1 00:03:45,560 --> 00:04:03,060 We have five members of the Planning Commission that are President which constitutes a Quorum. Our first item this evening is an organizational meeting item from the Election of the Officers, the First Item of Business is an Election of Chair and Vice-Chair and the Degs and 2 00:04:03,060 --> 00:04:05,320 Nations of Secretary and parliamentarians. 3 00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:08,620 for the 2024 term of the planning commission. 4 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:14,120 So, right to the chase, is there a motion to nominate the chair for the planning commission? 5 00:04:15,300 --> 00:04:20,480 Mr. Chairman, I nominate Michael Rumbio as the chairman. 6 00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:21,900 Second. 7 00:04:22,880 --> 00:04:26,400 We have a motion by Commissioner McFarlane, a second by Vice Chair Burke, 8 00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:28,160 is there any discussion on the motion? 9 00:04:32,950 --> 00:04:36,790 Seeing none, I will call for the vote and ask for the clerk to call the roll. 10 00:04:36,790 --> 00:04:38,470 Commissioner Donahue? 11 00:04:38,670 --> 00:04:39,010 Yes. 12 00:04:39,790 --> 00:04:40,930 Commissioner Mark Farland? 13 00:04:41,270 --> 00:04:41,490 Yes. 14 00:04:43,130 --> 00:04:44,050 Commissioner Johannes? 15 00:04:44,890 --> 00:04:45,070 Yes. 16 00:04:46,310 --> 00:04:47,010 Vice Chair Burke? 17 00:04:47,490 --> 00:04:47,670 Yes. 18 00:04:48,490 --> 00:04:49,350 Chair Romeo? 19 00:04:49,830 --> 00:04:51,310 I will also support that motion. 20 00:04:51,650 --> 00:04:58,250 It will pass 5-0-2 with Commissioner's Alperancey and Moses absent for the vote. 21 00:04:58,330 --> 00:05:00,610 I want to thank everybody for your continuing confidence in me. 22 00:05:00,870 --> 00:05:01,910 I very much appreciate it. 23 00:05:02,910 --> 00:05:07,210 Second, is there a motion to nominate the Vice Chair for the Planning Commission? 24 00:05:09,220 --> 00:05:13,500 Mr. Chairman, I nominate George Burke as the Vice Chair of the Planning Commission. 25 00:05:13,900 --> 00:05:14,580 I will second that. 26 00:05:15,300 --> 00:05:16,960 Is there any discussion on the motion? 27 00:05:19,230 --> 00:05:21,570 Seeing none, I will call for the vote and ask for the clerk to call the roll. 28 00:05:27,140 --> 00:05:27,840 Commissioner Donohue. 29 00:05:28,160 --> 00:05:28,500 Yes. 30 00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:30,680 Commissioner McFarland. 31 00:05:30,880 --> 00:05:31,040 Yes. 32 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:33,240 Commissioner Johannes. 33 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:34,220 Yes. 34 00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:35,800 Vice Chair Burke. 35 00:05:36,360 --> 00:05:36,560 Yes. 36 00:05:37,660 --> 00:05:38,440 Chair Romeo. 37 00:05:38,440 --> 00:05:44,780 Yes, that motion also passes 502 with commissioners Albrossi and most absent for the vote. 38 00:05:49,200 --> 00:05:55,920 Is there a motion to designate the director of community development or their design me as the secretary for the planning commission? 39 00:05:57,160 --> 00:06:01,000 So I'll move Mr. June, very good is there a second second. 40 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:06,500 Okay, motion made by commission Don he's second by vice chair Burke is there any discussion on the motion? 41 00:06:08,060 --> 00:06:09,540 I'm going to call for the vote and ask for the vote. 42 00:06:09,740 --> 00:06:10,000 Call the roll. 43 00:06:10,980 --> 00:06:11,520 Commissioner Donnie. 44 00:06:11,780 --> 00:06:12,080 Yes. 45 00:06:13,180 --> 00:06:14,160 Commissioner Mike Farlane. 46 00:06:14,580 --> 00:06:14,900 Yes. 47 00:06:15,960 --> 00:06:16,800 Commissioner Johannes. 48 00:06:17,420 --> 00:06:17,640 Yes. 49 00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:19,240 Vice Chair Burke. 50 00:06:19,880 --> 00:06:20,100 Yes. 51 00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:21,460 Chair Romeo. 52 00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:22,440 Yes. 53 00:06:22,780 --> 00:06:24,500 That motion passes 502. 54 00:06:25,400 --> 00:06:26,260 Moving on. 55 00:06:26,400 --> 00:06:32,100 Is there a motion to designate the town attorney or their, sorry, and their designate as the 56 00:06:32,100 --> 00:06:33,960 parliamentarian for the planning commission? 57 00:06:33,960 --> 00:06:43,340 So moved second very good. We have a motion by vice chair Burke second by Commissioner Donahue. Is there any discussion on the motion? 58 00:06:44,720 --> 00:06:47,700 Seeing none I'll call for the vote. And that's the call the roll 59 00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:50,200 Commissioner Donahue. Yes 60 00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:52,660 Commissioner McFarland. Yes 61 00:06:53,680 --> 00:06:55,420 Commissioner Johannes. Yes 62 00:06:55,940 --> 00:06:57,380 vice chair Burke. Yes 63 00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:03,680 I'm also, yes, that motion passes 5-0-2. 64 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:09,100 Commissioner's Albrossi and Moses absent for the meeting. 65 00:07:11,240 --> 00:07:12,440 Let's go 66 00:07:21,650 --> 00:07:22,510 on one second. 67 00:07:22,890 --> 00:07:24,470 Miss Yeats, I have a question for you. 68 00:07:25,790 --> 00:07:26,390 Okay, 69 00:07:53,890 --> 00:07:54,470 moving on. 70 00:07:54,750 --> 00:07:57,270 Item 3 in the agenda are the approval of the minutes. 71 00:07:57,270 --> 00:07:57,530 minutes. 72 00:07:59,690 --> 00:08:04,430 These minutes are the December 4th, 2023 planning commission work session minutes, 73 00:08:04,650 --> 00:08:10,270 the December 11th, 2023 joint planning commission, TRG advisory committee minutes, and the December 74 00:08:10,270 --> 00:08:16,310 18th planning commission regular minutes. Is there a motion to approve these minutes? 75 00:08:16,750 --> 00:08:20,890 I know that we approve all of those. And what, go. 76 00:08:21,610 --> 00:08:24,370 We have a motion from Commissioner McFarland for approval. 77 00:08:24,370 --> 00:08:28,510 second. Second by Vice Chair Burke. Any discussion on the motion? 78 00:08:30,670 --> 00:08:33,490 All right. Seeing none, I'll call for the vote and ask for the clerk to call the roll. 79 00:08:34,270 --> 00:08:38,590 Commissioner Donahue. Yes. Pardon me, yes. Commissioner McFarlane. Yes. 80 00:08:39,610 --> 00:08:44,950 Commissioner Johannes. Yes. Vice Chair Burke. Yes. Chair Romeo. 81 00:08:45,610 --> 00:08:49,970 I'm also, yes, that motion will pass 502 with commissioners Albrossian Moses. 82 00:08:49,970 --> 00:08:57,690 is absent for the vote, moving along to item four on our agenda of the seating. 83 00:08:57,790 --> 00:09:02,510 In the comments, does the staff have any comments for the commission of the seat? 84 00:09:05,730 --> 00:09:07,910 No chairman Romeo, we did not. Thank you. 85 00:09:08,470 --> 00:09:12,530 Thank you, Ms. Gillard. Do you, are there any commissioner comments 86 00:09:12,530 --> 00:09:13,030 this evening? 87 00:09:16,070 --> 00:09:19,730 Okay, very good. Moving on to comments from the citizens. 88 00:09:21,130 --> 00:09:29,210 This portion of our agenda is to invite forward any individual to address the board on any matter that is not listed as a public hearing item on the agenda this evening. 89 00:09:29,650 --> 00:09:35,590 Speakers have up to three minutes and may not address the commission on the same item more than once and less call back by commissioner. 90 00:09:36,530 --> 00:09:45,410 Green light comes on at the beginning a yellow light will come on a 30 seconds before your time is up and speakers should wrap up at that time a red light will come on when your time is expired. 91 00:09:45,410 --> 00:09:49,970 speakers should complete the sign-up sheet at the podium and state their name and address for the record. 92 00:09:50,490 --> 00:09:54,790 Is there anybody that would like to address the commission this evening on anything that is not on the agenda? 93 00:09:57,580 --> 00:09:57,720 All right. 94 00:09:58,080 --> 00:10:03,100 Seeing none, we'll move on to item five on our agenda, which is the public hearing portion of our agenda. 95 00:10:03,240 --> 00:10:04,700 I was for Ms. Giloran. 96 00:10:04,980 --> 00:10:08,000 If the public hearing items on the tonight's agenda were properly advertised. 97 00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:15,920 Yes, they were. The items were properly advertised with notices of public hearing, having been 98 00:10:15,920 --> 00:10:22,500 duly advertised in the January 12th and January 19th, 2024, issues of the Fairfax County Times 99 00:10:22,500 --> 00:10:28,040 newspapers, certificates of publication from the editor will be entered into the record upon receipt. 100 00:10:29,600 --> 00:10:34,160 Thank you very much, Ms. Giller. Our first item this evening is on the map of amendment 101 00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:40,380 ZMA-22-02, 131-13150-world-gate drive. 102 00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:46,800 This is for the redevelopment of that site with single-family attached and multifamily residential uses. 103 00:10:47,640 --> 00:10:51,820 This item was continued from our December 18, 2023 regular meeting. 104 00:10:52,360 --> 00:10:55,220 I'll open the public hearing and call on Mr. Bryce-Prayer for the staff report. 105 00:10:55,740 --> 00:10:56,400 Whenever you're ready, Bryce. 106 00:10:57,900 --> 00:11:00,540 Thanks, Jeremy. I'm members of the Planning Commission. Good evening to you. 107 00:11:11,370 --> 00:11:16,390 Okay, so this case has been before the planning commission now on a few occasions. 108 00:11:16,950 --> 00:11:20,410 I'm not going to really spend too much time going through all the details of the case 109 00:11:20,410 --> 00:11:24,390 that will provide a brief summary of the case but then spend most of the presentation 110 00:11:24,390 --> 00:11:28,970 are going through case updates since you all saw it at your work session in January. 111 00:11:30,410 --> 00:11:34,770 So the two subject parsers are located at the corner of Eldens Street and World Gate Drive. 112 00:11:34,770 --> 00:11:36,550 that's the area highlighted here in yellow. 113 00:11:38,350 --> 00:11:42,370 It's just south of the Shannon Park in the course of Shannon residential neighborhood 114 00:11:42,370 --> 00:11:45,950 and the Dallas Glen apartments. 115 00:11:46,610 --> 00:11:50,770 It's across Worldgate Drive from the Worldgate Retail Center, across Elin street from the 116 00:11:50,770 --> 00:11:56,350 coal shopping center, just to the west of the western apartments of Worldgate. 117 00:11:56,930 --> 00:12:02,370 It's about 0.8 miles to both the innovation metro station and the Hernan metro rail station. 118 00:12:02,370 --> 00:12:05,670 And it's about a mile from where we are today in Doughton, Harneddon. 119 00:12:06,910 --> 00:12:12,370 This site is currently improved with a two-story parking garage and two office buildings 120 00:12:13,070 --> 00:12:21,010 totaling, I think it's around, it's about 350,000 square feet of office GFA and the acreage 121 00:12:21,010 --> 00:12:22,490 of the site is a little over 10 acres. 122 00:12:23,770 --> 00:12:31,670 So with this case, the rezoning would allow for the redevelopment of the site, including 123 00:12:31,670 --> 00:12:36,210 the demolition of the two existing office buildings, the demolition of half of the existing garage, 124 00:12:37,010 --> 00:12:42,570 and then redevelopment with a multifamily building and then stacked to over two residential units 125 00:12:42,570 --> 00:12:50,270 and residential townhouse units over the property and then retention and reuse of the remaining 126 00:12:50,270 --> 00:12:57,730 half of the existing parking garage. In total, the density was set around about around 1.34 floor 127 00:12:57,730 --> 00:13:04,110 area ratio and in total it's about 460 dwelling units that's about 610,000 square feet of residential 128 00:13:04,110 --> 00:13:10,310 rest floor area. There are nine zoning modifications being requested as part of this application which 129 00:13:10,310 --> 00:13:14,010 does include a generalized development plan and GDP and also a proper statement. 130 00:13:18,540 --> 00:13:19,640 So since the work session 131 00:13:19,640 --> 00:13:26,680 staff did have a very productive meeting with the applicant and subsequent to that there were revised 132 00:13:26,680 --> 00:13:29,320 materials that have been submitted those came in last week. 133 00:13:30,900 --> 00:13:36,580 The revised materials are very responsive to the issues that have been raised by staff, 134 00:13:36,940 --> 00:13:41,200 the vast majority of staff's comments were addressed with what has most recently come 135 00:13:41,200 --> 00:13:41,400 in. 136 00:13:42,080 --> 00:13:47,500 However, staff has not yet had the time to fully review the revised materials and is still 137 00:13:47,500 --> 00:13:49,680 continuing to do so as of right now. 138 00:13:50,700 --> 00:13:56,620 What I have here is a list that highlights some of the revisions or the least the most 139 00:13:56,620 --> 00:13:59,440 notable revisions that have occurred with the latest submission. 140 00:14:00,040 --> 00:14:03,280 This was not provided to the Planning Commission, this is new information. 141 00:14:04,080 --> 00:14:09,840 We will certainly have this before you all as soon as we can at the next meeting. 142 00:14:11,040 --> 00:14:16,680 But just to go through here, there was a redesign of the Rode entrance to a right-in only off 143 00:14:16,680 --> 00:14:17,340 of World Gay Drive. 144 00:14:17,340 --> 00:14:23,520 If you remember, that was right in, right out previously, and that addresses a lot of safety 145 00:14:23,520 --> 00:14:28,160 and conflict questions and issues that staff had raised and was working with the applicant 146 00:14:28,160 --> 00:14:30,420 on over the last couple of submissions. 147 00:14:31,760 --> 00:14:35,720 The trail along the northern boundary of the property was moved away from the garage 148 00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:39,940 and some security lighting has been committed to security lighting has been added to the project. 149 00:14:40,580 --> 00:14:43,600 Those were two key comments from staff. 150 00:14:45,080 --> 00:14:52,180 The alternative options have been provided for the offsite work in cases where permission 151 00:14:52,180 --> 00:14:57,780 from the adjacent property owners are granted, so now there are provisions, there are commitments 152 00:14:57,780 --> 00:14:59,640 and it's to all that... 153 00:15:00,020 --> 00:15:27,360 So, pursuing other means to make those improvements and connections in that event and that is in there now. Staff had a number of pedestrian circulation concerns internal to the site, ADA compliance concerns internal to the site, those have all been addressed. It would seem with this most recent submission. It also, the most recent submission also includes now the inclusion of the Worldgate Drive bus stop in the location that I had discussed at the work session. 154 00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:31,180 and also addresses staff's concern regarding the timing 155 00:15:31,180 --> 00:15:32,480 of the Elm Street bus stop. 156 00:15:33,740 --> 00:15:35,720 There is some additional clarifying information 157 00:15:35,720 --> 00:15:36,920 that have been provided for emergency 158 00:15:36,920 --> 00:15:39,420 and public accessesment and some clarifying information 159 00:15:39,420 --> 00:15:40,920 provided regarding private improvements 160 00:15:40,920 --> 00:15:43,100 and maintenance within public right of way. 161 00:15:43,940 --> 00:15:45,880 The parking study has been updated with information 162 00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:47,520 about visitor parking, which is something 163 00:15:47,520 --> 00:15:51,260 that the Planning Commission had discussed and requested. 164 00:15:51,900 --> 00:15:54,720 There are some further commitments to finishing 165 00:15:54,720 --> 00:16:00,360 the garage and the interim periods between the two phases of the project, and there are 166 00:16:00,360 --> 00:16:04,460 further commitments to green building and green infrastructure measures for the project. 167 00:16:05,500 --> 00:16:10,020 Also there are some tree preservation areas that weren't previously being proposed, that 168 00:16:10,020 --> 00:16:14,860 are now being proposed, those are along the Northern Boundary and the area where there 169 00:16:14,860 --> 00:16:19,980 is an established canopy, excuse me. 170 00:16:21,440 --> 00:16:28,420 Although staff review is ongoing, there were a couple of, I'd say, relatively minor items 171 00:16:28,420 --> 00:16:32,940 identified that will need some follow-up by the applicant, and of course, as staff 172 00:16:32,940 --> 00:16:37,700 continues to review this, we do expect a few more items to come in over the next couple 173 00:16:37,700 --> 00:16:38,020 weeks. 174 00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:44,080 Given the reality of the timing, necessary for staff review at this time staff is recommending 175 00:16:44,080 --> 00:16:51,120 of the case to the February Public Hearing of the Planning Commission and to further clarify 176 00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:57,620 that although there are matters that we do truly believe need to be worked out prior 177 00:16:57,620 --> 00:17:03,460 to this case moving on to town council, a big part of this recommendation really is that 178 00:17:03,460 --> 00:17:04,160 timing issue. 179 00:17:04,520 --> 00:17:09,960 It really just, staff hasn't really had a chance to give it a full technical review that 180 00:17:09,960 --> 00:17:12,940 that we would normally expect to have been done for this 181 00:17:12,940 --> 00:17:15,640 and to be able to guide the planning commission 182 00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:16,480 in every way that we can. 183 00:17:17,660 --> 00:17:19,300 I do have one more slide here. 184 00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:22,920 This is bit of a preview of the revised, 185 00:17:23,140 --> 00:17:24,940 one of the sheets in the revised GEP 186 00:17:25,520 --> 00:17:27,540 that has been extracted out here, 187 00:17:27,560 --> 00:17:30,160 but this does show you some of the items 188 00:17:30,160 --> 00:17:31,300 that I had referenced earlier. 189 00:17:31,840 --> 00:17:34,720 As you can see that entrance into Rode has been changed 190 00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:39,680 into a right in only so that concern and conflict 191 00:17:39,680 --> 00:17:44,660 of the right out and the potential for vehicles crossing over multiple lanes, 192 00:17:44,660 --> 00:17:48,200 either go straight through the intersection or take a left south on onto 193 00:17:48,200 --> 00:17:52,560 central road, that has now been removed, that movement is completely removed 194 00:17:52,560 --> 00:17:54,500 from the entrance. 195 00:17:56,180 --> 00:17:59,540 You might also notice the internal pedestrian connections, 196 00:17:59,960 --> 00:18:03,200 additional crosswalks, additional sidewalks, sidewalks moved away from the curb, 197 00:18:03,580 --> 00:18:07,800 all of those issues that staff had raised are now shown on the GDP. 198 00:18:07,800 --> 00:18:14,900 I mentioned the trail on the north being separated a little bit from the garage. 199 00:18:15,300 --> 00:18:20,860 It has been by a couple of feet here, I believe, any further, and I believe it would start 200 00:18:20,860 --> 00:18:26,480 to impact that existing landscaping that they're trying to now preserve along that northern 201 00:18:26,480 --> 00:18:26,860 boundary. 202 00:18:30,760 --> 00:18:38,540 Staff is working to get this review wrapped up as soon as possible and does hope to have more 203 00:18:38,540 --> 00:18:41,540 information and a recommendation back before the planning 204 00:18:41,540 --> 00:18:44,980 commission for your February work session and public hearing 205 00:18:45,420 --> 00:18:47,120 at that time. 206 00:18:47,540 --> 00:18:48,200 And that's all I have. 207 00:18:48,420 --> 00:18:48,760 Thank you. 208 00:18:51,240 --> 00:18:51,940 Thank you, Bryce. 209 00:18:52,340 --> 00:18:55,440 Do any commissioners have questions for staff this time? 210 00:19:00,400 --> 00:19:01,400 I do have a question, Bryce. 211 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:05,860 Could you walk me through the timeline real quick? 212 00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:07,660 And can you go back to the bullet point section, 213 00:19:07,980 --> 00:19:12,220 the bullet point slide that identifies all the updates, 214 00:19:12,220 --> 00:19:14,060 all their commitments that were made. 215 00:19:16,100 --> 00:19:19,940 So just to kind of walk it back from what I recall from our previous meeting. 216 00:19:20,300 --> 00:19:23,880 So at the January, January 8th, Plenty of commercial work session, 217 00:19:24,120 --> 00:19:28,180 you had mentioned that the Friday before, I assume that was January 5th, 218 00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:29,560 you provided comments to the applicant. 219 00:19:30,800 --> 00:19:34,300 It was either that Saturday or that Sunday. 220 00:19:34,500 --> 00:19:34,920 It was over the weekend. 221 00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:37,280 It was a 6-7th. 222 00:19:38,760 --> 00:19:40,680 And then you guys said you were going to have a meeting 223 00:19:40,680 --> 00:19:44,440 with the applicant on that Friday, which is January 12th? 224 00:19:44,440 --> 00:19:44,800 Correct. 225 00:19:45,540 --> 00:19:48,720 When did the applicant resubmit materials to staff? 226 00:19:49,060 --> 00:19:50,240 It was a very quick turnaround. 227 00:19:50,520 --> 00:19:52,060 I believe it came in on Tuesday night. 228 00:19:52,560 --> 00:19:53,240 Tuesday night? 229 00:19:53,920 --> 00:19:56,880 OK, so that was the following Tuesday. 230 00:19:58,100 --> 00:20:02,760 So we're looking at the 16th, the 16th. 231 00:20:02,940 --> 00:20:08,660 So my question is, I understand where staff's coming from. 232 00:20:08,980 --> 00:20:10,660 It takes some time to review this information, 233 00:20:10,660 --> 00:20:19,660 But in the packet materials we've got a one page agenda item update that just says we're going to continue the item. 234 00:20:20,820 --> 00:20:26,860 Would have been impossible to provide us at least with this bullet point list of things that have been updated prior to tonight because I. 235 00:20:27,460 --> 00:20:32,820 I feel like we're just coming in blind to this assuming we're going to a continuance and I'm not sure if that's necessarily where we are. 236 00:20:33,100 --> 00:20:35,300 Maybe we are maybe that's where the commission is going to be. 237 00:20:35,300 --> 00:20:39,660 was there an ability to provide a staff report that's a little more media than just 238 00:20:39,660 --> 00:20:45,160 this one pager that we did receive? Unfortunately not. The deadline 239 00:20:45,160 --> 00:20:52,300 essentially for staff for the planning commission dispatch was the week 240 00:20:52,300 --> 00:20:57,260 before the we received the revised materials so it just wouldn't wouldn't 241 00:20:57,260 --> 00:21:00,200 have been possible. We didn't have the materials at that point when we were 242 00:21:00,200 --> 00:21:03,160 gathering up the dispatch for you. Okay. Thank you, Bryce. 243 00:21:05,620 --> 00:21:17,280 I thought it was more of a comment, but perhaps a question, but walking around the area, I noticed there's a dog park almost immediately adjacent to this project. 244 00:21:17,940 --> 00:21:28,340 Right now, it's commercial use. It's going to go to residential use, which will certainly, I'd imagine there'd be more dogs on the dog park. 245 00:21:28,340 --> 00:21:44,000 Is there any talk about whether or not that dog park is sufficient given the fact that it's going to change from office used to residential use it seems to be a big benefit for this project for tenants and purchasers? 246 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:54,760 There hasn't been any specific conversations between staff and the applicant regarding any sort of additional accommodations for pet owners. 247 00:21:55,540 --> 00:22:01,240 of course, we have seen that with some other applications, but in this case, as far as staffs, 248 00:22:01,360 --> 00:22:05,260 staff knows, that is not something that's being proposed. However, the applicant might be 249 00:22:05,260 --> 00:22:09,700 able to provide more information on that. And you are correct. The Shannon Park Dog Park, 250 00:22:09,700 --> 00:22:15,820 public dog park is immediately a budding, really, like the center of this site here, it's in this 251 00:22:15,820 --> 00:22:21,660 location right here. Are you worried that that dog park might be overburdened? And some sort of, 252 00:22:21,660 --> 00:22:29,720 We changed that. Is that at all a concern or seems like it's in kind of rough condition right now just from looking at it to be perfectly honest 253 00:22:29,720 --> 00:22:35,940 We didn't didn't look at analyzing that it is it is a heavily used park. It's very popular over there 254 00:22:36,540 --> 00:22:42,000 But we did not analyze it's usage and and the impacts that this would have on it 255 00:22:44,960 --> 00:22:47,040 That's a county facility though correct 256 00:22:49,080 --> 00:22:50,100 It is it 257 00:22:50,100 --> 00:23:00,820 It is a town owned, oh boy, we have every parking town is different whether it's town owned and county operated or vice versa, but 258 00:23:01,400 --> 00:23:07,460 Miss Kilerin, do you have clarity on whether that is I'm trying to remember this town or county 259 00:23:07,460 --> 00:23:13,600 But the actual operation is by an organization called herndon dogs, right and 260 00:23:13,600 --> 00:23:17,480 And they're responsible for the upkeep of it. 261 00:23:17,580 --> 00:23:19,240 It was an agreement that was entered into. 262 00:23:19,240 --> 00:23:27,760 I think it's town, but the town as an entity is not the one taking care of it. 263 00:23:27,780 --> 00:23:29,100 It is this other organization. 264 00:23:29,880 --> 00:23:30,520 That's my memory. 265 00:23:33,090 --> 00:23:37,210 We can collect some additional information on that and provide about a planning commission. 266 00:23:38,770 --> 00:23:43,870 I guess my point is given that it's, well, it's certainly adjacent to Shandon Park. 267 00:23:43,870 --> 00:23:48,070 I don't want to say it's part of Shannon Park, Shannon Park is a Fairfax County facility. 268 00:23:50,250 --> 00:23:57,290 And if in fact it's Fairfax County land, it seems to be outside the scope of 269 00:23:58,590 --> 00:24:02,910 town's negotiations with the applicant. 270 00:24:03,630 --> 00:24:08,810 I share your concern, but I think the ownership of the land is relevant here. 271 00:24:08,810 --> 00:24:09,710 Right. 272 00:24:13,450 --> 00:24:18,250 So I had a couple questions about the technical changes. I know one of the big issues 273 00:24:18,250 --> 00:24:24,430 for staff was the right out extension of the right turn lane from that entrance to Eldon 274 00:24:24,430 --> 00:24:26,110 Street. Was that included in the updated package? 275 00:24:30,080 --> 00:24:31,200 Or was it from Wiltshire? 276 00:24:31,780 --> 00:24:41,080 The last time we spoke about this, staff's comment was a request to extend the existing right-hand 277 00:24:41,080 --> 00:24:43,140 in turn lane northbound onto Eldon Street, 278 00:24:43,340 --> 00:24:44,900 extend that back all the way to road A. 279 00:24:45,680 --> 00:24:47,480 And the purpose of that was to reduce 280 00:24:49,240 --> 00:24:53,800 a conflict of vehicles exiting road A 281 00:24:55,180 --> 00:24:57,160 and merging into that through lane. 282 00:24:58,060 --> 00:25:03,280 With the change of this into a right in only condition 283 00:25:03,280 --> 00:25:04,960 that conflict no longer exists 284 00:25:04,960 --> 00:25:07,080 so staff's comments of extending that lane 285 00:25:07,080 --> 00:25:10,320 is no longer valid or no longer applicable, I should say. 286 00:25:10,320 --> 00:25:16,000 So Rode is just to write in. That's why I see I didn't I missed that that there was no longer writing right out there 287 00:25:16,000 --> 00:25:20,860 So that's right just to write in now so they're all gonna be going out through the signal there 288 00:25:21,620 --> 00:25:26,200 With department complex. That's right. So we there's no no need to have to then 289 00:25:26,740 --> 00:25:32,060 Access manage that stretch of world gay drive really in any manner if you remember before there was a 290 00:25:32,580 --> 00:25:37,460 raised concrete median that was going down splitting the the left-hand turn lanes and the through lanes 291 00:25:37,460 --> 00:25:44,500 to limit that to limit cars crossing to try to make that left movement that's no longer necessary here because again, it's right in only. 292 00:25:44,880 --> 00:25:45,920 Okay, thank you. 293 00:25:46,560 --> 00:25:53,400 In regard to pedestrian bridge because across to Shannon Park, there was a question about getting that little sliver of an easement there. 294 00:25:53,820 --> 00:25:57,620 Is that part of the updated package that that's been included? 295 00:25:57,920 --> 00:26:03,760 It's still showing it as it was previously shown with that connection being made right next right at that end of the bridge. 296 00:26:04,240 --> 00:26:15,680 However, the proffers now also commit to a connection directly into Shannon Park if the offsite permissions are not achieved to make that connection at the bridge. 297 00:26:16,220 --> 00:26:24,960 Okay, so there would be a bridge connection. If he's was not acquired, then there would be another connection somewhere along the two over two frontage there in the Shannon Park. 298 00:26:25,880 --> 00:26:29,780 Alonglines what staff was requesting before. And you don't need to tell me the exact location. 299 00:26:29,780 --> 00:26:33,700 Yeah, I mean, it would be in an area that makes the most sense, which is where it's at. 300 00:26:33,740 --> 00:26:36,680 It's probably at its flattest and closest to the existing trail, it'll probably be open. 301 00:26:36,780 --> 00:26:42,860 This area here. Okay. Gotcha. Okay. Thank you, Bryce. Any other questions for staff? 302 00:26:44,700 --> 00:26:50,460 No. Okay. I invite the applicant, the applicant's agent forward to address the commission. 303 00:26:50,980 --> 00:26:53,620 If you came forward, please complete the sound of sheet of the podium. 304 00:26:53,620 --> 00:26:55,180 The stage of name and address for the record. 305 00:26:56,100 --> 00:26:57,140 Good evening, Mr. Chairman. 306 00:26:57,340 --> 00:27:00,620 Remember the Planning Commission, Ken Weyer with the law firm, Weyer Gil, with the 307 00:27:00,620 --> 00:27:04,000 mean this evening is Sean Sullivan with Boston Properties and various members of our 308 00:27:04,000 --> 00:27:04,620 design team. 309 00:27:05,600 --> 00:27:09,500 Mr. Perry, if you can go back, maybe to a site map for a second while I ramble on and then 310 00:27:09,500 --> 00:27:10,120 get to the meet of it. 311 00:27:10,760 --> 00:27:11,780 I do want to thank staff. 312 00:27:12,260 --> 00:27:13,380 Mr. Perry is absolutely right. 313 00:27:13,680 --> 00:27:17,980 We're still somewhat suffering from that holiday contraction of our response times. 314 00:27:18,800 --> 00:27:20,800 So we did a great turnaround with staff. 315 00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:25,480 We had a I think great working meeting going through all if I can count correctly 11 bullet points 316 00:27:25,480 --> 00:27:35,020 I think we did everything staff asked for in that we talked it through we had I don't know doesn't or so members on our team and staffs talking through it and we were hoping 317 00:27:35,880 --> 00:27:42,340 To submit on a Tuesday and be approved on a Monday. That's a very tough statement to say. I certainly understand and appreciate that 318 00:27:43,100 --> 00:27:47,440 But Mr. Perry if you can go back to your list for a second. I would be remiss if I didn't push a tiny bit 319 00:27:47,860 --> 00:27:50,100 It seems like we have reviewed a bunch of these items 320 00:27:50,800 --> 00:27:54,920 I think in the global sense staff asked for 11 items and we saw the wisdom to fix all 321 00:27:54,920 --> 00:27:55,200 them. 322 00:27:55,700 --> 00:27:58,340 Pedestrian connections, off-site easements and the like. 323 00:27:58,700 --> 00:28:01,580 I will admit there's probably some still wordsmithing we could do in the proffers. 324 00:28:02,660 --> 00:28:04,860 For instance, we're committing to lead certified. 325 00:28:05,120 --> 00:28:08,420 We didn't make that strong enough so there's a comment we continue to work on. 326 00:28:09,560 --> 00:28:13,480 But my request to talk about possibly going forward now is one of timing. 327 00:28:14,020 --> 00:28:17,000 As you know, the markets are extremely tight, months matter, weeks matter. 328 00:28:17,300 --> 00:28:19,580 We have a project we can fund and we're ready to get going. 329 00:28:20,040 --> 00:28:23,960 I think from the conception of this project, I don't think we've ever disagreed with staff. 330 00:28:24,060 --> 00:28:25,260 We work through things, don't get us wrong. 331 00:28:25,480 --> 00:28:28,620 I mean, if you remember in the beginning, the entire project was backwards, excuse me, 332 00:28:28,700 --> 00:28:29,040 it was backwards. 333 00:28:29,380 --> 00:28:33,640 We had the townhouses closest to the Elden Street and the multifamily in the middle, and we 334 00:28:33,640 --> 00:28:35,060 worked with staff, we flipped it around. 335 00:28:35,860 --> 00:28:40,880 Just like the right-hand turn, we liked that idea for project access, but the more we heard 336 00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:45,280 staff's concerns about safety, we sort of saw the wisdom of that and removing that right-hand 337 00:28:45,280 --> 00:28:48,880 in turn lane with somewhere between one and five percent of our total trips. 338 00:28:49,600 --> 00:28:52,120 So it's almost negligent to put it back to World Shire like it is today. 339 00:28:52,840 --> 00:28:56,260 So the reason for that background is really just to talk about, and thanks staff for 340 00:28:56,260 --> 00:29:01,640 the collaborative approach and just see if there's any chance to work forward between Plenty 341 00:29:01,640 --> 00:29:04,280 Commission and Town Council on some of these nits. 342 00:29:04,460 --> 00:29:12,260 Because I think the macro issues of the unit types, we are offering $2,000, $2,100 per unit 343 00:29:12,260 --> 00:29:18,480 for off-site recreational amenities that's roughly $910,000 towards off-site parks and rec for 344 00:29:18,480 --> 00:29:22,320 whether it's dogs or trails or whatever we want to work for. We're happy to work through that. 345 00:29:22,900 --> 00:29:27,600 But I think conversion of this building at the edge of town, doing the bus stops, having the open space, 346 00:29:28,260 --> 00:29:32,520 saving the majority of the garage, I think it's a good project. We've had several community meetings 347 00:29:32,520 --> 00:29:38,340 and one or two people attend, but signs up. I think we notified over 800 people of our meeting, 348 00:29:38,340 --> 00:29:42,800 and we had a few emails, but just generally more concerns about when it's going to start, 349 00:29:42,940 --> 00:29:47,240 what does it look like? And I think we've been pretty visible. That's the right word in the community. 350 00:29:47,920 --> 00:29:51,820 So this is our fourth planning commission appearance. We had in two ARBs, our sixth time. 351 00:29:52,240 --> 00:29:57,080 We would like to stress test staff's position of not continuance and see if we can continue that 352 00:29:57,080 --> 00:29:59,380 working trend of working in quick succession. 353 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:29,820 And see if we can work forward. I know it's a big ask, but I would be remiss if I didn't, I didn't ask. Some happy to answer any questions while I fill out to our speakers here. Thank you, Mr. Warr. Do any commission members have questions for the applicant's agent? Mr. Chairman. One question I recall parking. We were trying to reduce the parking requirement outside of what is typically required. Am I recalling that correctly? Where do we stand on parking? So we go back to the map. Sorry, Mr. President. I like the point when I'm talking. 354 00:30:29,820 --> 00:30:31,880 and keeps me grounded a little bit. 355 00:30:32,480 --> 00:30:33,200 So if you recall, 356 00:30:33,380 --> 00:30:34,400 let's think of this as two projects. 357 00:30:34,620 --> 00:30:36,320 On the right hand side with the multifamily 358 00:30:36,320 --> 00:30:37,260 and two over twos, 359 00:30:37,560 --> 00:30:39,100 every building there has, 360 00:30:39,300 --> 00:30:40,660 every unit has two parking spaces. 361 00:30:41,580 --> 00:30:43,120 Staff and my team can correct me if I'm wrong. 362 00:30:43,360 --> 00:30:45,820 There's also 37 street parking spaces 363 00:30:46,300 --> 00:30:48,160 for the visitors and the like. 364 00:30:48,400 --> 00:30:50,220 So that's an excess of code, 365 00:30:50,360 --> 00:30:50,640 if you will. 366 00:30:51,600 --> 00:30:53,940 37 on street parking spaces. 367 00:30:54,080 --> 00:30:56,300 How many residential units are there? 368 00:30:56,800 --> 00:30:58,680 There's 460 total and for the life of me, 369 00:30:58,760 --> 00:30:59,480 I forgot the breakdown. 370 00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:03,380 It's probably in the hundreds, it's over 100, I believe we're at 350. 371 00:31:04,580 --> 00:31:04,820 101. 372 00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:06,600 Easy number, I don't know why I forgot it. 373 00:31:06,700 --> 00:31:12,460 So there's 101 total units with 202 parking spaces internal and 37 external. 374 00:31:13,180 --> 00:31:16,100 Staffing grant me if I'm wrong, but we're meeting the parking ordinance on the 375 00:31:17,700 --> 00:31:20,300 for sale townhouse and two of our two product. 376 00:31:21,420 --> 00:31:24,500 I believe we're at 1.3 ratio on the multi-family. 377 00:31:24,940 --> 00:31:27,280 We sit in a pretty extensive parking study. 378 00:31:27,280 --> 00:31:34,200 We think we're going to be somewhere between 80 to 90% occupancy, and the letter we submitted to Mr. Perry is that all 379 00:31:35,380 --> 00:31:40,400 Multifamily parking lot to park internal to the garage and from our sort of studies roundabout 380 00:31:40,400 --> 00:31:43,220 We think that that 1.3 is less than than town code 381 00:31:43,220 --> 00:31:47,320 But if we were in Fairfax under the new code we meet it and we think from a demand standpoint 382 00:31:47,320 --> 00:31:53,000 There's about a 10% fluctuation there we can use to meet demand and turnover and visitors and Mr. Perry you're free 383 00:31:53,000 --> 00:31:54,860 Please correct me if I misstated any of that 384 00:31:57,020 --> 00:32:01,860 I'm more concerned about the for sale units you're saying I see you meet the code yes 385 00:32:01,860 --> 00:32:06,580 sir for the for sale yes sir sorry I want to tangent for something you didn't ask all 386 00:32:06,580 --> 00:32:07,400 good to know 387 00:32:14,410 --> 00:32:21,930 all right I thank you mr. wire for providing your comments and thank you 388 00:32:21,930 --> 00:32:28,170 Bryce for providing your comments as well I I really dislike the timing on this one in terms 389 00:32:28,170 --> 00:32:33,390 of like the quick turnaround. It's just an unfortunate factor of the holidays. It happens 390 00:32:33,390 --> 00:32:37,790 all of us, things get pushed and you try and turn things around quickly. It's just a very 391 00:32:37,790 --> 00:32:42,450 tough situation. I don't like keeping this here for another month if we don't have to. 392 00:32:44,470 --> 00:32:46,770 My question I guess would be more for Bryce. 393 00:32:49,510 --> 00:32:51,670 Are these major issues that still need to be resolved? 394 00:32:51,870 --> 00:32:56,030 Are we talking about minor proper revisions and CDP revisions at this point in time? 395 00:32:58,290 --> 00:33:02,090 Well, again, we haven't received engineering is still doing its review. 396 00:33:03,010 --> 00:33:04,890 Legal is still doing its review. 397 00:33:06,130 --> 00:33:11,290 Planning zoning has started to look into it and has noted a few things. 398 00:33:11,990 --> 00:33:14,730 Some of that I'd say is a little bit more administrative. 399 00:33:15,730 --> 00:33:22,670 I think some of the modification requests actually have to be updated to reflect the existing, 400 00:33:22,970 --> 00:33:24,710 the revisions that have been made now. 401 00:33:24,710 --> 00:33:34,950 know, I think there is real concern regarding language on conflicts with existing utilities 402 00:33:35,930 --> 00:33:42,330 and proposed landscaping. There is a new, obviously there is a new road configuration 403 00:33:42,330 --> 00:33:50,090 here. What that means for final Marshall review is kind of up in the air. 404 00:33:53,990 --> 00:33:54,690 It's likely 405 00:33:55,310 --> 00:33:58,370 Those are the items that I think jump out at me. 406 00:33:59,470 --> 00:34:07,210 I mean, there's a few other minor ones, but nothing more significant really than I think those, 407 00:34:07,790 --> 00:34:13,930 although again, without hearing back from reviewing agencies, 408 00:34:13,990 --> 00:34:16,030 I can't really be confident one way or the other. 409 00:34:16,170 --> 00:34:18,070 That's something I won't come in. 410 00:34:19,470 --> 00:34:23,790 Obviously, the road design, although it really addresses a lot of staff's concern 411 00:34:23,790 --> 00:34:26,190 and it was in response to staff's concerns. 412 00:34:26,610 --> 00:34:28,150 It is a little bit of a new configuration 413 00:34:30,230 --> 00:34:32,390 that our engineers are gonna have to take a look at. 414 00:34:32,930 --> 00:34:33,990 Okay, thanks for ice. 415 00:34:34,670 --> 00:34:36,990 Ms. Yates, from the county attorney, 416 00:34:37,110 --> 00:34:39,010 or the town attorney's review perspective, 417 00:34:40,490 --> 00:34:42,010 how significant were the revisions 418 00:34:42,010 --> 00:34:43,390 to the proffers that you saw? 419 00:34:47,420 --> 00:34:48,140 They're numerous. 420 00:34:50,800 --> 00:34:51,040 Okay. 421 00:35:11,330 --> 00:35:12,890 And I don't have my speaker on. 422 00:35:14,430 --> 00:35:18,330 So to repeat, we felt like there were quite a few 423 00:35:18,330 --> 00:35:24,530 provision, proper revisions, and other irregularities that we agreed with through 424 00:35:24,530 --> 00:35:30,210 in development's recommendation that it should remain plain in commission to 425 00:35:30,210 --> 00:35:35,790 allow those comments to come in and those things to be done and we felt that it 426 00:35:36,490 --> 00:35:41,570 might not be a service to the applicant all of a certain that they would want to 427 00:35:41,570 --> 00:35:46,710 say whether they feel like it was or not to pass it on to town council at 428 00:35:46,710 --> 00:35:53,570 this point. Okay. Thank you, machines. Just real quick. You know, this is a very 429 00:35:53,570 --> 00:35:57,550 tough one because again, I haven't even seen any of the bullet points until tonight. And I know 430 00:35:57,550 --> 00:36:03,190 I feel the commissioners haven't either. Just getting a comfort level check from our commissioners 431 00:36:03,190 --> 00:36:08,530 from the commission. Just going down the line, sorry with you, George, how do you feel about this? Do 432 00:36:08,530 --> 00:36:12,210 want to continue this, or do you want to move forward this evening? 433 00:36:15,330 --> 00:36:19,550 Well, I understand your point, and I wish I could share it. 434 00:36:22,110 --> 00:36:26,710 The cake isn't fully baked, in my opinion, for a variety of reasons. 435 00:36:27,390 --> 00:36:30,210 And that, to me, is the deciding factor. 436 00:36:31,050 --> 00:36:33,230 I would vote to continue it. 437 00:36:33,410 --> 00:36:33,630 Okay. 438 00:36:34,230 --> 00:36:35,110 Mary, do you feel similar? 439 00:36:36,090 --> 00:36:38,350 Yeah, it's hard for me to vote on something. 440 00:36:38,350 --> 00:36:40,650 I think I feel like I didn't get a proper review on, unfortunately. 441 00:36:42,590 --> 00:36:44,670 Yeah, I'm afraid I'm going to agree with that. 442 00:36:44,870 --> 00:36:48,690 I just, frankly, I don't yet think we've done our job here. 443 00:36:49,210 --> 00:36:54,250 And I don't think I want to pass it out on the town council, one force them to make 444 00:36:54,250 --> 00:36:57,290 judgments whether or not quite as informed as they should be. 445 00:36:57,690 --> 00:37:00,950 So I think I would support the continuance. 446 00:37:01,490 --> 00:37:01,590 Okay. 447 00:37:02,390 --> 00:37:17,310 Well, I think I'm in the minority because it doesn't, it seems if we have the general concept, the cake can continue to cook and take and maybe the town council could pull it out of the oven to beat an analogy. 448 00:37:17,570 --> 00:37:22,350 But if I'm in the minority, I think continuance is probably the best option. 449 00:37:22,350 --> 00:37:28,070 Okay. Thank you all for your input. I think that's pretty straightforward as to what the outcomes 450 00:37:28,070 --> 00:37:32,870 going to be. I wish we could move you guys forward tonight. It's just not going to happen. 451 00:37:33,090 --> 00:37:41,770 Unfortunately, so I apologize for that. It's just a product of the schedule that we had to do with 452 00:37:41,770 --> 00:37:47,230 over the holiday. So hopefully we can get all this worked out. All the T's crossed and I started 453 00:37:47,230 --> 00:37:50,870 before the next meetings and we can have a very good robust 454 00:37:50,870 --> 00:37:53,810 supportive recommendation of this when it comes back to us again. 455 00:37:54,110 --> 00:37:56,210 So I want to thank the applicant again for putting all your 456 00:37:56,210 --> 00:37:59,750 effort into providing the updates that were requested by staff. 457 00:38:00,090 --> 00:38:01,830 And Brian, thank you for working with the applicant. 458 00:38:02,010 --> 00:38:03,850 It sounds like you guys had a great meeting on that Friday. 459 00:38:04,350 --> 00:38:06,710 And you guys came to a lot of agreement, which is very helpful. 460 00:38:07,730 --> 00:38:10,370 Mr. Chair Romeo, I don't believe you called on the public. 461 00:38:11,490 --> 00:38:12,710 It's a good point. 462 00:38:13,110 --> 00:38:14,310 Thank you very much. 463 00:38:15,810 --> 00:38:16,530 Thank you. 464 00:38:16,890 --> 00:38:18,990 I'm glad we re-appointed to go that position. 465 00:38:21,090 --> 00:38:23,570 All right, so moving on. 466 00:38:23,730 --> 00:38:26,930 So this time I'll call in comments for the audience. 467 00:38:27,470 --> 00:38:28,890 Comments shall be limited to three minutes. 468 00:38:29,170 --> 00:38:30,390 Green light comes on at the beginning. 469 00:38:30,590 --> 00:38:32,670 Yellow light will come on 30 seconds before your time is up. 470 00:38:33,370 --> 00:38:34,430 And speakers should wrap up. 471 00:38:34,570 --> 00:38:36,650 And our light will come on when your time is expired. 472 00:38:37,290 --> 00:38:39,350 Speakers should complete the sign-up sheet at the podium 473 00:38:39,350 --> 00:38:41,130 and say their name and address for the record. 474 00:38:42,790 --> 00:38:47,110 and at this time would anybody on public like to speak on this application? 475 00:38:49,700 --> 00:38:58,620 All right, so you're none. I'm not going to close the public hearing because looks like we're going to be going to the February work session and planning commission public hearing. 476 00:39:00,120 --> 00:39:05,340 So I'll move to the commission level for discussion and action. Do we have a motion for this item? 477 00:39:05,340 --> 00:39:17,040 this evening. This is a motion to continue, correct? Yes, I moved to continue until the February 478 00:39:19,460 --> 00:39:26,580 2022. February, it's been a long time. So February, 2024, public hearing. Second. Very 479 00:39:26,580 --> 00:39:29,860 good. We've got a motion for continuance by Vice Chair Burke and seconded by Commissioner 480 00:39:30,680 --> 00:39:32,980 I'll call for the, I'm sorry, is there any discussion on the motion? 481 00:39:34,000 --> 00:39:36,980 No? Okay. Call for the vote. National clerk. Call the roll. 482 00:39:38,300 --> 00:39:42,060 Commissioner Donohue. Yes. Commissioner McFarland. Yes. 483 00:39:43,600 --> 00:39:47,640 Commissioner Johannes. Yes. Vice Chair Burke. Yes. 484 00:39:49,060 --> 00:39:53,740 Chair Romeo. I'm also yes. The motion will pass 5-0-2 with commissioners Alborossi 485 00:39:53,740 --> 00:39:57,920 and Moses absent for the vote and we look forward to seeing y'all back here in a month. Thank you. 486 00:39:58,760 --> 00:40:04,080 Next item on the agenda is SE23-03. 487 00:40:04,340 --> 00:40:06,540 This is an application to allow personal service use 488 00:40:06,540 --> 00:40:09,620 consisting of cosmetics and aesthetic services 489 00:40:09,620 --> 00:40:12,480 at 299 Herndon Parkway, Suite 106. 490 00:40:13,240 --> 00:40:14,160 I will open the public hearing 491 00:40:14,160 --> 00:40:17,220 and call on Federica and Glacias for the staff board. 492 00:40:17,620 --> 00:40:17,960 Whenever you're ready. 493 00:40:27,360 --> 00:40:29,400 Good evening, members of the planning commission 494 00:40:29,400 --> 00:40:30,460 for the record. 495 00:40:30,960 --> 00:40:33,720 My name is Federica Iglesias, Community Planner 496 00:40:33,720 --> 00:40:36,020 and I'm here to present you the special exception, 497 00:40:38,480 --> 00:40:39,000 SE2303. 498 00:40:39,240 --> 00:40:41,300 How do you go? Hold on. Can we just have somebody close the door? 499 00:40:41,380 --> 00:40:43,260 Sure. Thank you. Apologies for that. 500 00:40:48,900 --> 00:40:50,060 Please go ahead on your own. 501 00:40:50,600 --> 00:40:51,060 Thank you. 502 00:40:54,140 --> 00:40:57,120 This application is to consider personal service use, 503 00:40:57,400 --> 00:40:59,940 consisting of cosmetics and aesthetic services. 504 00:41:00,280 --> 00:41:01,980 The property owner and applicant 505 00:41:01,980 --> 00:41:06,880 proposes reconfiguring the existing 916 square feet 506 00:41:06,880 --> 00:41:09,140 of tenant space to sign a new tenant 507 00:41:09,140 --> 00:41:14,140 within the first floor of the multi-tenant commercial office building at the intersection of 508 00:41:14,140 --> 00:41:22,760 Herndon Parkway and L.S. Street. The site to attach buildings to 99 and 297 parking ends around 509 00:41:22,760 --> 00:41:31,080 these site features known as the Herndon Park condominium center and was constructed circa 1987. 510 00:41:31,640 --> 00:41:38,320 The commercial space is surrounded by associated business parking at the northwest corner of 511 00:41:38,320 --> 00:41:44,340 intersection of Herndon Parkway and Elden Street. The property is zone commercial office, 512 00:41:44,440 --> 00:41:50,640 CO, the Herndon 2030 comprehensive plan, designated the property as business corridor use. 513 00:41:51,700 --> 00:41:58,940 The existing zoning of the commercial office, the ADS and zoning at the north 514 00:41:58,940 --> 00:42:07,400 is residential multi-finaly. The south is office and light industrial. East residential single-family 515 00:42:07,400 --> 00:42:17,060 are 15 and on the West commercial services. The land use designation is Business Corridor, 516 00:42:17,580 --> 00:42:25,400 ADS and land use designation on the north side neighborhood conservation on south and east 517 00:42:25,400 --> 00:42:33,120 community facilities on the West Business Corridor and south west adaptive area residential. 518 00:42:33,120 --> 00:42:41,100 The current zoning ordinance addresses personal service uses in the commercial office zoning district. 519 00:42:41,340 --> 00:42:47,940 It's not permitted by right in the zoning district, but is permitted by special exception only. 520 00:42:49,100 --> 00:42:57,220 Zoning ordinance allows flexibility for businesses traditionally located with other commercial service and retail sales uses. 521 00:42:57,220 --> 00:43:04,860 but have operational characteristics that make them appropriate to operate in traditional office parks like this. 522 00:43:05,780 --> 00:43:08,700 Adequate development and land use controls are necessary. 523 00:43:09,400 --> 00:43:15,540 Provide for compatible spatial exception uses and minimize impacts to adias and less intense use. 524 00:43:16,280 --> 00:43:20,400 For example, residential uses next to it. 525 00:43:20,400 --> 00:43:28,680 A previous special exception is E21-05 was granted to allow personal service use consisting 526 00:43:28,680 --> 00:43:34,680 of cosmetics and aesthetic services within the adias and unit and an expansion into an 527 00:43:34,680 --> 00:43:38,500 additional unit subsequently granted a few months ago. 528 00:43:39,440 --> 00:43:49,920 So one special exception, 21-05, turning on Parkway, suite 108 for personal service use consisting 529 00:43:49,920 --> 00:43:56,960 of cosmetic anesthetic services for a maximum of six people was granted in November 2021. 530 00:43:58,120 --> 00:44:07,260 And a special exception, amendment 21-05, at the same building, 299 here in the Parkway 531 00:44:07,260 --> 00:44:15,920 Suite 107, for an expansion of the other service use, consisting of cosmetics and aesthetic 532 00:44:15,920 --> 00:44:23,840 services was granted on June 13, 2023, and increased the number of clients to 12 people 533 00:44:23,840 --> 00:44:29,360 in total, both units, including employees. In both cases, the planning commission recommend 534 00:44:29,360 --> 00:44:33,860 approval with the same conditions and the town council approve the application. 535 00:44:41,950 --> 00:44:51,030 The applicant proposes to reconfigure the existing 916 square feet of tenant space into a cosmetic 536 00:44:51,030 --> 00:44:54,170 and personal services business to sign a new tenant. 537 00:44:54,870 --> 00:44:59,850 These personal services may include a spa, salon, and cosmetic services. 538 00:45:01,140 --> 00:45:08,560 Proposed maximum of customer count of 6 at any given time of each unit, including staff. 539 00:45:12,150 --> 00:45:34,190 The property contains a parking lot with 108 spaces. It's close to bus station and 101 mile and a half away from a random metro rail station. The staff analysis of these requests for a special exception for a personal service used in the CO zone in this street, evaluated the 540 00:45:34,190 --> 00:45:39,250 components such as zone-in-ordance compliance and comprehensive plan adherence, purpose 541 00:45:39,250 --> 00:45:45,870 and intent of the CO zone in district, byte-write uses versus special accepted uses, use compatibility, 542 00:45:46,650 --> 00:45:51,850 parking analysis and potential impacts, and what conditions may mitigate and-or manage 543 00:45:51,850 --> 00:45:52,510 impacts. 544 00:45:54,170 --> 00:46:00,530 Disapplication as proposed and with conditions recommended by staff would not adversely impact 545 00:46:00,530 --> 00:46:04,290 at ESN properties, but anticipated at denial or approval. 546 00:46:05,210 --> 00:46:08,790 The denial of the special exception means 547 00:46:08,790 --> 00:46:12,610 by-right use is commercial office remains zero. 548 00:46:13,610 --> 00:46:19,010 Proposed expansion of business or lease this space 549 00:46:19,010 --> 00:46:22,730 would not be permitted at the subject property location 550 00:46:22,730 --> 00:46:23,950 for the specific use. 551 00:46:25,070 --> 00:46:26,970 And approval of the special exception 552 00:46:26,970 --> 00:46:32,090 would mean by right uses and land use compatibility remain, 553 00:46:32,910 --> 00:46:36,310 non-anticipated negative impacts with attached conditions 554 00:46:36,310 --> 00:46:40,290 and current local businesses will be ready to expand operations 555 00:46:40,290 --> 00:46:45,350 or lease adding economic development and tax base. 556 00:46:47,570 --> 00:46:51,350 The special conditions proposed are the following. 557 00:46:51,730 --> 00:46:54,850 The personal services business space shall be constructed 558 00:46:54,850 --> 00:47:02,390 and utilize insubstantial conformance with the original application and updated first floor plan 559 00:47:02,390 --> 00:47:14,110 received on June 27, 2023 and soon subsequently on in September 25, 2023 or similar types of 560 00:47:14,110 --> 00:47:20,890 cosmetic samples on the service uses. The business operations shall be conducted by appointment only 561 00:47:20,890 --> 00:47:26,730 be limited to six total people, including employees, occupy in the space at any given time. 562 00:47:27,390 --> 00:47:32,890 And the third condition is that the retail sales floor and space location shall be limited 563 00:47:32,890 --> 00:47:36,730 to not more than 50 square feet within the tenant space. 564 00:47:41,870 --> 00:47:47,610 Staff recommends approval of a special exception, 23 or three, with conditions in accordance 565 00:47:47,610 --> 00:47:49,510 to drop resolution. 566 00:47:52,020 --> 00:47:52,880 Thank you, Mr. Glacias. 567 00:47:53,240 --> 00:47:54,180 Appreciate the staff report. 568 00:47:54,480 --> 00:47:58,080 Do any commissioners have questions or comments for staff at this time? 569 00:48:01,010 --> 00:48:01,350 Go ahead, George. 570 00:48:01,990 --> 00:48:02,250 Thank you. 571 00:48:03,350 --> 00:48:08,530 I raised this, I believe, at the work session. 572 00:48:08,990 --> 00:48:13,550 And I'd just like to go over it again for clarification's sake. 573 00:48:16,040 --> 00:48:17,500 In terms of the conditions, 574 00:48:17,500 --> 00:48:30,980 as I read conditions two and three together, walk in clients for the retail 575 00:48:30,980 --> 00:48:40,360 operation would not be permitted. Is that the intent of this? That's correct. Okay. 576 00:48:41,100 --> 00:48:47,440 All right. That answers my question. So anyone purchasing from the 577 00:48:47,440 --> 00:48:55,790 retail space would already be there by appointment. 578 00:48:56,190 --> 00:48:57,150 Correct. I have one. 579 00:48:57,170 --> 00:48:58,190 Okay. Thank you. 580 00:48:58,350 --> 00:49:00,550 I'm glad I got that on the record. Thank you very much. 581 00:49:00,950 --> 00:49:01,210 I'm done. 582 00:49:01,570 --> 00:49:02,970 All right. 583 00:49:03,210 --> 00:49:04,830 This time I'll invite the applicant, the applicant, 584 00:49:04,830 --> 00:49:07,670 it's agent to come up and speak before us this evening. 585 00:49:09,530 --> 00:49:12,110 I'm not seeing anybody move, so I assume they're not here. 586 00:49:12,990 --> 00:49:16,470 At this time, we'll call and comment from the audience. 587 00:49:16,470 --> 00:49:19,610 Is anybody would like to speak on this item this evening? 588 00:49:22,660 --> 00:49:29,180 Seeing none, I will close the public hearing and move to the commission level for a motion. 589 00:49:29,460 --> 00:49:31,800 Is there a motion on this item this evening? 590 00:49:33,160 --> 00:49:41,060 I would move to approve SE23-03 with the stated conditions. 591 00:49:42,060 --> 00:49:42,980 I'll second that. 592 00:49:43,620 --> 00:49:46,780 So motion for approval by Vice Chair Burke, a second by Chair Romeo. 593 00:49:46,780 --> 00:49:48,660 it's any discussion on the motion. 594 00:49:51,060 --> 00:49:53,520 All right. Seeing none, I'll call for the vote and ask for the clerk to call the roll. 595 00:49:54,960 --> 00:49:56,620 Commissioner Donohue. Yes. 596 00:49:57,600 --> 00:49:58,860 Commissioner Farron. Yes. 597 00:50:00,040 --> 00:50:02,860 Commissioner Johannes. Yes. 598 00:50:03,960 --> 00:50:12,320 Vice Chair Burke. Yes. Chair Romeo. Yes, the motion will pass 502 with commissioners Albrossi and Moses absent for the vote. 599 00:50:13,120 --> 00:50:15,440 Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks. 600 00:50:15,440 --> 00:50:21,700 Our next item this evening, which is our last public hearing item, is CPA 23-SAR-1. 601 00:50:21,880 --> 00:50:25,440 This is a resolution to consider a conference of plan amendment to the town of 602 00:50:25,440 --> 00:50:28,840 herding 2030 conference of plan adopted on August 12, 2008. 603 00:50:29,480 --> 00:50:35,420 As amended through May 24, 2022, I will open public hearing and call Mr. Ahmed Saki for 604 00:50:35,420 --> 00:50:36,020 the staff board. 605 00:50:36,340 --> 00:50:36,700 Whenever you're ready. 606 00:50:37,220 --> 00:50:37,880 Thank you, Chairman. 607 00:50:38,620 --> 00:50:40,760 Good evening, member of the planning commission. 608 00:50:42,040 --> 00:50:46,020 For the record, my name is Ahmad Zaki and I'm the lead planner in both giving development 609 00:50:46,020 --> 00:50:47,160 long-range planning. 610 00:50:48,000 --> 00:50:52,400 Tonight, once again, I'm here to present the comprehensive plan amendments to be in 611 00:50:52,400 --> 00:51:00,080 number 23-01, and as you all know, at the heart of this planning allows the transatlated 612 00:51:00,080 --> 00:51:05,540 growth, a small ear plan, for the record, the transatlated growth, a small ear plan is 613 00:51:05,540 --> 00:51:10,740 looking at the south-eastern corner of the town between Spring Street and Van Buren Street 614 00:51:10,740 --> 00:51:13,060 and on the north side, it's mounted by 615 00:51:13,060 --> 00:51:16,180 a dance residential neighborhood 616 00:51:16,180 --> 00:51:17,500 and on the south side of it is the 617 00:51:17,500 --> 00:51:19,440 hand and transit-oriented core area plan. 618 00:51:20,120 --> 00:51:22,820 The site excludes the fair work of property. 619 00:51:25,080 --> 00:51:25,960 As a result of the background, 620 00:51:26,220 --> 00:51:28,040 the comprehensive plan amendment was initiated 621 00:51:28,040 --> 00:51:31,000 by the town council on December 12th, 622 00:51:31,060 --> 00:51:34,020 through the solution of the 23-G-777 623 00:51:34,020 --> 00:51:35,560 and was referred to the planning commission 624 00:51:35,560 --> 00:51:37,420 for review and recommendation. 625 00:51:37,880 --> 00:51:38,860 The amendment will adopt 626 00:51:38,860 --> 00:51:40,700 the transit-related growth small area plan 627 00:51:40,700 --> 00:51:42,500 and then incorporated by reference 628 00:51:42,500 --> 00:51:44,840 into the town's 2038 Comprehensive Plan. 629 00:51:46,120 --> 00:51:47,880 Personnel Section 152, 630 00:51:48,040 --> 00:51:49,740 Dash 2222 of the Court of Virginia, 631 00:51:49,920 --> 00:51:51,280 local planning commission prepares 632 00:51:51,280 --> 00:51:52,560 the Comprehensive Plan amendment, 633 00:51:53,160 --> 00:51:53,740 and you command this, 634 00:51:53,880 --> 00:51:55,780 you command this by resolution for adoption 635 00:51:55,780 --> 00:51:57,200 by local government bodies. 636 00:52:00,800 --> 00:52:01,640 As I said background, 637 00:52:02,000 --> 00:52:06,120 the TRG project wasn't shaded by the town in April 2022. 638 00:52:07,240 --> 00:52:09,100 From the beginning of the process, 639 00:52:09,100 --> 00:52:13,160 we engaged with the community in order to get there for the 640 00:52:13,160 --> 00:52:15,960 spider-ion and their expectation from the planning process. 641 00:52:16,820 --> 00:52:21,320 The project was started with community outreach, reaching to the 642 00:52:21,320 --> 00:52:27,120 abatting property owners, abatting residents property owners to the town's community 643 00:52:27,120 --> 00:52:32,920 and also to the Tearge Advisory Committee, which was established to 644 00:52:32,920 --> 00:52:35,800 advise the governing bodies. 645 00:52:36,660 --> 00:52:42,640 Then, in the second phase, the project started with data collection, data analysis, kind 646 00:52:42,640 --> 00:52:46,480 of strengths, and opportunity analysis, and infrastructure analysis, and so on. 647 00:52:47,660 --> 00:52:55,480 At the phase three, using the material that we had collected, the project consultant developed 648 00:52:55,480 --> 00:52:58,900 three alternative scenarios for future development of the TRG. 649 00:52:58,900 --> 00:53:06,520 And those scenarios were shared with the public on TRG advisory community planning commission 650 00:53:06,520 --> 00:53:08,280 and town council for input. 651 00:53:10,020 --> 00:53:16,080 When those comments were reached out to the community to know about their expectation and 652 00:53:16,080 --> 00:53:22,000 aspiration for the future of the TRG, we heard their expectation as a TRG that's walkable 653 00:53:22,000 --> 00:53:28,520 that has the feel of small town that has the promotes connectivity that has a 654 00:53:28,520 --> 00:53:33,420 distant character and flexible flexibility of uses. Some of the community members 655 00:53:33,420 --> 00:53:36,060 also ask for more park spaces. 656 00:53:38,160 --> 00:53:40,320 Further, we also ask the community about the 657 00:53:40,320 --> 00:53:46,560 look and feel of the future Teorgy and majority of respondents prefer to feel and 658 00:53:46,560 --> 00:53:51,420 look like Mosaic District and a future herendent downtown. 659 00:53:54,720 --> 00:54:04,100 This process was kind of the end of visioning phase and based on those inputs, the project 660 00:54:04,100 --> 00:54:12,740 consultant kind of developed the draft TRG plan that included different elements like 661 00:54:12,740 --> 00:54:20,600 Land use aspects, transportation aspects, economic development, and other elements that are 662 00:54:20,600 --> 00:54:26,300 part of a small area plan. Obviously there are some critical elements that still 663 00:54:26,300 --> 00:54:32,660 needs to be discussed and still we need to work with the project consultant to 664 00:54:33,520 --> 00:54:39,020 further develop and resolve any potential conflicts or concerns that staff or 665 00:54:40,200 --> 00:54:42,980 We have here from the community or advisory community. 666 00:54:43,960 --> 00:54:51,540 One of the issues that we need to discuss further is the transportation framework and 667 00:54:52,080 --> 00:55:00,980 particularly the street network as, you know, the TRG plan proposes a new alternative 668 00:55:00,980 --> 00:55:02,540 to herendent parkway. 669 00:55:03,320 --> 00:55:08,160 The nature and function of herendent parkway is being changed and network of additional 670 00:55:08,160 --> 00:55:13,720 the street is being proposed. These all proposals are made in order to accommodate and facilitate 671 00:55:13,720 --> 00:55:19,700 the transportation and the density and added density that we will have in the future of GRG. 672 00:55:21,620 --> 00:55:25,900 Just to recap, the transportation was identified as a major constraint to density 673 00:55:25,900 --> 00:55:27,380 from the beginning of the project. 674 00:55:30,750 --> 00:55:32,890 The future of the year obviously changed 675 00:55:33,520 --> 00:55:38,730 from the existing suburban setup of development to a mixed-use urban transit-oriented development 676 00:55:39,270 --> 00:55:47,530 The Henan Park Race proposed to change to an urban corridor with vibrant mix of uses on two sides of it, connecting random metro station to sunset business bar. 677 00:55:48,030 --> 00:55:53,770 The proposed network includes a multi-modal mobility grade and that facility is different movement patterns. 678 00:55:55,150 --> 00:56:00,710 The street grade also helps in framing building envelopes and front of front of back of buildings. 679 00:56:02,120 --> 00:56:09,840 Another major element that is still being discussed is the development of the TRG, which 680 00:56:09,840 --> 00:56:13,740 is actually around anchored around the parking spaces. 681 00:56:14,940 --> 00:56:22,180 Some of the concerns that cell and items that cell are being developed is the network 682 00:56:22,180 --> 00:56:31,020 and shape of an accessibility and use of triangle park and the trapezoidal park, that's the center 683 00:56:31,020 --> 00:56:38,580 of the TRG and how a majority or all the user of the TRG or the residents of TRG should 684 00:56:38,580 --> 00:56:43,440 have access to different parks. 685 00:56:45,510 --> 00:56:54,550 Another major element of the TRG is the districts, the five kind of character-based 686 00:56:54,550 --> 00:56:57,670 districts or zones that we have in the TRG. 687 00:56:57,670 --> 00:57:01,330 The framework proposes five different corrector zones for the future. 688 00:57:02,130 --> 00:57:07,030 There are certain context-based guidelines proposed for each of the zones in the TRG plan. 689 00:57:07,610 --> 00:57:10,690 For example, the metro arrival, which in the five minute distance, 690 00:57:11,170 --> 00:57:20,070 five minute walk distance from the metro station was served as a gathering place with numbers retail kind of uses. 691 00:57:21,470 --> 00:57:26,130 The transition district, which is the residential area that will transition the height 692 00:57:26,130 --> 00:57:32,230 from the rent and metro station or the metro arrival zone to the Don's residential neighborhood 693 00:57:32,230 --> 00:57:38,950 will facilitate the high transition. The plan strategically places blocks shaping the network 694 00:57:38,950 --> 00:57:42,890 of open spaces and funding parks within the, within and outside the TRG. 695 00:57:45,190 --> 00:57:46,730 Another elements in the 696 00:57:46,730 --> 00:57:53,830 TRG critical element that still is being developed is the nature and the approach to the future 697 00:57:53,830 --> 00:57:54,890 of Sunset Business Park. 698 00:57:55,910 --> 00:57:58,630 Besides the option of retaining the existing Sunset Business 699 00:57:58,630 --> 00:58:03,130 Park in long term, the plan suggests transforming the Sunset 700 00:58:03,130 --> 00:58:05,950 District from a parking lot driven business park 701 00:58:05,950 --> 00:58:07,730 to a great urban public room. 702 00:58:11,310 --> 00:58:15,450 From the work session, the update that we have is 703 00:58:15,450 --> 00:58:18,970 the advisory committee recommendation that they put forward 704 00:58:18,970 --> 00:58:23,950 and their December, January 10, meeting. 705 00:58:25,910 --> 00:58:29,450 Just a recap, just as a recap for our public audience, 706 00:58:30,290 --> 00:58:32,250 the TRG Advisory Committee was established at the beginning 707 00:58:32,250 --> 00:58:36,310 of the TRG planning process in order to be part 708 00:58:36,310 --> 00:58:38,930 of this planning effort and also to advise 709 00:58:38,930 --> 00:58:41,050 the Planning Commission and Town Council 710 00:58:41,050 --> 00:58:42,250 on this planning process. 711 00:58:43,150 --> 00:58:45,270 The committee had their last session on January 10, 712 00:58:45,370 --> 00:58:47,730 in which they discussed the planning detail 713 00:58:47,730 --> 00:58:50,990 and came up with a set of recommendations that are us following. 714 00:58:52,270 --> 00:58:57,070 The AC generally, the advisory committee generally supported and recommended TRG plan 715 00:58:57,070 --> 00:58:59,210 with the following considerations. 716 00:59:00,150 --> 00:59:05,190 The committee supports the plan and use and density considering required flexibility 717 00:59:05,190 --> 00:59:09,170 of potential uses to market dynamics. 718 00:59:10,030 --> 00:59:13,270 The committee further recommends that densities should be balanced 719 00:59:13,270 --> 00:59:16,190 with viable transportation infrastructure improvements. 720 00:59:17,030 --> 00:59:21,850 When discussing about transportation and traffic, the committee recommended consideration 721 00:59:21,850 --> 00:59:27,430 of multimodal travel options and a balanced mix of transportation modes with the focus 722 00:59:27,430 --> 00:59:30,230 on walk-up, walk-ability and bike-ability in the TRG. 723 00:59:31,550 --> 00:59:37,450 They further recommended that street grid shall clearly define public and private roads 724 00:59:37,450 --> 00:59:42,010 in the plan and should allow for some adjustment in the small streets. 725 00:59:43,510 --> 00:59:48,690 The committee further instructed staff to collaborate with Osam when it comes to the 726 00:59:48,690 --> 00:59:56,170 architecture language and a TRG character that could help the development of guidelines 727 00:59:56,170 --> 00:59:59,590 lines that could help further the Architectural Review Board. 728 01:00:02,760 --> 01:00:12,000 The committee supported the park and open spaces framework and recommended spaces that allow and facilitate pop-up shops and recreation activities. 729 01:00:12,880 --> 01:00:29,540 In the discussion of parking measures, the committee supported parallel parking on some streets and the concept of shared parking where common ownership exists. About the sense of business park, also the committee recommended an interim option for the sense of business park. 730 01:00:29,540 --> 01:00:37,180 In which the park would be retained in its existing form and open space improvement would be part of it. 731 01:00:39,780 --> 01:00:46,220 As I mentioned, a lot is being done so far in the TRG planning process. 732 01:00:46,820 --> 01:00:57,960 But still there are some outstanding items that need further work and development that we are currently doing with the TRG project consultant. 733 01:00:57,960 --> 01:01:04,960 Some of the items that still need a nurse being developed as transportation impact mitigations, 734 01:01:05,880 --> 01:01:12,920 potential policy guidelines for traffic level of services, road alignment and geometry, 735 01:01:13,660 --> 01:01:17,360 open space and architectural form and character principles and guidelines, 736 01:01:18,120 --> 01:01:24,040 interim option for the sensitive district, and also parking strategies both of street and on street, 737 01:01:24,040 --> 01:01:31,880 impact to community services and town administration, which will be due to increased density and 738 01:01:31,880 --> 01:01:34,960 implementation and phasing strategies in the CHRG. 739 01:01:36,240 --> 01:01:40,640 A staff is continuing review and development of the detailed Arrata sheet listing additional 740 01:01:40,640 --> 01:01:42,300 comments to the consultant. 741 01:01:42,980 --> 01:01:47,400 The project consultant is currently updating and revising the plan in response to town 742 01:01:47,400 --> 01:01:52,140 affairs and comments, and also to staff and advisory committee comments and recommendations. 743 01:01:52,140 --> 01:01:57,500 These are revision and code both editorial and plan content updates. 744 01:01:57,860 --> 01:02:04,720 I find version of the plan is anticipated to be shared with the planning commission before their upcoming session. 745 01:02:08,000 --> 01:02:21,600 At this time, that we still need to work with the project consultant for additional for improvement and the outstanding item that they need to work. 746 01:02:23,180 --> 01:02:30,680 The staff is withholding a recommendation, but the Planning Commission has the following options for a recommendation. 747 01:02:31,200 --> 01:02:34,840 With this, I conclude my presentation here, and I'll be happy to answer any questions that you might have. 748 01:02:35,400 --> 01:02:35,660 Thank you. 749 01:02:36,520 --> 01:02:38,180 Thank you very much, Mr. Zaki. 750 01:02:38,740 --> 01:02:41,500 Do any commissioners have questions for staff at this time? 751 01:02:44,480 --> 01:02:45,460 I do, there's no question. 752 01:02:45,460 --> 01:02:46,520 I'll go Marin and then George. 753 01:02:46,940 --> 01:02:47,240 Go ahead, Marin. 754 01:02:47,860 --> 01:02:48,800 Thank you, Mr. Chair. 755 01:02:50,580 --> 01:02:51,600 Thank you, Mr. Zaki. 756 01:02:51,600 --> 01:02:57,340 I have a question, understanding that a lot of progress has happened, but there's still 757 01:02:57,340 --> 01:03:01,660 some flags that you all communicated to us. 758 01:03:03,540 --> 01:03:11,120 What's since the last TRG work session that we had, is there any plan for meeting with 759 01:03:11,120 --> 01:03:12,980 the consultant related to the next step? 760 01:03:13,140 --> 01:03:14,560 So I'm just curious about the timeline. 761 01:03:16,520 --> 01:03:20,700 Actually, we do have bi-weekly meeting with the consultant. 762 01:03:21,340 --> 01:03:28,400 We have already shared an Arada sheet that's with our comments, including the Teorgy Advisory 763 01:03:28,400 --> 01:03:31,360 Committee comments, and we had a meeting with him this morning. 764 01:03:33,010 --> 01:03:42,630 The schedule that we all have agreed on is they will prepare an updated presentation for 765 01:03:42,630 --> 01:03:50,630 upcoming planning commission and they might share an updated kind of soft copy of a plan 766 01:03:50,630 --> 01:03:57,270 that you will have access and we could comment. But the plan is that they will provide the draft plan, 767 01:03:57,890 --> 01:04:02,190 the next draft of the plan which could form the final version maybe before any minor 768 01:04:03,090 --> 01:04:09,510 edits that might be possible during the town council sessions or maybe major edits that will be 769 01:04:09,510 --> 01:04:11,650 required, they will share that we've 770 01:04:11,650 --> 01:04:13,310 best done before the town council. 771 01:04:14,950 --> 01:04:15,970 Thank you for that. 772 01:04:16,250 --> 01:04:20,310 And so if next month we have a draft that we look at, 773 01:04:22,010 --> 01:04:27,370 are we still on track in the over arching timeline of the TRG 774 01:04:27,370 --> 01:04:28,470 and going to the town council, 775 01:04:28,590 --> 01:04:32,150 or are we, I'm forgetting the overall timeline for this 776 01:04:32,150 --> 01:04:32,670 project. 777 01:04:33,790 --> 01:04:39,270 Yeah, based on the discussion and the kind of update 778 01:04:39,270 --> 01:04:47,150 that we are seeing from the project consultant, we think that they will be able to submit the 779 01:04:47,150 --> 01:04:52,630 revised version before the town council and we hope that we could get it done with the 780 01:04:53,510 --> 01:04:58,750 after the plan is being recommended by the planning commission and once it up in the town council 781 01:04:58,750 --> 01:05:01,870 decisions. Awesome. Thank you. That's it for me. 782 01:05:05,150 --> 01:05:08,170 Hello again. We've been saying a lot of one or 783 01:05:08,170 --> 01:05:08,410 other. 784 01:05:11,110 --> 01:05:17,670 That slide and the slides with the recommendations of the advisory committee. 785 01:05:18,650 --> 01:05:25,550 Did this body receive those and I apologize if we did and I missed it? No, unfortunately 786 01:05:25,550 --> 01:05:29,790 the same. It was listening to the discussion. Okay. 787 01:05:30,010 --> 01:05:36,390 Another piece. Yeah. The last platform. If we could go back to the first slide of the recommendations. 788 01:05:36,390 --> 01:05:37,330 Yes. 789 01:05:39,970 --> 01:05:50,290 In the event, we do not move this forward. I request that all the members of the planning commission be given. 790 01:05:51,830 --> 01:06:00,410 Well, you could give us a whole slide presentation if you'd like, but certainly from here until the until the end of the presentation. 791 01:06:00,410 --> 01:06:12,470 and I'd like to emphasize that that generally covers a lot of ground and most of that is 792 01:06:12,470 --> 01:06:20,170 flushed out by the numerical items to follow for the benefit of my fellow commissioners. 793 01:06:20,710 --> 01:06:21,290 Thanks. 794 01:06:23,750 --> 01:06:24,770 Thank you, George. Thank you, Marin. 795 01:06:26,870 --> 01:06:31,950 Mr. Zaki, I have a question in relation to the comments or the response you gave to Commissioner 796 01:06:31,950 --> 01:06:37,590 Johannes. Is it accurate to say the final version of the TRG draft? Assuming we continue 797 01:06:37,590 --> 01:06:43,070 this to the next month, we won't know the final draft version or won't see the final draft 798 01:06:43,070 --> 01:06:47,890 version of that at the February meetings. It won't happen until after we make a recommendation. 799 01:06:48,390 --> 01:06:50,910 Is that accurate or did I misinterpret that? 800 01:06:50,910 --> 01:07:08,010 Yeah, Lisa Glenn might add on this but what we had a discussion with as we had a discussion with the project consultant they were kind of all looking to account to a condition that they said that if we even submit a revised version, we will receive additional comments. 801 01:07:08,010 --> 01:07:15,890 So they said that we will receive the comments and apply it and you will have access to the revised version, but they said we will hold the whole cemetery vice version. 802 01:07:15,890 --> 01:07:17,690 and tell the Council for after meeting. 803 01:07:18,350 --> 01:07:21,210 Okay, so in advance of, if we go to February, 804 01:07:21,710 --> 01:07:22,750 in advance of those meetings, 805 01:07:22,890 --> 01:07:24,490 we'll see a revised version of this text 806 01:07:24,490 --> 01:07:26,670 based on the recommendations from the TRG committee 807 01:07:26,670 --> 01:07:28,230 and from staffs are out of sheet. 808 01:07:28,970 --> 01:07:31,190 And then at that time, there will still be further versions, 809 01:07:31,190 --> 01:07:32,910 which we would expect for town council to make, 810 01:07:33,230 --> 01:07:34,930 but we'll see a more complete version 811 01:07:34,930 --> 01:07:35,850 before our next meetings. 812 01:07:36,170 --> 01:07:36,790 Okay, that's right. 813 01:07:36,970 --> 01:07:37,710 I just wanna clarify that. 814 01:07:37,950 --> 01:07:38,210 Thank you. 815 01:07:38,870 --> 01:07:40,910 Any other questions for our staff at this time? 816 01:07:42,170 --> 01:07:42,390 Okay. 817 01:07:44,110 --> 01:07:49,530 this time we don't have an applicant so I'll call and comments from the audience. Does anybody 818 01:07:49,530 --> 01:07:53,570 from the audience, would anybody from the audience like to speak on this item this evening? Please 819 01:07:53,570 --> 01:07:57,750 me, I'm going to go ahead, you have three minutes to speak and please felt the sign and sheet when you're 820 01:07:57,750 --> 01:08:03,710 done speaking. Welcome. Thank you. Thank you. Good to see you all. And thank you for the opportunity to 821 01:08:03,710 --> 01:08:09,210 speak on this important plan and my name is Laurie Greenley from a senior land use planner with 822 01:08:09,210 --> 01:08:29,390 McGuire Woods, speaking tonight on behalf of Shornstein Properties LLC, the owner of approximately 15.46 acres of land in the TRG, the largest single ownership in a very strategically located property directly across from the promenade access to the Metro station. 823 01:08:29,390 --> 01:08:36,170 Greg Regal of my office who participated in the TRG advisory committee throughout the process 824 01:08:36,170 --> 01:08:41,690 I hope to speak tonight fortunately he could not be here so I'm here to relay our comments 825 01:08:41,690 --> 01:08:42,970 on this draft plan. 826 01:08:44,010 --> 01:08:50,370 First we appreciate the collective process staff has undertaken for the small area plan 827 01:08:50,370 --> 01:08:55,870 there was considerable engagement in many different forms and that's really the hallmark 828 01:08:55,870 --> 01:08:58,230 of an exemplary planning process. 829 01:08:58,230 --> 01:09:04,690 The Advisory Committee met numerous times alone, and together with the Planning Commission 830 01:09:05,010 --> 01:09:07,250 and there were very constructive discussions. 831 01:09:08,590 --> 01:09:15,090 On behalf of Shorenstein, we do support what is reflected in SOM's last plan, but importantly, 832 01:09:15,570 --> 01:09:21,690 we do support it as qualified by the comments and the motions that were unanimously passed 833 01:09:21,690 --> 01:09:30,250 by the TRG advisory committee. I staff mentioned this, the comments and the motions. It is our 834 01:09:30,250 --> 01:09:36,970 understanding that as you mentioned, Commissioner Burke, that you will receive the detailed resolution 835 01:09:37,530 --> 01:09:43,730 before you act in February, because there is a lot in there. Among other things, the advisory committee 836 01:09:43,730 --> 01:09:50,550 motions or recommendations added important and practical flexibility to the plan recommendations 837 01:09:50,550 --> 01:09:57,110 to ensure that landowners can reasonably respond to the still evolving market conditions. 838 01:09:57,870 --> 01:10:03,390 This flexibility also allows for the inevitable realities that come to light 839 01:10:03,390 --> 01:10:08,150 when site plans are actually engineered and buildings are put on the ground. 840 01:10:08,470 --> 01:10:09,790 And that is extremely important. 841 01:10:10,890 --> 01:10:15,490 The flexibility should not be construed as simply a landowner benefit. 842 01:10:15,490 --> 01:10:22,110 but very clearly it reflects a trust in and a reliance on the land use zoning process 843 01:10:23,650 --> 01:10:29,030 and that will follow any of the TRG recommendations. 844 01:10:29,830 --> 01:10:35,130 The flexibility to allow the landowner, staff and members of the commission and the council 845 01:10:35,130 --> 01:10:43,490 to continue to work together within a general framework provided by the plan is critical 846 01:10:43,490 --> 01:10:46,570 to a good outcome for any project in the TRG. 847 01:10:47,370 --> 01:10:51,470 The advisory committee recommendations logically establish 848 01:10:51,470 --> 01:10:55,070 well-defined maximums in terms of scale and density 849 01:10:55,070 --> 01:10:58,090 and a clear design framework, we think, 850 01:10:58,090 --> 01:11:00,850 that can logically guide future applications. 851 01:11:01,810 --> 01:11:04,970 The last point I'd like to make is that time is of the essence. 852 01:11:05,490 --> 01:11:08,590 This is a planning process that has spanned almost two years 853 01:11:09,510 --> 01:11:29,710 In a time of still rapidly shifting and evolving market conditions, finishing this planning process and moving quickly to the zoning ordinance text, which is a process in and of itself is the best way to ensure that the vision that you all vote for is comes to pass in the TRG. 854 01:11:30,250 --> 01:11:31,110 So thank you for your time. 855 01:11:32,450 --> 01:11:34,690 Looking forward to continue working with you. 856 01:11:35,530 --> 01:11:36,570 But you miss Greenleaf? 857 01:11:38,190 --> 01:11:39,730 Would anybody else like to speak on this side? 858 01:11:39,770 --> 01:11:41,330 I miss Greenleaf, you can move that to the side. 859 01:11:41,490 --> 01:11:42,130 The sign-in sheet. 860 01:11:42,450 --> 01:11:43,430 That's probably making it easier. 861 01:11:43,630 --> 01:11:44,410 So we've got the next speaker. 862 01:11:44,610 --> 01:11:44,970 Thank you. 863 01:11:45,530 --> 01:11:45,930 Mr. Warr. 864 01:11:46,070 --> 01:11:46,450 Welcome back. 865 01:11:47,090 --> 01:11:48,050 Chair and members of the commission. 866 01:11:48,630 --> 01:11:50,810 Staff, would you mind turning to page 9 for one second? 867 01:11:51,390 --> 01:11:53,670 I want to reiterate Mrs. Greenleaf's appreciation 868 01:11:53,670 --> 01:11:55,570 that Mr. Regal said for the TRG group. 869 01:11:56,070 --> 01:11:59,190 As Mr. Burke can probably attest in the first meeting or two, 870 01:11:59,730 --> 01:12:00,430 we sort of nodded. 871 01:12:00,490 --> 01:12:01,590 We got the right plan here. 872 01:12:01,930 --> 01:12:04,050 Tensing near the Metro, tapering down to the neighborhoods. 873 01:12:04,050 --> 01:12:06,390 roads, a parallel road network, and good open space. 874 01:12:07,090 --> 01:12:11,170 I would describe our struggle since then is getting the plan in the right form to reflect 875 01:12:11,170 --> 01:12:11,970 that community agreement. 876 01:12:12,750 --> 01:12:15,390 And how do you have a rigid flexibility, right? 877 01:12:15,490 --> 01:12:16,930 How do you take those two things that are opposed? 878 01:12:17,710 --> 01:12:20,210 I'm here this evening on behalf of Rooney Properties. 879 01:12:20,330 --> 01:12:21,650 They own 9.4 acres. 880 01:12:22,390 --> 01:12:27,010 And the first blue line, hopefully this is able to follow, but has the 90 foot width, and 881 01:12:27,010 --> 01:12:32,030 I'm giving you an example here of this flexibility we're looking for, as you see the 90 foot start 882 01:12:32,030 --> 01:12:35,530 to the middle of the plan and move to the right-hand side, 883 01:12:35,690 --> 01:12:38,390 that is a dimension shown in the master plan for 90 feet. 884 01:12:39,530 --> 01:12:41,290 And no one in the community asked for that. 885 01:12:41,390 --> 01:12:42,270 No one's way opposed to it. 886 01:12:42,350 --> 01:12:42,890 It's just a dimension. 887 01:12:43,350 --> 01:12:46,090 The problem is that forms the basis of zoning and expectations. 888 01:12:47,150 --> 01:12:48,290 To staff, you go to page 12. 889 01:12:48,310 --> 01:12:49,810 I want to show you what 90 feet means. 890 01:12:49,910 --> 01:12:51,890 And this is an example of this rigid flexibility, 891 01:12:51,890 --> 01:12:52,490 if you will. 892 01:12:52,930 --> 01:12:56,630 On the bottom right-hand side, our project for Rooney Properties 893 01:12:56,630 --> 01:12:58,290 is multi-family along Herndon Parkway, 894 01:12:58,530 --> 01:13:00,670 and then transitioning to those townhouses in the back. 895 01:13:01,470 --> 01:13:04,970 Well, if you do that, you have almost a 20-foot sidewalk that makes total sense against 896 01:13:04,970 --> 01:13:06,070 a building. 897 01:13:06,270 --> 01:13:07,630 This is a sunset business park. 898 01:13:07,810 --> 01:13:09,130 This is an example of a cross-section. 899 01:13:09,770 --> 01:13:12,330 As you see the cafes and the sidewalks, that makes total sense. 900 01:13:13,110 --> 01:13:14,990 It doesn't make a lot of sense up against townhouses. 901 01:13:15,650 --> 01:13:20,270 So this is an example of how do we take that intent of the plan for a big, vibrant road, 902 01:13:20,610 --> 01:13:24,790 paralleling herndon parkway that shows 90 feet, to wait in some sections it might be 82. 903 01:13:25,430 --> 01:13:29,430 And that's just an example of how we're hoping to see the master plan evolve and some of the 904 01:13:29,430 --> 01:13:33,070 flexibility we've been talking about because we've all been doing this long enough. 905 01:13:33,470 --> 01:13:34,970 As soon as you write a number, you're compared to the number. 906 01:13:35,610 --> 01:13:38,310 And we already know if some of the numbers are a little too tight in areas and they're 907 01:13:38,310 --> 01:13:38,870 fine to others. 908 01:13:39,910 --> 01:13:43,230 So somewhat of a joke here, I do hope you continue this until next hearing. 909 01:13:43,810 --> 01:13:46,130 Because we do hope to see the updated draft from SOM. 910 01:13:46,610 --> 01:13:48,290 Again, it's been a very good process. 911 01:13:48,310 --> 01:13:50,430 I think now it's getting the document in the right shape. 912 01:13:50,850 --> 01:13:53,590 I think the intent is there and now it's getting as technical items aligned. 913 01:13:54,050 --> 01:13:56,270 So thank you for your time and look forward to seeing you next month. 914 01:13:58,170 --> 01:14:03,070 Any other speakers this evening here this evening would like to speak on this item. 915 01:14:04,830 --> 01:14:05,450 All right. 916 01:14:05,670 --> 01:14:06,210 Seeing none. 917 01:14:07,950 --> 01:14:11,550 I'll move that the move to the planning committee is a little forward discussion action. 918 01:14:12,550 --> 01:14:14,730 Is there a motion for this item this evening? 919 01:14:15,290 --> 01:14:19,870 Mr. Chairman, I move that we continue this matter to the February schedule. 920 01:14:20,650 --> 01:14:21,410 Very good. Is there a second? 921 01:14:22,670 --> 01:14:27,530 I'll go ahead and second that so we have a motion for continuance to February by Commissioner McFarlane. 922 01:14:27,890 --> 01:14:31,370 Second by Chair Romeo. Is there any discussion on the motion? 923 01:14:32,350 --> 01:14:41,770 I'm going to support the motion but I would also like to point out that this has in fact 924 01:14:41,770 --> 01:14:52,230 been a very long process and the point made by one of the speakers about market changes 925 01:14:52,230 --> 01:14:57,250 and so forth is very well taken. I hear you. Thank you. 926 01:15:00,000 --> 01:15:29,760 Chair. Let me know if this is not the appropriate time to mention this, but just knowing that it, even I forgot that it's been about two years now, recognizing the market changes as well as Vice Chair Burke said, I'm curious to know if it would be fruitful for the in February to do another joint work session with the town council. If it's, I'm just imagining how long it's been taking for us to do this, how long it could also be with the town council and then zoning. 927 01:15:29,760 --> 01:15:36,300 So I'm just trying to be mindful here if that could be potentially helpful or useful to be able to do a joint session. 928 01:15:36,460 --> 01:15:41,400 If that's already on the calendar, then please ignore everything I just said, but if it's not, I just want to throw that out there. 929 01:15:43,240 --> 01:15:46,820 Any commissioning on us? Any other comments from commissioners this evening? 930 01:15:50,380 --> 01:15:57,840 I'm going to probably thank commissioning on us and vice chair Burke again next month, but I just want to thank you both for being the representative of the commission on the TRG committee. 931 01:16:00,040 --> 01:16:05,320 I think this plan is in a really good spot and I like the recommendations that were made by the committee. 932 01:16:06,100 --> 01:16:09,460 I can't wait to see the final revised version when we get that next month. 933 01:16:12,320 --> 01:16:14,760 And I look forward to supporting it at that time. 934 01:16:15,280 --> 01:16:16,460 So many everything has worked out. 935 01:16:17,300 --> 01:16:21,820 So at this time, I will call for a vote and ask for the call to roll. 936 01:16:33,860 --> 01:16:45,940 Yes, the motion passes 502 with commissioners Albrasi and Moses absent for the vote. All right, moving on to new businesses evening are six item on the agenda. 937 01:16:46,520 --> 01:16:50,520 This is a resolution to amend and restate the by-laws of the Ten Hurn and Planning Commission. 938 01:16:50,640 --> 01:16:52,880 I'll call on Ms. Alicia's for the staff for it. 939 01:16:53,800 --> 01:16:54,980 Thank you, Chair Romeo. 940 01:16:55,740 --> 01:17:05,820 As I noted at your last meeting, when we reviewed this first, the current by-laws require 941 01:17:05,820 --> 01:17:12,720 that you consider any amendment to by-laws at two public hearings before it can actually 942 01:17:12,720 --> 01:17:13,360 be adopted. 943 01:17:13,360 --> 01:17:15,300 So this would be the first public hearing. 944 01:17:15,920 --> 01:17:23,280 You are not seeing any of the suggestions that were made last week because staff is currently 945 01:17:23,980 --> 01:17:27,640 amongst all the boards and commissions, all four of the boards and commissions, gathering 946 01:17:28,250 --> 01:17:31,020 all the comments from all of those bodies. 947 01:17:32,360 --> 01:17:38,900 And then we will try to make them consistent across the board and commissions. 948 01:17:38,900 --> 01:17:49,820 At this point, however, one of the really key goals of this process was to make all the 949 01:17:49,820 --> 01:17:52,940 boards and commissions consistent with town council. 950 01:17:55,260 --> 01:18:02,900 Currently town council does not have attendance provisions on its agenda for consideration 951 01:18:02,900 --> 01:18:04,080 moving forward. 952 01:18:04,080 --> 01:18:13,000 So I think we will have to see whether they bring something forward in February, perhaps, or March, 953 01:18:13,640 --> 01:18:21,820 and then we could come back and adjust your bylaws for those to reflect those as well. 954 01:18:22,280 --> 01:18:29,620 So what I am saying is we do not anticipate having a final version for you to consider and vote on 955 01:18:29,620 --> 01:18:37,240 until possibly the end of February, beginning of March, your March public hearing, probably. 956 01:18:37,980 --> 01:18:38,540 Questions? 957 01:18:40,980 --> 01:18:41,760 Thank you, Ms. Yates. 958 01:18:42,140 --> 01:18:43,880 Any questions from Mr. Goodman? 959 01:18:46,260 --> 01:18:47,100 Good question. 960 01:18:47,340 --> 01:18:52,760 So, understanding that has to go through two rounds of public hearing, but knowing that 961 01:18:53,240 --> 01:19:00,340 there's a chance that the town council won't bring this up, this can still go forward. 962 01:19:00,340 --> 01:19:07,000 It's just going to be uniformity of all the boards, but there's not the same level of expectation for the town council. 963 01:19:07,200 --> 01:19:08,380 Am I getting that correctly? 964 01:19:09,760 --> 01:19:18,540 So, I think that, of course, you have a mandatory bylaws in the past without town council changing anything about what they do. 965 01:19:19,220 --> 01:19:29,380 This effort was focused on making the boards and commissions and town council rules and expectations all consistent. 966 01:19:30,920 --> 01:19:39,980 It does not look like that can happen as quickly as we thought, and right now, as I said, 967 01:19:40,140 --> 01:19:48,540 Council was considering an attendance ordinance that was not carried forward to the public hearing 968 01:19:48,540 --> 01:19:51,260 that they're having tomorrow night, so they won't be voting on anything. 969 01:19:54,580 --> 01:19:56,500 And given the fact that we 970 01:19:56,500 --> 01:20:03,240 have to review all the comments from the ARB, HDRB, and BZA. I don't know if that answers 971 01:20:03,240 --> 01:20:08,740 your question. I think it does. It does, but now I have a follow-up question. 972 01:20:11,490 --> 01:20:12,130 And not 973 01:20:12,130 --> 01:20:16,830 to put you in the spot at all, but like thematically, can you explain what was the reason for the 974 01:20:16,830 --> 01:20:26,330 town council for pushing this away momentarily? I think probably the best thing would be to watch 975 01:20:26,330 --> 01:20:37,610 the two work sessions where this was discussed, there was a lot of discussion around the meaning 976 01:20:37,610 --> 01:20:47,170 of good cause, and not so much discussion around what you are, your requirement, which 977 01:20:47,170 --> 01:20:55,030 is laid out in the code of Virginia, which is a two, two absences in a row or 25 percent 978 01:20:55,030 --> 01:20:58,430 for them, it was to be four absences in a row or 25 percent. 979 01:21:01,500 --> 01:21:04,100 I think it would be best to 980 01:21:05,800 --> 01:21:12,780 watch the discussion. There were two rather likely discussions at the work sessions. 981 01:21:14,560 --> 01:21:15,720 Got it. Thank you. 982 01:21:18,800 --> 01:21:21,060 Any other questions, comments for Ms. Hates? 983 01:21:22,240 --> 01:21:27,000 So the recommendation is not to approve this tonight. 984 01:21:27,000 --> 01:21:35,800 We couldn't. It's just the first. It's just the first reading. It requires two public hearings. I'm comfortable with that. 985 01:21:36,440 --> 01:21:57,930 As an aside, I couldn't help but notice that actually this is not a change as far as I know, but it brought it to my attention that the grounds for removal of a planning commission are based on certain attendance issues. 986 01:21:57,930 --> 01:22:09,170 are without limitation and that the somewhere it seems that the Councils is 987 01:22:09,170 --> 01:22:17,690 considering for for car or without cause and I see a distinction. Didn't I see 988 01:22:17,690 --> 01:22:22,950 that somewhere that there is that that's not without limitation provided 989 01:22:22,950 --> 01:22:24,150 provided causes shown. 990 01:22:24,970 --> 01:22:27,550 Definitely the state code language for you all. 991 01:22:28,210 --> 01:22:33,330 Has that in there in the in one of the versions 992 01:22:33,330 --> 01:22:35,690 that was considered by town council, 993 01:22:35,690 --> 01:22:38,450 it was with good cause. 994 01:22:38,850 --> 01:22:44,590 Another version was suggesting that good cause is presumed. 995 01:22:45,070 --> 01:22:48,070 So we have both versions of that out there. 996 01:22:48,430 --> 01:22:51,090 But no version is on the agenda for town council. 997 01:22:51,090 --> 01:23:10,670 My thinking is that if uniformity, and I think I gathered that, if uniformity is one of the considerations here, that the grounds should be identical between the standards to which the town council is held and the standards to which the planning commission is held. 998 01:23:11,550 --> 01:23:18,630 Understood. Of course, you can't change your attendance standards because those are dictated by the code of Virginia. 999 01:23:18,630 --> 01:23:48,210 Yeah. Well, then we can we can fix theirs. We can. That's powerful. We have. Any other questions, comments for mishades? No, I'm just going to say I'm glad we're not voting on this tonight because the three comments I made the last many weren't addressed in here, but I appreciate the explanation mishades and look forward to seeing this back in March. Well, I guess I want to ask if there's any other suggestions. Yeah. 1000 01:23:49,590 --> 01:23:52,710 We'll bring forward the ones from the other bodies. 1001 01:23:53,210 --> 01:23:56,950 We'll have a chance in March at the work session to make any additional comments. 1002 01:23:56,950 --> 01:23:57,110 Sure. 1003 01:23:57,490 --> 01:24:02,350 Okay, we'll see the updated version then, react to that and then hopefully adopt into that. 1004 01:24:02,510 --> 01:24:03,230 I hope we'll carry that one. 1005 01:24:03,950 --> 01:24:04,410 Okay. 1006 01:24:05,150 --> 01:24:06,090 Any additional questions? 1007 01:24:06,330 --> 01:24:07,070 No, I don't have it. 1008 01:24:07,270 --> 01:24:07,870 All right. 1009 01:24:08,230 --> 01:24:08,390 Great. 1010 01:24:08,870 --> 01:24:09,790 Thank you very much. 1011 01:24:10,050 --> 01:24:13,070 There's nothing to act on on this one, so move on to adjournment. 1012 01:24:13,070 --> 01:24:16,290 Our final item of the evening is their emotion to adjourn. 1013 01:24:17,910 --> 01:24:23,210 so moved. Second. Motion by Vice Chair Burke, second by Commissioner McFarlane. 1014 01:24:23,910 --> 01:24:30,150 There's no ejection. We are now adjourned at 8.23 p.m. Thank you very much. Have a good evening, everybody.