1 00:11:07,196 --> 00:11:09,975 I like to call this council committee meeting to order. 2 00:11:09,975 --> 00:11:11,655 Before we proceed, I want to acknowledge that the land 3 00:11:11,676 --> 00:11:17,212 upon. The story of the Adelante Ronc, the Hodenoshoni and 4 00:11:17,212 --> 00:11:20,412 the Anishnavi people. We are the beneficiaries of ancient agreements 5 00:11:20,753 --> 00:11:23,532 such as the dish with one spoon between the Anish 6 00:11:23,553 --> 00:11:26,012 Nabiya and the Hoden of Shoni, who agreed to share 7 00:11:26,052 --> 00:11:28,812 the abundance of the land through peace, friendship, and mutual 8 00:11:28,833 --> 00:11:32,332 respect. The two Ro Wampum, by which the Hoden - 9 00:11:32,332 --> 00:11:34,492 Nashoni welcomed the settlers and agreed to share the land 10 00:11:34,673 --> 00:11:38,412 in mutual respect. And the Treaty of Niagara, considered a 11 00:11:38,412 --> 00:11:44,859 fundamental document by First Nations in all future relations. And 12 00:11:44,899 --> 00:11:48,033 treaties with the British. We recognise that we have a 13 00:11:48,054 --> 00:11:51,233 responsibility to be stewards of the land in cooperation and 14 00:11:51,233 --> 00:11:54,913 collaboration with the Indigenous peoples, not only for one generation, 15 00:11:54,913 --> 00:11:57,873 but for all generations to come. We understand that we 16 00:11:57,913 --> 00:12:01,153 have an obligation to learn the lessons of our history, 17 00:12:01,153 --> 00:12:04,513 educate ourselves about the experiences of the indigenous people and 18 00:12:04,553 --> 00:12:08,953 seek opportunities to heal. The wounds that will result in 19 00:12:08,974 --> 00:12:14,873 reconciliation with our indigenous sisters and brothers. Many First Nations, 20 00:12:14,913 --> 00:12:17,833 Mehti and Inu people live and work in Fort Erie. 21 00:12:17,833 --> 00:12:20,713 We stand with all Indigenous people past and present in 22 00:12:20,713 --> 00:12:23,433 promoting the wise stewardship of the lands on which we 23 00:12:23,473 --> 00:12:26,153 live. We have the good fortune to live in a 24 00:12:26,153 --> 00:12:29,513 land of such abundance, diversity and beauty. Let us be 25 00:12:29,534 --> 00:12:35,578 vigilant in protecting turtle island. Mr. Clerk, the role call, 26 00:12:35,578 --> 00:12:43,442 please. You worship all members of Councillor President. Thank you. 27 00:12:43,482 --> 00:12:46,722 There is no, sorry, there isn't addendum this evening. It's 28 00:12:46,722 --> 00:12:49,442 with respect to report PBB - BBB - S12 - 29 00:12:49,783 --> 00:12:56,565 12026, which makes reference to. Be referenced to the Sunset 30 00:12:56,605 --> 00:13:00,325 Clause, which was previously provided by Wave Amendment at the 31 00:13:00,365 --> 00:13:05,365 last meeting? Correct your worship. I did circulate two councillors, 32 00:13:05,365 --> 00:13:07,885 the amendment that was approved at the Council meeting. So 33 00:13:07,946 --> 00:13:11,685 for clarification, we approved the amendment. We deferred the report 34 00:13:11,866 --> 00:13:14,565 as amended. Right. So the note on the agenda for 35 00:13:14,565 --> 00:13:17,205 that. And when we get to that in the agenda, 36 00:13:17,205 --> 00:13:20,046 when we're dealing with that, that will be apparent. Correct. 37 00:13:20,468 --> 00:13:26,827 Correct. Thank you. Just one announcement. I just wanted to 38 00:13:27,648 --> 00:13:32,107 mention that a number of councillors, including me and the 39 00:13:32,147 --> 00:13:34,907 CAO, will be travelling to Ottawa this year for the 40 00:13:34,947 --> 00:13:38,987 annual association municipalities of Ontario Conference. We have a number 41 00:13:39,008 --> 00:13:44,267 of delegations where we're meeting with ministers and parliamentary assistance. 42 00:13:44,267 --> 00:13:47,207 We're meeting with the Minister of Citizenship in Multiculturalism. The 43 00:13:47,207 --> 00:13:50,987 solicitor general, the Minister of Labour, and the Parliamentary Assistance 44 00:13:51,027 --> 00:13:59,018 for the Red Tape Reduction. Agency. Tourism and Culture, Infrastructure, 45 00:13:59,119 --> 00:14:03,338 Agriculture, and Natural Resources. I also received notice today that 46 00:14:03,679 --> 00:14:08,218 the mayors of the eight municipalities, which are not St. 47 00:14:08,239 --> 00:14:13,098 Catherine's NAGA Falls, Welled, or Lincoln, have been requested by 48 00:14:13,138 --> 00:14:17,178 the Minister of Municipal Affairs to meet with him at 49 00:14:17,178 --> 00:14:21,258 the conference to discuss the issues relative to governance in 50 00:14:21,279 --> 00:14:25,418 NAG or going forward. Those will include the appointment of 51 00:14:25,599 --> 00:14:30,778 the chair, the Strong Chair Powers, and the Voting or 52 00:14:30,818 --> 00:14:34,458 Weighted Voting. So that will be very interesting, and I'm 53 00:14:34,458 --> 00:14:38,378 very much looking forward to that. And we are in 54 00:14:38,378 --> 00:14:42,938 the process of arranging meetings with the Minister of Infrastructure 55 00:14:43,199 --> 00:14:47,098 with whom I had direct communications about two weeks ago, 56 00:14:47,098 --> 00:14:51,258 and the Minister of Health after AMO, which you will 57 00:14:51,298 --> 00:14:54,058 provide us with greater time to discuss with them the 58 00:14:54,079 --> 00:14:58,298 important dishes that we're dealing with. Okay, Declarations of Precoery 59 00:14:58,319 --> 00:15:05,309 Interest. Councillor Flag. Thank you, worship PBBS - 12 - 60 00:15:05,349 --> 00:15:08,429 120 - 26. I'm the applicant where former Business Partners. 61 00:15:12,056 --> 00:15:18,547 Any others. That takes us to notices of upcoming meetings, 62 00:15:18,547 --> 00:15:22,707 and there is an open house scheduled for August the 63 00:15:22,808 --> 00:15:27,181 18th. At 5 o'clock here in the Town Hall Atrium, 64 00:15:27,181 --> 00:15:30,781 and that is with respect to developing a Community Planning 65 00:15:31,042 --> 00:15:37,470 Permit System. And that will run, that's Tuesday, August 18th, 66 00:15:37,470 --> 00:15:40,947 5 until 7pm here in the Town Hall Atrium. There 67 00:15:40,987 --> 00:15:44,547 are no public meetings this evening. There is no consent 68 00:15:44,587 --> 00:15:49,347 agenda, so everything is to be contentious this evening. That 69 00:15:49,347 --> 00:15:53,107 takes us then to the first set of contentious issues, 70 00:15:53,107 --> 00:15:58,729 planning, building, and development services, council or Christensen. Thank you, 71 00:15:58,729 --> 00:16:02,409 your worship. This meeting of Planning Building by - law 72 00:16:02,409 --> 00:16:07,529 services is now in Session. We have a presentation tonight 73 00:16:08,990 --> 00:16:13,849 by Ms. Kimberlyn Smith with respect to the Draft Community 74 00:16:14,110 --> 00:16:14,809 Improvement Plan. 75 00:16:26,025 --> 00:16:29,124 So, my name is Kimberlyn Smith. I'm a junior Community 76 00:16:29,164 --> 00:16:32,513 Planner with the Town of Fort Erie. The purpose of 77 00:16:32,614 --> 00:16:36,593 today's Presentation is to provide an overview of the proposed 78 00:16:36,774 --> 00:16:41,073 Community Improvement Plan, including the changes from the town's existing 79 00:16:41,094 --> 00:16:46,233 CIPs, the proposed incentive programs, and funding approach. And the 80 00:16:46,233 --> 00:16:51,425 next steps towards finalising the plan. The CIP is established 81 00:16:51,766 --> 00:16:55,745 under Section 28 of the Planning Act, which provides municipalities 82 00:16:56,086 --> 00:17:01,252 with the authority to designate Community Improvement Project Areas. Adopt 83 00:17:01,292 --> 00:17:06,217 CIPs, and provide financial incentives. Relevant provisions of the Municipal 84 00:17:06,318 --> 00:17:11,737 Act includes sections 106, and 365. 1, which address municipal 85 00:17:11,758 --> 00:17:16,150 bonusing in Brownfield Tax Assistance. The CIP is also guided 86 00:17:16,171 --> 00:17:20,470 by the town's official plan, applicable secondary plans, and the 87 00:17:20,510 --> 00:17:25,392 climate change action plan. The proposed CIP brings the towns 88 00:17:25,432 --> 00:17:30,432 incentive programs into alignment with this legislative and policy framework. 89 00:17:32,384 --> 00:17:35,803 A Community Improvement Plan is both a planning and economic 90 00:17:35,824 --> 00:17:41,483 development tool. It allows municipalities to identify areas where improvements, 91 00:17:41,483 --> 00:17:46,923 rehabilitation, redevelopment, or revitalization are encouraged and to provide financial 92 00:17:47,184 --> 00:17:52,865 incentives to support those objectives. In 4DRI, the CIP is 93 00:17:52,886 --> 00:17:58,145 intended to encourage private sector investment, support revitalization of core 94 00:17:58,185 --> 00:18:02,545 areas, improve the built environment and public realm and encourage 95 00:18:02,726 --> 00:18:07,710 redevelopment and sustainable development. The main reason for undertaking this 96 00:18:07,731 --> 00:18:12,110 review was that the town currently has multiple community improvement 97 00:18:12,131 --> 00:18:15,470 plans that were prepared at different times and under previous 98 00:18:15,651 --> 00:18:20,430 planning frameworks. Since those plans were adopted, provincial planning policy 99 00:18:20,611 --> 00:18:23,710 has evolved. The town has adopted a new official plan 100 00:18:24,531 --> 00:18:28,924 in additional secondary plans have been completed. The proposed approach 101 00:18:28,964 --> 00:18:32,764 is to move toward one consolidated CIP framework that is 102 00:18:32,804 --> 00:18:36,924 easier to administer, more consistent across the town and aligned 103 00:18:36,924 --> 00:18:41,395 with the current official plan. Under the Planning Act, the 104 00:18:41,496 --> 00:18:45,875 town is required to identify the Community Improvement Project Areas 105 00:18:46,056 --> 00:18:50,609 where the CIP Programs will apply. The proposed framework identifies 106 00:18:51,030 --> 00:18:57,498 six core areas. Bridgeway, Bridgeburg, Stevensville, South, and River Walk, 107 00:18:57,498 --> 00:19:01,427 Gateway, and Crystal Beach. In addition to those six core 108 00:19:01,467 --> 00:19:05,507 areas, the proposed framework identifies a town - wide brownfield 109 00:19:05,608 --> 00:19:09,827 community improvement project area. The Core areas were selected based 110 00:19:09,827 --> 00:19:14,067 on their existing downtown and Main Street functions. Opportunities for 111 00:19:14,328 --> 00:19:18,707 revitalization and reinvestment, and alignment with the town's official plan 112 00:19:18,968 --> 00:19:24,469 and secondary plans. The side provides the proposed boundaries of 113 00:19:24,490 --> 00:19:28,770 the Community Improvement Project Areas. On the left, you can 114 00:19:28,770 --> 00:19:31,970 see the individual core area boundaries, and on the right 115 00:19:31,991 --> 00:19:36,210 is the broader brownfield project area. The Intention is to 116 00:19:36,250 --> 00:19:40,210 provide targeted incentives within the core areas while allowing the 117 00:19:40,391 --> 00:19:45,810 brownfield programs to apply more broadly to eligible properties within 118 00:19:46,231 --> 00:19:53,641 settlement areas. The first program is the commercial building improvement 119 00:19:53,822 --> 00:19:57,801 grant, which is intended to support improvements to existing commercial 120 00:19:58,542 --> 00:20:03,080 and mixed use buildings within core areas. Eligible improvements can 121 00:20:03,101 --> 00:20:09,400 include facade upgrades, windows, indoors, accessibility improvements, exterior lighting and 122 00:20:09,400 --> 00:20:14,847 signage, as well as other site improvements. The proposed funding 123 00:20:14,868 --> 00:20:17,887 is a matching grant of up to 50 percent of 124 00:20:17,908 --> 00:20:23,664 eligible costs to a maximum of 20, 000 dollars. The 125 00:20:23,664 --> 00:20:27,504 next program is the professional study grant, which is a 126 00:20:27,544 --> 00:20:31,115 new component of the proposed framework. The purpose is to 127 00:20:31,155 --> 00:20:35,035 help offset the cost of professional studies that may be 128 00:20:35,035 --> 00:20:39,894 required to advance redevelopment projects. The proposed eligible studies include 129 00:20:40,075 --> 00:20:46,614 feasibility studies, heritage impact assessments, servicing and infrastructure studies, accessibility 130 00:20:46,715 --> 00:20:51,734 assessments, archaeological assessments, and other studies as outlined in the 131 00:20:51,755 --> 00:20:59,980 program appendix. The proposed funding is a matching grant of 132 00:21:00,081 --> 00:21:06,098 up to 50 percent of eligible costs. The sustainability and 133 00:21:06,098 --> 00:21:09,378 climate improvement grant is another new component of the proposed 134 00:21:09,418 --> 00:21:13,938 framework. The program is intended to support improvements that enhance 135 00:21:14,039 --> 00:21:19,766 environmental performance and climate resilience. Eligible improvements can include insulation 136 00:21:19,947 --> 00:21:24,647 and building envelope upgrades. High efficiency H - vac systems, 137 00:21:24,647 --> 00:21:29,287 and heat pumps, solar panels, EV charging infrastructure, and green 138 00:21:29,308 --> 00:21:34,177 infrastructure. The proposed funding is a matching grant of up 139 00:21:34,217 --> 00:21:37,457 to 50 percent of eligible costs to a maximum of 140 00:21:37,878 --> 00:21:44,085 5, 000 dollars. Brownfield sites are properties where actual or 141 00:21:44,106 --> 00:21:50,097 potential environmental contamination may create barriers to redevelopment. The brownfield 142 00:21:50,137 --> 00:21:54,417 programs are intended to encourage the remediation and redevelopment of 143 00:21:54,758 --> 00:22:00,032 contaminated or potentially contaminated sites. There are three programs within 144 00:22:00,032 --> 00:22:04,305 the proposed brownfield framework. The first is the Environmental Site 145 00:22:04,406 --> 00:22:08,625 Assessment Grant Program, which helps offset the cost of environmental 146 00:22:08,646 --> 00:22:13,231 assessments. The second is the brownfield tax assistance program, which 147 00:22:13,412 --> 00:22:18,362 provides temporary municipal tax relief during remediation. And the third 148 00:22:18,402 --> 00:22:22,442 is the brown field rehabilitation grant, which provides an incentive 149 00:22:22,703 --> 00:22:28,522 based on the increase in municipal assessment following redevelopment. Collectively, 150 00:22:28,522 --> 00:22:31,562 these programs are intended to reduce some of the financial 151 00:22:31,743 --> 00:22:37,974 risk associated with brownfield redevelopment. Support environmental mediation, and help 152 00:22:38,075 --> 00:22:44,671 return underutilized properties to productive use. So this slide summarizes 153 00:22:44,692 --> 00:22:49,736 the main changes proposed through the updated CIP framework. The 154 00:22:49,917 --> 00:22:53,816 primary change is the consolidation of the town's existing course 155 00:22:54,077 --> 00:22:58,376 area CIPs into one coordinated framework, along with the addition 156 00:22:58,416 --> 00:23:02,158 of the gateway and crystal beach core areas. Two new 157 00:23:02,179 --> 00:23:05,758 grant programs are proposed to the professional study grant and 158 00:23:05,758 --> 00:23:10,690 the sustainability and climate improvement grant. The existing brownfield programs 159 00:23:10,730 --> 00:23:14,853 have been updated and incorporated into the framework. One thing 160 00:23:14,954 --> 00:23:17,653 to note is that the Brown Field Programs do have 161 00:23:17,674 --> 00:23:22,721 a different geographic application. From the core area programs. The 162 00:23:22,762 --> 00:23:27,717 Brownfield project area applies more broadly. To eligible properties within 163 00:23:27,738 --> 00:23:31,607 settlement areas. Whereas the other programs are focused on the 164 00:23:31,708 --> 00:23:36,588 designated core areas. The Brownfield Programs are currently included within 165 00:23:36,628 --> 00:23:40,748 the consolidated CIP, but they could be separated into a 166 00:23:40,849 --> 00:23:46,828 standalone brownfield CIP if council ultimately preferred that approach. The 167 00:23:47,089 --> 00:23:52,168 existing facade and signage programs have also been consolidated, and 168 00:23:52,168 --> 00:23:57,279 the administration and application processes have been standardized. Finally, the 169 00:23:58,180 --> 00:24:02,239 residential creation and intensification grant husband - removed from the 170 00:24:02,340 --> 00:24:06,719 current proposal. This was an existing program intended to encourage 171 00:24:07,060 --> 00:24:12,062 additional residential units within the core areas. The program was 172 00:24:12,062 --> 00:24:15,662 removed from the proposed framework to place greater emphasis on 173 00:24:15,662 --> 00:24:20,161 the town's Affordable Housing CIP. Stuff have since become aware 174 00:24:20,182 --> 00:24:23,408 that there may be desire to retain the program. And 175 00:24:23,408 --> 00:24:26,608 it can be incorporated back into the framework if council 176 00:24:26,648 --> 00:24:29,888 wishes. However, it is important to note that it cannot 177 00:24:29,928 --> 00:24:36,645 be used with the Affordable Housing Program. Overall, the proposed 178 00:24:36,666 --> 00:24:40,885 changes are intended to create a more coordinated and streamlined 179 00:24:40,925 --> 00:24:46,005 framework while supporting current planning, economic development, and climate objectives. 180 00:24:47,366 --> 00:24:51,105 The Draft CIP has gone through internal and external review, 181 00:24:51,105 --> 00:24:54,708 as well as public consultation. The Draft was circulated to 182 00:24:54,708 --> 00:24:58,228 the ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Niagara 183 00:24:58,268 --> 00:25:02,362 region for review and comment. The ministry's comments focus primarily 184 00:25:02,463 --> 00:25:08,842 on legislative consistency, document organisation, administrative procedures, and the Brownfield 185 00:25:08,943 --> 00:25:14,318 framework. Staff reviewed those comments and incorporated revisions where appropriate, 186 00:25:14,318 --> 00:25:21,038 including strengthening the legislative references, clarifying the program framework and 187 00:25:21,078 --> 00:25:26,444 strengthening administration. Niagar Region's comments focus primarily on the Brownfield 188 00:25:26,465 --> 00:25:32,122 programs, including eligible costs. Administration of the tax increment grant 189 00:25:32,463 --> 00:25:37,333 and tax assistance program. Stacking and property tax requirements. Those 190 00:25:37,514 --> 00:25:41,806 comments were also reviewed and incorporated where appropriate. On the 191 00:25:41,827 --> 00:25:45,886 Public Consultation side, the town held a public open house 192 00:25:45,926 --> 00:25:49,341 on May 20th. I do want to clarify one item 193 00:25:49,381 --> 00:25:52,861 in the report. On page nine, the May 20th event 194 00:25:52,962 --> 00:25:57,774 is incorrectly described as a statutory public meeting. This was 195 00:25:57,814 --> 00:26:00,494 an error. The event was a public open house held 196 00:26:00,595 --> 00:26:04,578 as part of the CIP consultation process. Two members of 197 00:26:04,578 --> 00:26:07,778 the Public attended the Open House and expressed support for 198 00:26:07,818 --> 00:26:13,618 the Brownfield programs, particularly the environmental benefits, of remediating contaminated 199 00:26:13,719 --> 00:26:19,938 lands, and encouraging redevelopment within existing settlement areas. The Draft 200 00:26:19,938 --> 00:26:23,538 CIP and supporting materials were also made available on Let's 201 00:26:23,578 --> 00:26:27,218 Talk Fortiery. The page was posted on May 11, ahead 202 00:26:27,218 --> 00:26:30,418 of the Open House, and the Presentation was subsequently uploaded. 203 00:26:30,756 --> 00:26:34,575 The page has remained available for Public comments since then. 204 00:26:35,349 --> 00:26:38,768 As of today, the page has received 98 views, 82 205 00:26:38,789 --> 00:26:43,008 visits in 71 visitors. One written submission was also received 206 00:26:43,029 --> 00:26:46,928 by staff yesterday. Staff reviewed the comments and have provided 207 00:26:47,109 --> 00:26:51,758 a response to the applicable items. Overall, the comments received 208 00:26:51,779 --> 00:26:55,838 through the agency review and Public Consultation have been considered 209 00:26:56,659 --> 00:27:03,649 an incorporated into the revised draft where appropriate. From a 210 00:27:03,910 --> 00:27:07,969 financial perspective, the proposed CIP would initially be funded through 211 00:27:08,009 --> 00:27:12,689 the town's existing Community Improvement Plan Reserve, which currently has 212 00:27:13,110 --> 00:27:19,928 approximately 640... 646, 000 dollars available. Approximately one third of 213 00:27:19,928 --> 00:27:23,528 the existing reserve has also been designated to support CIP 214 00:27:23,789 --> 00:27:27,768 initiatives in crystal beach during the initial years of implementation. 215 00:27:28,696 --> 00:27:32,515 Based on the proposed program structure and anticipated grant levels, 216 00:27:32,515 --> 00:27:35,955 the existing reserve is expected to support the initial years 217 00:27:35,955 --> 00:27:40,484 of implementation. Importantly, adoption of the CIP does not commit 218 00:27:40,524 --> 00:27:44,084 the town to a fixed annual funding allocation, funding for 219 00:27:44,124 --> 00:27:46,964 the programs would remain subject to council approval through the 220 00:27:47,065 --> 00:27:52,528 annual budget process. Staff would report annually on program uptake 221 00:27:52,789 --> 00:27:57,888 funding committed and distributed program up and the remaining reserve 222 00:27:57,909 --> 00:28:02,048 balance. This would allow council to assess program performance and 223 00:28:02,088 --> 00:28:09,492 determine whether the existing funding level remains appropriate. Following today's 224 00:28:09,513 --> 00:28:12,772 presentation, Council is being asked to provide direction on the 225 00:28:13,113 --> 00:28:17,172 Draft CIP and the proposed Community Improvement Project Areas. The 226 00:28:17,172 --> 00:28:20,292 next step would be to bring the project area designation 227 00:28:20,553 --> 00:28:24,361 by - law forward to counsel on August 24th. Following 228 00:28:24,361 --> 00:28:27,801 that, the final CIP would be brought back to council 229 00:28:27,841 --> 00:28:33,037 on September 14th for consideration. The proposed CIP adoption bylaw 230 00:28:33,077 --> 00:28:37,389 would then come forward on September 28th. Following adoption, there 231 00:28:37,429 --> 00:28:40,189 would be the applicable 20 - day appeal period after 232 00:28:40,370 --> 00:28:44,109 which the town could proceed with implementation of the incentive 233 00:28:44,290 --> 00:28:47,989 programs. Staff will continue to refine the document based on 234 00:28:48,290 --> 00:28:51,709 council's direction before the final CIP is brought forward for 235 00:28:52,210 --> 00:29:00,073 adoption. That concludes my presentation. Thank you, Mr. Are there 236 00:29:00,073 --> 00:29:06,913 any questions. Councillor Noise. There you go, Council Christensen. Thank 237 00:29:06,913 --> 00:29:10,033 you for your presentation and all the work, the hard 238 00:29:10,073 --> 00:29:13,313 work that went into this. I'm just wanted to clarify. 239 00:29:13,313 --> 00:29:14,593 I know the answer, but I'm just going to ask 240 00:29:14,614 --> 00:29:18,993 it anyway. The 20, 000, which is 50 percent of 241 00:29:19,494 --> 00:29:25,650 the investment for the CIP program, then the 7500. For 242 00:29:27,351 --> 00:29:31,330 the study grant. And then the climate improvement for 5, 243 00:29:31,330 --> 00:29:34,945 000. These are all piggyback. They're not... It doesn't take 244 00:29:34,945 --> 00:29:36,785 up any of the 20, 000. So in other words, 245 00:29:36,785 --> 00:29:42,625 if they add an assault together, they'll have about 30. 246 00:29:43,781 --> 00:29:48,812 32, 502 to go for matching funds. Through you, Madam 247 00:29:48,852 --> 00:29:51,852 Chair, to Councillor Noise, that is correct. As long as 248 00:29:51,953 --> 00:29:55,256 they're not applying the same eligible cost. And if they, 249 00:29:55,256 --> 00:29:57,382 if I. Want more questions, if they do do the 250 00:29:57,403 --> 00:30:00,962 study grant and they take advantage of the 7005, but 251 00:30:00,962 --> 00:30:03,222 let's say they spend 1, 500... 15, 000 dollars on 252 00:30:03,262 --> 00:30:07,622 it. That doesn't mean on the grant says it's going 253 00:30:07,622 --> 00:30:09,302 to cost you 2 million to do it. They can 254 00:30:09,342 --> 00:30:13,306 then back out. They're not committed to following through if 255 00:30:13,407 --> 00:30:16,826 the cost or the improvement is more than what they 256 00:30:16,847 --> 00:30:21,469 can bear. Through you, Madam Chair, to Counciloids, that's correct. 257 00:30:21,469 --> 00:30:28,070 They're not committed. Thank you. Councillor Lewis. Thank you, Madam 258 00:30:28,070 --> 00:30:29,910 Chair, and thank you for your presentation tonight. A couple 259 00:30:30,011 --> 00:30:33,350 of questions. One being back to the crystal beach or 260 00:30:33,390 --> 00:30:36,390 the map, maybe where it shows a different area. First, 261 00:30:36,390 --> 00:30:38,550 let me start by saying crystal beach is very excited 262 00:30:38,550 --> 00:30:42,070 to be taking part in this program. But it looks 263 00:30:42,110 --> 00:30:45,190 to me that we're using the boundary map for the 264 00:30:45,230 --> 00:30:51,590 secondary plan entertainment district and not necessarily the BIA boundary 265 00:30:51,771 --> 00:30:54,470 maps. Do you know if those two were over late 266 00:30:54,510 --> 00:30:58,845 or ever considered or which were considering in this. Through 267 00:30:58,885 --> 00:31:01,805 you, Madam Chair, the Councillor Lewis, we considered the secondary 268 00:31:01,906 --> 00:31:04,685 plan. Secondary player. Okay, and that was my understanding. I'll 269 00:31:04,725 --> 00:31:09,005 bring this up later when we speak to the report, 270 00:31:09,005 --> 00:31:12,365 because I would like to talk about Rebstock Road South 271 00:31:12,365 --> 00:31:16,365 to Erie Road potentially being included. The other question I 272 00:31:16,386 --> 00:31:21,948 had was regarding the residential intensification grant. Crystal Beach has 273 00:31:21,948 --> 00:31:24,188 never had the opportunity to participate in that because we 274 00:31:24,188 --> 00:31:27,628 never had the CIP for the area. I know that 275 00:31:27,729 --> 00:31:31,468 it's something that council could add in if council so 276 00:31:31,468 --> 00:31:33,788 wish to make that still be available to the community. 277 00:31:35,191 --> 00:31:37,010 But I just want to make sure I heard correctly 278 00:31:37,031 --> 00:31:39,810 that if that were the case, it would not be 279 00:31:39,810 --> 00:31:42,370 able to compete. It would have to be either the 280 00:31:42,410 --> 00:31:48,610 CIP Affordable Housing or the CIP residential intensification if both 281 00:31:48,650 --> 00:31:51,650 were available. Is that correct? Through you, Madam Chair to 282 00:31:51,690 --> 00:31:54,530 Councillor Lewis, that is correct. Okay, I believe those are 283 00:31:54,570 --> 00:31:56,610 all of my questions for now. And if not, I'll 284 00:31:56,631 --> 00:32:01,137 raise my hand again, but thank you. DeWish? Thank you. 285 00:32:01,137 --> 00:32:02,737 Thank you very much for your presentation. I know that 286 00:32:02,777 --> 00:32:06,947 the work that you've put into this. I just want 287 00:32:06,947 --> 00:32:13,264 to be clear. The report suggests that this is our 288 00:32:13,445 --> 00:32:17,664 opportunity to provide guidance to staff as to the program 289 00:32:17,765 --> 00:32:22,064 that's being proposed, a joint CIP for all of the 290 00:32:22,325 --> 00:32:28,384 existing core area CIPs plus the Brownfield remediation. It's tonight. 291 00:32:29,405 --> 00:32:31,224 We need to give you guidance. I mean, we can 292 00:32:31,224 --> 00:32:33,648 make changes later on. But it would be helpful for 293 00:32:33,648 --> 00:32:37,247 you to have what our thinking is tonight. Yes. Okay. 294 00:32:39,070 --> 00:32:45,078 So I'm going to start with the basic question. If 295 00:32:45,819 --> 00:32:49,958 it's advisable to consolidate the CIPs, why do we still 296 00:32:49,998 --> 00:32:52,998 have, if we proceed with this, why will we still 297 00:32:53,019 --> 00:32:56,438 have a separate CIP out on its own? The Affordable 298 00:32:56,478 --> 00:33:02,757 Housing CIP. Through you, Madam Chair, to your worship, the 299 00:33:02,757 --> 00:33:06,217 direction at the time was because the Affordable Housing CIP 300 00:33:06,238 --> 00:33:09,657 was so new, newly adopted. We decided to leave that 301 00:33:09,678 --> 00:33:14,028 one out of this one rather than combining them. So 302 00:33:14,049 --> 00:33:17,308 how does that fit into your comment that the purpose 303 00:33:17,348 --> 00:33:21,068 of this report is to revive one uniform CIP framework 304 00:33:21,649 --> 00:33:25,468 in the town? Wouldn't it be advisable to consider adding 305 00:33:25,489 --> 00:33:28,988 the Affordable Housing CIP? And that will deal with an 306 00:33:28,988 --> 00:33:35,471 issue that Councillor Lewis just raised. About at least crystal 307 00:33:35,511 --> 00:33:39,071 beach area being able to somehow piggyback into this. I 308 00:33:39,071 --> 00:33:41,791 mean, they can do it now. But shouldn't we be 309 00:33:41,831 --> 00:33:47,631 having one overarching framework for all of these programs? Through 310 00:33:47,631 --> 00:33:51,391 you, Madam Chair, to your worship, we could definitely look 311 00:33:51,412 --> 00:33:54,271 at doing that. I don't know the answer to that. 312 00:33:54,271 --> 00:33:55,871 I'm asking you the one that's done the work on 313 00:33:55,911 --> 00:33:58,511 this. And it may be that there's a good reason 314 00:33:58,612 --> 00:34:03,082 why the Affordable Housing CIP would remain outside. I'm just 315 00:34:03,103 --> 00:34:06,762 asking the question based on the report and the comments 316 00:34:06,762 --> 00:34:12,347 that you've made. Um. And the slide that you showed 317 00:34:12,387 --> 00:34:16,787 with respect to key changes also made reference, I don't 318 00:34:16,787 --> 00:34:23,967 know if you can pull that up now. Yes. So 319 00:34:24,007 --> 00:34:29,067 made reference to rather than having different application processes, now 320 00:34:29,067 --> 00:34:35,407 the standard administration. So maybe all CIPs aren't created equal. 321 00:34:35,407 --> 00:34:39,967 And I would think that the core area considerations and 322 00:34:40,007 --> 00:34:43,327 criteria, well, I wouldn't think I know are different than 323 00:34:43,908 --> 00:34:49,626 Brownfield remediation. Which would be different than affordable housing. But 324 00:34:49,666 --> 00:34:52,186 I think the objective is, and you can correct me 325 00:34:52,186 --> 00:34:56,906 if I'm wrong, is to have a standard framework that 326 00:34:57,167 --> 00:35:00,426 staff can utilise and can cross - reference if necessary 327 00:35:00,447 --> 00:35:05,146 to the various types of objectives that are outlined in 328 00:35:05,146 --> 00:35:08,896 the program. Am I close? Through you, Madam Chair, to 329 00:35:08,896 --> 00:35:11,176 your worship, yes, I think it would be advisable to 330 00:35:11,997 --> 00:35:17,336 have a standard CIP. We could include the Affordable Housing, 331 00:35:17,336 --> 00:35:21,416 otherwise we could have affordable housing, the core areas, and 332 00:35:21,416 --> 00:35:24,836 then Brownfields on its own. If that were the direction 333 00:35:25,177 --> 00:35:29,343 that council wanted to go. So we can have three 334 00:35:29,383 --> 00:35:32,915 separate CIPs or we can have. One. That's one of 335 00:35:32,915 --> 00:35:37,875 the questions we have to determine. Yes. I know that, 336 00:35:37,875 --> 00:35:45,293 sorry. I know that you've received comments from the Ministry 337 00:35:45,293 --> 00:35:48,553 of Municipal Affairs and Housing and also the region. And 338 00:35:48,553 --> 00:35:52,233 I know that you sent some information to us, uh, 339 00:35:52,434 --> 00:35:55,373 maybe a copy of the letter from the ministry late 340 00:35:55,373 --> 00:35:58,413 today, which, um, I haven't had a chance to fully 341 00:35:58,434 --> 00:36:00,333 review. And I don't know if the other councillors have 342 00:36:00,354 --> 00:36:02,453 seen it or not yet. And I know that you've 343 00:36:02,554 --> 00:36:07,953 also responded to, um, faith Black here who sent, um, 344 00:36:08,714 --> 00:36:13,893 a lengthy critique of your work. Um, some of which 345 00:36:14,314 --> 00:36:17,093 I can imagine you would be easily able to respond 346 00:36:17,114 --> 00:36:19,813 to which you've done. Again, I haven't seen that either. 347 00:36:21,118 --> 00:36:24,297 The reason I raise that is because I think this 348 00:36:24,398 --> 00:36:27,097 is an important piece of work that you've been dealing 349 00:36:27,118 --> 00:36:30,917 with. And I think that when we get this, um, 350 00:36:31,518 --> 00:36:35,177 in place, we need to make sure that it's right. 351 00:36:35,177 --> 00:36:37,177 It's either, so I think we need to make the 352 00:36:37,177 --> 00:36:40,137 determination. And I, for one, would like an opportunity to 353 00:36:40,177 --> 00:36:42,777 be able to review all of the information that you've 354 00:36:42,798 --> 00:36:47,410 had. Which I think we now have. Just haven't had 355 00:36:47,410 --> 00:36:49,090 a chance to review it. Had a couple of other 356 00:36:49,351 --> 00:36:55,903 questions. For the various CIPs right now, are there different 357 00:36:56,004 --> 00:37:00,863 staff, um, review committees. So if it's a CIP dealing 358 00:37:00,903 --> 00:37:04,263 with the core area, if I might, Madam Chair, or 359 00:37:04,263 --> 00:37:07,743 it's a Brownfield remediation, are they different staff members that 360 00:37:08,164 --> 00:37:11,295 are sitting on the review committee. Through you, Madam Chair 361 00:37:11,396 --> 00:37:14,555 to your worship. Um, I'm currently reviewing all of the 362 00:37:14,756 --> 00:37:18,735 core areas, the brown field and affordable housing in collaboration 363 00:37:18,775 --> 00:37:22,209 with one other staff member. So an application comes in. 364 00:37:23,127 --> 00:37:25,266 Just so that I'm clearing what you've said. An application 365 00:37:25,306 --> 00:37:29,137 comes in. You are the person. With the assistance of 366 00:37:29,318 --> 00:37:33,988 one other individual. That is correct. So you're the standard 367 00:37:35,689 --> 00:37:41,640 framework? Yes. Okay. Well, it's good to know. What happens 368 00:37:42,061 --> 00:37:45,560 if something should happen to the standard framework than where 369 00:37:45,581 --> 00:37:52,421 are we. That's rhetorical. Um. If I might, Madam Chair, 370 00:37:52,421 --> 00:37:55,736 just a couple of other questions. So you mentioned that 371 00:37:55,757 --> 00:37:59,656 we're going to be utilising the existing 646, 000 dollars 372 00:37:59,696 --> 00:38:03,524 that we have in the core area CIP. We have 373 00:38:03,625 --> 00:38:06,812 an annual budget amount, I think, for that. That we 374 00:38:06,913 --> 00:38:09,772 allocate. Um, are we doing that now or is this 375 00:38:09,772 --> 00:38:11,212 a question that I should raise when we get to 376 00:38:11,252 --> 00:38:14,042 the report. Through you, Madam Chair, to your worship, I 377 00:38:14,063 --> 00:38:17,882 do not believe we are allocating annually right now because 378 00:38:17,882 --> 00:38:24,260 of the reserve. The brownfield remediation programs, they don't rely 379 00:38:24,281 --> 00:38:28,225 upon that fund of money. No, they do not. Okay. 380 00:38:33,909 --> 00:38:38,543 And then finally. In a couple of things. Finally a 381 00:38:38,543 --> 00:38:41,663 couple of things. So this is, I know my last, 382 00:38:41,684 --> 00:38:47,263 last, my last, last question. In the appendix, it's clear 383 00:38:47,263 --> 00:38:50,463 that there should be an agreement. So if someone is 384 00:38:50,503 --> 00:38:53,903 going to make an application and qualify for funding, they'll 385 00:38:53,903 --> 00:38:56,343 have to enter into an agreement with the municipalities, is 386 00:38:56,343 --> 00:38:58,943 that correct? That was correct. There's no circumstance where they 387 00:38:58,983 --> 00:39:01,423 will get money with out there being a written agreement. 388 00:39:01,423 --> 00:39:04,863 That is correct. Okay. And then finally, this is my 389 00:39:04,964 --> 00:39:09,943 file. In terms of payment, there's an indication that the 390 00:39:10,044 --> 00:39:14,263 town may require an affidavit indicating that payment to the 391 00:39:14,364 --> 00:39:19,650 subtrades has been made. We'll be not making payments accepting 392 00:39:19,650 --> 00:39:24,608 compliance, I presume with a construction lean act. Through you, 393 00:39:24,608 --> 00:39:27,728 Madam Chair Tier Worship. I don't believe that exact language 394 00:39:27,728 --> 00:39:31,008 is in there. It's not, but it should be. Okay. 395 00:39:31,989 --> 00:39:38,338 Okay. Thank you. Councillor Flag. Thank you, Chair. And thank 396 00:39:38,338 --> 00:39:43,102 you for your presentation. Not often after when I speak 397 00:39:43,142 --> 00:39:45,102 after the Mary still have something to ask. But I 398 00:39:45,102 --> 00:39:47,262 do, in fact, tonight. Oh, did I miss a question? 399 00:39:47,443 --> 00:39:49,862 Yeah. Well, I don't know. I'll let you know. It 400 00:39:49,862 --> 00:39:52,222 might not be a good question. When it comes to, 401 00:39:52,222 --> 00:39:56,702 um, matching grants with respect to, um, specifically the sustainability 402 00:39:56,963 --> 00:40:00,462 and climate improvement grant, will this be net of other 403 00:40:00,803 --> 00:40:04,022 grants that may be available through other government agencies? So 404 00:40:04,083 --> 00:40:07,742 for example, right now the home renovation savings program grant 405 00:40:08,003 --> 00:40:10,302 X number of dollars off of each window? Or will 406 00:40:10,342 --> 00:40:13,022 this be an addition to unpaeable on the gross amount 407 00:40:13,363 --> 00:40:18,891 of, um, of construction. Through you, Madam Chair, two councillor 408 00:40:18,992 --> 00:40:22,370 flag. I believe it would be on the gross amount. 409 00:40:23,474 --> 00:40:26,813 Um, I think there is language in the CIP that 410 00:40:26,813 --> 00:40:29,693 talks about if there are other grants provided by other 411 00:40:29,874 --> 00:40:33,133 organisations, but it's definitely something we can look into and 412 00:40:33,173 --> 00:40:41,216 clarify. Councillor Noise. Thank you, Councillor Costerson. Just based on 413 00:40:41,216 --> 00:40:43,816 some of the questions asked. In your report, you talked 414 00:40:43,816 --> 00:40:47,896 about that the government needs to identify Corey areas from 415 00:40:47,896 --> 00:40:51,893 the CIP, right? But yet we do have a townwide 416 00:40:51,994 --> 00:40:54,773 CIP for affordable housing. And for Brownfields, how does that 417 00:40:54,773 --> 00:41:01,469 fit together. Through you, Madam Chair to Councillor Noice. I 418 00:41:01,469 --> 00:41:04,149 would have to look into how the Affordable Housing CIP 419 00:41:05,130 --> 00:41:09,189 was drafted. I suspect there was probably a bylaw that, 420 00:41:09,189 --> 00:41:12,449 um, designates the entire town as a project area. But 421 00:41:12,449 --> 00:41:16,149 I don't know on hand. Basically does that. So I'm 422 00:41:16,149 --> 00:41:18,549 just wondering what you said, the government needs to identify 423 00:41:18,890 --> 00:41:22,629 core areas. Um, and going back to the mayor's question 424 00:41:22,629 --> 00:41:28,389 about affordable housing, um, and the resiliency. Can't remember the 425 00:41:28,389 --> 00:41:37,651 name of it. They revitavelment residential intensification grant. That hopefully 426 00:41:37,691 --> 00:41:40,291 we will be allowing that one to continue. I know 427 00:41:40,331 --> 00:41:43,011 I had to talk with Anamika earlier today about that. 428 00:41:43,011 --> 00:41:45,171 And the Brown says, I can see how, how I 429 00:41:45,192 --> 00:41:48,131 understand the need to have everything kind of like it 430 00:41:48,131 --> 00:41:51,411 captured in one, in one report. But at the same 431 00:41:51,411 --> 00:41:55,316 point, these two are quite different. Than some of the 432 00:41:55,316 --> 00:41:57,479 other things that you've talked about. But I can see 433 00:41:57,479 --> 00:42:01,399 them being, being separate for the affordable CIP and also 434 00:42:01,399 --> 00:42:04,679 the Brownfields being separate from the others because the funding 435 00:42:04,679 --> 00:42:08,279 sources are different than the amount of money that we've 436 00:42:08,300 --> 00:42:11,559 set aside for CIP. Through you, Madam Chair, to Councillor 437 00:42:11,599 --> 00:42:17,541 Noites, that is correct. Okay. Thank you. Are there any 438 00:42:17,581 --> 00:42:22,783 other questions. That being the case, thank you very much, 439 00:42:22,804 --> 00:42:27,552 Ms. Smith. And there are no other, uh, delegations or 440 00:42:27,592 --> 00:42:32,352 presentations. So we'll move on to reports. The first report 441 00:42:32,533 --> 00:42:38,592 under consideration is PBBS 12 - 1 - 2026 proposed 442 00:42:38,773 --> 00:42:43,232 official plan and zoning bylaw amendment, adendam recommendation report for 443 00:42:43,973 --> 00:42:50,272 19 Derby Road. Councillor Lewis has moved that report is 444 00:42:50,272 --> 00:42:58,088 now on the floor for questions and comments. Councillor Noyes. 445 00:42:58,088 --> 00:42:59,928 Thank you, Councillor Kristen. And I am going to be 446 00:42:59,968 --> 00:43:04,008 supporting this. I did also read the letter from the 447 00:43:04,008 --> 00:43:06,648 owner about his past practice and his desire to do 448 00:43:06,669 --> 00:43:10,408 affordable housing. And that's his intent and that has been 449 00:43:10,448 --> 00:43:12,228 his practice in the past. So I have a lot 450 00:43:12,228 --> 00:43:14,808 of confidence, even though we can't necessarily put his feet 451 00:43:14,808 --> 00:43:17,128 to the fire. He has a good history of doing 452 00:43:17,229 --> 00:43:19,128 this. So I'm going to support this because we do 453 00:43:19,128 --> 00:43:22,148 need affordable housing and we do need department buildings. Um, 454 00:43:22,349 --> 00:43:25,448 I am concerned that it doesn't fit with the secondary 455 00:43:25,469 --> 00:43:28,568 plan. It goes, it's not there. But at the same 456 00:43:28,568 --> 00:43:32,768 point, I think when the secondary plan was discussed, I 457 00:43:32,768 --> 00:43:36,248 don't think they were even considering Snack Townhouses as being 458 00:43:36,288 --> 00:43:41,048 part of the options because it wasn't at that time. 459 00:43:41,048 --> 00:43:44,648 So I am in support of this. And, um, I 460 00:43:44,688 --> 00:43:48,568 do think it's going to be, I think it's necessary 461 00:43:48,568 --> 00:43:51,368 to have those apartments. I'm also pleased with how much 462 00:43:51,629 --> 00:43:55,768 he has changed things based on Council's comments. Thank you. 463 00:43:58,008 --> 00:44:01,400 Your worship. Yeah. Thank you very much. I'm also going 464 00:44:01,400 --> 00:44:05,800 to support this. The letter that Mr. Bremner provided to 465 00:44:05,800 --> 00:44:09,560 us, which is part of our package, really outlines the 466 00:44:09,581 --> 00:44:13,880 essential reasons why this is a good project. I know 467 00:44:13,920 --> 00:44:19,000 that the neighbours aren't necessarily happy about having a three 468 00:44:19,021 --> 00:44:22,120 - story building in their neighbourhood. But the reality is 469 00:44:23,181 --> 00:44:25,960 a three - story building could be put on this 470 00:44:27,901 --> 00:44:32,260 parcel of land in the form of stacked townhouses, uh, 471 00:44:32,260 --> 00:44:37,400 which is not a housing style that we necessarily need. 472 00:44:37,400 --> 00:44:40,760 We certainly, I don't believe need more townhouses, although that's 473 00:44:40,941 --> 00:44:43,880 an arguable point. But what we definitely do need is 474 00:44:44,141 --> 00:44:47,974 apartment units. And we need rental apartment units. And we've 475 00:44:47,995 --> 00:44:52,934 had some tire kicking from some other developers. We've had 476 00:44:52,934 --> 00:44:58,374 some discussions about, you know, maybe utilising our affordable housing 477 00:44:58,475 --> 00:45:02,534 CIP, but we haven't had someone who's come forward who 478 00:45:02,534 --> 00:45:07,974 has local experience building these types of units and managing 479 00:45:08,014 --> 00:45:11,574 them. And Mr. Bremner has indicated that not only is 480 00:45:11,574 --> 00:45:14,054 he intent on building these, but it's his intention to 481 00:45:14,235 --> 00:45:17,732 continue to manage them. He also points out an interesting 482 00:45:17,833 --> 00:45:23,969 aspect of the rental housing that we require. When he 483 00:45:24,009 --> 00:45:27,169 makes reference to individuals and forderie who may move into 484 00:45:27,190 --> 00:45:30,289 these units, if they own a home now, they'll be 485 00:45:30,289 --> 00:45:32,929 selling that home. And that means we'll have some housing 486 00:45:33,750 --> 00:45:36,609 on the market that we don't currently have. And there 487 00:45:36,609 --> 00:45:40,529 are many, many individuals in this community that want to 488 00:45:40,569 --> 00:45:44,129 stay in for degree, but they don't have the alternate 489 00:45:44,230 --> 00:45:49,971 housing that will accommodate them. Being able to do that. 490 00:45:50,011 --> 00:45:54,691 And so they're in their homes, their overhaused. And that's 491 00:45:54,792 --> 00:45:59,411 housing that really could benefit a broader sector of our 492 00:45:59,451 --> 00:46:02,771 community. So I'm going to support this. I know that, 493 00:46:02,771 --> 00:46:08,360 um, it's not necessarily what the neighbours want. But the 494 00:46:08,381 --> 00:46:11,880 proponent has been very flexible as council noises pointed out. 495 00:46:11,880 --> 00:46:13,720 He has responded to some of the changes that we 496 00:46:13,760 --> 00:46:18,600 want. He has tried to follow the requests of staff 497 00:46:19,261 --> 00:46:24,520 going back sometime. And yes, an apartment building doesn't necessarily 498 00:46:24,701 --> 00:46:27,640 fit in with a secondary plan. But I'm advised that 499 00:46:27,661 --> 00:46:31,240 it fits in with our new official plan. And it's 500 00:46:31,581 --> 00:46:38,040 a better and more needed housing type right now in 501 00:46:38,061 --> 00:46:40,760 this part of town in any part of town than 502 00:46:41,021 --> 00:46:45,161 stack towel houses. So I'm going to support this. Thank 503 00:46:45,161 --> 00:46:48,841 you, your worship. Are there any other questions or comments. 504 00:46:53,956 --> 00:46:59,376 Oh. Okay. Councillor Mike Dermon. Yep. Yeah. I just wanted 505 00:46:59,397 --> 00:47:02,896 to just say that. I agree with every point that 506 00:47:02,896 --> 00:47:08,505 the mayor is made. And, um, you know, Mr. Burner's 507 00:47:08,505 --> 00:47:13,576 work in town is very well known. Right by fear, 508 00:47:13,677 --> 00:47:18,696 he redid the, um, when he street funeral. And it's 509 00:47:18,696 --> 00:47:24,696 a beautiful apartment there. So there's no, um, no deciding 510 00:47:24,736 --> 00:47:27,376 on the fact that it doesn't do quality work. He 511 00:47:27,376 --> 00:47:29,656 certainly does. And I think that this will be a 512 00:47:29,656 --> 00:47:37,161 welcoming addition to Derby. Thank you. Councillor Dumino. 513 00:47:39,984 --> 00:47:43,323 Yeah. Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Um, when this, 514 00:47:43,323 --> 00:47:47,323 uh, had come up originally, I had mentioned similar comments, 515 00:47:47,323 --> 00:47:50,123 um, the need for apartment rental units. And I was 516 00:47:50,163 --> 00:47:53,223 supportive of this. Although, um, I do want to, uh, 517 00:47:53,264 --> 00:47:56,363 extend my appreciation to those involved for getting clarification on 518 00:47:56,384 --> 00:48:02,283 the affordability aspect. That was good to see. The market 519 00:48:02,384 --> 00:48:05,723 is a bit challenging right now because, um, later on 520 00:48:05,744 --> 00:48:08,683 in the agenda tonight, you'll see that there was a, 521 00:48:08,683 --> 00:48:14,043 um, condominium type project, um, is requesting an extension. And, 522 00:48:14,043 --> 00:48:17,963 uh, anyone who's been following the news or following real 523 00:48:18,003 --> 00:48:21,243 estate trends, um, has seen that, you know, condo development 524 00:48:21,344 --> 00:48:24,886 has fallen flat. And, you know, this is an opportunity 525 00:48:25,067 --> 00:48:28,786 right now to, at least in my opinion anyway, um, 526 00:48:29,227 --> 00:48:33,206 really utilise some of the funding that's available out there 527 00:48:33,307 --> 00:48:38,126 for, um, uh, rental units, um, which have been, as 528 00:48:38,126 --> 00:48:41,926 the mayor said, um, big challenge in this community when 529 00:48:41,926 --> 00:48:43,926 I, when I first ran in 2018, it was, it 530 00:48:43,947 --> 00:48:46,406 was one of my, one of my concerns was that 531 00:48:46,747 --> 00:48:50,086 we didn't have sufficient rental stock in the community, which 532 00:48:50,086 --> 00:48:53,926 was forcing senior citizens to have to leave town to 533 00:48:53,926 --> 00:48:55,846 be able to get a rental unit because they were 534 00:48:56,027 --> 00:48:57,766 at a point in their lives where they couldn't maintain 535 00:48:57,806 --> 00:49:00,086 the yard and the driveway and everything else of a 536 00:49:00,086 --> 00:49:03,846 single family home. The mayor also, uh, raised a very, 537 00:49:03,867 --> 00:49:07,826 very important aspect, which is the upward mobility in the 538 00:49:07,826 --> 00:49:12,166 market. As someone, um, finds their situation changing instead of 539 00:49:12,206 --> 00:49:15,206 being, for lack of a better word, stuck in an 540 00:49:15,246 --> 00:49:19,046 unsuitable housing type, this will allow them to get something 541 00:49:19,067 --> 00:49:21,846 more suitable, which then opens up an opportunity for a 542 00:49:21,867 --> 00:49:26,646 family or someone else, uh, enter the market into a 543 00:49:26,686 --> 00:49:30,006 home that's not necessarily new residential construction with all the 544 00:49:30,187 --> 00:49:34,006 associated costs and everything surrounding that. So I'm, I can 545 00:49:34,006 --> 00:49:38,726 appreciate the concerns with the secondary plan, but, um, you 546 00:49:38,726 --> 00:49:41,206 know, as the mayor said, they could put stack townhoses 547 00:49:41,206 --> 00:49:43,926 on there. I think it is much better for the 548 00:49:43,947 --> 00:49:47,286 sake of the entire community to have a, uh, a 549 00:49:47,326 --> 00:49:49,366 rental building go on that property. And it's an individual 550 00:49:49,467 --> 00:49:52,726 who's familiar with the community who knows the community is 551 00:49:52,766 --> 00:49:54,806 councillor McDermott said has done some good work in the 552 00:49:54,907 --> 00:49:58,726 community before. And, um, you know, I'm tired of the 553 00:49:58,766 --> 00:50:00,806 tire kickers too. So I'm, I'm looking forward to seeing 554 00:50:00,827 --> 00:50:03,926 something actually, uh, materialize and to see us get some 555 00:50:03,966 --> 00:50:06,086 rental stock in this community. So thank you very much, 556 00:50:06,126 --> 00:50:13,021 Madam Chair. Councillor Lewis. Thank you, your worship. And thank 557 00:50:13,021 --> 00:50:15,581 you colleagues for your comments. I do agree with many 558 00:50:15,621 --> 00:50:19,501 of them. Um, certainly on this application, I'm intrigued by 559 00:50:19,522 --> 00:50:23,901 the Affordable Housing Component and know of the developers good 560 00:50:23,901 --> 00:50:25,741 work and the other parts of four area where he 561 00:50:25,741 --> 00:50:29,661 has done, um, what I'm going to be commendable work. 562 00:50:29,661 --> 00:50:33,661 And also his letter mentioning the CMHC Affordable Housing Component 563 00:50:33,762 --> 00:50:37,759 of it. Um, this is an interesting one because it 564 00:50:37,799 --> 00:50:41,039 checks mini boxes, um, for things that we're looking for 565 00:50:41,060 --> 00:50:43,419 in the Community, not just in 40er, but in the 566 00:50:43,540 --> 00:50:48,210 crystal beach neighbourhood as well. As I mentioned before, that 567 00:50:48,210 --> 00:50:51,810 neighbourhood, um, as locals, we'll call it the top of 568 00:50:51,810 --> 00:50:55,410 the hill. Does have a number of pre - approved 569 00:50:56,311 --> 00:51:00,530 apartment buildings that have been built. As I mentioned before, 570 00:51:00,570 --> 00:51:02,850 not to belabor it, we do have the crystal beach 571 00:51:02,951 --> 00:51:05,650 secondary plan that is two years in operation that was 572 00:51:05,690 --> 00:51:10,130 built by the Community. I do understand that townhouses or 573 00:51:10,130 --> 00:51:13,730 where we're identified for that area. Um, at the time 574 00:51:13,730 --> 00:51:18,370 we didn't know, um, anything about the term stack townhouses 575 00:51:18,471 --> 00:51:21,490 or that new type of housing that developers would move 576 00:51:21,591 --> 00:51:24,130 forward with. And I do agree that that would not 577 00:51:24,170 --> 00:51:27,655 be in keeping with the neighbourhood as well. Um, that 578 00:51:27,676 --> 00:51:30,855 being said, and I'll be brief, even though I like 579 00:51:31,356 --> 00:51:34,615 many aspects of what this project speaks to in terms 580 00:51:34,615 --> 00:51:37,735 of the attainable and the rental units that the community 581 00:51:37,756 --> 00:51:41,335 needs, um, I am dealing with a community that is 582 00:51:41,375 --> 00:51:43,575 a bit frustrated by the fact that we went through 583 00:51:43,756 --> 00:51:47,895 a neighbourhood planning process to establish criteria that for whatever 584 00:51:47,996 --> 00:51:51,955 reason now does not fit on that property. So, um, 585 00:51:52,156 --> 00:51:55,975 even though there are aspects to the application that I 586 00:51:56,015 --> 00:51:58,855 am very supportive of and thank the developer for moving 587 00:51:58,876 --> 00:52:02,615 forward with, I am going to not support the application 588 00:52:02,636 --> 00:52:05,815 tonight and go with the recommendations that would have been 589 00:52:05,836 --> 00:52:12,141 following the secondary neighbourhood plan. Thank you. Councillinois. Thank you, 590 00:52:12,141 --> 00:52:14,701 Councillor Christensen. Um, just a question. I know in the, 591 00:52:14,741 --> 00:52:16,941 in the letter from, from the owner, he talked about 592 00:52:16,962 --> 00:52:19,101 that he would not be using these a short - 593 00:52:19,101 --> 00:52:21,981 term rentals. And I'm not sure if it falls within 594 00:52:21,981 --> 00:52:24,861 the boundaries of our short - term rental boundaries or 595 00:52:24,901 --> 00:52:29,181 not. I'm not sure. But regardless, can we put something, 596 00:52:29,181 --> 00:52:31,581 it doesn't. Okay, I'm just hearing Anamikas on my next 597 00:52:31,581 --> 00:52:33,181 question is, can we make sure it's in the site 598 00:52:33,221 --> 00:52:35,101 plan that's not short term rentals? But like I said, 599 00:52:35,141 --> 00:52:37,101 I don't need to because it's not within the boundaries. 600 00:52:37,101 --> 00:52:45,957 Thank you. Are there any other? Yeah, I just want 601 00:52:45,997 --> 00:52:48,677 to clarification. The last time we dealt with this, there 602 00:52:48,778 --> 00:52:51,637 was an amendment moved with respect to a five - 603 00:52:51,637 --> 00:52:55,672 year sunset clause. That, I believe, passed. I don't see 604 00:52:55,672 --> 00:53:01,068 it. Here. This is quite streamlined recommendations this evening. I 605 00:53:01,108 --> 00:53:02,988 would have thought it would have been better to have 606 00:53:03,169 --> 00:53:08,348 it as part of the amended report since it's already 607 00:53:08,689 --> 00:53:12,657 been approved. So can we not include that as part 608 00:53:12,657 --> 00:53:15,377 of the recommendation this evening so that it's crystal clear. 609 00:53:17,989 --> 00:53:26,341 In crystal beach. Madam Chance through you to his worship, 610 00:53:26,341 --> 00:53:29,894 yes, we can definitely include that as a recommendation. So 611 00:53:29,934 --> 00:53:32,214 that is there on record that this would, this would 612 00:53:32,254 --> 00:53:34,694 have a sunset clause for five years. Well, I'm thinking 613 00:53:34,734 --> 00:53:38,214 that when we pass this evening's recommendations that one of 614 00:53:38,214 --> 00:53:41,414 the paragraphs will be the sun set the five - 615 00:53:41,414 --> 00:53:44,774 year sunset clause, um, there was wording that was utilised 616 00:53:44,795 --> 00:53:47,574 last time. And I believe it should be dealt with 617 00:53:47,595 --> 00:53:51,546 tonight. That's, that's great. It was something about the approval 618 00:53:51,567 --> 00:53:58,423 of the site plan application. Yeah. Yes, please. Get through 619 00:53:58,423 --> 00:54:00,983 you, Chariot. And to clarify, we'll include the wording as 620 00:54:01,023 --> 00:54:04,263 part of the resolution and the vote will be carried 621 00:54:04,284 --> 00:54:08,103 as amended to reflect the amendment that was previously approved. 622 00:54:08,103 --> 00:54:10,983 The amendment, um, that will be adding is the last 623 00:54:11,004 --> 00:54:14,983 recommendation will be that the bylaw include a provision that 624 00:54:14,983 --> 00:54:17,863 the lands revert to the original zoning if site plan 625 00:54:17,884 --> 00:54:20,663 approval has not been issued within five years from the 626 00:54:20,844 --> 00:54:23,562 enactment of the bylaw. Okay. So that will be reflected 627 00:54:23,602 --> 00:54:30,952 in the minutes if this passes. Through you chair. That's 628 00:54:30,952 --> 00:54:36,918 correct. Thank you. Are there any other questions or comments? 629 00:54:36,918 --> 00:54:42,358 Um, I will say that I'm very impressed by this 630 00:54:42,398 --> 00:54:45,718 proposal for a number of NI. I share the concerns 631 00:54:45,758 --> 00:54:49,318 about the secondary plan. I was very, I've been very 632 00:54:49,339 --> 00:54:54,518 vocal about that. I do have, um, just a couple 633 00:54:54,518 --> 00:54:58,598 of comments about the point of order. You are the 634 00:54:58,779 --> 00:55:02,166 chair. Yes. If you want to make comments, you're supposed 635 00:55:02,166 --> 00:55:06,166 to give up the chair. Okay. Um, to somebody who 636 00:55:06,206 --> 00:55:12,457 hasn't spoken yet. Is everybody spoken? No, no, then Council 637 00:55:12,457 --> 00:55:15,097 McDermott. No, no, no, Council Market. You can hand it 638 00:55:15,097 --> 00:55:20,577 to him. If everybody else has spoken. All right. I 639 00:55:20,617 --> 00:55:24,417 just wanted to comment on the fact that, uh, not 640 00:55:24,438 --> 00:55:28,017 only are they rental units, but there is a distribution 641 00:55:28,118 --> 00:55:32,497 of one, two, and three bedroom units. The one bedroom 642 00:55:32,678 --> 00:55:37,377 is, and we know about the discussions of the 400 643 00:55:37,558 --> 00:55:41,277 square foot units that are so common in Toronto, uh, 644 00:55:41,398 --> 00:55:46,097 and other large municipalities and have in fact killed the 645 00:55:46,097 --> 00:55:48,817 concept of a condo market and have become short term 646 00:55:48,857 --> 00:55:56,017 rentals. Um, these are family units as well as generously 647 00:55:56,838 --> 00:56:00,732 size that would be attractive to people downsizing. Most people 648 00:56:00,753 --> 00:56:03,292 going from a three bedroom house will not go into 649 00:56:03,713 --> 00:56:08,721 400. Square feet. So I did want to point that 650 00:56:08,742 --> 00:56:13,441 out. And I also wanted to comment on the owner's 651 00:56:13,481 --> 00:56:16,481 letter, which to me, and I may have a bit 652 00:56:16,502 --> 00:56:21,601 of a bias, but once again, it indicates the absolute 653 00:56:22,902 --> 00:56:30,801 essential fact that affordable housing, truly affordable housing requires 654 00:56:32,742 --> 00:56:36,401 cooperation of the federal and provincial governments. And I would 655 00:56:36,401 --> 00:56:41,121 say beyond simply applying for grants, um, I think it 656 00:56:41,121 --> 00:56:43,521 really points out to the fact that with a willing 657 00:56:43,942 --> 00:56:50,029 owner developer. We still do not have a strategy. At 658 00:56:50,029 --> 00:56:53,709 the federal and provincial levels for this type of housing. 659 00:56:53,709 --> 00:56:57,229 And that's a problem. People like Mr. Bramner have to 660 00:56:57,250 --> 00:57:01,469 compete with others for money that should be virtually given 661 00:57:01,650 --> 00:57:06,658 as of right. Just wanted to make that comment. Any 662 00:57:06,679 --> 00:57:11,062 further comments, questions on this. Now I'll call the boat 663 00:57:11,163 --> 00:57:21,101 almond paper. Posey penny. Carried. Thank you, 664 00:57:21,202 --> 00:57:25,741 Councillor McDermott. And just let me get back to my, 665 00:57:25,741 --> 00:57:33,181 um, agenda. So, uh, the next, um, report is PBBS 666 00:57:34,162 --> 00:57:39,181 - 38 - 2026. The Draft Community Improvement Plan and 667 00:57:39,181 --> 00:57:48,231 Designation of Community Improvement Project Areas. Move by Councillor McDermott. 668 00:57:48,231 --> 00:57:51,431 That report is now on the floor for comment and 669 00:57:51,612 --> 00:57:57,461 question. Yeah. A couple of questions. So in terms of 670 00:58:00,042 --> 00:58:02,661 the Correre CIPs, right now we're not putting more money 671 00:58:03,002 --> 00:58:08,901 in through our budget because we have adequate accumulated reserve. 672 00:58:08,901 --> 00:58:13,061 But what about, um, Brownfields? How are we managing that 673 00:58:13,162 --> 00:58:20,641 from a budget perspective. Um, Ms. Smith. Well, I don't 674 00:58:20,641 --> 00:58:23,681 know whether it might be the treasurer that can provide 675 00:58:23,782 --> 00:58:29,473 better information. Oh, okay. Mr. Jansen, can you speak to 676 00:58:29,473 --> 00:58:34,113 that? Sure, yes. Um, and, uh, I was a way 677 00:58:34,153 --> 00:58:36,593 at the time of this preparation. So Kimberlyn may have 678 00:58:36,633 --> 00:58:39,373 some more background than I do on this. But, uh, 679 00:58:39,574 --> 00:58:44,193 in the 2026 budget, we did approve just annual contributions 680 00:58:45,014 --> 00:58:48,593 only for the Affordable Housing CIB program of 200, 000 681 00:58:48,633 --> 00:58:54,913 dollars per year. Uh, current annual funding for those of 682 00:58:54,953 --> 00:58:56,833 the programs we've said in the report that we should 683 00:58:56,873 --> 00:59:00,193 be reviewing that, uh, this year and every year in 684 00:59:00,193 --> 00:59:03,993 terms of the sufficiency in annual usage of that. So 685 00:59:03,993 --> 00:59:06,913 that is, um, it's just with the dedicated with the 686 00:59:06,953 --> 00:59:16,631 Affordable Housing right now. Um, you know, I'm pondering 687 00:59:16,631 --> 00:59:19,991 that, I mean, the suggestion is we're going to be 688 00:59:20,012 --> 00:59:24,951 consolidating these programs, one of which is we have a 689 00:59:24,972 --> 00:59:28,951 large reserve, one of which we're allocating money on an 690 00:59:28,991 --> 00:59:33,485 annual basis. And one of which. Um, I guess we 691 00:59:33,485 --> 00:59:35,605 wait and see if something comes in. So how would 692 00:59:35,605 --> 00:59:40,645 we handle a brown field remediation application under this new 693 00:59:40,746 --> 00:59:45,097 framework. I don't know who can answer that. I'm not 694 00:59:45,137 --> 00:59:48,685 sure. Ms. Smith. Do you want to take a staff 695 00:59:48,786 --> 00:59:50,445 and then we'll see who else. 696 01:00:36,793 --> 01:00:39,172 With the treasurer and all that. The treasurer and all. 697 01:00:40,721 --> 01:00:47,346 The rehabilitation grant is funded. Yeah. I would have to 698 01:00:47,346 --> 01:00:50,386 come back to council with that because, um, we did 699 01:00:50,426 --> 01:00:53,906 make a few changes, um, to our funding with the 700 01:00:53,946 --> 01:00:59,186 2026 budget with some of the reserve contributions. And I 701 01:00:59,186 --> 01:01:02,226 don't believe we have anything dedicated at this point for 702 01:01:02,487 --> 01:01:07,586 Brownfield. It is just through that consolidated CIP reserve balances. 703 01:01:10,195 --> 01:01:13,614 Madam Chair, before I'm willing to move this forward to 704 01:01:13,654 --> 01:01:15,854 the next stage, which I think puts us on the 705 01:01:16,035 --> 01:01:21,374 tracks towards a destination, I'd like to get, um, that 706 01:01:21,475 --> 01:01:24,654 information from the treasurer, I'd also like an opportunity to 707 01:01:24,675 --> 01:01:28,014 review the information that Ms. Smith has passed onto us. 708 01:01:28,794 --> 01:01:31,333 I'm not going to move that we defer this until 709 01:01:32,554 --> 01:01:35,253 August the 24th until other councillors have a chance to 710 01:01:35,274 --> 01:01:40,053 speak. But I'm not really comfortable moving this forward without 711 01:01:40,154 --> 01:01:42,213 that additional information and a chance to think about this. 712 01:01:44,859 --> 01:01:49,061 Thank you. Thank you, Madam Chair. And, uh, I agree 713 01:01:49,101 --> 01:01:50,821 with some of the points. The mayor's made about the 714 01:01:50,861 --> 01:01:53,941 additional information. And I too haven't looked at everything that 715 01:01:53,981 --> 01:01:57,461 came through this evening. Um, I did want to throw 716 01:01:57,482 --> 01:02:00,341 out there two things that I'm interested to hear if 717 01:02:00,381 --> 01:02:06,821 what council's opinion is on keeping the residential intensification grant 718 01:02:07,482 --> 01:02:12,661 that was part of the previous CIPs in place for 719 01:02:12,701 --> 01:02:16,602 at least crystal beach. Potentially even for a period of 720 01:02:16,863 --> 01:02:19,082 time, like a shorter window even that I would be 721 01:02:19,263 --> 01:02:22,682 interested in, um, because I think that's part of the, 722 01:02:22,682 --> 01:02:25,162 what we've been trying to do in the downtown core 723 01:02:25,183 --> 01:02:28,842 and crystal beach is try and intensify the downtown core 724 01:02:28,882 --> 01:02:33,120 with people living above shops. Because we haven't had a 725 01:02:33,160 --> 01:02:36,080 CIP in place for all the reasons that lead up 726 01:02:36,120 --> 01:02:39,120 to why we haven't this understandable. But I would hate 727 01:02:39,120 --> 01:02:42,240 to see that go out without there being some opportunity 728 01:02:42,280 --> 01:02:44,640 for the community to be able to potentially benefit from 729 01:02:44,661 --> 01:02:50,676 that. The other is the inclusion of Rebstock Road south 730 01:02:50,716 --> 01:02:53,476 to Erie Road in the CIP, whether that be for 731 01:02:53,516 --> 01:02:56,676 the full period of time or for, like I said 732 01:02:56,676 --> 01:03:01,076 before with the residential intensification grant component, maybe a specific 733 01:03:01,097 --> 01:03:04,724 period of time. Mainly because that is a commercial core 734 01:03:04,745 --> 01:03:08,404 that does have a mixed use of, um, residential as 735 01:03:08,444 --> 01:03:12,004 well as commercial, but we do see, um, more commercial 736 01:03:12,105 --> 01:03:16,164 opening in that stretch. Um, with the, with the properties 737 01:03:16,204 --> 01:03:18,484 that I won't get into for the sake of time, 738 01:03:18,484 --> 01:03:21,444 but I just want to flag those two areas where 739 01:03:21,785 --> 01:03:23,924 I think we maybe we should have some discussion on 740 01:03:23,945 --> 01:03:28,225 adding those components to it. Um, and those were my 741 01:03:28,225 --> 01:03:31,425 only comments, um, and I do share the mayor's opinion 742 01:03:31,465 --> 01:03:32,785 that I think we should take a little bit more 743 01:03:32,886 --> 01:03:35,589 time to make sure we get this right. And also 744 01:03:35,589 --> 01:03:37,749 not delay it to the point where people who have 745 01:03:37,789 --> 01:03:41,109 been waiting for it, i. e. crystal beach forever that 746 01:03:41,109 --> 01:03:43,669 they don't have a program. They can take advantage of, 747 01:03:43,669 --> 01:03:46,229 but certainly want to make sure that all those opportunities 748 01:03:46,250 --> 01:03:48,949 that were there for other parts of town still exist 749 01:03:50,410 --> 01:03:55,669 for the one area in town that is our entertainment 750 01:03:55,850 --> 01:03:59,749 district, tourism district, um, that brings the most amount of 751 01:03:59,789 --> 01:04:04,229 tourists to the community. So thank you. Councillor Noyes. Thank 752 01:04:04,269 --> 01:04:07,029 you, Councillor Christensen. I'm going to ask that we do 753 01:04:07,210 --> 01:04:10,149 amend this, that we do not take out the residential 754 01:04:10,330 --> 01:04:16,411 intensive grant that it not be removed. That'd be remained 755 01:04:16,512 --> 01:04:20,652 in place with the understanding that it's either or. Either 756 01:04:20,692 --> 01:04:22,572 they take advantage of this one or they take advantage 757 01:04:22,593 --> 01:04:27,585 of their affordable housing. So you're proposing an amendment. Yes. 758 01:04:28,633 --> 01:04:32,049 Um. You worship your second eight? No, no, we don't 759 01:04:32,049 --> 01:04:34,129 need to second it. I want to speak to that. 760 01:04:34,129 --> 01:04:39,092 Okay. Um, I, well, I just wanted, did Councillinoise, did 761 01:04:39,092 --> 01:04:41,912 you have anything for the say? No, I think we've, 762 01:04:41,912 --> 01:04:45,352 we've talked about. I think it may neither or. Okay. 763 01:04:45,352 --> 01:04:48,632 All right. Your worship. So when that, um, when that 764 01:04:48,653 --> 01:04:53,752 grant was first brought forward, we were trying to get 765 01:04:53,933 --> 01:04:58,712 more rental accommodations within the downtown core areas to provide 766 01:04:58,733 --> 01:05:01,832 some vibrancy in those areas. And that was all well 767 01:05:01,832 --> 01:05:05,512 and good. The problem with it is that many of 768 01:05:05,512 --> 01:05:08,552 the units that were created were not affordable. There weren't 769 01:05:08,592 --> 01:05:11,672 close to affordable. And what we need is affordable housing 770 01:05:11,773 --> 01:05:16,712 units. So my concern is that we continue to fund 771 01:05:17,133 --> 01:05:20,072 something that's not what we really need, what we really 772 01:05:20,072 --> 01:05:22,792 need is affordable. I don't know whether that means that 773 01:05:22,832 --> 01:05:27,352 we should be looking at the definition of affordable in 774 01:05:27,352 --> 01:05:29,832 our affordable housing CIP. That's an issue that was raised 775 01:05:29,933 --> 01:05:34,072 by Mr. Bremner in discussing with us the challenges that 776 01:05:34,112 --> 01:05:37,112 he's faced with. If he's faced with that, everybody else 777 01:05:37,373 --> 01:05:45,021 is. I think our objective should be intensification for affordable, 778 01:05:45,021 --> 01:05:48,361 or at least attainable units or something other than, you 779 01:05:48,361 --> 01:05:52,381 know, an extravagant apartment unit that we're helping to subsidize 780 01:05:52,962 --> 01:05:56,061 to be built, which really doesn't hit the market that 781 01:05:56,101 --> 01:05:58,781 we're trying to help, which is those who need the 782 01:05:58,802 --> 01:06:02,621 accommodations. So I can support this if there were some 783 01:06:02,661 --> 01:06:06,141 qualifications. I can't support it without. And I think the 784 01:06:06,162 --> 01:06:11,021 qualifications ought to be tied in with a definition. Maybe 785 01:06:11,021 --> 01:06:16,061 not strictly affordable, maybe not even CMH C affordable because 786 01:06:16,162 --> 01:06:20,221 additional rental units certainly will help. But something that is 787 01:06:20,242 --> 01:06:24,941 maybe within attainable, or maybe it's a CMHC definition. So 788 01:06:26,162 --> 01:06:32,541 I can support, um, in principle without being tied to 789 01:06:32,562 --> 01:06:37,161 it in the final analysis or, as some of you 790 01:06:37,161 --> 01:06:39,341 might say, I can suck and blow at the same 791 01:06:39,341 --> 01:06:45,978 time. So I'm sympathetic. Some might say that, yeah. I 792 01:06:45,978 --> 01:06:49,058 think the guy on my right. So I can support 793 01:06:49,079 --> 01:06:52,658 it, but not unless we've got some parameters that are 794 01:06:52,999 --> 01:07:00,613 tighter than just intensification grant as it currently exists. Councillor 795 01:07:00,714 --> 01:07:05,343 Dubineau. Thank you very much, Madam Chair. I'm of a 796 01:07:05,343 --> 01:07:09,343 similar school of thought to the mayor. And he raised 797 01:07:09,383 --> 01:07:13,023 a good point about affordable, which, you know, there's so 798 01:07:13,023 --> 01:07:15,903 many definitions of affordable. There's rank gear to income. There's 799 01:07:16,244 --> 01:07:21,023 CMH C affordable. Um, we're seeing now the phrase attainable, 800 01:07:21,023 --> 01:07:25,663 which doesn't necessarily meet the definition quote unquote of affordable, 801 01:07:25,663 --> 01:07:28,383 but is still very reasonable compared to market rent that 802 01:07:28,383 --> 01:07:32,143 we see today. So the moving pieces and moving targets 803 01:07:32,143 --> 01:07:34,463 to this that I do think we need to look 804 01:07:34,484 --> 01:07:39,743 at. I agree that, um, we shouldn't be subsidizing and 805 01:07:39,764 --> 01:07:43,883 providing, you know, taxpayer dollars to units that are, you 806 01:07:43,883 --> 01:07:46,783 know, luxury, for lack of a better word that people 807 01:07:46,884 --> 01:07:50,783 could, uh, who would purchase them could afford or to 808 01:07:50,823 --> 01:07:53,663 subsidize them to make a unit luxury that should otherwise 809 01:07:53,703 --> 01:07:59,103 be affordable. I think, um, I'm, I'm, I'm generally supportive 810 01:07:59,143 --> 01:08:01,023 of this, but I think I get the feeling that 811 01:08:01,044 --> 01:08:04,783 there'll be a postponement put on the floor to move 812 01:08:04,804 --> 01:08:09,903 this till, uh, August 24th. I don't know if, if 813 01:08:10,004 --> 01:08:12,623 councillor noise is agreeable to waiting until we get some 814 01:08:12,644 --> 01:08:16,383 analysis and some information back from staff, um, to August 815 01:08:16,644 --> 01:08:19,663 24th. Maybe it might be a better time to move 816 01:08:19,703 --> 01:08:22,303 that at, you know, at that time, depending on the 817 01:08:22,324 --> 01:08:25,503 information we get back, um, that's my thought on that. 818 01:08:25,503 --> 01:08:27,663 Maybe we want to wait until staff give us some 819 01:08:27,663 --> 01:08:29,983 information and some thoughts on the comment tonight before we 820 01:08:30,023 --> 01:08:35,091 move them, uh, an amendment like that. And I hear 821 01:08:35,131 --> 01:08:37,731 everyone and I tend to agree to, to a certain 822 01:08:38,152 --> 01:08:40,771 extent. I know that I sit on the non - 823 01:08:40,771 --> 01:08:43,491 for - profit housing. We have two apartment buildings and 824 01:08:43,491 --> 01:08:47,411 we have two things. We have, um, year to income 825 01:08:47,592 --> 01:08:50,211 and we have market rent. And I'm saying the market 826 01:08:50,552 --> 01:08:53,891 rant that people pay in those apartments are considerably less 827 01:08:54,872 --> 01:08:58,451 than what the market rent would be for all of 828 01:08:58,451 --> 01:09:01,171 Fort Erie. So maybe there's some litmus test or whatever 829 01:09:01,272 --> 01:09:03,731 we can maybe tie it to something like what the 830 01:09:03,771 --> 01:09:06,531 region does in regards to market rant. And they have 831 01:09:06,531 --> 01:09:09,171 everything from one bedroom, two bedroom, three bedroom, whatever. And 832 01:09:09,592 --> 01:09:16,371 it's considerably less than, um, than what, if I was 833 01:09:16,371 --> 01:09:19,491 renting an albony place or someplace, considerably less than that. 834 01:09:19,491 --> 01:09:24,371 Actually, I think it's about 875 dollars. So maybe tying 835 01:09:24,371 --> 01:09:26,851 it to something like that. Um, would make sense. I 836 01:09:26,851 --> 01:09:31,011 don't know exactly where the cutoff is for affordability. What 837 01:09:31,011 --> 01:09:34,291 dollars amount we're looking at with the range for affordability 838 01:09:34,312 --> 01:09:41,076 would be. So I'm happy to. Pull my amendment back, 839 01:09:41,076 --> 01:09:43,316 um, and have some time for snap to come up 840 01:09:43,316 --> 01:09:47,866 with some suggestions. But I don't want anything extravagant. But 841 01:09:47,866 --> 01:09:52,746 again, they're only going to be allowed 20, 000 or 842 01:09:52,746 --> 01:10:01,304 four. 5, 004. Yeah. 20, 000 maximum anyway. So. You 843 01:10:01,565 --> 01:10:07,944 had indicated that you were prepared to defer until. Right. 844 01:10:08,765 --> 01:10:11,384 If everybody's finished commenting because I want to make sure 845 01:10:11,384 --> 01:10:14,011 that, uh, Ms. Smith has. Want to make sure Ms 846 01:10:14,032 --> 01:10:17,371 Smith has adequate feedback from us so that she gets 847 01:10:17,552 --> 01:10:20,491 some direction, um, so yeah, I would, I would like 848 01:10:20,491 --> 01:10:23,291 to move that we defer this consideration of this report 849 01:10:23,392 --> 01:10:29,743 to the Council meeting schedule for August the 24th. Thank 850 01:10:29,743 --> 01:10:37,416 you. The next report. We have to vote on that. 851 01:10:37,416 --> 01:10:40,001 Oh, we have to vote on that. Okay. Sorry. Yes. 852 01:10:40,102 --> 01:10:46,216 Um, all those in favor of deferring. All those posed. 853 01:10:47,821 --> 01:10:53,443 That motion carries. Um, so our next report is PBBS 854 01:10:53,944 --> 01:10:57,763 39 - 2026. This is the extension of the draft 855 01:10:57,944 --> 01:11:01,203 plan approval of subdivision and draft plan of condominium approval 856 01:11:01,864 --> 01:11:08,163 recommendation report for 3303 Dominion Road. Can I get councillor 857 01:11:08,264 --> 01:11:12,563 Dubino that report is now on the floor for questions 858 01:11:12,744 --> 01:11:21,599 and comments. Councillor Duvenau. Thank you very much, Madam Chair. 859 01:11:21,599 --> 01:11:27,119 Um, just wondering if staff perhaps, um, want to offer 860 01:11:27,140 --> 01:11:29,519 up some comment on this. It is a three year 861 01:11:29,519 --> 01:11:33,039 extension, um, but I had made some comments earlier about, 862 01:11:33,039 --> 01:11:36,059 uh, the, the condo market and how that shifted. And 863 01:11:36,059 --> 01:11:39,279 I'm just wondering if, um, the developer is given any 864 01:11:39,319 --> 01:11:43,439 indication that, um, they still want to move forward. They're 865 01:11:43,479 --> 01:11:46,799 just waiting for better timing or has there been no 866 01:11:46,820 --> 01:11:50,559 communication? I'm just trying to get, uh, feel for this 867 01:11:50,660 --> 01:11:52,879 because I don't like kicking the can down the road, 868 01:11:52,879 --> 01:11:54,639 but at the same time I understand there's a practical 869 01:11:54,740 --> 01:11:58,639 reality that everyone has to face when market forces don't 870 01:11:58,679 --> 01:12:01,759 go the way they intend. And, uh, I think everyone 871 01:12:01,799 --> 01:12:03,599 should be offered an opportunity to wait for them to 872 01:12:03,700 --> 01:12:05,999 improve. So I'm just wondering if maybe staff have some 873 01:12:05,999 --> 01:12:10,799 thoughts. Madam Shed through you to the councillor, um, it's 874 01:12:10,820 --> 01:12:15,519 my understanding speaking with staff that the applicant is committed 875 01:12:15,559 --> 01:12:18,479 to moving forward, but it's just that the market situation 876 01:12:18,500 --> 01:12:20,879 is not good. And that is a reason they have 877 01:12:20,900 --> 01:12:30,029 requested an extension. Um, your worship. You're finished? Um, well, 878 01:12:30,029 --> 01:12:32,109 so I did ask some information about this because we 879 01:12:32,149 --> 01:12:36,269 didn't have an indication of where the developer is in 880 01:12:36,309 --> 01:12:39,149 connection with what steps they had been taking since this 881 01:12:39,149 --> 01:12:46,691 was approved. Three years ago. And, um. You know, they 882 01:12:46,712 --> 01:12:50,931 submitted some, um, information about a little over 18 months 883 01:12:50,931 --> 01:12:53,891 ago. They received a response from the town staff in 884 01:12:53,912 --> 01:12:59,091 February of 2025. Nothing has happened since February of 2025. 885 01:12:59,091 --> 01:13:01,011 So that's a year and a half that's gone by. 886 01:13:01,112 --> 01:13:04,211 I get it. Uh, they're in, they're concerned about the 887 01:13:04,251 --> 01:13:07,392 market. I follow that. But the information we did receive 888 01:13:07,432 --> 01:13:13,152 from staff indicates that of the 35 subdivision conditions, three 889 01:13:13,152 --> 01:13:16,832 have been cleared ate, they're working on, which means there's 890 01:13:17,013 --> 01:13:23,186 24 still to go. The condominium, uh, application, the conditions, 891 01:13:24,167 --> 01:13:27,824 none have been cleared. Five, they're working on. And that 892 01:13:27,824 --> 01:13:31,664 means there's seven that still need to be addressed. So 893 01:13:32,645 --> 01:13:38,521 out of 47, 31 haven't really moved at all. The 894 01:13:38,622 --> 01:13:44,521 letter from the, um, planning consultant of the developer indicates 895 01:13:44,521 --> 01:13:49,321 that they're actively engaged in trying to address these conditions. 896 01:13:49,321 --> 01:13:53,001 Well, they're not actively engaged in trying to meet these 897 01:13:53,022 --> 01:13:58,452 conditions if what we're told by staff is accurate. I'm 898 01:13:58,492 --> 01:14:01,892 not really inclined to agree to a three - year 899 01:14:01,892 --> 01:14:03,976 extension. I'm not even sure I want to go along 900 01:14:04,016 --> 01:14:09,496 with two years, but the market is a reality. And, 901 01:14:09,496 --> 01:14:13,736 um, I'd be prepared to extend this for two years, 902 01:14:13,736 --> 01:14:16,696 but not beyond two years. And then if they've made 903 01:14:16,736 --> 01:14:19,656 some headway over that two year period, great. Then we 904 01:14:19,656 --> 01:14:23,016 can consider where they are. But right now they're in 905 01:14:23,016 --> 01:14:25,798 a holding pattern. And we're under a lot of pressure 906 01:14:25,819 --> 01:14:28,918 from the provincial government through a whole bunch of rules 907 01:14:29,179 --> 01:14:33,423 to try to get new housing units built. This isn't 908 01:14:33,463 --> 01:14:37,850 helping. And, you know, this could be another couple of 909 01:14:37,850 --> 01:14:40,490 years before we see anything on this site. Hopefully we 910 01:14:40,490 --> 01:14:46,496 will. I'm, um, I have no reason to doubt that 911 01:14:46,597 --> 01:14:50,096 the developer eventually wants to proceed, but we need housing. 912 01:14:50,096 --> 01:14:53,536 And we need, we need units now rather than later. 913 01:14:53,536 --> 01:14:56,736 So Madam Chair, I'm going to remove that we amend 914 01:14:56,776 --> 01:14:59,456 the report to save a two year extension as opposed 915 01:14:59,456 --> 01:15:04,778 to a three year extension. Are there any comments. Councillor 916 01:15:04,818 --> 01:15:08,779 Dubino. Yeah. Just, just for the sake of the record, 917 01:15:08,779 --> 01:15:12,779 the applicant will, and staff can clarify this, if the 918 01:15:12,819 --> 01:15:15,579 applicant does move forward and show some progress, they will 919 01:15:15,579 --> 01:15:18,539 have the opportunity to come back to council. Um, because 920 01:15:18,579 --> 01:15:21,579 I sympathize with the reality of the market right now. 921 01:15:21,579 --> 01:15:24,199 The floor has fallen out of the condo market. But 922 01:15:24,199 --> 01:15:27,299 I completely understand where the mayor is coming from. We 923 01:15:27,299 --> 01:15:29,499 are under a lot of pressure from Queen's Park to 924 01:15:29,499 --> 01:15:33,019 get things moving forward. And, um, I think this allows 925 01:15:33,200 --> 01:15:35,739 us the ability to have some eyes on it to 926 01:15:35,739 --> 01:15:37,719 move forward. So I'm just wondering if staff can, uh, 927 01:15:38,000 --> 01:15:40,439 just put that on the record. We'll be good. Um, 928 01:15:41,040 --> 01:15:43,499 to have something come back if they request another extension 929 01:15:43,920 --> 01:15:53,386 in two years. If there's progress. Thank you, Councillor Kristen. 930 01:15:53,426 --> 01:15:55,466 Is there any way that, and I'm in full support 931 01:15:55,506 --> 01:15:59,146 of the mayor's suggestion. Is there any way that we 932 01:15:59,146 --> 01:16:02,986 can also add to that some targeted conditions that be 933 01:16:03,026 --> 01:16:05,786 approved of whether it's, okay, right now it's like maybe 934 01:16:06,047 --> 01:16:09,106 a quarter. And that's a, you know, we want to 935 01:16:09,106 --> 01:16:13,330 see progress every year to a certain extent. Like. 10, 936 01:16:13,330 --> 01:16:16,050 you know, like some, some numbers so that we're not 937 01:16:16,090 --> 01:16:18,610 right back here on the same place with the conditions, 938 01:16:18,610 --> 01:16:20,290 not me being met, that they have to basically put 939 01:16:20,391 --> 01:16:27,650 some, um, some substantial movement forward within those two years. 940 01:16:30,693 --> 01:16:35,072 So in response to that, ideally in two years, they 941 01:16:35,093 --> 01:16:37,352 will have met all these conditions. I don't want to 942 01:16:37,352 --> 01:16:41,312 be setting a bar for them which they can limp 943 01:16:41,352 --> 01:16:43,832 to and then say, okay, we made it. Give us 944 01:16:43,832 --> 01:16:46,990 another two years. I think the proof will be in 945 01:16:46,990 --> 01:16:50,190 the pudding. If they've made progress, uh, that's, that's one 946 01:16:50,190 --> 01:16:53,930 thing. But if we get another report that says, you 947 01:16:53,930 --> 01:16:58,430 know, there's still miles away. It tends to indicate that, 948 01:16:58,430 --> 01:17:00,510 okay, we're in a holding pattern. This is a piece 949 01:17:00,550 --> 01:17:03,950 of property that's not being developed and nothing can be 950 01:17:03,990 --> 01:17:07,870 done with it because we keep extending the time for 951 01:17:07,910 --> 01:17:10,670 them to meet the approval. So I think we just 952 01:17:10,670 --> 01:17:14,008 say, you know what two years. Come back to us 953 01:17:14,509 --> 01:17:16,168 if there's progress. We're not going to cut you off 954 01:17:16,269 --> 01:17:18,968 at the knees or whoever's here isn't like you're going 955 01:17:18,968 --> 01:17:20,248 to cut you off at the knees. But we need 956 01:17:20,288 --> 01:17:24,008 to see something more than just, you know, we're, we're, 957 01:17:24,008 --> 01:17:29,415 we're, we're working at it. So are there any no 958 01:17:29,415 --> 01:17:33,895 other comments? So I'll call the amendment all those in 959 01:17:33,935 --> 01:17:40,408 favor. Opposed. That amendment carries. 960 01:17:44,277 --> 01:17:47,856 We'll now call the report as amended. All those in 961 01:17:47,896 --> 01:17:56,572 favor. Opposed. That also is carried. Um, the final report 962 01:17:56,753 --> 01:18:02,332 this evening is PBBS 40 - 206, a part name 963 01:18:02,353 --> 01:18:11,763 proposal for 3440 Thunder Bay. So moved. Yes, your 964 01:18:11,763 --> 01:18:19,812 worship. This is, um. I think this is an excellent 965 01:18:20,233 --> 01:18:23,172 result. And I know that the author of the Report 966 01:18:24,233 --> 01:18:29,252 has misgivings. And, um, I've never read a report that 967 01:18:29,273 --> 01:18:31,332 goes around and around and around and comes to some 968 01:18:31,372 --> 01:18:36,266 place where the report wouldn't suggest it's going. But to 969 01:18:36,306 --> 01:18:39,866 name this park after Earl Plato doesn't really detract from 970 01:18:41,647 --> 01:18:44,826 the idea that there's an area in town called Thunder 971 01:18:44,847 --> 01:18:49,952 Bay. And that if we don't call this part Thunder 972 01:18:49,992 --> 01:18:53,676 Bay Park, somehow that's going to be lost. If you 973 01:18:53,697 --> 01:18:58,636 ask anybody where the Thunder Bay Golf Course was, they 974 01:18:58,676 --> 01:19:01,823 would have told you Ridgway. If you ask where Ridgway 975 01:19:01,844 --> 01:19:04,223 Shore's Golf Course was, they would have told you Ridgway. 976 01:19:05,439 --> 01:19:08,298 If they ask you, if you're from Ridgway and they 977 01:19:08,298 --> 01:19:11,338 say, is that Thunder Bay, they will tell you, no, 978 01:19:11,338 --> 01:19:13,738 that's not Thunder Bay. That's Ridgway. Thunder Bay starts at 979 01:19:14,479 --> 01:19:20,779 Maple Leaf or Pleasant Avenue and goes east. So I'm 980 01:19:20,800 --> 01:19:24,939 thinking that the name Thunder Bay, the geographic location Thunder 981 01:19:24,960 --> 01:19:27,179 Bay is not going to be lost because we call 982 01:19:27,219 --> 01:19:30,219 this Earl Plato Park. And I think it's a tremendous 983 01:19:30,400 --> 01:19:33,819 tribute to an individual who spent a lot of time 984 01:19:34,320 --> 01:19:38,139 educating, not just children, but because he was an educator, 985 01:19:38,139 --> 01:19:41,979 but also the public at large in generations of a 986 01:19:42,080 --> 01:19:45,659 naturalist and environmentalist. And, you know, when you think of 987 01:19:46,960 --> 01:19:51,739 individuals who had an impact on the education of the 988 01:19:51,760 --> 01:19:57,739 population about our natural environment, you think Burt Miller, Plato. 989 01:19:57,739 --> 01:20:01,659 So I think this is a fitting tribute. And I'm 990 01:20:01,699 --> 01:20:05,499 pleased to see that the recommendation is coming forward in 991 01:20:05,520 --> 01:20:08,139 this regard. And I hope the Council will support this. 992 01:20:08,400 --> 01:20:11,419 Also a support, a review of the terms of the 993 01:20:11,920 --> 01:20:14,699 part naming policy, um, if that's necessary, I think that 994 01:20:14,739 --> 01:20:17,579 could be updated. So I'm, if you haven't guessed, I'm 995 01:20:17,600 --> 01:20:25,032 supportive of this. Are there any other comments, questions. I'll 996 01:20:25,072 --> 01:20:28,712 just jump in very briefly further to the mayor's comments. 997 01:20:28,712 --> 01:20:30,312 I just want to say, as more and more new 998 01:20:30,312 --> 01:20:34,072 people move into our community to contribute to the development 999 01:20:34,112 --> 01:20:37,192 of our community, I think it's important that we ensure 1000 01:20:37,213 --> 01:20:40,837 that we. Highlight some of the history and the historical 1001 01:20:40,938 --> 01:20:44,437 aspects and some of the components that help shape our 1002 01:20:44,458 --> 01:20:47,797 community to turn it into the community that it is 1003 01:20:48,458 --> 01:20:51,957 that welcomes new people here. And you see new people 1004 01:20:51,978 --> 01:20:55,957 choosing to call the Community, our community home to them 1005 01:20:55,978 --> 01:20:59,637 as well. So I think acknowledging that people know we're 1006 01:20:59,677 --> 01:21:03,397 Thunder Bay is Thunder Bay is never going anywhere. It's 1007 01:21:03,397 --> 01:21:07,477 not like the, uh, the, um, the Gulf of Mexico 1008 01:21:08,138 --> 01:21:12,417 being changed to, you know, the Gulf of USA. But 1009 01:21:12,417 --> 01:21:14,757 I think this is very fitting. It's certainly someone in 1010 01:21:14,757 --> 01:21:18,197 the Community who, as the mayor said, has contributed and 1011 01:21:18,237 --> 01:21:25,277 I too am supportive. Councillor Flag. Thank you, Chair. Just, 1012 01:21:25,277 --> 01:21:29,117 uh, I guess a point of clarification. Within this report 1013 01:21:29,138 --> 01:21:34,717 as PBS 54 2025 as well. I'm wondering what the 1014 01:21:34,978 --> 01:21:37,517 current status of that report is and whether we have 1015 01:21:37,517 --> 01:21:42,157 to, um, defeat that report, whether that report was tabled 1016 01:21:42,178 --> 01:21:46,317 or anything like that before we can approve the report, 1017 01:21:46,317 --> 01:21:47,997 um, that we're considering this evening. 1018 01:21:56,441 --> 01:21:59,700 Yep, through you chair. Uh, typically we like to include, 1019 01:21:59,700 --> 01:22:01,860 uh, when we have, uh, a report on the same 1020 01:22:01,961 --> 01:22:05,300 matter that the previous report be received. That's typical to 1021 01:22:05,340 --> 01:22:08,020 have that in a recommendations. We don't have it here. 1022 01:22:08,020 --> 01:22:12,260 Um, that report, we would consider spent at this point. 1023 01:22:12,260 --> 01:22:17,026 And the address that I don't believe. As an answered, 1024 01:22:17,026 --> 01:22:23,762 thank you. Um. Being no more comments or questions, I 1025 01:22:23,762 --> 01:22:28,846 will, uh, call the question all those in favor. Opposed. 1026 01:22:32,409 --> 01:22:39,355 Don't dare. Gee, was that a threat. None opposed. So 1027 01:22:39,355 --> 01:22:46,851 that carries. Not chairman like I realise your worship. But 1028 01:22:46,952 --> 01:22:55,322 whatever. Um, so, uh, do we have any new business 1029 01:22:55,903 --> 01:22:59,777 or inquiries this evening. Your worship? Just following the, um, 1030 01:23:00,378 --> 01:23:05,317 consideration of the, um, consolidated CIP and the discussion around 1031 01:23:05,738 --> 01:23:10,197 the Affordable Housing. Just want to make sure that when, 1032 01:23:10,197 --> 01:23:13,077 um, the CIP report comes back, there will be some 1033 01:23:13,117 --> 01:23:16,837 consideration given to whether we need to change our definition 1034 01:23:16,858 --> 01:23:20,917 of affordable housing in our affordable housing CIP. Can I 1035 01:23:20,917 --> 01:23:24,517 just get confirmation that that will be considered by Ms. 1036 01:23:24,557 --> 01:23:31,097 Smith. De warrior. Madam Chair ESP would definitely have a 1037 01:23:31,137 --> 01:23:34,610 look at it. Okay. Thank you. Any other new business 1038 01:23:35,191 --> 01:23:40,440 or inquiries. That being the case will move on to 1039 01:23:40,440 --> 01:23:45,000 the business status report. Any questions about the business status 1040 01:23:45,040 --> 01:23:50,837 report. None being seen. That concludes the business of the 1041 01:23:51,738 --> 01:23:55,237 Planning Business and Bylaw Committee. And I turn the chair 1042 01:23:55,258 --> 01:23:58,097 back to you. Thank you very much, Councillor Kristensen. Um, 1043 01:23:58,097 --> 01:24:02,245 that takes us to Infrastructure Services. Councillor Lewis. Thank you. 1044 01:24:02,285 --> 01:24:05,685 We have a packed agenda tonight. Andrea Infrastructure with no 1045 01:24:05,706 --> 01:24:10,965 presentations or delegations, no reports. Um, are there any matters 1046 01:24:10,965 --> 01:24:15,249 of new business or inquiries for members. Councillor Flag. Thank 1047 01:24:15,249 --> 01:24:18,769 you, Chair. Um, in previous meetings, we've had a discussion 1048 01:24:18,870 --> 01:24:22,589 about the corner of Mitch Nern, Point Abno Road, uh, 1049 01:24:22,710 --> 01:24:27,729 with respect to traffic calming and daylight triangles. And I'm 1050 01:24:27,729 --> 01:24:30,289 just wondering, um, if we can get a report as 1051 01:24:30,329 --> 01:24:33,809 to where we are with that from staff, um, I've 1052 01:24:33,849 --> 01:24:37,089 driven that stretch, um, a number of times in the 1053 01:24:37,089 --> 01:24:40,449 last three weeks and find it very difficult. Um, and 1054 01:24:40,790 --> 01:24:43,409 I know that there has been some other individuals that 1055 01:24:43,430 --> 01:24:46,529 have reached out with the same concerns, um, and I'm 1056 01:24:46,529 --> 01:24:49,649 hopeful that staff can get us a report sooner than 1057 01:24:49,689 --> 01:24:52,871 later. Thank you, Councillor Flag. And I know the mayor 1058 01:24:52,911 --> 01:24:54,551 and I have spoke on this one as well. It's 1059 01:24:54,591 --> 01:24:57,991 come up at infrastructure services. And I believe is scheduled 1060 01:24:58,012 --> 01:25:03,591 for, um, traffic coordinating. Um, but, uh, director Clint, any 1061 01:25:03,612 --> 01:25:07,016 comments on that. Through you, Chair. Yes. I did speak 1062 01:25:07,037 --> 01:25:10,456 with, um, Tommy Peasl before this meeting. He did provide 1063 01:25:10,456 --> 01:25:13,576 me with some updates, which I can share. Um, so 1064 01:25:13,677 --> 01:25:16,776 he did mention that staffer currently brushing, um, for sight 1065 01:25:16,816 --> 01:25:19,096 lines. And that they are planning to bring it to 1066 01:25:19,096 --> 01:25:22,296 the traffic coordinating for review September 16th. That was the, 1067 01:25:22,296 --> 01:25:24,216 uh, the Information I received from him. I hope that 1068 01:25:24,216 --> 01:25:29,924 helps. Thank you. Thank you, Director Flag. Anything further? Nothing 1069 01:25:30,105 --> 01:25:33,364 further. I appreciate the soundtrack. Thank you. Any other questions 1070 01:25:33,785 --> 01:25:37,375 from members of Council. Seeing none, I just want to 1071 01:25:37,375 --> 01:25:41,335 add to that one, um, Director Clint, Mitchener and Far 1072 01:25:41,335 --> 01:25:45,155 Avenue or Mitchner to Fire Avenue in that section. Um, 1073 01:25:45,596 --> 01:25:48,615 should also maybe be flagged for traffic coordinating as well. 1074 01:25:49,038 --> 01:25:51,977 Um, if there are no other questions, I did have 1075 01:25:52,158 --> 01:25:58,937 one, um, pardon me? Oh, Councillor Christensen, go ahead. Yes, 1076 01:25:58,958 --> 01:26:02,137 Chair, and I'm not entirely certain where to raise this, 1077 01:26:02,137 --> 01:26:06,617 but it's a question. As you're aware, there has been, 1078 01:26:07,918 --> 01:26:11,737 uh, concerns expressed with respect to, um, the use of 1079 01:26:11,737 --> 01:26:15,657 motorized vehicles on trails requesting signage, which has been put 1080 01:26:15,657 --> 01:26:18,537 up in Shag Park Park. Thank you very much. Um, 1081 01:26:18,798 --> 01:26:24,457 and with respect to speeding and we have had media, 1082 01:26:24,457 --> 01:26:30,837 um, campaign initiated to educate the public on this. Um, 1083 01:26:31,758 --> 01:26:36,137 I wondered, I actually had someone, uh, raised the question 1084 01:26:36,318 --> 01:26:40,857 with me, uh, with respect to people who use pedal 1085 01:26:40,857 --> 01:26:46,657 assisted. Bikes and who have mild disabilities. Um, have difficulty 1086 01:26:46,657 --> 01:26:50,097 using a regular bike. And I did some research and 1087 01:26:50,137 --> 01:26:54,257 found out that there is a piece of legislation that 1088 01:26:54,438 --> 01:26:58,737 will actually set up classes of motorized vehicles with class 1089 01:26:58,758 --> 01:27:04,577 one being the, um, pedal assist bikes. And in other 1090 01:27:04,617 --> 01:27:09,537 provinces, their distinguished from others. My question is, would it 1091 01:27:09,537 --> 01:27:13,297 be possible to find out the current status? I understand 1092 01:27:13,398 --> 01:27:16,897 it is not being proclaimed. And I just wondered whether 1093 01:27:17,718 --> 01:27:21,377 you could find out what the current status or speak 1094 01:27:21,377 --> 01:27:24,337 to someone at the province who actually can give you 1095 01:27:24,358 --> 01:27:26,977 a little bit of background on when it will be 1096 01:27:27,478 --> 01:27:31,937 proclaimed, um, because then I might have a motion if 1097 01:27:31,937 --> 01:27:37,029 I know that. Through, through you, Chair, yeah, that's not 1098 01:27:37,029 --> 01:27:39,669 a problem. We can investigate that further. Thank you. Perfect. 1099 01:27:39,669 --> 01:27:41,829 And then the other component to that would be enforcement 1100 01:27:41,850 --> 01:27:45,349 on which we're already working on. Yes. And my mine 1101 01:27:45,349 --> 01:27:48,549 is simply a question at this point because it is, 1102 01:27:48,549 --> 01:27:52,296 um, they are not permitted. So yeah. Thank you. Any 1103 01:27:52,336 --> 01:27:56,056 other questions from council? If none, I do have one, 1104 01:27:56,056 --> 01:27:59,336 uh, director Clint, one question for you. I know it's 1105 01:27:59,376 --> 01:28:02,136 only August 10th, but I'm just wondering when we would 1106 01:28:02,157 --> 01:28:10,925 expect timing on the babych operational report for 2026. To 1107 01:28:10,965 --> 01:28:13,325 you, Chair, we're hoping to have it, I would say 1108 01:28:13,365 --> 01:28:16,285 at the end of December or December, if not early 1109 01:28:16,325 --> 01:28:20,838 January. And if I could continue with that, thank you. 1110 01:28:20,838 --> 01:28:23,638 Reason for bringing this up, I'd like to ask staff 1111 01:28:23,899 --> 01:28:27,638 that when bringing forward the end of your bay beach 1112 01:28:27,678 --> 01:28:30,958 report that we, in addition to the regular updates, we 1113 01:28:31,099 --> 01:28:35,398 receive on operations, attendance, revenues. We take a closer look 1114 01:28:35,398 --> 01:28:39,558 at the breakdown on revenue's generated from 40er residents compared 1115 01:28:39,558 --> 01:28:43,660 to non - residents. Um, with the said like to 1116 01:28:43,700 --> 01:28:47,580 also ask staff to include a scenario for council's consideration 1117 01:28:47,761 --> 01:28:50,700 in the upcoming budget that looks at the financial impact 1118 01:28:50,961 --> 01:28:57,820 of providing free beach passes to Fordieri residents, um, specifically 1119 01:28:57,820 --> 01:29:01,980 what revenues we would potentially be giving up by eliminating, 1120 01:29:01,980 --> 01:29:06,860 um, residential pass fees. And are there reasonable ways that 1121 01:29:07,041 --> 01:29:12,460 revenues could be absorbed within existing operations to recover those, 1122 01:29:12,460 --> 01:29:16,540 um, other revenues, including non - resident fees. Um, I 1123 01:29:16,580 --> 01:29:19,020 believe this is something that council may want to consider 1124 01:29:19,601 --> 01:29:21,980 or at least we should have the options, um, in 1125 01:29:21,980 --> 01:29:24,620 front of us in order to have those conversations in 1126 01:29:24,620 --> 01:29:28,860 the upcoming budget. So having that financial information and some 1127 01:29:28,860 --> 01:29:33,180 potential options available to council, I think would be helpful. 1128 01:29:33,180 --> 01:29:35,420 Um, I'm by no means suggesting that we want to 1129 01:29:35,460 --> 01:29:38,700 make this decision, um, I'm simply asking that we have 1130 01:29:38,740 --> 01:29:40,860 those numbers in front of us so that when we 1131 01:29:40,860 --> 01:29:44,300 look at this report, we're prepared to have further discussion. 1132 01:29:44,801 --> 01:29:46,700 Councillor Lewis, I'm going to suggest that that should be 1133 01:29:46,801 --> 01:29:50,446 a notice of motion at the August 24th meeting. Uh, 1134 01:29:50,446 --> 01:29:53,166 the time between then and the report. And that can 1135 01:29:53,166 --> 01:29:55,486 be dealt with in September. It'll give direction. Staff has 1136 01:29:55,526 --> 01:29:58,126 an idea where you're heading. But I think there's sufficient 1137 01:29:59,107 --> 01:30:01,566 work involved in that that's something that should be a 1138 01:30:01,606 --> 01:30:04,446 notice of motion. Absolutely. And I have no problem bringing 1139 01:30:04,486 --> 01:30:07,632 it up in that fashion. Thank you. Thank you, staff. 1140 01:30:07,632 --> 01:30:12,032 Um, if the, um, comments from council, I will move 1141 01:30:12,032 --> 01:30:14,432 that on to the business status report. There are two 1142 01:30:14,432 --> 01:30:17,023 items in that report. Are there any questions or comments 1143 01:30:17,124 --> 01:30:19,663 related to that? Seeing none, I will turn it back 1144 01:30:19,844 --> 01:30:23,343 to you, your worship. Thank you, Councillor Lewis. That takes 1145 01:30:23,383 --> 01:30:28,078 us then to Corporate Services Council flag. Thank you worship 1146 01:30:28,339 --> 01:30:31,278 Corporate Community Services. Now in Session, we have no presentations 1147 01:30:31,539 --> 01:30:34,398 or delegations this evening. One report on the floor looking 1148 01:30:34,398 --> 01:30:40,396 for a seconder. Thank you. Um, by your worship, move 1149 01:30:40,396 --> 01:30:47,326 by your worship comments, your worship. The report indicates that 1150 01:30:47,507 --> 01:30:49,886 there were some, there were some consideration given to what 1151 01:30:49,886 --> 01:30:55,006 other municipalities are doing and didn't really specify which ones 1152 01:30:55,046 --> 01:30:58,986 they might be. But it also indicated that this, um, 1153 01:30:59,667 --> 01:31:03,166 agreement that's been negotiated for the extension with TD Banking 1154 01:31:05,027 --> 01:31:08,526 is favorable to the, to the town. But there is 1155 01:31:08,566 --> 01:31:14,366 nothing to indicate what other banks are offering or doing. 1156 01:31:14,366 --> 01:31:17,866 I'm going to support this, but I would like, uh, 1157 01:31:17,907 --> 01:31:20,846 before the bylaw comes forward to get some information from 1158 01:31:21,027 --> 01:31:23,886 staff with respect to what the other banks have been 1159 01:31:23,987 --> 01:31:27,566 offering, what other municipalities may be able to have generated 1160 01:31:27,907 --> 01:31:31,166 because the end of the report suggests that it may 1161 01:31:31,206 --> 01:31:33,486 be coming time when we would want to go out 1162 01:31:33,486 --> 01:31:41,027 to the market again. Thank you. Other comments. Seeing none, 1163 01:31:41,027 --> 01:31:45,944 all those in favor. Unopposed, that carries. Brings us the 1164 01:31:45,944 --> 01:31:52,615 new business inquiries. Questions on the business status report. Seeing 1165 01:31:52,716 --> 01:31:55,095 none, I'll close that and turn it back to you, 1166 01:31:55,095 --> 01:31:58,819 worship. Thank you very much, Councillor Flag. That was, uh, 1167 01:31:59,420 --> 01:32:07,561 quite expeditious. Um, okay, scheduling of meetings. Councillor Noyes. There's 1168 01:32:07,561 --> 01:32:10,761 an SBCA meeting on the 20th. I think about five 1169 01:32:10,801 --> 01:32:18,900 o'clock at the chair's house. Mary Reinhardt. You say 5 1170 01:32:18,921 --> 01:32:24,709 p. m. Yes. Any other meetings. Councillor Lewis. We have 1171 01:32:24,709 --> 01:32:30,149 the crystal beach BIA meeting business improvement this area board 1172 01:32:30,149 --> 01:32:33,269 of management meeting on Wednesday, August the 12th at 6 1173 01:32:33,290 --> 01:32:37,485 p. m. And Wednesday, August the 12th at 5 p. 1174 01:32:37,485 --> 01:32:42,372 m. is the next meeting for EAC. Okay. Anyone else. 1175 01:32:43,574 --> 01:32:48,993 If not, that, sorry, Councillor Noise. There also non - 1176 01:32:48,993 --> 01:32:51,903 for - profit housing meeting on the 19th. The Wednesday, 1177 01:32:51,903 --> 01:32:57,540 and it's usually at Betty. S. At nine. 9 a. 1178 01:32:57,540 --> 01:33:04,763 m. The date on that again. Thank you. Any others. 1179 01:33:06,316 --> 01:33:09,411 Contraduino. Yes, sir. I'd like to move the council and 1180 01:33:09,411 --> 01:33:12,800 committee adjourn this evening at 722 p. m. All those 1181 01:33:12,840 --> 01:33:16,988 in favor. Unanimous. Thank you all.