[This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person -- it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.]

[7:47] And we're quite waiting for the last year, this is like the second.
[7:53] So I would like to call today's August 25th, council meeting to order and I would like to begin by acknowledging
[7:58] this meeting is taken place. So I'm going to unseated traditional territory, because the Yacht kind of keep within the Tama Foundation.
[8:06] And then that we share and we're going to leave the play on.
[8:10] I would like a motion to adopt the agenda of today's Council meeting.
[8:14] It's in my Council of Baldwin, seconded Council of Hatton, Paul and Fairirk.
[8:18] Motion is carried and we'll deal with a minute of the last meeting.
[8:23] I'm obviously 11 to the motion table without the minutes of that regular Council meeting.
[8:28] Councilor Eisler, seconded Councilor Duas, I'm on favor.
[8:31] Motion is carried.
[8:33] Our next thing will be our meeting.
[8:35] the report.
[8:45] In the 12th of August, I had an EMCR emergency management climate readiness situation
[8:52] or briefing. We have them here. We're right now the week. So I did one on the 19th as well,
[8:59] just to let us all know what the fire and vote situation was like in the province. On the 20th of August,
[9:06] I attended an RDCK board meeting. On the 22nd myself and several other counselors here,
[9:12] we're at the Crest and Farmers Market for Public Engagement, and we had lots of chat with people.
[9:18] And the one thing that's out on there is the Rolling Burroge motorcycle group that
[9:23] stopped in Crest and on Friday at Fire Hall. Several hundred bikers there and they are a group
[9:30] that has been assembled to travel across Canada, former firefighters, police officers and
[9:36] other emergency personnel who have had PTSD and if unified as a group to bring awareness to this
[9:43] and we're very supportive of each other. It's so nice to have them stop in our community
[9:49] and I'll say, when they look around, what a beautiful place we live in. And I agreed with them.
[9:56] That's what they're doing us. Yeah, thank you. August 17th. And we had two situation table meetings last
[10:03] on August 17th and 18th, and then I attended the Candidate Readiness Workshop on August 20th,
[10:10] and the invitation from the museum to honor the outgoing students and then also the farmer's market
[10:17] on the 22nd of August. Dr. Baldwin, just the farmer's market requires 10 days of,
[10:25] Remember, let's, let's try a new video on the back of the screen.
[10:29] Yeah, that's great.
[10:31] Yeah, that's great.
[10:32] How's it going?
[10:33] I, the 20th day, kind of the canon is ready.
[10:36] It's workshop in the 22nd, the former screen.
[10:39] Anyone else?
[10:40] How's it going?
[10:41] Yeah, on October 17th and October, we're going to just wait until we're,
[10:46] August 17th and August 18th.
[10:49] Put your glasses on and you'll see that scenario, not at all.
[10:52] a situation table meetings, August 18th as well emergency management planning committee meeting
[11:00] in the afternoon, and on August 19th, in Nelson at the joint resource recovery committee meeting.
[11:09] In the other reports, even now can I have a motion that the verbal and written reports of council
[11:15] be received, Councillor Eisner, Executive, Councillor Holland, all in favour?
[11:20] Motion is carried, and we'll write along, we will bow, we'll download in the motion
[11:26] that Councillor results itself into a committee of the whole.
[11:29] Councillor, do me a second, a Councillor Baldwin or a favour?
[11:33] Motion is carried, that brings us to our delegation, which is Canadian Cancer Society,
[11:38] you can work in 100 rate on, let's get challenge for question Vc. So you are on pattern.
[11:46] Thank you very much, Mayor DeBoon and Council for allowing me to present. We worked with
[11:53] the town of Creston to distribute rate on test kits over the last winter and I'm presenting
[11:58] the report summary of that project.
[12:03] So the 100 test kit challenge is a program that is
[12:08] One of the initiatives of take action on Raidon and take action on Raidon is funded by Health
[12:13] Canada.
[12:14] It's run by the Canadian Cancer Society and Cars, which is our Raidon Association with
[12:20] the intent of raising awareness across the country and working with various groups to do that.
[12:25] It's a turnkey program, it's free, but we certainly appreciate the staff and all the support
[12:31] that we had from your team in the community to run it.
[12:36] We were able to distribute test kits through the community, raise awareness as we did that.
[12:44] And then a couple of the other goals that we have among this program are to generate data, which I'm presenting today.
[12:51] And also to inspire legacy programs.
[12:53] So I'll just refer to my end slides about some resources that health Canada has developed to help support communities such as yourself with continuing discussion about rate on.
[13:02] The hundred test kit challenge is in just wrapping up its eight years, so we've been able to work
[13:07] with communities across the country. We have worked in all provinces and when first, when territory,
[13:14] as well, we have worked with some first nations in the AT groups. We have about a 74% return rate
[13:20] on our program, and part of that reason is because we have a structure to it. So although testing
[13:26] for rate on is easy, there are a lot of competing priorities in our life, and we find people tend
[13:31] forget to return it. So the program is structured in such a way to support people's all the way through
[13:37] the testing program. And then one of our other priorities is making sure that people actually
[13:44] reduce their rate on exposure. So although testing and the program really involves just the first step,
[13:50] we do want to support people with understanding what mitigation is and so our surveys show that about
[13:56] 50% of our past participants have taken action to reduce it if their levels were above 200.
[14:04] I have included all the communities that we've worked with in your package.
[14:08] I won't go through all those, but just for your reference, you can see we've worked with a number of other BC communities.
[14:14] So the reason that we're prioritizing this program is rate on is linked to lung cancer.
[14:19] So health Canada estimates about 3,000 people per year are dying of rate on related lung cancer.
[14:25] It is the number one cause of lung cancer for people who don't smoke and it is a contributing factor to those who do have a smoking history.
[14:32] So either current smokers or ever smokers, it adds to their risk factor as well.
[14:39] Now, Radon is founded our soil all across Canada.
[14:42] It is comes from uranium, uranium eventually decays and becomes radon, radon is a gas and it moves up out of our soil into the air.
[14:50] So any building that has contact with the ground can have a potential of having elevated levels of rate on.
[14:56] It doesn't just stay in the basement, it can circulate throughout the air.
[15:00] We'll focus on testing kind of from the lowest level up because typically levels are highest in the basement.
[15:06] Health Canada recommends testing buildings using a three-month test.
[15:10] And then if any levels are above 200, that the building owner take action to reduce them.
[15:16] And so those are the types of tests that we used in this project. We were able to distribute just over 100 detectors.
[15:23] And you'll see that we were able to issue 86 reports within 85% return rate.
[15:28] So really one of our better return rates of the community.
[15:32] You will see that one person may still have their detector in place.
[15:37] And so if they still have it, they can still mail it back to us.
[15:40] And we'll make sure that it gets analyzed.
[15:42] And there may be a handful of people that forgot to even set up their detector.
[15:46] And so again, if there are people that either have a detector,
[15:50] they can set them up still and then leave them in place for three months and return them after the program.
[15:57] Or if there is somebody that started it and forgot to return it, we're still taking it back so we want you to mail it back to us and we'll make sure that we get it analyzed.
[16:06] But this report is on the 86 reports that we've been able to issue and we do find that some people,
[16:13] we send these reports out by email, some people don't get them, so we also want to let people know that if they didn't get the report by email,
[16:19] can reach out to us and we will make sure that we help get them a report. But at this point,
[16:23] 86 people should have received their rate on test report and a one-pager with help some with
[16:29] understanding what the results of the report mean. And from the data that we have issued in these
[16:35] report, 19% of these reports are above 200. So that's health Canada's action guideline. And so it
[16:42] breaks down like this, 36% are in the green and those are reports that are under 100 beckorals.
[16:49] 45% are in the yellow and that's representing one to 200 beckerels, so that's just coming up to the health candidate guideline.
[16:56] And then in the red are the ones that are between two and six hundred, so we had 16% of reports were in that two to six hundred level.
[17:04] And then there was a report in each of the next levels, purple represents six hundred to a thousand and black as a thousand.
[17:11] And so we lay out the information this way because exposure to rate on does increase as the exposure increases.
[17:19] And so as the levels go up, that does represent an increased health risk.
[17:24] Now, some of the other data that we gathered is about housing types.
[17:27] You can see that the majority of people in this program participated were in single detached homes.
[17:32] There were some semi detached couple mobile homes and a couple apartments or condo style units.
[17:39] And so, you can see that all the ones that were high were single detached homes, but we do have resources for other groups because there has been other programs where we've seen mobile homes with elevated levels or condos or stradas or apartments that also could have elevated levels.
[17:59] And the other thing that we have had is renters.
[18:02] And so you can see in the next chart that there was one renter who did test high.
[18:10] And those often require some additional resources, because a renter now needs to go and talk to their landlord.
[18:16] A landlord really is the one that's responsible for the mitigation.
[18:20] And so we do have resources for renters.
[18:23] Also, if there happened to be strada, there's a co-ownership that structure there as well.
[18:27] and so we do can support those as well in talking with their ownership group, if there is a need for reduction.
[18:35] The other thing that we ask is about testing, so our goal of the program really is to support people through testing the first time.
[18:43] And so you can see that the majority of people, this was the first time they tested, but you can see that there was a few people that they had already tested before.
[18:50] And this is not unusual. Sometimes people do need to test a couple times before they take action to reduce it.
[18:58] But we do want to tell people that the tests that we use in this program are accurate.
[19:01] We do quality assurance on it, so they can have confidence in the results of the report and move to take action on it.
[19:09] We also asked about rate on systems that were installed in the home.
[19:12] And so you can see that the majority didn't have any system installed or they didn't know.
[19:18] But there was a couple with that passive stack.
[19:20] So that is the current building code in BC and in the
[19:23] Crestan area that extended rough in that does extend out.
[19:29] And so if those levels were high, then they would just need to make sure
[19:34] that the fan is properly sized and added on to that passive system.
[19:38] But you can see that those ones were below the 200 level.
[19:42] And then the other thing that we ask is age of construction.
[19:44] And so often we get questions from people about,
[19:47] know, is it in old homes or new homes? And you can see here in this graph, the top level
[19:53] top bar is, we don't know the age of construction, or they didn't know, so they didn't
[19:59] provide it to us. But then each bar here represents a decade. And we've just simplified the
[20:04] results. So green represents levels below 200, red represents levels above 200. And then
[20:09] the numbers at the bottom represent the number of units in that area. And so are the number
[20:16] data per bar. And so you can see that it does go across age of construction. So although we
[20:24] don't have any in the 2020 or more recent, you can see that the numbers of data points are quite
[20:31] low in that age group. But what we have found from doing this project across the country is that
[20:36] it is in older homes. It is in newer homes. Everybody really does need to test to know with
[20:41] they need to either add a fan if they've got that passive system or add a full system.
[20:48] And you can see in this graph, just that we've worked with other communities across BC,
[20:53] and so you happen to be kind of right in the middle, although the BC average is about 8%,
[20:57] we do find at a community level that we've certainly have a number of communities that are higher than
[21:03] that provincial average. So this data is all for you to help answer some of the questions that we find
[21:09] Mayor and Councils might have or that your citizens may have to help you with supporting
[21:15] some answers to them.
[21:17] We are here to continue to provide support to you or to the participants or your citizens
[21:22] about right on awareness, but this is our public report now, so this will be shared out on
[21:26] our website.
[21:28] It's a one-page report with the results of the survey on the one side and then with general
[21:32] information about right on on the other side so that it answers some of these basic questions
[21:37] people have about the health risk of rate on how to mitigate it and how to find a certified professional.
[21:43] And then the additional slides that I've provided also provides some additional information.
[21:48] We, this is program is funded by Health Canada and so we are funding to do it one year,
[21:52] but we can include repeat programs for communities if we're able to find partner funding.
[21:59] There also is information about our certification program so anybody that needs to reduce their
[22:04] on level can hire a certified professional, and there is a list that you can direct people to online.
[22:10] There is also a mitigation grant. So for those that don't have the finances and are
[22:16] concerned about the cost of mitigation, they can apply to the Canadian Lung Association before the
[22:21] Lung's Matter Grant. They need a long-term test report, a quote from a CNRPP professional, and then
[22:26] need to qualify, and they can qualify one of two ways.
[22:30] So they can provide proof of income and they are under the median income or also they would qualify if they had a lung cancer diagnosis.
[22:38] So those are two ways that they could qualify. Another thing I wanted to point out is that BC does have a pilot program.
[22:46] It's a screening program for those that are have been exposed to high levels. And so we do find that we get questions from people saying,
[22:52] I've lived in my house for 20 years, and I'm just finding out now about rate on, and so they can go to the BC Cancer
[22:58] site. If their levels are 800 or if they're even approaching, they can ask to be included in this,
[23:06] and this is a lung house check just to see what their lung exposure might be at this point.
[23:13] And then the last slides are the rate on action guides that health Canada have developed for
[23:17] municipalities. And so I've just put some quick summaries of what they're included, but they're
[23:22] really great guides for communities to read and see suggestions on how you can continue to support
[23:27] your citizens with right on awareness. There's some really easy things like putting information on your
[23:33] website or more in-depth things like testing all your municipal buildings and that sort of thing.
[23:38] Thank you very much for the time and I'm happy to answer any questions.
[23:43] Thank you.
[23:43] Thank you.
[23:46] Thanks, man.
[23:48] That was good.
[23:49] Very interesting report.
[23:51] Two quick questions.
[23:52] One is, we used to connect this information to the local media.
[23:57] So, if you want to get people to participate seeing the results of this will be
[24:02] important step long.
[24:04] And then the second part of the question is, are there other communities so far that
[24:08] taking you up on your request to run the program again, because we haven't really pissed about
[24:14] context for that today, but just wondering, are other communities doing that?
[24:19] Yeah, thank you for the question. And so we will circulate it. We do have a draft press release that we
[24:25] shared with Asha and that we will share so that we can help the community with communications as well as
[24:32] related to the local media. We bill, like I said, it's accessible on our website as of now so that people can access that as well.
[24:42] And then yeah, we do have repeat communities. We've worked with actually at the regional level. We've worked with the regional district of central Okanagan and the regional district of Okanagan,
[24:53] to support them a couple of years with their communities.
[24:56] We've also worked with Kimberly, multiple years,
[25:01] and in all of her, although it's in the RDS a couple of times,
[25:05] and in B.C., and then in other provinces,
[25:08] we've worked with other communities as well.
[25:10] We find that, like you've kind of inferred that.
[25:13] Once people start to see the results,
[25:15] and they see that other people have tested now,
[25:18] they're more interested in testing as well.
[25:20] sometimes some of us need sort of some other people to go ahead and do it first and then then
[25:26] we do see a pick up of testing after that. I was just wondering if a community did not run a
[25:36] program a second time and just actually get free like and get it tested. So yeah, we don't actually
[25:47] sell test kits but there are kids available and so yeah certainly people can purchase them
[25:51] online, and we do have information about that on the second page on that community report.
[25:57] And so they can go on to our take action on rate on website, and we have a list of different
[26:00] community, sorry, different companies that sell kits, there that people can purchase from.
[26:06] In addition, the libraries also have digital monitors that are available, so people can
[26:11] borrow them if they want to do that.
[26:13] First, it's sort of a screening because it's a shorter term, and they're off the shelves
[26:19] for the summer but then they kind of go back on now as we start to get into the winter. So they will
[26:24] become available again. And then on the CNRPP website there is information about digital monitors
[26:31] as well. So we use the one used kit kits in this program but there are electronic ones that you can
[26:36] connect to your smartphone and that sort of thing. And so there's a list of those on the CNRPP website as well.
[26:43] I think it was just curious about if you have a mapping if like does it work like let's say the 10 were in one neighborhood do you have that mapped and would you recommend
[26:58] like approaching those people around that neighborhood is that how it like does I don't like you have to teach me.
[27:04] Yeah, it works.
[27:05] One area will be have more rate on and what maybe other areas
[27:08] and questions will not have less.
[27:10] So is do not that and we're able to have that data?
[27:13] So that is a common question that we get.
[27:15] So yeah, thanks for asking that.
[27:16] Because we do map it.
[27:18] We're very cautious with it.
[27:19] And so we walk through a little bit with that
[27:21] when we review the data and putting this present together.
[27:27] And what we find in your community is the same as what we find
[27:32] in most of the all the other communities that we've done in the country that they are distributed throughout the
[27:38] the area. So there's no one neighborhood or they're not all in one area. So you can have
[27:43] we sort of put the the colored marks to differentiate between the different levels and you can have like
[27:50] one you know green house next to a red house next to a yellow. So even on one street it can be you know one
[27:57] low one as high. And that's quite common, even with the same developer, even with
[28:02] the same proximity of age of construction and all those sorts of things it can
[28:06] range. So yeah, it's important for everybody to test. But we do check it just in
[28:11] case, there's something, you know, unique like you said. And then what we do, so
[28:17] we protect our mapping data because it's, you know, we protect privacy, but we
[28:23] at it from that level, but we do share it with the BC CDC and they then map it at a summary
[28:29] level, so they roll up the details into and they protect individual privacy. And so you can
[28:36] go on the BC CDC rate on map and find the data there as well. Interesting. Thank you for that.
[28:45] So this morning when I turned my phone on, that was in a pop up reminder, we turned your
[28:50] on detector. Well, we hear them like, and yes, I'm not the one. They said, I'm not
[28:54] he's an astronaut for our radar detector, and she said, no, they're all up. I purchased
[28:59] mine independently. I really appreciate all this information, and as soon as I find the
[29:05] envelope is going in, but I think I know what the envelope is. But I do have a question, and
[29:10] is there any observable, a conclusive link between the cumulative effects of wildfires
[29:16] will array.
[29:19] Yeah, that is a good question and it is a serious thing that we're looking at right now.
[29:23] So there is a number of researchers that are taking a look at it from a few different angles.
[29:28] So as your question about exposure, the data is still early.
[29:34] So there really isn't any confirmed research at that point,
[29:38] but we do know that there is research with the smoking combination
[29:43] that the damage that smoking can do to lungs makes lungs more easily damaged by the
[29:58] So...
[30:00] Issues, you know, other illnesses that impact our lungs can also make people more vulnerable. That's the word I was looking for.
[30:08] To to risk of lung cancer when then that's combined with exposure to rate on. So there's a number of research papers that I have are ongoing.
[30:18] But yeah, it's it's not been published yet.
[30:23] I appreciate doing the research, so I think it's something that is probably important that they do, so.
[30:30] Yeah. Thank you for all your information.
[30:34] And like I said, mind going back to the lab as soon as I find the album.
[30:38] Sounds good, and if you need help with that, we're here to help connect you with where to send it.
[30:42] So, let us know.
[30:44] And pretty sure I know what this was.
[30:46] Thank you.
[30:48] Yeah, thank you very much for your time.
[30:51] Okay, so well and we have a motion up to the end.
[30:56] We've got what it is.
[30:58] We've got a committee council receives a delegation in the community council's society,
[31:02] and what do you think?
[31:03] 100 rate on just get challenge.
[31:06] That's the VC bill.
[31:08] So as members, second, is that?
[31:10] Shall we follow them?
[31:11] I want to say them.
[31:12] I believe we're in two.
[31:13] Yes.
[31:14] Thank you.
[31:15] Thank you.
[31:16] And the fact that I was.
[32:22] And then we'll go to the next one of our council direction requests from the Director of Community Services for the only by-law amendment that's how it's going to extend.
[32:35] Thank you, Russia. Council.
[32:38] So this report presents the two proposed amendments for our current zoning by-law and seeks council direction and should proceed with by-law amendments for person.
[32:47] and reading out how coming meeting.
[32:50] So the first amendment is,
[32:52] opportunities to fence regulations.
[32:55] It would allow residential properties
[32:56] that front-to-exervantial highway
[32:58] to construct a six-foot fence versus the four-foot fence,
[33:02] which is currently permitted.
[33:05] The amendment responds to some concerns raised by residents
[33:08] that live in those areas to traffic noise.
[33:11] And like, like, our public safety security,
[33:13] all those types of things.
[33:15] Properties would still be required
[33:16] to comply with ministry of transportation and transit requirements, such as an
[33:21] encrophtment structure permit and the corner visibility regulations will remain in place
[33:27] to maintain that safe site line at interceptions.
[33:30] The second proposed amendment is speaking to some tenure restrictions that we have, so we're
[33:37] looking at removing tenure restrictions for some residential units in a commercial highly
[33:42] service, partial neighborhood, and industrial general zones. So currently these units can only be
[33:48] occupied by the principal owner, caretaker, or operator of set business. These restrictions are a
[33:54] bit of a carryover from a previous by law and we're coming practice at that time in 1989. And we're
[34:01] intended really to ensure that the residential uses remain support meant to those primary uses.
[34:07] Housing availability continues to be a significant challenge in question and staff have also
[34:12] heard from residents and business owners that they're looking at, you know,
[34:16] they're requesting some greater flexibility around that
[34:18] tenure ship. So removing restrictions could support, you know,
[34:21] additional housing opportunities, rental opportunities, housing
[34:24] choice, and they even open up some currently vacant units to become
[34:29] available. Tenure restrictions are also very challenging to administer
[34:33] an enforce. They require a constant ongoing verification, whether
[34:37] the documents occupants meet those by a lot of requirements or not. So
[34:41] moving these restrictions with simplified administration and reducing ambiguity.
[34:47] So as these amendments are also consistent with our official community plan,
[34:51] a public hearing is not required for these amendments under the local government act,
[34:55] although council may choose to proceed with the public hearing effect.
[35:01] Any questions? I'm so sorry. I didn't really understand the context of the R6,
[35:08] So I mean, where it's took it looking at a manufacturer home and that detain you're there.
[35:15] And I was saying that if you haven't had any complaints about that, because there were
[35:19] divisions on that, much of why it isn't perhaps being included in the context of this.
[35:25] Absolutely.
[35:27] Um, I think we can look at this, you know, as those things presents, right now when we
[35:32] the look at the few mobile home parts we have it typically is the one or chair and taker of that
[35:40] park that is living in those spaces, but it's definitely open. It's a combination like anything else.
[35:48] So maybe it can be run remotely and between on for this as incremental accommodation for something.
[35:55] I'm going to read the vote, but that's connected with the council received.
[36:04] The council received that says August 11, but we need to log in 25 council direction.
[36:08] Request the title to go on the amendment by our fence, height to mixed use 10 years.
[36:12] Relicator community services for information.
[36:15] And further that council direct staff to present that proposed by law amendments to council consideration.
[36:20] And for first and second reading and upcoming council meeting,
[36:24] some special by a council member,
[36:26] do you want to be a little bigger than you think?
[36:29] Yeah, we're in committee.
[36:30] Sorry, I have to recommend to you.
[36:31] I need to know if anybody can answer me.
[36:33] We're all not.
[36:34] We're all not.
[36:35] Okay.
[36:36] We got it.
[36:38] Well, let's get out of the committee.
[36:39] The whole one is that.
[36:40] I have to do that.
[36:41] Let's go.
[36:42] The next motion is that we rise out of the committee,
[36:44] the whole one.
[36:45] Dr. Baldwin, we have to help the hot one.
[36:47] On Facebook.
[36:48] option is very long with our division report. Then corporate services request for
[36:54] designated the Director of Corporate Services Officers and Employees by
[36:59] that 2,056 vote option. Thank you for your question. So council has provided
[37:04] first-click for the greetings of the officers that I'm going to take a assist to officers
[37:09] by law as presented. This pilot just is a reminder establishes the corporate officer
[37:15] financial officer and CAO for the organization pursuant to the goals specified within each
[37:21] charter. So at this time we are just looking for an adoption of this album.
[37:30] The Council received this report, and further the Council on the Town of Breast and Officer by
[37:39] last 2056. We adopted, who shall be back down to the moment, Secretary of Health and the Honourance,
[37:44] on favor, we can be very to that. Well, is now adopted. We'll go on to the community services. We'd
[37:53] for the session of the undergraduate community services,
[37:56] build communities strong and find their part one week of expansion.
[38:06] So this report seeks Council authorization for staff to submit an expression of interest
[38:12] and future grant application to the field community strong fund,
[38:16] direct delivery stream, or the airport run-mates syndrome project.
[38:21] This project has been identified as a priority in the press in a fairly regional
[38:24] your master plan has a estimated cost of $1.7 million, but for post-project, would extend
[38:31] runway 1533 from its current length, which is approximately $3,900 or more for feed to
[38:37] approximately $4,500 feed. The existing runway can create some operational challenges during
[38:46] hot weather and for some heavier aircraft, including air ambulance services. The extension
[38:50] And we'd also help accommodate future ambulance sleep requirements improve reliability for emergency medical transfer and and has the ability to support emergency response as well for our suppression.
[39:03] The runway extension would also improve regional connectivity supporting economic and tourism development.
[39:09] The project does align with the Bell Community Strong Fund, securing additional funding or sorry external funding
[39:15] reproduced financial impact on local taxpayers while advancing the Agapra Festival.
[39:24] Any questions on this one? Can we start talking?
[39:27] Yeah, I think it looks great.
[39:31] And I went online and just looked at the criteria for the fund.
[39:36] And I just have some questions when we talk about climate resilience and, like, understanding
[39:46] how the extension of the run way puts climate resilience as a factor. So trying to figure that out myself,
[39:58] I can't try to understand, is that, like, are we looking at composition as the actual turnack?
[40:03] And when we talk about that, rather than if they go to your firm plane to land.
[40:09] That's right.
[40:09] So climate resilience is a little bit around.
[40:12] You know, yes, it will be easier for some larger aircraft for wildfires.
[40:17] Especially in the things like that, but it's the actual tarmac piece.
[40:20] And the really fun weather right now has it's replaceable.
[40:24] Hopefully, add some climate resilience to that infrastructure.
[40:27] And so supplemental food.
[40:31] like that. So I went and looked back at our airport strategic plan and we've got the
[40:40] cost break down sheet as well, but it doesn't really like is there a big difference in the price for
[40:48] materials that make this and more climate resistant type of tarmac surface because I don't
[40:56] And when I read through the document again, it doesn't really talk about that type of changes to the runway.
[41:04] It just talks about extending it and putting those resources on the end.
[41:12] So I can't talk about adding that.
[41:15] But I think it might need to resurface the entire runway.
[41:19] We are using that as criteria for the grant.
[41:22] I'm honestly not too sure. I'd have to follow up with the director. We had a fast
[41:31] be estimate for approximately that amount, but I can't see to be sure if it's a contest.
[41:38] That's great.
[41:39] I think that's right.
[41:40] The requirement resiliency is actually about the length of the runway. As a temperature
[41:45] is going up, it actually makes planes that can take off and that's why it's a runway
[41:50] not even take on. And as the Iranians changes their fleet, they're actually increasing
[41:55] size of their plane. So, in cold weather, they are able to take off in the distance.
[41:59] But in temperatures over 30 degrees Celsius, they can often decrease in the long enough
[42:04] for them because they lift as changes as temperature rises. So, what that climate resiliency
[42:11] is that we're getting more and more days over those 30 degrees Celsius days, which then
[42:15] which at risk those, the ability for those types of pains to take off. So by adding that
[42:21] extension, that actually extends that ability to take off in higher temperature, so that's
[42:26] those days.
[42:33] Yes.
[42:34] Then I would like the motion at the August 25th, 2020. It's right for the city. I will build communities
[42:41] problem. Fund, airport runway extension. I'm in the direction of community service as a
[42:45] received information and accounts are authorized to staff and prepare and submit flat applications
[42:51] through the bill communities. Drug fund, the rate of delivery to get a $2 million one
[42:56] of the most $60,000, $900,000. In further accounts are authorized to staff of
[43:01] under seat of the grant to administer the funding to complete the airport, airport loan
[43:05] that should project if successful.
[43:09] Councilor Halt, that can get Councilor Eisner, discussion.
[43:13] All in favor, motion is carry in, very dangerous across the country.
[43:18] One of the benefits that would be a car for you, and we actually got a vast ability to
[43:22] get.
[43:22] It's competitive, and it's a lot of money, but it will deserve to be one of the focus on it.
[43:29] Okay, so you're still here for me, and I will be able to buy a lot of options.
[43:34] So this report presents the encroachment by-law and associated by-laws to modernize the
[43:40] test of corrosion and managing our encroachments.
[43:43] The proposed amendments have outdated definitions, clarify the distinction between major
[43:48] and minor encroachments, revise some legislative references, staff titles, and remove the
[43:54] actual agreement on the by-law to provide some more administrative flexibility.
[43:58] The final also establishes a more comprehensive risk management framework in the form of major encroachments as major encroachments will be required to have a cabinet registered on title to clearly identify the encroachment.
[44:12] Overall, the proposed changes are intended to improve administrative efficiency, provider clarity for applicants and staff, strengthen our risk management practices, and ensure our encroachment for regulations for many current and effective.
[44:25] So, the recommendation of our council today is to adopt the three by-laws.
[44:33] One has our hand up.
[44:35] So this is four parts. First, that we receive this information.
[44:39] Second, that how we encoder by-law number two zero six zero.
[44:43] Twenty twenty six be adopted.
[44:45] And then by-law, notice the enforcement amendment by-law number two zero six one twenty twenty six be adopted.
[44:52] You're welcome.
[44:53] Thank you.
[44:54] Thank you.
[45:00] So we'll start with the first one, and the third motion is that we receive this for information.
[45:06] Motion by council, aye, aye, aye, second accounts for following. All in favour, motion carry. Next, the highway
[45:12] encoder by land number 206026B adopted, counter-ball wound, second accounts are domestic to all in favour.
[45:21] Motion carries. Next that by law, notice enforcement amendment,
[45:26] Kyla 206-120-160 adopted.
[45:30] There are buttons that get captured fallen on favorite. Motion carried.
[45:37] And then last that feeds and charges amendment by the number 206-32026 feet adopted.
[45:44] Councillor Dumbus, second accounts for Eisner on favorite. Motion is carried.
[45:50] So now a little bit protective services information report from the emergency management coordinator regarding hazardous risk and vulnerability assessment.
[46:18] They sure want you put together.
[46:20] We need to be sure.
[46:21] Quick quick.
[46:22] Quick quick.
[46:26] I'll just stack it in both of the way.
[46:33] We're going to the last conversation.
[46:35] Yes, so we received that and we received that and there's a lot of happy to stay very excited about having our HIV
[46:45] HIV.
[46:48] And so, and HIV has a risk and vulnerability assessment, and I live in the world and acronyms.
[46:55] So, the HIV-Aconcerers, the Hazard Impact and Preston, the AIDS-Cancerous Polymer
[47:00] believes that it can serve as a classic medicine associated with the hazards.
[47:04] So, we've listed in requirements in considering how there is considering a risk that has
[47:10] a risk and has a consequence that's. Overall, this HIV-A provides the foundation for
[47:15] emergency planning and the pairness, or increased resiliency question. And when I say
[47:20] a press in specific hazards, I'm talking about hazards that impact the time for us and directly,
[47:27] but also hazards that occur over on press, and that happen in the next year. So,
[47:36] just for
[47:36] So
[47:41] a housing is a circumstance condition or process of phenomenon that can be human or natural
[47:48] cost that gives rise to an emergency.
[47:52] The vulnerability is characteristic or circumstance in the community that makes it more susceptible
[47:57] to the impact of the hazards.
[48:00] And the risk of the combination of the likelihood of the hazard occurring and the severity of the
[48:04] consequences.
[48:05] So for example, air pollution is a hazard, predate, air pollution is a hazard, and the vulnerability
[48:13] could be aged, for example, very young or elderly, could be more susceptible to the impacts
[48:18] of the hazard, so that's vulnerable. And then risk for air quality for the air pollution,
[48:24] for example, is a level, because the likelihood while high has lower consequences.
[48:31] So
[48:36] our consultants used a little toolkit as the foundation for developing this HRBD, which encourages scientific knowledge and local scientific knowledge and local knowledge.
[48:48] These observational and existing data.
[48:52] I consider past event, current research, as well as future projections, specifically climate
[48:58] projections.
[49:00] And then there was thorough engagement as well with partners, both in-person and online,
[49:05] which will speak to a little bit more a little bit here.
[49:11] So, the problems I identify is 57 hazards that are applicable in BC, six of those hazards
[49:18] are not all relevant to Preston, 27 of those hazards are what we consider two or one hazards.
[49:23] And so those are the highest priority hazards or hazards of degrees in the current.
[49:28] Whereas 24 of them, we can sort of share two hazards, which are the lower relative risk hazards.
[49:36] And so all hazards were ranked on a likelihood scale from rare to almost certain.
[49:43] With rare being less than 1% chance at that hazard occurring in any given year and almost certain
[49:48] the hazard predictors on 50% chance occurring in any given year.
[49:52] So we're in another way to say it is 1 in 100 year event for a rare event.
[50:11] And so we looked at both non-climate and climate-related hazards.
[50:15] We considered population changes, new work signing industry,
[50:19] land use development, infrastructure for non-climate hazards,
[50:22] and then the climate-related hazards really looked at those project-related future trends.
[50:27] We also looked at current and future livelihoods with current being hazards in the near-mediate
[50:33] and then future interactions out to 2015.
[50:42] So, the bulk of the feedback we received,
[50:45] how to do with health care assistance,
[50:46] we let the consequences of assistance for all the hazards.
[50:50] And this is where we did our partner engagement workshop
[50:52] over the World Cafe style engagement
[50:54] where we invited community partners,
[50:56] volunteers, First Nations.
[50:58] We had a specific workshop with the Yaklingki,
[51:02] lower pretty best staff who sat down with us.
[51:05] And then anyone who wasn't able to attend the
[51:07] First of all, we're invited for one I want you to use.
[51:11] We also did a public survey with the community and we had really good feedback there.
[51:16] There was desktop research and then also a subject matter expert and put it into the document as well.
[51:25] So for each hazard we looked at 11 consequence categories. All the categories ranked from
[51:30] from non-to-street.
[51:35] Petalities, for example,
[51:39] non-meaning that there are no fatalities
[51:41] to extreme-meaning many fatalities
[51:45] and for exceeding our local resources,
[51:48] going into an eventual federal
[51:49] or even international resources.
[51:51] Another example is psychological impacts
[51:54] with non-being unlikely to result in a short
[51:57] or long-term trauma or extreme being widespread
[52:00] then in terms of technical assessment.
[52:05] And again, there are 11 categories for each hazard.
[52:10] And that brings us to our risk scoring. So that's, um, so each hazard, both current and
[52:16] likelihood assessments were done, as well as the consequences assessments. And then that brings us
[52:22] to our risk matrix, which is my favorite part of the document.
[52:28] And so,
[52:31] So how likely was the hazard to repair and the consequences on the bottom? How severe are the consequences?
[52:38] In the top right-hand corner, where we have it in red, that's our higher consequences more likely to happen and the green and the left corner, lower consequences.
[52:48] So we're like here and currently we have Walber, are there only hazards? Only only high hazard.
[52:57] Harvest hazard, whereas we look at future.
[53:01] Production, some of those hazards do bump up.
[53:04] Extreme heat, drought, wastewater, rail, those all do bump up into that red category.
[53:11] And I'll just pause here for any questions.
[53:15] I've got stuck on the stage when I went through this first time and I looked it up and it's a recurring way, right?
[53:22] So I'm trying to figure out how is that connect to space weather or does it connect?
[53:26] No, it doesn't.
[53:27] It doesn't.
[53:27] It doesn't.
[53:28] It doesn't.
[53:28] It doesn't.
[53:29] It doesn't.
[53:29] It doesn't.
[53:31] It doesn't.
[53:32] It doesn't.
[53:32] It doesn't.
[53:34] It doesn't.
[53:34] It doesn't.
[53:37] It doesn't.
[53:40] because if it did happen, it could have more severe.
[53:43] I'm sorry, you're like, you know, I really like you with that.
[53:48] You're gonna see, it seemed like these are whatever it is.
[53:50] I should have noticed if I never looked at it.
[53:52] It's these, I think, should actually be a little bit lower.
[53:55] They're, because that's really, that would be clearly a big way to pretty, like,
[54:00] especially back and forth.
[54:00] So that one actually, I think should be lower, and then bumped into the right.
[54:03] So I think that one.
[54:04] But some ways, whether it in particular, that was also something that struck me as...
[54:08] That one could happen, I guess, based on whether actually
[54:12] how it's cryptic will.
[54:13] It sounds awesome.
[54:15] We just saw it.
[54:16] I wasn't talking about it much.
[54:17] I think it was consequences artists.
[54:19] Hi, right.
[54:21] It's like, it could cost power out of the end.
[54:24] Right.
[54:24] Like that.
[54:24] But not very likely to happen.
[54:27] Well, it wasn't.
[54:28] I like the category.
[54:29] So maybe things have changed.
[54:32] Sorry.
[54:32] More likely to happen.
[54:33] Lower cost.
[54:34] It's for that one.
[54:35] Yeah.
[54:35] The sea, so I think that one's a bit of an error.
[54:39] That one should go down into the right.
[54:41] So we can have higher consequences, but very, very, very,
[54:43] I don't think I happen.
[54:45] Stop, help that.
[54:47] Yep, now I go to all these types of levels.
[54:49] No, that's a very question.
[54:53] They had recorded in the school seven.
[54:55] Well, that's a very big question.
[54:56] And then we looked at vulnerabilities for questions.
[54:59] So it's one thing to understand or hasn't it,
[55:02] but how are you naturally in that dusk?
[55:05] So we looked at three categories of vulnerabilities.
[55:07] So we have a third-party infrastructure and services,
[55:10] social and economic and physical and environmental vulnerabilities.
[55:16] So for a critical and any infrastructure vulnerabilities,
[55:21] there were some highlights, for example,
[55:23] dependence on a power supply with limited backup,
[55:26] reliance on peer transportation routes with end-fuel supplies,
[55:30] Bayesian or Compacity Constructing Assets,
[55:33] exposure over infrastructure and environment hazards.
[55:35] So, those are some of the examples in our critical infrastructure vulnerability category.
[55:44] And then we go and look at our social and economic vulnerability that is quite different.
[55:49] And the way this has looked at is where something called the Canadian index of some of vulnerability,
[55:54] which is the stats Canada.
[55:58] It is created by stats Canada and it provides them social vulnerability score progress,
[56:02] and based on four dimension categories.
[56:05] And you can see the map there is all blue with very dark blue
[56:09] in the middle, which tells us that there are no areas
[56:12] in question, where we have a low vulnerability score.
[56:16] And specifically is because mostly because I've
[56:19] mentioned two, we're about 80% of our categorizing
[56:24] or our narrative in question.
[56:27] And age is really, I think, the driving factor behind that one.
[56:31] So again, it's completely spread out on a request and a little bit more concentrated in the center,
[56:36] I'm not slightly due to population, but yeah, so that that's a good to know for us,
[56:41] especially for planning, as I said, as I mentioned to you, is just 80% in the question.
[56:50] That really does influence our planning of preparedness moving forward.
[56:56] As well, there are some environmental vulnerabilities, such as our dependence on wetlands of
[57:01] parent areas for water storage, water quality, and drought. We have land and water management activities
[57:08] that are outside of the town that could influence our runoff and erosion. And there are some
[57:14] state terrain that could cause debris flows, not fires, you know, those things could impact our
[57:18] roadways and things like that.
[57:24] And that brings us to the meat and potatoes of the document,
[57:27] which is our all-hundred summary. And so this is where each hazard is looked at and given
[57:35] sort of more detailed analysis, but with the higher priority hazards list of first. So wall
[57:40] priorities on the top, and then it goes down from there. Tier 1 hazards have a more detailed
[57:45] analysis, but each hazard has a background likely to hurt rationale, key consequences, and
[57:51] compounding relationships, so how do you both hazards interact with one another?
[58:00] I really wanted
[58:01] to highlight some of the existing risk reduction measures we've already had in person because there are
[58:06] for you and we have our very emergency management organization with a number of services
[58:11] in Custon, our emergency management teams, by our ambulance police, we have a number of
[58:16] those services really well set up and define in Custon. There are also a number of funds and reports
[58:23] that already exist and do get implemented here in Custon, as well as other members of the public
[58:29] education, staff training, building clothes, of course, not selling bylaws, etc.
[58:38] And that brings
[58:38] us to our resilience recommendations. So what can we do moving forward to become more
[58:43] resilient and accustomed?
[58:47] And so their recommendations are broken out a little bit. There are
[58:50] over-arching hazard recommendations, and then there are also hazard specific recommendations
[58:55] based on priority hazard. For overarching hazard recommendations, thankfully, all of the top five
[59:02] recommendations are already on our work plans. So we already have business continuity in our
[59:07] Ponds for next year. We do have a disaster response plan. We're looking at those amendments
[59:13] this year and next year. We are having RFP out currently for a climate adaptation plan.
[59:19] We are looking at during our evacuation planning, both planning next year as well and we're currently
[59:24] working on our public information plan. So good news that we're already progressing in all of these areas.
[59:33] And then we come to the client for her, he has her recommendations.
[59:37] And again, some of the work we're already doing some of the work, and some of it is already in our work plans.
[59:43] So for example, reducing all of our exposure to public works, as well as other critical infrastructure.
[59:49] Our first work coordinator has already been working on some of these critical infrastructure assessments and looking at ways to mitigate those.
[59:55] We do have an extremely heat response plan that we can look at incorporating potentially.
[1:00:01] Recommendations. We are looking at some hazards specific planning in the next couple years. You know, we may consider
[1:00:06] bulky oath to drop response and pandemic response specifically, and then it also recommends some wastewater upgrading,
[1:00:15] including install back-of-power, call-the-stream, left-station, upgraded, or state assistance.
[1:00:19] There are a number of other recommendations, but these are some of the top ones.
[1:00:26] And not the third, there are a number of maps
[1:00:28] of support planning, and it's also just really interesting, I think, to look at my really
[1:00:33] like this wall burn map. You can see Crescent really doesn't have a lot of risk identified
[1:00:39] on this map, but all of the surrounding areas are quite high. Again, that speaks to the hazards
[1:00:46] that impact us in the valley.
[1:00:51] Any other questions about that?
[1:00:54] Now, I have some questions.
[1:00:58] You have this to hold us to recommendations here.
[1:01:02] And people always ask, are we prepared?
[1:01:05] The fact that it says here a lot, that's for in-progress or part of it again.
[1:01:10] I don't want that to be confused with the fact that we haven't done anything.
[1:01:13] So, I know that there's a lot of work here, and that there are some plans in place that require more detail.
[1:01:19] But I just want people to understand that the fact that it says here,
[1:01:23] that to begin, it doesn't mean that at the least point we haven't been planning, so I just want
[1:01:27] some of those therapies. Sure, absolutely. Is there anything specifically you want to
[1:01:31] eradicate, Sean? No, I'm really, but again, when you see, you have a business continuity plan
[1:01:37] disaster and response plan, all these different plans, those have been mean, like we have plans in place,
[1:01:46] but by you. There are, there are things we can do to update those in Bimbledes plans, and that's just
[1:01:51] I wanted to be clear on is the fact that we're doing this written here and it almost looks like well we haven't even started that right question clear.
[1:01:59] Yeah, so business partner and I'll speak to a lot of specific ways so that fun we do have
[1:02:05] her and us for business continuity absolutely it's really going to help us specifically with the IT side of things it's really going to help us just respond
[1:02:14] or quickly, or having a better idea of exactly where to start,
[1:02:18] but it's not to say that, you know, we're going to be completely lost
[1:02:21] if something happens.
[1:02:22] As living out, we do have time in place.
[1:02:24] Do you know what we're doing?
[1:02:26] We don't know what we're doing.
[1:02:28] But this will help us.
[1:02:32] It's really a very specific and really a guide for a question.
[1:02:38] And then again, like the disaster response plan, for example,
[1:02:40] we do already have disaster response plans
[1:02:42] with the new legislators that are part of the same business, how to be applying, with the new legislative requirements, we have to have these things in our specific asks for these things that we need to, that we need to meet, right?
[1:02:54] And those that legislation came out two years ago, and the regulations came out only just recently and they begin in 2020, which is why I never, those things are on our plans for next year.
[1:03:06] I'm looking at this point of view of somebody who just goes online, looks at the agenda without your information and they see that, oh my goodness, they have to begin all this stuff because that's who I wanted to direct this to that people that are unaware of what we've done in the background, how far we are on this to just not listen to information.
[1:03:27] It's why I wanted to highlight a number of the things already in place too, because we do already have a number of really pretty solid on the place.
[1:03:35] And we do use them regularly.
[1:03:38] But I mean, the point of this too, like there are gaps.
[1:03:42] Right.
[1:03:42] And then I would be honest with the fact that there are gaps.
[1:03:45] And it is work to be done.
[1:03:47] But that's exactly what this is for.
[1:03:49] It's to identify those gaps so that we can become more resilient moving forward.
[1:03:53] Right.
[1:03:53] And every community is going to have gaps.
[1:03:56] very, but it's really important to identify them and then make a solid plan to work on them.
[1:04:01] Well, there's a big community that doesn't have the experience of emergency situation, which
[1:04:05] several have had this year. I think we can learn from that as well.
[1:04:09] Absolutely. We don't want to be caught on preparing the local level.
[1:04:13] I think that the biggest thing is, again, we have such great services here.
[1:04:18] Yes. With our regulars for our police with our fire, we have such amazing services.
[1:04:21] Yes. And they're very well trained. They're very serious.
[1:04:26] You know, so that those are the resources we're going to want first, but it's really great to have these plans in place to give us a step-by-step on on to do basically.
[1:04:36] We also have four routes to get up to 10, back just one.
[1:04:40] The reason that part is highlighted in there is basically because the hazards can still impact those things last life all for, you know, we do have more routes to get out than many communities, absolutely.
[1:04:53] either, but those things started limited, you know, as it's a her. Yeah. Yeah. Thank you for that.
[1:05:00] This is the thing. The expression.
[1:05:04] The motion that is at the report.
[1:05:06] Pables by 100 risk and vulnerability assessment data today from the emergency management.
[1:05:12] Prime Minister Cornyn has coordinated. We see for information and further that council adopt
[1:05:16] the hazard risk and vulnerability assessment. It's part of the town of Christine 2026.
[1:05:21] So it's been emotional for that.
[1:05:23] I should have followed the technical statements.
[1:05:25] Excuse me.
[1:05:26] Excuse me.
[1:05:27] Paul and Faber.
[1:05:29] You're sharing his carry.
[1:05:31] Thank you for all that.
[1:05:32] Excuse me.
[1:05:32] So about me for a couple more.
[1:05:33] We've had anyone paid it on with the,
[1:05:35] we have to encourage that program.
[1:05:37] I think of people here interested in that.
[1:05:40] That's true.
[1:05:40] That's true.
[1:05:41] I've never got them in order, right?
[1:05:43] So for the cars or program,
[1:05:46] staff are seeking direction from council,
[1:05:48] regarding the Preston Valley Climate Action Society's request for a dedicated level to
[1:05:54] DB Charger and parking states for the purpose of operating a pressure program.
[1:06:01] So to support this program, there is a free level to charge in the concrete parking lot.
[1:06:06] That staff recommends requesting a replacement for, with the install of a new level to
[1:06:13] charger with RFID capabilities.
[1:06:16] And so RFID just means the charger can be
[1:06:19] controlled through system verification.
[1:06:22] Science will support this program implementation
[1:06:24] and may help with noncompliance, but can't fully
[1:06:28] ensure that outside reusable use that, that
[1:06:31] designated purpose space, and enforcement
[1:06:33] for this program would exceed current service levels,
[1:06:37] especially outside of regular working hours.
[1:06:40] There is a cost of replacement
[1:06:42] for the charter, it would be about 15 to 16,000 for a purchase and install of the charter,
[1:06:48] as well as service annual service fees moving forward, which takes on society may be unwilling
[1:06:54] or unable for purchase.
[1:06:58] As a benefit, the removal of the free Tesla charter could see an increase in the
[1:07:02] usage of customs three other paid stations. And there's benefits to a partial of programs such
[1:07:08] increase accessibility and mobility to those who don't have a beautiful or for low-income individuals
[1:07:15] and it may reduce strain on road infrastructure. Even so some individuals may not be able to
[1:07:21] access the car shop around due to cost or accessibility requirements. To summarize, staff are recommending
[1:07:27] that council direct staff to offer.
[1:07:30] Partying states, regular rates. And then, if you're pressed up to climate society, provide a level to
[1:07:36] charge your with our fragility and for staff to bring the parking lot while on them is for a
[1:07:42] forwarded designated space and to collaborate with the climate society on a agreement you'll be
[1:07:47] forward. I'll sort of definitely council could consider purchasing the charter in an upcoming
[1:07:52] in the 20s and in the upcoming municipal budget process.
[1:07:57] Right, thank you.
[1:08:05] Thank you.
[1:08:07] Your money.
[1:08:08] I see that the biggest challenges and
[1:08:11] unless it's like somewhat prohibited in terms of the RFID,
[1:08:16] that people will have been using the Tesla one.
[1:08:19] We'll go, okay, that's still a charger and now I have to pay for it,
[1:08:23] I don't know what the other one's are and I'm just going to park my car in three hours
[1:08:27] and plug that up and the rental or the right-share car is circling the block waiting to get back in there.
[1:08:36] How is that going to resolve this off?
[1:08:39] Because you don't have anybody to take on the second enforcing and have somebody to do that.
[1:08:45] We can do things to help.
[1:08:49] like, again, you can have dedicated science.
[1:08:51] And the RFID capability means that anyone
[1:08:53] part of their tent use that charter.
[1:08:56] But we can't fully walk it off and really using that.
[1:09:00] OK, but somebody who doesn't have part of the program,
[1:09:04] ID can't use a charter.
[1:09:06] It's not fair because they can't act without it.
[1:09:07] That's why it's not as fairly clear on this.
[1:09:09] But that RFID card.
[1:09:12] Is there is that the only location that has been looked at?
[1:09:20] It's, it's the only location that has the infrastructure already there, okay. So we could put in other infrastructure elsewhere, but it would cost more and we still have the same issues, because there are, that's it.
[1:09:35] there's only the one Tesla charger.
[1:09:40] I'm talking about the supplement.
[1:09:42] The impact of taking out the free charger, will that be possibly resented by businesses?
[1:09:51] I don't know how many of that's just people passing through what the usage profile on that charger is, but it's the only free one.
[1:09:59] Because it's unmonitored.
[1:10:01] It's honestly worth saying we don't know who's using it.
[1:10:02] how long are you using it for?
[1:10:04] It could be the same car park they're all there every day, honestly, we don't know.
[1:10:09] So is there a potential for that?
[1:10:14] However, currently, you know, you're paying for the electricity for these items, no, I mentioned
[1:10:20] a gaping.
[1:10:21] So, it's just the fact that you're taking something that was free away and you're not actually
[1:10:26] replacing with anything other than the people that are part of the right share.
[1:10:29] I think my country sponsored it.
[1:10:31] So just very quickly to add to that, though,
[1:10:33] is that this was going to come to Council
[1:10:35] regardless of this request, is that the free charge
[1:10:38] of which money was put in was before electric cars
[1:10:41] or really a thing.
[1:10:42] It was kind of to encourage people
[1:10:44] now that there are more mainstream,
[1:10:46] it doesn't make sense to be paying for electricity
[1:10:49] and for people and to get free electricity
[1:10:53] for the vehicles, which has more come or come in place.
[1:10:56] And so that's one of this regardless of this issue,
[1:10:59] The recommendation with the fee review is to remove that free status from that charter and it's a lot of fine guys
[1:11:07] And I do we're taking small steps because at this point we did it with one car
[1:11:12] Yeah, yeah, so it may grow in time and where we may be Council maybe faced with more decisions
[1:11:18] But at this point we're talking about one car in place to park in a chart and so
[1:11:25] Well, that I will read the motion
[1:11:27] The Council reacts to a dedicated parking space in the Gulf Street parking lot and
[1:11:33] regulates according to the fees and charges by a lot, because the Crescent Valley Climate
[1:11:37] Actions Society, by the purpose of a car share program, additional on CVCA ads, providing
[1:11:44] a level 2 EV charger to support the program and completion of an agreement, outlining responsibilities
[1:11:50] these new requirements. The council direct staff to present amendments to the parking lot by
[1:11:55] a line number 8195 on the 19th. Designating the space in the post street parking lot for the
[1:12:01] car share program, the council consideration there are not coming council meetings and further
[1:12:06] that council direct staff to collaborate with CVCAS to invest in agreement addressing program operating
[1:12:13] cost science and installation requirements for council's consideration and upcoming regular
[1:12:18] council meeting. Well, that's one motion.
[1:12:21] That's for Holland. Seconded council involvement, discussion.
[1:12:26] One favor.
[1:12:28] What's the question?
[1:12:28] Council areas was anything to add or ask over you.
[1:12:33] Were you supporting the motion?
[1:12:35] I was supporting motion.
[1:12:38] Yeah.
[1:12:38] Thanks.
[1:12:39] I didn't want to ignore you.
[1:12:42] Okay. So that's just the request for the decision.
[1:12:44] the membership management, more opportunity to bring one of those
[1:12:47] we should qualify as a couple of days when we've worked with it.
[1:12:51] I think they were checked. So this one, we just recommended amendments to our
[1:12:57] extremal response spec. This is for two reasons. One is to align with
[1:13:03] an environment how this new color-coded alert weather system that they
[1:13:06] release this year. And then the other is to adjust for any extremal
[1:13:11] of shelter that now exists in town that wasn't anticipated last time that this was brought to
[1:13:16] housing.
[1:13:19] So in 2026 the government kind of did adopt this new kind of color quoted by the
[1:13:23] other other system. But health risks to increase the yellow to red for their alert. The yellow warning
[1:13:30] seen presence starting at 35 to 33 to 35 degrees Celsius for heat alerts with overnight times
[1:13:39] 15 to 16 Celsius for two or more nights, and that does change this is really with the
[1:13:45] overnight temperature. Previously it was the 18 degrees and they dropped that temperature down.
[1:13:52] The updated activation criteria trigger the opening of a warrior unit center as before,
[1:13:57] but it's as time specifically with the political ladleurs.
[1:14:02] And this amendment also aligns with
[1:14:09] center when an extreme weather shelter is available. So that's another reason why we recommend
[1:14:14] the case amendments. With these changes of the town still meet the legislature of all
[1:14:19] the patients and may require a few receiving resources. However, it does mean that access to a
[1:14:25] warm space can be more limited to vulnerable individuals who are at home because specifically
[1:14:31] extreme weather shelters of our safety on-house.
[1:14:35] But, what do you think about the world?
[1:14:38] I'm a mate.
[1:14:39] I can't believe I'm a mate.
[1:14:40] I've watched the most in the world, but we see this reports.
[1:14:43] Okay, and I can also adopt the 2012 to 631 which is approximately five to six.
[1:14:48] That's the ball done question.
[1:14:51] It's this book.
[1:14:53] I was looking through it as I could see anything that talks about what this is going to be,
[1:14:57] emerging problem, which
[1:15:00] This is a heat offson to come up and connect to smoke, so it's not just a warming or a cooling center, it's a fresh air resource.
[1:15:09] Okay, nothing human is, but this is all temperature based on just the best.
[1:15:13] Our activation procedure does consider air pollution.
[1:15:17] So, it does add a lower temperature of the activity of the higher air pollution.
[1:15:23] But currently, you know, it doesn't consider a clean air shelter, but
[1:15:28] The air, when you get to give the alerts on your weather report on your phone, it comes up with severe air quality tissue.
[1:15:37] I don't think it's, again, color coded as well as new food.
[1:15:42] That is also a recommendation in our HIV A to consider things.
[1:15:45] Hair shelters or filter, then our public building is available.
[1:15:49] It also wants to directly, and certainly look into what's available now.
[1:15:53] and for entering that back for consideration or planning, but that's correct for any of it. It doesn't
[1:15:58] mean, just considerations with the activation criteria.
[1:16:02] Thank you.
[1:16:04] Focus on the security directly.
[1:16:06] Thank you.
[1:16:08] All right. No. Could I have a move from that one?
[1:16:12] No.
[1:16:13] No, it's the ball.
[1:16:13] Check the transfer.
[1:16:14] There's the discussion.
[1:16:16] All in favor.
[1:16:18] Motion necessary.
[1:16:20] And we have a black figure, of course, on this.
[1:16:23] But first of all, on our own question, youth council,
[1:16:29] with the suggestion that someone has a youth council.
[1:16:35] And I think that might require some sort of election
[1:16:37] to have a position of council, or others in that.
[1:16:40] They can be here just as a representative of youth
[1:16:44] to attend meetings, for example.
[1:16:46] I was just looking at it.
[1:16:48] And like, Elkford has a bunch of communities
[1:16:51] to have a, and it's not an elected thing.
[1:16:53] People hopefully put an application in it.
[1:16:55] They're not necessarily,
[1:16:56] they're never meeting, but they're pretty to some media.
[1:16:59] So they may, there's lots of different ways to do it.
[1:17:03] Yeah.
[1:17:04] Yeah.
[1:17:04] Yeah.
[1:17:05] I'm just looking at it too.
[1:17:07] And even, you know, some communities are doing something
[1:17:12] that parallels a little bit.
[1:17:13] Like what we're doing with the public art working group,
[1:17:16] community, where there are youth representatives,
[1:17:19] maybe from church groups.
[1:17:20] and from the high school from Reck and the key, and they're not necessarily at every
[1:17:27] council meeting, but they are also reviewing documents that are being laid by council.
[1:17:35] Well, as Kristen, would there be a thing that we would have to do, sort of,
[1:17:40] what protocols, some sort of organized way to do this? I'm not, you know, I think for right now
[1:17:46] something Council is interested in it, and it certainly referred to Stynoptic coming up with a
[1:17:50] bit of a personal zone. So similar to the other advice we've told you that you do have
[1:17:55] if you wanted to have a needed advisory committee, you would want to consider a transfer preference
[1:18:00] in a idealization process so that it's individuals who can actually buy, and that's certainly
[1:18:06] something that you can look at, you can do a bit of research for all that other community stages such
[1:18:10] as that curve. But my recommendation would be to make sure that whatever Council is
[1:18:15] direct that it's fair, but there is a trans-pharic wave for applications and in terms of
[1:18:20] our best effort, we've gotten them to that. It's no relatively easy to administer.
[1:18:28] So for all we could you go through the personal youth network?
[1:18:33] So we see you have their question values whenever it's available. This wasn't
[1:18:35] not could be an excellent resource for supporting that piece of engagement.
[1:18:41] Probably recommend them to stay fit in corporate services, but they're definitely
[1:18:45] the organization, that's very unattachable here,
[1:18:47] proved Baltimore's dean, and captures that high school
[1:18:50] and a drink with a book for them.
[1:18:52] So there's a piece of that to you.
[1:18:56] Really?
[1:18:57] I'll do it.
[1:18:58] Thank you.
[1:18:59] I would like to move that we refer this to staff.
[1:19:02] Yes, certainly.
[1:19:03] If it can I just clarify and living to staff that we just asked
[1:19:09] but when it's brought back that is brought that's made
[1:19:11] of the bolts, so that we can have a bit more of a,
[1:19:15] discussion, conversation around what it looks like. Just want to clarify now.
[1:19:20] It comes about.
[1:19:23] It's been moved in a second. Discussion on the motion. Here, you're not all in favour?
[1:19:29] The motion is carry. And then we have the best for letters, support from the request
[1:19:34] to the immediate forest corporation. And the motion is the council authorizes the mayor
[1:19:39] to write a letter of support. The request and value for corporations request for an area expansion
[1:19:45] and increased to a reliable and new cut.
[1:19:48] Anything you want to add,
[1:19:49] or do we just want to close a motion?
[1:19:50] I don't have anything further to add.
[1:19:52] Other than I was contained within your package,
[1:19:54] no one can do it.
[1:19:58] I will look for a mover on that.
[1:20:00] It comes from Baldwin, secondly, Founsell Holland.
[1:20:03] This question.
[1:20:04] All in favor?
[1:20:06] Motion, scary.
[1:20:08] And there's two other,
[1:20:09] um, pieces of course,
[1:20:11] bond and tear.
[1:20:12] I know someone wants to do it.
[1:20:14] Do anything different, there will be motion used to just receive them for information.
[1:20:21] Okay, let's have a motion on that, please.
[1:20:23] What's that for?
[1:20:24] Martin Luther is a kind of counter involvement discussion on favor.
[1:20:29] Motion is carried.
[1:20:32] What's it about?
[1:20:33] Well, none of the things to do with this.
[1:20:34] If you see the answer in there.
[1:20:35] If you see the answer there.
[1:20:37] But there's an election come a lap.
[1:20:39] So that will probably change in time.
[1:20:43] And we're open for questions from the gallery.
[1:20:46] Any questions?
[1:20:48] It's not so much as the question as a statement,
[1:20:52] but the motion that you've passed
[1:20:54] that the questions are in action society
[1:20:56] will be responsible for installing or build and charge up
[1:21:00] effectively kills the program.
[1:21:01] Because we are up the fundraiser by a car.
[1:21:04] You don't know how to have a capacity
[1:21:06] by any family.
[1:21:08] Don't pay for an electric driver.
[1:21:09] Especially if we cannot use
[1:21:11] pounds of forward in an application when we fundraise.
[1:21:15] So I guess what I'm asking you is to reconsider,
[1:21:17] meaning the option too, which will provide a higher cooperation
[1:21:21] from the town to help us to get this program going,
[1:21:25] because otherwise we're done.
[1:21:28] And especially in the face of climate action,
[1:21:31] I mean, the town supporting an even harsh,
[1:21:33] I think we also look very good from the town.
[1:21:35] So we should look and consider that we want to follow. Thank you.
[1:21:44] Thank you.
[1:21:46] We do have a,
[1:21:48] have a new policy on our on our grants.
[1:21:51] And so,
[1:21:52] the person is there a streamer,
[1:21:54] an application that they could put in,
[1:21:55] so that they could come before us for discussion.
[1:21:58] There,
[1:21:59] there are absolutely as two points of the other grants.
[1:22:02] We decided to help all of our community right across the city.
[1:22:06] So we'll have a presentation of that.
[1:22:09] And we'll need to be able to have many of that in the process.
[1:22:13] So that's a January process to, you know,
[1:22:17] closes in April.
[1:22:19] The competition puts it right.
[1:22:20] So that, that is a streamer there is somewhere in this case stream.
[1:22:23] So that would be a recommendation.
[1:22:25] You can put it on the process of the town.
[1:22:26] And we can try and interact with two of that stream, but there's no.
[1:22:30] We have to say that we have to say that we have to say that we have to say that we have to say that.
[1:22:32] But the call at the end of the charge of looking at 65,000 dollars. That's a little bit more money than the event ground solution.
[1:22:39] That's a hurry.
[1:22:43] What we're not going to talk about, I'm just going to say one thing.
[1:22:47] So the second option was to keep the TESLID charger.
[1:22:53] And I don't know how much you've been spending. How much you've been spending annually to subsidize TESLID owners.
[1:22:59] up until this point, do you know? It would be electricity, let's start to tend dollars a day.
[1:23:06] Yes. So there's like five or six thousand and a year, for how many years?
[1:23:11] Sorry, I'll just put it on. It's about 10 oh, isn't it eight? There's
[1:23:15] program that's using it regularly every day. We don't know exactly how much electricity costs.
[1:23:23] It's about that one. It's not that high at all. There's heard it's right now. That estimate is based on
[1:23:28] I got a regular of these program where that credit was rented out in a couple of days.
[1:23:34] Well, I just see I mentioned we are facing we're planning to face that.
[1:23:38] Yeah, but I really really appreciate the staff put in the work.
[1:23:43] We explore it and that the council thought about it because I've been looking at your agendas for the last couple of months.
[1:23:50] And I'm going, oh my goodness, there's so much going on.
[1:23:52] And then with the threat of wildfire and all the smoke and I know there's a lot on your mind and so maybe at a future day when there's a little blighter you know in town and
[1:24:07] We'll revisit it and it's not necessarily down the water, but we do feel very discouraged and disappointed, but I'm sure you expect this, that we will feel this way.
[1:24:18] We are very hopeful because the district of Inbermeer, we're very supportive of the, so we thought we were going to go far more progressive than the district of Inbermeer, but I can see that there's too much going on and then not enough attacks face.
[1:24:33] but I also didn't know, we weren't asking for a new charger. I thought it would be an existing one, but Joel was saying some of the agreements with all the other people who installed the charges as though it couldn't be a dedicated to just one group or public. So anyway, thank you so much for considering it and for all the work that you do for us.
[1:24:57] So, I guess I asked this of Mike, you know, there is such a thing as a motion to reconsider and I don't really think this is the immediate to do that, but if a counselor wanted to introduce the motion to reconsider this, we don't let it up coming council meeting, right?
[1:25:13] I certainly, or the group could actually just put in a grant request for council's consideration of your debate, which I think would be the easiest way.
[1:25:20] You know, the request was for a dedicated spot for a parking of vehicle, which was considered
[1:25:29] granted.
[1:25:30] So, really, what their statements are at the moment is that the cost of the car charger itself,
[1:25:39] which certainly they could put in that request to council, the separate request of the council's
[1:25:43] consideration and perhaps for the budget process council that could look at the, you know, that's
[1:25:49] It was a pleasure, but that would be my suggestions, just to submit a letter for the grant request for that, and then certainly staff can have that back in front of Council and Council can decide what to do with it at that point.
[1:26:02] Which would be the same as bringing back anything to reconsider to that same thing.
[1:26:06] But it is a bunch of things.
[1:26:08] Yeah.
[1:26:09] Yeah.
[1:26:10] We weren't wanting to have towns and taxpayers to pay for a charger for us.
[1:26:15] That was not our intention.
[1:26:17] Yeah, I was just going to say, you know, what we did pass was that staff would meet with the
[1:26:29] link with you guys and they were bring back information, which very well-made, the word would
[1:26:35] you've just stated. And so then there is the opportunity for us to explore other options.
[1:26:44] It's not necessarily dead in the end of this.
[1:26:47] I'm here.
[1:26:52] I'm sorry.
[1:26:53] Hi.
[1:26:53] How are you?
[1:26:54] Good.
[1:26:54] Thank you, Your Worship.
[1:26:56] Actually, I ate them up.
[1:26:58] I'm not picking on you.
[1:26:59] But you need to report so long to make your cups of coffee.
[1:27:03] There's just a few things I know and experience.
[1:27:07] The air and intermediate salt on the page 102.
[1:27:09] You show that image, there's building town hopeful, that back up to yours. The air media, it's a hold of them.
[1:27:16] The air media, it's on. Yeah, Crawford Hill. Oh,
[1:27:22] notice this with the helping of Skeda and donation for water.
[1:27:30] The long page 103 of the agenda,
[1:27:34] They mentioned eight hours of timeline for Colors Street.
[1:27:37] This was a long time ago.
[1:27:39] It was about 14 years ago.
[1:27:41] The law was just being built.
[1:27:43] We had a heavy for Shack.
[1:27:45] We had issues with what products.
[1:27:47] Fewers went.
[1:27:48] And it was back.
[1:27:52] Just so you know, you wouldn't know that because you were different.
[1:27:55] A lot.
[1:27:56] Sure.
[1:27:56] Yeah.
[1:27:57] But still we're skating.
[1:27:58] Didn't mean well.
[1:27:59] Yeah.
[1:27:59] form by not that it's eight-day hours, but thank you for that input in the program.
[1:28:03] On date 104, the agenda, barrel creek also has a backup generator. So they can supply
[1:28:10] water to Crawford Hill, which can supply the entire two of
[1:28:15] them.
[1:28:17] H227 under non-town, on critical infrastructure, energy utilities, power outlets, it's down
[1:28:23] the ECI-rollers. But I'm almost positive for the ECU. Yeah.
[1:28:27] Yes, the force we see now would be safe.
[1:28:30] No problem.
[1:28:31] No, it's not a beer.
[1:28:32] It is for us.
[1:28:33] You just wanted to.
[1:28:35] That is it for me.
[1:28:36] Thank you.
[1:28:37] I'd like to first report we have from you.
[1:28:39] We're over here.
[1:28:40] Yes.
[1:28:41] Yeah, I'm over there.
[1:28:41] They just call that topic.
[1:28:43] They can ask it.
[1:28:44] Thank you.
[1:28:45] Thank you.
[1:28:48] That is exactly what you've done.
[1:28:49] You've done everything that you've been getting.
[1:28:51] Oh, they're all gone.
[1:28:54] Yeah.
[1:28:55] I'm sorry.
[1:28:55] You can give us who we might see on Thursday for the bumpy chat with Mayor and Council.
[1:29:00] Over there.
[1:29:02] Yeah.
[1:29:02] There is all the folks that have heard of this.
[1:29:05] They better bring lots of coffee and lots of blood.
[1:29:07] I was hoping to attend as well as I think it was on the list.
[1:29:11] Yeah.
[1:29:12] Yeah.
[1:29:13] But I'm so interested.
[1:29:14] You guys aren't.
[1:29:20] You aren't in Council.
[1:29:21] That's somebody else's thing.
[1:29:22] It was a very big thing.
[1:29:23] You guys aren't.
[1:29:24] You aren't in Council.
[1:29:24] That's somebody else's thing.
[1:29:25] Yeah, look forward to being there again to see it all finished.
[1:29:29] Running, so yeah.
[1:29:32] Hey, I guess our next thing then, it's most of the time.
[1:29:36] Time for hot and modern, I guess you want to have a beer.
[1:29:39] Yeah, yeah.
[1:29:40] We thank you everyone.
[1:29:41] Thank you.