1
00:00:07,248 --> 00:00:10,747
And just to go with Miriam's point about King Street

2
00:00:10,768 --> 00:00:15,694
is the only nice entrance left in Cobrack. Really main

3
00:00:15,715 --> 00:00:19,454
interest. Like do we, all this development, and I don't

4
00:00:19,454 --> 00:00:22,254
think it can just take it in context with this

5
00:00:22,355 --> 00:00:26,734
one development that meets traffic studies. You have four or

6
00:00:26,774 --> 00:00:31,136
five new developments all along. Which are going to impact

7
00:00:32,837 --> 00:00:37,780
substantially. More together than separately. And that's going to cause

8
00:00:37,961 --> 00:00:43,604
pressures on the congestion. And I noted today, I was

9
00:00:43,644 --> 00:00:46,724
looking at the entrances and exodus to all of the

10
00:00:46,745 --> 00:00:50,244
developments and proposed developments. And they all only had one

11
00:00:50,265 --> 00:00:57,674
or two. Access points onto King Street. And they're all

12
00:00:57,714 --> 00:01:03,001
little fivetoms. Or communities in themselves. There's no connection to

13
00:01:03,102 --> 00:01:06,921
them. So the little choice how people want to move

14
00:01:06,942 --> 00:01:09,041
through their developments. And they're all going to end up

15
00:01:09,902 --> 00:01:15,970
at these maybe seven and one on Brook Crowd. Entrances

16
00:01:16,231 --> 00:01:23,404
and exodus. And that's going to cause immense. Congestion, I

17
00:01:23,404 --> 00:01:25,844
think, especially at different times of the day. And it's

18
00:01:25,844 --> 00:01:29,844
this pressure the town to widen the King Street to

19
00:01:29,884 --> 00:01:32,324
four lanes. Do we want again to end up as

20
00:01:32,425 --> 00:01:38,724
a King Street East as Williams Street or Elgin Street?

21
00:01:38,724 --> 00:01:44,804
I think not. I never heard any justification for the

22
00:01:44,804 --> 00:01:48,644
additional five stories on what I thought was one apartment,

23
00:01:48,644 --> 00:01:53,764
but it looks like it's a very high concentrated, large

24
00:01:54,105 --> 00:02:00,046
one building apartment. So I am the ACO disagree with

25
00:02:00,307 --> 00:02:06,446
the zoning height. And again, historically these dents has always

26
00:02:06,446 --> 00:02:11,975
been a residential low rise. Community starting from Darth Street

27
00:02:12,076 --> 00:02:16,247
in the forties and fifties. Down to fits you shores.

28
00:02:16,247 --> 00:02:19,527
All one story, one and a half stories, two -

29
00:02:19,527 --> 00:02:23,579
story construction. There's never been anything higher than I can

30
00:02:23,619 --> 00:02:26,779
think of in that area. So it's not that this

31
00:02:26,779 --> 00:02:34,459
is a undivined, defined zone. It has its own character.

32
00:02:34,459 --> 00:02:37,499
And as I say, it's, and Miriam said, or constantly

33
00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:42,919
Mutan said, the only beautiful entrance left in Coburg. And

34
00:02:42,919 --> 00:02:46,139
that should be, and, you know, when I think of

35
00:02:46,160 --> 00:02:49,019
coming over Kingston Road Bridge, you're going to see those

36
00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:52,679
towers. You can put townhouses in front of them. But

37
00:02:52,880 --> 00:02:56,219
coming east or west, you will see those towers jump

38
00:02:56,320 --> 00:03:00,811
out at you. And we have no problem with senior

39
00:03:00,811 --> 00:03:06,411
apartments and long care. That's great. But, uh, the density

40
00:03:06,592 --> 00:03:08,491
is so much. And the building that I saw today

41
00:03:09,392 --> 00:03:12,331
is so massive, it makes me think of 202 Street.

42
00:03:13,499 --> 00:03:15,718
And is that the kind of, and does that set

43
00:03:15,758 --> 00:03:20,821
a precedent for further development along King Street. Or further

44
00:03:22,042 --> 00:03:26,661
into whatever boundaries. So this is President setting as well

45
00:03:26,661 --> 00:03:33,941
as to me, way over the density that we want

46
00:03:34,122 --> 00:03:38,261
in this area. And I grew up in that area

47
00:03:38,522 --> 00:03:43,291
and I remember it well. And, you know, we have

48
00:03:43,291 --> 00:03:47,812
a school almost across from all these developments. What's the

49
00:03:47,812 --> 00:03:55,457
ramifications of that? And, uh, let me see. So again,

50
00:03:56,838 --> 00:03:59,777
in connection with all of these, they're going to be

51
00:03:59,958 --> 00:04:06,497
pressures on taxes on roads, traffic, congestion, managing all of

52
00:04:06,497 --> 00:04:12,212
this. You know, and again, commercial area. East End needs

53
00:04:12,252 --> 00:04:21,284
commercial. Buildings or commercial businesses. But again, it should be

54
00:04:21,545 --> 00:04:25,477
planned out in the long term. We don't want to

55
00:04:25,477 --> 00:04:31,477
end up with strip malls and teeny little, again, strip

56
00:04:31,517 --> 00:04:35,424
malls. All along King Street, the way you have Long

57
00:04:35,424 --> 00:04:38,944
Williams Street and Division Street. And Elgin Street. You want

58
00:04:38,944 --> 00:04:43,564
to ensure that that is all maintained in a way

59
00:04:44,405 --> 00:04:49,344
that conforms and enhances King Street East rather than fights

60
00:04:49,445 --> 00:04:54,110
it. And I think it's unfortunate, and this is probably

61
00:04:54,291 --> 00:05:00,115
years ago that a service road wasn't. Made parallel to

62
00:05:00,115 --> 00:05:06,023
the tracks. Because that way you would have another avenue

63
00:05:06,444 --> 00:05:13,703
of motor cars to access the property. I saw studying

64
00:05:14,204 --> 00:05:19,143
a lecture on the mobility of cars within their own

65
00:05:19,164 --> 00:05:22,263
neighbourhoods. And they have very little choice in how they

66
00:05:22,284 --> 00:05:25,383
can get in and out of that. And again, as

67
00:05:25,484 --> 00:05:30,049
I say repeat. You know, it just repeats the congestion.

68
00:05:31,051 --> 00:05:34,390
And, you know, how many more traffic lights will we

69
00:05:34,390 --> 00:05:41,079
need. I mean, there's just so many problems, not with

70
00:05:41,180 --> 00:05:43,559
this, not just with this one, which I think is

71
00:05:43,599 --> 00:05:46,999
way too high. Or we as the ACO think is

72
00:05:47,020 --> 00:05:50,599
too high. But all the pressures that will result from

73
00:05:50,780 --> 00:05:55,239
this and all the other King Street Developments, they're following

74
00:05:55,340 --> 00:05:59,100
in line within the next few years. And, uh, it's

75
00:05:59,140 --> 00:06:02,875
just going to be a mess, I think. And, uh,

76
00:06:03,476 --> 00:06:10,699
so we are asking that the. Council, either.

77
00:06:14,068 --> 00:06:18,127
A vote against or disprove of this plan as it

78
00:06:18,127 --> 00:06:26,624
stated, or that. Suspends the project until the town has

79
00:06:26,664 --> 00:06:33,104
done the density and height studies that they said they

80
00:06:33,144 --> 00:06:38,444
would do in the last August 16th meeting. And, uh.

81
00:06:39,870 --> 00:06:44,169
I think, again, as Councillor Mutan said, this is a

82
00:06:44,169 --> 00:06:48,626
very important strip of King Street. And again, it's been

83
00:06:48,647 --> 00:06:52,226
said before we are at a very crucial time in

84
00:06:52,247 --> 00:06:57,586
Coburg where height restrictions are not, don't seem to be

85
00:06:58,407 --> 00:07:02,786
commander in the discussions of these buildings. So again, I

86
00:07:02,826 --> 00:07:08,466
just would like either it turned down or deferred till

87
00:07:08,506 --> 00:07:14,239
the studies on height and density occur. Thank you, Mr.

88
00:07:14,239 --> 00:07:18,099
Michael. Appreciate your comments. Any questions for Mr. Michael at

89
00:07:18,139 --> 00:07:22,573
this time. Seeing none, uh, Mr. Merrill passed chair back

90
00:07:22,573 --> 00:07:25,165
to you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much

91
00:07:25,266 --> 00:07:29,432
for your presentation. Mr. Michael. We got another submission. Mr.

92
00:07:29,432 --> 00:07:31,852
Peter McLaughlin. Would you like to come up and present.

93
00:08:09,914 --> 00:08:14,292
Your worship, Madam Deputy Mayor Councillors and staff. My name

94
00:08:14,332 --> 00:08:18,416
is Peter McLaughlin and I reside in East Coburg. Thank

95
00:08:18,416 --> 00:08:20,976
you for the opportunity to speak to Council today. Regarding

96
00:08:21,016 --> 00:08:24,576
the completed application for amendments to the official plan and

97
00:08:24,616 --> 00:08:28,416
zoning by law for property located at 535 and 536

98
00:08:28,757 --> 00:08:33,944
John Kiefer Mahoney Court Courberg, Ontario. The subject property located

99
00:08:34,045 --> 00:08:36,744
in East Village face five was part of the lands

100
00:08:36,744 --> 00:08:40,534
that were subject to a draft plan of subdivision. Official

101
00:08:40,635 --> 00:08:43,894
plan amendment and Zoning bylaw amendments that were approved in

102
00:08:43,894 --> 00:08:49,508
the summer of 2019. That development proposal, that plan of

103
00:08:49,548 --> 00:08:54,628
subdivision comprised 334 dwellings, of which 102 were proposed to

104
00:08:54,628 --> 00:08:57,748
be high density in the form of two, I presume

105
00:08:58,489 --> 00:09:02,340
51 unit department buildings. And the amendments allowed the apartment

106
00:09:02,521 --> 00:09:06,188
buildings to be five stories each. The plan also provided

107
00:09:06,849 --> 00:09:12,719
for four 10 Plex units. Including, sorry, 410 flex units

108
00:09:12,820 --> 00:09:15,639
on block 60, which is the block immediately north of

109
00:09:15,639 --> 00:09:18,029
where the apartment buildings were going to be built. Which

110
00:09:18,050 --> 00:09:21,535
would be 40 units in total. The 10 flex units

111
00:09:21,575 --> 00:09:26,447
were not planned to exceed three stories. Block 61, where

112
00:09:26,447 --> 00:09:30,527
the two currently under construction apartment buildings are situated. Represents

113
00:09:31,108 --> 00:09:34,687
approximately 12 percent of the total landmass of East Village

114
00:09:34,868 --> 00:09:39,641
phase five development. And Block 60 represents approximately 19 percent.

115
00:09:40,046 --> 00:09:44,665
Of the development Sland Mass. It's 12 percent of the

116
00:09:44,705 --> 00:09:49,945
total landmass on which accommodations are built. In block 60

117
00:09:49,966 --> 00:09:59,320
represents a prophecy on which residential units are located. The

118
00:09:59,501 --> 00:10:03,480
apartment buildings in Block 61 being 102 units in total

119
00:10:03,741 --> 00:10:06,760
represented approximately 31 percent of the total units for the

120
00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:11,320
development. And block 60 with 40 units represented approximately 12

121
00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:16,946
percent of the total units. That was then. What have

122
00:10:16,946 --> 00:10:21,393
we now? The current application proposed the addition of 345

123
00:10:21,414 --> 00:10:26,814
units. 241 retirement home units and 104 seniors departments. To

124
00:10:26,835 --> 00:10:29,294
be built north of the two apartment buildings on block

125
00:10:29,395 --> 00:10:33,245
60 frontending King Street. One can't separate the two blocks

126
00:10:33,285 --> 00:10:37,405
as the applicant has said under this application because part

127
00:10:37,445 --> 00:10:41,547
of the current application requires building on block 61. In

128
00:10:41,547 --> 00:10:43,387
addition to block 60. And the reason for that is

129
00:10:43,408 --> 00:10:48,907
they changed the orientation of the two apartment buildings which

130
00:10:49,648 --> 00:10:53,867
originally going to be spaced well apart on block 60

131
00:10:53,888 --> 00:10:56,667
and have parking in between. And they rotated it so

132
00:10:56,707 --> 00:10:58,987
that everything fronts along King Street and you get this

133
00:10:59,027 --> 00:11:06,021
nice mass of buildings on King Street. Anyway, um, the

134
00:11:06,122 --> 00:11:08,261
total number of units in the two blocks then is

135
00:11:08,301 --> 00:11:13,228
now 447 units. Which is approximately 70 percent of the

136
00:11:13,409 --> 00:11:18,649
total number of units in the phase five development. Located

137
00:11:19,070 --> 00:11:22,569
on just 21 percent of the total landmass of housing

138
00:11:22,590 --> 00:11:27,580
units in that development. This is intensification. It's most extreme.

139
00:11:29,310 --> 00:11:32,649
In 2019, Virginia and I were concerned about the proposed

140
00:11:32,750 --> 00:11:37,025
intensification in the draft plan of subdivision. Among other things,

141
00:11:37,025 --> 00:11:39,745
we were concerned about water flows from the subject property.

142
00:11:39,745 --> 00:11:42,305
And the Introduction of high density in this, the most

143
00:11:42,326 --> 00:11:46,038
easterly part of the town of Coburg. This current application

144
00:11:46,139 --> 00:11:51,054
only makes the issues worse. We've heard that the stormwater

145
00:11:51,094 --> 00:11:53,694
management is not a problem, but I have to tell

146
00:11:53,694 --> 00:11:57,134
you, um, there's going to be even less land available

147
00:11:57,155 --> 00:12:01,134
to absorb precipitation. More runoff will flow into the stormwater

148
00:12:01,174 --> 00:12:06,510
management pond. And I'm going to be really surprised to

149
00:12:06,550 --> 00:12:08,430
see that it's going to be the alleged feature of

150
00:12:08,771 --> 00:12:12,430
phase five of the phase five development that it's supposed

151
00:12:12,430 --> 00:12:16,320
to be. But from the intensification perspective, I looked back

152
00:12:16,360 --> 00:12:20,320
to submissions we raised in 2019. We started our remarks

153
00:12:20,421 --> 00:12:22,800
with a reminder made to the then council the decisions

154
00:12:22,840 --> 00:12:26,080
made by Council have a significant and long - term

155
00:12:26,080 --> 00:12:29,840
impact on the ascetics, livability and sustainability of the town.

156
00:12:30,688 --> 00:12:33,387
We had in mind such things as the attractiveness and

157
00:12:33,568 --> 00:12:37,307
appropriateness of the build form, the viability of businesses, including

158
00:12:37,328 --> 00:12:40,347
those in the town centre. The ability of residents to

159
00:12:40,387 --> 00:12:43,787
walk are bicycle to shop, dine, or access services that

160
00:12:43,827 --> 00:12:47,364
they might require. The efficient use of Public Infrastructure, such

161
00:12:47,465 --> 00:12:51,684
as water, sewers, parks, libraries, activities of Victoria Hall, Public

162
00:12:51,724 --> 00:12:56,964
Transportation and other amenities, such as a proposed senior's fitness

163
00:12:57,004 --> 00:13:00,991
centre. Don't know where that is, actually. We referenced the

164
00:13:00,991 --> 00:13:04,851
towns then priority revitalizing the downtown. And we looked at

165
00:13:04,872 --> 00:13:09,300
the 2019 plan of subdivision in that context. The issue

166
00:13:09,340 --> 00:13:12,740
is negatively affected in their proposal then are still the

167
00:13:12,740 --> 00:13:19,060
same as this current application, namely the proposed location is

168
00:13:19,100 --> 00:13:22,596
that the eastern entrance into the town of Coburg. The

169
00:13:22,636 --> 00:13:26,130
lands to the east, are rural in nature. Arriving from

170
00:13:26,170 --> 00:13:29,490
the east, the first impression of Coburg for residents and

171
00:13:29,991 --> 00:13:33,727
visitors as alike. Would be a land use that is

172
00:13:33,767 --> 00:13:37,487
neither sympathetic to nor compatible with the current land use

173
00:13:37,508 --> 00:13:41,967
and housing mix. Now, I say that from the 2019

174
00:13:42,068 --> 00:13:45,727
period, um, the argument is going to be that we

175
00:13:45,748 --> 00:13:50,607
now have a two apartment building complex, fronting King Street.

176
00:13:50,607 --> 00:13:52,167
And so whatever we build behind it is going to

177
00:13:52,167 --> 00:13:55,247
be compatible. Well, I invite you to see for yourselves

178
00:13:55,428 --> 00:13:58,127
how out of place these two apartments buildings are and

179
00:13:58,127 --> 00:14:01,407
imagine what an additional two or three times build mass

180
00:14:01,447 --> 00:14:04,367
might look like, especially, and I thought it was only

181
00:14:04,388 --> 00:14:07,087
one, but apparently there are three nine - story towers.

182
00:14:09,147 --> 00:14:12,966
The possibility of the apartment buildings of 102 units being

183
00:14:13,067 --> 00:14:16,689
converted to a senior's assisted living rental space. Was crazy

184
00:14:17,030 --> 00:14:24,967
then. I think it's crazy now. The location then was

185
00:14:25,007 --> 00:14:28,007
then and still is now an expensive taxi ride to

186
00:14:28,028 --> 00:14:30,807
purchase groceries, to go to the doctor's office or to

187
00:14:30,807 --> 00:14:33,447
the hospital or to a senior centre or do any

188
00:14:33,447 --> 00:14:38,223
other off - site social activities. And I'm sorry. Seniors

189
00:14:38,263 --> 00:14:39,983
don't drive as much as they used to. I know

190
00:14:39,983 --> 00:14:45,129
that. I had parents. If your mobility is challenged or

191
00:14:45,169 --> 00:14:47,209
you don't have a car, you can't balance on your

192
00:14:47,249 --> 00:14:52,773
bicycle. You run the risk of isolation. Adding 345 new

193
00:14:52,773 --> 00:14:57,573
units will have additionally 345 seniors at least. The issues

194
00:14:57,674 --> 00:15:02,462
become greater in magnitude. As mentioned earlier, the easterly part

195
00:15:02,462 --> 00:15:04,942
of Cogberg, including the build - out phases of East

196
00:15:04,982 --> 00:15:07,002
Village and the subdivisions to the south side of the

197
00:15:07,002 --> 00:15:10,862
King Street, comprised predominantly single family dwellings as well as

198
00:15:10,883 --> 00:15:16,738
a few multiplexes in some townhouses. As I said before,

199
00:15:16,738 --> 00:15:18,578
or sorry, the only structure in the Easterly part of

200
00:15:18,618 --> 00:15:21,138
Coburg that is more than three stories are the new

201
00:15:21,178 --> 00:15:24,658
apartment buildings being built on block 60. There were the

202
00:15:24,658 --> 00:15:28,898
subject of the 2019 Plan of Subdivision. These two apartment

203
00:15:28,898 --> 00:15:32,424
buildings. Which are not close to being complete. Are being

204
00:15:32,525 --> 00:15:35,064
touted in this current application as the reason that this

205
00:15:35,085 --> 00:15:39,864
new intensification is appropriate, both in terms of build form

206
00:15:39,965 --> 00:15:43,442
and massing and all that other stuff. These department buildings

207
00:15:43,463 --> 00:15:46,802
are not yet finished. They're not yet occupied. And aside

208
00:15:46,802 --> 00:15:49,602
from the hulking frontage on King Street, we have no

209
00:15:49,642 --> 00:15:54,726
idea of the eventual streetscape. But the current application uses

210
00:15:54,827 --> 00:15:59,286
this 2019 OP and Zoning Amendments effectively has justification for

211
00:15:59,387 --> 00:16:03,046
an application that requires even further zoning an official plan

212
00:16:03,086 --> 00:16:06,486
amendments for height, masking and density in order to proceed.

213
00:16:07,072 --> 00:16:12,792
This is a slippery slope. The 334 dwelling units from

214
00:16:12,813 --> 00:16:17,032
the original 2019 Plan of Subdivision have already put pressure

215
00:16:17,053 --> 00:16:21,192
on existing road infrastructure. Even those units are not yet

216
00:16:21,453 --> 00:16:26,110
fully built out. Traffic has definitely increased on King Street

217
00:16:26,150 --> 00:16:30,203
East. I can tell that because I drive it. One

218
00:16:30,384 --> 00:16:32,683
can see this particularly at times when people are going

219
00:16:33,264 --> 00:16:36,043
to or returning from work. Or if there's a shift

220
00:16:36,144 --> 00:16:38,363
change at one of the businesses in the industrial area

221
00:16:38,384 --> 00:16:42,951
of South of King. When the shift changes coming out

222
00:16:42,951 --> 00:16:47,271
of Wilmont Street, there is a constant line of traffic

223
00:16:47,452 --> 00:16:50,151
trying to get out turning left. And when the shift

224
00:16:50,191 --> 00:16:54,391
is going in, there are constantly guys flying down King

225
00:16:54,492 --> 00:16:56,871
Street going east, trying to make it in time to

226
00:16:56,871 --> 00:17:01,239
hit the shift. Adding an additional 345 units will only

227
00:17:01,279 --> 00:17:03,840
add to the burden. Not only from residents living in

228
00:17:03,840 --> 00:17:07,520
the units, but by all the support, maintenance and healthcare

229
00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:09,360
workers who will be travelling to and from the site

230
00:17:09,400 --> 00:17:12,880
to care for and support those residents. And I haven't

231
00:17:12,901 --> 00:17:15,520
mentioned anything about the commercial activities because I have an

232
00:17:15,560 --> 00:17:18,160
ended chance to look at that. I saw no mention

233
00:17:18,181 --> 00:17:21,489
of these additional vehicles in the traffic study. Is this

234
00:17:21,529 --> 00:17:24,289
a case of the proposed development leading to a King

235
00:17:24,329 --> 00:17:30,875
Street becoming four lane thoroughfare. Probably at Coburg's expense. The

236
00:17:31,056 --> 00:17:34,155
OPA in 2019 was at best premature and should have

237
00:17:34,155 --> 00:17:37,355
waited for a comprehensive review of the official plan. When

238
00:17:37,355 --> 00:17:39,755
the amount mixed in location of high density can be

239
00:17:39,795 --> 00:17:42,475
considered within the context, the overall plan for the town

240
00:17:42,475 --> 00:17:46,109
of Coburg. Now that we have two apartment buildings well

241
00:17:46,109 --> 00:17:49,864
under construction. It's too late to undo that decision. The

242
00:17:50,045 --> 00:17:54,184
addition to 345 additional seniors retirement and assisted living units

243
00:17:54,224 --> 00:17:59,355
in this space is completely inappropriate for this development. Now

244
00:17:59,395 --> 00:18:03,143
we are fortunate. We are fortunate that council is preparing

245
00:18:03,183 --> 00:18:06,743
to go ahead with an interim control bylaw. And by

246
00:18:06,783 --> 00:18:09,943
goodness, I certainly hope you do. It is essential that

247
00:18:09,964 --> 00:18:12,823
we allow sufficient time to have a new comprehensive official

248
00:18:12,924 --> 00:18:17,523
plan developed and approved. I don't mean to interrupt, but

249
00:18:17,523 --> 00:18:20,983
we're well past time. So if we could please. Again,

250
00:18:21,004 --> 00:18:22,583
we're past time. So if we can conclude it with

251
00:18:22,604 --> 00:18:27,747
the last sentence, it would be really appreciated, sir. This

252
00:18:27,787 --> 00:18:30,627
is a chance to have Coburg do a development to

253
00:18:30,627 --> 00:18:33,107
do a planning, to do an exercise, to make us

254
00:18:34,328 --> 00:18:38,964
all agree. That what we want for our town is

255
00:18:38,964 --> 00:18:43,109
appropriate. And not have a developer come along and there

256
00:18:43,109 --> 00:18:45,189
are lots of them coming who say, oh, we're going

257
00:18:45,189 --> 00:18:46,469
to do this. We're going to do that. We're going

258
00:18:46,469 --> 00:18:48,389
to do the other thing. And we don't have a

259
00:18:48,389 --> 00:18:51,666
chance to plan and tell them what we want. We

260
00:18:51,687 --> 00:18:54,969
need to tell them what we want. And that's my

261
00:18:54,969 --> 00:18:59,797
submission. I'll send you the full remarks. Greatly appreciate it

262
00:19:00,218 --> 00:19:03,812
at this time. Are there any questions. See none. Thank

263
00:19:03,812 --> 00:19:08,509
you so much, sir, for your prelegation. Presentation. Um, I

264
00:19:08,549 --> 00:19:10,349
just want to confirm, has someone already read out all

265
00:19:10,389 --> 00:19:12,589
the lames that have gone? Okay, gotcha. So we are

266
00:19:12,589 --> 00:19:18,429
now down to Council Submissions. Any questions or any questions

267
00:19:18,450 --> 00:19:22,414
or comments from members of Council at this time. Council

268
00:19:22,454 --> 00:19:31,901
Mutant. Just a question. Um. I read news reports

269
00:19:33,042 --> 00:19:39,512
that, um, sort of, uh. High rise living. Is not

270
00:19:39,533 --> 00:19:43,778
for everybody. And my question, I don't know whether it

271
00:19:43,778 --> 00:19:49,533
would be to staff or the applicant. What comparables. In,

272
00:19:49,533 --> 00:19:53,613
let's say, Southern Ontario for high rise buildings with seniors

273
00:19:53,634 --> 00:19:58,875
in them. Uh, do they feel our working well? Because

274
00:19:58,896 --> 00:20:05,275
in my research, high rise buildings, um, I mean, this

275
00:20:05,275 --> 00:20:08,795
is documented. Uh, they turn in to ghettos. If people,

276
00:20:08,795 --> 00:20:12,795
they don't want to go out, uh, definitely high rise.

277
00:20:12,835 --> 00:20:15,195
This is not the case here with regards to having

278
00:20:15,536 --> 00:20:19,515
families there. But, uh, it high rise living is not

279
00:20:19,515 --> 00:20:22,555
for everybody. I am concerned when you have age in

280
00:20:22,555 --> 00:20:26,321
place. You could very well have someone who doesn't leave

281
00:20:26,902 --> 00:20:30,881
their apartment or their unit. So the main question is,

282
00:20:30,881 --> 00:20:34,641
are there comparable examples that are functioning very well that

283
00:20:34,641 --> 00:20:40,386
we should know about. I don't know what staff would

284
00:20:40,426 --> 00:20:42,306
ever have the expertise to answer that question. But if

285
00:20:42,346 --> 00:20:48,428
one would like to try, by all means. Through the

286
00:20:48,468 --> 00:20:50,428
charity Council Mental, I'm not sure staff that we can

287
00:20:50,428 --> 00:20:53,308
answer that question today. Um, so the focus of today's

288
00:20:53,308 --> 00:20:55,468
meeting, it's, it's a public planning meeting. So we're here

289
00:20:55,468 --> 00:20:57,948
to listen to submissions from members of the public in

290
00:20:57,948 --> 00:21:01,388
support of or an opposition to the application that's before

291
00:21:01,889 --> 00:21:04,588
counsel today. There will be a fullsome staff report that

292
00:21:04,609 --> 00:21:08,908
comes to standing committee meeting where staff respond and provide

293
00:21:08,929 --> 00:21:12,808
comment on all of the technical studies and submissions. Um,

294
00:21:13,089 --> 00:21:15,308
that the applicant has made. Staff will provide a professional

295
00:21:15,409 --> 00:21:19,788
recommendation at that time. Um, but questions that deal outside

296
00:21:19,809 --> 00:21:22,748
of the OPA and ZBA application that we're here today.

297
00:21:22,748 --> 00:21:28,775
We're not prepared to answer. Madon. So with regards to

298
00:21:29,436 --> 00:21:34,295
context for our official plan, uh, zoning by law, that

299
00:21:35,436 --> 00:21:41,335
I think Colberg has expressed sort of more recent concerns

300
00:21:41,516 --> 00:21:47,375
that we need balanced neighbourhoods we need healthy neighbourhoods. We

301
00:21:47,375 --> 00:21:51,095
need sustainable and safe neighbourhoods. So I would say that

302
00:21:51,596 --> 00:21:56,295
possibly in conversation and discussion, uh, it is very pertinent.

303
00:21:59,077 --> 00:22:01,296
Thank you for that comment. I would say the thousands

304
00:22:01,336 --> 00:22:03,696
of seniors waiting for long - term care bets is

305
00:22:03,736 --> 00:22:06,592
also a consideration we need to take into consideration. And

306
00:22:06,693 --> 00:22:12,587
we'll move forward. So, uh, with no other Council comments

307
00:22:12,627 --> 00:22:15,467
or submissions, we're going to move on to 6. 2.

308
00:22:16,750 --> 00:22:20,489
Zoning bylaw amendment at 540 King Street East. The deputy

309
00:22:20,510 --> 00:22:22,969
cleric will now advise that the procedure and dates by

310
00:22:23,009 --> 00:22:28,518
which this notice was provided. Thank you through you mayor.

311
00:22:28,518 --> 00:22:30,518
Notice of this Public Meeting was mailed to properties within

312
00:22:30,779 --> 00:22:34,358
120 metres on August 5th, 2026. Assignments posted on the

313
00:22:34,459 --> 00:22:37,718
property on August 6th, 2026. And notice was posted on

314
00:22:37,758 --> 00:22:47,028
the Towns website on August 5th, 2026. At this time,

315
00:22:47,028 --> 00:22:53,692
I'd like to invite, I believe. Yep. Yuki Naganuma. My

316
00:22:53,692 --> 00:22:56,372
apologies UK. I didn't get the last name. And Mike

317
00:22:56,393 --> 00:22:59,492
Keen from Foughton Planning and design them. Not sure if

318
00:22:59,492 --> 00:23:02,612
I'm even saying that. Foten. I now provide no review.

319
00:23:02,612 --> 00:23:05,652
The proposed Zoning bylaw amendment at 540 King Street East.

320
00:23:06,665 --> 00:23:11,327
Welcome. Now your first time. You've got the clicker in

321
00:23:11,327 --> 00:23:13,327
front of you there and the microphone's yours. We look

322
00:23:13,327 --> 00:23:21,937
forward to your presentation. Good evening. We would like to

323
00:23:21,977 --> 00:23:25,137
begin our presentation with a few words from the owner,

324
00:23:25,137 --> 00:23:29,736
Ruth Kane, who should be logging in virtually. Hi, can

325
00:23:29,776 --> 00:23:34,008
everyone hear me okay? Yes, we can hear you. And

326
00:23:34,008 --> 00:23:37,468
thank you for joining us. Good evening, Mayor Cleaveman Council

327
00:23:37,468 --> 00:23:41,370
members. Town staff and members of the Court community. My

328
00:23:41,370 --> 00:23:43,650
name is Ruth Kane. I am the owner and developer

329
00:23:43,671 --> 00:23:47,330
of Sunnyside Village, a small subdivision on King Street East

330
00:23:47,431 --> 00:23:50,210
that will soon be home to 87 families, including my

331
00:23:50,210 --> 00:23:52,996
own. I just wanted to first say that it is

332
00:23:53,036 --> 00:23:55,716
a pleasure to work with the town staff. I especially

333
00:23:55,817 --> 00:24:00,756
thank our planning director, Chris, along with Victoria Emma Nate.

334
00:24:00,756 --> 00:24:03,796
Pauline Natalie Eddie Terry and so many others who have

335
00:24:03,836 --> 00:24:07,956
helped diligently move this project forward. We really appreciate you

336
00:24:08,137 --> 00:24:12,276
joining me on Zoom is Spencer Putnam, our legal counsel.

337
00:24:13,445 --> 00:24:16,601
And present with you today. Neil Pope, our primary project

338
00:24:16,862 --> 00:24:21,801
manager and builder, Andy Smith, our architect who designed this

339
00:24:22,302 --> 00:24:26,441
beautiful community and the spirit of the historic farmhouse, Mike

340
00:24:26,441 --> 00:24:29,001
Keen and Yukina Ganumi, who will give the presentation today

341
00:24:29,102 --> 00:24:33,321
our planners from Fojun. Since Council approved our draft plan

342
00:24:33,982 --> 00:24:36,921
two years ago, we have been working through the detailed

343
00:24:36,921 --> 00:24:40,761
design process. And in doing so, we identified a few

344
00:24:40,801 --> 00:24:45,181
zoning anomalies that are narrow in scope. And. We were

345
00:24:45,181 --> 00:24:49,083
asking Council to address them through this amendment. Our vision

346
00:24:49,123 --> 00:24:53,083
for Sunnyside has not changed. We remain committed to creating

347
00:24:53,104 --> 00:24:57,403
a beautiful Eastern gateway into Coburg. And we're grateful for

348
00:24:57,584 --> 00:25:00,523
your support. And with that, I'll turn the presentation over

349
00:25:00,704 --> 00:25:04,043
to our lead planner. You can NAGA Numa from Foton.

350
00:25:14,695 --> 00:25:16,754
Good evening. And thank you for inviting us into your

351
00:25:16,794 --> 00:25:20,114
Council Chambers today. My name is Yuki Naganuma and I'm

352
00:25:20,154 --> 00:25:23,206
a planner at Foten Planning and Design. I'm joined by

353
00:25:23,307 --> 00:25:26,646
my colleague, Mike Keen, Principal at Foten, and we represent

354
00:25:26,646 --> 00:25:29,766
the owners of Sonnyside Village Inc. We are here to

355
00:25:29,806 --> 00:25:32,486
speak to the Zoning bylaw Amendment application for the property

356
00:25:32,587 --> 00:25:39,167
municipally known as 540 King Street East. The sunny side

357
00:25:39,188 --> 00:25:43,167
village development is an existing subdivision for which Council previously

358
00:25:43,268 --> 00:25:46,872
approved a Zoning bylaw amendment in 2024. This site is

359
00:25:46,893 --> 00:25:49,992
located in East Coburg on the lands immediately east of

360
00:25:49,992 --> 00:25:54,312
the Wilmot Street Extension. As background, the ownership group has

361
00:25:54,413 --> 00:25:56,552
long been engaged with Cobra's staff on the Development of

362
00:25:56,573 --> 00:25:59,922
this community in East Coburg. Well before the Submission of

363
00:25:59,922 --> 00:26:03,362
the First Development Application, the ownership group has sought input

364
00:26:03,402 --> 00:26:06,242
from Planning Staff to ensure that the future sunnyside community

365
00:26:06,263 --> 00:26:10,027
would meet objectives of the town of Coburg. These discussions

366
00:26:10,208 --> 00:26:13,627
with staff go back to 2019, whereby the ownership group

367
00:26:13,667 --> 00:26:16,267
were encouraged to provide a compact community offering a diverse

368
00:26:16,368 --> 00:26:20,427
array of housing typologies. The first Zoning Amendment and subdivision

369
00:26:20,467 --> 00:26:24,027
applications were submitted in 2022 and received Council approval in

370
00:26:24,048 --> 00:26:29,387
2024. The Zoning Approval established site - specific zoning framework

371
00:26:29,648 --> 00:26:33,387
necessary to support the future residential community and approved a

372
00:26:33,387 --> 00:26:37,942
three block draft plan of subdivision. Since the 2024 approval,

373
00:26:37,942 --> 00:26:40,902
the project team has been working closely with municipal staff

374
00:26:41,083 --> 00:26:44,582
to progress the development further through three detailed design submissions.

375
00:26:44,582 --> 00:26:47,382
The clearing of conditions of the draft plan and supporting

376
00:26:47,422 --> 00:26:51,302
the designation of the built heritage structures. The Zoning Amendment

377
00:26:51,803 --> 00:26:54,502
being considered today does not change the overall development concept

378
00:26:54,542 --> 00:26:58,025
for the community. Rather, it seeks approval for what we

379
00:26:58,126 --> 00:27:01,865
categorize as technical and administrative issues as a development concept

380
00:27:02,126 --> 00:27:05,945
is further refined. Importantly, the sunny side village concept has

381
00:27:05,966 --> 00:27:12,059
remained consistent with the vision as originally approved. With respect

382
00:27:12,099 --> 00:27:15,499
to the existing regulatory framework, the subject site contains site

383
00:27:15,499 --> 00:27:18,299
- specific zones as approved in 2024 to facilitate the

384
00:27:18,400 --> 00:27:22,271
sunny side village community. The Zoan categories as applicable to

385
00:27:22,292 --> 00:27:25,071
the site are shown on this slide. These include the

386
00:27:25,172 --> 00:27:29,951
residential two and residential four exception zones. The Environmental Constraint

387
00:27:29,951 --> 00:27:36,403
Zone, Open Space Zones, and a Development Zone. As noted

388
00:27:36,403 --> 00:27:39,443
earlier, the vision, scale, and overall development concept approved by

389
00:27:39,624 --> 00:27:44,995
concept remains substantially unchanged. The refinements made since the 2024

390
00:27:45,016 --> 00:27:53,056
approval are relatively minor and largely technical in nature. The

391
00:27:53,056 --> 00:27:55,296
most notable change is a reduction in the total number

392
00:27:55,336 --> 00:27:59,776
of residential units from 102 down to 87 units. This

393
00:27:59,797 --> 00:28:02,656
comes as a result of modifying the rear townhouse blocks

394
00:28:02,696 --> 00:28:08,496
from Stock Townhouse stacked townhouse style to standard street townhouses.

395
00:28:08,496 --> 00:28:11,776
The annotations shown here points to where these changes were

396
00:28:11,816 --> 00:28:15,298
made on the plan. Additional minor changes to building footprints

397
00:28:15,399 --> 00:28:17,618
have also been made throughout the site to accommodate a

398
00:28:17,658 --> 00:28:23,545
refined subdivision plan. The following slides illustrate the sunny side

399
00:28:23,566 --> 00:28:26,897
vision. As shown the development concept presents a land use

400
00:28:26,937 --> 00:28:29,697
structure that provides a range of missing middle housing typologies

401
00:28:29,798 --> 00:28:33,857
ranging from detached semi - detached stacked and standard townhouse

402
00:28:33,897 --> 00:28:38,695
dwellings. The built form strategy prioritizes pedestrian comfort through street

403
00:28:38,695 --> 00:28:42,935
- oriented buildings, active frontages, and a cohesive streetscape. Building

404
00:28:42,956 --> 00:28:45,895
heights are modest generally between two to four stories, helping

405
00:28:45,935 --> 00:28:51,872
to reinforce the human skill character of the community. The

406
00:28:52,053 --> 00:28:55,312
proposal conserves the site's cultural heritage through the retention and

407
00:28:55,352 --> 00:28:58,992
future adaptive reuse of the existing farmhouse and barn, ensuring

408
00:28:58,992 --> 00:29:01,552
that these important landmarks remain focal points within the neighbourhood.

409
00:29:02,282 --> 00:29:04,981
Open spaces beside the hair to structures comprise of a

410
00:29:04,981 --> 00:29:07,701
central park and barn parquette will offer areas for recreation

411
00:29:07,802 --> 00:29:10,821
and gathering. These features are linked to the wider site

412
00:29:10,861 --> 00:29:14,581
through an interconnected and pedestrian - friendly street network that

413
00:29:14,621 --> 00:29:18,101
circulates throughout the site alongside the environmental protection area and

414
00:29:18,141 --> 00:29:24,253
connections to the King Street Corridor. Overall, the concept shown

415
00:29:24,253 --> 00:29:27,613
here maintains the same vision for complete walkable heritage sensitive

416
00:29:27,653 --> 00:29:30,493
community that contributes positively to the future growth of Coburg.

417
00:29:32,039 --> 00:29:35,458
We'd also like to mention that Public Commons received as

418
00:29:35,498 --> 00:29:37,938
part of the initial planning application were heard and incorporated

419
00:29:37,978 --> 00:29:40,418
into the design of the community. For instance, the integration

420
00:29:40,418 --> 00:29:45,768
of EV charging for residential and Public Parking spaces. In

421
00:29:45,808 --> 00:29:47,848
the following section, I'll speak to the purpose of the

422
00:29:47,848 --> 00:29:51,670
current zoning bylaw Amendment application. Approval is being sought for

423
00:29:51,670 --> 00:29:53,910
a series of exceptions to the existing site - specific

424
00:29:54,011 --> 00:29:57,631
R2 and R4 regulations that apply to the property. These

425
00:29:57,812 --> 00:30:00,591
exceptions are required to address several minor adjustments relating to

426
00:30:00,612 --> 00:30:04,591
setbacks, lot area, and building coverage. In addition, amendments are

427
00:30:04,631 --> 00:30:07,631
requested for certain lot - specific provisions, including maximum density

428
00:30:07,652 --> 00:30:12,206
and parking location. These amendments are administrative in nature and

429
00:30:12,227 --> 00:30:14,526
is not the result of additional density being introduced to

430
00:30:14,566 --> 00:30:17,954
the site. Given the number of required site - specific

431
00:30:17,994 --> 00:30:20,514
changes, a zoning amendment was determined to be the appropriate

432
00:30:20,554 --> 00:30:24,434
planning approval process in consultation with staff rather than pursuing

433
00:30:24,455 --> 00:30:30,911
multiple minor variances. For further context, this Zoning Amendment is

434
00:30:30,932 --> 00:30:33,871
necessitated by a redlining of the approved draft plan of

435
00:30:33,871 --> 00:30:37,164
subdivision, which is concurrently being submitted to the town. The

436
00:30:37,265 --> 00:30:41,965
purpose of the redlining. Of the draft plan is to

437
00:30:41,965 --> 00:30:44,525
help legally define the site into a finer - grained

438
00:30:44,525 --> 00:30:48,428
network of street's blocks and lots as originally envisioned. As

439
00:30:48,468 --> 00:30:50,508
shown on the left, the site is currently approved for

440
00:30:50,769 --> 00:30:52,668
a three - block plan, and the site is now

441
00:30:52,668 --> 00:30:54,828
moving towards a 32 block plan, as shown on the

442
00:30:54,828 --> 00:30:58,788
right. As a lot fabric has evolved, targeted design adjustments

443
00:30:59,289 --> 00:31:02,708
were made to the approved concept to maintain zoning compliance.

444
00:31:02,708 --> 00:31:05,508
However, some provisions could not be fully accommodated and will

445
00:31:05,548 --> 00:31:09,188
require site - specific zoning amendments. For instance, slight reductions

446
00:31:09,228 --> 00:31:11,828
to front and exterior side yard setbacks at the south

447
00:31:11,868 --> 00:31:15,268
and central blocks. Minimum lot area adjustments to the central

448
00:31:15,289 --> 00:31:19,828
blocks and reducing detached garage setbacks were applicable. These are

449
00:31:20,169 --> 00:31:22,068
minor in scale and the site will continue to maintain

450
00:31:22,489 --> 00:31:25,557
an appropriate balance between built form and open space. The

451
00:31:25,578 --> 00:31:28,197
amendments relating to density and parking location will be discussed

452
00:31:28,218 --> 00:31:35,199
further for clarity. With regards to density, Council approval is

453
00:31:35,239 --> 00:31:37,839
being sought to formally recognise a higher density calculation on

454
00:31:37,860 --> 00:31:41,449
certain individual blocks. To be clear, the density surplus is

455
00:31:41,449 --> 00:31:43,609
not the result of additional density being introduced to the

456
00:31:43,790 --> 00:31:46,409
site, but rather due to the technicality of new LOT

457
00:31:46,409 --> 00:31:49,449
fabric over the property. As shown on the left, the

458
00:31:49,550 --> 00:31:52,729
property has already been assessed and Council approved for an

459
00:31:52,729 --> 00:31:56,425
overall net density of 24 units per net hectar. As

460
00:31:56,425 --> 00:31:59,385
shown on the right, the refined 32 block plan now

461
00:31:59,406 --> 00:32:02,505
has an overall density of 22 units per net hectar.

462
00:32:03,721 --> 00:32:07,380
However, given the new LOT fabric introduced, density is required

463
00:32:07,380 --> 00:32:08,980
to be calculated on a block - by - block

464
00:32:08,980 --> 00:32:12,740
basis, therefore those blocks containing standard and stack townhouses are

465
00:32:12,761 --> 00:32:15,940
now shown to exceed the maximum density requirement of 50

466
00:32:15,980 --> 00:32:18,420
units per net hectare and require a site - specific

467
00:32:18,441 --> 00:32:23,148
amendment. Given that the requested amendment seeks to accommodate the

468
00:32:23,148 --> 00:32:25,628
same level of built - form intensity, as has already

469
00:32:25,668 --> 00:32:28,668
been approved by council, it's our opinion that this amendment

470
00:32:28,689 --> 00:32:32,439
is minor and administrative in nature. As a reminder, the

471
00:32:32,540 --> 00:32:35,319
proposed overall density of 22 units per net hector is

472
00:32:35,340 --> 00:32:37,719
still well within the town's acceptable range of the medium

473
00:32:37,740 --> 00:32:41,479
density category of residential development. In fact, it is lower

474
00:32:41,479 --> 00:32:43,639
than the approved total as the plan has decreased by

475
00:32:43,820 --> 00:32:51,478
15 units. Additionally, Council Approval is sought for site -

476
00:32:51,478 --> 00:32:54,709
specific zoning amendments relating to the location of parking. The

477
00:32:54,810 --> 00:32:57,349
Zoning Bylaw requires that parking spaces be located on the

478
00:32:57,349 --> 00:32:59,749
same lot as a use that they serve and access

479
00:32:59,789 --> 00:33:02,949
from a publicly owned and maintained lane. It should be

480
00:33:02,949 --> 00:33:05,429
noted that the internal loop road to which all dwellings

481
00:33:05,429 --> 00:33:07,509
will have frontage on will be a private condo road.

482
00:33:08,442 --> 00:33:11,301
Owned and maintained privately. So an amendment is required to

483
00:33:11,341 --> 00:33:15,214
recognise this condition. Also, while the development site continues to

484
00:33:15,254 --> 00:33:18,174
provide the required number of parking spaces along with guest

485
00:33:18,174 --> 00:33:21,774
parking throughout the site, the Introduction of the Detailed Lot

486
00:33:21,814 --> 00:33:25,134
fabric has resulted in some required residential parking spaces being

487
00:33:25,174 --> 00:33:27,614
located on a separate lot from the unit they serve.

488
00:33:28,675 --> 00:33:33,134
In actuality, as shown on the images, the affected parking

489
00:33:33,174 --> 00:33:36,174
spaces remain in close proximity to their associated units and

490
00:33:36,275 --> 00:33:40,174
are provided through conveniently located surface parking areas or detached

491
00:33:40,174 --> 00:33:43,614
garages. Ownership and use of these parking spaces will be

492
00:33:43,654 --> 00:33:46,574
secured through legal agreements tied to the respective dwelling units

493
00:33:46,915 --> 00:33:49,534
to ensure they will remain available to the residents they're

494
00:33:49,534 --> 00:33:52,916
intended to serve. In our opinion, this requested zoning amendment

495
00:33:52,937 --> 00:33:55,876
is also minor and administrative in nature, as it does

496
00:33:55,876 --> 00:34:03,875
not alter the functionality of the site. There should be

497
00:34:03,875 --> 00:34:11,498
a final slide. There. We go. In conclusion, the requested

498
00:34:11,538 --> 00:34:14,538
amendments discussed today represent the final stage of approvals before

499
00:34:14,578 --> 00:34:17,418
the ownership group can readily advance the property into the

500
00:34:17,439 --> 00:34:20,740
construction base. After many years of positive collaboration with members

501
00:34:20,780 --> 00:34:24,020
of Council and Municipal staff, their eager to establish sunny

502
00:34:24,060 --> 00:34:26,020
side village as the eastern gateway into the town of

503
00:34:26,041 --> 00:34:30,351
Colberg. This concludes our presentation regarding the proposed zoning bylaw

504
00:34:30,351 --> 00:34:33,311
amendment for 540 King Street East. Thank you for your

505
00:34:33,351 --> 00:34:37,880
time and we welcome any comments or questions. Anyone from

506
00:34:37,880 --> 00:34:42,800
Council, if any questions Council Matan. Two questions. Thank you

507
00:34:42,800 --> 00:34:47,460
very much for your presentation. One of your slides on

508
00:34:47,561 --> 00:34:52,500
Zoning bylaw amendment, I think the parcel that has the

509
00:34:52,681 --> 00:34:57,439
barn on it was zone D. Could you please clarify

510
00:34:59,300 --> 00:35:04,260
what that might mean. Through you, Mr. Mayor. Thank you

511
00:35:04,260 --> 00:35:08,800
for the question. The purpose of the development zone, um,

512
00:35:08,921 --> 00:35:12,740
overlaid over the barn block is because the ownership group

513
00:35:12,780 --> 00:35:16,820
has intentions to develop the barn as a future potential

514
00:35:17,081 --> 00:35:21,140
mixed use community area. However, through adaptively reusing the existing

515
00:35:21,161 --> 00:35:24,480
structure. However, at this current time, there are no, um,

516
00:35:24,480 --> 00:35:27,620
concrete plans, which is the reason why it's currently zoned

517
00:35:27,620 --> 00:35:32,065
in the development block. And my second question, Mr. Mayor.

518
00:35:32,817 --> 00:35:39,196
I believe some of the enclosed parking spaces are just

519
00:35:39,857 --> 00:35:45,196
one - story garage. Um, what you seek in your

520
00:35:45,196 --> 00:35:50,236
application, would that allow for, let's say, like a coach

521
00:35:50,276 --> 00:35:53,515
house built on top. Uh, in the future? Or is

522
00:35:53,555 --> 00:35:57,915
that something that the owner, the developer is not considering

523
00:35:58,096 --> 00:36:01,515
at this time or would that be a future application?

524
00:36:01,515 --> 00:36:06,075
Um, I'm just thinking of efficiencies of use of building

525
00:36:06,336 --> 00:36:13,111
footprints. Through you, Mr. Mayor, uh, the ownership group has

526
00:36:13,212 --> 00:36:18,391
no intentions to develop the garage structures with future residential

527
00:36:18,492 --> 00:36:23,953
uses. No. I'd like to say thank you very much.

528
00:36:24,441 --> 00:36:28,359
For your presentation. I believe at this time, I'm going

529
00:36:28,359 --> 00:36:31,079
to move on to, have there any been any correspondences

530
00:36:31,119 --> 00:36:35,784
received. Through you, Mr. Mayor, there was one piece of

531
00:36:35,824 --> 00:36:39,624
correspondence received from Robert Michael. Wonderful. And deputie clerk, have

532
00:36:39,624 --> 00:36:43,464
any registered speakers? Let me guess. We've got one registered

533
00:36:43,464 --> 00:36:47,224
speaker. We do. Yes. Mr. Mickl. Michael. Thank you for

534
00:36:47,264 --> 00:36:50,344
your presentation. We will, uh, get ready for Mr. Michael

535
00:36:50,344 --> 00:36:58,676
to come up. Mr. Michael, welcome back.

536
00:37:01,280 --> 00:37:02,379
I know you should have put your name on the

537
00:37:02,640 --> 00:37:11,144
ballot a few weeks ago. Thank you.

538
00:37:14,670 --> 00:37:21,282
Basically. Everyone that I've talked to in the ACO and

539
00:37:21,383 --> 00:37:26,642
branch, and myself, I very feel very positively about this

540
00:37:26,682 --> 00:37:29,922
development. We think it's a responsible development and a great

541
00:37:29,922 --> 00:37:37,381
way to incorporate heritage within the, uh, new developments. And

542
00:37:37,421 --> 00:37:43,221
I hope that, um, more developers will see the success.

543
00:37:43,221 --> 00:37:48,138
And, uh, character of this development and want to. Do

544
00:37:48,319 --> 00:37:51,338
similar projects. They also didn't mention, but I'll mention that

545
00:37:51,599 --> 00:37:55,498
they've named their buildings after early prominent families who had

546
00:37:56,079 --> 00:38:00,058
some, uh, influence in the early establishment of the town.

547
00:38:00,284 --> 00:38:06,503
So overall, I think it's in all the ACL members

548
00:38:06,604 --> 00:38:09,223
I've talked to who've seen it, I think it's quite

549
00:38:09,404 --> 00:38:13,703
a positive move in the direction of development in Coburg.

550
00:38:14,762 --> 00:38:22,007
That's all. Thank you. So before we go to that,

551
00:38:22,007 --> 00:38:25,047
let's just talk because we've got any other questions or

552
00:38:25,068 --> 00:38:29,959
comments or members of Council. Wonderful. Third and final matter,

553
00:38:29,959 --> 00:38:34,494
6. 3 recording Zoning by a Law Amendment. Administrative updates.

554
00:38:34,494 --> 00:38:36,894
So Deputy Clerk will now advise of the procedure of

555
00:38:36,915 --> 00:38:39,374
which notice was given and confirmed the dates notice was

556
00:38:39,374 --> 00:38:45,279
given. Through you, Mr. Chair. Notice of this Public Meeting

557
00:38:45,319 --> 00:38:47,919
was posted on the town's website on August 5th, 2026.

558
00:38:48,784 --> 00:38:52,443
Noted. Uh, Explanation, Emma Hughes, manager of Long Range Planning

559
00:38:52,464 --> 00:38:54,843
will now provide an overview of the proposed bylaw amendment

560
00:38:54,843 --> 00:39:02,105
to correct administrative updates. I'd love. Miss Hughe. Are you

561
00:39:02,105 --> 00:39:04,609
going to do it from back there? Uh, it's fine

562
00:39:04,609 --> 00:39:06,849
with me if you are. I can happily know stay

563
00:39:06,849 --> 00:39:09,889
back there. It's all good. Whatever council prefers. Um, and

564
00:39:10,070 --> 00:39:12,369
just in the off chance, Deputy Mayor, I am expecting

565
00:39:12,390 --> 00:39:14,449
another phone call. So if I have to leave, will

566
00:39:14,449 --> 00:39:17,646
you assume the chair upon my exit? Thank you. Not

567
00:39:17,646 --> 00:39:22,204
a curse. This is. All you. Thank you, Mr. Mayor.

568
00:39:22,204 --> 00:39:24,764
So two council through the mayor, the Planning Department does

569
00:39:24,804 --> 00:39:28,924
want to present, um, some proposed administrative updates to the

570
00:39:29,105 --> 00:39:32,524
comprehensive zoning bylaw. We had advised during our last administrative

571
00:39:32,564 --> 00:39:34,924
update that we would potentially have one or two more

572
00:39:35,185 --> 00:39:37,884
administrative updates to bring to Council over the course of

573
00:39:37,884 --> 00:39:41,564
the next year. Um, so just some background context for

574
00:39:41,585 --> 00:39:46,204
everybody on December 17th, 2026, the town of Coburg passed

575
00:39:46,204 --> 00:39:49,484
its new comprehensive zoning bylaw, which replaced the previous comprehensive

576
00:39:49,665 --> 00:39:54,524
zoning bylaw 2003 at 85. Um, this was, uh, pertains

577
00:39:54,524 --> 00:39:57,564
to all lands in Coburg outside of defined employment areas

578
00:39:57,665 --> 00:40:00,524
as additional studies are being conducted through the official plan

579
00:40:00,545 --> 00:40:04,609
update. So as part of this continued process of implementing

580
00:40:04,630 --> 00:40:07,809
this new Zoning bylaw, the town staff have identified several

581
00:40:08,150 --> 00:40:10,449
elements of the Zoning bylaw that should be updated to

582
00:40:10,870 --> 00:40:15,809
correct either conflicting information, duplication of information or to bring,

583
00:40:15,809 --> 00:40:21,409
uh, current zoning policies into conformity with legislative and, pardon

584
00:40:21,409 --> 00:40:27,245
me. Other existing bylaws that have been passed. So we

585
00:40:27,245 --> 00:40:29,085
have a summary of our proposed amendments. We are looking

586
00:40:29,106 --> 00:40:33,725
at Introducing ATA administrative updates to this comprehensive Zoning bylaw

587
00:40:33,765 --> 00:40:38,192
today. And I will just move right into them. So

588
00:40:38,213 --> 00:40:41,072
the first Zoning bylaw amendment that we are proposing today

589
00:40:41,893 --> 00:40:44,752
relates to the regulations surrounding food trucks in the current

590
00:40:44,853 --> 00:40:47,392
zoning bylaws. So the current definition of a food truck

591
00:40:47,392 --> 00:40:51,312
in the Zoning Bylaw specifically excludes trailers, push carts and

592
00:40:51,312 --> 00:40:54,672
non - motorized vehicles. Uh, that are propelled by muscle

593
00:40:54,672 --> 00:40:58,032
power. There is no alternative definition in the Zoning bylaw

594
00:40:58,072 --> 00:41:00,192
that would include these types of vehicles to be used

595
00:41:00,232 --> 00:41:03,072
in the same manner as a food truck. The towns

596
00:41:03,112 --> 00:41:06,512
refreshment vehicle license by law 43 2015 has a much

597
00:41:06,533 --> 00:41:10,832
broader definition of refreshment vehicles, which does include a trailers

598
00:41:10,832 --> 00:41:14,092
and other vehicles that are propelled by muscle power. Um,

599
00:41:14,133 --> 00:41:16,992
so therefore planning staff are proposing to replace the current

600
00:41:17,173 --> 00:41:20,032
definition of food truck with a new more expansive definition

601
00:41:20,453 --> 00:41:22,992
that does include trailers push carts and other types of

602
00:41:23,093 --> 00:41:27,132
vehicles that are currently included in the licensing bylaw. Um,

603
00:41:27,813 --> 00:41:31,152
this new definition, pardon me, would not be limited to

604
00:41:31,253 --> 00:41:33,632
trucks a new term is also being proposed for this

605
00:41:33,733 --> 00:41:37,472
revised definition. Planning staff are recommending that the term mobile

606
00:41:37,573 --> 00:41:40,752
catering unit be used for the new definition. This is

607
00:41:40,792 --> 00:41:43,232
based on the term mobile catering use, which is listed

608
00:41:43,272 --> 00:41:45,712
as a permitted use in the business park and district

609
00:41:45,973 --> 00:41:49,232
commercial zones in the comprehensive zoning bylaw. Um, but it's

610
00:41:49,272 --> 00:41:52,592
not defined elsewhere. This term, pardon me, is more appropriate

611
00:41:53,733 --> 00:41:56,432
in appropriate pardon me through staff's purview given that it

612
00:41:56,432 --> 00:41:58,992
has a more expansive definition and makes it easier for

613
00:41:59,013 --> 00:42:02,192
small business owners and citizens to interpret and go through

614
00:42:02,232 --> 00:42:05,973
the licensing process with our bilaw department. So next up

615
00:42:05,994 --> 00:42:08,933
we have amendment two. So we are amending patio definitions

616
00:42:08,954 --> 00:42:12,133
again for more clarity and easy comprehension for users of

617
00:42:12,234 --> 00:42:17,093
the Zoning Biolaw. The purpose of encroachment specifically for patios

618
00:42:17,093 --> 00:42:19,493
under this section is to regulate structures that would otherwise

619
00:42:19,594 --> 00:42:23,333
be considered DECs, uh, but for their height. So the

620
00:42:23,354 --> 00:42:26,533
definition of deck under the comprehensive zoning bylaw requires that

621
00:42:27,114 --> 00:42:29,333
a floor have at least 0. 3 metres above finished

622
00:42:29,354 --> 00:42:32,213
grade. The purpose of the patio regulation is to allow

623
00:42:32,234 --> 00:42:35,093
for decks that do not exceed 0. 3 metres above

624
00:42:35,354 --> 00:42:37,973
grade to be located in front yards and also have

625
00:42:37,973 --> 00:42:41,813
smaller setback requirements than your standard patio. This is in

626
00:42:41,813 --> 00:42:44,773
line with the previous approach to deck regulations under section

627
00:42:44,954 --> 00:42:49,893
5. 13 of our comprehensive zoning byla 85 - 2003,

628
00:42:49,893 --> 00:42:53,013
which did establish different regulations for sun decks and patios

629
00:42:53,053 --> 00:42:55,493
less than 0. 6 metres above grade, but was not

630
00:42:55,493 --> 00:42:58,373
carried over. So the primary purpose of this change is

631
00:42:58,474 --> 00:43:02,693
to clarify what the patio setback encroachment regulations apply to.

632
00:43:02,693 --> 00:43:05,333
These policies are not intended to apply to what would

633
00:43:05,373 --> 00:43:10,053
typically be considered a patio, but rather would effectively, what

634
00:43:10,053 --> 00:43:12,133
are effectively decks that do not meet the minimum height

635
00:43:12,234 --> 00:43:16,133
requirements. So again, this captures decks that would be at

636
00:43:16,133 --> 00:43:18,853
that point three metre height above grade, not meaning that

637
00:43:18,954 --> 00:43:20,853
0. 6 metre, but it is to be more permissible

638
00:43:20,874 --> 00:43:23,573
in the front yard and to allow again, more easier

639
00:43:23,914 --> 00:43:27,173
interpretation for citizens when they are looking at the zoning

640
00:43:27,274 --> 00:43:31,313
bylaw and planning on installing DEX patios, et cetera. Um,

641
00:43:31,434 --> 00:43:34,773
in addition, uh, to the above described patio encroachment regulations

642
00:43:35,034 --> 00:43:37,333
and that we are looking at, we're also looking to

643
00:43:37,514 --> 00:43:40,933
introduce a definition for restaurant patios. So the definition for

644
00:43:41,114 --> 00:43:44,133
a restaurant patio is not intended to limit or define

645
00:43:44,133 --> 00:43:46,533
the parameters of how the patios are to be used

646
00:43:47,514 --> 00:43:51,173
and structured, but rather to define what their use is.

647
00:43:51,173 --> 00:43:53,973
So when we have our temporary patioza that pop up,

648
00:43:53,973 --> 00:43:56,933
especially inheritage districts, part of the process is that the

649
00:43:56,954 --> 00:43:59,493
licensing application be sent to the planning department to ensure

650
00:43:59,834 --> 00:44:04,133
conformity with the heritage district policies. And zoning right now,

651
00:44:04,133 --> 00:44:07,973
we have policies that speak to a temporary outdoor furniture

652
00:44:07,994 --> 00:44:11,416
within the heritage district. To ensure that it maintains the

653
00:44:11,456 --> 00:44:14,436
character of the district and isn't detracting or inappropriate, but

654
00:44:14,436 --> 00:44:17,576
we do not have a specific definition for restaurant patio

655
00:44:17,677 --> 00:44:21,896
use. So again, to create more clarity, easy interpretation for

656
00:44:21,936 --> 00:44:25,496
both staff and the public, um, the building department and

657
00:44:25,496 --> 00:44:29,096
licensing as well, capturing everybody here when issuing these permits

658
00:44:29,136 --> 00:44:33,256
introducing this definition for restaurant patios again aids an easier

659
00:44:33,277 --> 00:44:38,631
interpretation for the bylaw. Next, we are going on to

660
00:44:38,631 --> 00:44:43,827
the removal of accessory dwelling definition. Um. So one of

661
00:44:43,827 --> 00:44:47,347
the definitions in the comprehensive zoning bylaw is for accessory

662
00:44:47,387 --> 00:44:49,907
dwellings, which defines a dwelling unit that is accessory to

663
00:44:49,907 --> 00:44:52,307
the main use of a non - residential building. This

664
00:44:52,307 --> 00:44:54,787
use is listed as a permitted use in most zones

665
00:44:54,808 --> 00:44:57,187
in the town of Coburg. The purpose of this definition

666
00:44:57,208 --> 00:44:59,267
is to provide a framework to allow for mixed use

667
00:44:59,307 --> 00:45:02,467
developments in commercial or mixed use zones. However, through the

668
00:45:02,507 --> 00:45:05,747
drafting process that we had expressed concerns about potential confusion

669
00:45:05,787 --> 00:45:10,067
between the terms accessory dwelling and additional residential unit. The

670
00:45:10,107 --> 00:45:14,127
staff are proposing to remove the accessory dwelling definition. Um,

671
00:45:14,408 --> 00:45:18,467
as it is, it duplication of the, uh, most currently

672
00:45:18,488 --> 00:45:21,987
accepted additional residential unit to language that is found in

673
00:45:21,987 --> 00:45:24,307
the PPS and other planning documents. So again, we are

674
00:45:24,347 --> 00:45:28,227
not removing the ability to have accessory or additional residential

675
00:45:28,248 --> 00:45:31,547
units. We are simply removing a duplication of terminology. So

676
00:45:31,547 --> 00:45:35,267
additional residential unit and accessory dwelling unit mean the same

677
00:45:35,288 --> 00:45:40,147
thing. The provincial provincially preferred term is additional residential unit.

678
00:45:40,147 --> 00:45:42,627
So we, we, we will be again, removing that duplication

679
00:45:42,648 --> 00:45:45,347
to offer some more clarity and support for anybody that

680
00:45:45,688 --> 00:45:51,324
is using and interpreting this bylaw. Then we are moving

681
00:45:51,364 --> 00:45:53,884
on to amendment number four. So we're cross - referencing

682
00:45:54,305 --> 00:45:58,604
additional residential unit policies. As the section 4. 3. 1C

683
00:45:58,604 --> 00:46:01,804
of the Zoning Bylaw Clarifies, the properties with additional residential

684
00:46:01,825 --> 00:46:05,804
units, ARUs are subject to the requirements to have frontage

685
00:46:05,844 --> 00:46:07,564
on a Public Street or similar right - of -

686
00:46:07,564 --> 00:46:10,364
way unless the ARU is located on a lane. The

687
00:46:10,465 --> 00:46:14,124
relevant section references the section containing these access provisions. Action

688
00:46:14,225 --> 00:46:18,044
4. 8 when it actually should reference section 4. 9.

689
00:46:18,044 --> 00:46:21,004
We are just proposing to correct the numerology mistake here.

690
00:46:21,004 --> 00:46:24,204
So again, currently referencing section 4. 8, but this should

691
00:46:24,225 --> 00:46:27,004
reference section 4. 9 of the bylaw. So we are

692
00:46:27,105 --> 00:46:30,204
proposing an amendment to that numerology to make sure that

693
00:46:30,244 --> 00:46:32,604
it is properly accounted for in the bylaws. So just

694
00:46:32,604 --> 00:46:34,604
again, one more time, we are only amending that section

695
00:46:34,625 --> 00:46:37,964
to update it from item 4. 8 in the bylaw

696
00:46:37,964 --> 00:46:44,964
to be reflected as item 4. 9. Proposed amendment number

697
00:46:44,985 --> 00:46:48,804
five is a temporary special events regulations. So another element

698
00:46:48,844 --> 00:46:52,164
of the comprehensive zoning bylaw that Planning staff identified as

699
00:46:52,204 --> 00:46:55,664
needing improvement was our process for regulating special events. The

700
00:46:55,664 --> 00:46:58,004
town of Cobra Coast, many special events throughout the years

701
00:46:58,025 --> 00:47:00,484
such as the waterfront festival. We just had rib fest

702
00:47:00,484 --> 00:47:04,287
take place. Two weekends ago, one or two weekends ago.

703
00:47:04,287 --> 00:47:06,927
Um, just to name a few, um, as well as

704
00:47:06,927 --> 00:47:10,127
many sidewalk sales and other community events, any buildings or

705
00:47:10,127 --> 00:47:13,887
structures associated with these events typically including tents are technically

706
00:47:13,908 --> 00:47:16,527
subject to the provisions of the bylaw. So that includes

707
00:47:16,788 --> 00:47:21,787
setbacks total law coverage, et cetera noise as well. Um,

708
00:47:21,908 --> 00:47:25,327
however, these events only exist on a temporary basis and

709
00:47:25,367 --> 00:47:28,767
are already required to have approvals through other town departments,

710
00:47:28,767 --> 00:47:33,147
including the fire department, building services, potentially public works, um,

711
00:47:33,428 --> 00:47:38,447
if there is access, um, so there is already extensive

712
00:47:38,447 --> 00:47:41,087
review taking place for these events. So what planning staff

713
00:47:41,268 --> 00:47:45,327
is proposing it to help remove the red tape for

714
00:47:45,428 --> 00:47:48,607
planting these events for the town of Colberg is to

715
00:47:48,647 --> 00:47:51,967
define the term temporary special event within the bylaw. We

716
00:47:52,007 --> 00:47:54,367
currently do not define a temporary special event in the

717
00:47:54,548 --> 00:47:58,047
bylaw. Um, so we would like to introduce a definition.

718
00:47:58,047 --> 00:48:00,767
Um, and the definition would, um, state any event being

719
00:48:00,788 --> 00:48:05,487
approved through the town's municipal application process. These events would

720
00:48:05,527 --> 00:48:09,727
then be permitted in all zones knee environmental constraints. They

721
00:48:09,748 --> 00:48:13,327
are required to follow the processes that are outlined from

722
00:48:13,367 --> 00:48:17,309
municipal special events as defined by tourism. And a community

723
00:48:17,349 --> 00:48:21,449
services. And again, would just provide more clear direction, uh,

724
00:48:21,730 --> 00:48:25,709
for town staff when receiving these applications. Um, the impact

725
00:48:25,749 --> 00:48:27,469
would be minimal. But again, it is just to provide

726
00:48:27,490 --> 00:48:31,306
more clarity and Aeda, the town. In these events taking

727
00:48:31,306 --> 00:48:36,055
place in AMR. Efficient fashion. So we'll move on to

728
00:48:36,156 --> 00:48:39,495
amendment number six, which is temporary use regulation. So as

729
00:48:39,495 --> 00:48:42,695
we just described above, Plating Staff are proposing to expand

730
00:48:43,196 --> 00:48:45,415
a list of uses that are permitted in all zones.

731
00:48:45,415 --> 00:48:47,895
So allowing for temporary special events in all zones outside

732
00:48:47,996 --> 00:48:51,735
of the environmental constraint and floodway. Um, we want to

733
00:48:52,156 --> 00:48:55,655
expand that definition to include temporary mobile catering units and

734
00:48:55,676 --> 00:48:57,895
temporary special events. So again, we want to be sure

735
00:48:57,935 --> 00:49:01,735
that when we're updating, um, our temporary mobile catering unit,

736
00:49:01,735 --> 00:49:04,775
um, and events definitions that we are ensuring that they

737
00:49:04,775 --> 00:49:08,295
are actually permitted in the zones as outlined in the

738
00:49:08,335 --> 00:49:10,935
bylaws. So this update is to ensure that those provisions

739
00:49:10,975 --> 00:49:13,175
are captured in the right sections of the bylaw that

740
00:49:13,215 --> 00:49:19,090
would allow their uses. Amendment number seven is for the

741
00:49:19,130 --> 00:49:23,490
short term rental accommodation parking. Um, so on February 26th

742
00:49:23,490 --> 00:49:29,250
of 2025, Count Council passed a licensing 2025 to regulate

743
00:49:29,271 --> 00:49:33,387
short - term rental accommodations. One of the regulations that

744
00:49:33,427 --> 00:49:36,187
became more restrictive was the parking requirement when the comprehensive

745
00:49:36,288 --> 00:49:39,147
Zoning bylaw was updated. It was updated to reflect the

746
00:49:39,408 --> 00:49:42,027
current provisions for a bed and breakfast, which requires that

747
00:49:42,048 --> 00:49:46,267
there be one parking space per room rented. Um, as

748
00:49:46,267 --> 00:49:48,747
we have rolled out the licensing process and the review

749
00:49:48,768 --> 00:49:52,507
process, there has been some conflicts with parking. And we

750
00:49:52,547 --> 00:49:56,427
are introducing the amendment to, uh, state that parking requirements

751
00:49:56,528 --> 00:50:00,267
for additional residential units, be in alignment with the parking

752
00:50:00,288 --> 00:50:03,307
requirements in the bylaw for that dwelling typology. So for

753
00:50:03,307 --> 00:50:07,467
example, if you are renting short - term rental that

754
00:50:07,467 --> 00:50:10,827
is a single detached dwelling, the parking accommodations for these

755
00:50:10,867 --> 00:50:13,067
short - term rental accommodation would be the same that

756
00:50:13,107 --> 00:50:17,387
the Planning Department would require for a single detached dwelling.

757
00:50:17,888 --> 00:50:20,187
Um, so if it is one parking space that is

758
00:50:20,227 --> 00:50:22,427
required for that dwelling typology, whether it be semi -

759
00:50:22,427 --> 00:50:24,907
detached, etc., that is what will be required instead of

760
00:50:24,907 --> 00:50:29,163
a per bedroom requirement. This is also more in line

761
00:50:29,203 --> 00:50:32,283
with licensing process and what is outlined in the licensing

762
00:50:32,384 --> 00:50:35,751
bylaw. So moving along to number eight, we have a

763
00:50:35,791 --> 00:50:40,391
mapping error that staff have identified and need to correct.

764
00:50:40,391 --> 00:50:42,951
This was identified on rocking cam court. So they are

765
00:50:42,951 --> 00:50:46,391
currently zoned residential four, exception five. So our four -

766
00:50:46,412 --> 00:50:49,831
five. This zone was not intended to apply to these

767
00:50:49,852 --> 00:50:52,471
properties, but rather was intended to apply to the properties

768
00:50:52,511 --> 00:50:55,991
on Ratan Terrace. It does currently apply to the properties

769
00:50:56,031 --> 00:50:59,671
there. It was applied to retain terrace. Um, but these

770
00:50:59,671 --> 00:51:03,591
are linked dwellings. So a link dwelling just for information

771
00:51:03,932 --> 00:51:07,351
purposes. They appear to be single detached dwellings above grade

772
00:51:07,372 --> 00:51:10,231
when you're looking at them from the street, but they're

773
00:51:10,231 --> 00:51:12,991
quite literally as the name suggests linked below grade. So

774
00:51:12,991 --> 00:51:16,711
the basements are attached below grade. So updating, we would

775
00:51:16,711 --> 00:51:20,791
update the site specifica Zone to be, um, to be

776
00:51:20,791 --> 00:51:23,111
more appropriate to the property. And we would also ensure

777
00:51:23,532 --> 00:51:28,071
that the definition for linked dwelling is updated to appropriately

778
00:51:28,572 --> 00:51:33,217
align with the use on rocking hampart. So our next

779
00:51:33,257 --> 00:51:36,897
step, just so everybody knows what is coming. There will

780
00:51:36,918 --> 00:51:39,537
be a report that will be brought to the Public

781
00:51:39,878 --> 00:51:43,377
Works Planning and Development Standing Committee on September 9th after

782
00:51:43,398 --> 00:51:45,137
it is reviewed by the Standing Committee. It will then

783
00:51:45,177 --> 00:51:47,457
be forwarded on to a regular Council meeting on September

784
00:51:47,798 --> 00:51:52,417
23rd for further discussion. Um, and if these proposed amendments

785
00:51:52,457 --> 00:51:54,737
are approved, the changes could come into effect as soon

786
00:51:54,737 --> 00:51:57,777
as October 14th, 2026. I will turn it back over

787
00:51:58,198 --> 00:52:04,097
through the VERICHA Council for any comments, questions, considerations. Seems

788
00:52:04,137 --> 00:52:10,769
pretty straightforward. At this time, do any public submissions. Do

789
00:52:10,769 --> 00:52:12,609
you chair, we do not have any public submissions and

790
00:52:12,609 --> 00:52:14,929
we don't have any registered speakers. It's good to hear.

791
00:52:14,929 --> 00:52:16,929
Well, I know we've got a Council comments. So Council

792
00:52:17,030 --> 00:52:20,381
Mutant. Let us coming to the standing committee and the

793
00:52:20,381 --> 00:52:22,701
thought I've ever give a heads up on some questions.

794
00:52:22,741 --> 00:52:25,881
Some of these are on clarity. Um, and thank you

795
00:52:25,881 --> 00:52:28,861
very much. I'm going to go backwards through your presentation.

796
00:52:28,861 --> 00:52:32,701
So Amendment number eight. Were the, uh, where the people

797
00:52:33,762 --> 00:52:37,901
affected unrocking him court, uh, notified of the Zoning change.

798
00:52:39,884 --> 00:52:43,943
Through the mayor to Councillor Maton. Every resident in Coburg

799
00:52:44,204 --> 00:52:46,983
has provided the prescribed notice for an update to the

800
00:52:47,004 --> 00:52:49,383
comprehensive Zoning bylaw. So yes, they would have been provided

801
00:52:49,884 --> 00:52:53,912
notice. With the whole of cowork mailed. No, it is

802
00:52:53,912 --> 00:52:56,752
posted on the town's website just for budgetary reasons. It

803
00:52:56,752 --> 00:52:59,192
would be very expensive to have to mail a notice

804
00:52:59,192 --> 00:53:01,912
to all residents for, yeah, the reason I asked Mr.

805
00:53:01,952 --> 00:53:06,512
Mayor is that it specifically affects property owners. It's an

806
00:53:06,512 --> 00:53:11,912
error, but they may have not known. But okay, amendment

807
00:53:11,952 --> 00:53:17,752
number seven, STRA parking lot or parking requirements is the

808
00:53:17,792 --> 00:53:22,144
STRA license, is that an annual. Uh, IM, is that

809
00:53:22,144 --> 00:53:29,665
renewed annually or is it, uh, different. Mr. Larmo on

810
00:53:29,665 --> 00:53:33,506
that one. Thankfully he's here. Through you to renewal license,

811
00:53:33,506 --> 00:53:35,746
but we can answer questions that aren't related to the

812
00:53:35,786 --> 00:53:38,146
Zoning Byleth at the standing committee meeting, no problem. We'll

813
00:53:38,146 --> 00:53:41,246
bring those answers for you. Okay. So, uh, question, uh,

814
00:53:41,367 --> 00:53:46,666
on the, uh, application, uh, short term rental accommodation, et

815
00:53:46,666 --> 00:53:51,106
cetera. I understood a tandem parking. Do you anticipate any

816
00:53:51,447 --> 00:53:54,626
of hearing some, the issues with that? Especially if it's

817
00:53:54,666 --> 00:53:57,346
a shared driveway. Do you anticipate that there might be

818
00:53:57,386 --> 00:54:02,146
a refinement with regards to if tandem parking is permitted

819
00:54:02,407 --> 00:54:05,106
as of right that they have to actually put up

820
00:54:05,146 --> 00:54:09,566
a little fence or something so they're not interfering. And

821
00:54:09,566 --> 00:54:13,666
STRA, the person renting may not be aware. Uh, so

822
00:54:14,087 --> 00:54:17,186
just to make it easier for the adjacent property owner

823
00:54:17,207 --> 00:54:20,546
that they don't have to keep reminding a visitor that

824
00:54:20,647 --> 00:54:23,666
they shouldn't be parking there. It might clear on that

825
00:54:23,706 --> 00:54:27,586
one. Yeah. So through the mirror, just a Councillor Matan,

826
00:54:27,586 --> 00:54:30,066
I might even direct that back to the director of

827
00:54:30,106 --> 00:54:34,066
legislative services only because, uh, the actual licensing bylaw is

828
00:54:34,327 --> 00:54:36,546
in a document that the planning department updates and reviews

829
00:54:36,586 --> 00:54:39,586
that would be through the preview of the bylaw department.

830
00:54:39,586 --> 00:54:41,826
Um, so our purpose with that is sheerly just to

831
00:54:41,866 --> 00:54:44,146
define what is allowable. But the parameters of what would

832
00:54:44,186 --> 00:54:47,106
actually have to take place through the issuance of the

833
00:54:47,146 --> 00:54:49,806
license would have to come through. Belaw, I believe. And

834
00:54:49,806 --> 00:54:52,910
I can be corrected if I'm wrong. So, uh, and

835
00:54:52,910 --> 00:54:57,470
then the other question is, uh, STRA parking. Is there

836
00:54:57,510 --> 00:54:59,790
a potential that people buy a permit so that they

837
00:55:00,131 --> 00:55:04,510
use street parking? I cannot recall the bylaw and it

838
00:55:04,510 --> 00:55:08,510
might, I can defer that question to the standing committee.

839
00:55:08,510 --> 00:55:11,710
But if you've got, if you buy a permit, then

840
00:55:11,731 --> 00:55:15,230
it takes up a public parking spot just, uh, that's

841
00:55:15,230 --> 00:55:18,670
where I was headed with that. So amendment number six

842
00:55:19,011 --> 00:55:27,265
temporary use regulations. So, uh, little bit confused. You will

843
00:55:27,265 --> 00:55:32,225
be allowing use of EC and hazard lands? No. Through

844
00:55:32,225 --> 00:55:35,265
the mayor to Councillor Mattan, know in all zones outside

845
00:55:35,286 --> 00:55:39,185
of environmental constraint, uh, the flood overlay, I would just

846
00:55:39,225 --> 00:55:42,065
like to note though we do work closely with the

847
00:55:42,406 --> 00:55:45,265
gainerosker region conservation authority. So if there was ever a

848
00:55:45,305 --> 00:55:47,105
proposal, that would be something that would be considered on

849
00:55:47,606 --> 00:55:50,145
a case specific basis. They would be directed to consult

850
00:55:50,185 --> 00:55:52,625
with the GRCA. And before we would consider they would

851
00:55:52,625 --> 00:55:56,065
have to provide us with some formal written reference from

852
00:55:56,105 --> 00:55:59,085
the GRCA outlining that it's not a hazard. And just

853
00:55:59,085 --> 00:56:02,465
a gentle reminder, the Conservation Authorities are actually, as of

854
00:56:02,486 --> 00:56:06,385
next year, they have a different format, maybe just check

855
00:56:06,425 --> 00:56:09,965
with them to see if it's business as usual. Um,

856
00:56:10,726 --> 00:56:17,898
amendment number five. Temporary special events. Will your report forthcoming

857
00:56:18,159 --> 00:56:23,158
have maps for the zones, which this would apply, um,

858
00:56:23,919 --> 00:56:26,218
it wasn't clear to me when the, when the page

859
00:56:26,239 --> 00:56:31,418
says applicable zones, uh, would there be additional information in

860
00:56:31,418 --> 00:56:34,538
your forthcoming report? Yes. Sorry. And my apologies. I should

861
00:56:34,538 --> 00:56:37,898
have been more clear to Councillor Matan. The special temporary

862
00:56:37,919 --> 00:56:40,298
special events will be allowed in all zones outside of

863
00:56:40,298 --> 00:56:44,138
the environmental constraint and flood overlay zones. We can't provide

864
00:56:44,239 --> 00:56:46,918
mapping with our report if you would like. So, um,

865
00:56:47,039 --> 00:56:51,338
actually, uh, we will express a concern that residential zones

866
00:56:51,599 --> 00:56:58,058
and temporary special events. I think that's a potential conflict.

867
00:56:58,058 --> 00:57:00,618
I have, I hear on a regular basis, even though

868
00:57:00,658 --> 00:57:02,858
we have special events in Victoria Park, we have a

869
00:57:02,858 --> 00:57:07,818
lot of residential area close by. And so not knowing

870
00:57:07,839 --> 00:57:10,298
further details, I think there is a bit of a

871
00:57:10,319 --> 00:57:15,658
sensitivity matter that may need to be taken into account.

872
00:57:15,658 --> 00:57:23,061
Amendment four. Cross - reference in ARU. Thank you for

873
00:57:23,061 --> 00:57:26,796
that. There's a question in a couple of amendments with

874
00:57:26,817 --> 00:57:32,156
regards to encroachments. There are specified setbacks, but then there's

875
00:57:32,257 --> 00:57:35,916
allowable encroachments. For example, if you have a front porch,

876
00:57:35,916 --> 00:57:37,916
you can encroach a couple of feet into the street

877
00:57:38,017 --> 00:57:40,716
right of way. You know, if you're building as like

878
00:57:40,716 --> 00:57:43,676
very, so, uh, that would be a question I would

879
00:57:44,017 --> 00:57:47,836
ask is, what are the allowable encroachments? For example, you

880
00:57:47,836 --> 00:57:52,536
might have the building wall, but then your Eve, uh,

881
00:57:52,577 --> 00:57:56,396
might encroach into a side yard. And that, that's, that's

882
00:57:56,396 --> 00:58:00,955
a question that comes up. Um, uh, adding a dwelling

883
00:58:01,216 --> 00:58:03,915
unit in a non - residential building that makes me

884
00:58:04,016 --> 00:58:07,835
kind of interested in what that means. Like we may

885
00:58:07,875 --> 00:58:11,515
have a commercial or industrial building with a residential unit.

886
00:58:12,678 --> 00:58:15,537
So through the merit account, Sermatin, we do focus more

887
00:58:15,558 --> 00:58:18,337
so on mixed use. So that could also expand right

888
00:58:18,377 --> 00:58:23,217
to, to, uh, retail, um, and additional residential units as

889
00:58:23,257 --> 00:58:25,897
of right are permitted and mixed use buildings already. So

890
00:58:25,897 --> 00:58:28,097
the idea is actually to support the policies and the

891
00:58:28,097 --> 00:58:31,697
official plan that direct us to focus on mixed use

892
00:58:31,798 --> 00:58:36,577
intensification. So allowing for live more live work situations where

893
00:58:36,577 --> 00:58:38,897
it's permitted obviously outside of employment areas. I also should

894
00:58:38,937 --> 00:58:41,857
have been more clear that it does not extend to

895
00:58:41,897 --> 00:58:45,617
employment areas. We do not allow residential ADs. Okay. Unless

896
00:58:46,678 --> 00:58:50,977
it's explored in other app through other avenues with Council.

897
00:58:50,977 --> 00:58:53,857
But yeah, it would, uh, would offer us that opportunity.

898
00:58:57,241 --> 00:59:02,740
An amendment, uh, number two. Oh, I should mention with

899
00:59:02,841 --> 00:59:06,340
number three, um, I was a bit surprised when an

900
00:59:06,340 --> 00:59:09,380
accessory dwelling unit had a bigger footprint than the actual

901
00:59:09,481 --> 00:59:12,100
primary house. So that will be a question that comes

902
00:59:12,121 --> 00:59:15,460
up too. You know, the proportion, uh, the use of,

903
00:59:15,460 --> 00:59:18,020
uh, how much of the law is, is usable and

904
00:59:18,020 --> 00:59:21,220
so forth. Number two, patio definitions. So I got a

905
00:59:21,220 --> 00:59:23,060
little confused with this because I always, I make the

906
00:59:23,100 --> 00:59:27,620
distinction between the deck and a patio. So, uh, would

907
00:59:27,620 --> 00:59:34,340
it be part of the verbiage that, uh, the size

908
00:59:34,380 --> 00:59:38,260
of this in proportion, let's say the building footprint is,

909
00:59:38,260 --> 00:59:41,780
you know, 15 by 15 that the patio is proportional

910
00:59:42,601 --> 00:59:45,060
or is that done on a case by case basis.

911
00:59:46,393 --> 00:59:48,612
Through the merit to Councillor Gaton. Could you possibly just

912
00:59:48,652 --> 00:59:50,672
repeat your question? Fermi, sorry. I'm just having a bit

913
00:59:50,672 --> 00:59:56,852
of difficulty. Yeah. So, uh, patio and restaurant patio. Specifically,

914
00:59:56,852 --> 01:00:03,012
it's a patio, the patio definition, um, I've always considered,

915
01:00:03,012 --> 01:00:06,132
you know, if it's less, if it's less than 0.

916
01:00:06,132 --> 01:00:10,052
3 metres, uh, then it's still a deck. And then

917
01:00:10,052 --> 01:00:12,852
if it's higher, it actually is a structural element that

918
01:00:12,892 --> 01:00:16,772
has to go through on like the building inspector and

919
01:00:16,772 --> 01:00:19,572
that sort of permitting. But it's the sigh. So if

920
01:00:19,572 --> 01:00:23,972
you have, if you're building footprint is 15 by 15,

921
01:00:23,972 --> 01:00:26,812
20 by 24. Are there any and you have a

922
01:00:26,812 --> 01:00:33,465
big lot? Are there. Any restrictions or accommodations? How big

923
01:00:33,966 --> 01:00:38,532
your patio can be. Through the merit to Councillor Maton.

924
01:00:38,532 --> 01:00:40,432
We can provide more information at the standing committee, but

925
01:00:40,432 --> 01:00:43,092
yes, they would be subject to the Zoan specifica requirements

926
01:00:43,113 --> 01:00:47,232
for patios decks and accessory structures is also too, but

927
01:00:47,232 --> 01:00:49,652
we consider them. So they would be, um, they would

928
01:00:49,652 --> 01:00:52,372
be a subject to those provisions. And if there are

929
01:00:52,412 --> 01:00:54,572
any zones that you would like more information on, we

930
01:00:54,572 --> 01:00:57,252
are happy to provide the specifics of those requirements. They

931
01:00:57,252 --> 01:01:02,532
do vary between zones. Okay. And finally, mobile catering unit

932
01:01:02,953 --> 01:01:07,812
in all zones, which it is permitted. My understanding from

933
01:01:07,812 --> 01:01:10,052
you is that they could be possible in any zone.

934
01:01:11,676 --> 01:01:16,966
Or they'll be specifics. Through the merit to Councillor Maton.

935
01:01:16,966 --> 01:01:19,686
I would have to confer the director of legislative services

936
01:01:19,707 --> 01:01:23,206
about which Zoans the mobile catering food trucks are explicitly

937
01:01:23,227 --> 01:01:25,286
permitted in, but that is why we worded it that

938
01:01:25,286 --> 01:01:28,006
way. So they are allowed in the zones through which

939
01:01:28,027 --> 01:01:31,106
the licensing bylaw states they are allowed to exist. And

940
01:01:31,106 --> 01:01:32,806
so if the licensing bylaws says you can only have

941
01:01:32,987 --> 01:01:37,446
them in a mixed use corridor, you know, no residential

942
01:01:37,467 --> 01:01:40,366
zones. And that is how this permission is worded. So

943
01:01:40,366 --> 01:01:42,486
it is to be more in alignment with the bylaw

944
01:01:42,486 --> 01:01:44,646
that was passed. I believe it was in June or

945
01:01:44,686 --> 01:01:48,326
July for the mobile cater or temporary catering. So that's

946
01:01:48,326 --> 01:01:51,686
how we worded it that way. So it captures the

947
01:01:51,707 --> 01:01:54,646
zone set the licensing bylaw specifically states they could operate

948
01:01:54,747 --> 01:01:56,806
in. So one of the things that crossed my mind

949
01:01:56,827 --> 01:01:59,766
is that let's say you're on a very beautifully well

950
01:01:59,947 --> 01:02:05,926
- treed street. You can't necessarily be cooking underneath a

951
01:02:05,947 --> 01:02:12,246
tree canopy. That's like it's a form of incompatible use.

952
01:02:12,246 --> 01:02:15,286
Uh, so, so accommodation. I hear that. Yes. I hear

953
01:02:15,326 --> 01:02:17,686
all the huffing and puffing over here, but this is

954
01:02:17,686 --> 01:02:20,786
my opportunity to put this out in the open. And

955
01:02:20,786 --> 01:02:24,246
so that was just, uh, sort of sensitive, uh, uses

956
01:02:24,347 --> 01:02:26,966
or incompatible uses that there must be a way of

957
01:02:26,987 --> 01:02:31,446
addressing that. And so forth. So that's my, my last

958
01:02:31,446 --> 01:02:39,917
question. You can go, Hey Chris. Through the chair to

959
01:02:39,917 --> 01:02:42,237
Councillor Motels, I'll just add a couple more points with

960
01:02:42,277 --> 01:02:45,917
Miss Hughes has said. So specifically for the temporary events

961
01:02:45,917 --> 01:02:48,957
and for the mobile catering units, they're still subject to

962
01:02:49,378 --> 01:02:52,237
the licensing regime of the town. Uh, and they're still

963
01:02:52,237 --> 01:02:54,957
subject to the special event application process. So there is

964
01:02:54,997 --> 01:02:58,957
a 17 page special event application that gets circulated to

965
01:02:58,997 --> 01:03:01,917
all departments of the town. Um, it is easier to

966
01:03:02,018 --> 01:03:04,957
make them permissible across the town and then to regulate

967
01:03:04,997 --> 01:03:08,077
them through the licensing bylaw and then through the special

968
01:03:08,098 --> 01:03:11,597
event application process. Right now the conflict between the two.

969
01:03:11,597 --> 01:03:13,837
So it's easier to allow them as of right in

970
01:03:13,837 --> 01:03:17,117
certain zones. Subject to the actual licensing regime and the

971
01:03:17,157 --> 01:03:22,059
special event application process. Oh, are you the chair? Sorry,

972
01:03:22,059 --> 01:03:25,579
just a comment more than once I've heard when there

973
01:03:26,000 --> 01:03:30,199
is a conflict, um, and just as a generalization, uh,

974
01:03:30,880 --> 01:03:32,619
you know, it's a, it's a of right as a

975
01:03:32,619 --> 01:03:37,179
permit, uh, or as a zoning, et cetera. And then

976
01:03:37,360 --> 01:03:40,699
the response to a neighbour or someone who has some

977
01:03:40,800 --> 01:03:45,259
concerns is, Oh, it's a civil matter. And, um, I

978
01:03:45,259 --> 01:03:48,599
think there needs to be an opportunity to, you know,

979
01:03:48,720 --> 01:03:51,499
if, if there is a burden placed on a neighbour

980
01:03:52,240 --> 01:03:57,499
because of something that is, you know, rightfully possible that,

981
01:03:57,499 --> 01:04:00,699
um, it's an internal process rather than, you know, asking

982
01:04:01,360 --> 01:04:06,543
or suggesting that people go. And pursue it independently. Like

983
01:04:06,543 --> 01:04:08,463
we have an obligation is what I'm trying to get

984
01:04:08,564 --> 01:04:15,108
at. So I'm just trying to avoid potential conflicts. Thank

985
01:04:15,108 --> 01:04:16,868
you very much, Miss Hughes. And thank you to the

986
01:04:17,129 --> 01:04:22,948
director for the final comments. Any questions related to look

987
01:04:22,948 --> 01:04:26,148
forward to it going through the September cycle round. Thank

988
01:04:26,148 --> 01:04:29,988
you for continuing to observe the evolution of the comprehensive

989
01:04:30,028 --> 01:04:34,708
zoning bylaw. At this time, I do apologise. I don't

990
01:04:35,369 --> 01:04:38,148
wear just a journey. There's no other. Thank you. Sorry

991
01:04:38,169 --> 01:04:41,108
folks. I just don't have the agenda. And speaking of

992
01:04:41,108 --> 01:04:43,588
it's in front of me. So we will adjourn the

993
01:04:44,169 --> 01:04:47,348
public meeting. We are finished and we will take a

994
01:04:47,348 --> 01:04:54,454
10 minute break. Thank you. 720. 720. Let's just do

995
01:04:54,454 --> 01:04:55,654
720. What up? Thank you very much.

996
01:20:43,533 --> 01:20:46,472
Welcome back. I am going to call this meeting to

997
01:20:46,472 --> 01:20:51,672
order at 724, I believe, 724 p. m. This would

998
01:20:51,672 --> 01:20:55,032
be the third council meeting. We are commencing. It is

999
01:20:55,053 --> 01:20:57,992
also a carryover of the first meeting, but we are

1000
01:20:58,032 --> 01:21:00,232
not allowed to have two meetings at once. We ended

1001
01:21:00,253 --> 01:21:03,352
one, had a second, ended that, and now we're resuming

1002
01:21:03,453 --> 01:21:05,432
with the third meeting to pick up from where we

1003
01:21:05,533 --> 01:21:09,272
started on the first meeting. I will, we have no

1004
01:21:09,272 --> 01:21:12,152
introduction at the end of items. We do have a

1005
01:21:12,192 --> 01:21:16,152
confirmation of this wonderfully produce, so booved by Councillor Bureau

1006
01:21:16,253 --> 01:21:19,512
and seconded by Councillor Burkhat. Any questions or concern, seeing

1007
01:21:19,512 --> 01:21:23,112
none all in favor, so moved. We've already read Traditional

1008
01:21:23,213 --> 01:21:25,512
Land acknowledgement. We will move past that. We will go

1009
01:21:25,693 --> 01:21:28,152
to five. Disclosure pecuniary interests. Are there any at this

1010
01:21:28,152 --> 01:21:33,033
time. I'm going back over what we had before, and

1011
01:21:33,033 --> 01:21:36,093
I believe all of the items previously declared pecuniary interest

1012
01:21:36,274 --> 01:21:38,744
are complete. I'm just going to confirm that. Yes, it

1013
01:21:38,744 --> 01:21:43,324
is. So no disclosures, we go on to Bylaws, and

1014
01:21:43,324 --> 01:21:48,708
we have six. So we have a consent motion. Do

1015
01:21:48,708 --> 01:21:50,588
I have mover in a seconder? So move by Councillor

1016
01:21:50,609 --> 01:21:54,988
Darling, seconded by Councillor Burkhat. So at this time, any

1017
01:21:55,009 --> 01:22:00,517
questions, concerns, we've got the six heritage designations. Seeing no

1018
01:22:00,517 --> 01:22:04,317
other questions or concerns, all in favor, so moved. We

1019
01:22:04,458 --> 01:22:08,517
now move on to a notice of motion, 7. 1.

1020
01:22:08,517 --> 01:22:10,517
It's my motion, so I'm assuming I should probably pass

1021
01:22:10,858 --> 01:22:13,477
the chair, assuming Deputy Mayor is probably going to want

1022
01:22:13,477 --> 01:22:15,597
to speak to it. I know Councillor Darling is, so

1023
01:22:15,597 --> 01:22:17,877
I'm happy to go to Councillor Barber if you'd like.

1024
01:22:18,058 --> 01:22:24,016
Reject to chair this item. If not, I'm happy, Chair.

1025
01:22:24,517 --> 01:22:27,696
I said, I'm happy to share it. So I'll ask

1026
01:22:27,717 --> 01:22:31,533
first, is there a mover of the motion. Okay, so

1027
01:22:31,533 --> 01:22:33,013
now I'm going to have to pass the chair. Is

1028
01:22:33,013 --> 01:22:35,813
there anyone who'd like to take the chair? By all

1029
01:22:35,813 --> 01:22:37,333
means, thank you, Deputy Mayor. So I'd like to move

1030
01:22:37,354 --> 01:22:41,206
the motion. Chair's yours. Thank you. So we have the

1031
01:22:41,387 --> 01:22:49,351
motion move. Is there a seconder. The motion is.

1032
01:22:51,506 --> 01:22:53,805
What is fake one moment? Sorry, we'll get it.

1033
01:23:12,287 --> 01:23:16,426
And procedurally, I just want to confirm Mr. Lahmard that

1034
01:23:16,466 --> 01:23:19,466
speakers may not register to speak to. Notice his emotions,

1035
01:23:19,466 --> 01:23:20,186
correct? Correct. Thank you.

1036
01:23:30,309 --> 01:23:35,451
So if I move, do we have a seconder. Okay,

1037
01:23:35,552 --> 01:23:37,531
seeing none, the motion doesn't make it to the floor.

1038
01:23:40,395 --> 01:23:42,374
Not a problem. We do have another notice of motion,

1039
01:23:42,374 --> 01:23:45,791
which is 16. 2. Again, I'll ask if the mover.

1040
01:23:48,215 --> 01:23:53,004
I'll ask if the chair. And I will move. We

1041
01:23:53,044 --> 01:23:59,558
have a mover. Is there a seconder. Okay, seeing none

1042
01:23:59,558 --> 01:24:00,998
the motion doesn't make it to the floor. Back to

1043
01:24:00,998 --> 01:24:02,678
you, Mr. Mayor. Thank you very much. So we have

1044
01:24:02,939 --> 01:24:06,358
no seconders for either of those motions noted. Uh, I

1045
01:24:06,358 --> 01:24:08,740
guess that would take us to the. Confirmation by -

1046
01:24:08,740 --> 01:24:11,358
law. Oh, close session. We got to go back to

1047
01:24:11,358 --> 01:24:13,753
the close. That's right. So at this point, I guess

1048
01:24:13,793 --> 01:24:16,953
we will go back into closed session. Uh, I need

1049
01:24:16,974 --> 01:24:19,545
to move for a seconder. So move by deputy mayor

1050
01:24:19,585 --> 01:24:21,865
and seconded by Council Burkkat. It's moved in second at

1051
01:24:21,905 --> 01:24:29,057
all in favor. So move. Thank you very much. Dip

1052
01:24:29,057 --> 01:24:30,337
in Mural, I'll pass to you just to take another

1053
01:24:30,358 --> 01:24:32,017
phone call, and I will see you guys in about

1054
01:24:32,017 --> 01:24:34,195
10 minutes. Please continue.

1055
03:13:02,508 --> 03:13:10,248
All right, so we're now. Welcome back into Open at

1056
03:13:10,269 --> 03:13:15,121
9. 15. May have a mover at this moment, so

1057
03:13:15,121 --> 03:13:18,101
move by Council Burk at seconded by Councillor Bureau. Any

1058
03:13:18,142 --> 03:13:21,642
questions or concerns, seeing none all in favor. So moved.

1059
03:13:23,018 --> 03:13:24,997
Coming out of Open, we've also got the appointment to

1060
03:13:25,037 --> 03:13:28,197
accessibility advisory committee. Do I have a mover? Councillor Burkat,

1061
03:13:28,197 --> 03:13:34,464
seconded by. Thank you, let's go. Councillor Bureau. Any other

1062
03:13:34,504 --> 03:13:38,624
questions or concerns? Seeing none, all in favor. So moved.

1063
03:13:38,645 --> 03:13:44,025
Last and final. DBIA, Stephen G. Cousins. We're gonna wait

1064
03:13:44,065 --> 03:13:46,185
till the one member of the DBI leaves from the

1065
03:13:46,366 --> 03:13:52,172
meeting as he is a conflict of interest. Moved by.

1066
03:13:53,121 --> 03:13:58,758
So move by Councillor. Darling, seconded by. Second and bye.

1067
03:13:58,886 --> 03:14:02,686
Oh, thank you, Councillor Burkat. Didn't see, I just see

1068
03:14:02,686 --> 03:14:05,866
that. So there, and you know questions, seeing none, all

1069
03:14:05,866 --> 03:14:10,685
in favor, so moved. Reappointing of hold co - director.

1070
03:14:10,685 --> 03:14:13,485
Mr. Fred Clifford, last one moved by Councillor Burkhat, seconded

1071
03:14:13,485 --> 03:14:19,150
by Councillor Darlingberg, Councillor Barber. Barber. It's been a long

1072
03:14:19,190 --> 03:14:23,168
day. Any questions or concerns, all in favor. So moved.

1073
03:14:24,462 --> 03:14:27,241
We're now gonna move to the confirmatory by - law.

1074
03:14:29,123 --> 03:14:31,452
Nine and a half hours later. We're there. So moved

1075
03:14:31,452 --> 03:14:36,136
by Councillor Burkat, seconded by. Deputy Mayor Beauty, I'll give

1076
03:14:36,136 --> 03:14:37,656
her on that one. She got fastest guns on the

1077
03:14:37,757 --> 03:14:42,513
West here. That seconding. Any other questions or concerns regarding

1078
03:14:42,513 --> 03:14:47,760
our confirmatory bylaw? Oh, we got one, Mr. Larmer. We

1079
03:14:47,760 --> 03:14:49,440
just gonna put on the screen just because this is

1080
03:14:49,480 --> 03:14:51,680
a new meeting. We had to confirm the by -

1081
03:14:51,680 --> 03:14:53,480
law from the other meeting was referred, and then we

1082
03:14:53,480 --> 03:14:56,080
have a conferendium by Bylaw for this meeting. So 053

1083
03:14:56,501 --> 03:15:01,040
- 2026 and 054 - 2026. So we get two

1084
03:15:01,080 --> 03:15:04,000
confirmatory bylaws. Yes, we did that. Now, first time for

1085
03:15:04,021 --> 03:15:08,673
everything, folks. We're doing them both in one, because that's

1086
03:15:08,673 --> 03:15:11,393
the kind of effective efficiency we expect from our clerks

1087
03:15:11,393 --> 03:15:15,329
department. Exactly. We'd hate to debate those. So do I

1088
03:15:15,329 --> 03:15:17,009
have a mover in a second or still? I got

1089
03:15:17,030 --> 03:15:19,649
Deputy Mayor Fast Gun Salute on the right. I got

1090
03:15:19,689 --> 03:15:22,929
another one over here, the seconder on the left. Any

1091
03:15:22,969 --> 03:15:27,289
other questions or concerns, seeing none, all in favor. So

1092
03:15:27,289 --> 03:15:31,034
moved. I will adjourn this official meeting at 9. 17

1093
03:15:31,735 --> 03:15:32,754
p. m. Thank you all.