52,720 --> 00:51:57,599 permitted >> and everywhere else the professional 699 00:51:55,359 --> 00:52:01,359 office has a use, we just mirrored that MT was the only one that we changed it. 700 00:51:59,599 --> 00:52:04,559 So that's why I was kind of like, >> yeah, 701 00:52:02,160 --> 00:52:09,200 » um, lab research facility, I think, was more strictly governed due to what you 702 00:52:06,319 --> 00:52:12,160 brought up, Susan. Yeah. But to me, I think that there's other things that are 703 00:52:10,640 --> 00:52:15,040 looking at that. It's probably having the same. You're not going to tell. 704 00:52:13,920 --> 00:52:18,240 You're not going to be able to tell if something is a lab research facility 705 00:52:16,640 --> 00:52:21,680 versus a professional office, quite honestly, probably from the outside. 706 00:52:19,920 --> 00:52:24,240 Same goes for like a medical clinic. You're probably not really going to know 707 00:52:22,720 --> 00:52:26,960 what people are doing inside of it, just that they're showing up in the morning 708 00:52:25,440 --> 00:52:32,079 at like 8 a.m. >> and um leaving. And also, honestly, 709 00:52:29,440 --> 00:52:35,200 right now, um I think the dentist's trigger professional office. It's what 710 00:52:33,599 --> 00:52:39,200 we've reviewed them under, not medical clinic. So, I don't even know who's 711 00:52:36,960 --> 00:52:43,760 falling underneath that use. I think the differentiations of them have been hard 712 00:52:41,440 --> 00:52:48,000 for Tom. And then off of buildings as accessory uses, I don't genuinely know 713 00:52:45,599 --> 00:52:53,440 what that use is or what it was being used for. I don't know of any MPD 714 00:52:50,000 --> 00:52:58,960 though. So, we're looking at >> it's office. No. And so, we're saying 715 00:52:56,160 --> 00:53:01,839 it's permitted in MPD. Oh, good. Okay, great. 716 00:52:59,680 --> 00:53:04,640 » Yeah, CC was or was the only one where I saw a different I felt like professional 717 00:53:03,280 --> 00:53:07,920 office was the most important one to look at. 718 00:53:05,680 --> 00:53:11,200 and MT was the only one that differed. So 719 00:53:09,520 --> 00:53:14,960 therefore, to me that that made some sense, but it is a center zone. So I 720 00:53:12,880 --> 00:53:20,800 wanted to get your opinion as a group on that. And you know, 721 00:53:16,480 --> 00:53:24,240 » do people make a optical in the same breath as medical? 722 00:53:22,640 --> 00:53:27,040 » Yeah, I think it would, but it might follow just under professional office 723 00:53:26,000 --> 00:53:30,559 honestly because that's where all the dentists fall. 724 00:53:28,880 --> 00:53:33,920 » Yeah, I said I said optical. >> I know. 725 00:53:31,440 --> 00:53:37,760 » I know. But I'm saying if dentists are falling under that, my guess is optical 726 00:53:35,200 --> 00:53:41,920 would fall under the same category. >> Y wor. 727 00:53:39,599 --> 00:53:44,960 » Okay, good. >> And are you guys okay to bring that up 728 00:53:43,440 --> 00:53:48,800 with the planning board as a suggestion from you? I don't like to amend my 729 00:53:47,359 --> 00:53:53,760 memos. >> Right. 730 00:53:51,359 --> 00:53:58,800 So, let's see where this fact. >> I think she should just say this is 731 00:53:54,960 --> 00:54:00,720 what's going to be save time. >> No, 732 00:53:59,200 --> 00:54:04,480 » we can talk about a different method if you want to, Susan. To me that made 733 00:54:02,400 --> 00:54:08,400 sense, but I don't mean to push you to do something. 734 00:54:06,640 --> 00:54:16,640 » No, it's I mean I'm fine saying that. It's it's um because we haven't the 735 00:54:12,000 --> 00:54:23,760 thing that I think is to be clear is the stuff that's in this 736 00:54:20,800 --> 00:54:27,359 chart. We have not vetted carefully. >> We are currently in the process. Yep. 737 00:54:25,839 --> 00:54:34,319 So, you know, we can say that it's it's uh 738 00:54:30,640 --> 00:54:38,559 it shows up as conditional that um in mixed transitional and it really makes 739 00:54:36,559 --> 00:54:43,119 no sense for it to be permitted. You know, that's what we're suggesting 740 00:54:41,599 --> 00:54:46,480 » and I would think the planning department would be good. It's more 741 00:54:45,280 --> 00:54:48,319 flexibility for them. >> Yes. 742 00:54:46,640 --> 00:54:51,599 » Oh, yeah. I I like the idea of it and I'll support you. I just thought it made 743 00:54:49,760 --> 00:54:55,280 sense agenda wise for it to come from CPIC in a sense. 744 00:54:53,119 --> 00:55:04,000 » Yeah. this. Um, so that's we're talking about 745 00:54:59,760 --> 00:55:08,680 that is 22 Union Park Road. No, that is not. It's four. 746 00:55:05,680 --> 00:55:08,680 » Yeah. 747 00:55:10,240 --> 00:55:14,040 » Yep. We can bring back 748 00:55:17,839 --> 00:55:28,160 in mixed transition. Good. Okay. So, one last one which is 749 00:55:24,480 --> 00:55:33,599 the 22 Union Park Road. Is there a typo there? Um, topsome voan. 750 00:55:31,599 --> 00:55:36,760 » No, that's what that's >> right here. 751 00:55:37,680 --> 00:55:43,520 That's what's listed as the owner. >> Okay. 752 00:55:41,359 --> 00:55:45,920 » I also thought it would be Va. >> Yeah. 753 00:55:43,920 --> 00:55:48,160 » A because I was in a depression with Volunteers of America. Yes. I don't 754 00:55:47,680 --> 00:55:54,079 know. >> Volunteers of America. Yeah. Quite odd. 755 00:55:50,799 --> 00:55:59,040 Yep. Okay. It's a remains permitted. I think it probably hits all the necessary 756 00:55:57,119 --> 00:56:01,520 requirements building wise. So, I'm not really concerned about 757 00:55:59,920 --> 00:56:05,359 » So, is there one more? >> No, it was just these. This one stays in 758 00:56:04,000 --> 00:56:07,680 Upper Village. >> Okay. That's right. That's right. Good 759 00:56:07,200 --> 00:56:09,520 stuff. >> Okay. 760 00:56:08,400 --> 00:56:13,760 » Why? >> It wasn't proposed when you when this 761 00:56:11,839 --> 00:56:19,280 was split before I started working here. Yeah, we looked we looked at that and um 762 00:56:16,480 --> 00:56:25,359 it was pointed out to us that ownership of a couple of lots um you know it's 763 00:56:22,799 --> 00:56:28,480 better to sort of keep lots owned by one person even if they're separate parcels 764 00:56:27,359 --> 00:56:31,839 in one >> I will say that's not the case anymore 765 00:56:30,240 --> 00:56:35,760 but you can certainly see that from Main Street in a way you can't the other ones 766 00:56:33,440 --> 00:56:39,720 so I think that it makes sense from that >> perspective okay 767 00:56:40,720 --> 00:56:46,799 » so there's nothing sort of harmed confirmed in terms of use or building 768 00:56:45,920 --> 00:56:48,880 type. >> No, I don't think so for the not that 769 00:56:48,319 --> 00:56:50,799 we're going to read. >> Not for Westerm House. 770 00:56:49,839 --> 00:56:53,920 » Yeah. >> Great. 771 00:56:52,640 --> 00:56:59,599 Okay. >> And I started at the bottom here. 772 00:56:57,440 --> 00:57:04,640 That is very bright orange. >> Yeah, that is that's a little hard to 773 00:57:02,480 --> 00:57:08,640 see. I'm going to turn that off. We know which spots we're doing. 774 00:57:07,280 --> 00:57:11,640 Yeah, that's a little easier on the eyes. 775 00:57:12,160 --> 00:57:16,799 If that's okay with you guys, I can put it back on. 776 00:57:14,000 --> 00:57:21,280 » No, it it doesn't matter. It's um So, we're So, we're finished with all of 777 00:57:18,480 --> 00:57:28,359 that. We're moving on to >> boundary changes to 778 00:57:24,400 --> 00:57:28,359 um yeah, Park Drive. 779 00:57:28,960 --> 00:57:36,480 And we had talked about how it makes sense to alter what's being 780 00:57:34,960 --> 00:57:41,119 proposed, but we're not getting into that here. Um 781 00:57:38,240 --> 00:57:45,520 » um you know in terms of the l the terrain 782 00:57:43,599 --> 00:57:47,520 » as it comes out to tops and fair mall road 783 00:57:46,000 --> 00:57:52,160 » we had talked about dropping some of these lots from the mixed transitional I 784 00:57:49,760 --> 00:57:56,640 think um I just went off of the documents that I have honestly and if I 785 00:57:54,799 --> 00:58:00,160 missed something from Leslie I am sorry. Um, I think that that's the other reason 786 00:57:58,480 --> 00:58:04,559 I wanted to give you guys the chance to speak to say, "Yes, this might have 787 00:58:02,960 --> 00:58:07,559 happened, but we think it should be this thing." 788 00:58:08,640 --> 00:58:14,480 » Um, you know, I I would say that I don't 789 00:58:12,799 --> 00:58:17,440 necessarily know if these lots make the most sense in the 790 00:58:16,559 --> 00:58:20,760 » mixed transition >> mixed transitional. 791 00:58:22,400 --> 00:58:28,240 Um, you know, you could remove all three of 792 00:58:26,400 --> 00:58:30,480 these, I think. And I feel like we did discuss this with Leslie at one point. 793 00:58:30,160 --> 00:58:34,960 » Yeah. >> This is probably I think it's owned by 794 00:58:32,079 --> 00:58:39,359 the town. Um, >> is there a creek in there? 795 00:58:36,640 --> 00:58:43,119 » Yeah, I think so. >> Yeah. 796 00:58:39,760 --> 00:58:45,520 » So, it's probably not a It's undevelopable, right? 797 00:58:44,240 --> 00:58:48,000 » Yeah. I'm pretty sure this is highly undevelopable. 798 00:58:46,400 --> 00:58:49,920 » So, it doesn't matter what it is. >> Really? 799 00:58:48,640 --> 00:58:53,040 » So, it could stay on you. >> Yeah. 800 00:58:51,440 --> 00:58:56,400 Well, if that's what they want. >> Yes, exactly. So, I don't think this one 801 00:58:54,559 --> 00:58:59,040 matters. I do think these ones, they don't really feel like they're on park 802 00:58:57,599 --> 00:59:01,920 drive as much to me. So, I think you could certainly argue for them. 803 00:59:00,640 --> 00:59:05,280 » One is undeveloped, right? >> Yes. One is undeveloped. I don't really 804 00:59:03,599 --> 00:59:07,839 know the developability of this parcel. Apparently, the 7th Day Adventists own 805 00:59:06,799 --> 00:59:12,359 this one as well. >> Yeah. 806 00:59:09,359 --> 00:59:12,359 » Um, 807 00:59:13,359 --> 00:59:22,720 yeah. So when you look at that, it doesn't in terms of the uni unity of the 808 00:59:21,200 --> 00:59:26,559 zone, those 809 00:59:24,240 --> 00:59:30,720 two are anomalous. >> I think you could leave them out. 810 00:59:28,400 --> 00:59:35,359 Honestly, I don't think it's crazy to have them in there, but kind of based on 811 00:59:32,960 --> 00:59:38,559 the terrain of this road, you know, you kind of come down, you're on top and 812 00:59:36,960 --> 00:59:42,240 fair, I could very much see, and especially because you don't border Tops 813 00:59:40,160 --> 00:59:47,200 and Fairl over here, >> right? I could see suggesting to take 814 00:59:44,400 --> 00:59:51,720 these three out honestly. Um I do think that that could make some sense. 815 00:59:48,720 --> 00:59:51,720 » Yeah. 816 00:59:54,240 --> 00:59:59,839 » Certainly simplify things. >> Yeah. So is that that's something that 817 00:59:58,799 --> 01:00:04,559 we should speak to? >> Um I think it I I didn't didn't prepare 818 01:00:02,720 --> 01:00:09,200 thinking about that one quite honestly. Um 819 01:00:06,720 --> 01:00:13,200 I didn't. >> It's a slippery slope 820 01:00:10,160 --> 01:00:16,160 » used for means permitted in MT. Yes. >> Say more. Say more. 821 01:00:16,000 --> 01:00:20,960 Let >> me double check if the use is allowable 822 01:00:17,839 --> 01:00:23,920 in the other one. I'm sure it is, but community assembly is permitted in every 823 01:00:22,720 --> 01:00:26,000 single zone. They're not going to be impacted no matter where you put them. 824 01:00:25,599 --> 01:00:28,400 » That's good. >> The church can do what they want. 825 01:00:27,680 --> 01:00:33,680 » Yeah. >> Um, so I guess, you know, 826 01:00:31,440 --> 01:00:37,040 I don't I don't know. I don't I think I could say that you you could certainly 827 01:00:35,359 --> 01:00:41,760 see the argument for removing these three. This one's undevelopable. These 828 01:00:38,960 --> 01:00:46,640 two are owned by a religious institution that is a permitted use in either zone. 829 01:00:44,160 --> 01:00:50,079 » Um, but I also don't think it doesn't make sense looking like this if you know 830 01:00:48,720 --> 01:00:55,359 you guys are like it's permitted in that zone. This one's undevelopable. It is 831 01:00:52,240 --> 01:01:00,640 kind of a transitory between R1 and we think it makes more sense. But the only 832 01:00:56,720 --> 01:01:02,960 thing I'll say is um >> Well, I I don't know. 833 01:01:02,160 --> 01:01:06,480 » Keep saying that. >> No, I it wasn't it wasn't right 834 01:01:04,480 --> 01:01:11,280 actually. So, I'm not going to say it. Um, I think I had kept thinking that 835 01:01:08,640 --> 01:01:16,400 light industrial not be allowed in commercial mixed use. Um, but I'm pretty 836 01:01:14,000 --> 01:01:20,240 sure it is or is it? 837 01:01:18,400 --> 01:01:27,760 Wait, no, I know. Yeah, it's conditional in both. Um, right. 838 01:01:24,720 --> 01:01:30,400 Yeah. Yeah. So, it doesn't really because I was going to say, oh, would 839 01:01:28,720 --> 01:01:34,640 you really want light industrial out here? 840 01:01:32,240 --> 01:01:38,000 But it's actually allowing you. >> Yeah. 841 01:01:35,839 --> 01:01:44,880 » And in terms of sort of, you know, having a zone that coheres 842 01:01:43,200 --> 01:01:49,119 as a shape, >> you know, I wouldn't argue either way. 843 01:01:47,520 --> 01:01:54,720 It's like if they want to change it, let them change it. Um, that's my feeling. 844 01:01:51,599 --> 01:02:00,960 But, you know, as it or if they're happy leaving it like this, I I don't I feel 845 01:01:57,680 --> 01:02:04,640 no need to argue change. Mr. is happy leaving it like this. I think he wants 846 01:02:02,799 --> 01:02:07,119 it all commercial mixed use. >> Oh. 847 01:02:05,119 --> 01:02:08,319 » And we have to convince him why that's not 848 01:02:07,520 --> 01:02:12,799 » right. >> A good idea. That's where I think we 849 01:02:10,160 --> 01:02:14,720 are. And the more pieces that you give >> Yeah. 850 01:02:13,119 --> 01:02:17,599 » Yeah. to commercial mixed use, the harder it's going to be to keep the rest 851 01:02:16,160 --> 01:02:20,880 of it mixed transitional. >> If I was going to give anything, it 852 01:02:19,200 --> 01:02:23,680 would be that libert sliver where the creek is. 853 01:02:22,880 --> 01:02:28,079 » Crick. >> Yeah. Creek. Cick. Well, creek if you're 854 01:02:25,599 --> 01:02:31,680 from Pennsylvania, which I am, >> but I learned. Yeah, I think you can go 855 01:02:30,319 --> 01:02:35,839 either which way with those lots, which is what I wanted to share. So, I think 856 01:02:33,359 --> 01:02:38,640 that's your I this isn't me going I don't think this makes sense, guys. You 857 01:02:37,520 --> 01:02:40,799 know, we might want to consider it this way either way. 858 01:02:39,440 --> 01:02:43,599 » I really think you can look at this from either direction. 859 01:02:41,680 --> 01:02:48,280 » Yeah. three 860 01:02:45,280 --> 01:02:48,280 lots. 861 01:02:49,680 --> 01:02:58,000 So, you know what? Recode is proposing what it's proposing 862 01:02:55,359 --> 01:03:04,720 and let them do with it what they'd like. 863 01:03:00,480 --> 01:03:08,559 » That's you still want to encourage I think 864 01:03:07,200 --> 01:03:12,319 housing. >> Yes, we were calling. That's right. 865 01:03:10,319 --> 01:03:14,160 That's right. as opposed to more commercial 866 01:03:12,799 --> 01:03:20,160 » commercial. Yeah. >> Yeah. I will say I think housing is 867 01:03:15,839 --> 01:03:23,039 fully allowed um in the other one. >> Commercial mixed use. 868 01:03:21,200 --> 01:03:27,359 » Let's see if there any different I can pull it up rather than looking at it. 869 01:03:25,119 --> 01:03:31,280 » Um cuz that is part of the idea for the 870 01:03:29,119 --> 01:03:35,200 commercial mixed use is that it be mixed use. 871 01:03:31,599 --> 01:03:39,359 » Yeah. Um, so, uh, 872 01:03:37,520 --> 01:03:41,599 it is exactly the same allowances for those, 873 01:03:40,240 --> 01:03:45,119 » but the fact of the matter is that nobody's doing that 874 01:03:43,280 --> 01:03:50,720 » in commercial mixed use. >> Yep. That's fair. And there's there are 875 01:03:47,359 --> 01:03:52,640 80 units going up in MT. >> Yep. 876 01:03:51,359 --> 01:03:56,240 » Mixed transitional. >> Mhm. Um, 877 01:03:53,520 --> 01:04:00,799 » how much more develop developable 878 01:03:59,280 --> 01:04:04,240 acreage is there >> in empty or 879 01:04:02,160 --> 01:04:07,039 » in mixed? Yeah. Or mixed commercial. >> In the mixed commercial. I mean, you got 880 01:04:05,440 --> 01:04:09,200 the empty lot for the church. They can do something if they want. 881 01:04:07,920 --> 01:04:14,319 » I think there's that one. >> Yeah. 882 01:04:09,920 --> 01:04:16,079 » And then maybe this one, which is empty. >> Yeah. 883 01:04:14,640 --> 01:04:20,799 » Which I guess actually that's another one you could consider. 884 01:04:19,039 --> 01:04:26,880 Um, I'm not suggest I'm just saying, you 885 01:04:22,400 --> 01:04:32,640 know, um, there's like those back there, which those are empty. Um, and I think 886 01:04:30,720 --> 01:04:35,640 this, uh, the density isn't good there. Whoopsie. 887 01:04:35,920 --> 01:04:41,160 » Currently, that's Oh my god. 888 01:04:45,680 --> 01:04:51,680 I feel like someone might asked me about that at one point. So I would probably 889 01:04:48,799 --> 01:04:56,000 expect these to go housing once the density is upped and because this is 890 01:04:53,839 --> 01:05:01,640 currently mixed use commercial that >> there's a storage 891 01:04:57,599 --> 01:05:01,640 » right right storage 892 01:05:02,720 --> 01:05:10,240 » and you know much to my surprise we talked about at once with Leslie that 893 01:05:08,480 --> 01:05:12,799 you could do infill >> within the tops fair mall 894 01:05:12,240 --> 01:05:17,119 » y >> you know it's not like it's empty 895 01:05:15,599 --> 01:05:25,359 undeveloped land but it can be redeveloped Ed as housing um when you 896 01:05:21,039 --> 01:05:30,000 know if there's less demand for retail >> there's some there's some shifting 897 01:05:28,000 --> 01:05:34,079 » yeah there's some space over here though mall does pretty well I see the parking 898 01:05:32,000 --> 01:05:37,839 lot full a lot >> um I think if we're going to see 899 01:05:35,680 --> 01:05:40,960 significant housing >> it's going to be on the other side 900 01:05:39,119 --> 01:05:45,839 » it's going to be on the other side um just realistically you know because I 901 01:05:44,000 --> 01:05:51,839 sometimes when I go to like >> you know Reny's or it. I It's not that 902 01:05:48,960 --> 01:05:57,359 it's impossible to find a parking space, but I might have to look for a moment, 903 01:05:54,319 --> 01:06:01,119 which is not necessarily common in a strip mall, quite honestly. 904 01:05:58,480 --> 01:06:08,079 » Unless they go to um multi-story parking garages. There 905 01:06:03,680 --> 01:06:10,480 isn't there isn't place to build houses. Yeah. 906 01:06:08,960 --> 01:06:13,680 » And I think that would be that would be a huge development choice, which I'm not 907 01:06:13,280 --> 01:06:16,960 » Yeah. >> Don't see that coming quickly. But I can 908 01:06:15,280 --> 01:06:19,440 see all sorts of advantages to it. You know, you don't have to snowplow the 909 01:06:18,160 --> 01:06:23,119 bottom of the lake. You know, you don't got this, you don't have to 910 01:06:20,480 --> 01:06:25,599 » There's so many advantages, but it would be expensive. 911 01:06:23,920 --> 01:06:28,319 » Yeah. Yep. And I think the thing is is, you know, how would you handle 912 01:06:26,559 --> 01:06:31,839 ownership? There's other things like that that it's just kind of like, you 913 01:06:30,079 --> 01:06:35,680 know, there is um >> I mean, there's another pad site over 914 01:06:33,359 --> 01:06:38,400 here. I could, but that's so small. I don't think you could get anything 915 01:06:36,799 --> 01:06:44,559 meaningful um over here. So, really, this was the 916 01:06:42,400 --> 01:06:48,160 last big lot. There is this one, but I've heard it has real geotechnical 917 01:06:46,319 --> 01:06:50,240 concerns. Um, someone was going to do multif family here and pulled out. 918 01:06:49,839 --> 01:06:55,520 » Mhm. >> When I was the planner and then here, 919 01:06:53,680 --> 01:06:58,960 you know, we're getting it on that area. But that's a pretty decently sized area 920 01:06:58,000 --> 01:07:02,559 right there. >> You're not really seeing that. 921 01:07:00,160 --> 01:07:06,079 » Two, is it two or three apartment buildings? Four. 922 01:07:04,559 --> 01:07:10,680 » Four. There's two up right now, but it's going to be four total. 923 01:07:07,680 --> 01:07:10,680 » Um, 924 01:07:11,200 --> 01:07:17,200 » what are you looking at? Oh, the really green lawns. It's just kind of funny 925 01:07:14,799 --> 01:07:20,559 compared to the other lawns. >> Um, 926 01:07:18,640 --> 01:07:25,280 » and then there's this one. I would expect that to probably 927 01:07:23,440 --> 01:07:28,799 » turn into a multif family. That'd be my guess. 928 01:07:26,480 --> 01:07:35,839 » Yeah. >> Yeah. So the the strength of the um 929 01:07:33,680 --> 01:07:41,520 rationale for the mixed transitional zone is that you know in terms of the 930 01:07:39,200 --> 01:07:48,319 need for housing and the current commitment to 80 units of housing and 931 01:07:44,880 --> 01:07:54,319 the uses allowed along that road is it's it does um sort of argue for the 932 01:07:51,680 --> 01:07:59,280 existence of the mixed transitional zone where where those boundaries get drawn. 933 01:07:57,119 --> 01:08:04,000 you know, we don't have to be part of that argument, but they're drawn the way 934 01:08:01,440 --> 01:08:07,200 they are as a suggestion and they can take it from there. 935 01:08:06,000 --> 01:08:11,760 » Yeah. >> And what you've done is given a 936 01:08:10,160 --> 01:08:14,640 developer options. >> Yeah. 937 01:08:12,160 --> 01:08:16,880 » It's not just that box. It's not >> here three or four. So, 938 01:08:16,400 --> 01:08:21,600 » yeah, >> I would think that would be comfortable 939 01:08:18,960 --> 01:08:28,239 to >> Okay. Who owns all that? Uh, the one 940 01:08:24,400 --> 01:08:28,239 right here. Yeah. 941 01:08:28,319 --> 01:08:31,799 Pop LLC. 942 01:08:32,400 --> 01:08:36,239 » We don't know who that is. I don't know who that one is. 943 01:08:34,880 --> 01:08:39,440 » Okay. >> Um, 944 01:08:37,839 --> 01:08:45,759 yeah. I think they might own Life Storage, though. 945 01:08:42,400 --> 01:08:50,960 » So, no, that's Life Storage LP. Swear to God, they own somewhere else. It's in 946 01:08:47,600 --> 01:08:56,400 It's in here. So, in terms of the the the partial by partial, I just want to 947 01:08:54,799 --> 01:09:01,199 make sure that we're not >> overlooking. So, the 948 01:08:58,719 --> 01:09:04,080 » I think we kind of Yeah, I think we kind of got distracted so we didn't do the 949 01:09:02,719 --> 01:09:10,960 parcel by parcel. So, >> yeah. Um there's a vacant lot, but we 950 01:09:08,239 --> 01:09:14,880 So, we've gone through two of them, the 7th Day Adventist and the empty lot. And 951 01:09:13,440 --> 01:09:18,000 then we're looking at >> I think we've gone through. So if we 952 01:09:16,640 --> 01:09:24,319 talk about goodwill, we'll be finished with the first that that page three. 953 01:09:21,440 --> 01:09:28,480 » So yes, I can understand the reasons. >> And is that 11 lot 11 LLC 954 01:09:28,000 --> 01:09:30,000 drive? >> Yeah. 955 01:09:28,799 --> 01:09:34,799 » Yep. >> Um and so the use it says it remains 956 01:09:32,960 --> 01:09:38,480 permitted. So because it reflects the change that we Yes. Yeah. Repale is 957 01:09:36,880 --> 01:09:41,199 permitted. Yeah. >> Just not the 958 01:09:39,679 --> 01:09:44,480 » Yeah. because the use table that we did this summer included those changes, I 959 01:09:43,520 --> 01:09:50,000 think. >> Okay. So, then we look at 70 Park Drive, 960 01:09:47,920 --> 01:09:52,480 which is the >> Oh, we already did that one. That's the 961 01:09:51,440 --> 01:09:57,280 really skinny one. >> Okay. Oh, right, right, right. 962 01:09:56,080 --> 01:10:01,239 » Um, >> 10 Way 963 01:10:02,159 --> 01:10:09,280 and undeveloped. >> That's old park drive. 964 01:10:06,000 --> 01:10:12,280 But I first shoot 965 01:10:16,560 --> 01:10:24,080 you didn't put it in the memo. I think I forgot to put it in the middle. Oh no, 966 01:10:22,239 --> 01:10:27,400 I'm probably going to do revision for that one. 967 01:10:28,000 --> 01:10:35,600 » So where what is that? >> It's the housing 968 01:10:32,880 --> 01:10:40,640 units. That's our fiesta resistance 969 01:10:38,320 --> 01:10:46,560 for the Yeah. 970 01:10:43,600 --> 01:10:50,440 » Yeah. I think I was just moving all around and got missed. 971 01:10:51,360 --> 01:10:59,440 Okay. So, then we get to 10 Marman Way, which is this one, which I would say is 972 01:10:56,880 --> 01:11:05,600 probably also um 973 01:11:01,440 --> 01:11:10,640 undevelopable. This is a ravine as well. H 974 01:11:06,640 --> 01:11:13,199 » to the right of that I see a box the green 975 01:11:11,120 --> 01:11:16,320 » it's green space >> what the lines have a meeting 976 01:11:14,800 --> 01:11:18,080 » yeah it's a green space for the subdivision 977 01:11:17,520 --> 01:11:22,320 » okay >> yeah so it's conserved land the 978 01:11:20,640 --> 01:11:25,679 » conservation >> frozen walks okay 979 01:11:23,440 --> 01:11:30,560 » yep yep so that's permanently >> took my bike down there the other day it 980 01:11:28,080 --> 01:11:33,679 it's really nice back there very very nice homes are nice 981 01:11:32,320 --> 01:11:36,080 » development going on >> yep It's a nice development 982 01:11:35,040 --> 01:11:36,960 » and that's R1. >> Mhm. 983 01:11:36,480 --> 01:11:39,600 » Yeah. >> Very nice. 984 01:11:38,080 --> 01:11:41,280 » Had to have an open space subdivision get the density though. 985 01:11:40,960 --> 01:11:43,520 » So, >> right. 986 01:11:41,920 --> 01:11:48,640 » Um, so we're on 78 Park Drive. Is that Is 987 01:11:46,880 --> 01:11:50,640 that That's it. That's a big lot. >> Yep. 988 01:11:49,679 --> 01:11:53,040 » Um, >> it looks like it might have some 989 01:11:51,600 --> 01:11:54,880 shoreline going through it, though, too. It's a little unclear. It could have 990 01:11:54,320 --> 01:11:59,360 some development. >> Oh, there's a stream. Yeah, potentially. 991 01:11:56,960 --> 01:12:05,679 I mean, those aren't all real. It could >> it could have a stream going through it. 992 01:12:01,280 --> 01:12:10,719 » You said check TV. Oh, TDI subdivision. >> I kind of forgot that was in there. Um, 993 01:12:09,360 --> 01:12:14,000 » they're finding lots of things. There was a subdivision out there that they 994 01:12:12,560 --> 01:12:19,120 were concerned and I think it was just that they were concerned that that 995 01:12:16,800 --> 01:12:23,760 subdivision was for commercial reasons and they wanted to make sure commercial 996 01:12:20,640 --> 01:12:29,440 uses were still allowed. And that I was actually reminded of it with this one 997 01:12:25,360 --> 01:12:34,560 because this is off of some this picture is off of some subdivision. I don't know 998 01:12:31,520 --> 01:12:37,600 which one. probably probably Mallet Woods, but I'm really not sure. And so 999 01:12:36,320 --> 01:12:40,640 then I was thinking about it when I did this and I honestly forgot to check TDI 1000 01:12:39,440 --> 01:12:46,440 and I probably shouldn't have left that note in there, but well, it's it's in 1001 01:12:42,480 --> 01:12:46,440 there so we can talk about it. 1002 01:12:46,640 --> 01:12:52,640 Okay. So then 1003 01:12:49,920 --> 01:12:57,679 there's nothing for us to present there. Um, 1004 01:12:54,560 --> 01:13:02,880 light manufacturing 62 Park Drive is next. 1005 01:13:01,760 --> 01:13:04,000 Or have we already done that? >> No, it's right here. 1006 01:13:03,679 --> 01:13:10,400 » Yeah. >> Um, good. 62 Park Drive is 1007 01:13:07,679 --> 01:13:13,800 » commercial warehouse. >> Only two floors. 1008 01:13:19,199 --> 01:13:25,040 » You mean permitted? Yeah. >> No. No. 1009 01:13:22,640 --> 01:13:29,679 That's Oh, yeah, that one's fine. Sorry. Um Oh, it's jumped down one. My 1010 01:13:27,840 --> 01:13:34,880 apologies. Yeah, use remains permitted in there. 1011 01:13:31,679 --> 01:13:39,760 This is life storage. Um, we need to talk about the use because it's kind of 1012 01:13:38,000 --> 01:13:44,719 unclear if it's warehousing or if it's self storage and self storage is not 1013 01:13:41,360 --> 01:13:47,679 allowed in this zone. And self storage is a one-story drive up situation. I 1014 01:13:46,719 --> 01:13:50,400 don't think we want allowed in this zone. So, Tom and I kind of needed to 1015 01:13:49,120 --> 01:13:52,719 figure out how this works. >> Yeah. Yeah. With a multi-story 1016 01:13:51,760 --> 01:13:55,199 situation. >> So that is a multi-story. 1017 01:13:54,880 --> 01:13:58,320 » Yeah. >> Yeah. 1018 01:13:55,920 --> 01:14:01,440 » I've had I mean I've used self storage in Berlin that was multi multi-level. 1019 01:14:00,800 --> 01:14:03,120 » Mhm. >> Four five floors. 1020 01:14:02,239 --> 01:14:07,120 » Yeah. We're just trying to figure out how it fits into use. We don't have a 1021 01:14:04,640 --> 01:14:10,960 problem with it as a concept. Um I think it would technically trigger self 1022 01:14:08,719 --> 01:14:14,000 storage, but self storage isn't allowed in this zone. So we're kind of thinking, 1023 01:14:12,239 --> 01:14:18,880 okay, do we want to change the storage and warehousing one to allow multitory? 1024 01:14:17,280 --> 01:14:21,760 Because this is a much different use than say 1025 01:14:22,560 --> 01:14:29,520 I did this one recently, which is the only reason I'm going to pick on them 1026 01:14:28,800 --> 01:14:30,320 » 196. >> Yeah. 1027 01:14:29,840 --> 01:14:33,280 » Yeah. >> You know, it's just a very different 1028 01:14:31,600 --> 01:14:38,080 look than >> um if you guys, you know, it's a very 1029 01:14:35,920 --> 01:14:41,360 different look than this kind of thing >> and they're kind of two different 1030 01:14:39,679 --> 01:14:44,880 situations. One of them is a rather dense way of doing storage, which is 1031 01:14:42,960 --> 01:14:49,120 more appropriate to that zone. Yes. So Tom and I talked about it. I don't think 1032 01:14:46,320 --> 01:14:50,800 we had a a total um 1033 01:14:49,760 --> 01:14:53,520 » completed. >> Yeah. So that's why it was noted as we 1034 01:14:52,239 --> 01:14:58,800 just kind of need to discuss it. So we kind of need to I think have an idea of 1035 01:14:54,880 --> 01:15:04,320 maybe what um you and planning board are thinking. So 1036 01:15:01,360 --> 01:15:07,360 might be worth considering that. I don't want to I don't think that it's in 1037 01:15:05,840 --> 01:15:12,080 anyone's best interest and if life storage should not non-conforming, 1038 01:15:09,600 --> 01:15:17,280 » right? because I do think it's the appropriate use of storage in this type 1039 01:15:14,320 --> 01:15:18,960 of area to have it be more more dense. Yeah. 1040 01:15:18,000 --> 01:15:23,760 » Yeah. >> It's safer in my opinion. 1041 01:15:20,880 --> 01:15:27,760 » Mhm. It is. Yeah. I think that we just need to figure out how we make it 1042 01:15:25,199 --> 01:15:31,440 allowable is probably probably the discussion is that no one wants to make 1043 01:15:29,280 --> 01:15:36,560 it not allowed. Do we amend the self storage so that multi-story ones or 1044 01:15:34,400 --> 01:15:41,040 something or do we amend the storage and warehousing and say multi-story 1045 01:15:39,040 --> 01:15:44,080 is allowed where this is allowed. We're not we weren't quite sure and I think it 1046 01:15:42,560 --> 01:15:47,440 felt maybe a little bit beyond us in some ways too. 1047 01:15:45,199 --> 01:15:50,400 » So how do we leave this in terms of Thursday? 1048 01:15:48,159 --> 01:15:54,159 » I think that CPIC probably should be ready if you guys are okay with life 1049 01:15:52,239 --> 01:15:57,280 storage as a use in the location that it's in. We should be ready to talk 1050 01:15:55,840 --> 01:16:00,960 about, you know, you want to find a way to make it allowable and how that works 1051 01:15:59,040 --> 01:16:04,000 with the uses you would want the planning board and staff to figure out 1052 01:16:02,880 --> 01:16:06,800 and that you don't want to make it non-conforming, but you don't want to 1053 01:16:05,600 --> 01:16:08,800 have >> single story. 1054 01:16:07,600 --> 01:16:12,640 » Single story, >> self storage. 1055 01:16:10,880 --> 01:16:16,000 » What What are the characteristics that make it safer? 1056 01:16:13,920 --> 01:16:19,760 » You're inside a building. >> So, if somebody wants to break in, first 1057 01:16:17,760 --> 01:16:23,120 they have to break into the building and then they have to break into the 1058 01:16:21,120 --> 01:16:26,719 individual storage units. When you have those long ones that are one level 1059 01:16:24,719 --> 01:16:30,080 outside, all you have to do is bust into the you bust into the the the door. 1060 01:16:29,600 --> 01:16:32,960 » Yeah. >> There's nothing between you. 1061 01:16:32,239 --> 01:16:34,800 » You know, >> any item you want to store. 1062 01:16:34,480 --> 01:16:38,800 » Yeah. >> Yeah. 1063 01:16:36,560 --> 01:16:43,280 » And it's probably, if it's done right, it's climate controlled. 1064 01:16:41,920 --> 01:16:47,440 So, you've got air conditioning and heating and you don't have that in the 1065 01:16:45,679 --> 01:16:50,239 in the ones that are single level. >> Yeah. 1066 01:16:48,960 --> 01:16:52,640 » Yep. Which is Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. So, I think probably just 1067 01:16:51,360 --> 01:16:55,520 coming to say like we want to allow this. We don't want to make them 1068 01:16:53,600 --> 01:16:58,560 non-conforming. However, we need to amend definitions to get there. 1069 01:16:57,840 --> 01:17:03,320 » We support >> definitions. Yeah. Amend definition. 1070 01:17:04,480 --> 01:17:12,000 » Okay. Great. So, moving on to 11 Sand Hill Road. 1071 01:17:09,600 --> 01:17:15,120 » Also, that's what we're just did. We just did that. I think we're on 46 Park 1072 01:17:13,840 --> 01:17:20,320 Drive, >> which is um 1073 01:17:17,760 --> 01:17:24,560 warehouse light manufacturing. Yeah. >> Remains permitted. One of those 1074 01:17:22,239 --> 01:17:26,159 hallmarks of Park Drive manufacturing kind of right in here. 1075 01:17:25,440 --> 01:17:28,080 » Light. >> Yep. 1076 01:17:26,640 --> 01:17:33,199 » Yep. >> Okay. Then on to 47. 1077 01:17:30,400 --> 01:17:37,199 » I think effectively the same thing. This is um the granite place. 1078 01:17:36,320 --> 01:17:38,080 » Yep. >> Morning Star. 1079 01:17:37,840 --> 01:17:39,600 » Yep. >> Yep. 1080 01:17:38,400 --> 01:17:42,400 » Yeah. I forgot the name. >> 47. 1081 01:17:41,280 --> 01:17:48,480 Yep. >> Um so the use is permitted. All good. 1082 01:17:45,040 --> 01:17:52,560 » Yep. on to cell 12 Sand Hill Road >> which is this one 1083 01:17:49,600 --> 01:17:56,000 » also Morning Star >> used. 1084 01:17:53,040 --> 01:17:58,000 » No. Oh, it is. Didn't consider that. Yep. 1085 01:17:56,560 --> 01:18:00,960 » So, I didn't realize Morning Star owned that one. Yep. 1086 01:17:58,880 --> 01:18:06,239 » Developable land, >> but it doesn't front on Park Drive. What 1087 01:18:04,239 --> 01:18:09,600 is So, there's this little >> It's accessible from Monument. 1088 01:18:08,400 --> 01:18:12,560 » Uhhuh. >> Yeah. 1089 01:18:10,880 --> 01:18:16,719 » Okay. So, >> interesting. These four are kind of a 1090 01:18:14,719 --> 01:18:22,159 strange one and you know you may want to be ready to discuss 1091 01:18:18,800 --> 01:18:26,400 » those I guess. Um >> so 1092 01:18:24,239 --> 01:18:30,880 the other so to the left of that one you've got there to the left is that in 1093 01:18:29,440 --> 01:18:34,080 » also in the mix transitional. >> Oh is it okay? 1094 01:18:31,679 --> 01:18:37,679 » That's the one below which is >> for Sand Hill. 1095 01:18:35,760 --> 01:18:41,679 » Yeah. Um, and that's the one that I would I think I've had people ask about 1096 01:18:40,000 --> 01:18:44,320 doing multif family there before and once the density shoots up there I could 1097 01:18:43,520 --> 01:18:48,000 see happening. >> Yeah. Great. So that 1098 01:18:46,080 --> 01:18:51,360 » I think theity isn't great there right now, 1099 01:18:49,280 --> 01:18:54,159 » but it fits great in mixed transitional. >> I think it's fine there. 1100 01:18:52,480 --> 01:18:57,679 » Yeah, good. >> Okay, that's four. Moving on to 30. 1101 01:18:57,360 --> 01:19:00,960 Where's >> I guess all I'd say for this one is I 1102 01:18:59,600 --> 01:19:03,920 could see that one going either way. I mean there's not a huge difference 1103 01:19:02,159 --> 01:19:07,840 between mixed transitional and commercial mixed juice except for the 1104 01:19:05,280 --> 01:19:12,159 allowance of the warehouse building I think potentially is not allowed in 1105 01:19:10,159 --> 01:19:16,159 commercial mixed juice and the suburban storefront is not allowed in mixed 1106 01:19:13,360 --> 01:19:17,679 transitional potentially. I'm actually not sure 1107 01:19:16,640 --> 01:19:20,800 » important. >> Yeah. No, no, no. So I'm just saying for 1108 01:19:19,440 --> 01:19:26,239 what we're talking about I don't really see it as a big deal. I could see it 1109 01:19:22,239 --> 01:19:32,159 going either way. Um and suburban storefront is 1110 01:19:29,840 --> 01:19:36,400 the workshop is not allowed in commercial. So it is kind of through 1111 01:19:33,520 --> 01:19:42,080 form commercial mixed use is a little less industrial focused and mixed 1112 01:19:38,960 --> 01:19:44,239 transitional is and retail wise it goes the other way 1113 01:19:43,440 --> 01:19:49,719 through form. >> Yeah. Um, 1114 01:19:46,719 --> 01:19:49,719 so 1115 01:19:50,159 --> 01:20:01,520 any comments before we >> move on to 30? 1116 01:19:56,159 --> 01:20:04,560 Where's 30? Okay, 30 drive 30 >> office. 1117 01:20:01,920 --> 01:20:07,199 » This is I think >> professional office. 1118 01:20:05,679 --> 01:20:11,120 » It's a professional office. So this one would go to permitted with what we just 1119 01:20:09,120 --> 01:20:15,360 talked about earlier. So >> that's important. 1120 01:20:12,000 --> 01:20:20,880 » Yep. Um, and then this is 25. 1121 01:20:18,320 --> 01:20:23,920 Um, same thing. So, here's the third. Yeah. So, this is when I was starting to 1122 01:20:22,400 --> 01:20:27,440 be like, huh, maybe we should let professional maybe we should let office 1123 01:20:25,760 --> 01:20:30,320 just be permitted. Like, I found the three so far. 1124 01:20:28,480 --> 01:20:32,320 » Yeah, that's the endodonics place. >> Oh, is it? 1125 01:20:30,880 --> 01:20:35,360 » I think access. >> Okay. Yeah. So, this one's a medical 1126 01:20:33,600 --> 01:20:37,440 one, but it falls under, as you can see, it's already falling under 1127 01:20:37,040 --> 01:20:42,159 » Yeah. >> medical or just professional office. Um 1128 01:20:40,880 --> 01:20:44,960 and then this is the date >> 24. Is that 24? 1129 01:20:43,760 --> 01:20:50,800 » Y okay. >> Um it remains permitted. 1130 01:20:49,040 --> 01:20:54,880 » Great. Okay. 1131 01:20:52,640 --> 01:20:57,520 So then we get into Okay. Now so now we have we're nearly at the end of our 1132 01:20:56,560 --> 01:20:59,600 time. >> Yep. 1133 01:20:58,480 --> 01:21:02,080 » Yeah. Is that right? >> Yes. 1134 01:21:00,239 --> 01:21:08,080 » Yeah. Start hour really. >> So planned commercial development. I 1135 01:21:05,679 --> 01:21:14,320 mean, I wouldn't agree about getting too far into this. Quite honestly, I tried 1136 01:21:10,719 --> 01:21:18,719 to lay out to them what it is, what it what it is required to do, how it aligns 1137 01:21:17,040 --> 01:21:20,960 with article 2. I'm meeting Tom and I are meeting with Leslie tomorrow to talk 1138 01:21:20,400 --> 01:21:23,520 about it. >> Okay. 1139 01:21:21,360 --> 01:21:28,880 » I do genuinely think that in many ways that PCD was kind of absorbed into the 1140 01:21:26,239 --> 01:21:33,280 concept of article 2, but I didn't see that 1141 01:21:30,719 --> 01:21:38,480 spelled out here. >> Yeah. And I thought that might have 1142 01:21:34,640 --> 01:21:45,600 been, you know, that all that most of the goals of the PCD are achieved in 1143 01:21:43,440 --> 01:21:48,880 recodes 10 center zones. >> Yeah, I say the formbbased code 1144 01:21:47,440 --> 01:21:52,719 requirements vertical 2 seem to build upon the ideas of the PCD at a larger 1145 01:21:50,880 --> 01:21:55,440 more encompassing scale focusing on creating a pattern of development with 1146 01:21:54,080 --> 01:21:59,199 an integrated design requiring pedestrian friendly development and a 1147 01:21:56,880 --> 01:22:02,239 sense of community through form. The FBC is only found in areas of town that are 1148 01:22:00,560 --> 01:22:06,400 served by water and sewer as PCDs were intended to be. Article 2 does not have 1149 01:22:04,320 --> 01:22:10,400 limitations on sensitive beyond form. Allows multiple buildings to be sighted 1150 01:22:07,920 --> 01:22:14,480 on one lot if they front on a street or courtyard and allow minimal setbacks 1151 01:22:12,159 --> 01:22:16,960 internally. When discussing PCDs in relation to article 2, it seems that 1152 01:22:15,600 --> 01:22:20,080 they are not necessary in the zone as the intent of them was carried forward. 1153 01:22:18,719 --> 01:22:22,719 If there are concerns of the zoning requirements of the zone which they are 1154 01:22:21,280 --> 01:22:28,080 located in, we should discuss those when we discuss article 2 as they would no 1155 01:22:24,480 --> 01:22:31,280 doubt apply to all. If you guys would like to say more about 1156 01:22:29,760 --> 01:22:37,199 this, please go ahead. I did want to give you that option to have a place to 1157 01:22:33,920 --> 01:22:45,920 speak. It's it to me it's like we have had no um 1158 01:22:41,040 --> 01:22:51,280 no real expertise in PCDs you know and >> so it's really I I think we are relying 1159 01:22:49,360 --> 01:22:58,080 on you know your understanding of what PCDs 1160 01:22:55,760 --> 01:23:05,440 are designed to do >> and if recode actually achieves the 1161 01:23:02,639 --> 01:23:09,840 majority of what the PCD is designed to do. 1162 01:23:07,840 --> 01:23:13,600 What are we talking about? >> You know, um 1163 01:23:11,120 --> 01:23:17,360 » yeah, I think that that's one way to look at it. Um you know, I try to let 1164 01:23:16,080 --> 01:23:22,320 them make a lot of their own determinations about these things. Um in 1165 01:23:20,560 --> 01:23:26,400 some ways, and I like to try to strike that balance 1166 01:23:25,040 --> 01:23:30,239 between this is what I'm seeing and this is one way to look at it between telling 1167 01:23:28,400 --> 01:23:35,639 them this is what something is just because there are multiple ways to look 1168 01:23:31,679 --> 01:23:35,639 at it. Um, 1169 01:23:37,040 --> 01:23:43,440 I'm not sure how they'll approach this quite honestly. 1170 01:23:41,360 --> 01:23:48,239 » Yeah. And depending on how they approach it, 1171 01:23:45,360 --> 01:23:52,080 what will be the effect? >> I think it partially depends on whether 1172 01:23:49,679 --> 01:23:56,159 or not they read it read article two and really understand what's going on 1173 01:23:53,840 --> 01:24:01,679 because we haven't gotten into it very much. I think that the the fact is that 1174 01:23:58,639 --> 01:24:05,600 if they want to keep PCDs that we'll just need to talk about them again when 1175 01:24:03,199 --> 01:24:09,520 we get to article two and how the requirements of article 2 would play 1176 01:24:07,120 --> 01:24:14,639 with them as a use because one thing that we note is that the PCDs when they 1177 01:24:12,560 --> 01:24:18,719 were created they were required to adhere to the dimensional table at 1178 01:24:16,400 --> 01:24:22,880 external lot lines right um and that they just weren't updated with the table 1179 01:24:20,480 --> 01:24:26,719 of dimensional requirements which has been beneficial to some people using 1180 01:24:25,520 --> 01:24:32,880 PCDs to, you know, build things. Um, and that 1181 01:24:31,520 --> 01:24:38,960 if we want to keep them in the center zones, we need to make sure that the 1182 01:24:34,239 --> 01:24:43,360 form requirements underlying would be kept because the intent of a PCD was not 1183 01:24:41,520 --> 01:24:46,080 to get out of and if they have issues with the form, we need to talk about 1184 01:24:44,480 --> 01:24:49,440 that as a whole. PCD shouldn't be the way of getting out of it. So, that's 1185 01:24:47,600 --> 01:24:53,120 kind of the concept is I just this is what it is. what is it actually 1186 01:24:50,800 --> 01:24:56,320 providing that's a benefit that isn't just an issue that we have 1187 01:24:54,719 --> 01:24:59,920 with article 2 that may need to be fixed for everyone that would fall under 1188 01:24:58,000 --> 01:25:03,360 article 2. So that's that's the way that I see it and I'm hoping that's the take 1189 01:25:01,360 --> 01:25:09,679 they'll take what they'll have to take away from it. But yeah, 1190 01:25:04,880 --> 01:25:14,800 » we should try to avoid them making a fixed and firm decision that we will do 1191 01:25:12,400 --> 01:25:18,560 PCDs and instead kick the can >> in the center zones. in the center zone. 1192 01:25:17,120 --> 01:25:23,040 in the center fields have kicked the can down the road for further discussion 1193 01:25:21,440 --> 01:25:27,199 » if they want to keep them if they were to go okay well wow you know maybe these 1194 01:25:24,880 --> 01:25:30,400 aren't as necessary >> it bears further discussion that we're 1195 01:25:28,800 --> 01:25:33,920 not ready >> for decision 1196 01:25:31,600 --> 01:25:38,320 » I don't think that probably a decision should be reached on like I mean if they 1197 01:25:36,239 --> 01:25:43,679 were to say okay we want to keep PCDs in the center zones okay but when we come 1198 01:25:41,120 --> 01:25:47,760 back to article two it would be we need to change the PCD language to have all 1199 01:25:45,679 --> 01:25:52,159 of these things in So that that it isn't some get out of 1200 01:25:49,760 --> 01:25:54,560 free get out of zoning free card, you know, 1201 01:25:53,040 --> 01:26:00,159 » and that you aren't applicable that it would just be updated to apply to all, 1202 01:25:56,719 --> 01:26:06,880 » you know, things. That's that's my hope. >> And I'm be I'm curious like, you know, 1203 01:26:03,440 --> 01:26:13,760 the the way the PCD is designed, it's supposed to be in areas where it already 1204 01:26:10,080 --> 01:26:17,920 served by public water and public sewer, >> but it's not always. it is allowed in 1205 01:26:16,560 --> 01:26:22,560 zones that don't have those, which is interesting to me. So, it's kind of a 1206 01:26:19,840 --> 01:26:26,239 strange little thing. Um, that I think and how I see it is that, you know, the 1207 01:26:24,400 --> 01:26:30,560 concept of that probably at the time was needed and necessary to allow some of 1208 01:26:28,159 --> 01:26:34,400 the development that we see happened and that article 2 builds upon that idea 1209 01:26:32,719 --> 01:26:41,920 that you can be more flexible with citing things online. You can allow more 1210 01:26:36,880 --> 01:26:45,199 uses in near each other. Um, and it doesn't need that use because the 1211 01:26:43,679 --> 01:26:48,239 entirety of article 2 is kind of allowing those things. That's that's how 1212 01:26:46,719 --> 01:26:52,560 I kind of took it. I do need to meet with Leslie tomorrow. She brought up 1213 01:26:50,639 --> 01:26:56,719 MPD, which is a little concerning to me because if MPD is the sequel to PCD, 1214 01:26:55,760 --> 01:27:03,199 that's a much more difficult conversation in my opinion. So, I will 1215 01:26:58,320 --> 01:27:08,320 see what she has to say. Right. >> Well, and and you know, it was clear to 1216 01:27:05,760 --> 01:27:15,760 you, I think, in looking at the MPD that there is an affinity there to talk about 1217 01:27:11,920 --> 01:27:19,600 um what do we what is the verbiage? >> It's really simil I mean, it's got parts 1218 01:27:17,360 --> 01:27:23,120 of subdivision site plan in it. It's just kind of a combination of all of our 1219 01:27:21,360 --> 01:27:27,840 » subdivision. is not something that Cbec CPC focused on at all because it's 1220 01:27:25,199 --> 01:27:33,360 outside the town centers and but where there is an affinity there in terms of 1221 01:27:30,000 --> 01:27:40,719 what's being asked of a developer and required of a developer um I don't know 1222 01:27:36,960 --> 01:27:44,719 if Leslie took that on conceptually you know at least in even a 1223 01:27:43,760 --> 01:27:48,719 little bit yeah >> that would be helpful so we've actually 1224 01:27:46,880 --> 01:27:52,480 got two more pages which we obviously don't have time to do it's not too 1225 01:27:50,719 --> 01:27:55,280 » it's nothing really it's just um >> goes into the use table. 1226 01:27:53,520 --> 01:27:59,920 » It's just what changed in the use table which is very few things um household 1227 01:27:57,679 --> 01:28:01,440 living was changed to do the main street. 1228 01:28:00,320 --> 01:28:06,320 » They made those decisions. >> Yep. They made those decisions and then 1229 01:28:03,520 --> 01:28:10,239 the follow-up questions um our drive-throughs are in article 7. 1230 01:28:08,159 --> 01:28:13,920 » I love the mobile food thing. >> Yeah, that felt like that was going to 1231 01:28:12,000 --> 01:28:17,520 solve the issues that we needed. So hopefully they'll like that. And then 1232 01:28:15,440 --> 01:28:20,320 the other one I took that to mean and please make sure this is done at some 1233 01:28:18,800 --> 01:28:22,000 point. So I'll have Evelyn working on that. 1234 01:28:20,560 --> 01:28:24,560 » Yeah. at some point actually a little bit more subtle. 1235 01:28:23,679 --> 01:28:27,280 » Great. >> Yeah. 1236 01:28:26,000 --> 01:28:32,960 » Okay. >> And I think the only question I'd have 1237 01:28:30,239 --> 01:28:33,920 is um and I know we're at the end of the meeting. 1238 01:28:33,360 --> 01:28:37,679 » Yeah. >> I think we've gone over these uses. I 1239 01:28:35,760 --> 01:28:40,000 feel pretty good with these uses. >> Yeah. 1240 01:28:38,080 --> 01:28:45,520 » And I think you guys have gotten pretty far through the use table, but they will 1241 01:28:43,199 --> 01:28:51,280 be talking about uses in the UV and the MT. you guys were going like this and 1242 01:28:48,480 --> 01:28:54,159 they switched it to going like, you know, this. 1243 01:28:52,560 --> 01:28:58,639 » So, we should just have a look at those. >> Just make sure that there's nothing in 1244 01:28:55,360 --> 01:29:02,000 the MT or the UV usewise that you guys are uncomfortable with or that was a 1245 01:29:00,560 --> 01:29:06,159 mistake or something. >> Um, I don't expect there to be, but 1246 01:29:04,080 --> 01:29:10,800 yeah, I would feel remiss if I didn't bring that up. 1247 01:29:07,440 --> 01:29:15,920 » So, how about we adjourn at 5:29? >> All right, let me shut down the Zoom. 1248 01:29:12,639 --> 01:29:18,880 Let me shut down the Zoom. We now we've closed the meeting.