1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,360 Time is it? It is 2.34. Oh, okay. This meeting 2 00:00:07,730 --> 00:00:13,430 is called the order. We do have a quorum. Excuse me, let me get to my agenda there. 3 00:00:15,580 --> 00:00:25,740 We're going to have an electronic roll call. So those of you who want to pull up your voting machine just looks 4 00:00:52,820 --> 00:01:00,130 like everybody's voted. And we have, we have everybody here, except lesser absent. 5 00:01:03,890 --> 00:01:06,710 The approval of minutes for May 22nd. 6 00:01:06,910 --> 00:01:08,050 Has everybody looked at those? 7 00:01:08,310 --> 00:01:11,570 Want to have a, oh, it's been moved and seconded. 8 00:01:12,290 --> 00:01:15,810 Is there any discussion or any comments or changes to the motion? 9 00:01:16,670 --> 00:01:17,350 To the minutes? 10 00:01:18,550 --> 00:01:23,230 Seeing none, let's vote to approve or it's 11 00:01:33,310 --> 00:01:33,730 been approved. 12 00:01:34,490 --> 00:01:35,550 Thank you very much. 13 00:01:37,670 --> 00:01:39,370 Everybody's had a look at the agenda. 14 00:01:39,370 --> 00:01:43,530 Does anybody have any additions to the agenda or comments on the agenda? 15 00:01:44,190 --> 00:01:49,150 Seeing none, can I have a motion and a second to approve the minutes? 16 00:01:49,850 --> 00:01:51,830 So they've moved and seconded and 17 00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:55,300 we will vote. 18 00:02:02,930 --> 00:02:05,150 They've been approved. Thank you very much. 19 00:02:05,990 --> 00:02:07,050 Move on to public comments. 20 00:02:09,750 --> 00:02:13,470 If lots of people in the audience, do we have anyone that wants to make a nice comment? 21 00:02:14,150 --> 00:02:15,090 Or any kind of comment? 22 00:02:15,090 --> 00:02:21,030 see none. No. We'll move forward. 23 00:02:23,350 --> 00:02:26,730 Mike Ronskiewicz, you wanted to make a quick announcement. 24 00:02:28,750 --> 00:02:29,490 Hopefully 25 00:02:29,490 --> 00:02:34,510 all of you received an email maybe even a couple this week regarding a Complete Streets 26 00:02:34,510 --> 00:02:42,250 MPO partner survey. I think it was sent to all TAC members as well as city managers. 27 00:02:43,290 --> 00:02:49,190 it's been sent out a few times. Today we've got 14 of the 31 municipalities 28 00:02:49,190 --> 00:02:53,810 responding. We'd like to get a much better response. Here's kind of what the 29 00:02:53,810 --> 00:03:00,110 survey looks like. So check out your emails and complete the survey. That would 30 00:03:00,110 --> 00:03:04,970 be great. There's several questions on it. Do you know when it was sent out? 31 00:03:05,070 --> 00:03:08,970 Because I don't remember. There was an email sent Monday and Tuesday of this 32 00:03:08,970 --> 00:03:09,350 week 33 00:03:12,550 --> 00:03:19,090 if for some reason you haven't got to them or you haven't seen it you can 34 00:03:19,090 --> 00:03:23,490 just let me know and we'll we'll get you the link to it okay thank you Mike yep 35 00:03:23,490 --> 00:03:28,830 hope everybody responds to that announcement yes very important we'll 36 00:03:28,830 --> 00:03:32,910 move on to number six the 25 2045 metropolitan transportation plan update 37 00:03:34,980 --> 00:03:38,240 Will that be Peter? Peter Gies? Good to see you, Peter. 38 00:03:40,500 --> 00:03:41,160 Good to see you, Paul. 39 00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:42,800 The rest of the TAC. 40 00:03:45,020 --> 00:03:47,440 Peter Gies, now systems planning manager. 41 00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:51,140 For those of you not that it makes a huge difference, I'm working under Bill now, 42 00:03:51,260 --> 00:03:52,980 so I'm doing a lot of planning and programming stuff, 43 00:03:53,160 --> 00:03:55,960 and it's probably more appropriate now that I'm working a lot on the Metropolitan 44 00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:59,580 Transportation Plan, so new title, but my role is basically still the same. 45 00:04:00,520 --> 00:04:03,580 So with that, I'm here as a usual fixture at the TAC, 46 00:04:03,580 --> 00:04:08,360 giving you an update on the Metropolitan Transportation Plan, going to hit home one 47 00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:12,700 item today, which is on the draft cost-feasible plan, and as it relates to resolutions. 48 00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:18,180 But before I do that, I do want to give you a little bit of a teaser to what's coming 49 00:04:18,180 --> 00:04:22,700 later on, related to our multimodal priorities list, and give you a little bit of a heads-up 50 00:04:22,700 --> 00:04:23,060 as well. 51 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:27,300 So we've been talking for so long, over a year now, about the Metropolitan Transportation 52 00:04:27,300 --> 00:04:30,400 Plan, about the cost-feasible plan, that it's so important that you get your 53 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:31,160 projects in there. 54 00:04:31,160 --> 00:04:32,060 Well, guess what? 55 00:04:32,300 --> 00:04:36,860 Today you're going to see a lot of that come to fruition because you'll be hearing a presentation 56 00:04:36,860 --> 00:04:40,480 on the multimodal priorities list and I want to make it very clear that the projects from 57 00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:45,900 the 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, the new priorities, are incorporated as part 58 00:04:45,900 --> 00:04:47,360 of this multimodal priorities list. 59 00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:51,760 So here now you're seeing the long-range planning process moving into the short-range 60 00:04:51,760 --> 00:04:55,900 planning process where we're starting to take projects from that plan and programming 61 00:04:55,900 --> 00:04:59,360 them as part of the multimodal priorities list and you'll then see them come up 62 00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:01,620 in the new TIP next year as well. 63 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:03,760 So this is the start of that cycle now, 64 00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:06,980 or annual TIP cycle, where those projects will be programmed. 65 00:05:08,860 --> 00:05:11,600 So just as a reminder, we are in the process 66 00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:13,080 of getting projects in the cost fees 67 00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:14,560 well planned program ready, which means 68 00:05:14,560 --> 00:05:16,160 that they need to have a clear scope of work, 69 00:05:16,420 --> 00:05:19,120 a good cost estimate, collaboration with partners, 70 00:05:19,360 --> 00:05:20,940 and also a resolution of support. 71 00:05:21,540 --> 00:05:24,300 And I want to specifically hit on the resolutions 72 00:05:24,300 --> 00:05:26,040 of support and partner collaboration 73 00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:29,960 because we've reached out to most of you now at this point 74 00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:31,680 who have projects in the cost feasible plan 75 00:05:31,680 --> 00:05:33,800 and have scheduled one-on-one meetings 76 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:35,960 to discuss projects in the plan. 77 00:05:36,280 --> 00:05:38,380 Try and get a little bit more detail from you all 78 00:05:38,380 --> 00:05:41,260 as to the scope of work for those projects. 79 00:05:41,420 --> 00:05:43,000 Make sure that we're all on the same page. 80 00:05:43,060 --> 00:05:44,300 We've had good meetings this morning. 81 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:45,820 We had a meeting with the town of Davy. 82 00:05:46,060 --> 00:05:47,880 We've met with Oakland Park, with Parkland. 83 00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:50,320 So a lot of you are coming in and meeting with us 84 00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:53,120 and it's been very, very helpful to get a better understanding 85 00:05:53,120 --> 00:05:55,440 of what these projects are. 86 00:05:55,440 --> 00:06:01,460 I mean just beyond the few sentences of scope that you've given us and also allow us to make any tweaks to that 87 00:06:01,460 --> 00:06:07,800 general scope so that we can make sure we capture the general essence of that project when we put it in the plan because we 88 00:06:07,800 --> 00:06:11,720 Don't want to be super detailed in the plan. We don't want to hamstring ourselves by the same token 89 00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:17,180 We also want to have enough detail on the back end so that when the project moves through the multimodal priorities list and gets 90 00:06:17,180 --> 00:06:23,000 Into f dots hands that we can say yes, these were some of the more detailed ideas that the 91 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:28,100 municipality had in mind when it comes to that project. As another reminder, all 92 00:06:28,100 --> 00:06:32,240 projects in the draft cost feasible plan must be program ready, and with that we 93 00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:35,100 need to make sure that we have a resolution of support. So here is a 94 00:06:35,100 --> 00:06:39,240 reminder of the two different due dates for the resolutions of support. The 95 00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:44,440 first due date being August 1st on the right, and this is required if you're 96 00:06:44,440 --> 00:06:50,420 looking to have your project ready for programming this work program cycle. 97 00:06:50,420 --> 00:06:58,600 So that means if you get a resolution of support in by August 1st and you're a fairly high-ranked project in the cost-feasible plan, 98 00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:03,500 you could potentially receive funding this work program cycle for your project. 99 00:07:03,940 --> 00:07:07,920 If you can't make that August 1st deadline, that doesn't mean that your project falls off the list. 100 00:07:08,020 --> 00:07:10,800 You still have until September 11th to get as a resolution, 101 00:07:10,860 --> 00:07:16,360 but the only difference is then that your project would not be considered for program until the next work programming cycle. 102 00:07:16,480 --> 00:07:18,260 So you'd have about a year delay in that. 103 00:07:18,260 --> 00:07:22,760 So, we're leaving it up to you all to make the decision as to when you need to get the 104 00:07:22,760 --> 00:07:26,860 resolution of support to us, but I want to stress that September 11th is the last date. 105 00:07:26,960 --> 00:07:32,360 We need a resolution of support sent to us, and you can email them to me by September 11th. 106 00:07:32,380 --> 00:07:36,340 If we don't get it by September 11th, that project will move out of the cost-feasible 107 00:07:36,340 --> 00:07:38,820 plan and into the needs, and I can't stress that enough. 108 00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:42,720 We really need these resolutions by the latest September 11th. 109 00:07:43,060 --> 00:07:45,900 For those of you who have already gotten those resolutions, thank you very much, 110 00:07:45,900 --> 00:07:50,340 and I'm pretty sure that you can attest to the fact that you can just email me, email 111 00:07:50,340 --> 00:07:54,260 me drafts of resolutions, I'll usually turn around the email within a day or so and be 112 00:07:54,260 --> 00:07:58,700 able to let you know if everything looks good, if you have any questions, especially on 113 00:07:58,700 --> 00:08:03,020 the Broward MPO-led projects. I know there's a few of you who've reached out to me and 114 00:08:03,020 --> 00:08:06,900 said, hey, this isn't a project we submitted, but it's a project that was proposed in 115 00:08:06,900 --> 00:08:11,120 our municipality, and I will usually have a little blurb that you all can refer 116 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:15,160 to or include in your agenda item, which talks to the fact that these projects were 117 00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:19,580 identified based on other sources in the needs assessment that the Broward MPO 118 00:08:19,580 --> 00:08:23,920 looked at, so whether it be like our Southeast Regional Freight Plan, our 119 00:08:23,920 --> 00:08:29,660 transportation demand model analysis, and other partner plans as well that we 120 00:08:29,660 --> 00:08:33,760 as an MPO have identified as a need and incorporated in there, and I also want 121 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:37,680 to stress that this does not mean that that project is getting built 122 00:08:37,680 --> 00:08:41,720 tomorrow. Just like your projects that you submit to us, these projects are 123 00:08:41,720 --> 00:08:44,460 put in the plan because there's an identified need there and we would 124 00:08:44,460 --> 00:08:48,920 like to work with you and your commission and your residents to make sure that we can 125 00:08:48,920 --> 00:08:54,140 find a solution for that need. So that really getting us a resolution of support for that 126 00:08:54,140 --> 00:08:58,220 project allows us to move forward through the planning process, the PD&E process, working 127 00:08:58,220 --> 00:09:02,920 closely with you to identify the solution that works for everyone. It's not that tomorrow 128 00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:05,860 the bulldozers are going to show up. And I think that's really important to stress 129 00:09:05,860 --> 00:09:08,940 with your commission as well. So if you would agree that there's an issue at 130 00:09:08,940 --> 00:09:12,480 a particular intersection or in a particular corridor, and we've identified that as 131 00:09:12,480 --> 00:09:16,060 a need, getting as a resolution allows us to continue working through that process. 132 00:09:17,980 --> 00:09:22,320 So just to give you a high-level overview on the next steps related to the Metropolitan 133 00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:25,980 Transportation Plan, so June and July we're going to have our partner meetings. 134 00:09:26,520 --> 00:09:30,560 Some of them may spill over into August, but ideally all the ones that have projects 135 00:09:30,560 --> 00:09:32,820 in the cost-feasible plan, we'd like to be finished by July. 136 00:09:33,740 --> 00:09:38,380 Here are the two resolution dates that we would like resolutions in order for 137 00:09:38,380 --> 00:09:43,020 programming either this work program cycle or next work program cycle and in 138 00:09:43,020 --> 00:09:45,980 September we'd like to be able to give you all the cost fees we'll plan update 139 00:09:45,980 --> 00:09:51,900 basically capturing all the comments and revisions that we've made based on all 140 00:09:51,900 --> 00:09:56,200 of these meetings what projects fell off what new projects have moved in as a 141 00:09:56,200 --> 00:10:01,560 result and that should be coming in September of 2019. So with that you 142 00:10:01,560 --> 00:10:05,000 can always keep up to date on commitment2045.org we're posting all 143 00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:08,020 of our technical reports on there, and you can also contact me. 144 00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:11,160 So, Mr. Chair, I'll turn it back over to you if there are any questions. 145 00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:15,100 We have a question from Nicholas O'Fall. 146 00:10:17,260 --> 00:10:17,680 Hey, Peter. 147 00:10:20,240 --> 00:10:25,160 We noticed in the cost-feasible plan, there's a lot of projects either proposed by cities 148 00:10:25,160 --> 00:10:31,080 and sponsored by the MPO that may intersect county jurisdiction on the roadway in some 149 00:10:31,080 --> 00:10:31,700 ways to perform. 150 00:10:31,700 --> 00:10:35,940 You know, it's in some cases even maybe it's a long candle, so the dirt is not right away 151 00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:41,240 So can we meet with you at some point to kind of discuss all these projects to kind of intersect our facilities? 152 00:10:41,480 --> 00:10:46,580 We have a better idea the scope and kind of what exactly is in the plan because I think I don't think we've been really engaged in it 153 00:10:46,580 --> 00:10:52,520 Because you've been engaging more of the sponsors than with the right-of-way. No excellent question 154 00:10:52,520 --> 00:10:57,920 Nick I'm glad you brought this up because we did do an analysis of roadway ownership based on projects in the plan 155 00:10:57,920 --> 00:11:01,840 and we've separated out those lists, and I'm going to be reaching out to you one-on-one 156 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:06,000 to set something up, A, so that you get the list of projects, and B, so that you can come 157 00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:07,720 in and meet with us and talk about those projects. 158 00:11:07,880 --> 00:11:11,440 And for those of you who have met with us, you know that we toe the line that all of 159 00:11:11,440 --> 00:11:14,580 these improvements are if you're proposing them on someone else's roadway that they're 160 00:11:14,580 --> 00:11:19,200 contingent on the roadway owner buying into that actual scope of work as well. 161 00:11:19,300 --> 00:11:21,400 So yes, Nick, I'll be reaching out to you soon. 162 00:11:21,540 --> 00:11:21,580 Thank you. 163 00:11:24,120 --> 00:11:26,960 There's no other request in the queue, but I'll have a question. 164 00:11:26,960 --> 00:11:29,780 The PowerPoint presentation, I don't think, was part of the packet. 165 00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:35,020 Is it this one? No. No. But I can gladly upload it if you'd like. 166 00:11:35,860 --> 00:11:38,820 Yeah, it was just nice to have it, I guess, as reference. 167 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:44,080 I think it was similar to one we've seen before. Those dates have been noticed before. 168 00:11:44,940 --> 00:11:49,000 So I'm going to say by the end of today, the latest tomorrow morning, this will be up on the website. 169 00:11:50,260 --> 00:11:54,420 I'm looking at Rebecca here. She's giving me a smile, so that means probably. 170 00:11:54,420 --> 00:11:57,680 Thank you. Any other questions? 171 00:12:00,060 --> 00:12:02,880 None here, so thank you Peter. Thank you. 172 00:12:05,630 --> 00:12:06,130 We'll move 173 00:12:06,130 --> 00:12:09,730 on to number seven, the most to elect officers to serve for the next year, July 174 00:12:09,730 --> 00:12:11,330 through June of 2020. 175 00:12:13,940 --> 00:12:21,420 I think I've both Karen and I have expressed that if 176 00:12:21,420 --> 00:12:25,420 there's anybody else willing to do chair or vice chair, step up. Now is your 177 00:12:25,420 --> 00:12:29,380 opportunity. Nobody else has expressed a desire to, but we're open to being 178 00:12:29,380 --> 00:12:29,880 replaced. 179 00:12:32,720 --> 00:12:36,560 We are all in a public position so neither one of none of us are 180 00:12:37,220 --> 00:12:40,800 insured that we will be here a year from now and both Karen and I are in that 181 00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:45,720 situation so if there's anybody that would like to nominate somebody for 182 00:12:45,720 --> 00:12:47,660 chair please do. 183 00:12:49,840 --> 00:12:54,300 Thomas good thank you. Thank you Mr. Chair I'd like to move that 184 00:12:54,300 --> 00:13:01,440 we retain the chair and the vice chair okay I take away my thank you thank you 185 00:13:01,440 --> 00:13:06,400 Thomas that's okay we need a second on that is there any other we don't need a 186 00:13:06,400 --> 00:13:09,460 second I guess we need a any other nominations for 187 00:13:11,860 --> 00:13:13,320 vice chair or chair 188 00:13:16,790 --> 00:13:22,450 seeing none let's have a can we do we need to vote on this we need to vote 189 00:13:22,450 --> 00:13:23,350 All right, let's vote. 190 00:13:24,370 --> 00:13:25,250 We accept, right? 191 00:13:25,370 --> 00:13:26,470 Karen, did you accept us? 192 00:13:26,590 --> 00:13:27,850 OK, all right, thank you. 193 00:13:29,410 --> 00:13:33,110 I told my bosses I wasn't going to do this, but it's OK. 194 00:13:33,290 --> 00:13:35,350 I guess you're going to have to go back and tell them otherwise. 195 00:13:35,670 --> 00:13:36,210 I'm sure I will. 196 00:13:37,610 --> 00:13:38,470 I had no choice. 197 00:13:39,050 --> 00:13:40,010 But anyway, I appreciate it. 198 00:13:40,030 --> 00:13:40,650 Thank you very much. 199 00:13:40,730 --> 00:13:42,210 I'm sure Karen appreciates it too. 200 00:13:42,410 --> 00:13:47,170 So we'll try to hold these meetings down 201 00:13:47,170 --> 00:13:49,330 to an hour, hour and a half, as we always do. 202 00:13:50,350 --> 00:13:51,710 Let's just take a vote on it, though. 203 00:13:51,710 --> 00:13:54,430 let's do. I'm ready. Oh, there we go. 204 00:14:04,020 --> 00:14:07,980 Looks like it's unanimous. My goodness. Thank you very much. 205 00:14:10,580 --> 00:14:17,640 Thank you, Tom. I'll meet you afterwards. In the parking lot, Tom. All right, we'll move on to 206 00:14:17,640 --> 00:14:26,500 the action items. This is a public meeting, so I want to, this is a public meeting in motion 207 00:14:26,500 --> 00:14:32,100 to recommend Broward MPO approve the draft fiscal year 20 through 24 transportation improvement 208 00:14:32,100 --> 00:14:39,500 program with staff recommended amendments. And do we go through a presentation from Mr. Cross first 209 00:14:39,500 --> 00:14:42,740 or do we have public comment or does that matter? Mike? 210 00:14:49,190 --> 00:14:51,850 It's you could do it either way. 211 00:14:53,310 --> 00:14:58,370 Sometimes the presentation I've seen it where sometimes give the presentation and open it up 212 00:14:58,370 --> 00:14:59,270 for public comments. 213 00:15:00,440 --> 00:15:03,380 After that, but you'd want to do it before you have the vote. 214 00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:10,340 Okay, so Mr. Cross, welcome. So why don't you give your, are you going to do a presentation 215 00:15:10,340 --> 00:15:14,560 and summary, and then we'll open it up for any public comment, and then we'll do a discussion 216 00:15:14,560 --> 00:15:16,420 and vote. Okay, let's do it that way. 217 00:15:17,040 --> 00:15:20,260 Okay, well Mr. Chair, we do have a presentation for you today if you would like to. 218 00:15:20,260 --> 00:15:21,180 I do have it here too. 219 00:15:21,500 --> 00:15:26,840 Okay, well we're going to deliver it to you right now. So Bill Cross, Broward MPO, 220 00:15:26,840 --> 00:15:33,540 pleased to be here in front of you today. This is our once annual meeting to adopt 221 00:15:33,540 --> 00:15:38,540 the TIP, our transportation improvement program. So let's go ahead and get 222 00:15:38,540 --> 00:15:43,560 started. So just as a reminder we may have some some new members here. These 223 00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:47,980 are the MPO core products and you can see across the top bar there there are 224 00:15:47,980 --> 00:15:52,140 the three. Of course we've got the metropolitan transportation plan that 225 00:15:52,140 --> 00:15:56,080 we've been working on. You heard an update from Peter. The priorities list 226 00:15:56,080 --> 00:16:01,400 is also coming later, immediately following this presentation, which is kind of the start 227 00:16:01,400 --> 00:16:05,620 of the process, and then the Transportation Improvement Program, which is really the conclusion 228 00:16:05,620 --> 00:16:09,780 today of about a year-long process to get to this point. 229 00:16:11,720 --> 00:16:15,360 Okay, so the outline we're going to talk about, the development process a little bit. 230 00:16:15,460 --> 00:16:19,940 We'll also talk about some of the project highlights, as well as the proposed project 231 00:16:19,940 --> 00:16:20,360 changes. 232 00:16:20,480 --> 00:16:23,800 And there are a couple from the draft that was previously published. 233 00:16:23,800 --> 00:16:29,180 We'll also talk about the comments that we've received and those responses to those and 234 00:16:29,180 --> 00:16:34,420 then again public notice, public comments and opportunities that we have made available 235 00:16:34,420 --> 00:16:35,480 throughout this process. 236 00:16:35,780 --> 00:16:38,020 So let's start with the tip development process. 237 00:16:38,340 --> 00:16:42,840 So some of you again have seen this slide, if so apologies, but we'd like to keep going 238 00:16:42,840 --> 00:16:45,260 back through this so you're familiar with the process. 239 00:16:45,760 --> 00:16:47,180 So of course we start with the MTP. 240 00:16:47,820 --> 00:16:51,600 All the projects that you're going to see here today were projects that were at 241 00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:53,620 one point identified in the MTP. 242 00:16:54,460 --> 00:16:57,480 Then they go through the prioritization process. 243 00:16:58,460 --> 00:16:59,820 The board then approves that. 244 00:17:00,340 --> 00:17:04,540 We send that over to DOT, who then programs the funds. 245 00:17:05,020 --> 00:17:08,040 They then show up as the draft tentative work program, 246 00:17:08,380 --> 00:17:11,680 generally in December, but certainly the fall of each year. 247 00:17:12,300 --> 00:17:14,640 And then we've developed the tip 248 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:19,200 and it comes back this spring, early summer, each year. 249 00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:20,140 So that's the cycle. 250 00:17:22,520 --> 00:17:27,080 You see what's in blue there, the prioritization and the TIP process. 251 00:17:27,540 --> 00:17:28,640 We do that every year. 252 00:17:29,560 --> 00:17:33,000 The MTP process, that's something we do once every five years. 253 00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:38,300 Okay, so I mentioned that I was going to touch on some of the highlights. 254 00:17:38,820 --> 00:17:39,720 So here they are. 255 00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:44,540 There are 510 projects included in this year's TIP. 256 00:17:44,540 --> 00:17:52,480 and that amounts to $4.8 billion worth of transportation improvements for the county. 257 00:17:52,740 --> 00:17:54,340 So a pretty significant document. 258 00:17:55,380 --> 00:17:59,920 The way the funding breaks down, let's first take a look at it by the different modes. 259 00:18:00,740 --> 00:18:07,080 You can see that Highway continues to be the largest single share there at about 59%, 260 00:18:07,080 --> 00:18:09,560 and almost $3 billion. 261 00:18:09,560 --> 00:18:17,140 dollars. You can see the other shares there. I won't read them to you, but each of them is not 262 00:18:17,140 --> 00:18:23,700 in substantial amount of investment. Even bike ped at the least amount, at the smallest number 263 00:18:23,700 --> 00:18:30,200 there, is over 280 million dollars in the five years. So significant improvements all around. 264 00:18:31,760 --> 00:18:37,740 The other way to look at it is the funding by source. So, of course, this is a document 265 00:18:37,740 --> 00:18:44,340 that has funding from various partners including local, state, federal, and the term pike, and you 266 00:18:44,340 --> 00:18:45,840 can see how those break out. 267 00:18:49,630 --> 00:18:53,890 We always like to also point out how the MPO attributable funds 268 00:18:53,890 --> 00:19:00,050 break out. You heard quite a bit of this during the MTP conversation, how the MTP attributable 269 00:19:00,050 --> 00:19:05,530 is just a small portion of the total pie. So we wanted to share with you that breakdown. 270 00:19:05,530 --> 00:19:12,230 and just to reiterate the point that today's tip is really the last tip that 271 00:19:12,230 --> 00:19:16,710 you're going to see that was based on the old metropolitan transportation plan 272 00:19:16,710 --> 00:19:21,870 the 2040 and so that's why we're still using the old nomenclature there of 273 00:19:21,870 --> 00:19:26,310 bike pad planning projects major infrastructure from here on out you'll 274 00:19:26,310 --> 00:19:33,690 start to hear us talk about the six program areas from the 2045 plan so 275 00:19:35,160 --> 00:19:39,860 So going over some of the highlights, of course the Sawgrass Expressway, we can start there 276 00:19:39,860 --> 00:19:45,660 over a half a billion dollars and that's programmed to start fiscal 2023. 277 00:19:46,540 --> 00:19:51,840 So a significant turnpike investment in the Sawgrass, a Southwest 10th is on there and 278 00:19:51,840 --> 00:19:56,740 while that doesn't reflect necessarily the full ultimate investment in that project, 279 00:19:57,200 --> 00:20:01,760 it shows what's currently in the tip at over $400 million. 280 00:20:01,760 --> 00:20:07,500 dollars. Following up on that is I-95 interchanges. Those are down in the 281 00:20:07,500 --> 00:20:11,920 southern portion of the county. You can see those are improvements up and down 282 00:20:11,920 --> 00:20:17,720 the corridor. Loxahatchee Road. Some of you are familiar with that. That's coming 283 00:20:17,720 --> 00:20:26,280 as early as 23 as is University Drive. I-75 we like to point out because this 284 00:20:26,280 --> 00:20:32,300 was a bit of a of a of an issue in the past year with some of the board members. They 285 00:20:32,300 --> 00:20:38,220 wanted to make sure that this one was was deferred. And so DOT did agree to defer this 286 00:20:38,220 --> 00:20:45,180 out to 2024. And so this is just to confirm that this project remains deferred in the 287 00:20:45,180 --> 00:20:51,460 tip moving forward. Prospect Road. That's one of our mobility projects. It's a lane 288 00:20:51,460 --> 00:20:58,440 elimination. That's funded for 2020. So that's up right away. Same thing for the 289 00:20:58,440 --> 00:21:02,400 Pompano Beach Mobility Sidewalks. You can see that that's programmed in Fiscal 290 00:21:02,400 --> 00:21:07,600 2020 as well. Elmar Drive and Power Line Road. These are all things that are 291 00:21:07,600 --> 00:21:11,340 coming up very short term. In the Power Line Road, you'll be able to watch 292 00:21:11,340 --> 00:21:18,520 being constructed right out behind you there out the window. US-1 Gateway 293 00:21:18,520 --> 00:21:22,160 So these are some major project studies that are coming up. 294 00:21:22,540 --> 00:21:24,120 We're kind of excited about this one. 295 00:21:24,320 --> 00:21:35,160 This is the US-1 sunrise where the city has given us the green light to move forward with studying some potential solutions at that location. 296 00:21:36,740 --> 00:21:40,560 595, another board-generated planning study. 297 00:21:40,980 --> 00:21:46,060 This is one to look at all the arterial connections between State Road 7 and out at the sawgrass 298 00:21:46,060 --> 00:21:51,480 of how the arterials connect to 595 with a lot of congestion or all those interchanges. 299 00:21:52,260 --> 00:21:56,840 And so that project, they actually just selected the consultant and DOT will be kicking 300 00:21:56,840 --> 00:22:00,580 off that study, I believe it's October of this year. 301 00:22:01,560 --> 00:22:08,180 Pines Boulevard at Flamingo. This is one we've been working with the city on. It's actually a 302 00:22:08,180 --> 00:22:13,200 center turn overpass and we've been to the city twice now with this project. They're excited, 303 00:22:13,340 --> 00:22:17,820 we're excited, and I believe DOT is excited to move forward and to take a look at this in 304 00:22:17,820 --> 00:22:23,400 more detail. So you see the money for the PD&E is showing up in the 23-24 time frame. 305 00:22:23,400 --> 00:22:24,500 Okay, 306 00:22:26,940 --> 00:22:32,940 now under some of the existing programs, C-SLIP, there's 22 projects at 34 million, 307 00:22:33,100 --> 00:22:34,980 so that's what got funded. 308 00:22:35,680 --> 00:22:40,160 And these do include local shares, I believe, on all of these. 309 00:22:40,860 --> 00:22:47,660 Mobility program, 44 projects, 144 million, so really a very significant amount of money 310 00:22:47,660 --> 00:22:48,760 going into those projects. 311 00:22:49,360 --> 00:22:55,220 And the Tiger grants, there's five projects that are all part of that same grant, 19.7 312 00:22:55,220 --> 00:22:59,860 million. That also includes the local funding and in addition to that there 313 00:22:59,860 --> 00:23:05,300 were some requests from DOT for additional funding. The MPO has worked to 314 00:23:05,300 --> 00:23:12,400 obtain about just over a million dollars of SU MPO attributable funds to push 315 00:23:12,400 --> 00:23:16,240 into that project to help close that that funding gap on the Tiger project 316 00:23:16,240 --> 00:23:21,720 and keep that on track. So some of the proposed project changes that I had 317 00:23:21,720 --> 00:23:27,820 mentioned earlier, they're relatively minor, but the first one up is the Broward MPO UPWP. 318 00:23:28,340 --> 00:23:35,920 And in order to be fully consistent with what we're doing, we wanted to make this change 319 00:23:35,920 --> 00:23:36,960 to the tip. 320 00:23:37,380 --> 00:23:46,320 So there's $105,852 that is money that will move from this year to the following year, 321 00:23:46,320 --> 00:23:57,220 And so we have amended the normal four million with that additional money to make sure that we capture the full and accurate amount moving forward. 322 00:23:58,300 --> 00:24:09,300 The second change is that there was an additional project for quiet zones contained in the tip for this coming fiscal year. 323 00:24:09,840 --> 00:24:14,680 As you know, the quiet zone in Broward is now fully implemented. These funds are no longer necessary. 324 00:24:14,680 --> 00:24:22,160 So we have been working with DOT about how to repurpose these dollars, but of course the first step is to release them from the tip. 325 00:24:22,340 --> 00:24:26,700 So this project is being removed from the tip. 326 00:24:27,520 --> 00:24:32,420 The second project down there, this is a project in the city of Fort Lauderdale. 327 00:24:32,620 --> 00:24:39,860 It was a pedestrian overpass of the New River, I guess associated with U.S. 1 corridor. 328 00:24:39,860 --> 00:24:46,460 door, but we have received confirmation from both the city and from DOT that that project 329 00:24:46,460 --> 00:24:49,980 is not moving forward, and so that project is also being removed. 330 00:24:51,740 --> 00:24:59,060 These were the comments that we had received during the public opportunity for comment 331 00:24:59,060 --> 00:25:03,360 period, and you can see mostly very minor comments. 332 00:25:03,540 --> 00:25:05,820 I'm not going to read them through if you have any questions. 333 00:25:05,960 --> 00:25:06,420 Be glad. 334 00:25:06,420 --> 00:25:15,560 Again, thank you. Andrew was able to identify that we had Northwest, not Northeast, so we've got that cleaned up and corrected. 335 00:25:16,140 --> 00:25:22,200 We've also will address the comments that we received from FDOT, so we appreciate those comments as well. 336 00:25:23,040 --> 00:25:32,940 So the public notice, just to go over this real quickly, we did follow the requirements for noticing the tip was distributed back in May 29th as a draft. 337 00:25:32,940 --> 00:25:38,520 We provided news releases in three different newspapers and those began 338 00:25:38,520 --> 00:25:42,660 running on the 6th and 9th. They had different start dates that they work 339 00:25:42,660 --> 00:25:47,760 with. Of course the documents were available on our website for the 340 00:25:47,760 --> 00:25:52,480 entire period and they were also sent out in hard copy to eight Broward 341 00:25:52,480 --> 00:25:58,080 County libraries. The public meetings, this is the first one, the first option 342 00:25:58,080 --> 00:26:01,940 availability for the public to come and speak on this. There will be two 343 00:26:01,940 --> 00:26:06,320 more this evening at the CAC and then at the board meeting on July 11th. 344 00:26:08,340 --> 00:26:08,780 So 345 00:26:08,780 --> 00:26:14,160 that's the end of the presentation. Glad to try to take any questions that you 346 00:26:14,160 --> 00:26:17,880 might have. Of course I have the entire team that did all the work behind this 347 00:26:17,880 --> 00:26:22,880 here and with the different programs so maybe a team effort answering questions 348 00:26:22,880 --> 00:26:27,710 but we're glad to try to answer any that you might have. Thank you Bill. 349 00:26:36,560 --> 00:26:37,040 Is 350 00:26:37,040 --> 00:26:44,880 Seeing none, if there's any comments from the TAC committee, we can take them and if there's 351 00:26:44,880 --> 00:26:47,420 any motions to be had, we'll take those too. 352 00:26:48,640 --> 00:26:49,220 Mr. Good. 353 00:26:51,350 --> 00:26:52,370 Thank you, Mr. Chair. 354 00:26:55,290 --> 00:27:00,670 So it's a lot that I want to say but not take all your time. 355 00:27:01,690 --> 00:27:05,110 So I'm trying to make this as succinct as possible. 356 00:27:05,110 --> 00:27:11,630 So in reference to the major projects, the two major projects, one being the Sawgrass 357 00:27:11,630 --> 00:27:19,290 Expressway and the other being Southwest 10th Street, many of you may know, and maybe you 358 00:27:19,290 --> 00:27:29,270 do not know, but the city of Deerfield Beach has been in intense dialogue, involvement, 359 00:27:30,010 --> 00:27:34,210 communication, whatever you want to call it, dealing with these two projects throughout 360 00:27:34,210 --> 00:27:43,010 the PD&E which is not yet complete. The Sawgrass Expressway component in particular when it goes 361 00:27:43,010 --> 00:27:51,650 from the Turnpike to Powerline Road is of great concern to the city of Deerfield Beach and 362 00:27:51,650 --> 00:27:58,270 I would suspect it is also a great concern to the city of Coconut Creek because of the 363 00:27:58,270 --> 00:28:05,370 number of ramps that are going to be installed and the proximity to the 364 00:28:05,370 --> 00:28:09,830 residential communities. I don't think anybody has really picked up on the 365 00:28:09,830 --> 00:28:15,490 gravity of what that impact would be to those communities. The portion with 366 00:28:15,490 --> 00:28:20,510 regards to the Southwest 10th Street, without boring a lot of the details 367 00:28:20,510 --> 00:28:23,350 and what happened during the COPE committees and some of the 368 00:28:23,350 --> 00:28:28,210 recommendations and how that has moved forward, probably the most important 369 00:28:28,210 --> 00:28:34,750 One thing to the city is this statement that it makes about adding managed lanes. 370 00:28:35,970 --> 00:28:42,410 When this project was initiated in conversation with several cities to come up with a solution 371 00:28:42,410 --> 00:28:52,310 on how to make the southwest 10 street connector, and I emphasize the word connector, how to 372 00:28:52,310 --> 00:28:55,170 make that possible to connect the sawgrass to 95. 373 00:28:57,050 --> 00:29:05,310 During 18 months, close to two years' worth of negotiations and discussions, it was always 374 00:29:05,310 --> 00:29:09,170 referenced as a connector, it was never referenced as a managed lane. 375 00:29:10,570 --> 00:29:15,310 Many of you know a managed lane requires, it's a toll road. 376 00:29:16,790 --> 00:29:23,700 And more importantly, the managed lanes do not carry truck traffic. 377 00:29:26,400 --> 00:29:34,820 Managed lanes also have different design criteria than if you were maybe creating a different 378 00:29:34,820 --> 00:29:38,440 type of roadway that would act as that connector. 379 00:29:38,740 --> 00:29:43,460 So the city of Deerfield Beach has always believed that this was going to just be an extension 380 00:29:44,240 --> 00:29:53,900 from the sawgrass 295 as just extending the highway where all forms of vehicles 381 00:29:53,900 --> 00:29:59,800 would be able to travel that right away but now that it's become a managed 382 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:13,760 The city is adamantly against. It is putting a large volume of traffic onto the local roads to go from Sawgrass to 95. 383 00:30:16,420 --> 00:30:23,820 So the city is, again, not in agreement with this project as the way it is. 384 00:30:23,820 --> 00:30:26,240 Again, the PD is not completed. 385 00:30:26,980 --> 00:30:34,160 I ask my colleagues to consider this fact about it being a managed lane versus a regular highway. 386 00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:39,840 And I don't know exactly how to move forward with this, and so I may need some help. 387 00:30:40,340 --> 00:30:44,280 But I would like to specifically extract this one item. 388 00:30:44,680 --> 00:30:49,700 I'm not opposed to the MTP here, but 389 00:30:50,740 --> 00:30:56,360 this one project is of great concern to the city and I don't think we should 390 00:30:56,360 --> 00:30:59,780 really even be dealing with this project until we know until we go through some 391 00:30:59,780 --> 00:31:03,140 of the PD&E and some of the other issues that are going to be impacting not 392 00:31:03,140 --> 00:31:07,060 just the city of Deerfield Beach but some of the other local cities that are 393 00:31:07,060 --> 00:31:12,340 nearby so I'd like to try to I'd like to just pull this out if I I don't 394 00:31:12,340 --> 00:31:15,320 know that we made an emotion or anything but I'd like to make a 395 00:31:15,320 --> 00:31:21,500 motion to pull this one particular project out and vote on it separately as there may 396 00:31:21,500 --> 00:31:28,940 be other cities who are also concerned about this particular project and how it may impact 397 00:31:28,940 --> 00:31:36,180 a community and that's my motion and is to pull this one particular item out to be 398 00:31:36,180 --> 00:31:36,880 voted on separately. 399 00:31:37,120 --> 00:31:37,580 That's my motion. 400 00:31:39,160 --> 00:31:44,800 If I can we also have DOT they're going to make a presentation on this but a couple 401 00:31:44,800 --> 00:31:51,540 of things with regards to manage lanes and also the the truck traffic we have met with DOT and there 402 00:31:51,540 --> 00:31:57,800 are some resolutions and I think we'll have DOT just kind of speak on on those more recent events 403 00:31:58,560 --> 00:32:04,100 before we move forward on that. Robert. Good afternoon my name is Robert Bosch. I'm with 404 00:32:04,100 --> 00:32:08,080 the floor department transportation. I'm the project manager for the southwest 10th street 405 00:32:08,080 --> 00:32:14,800 point of order yeah I have a motion on the floor here right and so before we 406 00:32:14,800 --> 00:32:19,920 move further into discussion and I like for that to be disposed of okay well 407 00:32:19,920 --> 00:32:21,900 is there a second to that motion it's 408 00:32:27,440 --> 00:32:28,460 good you don't have a second for the 409 00:32:28,460 --> 00:32:32,240 motion so I think that's disposed of thank you Mr. Chair at least at least it's 410 00:32:32,240 --> 00:32:37,740 on the record thank you okay thanks so okay again good afternoon I'm Robert 411 00:32:37,740 --> 00:32:41,700 Bosch and with the floor Department transportation the project manager of 412 00:32:41,700 --> 00:32:42,920 Southwest 10-3 connector. 413 00:32:43,240 --> 00:32:45,820 I appreciate the comments by Mr. Good. 414 00:32:45,940 --> 00:32:46,340 He's correct. 415 00:32:46,480 --> 00:32:47,420 We've had a lot of conversations. 416 00:32:48,120 --> 00:32:50,800 We've certainly met with the city numerous times 417 00:32:50,800 --> 00:32:52,800 and the staff and we appreciate the opportunity to 418 00:32:53,320 --> 00:32:54,560 to listen to the concerns. 419 00:32:55,000 --> 00:32:56,880 And I think as many of you know, 420 00:32:56,920 --> 00:32:59,300 being working with municipalities that, 421 00:32:59,880 --> 00:33:02,000 you know, some big issues sometimes take, 422 00:33:02,020 --> 00:33:03,240 you know, quite a bit of time 423 00:33:03,240 --> 00:33:04,780 to kind of work through the system. 424 00:33:05,000 --> 00:33:09,160 So we do feel this is a connector 425 00:33:09,160 --> 00:33:14,800 between the sawgrass and and I-95 it also includes the turnpike interchange I 426 00:33:15,360 --> 00:33:18,840 think when we started off the PDD study almost a year and a half ago we start 427 00:33:18,840 --> 00:33:23,080 we approached it with the express lanes and we talked about managed lanes 428 00:33:23,080 --> 00:33:26,980 managed lanes aren't necessarily a toll facility like HOV lanes or managed 429 00:33:26,980 --> 00:33:30,980 lanes those are not tolls express lanes are told typically express lanes or 430 00:33:30,980 --> 00:33:35,480 congestion price tolls so the concerns about this particular connector 431 00:33:35,480 --> 00:33:41,860 being a manager express lanes has been noted. We did have a DOT or do have a FDOT statewide 432 00:33:41,860 --> 00:33:47,280 policy that in that we look at new facilities we look at management facilities and look at 433 00:33:47,280 --> 00:33:52,480 express lane facilities. Our policy does also include that heavy trucks are not allowed. 434 00:33:52,780 --> 00:33:58,580 So through our coordination with the city and the statewide offices we kind of revisited that. 435 00:33:59,220 --> 00:34:04,300 We this will be a connector it will heavy trucks will be allowed motorcycles cars buses 436 00:34:04,300 --> 00:34:09,800 all vehicles will be allowed. It will not be told. It will be a connection between Sawgrass and I-95. 437 00:34:10,480 --> 00:34:16,700 It will have some intermediate access with the local roadway because that's what the city has expressed what they want. 438 00:34:17,220 --> 00:34:21,480 So I think we handle a lot of those big issues and we're ready to move forward with the PD&E study. 439 00:34:21,960 --> 00:34:25,420 And I can, a little later on, I can get into my presentation a little bit more formally. 440 00:34:28,930 --> 00:34:29,550 Thank you, Robert. 441 00:34:32,390 --> 00:34:37,110 So the floor is still open for any more discussion on the TIP. 442 00:34:44,070 --> 00:34:50,490 I'm sorry, I just want to make it clear for the record that this is the only issue that 443 00:34:50,490 --> 00:34:58,170 I do have with regard to the TIP, but because it is an issue and I did not get a second 444 00:34:58,170 --> 00:35:02,750 to the motion to separate this, then I will have to vote against this item for that reason. 445 00:35:03,290 --> 00:35:03,610 Thank you. 446 00:35:05,140 --> 00:35:09,640 Okay, any other? I don't have anybody in the queue, but I do have a couple questions. 447 00:35:13,100 --> 00:35:13,580 And 448 00:35:16,850 --> 00:35:25,830 the major projects, did I miss something? The flyover from the 10th Street to I-95 is not in this? 449 00:35:27,700 --> 00:35:31,440 And the TIP? Is that too far behind? It's not ready to be... 450 00:35:31,440 --> 00:35:36,200 Well, remember, this is just a sampling, so I'm actually going to have to look to... 451 00:35:45,300 --> 00:36:06,740 I don't know the answer and we actually can pull this thing up. I believe we have it up here. I don't know if we're going to be able to find it help from you mentioned some interchange improvements long 95 going up the Hillsborough but I think a second project along here connecting to 100 to 10th Street was Hillsborough to sample I believe. 452 00:37:03,740 --> 00:37:12,320 So Mr. Chair, we're not able to find that in the tip at the moment, but we'll continue 453 00:37:12,320 --> 00:37:13,080 to look. 454 00:37:13,620 --> 00:37:13,800 Okay. 455 00:37:14,380 --> 00:37:19,540 Let me just ask, this is cheating a little bit, but do you want us to find it or do you 456 00:37:19,540 --> 00:37:20,780 want us not to find it? 457 00:37:22,540 --> 00:37:25,180 I would want you to find it. 458 00:37:25,400 --> 00:37:25,580 Okay. 459 00:37:25,580 --> 00:37:26,580 All right, I mean 460 00:37:27,820 --> 00:37:32,040 I mean it was part of the public workshops that we had with Southwest 10th Street 461 00:37:32,900 --> 00:37:36,060 What wasn't part of those workshops was also the termpikes 462 00:37:36,680 --> 00:37:38,460 portion of that, you know 463 00:37:38,460 --> 00:37:43,760 Turns the termpike connections to the 10th Street that wasn't part of the workshop 464 00:37:43,760 --> 00:37:50,980 I don't know that maybe tailing behind this one may maybe I 95 portion is also that's my recollection because we had spoken about this earlier 465 00:37:50,980 --> 00:37:54,940 when we were reviewing it in-house just this morning that there's like 400 466 00:37:54,940 --> 00:37:59,060 million there for Southwest 10th, but we know the price tag is larger when you 467 00:37:59,060 --> 00:38:03,620 include the interchange. I'm guessing that it's just a couple years behind in 468 00:38:03,620 --> 00:38:07,960 funding for this, but we will dig through and find you an answer 469 00:38:07,960 --> 00:38:13,280 definitively. Okay. And I just have a, oh I'm gonna, Jonathan Robertson. 470 00:38:16,040 --> 00:38:16,120 Oh, 471 00:38:16,300 --> 00:38:20,200 would you like to answer that question, Robert? Yeah, take a stab at, for the I-95 472 00:38:20,200 --> 00:38:25,240 that you're talking about. So I'm the project manager for that. It's a PD&E study. It's actually 473 00:38:25,240 --> 00:38:29,860 in the fiscal year 25, so it's the year in the next year outside of the current time. 474 00:38:33,110 --> 00:38:40,210 Thanks, Mr. Chair. Bill, I'm morbidly curious about the trip funding. And this tip compared 475 00:38:40,210 --> 00:38:50,740 to maybe this time last year, is there anything different? Is the FY24 funds, was that 476 00:38:50,740 --> 00:38:56,200 the newest year added to this this tip in my uh is there anything no there's 477 00:38:56,200 --> 00:39:00,680 really nothing here to nothing new to see as you know we went through the 478 00:39:00,680 --> 00:39:06,280 process this spring of of trying to identify some new priority so we're 479 00:39:06,280 --> 00:39:12,940 actually hoping next year that I'll be able to answer yes affirmatively that 480 00:39:12,940 --> 00:39:18,980 we were able to to get something so some new projects in okay so and you're 481 00:39:18,980 --> 00:39:26,260 We're hoping in time for the next tip process to have, I suppose, what, a 2025, or a... 482 00:39:26,260 --> 00:39:37,220 Yeah, so the timeframe is, I know it's a little confusing, but for the prioritization process 483 00:39:37,220 --> 00:39:42,020 that we went through, I believe it was like in March with ARTAC for the trip projects, 484 00:39:42,320 --> 00:39:47,080 is actually the same cycle that we'll be going through immediately following this 485 00:39:47,080 --> 00:39:51,860 presentation with our multimodal priority list those projects will show up 486 00:39:51,860 --> 00:39:58,300 in December or I think it's early cycle this year but the fall so that's when 487 00:39:58,300 --> 00:40:01,380 we're going to get some kind of a response from what we did this spring 488 00:40:01,380 --> 00:40:07,940 they're not here in this in this tip cycle okay thank you but I just have a 489 00:40:07,940 --> 00:40:12,800 couple more questions little ones so when your project highlights the 490 00:40:12,800 --> 00:40:14,920 The Pompano Beach Mobility sidewalks. 491 00:40:14,920 --> 00:40:17,240 Is that a city program? 492 00:40:18,220 --> 00:40:22,140 They're the ones that are going to be doing the project. 493 00:40:22,820 --> 00:40:25,380 I would like somebody from our mobility group, Ricardo. 494 00:40:25,940 --> 00:40:27,040 Oh, Mr. Gutierrez. 495 00:40:29,570 --> 00:40:31,790 Good afternoon, Ricardo Gutierrez of our MPO staff. 496 00:40:32,250 --> 00:40:33,490 Now, that's actually one of our projects 497 00:40:33,490 --> 00:40:35,710 that were bundled in an area to make it more efficient 498 00:40:35,710 --> 00:40:36,570 and implementing. 499 00:40:37,250 --> 00:40:38,550 So it's one of our mobility projects. 500 00:40:38,730 --> 00:40:39,410 It would be DOT? 501 00:40:40,170 --> 00:40:41,010 With DOT, yes. 502 00:40:41,290 --> 00:40:42,410 How about Elmar Drive? 503 00:40:45,890 --> 00:41:01,590 We're working with the city that's another mobility project as well. Okay last one is see slip. Twenty two projects bike lane thirty four million dollars that's over five years. How do I understand how that works how do you know how many projects that are over the five year program. 504 00:41:05,810 --> 00:41:12,910 As you can see this is a team effort here. Yes always sorry I missed the the question I did hear see under C slip on the. 505 00:41:14,510 --> 00:41:22,030 I'm police chief local initiatives program. It says 22 projects. This is a TIP bike lane 506 00:41:22,030 --> 00:41:27,450 sidewalk $34 million over five years. But how do we know how many projects that would 507 00:41:27,450 --> 00:41:35,310 be? So it should be it's 22 projects. Can you can tell me can you tell me who funded 508 00:41:35,310 --> 00:41:40,050 in the fifth year? Projects are funded in the fifth year. I could probably get 509 00:41:40,050 --> 00:41:47,090 know that for you but I haven't applied for him yet. Okay perfect okay so this 510 00:41:47,090 --> 00:41:51,350 chair I think your question really again gets down to kind of the confusing 511 00:41:51,350 --> 00:41:58,290 cycle that we're that we're always on so what's reflected here under C-slip in 512 00:41:58,290 --> 00:42:02,750 the 22 projects these are all projects that were previously announced 513 00:42:02,750 --> 00:42:06,770 that that you had received an award and they're just showing up now in the 514 00:42:06,770 --> 00:42:11,450 programming so the project right exactly it's just I know the 515 00:42:11,450 --> 00:42:13,650 cycles that's why I always show those those kind of 516 00:42:14,450 --> 00:42:17,010 but if you're sitting up here you could have bought me in the 517 00:42:17,010 --> 00:42:19,650 head just give me back in tune here so that's I understand 518 00:42:19,650 --> 00:42:22,690 because our projects are five years off. Yes, yes, I'm dumb 519 00:42:22,690 --> 00:42:25,810 question. I'm sorry. No dumb questions. Okay, let me let me 520 00:42:25,810 --> 00:42:28,870 have one more response. No, he's in the queue to Mr. 521 00:42:28,990 --> 00:42:29,130 Good. 522 00:42:30,770 --> 00:42:34,150 From coral Springs perspective, we've met with the 523 00:42:41,270 --> 00:43:04,130 I mean, we wanted the trucks on the quote managed lanes. We did not want. I mean, that was part of our rationale for pressing for this whole Southwest 10th Street was our industrial park and the trucks and I'm sure other cities sunrise. Maybe I mean, I was mentioned. These are these other discussions we've had with them that I'm picking up from our 524 00:43:04,130 --> 00:43:09,390 MPO member that that he was definitely opposed to it at the 525 00:43:09,390 --> 00:43:12,290 time when everything was being pushed onto your local roads. 526 00:43:12,830 --> 00:43:17,910 And and that that they wouldn't have access to the the the 527 00:43:17,910 --> 00:43:19,910 straight flow of traffic through there and access to I 528 00:43:19,910 --> 00:43:23,470 95, which is what they want. So if that this was a couple 529 00:43:23,470 --> 00:43:28,510 months ago opposed to it and and the staff and consultants 530 00:43:29,050 --> 00:43:32,550 worked with D. O. T. Palahasi and came with the last 531 00:43:32,550 --> 00:43:37,890 we met with them, he expressed what he had just expressed here. And I think that turned 532 00:43:38,330 --> 00:43:42,930 Mr. Bagnola, our representative of the MPO, more in support of the program where they 533 00:43:42,930 --> 00:43:46,990 were saying that it's going to be a fleet, you know, available to all vehicles. So I 534 00:43:46,990 --> 00:43:50,570 don't know if you'd heard that before, if that influenced you, but there may be 535 00:43:50,570 --> 00:43:54,630 other reasons you'd be opposed to it, but that was how it happened in Coral Springs 536 00:43:57,660 --> 00:44:01,800 so far. You can speak. I'm sorry. Thomas, in response. 537 00:44:01,800 --> 00:44:07,740 Okay. And thank you, Mr. Chair. And yes, we've heard much of the same thing. 538 00:44:08,340 --> 00:44:14,620 However, you've got to understand that the city of Deerfield Beach has been like ground zero for this from day one. 539 00:44:15,320 --> 00:44:20,740 And the city has heard many promising things where promises have since been broken. 540 00:44:21,280 --> 00:44:29,060 And many of us are in government and many of us recognize that verbal commitments 541 00:44:29,060 --> 00:44:36,420 events are only as far as it can be used to get the purpose done, but what really counts 542 00:44:36,420 --> 00:44:42,620 is what's in writing and nothing has been provided in writing to make clear anything 543 00:44:42,620 --> 00:44:43,880 that you said at this point. 544 00:44:44,640 --> 00:44:51,300 So because the city has been engaged with this process and has been broken hearted 545 00:44:51,300 --> 00:44:55,420 many times, we're just not falling for it anymore. 546 00:44:55,420 --> 00:44:59,900 So we just want to be on record to make it clear that we do have 547 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:06,340 Opposition, that there are concerns. And we do hope, I mean, we are very, very much in 548 00:45:06,340 --> 00:45:12,380 favor of this as well, too. I mean, you know, we need this corridor, you know, creates a 549 00:45:12,380 --> 00:45:17,520 lot of congestion within the city. And we know any improvement will be an 550 00:45:17,520 --> 00:45:22,880 improvement to, you know, our traffic ways. However, again, it's just, you know, 551 00:45:22,940 --> 00:45:27,480 how it's being done, you know, and who's paying the price for it. It is the 552 00:45:27,480 --> 00:45:33,140 City of Deerfield Beach and we're asking our partner cities to recognize that. 553 00:45:33,580 --> 00:45:33,940 Thank you. 554 00:45:34,260 --> 00:45:34,680 Appreciate it. 555 00:45:34,800 --> 00:45:34,940 Thank you. 556 00:45:35,500 --> 00:45:36,540 Nicholas, soful. 557 00:45:38,980 --> 00:45:39,620 I move the item. 558 00:45:40,840 --> 00:45:41,500 Is there a second? 559 00:45:45,940 --> 00:45:51,740 We do have another speaker or another question, but I'll wait for a second before you start 560 00:45:51,740 --> 00:45:52,060 voting. 561 00:45:58,660 --> 00:46:01,340 There's a motion of support to approve. 562 00:46:01,800 --> 00:46:02,560 I'll go on to... 563 00:46:04,200 --> 00:46:04,780 Is it up ready? 564 00:46:05,500 --> 00:46:05,660 Yeah. 565 00:46:05,920 --> 00:46:06,100 Okay. 566 00:46:06,100 --> 00:46:08,620 Well, we can take us take the question. 567 00:46:11,070 --> 00:46:12,830 I want to make a electronic. 568 00:46:18,840 --> 00:46:19,900 Should I go to the question? 569 00:46:20,900 --> 00:46:22,700 Let's go to the question in Elise Michaels 570 00:46:23,420 --> 00:46:27,620 Thank you. I just want to put on the record in line with mr. Good 571 00:46:27,620 --> 00:46:31,500 There is three major projects that are going to be happening on 572 00:46:32,180 --> 00:46:38,200 2023 they're around around the city of Parkland and we just have concerns of the timing and scheduling 573 00:46:38,200 --> 00:46:40,500 Because it's gonna create a lot of congestion 574 00:46:40,500 --> 00:46:46,600 for our residents so I'm not opposing to it just have concerns as far as projects 575 00:46:46,600 --> 00:46:54,480 happening all the same time around the city thank you thank you we're still 576 00:46:54,480 --> 00:46:56,580 waiting on the screen to Rebecca 577 00:46:59,750 --> 00:47:02,730 Schultz proud MPO over here in the corner it 578 00:47:02,730 --> 00:47:04,650 is ready for a motion so 579 00:47:06,920 --> 00:47:10,380 someone want to make somebody made a motion did you 580 00:47:14,200 --> 00:47:20,160 We do have a motion and a second, so if there's any more discussion, there's none in the queue. 581 00:47:21,020 --> 00:47:22,400 I think we're probably ready to vote. 582 00:47:23,700 --> 00:47:24,100 Pardon? 583 00:47:32,560 --> 00:47:33,220 Were you done, Bill? 584 00:47:36,070 --> 00:47:38,230 Okay. Yeah, you're done now. 585 00:47:42,210 --> 00:47:50,010 It is approved with one dissenting vote and so it is approved recommended thank 586 00:47:50,010 --> 00:47:50,250 you 587 00:47:54,060 --> 00:48:00,620 we'll move on to action item number two which is the motion to recommend 588 00:48:00,620 --> 00:48:04,960 Broward MPO approved the draft fiscal year 2020 multimodal priorities list 589 00:48:07,240 --> 00:48:08,880 MMPL. We get you again, Mr. Cross? 590 00:48:09,160 --> 00:48:13,860 And I'm back again. All right. Yes, sir. All right. Let me see. This is a huge, huge presentation. 591 00:48:14,860 --> 00:48:20,840 So go for it, Bill. Yes. And it's a big document, and it's hugely important. 592 00:48:21,140 --> 00:48:26,140 And there's a huge number of changes. So, yeah, a very important document today. 593 00:48:26,300 --> 00:48:31,360 So we're really excited to get here. It has been over a year getting to this point. 594 00:48:31,360 --> 00:48:34,560 And we've spent a lot of time with this group, as you know, 595 00:48:34,640 --> 00:48:39,140 working through the new 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan 596 00:48:39,140 --> 00:48:41,440 to come up with a new format and a new approach. 597 00:48:42,140 --> 00:48:46,340 And we have embodied that in the new priority list 598 00:48:46,340 --> 00:48:47,760 that you have in front of you. 599 00:48:48,260 --> 00:48:50,180 So again, today we're talking about one 600 00:48:50,180 --> 00:48:52,600 of our core products, the multimodal priorities list. 601 00:48:53,360 --> 00:48:55,780 I'm not going to go through the animation on this again 602 00:48:55,780 --> 00:48:58,620 with you, but I will go through some animation 603 00:48:58,620 --> 00:48:59,300 with this one. 604 00:48:59,300 --> 00:49:04,800 So the priorities list is really the bridge between the Metropolitan Transportation Plan 605 00:49:04,800 --> 00:49:08,660 and actually getting things onto the TIP that we just adopted. 606 00:49:08,900 --> 00:49:15,400 So what we're talking about today, we will be adopting in the form of a TIP a year from 607 00:49:15,400 --> 00:49:15,660 now. 608 00:49:18,300 --> 00:49:22,220 So some of the changes that we've made to the priorities list this time is it's 609 00:49:22,220 --> 00:49:26,320 going to be organized by the 2045 MTP funding programs. 610 00:49:26,320 --> 00:49:32,500 programs. It's also going to incorporate the measures of program readiness and we'll show 611 00:49:32,500 --> 00:49:37,520 you that. I know you've seen that before. Christopher Streppo has given you that presentation. 612 00:49:38,580 --> 00:49:43,120 Tracking funds by phase and source, that's something new that we are also adding in 613 00:49:43,120 --> 00:49:47,660 to help keep track of where the money is coming from and going to. And then of course 614 00:49:47,660 --> 00:49:53,160 we also want to start talking and tracking the progress on delivering the projects. 615 00:49:53,800 --> 00:50:08,860 You've seen this before, this is just a reminder of the 2045 MTP funding programs, along with their relative percentages of funding that our board has asked that we attempt to match that different level of funding. 616 00:50:09,000 --> 00:50:14,940 So you can see the largest there is for our Complete Street Master Plan with about 25%. 617 00:50:15,540 --> 00:50:23,260 Okay, so program ready. Again, all the projects do need to be program ready in order for DOT to program the work. 618 00:50:23,940 --> 00:50:32,460 So as we go through the program, I'll show you how you can tell whether or not your project specifically has met those four criteria. 619 00:50:32,820 --> 00:50:40,060 And as a reminder, it's scope of work, a resolution of support from the city, cost estimate and the collaboration amongst partners. 620 00:50:40,060 --> 00:50:44,100 that could mean the neighbor, it could mean the owner of the facility that the 621 00:50:44,100 --> 00:50:49,100 project is proposed on. Again the important dates and I just have a minor 622 00:50:49,100 --> 00:50:53,840 edit that I asked that we add in here. Please if you're going to try to meet 623 00:50:53,840 --> 00:50:59,060 what we've been saying sharing with you is the August 1st deadline and 624 00:50:59,060 --> 00:51:02,220 that's only important if you have a project that's really up high in the 625 00:51:02,220 --> 00:51:07,040 priority for this cycle. Try to get it to us July 31st because our 626 00:51:07,040 --> 00:51:11,700 deadline to submit to DOT is actually August 1st so if we get it from you at 627 00:51:11,700 --> 00:51:15,700 5 p.m. on August 1st and then we have to go through the update you know it's 628 00:51:15,700 --> 00:51:19,340 just going to be a little bit difficult. We'll do it because we've been saying 629 00:51:19,340 --> 00:51:23,140 August 1st but if you can get it to us a little bit early we've very much 630 00:51:23,140 --> 00:51:28,100 appreciate that. Again September 11th is the date for all other projects 631 00:51:28,100 --> 00:51:36,320 just to make sure that you are able to be in the 2045 MTP. Okay so let's 632 00:51:36,320 --> 00:51:38,460 Let's talk a little bit about the funding source distribution. 633 00:51:39,280 --> 00:51:44,600 Here's the way the funds are distributed between state and federal. 634 00:51:45,120 --> 00:51:47,680 And then you can see the bottom three colors there. 635 00:51:48,040 --> 00:51:52,960 That's where we use some of our federal dollars to try to leverage both state and local dollars. 636 00:51:53,460 --> 00:51:55,060 So these are the recommendations. 637 00:51:55,320 --> 00:51:58,080 These are, again, these are priority lists. 638 00:51:58,220 --> 00:52:01,340 It's not necessarily the result that we will get a year from now. 639 00:52:02,600 --> 00:52:03,480 Similar here. 640 00:52:03,480 --> 00:52:09,020 We're going to go through program funding source by the different funding programs of the MTP. 641 00:52:09,400 --> 00:52:11,420 So on highway you can see how that breaks out. 642 00:52:11,740 --> 00:52:16,940 And I think logically most of the highway funding is coming through the state. 643 00:52:18,620 --> 00:52:23,720 We take a look at the system management and operations slash safety. 644 00:52:24,000 --> 00:52:29,720 Again, significant portion is coming from the state, but the other piece is coming from the MPO attributable. 645 00:52:29,720 --> 00:52:44,680 And that's because both FDOT and ourselves, we have adopted Division Zero, and so we are actively working to make more capital investments in safety programs around the county as part of this plan. 646 00:52:46,700 --> 00:52:49,840 Transit, you can see a little bit different breakout there. 647 00:52:53,510 --> 00:52:55,110 C-slip, a little bit different again. 648 00:52:57,750 --> 00:53:02,410 mobility hubs. We're still working on standing that program up, so it looks a 649 00:53:02,410 --> 00:53:06,850 little bit like a bull's-eye there, but I'm sure that we will fill that out in 650 00:53:06,850 --> 00:53:13,570 future years. And the complete Street Master Plan. Here you can see this is 651 00:53:13,570 --> 00:53:19,490 again our largest single funding program for MPO attributable dollars, and 652 00:53:19,490 --> 00:53:26,810 so this one actually has an oversized federal blue piece of that pie. Okay, 653 00:53:26,810 --> 00:53:31,070 Okay, so program distribution, I'll try to go through these fairly quickly, but if you 654 00:53:31,070 --> 00:53:32,510 have questions, we can come back. 655 00:53:33,330 --> 00:53:37,790 This again, I'll go through the different funding programs of how the projects break out. 656 00:53:38,070 --> 00:53:41,650 So we'll go through this first one a little bit slowly so you can follow what's here. 657 00:53:42,210 --> 00:53:47,550 So at the top there is the 20% that was the board adopted percentage of funding. 658 00:53:47,690 --> 00:53:49,170 They'd like to see go into that program. 659 00:53:49,690 --> 00:53:51,510 Below that tells you what the program is. 660 00:53:51,570 --> 00:53:52,830 This one happens to be the highway. 661 00:53:52,830 --> 00:53:57,750 There are 53 projects on the priority list, highway projects, 662 00:53:58,150 --> 00:53:59,550 eight of them are existing projects. 663 00:53:59,790 --> 00:54:05,410 And just as a reminder, the priority list continues to carry as the highest priorities, 664 00:54:05,890 --> 00:54:10,450 projects that were previous MPO priorities that have partial funding 665 00:54:10,450 --> 00:54:13,150 and are still waiting to become 100% funded. 666 00:54:13,470 --> 00:54:16,450 So the older projects, you know, they hang around 667 00:54:16,450 --> 00:54:19,390 and they retain the highest priority until they're funded. 668 00:54:19,390 --> 00:54:26,170 So in this case, we're adding 45 new projects as potential programming options. 669 00:54:26,970 --> 00:54:28,790 And again, you're going to see as we go through this, 670 00:54:28,890 --> 00:54:32,190 not all of the 45 are actually going to be program ready, 671 00:54:32,210 --> 00:54:35,190 so they won't all be eligible to be programmed, 672 00:54:35,390 --> 00:54:37,250 but we're putting them on the list. 673 00:54:38,230 --> 00:54:42,990 Okay, so this one is TSMNO slash safety, 10 projects, 674 00:54:43,470 --> 00:54:45,370 three of them are existing that are carrying forward, 675 00:54:45,590 --> 00:54:47,370 and we have seven new projects. 676 00:54:48,150 --> 00:54:55,470 For transit, there are four projects that are carrying forward from previously and there are no new projects. 677 00:54:56,090 --> 00:55:01,770 Or maybe I have that backwards. I'm sorry, there are zero carrying forward and there are four new projects. 678 00:55:02,190 --> 00:55:02,610 Thank you, Mike. 679 00:55:05,580 --> 00:55:08,120 Okay, so what do we have here? We have C-slip. 680 00:55:08,720 --> 00:55:14,620 So there are 38 total projects, 12 of them are projects that were partially funded previously. 681 00:55:14,620 --> 00:55:17,900 Obviously, we're going to continue to keep them on to get them fully funded for you, 682 00:55:18,180 --> 00:55:24,900 and there's 26 new projects that have come from the recent cycle. 683 00:55:25,360 --> 00:55:30,920 What's important to point out here with the C-slip projects, there are 26 that came through 684 00:55:30,920 --> 00:55:32,400 the C-slip this time. 685 00:55:33,960 --> 00:55:39,640 Of those 26, the ones that get funded by DOT this time will be kept until they're 686 00:55:39,640 --> 00:55:40,300 fully funded. 687 00:55:40,300 --> 00:55:50,420 However, if you don't receive funding, then you'll be hearing back from us because those projects will have to be resubmitted through the annual C-slip process. 688 00:55:50,640 --> 00:55:51,760 We don't carry those forward. 689 00:55:53,560 --> 00:55:55,040 And finally, Mobility Hubs. 690 00:55:56,960 --> 00:55:57,820 That's the zeroes there. 691 00:55:58,300 --> 00:56:00,220 Next year it's going to be a great program. 692 00:56:01,240 --> 00:56:02,820 Complete Street Master Plans. 693 00:56:02,920 --> 00:56:05,100 We've got a lot of projects moving through there as well. 694 00:56:06,660 --> 00:56:09,240 Okay, so let's talk a little bit about the new format. 695 00:56:09,240 --> 00:56:13,480 I know you've seen this before, but there are a lot of changes. 696 00:56:14,880 --> 00:56:16,580 First off is the prioritization. 697 00:56:17,020 --> 00:56:22,340 So let me just point out to you that what you're going to see, two slightly different things. 698 00:56:22,860 --> 00:56:29,120 One of the things that we've changed this time is we've generated a priority report for each of your municipalities. 699 00:56:30,220 --> 00:56:36,660 Okay, so you have, instead of looking at the whole document, you can just kind of focus on what's happening in your municipality. 700 00:56:36,660 --> 00:56:47,500 What you'll see under the prioritization is that the newer projects, they're going to be color-coded to match whatever program you're in. 701 00:56:47,840 --> 00:56:55,560 And that's going to tell you that these are truly new projects as opposed to legacy projects that we're continuing to fund and move forward. 702 00:56:56,320 --> 00:56:59,560 The project characteristics, you can see the areas that are highlighted. 703 00:56:59,560 --> 00:57:07,760 it will tell you information like the city, it will tell you the project limits, description, etc. 704 00:57:08,360 --> 00:57:14,140 The financial information there is in the middle, it's most importantly to the far right, 705 00:57:14,380 --> 00:57:17,560 it will tell you if there is still funding needed. 706 00:57:18,140 --> 00:57:24,120 So for the projects that are carrying over, you'll be able to see the years where there is partial funding 707 00:57:24,120 --> 00:57:28,180 and what the shortfall is so you can see what the need is moving forward. 708 00:57:28,880 --> 00:57:33,300 and then program readiness this is a really important box here so the four 709 00:57:33,300 --> 00:57:38,060 areas that we mentioned you need to get four greens next to those areas in order 710 00:57:38,060 --> 00:57:44,410 for F dot to take these projects and start applying dollars to them okay I 711 00:57:44,410 --> 00:57:51,170 know that was a lot glad to try to take any questions that you might have 712 00:57:51,170 --> 00:57:52,090 still 713 00:58:04,470 --> 00:58:08,010 looking for my city okay Christopher tells me that you do all 714 00:58:08,010 --> 00:58:14,630 have your city specific version of the priority list in front of you. Jonathan 715 00:58:14,630 --> 00:58:20,510 Roberson. Thank you Mr. Chair. Hi Bill. Hey question for you on the transit 716 00:58:20,510 --> 00:58:25,890 projects on page 50 of the actual list. 717 00:58:28,430 --> 00:58:33,690 Just curious about the project two and 718 00:58:33,690 --> 00:58:43,830 three, the city line, or I suppose it's at the bottom, it's not, I'm not sure if that's 719 00:58:43,830 --> 00:58:51,610 supposed to be the sponsor, but for both of these are regional kind of rapid bus BRT projects 720 00:58:51,610 --> 00:58:57,230 and the local jurisdiction thing is different. 721 00:58:57,690 --> 00:59:02,730 One of them is Broward County, the Hollywood one is Pimper Pines Hollywood, and since 722 00:59:02,730 --> 00:59:07,530 It says kind of all going to be funded by kind of regional funds. 723 00:59:07,770 --> 00:59:09,930 I'm just wondering what it's meant there. 724 00:59:10,230 --> 00:59:15,050 Should that be the owner, the sponsor of the project in that first thing, or are you trying 725 00:59:15,050 --> 00:59:17,570 to put the cities that it goes through? 726 00:59:18,130 --> 00:59:22,410 So it's a great point, Jonathan, and the answer is none of the above. 727 00:59:22,870 --> 00:59:30,110 So we don't give you credit for you being the owner because we point out that the 728 00:59:30,110 --> 00:59:32,650 ownership of the facility is actually the state. 729 00:59:33,290 --> 00:59:36,310 We do acknowledge that the program is transit 730 00:59:36,830 --> 00:59:39,850 and the city is literally just that. 731 00:59:40,030 --> 00:59:43,010 It's one of the cities that the project travels through. 732 00:59:43,610 --> 00:59:47,610 So I think that you may have pointed out to us 733 00:59:48,750 --> 00:59:52,730 another field that we might wanna try to incorporate, 734 00:59:53,270 --> 00:59:55,970 but it's a balancing act. 735 00:59:56,130 --> 00:59:57,370 The more detail we put in here, 736 00:59:57,470 --> 00:59:58,450 the more crowded it gets 737 00:59:58,450 --> 00:59:59,670 and the more difficult to read. 738 00:59:59,670 --> 00:59:59,870 But 739 01:00:00,240 --> 01:00:15,360 I would consider that, you know, we would be working with every city on the corridors to implement some, you know, aspects of rapid bus and it would be like some kind of multiple, not jurisdiction, but multiple, 740 01:00:16,780 --> 01:00:22,260 There's multiple governments need to be on board for them to happen. 741 01:00:22,600 --> 01:00:28,120 And it's obviously, the funding sources are obviously, I mean, they're surtax and state 742 01:00:28,120 --> 01:00:33,900 or flexed federal funds to the state, whatever, but it might be a good recommendation just 743 01:00:33,900 --> 01:00:38,140 to have some kind of multiple jurisdictional involvement in this. 744 01:00:39,280 --> 01:00:39,720 Thank you. 745 01:00:43,520 --> 01:00:44,040 Eric Houston. 746 01:00:46,480 --> 01:00:48,260 Can you explain the icons? 747 01:00:48,260 --> 01:00:55,220 I have two questions. Can you explain icons with the search, the paper, the like funding and the people? 748 01:00:55,440 --> 01:00:58,840 What do those mean? What do you say you have to have for yeses? 749 01:01:01,810 --> 01:01:09,140 Oh, okay. Sure. This is the program ready. And we actually, we do have a slide for that. 750 01:01:09,560 --> 01:01:13,900 I can't read it on this one. I'm going to have to back up a few slides here, guys. 751 01:01:14,720 --> 01:01:18,180 There's also, Eric, there's also legends at the bottom of the page. 752 01:01:18,180 --> 01:01:26,720 So, the magnifying scope of work, paper resolution, tag as the cost estimate, and collaboration 753 01:01:26,720 --> 01:01:28,800 of among partners is the last one. 754 01:01:28,980 --> 01:01:30,280 Yeah, that answers that question. 755 01:01:30,420 --> 01:01:30,680 Okay. 756 01:01:31,360 --> 01:01:37,580 My other question is with the priority, and it says 22, and then there's a number 757 01:01:37,580 --> 01:01:39,920 below it, 2019-10. 758 01:01:42,100 --> 01:01:58,280 What can you explain that priority like is it because is it twenty two overall in the plan or is it twenty two in that particular section or and then what's the twenty nineteen dash ten right so that what we try to do their Eric was first off. 759 01:01:58,280 --> 01:02:05,020 If there's no color code under that priority number, 760 01:02:05,620 --> 01:02:08,060 then that tells you it's a carryover project. 761 01:02:08,600 --> 01:02:14,180 And then the two letter code there is basically the year 762 01:02:14,180 --> 01:02:16,260 where it was originally prioritized 763 01:02:16,260 --> 01:02:18,100 and that original priority. 764 01:02:18,520 --> 01:02:20,460 And then the new projects, yes, 765 01:02:20,460 --> 01:02:29,280 their their reflect the overall rank consistent with the MTP and those will 766 01:02:29,280 --> 01:02:34,760 start with the I believe it's 2020 yeah so all of the new priorities that are 767 01:02:34,760 --> 01:02:40,900 for the first time this year we'll start with the 2020 designation the 768 01:02:42,240 --> 01:02:49,480 season of stars of 2019 yes because the projects that we're incorporating this 769 01:02:49,480 --> 01:02:55,020 year into the multimodal priority list we're from a prior year cycle of C-slip 770 01:02:55,020 --> 01:03:02,420 which again is one of those schedule cycle kind of gotcha there's there okay 771 01:03:02,420 --> 01:03:08,340 it's not always obvious how how the cycles run with each other okay and so 772 01:03:08,340 --> 01:03:14,840 this upcoming cycle of C-slip will have the 2020 but it will appear in the 773 01:03:14,840 --> 01:03:15,260 We're going to go back to the 774 01:03:15,260 --> 01:03:18,440 twenty twenty one. Priority yes 775 01:03:18,440 --> 01:03:19,760 all right that's my question 776 01:03:19,760 --> 01:03:20,500 and 777 01:03:24,340 --> 01:03:27,020 yes back please. I don't 778 01:03:27,020 --> 01:03:29,560 under the tribal rolling stock 779 01:03:29,560 --> 01:03:31,880 item under the transit section 780 01:03:31,880 --> 01:03:34,460 I know that we are working to 781 01:03:34,460 --> 01:03:36,060 provide a resolution of 782 01:03:36,060 --> 01:03:37,420 support which should clear 783 01:03:37,420 --> 01:03:38,560 one of those boxes up 784 01:03:38,560 --> 01:03:40,660 because we have. Two items 785 01:03:40,660 --> 01:03:45,580 that are checked now under program readiness, the other being the collaboration among partners. 786 01:03:46,140 --> 01:03:53,900 We are in conversations with the other two neighboring MPOs, TPO, TPA, to try to get these 787 01:03:53,900 --> 01:03:58,060 included, the rolling stock, their share included into their plans. 788 01:04:00,240 --> 01:04:08,840 In terms of time frames, the inclusion of their third, I would need those from 789 01:04:08,840 --> 01:04:12,280 both counties for this to be changed from no to a yes. 790 01:04:12,660 --> 01:04:15,080 So that's an excellent question, Natalie. 791 01:04:15,340 --> 01:04:18,480 And I have to say, I haven't thought of that. 792 01:04:18,760 --> 01:04:21,800 I don't think we've really fully thought that one through. 793 01:04:22,020 --> 01:04:24,080 So maybe we can talk offline about that. 794 01:04:24,920 --> 01:04:27,140 Collaboration is normally if you're doing something 795 01:04:27,740 --> 01:04:29,320 with your adjacent cities. 796 01:04:29,540 --> 01:04:31,060 In this case, it's adjacent counties. 797 01:04:31,460 --> 01:04:34,120 But I don't know if that should preclude us 798 01:04:34,120 --> 01:04:37,180 from having a project in Broward County 799 01:04:37,180 --> 01:04:45,540 if the two counties on either side are necessarily not ready to go and you're free to buy rolling 800 01:04:45,540 --> 01:04:46,420 stock for your own. 801 01:04:46,540 --> 01:04:48,520 I'm not sure there's another agency there involved. 802 01:04:48,800 --> 01:04:49,660 I don't know, Mike, to use. 803 01:04:50,340 --> 01:04:51,440 I don't see a problem. 804 01:04:51,600 --> 01:04:54,600 I think we can turn that first red to green for you. 805 01:04:54,800 --> 01:04:55,060 Okay. 806 01:04:55,180 --> 01:04:58,400 And then if you can get us the resolution, I think you probably have greens all the 807 01:04:58,400 --> 01:04:59,080 way across there. 808 01:04:59,400 --> 01:04:59,640 Okay. 809 01:04:59,740 --> 01:05:00,040 Thank you. 810 01:05:00,160 --> 01:05:00,820 Great question though. 811 01:05:00,960 --> 01:05:01,180 Thank you. 812 01:05:05,000 --> 01:05:05,360 Karen Moore? 813 01:05:07,250 --> 01:05:08,470 I had a question kind of on that. 814 01:05:08,470 --> 01:05:15,330 If we have changes that we know for some of these, like I have one, the US 1595 RAM, we 815 01:05:15,330 --> 01:05:20,470 have a resolution of support and we are working with DOT and the community on that, do we still 816 01:05:20,470 --> 01:05:21,730 have opportunity to update these? 817 01:05:23,530 --> 01:05:23,970 Yes. 818 01:05:24,370 --> 01:05:24,770 Thank you. 819 01:05:25,010 --> 01:05:30,570 If you get us that information, we can make changes and updates prior to the board. 820 01:05:31,530 --> 01:05:33,890 One at a time though, so get them to us quick. 821 01:05:34,370 --> 01:05:36,130 I think that's the only one that I saw going through. 822 01:05:36,270 --> 01:05:36,470 Okay. 823 01:05:36,470 --> 01:05:37,250 Oh, look again. 824 01:05:37,450 --> 01:05:37,970 Good, thank you. 825 01:05:38,150 --> 01:05:44,110 And then in terms of C-slip, as long as it's not, like, the construction's not programmed 826 01:05:44,110 --> 01:05:48,570 yet, it'll still be on here, but once the construction's programmed, it won't. 827 01:05:49,190 --> 01:05:50,430 Am I understanding that right? 828 01:05:50,670 --> 01:05:51,090 Right. 829 01:05:51,330 --> 01:05:56,550 Once the project is fully funded, then it does drop off of the priority list, and 830 01:05:56,550 --> 01:05:58,650 it would be reflected in the tip at that point. 831 01:05:59,270 --> 01:05:59,490 Okay. 832 01:06:01,520 --> 01:06:02,120 Bradley Swing. 833 01:06:02,760 --> 01:06:07,880 question about University Drive Rapid Bus the funding sources state and local 834 01:06:07,880 --> 01:06:11,160 but and we would like to provide the resolution of support but I don't see 835 01:06:11,160 --> 01:06:17,800 what the local support is there there's no indication here of any number so right 836 01:06:17,800 --> 01:06:24,360 so the local support at this point is surtax and that's based upon the 837 01:06:24,360 --> 01:06:29,840 commitment from the county as reflected in their published surtax plan and 838 01:06:29,840 --> 01:06:32,260 program. All right, thanks. 839 01:06:36,720 --> 01:06:39,420 I may have missed this, but the the C-slip programs 840 01:06:39,420 --> 01:06:46,080 that have no funding attached to a year because we don't know yet what's been 841 01:06:46,080 --> 01:06:50,640 funded in the last C-slip round, is that why they're in there? So there are some 842 01:06:50,640 --> 01:06:55,140 of those that don't get funded will drop off. And when do you think we'll know 843 01:06:55,140 --> 01:07:01,900 that? We're gonna put Connor on them. We can get Connor up here, but we 844 01:07:01,900 --> 01:07:06,680 should know by when the work program comes out and the work program we expect 845 01:07:06,680 --> 01:07:09,480 to see in September at your September meeting. 846 01:07:11,810 --> 01:07:13,210 So okay. And Connor you want to 847 01:07:13,210 --> 01:07:17,890 call me that before I just wanted to make sure. Yes. Sorry the speaker in the 848 01:07:17,890 --> 01:07:21,970 audio room is not working right now so could you repeat that? Is this the 849 01:07:21,970 --> 01:07:25,690 question of when we'll know about the C-slip project from last year? Oh from 850 01:07:25,690 --> 01:07:29,270 last year so we it's an early cycle this year with DOT so we should be 851 01:07:29,270 --> 01:07:35,510 knowing relatively soon maybe, I believe, possibly October, does that sound about right? 852 01:07:35,530 --> 01:07:36,250 Mike said September. 853 01:07:36,610 --> 01:07:36,790 September. 854 01:07:37,410 --> 01:07:42,270 We'll see, you'll see the draft of the work program in September and it goes to the 855 01:07:42,270 --> 01:07:44,770 MPO board in October, yep, this year. 856 01:07:45,370 --> 01:07:45,570 Okay. 857 01:07:47,030 --> 01:07:47,650 Thank you. 858 01:07:48,830 --> 01:07:53,490 We have no more requests in the queue and you 859 01:07:55,670 --> 01:07:56,710 need a motion for this. 860 01:08:00,690 --> 01:08:01,750 Ready for a motion. 861 01:08:01,750 --> 01:08:06,130 who ever wants to, ah, thank you, Mr. Guestback. 862 01:08:07,830 --> 01:08:11,590 Michael Rigetti is seconded, so we are almost ready to vote. 863 01:08:13,270 --> 01:08:17,430 Oh, we have another question. Eric Houston, you didn't push your button. 864 01:08:19,050 --> 01:08:20,310 Oh, okay. Thank you. 865 01:08:20,390 --> 01:08:24,270 On community, I know you said you got to get the information in fast, 866 01:08:24,390 --> 01:08:27,310 but when it says, um, collaboration among partners, 867 01:08:29,110 --> 01:08:32,810 What is the city supposed to do with that if it's in the MTP projects? 868 01:08:34,430 --> 01:08:37,150 What depends who the collaboration needs to be with. 869 01:08:37,450 --> 01:08:41,610 So I, you know, we can talk offline about specific projects, glad to do that, 870 01:08:41,790 --> 01:08:48,130 but let's say for instance that you have a project and the collaboration box is currently red 871 01:08:48,130 --> 01:08:52,730 and it's on a state facility or maybe a county facility, 872 01:08:52,730 --> 01:08:57,390 then collaboration with either the county or the city in that case would be 873 01:08:57,390 --> 01:09:02,350 indicated by some type of a letter from them that they are supportive of that 874 01:09:02,350 --> 01:09:07,830 project that you're proposing on their facility. Okay, by the next. 875 01:09:10,890 --> 01:09:13,250 So one of 876 01:09:13,250 --> 01:09:15,330 the reasons why we're doing the one-on-one partner meetings is to get 877 01:09:15,330 --> 01:09:18,510 that collaboration among partners resolved so if you haven't had a 878 01:09:18,510 --> 01:09:21,250 meeting with us yet you'll see when you do actually sit down and meet 879 01:09:21,250 --> 01:09:24,430 with us will let you know hey this is a state facility we'd like you to work with 880 01:09:24,430 --> 01:09:27,530 the state to get a letter of support whatever that may be and we'll set a 881 01:09:27,530 --> 01:09:32,330 timeframe there for that as well we would prefer for projects that are on the 882 01:09:32,330 --> 01:09:37,670 state system to get as soon as you can a letter of support and work through us 883 01:09:37,670 --> 01:09:43,490 in order to do that as well okay thank you all right we can vote then 884 01:09:45,700 --> 01:09:47,200 moved and seconded it's 885 01:10:05,920 --> 01:10:09,660 been approved unanimously thank you very much we'll 886 01:10:09,660 --> 01:10:15,160 move on to non-action items, a report from partner agencies, 887 01:10:15,360 --> 01:10:17,380 Florida DOT, Southwest 10th Street Update. 888 01:10:23,390 --> 01:10:24,350 Hi, good afternoon. 889 01:10:24,570 --> 01:10:25,770 Paul Caparazzi, Breyer NPO. 890 01:10:26,010 --> 01:10:27,450 I'm introducing our friends at FDOT. 891 01:10:28,710 --> 01:10:30,550 Just a little history on this one. 892 01:10:30,710 --> 01:10:32,590 This all started with a letter that was 893 01:10:32,590 --> 01:10:35,390 said to the NPO board four years ago now, I believe. 894 01:10:36,250 --> 01:10:39,430 And from there, the NPO formed the Community Oversight 895 01:10:39,430 --> 01:10:42,910 Advisory Team, which was a group of residents, 896 01:10:42,910 --> 01:10:47,150 business interests from throughout the Southwest Tensory corridor and beyond. 897 01:10:48,070 --> 01:10:53,390 They came up with 18 recommendations as to what elements the PD&E, should a 898 01:10:53,390 --> 01:10:58,010 PD&E happen, what should they cover. That was adopted by the MPO Board about 899 01:10:58,010 --> 01:11:03,130 going on three years ago now. Since then, FDOT has begun their PD&E and 900 01:11:03,630 --> 01:11:07,570 they're here today to just provide an update to the TAC and later tonight 901 01:11:07,570 --> 01:11:12,750 our CAC on what the status of what their alternatives look like etc. So with 902 01:11:12,750 --> 01:11:14,770 that I'd like to introduce Robert Boston, 903 01:11:14,990 --> 01:11:16,470 the project manager from FDOT. 904 01:11:22,980 --> 01:11:23,580 Thanks, Paul. 905 01:11:23,760 --> 01:11:24,880 Gaffrey and again, it's me again. 906 01:11:25,800 --> 01:11:27,100 Yeah, just going to give you, it's really, 907 01:11:27,260 --> 01:11:29,440 it's not a long update of where we are at the project. 908 01:11:30,080 --> 01:11:32,360 And I'll focus a little bit on what Paul mentioned 909 01:11:32,360 --> 01:11:35,140 about the COTE team and kind of where we are with that. 910 01:11:35,740 --> 01:11:37,340 I know the project itself actually goes back 911 01:11:37,340 --> 01:11:38,480 more than four years, actually. 912 01:11:38,560 --> 01:11:40,620 I think in the 1970s, it was originally planned 913 01:11:41,120 --> 01:11:44,080 and it was attempted to move forward a number of times 914 01:11:44,080 --> 01:11:45,540 but obviously it's controversial. 915 01:11:46,340 --> 01:11:47,520 It was stopped a few times. 916 01:11:47,520 --> 01:11:49,380 So I think we've done a lot of outreach. 917 01:11:49,580 --> 01:11:54,720 The DOT had started the PD&E study back in September 2017. 918 01:11:54,720 --> 01:11:57,060 So it's a little bit under two years, about a year and three 919 01:11:57,060 --> 01:11:58,080 quarters have been working on it. 920 01:11:58,480 --> 01:11:59,940 And kind of you've got a preview already. 921 01:12:00,180 --> 01:12:01,240 There's a lot of issues. 922 01:12:01,420 --> 01:12:02,460 It's a complicated corridor. 923 01:12:03,040 --> 01:12:04,620 There's certainly a lot of stakeholders. 924 01:12:05,040 --> 01:12:07,460 It's both significant, both locally, 925 01:12:07,960 --> 01:12:09,760 obviously with the city of Deerfield Beach 926 01:12:09,760 --> 01:12:11,680 and local residents and businesses 927 01:12:11,680 --> 01:12:14,000 and regionally because it's really a regional connector 928 01:12:14,000 --> 01:12:16,120 as well as a local facility. 929 01:12:16,120 --> 01:12:26,400 You know, it connects, you know, the Sawgrass and the Turnpike, obviously, to I-95, but it's also part of the regional highway transportation system we have here in South Florida. 930 01:12:26,780 --> 01:12:27,780 So that, 931 01:12:33,900 --> 01:12:34,620 yep, hit the right one. 932 01:12:34,760 --> 01:12:37,160 So I want to go over just a brief overview. 933 01:12:37,440 --> 01:12:43,100 I'll touch on what the code recommendations are and kind of how that compares to what we're looking at as far as alternatives for the project. 934 01:12:43,220 --> 01:12:44,340 And then I'll touch on the alternatives. 935 01:12:44,540 --> 01:12:49,180 We are in the PD&E, so we're, you know, a key element of that is really its outreach. 936 01:12:49,180 --> 01:12:53,440 that's probably the biggest element. We look at a lot of the socio and economic aspects as well as 937 01:12:53,440 --> 01:12:58,160 geometric aspects of the project, but really getting the stakeholder input. And with this project 938 01:12:58,160 --> 01:13:02,860 we have a lot of challenges and we're basically trying to address them as best we can. As we move 939 01:13:02,860 --> 01:13:07,880 forward we continue to make a lot of advancements in the geometric design, the changes to the 940 01:13:07,880 --> 01:13:11,820 alternatives, and the major issues along the corridor. So I think we're making a lot of 941 01:13:11,820 --> 01:13:16,200 progress. I think we have still a lot of work to do and you'll kind of see where we're 942 01:13:16,200 --> 01:13:21,540 it as we get through this presentation. So what's highlighted this box here really shows 943 01:13:21,540 --> 01:13:27,160 got 18 separate boxes and they're really just summarizing the 18 code recommendations. Paul 944 01:13:27,160 --> 01:13:31,660 had mentioned that that group worked together to build a consensus and with that they brought 945 01:13:31,660 --> 01:13:37,260 recommendations to the MPO and basically to move the project forward you know when that was 946 01:13:37,260 --> 01:13:41,500 passed on the DOT that was part of our initiative to kind of look at the project as 947 01:13:41,500 --> 01:13:44,760 we're looking at the different alternatives to make sure we're looking at each one of the 948 01:13:44,760 --> 01:13:49,340 alternatives, I mean each one of the the code recommendations and evaluate them 949 01:13:49,340 --> 01:13:53,300 for each alternative and basically to see how we can incorporate what that 950 01:13:53,300 --> 01:13:57,720 desire is with the with the outcome of the PD&E study. So what's in green 951 01:13:57,720 --> 01:14:02,720 here what really shows that these code recommendations are pretty much similar 952 01:14:03,280 --> 01:14:07,620 they're handled or addressed in a very similar way or the same way for each 953 01:14:07,620 --> 01:14:11,640 of the three alternatives. What's highlighted in blue the four through 954 01:14:11,640 --> 01:14:15,180 seven there are some differences and I'll kind of I'll touch on that but with 955 01:14:15,180 --> 01:14:19,160 these four recommendations which the fourth one would be in the depressed 956 01:14:19,160 --> 01:14:22,040 roadway section because with alternatives there's different lengths of 957 01:14:22,040 --> 01:14:27,560 depression and then not elevating in residential areas and then access as 958 01:14:28,140 --> 01:14:31,340 well as accessibility so there's a little bit of differences with the 959 01:14:31,340 --> 01:14:33,860 co-recommendations and the different alternatives that we're looking at 960 01:14:33,860 --> 01:14:38,020 and I'll touch on that in just a moment so to kind of start with our 961 01:14:38,020 --> 01:14:44,420 We call our full depressed option and what I mean by that this is basically where the connector lanes the connector 962 01:14:44,420 --> 01:14:50,280 Railway is below below grade and if you're starting from the east from not from where it connects with I-95 963 01:14:50,280 --> 01:14:53,280 It's going to be elevated over military trail 964 01:14:53,280 --> 01:14:59,620 And it will basically from just west of military trail. It could be it could basically be depressed below the 965 01:15:09,780 --> 01:15:15,100 So that was the first alternative we started looking at. It's a little bit over a mile and 966 01:15:15,100 --> 01:15:20,900 a quarter. Some of the concerns with this are basically a lot of the business impacts, specifically 967 01:15:20,900 --> 01:15:26,040 around a power line road intersection. It's a major intersection there. There's businesses 968 01:15:26,040 --> 01:15:30,900 This is on three of the four quadrants, and the fourth quadrant is actually, it's open, 969 01:15:31,100 --> 01:15:33,480 but it's basically below gray ground. 970 01:15:33,740 --> 01:15:39,060 It's a significant amount of FPNL transmission lines that feed a substation that's about 971 01:15:39,060 --> 01:15:40,020 a block to the north. 972 01:15:40,580 --> 01:15:44,820 So there's really impacts along that four quadrants because it's going below grayed 973 01:15:44,820 --> 01:15:47,660 and the impacts of that depressed section in that area. 974 01:15:47,760 --> 01:15:50,860 So that's one of the things we've looked at pretty closely. 975 01:15:52,200 --> 01:16:00,860 The other aspect of this project, which is a key element, is it has the least amount of elevated sections of the roadway. 976 01:16:01,780 --> 01:16:06,240 So this rendering itself, it's basically a little bit just west of Power Line Road. 977 01:16:06,840 --> 01:16:11,480 On your right is a north, which is labeled a Century Village, so that's basically in a residential area. 978 01:16:12,060 --> 01:16:19,520 So one of the key recommendations I mentioned before is really to minimize the structures, the elevated structures near residential areas. 979 01:16:19,520 --> 01:16:24,140 It's a kind of, you know, they basically want to try to maintain the best quality of life as they can. 980 01:16:24,520 --> 01:16:29,360 And this facility already being, you know, expanded as such, having elevated sections, 981 01:16:29,540 --> 01:16:34,080 basically is something close to where the residents are, is not something that's desirable. 982 01:16:36,220 --> 01:16:38,840 So the next section I have showed here is a partially depressed. 983 01:16:39,220 --> 01:16:42,540 So I had mentioned some of the areas like Power Line Road. 984 01:16:42,680 --> 01:16:45,540 There's areas along the corridor that are residential areas, 985 01:16:45,660 --> 01:16:48,640 and there's some areas specifically closer to Power Line Road, that area. 986 01:16:48,640 --> 01:16:55,500 It's more industrial and commercial, so that area doesn't have the same kind of constraints as far as maybe an elevated section 987 01:16:55,500 --> 01:17:02,260 and because of the impacts we wanted to take some time and look at a partial depressed section where it would be depressed 988 01:17:02,260 --> 01:17:08,100 in the residential areas and try to minimize any kind of above grade structures in the residential areas. 989 01:17:08,480 --> 01:17:15,660 So that's one of the things. What this does is actually alleviate some of the concerns of the business relocations 990 01:17:15,660 --> 01:17:18,120 as well as the utility impacts of Powerline Road. 991 01:17:19,140 --> 01:17:21,240 It also does, it kind of alleviates some 992 01:17:21,240 --> 01:17:25,060 of the construction problems as far as MOT and the longevity. 993 01:17:25,400 --> 01:17:29,160 It does reduce the construction time significantly and well 994 01:17:29,160 --> 01:17:32,880 as well as providing access between the connector roadway 995 01:17:32,880 --> 01:17:34,120 and the local roadway. 996 01:17:34,820 --> 01:17:37,220 So, and I'll touch on that. 997 01:17:37,560 --> 01:17:39,560 We actually looked at three, can I go back? 998 01:17:40,100 --> 01:17:40,700 Maybe I can't go back. 999 01:17:41,440 --> 01:17:45,260 Okay. We actually looked at three subsets to this option 1000 01:17:45,260 --> 01:17:48,080 And we're in this set, we're looking at the westbound ramp 1001 01:17:48,080 --> 01:17:51,660 is being depressed underneath the connector road. 1002 01:17:52,140 --> 01:17:54,720 That way we said we don't need, we can make that connection 1003 01:17:54,720 --> 01:17:58,500 between the local lanes and the connector facility 1004 01:17:58,500 --> 01:18:00,320 between 995 and the Sawgrass. 1005 01:18:00,580 --> 01:18:02,440 And we don't need to do that with above grade structure. 1006 01:18:02,580 --> 01:18:04,900 We can do that kind of tucking it under, under. 1007 01:18:05,080 --> 01:18:07,080 So, and we looked at three different options 1008 01:18:07,080 --> 01:18:09,020 where we could tuck under one or both 1009 01:18:09,460 --> 01:18:13,380 of the connector roadway and then keep the exit ramp 1010 01:18:13,380 --> 01:18:13,720 above. 1011 01:18:13,720 --> 01:18:16,580 So we just looked at several options to see which may be the best bet. 1012 01:18:17,720 --> 01:18:20,220 And then the third one we looked at is basically non-press. 1013 01:18:20,380 --> 01:18:22,780 We're looking at the same area of the corridor. 1014 01:18:23,700 --> 01:18:27,160 And this rendering doesn't show any kind of above-grade structure. 1015 01:18:28,120 --> 01:18:31,720 So it's an at-grade, still at-grade roadway within the residential areas, 1016 01:18:31,780 --> 01:18:33,260 which is important, as I mentioned. 1017 01:18:33,740 --> 01:18:37,860 But if we were going to have that connection between the connector lanes and the local lanes, 1018 01:18:38,120 --> 01:18:39,980 it would require a bridge there. 1019 01:18:39,980 --> 01:18:46,760 So that's one of the major downsides here because this is a long stretch where you do have residential areas 1020 01:18:46,760 --> 01:18:51,460 and trying to fit in those access points for the ingress and egress points. 1021 01:18:51,920 --> 01:18:55,340 We would need to use part of this area for that to make that connection, 1022 01:18:55,340 --> 01:18:58,800 and it would cause us to put a bridge in this area, which is not desirable. 1023 01:19:01,190 --> 01:19:07,630 So I wanted to touch on one of the last time I kind of came to visit this group was back in the fall. 1024 01:19:07,630 --> 01:19:12,690 We talked a little bit about this is on the west end of the project, a place called Waterways. 1025 01:19:12,930 --> 01:19:14,070 You may be familiar with that. 1026 01:19:14,210 --> 01:19:21,270 It's one of the key issues we've been kind of working on pretty much the last year. 1027 01:19:21,750 --> 01:19:26,690 Because of the connection with the Sawgrass Expressway and the Turnpike and then the local lanes, 1028 01:19:27,090 --> 01:19:32,790 it was required for us to take the connector roadway, bridge it over the local lanes 1029 01:19:32,790 --> 01:19:34,770 so we could make that connection to the Sawgrass. 1030 01:19:35,210 --> 01:19:37,910 So the way we had envisioned doing it was with this bridge. 1031 01:19:38,210 --> 01:19:40,290 This is basically, if you look at the before picture, 1032 01:19:41,010 --> 01:19:43,850 we are looking out, leaving the waterways facility. 1033 01:19:44,410 --> 01:19:46,290 We would have a bridge there, so as they come out, 1034 01:19:46,390 --> 01:19:47,730 they would have a bridge beyond the bridge. 1035 01:19:47,830 --> 01:19:49,390 It is basically the quiet waters park. 1036 01:19:50,230 --> 01:19:51,310 That was a concern. 1037 01:19:51,910 --> 01:19:53,110 We had some issues. 1038 01:19:53,250 --> 01:19:55,390 We tried to do some different things moving it. 1039 01:19:55,850 --> 01:19:58,330 The turnpike had kind of gotten a little bit behind us 1040 01:19:58,330 --> 01:20:00,210 as far as where they were in their study. 1041 01:20:00,630 --> 01:20:02,330 We kind of got them to speed up a little bit. 1042 01:20:02,330 --> 01:20:10,790 They actually did a big initiative to redesign some of the interchange work, allowing us to move that bridge further to the west. 1043 01:20:11,470 --> 01:20:19,170 So the after picture of where we are now, that bridge is moved out of the sight line pretty much right as that entrance way to Waterways. 1044 01:20:19,630 --> 01:20:27,670 If you kind of look closely, you'll see that that bridge is just starting to creep up as you look to the left side of that bottom panel. 1045 01:20:27,670 --> 01:20:35,750 And one of the things we did where we were originally looking at the connector roadway going over the local roadway, we actually flipped that. 1046 01:20:35,910 --> 01:20:39,890 This is where the local roadway is going to go over the connector roadway. 1047 01:20:40,010 --> 01:20:46,990 So it kind of worked out well geometrically that way and allows us to move that structure further to the west. 1048 01:20:49,100 --> 01:20:54,840 So this slide is very busy. I kind of really wanted to use it to touch on the other key aspects of the bridge. 1049 01:20:54,980 --> 01:20:56,460 You've heard me talk about the bridge a little bit. 1050 01:20:57,320 --> 01:21:03,640 So what's in the yellow circles, and I touched on it as first the largest yellow circle towards the right, 1051 01:21:04,040 --> 01:21:05,620 that's near military trails. 1052 01:21:05,960 --> 01:21:08,680 So what's in blue is the residential areas. 1053 01:21:09,120 --> 01:21:16,180 So that big circle kind of shows where that bridge, for the connector roadway to go over military trail, 1054 01:21:16,500 --> 01:21:19,720 how it extends to that west before it touches down. 1055 01:21:19,940 --> 01:21:25,060 So it's even at the top you can see some what we've got identified as how high that bridge would be. 1056 01:21:25,060 --> 01:21:30,280 The furthest to the west it kind of portion it kind of shows basically zero to 12 feet and 12 to 20 60 1057 01:21:30,280 --> 01:21:32,740 And that's from the from the ground level 1058 01:21:32,740 --> 01:21:36,520 So so that is that the same for all the alternatives that doesn't change 1059 01:21:36,520 --> 01:21:39,600 We do need to elevate it there to get over military trail 1060 01:21:39,600 --> 01:21:46,040 There's not enough room between military trail and that in the South Florida rail corridor and 1061 01:21:46,620 --> 01:21:50,280 I-95 to get them up and down if you're familiar with that corridor right now 1062 01:21:50,280 --> 01:21:53,300 It does kind of go up and down it's at great at military trail 1063 01:21:53,300 --> 01:22:00,380 It goes over the railroad. It comes back down. There's a signal. It's called Newport Center, and then it goes back up 1064 01:22:01,220 --> 01:22:06,220 over I-95. So that's at a lower speed, and it's actually a more aggressive 1065 01:22:07,000 --> 01:22:11,300 grades than we would be able to do today. It's been there a long time, but people have driven there. 1066 01:22:11,440 --> 01:22:13,780 They know what I'm talking about as hard as that goes up and down. 1067 01:22:14,320 --> 01:22:17,940 So we will be able to kind of correct that a little bit for the local roadway. 1068 01:22:17,940 --> 01:22:29,280 It will still go over the railroad, but it will be at grade with military trail, but for the connector road that's connecting I-95 to the Saras, that would need to go over the railroad and over at military trail. 1069 01:22:29,400 --> 01:22:35,600 We can't, because of that geometry, we can't get it down quick enough because of the speeds and to safely make that maneuver. 1070 01:22:35,800 --> 01:22:41,680 So for all alternatives, that bridge just goes over military and then it connects back in at grade. 1071 01:22:42,340 --> 01:22:47,680 It's about 1,000 to 1,200 feet west on the west side of that intersection. 1072 01:22:49,100 --> 01:22:55,700 So that's on the other yellow or to the left, I spoke about that yellow circle. 1073 01:22:56,220 --> 01:22:58,900 That's where the bridge I just spoke about basically at Waterways. 1074 01:22:59,960 --> 01:23:03,300 We were able to move that further a little bit out of the line of sight. 1075 01:23:03,720 --> 01:23:06,580 What it's actually close to, there's actually an apartment complex there. 1076 01:23:06,920 --> 01:23:09,720 So it still is near that apartment complex. 1077 01:23:09,720 --> 01:23:12,160 but that is basically the same for all alternatives. 1078 01:23:12,640 --> 01:23:15,720 Now, to the red, there's a smaller red circle that you'll see. 1079 01:23:15,860 --> 01:23:17,140 It's not too small to see. 1080 01:23:17,760 --> 01:23:22,780 So that's a big difference between the fully depressed section that we go below grade 1081 01:23:22,780 --> 01:23:26,820 through Power Line Road and then either the partial depressed section alternative 1082 01:23:26,820 --> 01:23:35,340 or the at grade alternative, where those two alternatives would require bridge over Power Line Road. 1083 01:23:35,340 --> 01:23:47,260 So that bridge goes over power line and comes down and there's a portion of that end of that bridge that does basically progress into that independence bay community that's listed in blue. 1084 01:23:47,740 --> 01:23:52,460 So that it is coming down during that section you can see it's basically it touches down at zero. 1085 01:23:52,700 --> 01:24:01,260 So basically the farthest east point of that community is about 12 feet above the existing grade. 1086 01:24:01,260 --> 01:24:02,720 So that's what we're looking at right now. 1087 01:24:03,700 --> 01:24:06,740 I kind of give me a second chance to step back and let you so. 1088 01:24:07,040 --> 01:24:09,020 We are in PD&E. We're not in final design. 1089 01:24:09,660 --> 01:24:13,080 We've actually made a lot of refinements to kind of get us to this point. 1090 01:24:13,740 --> 01:24:18,140 As we move forward, I'm sure we will look at other issues that pop up 1091 01:24:18,140 --> 01:24:21,320 and we'll be able to kind of refine the geometry and try to keep improving 1092 01:24:21,320 --> 01:24:23,860 as we progress through the phase. 1093 01:24:25,740 --> 01:24:29,700 So next couple of slides, two slides I have are really just to kind of summarize things. 1094 01:24:29,700 --> 01:24:34,580 This is really a summary evaluation of the three alternatives. 1095 01:24:34,960 --> 01:24:37,340 I mentioned to you, fully depressed, partially depressed, 1096 01:24:37,520 --> 01:24:41,020 non-depressed, related kind of like against some, 1097 01:24:41,140 --> 01:24:43,040 it's basically evaluated against some 1098 01:24:43,040 --> 01:24:43,860 of the major criteria. 1099 01:24:44,720 --> 01:24:47,620 The regional connectivity, the local conditions, 1100 01:24:47,900 --> 01:24:51,520 the construction impacts, business and utility impacts, 1101 01:24:51,780 --> 01:24:55,100 the long-term maintenance and the noise and also 1102 01:24:55,100 --> 01:24:56,160 the complete streets element. 1103 01:24:56,400 --> 01:24:59,280 So what it kind of shows you here is first, 1104 01:24:59,280 --> 01:25:05,200 the no-build situation, it really doesn't meet either our traffic regional connectivity 1105 01:25:05,200 --> 01:25:09,860 as far as requirements to basically move traffic through this corridor long-term or the local 1106 01:25:09,860 --> 01:25:14,780 traffic needs. Long-term maintenance is obviously very good for the no-build because there's 1107 01:25:14,780 --> 01:25:19,180 no additional maintenance. It's a smaller roadway facility, so it's a lower cost. 1108 01:25:20,420 --> 01:25:24,840 But we would not be addressing any kind of noise issues that exist today with 1109 01:25:24,840 --> 01:25:31,720 with the no-build. With the fully depressed, as with basically all the other three, we're 1110 01:25:31,720 --> 01:25:36,600 addressing really the trapping needs, basically the long-term requirements really so we can 1111 01:25:36,600 --> 01:25:43,760 basically get both the local and the regional accessibility through movement of both basically 1112 01:25:43,760 --> 01:25:46,160 people and goods and freight and all those other things. 1113 01:25:47,100 --> 01:25:51,400 So what we start to see the differences is when you get into the construction 1114 01:25:51,400 --> 01:25:55,040 impacts, the business and utility impacts in the long-term maintenance. 1115 01:25:55,300 --> 01:25:59,500 So the fully depressed section has significantly more impacts, is basically what this is showing you. 1116 01:25:59,940 --> 01:26:03,340 The partially depressed, much reduced in that. 1117 01:26:03,460 --> 01:26:07,560 There's still some impacts, still a little bit longer construction than just your typical 1118 01:26:07,560 --> 01:26:11,060 at-grade construction. I don't bring slides here, but 1119 01:26:11,060 --> 01:26:14,720 some of you may be aware we've had some of the other presentations we've done. 1120 01:26:15,460 --> 01:26:18,780 The below-grade section is pretty comprehensive and it's a pretty 1121 01:26:19,740 --> 01:26:23,960 difficult type of construction. They're kind of built in cells and they're 1122 01:26:23,960 --> 01:26:27,700 progressed kind of like a train one at a time. There's possibilities we can do 1123 01:26:28,080 --> 01:26:31,840 two over a period of time but they're smaller cells that are done. It's not 1124 01:26:31,840 --> 01:26:36,380 it's not an area where you're going to build up to kind of like dig down you 1125 01:26:36,380 --> 01:26:42,020 know for the 25 to 30 feet be able to do that more than a thousand or 1126 01:26:42,020 --> 01:26:44,460 two thousand feet because of the amount of dewatering. So you have to 1127 01:26:44,460 --> 01:26:50,420 dewater certain sections at a time. So that basically brings in some more difficult construction 1128 01:26:50,420 --> 01:26:53,760 and not just from the difficulty, but the time of construction is increased. 1129 01:26:54,840 --> 01:27:00,440 So then just on to the last one, the non-depress section. It basically has a little bit more 1130 01:27:00,440 --> 01:27:05,960 in the good column. It still has some construction impacts, not as much as the other depressed 1131 01:27:05,960 --> 01:27:10,840 type sections. And it still handles the local traffic, but in this particular case 1132 01:27:10,840 --> 01:27:14,560 We're kind of showing where we don't have that ingress-egress. 1133 01:27:14,760 --> 01:27:18,040 We're not connecting the local rain to the connector road. 1134 01:27:18,280 --> 01:27:22,100 So it basically doesn't help the local traffic quite as much. 1135 01:27:24,360 --> 01:27:26,760 I've been talking a lot of pause for a second to take a look at. 1136 01:27:26,840 --> 01:27:30,720 It's a little bit to take in, but we're just doing a rough comparison here. 1137 01:27:31,140 --> 01:27:33,980 I won't say it's a rough comparison, but we're trying to summarize the comparison. 1138 01:27:34,500 --> 01:27:35,560 We do have a website. 1139 01:27:36,680 --> 01:27:40,120 It's basically just Southwest, it's just Southwest 10th Street. 1140 01:27:40,600 --> 01:27:42,260 And we have the full matrix. 1141 01:27:42,260 --> 01:27:45,160 We brought it into our Alternatives Public Workshop. 1142 01:27:45,280 --> 01:27:48,640 We had a large project workshop November 29th of last year, 1143 01:27:48,860 --> 01:27:51,000 and we basically presented the full matrix. 1144 01:27:51,200 --> 01:27:53,540 It kind of breaks it down a little bit more in greater detail. 1145 01:27:53,740 --> 01:27:55,900 So if you're interested, you can look at the website, 1146 01:27:56,440 --> 01:27:58,920 and that matrix there, and it gives you a little bit more detail. 1147 01:27:59,360 --> 01:28:00,760 So I'll go on to the next slide. 1148 01:28:01,960 --> 01:28:04,240 And the next slide is summary and basically the cost. 1149 01:28:04,360 --> 01:28:05,980 The cost is some of the major components. 1150 01:28:06,480 --> 01:28:08,460 We typically, when we started this process, 1151 01:28:08,460 --> 01:28:12,720 And even where we're today, we haven't really paid as much attention to cost because we 1152 01:28:12,720 --> 01:28:18,620 really understand the importance of this area, the concerns, so really trying to find the 1153 01:28:18,620 --> 01:28:23,860 best alternative, the best fit that really maximizes the benefits both locally and regionally 1154 01:28:23,860 --> 01:28:30,220 and reduces the impacts as much as you can is really what our goal is to achieve here. 1155 01:28:30,560 --> 01:28:32,580 So but we have been asked to put this out. 1156 01:28:32,780 --> 01:28:35,640 This again, this has been on our website and it was presented in our public meetings. 1157 01:28:35,640 --> 01:28:42,300 So I wanted to share that with you and again, it just shows the differences between the fully depressed the partial press and the non-depress 1158 01:28:42,300 --> 01:28:48,260 Now what I've added in here is also the I-95 portion of it. They're two separate projects 1159 01:28:48,260 --> 01:28:54,720 Mostly I've been talking about the Southwest 10th Street project, which technically goes from military trail west to the term pipe 1160 01:28:55,320 --> 01:29:01,640 There's an ongoing PDE study along I-95 it goes from Hillsborough Boulevard to South of Southwest 10th Street 1161 01:29:01,640 --> 01:29:05,260 it goes to about halfway between Southwest Tenth Street and Sample. It doesn't go all 1162 01:29:05,260 --> 01:29:09,980 the way to Sample, Paul, but it goes to go down there. And it also brings in that direct 1163 01:29:09,980 --> 01:29:14,720 connection between the connector roadway and I-95 as direct connect ramps. So that's 1164 01:29:14,720 --> 01:29:19,920 part of that peating study. And so I put it brought in the cost here so you can get 1165 01:29:19,920 --> 01:29:23,680 a cost of basically the combined, those combined projects and where that brings you to. 1166 01:29:27,890 --> 01:29:32,970 Just to wrap up where we are, we actually finished up kind of a series of coat meetings 1167 01:29:34,430 --> 01:29:40,450 as I mentioned earlier, public input, state or holder input is really the most important part of this process. 1168 01:29:41,450 --> 01:29:48,610 So we reached out to them. We are going to continue to work with that group and actually looking at kind of refreshing that group 1169 01:29:48,610 --> 01:29:53,230 because over time, you know, people have had to drop off and other things have occurred, 1170 01:29:53,250 --> 01:29:58,910 so we want to refresh that group, kind of, you know, work with the cities and their MPO representatives 1171 01:29:58,910 --> 01:29:59,890 and kind of bring on people. 1172 01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:04,180 It's really advantageous to work with the DOT and kind of help us, you know, understand 1173 01:30:04,180 --> 01:30:08,300 the issues and the challenges, and then help us kind of lead us to finding the right solutions 1174 01:30:08,300 --> 01:30:14,160 for them. So that's going to be on the way. We're here basically today. We're looking 1175 01:30:14,160 --> 01:30:20,200 towards July, hopefully coming to the MPO meeting, July 11th, and then basically moving 1176 01:30:20,200 --> 01:30:28,420 forward to a public hearing in the fall of 2019. The P&E process over wall is basically 1177 01:30:28,420 --> 01:30:34,240 for us to have to move forward our recommended alternative into a public hearing and then 1178 01:30:34,240 --> 01:30:38,460 get a lot of feedback, a chance to basically look at one alternative rather than a number 1179 01:30:38,460 --> 01:30:39,020 of alternatives. 1180 01:30:39,640 --> 01:30:44,880 When we had, we've had two public alternatives workshops where we brought different alternatives 1181 01:30:44,880 --> 01:30:45,400 to the group. 1182 01:30:45,960 --> 01:30:49,860 Now we want to narrow it down to one alternative and basically come back to the public, do 1183 01:30:49,860 --> 01:30:55,420 a public hearing, outreach public locally like HOAs and other local meetings and 1184 01:30:55,420 --> 01:30:59,520 basically get that type of feedback now that we're recommending one alternative. 1185 01:31:00,200 --> 01:31:04,720 And then see where that puts us, you know, as we move forward, we continue to address 1186 01:31:04,720 --> 01:31:10,000 more issues and basically evaluate the alternative that we're going to be working with and some 1187 01:31:10,000 --> 01:31:15,040 of the ways to, I guess, find solutions to some of the challenges that we uncover. 1188 01:31:15,940 --> 01:31:21,100 So we would, past that point, we'd be looking towards a spring of 2020. 1189 01:31:21,100 --> 01:31:29,180 We call location design concept acceptance and that's basically completion of the PD&E phase and that would lead us into the design phase. 1190 01:31:29,520 --> 01:31:37,160 So our goal is to go through the PD&E phase with a kind of a best fit alternative that we can move into design 1191 01:31:37,160 --> 01:31:44,060 and we would continue the efforts to kind of refine the design and again, you know, come up with the project that we can deliver 1192 01:31:44,060 --> 01:31:47,800 that will satisfy all the regional and the local concerns with the project. 1193 01:31:47,800 --> 01:31:48,520 That's 1194 01:31:51,720 --> 01:31:52,400 about wraps it up. 1195 01:31:52,600 --> 01:31:54,380 So I'm open for questions. 1196 01:31:55,360 --> 01:31:56,220 Thank you. 1197 01:31:58,410 --> 01:31:59,430 Richard Dourneese. 1198 01:32:00,370 --> 01:32:00,950 Yes. 1199 01:32:01,510 --> 01:32:10,330 During your outreach, especially with the residential communities right adjacent to the Connector Road, what is their feedback? 1200 01:32:10,550 --> 01:32:17,170 What have they been giving you as far as of the alternatives of the partially depressed, fully depressed or at grade? 1201 01:32:17,570 --> 01:32:20,110 What were they saying as far as what they'd like to see? 1202 01:32:20,770 --> 01:32:27,670 but it varies a little bit. I think the concerns I mentioned before as far as 1203 01:32:27,670 --> 01:32:32,570 the bridges that may be near and the vicinity of their community is a big 1204 01:32:32,570 --> 01:32:35,950 concern to them. I talked a little bit about the waterways with the bridge 1205 01:32:35,950 --> 01:32:39,790 and how we move that we met with them a number of times and they certainly were 1206 01:32:39,790 --> 01:32:43,610 not shy about voicing their concerns about the bridge. I don't know if that 1207 01:32:43,610 --> 01:32:46,970 rendering was pretty small but as we were working through that with them 1208 01:32:46,970 --> 01:32:51,290 we actually felt like with the bridge we felt we could do a lot to it so we 1209 01:32:51,290 --> 01:32:54,590 actually did a lot of our artistic rendering related to a lot of the 1210 01:32:54,590 --> 01:32:57,670 aesthetic treatments we could do to the bridge make the bridge very 1211 01:32:57,670 --> 01:33:01,750 aesthetically pleasing put a lot of the the pioneer growth theme to it and 1212 01:33:01,750 --> 01:33:05,590 aesthetic treatments to it and one of the comments we got to them was 1213 01:33:05,590 --> 01:33:09,710 basically if you put a bridge here you're gonna you're gonna block our 1214 01:33:09,710 --> 01:33:13,490 view of as we come out we can see the park it's a nice view of the park 1215 01:33:13,490 --> 01:33:18,630 So we actually went with our structure engineers and we moved some of the peers around to give them a nice open view. 1216 01:33:19,070 --> 01:33:24,350 So we went back with them with a nice aesthetic treatment, an open view, a nicer bridge. 1217 01:33:24,670 --> 01:33:32,270 We looked at it and we gave them some other ideas about really making a nice entrance way feature to their community, and they really still didn't like it. 1218 01:33:32,670 --> 01:33:35,790 So we moved the bridge. So those are the type of things we're getting. 1219 01:33:35,950 --> 01:33:40,470 You know, things that are really consistent with really their community. 1220 01:33:40,470 --> 01:33:55,510 And so individually, they're a little bit different throughout the different communities along the corridor, but it's all very good input and we're basically as we work through, we're just trying to do best we can to look at what ways we can work with them and come up with solutions that, you know, make it a better project for everybody. 1221 01:33:55,790 --> 01:34:10,230 Right. And continue with the theme as far as outreach on noise especially. Have you been hearing different communities really concerned about that as much as other aspects of your project? 1222 01:34:10,230 --> 01:34:14,650 Again, noise is one of the big key issues that came up from almost like day one. 1223 01:34:14,790 --> 01:34:19,190 A lot of people of all the communities expressed to us that they're concerned about the noise 1224 01:34:19,190 --> 01:34:19,470 today. 1225 01:34:19,730 --> 01:34:24,990 It can be very noisy today, especially with this corridor does have a lot of truck movement 1226 01:34:25,600 --> 01:34:26,730 and the trucks are louder. 1227 01:34:27,190 --> 01:34:29,790 If their motorcycles are obviously everywhere and those can be noisy. 1228 01:34:30,290 --> 01:34:35,030 So noise is something, so we did have done a noise study and we were getting towards 1229 01:34:35,030 --> 01:34:38,830 the end of that noise study, which have determined that noise abatement, noise 1230 01:34:38,830 --> 01:34:42,790 walls are warranted for all all of the resident communities throughout the 1231 01:34:42,790 --> 01:34:47,390 corridor so that brings on kind of other other challenges because I've been 1232 01:34:47,390 --> 01:34:50,390 approached by many of the homeowners live close to the corridor they're most 1233 01:34:50,390 --> 01:34:54,130 impacted by noise who've expressed that you really they really would like a 1234 01:34:54,130 --> 01:34:58,190 sound wall a noise wall they really need it there's others pops a hospital 1235 01:34:58,190 --> 01:35:02,170 even the city that are concerned if we put noise walls everywhere that's 1236 01:35:02,170 --> 01:35:07,850 gonna basically kind of have a negative effect as far as the the 1237 01:35:07,850 --> 01:35:11,930 experience through the quarter because it's walling it off so that's one of the 1238 01:35:11,930 --> 01:35:15,410 challenges we'll be working with as we move forward we do know that noise 1239 01:35:15,410 --> 01:35:19,990 abatement is warranted how how that typically that's handled in the design 1240 01:35:19,990 --> 01:35:24,930 phase when we individually go to each community and even do surveys and talk 1241 01:35:24,930 --> 01:35:28,850 with them about you know how we can address those issues can we find the 1242 01:35:28,850 --> 01:35:32,490 best fit some communities maybe a lower wall works good for them a 1243 01:35:32,490 --> 01:35:35,050 community might not want a wall or a community might want a higher wall 1244 01:35:35,050 --> 01:35:39,050 like I've worked with Century Village who express to me that they're they want to 1245 01:35:39,050 --> 01:35:42,470 build their own wall and they think the DOT can build a higher wall so they said 1246 01:35:42,470 --> 01:35:45,450 we'd rather you build it because you can build it higher and we don't have to pay 1247 01:35:45,450 --> 01:35:49,530 for it so it's a little different throughout the corridor. Thank you 1248 01:35:49,530 --> 01:35:49,710 Rob. 1249 01:35:53,180 --> 01:35:58,120 Thank you Mr. Chair. Just curious to know how many heavy trucks you have 1250 01:35:58,120 --> 01:36:03,620 coming through there on a weekly or daily basis? You know I spent a lot of 1251 01:36:03,620 --> 01:36:10,580 time looking at our 2040 traffic so in 2040 we have 4,000 so today I don't know 1252 01:36:10,580 --> 01:36:14,860 exactly I really have to look at per lane hurt day it's daily through the 1253 01:36:14,860 --> 01:36:20,200 corridor it's not per lane but basically about 4,000 heavy trucks going 1254 01:36:20,200 --> 01:36:25,060 through that corner in 2040 is what's projected now we had just gone out a 1255 01:36:25,060 --> 01:36:28,500 few weeks ago and updated some traffic counts there's there's a large 1256 01:36:28,500 --> 01:36:34,840 It's called Publix Distribution Center on the east side, between 995 and Military Trove. 1257 01:36:34,920 --> 01:36:38,040 And they have a lot of trucks that went out there and took counts just recently. 1258 01:36:38,680 --> 01:36:43,220 So they have, each day, they have well over 100 trucks go in and out of that facility. 1259 01:36:44,020 --> 01:36:45,460 So currently, do you know what it is? 1260 01:36:45,580 --> 01:36:47,120 Currently per week or per day? 1261 01:36:48,140 --> 01:36:49,040 I don't currently. 1262 01:36:49,240 --> 01:36:49,500 I'm sorry. 1263 01:36:49,760 --> 01:36:50,360 I just don't. 1264 01:36:50,500 --> 01:36:51,700 24 is about 4,000. 1265 01:36:51,980 --> 01:36:52,640 4,000. 1266 01:36:52,940 --> 01:36:54,280 Yeah, I don't remember that. 1267 01:36:54,280 --> 01:37:00,960 So but it's it's fairly significant. There is a long a long power line road north and south. There is a lot of industry 1268 01:37:01,560 --> 01:37:08,020 Like I mentioned the public's distribution center that basically serves a lot of the local public's facilities as far as they bring in 1269 01:37:08,780 --> 01:37:11,860 Bring in food and goods and then distribute it locally 1270 01:37:12,360 --> 01:37:18,320 So there and there is the the quiet waters business park, which does have a lot of heavy trucks as well 1271 01:37:18,320 --> 01:37:23,680 So right along that corridor there are some significant businesses that do have the heavy trucks 1272 01:37:23,680 --> 01:37:26,820 And you know access in and out of their other business. Thank you. 1273 01:37:30,280 --> 01:37:32,120 Any more comments? I have none in the queue 1274 01:37:34,020 --> 01:37:38,510 I think that's good. Thank you. Okay. Thank you 1275 01:37:40,580 --> 01:37:45,620 You have next the community reports and administrative items. Are there any member comments? 1276 01:37:50,960 --> 01:37:55,280 There are no member comments in the queue. We have a participation record make sure you've been 1277 01:37:56,000 --> 01:37:57,800 accounted for if you've been here 1278 01:38:00,100 --> 01:38:08,140 MPO outreach and events. Summary of the 2019 events for May is there. And our next meeting 1279 01:38:08,140 --> 01:38:14,980 is August 28th. We've got two months from now, so we got July off. No August MPO meeting, 1280 01:38:15,080 --> 01:38:19,860 so we get next month off. And good luck everybody. Have a great summer. We'll see you at the 1281 01:38:19,860 --> 01:38:23,820 end of August. I think we're adjourned. Motion to adjourn. Do we have to have 1282 01:38:23,820 --> 01:38:27,900 motion to adjourn. Please, so moved.