1 00:00:00,719 --> 00:00:02,810 foreign 2 00:00:02,810 --> 00:03:24,250 [Music] 3 00:03:24,260 --> 00:03:31,309 are you ready 4 00:03:31,319 --> 00:03:33,060 um Hello everybody welcome 5 00:03:33,060 --> 00:03:35,159 um this is the board of appeals meeting 6 00:03:35,159 --> 00:03:40,440 uh 7 P.M September 19th 2023. uh we are 7 00:03:40,440 --> 00:03:46,070 here to hear case number 2023-03 8 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:48,480 um we will begin with our roll call of 9 00:03:48,480 --> 00:03:50,280 the members present 10 00:03:50,280 --> 00:03:51,720 um I will ask if you're present please 11 00:03:51,720 --> 00:03:54,180 respond informatively uh Mr Paul Doherty 12 00:03:54,180 --> 00:03:57,000 president Miss Amy Everett 13 00:03:57,000 --> 00:03:59,940 Stephen sharp present I am Jody Hoon 14 00:03:59,940 --> 00:04:00,680 star 15 00:04:00,680 --> 00:04:03,720 chair uh we are also joined by town 16 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:06,000 clerk Sharon hum and legal counsel Fred 17 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:08,459 Sussman at this point I'll pass it to 18 00:04:08,459 --> 00:04:10,439 Sharon for confirmation of posting and 19 00:04:10,439 --> 00:04:14,929 any documents entered into the record 20 00:04:14,939 --> 00:04:16,919 in the matter of the application for 21 00:04:16,919 --> 00:04:18,260 case number 22 00:04:18,260 --> 00:04:21,720 2023-03 rod and reel Inc Donovan 23 00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:24,840 estate's LLC I caused to be published in 24 00:04:24,840 --> 00:04:27,540 the southern Maryland News newspaper a 25 00:04:27,540 --> 00:04:29,220 notice of the public Hearing in this 26 00:04:29,220 --> 00:04:31,259 case the three consecutive weeks 27 00:04:31,259 --> 00:04:33,180 beginning Friday September 1st 28 00:04:33,180 --> 00:04:36,000 continuing Friday September 8th and 29 00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:39,680 Friday September 15th on August 24 30 00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:42,600 2023 I transmitted to the Planning 31 00:04:42,600 --> 00:04:44,940 Commission notice of time and place with 32 00:04:44,940 --> 00:04:49,020 a copy of application on August 24 2023 33 00:04:49,020 --> 00:04:52,440 I mailed by registered mail notice to 34 00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:54,180 the applicant and adjoining property 35 00:04:54,180 --> 00:04:56,460 owners of said properties involved in 36 00:04:56,460 --> 00:04:59,639 the case and signs giving notice of said 37 00:04:59,639 --> 00:05:01,860 case were posted on said properties 38 00:05:01,860 --> 00:05:05,100 August 29 2023 by the Department of 39 00:05:05,100 --> 00:05:08,629 Public Works 40 00:05:08,639 --> 00:05:10,440 yeah 41 00:05:10,440 --> 00:05:13,680 um at this point do you have a affidavit 42 00:05:13,680 --> 00:05:16,740 to enter into the record yes I do yes I 43 00:05:16,740 --> 00:05:21,650 do 44 00:05:21,660 --> 00:05:24,419 yes that'll be exhibit one okay it's a 45 00:05:24,419 --> 00:05:26,220 bit one 46 00:05:26,220 --> 00:05:28,440 foreign 47 00:05:28,440 --> 00:05:31,620 okay in that case uh we will begin with 48 00:05:31,620 --> 00:05:34,500 case 2020 303 to consider an application 49 00:05:34,500 --> 00:05:37,080 from Rod and Reel Inc or Donovan Estates 50 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:40,080 LLC of 4160 Mears Avenue Chesapeake 51 00:05:40,080 --> 00:05:42,060 Beach uh for a decision on 52 00:05:42,060 --> 00:05:44,520 interpretation or alleged error 53 00:05:44,520 --> 00:05:46,979 um to article uh six of the Chesapeake 54 00:05:46,979 --> 00:05:50,160 Beach zoning ordinance uh and some 55 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:51,720 sections of the Chesapeake Beach Town 56 00:05:51,720 --> 00:05:53,759 Charter applicant requests the 57 00:05:53,759 --> 00:05:55,320 Chesapeake Beach zoning board of appeals 58 00:05:55,320 --> 00:05:57,000 to quote order of the zoning 59 00:05:57,000 --> 00:05:58,320 administrator and planning and zoning 60 00:05:58,320 --> 00:06:00,060 commission to immediately commence and 61 00:06:00,060 --> 00:06:02,340 prioritize the processing and review of 62 00:06:02,340 --> 00:06:03,960 the relevant site plans submitted by Rod 63 00:06:03,960 --> 00:06:06,240 and Reel Inc and Donovan Estates and 64 00:06:06,240 --> 00:06:07,500 that the zoning administrator and 65 00:06:07,500 --> 00:06:08,940 planning and zoning commission be 66 00:06:08,940 --> 00:06:10,680 ordered to apply the zoning ordinances 67 00:06:10,680 --> 00:06:14,759 in effect as of January 29 2021 when the 68 00:06:14,759 --> 00:06:16,500 applications were submitted and for 69 00:06:16,500 --> 00:06:18,180 other such and further relief as the 70 00:06:18,180 --> 00:06:20,520 nature of their cause requires at this 71 00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:22,380 point I will pass it to Mr Blitz 72 00:06:22,380 --> 00:06:25,080 representing rod and reel and Donovan 73 00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:27,529 Estates 74 00:06:27,539 --> 00:06:29,940 oh apologies one note 75 00:06:29,940 --> 00:06:31,259 um in the event that the presentation 76 00:06:31,259 --> 00:06:33,660 here tonight extends past 8 30 PM we 77 00:06:33,660 --> 00:06:35,120 will adjourn this session to resume 78 00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:39,000 October 30th 7 pm at this point in time 79 00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:40,560 we don't know how long it will take to 80 00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:41,880 hear the full presentations and to 81 00:06:41,880 --> 00:06:45,060 receive public comments it may be one or 82 00:06:45,060 --> 00:06:47,039 more evenings if you have provided your 83 00:06:47,039 --> 00:06:48,539 contact information on the sign-in sheet 84 00:06:48,539 --> 00:06:49,919 be aware that you may not have the 85 00:06:49,919 --> 00:06:52,919 opportunity to speak this evening 86 00:06:52,919 --> 00:06:56,100 now Mr Blitz if you please 87 00:06:56,100 --> 00:06:57,300 thank you 88 00:06:57,300 --> 00:06:58,740 um members of the board 89 00:06:58,740 --> 00:07:01,139 chair uh my name is Eric Blitz I 90 00:07:01,139 --> 00:07:02,699 represent the rod and reel Inc in 91 00:07:02,699 --> 00:07:06,180 Donovan Estates LLC Donovan Estates LLC 92 00:07:06,180 --> 00:07:08,759 is a wholly owned subsidiary of Rod and 93 00:07:08,759 --> 00:07:11,039 Reel so throughout this hearing I'll 94 00:07:11,039 --> 00:07:13,199 basically just be referring to the rod 95 00:07:13,199 --> 00:07:16,259 and reel as that's the real party in 96 00:07:16,259 --> 00:07:19,500 interest in moving forward in this case 97 00:07:19,500 --> 00:07:20,300 um 98 00:07:20,300 --> 00:07:22,620 I'm going to sit down just to make sure 99 00:07:22,620 --> 00:07:24,599 I'm closer to the mic if that's okay 100 00:07:24,599 --> 00:07:27,070 with you 101 00:07:27,080 --> 00:07:34,850 [Music] 102 00:07:34,860 --> 00:07:37,860 um quick question on just process 103 00:07:37,860 --> 00:07:39,780 do we need to 104 00:07:39,780 --> 00:07:42,780 have Mr pounds entered in as 105 00:07:42,780 --> 00:07:46,430 representing a party at this time 106 00:07:46,440 --> 00:07:48,840 all right pardon is Mr pounds here to 107 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:52,440 represent a party and if so should he be making a statement in the 108 00:07:52,440 --> 00:07:54,300 beginning of the case that he is 109 00:07:54,300 --> 00:07:56,220 I'm following the instructions of the 110 00:07:56,220 --> 00:07:59,220 chair and the chair instructed this uh I 111 00:07:59,220 --> 00:08:00,780 mean when it's time my turn I certainly 112 00:08:00,780 --> 00:08:03,960 will enter my appearance just for the 113 00:08:03,960 --> 00:08:06,960 record on Todd pounds 114 00:08:06,960 --> 00:08:10,259 I'm the town attorney and uh I will be I 115 00:08:10,259 --> 00:08:19,550 will be speaking when I'm addressed 116 00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:21,419 for the record 117 00:08:21,419 --> 00:08:23,759 there's a record being made of this so 118 00:08:23,759 --> 00:08:25,680 that are we supposed to hear it or what 119 00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:27,539 no I'm sorry you can't hear it I'll try 120 00:08:27,539 --> 00:08:30,479 to speak up as loudly microphones 121 00:08:30,479 --> 00:08:32,099 it was don't aren't for broadcast 122 00:08:32,099 --> 00:08:37,550 they're just for the record all right 123 00:08:37,560 --> 00:08:39,539 um by way of introduction I'll summarize 124 00:08:39,539 --> 00:08:41,219 uh the issues and some of the key 125 00:08:41,219 --> 00:08:43,620 evidentiary points uh you will hear in 126 00:08:43,620 --> 00:08:47,160 this case uh to give you some background 127 00:08:47,160 --> 00:08:49,500 um context for the information we will 128 00:08:49,500 --> 00:08:50,880 present to you tonight 129 00:08:50,880 --> 00:08:52,260 um 130 00:08:52,260 --> 00:08:54,120 as the chair noted this is an appeal 131 00:08:54,120 --> 00:08:55,680 alleging error by the Planning and 132 00:08:55,680 --> 00:08:57,600 Zoning commission and the zoning 133 00:08:57,600 --> 00:08:58,980 administrator 134 00:08:58,980 --> 00:09:01,920 um in failing or refusing to review 135 00:09:01,920 --> 00:09:04,140 properly filed site plans for five 136 00:09:04,140 --> 00:09:07,200 properties owned by the rod and reel 137 00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:09,600 the rationale for their refusal was a 138 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:12,240 Reliance upon an invalid moratorium that 139 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:14,459 purported to Halt the processing of some 140 00:09:14,459 --> 00:09:17,279 category one site plans uh and then 141 00:09:17,279 --> 00:09:19,380 later when the moratorium had obviously 142 00:09:19,380 --> 00:09:21,120 expired 143 00:09:21,120 --> 00:09:23,160 um and they had spent countless time and 144 00:09:23,160 --> 00:09:25,260 energy on explaining 145 00:09:25,260 --> 00:09:27,540 um and promoting the moratorium as a 146 00:09:27,540 --> 00:09:29,279 temporary 147 00:09:29,279 --> 00:09:31,920 um moratorium and only for a discernible 148 00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:33,600 duration 149 00:09:33,600 --> 00:09:34,980 um they apparently changed their 150 00:09:34,980 --> 00:09:36,540 argument and took the position that the 151 00:09:36,540 --> 00:09:39,660 moratorium was in fact indefinite 152 00:09:39,660 --> 00:09:42,480 um we will just demonstrate why the 153 00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:44,220 attempt at passing a moratorium on site 154 00:09:44,220 --> 00:09:46,620 plans review was invalid and therefore 155 00:09:46,620 --> 00:09:50,160 they were in error in relying upon it uh 156 00:09:50,160 --> 00:09:53,279 to deny uh the rod and reel site review 157 00:09:53,279 --> 00:09:55,380 applications 158 00:09:55,380 --> 00:09:57,360 um we'll also show how absurd the later 159 00:09:57,360 --> 00:09:58,980 position is that the moratorium was 160 00:09:58,980 --> 00:10:00,420 indefinite 161 00:10:00,420 --> 00:10:02,580 um and therefore subject to their 162 00:10:02,580 --> 00:10:04,740 discretion to turn out 163 00:10:04,740 --> 00:10:07,440 um how long it would be 164 00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:09,060 um we're going to show how the 165 00:10:09,060 --> 00:10:10,860 obligation to process site plan 166 00:10:10,860 --> 00:10:12,540 applications when they are submitted is 167 00:10:12,540 --> 00:10:15,300 a mandatory obligation on their part on 168 00:10:15,300 --> 00:10:17,160 the part of the administrators that's 169 00:10:17,160 --> 00:10:18,480 the zoning administrator and the 170 00:10:18,480 --> 00:10:20,459 Planning and Zoning Commission 171 00:10:20,459 --> 00:10:22,320 and not something that can simply be 172 00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:24,300 removed by simple resolutions of the 173 00:10:24,300 --> 00:10:27,410 Town Council 174 00:10:27,420 --> 00:10:29,339 um then if after considering all the 175 00:10:29,339 --> 00:10:31,500 evidence that we will produce uh for you 176 00:10:31,500 --> 00:10:33,720 that demonstrates that their Reliance on 177 00:10:33,720 --> 00:10:36,300 the purported moratorium uh was legally 178 00:10:36,300 --> 00:10:38,760 faulty we will demonstrate that the harm 179 00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:40,680 caused by this failure is a good reason 180 00:10:40,680 --> 00:10:43,560 for this board to exercise its appeal 181 00:10:43,560 --> 00:10:46,500 Authority in a responsible fashion 182 00:10:46,500 --> 00:10:48,740 um we will be asking you to 183 00:10:48,740 --> 00:10:51,120 find that the refusal 184 00:10:51,120 --> 00:10:53,640 of both the zoning administrator and the 185 00:10:53,640 --> 00:10:54,899 Planning and Zoning commission to 186 00:10:54,899 --> 00:10:57,240 process the site plans to have been in 187 00:10:57,240 --> 00:10:58,680 air but 188 00:10:58,680 --> 00:11:02,100 that in the just responsible I'm sorry 189 00:11:02,100 --> 00:11:04,380 the just and responsible response to 190 00:11:04,380 --> 00:11:07,920 this is to exercise your Authority 191 00:11:07,920 --> 00:11:10,560 um to order the site plans to be 192 00:11:10,560 --> 00:11:11,880 reviewed 193 00:11:11,880 --> 00:11:14,880 um with the law in effect at the time uh 194 00:11:14,880 --> 00:11:18,180 that therefore the the site plans would 195 00:11:18,180 --> 00:11:21,180 have proceeded in January of 196 00:11:21,180 --> 00:11:24,060 2021 197 00:11:24,060 --> 00:11:26,579 um but for this uh erroneous 198 00:11:26,579 --> 00:11:28,560 interpretation and Reliance on the 199 00:11:28,560 --> 00:11:30,300 moratorium 200 00:11:30,300 --> 00:11:31,860 um but before we get to the request 201 00:11:31,860 --> 00:11:33,899 relief we need to establish the 202 00:11:33,899 --> 00:11:35,940 administrative agents namely the zoning 203 00:11:35,940 --> 00:11:37,079 administrator and the Planning and 204 00:11:37,079 --> 00:11:38,519 Zoning Commission 205 00:11:38,519 --> 00:11:40,380 we're in air 206 00:11:40,380 --> 00:11:41,279 um 207 00:11:41,279 --> 00:11:43,980 so unlike your more typical variance 208 00:11:43,980 --> 00:11:46,980 case or special exception case 209 00:11:46,980 --> 00:11:48,779 um in this case you were determining if 210 00:11:48,779 --> 00:11:51,600 there it was an error on the part of the 211 00:11:51,600 --> 00:11:52,800 zoning administrator and the Planning 212 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:54,300 and Zoning commission and then crafting 213 00:11:54,300 --> 00:11:57,480 your relief uh this makes this appeal 214 00:11:57,480 --> 00:12:00,240 more like a legal hearing uh than you 215 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:02,220 may be used to and I will try to go slow 216 00:12:02,220 --> 00:12:04,880 in explaining my Reliance on certain 217 00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:07,440 statutes and cases 218 00:12:07,440 --> 00:12:09,180 um 219 00:12:09,180 --> 00:12:11,220 we have lots of exhibits to demonstrate 220 00:12:11,220 --> 00:12:13,380 the factual points that I'll rely upon 221 00:12:13,380 --> 00:12:17,030 um 222 00:12:17,040 --> 00:12:19,560 I've I've prepared booklets that I'll 223 00:12:19,560 --> 00:12:21,899 hand out to each of you for all of the 224 00:12:21,899 --> 00:12:24,120 exhibits that doesn't necessarily mean 225 00:12:24,120 --> 00:12:25,579 they're in the record but that way 226 00:12:25,579 --> 00:12:28,680 Council and each of you can look at the 227 00:12:28,680 --> 00:12:30,360 exhibits as I talk to them rather 228 00:12:30,360 --> 00:12:33,420 because they'll be handed just one the 229 00:12:33,420 --> 00:12:35,940 official exhibit and I've provided a 230 00:12:35,940 --> 00:12:38,110 copy to uh Mr pounds 231 00:12:38,110 --> 00:12:40,920 [Music] 232 00:12:40,920 --> 00:12:43,740 closer to them like I will try yes but 233 00:12:43,740 --> 00:12:46,519 that's not going to help you here 234 00:12:46,519 --> 00:12:50,220 oh do you okay 235 00:12:50,220 --> 00:12:53,399 let me bring it closer then 236 00:12:53,399 --> 00:12:54,839 how's that 237 00:12:54,839 --> 00:13:05,150 yes great 238 00:13:05,160 --> 00:13:06,779 um similarly I'll be asking you to 239 00:13:06,779 --> 00:13:08,399 consider the impact of various statutes 240 00:13:08,399 --> 00:13:11,100 and code sections and even some case law 241 00:13:11,100 --> 00:13:13,320 and I'll hand out that binder so let's 242 00:13:13,320 --> 00:13:15,180 get started the first three exhibits are 243 00:13:15,180 --> 00:13:17,040 pro forma introductions to make sure 244 00:13:17,040 --> 00:13:18,779 they're in the record 245 00:13:18,779 --> 00:13:21,420 um the first is the zoning applications 246 00:13:21,420 --> 00:13:23,519 I mean the application for appeal that's 247 00:13:23,519 --> 00:13:25,500 filed in this case 248 00:13:25,500 --> 00:13:28,139 um so that would be 249 00:13:28,139 --> 00:13:35,810 submitted it as I believe exhibit two 250 00:13:35,820 --> 00:13:37,920 and let me go ahead and hand out those 251 00:13:37,920 --> 00:13:39,120 binders 252 00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:41,339 and why it was really 253 00:13:41,339 --> 00:13:42,560 good 254 00:13:42,560 --> 00:13:47,750 what's that 255 00:13:47,760 --> 00:13:55,009 really that's Town Council 256 00:13:55,019 --> 00:13:59,530 so the black binders 257 00:13:59,540 --> 00:14:02,399 [Music] 258 00:14:02,399 --> 00:14:10,629 foreign 259 00:14:10,639 --> 00:14:13,800 ERS are the exhibits 260 00:14:13,800 --> 00:14:16,730 file 261 00:14:16,740 --> 00:14:18,140 apologize 262 00:14:18,140 --> 00:14:30,769 [Music] 263 00:14:30,779 --> 00:14:32,459 and Mr chair just for procedural 264 00:14:32,459 --> 00:14:34,440 purposes uh I also had no objection to 265 00:14:34,440 --> 00:14:37,440 the uh affidavit as far as exhibit one 266 00:14:37,440 --> 00:14:41,040 uh I and and as far as exhibit two which 267 00:14:41,040 --> 00:14:42,839 is just the application but many of the 268 00:14:42,839 --> 00:14:44,519 exhibits I'm going to be objected to as 269 00:14:44,519 --> 00:14:47,569 we go forward 270 00:14:47,579 --> 00:14:49,440 so at this time I would ask Mr pounds to 271 00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:50,940 identify who he's representing in this 272 00:14:50,940 --> 00:14:52,019 case 273 00:14:52,019 --> 00:14:55,860 I am uh I've been asked to uh present 274 00:14:55,860 --> 00:14:58,440 the position of the town as released 275 00:14:58,440 --> 00:15:00,839 this application so in essence I am the 276 00:15:00,839 --> 00:15:03,420 town attorney uh I'm not acting as a 277 00:15:03,420 --> 00:15:04,800 town attorney even though I am the town 278 00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:07,560 attorney Town attorney uh and I may have 279 00:15:07,560 --> 00:15:10,440 that capacity but primarily uh since the 280 00:15:10,440 --> 00:15:12,839 uh zoning administrator as all of you 281 00:15:12,839 --> 00:15:15,420 know that uh has resigned and he's taken 282 00:15:15,420 --> 00:15:17,220 another position the town does not 283 00:15:17,220 --> 00:15:19,260 presently have a current zoning 284 00:15:19,260 --> 00:15:22,260 administrator uh which they've recently 285 00:15:22,260 --> 00:15:25,740 been hired and moving forward but they 286 00:15:25,740 --> 00:15:27,660 have not uh been up to speed with regard 287 00:15:27,660 --> 00:15:30,120 to any of these projects whatsoever so 288 00:15:30,120 --> 00:15:32,100 um uh as a result I'm the one who's 289 00:15:32,100 --> 00:15:34,760 presenting this uh on behalf of the town 290 00:15:34,760 --> 00:15:37,260 uh much of what and I'm going to be 291 00:15:37,260 --> 00:15:39,839 saying much about Mr Blitz as said 292 00:15:39,839 --> 00:15:41,579 earlier we're going to be objecting to 293 00:15:41,579 --> 00:15:43,380 and that we believe is completely 294 00:15:43,380 --> 00:15:45,420 incorrect so 295 00:15:45,420 --> 00:15:46,560 um obviously we're going to follow 296 00:15:46,560 --> 00:15:48,720 whatever procedure the chair wants to 297 00:15:48,720 --> 00:15:50,579 follow with regard to the hearing and so 298 00:15:50,579 --> 00:15:51,720 I'm 299 00:15:51,720 --> 00:15:53,940 you know I guess 300 00:15:53,940 --> 00:15:55,920 since he had an opening statement right 301 00:15:55,920 --> 00:15:57,779 into his case uh we did not have an 302 00:15:57,779 --> 00:15:59,040 opening statement but we're going to 303 00:15:59,040 --> 00:16:00,120 follow the instructions on the chair 304 00:16:00,120 --> 00:16:05,210 thank you Mr chair so my question is 305 00:16:05,220 --> 00:16:06,839 yeah 306 00:16:06,839 --> 00:16:08,100 sorry 307 00:16:08,100 --> 00:16:10,440 so my question is 308 00:16:10,440 --> 00:16:13,560 the Town Administrator and the Planning 309 00:16:13,560 --> 00:16:14,820 and Zoning commission or the Apple 310 00:16:14,820 --> 00:16:16,560 leaves in this case 311 00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:19,440 and then you can also represent the 312 00:16:19,440 --> 00:16:21,300 mayor and Town Council who can join this 313 00:16:21,300 --> 00:16:23,639 case under the law as parties so I'm 314 00:16:23,639 --> 00:16:25,620 trying to figure out and establish for 315 00:16:25,620 --> 00:16:26,699 the record 316 00:16:26,699 --> 00:16:28,139 are you representing the Planning and 317 00:16:28,139 --> 00:16:30,959 Zoning commission all all of them the 318 00:16:30,959 --> 00:16:32,519 Planning and Zoning commission and the 319 00:16:32,519 --> 00:16:34,440 zoning administrator and the mayor and 320 00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:36,720 Town Council the record 321 00:16:36,720 --> 00:16:39,779 filed an appeal in this case we are that 322 00:16:39,779 --> 00:16:41,399 is only thing that is that is going to 323 00:16:41,399 --> 00:16:43,980 be heard with regard to this uh review 324 00:16:43,980 --> 00:16:46,920 by the board of appeals only your appeal 325 00:16:46,920 --> 00:16:50,160 so with regard to uh who I represent I'm 326 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:52,199 representing the town has released to 327 00:16:52,199 --> 00:16:53,759 this appeal that's all it's going to be 328 00:16:53,759 --> 00:16:55,800 heard by this board and that's who I 329 00:16:55,800 --> 00:16:58,019 represent 330 00:16:58,019 --> 00:16:59,040 so 331 00:16:59,040 --> 00:17:00,660 just for the record I'm trying to 332 00:17:00,660 --> 00:17:02,220 identify who the parties to the case are 333 00:17:02,220 --> 00:17:04,439 uh their Autumn they're automatically 334 00:17:04,439 --> 00:17:06,660 not the case this is simply an appeal 335 00:17:06,660 --> 00:17:08,880 any any other case that may have been in 336 00:17:08,880 --> 00:17:11,640 court or any other place that is not 337 00:17:11,640 --> 00:17:13,679 those parties are separate and distinct 338 00:17:13,679 --> 00:17:15,839 from what is going here tonight what is 339 00:17:15,839 --> 00:17:17,699 going on here tonight is you filed an 340 00:17:17,699 --> 00:17:19,679 appeal and that's what is being 341 00:17:19,679 --> 00:17:22,500 addressed is your appeal that's it so Mr 342 00:17:22,500 --> 00:17:24,480 pounce you can't say that you represent 343 00:17:24,480 --> 00:17:26,339 the town you need to identify who you 344 00:17:26,339 --> 00:17:28,620 represent there are 345 00:17:28,620 --> 00:17:31,200 four options Mr but you have my answer 346 00:17:31,200 --> 00:17:33,780 please proceed well I'm going to direct 347 00:17:33,780 --> 00:17:36,179 this thing to the board 348 00:17:36,179 --> 00:17:38,640 the Planning and Zoning Commission and 349 00:17:38,640 --> 00:17:40,559 the zoning administrator are those who 350 00:17:40,559 --> 00:17:42,900 we allege that committed error 351 00:17:42,900 --> 00:17:44,940 they are automatically 352 00:17:44,940 --> 00:17:47,280 parties to this appeal and can be 353 00:17:47,280 --> 00:17:48,840 represented 354 00:17:48,840 --> 00:17:51,299 in addition the mayor and Town Council 355 00:17:51,299 --> 00:17:53,760 have the right to join this case as 356 00:17:53,760 --> 00:17:55,679 parties themselves 357 00:17:55,679 --> 00:17:58,200 I'm trying to identify 358 00:17:58,200 --> 00:18:00,000 because Mr pounds has just said he 359 00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:02,580 represents the town which isn't unless 360 00:18:02,580 --> 00:18:04,080 he's saying he represents the mayor in 361 00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:05,820 Town Council 362 00:18:05,820 --> 00:18:07,620 isn't a thing there's these are the 363 00:18:07,620 --> 00:18:09,360 parties the potential parties that Mr 364 00:18:09,360 --> 00:18:14,810 pounds could represent 365 00:18:14,820 --> 00:18:17,760 just let you filed an appeal yes and the 366 00:18:17,760 --> 00:18:19,620 appeal is before the board of appeals 367 00:18:19,620 --> 00:18:22,860 and and I am presenting the case on 368 00:18:22,860 --> 00:18:24,720 behalf of the Town through the board of 369 00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:28,870 appeals that's it 370 00:18:28,880 --> 00:18:30,900 the town 371 00:18:30,900 --> 00:18:32,760 you mean the corporate body of the town 372 00:18:32,760 --> 00:18:36,120 of Chesapeake Beach it's you know are we 373 00:18:36,120 --> 00:18:37,860 going to stay here all night that's fine 374 00:18:37,860 --> 00:18:40,740 the reason I'm asking is we have to know 375 00:18:40,740 --> 00:18:46,430 who are parties to this appeal this is 376 00:18:46,440 --> 00:18:48,260 huh 377 00:18:48,260 --> 00:18:51,240 the we know that don't don't direct 378 00:18:51,240 --> 00:18:54,059 comments to 379 00:18:54,059 --> 00:18:55,799 the Planning and Zoning commission and 380 00:18:55,799 --> 00:18:57,360 the zoning administrator are the people 381 00:18:57,360 --> 00:18:59,460 that the rod and reel alleged commit 382 00:18:59,460 --> 00:19:01,919 error and therefore they're the applese 383 00:19:01,919 --> 00:19:04,080 we're the appellants in this case 384 00:19:04,080 --> 00:19:06,539 so they're automatically parties I don't 385 00:19:06,539 --> 00:19:09,360 know whether Mr pounds represents them 386 00:19:09,360 --> 00:19:11,580 or whether he's trying to introduce and 387 00:19:11,580 --> 00:19:14,460 represent the mayor in Town Council 388 00:19:14,460 --> 00:19:16,620 who do have the right to join this as 389 00:19:16,620 --> 00:19:18,720 parties but we should we have to let the 390 00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:20,640 record reflect who the parties to this 391 00:19:20,640 --> 00:19:23,039 appeal are in addition anybody that 392 00:19:23,039 --> 00:19:24,900 testifies in this case under Maryland 393 00:19:24,900 --> 00:19:27,480 law becomes a party because they get a 394 00:19:27,480 --> 00:19:30,120 notice if this goes to subsequent 395 00:19:30,120 --> 00:19:31,919 um appeals and courts and things like 396 00:19:31,919 --> 00:19:34,080 that and so that's why you have them 397 00:19:34,080 --> 00:19:36,780 sign up so you have their information so 398 00:19:36,780 --> 00:19:38,580 we have to identify who the parties are 399 00:19:38,580 --> 00:19:39,900 and I'm trying to find out whether the 400 00:19:39,900 --> 00:19:41,340 mayor and Town Council or parties to 401 00:19:41,340 --> 00:19:42,559 this case 402 00:19:42,559 --> 00:19:45,840 at this point your clients are the going 403 00:19:45,840 --> 00:19:48,549 parties 404 00:19:48,559 --> 00:19:53,039 there's no process for Apple leaves in 405 00:19:53,039 --> 00:19:55,440 an adversarial role 406 00:19:55,440 --> 00:20:02,400 uh if if Mr Townes uh determined to 407 00:20:02,400 --> 00:20:05,820 speak or offer evidence he will I hope 408 00:20:05,820 --> 00:20:08,820 identify who he's offering that evidence 409 00:20:08,820 --> 00:20:12,900 for and at that point in time uh 410 00:20:12,900 --> 00:20:16,620 that individual or those individuals of 411 00:20:16,620 --> 00:20:19,500 that group may as a matter of all become 412 00:20:19,500 --> 00:20:23,039 a party but they may not okay the reason 413 00:20:23,039 --> 00:20:24,780 I asked at the beginning was he was 414 00:20:24,780 --> 00:20:26,400 mentioning that he's maybe making 415 00:20:26,400 --> 00:20:28,440 objections for him to make objections he 416 00:20:28,440 --> 00:20:32,330 has to represent a party 417 00:20:32,340 --> 00:20:34,380 okay I'll proceed 418 00:20:34,380 --> 00:20:37,860 we typically allow on this board the 419 00:20:37,860 --> 00:20:39,000 petitioner to do their entire 420 00:20:39,000 --> 00:20:41,720 presentation and have never heard 421 00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:43,980 objections at the time the statements 422 00:20:43,980 --> 00:20:45,780 were made I'm not saying that I'm not 423 00:20:45,780 --> 00:20:48,360 open to that if that's how you would 424 00:20:48,360 --> 00:20:50,520 recommend proceeding we have never done 425 00:20:50,520 --> 00:20:52,679 it 426 00:20:52,679 --> 00:20:54,120 um I guess I will leave that question 427 00:20:54,120 --> 00:20:56,220 open why don't you proceed with your 428 00:20:56,220 --> 00:20:58,260 presentation and assume that no 429 00:20:58,260 --> 00:20:59,700 interruptions or objections will come 430 00:20:59,700 --> 00:21:01,919 and if it does 431 00:21:01,919 --> 00:21:03,120 what yeah 432 00:21:03,120 --> 00:21:06,590 thank you 433 00:21:06,600 --> 00:21:08,160 so 434 00:21:08,160 --> 00:21:10,140 we've got the application we're just 435 00:21:10,140 --> 00:21:12,299 doing the pro formas right now so the 436 00:21:12,299 --> 00:21:15,299 second one is that I'm offering would be 437 00:21:15,299 --> 00:21:28,730 exhibit three and this represents uh 438 00:21:28,740 --> 00:21:32,640 and we start early I don't know how a an 439 00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:34,860 order of the Court would have any uh 440 00:21:34,860 --> 00:21:36,360 really binding or any type of 441 00:21:36,360 --> 00:21:39,419 governments as to what the board is 442 00:21:39,419 --> 00:21:41,700 going to be you know seeking 443 00:21:41,700 --> 00:21:44,400 um uh or what what the questions are 444 00:21:44,400 --> 00:21:46,740 going to be addressing so uh this is a 445 00:21:46,740 --> 00:21:49,320 this is we're here based on appeal 446 00:21:49,320 --> 00:21:52,620 um and so I obviously I think it's going 447 00:21:52,620 --> 00:21:54,299 to be the relevance would be up the 448 00:21:54,299 --> 00:21:56,880 council into the Mr chair but we're 449 00:21:56,880 --> 00:21:58,140 going to start right out there how 450 00:21:58,140 --> 00:21:59,520 that's going to be relevant these 451 00:21:59,520 --> 00:22:01,020 proceedings for the purpose of while 452 00:22:01,020 --> 00:22:02,940 we're here I have no idea that that's 453 00:22:02,940 --> 00:22:06,960 not good Mr Blitz I think I take issue 454 00:22:06,960 --> 00:22:09,600 with your characterization that is the 455 00:22:09,600 --> 00:22:12,179 opinion the order of the court in this 456 00:22:12,179 --> 00:22:14,460 case this case is an administrative 457 00:22:14,460 --> 00:22:18,960 appeal and is not uh part of the 458 00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:20,820 judicial proceeding that was decided a 459 00:22:20,820 --> 00:22:23,580 number of months ago so let me make my 460 00:22:23,580 --> 00:22:25,679 argument for why it should be 461 00:22:25,679 --> 00:22:27,480 number one 462 00:22:27,480 --> 00:22:29,520 um as you'll hear tonight uh improper 463 00:22:29,520 --> 00:22:31,679 delay using an arbitrary and capricious 464 00:22:31,679 --> 00:22:33,419 denial of procedural rights guaranteed 465 00:22:33,419 --> 00:22:35,760 by Maryland law and town laws is a big 466 00:22:35,760 --> 00:22:38,039 part of the rationale for this appeal 467 00:22:38,039 --> 00:22:40,740 paragraph two page one of the order 468 00:22:40,740 --> 00:22:43,080 directs the portion of this board's 469 00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:44,220 process 470 00:22:44,220 --> 00:22:46,799 you are under a court order to do it 471 00:22:46,799 --> 00:22:48,780 according to that process 472 00:22:48,780 --> 00:22:51,179 the court found that the rodent real Inc 473 00:22:51,179 --> 00:22:53,700 was an agree a grieved party 474 00:22:53,700 --> 00:22:56,220 which is a prerequisite requirement for 475 00:22:56,220 --> 00:22:58,919 the appeal to this board and you can see 476 00:22:58,919 --> 00:23:02,700 that uh in the his finding on page 14 of 477 00:23:02,700 --> 00:23:04,020 the original order 478 00:23:04,020 --> 00:23:05,880 the court found that the rod and reel 479 00:23:05,880 --> 00:23:07,799 had filed its application in a timely 480 00:23:07,799 --> 00:23:11,400 manner that also is subject in this case 481 00:23:11,400 --> 00:23:14,280 and it's it's important for this board 482 00:23:14,280 --> 00:23:17,460 who is under this court order to know 483 00:23:17,460 --> 00:23:20,220 that and see the the rationale of the 484 00:23:20,220 --> 00:23:22,679 Court the court order specifies 485 00:23:22,679 --> 00:23:25,380 procedural conduct required of this 486 00:23:25,380 --> 00:23:28,020 board with respect to this case in its 487 00:23:28,020 --> 00:23:29,880 final paragraph of the order which 488 00:23:29,880 --> 00:23:32,159 should be memorialized in the record of 489 00:23:32,159 --> 00:23:34,500 the appeal as it forms a part of the law 490 00:23:34,500 --> 00:23:38,340 of the case so I think it's I think it's 491 00:23:38,340 --> 00:23:40,020 quite obvious that it needs to come into 492 00:23:40,020 --> 00:23:42,539 the order you are being directed by a 493 00:23:42,539 --> 00:23:44,100 judge to hold this hearing in a certain 494 00:23:44,100 --> 00:23:46,200 way with procedures dictated by the 495 00:23:46,200 --> 00:23:48,419 court order that should be brought into 496 00:23:48,419 --> 00:23:50,580 the record I'm not disputing that but 497 00:23:50,580 --> 00:23:53,220 with the only thing I was disputing was 498 00:23:53,220 --> 00:23:57,120 your characterization that that order is 499 00:23:57,120 --> 00:24:00,539 an order in this case I apologize if I 500 00:24:00,539 --> 00:24:01,799 said that I didn't mean to say that 501 00:24:01,799 --> 00:24:03,480 that's what I was questioning I 502 00:24:03,480 --> 00:24:06,240 apologize for Mr Sussman um I just 503 00:24:06,240 --> 00:24:08,700 misheard you and didn't realize what you 504 00:24:08,700 --> 00:24:10,980 were saying 505 00:24:10,980 --> 00:24:13,080 so help we've taken care of the 506 00:24:13,080 --> 00:24:13,980 admission 507 00:24:13,980 --> 00:24:15,840 because I don't think it's been ruled 508 00:24:15,840 --> 00:24:17,940 upon I mean so my question now is Mr 509 00:24:17,940 --> 00:24:20,220 pounds is making an objection he needs 510 00:24:20,220 --> 00:24:24,950 to identify which party he represents 511 00:24:24,960 --> 00:24:27,559 I would agree with that okay basically 512 00:24:27,559 --> 00:24:31,799 uh you know well the parties in this 513 00:24:31,799 --> 00:24:33,780 case okay we're talking about this case 514 00:24:33,780 --> 00:24:37,080 as opposed to you know any other case 515 00:24:37,080 --> 00:24:39,299 the court case or anything like that is 516 00:24:39,299 --> 00:24:40,799 the town of Chesapeake Beach because 517 00:24:40,799 --> 00:24:43,860 that that is the party here uh which is 518 00:24:43,860 --> 00:24:46,140 the part the other two parties in the 519 00:24:46,140 --> 00:24:48,000 court case are not going to be part of 520 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:50,039 this case so as it applies to the town 521 00:24:50,039 --> 00:24:53,159 of Chesapeake Beach that was not a party 522 00:24:53,159 --> 00:24:57,840 to the court case therefore uh uh how is 523 00:24:57,840 --> 00:25:00,120 any Court decision would have been on 524 00:25:00,120 --> 00:25:01,740 those parties are different than 525 00:25:01,740 --> 00:25:03,360 whatever they would be going on with 526 00:25:03,360 --> 00:25:06,960 regard to anything on this matter okay 527 00:25:06,960 --> 00:25:09,179 which is in essence on behalf of the 528 00:25:09,179 --> 00:25:12,240 town so uh as a result the relevance on 529 00:25:12,240 --> 00:25:15,419 behalf of the Town becomes it means that document becomes completely 530 00:25:15,419 --> 00:25:18,299 irrelevant so I would object because the 531 00:25:18,299 --> 00:25:20,700 town has a corporate body can't be a 532 00:25:20,700 --> 00:25:21,960 party 533 00:25:21,960 --> 00:25:23,400 to this case 534 00:25:23,400 --> 00:25:25,260 the people that can be a party to this 535 00:25:25,260 --> 00:25:26,100 case 536 00:25:26,100 --> 00:25:27,360 are 537 00:25:27,360 --> 00:25:28,740 the mayor 538 00:25:28,740 --> 00:25:31,140 the Town Council 539 00:25:31,140 --> 00:25:33,840 the Planning and Zoning administrator 540 00:25:33,840 --> 00:25:37,559 and the planning on zoning Commission 541 00:25:37,559 --> 00:25:39,539 I need to know 542 00:25:39,539 --> 00:25:41,039 if Mr pounds is going to be here 543 00:25:41,039 --> 00:25:42,179 representing somebody as an attorney 544 00:25:42,179 --> 00:25:43,919 whether he represents any of those four 545 00:25:43,919 --> 00:25:45,900 parties so that we know that whether 546 00:25:45,900 --> 00:25:49,320 they are parties of record in this case 547 00:25:49,320 --> 00:25:52,140 you know and then then okay and then the 548 00:25:52,140 --> 00:25:54,059 council wants to keep you know going 549 00:25:54,059 --> 00:25:56,640 back and forth here's the problem the 550 00:25:56,640 --> 00:25:58,980 problem is is that exhibit two the 551 00:25:58,980 --> 00:26:01,679 application Zuni board of appeals town 552 00:26:01,679 --> 00:26:04,140 of Chesapeake Beach doesn't say anything 553 00:26:04,140 --> 00:26:06,659 about any other parties or anything his 554 00:26:06,659 --> 00:26:09,120 application that he filed that he 555 00:26:09,120 --> 00:26:11,760 introduced says the town of Chesapeake 556 00:26:11,760 --> 00:26:14,460 Beach not any other parties this is his 557 00:26:14,460 --> 00:26:18,179 document his appeal so therefore uh you 558 00:26:18,179 --> 00:26:20,159 know by his own document he wants to try 559 00:26:20,159 --> 00:26:22,380 to switch it and turn it and change it 560 00:26:22,380 --> 00:26:24,419 the problem is that he's the one that 561 00:26:24,419 --> 00:26:26,159 presented the application he's the one 562 00:26:26,159 --> 00:26:27,659 who filled it out he's the one who 563 00:26:27,659 --> 00:26:28,799 presented this 564 00:26:28,799 --> 00:26:31,380 he's stuck with his own document 565 00:26:31,380 --> 00:26:34,440 so respectfully 566 00:26:34,440 --> 00:26:37,080 I'm not trying to by introducing the 567 00:26:37,080 --> 00:26:39,360 order change who the parties are the 568 00:26:39,360 --> 00:26:41,220 parties right now 569 00:26:41,220 --> 00:26:43,500 or the rod and reel because I understand 570 00:26:43,500 --> 00:26:47,810 it as as an appellant 571 00:26:47,820 --> 00:26:49,740 by introducing the order all I'm doing 572 00:26:49,740 --> 00:26:52,320 is telling putting into evidence for you 573 00:26:52,320 --> 00:26:54,960 what the court found with respect to the 574 00:26:54,960 --> 00:26:56,820 procedures that are required in this 575 00:26:56,820 --> 00:26:59,460 board of appeals hearing in this case 576 00:26:59,460 --> 00:27:02,279 and the rationale for that that doesn't 577 00:27:02,279 --> 00:27:03,960 change the parties 578 00:27:03,960 --> 00:27:07,320 but for an attorney to represent someone 579 00:27:07,320 --> 00:27:10,080 here and make objections they have to 580 00:27:10,080 --> 00:27:12,240 say who they represent and it can't be a 581 00:27:12,240 --> 00:27:13,740 corporate body as far as I know I've 582 00:27:13,740 --> 00:27:17,159 never heard of the corporate body of 583 00:27:17,159 --> 00:27:19,980 Chesapeake Beach being the party in a 584 00:27:19,980 --> 00:27:24,230 board of appeals case in a zoning case 585 00:27:24,240 --> 00:27:27,720 I mean perhaps they could but it I 586 00:27:27,720 --> 00:27:30,960 that's when you you filed it okay 587 00:27:30,960 --> 00:27:33,120 and that's what the document says you 588 00:27:33,120 --> 00:27:35,460 filed it this is what it says and of 589 00:27:35,460 --> 00:27:38,220 course the a corporation can have a 590 00:27:38,220 --> 00:27:39,779 presentation through the attorney that's 591 00:27:39,779 --> 00:27:42,179 what a corporation does I mean this is 592 00:27:42,179 --> 00:27:44,940 this isn't anything new that you're this 593 00:27:44,940 --> 00:27:48,120 is your uh this is your appeal you filed 594 00:27:48,120 --> 00:27:50,760 it you're stuck with it I don't know 595 00:27:50,760 --> 00:27:52,320 what you think I'm stuck with all I've 596 00:27:52,320 --> 00:27:55,140 done is is gone to court to force the 597 00:27:55,140 --> 00:27:57,059 board to hear this case 598 00:27:57,059 --> 00:27:59,700 and one 599 00:27:59,700 --> 00:28:03,419 and then we're holding the case 600 00:28:03,419 --> 00:28:05,640 we're the party now 601 00:28:05,640 --> 00:28:10,200 we're complaining about only the conduct 602 00:28:10,200 --> 00:28:11,640 of the Planning and Zoning commission 603 00:28:11,640 --> 00:28:14,700 and the zoning administrator 604 00:28:14,700 --> 00:28:16,500 because we wouldn't be able to challenge 605 00:28:16,500 --> 00:28:19,440 directly into the board of appeals 606 00:28:19,440 --> 00:28:22,559 the conduct of the town or the Town 607 00:28:22,559 --> 00:28:23,760 Council 608 00:28:23,760 --> 00:28:26,760 but they are entitled to represent 609 00:28:26,760 --> 00:28:29,700 themselves and join a zoning case 610 00:28:29,700 --> 00:28:32,580 and in doing so it has nothing to do 611 00:28:32,580 --> 00:28:34,919 with that order I'm not trying to make 612 00:28:34,919 --> 00:28:36,480 that order change who the parties are 613 00:28:36,480 --> 00:28:38,159 the parties right now are just the board 614 00:28:38,159 --> 00:28:39,360 of appeals we're trying to find out 615 00:28:39,360 --> 00:28:41,279 whether other parties are going to join 616 00:28:41,279 --> 00:28:43,200 by Mr pounds representation 617 00:28:43,200 --> 00:28:45,900 Mr bullets I think Mr pounds has made it 618 00:28:45,900 --> 00:28:48,779 quite clear that he is representing the 619 00:28:48,779 --> 00:28:50,340 corporate entity of the town of pet 620 00:28:50,340 --> 00:28:53,580 Chesapeake Beach and that is the entity 621 00:28:53,580 --> 00:28:56,750 uh 622 00:28:56,760 --> 00:28:59,220 that can move forward and I would 623 00:28:59,220 --> 00:29:03,730 determine that your 624 00:29:03,740 --> 00:29:08,269 opinion in order are invisible 625 00:29:08,279 --> 00:29:12,890 thank you 626 00:29:12,900 --> 00:29:15,779 uh 627 00:29:15,779 --> 00:29:19,500 next is a letter dated August 14th 2023 628 00:29:19,500 --> 00:29:20,880 this is the last of what I would 629 00:29:20,880 --> 00:29:25,070 describe as pro forma introductions 630 00:29:25,080 --> 00:29:28,020 um August 14th 2023. 631 00:29:28,020 --> 00:29:30,600 like the gallery please 632 00:29:30,600 --> 00:29:39,169 um 633 00:29:39,179 --> 00:29:41,640 feed that's required to have this appeal 634 00:29:41,640 --> 00:29:43,620 just getting that into the record 635 00:29:43,620 --> 00:29:45,299 that's why I call them pro forma these 636 00:29:45,299 --> 00:29:46,799 first three are just kind of 637 00:29:46,799 --> 00:29:50,870 need to be sure 638 00:29:50,880 --> 00:29:52,559 so I'm going to begin 639 00:29:52,559 --> 00:29:54,179 um testimony 640 00:29:54,179 --> 00:29:55,200 um 641 00:29:55,200 --> 00:29:57,840 with uh Mr Paul Woodburn um Paul would 642 00:29:57,840 --> 00:30:00,000 you come up to the lectern to answer 643 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:05,450 these questions so that you can be heard 644 00:30:05,460 --> 00:30:06,720 um 645 00:30:06,720 --> 00:30:09,720 or anybody attending in the in speaking 646 00:30:09,720 --> 00:30:10,980 from the audience Please be aware that 647 00:30:10,980 --> 00:30:12,659 we're going to do a blanket swearing in 648 00:30:12,659 --> 00:30:14,399 right now 649 00:30:14,399 --> 00:30:16,380 um if you come and speak to the lectern 650 00:30:16,380 --> 00:30:21,779 please uh note your name down on uh any sheet along with your name address 651 00:30:21,779 --> 00:30:24,240 and uh who you represent or if you're 652 00:30:24,240 --> 00:30:25,559 speaking on your own behalf obviously 653 00:30:25,559 --> 00:30:27,240 witness 654 00:30:27,240 --> 00:30:28,860 um so for the swearing in for anybody 655 00:30:28,860 --> 00:30:31,080 stepping to lectern please know uh do 656 00:30:31,080 --> 00:30:33,000 you solemnly swear or affirm under the 657 00:30:33,000 --> 00:30:34,440 penalty of perjury that the testimony 658 00:30:34,440 --> 00:30:36,059 you're about to give and the responses 659 00:30:36,059 --> 00:30:37,320 and statements you're about to make 660 00:30:37,320 --> 00:30:39,000 believe the whole truth and nothing but 661 00:30:39,000 --> 00:30:41,899 the truth I do 662 00:30:41,899 --> 00:30:45,950 okay thank you 663 00:30:45,960 --> 00:30:47,520 um 664 00:30:47,520 --> 00:30:50,059 Mr Woodburn um 665 00:30:50,059 --> 00:30:52,440 if Mr woodburns could be testifying he 666 00:30:52,440 --> 00:30:53,940 has a document as we can proceed forward 667 00:30:53,940 --> 00:30:55,559 but if he indeed is going to be 668 00:30:55,559 --> 00:30:57,840 expressing an opinion such as an expert 669 00:30:57,840 --> 00:31:00,120 witness obviously we're going to be you 670 00:31:00,120 --> 00:31:02,100 know objecting to that as well as the 671 00:31:02,100 --> 00:31:03,059 fact that I'm probably going to avoid 672 00:31:03,059 --> 00:31:06,539 the error uh uh on his request to uh 673 00:31:06,539 --> 00:31:09,179 issue any opinions 674 00:31:09,179 --> 00:31:11,940 understand that that's fine if we get to 675 00:31:11,940 --> 00:31:12,780 that but 676 00:31:12,780 --> 00:31:13,919 [Music] 677 00:31:13,919 --> 00:31:15,960 I get to put on his qualifications from 678 00:31:15,960 --> 00:31:17,700 the start anyway before we get into that 679 00:31:17,700 --> 00:31:19,200 objection I think Mr 680 00:31:19,200 --> 00:31:21,059 um pounds is kind of 681 00:31:21,059 --> 00:31:24,539 got a trigger finger on objections here 682 00:31:24,539 --> 00:31:25,860 um Mr 683 00:31:25,860 --> 00:31:28,380 um Woodburn um what's your profession 684 00:31:28,380 --> 00:31:30,120 oh no can you actually say where you 685 00:31:30,120 --> 00:31:31,320 live please 686 00:31:31,320 --> 00:31:33,299 in your full name uh my name is Paul 687 00:31:33,299 --> 00:31:35,399 Woodburn I'm a professional engineer I'm 688 00:31:35,399 --> 00:31:38,399 with the offices of Atwell engineering 689 00:31:38,399 --> 00:31:42,299 at 11721 Woodmore Road in Mitchellville 690 00:31:42,299 --> 00:31:44,220 Maryland and are you licensed to 691 00:31:44,220 --> 00:31:47,760 practice Engineering in Maryland I am 692 00:31:47,760 --> 00:31:49,679 um have you submitted site plans to 693 00:31:49,679 --> 00:31:53,159 municipalities before I have and in that 694 00:31:53,159 --> 00:31:54,720 process do you put your seal on 695 00:31:54,720 --> 00:31:57,600 documents uh as an engineer submitted to 696 00:31:57,600 --> 00:32:00,480 the various local jurisdictions 697 00:32:00,480 --> 00:32:02,460 um and 698 00:32:02,460 --> 00:32:05,700 do you represent well no in January of 699 00:32:05,700 --> 00:32:08,100 um 2021 did you represent the rod and 700 00:32:08,100 --> 00:32:09,360 reel yes 701 00:32:09,360 --> 00:32:12,179 and so you were acting as the agent for 702 00:32:12,179 --> 00:32:14,460 the rod and reel yes 703 00:32:14,460 --> 00:32:16,799 um and did you have uh occasion to file 704 00:32:16,799 --> 00:32:20,159 five site plans with the uh town clerk 705 00:32:20,159 --> 00:32:22,980 on January 29th 2021 706 00:32:22,980 --> 00:32:24,480 I did 707 00:32:24,480 --> 00:32:26,580 um and was that for the review of the 708 00:32:26,580 --> 00:32:28,320 site Plans by the Planning and Zoning 709 00:32:28,320 --> 00:32:30,179 Commission of Chesapeake Beach Maryland 710 00:32:30,179 --> 00:32:33,539 yes uh in your experience uh were the 711 00:32:33,539 --> 00:32:34,980 plans to be reviewed by the zoning 712 00:32:34,980 --> 00:32:36,419 administrator of the Town who at the 713 00:32:36,419 --> 00:32:39,659 time was Christopher Jakubiak 714 00:32:39,659 --> 00:32:42,179 oh yeah I missed the question sure 715 00:32:42,179 --> 00:32:45,240 um in your experience were the plans 716 00:32:45,240 --> 00:32:46,919 also to be reviewed by the zoning 717 00:32:46,919 --> 00:32:48,539 administrator of the Town who at the 718 00:32:48,539 --> 00:32:49,380 time 719 00:32:49,380 --> 00:32:53,100 this is January of 2021 at the time was 720 00:32:53,100 --> 00:32:57,710 Christopher Jakubiak 721 00:32:57,720 --> 00:33:00,960 what's the basis basis yeah well one of 722 00:33:00,960 --> 00:33:03,059 these things is one is his experience I 723 00:33:03,059 --> 00:33:05,279 don't know what his experiences or basis 724 00:33:05,279 --> 00:33:08,880 for his experience but uh as I said if 725 00:33:08,880 --> 00:33:11,580 this if it's just to your knowledge 726 00:33:11,580 --> 00:33:14,279 that's fine and that's going to be a yes 727 00:33:14,279 --> 00:33:15,899 or no question but if he's going to be 728 00:33:15,899 --> 00:33:18,779 expressing an opinion here uh I just 729 00:33:18,779 --> 00:33:20,460 want to let you know that 730 00:33:20,460 --> 00:33:22,559 starting off that's where we're going 731 00:33:22,559 --> 00:33:25,200 very quickly so if he if he says you're 732 00:33:25,200 --> 00:33:27,659 based on your experience yes or no then 733 00:33:27,659 --> 00:33:29,220 I'll withdraw the objection but we're 734 00:33:29,220 --> 00:33:31,260 going to quickly hit that wall 735 00:33:31,260 --> 00:33:33,600 that's what I said in your experience uh 736 00:33:33,600 --> 00:33:35,039 I'll ask a preliminary question before 737 00:33:35,039 --> 00:33:37,500 you get to that Mr Mr Woodburn have you 738 00:33:37,500 --> 00:33:39,960 presented prior to filing the site plans 739 00:33:39,960 --> 00:33:41,220 with the right 740 00:33:41,220 --> 00:33:45,480 the rod and reel in on January 29th 2021 741 00:33:45,480 --> 00:33:48,600 had you experienced had you um filed uh 742 00:33:48,600 --> 00:33:50,460 other plans with the town of Chesapeake 743 00:33:50,460 --> 00:33:53,399 Beach prior to that yes how many can you 744 00:33:53,399 --> 00:33:55,669 guess 745 00:33:55,679 --> 00:33:59,340 1000 okay so in your experience were the 746 00:33:59,340 --> 00:34:01,320 plans to be reviewed also be reviewed by 747 00:34:01,320 --> 00:34:03,000 the zoning administrator of the Town who 748 00:34:03,000 --> 00:34:05,279 at the time was Christopher jukubiak all 749 00:34:05,279 --> 00:34:06,659 experience yes 750 00:34:06,659 --> 00:34:08,580 um so for the five site plans were each 751 00:34:08,580 --> 00:34:10,440 of them to be considered category one 752 00:34:10,440 --> 00:34:12,839 site plans I believe they're category 753 00:34:12,839 --> 00:34:15,720 one site plans okay and why is that 754 00:34:15,720 --> 00:34:18,240 uh because they're in critical area and 755 00:34:18,240 --> 00:34:20,700 they include multi-family dwelling units 756 00:34:20,700 --> 00:34:23,820 as the use correct correct 757 00:34:23,820 --> 00:34:26,329 um 758 00:34:26,339 --> 00:34:28,440 and can you describe the five Projects 759 00:34:28,440 --> 00:34:31,139 please and and give them names so that 760 00:34:31,139 --> 00:34:32,280 the 761 00:34:32,280 --> 00:34:34,919 word he knows what those are 762 00:34:34,919 --> 00:34:37,379 sure so uh 763 00:34:37,379 --> 00:34:40,919 through the first three are and um we 764 00:34:40,919 --> 00:34:42,780 call Harbor Vista there's Harbor Vista 765 00:34:42,780 --> 00:34:44,940 North Harbor Vista South Harbor Vista 766 00:34:44,940 --> 00:34:46,379 West 767 00:34:46,379 --> 00:34:47,820 um and they're down next to kellum's 768 00:34:47,820 --> 00:34:49,379 field just so you have an idea of the 769 00:34:49,379 --> 00:34:51,179 general location 770 00:34:51,179 --> 00:34:53,280 sure and Council I'm going to leave it 771 00:34:53,280 --> 00:34:55,379 up to you as far as how far this but 772 00:34:55,379 --> 00:34:57,060 obviously where are we going today is 773 00:34:57,060 --> 00:34:59,400 this is going to be far uh different 774 00:34:59,400 --> 00:35:01,020 from the ultimate questions that the 775 00:35:01,020 --> 00:35:03,540 board is going to be looking to testify 776 00:35:03,540 --> 00:35:05,640 to even in Mr blitz's opening statements 777 00:35:05,640 --> 00:35:07,500 so the fact that there were five 778 00:35:07,500 --> 00:35:09,359 projects if he wants to do a brief 779 00:35:09,359 --> 00:35:11,099 summary of the five that's fine but you 780 00:35:11,099 --> 00:35:13,200 need details we're going to be objecting 781 00:35:13,200 --> 00:35:15,480 that also so I'm assuming this is going 782 00:35:15,480 --> 00:35:17,220 to be just a summary of where we're 783 00:35:17,220 --> 00:35:18,900 going with this it is going to be a 784 00:35:18,900 --> 00:35:20,040 summary and I would ask that you'd not 785 00:35:20,040 --> 00:35:21,240 make objections in the middle of his 786 00:35:21,240 --> 00:35:23,579 testimony I'll do my case you do your 787 00:35:23,579 --> 00:35:25,740 case okay 788 00:35:25,740 --> 00:35:28,980 so three uh as I said are on we call 789 00:35:28,980 --> 00:35:32,329 Harbor Vista 790 00:35:32,339 --> 00:35:34,800 Northwest and South 791 00:35:34,800 --> 00:35:37,320 um two are on Gordon Senate Avenue one's 792 00:35:37,320 --> 00:35:40,500 on Old Bayside across from the library 793 00:35:40,500 --> 00:35:43,740 um the fourth project is called stenets 794 00:35:43,740 --> 00:35:45,060 place 795 00:35:45,060 --> 00:35:48,300 um which is off of C Street the two open 796 00:35:48,300 --> 00:35:50,460 grass lots I'm sure you all know where 797 00:35:50,460 --> 00:35:51,660 that is 798 00:35:51,660 --> 00:35:54,900 and the the last project is called Home 799 00:35:54,900 --> 00:35:56,099 Place 800 00:35:56,099 --> 00:35:56,760 um 801 00:35:56,760 --> 00:35:58,320 it's on Cox Road 802 00:35:58,320 --> 00:36:01,859 called what sir Home Place 803 00:36:01,859 --> 00:36:05,030 on Cox Road 804 00:36:05,040 --> 00:36:07,859 Mr Woodburn we're all five projects uh 805 00:36:07,859 --> 00:36:09,780 located in the critical area 806 00:36:09,780 --> 00:36:12,540 yes and 807 00:36:12,540 --> 00:36:14,640 did you submit critical area site plans 808 00:36:14,640 --> 00:36:16,380 along with the applications 809 00:36:16,380 --> 00:36:17,280 um 810 00:36:17,280 --> 00:36:22,609 we do okay 811 00:36:22,619 --> 00:36:26,089 so at this time 812 00:36:26,099 --> 00:36:28,440 I'm going to offer a copy of the 813 00:36:28,440 --> 00:36:30,900 application 814 00:36:30,900 --> 00:36:33,000 to 815 00:36:33,000 --> 00:36:41,470 the Planning and Zoning Commission 816 00:36:41,480 --> 00:36:45,349 and at least I'm gonna 817 00:36:45,359 --> 00:36:58,690 help 818 00:36:58,700 --> 00:37:07,010 but I don't have one 819 00:37:07,020 --> 00:37:10,020 I would also uh like to submit my PDF 820 00:37:10,020 --> 00:37:12,000 the entire site plans this is just the 821 00:37:12,000 --> 00:37:13,560 applications 822 00:37:13,560 --> 00:37:15,900 not going to be asking you really to at 823 00:37:15,900 --> 00:37:17,160 this stage 824 00:37:17,160 --> 00:37:19,440 review any of those details but you do 825 00:37:19,440 --> 00:37:21,119 need to be in the record because those 826 00:37:21,119 --> 00:37:25,430 are all the things 827 00:37:25,440 --> 00:37:27,900 Mr Blitz are you asking they be 828 00:37:27,900 --> 00:37:34,130 introduced collectively as exhibit six 829 00:37:34,140 --> 00:37:36,300 if that's okay yes 830 00:37:36,300 --> 00:37:38,540 for the purpose of 831 00:37:38,540 --> 00:37:42,000 Mr chair and Council just to indicate 832 00:37:42,000 --> 00:37:45,119 that there were projects and these are 833 00:37:45,119 --> 00:37:47,940 the projects the note fashion 834 00:37:47,940 --> 00:37:52,130 okay 835 00:37:52,140 --> 00:37:57,530 Tom are you sure that that was six 836 00:37:57,540 --> 00:38:05,990 it is okay 837 00:38:06,000 --> 00:38:08,640 it's good 838 00:38:08,640 --> 00:38:10,560 I'll call Mr Woodburn back up but I've 839 00:38:10,560 --> 00:38:13,859 gotta a lot of the legal side of this to 840 00:38:13,859 --> 00:38:16,970 go over first 841 00:38:16,980 --> 00:38:20,760 I'm going to want to examine Mr Woodburn 842 00:38:20,760 --> 00:38:22,560 is is he 843 00:38:22,560 --> 00:38:24,900 you can't just set somebody down and 844 00:38:24,900 --> 00:38:27,119 bring them back if it's Mr bird Barn I 845 00:38:27,119 --> 00:38:29,099 wouldn't examine him now 846 00:38:29,099 --> 00:38:33,530 um you know 847 00:38:33,540 --> 00:38:35,579 I think that's appropriate yeah he can 848 00:38:35,579 --> 00:38:37,020 cross-examine I'm going to bring him 849 00:38:37,020 --> 00:38:38,940 back and he can cross-examine him again 850 00:38:38,940 --> 00:38:40,740 after that so Mr Woodburn can you return 851 00:38:40,740 --> 00:38:51,550 to the left turn please 852 00:38:51,560 --> 00:38:53,700 okay I didn't know if he had something 853 00:38:53,700 --> 00:38:55,920 else so Mr Weber you testified earlier 854 00:38:55,920 --> 00:38:58,380 that uh indeed you were the one who 855 00:38:58,380 --> 00:39:00,000 actually prepared the site plans the 856 00:39:00,000 --> 00:39:01,740 five site plans that are being discussed 857 00:39:01,740 --> 00:39:02,640 here 858 00:39:02,640 --> 00:39:06,359 honor my direction correct so you didn't 859 00:39:06,359 --> 00:39:07,440 actually do it it was under your 860 00:39:07,440 --> 00:39:08,640 direction 861 00:39:08,640 --> 00:39:10,560 well my office did them under my 862 00:39:10,560 --> 00:39:12,720 direction it takes more than one person 863 00:39:12,720 --> 00:39:15,839 to prepare these plans yes okay so uh 864 00:39:15,839 --> 00:39:17,700 you're the one who signed it signed 865 00:39:17,700 --> 00:39:19,500 these applications correct and you're 866 00:39:19,500 --> 00:39:21,000 either you stamped them 867 00:39:21,000 --> 00:39:27,859 the applications no plans yes okay who actually uh stamped the plans 868 00:39:27,859 --> 00:39:30,599 uh I'd have to look at each one I know I 869 00:39:30,599 --> 00:39:32,040 stand some I don't know if I stamped 870 00:39:32,040 --> 00:39:33,660 everyone okay so basically you're 871 00:39:33,660 --> 00:39:35,520 telling me that applications were filed 872 00:39:35,520 --> 00:39:38,820 and you were unaware of it wasn't you 873 00:39:38,820 --> 00:39:41,760 who actually uh uh either signed or 874 00:39:41,760 --> 00:39:44,099 stamped them no I didn't say that I said 875 00:39:44,099 --> 00:39:46,980 I don't know if I signed everyone but I 876 00:39:46,980 --> 00:39:49,619 did oversee and 877 00:39:49,619 --> 00:39:51,720 um 878 00:39:51,720 --> 00:39:55,380 worked on each site plan 879 00:39:55,380 --> 00:39:57,900 um and you know all the computations and 880 00:39:57,900 --> 00:40:00,660 the applications that go with them okay 881 00:40:00,660 --> 00:40:03,060 so basically uh this you testified this 882 00:40:03,060 --> 00:40:05,040 was a category one multi-flame family 883 00:40:05,040 --> 00:40:07,260 plans that included the critical area 884 00:40:07,260 --> 00:40:10,440 right let me ask something Mr Woodburn 885 00:40:10,440 --> 00:40:12,420 um did these have five applications go 886 00:40:12,420 --> 00:40:15,119 before the Planning Commission uh with 887 00:40:15,119 --> 00:40:17,700 regard to their review 888 00:40:17,700 --> 00:40:21,000 ever or under this application during 889 00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:22,440 the time that the Planning Commission 890 00:40:22,440 --> 00:40:25,980 was reviewing the uh the comprehensive 891 00:40:25,980 --> 00:40:28,260 plan that these five applications go 892 00:40:28,260 --> 00:40:31,320 before the Planning Commission 893 00:40:31,320 --> 00:40:33,359 I was not involved in any review of them 894 00:40:33,359 --> 00:40:36,109 why not 895 00:40:36,119 --> 00:40:38,520 ified so we have five applications your 896 00:40:38,520 --> 00:40:40,980 testimony that were filed but none of 897 00:40:40,980 --> 00:40:42,359 these applications went before the 898 00:40:42,359 --> 00:40:44,099 Planning Commission for the review for 899 00:40:44,099 --> 00:40:45,660 the comprehensive plan is that your 900 00:40:45,660 --> 00:40:48,300 testimony a test I could read it in if 901 00:40:48,300 --> 00:40:50,160 you'd like an email that I received from 902 00:40:50,160 --> 00:40:52,079 the Planning and Zoning I want to know 903 00:40:52,079 --> 00:40:53,880 what your knowledge is my knowledge if 904 00:40:53,880 --> 00:40:55,200 I'm gonna read it I'll be happy to get 905 00:40:55,200 --> 00:40:57,480 it do you have knowledge that indeed the 906 00:40:57,480 --> 00:40:59,460 Planning Commission reviewed these five 907 00:40:59,460 --> 00:41:01,200 applications 908 00:41:01,200 --> 00:41:03,119 I do not have knowledge that they did or 909 00:41:03,119 --> 00:41:05,579 did not review them can you tell me why 910 00:41:05,579 --> 00:41:07,560 this these applications would not have 911 00:41:07,560 --> 00:41:08,880 gone before the Planning Commission for 912 00:41:08,880 --> 00:41:11,280 the review objection 913 00:41:11,280 --> 00:41:12,480 look 914 00:41:12,480 --> 00:41:14,880 the entire case is about the fact that 915 00:41:14,880 --> 00:41:16,020 the Planning and Zoning commission and 916 00:41:16,020 --> 00:41:17,640 the zoning administrator didn't review 917 00:41:17,640 --> 00:41:20,099 the applications I didn't ask 918 00:41:20,099 --> 00:41:23,099 Mr Woodburn about that so it's beyond 919 00:41:23,099 --> 00:41:24,300 cross-exam the scope of 920 00:41:24,300 --> 00:41:28,560 cross-examination to cross to expand Mr 921 00:41:28,560 --> 00:41:32,400 uh Woodburn's testimony at this point 922 00:41:32,400 --> 00:41:34,740 we're going to be going over in quite 923 00:41:34,740 --> 00:41:36,420 detail why the Planning and Zoning 924 00:41:36,420 --> 00:41:37,560 Commission in the zoning administrator 925 00:41:37,560 --> 00:41:39,660 didn't review the site plans we don't 926 00:41:39,660 --> 00:41:41,700 need Mr Woodburn for that well a couple 927 00:41:41,700 --> 00:41:43,859 things first of all this obviously is 928 00:41:43,859 --> 00:41:45,900 within the scope of his knowledge and 929 00:41:45,900 --> 00:41:48,119 what he was testifying to as well as the 930 00:41:48,119 --> 00:41:50,400 fact that the rules or procedure for the 931 00:41:50,400 --> 00:41:57,480 board of appeals does call for broad uh evidence to be incorporated into the 932 00:41:57,480 --> 00:42:00,359 record so you know under the board of 933 00:42:00,359 --> 00:42:03,000 appeals own rules that have that would 934 00:42:03,000 --> 00:42:07,069 be admitted 935 00:42:07,079 --> 00:42:10,500 okay so uh basically there's a question 936 00:42:10,500 --> 00:42:12,960 pending for you Mr Woodburn yeah no uh 937 00:42:12,960 --> 00:42:15,180 no there's a question for the board I I 938 00:42:15,180 --> 00:42:16,380 objected to the scope of the 939 00:42:16,380 --> 00:42:20,150 cross-examination 940 00:42:20,160 --> 00:42:23,520 I think the scope's appropriate broad 941 00:42:23,520 --> 00:42:24,900 latitude is given in these 942 00:42:24,900 --> 00:42:27,480 Administrative Hearings and if I think 943 00:42:27,480 --> 00:42:30,180 it's going way too far I'll uh say 944 00:42:30,180 --> 00:42:32,520 something about it okay so the last 945 00:42:32,520 --> 00:42:34,740 question was Mr Woodburn why were these 946 00:42:34,740 --> 00:42:36,780 applications not presented to by the uh 947 00:42:36,780 --> 00:42:38,040 to the Planning Commission for their 948 00:42:38,040 --> 00:42:41,810 review 949 00:42:41,820 --> 00:42:44,220 I received after submitting the 950 00:42:44,220 --> 00:42:46,560 applications and email from Christy 951 00:42:46,560 --> 00:42:47,700 Kubiak 952 00:42:47,700 --> 00:42:51,420 February 5th 2021 905 a.m and I'll read 953 00:42:51,420 --> 00:42:54,119 it says hi Paul this is unprecedented 954 00:42:54,119 --> 00:42:56,160 and imposed is a significant challenge 955 00:42:56,160 --> 00:42:57,839 to the Planning Commission and the 956 00:42:57,839 --> 00:43:00,060 town's planning zoning and project 957 00:43:00,060 --> 00:43:01,680 review functions 958 00:43:01,680 --> 00:43:04,200 no town could reasonably and reasonably 959 00:43:04,200 --> 00:43:05,700 handle 960 00:43:05,700 --> 00:43:08,220 or excuse me responsibly handle a load 961 00:43:08,220 --> 00:43:09,480 of projects like this without 962 00:43:09,480 --> 00:43:13,200 significant delays to or derailing 963 00:43:13,200 --> 00:43:16,140 of its comprehensive Plan update and or 964 00:43:16,140 --> 00:43:18,540 zoning review and update further these 965 00:43:18,540 --> 00:43:20,880 projects if implemented have real 966 00:43:20,880 --> 00:43:22,980 potential compound 967 00:43:22,980 --> 00:43:25,200 to compound the challenges the planning 968 00:43:25,200 --> 00:43:26,700 commissions work on planning and 969 00:43:26,700 --> 00:43:29,880 ordinance drafting to seeking to address 970 00:43:29,880 --> 00:43:32,220 is seeking to address today is the news 971 00:43:32,220 --> 00:43:34,440 in the newspaper is legal notice of 972 00:43:34,440 --> 00:43:36,660 public hearing to be conducted by the 973 00:43:36,660 --> 00:43:39,300 Planning Commission on two 24-21 to 974 00:43:39,300 --> 00:43:40,940 consider a resolution 975 00:43:40,940 --> 00:43:43,020 recommending to the mayor and Town 976 00:43:43,020 --> 00:43:44,520 Council that 977 00:43:44,520 --> 00:43:46,800 they adopt an ordinance creating a 978 00:43:46,800 --> 00:43:48,839 temporary moratorium on the processing 979 00:43:48,839 --> 00:43:50,819 of major development projects which 980 00:43:50,819 --> 00:43:53,220 would include these five plans please 981 00:43:53,220 --> 00:43:55,740 contact Sharon hum at Town Hall if you 982 00:43:55,740 --> 00:43:58,680 want a copy of the resolution Chris okay 983 00:43:58,680 --> 00:44:03,180 so and obviously uh Mr pounds uh it's 984 00:44:03,180 --> 00:44:04,440 not going to be made a part of the 985 00:44:04,440 --> 00:44:06,540 record that email I was planning on it 986 00:44:06,540 --> 00:44:08,760 but it's by cross-examining he's 987 00:44:08,760 --> 00:44:12,000 jumbling up our case to in the timeline 988 00:44:12,000 --> 00:44:15,540 so if you want it now we can do it but I 989 00:44:15,540 --> 00:44:18,420 think it would be appropriate okay so I 990 00:44:18,420 --> 00:44:20,880 haven't seen a copy of that 991 00:44:20,880 --> 00:44:21,960 okay 992 00:44:21,960 --> 00:44:24,420 everybody this is 993 00:44:24,420 --> 00:44:29,870 the B exit seven 994 00:44:29,880 --> 00:44:33,000 and that's the email of February 5th uh 995 00:44:33,000 --> 00:44:34,510 2021. 996 00:44:34,510 --> 00:44:35,900 [Music] 997 00:44:35,900 --> 00:44:39,480 from Mr Jakubiak to 998 00:44:39,480 --> 00:44:43,319 Paul Woodburn with a copy to me and 999 00:44:43,319 --> 00:44:46,079 um another engineer working at Mr 1000 00:44:46,079 --> 00:44:48,960 Woodburn's office I believe 1001 00:44:48,960 --> 00:44:56,710 foreign 1002 00:44:56,720 --> 00:44:59,220 basically based upon that one email 1003 00:44:59,220 --> 00:45:01,619 about Mr uh Kubiak 1004 00:45:01,619 --> 00:45:03,540 um uh you're telling me that's what 1005 00:45:03,540 --> 00:45:05,220 caused these five projects not to be 1006 00:45:05,220 --> 00:45:07,500 sent to the Planning Commission 1007 00:45:07,500 --> 00:45:09,900 I can't make a judgment call not I don't 1008 00:45:09,900 --> 00:45:11,579 know well you're the one submitted his 1009 00:45:11,579 --> 00:45:13,200 email 1010 00:45:13,200 --> 00:45:15,839 I mean I'm I didn't never talk to Mr GK 1011 00:45:15,839 --> 00:45:17,700 after that you can take it for face 1012 00:45:17,700 --> 00:45:19,859 value you heard what I said okay so 1013 00:45:19,859 --> 00:45:22,319 basically uh who made the decision at 1014 00:45:22,319 --> 00:45:23,940 that point so you're telling me if 1015 00:45:23,940 --> 00:45:25,859 that's the whole email that made the 1016 00:45:25,859 --> 00:45:27,720 decision not to file any type of 1017 00:45:27,720 --> 00:45:29,099 applications with the Planning 1018 00:45:29,099 --> 00:45:30,500 Commission 1019 00:45:30,500 --> 00:45:32,640 just because of the way it was phrased 1020 00:45:32,640 --> 00:45:35,940 we filed all five site plans the result 1021 00:45:35,940 --> 00:45:38,460 of that was an email seven days later 1022 00:45:38,460 --> 00:45:40,140 that you just received into the record 1023 00:45:40,140 --> 00:45:42,000 on exhibit seven saying they weren't 1024 00:45:42,000 --> 00:45:43,980 going to be reviewed and that the 1025 00:45:43,980 --> 00:45:45,900 moratorium was going to be the one of 1026 00:45:45,900 --> 00:45:48,420 the two rationales for not reviewing it 1027 00:45:48,420 --> 00:45:52,560 Mr Woodburn can't testify as to why the 1028 00:45:52,560 --> 00:45:54,900 town did or didn't do something 1029 00:45:54,900 --> 00:45:56,940 he could you can ask him whether he 1030 00:45:56,940 --> 00:45:59,220 heard from him I know what to ask him 1031 00:45:59,220 --> 00:46:00,960 Council but so basically the question 1032 00:46:00,960 --> 00:46:04,020 comes into so in essence is that your 1033 00:46:04,020 --> 00:46:05,579 testimony that based upon that eggmail 1034 00:46:05,579 --> 00:46:08,300 that those projects were not sent before 1035 00:46:08,300 --> 00:46:10,380 the Planning Commission is that your 1036 00:46:10,380 --> 00:46:11,819 testimony 1037 00:46:11,819 --> 00:46:14,520 my testimony is that I know that those 1038 00:46:14,520 --> 00:46:16,740 site plans were not reviewed and the 1039 00:46:16,740 --> 00:46:19,500 reason that was given was emailed to me 1040 00:46:19,500 --> 00:46:21,540 on the date that I 1041 00:46:21,540 --> 00:46:24,599 let me ask you this is Mr Kubiak part of 1042 00:46:24,599 --> 00:46:26,339 the Planning Commission 1043 00:46:26,339 --> 00:46:29,940 hey no at that time 1044 00:46:29,940 --> 00:46:31,380 um 1045 00:46:31,380 --> 00:46:34,200 he's the zoning administrator I believe 1046 00:46:34,200 --> 00:46:36,119 so your testimony is that he was not 1047 00:46:36,119 --> 00:46:37,560 part of the actual Planning Commission 1048 00:46:37,560 --> 00:46:40,200 correct so you could have in essence 1049 00:46:40,200 --> 00:46:41,880 brought those applications to the 1050 00:46:41,880 --> 00:46:43,339 Planning Commission to be reviewed 1051 00:46:43,339 --> 00:46:46,319 objection we did it's one of the 1052 00:46:46,319 --> 00:46:50,520 exhibits the very uh first exhibit no 1053 00:46:50,520 --> 00:46:52,859 first exhibit was our appeal 1054 00:46:52,859 --> 00:46:55,619 um it's it's the exhibit that 1055 00:46:55,619 --> 00:46:58,560 the application which was filed with the 1056 00:46:58,560 --> 00:47:00,720 town that's the way you file for site 1057 00:47:00,720 --> 00:47:03,480 plans you don't file it but the first 1058 00:47:03,480 --> 00:47:06,180 person to review those is Mr 1059 00:47:06,180 --> 00:47:08,339 um jacobiak the zoning administrator and 1060 00:47:08,339 --> 00:47:09,660 then the Planning and Zoning commission 1061 00:47:09,660 --> 00:47:12,780 gets the file and holds a hearing 1062 00:47:12,780 --> 00:47:15,540 the refusal or the failure of them to 1063 00:47:15,540 --> 00:47:16,980 hold the hearing which they have never 1064 00:47:16,980 --> 00:47:18,060 done 1065 00:47:18,060 --> 00:47:20,700 is what's at stake in this case why are 1066 00:47:20,700 --> 00:47:23,280 you asking Mr 1067 00:47:23,280 --> 00:47:25,260 wood burn I generally don't get into 1068 00:47:25,260 --> 00:47:28,859 debates okay but but the reason I'm 1069 00:47:28,859 --> 00:47:30,540 objecting is I will answer that question 1070 00:47:30,540 --> 00:47:33,480 okay because he is the one who testified 1071 00:47:33,480 --> 00:47:35,579 he was acting as an agent for Rod and 1072 00:47:35,579 --> 00:47:37,200 Reel he's the one who filed the 1073 00:47:37,200 --> 00:47:40,280 applications so in essence he is the one 1074 00:47:40,280 --> 00:47:42,960 and even though he didn't sign off on 1075 00:47:42,960 --> 00:47:45,119 them he's the one whose office and he's 1076 00:47:45,119 --> 00:47:47,280 supervised and he was in charge of these 1077 00:47:47,280 --> 00:47:49,680 applications so in essence if he's the 1078 00:47:49,680 --> 00:47:52,920 one to charge the applications and why 1079 00:47:52,920 --> 00:47:54,000 didn't you take him for the Planning 1080 00:47:54,000 --> 00:47:56,119 Commission to be reviewed 1081 00:47:56,119 --> 00:47:59,280 the question is as simple as that or 1082 00:47:59,280 --> 00:48:02,160 does he know maybe doesn't know or or 1083 00:48:02,160 --> 00:48:04,440 anything but that's the question because 1084 00:48:04,440 --> 00:48:05,579 I can tell you that's going to be part 1085 00:48:05,579 --> 00:48:08,040 of my case and I'm setting this up for 1086 00:48:08,040 --> 00:48:09,599 later on if you can do what's happening 1087 00:48:09,599 --> 00:48:12,000 so so Mr boardburn 1088 00:48:12,000 --> 00:48:14,880 and that's that's the question is do you 1089 00:48:14,880 --> 00:48:16,500 have any knowledge as to why these five 1090 00:48:16,500 --> 00:48:18,660 applications were not presented to the 1091 00:48:18,660 --> 00:48:23,589 uh uh Planning Commission 1092 00:48:23,599 --> 00:48:29,990 let's let's move on 1093 00:48:30,000 --> 00:48:31,980 are there any further questions aside 1094 00:48:31,980 --> 00:48:34,680 from based upon his limited testimony of 1095 00:48:34,680 --> 00:48:36,660 what he's gone so far nothing more 1096 00:48:36,660 --> 00:48:38,280 obviously there will be more when he 1097 00:48:38,280 --> 00:48:39,599 comes we'll have another chance when he 1098 00:48:39,599 --> 00:48:43,260 adds uh substantial commentary yeah 1099 00:48:43,260 --> 00:48:46,079 thank you Mr Woodburn um 1100 00:48:46,079 --> 00:48:48,000 so the board's going to need to consider 1101 00:48:48,000 --> 00:48:50,520 the legal context of what is happening 1102 00:48:50,520 --> 00:48:52,500 in this case so I'll start with an 1103 00:48:52,500 --> 00:48:54,480 explanation of that 1104 00:48:54,480 --> 00:48:55,400 um 1105 00:48:55,400 --> 00:48:58,440 are you testifying no I'm giving them 1106 00:48:58,440 --> 00:49:03,119 I'm giving my presentation and my please 1107 00:49:03,119 --> 00:49:05,760 let me speak report Mr Blitz cannot give 1108 00:49:05,760 --> 00:49:09,410 you legal 1109 00:49:09,420 --> 00:49:12,420 that's Mr Sussman but as far as him you 1110 00:49:12,420 --> 00:49:14,040 know having legal opinions to the board 1111 00:49:14,040 --> 00:49:16,740 that's that's completely improper I'm 1112 00:49:16,740 --> 00:49:19,319 going to object right now to the entire 1113 00:49:19,319 --> 00:49:22,380 process of of interrupting our case at 1114 00:49:22,380 --> 00:49:25,140 every turn solely for the reason of 1115 00:49:25,140 --> 00:49:26,819 interruption what's happening 1116 00:49:26,819 --> 00:49:28,740 introduction that's not I am presenting 1117 00:49:28,740 --> 00:49:31,079 an argument can I please finish this 1118 00:49:31,079 --> 00:49:34,309 case 1119 00:49:34,319 --> 00:49:38,099 I get to make a presentation as I bring 1120 00:49:38,099 --> 00:49:40,619 in evidence I can explain the legal 1121 00:49:40,619 --> 00:49:45,000 context of what we our case is about to 1122 00:49:45,000 --> 00:49:46,619 make the legal argument so that you 1123 00:49:46,619 --> 00:49:49,079 understand the context of all the 1124 00:49:49,079 --> 00:49:51,780 evidence that will come in a big part of 1125 00:49:51,780 --> 00:49:54,420 this case is a legal argument 1126 00:49:54,420 --> 00:49:57,660 this is an appeal on alleged error so I 1127 00:49:57,660 --> 00:50:00,480 need to explain to you as a board and I 1128 00:50:00,480 --> 00:50:02,220 need to convince you if I'm going to be 1129 00:50:02,220 --> 00:50:05,220 successful of the merits of those things 1130 00:50:05,220 --> 00:50:07,200 we're going to be bringing a lot of 1131 00:50:07,200 --> 00:50:08,579 legal arguments because that's what 1132 00:50:08,579 --> 00:50:10,380 you're going to have to decide you're 1133 00:50:10,380 --> 00:50:12,420 going to have to decide whether the 1134 00:50:12,420 --> 00:50:14,099 Planning and Zoning commission and the 1135 00:50:14,099 --> 00:50:15,960 zoning administrators failure to process 1136 00:50:15,960 --> 00:50:18,599 site plans and the reasons for that were 1137 00:50:18,599 --> 00:50:22,440 in error that's the case so I'm going to 1138 00:50:22,440 --> 00:50:24,599 be talking a lot of Law and explaining 1139 00:50:24,599 --> 00:50:26,460 what our position on the law is I'm not 1140 00:50:26,460 --> 00:50:28,680 giving an opinion to you about the law 1141 00:50:28,680 --> 00:50:32,280 Mr Sussman can always weigh in if you 1142 00:50:32,280 --> 00:50:34,380 have questions about the law or 1143 00:50:34,380 --> 00:50:35,940 questions about what I say but I get to 1144 00:50:35,940 --> 00:50:38,160 present a case and it shouldn't be 1145 00:50:38,160 --> 00:50:40,560 interrupted at every turn when all I'm 1146 00:50:40,560 --> 00:50:42,060 doing is presenting 1147 00:50:42,060 --> 00:50:48,109 the basic case 1148 00:50:48,119 --> 00:50:53,390 oh you continue okay 1149 00:50:53,400 --> 00:50:55,920 first we start with you know the basic 1150 00:50:55,920 --> 00:50:58,140 property rights as it relates to zoning 1151 00:50:58,140 --> 00:50:59,579 power 1152 00:50:59,579 --> 00:51:03,359 um the default is that you own property 1153 00:51:03,359 --> 00:51:04,020 um 1154 00:51:04,020 --> 00:51:06,660 and if you own it fee simple and and 1155 00:51:06,660 --> 00:51:09,780 the owners get to decide uh free from 1156 00:51:09,780 --> 00:51:12,300 all interference uh on what is done with 1157 00:51:12,300 --> 00:51:13,859 that property including what is built 1158 00:51:13,859 --> 00:51:15,780 there that's the base 1159 00:51:15,780 --> 00:51:18,540 all limitations on that basic property 1160 00:51:18,540 --> 00:51:21,839 right are evaluated on whether they are 1161 00:51:21,839 --> 00:51:24,300 consistent with the law 1162 00:51:24,300 --> 00:51:28,549 such as zoning in this context 1163 00:51:28,559 --> 00:51:31,500 a zoning regulation does not direct a 1164 00:51:31,500 --> 00:51:33,480 property owner of what to build 1165 00:51:33,480 --> 00:51:36,480 uh or when to build it but provides the 1166 00:51:36,480 --> 00:51:38,640 youth limitations applicable to that 1167 00:51:38,640 --> 00:51:40,559 property as well as many other site plan 1168 00:51:40,559 --> 00:51:43,400 limitations on design orientation 1169 00:51:43,400 --> 00:51:49,609 mitigation that may be required Etc 1170 00:51:49,619 --> 00:51:52,859 that range of options 1171 00:51:52,859 --> 00:51:57,240 is limited by the zoning code 1172 00:51:57,240 --> 00:51:58,500 and 1173 00:51:58,500 --> 00:52:02,099 sometimes the subdivision regulations 1174 00:52:02,099 --> 00:52:04,140 um but the decision remains with the 1175 00:52:04,140 --> 00:52:05,819 property owner 1176 00:52:05,819 --> 00:52:08,040 that discretion that I'm describing is 1177 00:52:08,040 --> 00:52:10,260 important to remember because unless a 1178 00:52:10,260 --> 00:52:12,780 regulation on property development is 1179 00:52:12,780 --> 00:52:13,740 valid 1180 00:52:13,740 --> 00:52:15,839 and applied according to due process of 1181 00:52:15,839 --> 00:52:17,099 law 1182 00:52:17,099 --> 00:52:19,020 then the default is that the owner is 1183 00:52:19,020 --> 00:52:21,829 entitled to Bill 1184 00:52:21,839 --> 00:52:26,089 foreign 1185 00:52:26,099 --> 00:52:29,099 in the exhibit that I submitted uh for 1186 00:52:29,099 --> 00:52:31,020 the order of the circuit court for 1187 00:52:31,020 --> 00:52:33,599 Calvert County you can see on page 10 1188 00:52:33,599 --> 00:52:36,359 of exhibit three 1189 00:52:36,359 --> 00:52:37,020 um 1190 00:52:37,020 --> 00:52:38,460 the Court's point that the Supreme Court 1191 00:52:38,460 --> 00:52:40,380 of the United States has recognized in 1192 00:52:40,380 --> 00:52:42,119 multiple cases the high importance of 1193 00:52:42,119 --> 00:52:43,380 property rights 1194 00:52:43,380 --> 00:52:45,300 so there's a legal process associated 1195 00:52:45,300 --> 00:52:47,400 with zoning which must be clear and 1196 00:52:47,400 --> 00:52:50,040 constitutionally precise 1197 00:52:50,040 --> 00:52:52,260 it must not be impermissibly 1198 00:52:52,260 --> 00:52:54,660 overburdened the property interest and 1199 00:52:54,660 --> 00:52:57,119 it must be fairly and non-arbitrarily 1200 00:52:57,119 --> 00:52:59,640 applied to property owners 1201 00:52:59,640 --> 00:53:01,859 treating every property owner of a 1202 00:53:01,859 --> 00:53:04,020 similarly situated property interest 1203 00:53:04,020 --> 00:53:07,500 within the town zoning wall equally and 1204 00:53:07,500 --> 00:53:12,109 without bias or improper discrimination 1205 00:53:12,119 --> 00:53:15,359 a part of that due process is 1206 00:53:15,359 --> 00:53:17,220 if there are administrative procedures 1207 00:53:17,220 --> 00:53:18,960 that are set up to allow properties to 1208 00:53:18,960 --> 00:53:21,059 qualify under the zoning law 1209 00:53:21,059 --> 00:53:23,760 uh to develop their property 1210 00:53:23,760 --> 00:53:25,680 um you know it's a foundational concept 1211 00:53:25,680 --> 00:53:28,020 of zoning law in Maryland 1212 00:53:28,020 --> 00:53:29,760 throughout the country you know this is 1213 00:53:29,760 --> 00:53:32,339 traces back all the way to the Euclid 1214 00:53:32,339 --> 00:53:35,099 decision of the Supreme Court which you 1215 00:53:35,099 --> 00:53:37,920 know that's a century ago that 1216 00:53:37,920 --> 00:53:39,839 um established the constitutionality of 1217 00:53:39,839 --> 00:53:41,880 zoning that 1218 00:53:41,880 --> 00:53:46,500 both the substantive law and the process 1219 00:53:46,500 --> 00:53:49,079 for administering it must not be 1220 00:53:49,079 --> 00:53:51,000 arbitrary or unreasonable and there has 1221 00:53:51,000 --> 00:53:52,859 to be a constitutional due process in 1222 00:53:52,859 --> 00:53:57,260 the administration of all zoning laws 1223 00:53:57,260 --> 00:53:59,700 the importance of this point 1224 00:53:59,700 --> 00:54:01,200 is that when conducting the 1225 00:54:01,200 --> 00:54:03,300 administration of the zoning law the 1226 00:54:03,300 --> 00:54:04,440 Planning and Zoning commission and the 1227 00:54:04,440 --> 00:54:06,780 zoning administration's task is not to 1228 00:54:06,780 --> 00:54:08,099 legislate 1229 00:54:08,099 --> 00:54:10,559 or to create substantive policy on their 1230 00:54:10,559 --> 00:54:12,960 own but to administer the laws properly 1231 00:54:12,960 --> 00:54:14,760 passed by the Town Council 1232 00:54:14,760 --> 00:54:16,920 and with respect to property rights 1233 00:54:16,920 --> 00:54:20,930 existing at the time 1234 00:54:20,940 --> 00:54:22,740 I apologize with respect to the 1235 00:54:22,740 --> 00:54:24,119 properties existing at the time that the 1236 00:54:24,119 --> 00:54:25,740 applications are filed 1237 00:54:25,740 --> 00:54:32,450 um 1238 00:54:32,460 --> 00:54:34,559 those conducting the administrative 1239 00:54:34,559 --> 00:54:37,260 functions of the Town zoning laws in 1240 00:54:37,260 --> 00:54:38,819 site plan review 1241 00:54:38,819 --> 00:54:40,619 or reviewing the applications to 1242 00:54:40,619 --> 00:54:42,900 determine their consistency with 1243 00:54:42,900 --> 00:54:45,359 existing zoning laws 1244 00:54:45,359 --> 00:54:47,460 and while during site plan review the 1245 00:54:47,460 --> 00:54:49,579 Planning and Zoning commission has broad 1246 00:54:49,579 --> 00:54:51,900 broader discretion than the zoning 1247 00:54:51,900 --> 00:54:54,660 administrator uh to achieve uh more 1248 00:54:54,660 --> 00:54:56,700 abstract principles 1249 00:54:56,700 --> 00:54:58,140 um 1250 00:54:58,140 --> 00:55:00,119 determining whether the proposed site 1251 00:55:00,119 --> 00:55:02,520 plan complies with the zoning code that 1252 00:55:02,520 --> 00:55:04,920 applies at the time of the review 1253 00:55:04,920 --> 00:55:07,380 typically measured as of the time of the 1254 00:55:07,380 --> 00:55:10,430 application 1255 00:55:10,440 --> 00:55:12,300 this fundamental 1256 00:55:12,300 --> 00:55:14,460 principle of zoning law is made clear in 1257 00:55:14,460 --> 00:55:17,099 the very first sentence of the town code 1258 00:55:17,099 --> 00:55:19,859 section on site plan review 1259 00:55:19,859 --> 00:55:22,440 so in your binders on 1260 00:55:22,440 --> 00:55:23,280 um 1261 00:55:23,280 --> 00:55:25,800 the law I point out I provide you 1262 00:55:25,800 --> 00:55:26,780 section 1263 00:55:26,780 --> 00:55:29,460 290-23a of the Town zoning code I'm 1264 00:55:29,460 --> 00:55:31,319 going to read you the section 1265 00:55:31,319 --> 00:55:35,160 you know focusing your attention on 1266 00:55:35,160 --> 00:55:37,079 that's uh 1267 00:55:37,079 --> 00:55:40,500 293 23A 1268 00:55:40,500 --> 00:55:43,859 want site plans prepared and approved in 1269 00:55:43,859 --> 00:55:45,240 accordance with the provisions of this 1270 00:55:45,240 --> 00:55:46,859 article should be required to assist 1271 00:55:46,859 --> 00:55:49,200 Town administrative officials in the 1272 00:55:49,200 --> 00:55:51,000 review of applications 1273 00:55:51,000 --> 00:55:52,559 for building permits and assure 1274 00:55:52,559 --> 00:55:54,000 compliance with all applicable 1275 00:55:54,000 --> 00:55:57,599 requirements of this Charter 1276 00:55:57,599 --> 00:56:00,000 I bring all this up because the rod and 1277 00:56:00,000 --> 00:56:02,579 reel in initiating the site plan process 1278 00:56:02,579 --> 00:56:05,339 is legally required to do so for this 1279 00:56:05,339 --> 00:56:06,599 development 1280 00:56:06,599 --> 00:56:09,480 okay so I've described the basic 1281 00:56:09,480 --> 00:56:10,980 fundamental property rights and now 1282 00:56:10,980 --> 00:56:14,480 there's a process site plan review that 1283 00:56:14,480 --> 00:56:18,119 applies the zoning 1284 00:56:18,119 --> 00:56:20,940 to the to the site plan that's being 1285 00:56:20,940 --> 00:56:24,770 presented 1286 00:56:24,780 --> 00:56:26,400 now the Planning and Zoning commission 1287 00:56:26,400 --> 00:56:29,059 is responsible for reviewing and it's 1288 00:56:29,059 --> 00:56:31,500 exclusively responsible for reviewing 1289 00:56:31,500 --> 00:56:34,079 all category site one category one site 1290 00:56:34,079 --> 00:56:36,000 plans you've heard from Mr Woodburn that 1291 00:56:36,000 --> 00:56:38,760 they were all category one site plans 1292 00:56:38,760 --> 00:56:42,780 and that's in section 290 23 C3 and 4. 1293 00:56:42,780 --> 00:56:46,079 this is not a discretionary Authority 1294 00:56:46,079 --> 00:56:48,119 the commission must undertake a process 1295 00:56:48,119 --> 00:56:50,520 and approve or disapprove or approved 1296 00:56:50,520 --> 00:56:52,800 with conditions any site plan filed with 1297 00:56:52,800 --> 00:56:54,000 it 1298 00:56:54,000 --> 00:56:55,800 the commission can reject the site plan 1299 00:56:55,800 --> 00:56:58,380 only for non-compliance with then 1300 00:56:58,380 --> 00:57:00,780 existing zoning and or subdivision law 1301 00:57:00,780 --> 00:57:03,180 or other laws impacting the development 1302 00:57:03,180 --> 00:57:05,040 plan such as the county stormwater 1303 00:57:05,040 --> 00:57:08,640 regulations or is a common example 1304 00:57:08,640 --> 00:57:09,960 um 1305 00:57:09,960 --> 00:57:11,940 in addition because the rod and reel 1306 00:57:11,940 --> 00:57:13,800 properties are located in the critical 1307 00:57:13,800 --> 00:57:16,140 area which you've heard 1308 00:57:16,140 --> 00:57:18,180 the Planning and Zoning commission's 1309 00:57:18,180 --> 00:57:20,400 exclusive and mandatory review Authority 1310 00:57:20,400 --> 00:57:23,700 is repeated again in your town code in 1311 00:57:23,700 --> 00:57:29,700 section 290 25a2 and 2A 1312 00:57:29,700 --> 00:57:32,760 and that process is set forth in A5 and 1313 00:57:32,760 --> 00:57:35,220 I'll I'll read it to you 1314 00:57:35,220 --> 00:57:38,520 number five procedure for processing 1315 00:57:38,520 --> 00:57:40,500 upon receipt 1316 00:57:40,500 --> 00:57:43,140 of the site plan the Planning and Zoning 1317 00:57:43,140 --> 00:57:44,819 commission shell 1318 00:57:44,819 --> 00:57:47,579 conduct a review soliciting comments 1319 00:57:47,579 --> 00:57:48,960 from other technical agencies 1320 00:57:48,960 --> 00:57:51,240 departments agents agencies and 1321 00:57:51,240 --> 00:57:52,859 officials as the ploning and Zoning 1322 00:57:52,859 --> 00:57:55,559 commission may deem appropriate 1323 00:57:55,559 --> 00:57:57,359 subsection B 1324 00:57:57,359 --> 00:58:00,900 the site plan shall be approved if it 1325 00:58:00,900 --> 00:58:03,720 meets the requirements of this article 1326 00:58:03,720 --> 00:58:05,579 comma the other requirements of this 1327 00:58:05,579 --> 00:58:07,319 chapter and all other federal state and 1328 00:58:07,319 --> 00:58:08,940 town regulations and all necessary 1329 00:58:08,940 --> 00:58:11,700 permits and approvals have been obtained 1330 00:58:11,700 --> 00:58:12,960 C 1331 00:58:12,960 --> 00:58:15,420 the Planning and Zoning commission shall 1332 00:58:15,420 --> 00:58:18,180 approve conditionally approve or reject 1333 00:58:18,180 --> 00:58:21,119 a site plan within 60 days from the 1334 00:58:21,119 --> 00:58:23,460 filing of the application 1335 00:58:23,460 --> 00:58:25,800 notice of such actions shall be given in 1336 00:58:25,800 --> 00:58:29,450 writing to the applicant 1337 00:58:29,460 --> 00:58:32,400 as you may be able to tell I emphasized 1338 00:58:32,400 --> 00:58:35,640 the words shell those are all 1339 00:58:35,640 --> 00:58:39,299 in statutory language considered indicia 1340 00:58:39,299 --> 00:58:43,079 of a mandatory obligation it's saying in 1341 00:58:43,079 --> 00:58:44,160 the law 1342 00:58:44,160 --> 00:58:48,119 that the Town Council and mayor passed 1343 00:58:48,119 --> 00:58:51,119 to apply in the zoning code to the 1344 00:58:51,119 --> 00:58:53,640 properties filed by this rod and reel 1345 00:58:53,640 --> 00:58:55,619 this this is the site plan review for 1346 00:58:55,619 --> 00:59:00,480 critical area site plans and it must be 1347 00:59:00,480 --> 00:59:02,880 reviewed and 1348 00:59:02,880 --> 00:59:04,619 by either approving it conditionally 1349 00:59:04,619 --> 00:59:06,540 approving it or rejecting that site plan 1350 00:59:06,540 --> 00:59:08,640 within 60 days of the filing application 1351 00:59:08,640 --> 00:59:10,980 so that gives you the timeline where the 1352 00:59:10,980 --> 00:59:21,049 town code mandates that 1353 00:59:21,059 --> 00:59:23,700 it should be noted that 1354 00:59:23,700 --> 00:59:25,380 resolution is done in Chesapeake Beach 1355 00:59:25,380 --> 00:59:26,940 with a preliminary site plan approval 1356 00:59:26,940 --> 00:59:30,000 typically that includes conditions set 1357 00:59:30,000 --> 00:59:31,740 by the Planning and Zoning commission so 1358 00:59:31,740 --> 00:59:33,660 what they do is review it 1359 00:59:33,660 --> 00:59:35,880 first at a hearing have a preliminary 1360 00:59:35,880 --> 00:59:37,319 site plan 1361 00:59:37,319 --> 00:59:39,180 that's reviewed 1362 00:59:39,180 --> 00:59:40,920 then 1363 00:59:40,920 --> 00:59:44,220 conditions for the developer to meet 1364 00:59:44,220 --> 00:59:47,040 before you get back to the final site 1365 00:59:47,040 --> 00:59:49,140 plan review 1366 00:59:49,140 --> 00:59:51,599 um I've done lots of site plan reviews 1367 00:59:51,599 --> 00:59:54,000 with the Chesapeake Beach so I I know 1368 00:59:54,000 --> 00:59:55,859 how the process works I just want to 1369 00:59:55,859 --> 00:59:57,839 make sure you understand that how it 1370 00:59:57,839 --> 01:00:01,200 typically Works doesn't technically have 1371 01:00:01,200 --> 01:00:01,980 to 1372 01:00:01,980 --> 01:00:04,380 have both a preliminary and final but 1373 01:00:04,380 --> 01:00:06,240 that's almost always the way it is on 1374 01:00:06,240 --> 01:00:07,920 anything 1375 01:00:07,920 --> 01:00:09,839 substantive 1376 01:00:09,839 --> 01:00:13,130 um 1377 01:00:13,140 --> 01:00:15,540 I want to point out another important 1378 01:00:15,540 --> 01:00:18,780 code section that's relevant as we begin 1379 01:00:18,780 --> 01:00:22,500 this timeline sorry 1380 01:00:22,500 --> 01:00:24,319 um section 1381 01:00:24,319 --> 01:00:27,720 290-31e1 of your zoning code 1382 01:00:27,720 --> 01:00:29,700 provides another binding obligation of 1383 01:00:29,700 --> 01:00:30,780 the commission 1384 01:00:30,780 --> 01:00:32,460 it's grounded in law and not in a 1385 01:00:32,460 --> 01:00:35,450 discretionary power 1386 01:00:35,460 --> 01:00:37,380 and addresses the condition the 1387 01:00:37,380 --> 01:00:39,059 commission's meeting obligations with 1388 01:00:39,059 --> 01:00:41,520 respect to site plan admissions 1389 01:00:41,520 --> 01:00:44,510 I'll read it 1390 01:00:44,520 --> 01:00:47,940 the Planning Commission shall establish 1391 01:00:47,940 --> 01:00:49,920 a regular meeting schedule and shall 1392 01:00:49,920 --> 01:00:51,839 meet frequently enough so that it can 1393 01:00:51,839 --> 01:00:54,780 take action on all complete applications 1394 01:00:54,780 --> 01:00:57,839 in an expeditious manner 1395 01:00:57,839 --> 01:00:59,339 the Planning Commission shall hold 1396 01:00:59,339 --> 01:01:01,680 meetings quarterly or more often as the 1397 01:01:01,680 --> 01:01:03,839 planning commission's duties require 1398 01:01:03,839 --> 01:01:05,400 if there is no business before the 1399 01:01:05,400 --> 01:01:06,720 Planning Commission the chairman May 1400 01:01:06,720 --> 01:01:08,819 cancel the meeting 1401 01:01:08,819 --> 01:01:13,440 so not the meetings also have to be as a 1402 01:01:13,440 --> 01:01:17,270 mandatory process 1403 01:01:17,280 --> 01:01:19,680 be held and they have to be held 1404 01:01:19,680 --> 01:01:21,720 frequently enough so that they can take 1405 01:01:21,720 --> 01:01:24,599 action on to complete applications in an 1406 01:01:24,599 --> 01:01:26,280 expeditious manner so that's the 1407 01:01:26,280 --> 01:01:28,260 standard that the town code provides to 1408 01:01:28,260 --> 01:01:29,880 the Planning and Zoning commission when 1409 01:01:29,880 --> 01:01:33,660 they get site plan reviews and this 1410 01:01:33,660 --> 01:01:40,370 especially with critical area 1411 01:01:40,380 --> 01:01:43,619 now the zoning administrator also a 1412 01:01:43,619 --> 01:01:46,260 party that we allege error is required 1413 01:01:46,260 --> 01:01:49,799 under your code the town code 1414 01:01:49,799 --> 01:01:54,359 to assist in the in the administration 1415 01:01:54,359 --> 01:01:58,140 of site plan review and that's found in 1416 01:01:58,140 --> 01:02:02,940 subsection C2 of section 290-23 which 1417 01:02:02,940 --> 01:02:05,339 also uses the mandatory language the 1418 01:02:05,339 --> 01:02:07,440 shell language and says the 1419 01:02:07,440 --> 01:02:09,000 administrator shall review the 1420 01:02:09,000 --> 01:02:10,500 application for completeness and will 1421 01:02:10,500 --> 01:02:12,480 refer the application to the appropriate 1422 01:02:12,480 --> 01:02:14,359 individuals or agencies for review 1423 01:02:14,359 --> 01:02:18,059 comment or approval 1424 01:02:18,059 --> 01:02:20,700 note that for category one-site plans 1425 01:02:20,700 --> 01:02:22,859 like in the critical area that we have 1426 01:02:22,859 --> 01:02:24,599 in this case 1427 01:02:24,599 --> 01:02:26,520 um this would need to be done in time to 1428 01:02:26,520 --> 01:02:28,200 fit within the 60-day resolution 1429 01:02:28,200 --> 01:02:30,420 requirement 1430 01:02:30,420 --> 01:02:32,339 uh this obligation of the zoning 1431 01:02:32,339 --> 01:02:34,920 administrator is restated in the section 1432 01:02:34,920 --> 01:02:36,780 establishing the zoning administrator's 1433 01:02:36,780 --> 01:02:39,119 Authority as set forth in section 1434 01:02:39,119 --> 01:02:42,650 290-2615 1435 01:02:42,660 --> 01:02:46,140 typically uh the zip Tana zoning 1436 01:02:46,140 --> 01:02:47,880 administrator provides a staff report to 1437 01:02:47,880 --> 01:02:49,319 the commission which provides the 1438 01:02:49,319 --> 01:02:52,079 administrator's view of the proposed 1439 01:02:52,079 --> 01:02:53,579 development and its compliance with the 1440 01:02:53,579 --> 01:02:55,319 zoning ordinance subdivision regulations 1441 01:02:55,319 --> 01:02:57,960 or other related laws uh consistent with 1442 01:02:57,960 --> 01:03:09,049 his authority in 290-2613. 1443 01:03:09,059 --> 01:03:11,819 so to recap we've got a mandatory 1444 01:03:11,819 --> 01:03:13,740 obligation of the Planning and Zoning 1445 01:03:13,740 --> 01:03:15,599 commission to review category 1 site 1446 01:03:15,599 --> 01:03:17,940 plans hold a public hearing on them and 1447 01:03:17,940 --> 01:03:19,680 must provide a decision within 60 days 1448 01:03:19,680 --> 01:03:21,420 of the filing 1449 01:03:21,420 --> 01:03:23,280 mandatory obligation of the zoning 1450 01:03:23,280 --> 01:03:24,960 administrator to assist in that 1451 01:03:24,960 --> 01:03:27,720 pre-hearing review for category one site 1452 01:03:27,720 --> 01:03:29,280 plans and assist the Planning and Zoning 1453 01:03:29,280 --> 01:03:33,170 Commission 1454 01:03:33,180 --> 01:03:35,460 you've we already brought into the 1455 01:03:35,460 --> 01:03:36,960 record 1456 01:03:36,960 --> 01:03:39,059 I believe it's exhibit seven is it 1457 01:03:39,059 --> 01:03:41,520 Paul's letter seven the email that Mr 1458 01:03:41,520 --> 01:03:45,359 Woodburn received on February 5th seven 1459 01:03:45,359 --> 01:03:52,920 days after we file the site plans after he 1460 01:03:52,920 --> 01:03:54,180 filed the site plans for the rod and 1461 01:03:54,180 --> 01:03:57,410 reel 1462 01:03:57,420 --> 01:03:59,339 it's important to 1463 01:03:59,339 --> 01:04:01,500 understand the be that this is the 1464 01:04:01,500 --> 01:04:04,440 beginning of refusal to process the site 1465 01:04:04,440 --> 01:04:06,000 plans and he's telling you the two 1466 01:04:06,000 --> 01:04:07,680 reasons why 1467 01:04:07,680 --> 01:04:10,200 he believes those site plans shouldn't 1468 01:04:10,200 --> 01:04:12,599 be reviewed 1469 01:04:12,599 --> 01:04:14,220 if you want I can read it again to 1470 01:04:14,220 --> 01:04:15,660 emphasize it you've already got it in 1471 01:04:15,660 --> 01:04:17,339 the record but I don't want to 1472 01:04:17,339 --> 01:04:19,920 take more time but the point 1473 01:04:19,920 --> 01:04:21,480 is 1474 01:04:21,480 --> 01:04:24,299 that he makes two 1475 01:04:24,299 --> 01:04:27,960 reasons why site plan review shouldn't 1476 01:04:27,960 --> 01:04:29,040 proceed 1477 01:04:29,040 --> 01:04:32,040 one that it would compound the 1478 01:04:32,040 --> 01:04:33,780 challenges of the Planning and Zoning 1479 01:04:33,780 --> 01:04:35,280 commissions work 1480 01:04:35,280 --> 01:04:37,559 on planning 1481 01:04:37,559 --> 01:04:39,900 and ordinance drafting 1482 01:04:39,900 --> 01:04:41,579 um that they were doing with the 1483 01:04:41,579 --> 01:04:43,319 comprehensive plan 1484 01:04:43,319 --> 01:04:46,500 and then second that 1485 01:04:46,500 --> 01:04:48,960 a moratorium was going to be proposed 1486 01:04:48,960 --> 01:04:50,700 prior to this there was no moratorium 1487 01:04:50,700 --> 01:04:53,339 being discussed 1488 01:04:53,339 --> 01:04:57,589 at all 1489 01:04:57,599 --> 01:04:59,940 notice in this email that the zoning 1490 01:04:59,940 --> 01:05:02,040 administrator completely ignores the 1491 01:05:02,040 --> 01:05:03,839 60-day review requirement and the 1492 01:05:03,839 --> 01:05:05,280 obligation of the commission to hold 1493 01:05:05,280 --> 01:05:06,420 meetings 1494 01:05:06,420 --> 01:05:08,880 as often as necessary to get that work 1495 01:05:08,880 --> 01:05:09,900 done 1496 01:05:09,900 --> 01:05:13,619 so when he says that 1497 01:05:13,619 --> 01:05:16,200 one of the reasons for not reviewing the 1498 01:05:16,200 --> 01:05:19,500 site plans and not having the Planning 1499 01:05:19,500 --> 01:05:20,880 and Zoning commission review the site 1500 01:05:20,880 --> 01:05:24,900 plans is that it's too much work 1501 01:05:24,900 --> 01:05:28,079 I I cited you the section the section of 1502 01:05:28,079 --> 01:05:30,839 the town code says they shall meet must 1503 01:05:30,839 --> 01:05:34,200 meet as often as necessary to to do both 1504 01:05:34,200 --> 01:05:35,940 of their functions 1505 01:05:35,940 --> 01:05:38,280 to explain that 1506 01:05:38,280 --> 01:05:39,900 understand that the Planning and Zoning 1507 01:05:39,900 --> 01:05:42,059 commission has two different types of 1508 01:05:42,059 --> 01:05:44,160 functions they have the planning and 1509 01:05:44,160 --> 01:05:46,020 policy oriented function and that would 1510 01:05:46,020 --> 01:05:48,180 have been done for the comprehensive 1511 01:05:48,180 --> 01:05:50,220 plan 1512 01:05:50,220 --> 01:05:53,400 um and that's what Mr uh jacobiak was 1513 01:05:53,400 --> 01:05:55,260 referring to that they were working on a 1514 01:05:55,260 --> 01:05:56,640 comprehensive plan 1515 01:05:56,640 --> 01:05:58,920 that's a policy thing 1516 01:05:58,920 --> 01:06:01,440 they also are administrators 1517 01:06:01,440 --> 01:06:03,900 two different roles and they have to do 1518 01:06:03,900 --> 01:06:06,059 both of them under the law at the same 1519 01:06:06,059 --> 01:06:07,859 time and hold as many meetings as 1520 01:06:07,859 --> 01:06:09,900 necessary to do both of those functions 1521 01:06:09,900 --> 01:06:12,839 that administrative function is site 1522 01:06:12,839 --> 01:06:14,880 plan reviews like we filed for the rod 1523 01:06:14,880 --> 01:06:18,299 and reel but also subdivision plots get 1524 01:06:18,299 --> 01:06:20,579 reviewed if 1525 01:06:20,579 --> 01:06:22,260 the the 1526 01:06:22,260 --> 01:06:24,960 Town opens a new road they they do a 1527 01:06:24,960 --> 01:06:28,880 review they have a series of required 1528 01:06:28,880 --> 01:06:31,380 administrative tasks 1529 01:06:31,380 --> 01:06:33,480 under the town code that they must 1530 01:06:33,480 --> 01:06:34,859 complete 1531 01:06:34,859 --> 01:06:38,480 and a lot of those flow from Maryland 1532 01:06:38,480 --> 01:06:40,660 statutory law 1533 01:06:40,660 --> 01:06:44,329 [Music] 1534 01:06:44,339 --> 01:06:48,359 the I'm going to take take on the first 1535 01:06:48,359 --> 01:06:50,819 I'm going to divide the presentation now 1536 01:06:50,819 --> 01:06:54,000 between the two reasons why Mr Kubiak 1537 01:06:54,000 --> 01:06:55,940 was saying they weren't going to 1538 01:06:55,940 --> 01:07:00,490 do the site plan reviews 1539 01:07:00,500 --> 01:07:02,880 I mean we've been going on for some time 1540 01:07:02,880 --> 01:07:04,260 now and I've been letting him just kind 1541 01:07:04,260 --> 01:07:06,119 of go on with his presentation that's 1542 01:07:06,119 --> 01:07:09,420 fine but Mr jubiak has no Authority okay 1543 01:07:09,420 --> 01:07:11,400 so you keep speaking of talking about Mr 1544 01:07:11,400 --> 01:07:14,220 jubiakin is is his emails and so forth 1545 01:07:14,220 --> 01:07:16,079 he's got no Authority the Planning 1546 01:07:16,079 --> 01:07:18,660 Commission or or to the Town Council he 1547 01:07:18,660 --> 01:07:20,039 is someone who makes recommendations 1548 01:07:20,039 --> 01:07:23,819 that's it and so you know the idea that 1549 01:07:23,819 --> 01:07:26,160 somehow Mr Jupiter gets made final 1550 01:07:26,160 --> 01:07:27,420 decisions here 1551 01:07:27,420 --> 01:07:29,039 you've been we've been going on for some 1552 01:07:29,039 --> 01:07:31,920 time and obviously you know we've been 1553 01:07:31,920 --> 01:07:33,720 dancing around some of the key points of 1554 01:07:33,720 --> 01:07:35,940 the law so I'm going to be asked to have 1555 01:07:35,940 --> 01:07:39,059 just a few minutes when this ends 1556 01:07:39,059 --> 01:07:41,579 um uh but you know I just want to bring 1557 01:07:41,579 --> 01:07:44,460 up that point of saying at this point 1558 01:07:44,460 --> 01:07:46,079 I don't know what the relevance is what 1559 01:07:46,079 --> 01:07:49,799 Mr jubiak was doing but uh thank you I 1560 01:07:49,799 --> 01:07:52,380 noted uh with regards to Mr jacobiak and 1561 01:07:52,380 --> 01:07:54,539 we will give you some minutes to uh 1562 01:07:54,539 --> 01:07:56,460 respond in bulk later in the minute 1563 01:07:56,460 --> 01:07:58,260 please continue so 1564 01:07:58,260 --> 01:08:01,020 just to respond to that Mr jakku I just 1565 01:08:01,020 --> 01:08:04,020 read Mr jacobiak's Authority Under The 1566 01:08:04,020 --> 01:08:06,660 Zone obligation under the zoning code to 1567 01:08:06,660 --> 01:08:08,940 assist in site plan review that's what 1568 01:08:08,940 --> 01:08:10,920 he was doing when he sent his February 1569 01:08:10,920 --> 01:08:13,859 5th meeting I just read you the statute 1570 01:08:13,859 --> 01:08:23,150 that's what I'm referring to 1571 01:08:23,160 --> 01:08:25,440 so as I was saying I'm going to divide 1572 01:08:25,440 --> 01:08:28,259 up the rest of this dealing first with 1573 01:08:28,259 --> 01:08:30,359 the part that's associated with his 1574 01:08:30,359 --> 01:08:32,940 rationale for not proceeding with site 1575 01:08:32,940 --> 01:08:34,500 plan review 1576 01:08:34,500 --> 01:08:38,689 which was that there would be 1577 01:08:38,699 --> 01:08:40,319 that the commission it would be two 1578 01:08:40,319 --> 01:08:42,779 burdensome on the commission to do the 1579 01:08:42,779 --> 01:08:44,759 site plan reviews because they were also 1580 01:08:44,759 --> 01:08:49,010 doing the comprehensive plan 1581 01:08:49,020 --> 01:08:51,000 I've pointed out the statute that says 1582 01:08:51,000 --> 01:08:52,560 they have to do both at the same time 1583 01:08:52,560 --> 01:08:55,080 and do it as expeditiously with as many 1584 01:08:55,080 --> 01:08:57,480 meetings as necessary to do it 1585 01:08:57,480 --> 01:09:00,719 so what's particularly ridiculous about 1586 01:09:00,719 --> 01:09:03,359 this point in in the zoning 1587 01:09:03,359 --> 01:09:06,600 administrators argument in his email 1588 01:09:06,600 --> 01:09:09,179 is at this point in time 1589 01:09:09,179 --> 01:09:11,940 the town's comprehensive plan and the 1590 01:09:11,940 --> 01:09:13,620 implementing zoning ordinance was 1591 01:09:13,620 --> 01:09:16,500 already four years late 1592 01:09:16,500 --> 01:09:18,359 excuse me Mr pleasure are you going to 1593 01:09:18,359 --> 01:09:22,380 have a present evidence uh to uh 1594 01:09:22,380 --> 01:09:24,660 elucidate on these points that you're 1595 01:09:24,660 --> 01:09:27,540 making now or are you testifying uh I 1596 01:09:27,540 --> 01:09:30,179 will present well 1597 01:09:30,179 --> 01:09:32,520 number one you want to testify raise 1598 01:09:32,520 --> 01:09:35,100 your right hand and take the oath okay 1599 01:09:35,100 --> 01:09:37,920 or if you already took the other so we 1600 01:09:37,920 --> 01:09:41,100 can clear away I do include to include 1601 01:09:41,100 --> 01:09:45,299 any facts that I offer 1602 01:09:45,299 --> 01:09:46,679 that's fine 1603 01:09:46,679 --> 01:09:49,199 is that okay I mean you you're except 1604 01:09:49,199 --> 01:09:51,600 accepting that I mean we are moving 1605 01:09:51,600 --> 01:09:54,060 towards closing throughout a lot of what 1606 01:09:54,060 --> 01:09:55,860 he's talking about this is not testimony 1607 01:09:55,860 --> 01:09:57,780 does not you're Way Beyond where we 1608 01:09:57,780 --> 01:09:59,699 started with it's this is definitely 1609 01:09:59,699 --> 01:10:02,460 like a closing type argument but 1610 01:10:02,460 --> 01:10:04,610 um 1611 01:10:04,620 --> 01:10:06,900 this is you know where this is right now 1612 01:10:06,900 --> 01:10:08,880 not making a closing argument I'm making 1613 01:10:08,880 --> 01:10:12,840 the explanation of why we say that the 1614 01:10:12,840 --> 01:10:14,340 Planning and Zoning administrator and 1615 01:10:14,340 --> 01:10:16,020 the Planning and Zoning commission which 1616 01:10:16,020 --> 01:10:17,460 are the parties that we allege committed 1617 01:10:17,460 --> 01:10:20,820 error were wrongful in denying site plan 1618 01:10:20,820 --> 01:10:23,340 review so I get to go through all of the 1619 01:10:23,340 --> 01:10:25,620 reasons and the rationales and those 1620 01:10:25,620 --> 01:10:27,780 things that are related to that that 1621 01:10:27,780 --> 01:10:30,420 make their decisions completely unjust 1622 01:10:30,420 --> 01:10:32,040 with respect to the rod and reel 1623 01:10:32,040 --> 01:10:34,920 applications that were filed that's kind 1624 01:10:34,920 --> 01:10:38,040 of the raison Detra of this case so I'm 1625 01:10:38,040 --> 01:10:42,960 going to explain why first the first 1626 01:10:42,960 --> 01:10:45,060 argument of the zoning administrator in 1627 01:10:45,060 --> 01:10:47,040 his February 5th email 1628 01:10:47,040 --> 01:10:51,709 was so ridiculous 1629 01:10:51,719 --> 01:10:53,400 so remember that the applications were 1630 01:10:53,400 --> 01:10:56,520 filed on January 29th of 2021 1631 01:10:56,520 --> 01:10:59,159 that means the 60-day requirement 1632 01:10:59,159 --> 01:11:00,659 um to hold a hearing 1633 01:11:00,659 --> 01:11:03,120 on those site plans would put that date 1634 01:11:03,120 --> 01:11:06,780 on March 30th of 2021. 1635 01:11:06,780 --> 01:11:10,080 that hearing did not occur 1636 01:11:10,080 --> 01:11:11,580 at this point 1637 01:11:11,580 --> 01:11:13,800 the last comprehensive plan of the town 1638 01:11:13,800 --> 01:11:16,560 of Chesapeake Beach had been passed on 1639 01:11:16,560 --> 01:11:20,219 January 20th 2011. you can make take 1640 01:11:20,219 --> 01:11:22,500 judicial notice of that because it's the 1641 01:11:22,500 --> 01:11:24,600 official government thing it's on your 1642 01:11:24,600 --> 01:11:26,460 website that's actually where I get the 1643 01:11:26,460 --> 01:11:28,860 date we'll have other exhibits that 1644 01:11:28,860 --> 01:11:29,760 actually 1645 01:11:29,760 --> 01:11:32,280 um probably show that as well 1646 01:11:32,280 --> 01:11:35,520 um so it it's not a 1647 01:11:35,520 --> 01:11:37,980 issues so the point is that at that 1648 01:11:37,980 --> 01:11:39,480 point in time the last comprehensive 1649 01:11:39,480 --> 01:11:43,320 plan was January 20th of 2011. 1650 01:11:43,320 --> 01:11:45,360 now the legal obligation on the Planning 1651 01:11:45,360 --> 01:11:47,760 and Zoning commission is to propose a 1652 01:11:47,760 --> 01:11:49,860 new plan at least every six years under 1653 01:11:49,860 --> 01:11:51,300 the town law 1654 01:11:51,300 --> 01:11:56,209 that's found in section 290-31a1 1655 01:11:56,219 --> 01:11:57,840 and it reads 1656 01:11:57,840 --> 01:12:00,239 a purpose 1657 01:12:00,239 --> 01:12:03,300 the Planning Commission shall advise the 1658 01:12:03,300 --> 01:12:05,040 Town Council on all matters relating to 1659 01:12:05,040 --> 01:12:06,360 the orderly growth of the town of 1660 01:12:06,360 --> 01:12:09,420 Chesapeake Beach more specifically the 1661 01:12:09,420 --> 01:12:11,159 Planning Commission with the advice and 1662 01:12:11,159 --> 01:12:13,080 assistance of the Town staff and or 1663 01:12:13,080 --> 01:12:15,239 retained town planning experts shall 1664 01:12:15,239 --> 01:12:17,280 number one 1665 01:12:17,280 --> 01:12:19,560 prepare and recommend a comprehensive 1666 01:12:19,560 --> 01:12:21,060 plan for the town of Chesapeake Beach 1667 01:12:21,060 --> 01:12:23,400 and review and update said plan at least 1668 01:12:23,400 --> 01:12:25,560 once every six years 1669 01:12:25,560 --> 01:12:28,320 notice the mandatory language in that 1670 01:12:28,320 --> 01:12:29,400 section 1671 01:12:29,400 --> 01:12:31,320 this is not a discretionary Authority 1672 01:12:31,320 --> 01:12:32,940 the mayor and Town Council through a 1673 01:12:32,940 --> 01:12:36,360 legislative act adopted a zoning code 1674 01:12:36,360 --> 01:12:39,179 that uses the mandatory language shell 1675 01:12:39,179 --> 01:12:41,159 to establish that one of the legal 1676 01:12:41,159 --> 01:12:42,600 obligations of the Planning and Zoning 1677 01:12:42,600 --> 01:12:44,820 commission for Chesapeake Beach is to 1678 01:12:44,820 --> 01:12:46,080 prepare and recommend a new 1679 01:12:46,080 --> 01:12:48,239 comprehensive plan at least every six 1680 01:12:48,239 --> 01:12:49,440 years 1681 01:12:49,440 --> 01:12:52,500 now there is also a state mandate that 1682 01:12:52,500 --> 01:12:54,179 comprehensive plans be reviewed at least 1683 01:12:54,179 --> 01:12:56,280 every 10 years and that's found in 1684 01:12:56,280 --> 01:12:59,699 section 3-301 of the land use article of 1685 01:12:59,699 --> 01:13:01,560 the annotated code of Maryland and 1686 01:13:01,560 --> 01:13:04,440 that's in your white notebook 1687 01:13:04,440 --> 01:13:06,920 but that's at least every 10 years 1688 01:13:06,920 --> 01:13:09,780 municipalities are authorized to do it 1689 01:13:09,780 --> 01:13:12,420 as often as they want and this 1690 01:13:12,420 --> 01:13:14,880 municipality Chesapeake Beach 1691 01:13:14,880 --> 01:13:16,560 Road a law 1692 01:13:16,560 --> 01:13:18,120 it binds the Planning and Zoning 1693 01:13:18,120 --> 01:13:20,940 commission to do it every six years 1694 01:13:20,940 --> 01:13:23,940 the reason I bring that up is 1695 01:13:23,940 --> 01:13:25,739 the art the first argument of Mr 1696 01:13:25,739 --> 01:13:27,480 Jakubiak for not 1697 01:13:27,480 --> 01:13:29,460 preparing a site plan 1698 01:13:29,460 --> 01:13:32,280 was that the commission was working on a 1699 01:13:32,280 --> 01:13:33,540 comprehensive plan 1700 01:13:33,540 --> 01:13:35,699 and that's why I say 1701 01:13:35,699 --> 01:13:38,219 it's kind of ridiculous to say we we 1702 01:13:38,219 --> 01:13:41,040 don't have time to do your site plans 1703 01:13:41,040 --> 01:13:43,920 when they're six years late on doing 1704 01:13:43,920 --> 01:13:46,580 their current plan 1705 01:13:46,580 --> 01:13:49,560 sorry to interrupt you uh several times 1706 01:13:49,560 --> 01:13:51,540 you've mentioned a white notebook 1707 01:13:51,540 --> 01:14:04,310 did I not pass those out no I apologize 1708 01:14:04,320 --> 01:14:06,179 I did 1709 01:14:06,179 --> 01:14:20,870 foreign 1710 01:14:20,880 --> 01:14:29,350 [Music] 1711 01:14:29,360 --> 01:14:31,440 make one comment 1712 01:14:31,440 --> 01:14:33,120 okay 1713 01:14:33,120 --> 01:14:34,860 um you know we've been going on about 1714 01:14:34,860 --> 01:14:37,739 various things Mr chubiak did this Mr 1715 01:14:37,739 --> 01:14:40,260 trivia didn't do that uh I just want to 1716 01:14:40,260 --> 01:14:42,540 make sure that the the board understands 1717 01:14:42,540 --> 01:14:44,460 it's the Town Council that made the 1718 01:14:44,460 --> 01:14:46,679 decision okay the Town Council is the 1719 01:14:46,679 --> 01:14:48,300 one who passed a moratorium that told 1720 01:14:48,300 --> 01:14:50,940 him what he can and can do this has 1721 01:14:50,940 --> 01:14:52,800 nothing to do with Mr zubiak didn't 1722 01:14:52,800 --> 01:14:54,719 comply with dysregulation didn't comply 1723 01:14:54,719 --> 01:14:56,460 with that maybe the Town Council 1724 01:14:56,460 --> 01:14:59,400 everybody knows the Town Council runs 1725 01:14:59,400 --> 01:15:01,739 the town they make decisions on behalf 1726 01:15:01,739 --> 01:15:04,800 of the town they tell the people in the 1727 01:15:04,800 --> 01:15:07,739 town what they can and can't do so in 1728 01:15:07,739 --> 01:15:10,679 essence this this this tirade of going 1729 01:15:10,679 --> 01:15:13,020 on with Mr Kubiak didn't do this it 1730 01:15:13,020 --> 01:15:14,820 didn't comply with that doesn't make any 1731 01:15:14,820 --> 01:15:16,320 difference because the Town Council 1732 01:15:16,320 --> 01:15:18,060 passed a moratorium it was a legislative 1733 01:15:18,060 --> 01:15:20,040 function and they said this is what 1734 01:15:20,040 --> 01:15:21,540 you're going to do this is what you're 1735 01:15:21,540 --> 01:15:23,219 not going to do and I'm going to be 1736 01:15:23,219 --> 01:15:24,900 talking about that later but but I just 1737 01:15:24,900 --> 01:15:27,420 want to kind of it's one of the many 1738 01:15:27,420 --> 01:15:28,320 things we're going to be bringing up 1739 01:15:28,320 --> 01:15:32,450 thank you all right thank you continue 1740 01:15:32,460 --> 01:15:35,400 and kind of object to having our case 1741 01:15:35,400 --> 01:15:37,199 constantly that wasn't an objection it 1742 01:15:37,199 --> 01:15:39,480 was merely just an argument 1743 01:15:39,480 --> 01:15:42,179 under the board's rules we present our 1744 01:15:42,179 --> 01:15:44,400 entire case first 1745 01:15:44,400 --> 01:15:46,739 that's it our witnesses can be 1746 01:15:46,739 --> 01:15:48,719 cross-examined but I'm making the legal 1747 01:15:48,719 --> 01:15:51,659 arguments about why 1748 01:15:51,659 --> 01:15:54,179 the failure of the Planning and Zoning 1749 01:15:54,179 --> 01:15:56,460 commission to process site plans was 1750 01:15:56,460 --> 01:15:59,640 wrongful and I get to explain all of the 1751 01:15:59,640 --> 01:16:01,920 reasons and we're starting with the fact 1752 01:16:01,920 --> 01:16:03,719 that the zoning administrator who I've 1753 01:16:03,719 --> 01:16:05,880 demonstrated is legally obligated to 1754 01:16:05,880 --> 01:16:07,800 assist with site plan review with the 1755 01:16:07,800 --> 01:16:10,500 Planning and Zoning Commission 1756 01:16:10,500 --> 01:16:12,840 sent the letter and gave two rationales 1757 01:16:12,840 --> 01:16:14,820 why they weren't going to do it 1758 01:16:14,820 --> 01:16:17,640 and the first one is that they were too 1759 01:16:17,640 --> 01:16:18,840 busy because they were working on the 1760 01:16:18,840 --> 01:16:20,580 comprehensive plan and that these five 1761 01:16:20,580 --> 01:16:22,380 site plans would have 1762 01:16:22,380 --> 01:16:25,140 made that difficult or impossible you 1763 01:16:25,140 --> 01:16:27,179 didn't say that but he 1764 01:16:27,179 --> 01:16:29,280 you can read the letter I don't wanna 1765 01:16:29,280 --> 01:16:39,830 put Mr words in Mr jacobiak's um 1766 01:16:39,840 --> 01:16:42,659 I'll read the relevant section 1767 01:16:42,659 --> 01:16:45,179 um further these projects if implemented 1768 01:16:45,179 --> 01:16:46,679 have real potential to compound the 1769 01:16:46,679 --> 01:16:48,600 challenges of the planning commission's 1770 01:16:48,600 --> 01:16:51,300 work on planning and ordinance drafting 1771 01:16:51,300 --> 01:16:53,880 is seeking to address 1772 01:16:53,880 --> 01:16:54,900 wasn't 1773 01:16:54,900 --> 01:16:56,940 a complete sentence but 1774 01:16:56,940 --> 01:16:59,100 so 1775 01:16:59,100 --> 01:17:01,980 we're back to the idea of why that was 1776 01:17:01,980 --> 01:17:05,090 ridiculous first 1777 01:17:05,100 --> 01:17:06,600 they were he was pointing to the fact 1778 01:17:06,600 --> 01:17:07,560 that they were working on a 1779 01:17:07,560 --> 01:17:09,719 comprehensive plan and I'm pointing out 1780 01:17:09,719 --> 01:17:12,420 that they were legally already six years 1781 01:17:12,420 --> 01:17:14,990 behind 1782 01:17:15,000 --> 01:17:16,860 and I was talking about the state 1783 01:17:16,860 --> 01:17:19,620 deadline as well 1784 01:17:19,620 --> 01:17:22,199 but that state deadline also actually 1785 01:17:22,199 --> 01:17:24,480 has an important point 1786 01:17:24,480 --> 01:17:26,460 because even though the town law is 1787 01:17:26,460 --> 01:17:28,140 mandatory on the zoning administrator 1788 01:17:28,140 --> 01:17:29,340 and the Planning and Zoning commission 1789 01:17:29,340 --> 01:17:31,500 well I apologize on the Planning and 1790 01:17:31,500 --> 01:17:32,580 Zoning commission not the zoning 1791 01:17:32,580 --> 01:17:34,020 minister 1792 01:17:34,020 --> 01:17:36,229 um 1793 01:17:36,239 --> 01:17:39,550 you're going to hear 1794 01:17:39,560 --> 01:17:42,179 that the commission did not even meet 1795 01:17:42,179 --> 01:17:44,820 the state's 10-year deadline 1796 01:17:44,820 --> 01:17:46,860 the final resolution proposing the 1797 01:17:46,860 --> 01:17:48,659 updated comprehensive plan was adopted 1798 01:17:48,659 --> 01:17:50,460 by the Planning and Zoning Commission on 1799 01:17:50,460 --> 01:17:52,800 November 9th 2021. 1800 01:17:52,800 --> 01:17:55,020 okay and you can take judicial notes to 1801 01:17:55,020 --> 01:17:57,060 that given that the previous plan had 1802 01:17:57,060 --> 01:17:59,820 been adopted on January 20th January 1803 01:17:59,820 --> 01:18:03,239 20th of 2011 the commission was over 10 1804 01:18:03,239 --> 01:18:04,860 months late in meeting the state 1805 01:18:04,860 --> 01:18:06,179 deadline 1806 01:18:06,179 --> 01:18:08,880 this failure has important consequences 1807 01:18:08,880 --> 01:18:10,560 because both the state and town 1808 01:18:10,560 --> 01:18:12,659 deadlines are meaningful substantive 1809 01:18:12,659 --> 01:18:14,159 legal obligations of the Chesapeake 1810 01:18:14,159 --> 01:18:16,199 Beach Planning and Zoning Commission 1811 01:18:16,199 --> 01:18:18,780 property owners and citizens have the 1812 01:18:18,780 --> 01:18:20,699 right to rely upon those requirements 1813 01:18:20,699 --> 01:18:21,900 being met 1814 01:18:21,900 --> 01:18:24,300 and especially when their properties are 1815 01:18:24,300 --> 01:18:26,280 the ones being regulated by those zoning 1816 01:18:26,280 --> 01:18:27,480 laws 1817 01:18:27,480 --> 01:18:30,659 this is necessary to meet basic due 1818 01:18:30,659 --> 01:18:32,400 process 1819 01:18:32,400 --> 01:18:34,440 um in the application of the regulations 1820 01:18:34,440 --> 01:18:37,750 to property owners 1821 01:18:37,760 --> 01:18:40,440 these obligations are enforceable 1822 01:18:40,440 --> 01:18:42,659 because Maryland's adoption of what is 1823 01:18:42,659 --> 01:18:45,480 known as smart growth which includes as 1824 01:18:45,480 --> 01:18:48,179 one of the of its many state mandates 1825 01:18:48,179 --> 01:18:49,980 the obligation of the Planning and 1826 01:18:49,980 --> 01:18:52,320 Zoning commission and the Town Council 1827 01:18:52,320 --> 01:18:54,480 to adopt and apply what are known as the 1828 01:18:54,480 --> 01:18:56,640 smart growth visions 1829 01:18:56,640 --> 01:18:59,460 in their comprehensive plans 1830 01:18:59,460 --> 01:19:02,580 including any updates to the plan 1831 01:19:02,580 --> 01:19:05,159 to understand why these deadlines are 1832 01:19:05,159 --> 01:19:07,199 not merely aspirational goals under 1833 01:19:07,199 --> 01:19:09,900 state law but meaningful deadlines with 1834 01:19:09,900 --> 01:19:11,040 consequence 1835 01:19:11,040 --> 01:19:14,400 the board should consider section 3-304 1836 01:19:14,400 --> 01:19:16,620 of the land use article of the annotated 1837 01:19:16,620 --> 01:19:18,540 code of Maryland 1838 01:19:18,540 --> 01:19:21,780 that section requires inclusion of the 1839 01:19:21,780 --> 01:19:24,360 required plan elements in subtitle one 1840 01:19:24,360 --> 01:19:26,100 I'm not going to review 1841 01:19:26,100 --> 01:19:28,199 all the details of what those are but 1842 01:19:28,199 --> 01:19:29,760 their divisions 1843 01:19:29,760 --> 01:19:32,880 it's not really relevant to my point 1844 01:19:32,880 --> 01:19:34,440 um in accordance with the review 1845 01:19:34,440 --> 01:19:36,500 schedule in section 1846 01:19:36,500 --> 01:19:39,480 3-303 of the land use article 1847 01:19:39,480 --> 01:19:41,760 that imposes a deadline 1848 01:19:41,760 --> 01:19:44,100 which we just covered the required plan 1849 01:19:44,100 --> 01:19:46,020 elements have been added to over the 1850 01:19:46,020 --> 01:19:48,060 years they started off I believe at 12 1851 01:19:48,060 --> 01:19:52,140 and up to 17 or 18 of them now 1852 01:19:52,140 --> 01:19:54,320 um but notice that under subsection B 1853 01:19:54,320 --> 01:19:57,960 the local jurisdiction can request but 1854 01:19:57,960 --> 01:20:01,850 must establish good cause 1855 01:20:01,860 --> 01:20:05,040 May request a six-month extension of 1856 01:20:05,040 --> 01:20:07,729 that deadline 1857 01:20:07,739 --> 01:20:09,480 and they do that request to the Maryland 1858 01:20:09,480 --> 01:20:11,280 office of planning 1859 01:20:11,280 --> 01:20:13,020 the commission could have made up to two 1860 01:20:13,020 --> 01:20:15,179 extension requests but they did not make 1861 01:20:15,179 --> 01:20:17,340 any requests nor did the department of 1862 01:20:17,340 --> 01:20:19,020 planning Grant such an extension to the 1863 01:20:19,020 --> 01:20:20,460 Chesapeake Beach 1864 01:20:20,460 --> 01:20:22,320 planning a zoning commission 1865 01:20:22,320 --> 01:20:31,390 um 1866 01:20:31,400 --> 01:20:48,790 thank you 1867 01:20:48,800 --> 01:20:52,080 apologies Mr Bliss please continue 1868 01:20:52,080 --> 01:21:00,229 okay thanks 1869 01:21:00,239 --> 01:21:03,540 so since the plant the previous plan had 1870 01:21:03,540 --> 01:21:05,699 been adopted in 2011 January 20th I 1871 01:21:05,699 --> 01:21:07,260 believe the date was 1872 01:21:07,260 --> 01:21:09,960 um the new plan was required by Town law 1873 01:21:09,960 --> 01:21:13,920 on January 20th of 2017. 1874 01:21:13,920 --> 01:21:15,840 therefore at the time the rod and reel 1875 01:21:15,840 --> 01:21:17,699 had filed the five site plans and the 1876 01:21:17,699 --> 01:21:19,020 zoning administrator was taking the 1877 01:21:19,020 --> 01:21:20,580 position that the commission did not 1878 01:21:20,580 --> 01:21:22,739 have time to review its applications 1879 01:21:22,739 --> 01:21:24,659 because it needed to work on finishing 1880 01:21:24,659 --> 01:21:27,000 an update to the comprehensive plan that 1881 01:21:27,000 --> 01:21:32,630 plan was already four years overdue 1882 01:21:32,640 --> 01:21:34,500 the commission didn't really begin 1883 01:21:34,500 --> 01:21:36,420 discussing work on the comprehensive 1884 01:21:36,420 --> 01:21:40,199 plan until 2018 after the deadline 1885 01:21:40,199 --> 01:21:42,480 a year after the date 1886 01:21:42,480 --> 01:21:45,300 when Mr Foltz was appointed chair of the 1887 01:21:45,300 --> 01:21:47,880 to replace Miss riser in February of 1888 01:21:47,880 --> 01:21:49,560 2018. 1889 01:21:49,560 --> 01:21:52,440 in the February 15 2018 minutes of the 1890 01:21:52,440 --> 01:21:53,940 Town Council for the report to the 1891 01:21:53,940 --> 01:21:55,440 planning zone of the Planning and Zoning 1892 01:21:55,440 --> 01:21:56,580 Commission 1893 01:21:56,580 --> 01:21:59,040 councilman Jaworski reported the 1894 01:21:59,040 --> 01:22:01,020 commission held a meeting on February 14 1895 01:22:01,020 --> 01:22:02,760 2018. 1896 01:22:02,760 --> 01:22:04,320 and that it discussed the upcoming 1897 01:22:04,320 --> 01:22:06,000 conference a plan update with the hope 1898 01:22:06,000 --> 01:22:07,560 that it would be completed in one year 1899 01:22:07,560 --> 01:22:14,570 so he's saying that in 2018. 1900 01:22:14,580 --> 01:22:16,560 the town does not have the commission's 1901 01:22:16,560 --> 01:22:18,840 meeting minutes for that February 14 1902 01:22:18,840 --> 01:22:21,300 meeting up on its website 1903 01:22:21,300 --> 01:22:22,140 um 1904 01:22:22,140 --> 01:22:27,000 so I will submit the February 5th 2000 1905 01:22:27,000 --> 01:22:29,940 2018 Town Council minutes relevant to Mr 1906 01:22:29,940 --> 01:22:32,219 Jaworski's comment 1907 01:22:32,219 --> 01:22:35,640 and obviously most of the time 1908 01:22:35,640 --> 01:22:38,040 I'm just submitting the minutes for 1909 01:22:38,040 --> 01:22:40,860 these bodies not all of the attachments 1910 01:22:40,860 --> 01:22:42,719 that are on the files on the website 1911 01:22:42,719 --> 01:22:43,860 because those aren't actually 1912 01:22:43,860 --> 01:22:46,320 technically so I believe we're on 1913 01:22:46,320 --> 01:22:47,880 exhibit eight then 1914 01:22:47,880 --> 01:23:06,050 which would be 1915 01:23:06,060 --> 01:23:10,189 thank you 1916 01:23:10,199 --> 01:23:12,480 just as a note we are coming short on 1917 01:23:12,480 --> 01:23:14,100 time so if there's a natural break in 1918 01:23:14,100 --> 01:23:25,610 your presentation please plan for it now 1919 01:23:25,620 --> 01:23:27,840 so then I'm going to move forward with 1920 01:23:27,840 --> 01:23:29,760 the next exhibit which are the minutes 1921 01:23:29,760 --> 01:23:31,199 of the Planning and Zoning Commission of 1922 01:23:31,199 --> 01:23:35,810 May 9 2018. 1923 01:23:35,820 --> 01:23:37,739 hand her up for a moment 1924 01:23:37,739 --> 01:23:42,169 these exhibits in our binder yes 1925 01:23:42,179 --> 01:23:45,000 what was the date of that Mr Blitz 1926 01:23:45,000 --> 01:23:58,030 May 19 2018. 1927 01:23:58,040 --> 01:23:59,760 so uh 1928 01:23:59,760 --> 01:24:01,560 using that exhibit the Planning and 1929 01:24:01,560 --> 01:24:02,940 Zoning commission according to the 1930 01:24:02,940 --> 01:24:04,140 Planning and Zoning commission itself 1931 01:24:04,140 --> 01:24:05,580 they did not begin the process of 1932 01:24:05,580 --> 01:24:07,739 updating the comprehensive plan until it 1933 01:24:07,739 --> 01:24:09,960 held workshops on September 12th and 1934 01:24:09,960 --> 01:24:13,080 18th of 2018. I actually attended one of 1935 01:24:13,080 --> 01:24:14,040 those 1936 01:24:14,040 --> 01:24:16,080 um that's in the fifth whereas Clause of 1937 01:24:16,080 --> 01:24:17,820 the uh moratorium resolution that we're 1938 01:24:17,820 --> 01:24:19,199 going to get to 1939 01:24:19,199 --> 01:24:20,820 um 1940 01:24:20,820 --> 01:24:22,739 but this shows that they did begin 1941 01:24:22,739 --> 01:24:25,020 addressing the conference plan as an 1942 01:24:25,020 --> 01:24:27,719 agenda item in May of 2018 1943 01:24:27,719 --> 01:24:29,460 and the zoning administrator then 1944 01:24:29,460 --> 01:24:31,320 provided a presentation on economic 1945 01:24:31,320 --> 01:24:33,780 development and land uh availability and 1946 01:24:33,780 --> 01:24:35,640 walkability 1947 01:24:35,640 --> 01:24:38,159 so that's when they're starting a year 1948 01:24:38,159 --> 01:24:40,980 after the commission was due the the 1949 01:24:40,980 --> 01:24:42,719 comprehensive win was due that's true 1950 01:24:42,719 --> 01:24:44,580 I'm going to judge I don't seem to have 1951 01:24:44,580 --> 01:24:48,900 any any minutes from either 2018 or 19. 1952 01:24:48,900 --> 01:24:52,080 oldest one I got is 2020 in my book I 1953 01:24:52,080 --> 01:24:53,159 don't know if you guys have a different 1954 01:24:53,159 --> 01:24:57,480 book but somehow it's not in there 1955 01:24:57,480 --> 01:25:00,300 I'm sorry mine's in there oh yours in 1956 01:25:00,300 --> 01:25:03,420 there okay yeah it's a good bit in but 1957 01:25:03,420 --> 01:25:05,219 a few pages after exhibit seven if you 1958 01:25:05,219 --> 01:25:13,910 had that okay I'll look again thank you 1959 01:25:13,920 --> 01:25:17,040 next I'm going to submit 1960 01:25:17,040 --> 01:25:21,300 all as one exhibit a series of minutes 1961 01:25:21,300 --> 01:25:22,920 of the Planning and Zoning commission 1962 01:25:22,920 --> 01:25:26,880 that go from June 20th of 2018 1963 01:25:26,880 --> 01:25:30,659 to January 27th of 2021. what was the 1964 01:25:30,659 --> 01:25:36,530 first date uh June 20th 2018. 1965 01:25:36,540 --> 01:25:45,050 foreign 1966 01:25:45,060 --> 01:25:49,080 January 27th of 21 which is 1967 01:25:49,080 --> 01:25:51,360 chosen because that was the period 1968 01:25:51,360 --> 01:25:53,100 between when they started the work on 1969 01:25:53,100 --> 01:25:55,140 the comprehensive plan and when we filed 1970 01:25:55,140 --> 01:26:06,550 our cycling application 1971 01:26:06,560 --> 01:26:08,760 [Music] 1972 01:26:08,760 --> 01:26:10,199 the point 1973 01:26:10,199 --> 01:26:11,820 that I want to demonstrate with those 1974 01:26:11,820 --> 01:26:14,219 minutes is that during this period 1975 01:26:14,219 --> 01:26:16,260 the commercial worked on many different 1976 01:26:16,260 --> 01:26:19,199 administrative reviews including site 1977 01:26:19,199 --> 01:26:21,840 plan reviews while at the same time 1978 01:26:21,840 --> 01:26:24,360 often in the same meeting 1979 01:26:24,360 --> 01:26:27,080 working on the comprehensive plan 1980 01:26:27,080 --> 01:26:29,400 remember that's their legal obligation 1981 01:26:29,400 --> 01:26:31,500 to do but it was one of the reasons why 1982 01:26:31,500 --> 01:26:33,960 Mr Jakubiak was saying there would not 1983 01:26:33,960 --> 01:26:37,129 be any site plan review 1984 01:26:37,139 --> 01:26:38,820 while the commission didn't meet every 1985 01:26:38,820 --> 01:26:40,800 month typically they missed about three 1986 01:26:40,800 --> 01:26:42,540 months a year 1987 01:26:42,540 --> 01:26:44,219 um they also had a few extra work 1988 01:26:44,219 --> 01:26:45,960 sessions so they were keeping a pretty 1989 01:26:45,960 --> 01:26:47,580 regular schedule 1990 01:26:47,580 --> 01:26:49,920 like the point of this exhibit is to 1991 01:26:49,920 --> 01:26:51,239 show that 1992 01:26:51,239 --> 01:26:54,360 by doing both of their tasks from 2018 1993 01:26:54,360 --> 01:26:56,820 to 2020 1994 01:26:56,820 --> 01:26:58,800 that included some major site plan 1995 01:26:58,800 --> 01:27:00,780 reviews including one for the rod and 1996 01:27:00,780 --> 01:27:03,179 reel and one for Beach Elementary those 1997 01:27:03,179 --> 01:27:05,159 are all in the minutes package that I 1998 01:27:05,159 --> 01:27:08,870 just gave you 1999 01:27:08,880 --> 01:27:10,860 so in that minutes package you know in 2000 01:27:10,860 --> 01:27:13,020 May of 2018 the commission gets started 2001 01:27:13,020 --> 01:27:14,820 and puts comprehensive plan as a regular 2002 01:27:14,820 --> 01:27:16,080 agenda item 2003 01:27:16,080 --> 01:27:18,960 in June and July of 2018 the commission 2004 01:27:18,960 --> 01:27:21,900 considered Harbor Vista South Extension 2005 01:27:21,900 --> 01:27:23,880 requests and works on the comprehensive 2006 01:27:23,880 --> 01:27:25,980 plan 2007 01:27:25,980 --> 01:27:28,199 in November of 2018 they did a 2008 01:27:28,199 --> 01:27:29,880 reapproval of the site plan for a 2009 01:27:29,880 --> 01:27:31,560 portion of Richfield station and also 2010 01:27:31,560 --> 01:27:33,659 work on the comprehensive plan 2011 01:27:33,659 --> 01:27:36,300 February 2019 they did a sign review 2012 01:27:36,300 --> 01:27:38,760 issue in Richfield station and work on 2013 01:27:38,760 --> 01:27:41,219 the comprehensive plan so there's I'm 2014 01:27:41,219 --> 01:27:43,020 making the point they're doing both 2015 01:27:43,020 --> 01:27:44,760 their administrative tasks and their 2016 01:27:44,760 --> 01:27:47,520 planning tasks at the same time 2017 01:27:47,520 --> 01:27:50,100 May of 2019 there was a big issue 2018 01:27:50,100 --> 01:27:52,080 associated with a street opening 2019 01:27:52,080 --> 01:27:54,120 at the 18th Street entrance so they 2020 01:27:54,120 --> 01:27:57,169 handled that 2021 01:27:57,179 --> 01:27:59,040 they did the same in June of 2019 2022 01:27:59,040 --> 01:28:01,320 apparently that was a big issue 2023 01:28:01,320 --> 01:28:03,300 in December of 2019 the commission 2024 01:28:03,300 --> 01:28:04,860 worked on a revision of the site plan 2025 01:28:04,860 --> 01:28:07,139 for Richfield station and a review and 2026 01:28:07,139 --> 01:28:09,120 approval of this Subdivision plat in the 2027 01:28:09,120 --> 01:28:13,610 middle subdivision 2028 01:28:13,620 --> 01:28:16,139 in that package you might want to take 2029 01:28:16,139 --> 01:28:19,380 note of the June 2020 meeting because at 2030 01:28:19,380 --> 01:28:20,940 that time the commission was setting 2031 01:28:20,940 --> 01:28:22,860 timeline goals for finishing their work 2032 01:28:22,860 --> 01:28:24,960 on the comprehensive plan 2033 01:28:24,960 --> 01:28:26,460 with a projection that they would 2034 01:28:26,460 --> 01:28:29,040 finally complete the plan in May or June 2035 01:28:29,040 --> 01:28:32,870 of 2021. 2036 01:28:32,880 --> 01:28:34,860 so as I mentioned they handled Beach 2037 01:28:34,860 --> 01:28:37,020 Elementary that was in August 2020 and 2038 01:28:37,020 --> 01:28:38,820 in the same meeting they had they did 2039 01:28:38,820 --> 01:28:41,100 work on the comprehensive plan 2040 01:28:41,100 --> 01:28:44,159 November 2020 again Beach Elementary for 2041 01:28:44,159 --> 01:28:45,719 their final Flight Plan and the 2042 01:28:45,719 --> 01:28:48,060 comprehensive plan in the same meeting 2043 01:28:48,060 --> 01:28:49,860 in December of 2020 the commission 2044 01:28:49,860 --> 01:28:51,420 worked on the revisions of the rod and 2045 01:28:51,420 --> 01:28:53,340 real Redevelopment site plan and 2046 01:28:53,340 --> 01:28:55,860 comprehensive plan in the same meeting 2047 01:28:55,860 --> 01:28:57,960 this takes us up to the time when the 2048 01:28:57,960 --> 01:28:59,580 commission acted on the request for a 2049 01:28:59,580 --> 01:29:02,760 moratorium suggested in Mr jakubiak's 2050 01:29:02,760 --> 01:29:07,139 email of February 5th 2021. 2051 01:29:07,139 --> 01:29:10,560 so you cautioned me about time I don't 2052 01:29:10,560 --> 01:29:12,659 know whether you want to stop now the 2053 01:29:12,659 --> 01:29:16,629 next segment would take 2054 01:29:16,639 --> 01:29:21,540 15 to 20 minutes so this is a good time 2055 01:29:21,540 --> 01:29:23,219 to 2056 01:29:23,219 --> 01:29:23,820 um 2057 01:29:23,820 --> 01:29:27,960 return this session and reopen at a 2058 01:29:27,960 --> 01:29:29,520 later date 2059 01:29:29,520 --> 01:29:30,659 um 2060 01:29:30,659 --> 01:29:33,239 I did tell Mr pounds you could have a 2061 01:29:33,239 --> 01:29:34,320 few minutes if there's anything you 2062 01:29:34,320 --> 01:29:35,820 would like to address now or if you'd 2063 01:29:35,820 --> 01:29:38,100 like to hold till next time briefly if 2064 01:29:38,100 --> 01:29:40,800 you please very very very briefly like 2065 01:29:40,800 --> 01:29:42,659 if like three three minute briefly I'll 2066 01:29:42,659 --> 01:29:45,540 take the three minutes okay uh basically 2067 01:29:45,540 --> 01:29:47,280 you know it's interesting and obviously 2068 01:29:47,280 --> 01:29:50,159 Mr Blitzen going on for some time now 2069 01:29:50,159 --> 01:29:51,960 and so now he's talking about other 2070 01:29:51,960 --> 01:29:54,719 projects uh you know with regard to this 2071 01:29:54,719 --> 01:29:56,820 I mean like I said before you know this 2072 01:29:56,820 --> 01:29:58,739 is you know and I'm going to be bringing 2073 01:29:58,739 --> 01:30:00,179 this up just a little bit kind of a 2074 01:30:00,179 --> 01:30:02,280 heads up here you know if indeed Mr 2075 01:30:02,280 --> 01:30:04,080 jubiak was making the comments that 2076 01:30:04,080 --> 01:30:06,000 that's not going to be reviewed you go 2077 01:30:06,000 --> 01:30:07,679 before you know as a developer you know 2078 01:30:07,679 --> 01:30:10,199 the applicant here isn't somebody who's 2079 01:30:10,199 --> 01:30:12,600 brand new at this uh I mean he's been a 2080 01:30:12,600 --> 01:30:14,580 round he should have definitely gone to 2081 01:30:14,580 --> 01:30:15,840 the Planning Commission so I've got 2082 01:30:15,840 --> 01:30:17,520 these projects you know started 2083 01:30:17,520 --> 01:30:20,219 reviewing them right away nobody did it 2084 01:30:20,219 --> 01:30:22,620 okay nobody in fact uh Mr Woodbury you 2085 01:30:22,620 --> 01:30:24,540 know even admitted that he never you 2086 01:30:24,540 --> 01:30:26,280 know had you know with regard to these 2087 01:30:26,280 --> 01:30:28,080 projects somehow they want to wait until 2088 01:30:28,080 --> 01:30:32,940 afterwards uh to ask you somehow use the 2089 01:30:32,940 --> 01:30:35,520 law that indeed has been changed there's 2090 01:30:35,520 --> 01:30:37,320 going to be no doubt that the Town 2091 01:30:37,320 --> 01:30:39,540 Council has the right to change the law 2092 01:30:39,540 --> 01:30:41,340 they can make those decisions that's 2093 01:30:41,340 --> 01:30:42,840 part of what the County Council does 2094 01:30:42,840 --> 01:30:46,080 that's part of what the uh uh uh you 2095 01:30:46,080 --> 01:30:47,820 know their obligation isn't the zoning 2096 01:30:47,820 --> 01:30:49,500 code also what's going to be interesting 2097 01:30:49,500 --> 01:30:50,639 and we're going to be bringing this up 2098 01:30:50,639 --> 01:30:52,199 too you know again I'm going to keep my 2099 01:30:52,199 --> 01:30:54,239 three minutes these projects aren't 2100 01:30:54,239 --> 01:30:55,440 something that just came out of the 2101 01:30:55,440 --> 01:30:57,900 woodwork now these Prime projects have 2102 01:30:57,900 --> 01:30:59,520 been going on for the last 10 years or 2103 01:30:59,520 --> 01:31:03,000 so and uh you know many many years and 2104 01:31:03,000 --> 01:31:04,679 you know Council you know went on and on 2105 01:31:04,679 --> 01:31:06,780 about well the planning process was 2106 01:31:06,780 --> 01:31:08,820 delayed everything was delayed well if 2107 01:31:08,820 --> 01:31:09,960 these things have been going on for the 2108 01:31:09,960 --> 01:31:12,000 last years and he was aware of it the 2109 01:31:12,000 --> 01:31:13,679 delay would have helped them to use the 2110 01:31:13,679 --> 01:31:15,540 Old Law you know why are they waiting 2111 01:31:15,540 --> 01:31:17,520 till the comprehensive process starts to 2112 01:31:17,520 --> 01:31:19,139 suddenly file these applications to 2113 01:31:19,139 --> 01:31:21,719 another move forward so you know you 2114 01:31:21,719 --> 01:31:23,100 know since those those were important 2115 01:31:23,100 --> 01:31:26,280 too and also you know uh again I'm gonna 2116 01:31:26,280 --> 01:31:29,340 keep my three minutes it it says that 2117 01:31:29,340 --> 01:31:32,159 the Beach Elementary project was being 2118 01:31:32,159 --> 01:31:34,980 reviewed well you know an elementary 2119 01:31:34,980 --> 01:31:38,400 school is different than a category one 2120 01:31:38,400 --> 01:31:40,260 development which is going to include 2121 01:31:40,260 --> 01:31:43,620 both development for residential as well 2122 01:31:43,620 --> 01:31:46,080 as areas that's going to be you know 2123 01:31:46,080 --> 01:31:48,060 critical area so the idea that you're 2124 01:31:48,060 --> 01:31:50,280 going to compare that to helping out 2125 01:31:50,280 --> 01:31:52,199 kids and making sure their project gets 2126 01:31:52,199 --> 01:31:54,360 built seems to be kind of disingenuous 2127 01:31:54,360 --> 01:31:56,820 but uh we look forward to the new data 2128 01:31:56,820 --> 01:31:58,560 we will continue on thank you I need to 2129 01:31:58,560 --> 01:32:00,120 reply to some of that on the record so 2130 01:32:00,120 --> 01:32:04,010 firstly briefly 2131 01:32:04,020 --> 01:32:06,360 we don't go to a Planning and Zoning 2132 01:32:06,360 --> 01:32:08,100 commission until they schedule a meeting 2133 01:32:08,100 --> 01:32:10,739 that's the way the law works we file 2134 01:32:10,739 --> 01:32:12,900 applications typically the zoning 2135 01:32:12,900 --> 01:32:14,400 administrator gives us comments and we 2136 01:32:14,400 --> 01:32:15,780 work with the zoning administrator to 2137 01:32:15,780 --> 01:32:17,100 get it ready before the Planning and 2138 01:32:17,100 --> 01:32:18,600 Zoning commission Planning and Zoning 2139 01:32:18,600 --> 01:32:20,340 commission sets the schedule and the 2140 01:32:20,340 --> 01:32:21,780 hearing just like you did for this 2141 01:32:21,780 --> 01:32:24,360 hearing we don't have we don't go to any 2142 01:32:24,360 --> 01:32:26,400 meeting and say oh we're here to present 2143 01:32:26,400 --> 01:32:28,440 our case they schedule us 2144 01:32:28,440 --> 01:32:29,880 they never did 2145 01:32:29,880 --> 01:32:31,199 second 2146 01:32:31,199 --> 01:32:33,000 made reference to Beach Elementary it 2147 01:32:33,000 --> 01:32:36,480 literally is a category one site plan 2148 01:32:36,480 --> 01:32:37,860 thank you 2149 01:32:37,860 --> 01:32:40,620 um at this point I'm going to make a 2150 01:32:40,620 --> 01:32:42,840 motion for the board 2151 01:32:42,840 --> 01:32:46,440 um to pause where we're at to resume on 2152 01:32:46,440 --> 01:32:48,179 October 30th 2153 01:32:48,179 --> 01:32:49,800 7 pm 2154 01:32:49,800 --> 01:32:51,960 do I have a second 2155 01:32:51,960 --> 01:32:53,060 thank you 2156 01:32:53,060 --> 01:32:57,540 so this meeting I guess is in recess 2157 01:32:57,540 --> 01:33:00,239 um and I would advise Council to think 2158 01:33:00,239 --> 01:33:02,219 on ways 2159 01:33:02,219 --> 01:33:04,920 um we are not we are acting as a 2160 01:33:04,920 --> 01:33:06,719 legislative body but obviously no one 2161 01:33:06,719 --> 01:33:08,340 other than Town Council has legal 2162 01:33:08,340 --> 01:33:10,440 experience I'd advise you to take that 2163 01:33:10,440 --> 01:33:13,020 into account uh in terms of how you 2164 01:33:13,020 --> 01:33:14,520 address the board and how you come to 2165 01:33:14,520 --> 01:33:15,840 this meeting 2166 01:33:15,840 --> 01:33:16,860 um 2167 01:33:16,860 --> 01:33:20,380 thank you 2168 01:33:20,390 --> 01:33:40,750 [Music] 2169 01:33:40,760 --> 01:33:53,470 I was worried I'm like oh my God 2170 01:33:53,480 --> 01:34:01,330 you know I'm going home 2171 01:34:01,340 --> 01:34:07,850 you need those separators 2172 01:34:07,860 --> 01:34:10,460 so