1 00:01:12,320 --> 00:01:14,640 okay welcome again everyone um this is 2 00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:17,400 the board of appeals uh call to order um 3 00:01:17,400 --> 00:01:21,320 7 PM January 25th 2024 we start with a 4 00:01:21,320 --> 00:01:23,439 roll call um please indicate that you 5 00:01:23,439 --> 00:01:26,520 were present uh Mr Richard Burch present 6 00:01:26,520 --> 00:01:29,360 Mr Paul dhy present Miss Amy Everett 7 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:33,520 present I am Mr Jody hon star um as we 8 00:01:33,520 --> 00:01:36,960 set last time we will begin with any uh 9 00:01:36,960 --> 00:01:40,360 newly received public comment by the um 10 00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:42,240 by the town Sharon have we received 11 00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:44,320 anything since our last meeting yes we 12 00:01:44,320 --> 00:01:46,880 received one at the last meeting one at 13 00:01:46,880 --> 00:01:50,840 the last meeting okay um the uh can we 14 00:01:50,840 --> 00:01:53,159 make sure we provide copies to Mr pounds 15 00:01:53,159 --> 00:01:56,360 and Mr Blitz if we haven't already um 16 00:01:56,360 --> 00:01:59,240 and enter these comments into the record 17 00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:00,840 um I will note that the contents of the 18 00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:03,520 comments will not be addressed this time 19 00:02:03,520 --> 00:02:06,439 this is just for administrative 20 00:02:06,439 --> 00:02:11,039 purposes okay um on to the second uh 21 00:02:11,039 --> 00:02:13,280 agenda item is the approval of the 22 00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:15,840 minutes from our last meeting on January 23 00:02:15,840 --> 00:02:17,120 4 24 00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:20,599 2024 um does anybody have any 25 00:02:20,599 --> 00:02:22,120 corrections they'd like to issue or is 26 00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:25,030 it all 27 00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:27,560 fine in that case I will entertain a 28 00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:29,480 motion to approve uh the minutes from 29 00:02:29,480 --> 00:02:38,790 Jan 4th I will so move have a second right all in favor I all 30 00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:42,040 right minutes are approved okay um a 31 00:02:42,040 --> 00:02:43,239 little bit more on the announcement 32 00:02:43,239 --> 00:02:46,040 front this morning um or this evening uh 33 00:02:46,040 --> 00:02:47,840 we'll be limiting to the session tonight 34 00:02:47,840 --> 00:02:51,080 to two hours so we will end around 900 35 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:53,800 PM as normal um direct all comments and 36 00:02:53,800 --> 00:02:55,200 questions concerning the administration 37 00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:57,120 of this hearing to the board chair or 38 00:02:57,120 --> 00:02:59,159 legal counsel this applies to the 39 00:02:59,159 --> 00:03:00,640 gallery as well well do not direct 40 00:03:00,640 --> 00:03:02,159 questions or comments at the petitioner 41 00:03:02,159 --> 00:03:03,720 or staff during the presentation of 42 00:03:03,720 --> 00:03:07,159 their testimony um now this is a new one 43 00:03:07,159 --> 00:03:09,319 uh the third parties of record may ask 44 00:03:09,319 --> 00:03:11,159 questions of Any Given testimony at the 45 00:03:11,159 --> 00:03:13,440 conclusion of that testimony questions 46 00:03:13,440 --> 00:03:15,959 should generally be limited in scope to 47 00:03:15,959 --> 00:03:17,840 uh address the information presented I 48 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:19,560 will indicate to the gallery when this 49 00:03:19,560 --> 00:03:21,200 option is 50 00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:22,720 available 51 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:25,920 um number four uh as normal our order of 52 00:03:25,920 --> 00:03:28,280 presentation uh documented in our rules 53 00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:31,120 of procedure uh we are still on step one 54 00:03:31,120 --> 00:03:32,319 which is appellant testimony and 55 00:03:32,319 --> 00:03:34,760 evidence given by Mr Blitz and Witnesses 56 00:03:34,760 --> 00:03:38,280 once he has completed um we will uh 57 00:03:38,280 --> 00:03:40,439 offer the chance to ask questions for 58 00:03:40,439 --> 00:03:42,799 any parties of record which will then 59 00:03:42,799 --> 00:03:46,840 move on to Mr Po's uh presentation for 60 00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:49,879 any Town staff testimony evidence um 61 00:03:49,879 --> 00:03:53,519 same same questioning applies um and 62 00:03:53,519 --> 00:03:55,599 third after all this the testimony and 63 00:03:55,599 --> 00:03:57,640 evidence by the person or entity whose 64 00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:00,040 rights are impacted by the appeal you 65 00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:04,040 guys members of the public um so we yes 66 00:04:04,040 --> 00:04:06,439 okay um and once that's done we'll have 67 00:04:06,439 --> 00:04:08,200 summary statements at which point we 68 00:04:08,200 --> 00:04:10,280 will close the public hearing and what 69 00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:13,200 this means you have a correction 70 00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:16,000 D I would just like to note with respect 71 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:18,600 to the summary statements uh we're going 72 00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:22,079 to need to determine how those summary 73 00:04:22,079 --> 00:04:23,759 statements are going to be provided what 74 00:04:23,759 --> 00:04:27,199 orally written or a combination thereof 75 00:04:27,199 --> 00:04:31,919 so uh you that will be decided later 76 00:04:31,919 --> 00:04:34,840 date um okay wrapping that all up uh 77 00:04:34,840 --> 00:04:36,840 this means uh our normal notice for 78 00:04:36,840 --> 00:04:38,000 members of the public if you have 79 00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:39,440 attended here with the intent to State 80 00:04:39,440 --> 00:04:41,560 your opinion it most likely will not 81 00:04:41,560 --> 00:04:43,400 happen tonight although we are getting 82 00:04:43,400 --> 00:04:45,400 closer um if this is inconvenient we 83 00:04:45,400 --> 00:04:46,720 will take written statements if you'd 84 00:04:46,720 --> 00:04:49,320 like to provide them uh I'd also like to 85 00:04:49,320 --> 00:04:50,600 urge you to submit your REM marks at the 86 00:04:50,600 --> 00:04:52,199 conclusion of the testimony taking what 87 00:04:52,199 --> 00:04:54,160 you hear into account you're welcome to 88 00:04:54,160 --> 00:04:55,840 submit written comments at any time but 89 00:04:55,840 --> 00:04:58,120 we the board would uh most appreciate 90 00:04:58,120 --> 00:04:59,320 comments that are within the scope of 91 00:04:59,320 --> 00:05:02,000 what were able to rule on thank you 92 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:05,600 that's all for the uh announcements and 93 00:05:05,600 --> 00:05:09,280 now we continue on um with case 94 00:05:09,280 --> 00:05:11,680 20233 Roden reel Incorporated Donovan 95 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:13,960 Estates LLC to consider an application 96 00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:16,400 from the Roden reel LC Donovan Estates 97 00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:18,560 uh 4160 MIRS Avenue Chesapeake Beach 98 00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:20,240 Maryland for a decision on 99 00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:21,840 interpretation or alleged error to 100 00:05:21,840 --> 00:05:27,360 article 6 section 29023 29031 A1 A6 of 101 00:05:27,360 --> 00:05:29,039 the Chesapeake Beach zoning ordinance 102 00:05:29,039 --> 00:05:32,680 and C 3 uh 309 c310 and c311 of the 103 00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:34,759 Chesapeake Beach Town Charter uh 104 00:05:34,759 --> 00:05:36,639 applicant requests the Chesapeake Beach 105 00:05:36,639 --> 00:05:38,840 zoning board of appeals to quote order 106 00:05:38,840 --> 00:05:40,960 the zoning administrator uh and planning 107 00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:42,520 and zoning commission to immediately 108 00:05:42,520 --> 00:05:44,120 commence and prioritize the processing 109 00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:46,039 and review of the relevant site plan 110 00:05:46,039 --> 00:05:47,639 submitted by the Roden reel Incorporated 111 00:05:47,639 --> 00:05:49,880 Don States LLC and that the zoning 112 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:51,160 administrator and planning and zoning 113 00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:52,680 commission be ordered to apply the 114 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:55,199 zoning ordinances in effect as of 115 00:05:55,199 --> 00:05:58,560 January 29 2021 when the applications 116 00:05:58,560 --> 00:06:00,520 were submitted and for such other and 117 00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:02,360 further relief as the nature of their 118 00:06:02,360 --> 00:06:04,639 cause requires at this point I will pass 119 00:06:04,639 --> 00:06:14,029 it to Mr Blitz for a continuation of his 120 00:06:14,039 --> 00:06:15,800 presentation 121 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:18,440 microphone good evening uh Eric Blitz on 122 00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:20,880 behalf of the rod and reel and the other 123 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:22,240 applicant 124 00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:25,160 um you know we haven't had testimony I 125 00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:27,199 think since the November 8th one so I'm 126 00:06:27,199 --> 00:06:30,599 going to um 127 00:06:30,599 --> 00:06:34,280 kind of try to give a very brief summary 128 00:06:34,280 --> 00:06:36,960 of where we were so that you can pick up 129 00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:40,039 on where we are going so far our 130 00:06:40,039 --> 00:06:42,479 presentation has been focused on the 131 00:06:42,479 --> 00:06:44,680 administrative errors on the part of the 132 00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:45,919 zoning administrator and the Planning 133 00:06:45,919 --> 00:06:49,120 and Zoning commission um and in failing 134 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:50,960 to process the five site plans filed on 135 00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:53,039 January 29th 136 00:06:53,039 --> 00:06:57,080 2021 um as they were required to do by 137 00:06:57,080 --> 00:06:59,039 Statute uh I believe we've established 138 00:06:59,039 --> 00:07:00,800 the dut duty of both to review those 139 00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:02,879 site plans and the 60-day deadline 140 00:07:02,879 --> 00:07:04,840 imposed on the Planning and Zoning 141 00:07:04,840 --> 00:07:07,840 commission for doing so um let me go to 142 00:07:07,840 --> 00:07:10,309 slide 143 00:07:10,319 --> 00:07:14,240 two so we noted the to two reasons uh 144 00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:17,280 two reasons um of the Z that the zoning 145 00:07:17,280 --> 00:07:19,080 administrator gave in response to the 146 00:07:19,080 --> 00:07:21,919 filing of the five 147 00:07:21,919 --> 00:07:24,199 applications and why they were improper 148 00:07:24,199 --> 00:07:27,199 reasons uh to deny site plan 149 00:07:27,199 --> 00:07:29,919 review and the first reason 150 00:07:29,919 --> 00:07:31,360 was that the 151 00:07:31,360 --> 00:07:33,800 commission would have a burden in site 152 00:07:33,800 --> 00:07:36,720 plan review in in undertaking the site 153 00:07:36,720 --> 00:07:40,560 plan review um be on their workload and 154 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:42,000 the review of their site plans would 155 00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:43,800 jeopardize the commission's work on the 156 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:45,840 comprehensive plan and the zoning 157 00:07:45,840 --> 00:07:49,120 ordinance updates um we showed why those 158 00:07:49,120 --> 00:07:50,400 reasons were 159 00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:52,960 contradicted by the explicit statutory 160 00:07:52,960 --> 00:07:55,879 command uh that they that the commission 161 00:07:55,879 --> 00:07:58,879 has to do both their planning and their 162 00:07:58,879 --> 00:07:59,919 review 163 00:07:59,919 --> 00:08:03,120 at the same time and they have to do it 164 00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:05,360 concurrently and that they had done that 165 00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:07,280 and so and they have to do as they have 166 00:08:07,280 --> 00:08:09,240 to hold as many meetings as necessary to 167 00:08:09,240 --> 00:08:12,670 do 168 00:08:12,680 --> 00:08:15,280 so certainly the long delay between the 169 00:08:15,280 --> 00:08:17,400 filing of the site plan applications in 170 00:08:17,400 --> 00:08:19,520 the passage of the comprehensive plan 171 00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:22,039 and the implementing ordinances that 172 00:08:22,039 --> 00:08:24,400 provide the specific zoning um 173 00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:26,720 requirements used in site plan review 174 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:28,520 should be also should also be considered 175 00:08:28,520 --> 00:08:30,879 by the board um when considering the 176 00:08:30,879 --> 00:08:32,800 reasons offered by the zoning 177 00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:34,800 administrator the second justification 178 00:08:34,800 --> 00:08:40,589 was the 179 00:08:40,599 --> 00:08:42,959 moratorium so I think we've clearly 180 00:08:42,959 --> 00:08:44,920 demonstrated why we believe that the 181 00:08:44,920 --> 00:08:47,839 moratorium was directly and specifically 182 00:08:47,839 --> 00:08:50,480 targeted at the rod and reel site plan 183 00:08:50,480 --> 00:08:52,519 applications that it was invalid and 184 00:08:52,519 --> 00:08:54,680 inoperative because of it was improperly 185 00:08:54,680 --> 00:08:56,800 passed and then extended through 186 00:08:56,800 --> 00:09:00,760 resolutions and not ordinances and even 187 00:09:00,760 --> 00:09:03,320 after the purported moratorium had 188 00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:05,320 expired the zoning administrative 189 00:09:05,320 --> 00:09:06,720 Planning and Zoning commission still 190 00:09:06,720 --> 00:09:09,560 continued deny site plan review even up 191 00:09:09,560 --> 00:09:14,360 to this date so we're we're at January 25th so we're 192 00:09:14,360 --> 00:09:18,670 basically four days short of three 193 00:09:18,680 --> 00:09:20,839 years so if I'm correct and we've 194 00:09:20,839 --> 00:09:23,360 established that that was an error for 195 00:09:23,360 --> 00:09:24,320 the zoning administrator and the 196 00:09:24,320 --> 00:09:26,240 Planning and Zoning commission to deny 197 00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:29,200 site plan review today we get to the 198 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:31,600 nature of the relief and what's 199 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:34,279 appropriate in this case and before we 200 00:09:34,279 --> 00:09:36,200 turn to the facts and laws and arguments 201 00:09:36,200 --> 00:09:38,200 that I'll offer in favor of that 202 00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:40,640 requested relief um there has been one 203 00:09:40,640 --> 00:09:43,160 nagging issue that has been raised in 204 00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:46,360 cross-examination and arguments by um Mr 205 00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:48,399 pounds for the municipal Corporation of 206 00:09:48,399 --> 00:09:52,880 chesp beach that imply or suggest that 207 00:09:52,880 --> 00:09:54,640 the rod reel has not done what it needed 208 00:09:54,640 --> 00:09:58,560 to do to obtain a hearing or a review of 209 00:09:58,560 --> 00:10:00,920 The Five plan applications before the 210 00:10:00,920 --> 00:10:10,470 commission and I'd like to address that 211 00:10:10,480 --> 00:10:13,240 now you can see section 212 00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:15,360 29023 which we reviewed at the very 213 00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:18,200 beginning of this set of 214 00:10:18,200 --> 00:10:22,079 hearings um it sets forth the process 215 00:10:22,079 --> 00:10:24,560 site plans are required to obtain zoning 216 00:10:24,560 --> 00:10:27,079 permits to obtain a zoning permit for a 217 00:10:27,079 --> 00:10:28,760 multif family dwelling the property 218 00:10:28,760 --> 00:10:30,600 owner is required to submit a category 219 00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:33,440 one site plan and their application for 220 00:10:33,440 --> 00:10:35,760 with their application for a zoning 221 00:10:35,760 --> 00:10:38,440 permit you will recall that the app 222 00:10:38,440 --> 00:10:40,959 Roden Rio applications included some 223 00:10:40,959 --> 00:10:42,720 form of multif family 224 00:10:42,720 --> 00:10:46,120 dwellings on as their proposals so they 225 00:10:46,120 --> 00:10:48,120 all were category one site plans with 226 00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:50,480 the requisite information required by 227 00:10:50,480 --> 00:10:52,829 section 228 00:10:52,839 --> 00:10:55,560 29024 and that section provides a whole 229 00:10:55,560 --> 00:10:57,399 long list of what's needed to be 230 00:10:57,399 --> 00:10:59,959 provided with 231 00:10:59,959 --> 00:11:02,399 plans so the Roden reel filed the 232 00:11:02,399 --> 00:11:05,079 application on the form provided by the 233 00:11:05,079 --> 00:11:07,839 town which you can see in exhibit five 234 00:11:07,839 --> 00:11:10,720 which we already have in record labeled 235 00:11:10,720 --> 00:11:12,639 as a zoning permit 236 00:11:12,639 --> 00:11:14,480 application and as you can see in 237 00:11:14,480 --> 00:11:17,200 exhibits five and six those applications 238 00:11:17,200 --> 00:11:19,000 included the required site plan 239 00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:21,200 applications and the critical area site 240 00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:24,040 plan requirements there's no separate 241 00:11:24,040 --> 00:11:26,360 form for requesting site plan review 242 00:11:26,360 --> 00:11:28,360 with the commission because the process 243 00:11:28,360 --> 00:11:31,800 flows directly from the filing of those 244 00:11:31,800 --> 00:11:33,720 zoning permit applications with the site 245 00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:36,040 plans and you'll see I'm going to 246 00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:37,800 demonstrate that for you in the zoning 247 00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:40,480 code the property owner is requesting a 248 00:11:40,480 --> 00:11:43,200 zoning permit in the application but 249 00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:46,519 because site plan review is required for 250 00:11:46,519 --> 00:11:49,040 that zoning permit that's when the site 251 00:11:49,040 --> 00:11:50,959 plan process is 252 00:11:50,959 --> 00:11:54,200 triggered in your binder on the 253 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:55,959 reference statutes and cases I had 254 00:11:55,959 --> 00:11:57,720 included section 255 00:11:57,720 --> 00:12:02,120 29027 of the town's zoning 256 00:12:02,120 --> 00:12:04,720 code and you can see in subsection D it 257 00:12:04,720 --> 00:12:07,519 makes it explicit that all applications 258 00:12:07,519 --> 00:12:09,240 for zoning permits shall be accompanied 259 00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:11,040 by the site plans complying with the 260 00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:13,680 provisions of article six and that 261 00:12:13,680 --> 00:12:15,120 application for the zoning permit is 262 00:12:15,120 --> 00:12:23,430 there for the application for site plan 263 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:27,120 review in section 29023 it sets forth 264 00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:28,920 the process of what happens after the 265 00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:30,600 filing of the application for a zoning 266 00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:33,079 permit requiring site plan it's all in 267 00:12:33,079 --> 00:12:35,560 section sub subsection 268 00:12:35,560 --> 00:12:38,440 C the applicant shall submit a completed 269 00:12:38,440 --> 00:12:40,399 application so that's Our obligation the 270 00:12:40,399 --> 00:12:42,240 appropriate fee and the site plan for 271 00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:46,720 them to the public works SL zoning 272 00:12:46,720 --> 00:12:49,600 administrator in C2 the administrator 273 00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:51,199 shall review the application for 274 00:12:51,199 --> 00:12:53,880 completeness and will refer the 275 00:12:53,880 --> 00:12:55,120 application to the appropriate 276 00:12:55,120 --> 00:12:57,639 individuals or agencies for review 277 00:12:57,639 --> 00:12:59,480 comment and or or for 278 00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:02,600 approval in C3 the Planning and Zoning 279 00:13:02,600 --> 00:13:04,760 commission will review and take action 280 00:13:04,760 --> 00:13:08,120 on category one site plans and in C4 for 281 00:13:08,120 --> 00:13:08,920 all 282 00:13:08,920 --> 00:13:11,040 category category one site plan 283 00:13:11,040 --> 00:13:13,920 submitted for review the commission 284 00:13:13,920 --> 00:13:16,839 shall it says a submit written notice to 285 00:13:16,839 --> 00:13:19,240 the applicant by first class mail such 286 00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:21,160 to be postmarked at least 10 days prior 287 00:13:21,160 --> 00:13:23,040 to the meeting to discuss the site 288 00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:25,399 plan submit written notice to all the 289 00:13:25,399 --> 00:13:27,360 owners adjoining immediately across the 290 00:13:27,360 --> 00:13:30,000 street from the subject property 291 00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:31,680 and such written notice has to state the 292 00:13:31,680 --> 00:13:33,480 date the time the place subject matter 293 00:13:33,480 --> 00:13:35,360 of the meeting to discuss the site 294 00:13:35,360 --> 00:13:38,000 plan so as you can see in section four 295 00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:39,240 it's incumbent upon the Planning and 296 00:13:39,240 --> 00:13:41,360 Zoning commission to set the meeting 297 00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:43,320 send the written no notices to the 298 00:13:43,320 --> 00:13:45,560 applicant and to the adjoining property 299 00:13:45,560 --> 00:13:48,279 owners um at least 10 days prior to that 300 00:13:48,279 --> 00:13:51,199 meeting and all we do is file the 301 00:13:51,199 --> 00:13:53,519 application that triggers that 302 00:13:53,519 --> 00:13:56,120 process and I say we I meant the rod and 303 00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:57,759 reel I 304 00:13:57,759 --> 00:14:00,560 apologize 305 00:14:00,560 --> 00:14:02,759 there's no statutory requirement or rule 306 00:14:02,759 --> 00:14:05,279 of procedure that's imposed on the 307 00:14:05,279 --> 00:14:07,600 applicants such as the rod reel that 308 00:14:07,600 --> 00:14:10,800 would require to make a separate request 309 00:14:10,800 --> 00:14:13,800 for a hearing before the 310 00:14:13,800 --> 00:14:15,800 commission and you may recall we also 311 00:14:15,800 --> 00:14:18,560 covered section 29026 of the Town zoning 312 00:14:18,560 --> 00:14:21,160 ordinance in the first hearing which in 313 00:14:21,160 --> 00:14:23,079 subsection 15 demonstrates how the 314 00:14:23,079 --> 00:14:25,399 zoning administrator reviews the 315 00:14:25,399 --> 00:14:26,800 application and forwards the 316 00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:28,360 administrator's comments to the 317 00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:29,279 commission 318 00:14:29,279 --> 00:14:41,949 for that meeting it's typically a staff 319 00:14:41,959 --> 00:14:44,279 report so there there I've given you 320 00:14:44,279 --> 00:14:46,959 section 2926 which requires the zoning 321 00:14:46,959 --> 00:14:48,959 administrator to intake to act as the 322 00:14:48,959 --> 00:14:51,600 intake administrator for the filings and 323 00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:53,880 in B1 the zoning administrator receives 324 00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:55,320 and examines the 325 00:14:55,320 --> 00:14:57,680 applications um and refers them to the 326 00:14:57,680 --> 00:14:59,920 commission 327 00:14:59,920 --> 00:15:02,959 um each of the rod and reel applications 328 00:15:02,959 --> 00:15:05,480 uh called for many more than three off 329 00:15:05,480 --> 00:15:07,240 Street parkings so even if they were not 330 00:15:07,240 --> 00:15:09,839 category one site plans they would have 331 00:15:09,839 --> 00:15:11,199 to be referred to the commission for 332 00:15:11,199 --> 00:15:15,959 review and approval um but what I'm 333 00:15:15,959 --> 00:15:18,920 stressing to you I'm hoping is that this 334 00:15:18,920 --> 00:15:20,839 is an automatic process not requiring 335 00:15:20,839 --> 00:15:23,600 any additional requests by the applicant 336 00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:26,000 to the commission or the zoning 337 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:27,519 administrator as the zoning 338 00:15:27,519 --> 00:15:30,560 administrator acts as the 339 00:15:30,560 --> 00:15:35,269 take 340 00:15:35,279 --> 00:15:38,839 person in 2925 and subsection B15 you 341 00:15:38,839 --> 00:15:39,560 can 342 00:15:39,560 --> 00:15:41,720 see that the zoning administrator 343 00:15:41,720 --> 00:15:44,000 reviews the applications submits them to 344 00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:45,959 for review and approval in accordance 345 00:15:45,959 --> 00:15:49,160 with article six article six is includes 346 00:15:49,160 --> 00:15:50,920 section 29 347 00:15:50,920 --> 00:15:54,240 29023 that we just 348 00:15:54,240 --> 00:15:56,480 reviewed and there was testimony from Mr 349 00:15:56,480 --> 00:15:58,600 Woodburn that the applications met the 350 00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:00,360 requirements for a category one site 351 00:16:00,360 --> 00:16:03,240 plan and that a critical area site plan 352 00:16:03,240 --> 00:16:04,480 was also 353 00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:07,000 submitted and so the question is why 354 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:08,519 would the rod and reel file all this 355 00:16:08,519 --> 00:16:10,839 exhaustive list of information necessary 356 00:16:10,839 --> 00:16:13,880 for category one site plans review if 357 00:16:13,880 --> 00:16:17,600 they weren't asking for site plan 358 00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:20,040 review all remember also that we 359 00:16:20,040 --> 00:16:21,399 established that all five of these 360 00:16:21,399 --> 00:16:22,880 projects are in the critical 361 00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:27,509 area 362 00:16:27,519 --> 00:16:42,509 um 363 00:16:42,519 --> 00:16:52,230 seem to uh 364 00:16:52,240 --> 00:16:57,470 be 365 00:16:57,480 --> 00:17:02,829 okay 366 00:17:02,839 --> 00:17:04,120 20 367 00:17:04,120 --> 00:17:12,710 29025 A5 is what I want okay 368 00:17:12,720 --> 00:17:15,319 sorry so this lists out the whole 369 00:17:15,319 --> 00:17:17,360 procedure and I'm not going to read it 370 00:17:17,360 --> 00:17:19,839 all over again but it allows you to see 371 00:17:19,839 --> 00:17:21,079 what the code 372 00:17:21,079 --> 00:17:24,760 provides as far as what happens after we 373 00:17:24,760 --> 00:17:26,679 file the zoning application with the 374 00:17:26,679 --> 00:17:34,549 site plans 375 00:17:34,559 --> 00:17:36,080 yes 376 00:17:36,080 --> 00:17:39,720 after for you to provide us with a copy 377 00:17:39,720 --> 00:17:46,230 of the PowerPoint 378 00:17:46,240 --> 00:17:48,320 absolutely I think I did for the first 379 00:17:48,320 --> 00:17:50,120 one but I don't remember you asking for 380 00:17:50,120 --> 00:17:55,710 the other ones do you want all of 381 00:17:55,720 --> 00:17:57,400 them 382 00:17:57,400 --> 00:18:23,669 yes 383 00:18:23,679 --> 00:18:27,799 okay what I'm gonna pass out to you now 384 00:18:27,799 --> 00:18:30,950 is 385 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:57,310 additions to your 386 00:18:57,320 --> 00:19:07,430 um 387 00:19:07,440 --> 00:19:11,360 first one is the schedule of 388 00:19:11,360 --> 00:19:13,280 fees 389 00:19:13,280 --> 00:19:15,559 for site 390 00:19:15,559 --> 00:19:19,320 plans and as you can also see go to the 391 00:19:19,320 --> 00:19:20,080 next 392 00:19:20,080 --> 00:19:23,360 slide which is just what you've got 393 00:19:23,360 --> 00:19:24,720 there I'm 394 00:19:24,720 --> 00:19:27,240 emphasizing 395 00:19:27,240 --> 00:19:30,799 that the fees are much higher when you 396 00:19:30,799 --> 00:19:34,039 file a zoning permit 397 00:19:34,039 --> 00:19:36,480 or that includes a requirement for 398 00:19:36,480 --> 00:19:39,240 category one site plans and they're 399 00:19:39,240 --> 00:19:40,960 calculated based upon the nature and the 400 00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:41,960 size of the 401 00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:44,360 construction and each of the rod and re 402 00:19:44,360 --> 00:19:49,159 applications filed on January 29th were projects that were for 10 or more 403 00:19:49,159 --> 00:19:51,320 residential units so you can see that at 404 00:19:51,320 --> 00:19:54,760 the bottom so that part of the fee for 405 00:19:54,760 --> 00:19:57,240 site plan review is 406 00:19:57,240 --> 00:19:58,799 4,800 407 00:19:58,799 --> 00:20:02,789 and the base application is also 408 00:20:02,799 --> 00:20:06,280 raised further down on the document um 409 00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:07,960 when it's a critical area site plan 410 00:20:07,960 --> 00:20:11,039 which this was the all five of these 411 00:20:11,039 --> 00:20:14,039 were so since all five of the rod and 412 00:20:14,039 --> 00:20:15,720 reel projects were in the critical area 413 00:20:15,720 --> 00:20:17,480 and involved 414 00:20:17,480 --> 00:20:20,120 residential uses with more than 10 units 415 00:20:20,120 --> 00:20:23,200 the total fee was calculated by the 600 416 00:20:23,200 --> 00:20:25,360 base application fee plus the $ 4,800 417 00:20:25,360 --> 00:20:28,919 for a total of $5,400 for each 418 00:20:28,919 --> 00:20:31,440 application so as an applicant is paying 419 00:20:31,440 --> 00:20:33,400 that fee the applicant is literally 420 00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:39,110 paying for site plan 421 00:20:39,120 --> 00:20:42,720 review finally the moratorium resolution 422 00:20:42,720 --> 00:20:44,320 listed the rod and reel project 423 00:20:44,320 --> 00:20:46,480 submissions as the reason for passing 424 00:20:46,480 --> 00:20:48,640 the moratorium and referred to them when 425 00:20:48,640 --> 00:20:51,799 it recited and I'll quote from it on 426 00:20:51,799 --> 00:20:55,559 January 29th 2021 the town received in 427 00:20:55,559 --> 00:20:57,400 one delivery applications for four 428 00:20:57,400 --> 00:20:59,799 separate major development site plans in 429 00:20:59,799 --> 00:21:03,120 one major Subdivision plat end quote so 430 00:21:03,120 --> 00:21:05,440 the moratorium was designed to stop that 431 00:21:05,440 --> 00:21:06,919 site plan 432 00:21:06,919 --> 00:21:09,320 process it specifically targeted the 433 00:21:09,320 --> 00:21:12,360 category one site plans so it is kind 434 00:21:12,360 --> 00:21:16,159 of odd to now imply that the Roden reel 435 00:21:16,159 --> 00:21:17,919 didn't ask for site plan review or 436 00:21:17,919 --> 00:21:19,880 didn't do file what it needed to be 437 00:21:19,880 --> 00:21:25,830 filed to request site plan 438 00:21:25,840 --> 00:21:29,279 review the town's April 13 2021 letter 439 00:21:29,279 --> 00:21:32,279 that you have as exhibit 25 uh returning 440 00:21:32,279 --> 00:21:33,840 the filing fees to the Roden reel 441 00:21:33,840 --> 00:21:36,120 referred explicitly to the five projects 442 00:21:36,120 --> 00:21:38,799 by name but referenced the moratorium 443 00:21:38,799 --> 00:21:41,600 passed on March 18 444 00:21:41,600 --> 00:21:44,279 2021 by describing it as a category one 445 00:21:44,279 --> 00:21:46,080 site plan review moratorium and that's 446 00:21:46,080 --> 00:21:48,480 the reason why the projects wouldn't be 447 00:21:48,480 --> 00:21:51,120 reviewed so I think I want I hope that 448 00:21:51,120 --> 00:21:52,799 makes it clear to the board the Roden 449 00:21:52,799 --> 00:21:54,919 reel did apply for and was entitled to 450 00:21:54,919 --> 00:21:57,120 site plan review based upon the 451 00:21:57,120 --> 00:21:58,919 application they filed 452 00:21:58,919 --> 00:22:01,159 um questions about why the rod and reel 453 00:22:01,159 --> 00:22:03,480 did not go to the commission I think are 454 00:22:03,480 --> 00:22:05,760 a distraction you can't just show up at 455 00:22:05,760 --> 00:22:08,080 the commission and say tonight I'd like 456 00:22:08,080 --> 00:22:10,400 you to review my site 457 00:22:10,400 --> 00:22:13,200 plan the the town cannot both attempt to 458 00:22:13,200 --> 00:22:16,080 Halt the process of site plan review of 459 00:22:16,080 --> 00:22:17,720 the frod and reels applications and then 460 00:22:17,720 --> 00:22:20,480 later suggest the site plan review by 461 00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:22,919 the before the commission was never 462 00:22:22,919 --> 00:22:26,039 requested or applied 463 00:22:26,039 --> 00:22:28,919 for so let's turn to the relief that the 464 00:22:28,919 --> 00:22:33,990 rod and reel is 465 00:22:34,000 --> 00:22:37,039 requesting we start with the board's 466 00:22:37,039 --> 00:22:40,360 Authority and your board of appeals in 467 00:22:40,360 --> 00:22:42,600 reviewing appeal for error in the 468 00:22:42,600 --> 00:22:53,669 administrative process is very 469 00:22:53,679 --> 00:22:58,120 broad this is section 4306 F of the land 470 00:22:58,120 --> 00:23:00,039 use article of the annotated code which 471 00:23:00,039 --> 00:23:02,080 I just handed out with it's on the 472 00:23:02,080 --> 00:23:05,159 second part after the applications and 473 00:23:05,159 --> 00:23:06,679 as you can see in 474 00:23:06,679 --> 00:23:10,520 F1 a board May in Conformity with this 475 00:23:10,520 --> 00:23:13,720 division wholly or partly reverse order 476 00:23:13,720 --> 00:23:15,279 reverse the order requirement or 477 00:23:15,279 --> 00:23:17,559 decision that is subject to the appeal 478 00:23:17,559 --> 00:23:19,679 wholly or partly affirm the order 479 00:23:19,679 --> 00:23:20,840 requirement or 480 00:23:20,840 --> 00:23:25,600 decision um I I may have said first is 481 00:23:25,600 --> 00:23:28,520 revers then it's airm modify the order 482 00:23:28,520 --> 00:23:30,039 requirement or decision that is subject 483 00:23:30,039 --> 00:23:32,480 to the appeal or issue a new order 484 00:23:32,480 --> 00:23:35,039 requirement or decision so you have 485 00:23:35,039 --> 00:23:38,480 broad Authority if you find there was 486 00:23:38,480 --> 00:23:46,350 error to administer the 487 00:23:46,360 --> 00:23:49,640 relief then in subsection two the board 488 00:23:49,640 --> 00:23:52,240 shall of appeals shall have all the 489 00:23:52,240 --> 00:23:54,400 powers of the administrator officer or 490 00:23:54,400 --> 00:23:57,200 unit from whose the action the appeal is 491 00:23:57,200 --> 00:24:01,360 taken kind of a foundational part 492 00:24:01,360 --> 00:24:05,679 of Maryland law with respect to your 493 00:24:05,679 --> 00:24:08,200 authority to essentially step into the 494 00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:10,320 shoes of the administrators if you find 495 00:24:10,320 --> 00:24:12,640 that there's 496 00:24:12,640 --> 00:24:15,840 error the power of the board is again 497 00:24:15,840 --> 00:24:19,200 reinforced by the town zoning ordinance 498 00:24:19,200 --> 00:24:20,880 which is found in section 499 00:24:20,880 --> 00:24:24,240 29032 subsection G also a part that I 500 00:24:24,240 --> 00:24:25,480 handed out 501 00:24:25,480 --> 00:24:28,799 today and it restates 502 00:24:28,799 --> 00:24:31,720 the Maryland statutory law in the in the 503 00:24:31,720 --> 00:24:36,200 or in the ordinance same same 504 00:24:36,200 --> 00:24:38,679 language so this broad Authority for you 505 00:24:38,679 --> 00:24:40,320 to step into the shoes of the of the 506 00:24:40,320 --> 00:24:42,200 administrators who committed error and 507 00:24:42,200 --> 00:24:44,840 exercise their powers is important 508 00:24:44,840 --> 00:24:46,600 because it demonstrates that you have 509 00:24:46,600 --> 00:24:49,159 the power in this appeal to not only 510 00:24:49,159 --> 00:24:51,799 determine if there was an error on the 511 00:24:51,799 --> 00:24:54,240 part of the administrators but to craft 512 00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:55,080 the 513 00:24:55,080 --> 00:24:58,000 relief using their powers as is 514 00:24:58,000 --> 00:25:02,669 necessary to achieve the remedy you deem 515 00:25:02,679 --> 00:25:04,600 appropriate now you don't have cart 516 00:25:04,600 --> 00:25:06,760 blanch Authority you could not make a a 517 00:25:06,760 --> 00:25:10,279 word of Damages for example um because 518 00:25:10,279 --> 00:25:12,640 there is no statutory provision for that 519 00:25:12,640 --> 00:25:14,240 and because the zoning administrator and 520 00:25:14,240 --> 00:25:17,520 officials from whom you adopt Powers 521 00:25:17,520 --> 00:25:20,799 don't have that power either so you can 522 00:25:20,799 --> 00:25:26,669 only take on their powers in the 523 00:25:26,679 --> 00:25:28,720 relief 524 00:25:28,720 --> 00:25:30,159 so if the board finds that the Roden 525 00:25:30,159 --> 00:25:32,360 reel is correct that the failure of the 526 00:25:32,360 --> 00:25:33,640 zoning administrator and the Planning 527 00:25:33,640 --> 00:25:35,159 and Zoning commission to process and 528 00:25:35,159 --> 00:25:37,919 review the rod re site plan 529 00:25:37,919 --> 00:25:40,200 applications was not in accordance with 530 00:25:40,200 --> 00:25:41,399 the 531 00:25:41,399 --> 00:25:45,120 law or I apologize and therefore an 532 00:25:45,120 --> 00:25:47,200 error so if it's not in accordance with 533 00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:50,039 the law it's an error this is an appeal 534 00:25:50,039 --> 00:25:52,600 alleging error then the board can 535 00:25:52,600 --> 00:25:55,720 reverse that by ordering both to 536 00:25:55,720 --> 00:25:58,279 undertake the review yourselves 537 00:25:58,279 --> 00:25:59,720 as you take on that Planning and Zoning 538 00:25:59,720 --> 00:26:04,120 commission's power or the board can 539 00:26:04,120 --> 00:26:07,799 order the commission as we had as I 540 00:26:07,799 --> 00:26:09,559 believe the chair read off in the very 541 00:26:09,559 --> 00:26:11,440 beginning our requested relief so you 542 00:26:11,440 --> 00:26:15,000 have a two alternative approaches that 543 00:26:15,000 --> 00:26:25,549 we would suggest that you could 544 00:26:25,559 --> 00:26:27,799 consider and before I make the argument 545 00:26:27,799 --> 00:26:30,000 about how I believe the board should 546 00:26:30,000 --> 00:26:33,200 exercise its broad powers in this case I 547 00:26:33,200 --> 00:26:35,720 need to put on some evidence and argu 548 00:26:35,720 --> 00:26:37,600 and make some other arguments necessary 549 00:26:37,600 --> 00:26:40,240 to convince you that you 550 00:26:40,240 --> 00:26:42,720 should um which includes questions about 551 00:26:42,720 --> 00:26:45,559 the fairness of the process as it was 552 00:26:45,559 --> 00:26:47,720 applied to the rod and reel the 553 00:26:47,720 --> 00:26:50,679 Injustice and impact on the Roden reels 554 00:26:50,679 --> 00:26:53,200 for having its developed development 555 00:26:53,200 --> 00:26:55,799 applications denied for almost three 556 00:26:55,799 --> 00:26:58,520 years now and the legal implications of 557 00:26:58,520 --> 00:27:00,760 those alleged 558 00:27:00,760 --> 00:27:02,919 errors remember that until the Town 559 00:27:02,919 --> 00:27:04,919 Council approved the comprehensive plan 560 00:27:04,919 --> 00:27:06,520 in April of 561 00:27:06,520 --> 00:27:08,399 22 562 00:27:08,399 --> 00:27:12,880 2022 and it became effective uh in May 563 00:27:12,880 --> 00:27:16,399 of 22 which is in exhibit 564 00:27:16,399 --> 00:27:19,399 31 the previous comprehensive plan was 565 00:27:19,399 --> 00:27:22,720 the plan in effect and that was what was 566 00:27:22,720 --> 00:27:24,279 in effect when the Roden reel filed 567 00:27:24,279 --> 00:27:26,510 their 568 00:27:26,520 --> 00:27:32,909 applications 569 00:27:32,919 --> 00:27:36,640 so what I'd like to do now is pass out 570 00:27:36,640 --> 00:27:40,399 um today's 571 00:27:40,399 --> 00:27:43,120 exhibits for you to include in your 572 00:27:43,120 --> 00:27:56,509 binders and then we'll get to exhibit 573 00:27:56,519 --> 00:28:26,430 52 574 00:28:26,440 --> 00:28:35,909 for 575 00:28:35,919 --> 00:28:38,000 and Sharon I believe we're the next 576 00:28:38,000 --> 00:28:40,760 exhibit would would be 52 577 00:28:40,760 --> 00:28:43,080 correct 578 00:28:43,080 --> 00:28:45,399 okay 579 00:28:45,399 --> 00:28:49,279 so first I would like to submit exhibit 580 00:28:49,279 --> 00:28:52,279 52 which are selected pages from the 581 00:28:52,279 --> 00:28:56,440 town's 2010 comprehensive plan showing 582 00:28:56,440 --> 00:28:57,840 the status of the comp comprehensive 583 00:28:57,840 --> 00:28:59,399 planning for the town that were in 584 00:28:59,399 --> 00:29:01,399 effect at the time the Roden reel filed 585 00:29:01,399 --> 00:29:04,600 its applications on January 29th 586 00:29:04,600 --> 00:29:07,440 2021 the pages include the cover page 587 00:29:07,440 --> 00:29:14,799 and Pages 7 8 18 115 116 and 131 of the 588 00:29:14,799 --> 00:29:17,200 2010 comprehensive plan those are the 589 00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:18,799 pages that are I'm going to draw your 590 00:29:18,799 --> 00:29:21,840 attention to to make certain points you 591 00:29:21,840 --> 00:29:24,640 obviously have the ability to take 592 00:29:24,640 --> 00:29:26,200 judicial notice of the entire 593 00:29:26,200 --> 00:29:31,630 comprehensive plan from 20 594 00:29:31,640 --> 00:29:48,789 10 with 595 00:29:48,799 --> 00:29:51,760 that as you can see from the title page 596 00:29:51,760 --> 00:29:54,159 um to this exhibit um the 2010 597 00:29:54,159 --> 00:29:55,840 comprehensive plan was adopted on 598 00:29:55,840 --> 00:29:59,320 January 20th of 20 599 00:29:59,320 --> 00:30:00,960 I think we had put on testimony about 600 00:30:00,960 --> 00:30:03,080 that date earlier as 601 00:30:03,080 --> 00:30:05,760 well so since at least 602 00:30:05,760 --> 00:30:08,320 2011 what this exhibit shows is how the 603 00:30:08,320 --> 00:30:10,279 Planning and Zoning commission and the 604 00:30:10,279 --> 00:30:13,559 Town Council that adopted that plan um 605 00:30:13,559 --> 00:30:14,519 had 606 00:30:14,519 --> 00:30:17,159 identified these anticipated 607 00:30:17,159 --> 00:30:20,360 projects upon which they could base 608 00:30:20,360 --> 00:30:22,919 their planning or infrastructure and 609 00:30:22,919 --> 00:30:26,240 things like that so take you to slide 610 00:30:26,240 --> 00:30:40,870 16 it's not 611 00:30:40,880 --> 00:30:56,230 working turn on and off 612 00:30:56,240 --> 00:31:25,430 buttons 613 00:31:25,440 --> 00:31:27,240 yeah I can just go through it Qui 614 00:31:27,240 --> 00:31:35,389 quickly I think 615 00:31:35,399 --> 00:31:39,789 oops 616 00:31:39,799 --> 00:31:43,360 okay on page 18 of the comprehensive 617 00:31:43,360 --> 00:31:46,159 plan which I put up on the 618 00:31:46,159 --> 00:31:49,240 PowerPoint um which is the fourth page 619 00:31:49,240 --> 00:31:51,360 of your exhibit you can see that the 620 00:31:51,360 --> 00:31:54,279 home place project had been granted 621 00:31:54,279 --> 00:31:57,320 approval in July of 2006 for the for the 622 00:31:57,320 --> 00:32:01,919 use of 7.42 Acres of growth 623 00:32:01,919 --> 00:32:04,440 allocation as the plan recites ches 624 00:32:04,440 --> 00:32:07,279 beake Beach had been granted 100 acres 625 00:32:07,279 --> 00:32:09,320 of growth allocation and in combination 626 00:32:09,320 --> 00:32:11,760 with Richfield station the Home Place 627 00:32:11,760 --> 00:32:14,559 project meant that the town had 67.5 628 00:32:14,559 --> 00:32:17,440 four acres of growth allocation 629 00:32:17,440 --> 00:32:20,720 left growth allocation is the process of 630 00:32:20,720 --> 00:32:23,120 converting a more restrictive critical 631 00:32:23,120 --> 00:32:26,480 area zone um or District to a less 632 00:32:26,480 --> 00:32:29,440 restrictive under your zoning ordinance 633 00:32:29,440 --> 00:32:31,559 um when the critic 634 00:32:31,559 --> 00:32:36,519 art I don't I'll just stop there it's 635 00:32:36,519 --> 00:32:38,880 part of your local critical area program 636 00:32:38,880 --> 00:32:40,360 um that we discussed at one of these 637 00:32:40,360 --> 00:32:42,600 previous meetings so the Home Place 638 00:32:42,600 --> 00:32:45,240 project which is one of the five 639 00:32:45,240 --> 00:32:47,440 projects filed by the Roden reel was 640 00:32:47,440 --> 00:32:50,200 already in the development stage back in 641 00:32:50,200 --> 00:32:53,919 2006 when it was granted 7.42 Acres of 642 00:32:53,919 --> 00:32:56,039 the town's growth 643 00:32:56,039 --> 00:33:05,789 allocation 644 00:33:05,799 --> 00:33:09,200 as you can see on page seven of the 2010 645 00:33:09,200 --> 00:33:12,080 comprehensive plan page two of the 646 00:33:12,080 --> 00:33:14,840 exhibit The stinet Place Condominiums 647 00:33:14,840 --> 00:33:17,720 which were listed as two 16 unit multif 648 00:33:17,720 --> 00:33:19,360 family dwellings or 649 00:33:19,360 --> 00:33:22,039 buildings uh were part of the list of 650 00:33:22,039 --> 00:33:23,440 projected 651 00:33:23,440 --> 00:33:25,559 developments the plan noted that the 652 00:33:25,559 --> 00:33:27,720 permits had been issued though no 653 00:33:27,720 --> 00:33:30,549 construction had 654 00:33:30,559 --> 00:33:32,919 commenced on that same page the Home 655 00:33:32,919 --> 00:33:34,799 Place project was described with the 656 00:33:34,799 --> 00:33:38,039 unit count as was included in the 2021 657 00:33:38,039 --> 00:33:40,039 Roden reel 658 00:33:40,039 --> 00:33:43,200 applications for home place which was 659 00:33:43,200 --> 00:33:47,799 one new single family home and two 12 660 00:33:47,799 --> 00:33:50,600 unit multif family buildings and that 661 00:33:50,600 --> 00:33:52,559 the plan noted that all the approvals 662 00:33:52,559 --> 00:33:54,039 had been obtained and infrastructure 663 00:33:54,039 --> 00:33:56,440 permits issued no construction had 664 00:33:56,440 --> 00:34:00,960 started at the time they passed that in 665 00:34:00,960 --> 00:34:04,870 200 what was it 11 I 666 00:34:04,880 --> 00:34:07,840 think next on the same page the plan 667 00:34:07,840 --> 00:34:10,240 noted the Harbor Vista North 668 00:34:10,240 --> 00:34:13,119 project was being projected it noted 669 00:34:13,119 --> 00:34:15,720 that this development plan was approved 670 00:34:15,720 --> 00:34:18,240 but no final plants had yet been 671 00:34:18,240 --> 00:34:22,669 submitted for final approval by the 672 00:34:22,679 --> 00:34:25,879 commission turning to the next page page 673 00:34:25,879 --> 00:34:27,720 eight 674 00:34:27,720 --> 00:34:30,359 of of the 2010 comprehensive plan Harbor 675 00:34:30,359 --> 00:34:32,760 Vista South and 676 00:34:32,760 --> 00:34:35,639 North which we now call Harbor Vista 677 00:34:35,639 --> 00:34:38,599 South and Harbor Vista West just so you 678 00:34:38,599 --> 00:34:41,560 know the in the 2010 plan they were 679 00:34:41,560 --> 00:34:43,119 calling them something 680 00:34:43,119 --> 00:34:45,480 different Harbor Vista South and Harbor 681 00:34:45,480 --> 00:34:47,800 Vista West 682 00:34:47,800 --> 00:34:50,919 um were also projected developments and 683 00:34:50,919 --> 00:34:52,480 states that the prior owner Fishing 684 00:34:52,480 --> 00:34:55,440 Creek Landings Marina had received PR 685 00:34:55,440 --> 00:34:57,079 preliminary approval from the commission 686 00:34:57,079 --> 00:34:59,920 in 2002 but that it was contemplating a 687 00:34:59,920 --> 00:35:02,160 redesign that was to occur with the new 688 00:35:02,160 --> 00:35:04,640 ownership which was the rod and 689 00:35:04,640 --> 00:35:07,599 reel um so each of these projects were 690 00:35:07,599 --> 00:35:09,119 well known to the Planning and Zoning 691 00:35:09,119 --> 00:35:11,400 commission and the Town Council as they 692 00:35:11,400 --> 00:35:13,160 had been included in the 2010 693 00:35:13,160 --> 00:35:16,040 comprehensive plan and had received 694 00:35:16,040 --> 00:35:18,800 various forms of 695 00:35:18,800 --> 00:35:22,470 approval decades 696 00:35:22,480 --> 00:35:25,480 ago not only were the projects described 697 00:35:25,480 --> 00:35:27,320 generally in the 2010 698 00:35:27,320 --> 00:35:29,599 comprehensive plan their specific unit 699 00:35:29,599 --> 00:35:32,320 counts and anticip anticipated 700 00:35:32,320 --> 00:35:35,320 population growth were included in the 701 00:35:35,320 --> 00:35:37,680 plan as table 702 00:35:37,680 --> 00:35:42,680 22 so here's table 22 and it 703 00:35:42,680 --> 00:35:45,599 shows all five of the rod and reel 704 00:35:45,599 --> 00:35:47,880 projects and 705 00:35:47,880 --> 00:35:52,000 for included the unit counts 706 00:35:52,000 --> 00:35:55,160 um it actually had higher unit counts 707 00:35:55,160 --> 00:35:57,240 than we have proposed for in place in 708 00:35:57,240 --> 00:36:00,589 Harbor Vista 709 00:36:00,599 --> 00:36:03,720 North and you can see those on exhibit 710 00:36:03,720 --> 00:36:05,319 five 711 00:36:05,319 --> 00:36:08,359 um so Roden re development applications 712 00:36:08,359 --> 00:36:11,000 the the only one of the 2021 713 00:36:11,000 --> 00:36:13,000 applications that we filed that has a 714 00:36:13,000 --> 00:36:15,560 higher count than was listed in this 715 00:36:15,560 --> 00:36:18,240 2010 comprehensive plan is Harbor Vista 716 00:36:18,240 --> 00:36:22,359 North that our application requested 23 717 00:36:22,359 --> 00:36:24,960 units which on this chart you can see 718 00:36:24,960 --> 00:36:32,829 they have been planning for 16 719 00:36:32,839 --> 00:36:35,599 as you can see on page 116 table 23 the 720 00:36:35,599 --> 00:36:37,720 proposed developments which again 721 00:36:37,720 --> 00:36:40,200 included all five of the rod and reel 722 00:36:40,200 --> 00:36:42,760 projects it showed the anticipated units 723 00:36:42,760 --> 00:36:44,880 but also the stage of the permitting the 724 00:36:44,880 --> 00:36:47,240 land use and then the existing 725 00:36:47,240 --> 00:36:51,240 zoning this is the table that indicates 726 00:36:51,240 --> 00:36:52,800 uh you know the timeline for the 727 00:36:52,800 --> 00:36:56,160 proposed development going between 2009 728 00:36:56,160 --> 00:37:06,710 and 201 729 00:37:06,720 --> 00:37:09,839 16 so now I'd like to call Paul Woodburn 730 00:37:09,839 --> 00:37:12,430 back to 731 00:37:12,440 --> 00:37:16,950 testify Paul you're gonna sit 732 00:37:16,960 --> 00:37:19,400 there I think just for clarification 733 00:37:19,400 --> 00:37:21,400 purposes I think we were to talk about 734 00:37:21,400 --> 00:37:23,079 close examination especially by the 735 00:37:23,079 --> 00:37:27,119 public and so forth if this has stopped 736 00:37:27,119 --> 00:37:30,599 Mr bliss mean we're into for about 10 737 00:37:30,599 --> 00:37:34,800 hours of testimony for him and 738 00:37:34,800 --> 00:37:38,839 examination of so toward doesn't make 739 00:37:38,839 --> 00:37:40,560 sense I think it makes sense for to 740 00:37:40,560 --> 00:37:42,520 continue and then for the public to be 741 00:37:42,520 --> 00:37:45,040 able to you know ask questions of all of 742 00:37:45,040 --> 00:37:47,440 his witnesses as as the person seing at 743 00:37:47,440 --> 00:37:50,160 that time because otherwise you know one 744 00:37:50,160 --> 00:37:52,920 is the public could be the weather or 745 00:37:52,920 --> 00:37:55,079 whatever isn't here but this evening for 746 00:37:55,079 --> 00:37:56,880 that cause examination so so I think it 747 00:37:56,880 --> 00:37:58,160 would be better to make sure 748 00:37:58,160 --> 00:38:00,240 procedurally we're on the same page that 749 00:38:00,240 --> 00:38:02,640 in essence the public cause examination 750 00:38:02,640 --> 00:38:04,079 but it's going to be more towards the 751 00:38:04,079 --> 00:38:06,240 end of the case that as isue it is goes 752 00:38:06,240 --> 00:38:07,160 public will have a chance to 753 00:38:07,160 --> 00:38:10,400 cross-examine the bulk of the entirety 754 00:38:10,400 --> 00:38:12,440 of the presentation at 755 00:38:12,440 --> 00:38:16,480 the they also have the right to to uh 756 00:38:16,480 --> 00:38:18,359 ask Mr Woodburn questions at the 757 00:38:18,359 --> 00:38:21,040 completion of his testimony um so we 758 00:38:21,040 --> 00:38:24,000 can't stop them although content might 759 00:38:24,000 --> 00:38:26,720 blur the line so we will just see 760 00:38:26,720 --> 00:38:28,200 happens when his testimony finishes but 761 00:38:28,200 --> 00:38:29,560 you are welcome to and the public is 762 00:38:29,560 --> 00:38:32,640 welcome to as well which other than the 763 00:38:32,640 --> 00:38:35,000 public was is consistent with way we 764 00:38:35,000 --> 00:38:36,640 handled the earlier testimony on the 765 00:38:36,640 --> 00:38:38,870 first 766 00:38:38,880 --> 00:38:41,760 hearing so Mr Woodburn can you um 767 00:38:41,760 --> 00:38:44,319 restate your name uh and address for the 768 00:38:44,319 --> 00:38:47,000 record please sure for the uh record my 769 00:38:47,000 --> 00:38:49,640 name is Paul Woodburn and I'm a 770 00:38:49,640 --> 00:38:50,720 professional 771 00:38:50,720 --> 00:38:53,960 engineer and uh senior director for 772 00:38:53,960 --> 00:38:57,040 Atwell engineering and address is is 773 00:38:57,040 --> 00:39:14,910 11721 Woodmore Road in Mitchellville 774 00:39:14,920 --> 00:39:19,670 Maryland 775 00:39:19,680 --> 00:39:21,599 everybody I think it would be good just 776 00:39:21,599 --> 00:39:24,079 to make sure we're all on the same page 777 00:39:24,079 --> 00:39:25,960 if you wouldn't mind Mr susman you mind 778 00:39:25,960 --> 00:39:28,280 swearing said again I think the proper 779 00:39:28,280 --> 00:39:29,640 procedure is just to remind him that 780 00:39:29,640 --> 00:39:32,280 he's already been sworn in and recognize 781 00:39:32,280 --> 00:39:33,000 that 782 00:39:33,000 --> 00:39:35,800 fact I believe the proper procedure is 783 00:39:35,800 --> 00:39:38,359 to just have him recognize that he's 784 00:39:38,359 --> 00:39:40,640 already been sworn 785 00:39:40,640 --> 00:39:42,920 in you don't have to raise your hand to 786 00:39:42,920 --> 00:39:45,960 be sworn in there's no form for being 787 00:39:45,960 --> 00:39:48,319 sworn in he's already 788 00:39:48,319 --> 00:39:51,599 testified you swear or affirm under the 789 00:39:51,599 --> 00:39:53,680 penalty of perjury that the testimony 790 00:39:53,680 --> 00:39:55,800 that you are about to give testimony 791 00:39:55,800 --> 00:39:58,160 evidence your about to give be the truth 792 00:39:58,160 --> 00:40:00,119 the whole truth nothing but the truth I 793 00:40:00,119 --> 00:40:01,960 do thank 794 00:40:01,960 --> 00:40:05,599 you so Mr Woodburn um when you submitted 795 00:40:05,599 --> 00:40:07,240 the rod and real applications for the 796 00:40:07,240 --> 00:40:10,040 site plan review um what were the fee 797 00:40:10,040 --> 00:40:12,000 amounts that you paid when you submitted 798 00:40:12,000 --> 00:40:13,319 those 799 00:40:13,319 --> 00:40:16,319 applications uh the fee amounts I think 800 00:40:16,319 --> 00:40:17,720 you showed them on the screen earlier 801 00:40:17,720 --> 00:40:18,920 were 802 00:40:18,920 --> 00:40:21,720 $5,400 for each site plan plus I think 803 00:40:21,720 --> 00:40:25,920 we paid a $250 base application fee as 804 00:40:25,920 --> 00:40:39,270 well 805 00:40:39,280 --> 00:40:41,240 and I'm showing you what will be 806 00:40:41,240 --> 00:40:43,640 identified for the record is exhibit 807 00:40:43,640 --> 00:40:47,000 53 um and ask you to confirm that those 808 00:40:47,000 --> 00:40:49,280 are copies of the checks that you 809 00:40:49,280 --> 00:40:52,470 submitted with the 810 00:40:52,480 --> 00:40:55,280 applications with the exception I might 811 00:40:55,280 --> 00:40:58,000 point out for the record that we've uh 812 00:40:58,000 --> 00:41:00,720 blacked out the account 813 00:41:00,720 --> 00:41:03,520 numbers we blacked out the redacted the 814 00:41:03,520 --> 00:41:07,470 account 815 00:41:07,480 --> 00:41:10,480 numbers I offer that is exhibit 816 00:41:10,480 --> 00:41:14,160 50 and how many of those are there 817 00:41:14,160 --> 00:41:25,230 should be 818 00:41:25,240 --> 00:41:28,870 fine 819 00:41:28,880 --> 00:41:32,160 sep checks is one for 5400 for each of 820 00:41:32,160 --> 00:41:44,630 is 821 00:41:44,640 --> 00:41:47,960 $250 Mr Woodburn had you filed 822 00:41:47,960 --> 00:41:49,520 applications for projects that involve 823 00:41:49,520 --> 00:41:50,760 sight plan 824 00:41:50,760 --> 00:41:53,480 review um to the town of chesp beach 825 00:41:53,480 --> 00:41:55,240 before 826 00:41:55,240 --> 00:41:57,640 yes and uh were you involved in the 827 00:41:57,640 --> 00:41:59,440 applications filed for the rod and reel 828 00:41:59,440 --> 00:42:01,560 project at the resort and for Harbor 829 00:42:01,560 --> 00:42:05,599 Vista South projects in 2016 I 830 00:42:05,599 --> 00:42:08,359 was and are you familiar with the site 831 00:42:08,359 --> 00:42:11,400 plan approval process in chese Beach 832 00:42:11,400 --> 00:42:13,920 yes have you ever had to file a separate 833 00:42:13,920 --> 00:42:15,960 application for site plan review besides 834 00:42:15,960 --> 00:42:18,079 the applications using the zoning permit 835 00:42:18,079 --> 00:42:21,030 form 836 00:42:21,040 --> 00:42:23,559 no have you ever had to make a separate 837 00:42:23,559 --> 00:42:26,200 request the schedule the review of and 838 00:42:26,200 --> 00:42:27,400 hearings by the Planning and Zoning 839 00:42:27,400 --> 00:42:29,839 commission to have those applications 840 00:42:29,839 --> 00:42:33,990 heard by the commission I'm 841 00:42:34,000 --> 00:42:38,000 not after the February 5th 2021 email 842 00:42:38,000 --> 00:42:40,200 from the zoning administrator Mr jaub 843 00:42:40,200 --> 00:42:43,200 act have you received any communication 844 00:42:43,200 --> 00:42:45,319 from the zoning administrator the 845 00:42:45,319 --> 00:42:47,240 Planning and Zoning commission or any 846 00:42:47,240 --> 00:42:49,960 other Town official to review process or 847 00:42:49,960 --> 00:42:51,680 schedule hearings for any of the five 848 00:42:51,680 --> 00:42:54,000 site plan applications that you filed on 849 00:42:54,000 --> 00:42:57,880 January 29th of 2021 after the email the 850 00:42:57,880 --> 00:43:02,870 fifth you said I have 851 00:43:02,880 --> 00:43:06,800 not your experience in the town um of 852 00:43:06,800 --> 00:43:08,359 ches b beach what is the role of the 853 00:43:08,359 --> 00:43:09,680 Planning and Zoning commission during 854 00:43:09,680 --> 00:43:11,720 site plan 855 00:43:11,720 --> 00:43:14,559 review I did not hear the question I 856 00:43:14,559 --> 00:43:17,200 said in his experience he's already 857 00:43:17,200 --> 00:43:19,040 testified that he's has his experience 858 00:43:19,040 --> 00:43:20,400 doing these site plan reviews before 859 00:43:20,400 --> 00:43:22,760 this town what is the role of the 860 00:43:22,760 --> 00:43:24,119 Planning and Zoning commission during 861 00:43:24,119 --> 00:43:34,030 site plan review 862 00:43:34,040 --> 00:43:36,079 this point he's uh asking for an expert 863 00:43:36,079 --> 00:43:39,160 opinion okay and if he's talking about 864 00:43:39,160 --> 00:43:41,760 his experience uh that that is 865 00:43:41,760 --> 00:43:43,520 definitely going to an expert opinion he 866 00:43:43,520 --> 00:43:45,720 hasn't been qualified as an expert it's 867 00:43:45,720 --> 00:43:47,440 not an opinion I'm just having him 868 00:43:47,440 --> 00:43:49,680 testify what the commission's role was 869 00:43:49,680 --> 00:43:52,040 during the 870 00:43:52,040 --> 00:43:54,440 process clearly was expressing an 871 00:43:54,440 --> 00:43:56,160 opinion I don't think that's uh 872 00:43:56,160 --> 00:43:58,640 expressing his opinion I think that's 873 00:43:58,640 --> 00:44:01,559 expressing his experience based upon his 874 00:44:01,559 --> 00:44:06,390 experience which is different 875 00:44:06,400 --> 00:44:10,309 from R 876 00:44:10,319 --> 00:44:12,160 continue 877 00:44:12,160 --> 00:44:15,079 okay uh in my experience and I've 878 00:44:15,079 --> 00:44:17,559 prepared and processed hundreds of site 879 00:44:17,559 --> 00:44:20,280 plans not only in Calver County and 880 00:44:20,280 --> 00:44:23,480 chese Beach but in neighboring counties 881 00:44:23,480 --> 00:44:26,920 and States um the Planning and Zoning 882 00:44:26,920 --> 00:44:28,920 administrator in ches Peake Beach 883 00:44:28,920 --> 00:44:31,839 through in my experience of numerous 884 00:44:31,839 --> 00:44:35,520 site plans is to review the site plan 885 00:44:35,520 --> 00:44:38,559 against the ordinances and laws of the 886 00:44:38,559 --> 00:44:41,559 Town um and to make recommendations not 887 00:44:41,559 --> 00:44:43,280 only to the applicant but to the 888 00:44:43,280 --> 00:44:45,079 Planning Commission who would ultimately 889 00:44:45,079 --> 00:44:47,680 review the site plan the zoning 890 00:44:47,680 --> 00:44:49,040 administrator would review it for 891 00:44:49,040 --> 00:44:51,640 dimensional standards just a few 892 00:44:51,640 --> 00:44:54,400 examples would be parking requirements 893 00:44:54,400 --> 00:44:56,240 height requirements set back 894 00:44:56,240 --> 00:45:00,040 requirements Landscaping requirements 895 00:45:00,040 --> 00:45:03,000 Etc so I had asked what the role of the 896 00:45:03,000 --> 00:45:05,119 commission was so you've just explained 897 00:45:05,119 --> 00:45:06,839 what the zoning administrator did does 898 00:45:06,839 --> 00:45:08,520 in that process but what is the Planning 899 00:45:08,520 --> 00:45:10,440 and Zoning commission's role in doing 900 00:45:10,440 --> 00:45:13,240 site plan review you 901 00:45:13,240 --> 00:45:15,800 objection in his experience in your 902 00:45:15,800 --> 00:45:18,640 experience in my experience the Planning 903 00:45:18,640 --> 00:45:20,839 Commission would review the 904 00:45:20,839 --> 00:45:25,160 recommendations of the um planning or 905 00:45:25,160 --> 00:45:26,440 zoning admin 906 00:45:26,440 --> 00:45:29,280 ministrator um and hear testimony from 907 00:45:29,280 --> 00:45:35,040 the applicant and the public and with that information they would vote uh 908 00:45:35,040 --> 00:45:38,599 for um action on the site plan approval 909 00:45:38,599 --> 00:45:42,750 disapproval or approval with 910 00:45:42,760 --> 00:45:45,720 conditions okay and I believe you said 911 00:45:45,720 --> 00:45:48,359 it but you might not have given a number 912 00:45:48,359 --> 00:45:49,640 you know can you Hazard to guess how 913 00:45:49,640 --> 00:45:51,160 many site plans you've submitted on 914 00:45:51,160 --> 00:45:53,760 behalf of clients in your 915 00:45:53,760 --> 00:45:59,870 career hundreds okay 916 00:45:59,880 --> 00:46:02,040 so in your experience were any of the 917 00:46:02,040 --> 00:46:04,200 site plan applications and and the 918 00:46:04,200 --> 00:46:06,400 projects they proposed by the Roden reel 919 00:46:06,400 --> 00:46:10,119 in their January 29th 2021 applications 920 00:46:10,119 --> 00:46:12,079 particularly novel or 921 00:46:12,079 --> 00:46:14,720 complex 922 00:46:14,720 --> 00:46:17,680 no did any of them raise difficult 923 00:46:17,680 --> 00:46:20,359 issues that needed to be 924 00:46:20,359 --> 00:46:24,200 resolved um I don't believe so uh we did 925 00:46:24,200 --> 00:46:28,400 have a pre um 926 00:46:28,400 --> 00:46:31,319 application um discussion with the Town 927 00:46:31,319 --> 00:46:34,160 Administrator which is common um just to 928 00:46:34,160 --> 00:46:38,000 talk about what the proposal is um how 929 00:46:38,000 --> 00:46:40,880 we're heading you know things that uh 930 00:46:40,880 --> 00:46:45,200 might uh come out you know or be seen to 931 00:46:45,200 --> 00:46:46,480 say Hey you know you need to look out 932 00:46:46,480 --> 00:46:49,359 for this and one thing that came up I do 933 00:46:49,359 --> 00:46:51,359 recall was 934 00:46:51,359 --> 00:46:54,960 um uh the use of the existing storm 935 00:46:54,960 --> 00:46:56,520 waterer management 936 00:46:56,520 --> 00:46:58,000 um around the 937 00:46:58,000 --> 00:47:00,079 harbor I'm specifically talking about 938 00:47:00,079 --> 00:47:02,119 Harbor Vista North Harbor Vista South 939 00:47:02,119 --> 00:47:04,520 Harbor Vista West there's a lot of 940 00:47:04,520 --> 00:47:07,760 history with the properties but in 941 00:47:07,760 --> 00:47:12,520 essence um the the marina um was 942 00:47:12,520 --> 00:47:14,960 redeveloped um and it started with Dave 943 00:47:14,960 --> 00:47:18,400 Sison back in the early 2000s and it was 944 00:47:18,400 --> 00:47:21,559 built and rebuilt um by the donovans the 945 00:47:21,559 --> 00:47:24,800 marina and with that um they installed 946 00:47:24,800 --> 00:47:26,440 storm water manage 947 00:47:26,440 --> 00:47:29,800 and um buffer yard requirements for 948 00:47:29,800 --> 00:47:32,480 critical area around the marina and 949 00:47:32,480 --> 00:47:36,000 these areas were intended to um not only 950 00:47:36,000 --> 00:47:38,240 provide stormw management and buffer 951 00:47:38,240 --> 00:47:41,280 landscape buffer and and uh Green Space 952 00:47:41,280 --> 00:47:44,079 buffer for the marina but for the future 953 00:47:44,079 --> 00:47:46,240 development so it was in place and 954 00:47:46,240 --> 00:47:48,359 already built and there was some 955 00:47:48,359 --> 00:47:51,160 discussion as if that storm water 956 00:47:51,160 --> 00:47:52,720 management would still meet the 957 00:47:52,720 --> 00:47:55,000 requirements of the new like storm 958 00:47:55,000 --> 00:47:56,559 management regulation ations had changed 959 00:47:56,559 --> 00:47:59,119 over the years so we never got that far 960 00:47:59,119 --> 00:48:00,839 because we didn't get a review but that 961 00:48:00,839 --> 00:48:04,880 was a discussion point and then uh Mr 962 00:48:04,880 --> 00:48:06,720 jabak who was the zoning administrator 963 00:48:06,720 --> 00:48:11,440 at the time brought up um the uh SE or 964 00:48:11,440 --> 00:48:15,200 uh I should say sea level rise uh which 965 00:48:15,200 --> 00:48:18,880 now um has come out but at the time it 966 00:48:18,880 --> 00:48:20,960 was just a 967 00:48:20,960 --> 00:48:24,119 uh more of a proposal of information 968 00:48:24,119 --> 00:48:25,839 that was being provided but it was was n 969 00:48:25,839 --> 00:48:28,880 a regulation it wasn't issued as a law 970 00:48:28,880 --> 00:48:31,760 or an ordinance or anything um but he 971 00:48:31,760 --> 00:48:33,000 brought it to our attention and he 972 00:48:33,000 --> 00:48:35,000 wasn't sure how that could may or may 973 00:48:35,000 --> 00:48:37,599 not impact the projects so those two 974 00:48:37,599 --> 00:48:40,240 things came up uh but again we didn't 975 00:48:40,240 --> 00:48:43,079 get a review so I don't know how they 976 00:48:43,079 --> 00:48:46,349 would have turned 977 00:48:46,359 --> 00:48:48,880 out in your previous testimony you had 978 00:48:48,880 --> 00:48:51,160 identified the projects by names uh 979 00:48:51,160 --> 00:48:53,119 Harbor Vista South Harbor Vista North 980 00:48:53,119 --> 00:48:56,400 Harbor Vista West Home Place and stin it 981 00:48:56,400 --> 00:48:59,640 please MH um can you describe the 982 00:48:59,640 --> 00:49:01,839 location of Harbor Vista 983 00:49:01,839 --> 00:49:05,839 South so Harbor Vista South uh is on 984 00:49:05,839 --> 00:49:09,960 Harbor Road at the intersection um or 985 00:49:09,960 --> 00:49:13,359 the access point to rod and reel at the 986 00:49:13,359 --> 00:49:15,319 light on the south side of the bridge 987 00:49:15,319 --> 00:49:17,720 and it would be on the right side as you 988 00:49:17,720 --> 00:49:20,400 go over the bridge so existing parking 989 00:49:20,400 --> 00:49:22,559 lot at 990 00:49:22,559 --> 00:49:26,160 currently Harbor you me go each one yeah 991 00:49:26,160 --> 00:49:29,559 the for these three okay so Harbor Vista 992 00:49:29,559 --> 00:49:34,640 West uh would be the the center 993 00:49:34,640 --> 00:49:36,839 Arrow you can if you can see that if 994 00:49:36,839 --> 00:49:39,839 nobody's color blind to the right um of 995 00:49:39,839 --> 00:49:41,079 the screen 996 00:49:41,079 --> 00:49:43,559 center which would be back by The Dredge 997 00:49:43,559 --> 00:49:46,880 spoil site or I guess south of the um 998 00:49:46,880 --> 00:49:47,920 rental 999 00:49:47,920 --> 00:49:50,799 units and then Harbor Vista North is the 1000 00:49:50,799 --> 00:49:53,000 small parking lot at the bottom of the 1001 00:49:53,000 --> 00:49:55,880 page on the screen which is on Gordon to 1002 00:49:55,880 --> 00:50:04,109 Avenue right behind the water 1003 00:50:04,119 --> 00:50:06,119 park can you 1004 00:50:06,119 --> 00:50:08,520 describe the location of stennet place 1005 00:50:08,520 --> 00:50:12,119 please Gordon stennet uh is North I'm 1006 00:50:12,119 --> 00:50:17,640 yeah north side of town C Street and 261 1007 00:50:17,640 --> 00:50:19,160 it's the two 1008 00:50:19,160 --> 00:50:21,839 green football field looking areas on 1009 00:50:21,839 --> 00:50:24,440 the screen there 1010 00:50:24,440 --> 00:50:28,510 arrows 1011 00:50:28,520 --> 00:50:31,079 home place can you describe the location 1012 00:50:31,079 --> 00:50:35,160 home place as off of Cox Road um 1013 00:50:35,160 --> 00:50:38,640 western side of ches beake beach just 1014 00:50:38,640 --> 00:50:44,750 off of Route 1015 00:50:44,760 --> 00:50:47,920 260 okay 1016 00:50:47,920 --> 00:50:50,839 so let's go back to this one and just 1017 00:50:50,839 --> 00:50:52,359 have it up so that you can see what 1018 00:50:52,359 --> 00:50:54,240 we're talking about as I have Mr 1019 00:50:54,240 --> 00:50:57,920 Woodburn describe each of these projects 1020 00:50:57,920 --> 00:51:00,799 um can you describe the Harbor Vista 1021 00:51:00,799 --> 00:51:05,319 South projects you know its units the parking locations the access things 1022 00:51:05,319 --> 00:51:08,240 like that you have a site plan too you 1023 00:51:08,240 --> 00:51:10,200 put up there be easier uh no I don't 1024 00:51:10,200 --> 00:51:14,200 have okay that but I 1025 00:51:14,200 --> 00:51:17,000 do at this 1026 00:51:17,000 --> 00:51:21,400 point wish to offer we already have 1027 00:51:21,400 --> 00:51:24,880 exhibit five in the record which are all 1028 00:51:24,880 --> 00:51:27,319 the site 1029 00:51:27,319 --> 00:51:29,799 applications but they're in digital 1030 00:51:29,799 --> 00:51:32,520 form I had Paul prepare them in paper 1031 00:51:32,520 --> 00:51:35,040 form and I could hand those out and that 1032 00:51:35,040 --> 00:51:37,280 way it would be a lot easier I think for 1033 00:51:37,280 --> 00:51:39,640 you to have them but I also don't want 1034 00:51:39,640 --> 00:51:41,760 to duplicate exhibits but if if you 1035 00:51:41,760 --> 00:51:44,200 would like the paper versions so that 1036 00:51:44,200 --> 00:51:46,400 each of you can and Mr pounds can have 1037 00:51:46,400 --> 00:51:49,160 them too I've got them 1038 00:51:49,160 --> 00:51:54,349 here already in 1039 00:51:54,359 --> 00:52:11,309 evidence 1040 00:52:11,319 --> 00:52:12,359 did 1041 00:52:12,359 --> 00:52:15,960 you PA did you do these how many of did 1042 00:52:15,960 --> 00:52:24,270 you do did just four months 1043 00:52:24,280 --> 00:52:26,640 ago 1044 00:52:26,640 --> 00:52:47,030 why is this one big and 1045 00:52:47,040 --> 00:52:54,230 [Music] 1046 00:52:54,240 --> 00:53:16,069 small 1047 00:53:16,079 --> 00:53:18,240 maybe suggest five minutes uh uh yeah 1048 00:53:18,240 --> 00:53:19,760 that is a good point uh let's take five 1049 00:53:19,760 --> 00:53:24,150 while you do this thank 1050 00:53:24,160 --> 00:53:52,460 you 1051 00:53:52,470 --> 00:53:54,160 [Music] 1052 00:53:54,160 --> 00:54:11,910 for 1053 00:54:11,920 --> 00:54:14,440 yes you think an hour and 10 is going to 1054 00:54:14,440 --> 00:54:15,599 be enough for you to get to the end of 1055 00:54:15,599 --> 00:54:18,640 your presentation 1056 00:54:18,640 --> 00:54:24,069 no well I'm going to 1057 00:54:24,079 --> 00:54:28,040 try but I guess is 1058 00:54:28,040 --> 00:54:29,880 cross-examination okay yes that'll be 1059 00:54:29,880 --> 00:54:34,150 another 1060 00:54:34,160 --> 00:54:45,109 thing time you 1061 00:54:45,119 --> 00:54:54,069 guys yeah I'm just saying if we maybe we give 1062 00:54:54,079 --> 00:55:57,430 Mr 1063 00:55:57,440 --> 00:55:59,640 all right uh everybody's back we will uh 1064 00:55:59,640 --> 00:56:02,039 resume please continue I apologize I 1065 00:56:02,039 --> 00:56:04,119 thought we had a copy for each of you 1066 00:56:04,119 --> 00:56:06,440 what we have is two two sets of paper 1067 00:56:06,440 --> 00:56:09,000 one for two sets so what I'd like to do 1068 00:56:09,000 --> 00:56:12,079 is just give the board one paper set and 1069 00:56:12,079 --> 00:56:14,280 give Mr pounds the other just so he can 1070 00:56:14,280 --> 00:56:20,069 have them okay 1071 00:56:20,079 --> 00:56:22,440 but we have these in digital form the 1072 00:56:22,440 --> 00:56:32,990 full contents this is for reference only 1073 00:56:33,000 --> 00:56:36,039 I don't think so um the only thing is we 1074 00:56:36,039 --> 00:56:38,039 want to if if whatever would help 1075 00:56:38,039 --> 00:56:40,920 understanding the testimony today but 1076 00:56:40,920 --> 00:56:49,390 um we'll leave that to you to to 1077 00:56:49,400 --> 00:56:53,870 say 1078 00:56:53,880 --> 00:57:07,470 live 1079 00:57:07,480 --> 00:57:09,599 so Mr Woodburn first just generally 1080 00:57:09,599 --> 00:57:11,680 describe what Harbor Vista South project 1081 00:57:11,680 --> 00:57:12,680 is and what 1082 00:57:12,680 --> 00:57:18,440 it so Harbor Vista South is a proposed 1083 00:57:18,440 --> 00:57:20,440 condominium uh 1084 00:57:20,440 --> 00:57:22,680 development um it was originally 1085 00:57:22,680 --> 00:57:25,520 approved in I believe in 200 1086 00:57:25,520 --> 00:57:27,920 16 and again it's located at the 1087 00:57:27,920 --> 00:57:31,240 intersection Harbor Road of the top 1088 00:57:31,240 --> 00:57:36,280 Arrow condominium project of 59 units 1089 00:57:36,280 --> 00:57:39,280 um in accessed off a Harbor Road 1090 00:57:39,280 --> 00:57:42,760 directly across from the library um 1091 00:57:42,760 --> 00:57:46,559 building uh parking consisted of 1092 00:57:46,559 --> 00:57:48,559 primarily underneath of the 1093 00:57:48,559 --> 00:57:50,799 building um there was some surface 1094 00:57:50,799 --> 00:57:53,480 parking along um 1095 00:57:53,480 --> 00:57:57,839 260 one 1096 00:57:57,839 --> 00:58:00,880 um of course access to the marina the 1097 00:58:00,880 --> 00:58:05,200 front of the the property there um is uh 1098 00:58:05,200 --> 00:58:08,599 boat slips so you would access um 1099 00:58:08,599 --> 00:58:11,520 vehicular off for Harbor Vista but 1100 00:58:11,520 --> 00:58:15,359 pedestrian access through uh the rear 1101 00:58:15,359 --> 00:58:18,440 which also has pedestrian access under 1102 00:58:18,440 --> 00:58:20,280 the bridge over to the rod and reil so 1103 00:58:20,280 --> 00:58:22,640 there was a circular access almost 1104 00:58:22,640 --> 00:58:24,119 through the intersection to the rod and 1105 00:58:24,119 --> 00:58:25,400 reil back to 1106 00:58:25,400 --> 00:58:27,799 Vista back in 1107 00:58:27,799 --> 00:58:30,799 2016 was originally approved the parking 1108 00:58:30,799 --> 00:58:33,240 lot actually before that it was uh 1109 00:58:33,240 --> 00:58:34,520 constructed and 1110 00:58:34,520 --> 00:58:38,039 built um as you can see here and has 1111 00:58:38,039 --> 00:58:40,680 parking for the marina 1112 00:58:40,680 --> 00:58:42,480 currently 1113 00:58:42,480 --> 00:58:46,160 so go to the next slide 1114 00:58:46,160 --> 00:58:49,480 here and what I'm showing you is from 1115 00:58:49,480 --> 00:58:51,799 your site plan for Harbor Vista South 1116 00:58:51,799 --> 00:58:53,680 which is exhibit 5 and on the screen 1117 00:58:53,680 --> 00:58:56,119 we're looking at the center of the site 1118 00:58:56,119 --> 00:58:58,160 plan showing the building located on the 1119 00:58:58,160 --> 00:58:59,799 parcel 1120 00:58:59,799 --> 00:59:02,240 right 1121 00:59:02,240 --> 00:59:05,520 um so you've already kind of testified 1122 00:59:05,520 --> 00:59:06,960 that that's the orientation to the 1123 00:59:06,960 --> 00:59:11,359 streets so that shows them I didn't 1124 00:59:11,359 --> 00:59:13,039 bring it up fast enough but you started 1125 00:59:13,039 --> 00:59:14,039 talking about 1126 00:59:14,039 --> 00:59:17,150 it 1127 00:59:17,160 --> 00:59:20,359 um so is this already a separate and 1128 00:59:20,359 --> 00:59:23,039 subdivided buildable parcel it is it's a 1129 00:59:23,039 --> 00:59:25,520 ploted parcel it's parcel 1130 00:59:25,520 --> 00:59:27,920 shows on this it's plat book 1131 00:59:27,920 --> 00:59:30,839 ab4 plat 1132 00:59:30,839 --> 00:59:33,870 293 1133 00:59:33,880 --> 00:59:38,319 okay and on the next slide I'm showing 1134 00:59:38,319 --> 00:59:42,440 you the general notes on your sheet too 1135 00:59:42,440 --> 00:59:44,119 and we're going to go over some of these 1136 00:59:44,119 --> 00:59:46,960 for each of the projects um as a means 1137 00:59:46,960 --> 00:59:50,160 of describing some of the basics um but 1138 00:59:50,160 --> 00:59:52,039 important is the idea that it shows the 1139 00:59:52,039 --> 00:59:55,079 basic zoning compli ordinance compliance 1140 00:59:55,079 --> 00:59:58,440 requirements so the general notes 1141 00:59:58,440 --> 01:00:01,119 typically will well actually I'll ask Mr 1142 01:00:01,119 --> 01:00:02,359 Woodburn to 1143 01:00:02,359 --> 01:00:05,640 testify Mr Woodburn when you put um the 1144 01:00:05,640 --> 01:00:09,000 general notes on a site plan what are 1145 01:00:09,000 --> 01:00:11,160 they designed to 1146 01:00:11,160 --> 01:00:14,160 achieve so in the zoning ordinance there 1147 01:00:14,160 --> 01:00:16,960 is uh what we call dimensional standards 1148 01:00:16,960 --> 01:00:19,359 and general zoning standards for 1149 01:00:19,359 --> 01:00:22,720 density um property information and we 1150 01:00:22,720 --> 01:00:25,079 basically summarize this and General 1151 01:00:25,079 --> 01:00:28,920 notes to outline what the required 1152 01:00:28,920 --> 01:00:31,240 density would be what the required 1153 01:00:31,240 --> 01:00:34,319 parking ratio would be U what the 1154 01:00:34,319 --> 01:00:38,280 required bicycle um rack requirements 1155 01:00:38,280 --> 01:00:40,760 would be like how many bicycles loading 1156 01:00:40,760 --> 01:00:42,599 space 1157 01:00:42,599 --> 01:00:44,920 requirements as you can see here so we 1158 01:00:44,920 --> 01:00:47,400 would we would put down what's required 1159 01:00:47,400 --> 01:00:49,680 by the zoning and then we would put down 1160 01:00:49,680 --> 01:00:51,599 what's provided on the site 1161 01:00:51,599 --> 01:00:54,280 plan so it's more of a summary of what 1162 01:00:54,280 --> 01:00:55,160 actually 1163 01:00:55,160 --> 01:00:57,960 designed on the site plan okay and so 1164 01:00:57,960 --> 01:00:59,960 this is just showing your first 11 notes 1165 01:00:59,960 --> 01:01:04,710 but the notes are longer than this 1166 01:01:04,720 --> 01:01:06,839 correct and in this instance of course 1167 01:01:06,839 --> 01:01:08,440 we're in the critical area because 1168 01:01:08,440 --> 01:01:10,280 they're category ones and it just 1169 01:01:10,280 --> 01:01:15,559 critical area notes as well so using 1170 01:01:15,559 --> 01:01:18,599 this show it's demonstrating how the 1171 01:01:18,599 --> 01:01:20,599 proposed Harbor Vista South project 1172 01:01:20,599 --> 01:01:22,640 would comply with the zoning ordinance 1173 01:01:22,640 --> 01:01:24,760 at the time you filed it which was back 1174 01:01:24,760 --> 01:01:30,109 in January of 2021 correct that's 1175 01:01:30,119 --> 01:01:32,480 correct would the Harbor Vista South 1176 01:01:32,480 --> 01:01:34,440 project as proposed in the site plan 1177 01:01:34,440 --> 01:01:37,079 that was filed and included in exhibit 1178 01:01:37,079 --> 01:01:39,960 five comply with the current zoning 1179 01:01:39,960 --> 01:01:42,160 ordinance um in my read of the current 1180 01:01:42,160 --> 01:01:46,200 zoning ordinance it would not comply 1181 01:01:46,200 --> 01:01:48,480 okay and in your general notes you 1182 01:01:48,480 --> 01:01:50,000 identified that the property was in the 1183 01:01:50,000 --> 01:01:53,160 maritime Zone that's 1184 01:01:53,160 --> 01:01:56,039 correct it also describes the property 1185 01:01:56,039 --> 01:01:57,960 as being located in the bonus density 1186 01:01:57,960 --> 01:01:59,920 overlay District what's the bonus 1187 01:01:59,920 --> 01:02:05,599 density overlay District so under the prior zoning there was a provision 1188 01:02:05,599 --> 01:02:06,559 for 1189 01:02:06,559 --> 01:02:09,359 certain um zoning districts that that 1190 01:02:09,359 --> 01:02:11,200 you could have a bonus 1191 01:02:11,200 --> 01:02:14,760 density um and what that achieved was 1192 01:02:14,760 --> 01:02:17,480 more under the smart growth initiative 1193 01:02:17,480 --> 01:02:20,599 it allowed a higher density um within a 1194 01:02:20,599 --> 01:02:23,359 smaller footprint so 1195 01:02:23,359 --> 01:02:26,319 um you wouldn't have sprawl basically 1196 01:02:26,319 --> 01:02:30,319 you build up instead of out 1197 01:02:30,319 --> 01:02:33,160 yeah in developed Town centers in 1198 01:02:33,160 --> 01:02:39,950 certain yeah zones and be a town center 1199 01:02:39,960 --> 01:02:42,160 correct the proposed building for Harbor 1200 01:02:42,160 --> 01:02:43,480 Vista South was a multif family 1201 01:02:43,480 --> 01:02:45,359 residential structure correct that's 1202 01:02:45,359 --> 01:02:47,359 correct and was that allowed in the 1203 01:02:47,359 --> 01:02:49,000 maritime Zone at the time you filed the 1204 01:02:49,000 --> 01:02:52,109 application it 1205 01:02:52,119 --> 01:02:55,160 was and you include the General uh 1206 01:02:55,160 --> 01:02:57,240 critical area calculations in your notes 1207 01:02:57,240 --> 01:02:59,039 as well we 1208 01:02:59,039 --> 01:03:02,470 did 1209 01:03:02,480 --> 01:03:05,000 um and those calculations are required 1210 01:03:05,000 --> 01:03:06,880 to show what the required mitigation is 1211 01:03:06,880 --> 01:03:08,319 for a project in the critical area 1212 01:03:08,319 --> 01:03:11,430 correct that's 1213 01:03:11,440 --> 01:03:13,960 correct was any of the required critical 1214 01:03:13,960 --> 01:03:16,680 area mitigation for Harbor Vista South 1215 01:03:16,680 --> 01:03:17,920 to be met 1216 01:03:17,920 --> 01:03:23,240 offsite yes you describe that so we had 1217 01:03:23,240 --> 01:03:25,559 done and 1218 01:03:25,559 --> 01:03:29,400 2006 the 2016 approval um we had 1219 01:03:29,400 --> 01:03:34,079 proposed a um more of a comprehensive 1220 01:03:34,079 --> 01:03:37,760 mitigation approach for the rod and reel 1221 01:03:37,760 --> 01:03:43,000 itself and for Harbor Vista South um the 1222 01:03:43,000 --> 01:03:46,440 shopping center where Roland's Market is 1223 01:03:46,440 --> 01:03:49,319 um had no stormw Management in place it 1224 01:03:49,319 --> 01:03:51,319 was built in the 80s I believe maybe 1225 01:03:51,319 --> 01:03:53,839 even earlier so storm waterer management 1226 01:03:53,839 --> 01:03:56,880 wasn't acquired at the time um so we 1227 01:03:56,880 --> 01:03:59,359 proposed to do a storm waterer 1228 01:03:59,359 --> 01:04:02,839 Management Facility for the entire um 1229 01:04:02,839 --> 01:04:05,520 parking lot um so we captured the water 1230 01:04:05,520 --> 01:04:08,160 off of the parking lot um treated the 1231 01:04:08,160 --> 01:04:10,400 water in a underground storm water 1232 01:04:10,400 --> 01:04:14,119 filter system um which if you're 1233 01:04:14,119 --> 01:04:16,279 interested in it uh you can see it it's 1234 01:04:16,279 --> 01:04:18,000 at the corner of the garage when you 1235 01:04:18,000 --> 01:04:20,079 make your left into the to the rod and 1236 01:04:20,079 --> 01:04:22,720 reel um and that filtering system takes 1237 01:04:22,720 --> 01:04:24,839 care of the existing parking lot 1238 01:04:24,839 --> 01:04:27,319 which was a partial offset mitigation 1239 01:04:27,319 --> 01:04:29,839 for the Harbor Vista South and the rod 1240 01:04:29,839 --> 01:04:32,829 and reel 1241 01:04:32,839 --> 01:04:35,400 projects it's treated about acre and a 1242 01:04:35,400 --> 01:04:38,520 half I believe of uh the parking lot for 1243 01:04:38,520 --> 01:04:40,880 the Harbor Vista South so the mitigation 1244 01:04:40,880 --> 01:04:42,559 was being met critical area mitigation 1245 01:04:42,559 --> 01:04:45,880 was being met by providing storm Wonder 1246 01:04:45,880 --> 01:04:47,839 management for other people's properties 1247 01:04:47,839 --> 01:04:51,160 that the town wanted to get properly 1248 01:04:51,160 --> 01:04:54,640 treated is that correct um partly okay 1249 01:04:54,640 --> 01:04:57,119 we did mitigation onsite as well a lot 1250 01:04:57,119 --> 01:04:59,799 of plantings and and onsite but yes 1251 01:04:59,799 --> 01:05:03,319 partly yes how much of the credit was to 1252 01:05:03,319 --> 01:05:04,920 be applied to the Harbor Vista Southside 1253 01:05:04,920 --> 01:05:07,079 plan if you can recall I know it was an 1254 01:05:07,079 --> 01:05:10,559 acre and a half um which was like 1255 01:05:10,559 --> 01:05:14,200 63,000 plus or minus square feet of 1256 01:05:14,200 --> 01:05:16,440 mitigation how much was to go to Harbor 1257 01:05:16,440 --> 01:05:18,359 Vista South though because Harbor Vista 1258 01:05:18,359 --> 01:05:22,799 much that's have okay 1259 01:05:22,799 --> 01:05:25,400 yep so portion of the critical area 1260 01:05:25,400 --> 01:05:27,240 mitigation for the harbor Vis to South 1261 01:05:27,240 --> 01:05:29,760 project has already been completed it 1262 01:05:29,760 --> 01:05:41,029 has it's been built and constructed and 1263 01:05:41,039 --> 01:05:43,760 operational uh you were present for the 1264 01:05:43,760 --> 01:05:45,920 presentation where I provided the board 1265 01:05:45,920 --> 01:05:49,240 with the comprehensive plan um that was 1266 01:05:49,240 --> 01:05:52,880 adopted by the Town Council in April of 1267 01:05:52,880 --> 01:05:55,520 2022 um and the implementing ordinances 1268 01:05:55,520 --> 01:05:57,799 that were subsequently filed and still 1269 01:05:57,799 --> 01:05:59,920 being new comprehensive plan new 1270 01:05:59,920 --> 01:06:01,599 comprehensive plan and the implementing 1271 01:06:01,599 --> 01:06:04,599 ordinance yes so under the comprehensive 1272 01:06:04,599 --> 01:06:06,880 plan and implementing ordinances that 1273 01:06:06,880 --> 01:06:10,319 have been adopted so far following the 1274 01:06:10,319 --> 01:06:13,240 2022 comprehensive plan would the rod 1275 01:06:13,240 --> 01:06:16,200 and reel's Harbor Vista South project be 1276 01:06:16,200 --> 01:06:19,599 compliant with those ordinances 1277 01:06:19,599 --> 01:06:22,880 no um what zone is in the harbor Vista 1278 01:06:22,880 --> 01:06:25,520 South property 1279 01:06:25,520 --> 01:06:27,920 um what what zone is it in the current 1280 01:06:27,920 --> 01:06:31,000 plan the new the new plan I believe it's 1281 01:06:31,000 --> 01:06:33,319 the south is 1282 01:06:33,319 --> 01:06:37,640 MC Maritime commercial yeah can you 1283 01:06:37,640 --> 01:06:39,520 build a multif family dwelling in an MC 1284 01:06:39,520 --> 01:06:45,549 Maritime commercial now no 1285 01:06:45,559 --> 01:06:48,440 okay what was the previous height limit 1286 01:06:48,440 --> 01:06:52,279 in the maritime District uh it was 70 1287 01:06:52,279 --> 01:06:54,640 feet and the proposed Building height of 1288 01:06:54,640 --> 01:06:57,279 Harbor Vista South was what 1289 01:06:57,279 --> 01:07:01,039 582 and couple inches I think it was 582 1290 01:07:01,039 --> 01:07:05,589 58 foot 2 inches pH 1291 01:07:05,599 --> 01:07:08,839 call shows on the site 1292 01:07:08,839 --> 01:07:12,559 plan um so what's the maximum height in 1293 01:07:12,559 --> 01:07:19,870 the MC Maritime commercial now 35 1294 01:07:19,880 --> 01:07:22,720 feet so the Harbor Vista South project 1295 01:07:22,720 --> 01:07:24,960 as proposed could have been built 1296 01:07:24,960 --> 01:07:26,960 according to the laws in effect when the 1297 01:07:26,960 --> 01:07:29,680 applications were filed in January 2021 1298 01:07:29,680 --> 01:07:31,359 but can no longer under the current 1299 01:07:31,359 --> 01:07:36,549 zoning that's 1300 01:07:36,559 --> 01:07:39,119 correct was the site plan you submitted 1301 01:07:39,119 --> 01:07:43,000 in January 20121 for Harbor Vista South 1302 01:07:43,000 --> 01:07:45,359 substantially similar to the to plans 1303 01:07:45,359 --> 01:07:46,960 that you had previously submitted to the 1304 01:07:46,960 --> 01:07:48,599 commission for this 1305 01:07:48,599 --> 01:07:52,920 property almost identical in footprint 1306 01:07:52,920 --> 01:07:55,760 yes 1307 01:07:55,760 --> 01:07:57,520 you restate that please into the 1308 01:07:57,520 --> 01:07:59,960 microphone me or him it was almost 1309 01:07:59,960 --> 01:08:01,279 identical in 1310 01:08:01,279 --> 01:08:03,599 footprint thank 1311 01:08:03,599 --> 01:08:06,279 you and what stage of approval process 1312 01:08:06,279 --> 01:08:07,559 had that 1313 01:08:07,559 --> 01:08:11,039 received previously it was originally in 1314 01:08:11,039 --> 01:08:13,799 2016 preliminary site plan preliminary 1315 01:08:13,799 --> 01:08:22,829 site plan approval that's 1316 01:08:22,839 --> 01:08:28,990 correct 1317 01:08:29,000 --> 01:08:31,359 so now I'm submitting exhibit 54 which 1318 01:08:31,359 --> 01:08:33,799 are the minutes of the February 10th 1319 01:08:33,799 --> 01:08:36,199 2016 meeting of the Planning and Zoning 1320 01:08:36,199 --> 01:08:38,359 commission that shows the original 1321 01:08:38,359 --> 01:08:41,400 approval of the preliminary site 1322 01:08:41,400 --> 01:08:52,789 plan and that would be exhibit 1323 01:08:52,799 --> 01:09:19,669 54 1324 01:09:19,679 --> 01:09:21,480 I'm showing you what's been marked for 1325 01:09:21,480 --> 01:09:25,040 identification as exhibit 5 five Mr 1326 01:09:25,040 --> 01:09:29,000 Woodburn and ask you to confir confirm 1327 01:09:29,000 --> 01:09:31,600 that this is page two of the architect 1328 01:09:31,600 --> 01:09:33,640 site plan document and the February 9th 1329 01:09:33,640 --> 01:09:37,080 2016 memo of the zoning administrator on 1330 01:09:37,080 --> 01:09:39,199 the project simply to show how similar 1331 01:09:39,199 --> 01:09:41,640 the project was to the one that was 1332 01:09:41,640 --> 01:09:43,880 submitted in January 29th 1333 01:09:43,880 --> 01:09:47,759 2021 I mess on Architects I'm I'm this 1334 01:09:47,759 --> 01:09:50,319 is site plan that's your site plan 1335 01:09:50,319 --> 01:09:52,359 correct and this is the architect site 1336 01:09:52,359 --> 01:09:55,840 plan okay and then next is the 1337 01:09:55,840 --> 01:09:59,360 memorandum of the zoning administrator 1338 01:09:59,360 --> 01:10:02,600 correct yes it's 1339 01:10:02,600 --> 01:10:05,760 correct these are all for the 2016 1340 01:10:05,760 --> 01:10:08,239 preliminary plan site all for that is 1341 01:10:08,239 --> 01:10:21,070 exhibit 1342 01:10:21,080 --> 01:10:25,640 55 BL that exhibit in clud the uh staff 1343 01:10:25,640 --> 01:10:33,630 memorandum 1344 01:10:33,640 --> 01:10:42,669 yes that was that was dated February 9th 1345 01:10:42,679 --> 01:10:50,669 2016 just to show you an 1346 01:10:50,679 --> 01:10:52,320 overhead 1347 01:10:52,320 --> 01:10:56,520 oh okay so so this is an overhead view 1348 01:10:56,520 --> 01:10:59,000 that was included in exhibit 55 which as 1349 01:10:59,000 --> 01:11:02,040 you can see has a similar configuration 1350 01:11:02,040 --> 01:11:04,159 to the one we saw in the Roden reels 1351 01:11:04,159 --> 01:11:05,880 application for Harbor Vista South that 1352 01:11:05,880 --> 01:11:10,400 was filed in January 29 21 so 16 and 20 1353 01:11:10,400 --> 01:11:12,199 21 projects 1354 01:11:12,199 --> 01:11:17,950 were very very 1355 01:11:17,960 --> 01:11:21,270 similar next 1356 01:11:21,280 --> 01:11:24,840 I'll offer the minutes of the Planning 1357 01:11:24,840 --> 01:11:29,000 and Zoning commission dated February 8th 1358 01:11:29,000 --> 01:11:31,719 2017 1359 01:11:31,719 --> 01:11:34,440 um as exhibit excuse me Mr blit before 1360 01:11:34,440 --> 01:11:38,040 you go there do we have these uh rawing 1361 01:11:38,040 --> 01:11:41,040 this on the screen now it should be a 1362 01:11:41,040 --> 01:11:42,120 part 1363 01:11:42,120 --> 01:11:45,440 of your package it's second page of 1364 01:11:45,440 --> 01:11:52,550 exhibit 1365 01:11:52,560 --> 01:11:54,320 55 1366 01:11:54,320 --> 01:11:57,000 oh I don't want to jump too far ahead so 1367 01:11:57,000 --> 01:12:04,070 now I'm 1368 01:12:04,080 --> 01:12:06,360 offering missing the side information 1369 01:12:06,360 --> 01:12:11,750 it's just the image 1370 01:12:11,760 --> 01:12:22,470 itself it's 1371 01:12:22,480 --> 01:12:34,070 missing 1372 01:12:34,080 --> 01:12:36,040 PDF these some of the Architects PDFs 1373 01:12:36,040 --> 01:12:37,920 are in different layers and all kind of 1374 01:12:37,920 --> 01:12:40,880 weird stuff happens so that was exhibit 1375 01:12:40,880 --> 01:12:42,800 56 which is the 1376 01:12:42,800 --> 01:12:44,840 minutes and as these minutes show the 1377 01:12:44,840 --> 01:12:46,400 preliminary site plan for the prior 1378 01:12:46,400 --> 01:12:48,239 iteration of Harbor Vista project was 1379 01:12:48,239 --> 01:12:51,360 extended for an additional year so that 1380 01:12:51,360 --> 01:12:57,070 it would expire on February 1381 01:12:57,080 --> 01:12:59,960 2018 so Mr Woodburn were you aware that 1382 01:12:59,960 --> 01:13:01,600 the preliminary site plan approval had 1383 01:13:01,600 --> 01:13:05,000 been extended for one year in 2017 yes 1384 01:13:05,000 --> 01:13:07,440 and was a subsequent extension request 1385 01:13:07,440 --> 01:13:12,159 made yes was that granted 1386 01:13:12,159 --> 01:13:17,110 no so as late as February of 1387 01:13:17,120 --> 01:13:19,239 2018 the preliminary site plan for 1388 01:13:19,239 --> 01:13:21,120 Harbor Vista South had been valid but 1389 01:13:21,120 --> 01:13:27,030 had since lapsed correct that's correct 1390 01:13:27,040 --> 01:13:36,590 so let's turn to the Harbor Vista West 1391 01:13:36,600 --> 01:13:38,719 project so why don't you start off 1392 01:13:38,719 --> 01:13:40,560 generally describing what Harbor Vista 1393 01:13:40,560 --> 01:13:43,320 West project proposed in its unit count 1394 01:13:43,320 --> 01:13:46,000 and what it was parking locations where 1395 01:13:46,000 --> 01:13:48,440 it's access I PL a better one to discuss 1396 01:13:48,440 --> 01:13:50,679 all that honestly than this there you go 1397 01:13:50,679 --> 01:13:51,560 so 1398 01:13:51,560 --> 01:13:55,400 here's um shows you site plan sheet two 1399 01:13:55,400 --> 01:13:57,520 from the site 1400 01:13:57,520 --> 01:14:01,560 plan so um this plan is directed south 1401 01:14:01,560 --> 01:14:03,960 to North on The View just so you can get 1402 01:14:03,960 --> 01:14:06,840 yourself oriented the right hand side 1403 01:14:06,840 --> 01:14:08,639 where you see the north Arrow that's 1404 01:14:08,639 --> 01:14:11,560 water that's the actual boat slips if 1405 01:14:11,560 --> 01:14:14,520 you're familiar with the area um just to 1406 01:14:14,520 --> 01:14:17,239 the left of the north arrow is the 1407 01:14:17,239 --> 01:14:20,840 access road that would take you down to 1408 01:14:20,840 --> 01:14:23,400 the beginning of the Railway Trail the 1409 01:14:23,400 --> 01:14:26,040 Boardwalk portion of the railro trail 1410 01:14:26,040 --> 01:14:29,040 the Shaded um I'd say more like a 1411 01:14:29,040 --> 01:14:32,560 sidewalk looking um that's the uh 1412 01:14:32,560 --> 01:14:34,360 stamped concrete portion of the 1413 01:14:34,360 --> 01:14:37,199 boardwalk Trail and then to the left of 1414 01:14:37,199 --> 01:14:40,679 that where the red dots um are uh to the 1415 01:14:40,679 --> 01:14:43,560 left that's the proposed Harbor Vista 1416 01:14:43,560 --> 01:14:47,679 West um development uh the parking would 1417 01:14:47,679 --> 01:14:50,560 be on the bottom that surface parking 1418 01:14:50,560 --> 01:14:52,199 and then the building would be generally 1419 01:14:52,199 --> 01:14:55,320 in the center with parking underneath we 1420 01:14:55,320 --> 01:14:56,840 call Podium 1421 01:14:56,840 --> 01:15:00,320 parking um and to the left corner the 1422 01:15:00,320 --> 01:15:02,159 triangular piece that's an existing 1423 01:15:02,159 --> 01:15:04,480 storm waterer Management Facility that 1424 01:15:04,480 --> 01:15:06,760 again as I described earlier in a 1425 01:15:06,760 --> 01:15:08,320 testimony was 1426 01:15:08,320 --> 01:15:10,520 installed uh with the original 1427 01:15:10,520 --> 01:15:13,719 development by Dave sisen of the marina 1428 01:15:13,719 --> 01:15:15,480 uh for this future development it was 1429 01:15:15,480 --> 01:15:17,760 actually put in place for this 1430 01:15:17,760 --> 01:15:20,400 development uh and then on the north 1431 01:15:20,400 --> 01:15:23,600 side of the site development uh is more 1432 01:15:23,600 --> 01:15:24,719 surface 1433 01:15:24,719 --> 01:15:27,560 parking how many units was Harbor Vista 1434 01:15:27,560 --> 01:15:35,229 West supposed to be I believe this is 60 1435 01:15:35,239 --> 01:15:39,719 units next I'm unit showing you from 1436 01:15:39,719 --> 01:15:42,239 exhibit 5 the general notes one through 1437 01:15:42,239 --> 01:15:49,830 11 on P two of your site 1438 01:15:49,840 --> 01:15:52,239 plan so would the Harbor Vista West 1439 01:15:52,239 --> 01:15:54,120 project as proposed in the site plan 1440 01:15:54,120 --> 01:15:54,840 that's 1441 01:15:54,840 --> 01:15:57,600 included in exhibit 5 and was submitted 1442 01:15:57,600 --> 01:16:01,080 in January of 2021 would that uh comply 1443 01:16:01,080 --> 01:16:02,920 with the current zoning ordinance it 1444 01:16:02,920 --> 01:16:07,030 would not comply with the current zoning 1445 01:16:07,040 --> 01:16:09,159 ordinance in your general notes you 1446 01:16:09,159 --> 01:16:10,760 identify the property as being in the 1447 01:16:10,760 --> 01:16:13,040 maritime Zone correct that's 1448 01:16:13,040 --> 01:16:15,080 correct and it's supposed to be a multif 1449 01:16:15,080 --> 01:16:17,320 family structure 1450 01:16:17,320 --> 01:16:19,480 correct was that allowed in Maritime 1451 01:16:19,480 --> 01:16:22,239 Zone was yes already asked that for the 1452 01:16:22,239 --> 01:16:31,470 harbor Buist to 1453 01:16:31,480 --> 01:16:34,560 um so what what zone is the Harbor Vista 1454 01:16:34,560 --> 01:16:38,360 West property located in now it's uh RC 1455 01:16:38,360 --> 01:16:40,480 which is resource 1456 01:16:40,480 --> 01:16:42,639 conservation can you build a multif 1457 01:16:42,639 --> 01:16:43,840 family dwelling in a resource 1458 01:16:43,840 --> 01:16:46,880 conservation zone 1459 01:16:46,880 --> 01:16:49,120 no what was the previous height limit in 1460 01:16:49,120 --> 01:16:52,159 the maritime District 70 feet and what's 1461 01:16:52,159 --> 01:16:54,560 the proposed height of Harbor Vista West 1462 01:16:54,560 --> 01:16:56,840 35 feet under the curtain 1463 01:16:56,840 --> 01:16:59,159 zone no what is what was the proposed 1464 01:16:59,159 --> 01:17:02,120 height foot I believe it's 582 two two 1465 01:17:02,120 --> 01:17:05,480 inches exactly as Harbor Vista South 1466 01:17:05,480 --> 01:17:08,440 same height as Harbor Vista South 1467 01:17:08,440 --> 01:17:10,920 correct and the new maximum height in 1468 01:17:10,920 --> 01:17:13,600 the MC Maritime commercial Zone adopted 1469 01:17:13,600 --> 01:17:15,320 in 1470 01:17:15,320 --> 01:17:17,600 2022 well we're in the resource 1471 01:17:17,600 --> 01:17:19,560 conservation oh you're right resource 1472 01:17:19,560 --> 01:17:26,910 conservation 35 feet so 1473 01:17:26,920 --> 01:17:28,480 and the Roden reel gave the town an 1474 01:17:28,480 --> 01:17:30,800 easement across this property to 1475 01:17:30,800 --> 01:17:32,600 accomodate the railway Trail correct 1476 01:17:32,600 --> 01:17:34,159 that's 1477 01:17:34,159 --> 01:17:36,920 correct and the town built a water and 1478 01:17:36,920 --> 01:17:39,080 sewer pipe under that easement to serve 1479 01:17:39,080 --> 01:17:40,840 the eventual construction of Harbor 1480 01:17:40,840 --> 01:17:44,159 Vista West sewer pipe water water was 1481 01:17:44,159 --> 01:17:47,440 built previously with the uh rental 1482 01:17:47,440 --> 01:17:50,719 units next door okay yes so they built a 1483 01:17:50,719 --> 01:17:53,679 sewer pipe right to serve the eventual 1484 01:17:53,679 --> 01:18:01,990 construction that's 1485 01:18:02,000 --> 01:18:04,639 cor so now let's turn to Harbor Vista 1486 01:18:04,639 --> 01:18:06,719 North just to orient yourself where that 1487 01:18:06,719 --> 01:18:08,239 is that's that little 1488 01:18:08,239 --> 01:18:12,590 parcel at the end of the 1489 01:18:12,600 --> 01:18:20,510 marina go to the sheet three of the site 1490 01:18:20,520 --> 01:18:22,600 plan and wanted to give a general 1491 01:18:22,600 --> 01:18:24,679 descript ion of the orientation of the 1492 01:18:24,679 --> 01:18:26,639 building and the access and its unit 1493 01:18:26,639 --> 01:18:28,600 counts and things like that sure so once 1494 01:18:28,600 --> 01:18:30,719 again this uh is oriented 1495 01:18:30,719 --> 01:18:37,440 north um and this project it fronts on Gordon skinet 1496 01:18:37,440 --> 01:18:41,679 Avenue um which if you go out to uh 1497 01:18:41,679 --> 01:18:44,120 kellums field uh there's a large parking 1498 01:18:44,120 --> 01:18:47,560 lot on the top side of this sheet which 1499 01:18:47,560 --> 01:18:50,000 um is I think it's intended for boat 1500 01:18:50,000 --> 01:18:52,360 storage I think that's he uses it but 1501 01:18:52,360 --> 01:18:53,679 during footall football games I know 1502 01:18:53,679 --> 01:18:56,760 everybody use it um the building sits in 1503 01:18:56,760 --> 01:18:59,400 the center of this sheet here just on 1504 01:18:59,400 --> 01:19:01,679 the north side of the end of the water 1505 01:19:01,679 --> 01:19:04,000 the marina as you can see there's boat 1506 01:19:04,000 --> 01:19:05,920 slips you can see the circles those are 1507 01:19:05,920 --> 01:19:07,679 pilings for the boat 1508 01:19:07,679 --> 01:19:10,440 slips uh and then access to the site 1509 01:19:10,440 --> 01:19:13,639 would be off of Gordon Stant on both the 1510 01:19:13,639 --> 01:19:16,040 right side or east and the west side 1511 01:19:16,040 --> 01:19:20,120 which is the left and as um Mr Blitz had 1512 01:19:20,120 --> 01:19:22,320 mentioned it's kind of hard to see but 1513 01:19:22,320 --> 01:19:24,880 the diamond plated uh two lines on the 1514 01:19:24,880 --> 01:19:27,760 left that's the railway trail that uh 1515 01:19:27,760 --> 01:19:30,280 the Donovan provided the EAS for for 1516 01:19:30,280 --> 01:19:32,239 access to the railway 1517 01:19:32,239 --> 01:19:34,960 Trail um the building itself I guess 1518 01:19:34,960 --> 01:19:36,199 it's a little hard to see but it's a 1519 01:19:36,199 --> 01:19:39,840 u-shape there almost Center uh with 1520 01:19:39,840 --> 01:19:42,600 parking again underneath uh at the first 1521 01:19:42,600 --> 01:19:44,120 floor you would park underneath the 1522 01:19:44,120 --> 01:19:46,639 second floor and then surface parking 1523 01:19:46,639 --> 01:19:51,390 along Gordon stened 1524 01:19:51,400 --> 01:19:54,280 Avenue this project is located on parcel 1525 01:19:54,280 --> 01:19:55,880 J of the 1526 01:19:55,880 --> 01:19:58,400 plat it is on parcel J it's a 1527 01:19:58,400 --> 01:20:01,800 condominium actually it's um unit one of 1528 01:20:01,800 --> 01:20:03,000 partiel 1529 01:20:03,000 --> 01:20:06,400 J so it's already been ploted as a 1530 01:20:06,400 --> 01:20:08,000 identified as a developed lot 1531 01:20:08,000 --> 01:20:14,510 developable 1532 01:20:14,520 --> 01:20:17,560 lot so these are the general notes 1 1533 01:20:17,560 --> 01:20:21,229 through 11 for your site 1534 01:20:21,239 --> 01:20:25,910 plan or Harbor Vista 1535 01:20:25,920 --> 01:20:29,229 West that's 1536 01:20:29,239 --> 01:20:32,800 correct nor oh I 1537 01:20:32,800 --> 01:20:35,199 apologize Harbor Vista North Harbor 1538 01:20:35,199 --> 01:20:38,440 Vista North so would Harbor Vista North 1539 01:20:38,440 --> 01:20:39,960 as proposed in the site plan that you 1540 01:20:39,960 --> 01:20:41,760 provided in January 21st comply with the 1541 01:20:41,760 --> 01:20:45,320 urrent zoning ordinance it would 1542 01:20:45,320 --> 01:20:47,960 not was it located in the maritime Zone 1543 01:20:47,960 --> 01:20:51,199 we've already gone over that 1544 01:20:51,199 --> 01:20:55,679 yes the new zoning is MC Maritime 1545 01:20:55,679 --> 01:20:57,840 commercial the height of the proposed 1546 01:20:57,840 --> 01:20:59,199 building is 1547 01:20:59,199 --> 01:21:02,320 582 again 58 foot2 1548 01:21:02,320 --> 01:21:06,920 Ines um it's 23 units and would not be 1549 01:21:06,920 --> 01:21:09,560 allowed in the MC Zone the new 1550 01:21:09,560 --> 01:21:14,320 Zone um as proposed a 35 foot height 1551 01:21:14,320 --> 01:21:16,880 limit but in the prior Maritime Zone 1552 01:21:16,880 --> 01:21:18,639 District the height maximum height was 1553 01:21:18,639 --> 01:21:22,480 70 that's Shon not 11 yes 70 foot okay 1554 01:21:22,480 --> 01:21:23,440 and 1555 01:21:23,440 --> 01:21:26,560 so as when you made the applications in 1556 01:21:26,560 --> 01:21:28,840 January of 2021 they complied but they 1557 01:21:28,840 --> 01:21:30,360 no longer comply with the current zoning 1558 01:21:30,360 --> 01:21:33,390 correct that's 1559 01:21:33,400 --> 01:21:35,960 correct was there any prior work on the 1560 01:21:35,960 --> 01:21:37,560 property where Harbor Vista West and 1561 01:21:37,560 --> 01:21:43,920 Harbor Vista North were located um that the January 2021 applications were 1562 01:21:43,920 --> 01:21:46,870 relying 1563 01:21:46,880 --> 01:21:51,199 upon um yes what was that uh well we had 1564 01:21:51,199 --> 01:21:54,280 the sewer installed already U which we 1565 01:21:54,280 --> 01:21:57,280 spoke about and um storm waterer 1566 01:21:57,280 --> 01:21:59,199 management was already installed the 1567 01:21:59,199 --> 01:22:01,440 buffer yards were in put in place when 1568 01:22:01,440 --> 01:22:05,719 we um when the the uh Marine was built 1569 01:22:05,719 --> 01:22:07,760 the bulkheads were built and the Green 1570 01:22:07,760 --> 01:22:09,639 Space around the bulad are built there's 1571 01:22:09,639 --> 01:22:11,719 a sand filter system along the entire 1572 01:22:11,719 --> 01:22:14,199 length of that which was designed 1573 01:22:14,199 --> 01:22:16,080 approve by not only the town and the 1574 01:22:16,080 --> 01:22:17,800 county but the critic Larry commission 1575 01:22:17,800 --> 01:22:19,360 to provide storm management for the 1576 01:22:19,360 --> 01:22:22,920 entire development and then if you go 1577 01:22:22,920 --> 01:22:25,320 way back U when that Marina was actually 1578 01:22:25,320 --> 01:22:27,159 built for those you can remember there 1579 01:22:27,159 --> 01:22:29,760 was numerous um boat houses and I don't 1580 01:22:29,760 --> 01:22:32,320 know if everybody remers those but those 1581 01:22:32,320 --> 01:22:35,280 boat houses were taken down um 1582 01:22:35,280 --> 01:22:38,880 along the um the slip area there was a 1583 01:22:38,880 --> 01:22:41,159 Goodyear Building Maintenance building 1584 01:22:41,159 --> 01:22:43,560 that was taken down there was quite a 1585 01:22:43,560 --> 01:22:47,440 bit of um old dilapidated impervious 1586 01:22:47,440 --> 01:22:50,040 area as we call it that was taken out as 1587 01:22:50,040 --> 01:22:53,120 part of the original project 1588 01:22:53,120 --> 01:22:56,560 um to uh provide storm management and 1589 01:22:56,560 --> 01:23:00,080 critical area mitigation for these 1590 01:23:00,080 --> 01:23:02,400 developments so yeah quite a bit of work 1591 01:23:02,400 --> 01:23:04,960 was done did that also include frag 1592 01:23:04,960 --> 01:23:07,360 mighty's remediation there was frag 1593 01:23:07,360 --> 01:23:09,560 mighty's remediation 1594 01:23:09,560 --> 01:23:11,600 yes and wasn't there also some 1595 01:23:11,600 --> 01:23:13,239 adjustments to The Moorings and Pier 1596 01:23:13,239 --> 01:23:15,840 piles part of the mitigation the entire 1597 01:23:15,840 --> 01:23:21,470 Marina was 1598 01:23:21,480 --> 01:23:31,910 veryone 1599 01:23:31,920 --> 01:23:35,639 it's isn't it true that the ciens who 1600 01:23:35,639 --> 01:23:38,280 you referenced as being the prior 1601 01:23:38,280 --> 01:23:42,000 owners had done the title Wetlands 1602 01:23:42,000 --> 01:23:45,080 delineation for the Western Property 1603 01:23:45,080 --> 01:23:47,159 boundary because that had not previously 1604 01:23:47,159 --> 01:23:48,600 been mapped and that that was 1605 01:23:48,600 --> 01:23:51,080 transferred to the rod and reel talking 1606 01:23:51,080 --> 01:23:54,360 about Harbor V West area yes yes and so 1607 01:23:54,360 --> 01:23:57,320 they obtain the private Wetland permit 1608 01:23:57,320 --> 01:24:01,159 which I'll read is 03 wp1 1609 01:24:01,159 --> 01:24:04,000 155r and the core of army Engineers 1610 01:24:04,000 --> 01:24:08,840 permit 2004 to facilitate that work 1611 01:24:08,840 --> 01:24:11,360 that's correct and that was transferred 1612 01:24:11,360 --> 01:24:13,480 with the property to the rod and reel 1613 01:24:13,480 --> 01:24:15,840 for their projects that's correct 1614 01:24:15,840 --> 01:24:17,480 because all these projects had really 1615 01:24:17,480 --> 01:24:19,360 been kind of designed by the sistens 1616 01:24:19,360 --> 01:24:23,480 they started with the sistens um 1617 01:24:23,480 --> 01:24:27,120 almost as they were proposed in the 1618 01:24:27,120 --> 01:24:30,639 2021 application yes very 1619 01:24:30,639 --> 01:24:41,030 close that was as far back as 1620 01:24:41,040 --> 01:24:43,600 2004 but the rod and reel did the 1621 01:24:43,600 --> 01:24:46,040 mitigation work correct not the systens 1622 01:24:46,040 --> 01:24:47,400 that's correct assistants have gotten 1623 01:24:47,400 --> 01:24:50,320 the permits but the rodel actually um 1624 01:24:50,320 --> 01:24:52,159 performed the work or their contractor 1625 01:24:52,159 --> 01:24:54,080 you obtained a zoning permit for that 1626 01:24:54,080 --> 01:24:56,830 work that's 1627 01:24:56,840 --> 01:24:59,760 correct and all this mitigation was 1628 01:24:59,760 --> 01:25:01,880 going to be applied as credits to the 1629 01:25:01,880 --> 01:25:04,360 January 29th 2021 applications for 1630 01:25:04,360 --> 01:25:06,679 Harbor Vista West and Harbor Vista North 1631 01:25:06,679 --> 01:25:10,600 projects as they were for the 2016 1632 01:25:10,600 --> 01:25:12,880 approvals and you know we had several 1633 01:25:12,880 --> 01:25:14,600 approvals on Harbor Vista North and 1634 01:25:14,600 --> 01:25:16,000 Harbor Vista South and they were 1635 01:25:16,000 --> 01:25:17,719 credited for those and approve with 1636 01:25:17,719 --> 01:25:21,270 those 1637 01:25:21,280 --> 01:25:35,870 yes 1638 01:25:35,880 --> 01:25:37,920 so I'm showing you the zoning permit the 1639 01:25:37,920 --> 01:25:42,149 zoning 1640 01:25:42,159 --> 01:25:48,550 permit which you have in your exhibits I 1641 01:25:48,560 --> 01:25:51,199 mean oh no I haven't submitted that yet 1642 01:25:51,199 --> 01:26:03,590 exhibit 57 1643 01:26:03,600 --> 01:26:21,189 ail 1644 01:26:21,199 --> 01:26:47,629 201 1645 01:26:47,639 --> 01:26:49,920 let's turn to the Senate Place 1646 01:26:49,920 --> 01:27:16,330 project there's 1647 01:27:16,340 --> 01:27:21,709 [Music] 1648 01:27:21,719 --> 01:27:24,280 let's for clarification this zoning 1649 01:27:24,280 --> 01:27:26,679 permit it says partiel J so this is the 1650 01:27:26,679 --> 01:27:29,840 permit for har for North 1651 01:27:29,840 --> 01:27:34,199 right so the whole um property that 1652 01:27:34,199 --> 01:27:37,440 includes Harbor Vista North and Harbor 1653 01:27:37,440 --> 01:27:45,430 Vista West is partial J okay 1654 01:27:45,440 --> 01:27:49,040 yeah we're waiting for that Mr 1655 01:27:49,040 --> 01:27:53,080 Woodburn that permit was issued in 2011 1656 01:27:53,080 --> 01:28:00,550 do you recall whether it was 1657 01:28:00,560 --> 01:28:03,679 renewed The Marina the permit you just 1658 01:28:03,679 --> 01:28:21,030 showed yeah I I don't 1659 01:28:21,040 --> 01:28:22,600 recall 1660 01:28:22,600 --> 01:28:34,709 [Music] 1661 01:28:34,719 --> 01:28:36,400 reminder we have about 30 minutes left 1662 01:28:36,400 --> 01:28:50,990 before we're going to call it 1663 01:28:51,000 --> 01:28:57,199 so now we're getting to SED place I'm 1664 01:28:57,199 --> 01:28:58,960 just showing you the overhead view again 1665 01:28:58,960 --> 01:29:02,840 just so you could mind where it is um 1666 01:29:02,840 --> 01:29:05,400 now we'll go to the site 1667 01:29:05,400 --> 01:29:10,550 plan 1668 01:29:10,560 --> 01:29:13,639 um is shown on sheet two of the site 1669 01:29:13,639 --> 01:29:18,679 plan submitted on January 29th for State 1670 01:29:18,679 --> 01:29:20,920 Place 1671 01:29:20,920 --> 01:29:24,239 um can you give us a general description 1672 01:29:24,239 --> 01:29:26,960 the the orientation of this uh as you 1673 01:29:26,960 --> 01:29:28,679 can see the top right North therea the 1674 01:29:28,679 --> 01:29:31,600 north is right so North Beach would be 1675 01:29:31,600 --> 01:29:34,400 to the right um top side of the the 1676 01:29:34,400 --> 01:29:36,960 sheet Bas Side Road 1677 01:29:36,960 --> 01:29:40,639 261 Center uh is 31st 1678 01:29:40,639 --> 01:29:43,679 Street and the properties that are owned 1679 01:29:43,679 --> 01:29:45,440 under the application are the left side 1680 01:29:45,440 --> 01:29:48,880 and the right side um and I know you're 1681 01:29:48,880 --> 01:29:50,560 all probably familiar they're two big 1682 01:29:50,560 --> 01:29:53,639 grass areas if you go by them 1683 01:29:53,639 --> 01:29:56,800 today um this 1684 01:29:56,800 --> 01:30:01,239 area um used to be hous or used to House 1685 01:30:01,239 --> 01:30:02,840 stet 1686 01:30:02,840 --> 01:30:06,080 Restaurant um and it was a very low Ling 1687 01:30:06,080 --> 01:30:08,000 area it 1688 01:30:08,000 --> 01:30:12,600 flooded all the time um before some vast 1689 01:30:12,600 --> 01:30:14,719 improvements are made to this area 1690 01:30:14,719 --> 01:30:17,239 however for this plan here there's 11 1691 01:30:17,239 --> 01:30:18,320 townhouse 1692 01:30:18,320 --> 01:30:22,119 units uh proposed that are accessed off 1693 01:30:22,119 --> 01:30:26,560 of um C Street right in front of 1694 01:30:26,560 --> 01:30:30,520 Cate um garage 1695 01:30:30,520 --> 01:30:35,430 units 1696 01:30:35,440 --> 01:30:38,199 uh okay fairly 1697 01:30:38,199 --> 01:30:40,320 simple town 1698 01:30:40,320 --> 01:30:44,000 homes so I'm next I'm showing 1699 01:30:44,000 --> 01:30:47,360 you from exhibit 5 the general notes one 1700 01:30:47,360 --> 01:30:49,400 through nine on sheet two of your site 1701 01:30:49,400 --> 01:30:53,560 plan and as show as you've seen with the 1702 01:30:53,560 --> 01:30:57,320 other uh projects I plan General 1703 01:30:57,320 --> 01:30:59,639 notes the proposed compliance with a 1704 01:30:59,639 --> 01:31:01,480 zoning ordinances at the time the 1705 01:31:01,480 --> 01:31:03,000 applications were 1706 01:31:03,000 --> 01:31:05,360 filed so under the comprehensive plan 1707 01:31:05,360 --> 01:31:06,880 and implementing ordinances that have 1708 01:31:06,880 --> 01:31:08,480 now been 1709 01:31:08,480 --> 01:31:11,679 adopted after the filing would the rod 1710 01:31:11,679 --> 01:31:13,239 and reel state Place project be 1711 01:31:13,239 --> 01:31:16,430 compliant with those 1712 01:31:16,440 --> 01:31:18,400 ordinances 1713 01:31:18,400 --> 01:31:21,000 possibly um I haven't been through them 1714 01:31:21,000 --> 01:31:22,280 to 1715 01:31:22,280 --> 01:31:25,600 dissect them however there 1716 01:31:25,600 --> 01:31:29,480 um uh there may be some issue with 1717 01:31:29,480 --> 01:31:32,639 there's some ambiguous um review I think 1718 01:31:32,639 --> 01:31:34,719 with architecture and things like that 1719 01:31:34,719 --> 01:31:37,880 which it's hard to say in the reading um 1720 01:31:37,880 --> 01:31:40,360 if they would be compliant or not but 1721 01:31:40,360 --> 01:31:44,000 dimensionally they probably would be 1722 01:31:44,000 --> 01:31:46,000 compliant so in your general notes you 1723 01:31:46,000 --> 01:31:47,480 identifi the 1724 01:31:47,480 --> 01:31:50,119 property was in the RV District in 1725 01:31:50,119 --> 01:31:52,159 that's correct what's it now now what 1726 01:31:52,159 --> 01:31:54,000 district is it in 1727 01:31:54,000 --> 01:31:56,800 rv2 so was there any previous work done 1728 01:31:56,800 --> 01:32:02,880 on the Senate property expensive okay can you describe that 1729 01:32:02,880 --> 01:32:05,000 this this project has had several 1730 01:32:05,000 --> 01:32:07,360 approvals all the way to permit 1731 01:32:07,360 --> 01:32:09,600 issuance um when you say permit issuance 1732 01:32:09,600 --> 01:32:11,320 you mean zoning permit zoning permit 1733 01:32:11,320 --> 01:32:15,199 issuance which is just to clarify is the 1734 01:32:15,199 --> 01:32:19,119 final Town approval necessary for you 1735 01:32:19,119 --> 01:32:22,360 Town approval to receive permits to 1736 01:32:22,360 --> 01:32:24,320 construct so this would be the end of 1737 01:32:24,320 --> 01:32:27,440 the line although isn't it true that you 1738 01:32:27,440 --> 01:32:28,679 would then have to go get building 1739 01:32:28,679 --> 01:32:30,119 permits and other permits from calary 1740 01:32:30,119 --> 01:32:31,920 County development permits that we would 1741 01:32:31,920 --> 01:32:33,800 call these yes it's the last stage from 1742 01:32:33,800 --> 01:32:36,800 the town okay however on this particular 1743 01:32:36,800 --> 01:32:38,440 project we did have State Highway 1744 01:32:38,440 --> 01:32:41,119 permits and and town permit zoning 1745 01:32:41,119 --> 01:32:43,760 permit and County permits at one 1746 01:32:43,760 --> 01:32:48,920 time um extensive work was done and for 1747 01:32:48,920 --> 01:32:50,600 those of you that have lived in town a 1748 01:32:50,600 --> 01:32:52,080 while you may remember number of those 1749 01:32:52,080 --> 01:32:54,520 you don't I'll give you a little history 1750 01:32:54,520 --> 01:32:56,119 lesson 1751 01:32:56,119 --> 01:32:59,360 261 um and SE Street where I was saying 1752 01:32:59,360 --> 01:33:01,119 stet restaurant 1753 01:33:01,119 --> 01:33:04,040 was uh it'd be flooded tonight probably 1754 01:33:04,040 --> 01:33:07,080 in that day and um was around elevation 1755 01:33:07,080 --> 01:33:11,480 one maybe or something like that um tied 1756 01:33:11,480 --> 01:33:14,239 it's elevation 0 42 so you have about 1757 01:33:14,239 --> 01:33:15,880 six inches of play if you have a little 1758 01:33:15,880 --> 01:33:18,320 bit of wind and if you're if you're 1759 01:33:18,320 --> 01:33:20,679 familiar with the tidal gate right you 1760 01:33:20,679 --> 01:33:22,800 see it out there you'll wonder what it 1761 01:33:22,800 --> 01:33:25,600 is there's a reason that was put in it 1762 01:33:25,600 --> 01:33:29,320 never really worked but uh 1763 01:33:29,320 --> 01:33:32,280 so that was put in so if a hurricane or 1764 01:33:32,280 --> 01:33:33,679 something came up the bay they could 1765 01:33:33,679 --> 01:33:35,960 shut it right and it wouldn't push up 1766 01:33:35,960 --> 01:33:37,159 into the town well you have all the 1767 01:33:37,159 --> 01:33:38,960 water coming down too so you're fighting 1768 01:33:38,960 --> 01:33:41,760 water coming down and Tide pushing up 1769 01:33:41,760 --> 01:33:46,639 anyway um that area was very low and um 1770 01:33:46,639 --> 01:33:49,480 the State Highway Administration and the 1771 01:33:49,480 --> 01:33:52,639 town um and the Don 1772 01:33:52,639 --> 01:33:55,159 I would say worked in in a like a public 1773 01:33:55,159 --> 01:33:57,679 private partnership to fix the area to 1774 01:33:57,679 --> 01:33:59,639 raise it they 1775 01:33:59,639 --> 01:34:04,600 raised 261 I think about six feet um if 1776 01:34:04,600 --> 01:34:05,480 I'm not 1777 01:34:05,480 --> 01:34:08,440 mistaken um and at the same 1778 01:34:08,440 --> 01:34:11,719 time with permits in hand the donovans 1779 01:34:11,719 --> 01:34:14,119 raised their properties and the town 1780 01:34:14,119 --> 01:34:15,800 raised SE 1781 01:34:15,800 --> 01:34:18,480 Street um replace the entire sewer 1782 01:34:18,480 --> 01:34:20,440 system because the sewer system every 1783 01:34:20,440 --> 01:34:22,880 time it rained would flow back up 1784 01:34:22,880 --> 01:34:26,600 and overflow into the roads and down 1785 01:34:26,600 --> 01:34:28,360 into the stream 1786 01:34:28,360 --> 01:34:32,199 Etc new water lines were put in um a new 1787 01:34:32,199 --> 01:34:34,719 storm drain system was put in new water 1788 01:34:34,719 --> 01:34:36,440 and sewer lines were put in everything 1789 01:34:36,440 --> 01:34:39,360 was raised um by the state by the town 1790 01:34:39,360 --> 01:34:40,480 and by the 1791 01:34:40,480 --> 01:34:44,320 donovans as part of that a uh storm 1792 01:34:44,320 --> 01:34:46,679 water pump station was 1793 01:34:46,679 --> 01:34:48,960 installed um if you're not familiar with 1794 01:34:48,960 --> 01:34:51,080 it you see black fence on the property 1795 01:34:51,080 --> 01:34:52,520 goes around around that's what that is 1796 01:34:52,520 --> 01:34:56,250 that's a pump station so when you get 1797 01:34:56,250 --> 01:34:57,440 [Music] 1798 01:34:57,440 --> 01:35:01,440 um large storm events um there's a way 1799 01:35:01,440 --> 01:35:04,360 to actually pump the water out of that 1800 01:35:04,360 --> 01:35:07,560 area and without a location to put the 1801 01:35:07,560 --> 01:35:09,760 pump station and the backup it's a it's 1802 01:35:09,760 --> 01:35:11,960 a pumparound system the Donovan's 1803 01:35:11,960 --> 01:35:15,159 provided easements for that on their 1804 01:35:15,159 --> 01:35:17,239 property um so it could be out of the 1805 01:35:17,239 --> 01:35:18,800 flood plane it actually sits out of the 1806 01:35:18,800 --> 01:35:20,280 huner flood 1807 01:35:20,280 --> 01:35:22,400 plane uh 1808 01:35:22,400 --> 01:35:25,360 can I a lot ask a clarifying question 1809 01:35:25,360 --> 01:35:27,840 those easements you the pump you were 1810 01:35:27,840 --> 01:35:30,040 talking about was would be a Town Pump 1811 01:35:30,040 --> 01:35:32,440 it's a town facility is correct correct 1812 01:35:32,440 --> 01:35:34,040 but the easement that you were granting 1813 01:35:34,040 --> 01:35:37,199 was on the site plan yes that would for 1814 01:35:37,199 --> 01:35:39,040 the Senate Place project there's no 1815 01:35:39,040 --> 01:35:40,920 separate easement for it no it was 1816 01:35:40,920 --> 01:35:42,840 included with the development permit 1817 01:35:42,840 --> 01:35:44,800 part of the development permit process 1818 01:35:44,800 --> 01:35:50,390 yes 1819 01:35:50,400 --> 01:35:53,990 okay 1820 01:35:54,000 --> 01:35:56,400 so now I'm going to submit exhibit 58 1821 01:35:56,400 --> 01:35:58,520 which is the town zoning permit 1822 01:35:58,520 --> 01:36:01,199 6652 it was approved 1823 01:36:01,199 --> 01:36:04,080 8111 and two pages of renewal stamps 1824 01:36:04,080 --> 01:36:05,600 showing the permit 1825 01:36:05,600 --> 01:36:08,320 5688 being renewed prior to that for 1826 01:36:08,320 --> 01:36:11,800 Sate place so it's three pages that 1827 01:36:11,800 --> 01:36:20,310 would be exhibit 1828 01:36:20,320 --> 01:36:24,870 58 1829 01:36:24,880 --> 01:36:27,280 Mr Woodburn you you described working 1830 01:36:27,280 --> 01:36:30,119 the town the donovans 1831 01:36:30,119 --> 01:36:35,870 and the state highway working 1832 01:36:35,880 --> 01:36:39,400 together I'm asking you to clarify that 1833 01:36:39,400 --> 01:36:42,719 the development or state place was 1834 01:36:42,719 --> 01:36:45,080 designed to meet the heights of that was 1835 01:36:45,080 --> 01:36:46,520 agreed upon by all three of those 1836 01:36:46,520 --> 01:36:48,639 parties that's correct so the pads that 1837 01:36:48,639 --> 01:36:52,400 they now sit are building pads set up up 1838 01:36:52,400 --> 01:36:54,679 for those Heights for all that work that 1839 01:36:54,679 --> 01:36:58,440 was done yes they all worked all the 1840 01:36:58,440 --> 01:37:00,400 three or each of the three entities 1841 01:37:00,400 --> 01:37:02,360 worked together at the same time because 1842 01:37:02,360 --> 01:37:05,480 it was a big bowl so the donovans did 1843 01:37:05,480 --> 01:37:07,239 their part while the state was doing 1844 01:37:07,239 --> 01:37:08,880 their part while the town was doing 1845 01:37:08,880 --> 01:37:11,800 their part so that it all came up 1846 01:37:11,800 --> 01:37:17,189 together raised together I should 1847 01:37:17,199 --> 01:37:20,880 say okay let's turn to home place oh let 1848 01:37:20,880 --> 01:37:29,229 me ask let me quickly look at my notes 1849 01:37:29,239 --> 01:37:32,560 here okay home place so this is the 1850 01:37:32,560 --> 01:37:34,760 general location Google Map just showing 1851 01:37:34,760 --> 01:37:36,280 you where it 1852 01:37:36,280 --> 01:37:39,880 is and then we'll go to the site plan 1853 01:37:39,880 --> 01:37:43,679 which is your sheet two of exhibit 5 Mr 1854 01:37:43,679 --> 01:37:46,360 Woodburn can you describe generally what 1855 01:37:46,360 --> 01:37:48,880 this development is designed to 1856 01:37:48,880 --> 01:37:51,960 accomplish this is oriented North uh as 1857 01:37:51,960 --> 01:37:55,199 you see the north Arrow the top left the 1858 01:37:55,199 --> 01:37:58,679 property uh borders Maryland Route 260 1859 01:37:58,679 --> 01:38:03,040 on the North side and it fronts on Cox 1860 01:38:03,040 --> 01:38:07,599 Road um on the South Side the proposed 1861 01:38:07,599 --> 01:38:11,599 project um had two um condominium 1862 01:38:11,599 --> 01:38:15,199 buildings and one single family house to 1863 01:38:15,199 --> 01:38:18,000 mirror the existing home that's on the 1864 01:38:18,000 --> 01:38:21,880 property currently um access is off of 1865 01:38:21,880 --> 01:38:23,159 Cox 1866 01:38:23,159 --> 01:38:26,400 Road um you'd come in off Cox and make a 1867 01:38:26,400 --> 01:38:28,840 90 degre turn it's called home place was 1868 01:38:28,840 --> 01:38:30,119 the name of the 1869 01:38:30,119 --> 01:38:34,040 road and um you would park some surface 1870 01:38:34,040 --> 01:38:36,599 in front and the two condominium 1871 01:38:36,599 --> 01:38:38,760 buildings are on the right and the 1872 01:38:38,760 --> 01:38:41,000 bottom side of the parking lot and those 1873 01:38:41,000 --> 01:38:44,159 had Podium parking 1874 01:38:44,159 --> 01:38:46,440 beneath so let's turn to the general 1875 01:38:46,440 --> 01:38:49,159 notes which you're one through looks 1876 01:38:49,159 --> 01:38:56,750 like six of your notes 1877 01:38:56,760 --> 01:38:59,320 um and that describes all the lots that 1878 01:38:59,320 --> 01:39:01,800 were used to make up this parcel correct 1879 01:39:01,800 --> 01:39:05,189 that's 1880 01:39:05,199 --> 01:39:11,750 correct parcel one and 1881 01:39:11,760 --> 01:39:16,920 two so under the ordinance that existed 1882 01:39:16,920 --> 01:39:20,040 at the time you filed the 1883 01:39:20,040 --> 01:39:23,040 application would the proposed plan have 1884 01:39:23,040 --> 01:39:25,800 met the zoning ordinance at that time 1885 01:39:25,800 --> 01:39:31,000 yes it's RV and it was in the RV 1886 01:39:31,000 --> 01:39:33,199 district and under the comprehensive 1887 01:39:33,199 --> 01:39:36,560 plan that was subsequently passed 2022 1888 01:39:36,560 --> 01:39:39,400 with the Home Place project be compliant 1889 01:39:39,400 --> 01:39:41,560 it would it's in the rv2 in the new 1890 01:39:41,560 --> 01:39:44,119 ordinance and it would not be 1891 01:39:44,119 --> 01:39:46,400 compliant mainly due to the height 1892 01:39:46,400 --> 01:39:48,320 restriction of 35 1893 01:39:48,320 --> 01:39:51,440 feet if Mr BL I'm sorry I didn't hear 1894 01:39:51,440 --> 01:39:54,000 everything what he said okay could you 1895 01:39:54,000 --> 01:39:56,960 repeat that under the new 1896 01:39:56,960 --> 01:40:02,760 ordinance um it would not meet code as 1897 01:40:02,760 --> 01:40:06,679 um the height restriction of 35 feet 1898 01:40:06,679 --> 01:40:10,840 would uh preclude it from being approved 1899 01:40:10,840 --> 01:40:12,679 or allowed well you also described the 1900 01:40:12,679 --> 01:40:14,840 parking I believe as parking underneath 1901 01:40:14,840 --> 01:40:16,480 correct is that allowed under the 1902 01:40:16,480 --> 01:40:19,159 current no okay so that also would not 1903 01:40:19,159 --> 01:40:24,189 be compliant okay 1904 01:40:24,199 --> 01:40:26,080 so was there any previous work done for 1905 01:40:26,080 --> 01:40:29,950 these properties for Home 1906 01:40:29,960 --> 01:40:35,000 Place uh physical construction no um but 1907 01:40:35,000 --> 01:40:38,719 we did go through a resoning for growth 1908 01:40:38,719 --> 01:40:42,320 allocation um to go from the LDA to the 1909 01:40:42,320 --> 01:40:44,639 Ida which is required for this 1910 01:40:44,639 --> 01:40:46,760 development and that was approved I 1911 01:40:46,760 --> 01:40:49,520 think you actually you showed in the 1912 01:40:49,520 --> 01:40:52,760 previous slide apped um under the com 1913 01:40:52,760 --> 01:40:55,719 2010 comprehensive plan as part of the 1914 01:40:55,719 --> 01:41:00,430 growth allocation approval 1915 01:41:00,440 --> 01:41:03,000 y but you you must have gotten site plan 1916 01:41:03,000 --> 01:41:04,119 approval because you also got zoning 1917 01:41:04,119 --> 01:41:06,239 permits we did get site plan approval 1918 01:41:06,239 --> 01:41:09,239 and uh zoning permit yes okay so I'm 1919 01:41:09,239 --> 01:41:17,350 going to offer as exhibit 1920 01:41:17,360 --> 01:41:21,679 59 the four pages 1921 01:41:21,679 --> 01:41:25,800 the first two are zoning permit and 1922 01:41:25,800 --> 01:41:28,560 renewals 1923 01:41:28,560 --> 01:41:31,719 forms first one issued it looks like in 1924 01:41:31,719 --> 01:41:35,870 2009 February 12th of 1925 01:41:35,880 --> 01:41:38,440 2009 as well as the application for 1926 01:41:38,440 --> 01:41:39,719 grading 1927 01:41:39,719 --> 01:41:41,599 permit 1928 01:41:41,599 --> 01:41:49,830 to calary 1929 01:41:49,840 --> 01:41:58,149 County 1930 01:41:58,159 --> 01:42:00,080 Mr Woodburn were you to serve as a civil 1931 01:42:00,080 --> 01:42:02,119 engineer on all these 1932 01:42:02,119 --> 01:42:04,840 developments yes and what does a Civil 1933 01:42:04,840 --> 01:42:09,000 Engineer do for projects like this so uh 1934 01:42:09,000 --> 01:42:12,239 we will prepare all the site development 1935 01:42:12,239 --> 01:42:14,520 plans some of which you've seen here 1936 01:42:14,520 --> 01:42:15,800 which will 1937 01:42:15,800 --> 01:42:20,080 include a site plan a landscape plan 1938 01:42:20,080 --> 01:42:23,520 utility plans such as water sewer storm 1939 01:42:23,520 --> 01:42:26,800 drain storm water management grading 1940 01:42:26,800 --> 01:42:28,800 roads parking 1941 01:42:28,800 --> 01:42:33,199 Etc um we'd also coordinate with other 1942 01:42:33,199 --> 01:42:37,560 uh Consultants such as Contra or the um 1943 01:42:37,560 --> 01:42:40,400 Architects um for locating the building 1944 01:42:40,400 --> 01:42:44,239 and and such um a geotechnical engineer 1945 01:42:44,239 --> 01:42:46,599 Structural Engineers things like that 1946 01:42:46,599 --> 01:42:49,760 and then uh assist with uh filing the 1947 01:42:49,760 --> 01:42:51,760 applications 1948 01:42:51,760 --> 01:42:54,280 War zoning permit building permit 1949 01:42:54,280 --> 01:42:56,760 grading permits Etc so when you're doing 1950 01:42:56,760 --> 01:42:58,679 that work with the Architects and the 1951 01:42:58,679 --> 01:43:01,800 contractors um part of that includes for 1952 01:43:01,800 --> 01:43:04,719 your work getting the foundation set at 1953 01:43:04,719 --> 01:43:09,950 the right grade correct first 1954 01:43:09,960 --> 01:43:12,159 correct how many different projects have 1955 01:43:12,159 --> 01:43:13,920 you worked on for buildings such as this 1956 01:43:13,920 --> 01:43:16,239 where you would act as a civil engineer 1957 01:43:16,239 --> 01:43:19,080 if you can guess or give an estimate I 1958 01:43:19,080 --> 01:43:21,679 shouldn't call it a guess an estimate 1959 01:43:21,679 --> 01:43:23,280 hundreds 1960 01:43:23,280 --> 01:43:25,400 okay and you're the civil engineer for 1961 01:43:25,400 --> 01:43:26,719 the rot and reel development at the 1962 01:43:26,719 --> 01:43:34,790 resort that's 1963 01:43:34,800 --> 01:43:38,000 correct so given your knowledge and 1964 01:43:38,000 --> 01:43:40,360 experience and having been involved in 1965 01:43:40,360 --> 01:43:42,280 developing and submitting these site 1966 01:43:42,280 --> 01:43:44,880 plans do you believe that if the 1967 01:43:44,880 --> 01:43:47,440 Planning and Zoning commission had 1968 01:43:47,440 --> 01:43:49,800 approved the site plans in the spring of 1969 01:43:49,800 --> 01:43:52,119 2021 1970 01:43:52,119 --> 01:43:53,800 would the projects have been able to 1971 01:43:53,800 --> 01:43:59,910 begin construction before May of 1972 01:43:59,920 --> 01:44:03,840 22 we're going way way uh into the realm 1973 01:44:03,840 --> 01:44:05,880 of him as expressing an opinion 1974 01:44:05,880 --> 01:44:07,480 especially an opinion as to what he 1975 01:44:07,480 --> 01:44:09,400 thinks another administrative board may 1976 01:44:09,400 --> 01:44:12,599 or may not have done um I mean that's 1977 01:44:12,599 --> 01:44:14,080 not only is he expressing an opinion at 1978 01:44:14,080 --> 01:44:15,760 this point but he's trying to express an 1979 01:44:15,760 --> 01:44:17,560 opinion as to what the Planning 1980 01:44:17,560 --> 01:44:20,400 Commission may or may not have done so 1981 01:44:20,400 --> 01:44:22,520 yeah it's great we could all have an 1982 01:44:22,520 --> 01:44:27,840 opinion about something but that's we's asking now it's just a pure 1983 01:44:27,840 --> 01:44:31,400 speculation my question stipulated if 1984 01:44:31,400 --> 01:44:33,480 you had gotten approval so let's that's 1985 01:44:33,480 --> 01:44:36,159 the condition if you had gotten approval 1986 01:44:36,159 --> 01:44:38,719 in the spring of 2021 would you have 1987 01:44:38,719 --> 01:44:41,199 been able to get these projects under 1988 01:44:41,199 --> 01:44:44,719 construction before May of 2022 he has 1989 01:44:44,719 --> 01:44:46,920 experience with doing many of these 1990 01:44:46,920 --> 01:44:48,199 projects he's doing the rod and reel 1991 01:44:48,199 --> 01:44:51,840 project he's done the he he can testify 1992 01:44:51,840 --> 01:44:54,520 from his experience about how quickly 1993 01:44:54,520 --> 01:44:57,239 the construction could have 1994 01:44:57,239 --> 01:44:59,599 started was a different question that 1995 01:44:59,599 --> 01:45:00,840 was a different question so I would have 1996 01:45:00,840 --> 01:45:02,679 no objection to that question because 1997 01:45:02,679 --> 01:45:03,719 that was a different question that he 1998 01:45:03,719 --> 01:45:07,280 asked before so um please answer the 1999 01:45:07,280 --> 01:45:09,440 question is to based on your experience 2000 01:45:09,440 --> 01:45:12,400 as an engineer regardless of the timing 2001 01:45:12,400 --> 01:45:16,480 of any administrative outcomes would the 2002 01:45:16,480 --> 01:45:19,320 how far along would the construction be 2003 01:45:19,320 --> 01:45:23,629 in the timeline so 2004 01:45:23,639 --> 01:45:26,639 um again just to to let you know I do 2005 01:45:26,639 --> 01:45:28,760 these permits daily I've done it for 30 2006 01:45:28,760 --> 01:45:31,960 years I can't guarantee it'll be permit 2007 01:45:31,960 --> 01:45:34,599 will be approved in a week a month or 2008 01:45:34,599 --> 01:45:37,719 you know a year however um if you were 2009 01:45:37,719 --> 01:45:41,199 to ask me on this project or any one of 2010 01:45:41,199 --> 01:45:44,119 these projects can I get a foundation 2011 01:45:44,119 --> 01:45:46,639 permit within a year of site plan 2012 01:45:46,639 --> 01:45:49,480 approval I would say absolutely 2013 01:45:49,480 --> 01:45:56,990 yes 2014 01:45:57,000 --> 01:46:00,840 and um can you what is the what does a 2015 01:46:00,840 --> 01:46:03,080 foundation permit mean in terms of the 2016 01:46:03,080 --> 01:46:06,159 so it's a good question so 2017 01:46:06,159 --> 01:46:09,760 um in my world there's lots of permits 2018 01:46:09,760 --> 01:46:11,280 um ultimately you want the final 2019 01:46:11,280 --> 01:46:13,199 building permit that's everything right 2020 01:46:13,199 --> 01:46:19,599 move in ready but um in the essence of time um especially when you're trying 2021 01:46:19,599 --> 01:46:23,159 to get things done in weather um so 2022 01:46:23,159 --> 01:46:25,000 you're like okay what can we get 2023 01:46:25,000 --> 01:46:26,920 approved so that we can get through 2024 01:46:26,920 --> 01:46:29,800 winter let's say we'd say we're going to 2025 01:46:29,800 --> 01:46:33,280 file for a foundation only permit so 2026 01:46:33,280 --> 01:46:34,679 this would be a permit to just put the 2027 01:46:34,679 --> 01:46:37,360 concrete foundation in so that the 2028 01:46:37,360 --> 01:46:39,800 contractor then has some work to do they 2029 01:46:39,800 --> 01:46:41,440 can put in a lot of utilities below 2030 01:46:41,440 --> 01:46:43,719 ground and work on other things while 2031 01:46:43,719 --> 01:46:45,639 they're trying to get the final building 2032 01:46:45,639 --> 01:46:48,800 permit to erect the the 2033 01:46:48,800 --> 01:46:51,560 vertical so uh we we'll do Foundation 2034 01:46:51,560 --> 01:46:54,599 only permits they're pretty common so 2035 01:46:54,599 --> 01:46:56,400 let me follow up with a question then 2036 01:46:56,400 --> 01:46:58,960 the foundation permit would include the 2037 01:46:58,960 --> 01:47:02,080 permit for driving piles correct and the 2038 01:47:02,080 --> 01:47:05,040 pile caps anything below grade so that 2039 01:47:05,040 --> 01:47:08,080 would include any of the grade beams and 2040 01:47:08,080 --> 01:47:10,159 the the horizontal beams that are 2041 01:47:10,159 --> 01:47:12,000 underneath below grade for the 2042 01:47:12,000 --> 01:47:14,400 foundation 2043 01:47:14,400 --> 01:47:16,639 okay I have no other questions of Mr 2044 01:47:16,639 --> 01:47:20,880 Woodburn and so I stop allow cross okay 2045 01:47:20,880 --> 01:47:24,239 um at this point in time 2046 01:47:24,239 --> 01:47:27,040 um examine Mr Woodburn based on the 2047 01:47:27,040 --> 01:47:28,639 contents of his testimony 2048 01:47:28,639 --> 01:47:31,159 today um I can de mine's going to be 2049 01:47:31,159 --> 01:47:33,159 longer than the 15 minutes uh Mr 2050 01:47:33,159 --> 01:47:34,480 Woodburn would you make yourself 2051 01:47:34,480 --> 01:47:36,679 available at the end of Mr bliss's 2052 01:47:36,679 --> 01:47:38,920 presentation for additional questions of 2053 01:47:38,920 --> 01:47:43,070 your testimony 2054 01:47:43,080 --> 01:47:45,960 sure uh if you have a question uh that 2055 01:47:45,960 --> 01:47:47,880 what what has been presented today 2056 01:47:47,880 --> 01:47:49,679 please step to the lecturn uh put if 2057 01:47:49,679 --> 01:47:52,760 make sure your name on the list 2058 01:47:52,760 --> 01:47:56,040 um of um what's the 2059 01:47:56,040 --> 01:47:59,119 word uh I will add my 2060 01:47:59,119 --> 01:48:02,400 name part yeah yeah thank you arties of 2061 01:48:02,400 --> 01:48:04,360 record your name is on the list and uh 2062 01:48:04,360 --> 01:48:05,880 you may ask questions but only to the 2063 01:48:05,880 --> 01:48:09,639 scope yes sir presented Greg Morris 2064 01:48:09,639 --> 01:48:15,030 2425 Woodland 2065 01:48:15,040 --> 01:48:18,350 Court 2066 01:48:18,360 --> 01:48:23,149 301873 4036 thank 2067 01:48:23,159 --> 01:48:26,599 you Mr Woodburn have you ever worked for 2068 01:48:26,599 --> 01:48:28,360 the town of ches big 2069 01:48:28,360 --> 01:48:31,239 beach you direct them to me or you yes 2070 01:48:31,239 --> 01:48:34,719 he can ask them to you okay fine uh have 2071 01:48:34,719 --> 01:48:37,920 I ever work for the town CH yes please 2072 01:48:37,920 --> 01:48:40,880 explain the capacity you served so I was 2073 01:48:40,880 --> 01:48:42,280 Town 2074 01:48:42,280 --> 01:48:48,239 engineer um uh see on and off between 2075 01:48:48,239 --> 01:48:51,000 2000 I don't know exactly when I started 2076 01:48:51,000 --> 01:48:54,629 for to 2077 01:48:54,639 --> 01:48:59,280 2020 long long span there uh so you were 2078 01:48:59,280 --> 01:49:02,920 acting Town civil engineer at that 2079 01:49:02,920 --> 01:49:06,960 time mostly not all during that time 2080 01:49:06,960 --> 01:49:08,280 were you in charge of Planning and 2081 01:49:08,280 --> 01:49:09,960 Zoning review and recommendations to the 2082 01:49:09,960 --> 01:49:14,280 town was not was it can you explain 2083 01:49:14,280 --> 01:49:17,239 kubak is the zoning administrator when 2084 01:49:17,239 --> 01:49:20,440 did he uh begin serving as that don't 2085 01:49:20,440 --> 01:49:22,599 remember 2086 01:49:22,599 --> 01:49:25,199 sorry any time during your tenure with 2087 01:49:25,199 --> 01:49:27,119 the town did you also work with a rod 2088 01:49:27,119 --> 01:49:28,960 and reel in any capacity related to the 2089 01:49:28,960 --> 01:49:30,560 subject Pro 2090 01:49:30,560 --> 01:49:33,920 projects uh yes have further questions 2091 01:49:33,920 --> 01:49:44,750 thank 2092 01:49:44,760 --> 01:49:48,800 you or blackw 3256 Canon King Court ches 2093 01:49:48,800 --> 01:49:50,639 Peake Beach Maryland 2094 01:49:50,639 --> 01:50:10,589 Mr n Laura black 2095 01:50:10,599 --> 01:50:13,760 welder Mr Woodburn was the email 2096 01:50:13,760 --> 01:50:16,080 informing you of the moratorium the only 2097 01:50:16,080 --> 01:50:18,119 comment that you received from Mr chubak 2098 01:50:18,119 --> 01:50:19,440 when you were working with him on these 2099 01:50:19,440 --> 01:50:21,239 projects 2100 01:50:21,239 --> 01:50:23,840 yes you did not have any meetings with 2101 01:50:23,840 --> 01:50:26,360 him about the properties he did not 2102 01:50:26,360 --> 01:50:29,800 communicate any concerns about anything 2103 01:50:29,800 --> 01:50:31,440 that was the 2104 01:50:31,440 --> 01:50:34,599 only correspondence that you had with 2105 01:50:34,599 --> 01:50:38,239 him okay so can you define 2106 01:50:38,239 --> 01:50:41,360 correspondence um well when you're 2107 01:50:41,360 --> 01:50:43,040 working with the zoning administrator 2108 01:50:43,040 --> 01:50:45,599 you're you're meeting with him I assume 2109 01:50:45,599 --> 01:50:48,239 verbal correspondence sure yeah before 2110 01:50:48,239 --> 01:50:52,910 the submittal or after the submitt 2111 01:50:52,920 --> 01:50:54,880 appli after the submitt I had no 2112 01:50:54,880 --> 01:50:57,840 conversations with him no and before the 2113 01:50:57,840 --> 01:51:00,119 submittal did he communicate any 2114 01:51:00,119 --> 01:51:04,079 concerns to you as I testified yes okay 2115 01:51:04,079 --> 01:51:07,350 yes 2116 01:51:07,360 --> 01:51:14,149 um 2117 01:51:14,159 --> 01:51:17,719 and could those concerns that he had 2118 01:51:17,719 --> 01:51:20,599 about your site plans be a reason why he 2119 01:51:20,599 --> 01:51:22,320 would not bring them to the Planning 2120 01:51:22,320 --> 01:51:24,360 Commission I don't 2121 01:51:24,360 --> 01:51:27,320 know he did not state 2122 01:51:27,320 --> 01:51:30,679 that and he's not here to 2123 01:51:30,679 --> 01:51:34,159 testify um so so what you're saying is 2124 01:51:34,159 --> 01:51:37,360 you don't know why Mr he said I can read 2125 01:51:37,360 --> 01:51:41,320 you what he said if you'd like right but you also just testified that you 2126 01:51:41,320 --> 01:51:44,239 don't know why Mr dubak did not bring 2127 01:51:44,239 --> 01:51:46,360 the site plans to the Planning 2128 01:51:46,360 --> 01:51:47,960 Commission for review I know what he 2129 01:51:47,960 --> 01:51:50,040 said yeah I know his reason yes if you 2130 01:51:50,040 --> 01:51:51,960 like me to read it I can that's all I 2131 01:51:51,960 --> 01:51:54,760 can tell you I read it as well but you 2132 01:51:54,760 --> 01:51:57,119 will agree that you can't get into Mr 2133 01:51:57,119 --> 01:52:00,199 duc's head yeah I can't do 2134 01:52:00,199 --> 01:52:02,320 that 2135 01:52:02,320 --> 01:52:05,119 yes 2136 01:52:05,119 --> 01:52:09,040 um in your experience is a category one 2137 01:52:09,040 --> 01:52:11,360 site plan typically reviewed and 2138 01:52:11,360 --> 01:52:14,760 approved within 60 days of filing of an 2139 01:52:14,760 --> 01:52:16,679 application I would have no reason to 2140 01:52:16,679 --> 01:52:17,880 believe it wouldn't 2141 01:52:17,880 --> 01:52:21,199 be you said you filed hundreds of those 2142 01:52:21,199 --> 01:52:24,199 hundreds town no I haven't right so of 2143 01:52:24,199 --> 01:52:27,159 those hundreds that you've submitted 2144 01:52:27,159 --> 01:52:29,000 what percentage would you say is 2145 01:52:29,000 --> 01:52:31,400 reviewed and approved within 60 days of 2146 01:52:31,400 --> 01:52:34,360 your filing I've never added them up I 2147 01:52:34,360 --> 01:52:35,159 don't 2148 01:52:35,159 --> 01:52:39,960 know can you guess no is it 2149 01:52:39,960 --> 01:52:42,880 100% I don't know you don't know if it's 2150 01:52:42,880 --> 01:52:44,480 100% or not I keep track of that 2151 01:52:44,480 --> 01:52:47,719 information I couldn't tell 2152 01:52:47,719 --> 01:52:52,069 you okay 2153 01:52:52,079 --> 01:52:55,280 to your knowledge was the rod and reil 2154 01:52:55,280 --> 01:52:58,199 expansion accounted for in any of the 2155 01:52:58,199 --> 01:53:03,629 site plans that were previously 2156 01:53:03,639 --> 01:53:05,719 approved Che just because I don't 2157 01:53:05,719 --> 01:53:09,390 understand the 2158 01:53:09,400 --> 01:53:14,360 question and please just restate so um 2159 01:53:14,360 --> 01:53:18,040 well I'll I'll start with a different 2160 01:53:18,040 --> 01:53:20,560 question to your knowledge was the 2161 01:53:20,560 --> 01:53:23,440 expansion of the rod and reel a known 2162 01:53:23,440 --> 01:53:28,550 project in the 2010 comprehensive 2163 01:53:28,560 --> 01:53:31,760 plan I don't know 2164 01:53:31,760 --> 01:53:34,880 that um it was it was the known projects 2165 01:53:34,880 --> 01:53:37,560 are listed in the 2010 comprehensive 2166 01:53:37,560 --> 01:53:39,760 plan was it listed there oh you bring it 2167 01:53:39,760 --> 01:53:41,560 out I'll look I I don't remember if the 2168 01:53:41,560 --> 01:53:44,320 rod and reel was I don't remember that 2169 01:53:44,320 --> 01:53:46,560 it's not part of this hearing I don't 2170 01:53:46,560 --> 01:53:52,560 know right so to your knowledge were 2171 01:53:52,560 --> 01:53:54,679 traffic studies associated with any of 2172 01:53:54,679 --> 01:53:56,199 these 2173 01:53:56,199 --> 01:54:00,599 projects accounting for a rod and reel 2174 01:54:00,599 --> 01:54:09,430 expansion not to my 2175 01:54:09,440 --> 01:54:12,199 knowledge you have any knowledge to 2176 01:54:12,199 --> 01:54:14,159 describe the additional 2177 01:54:14,159 --> 01:54:16,760 mitigation that was performed to account 2178 01:54:16,760 --> 01:54:19,360 for the Roden reel expansion and 2179 01:54:19,360 --> 01:54:21,480 revision 2180 01:54:21,480 --> 01:54:23,800 as part of this hearing I have no idea 2181 01:54:23,800 --> 01:54:25,719 wait I don't know you already testified 2182 01:54:25,719 --> 01:54:28,480 about the shared mitigation 2183 01:54:28,480 --> 01:54:31,360 for the rod and reel expansion I I don't 2184 01:54:31,360 --> 01:54:32,960 know what that means as far as this 2185 01:54:32,960 --> 01:54:35,360 hearing goes I'm not following it no 2186 01:54:35,360 --> 01:54:37,400 this is getting a little bit outside of 2187 01:54:37,400 --> 01:54:39,679 I I I agree it is in the scope of this 2188 01:54:39,679 --> 01:54:42,520 hearing but maybe not in the testimony 2189 01:54:42,520 --> 01:54:44,760 that has been presented today so I 2190 01:54:44,760 --> 01:54:48,679 suspect we will come back to this thank 2191 01:54:48,679 --> 01:54:57,750 you 2192 01:54:57,760 --> 01:54:59,079 if we can come back to it I'll ask 2193 01:54:59,079 --> 01:55:06,950 further questions later thank you thank 2194 01:55:06,960 --> 01:55:10,040 you good evening uh my name is Kathleen 2195 01:55:10,040 --> 01:55:13,000 baralt and I live at 7409 B Street in 2196 01:55:13,000 --> 01:55:16,589 Chesapeake Beach 2197 01:55:16,599 --> 01:55:19,360 20732 you need my me to say my phone 2198 01:55:19,360 --> 01:55:21,800 number no that's perfectly f um Mr 2199 01:55:21,800 --> 01:55:24,480 Woodburn uh I just wanted to ask uh one 2200 01:55:24,480 --> 01:55:28,520 question uh in your experience um you 2201 01:55:28,520 --> 01:55:32,760 had testified earlier and said that the 2202 01:55:32,760 --> 01:55:37,159 plan was in compliance and then when uh 2203 01:55:37,159 --> 01:55:39,119 in this instance because of the 2204 01:55:39,119 --> 01:55:42,679 moratorium it now is not in compliance 2205 01:55:42,679 --> 01:55:46,599 have you experienced that with other 2206 01:55:46,599 --> 01:55:50,880 buildings in in your experience 2207 01:55:50,880 --> 01:55:52,639 um I I don't know as if it was really 2208 01:55:52,639 --> 01:55:55,639 the moratorium it was the new zoning 2209 01:55:55,639 --> 01:55:57,800 well I mean not necessarily a moratorium 2210 01:55:57,800 --> 01:56:01,159 but that initially that the property was 2211 01:56:01,159 --> 01:56:03,599 about to be approved and then because 2212 01:56:03,599 --> 01:56:06,560 for example a change administratively in 2213 01:56:06,560 --> 01:56:10,040 comprehensive plan the plan the 2214 01:56:10,040 --> 01:56:13,159 application no longer is in compliance 2215 01:56:13,159 --> 01:56:16,119 you've experienced that before we're an 2216 01:56:16,119 --> 01:56:18,000 applic so let me if I understand your 2217 01:56:18,000 --> 01:56:20,360 question we reward a little bit 2218 01:56:20,360 --> 01:56:22,440 so your question I think 2219 01:56:22,440 --> 01:56:25,800 is have I experienced an application of 2220 01:56:25,800 --> 01:56:29,840 a project that before it got reviewed I 2221 01:56:29,840 --> 01:56:31,920 think is what you're asking me that 2222 01:56:31,920 --> 01:56:35,280 there was a change in something a policy 2223 01:56:35,280 --> 01:56:38,719 maybe or something that would render the 2224 01:56:38,719 --> 01:56:40,679 project to not be 2225 01:56:40,679 --> 01:56:43,280 reviewed not just a policy she think she 2226 01:56:43,280 --> 01:56:45,079 was referring to ordinance or ordinance 2227 01:56:45,079 --> 01:56:46,440 I'm sorry I didn't say I didn't mean 2228 01:56:46,440 --> 01:56:49,920 policy ordinance sorry yeah I I guess 2229 01:56:49,920 --> 01:56:52,040 what I'm asking something that you what 2230 01:56:52,040 --> 01:56:55,040 you experienced in this instance here 2231 01:56:55,040 --> 01:56:57,560 that the project I can't say that I've 2232 01:56:57,560 --> 01:57:01,040 ever had one happen like this um but 2233 01:57:01,040 --> 01:57:05,199 I've had projects where um in the middle 2234 01:57:05,199 --> 01:57:08,360 of a review cycle during a review 2235 01:57:08,360 --> 01:57:10,719 somewhere in the process an ordinance 2236 01:57:10,719 --> 01:57:13,520 was changed that affected the outcome of 2237 01:57:13,520 --> 01:57:16,079 a project yes would you say that 2238 01:57:16,079 --> 01:57:18,400 happened frequently or is it very 2239 01:57:18,400 --> 01:57:22,520 infrequent but it has happened okay 2240 01:57:22,520 --> 01:57:27,189 thank 2241 01:57:27,199 --> 01:57:29,159 you right we are coming to the end of 2242 01:57:29,159 --> 01:57:31,440 the testimony I will finish up with one 2243 01:57:31,440 --> 01:57:33,560 of my own 2244 01:57:33,560 --> 01:57:40,790 um 2245 01:57:40,800 --> 01:57:44,040 oh um Mr Woodburn will be here at the 2246 01:57:44,040 --> 01:57:47,440 end of um end of the presentation um I I 2247 01:57:47,440 --> 01:57:49,079 would hope that we' get all the 2248 01:57:49,079 --> 01:57:50,320 questions concerning what he's talked 2249 01:57:50,320 --> 01:57:54,320 about here today done um but I suppose 2250 01:57:54,320 --> 01:57:57,440 it is it is open so yes he will he will 2251 01:57:57,440 --> 01:58:02,149 be back for um further 2252 01:58:02,159 --> 01:58:04,199 questions you're gonna you're going to 2253 01:58:04,199 --> 01:58:06,239 be cross-examining Mr Woodburn at the 2254 01:58:06,239 --> 01:58:07,560 start of the next meeting that's what 2255 01:58:07,560 --> 01:58:10,880 you're saying okay uh yes that will be 2256 01:58:10,880 --> 01:58:15,199 fine okay fair enough um my my question 2257 01:58:15,199 --> 01:58:20,239 is um when you submit a site plan 2258 01:58:20,239 --> 01:58:23,119 how many are typically submitted at 2259 01:58:23,119 --> 01:58:25,760 once what do you mean like the number of 2260 01:58:25,760 --> 01:58:28,320 like yeah right you have you submit one 2261 01:58:28,320 --> 01:58:31,400 at a time or do you submit 10 in a 2262 01:58:31,400 --> 01:58:33,960 bucket and slide them all it it depends 2263 01:58:33,960 --> 01:58:35,719 um I mean I have a town housee 2264 01:58:35,719 --> 01:58:38,599 subdivision that I just submitted 50 2265 01:58:38,599 --> 01:58:41,079 today um now they're single family you 2266 01:58:41,079 --> 01:58:43,880 know single Town units I mean they're 2267 01:58:43,880 --> 01:58:44,679 all 2268 01:58:44,679 --> 01:58:48,320 different um 2269 01:58:48,320 --> 01:58:51,360 so I mean in this you ask me for this 2270 01:58:51,360 --> 01:58:54,159 case or in general in general yeah your 2271 01:58:54,159 --> 01:58:57,920 yeah I've done both and does many does 2272 01:58:57,920 --> 01:59:00,199 the cat one 2273 01:59:00,199 --> 01:59:02,920 classification make a difference in your 2274 01:59:02,920 --> 01:59:07,079 experience like when people submit 50 2275 01:59:07,079 --> 01:59:10,360 applications at once would they be as 2276 01:59:10,360 --> 01:59:12,360 large as a cat one set like just give me 2277 01:59:12,360 --> 01:59:13,840 the sense from your profal experience 2278 01:59:13,840 --> 01:59:16,239 like category one's unique to CH b b so 2279 01:59:16,239 --> 01:59:18,880 it's a little different and it it rides 2280 01:59:18,880 --> 01:59:21,280 because critical area added to it so 2281 01:59:21,280 --> 01:59:24,480 there's you know that complexity to it 2282 01:59:24,480 --> 01:59:26,079 [Music] 2283 01:59:26,079 --> 01:59:29,440 um you know it depends I mean I I do 2284 01:59:29,440 --> 01:59:32,280 projects where there's a hundred sheets 2285 01:59:32,280 --> 01:59:36,159 for one project so you got have to look 2286 01:59:36,159 --> 01:59:38,960 at a 100 Sheets if if if you had five 2287 01:59:38,960 --> 01:59:40,840 projects and it's 10 sheets right you 2288 01:59:40,840 --> 01:59:43,599 get it's hard to it's hard to wait out 2289 01:59:43,599 --> 01:59:46,480 the way you're asking the question 2290 01:59:46,480 --> 01:59:48,239 um but 2291 01:59:48,239 --> 01:59:52,360 certainly one's less than five 2292 01:59:52,360 --> 01:59:57,239 right thank you yeah um in that case um 2293 01:59:57,239 --> 02:00:00,920 we are planning to resume this hearing 2294 02:00:00,920 --> 02:00:04,599 on February 8th may24 at 7 2295 02:00:04,599 --> 02:00:08,840 pm everybody's awareness um and at this 2296 02:00:08,840 --> 02:00:10,520 time I will entertain a motion to 2297 02:00:10,520 --> 02:00:12,719 adjourn the meeting until February 8th 2298 02:00:12,719 --> 02:00:16,840 at 7 pm move to Jour second I will 2299 02:00:16,840 --> 02:00:20,360 second that favor 2300 02:00:20,360 --> 02:00:29,510 all we are adjourned thank you 2301 02:00:29,520 --> 02:00:32,520 everybody