Motion, second, all in favour? Aye. Aye, nay, nay, abstain, send non-motion pass, have a motion to acknowledge the minutes from the November 15 meeting.
I'll make a motion, second.
Okay, motion, second, and all in favour? Aye, nay, nay, abstain, send non-motion pass. Now we'll go into the public hearing phase of our meeting.
We have three separate public hearings because there's three separate items.
The first one do we have a motion to open the public hearing for the resolution, introducing local law, adopted pursuant to cannabis law,
131 opting out of licensing and establishing cannabis retail dispensaries within the town of Waffinger, outside of any bill.
I'll second. Okay, motion and second. No, on paper.
Aye. Any news or extensions in the motion pass?
Does anyone have any comments with respect to this local law?
It's part of this public hearing.
If you do, please come up and identify yourself and make comments to the board.
My name is Doris Celestino. I am a community prevention educator at the council on addiction prevention and education. I was asked to come to speak here.
I'm not sure because I'm not a town of Wopponger's resident.
I'm not sure whether you're leaning to opt in or out.
So I, again, was just asked to present some facts.
And these are facts from other states that have opted in.
And just
some information, like I said, from states and municipalities
that have legalized marijuana and have allowed marijuana dispensaries and on-site consumption
facilities in their areas.
And again, I'm not either way.
I'm not sure which way you guys are leaning towards, but the facts are that 13-17-year-old youth
living close to dispensary and who are exposed to marijuana advertising,
were more likely to report their intent of using marijuana.
Young adults living within a four-mile radius
of a dispensary or more likely to use marijuana.
And experience more problems related to their use,
home prices within less than a half a mile radius of the area
where dispensaries are full by 3% to 4% on average relative to controlled areas.
The opioid overdoses, fatalities, have increased in Colorado since legalization, and as we all know there is a serious opioid epidemic that our youth is facing.
A community's decision to opt out sends a message that this community does not endorse getting high for fun.
And it also sends a message that dispensaries, we don't want dispensaries experimenting with our families.
Just a little education, this is not, and I love this line, I heard this from the FDA, but this is not your grandmother's Woodstock weed.
Over the years, the THC level has increased tremendously.
Now, back in, let's see, back in the 1970s, the THC, which is a chemical that gets you high,
the THC level was only 1 to 3 percent in the 1970s.
In 2009, that THC level increased to 9.75 in 2018, and increased from 14.88 percent.
Now today, the THC level is 18 to 23 percent, and as much as 90 percent in concentrates
of marijuana, which kids use dabbing or wax.
That is an incredible amount of THC.
marijuana back in the day, people would say,
oh, smokes and weed, it'll decrease your anxiety.
Studies have linked psychosis, anxiety, depression,
and suicide to marijuana and THC.
Not to mention driving while you're high on CHC in Colorado, driving while you're high.
The level of fatalities quadrupled since they legalized marijuana.
So this is what's happening.
The mayhem on the roadways.
I do have a town officials guide to cannabis here.
anybody would like to see it. I also will be giving out legal weed. It's a pamphlet. So people
can read on it and educate yourselves. And it's not, it's not medical marijuana that we're
talking about. It's recreational marijuana.
Today's marijuana is very, as I said before,
very high in potency, causes addiction, mental illness, violence, crime, DUIs, and many health
and social problems.
As I said, legalized marijuana will cause more mayhem on the roads.
It has quadrupled marijuana results in permanent brain damage to children.
Marijuana use before, during or after pregnancy, causes serious medical conditions, learning
problems, birth defects.
Marijuana exposure to our youth has increased over 600% over the past decade.
Team visits to the ER, Marijuana related emergency room visits, but in Colorado, has substantially
risen.
The percentage of teams that are vaping now, vaping is horrific.
It's not just water vapor, you know, there's marketing strategies, we won't get into that.
but youth marijuana vaping has drastically increased.
The percentage of teenagers who vape marijuana over the last year
has doubled in the past two years.
7% of eighth graders, those are babies.
19.4% or 10th graders and 20.8% or 12th graders.
Now, when they have more access to it, and it's legalized,
and there's dispensaries right there in their neighborhoods,
what stops them from getting in.
As more adults use marijuana, so will their children. So,
again, if it's accessible, it creates a problem. So, my job at Cape is to educate the community.
So, I hope I've given you a few facts.
Our mission is to promote drug-free initiatives. Our goal
is to reduce factors and increase protective—I'm sorry, our goal is to reduce risk factors
and increase protective factors in our communities.
The power of prevention does make a difference on the quality of life in our community.
Again, Cape's priority and passionate objective is to advance our initiatives and goals
to provide prevention counseling, community education, evidence-based program, recovery
support. We are here for the community we serve. So again, I hope I've given you a couple
of facts to consider while you're thinking about opting in or opting out. I can always
be reached. The number at Cape is 845-765-8301-extension 104. If I can be of any assistance
for whatever reason. I'm more than happy to. And again, I hope I've given you a couple
of facts to think about when considering. Thank you.
Thank you, Dawars. And thanks for your efforts in our schools and particularly high schools.
And much appreciate it. Thanks, Ellen, for bringing in. Any other comments with respect to this
question on the public hearing tonight? Make a motion to close the public hearing. Second.
Okay, motion, second, all in favour?
Aye.
Any nays or extensions?
See, and then the public hearing for item number one is closed.
Next public hearing, like they have a motion on the resolution introducing local law.
A local law adopted pursuant to cannabis law in section 131,
opting out of licensing and establishing on-site cannabis consumption premises,
within the town of Wapandra, outside of any village.
Have a motion?
I make the motion.
motion, second, all in favour? Any nayser abstentions? Seeing none motion past. Do we have any discussions
with respect to any comments on that? And Doris, I'm sure your comments apply to that as well.
Thank you. Any comments?
Make a motion to close the public hearing for number two.
Okay, second. Motion and second. All in favour?
Any nayser abstentions? Seeing none motion hearing. Motion to close the hearing is adopted.
The next hearing that we have tonight is Resolution Introducing Local Law.
I don't have the number of 2021, which would have men chapter 2, 40, zoning.
Also chapter 2, 10, solid waste, littering, and storage of garbage.
And chapter 2, 17, subdivision of land of the town code with respect to a variety of matters.
The motion to open the public hearing?
Okay, motion a second, the open public hearing on favor.
I have any nasal extensions to see a non-motion pass.
Anybody have any comments with respect to this series code changes?
Yes, sir.
Supervisor Regiro.
Good evening.
Thank you.
I wanted to bring to the Board's attention, obviously.
The legislation that's in front of the Board covers a variety of topics.
So one topic that concerns to me is the total repealing of chapter 127 of the Town of
Woppernjer Code, which is as a relates to open fire burning in the Town of Woppernjer.
At the request of the then fire inspector back in the early 2000s, fire inspector Mark
Lieberman and what the unanimous support of the fire prevention board was recommended to
the town board.
We adopt the local law at the time to outlaw open burning in the Town of Woppernjer.
The exception being a small barbecue pits and control fires and it is an event like a pepper
other something would be permit.
The idea is that the DC has the powers to control open burning, but at the time the town
had no powers to enforce it or control it.
Local neighbors burning the wrong type of refuse could, obviously, spread contaminants around the area.
At the time, we were in the middle of a severe drought and we were very concerned about what an open burning can do.
Ironically, years after I left office, my parents actually had to avail themselves of this law. They actually got a new neighbor, next door, a very enthusiastic homeowner.
and he and his friends decided to burn lots and lots of things in the backyard and if anyone knows the lots and rocky him farm and how small they are and how close they are and it was early fall and the windows are open because it was a cool night out and my parents were really smoke out of their own homes
They had a call to fire inspector issue a ticket and they had to go to court had that local law not been on the books there would have been no enforcement action or the ability to stop open burning
So I'm very concerned that this is the outright repeal of this law.
I don't know if the local firemen have weighed in.
You know, I spoke last month and I appreciate the board's consideration of my comments
as recorded to residential expansion and some conservation sensitive property for environmental
reasons.
And last week I was at the planning board meeting and we discussed an amendment by the
downboard to allow 90,000 gallon propane storage facilities in the
channel aperture.
It almost sounds like maybe guys are mad at the local firemen.
I don't know, but I don't think we're making their jobs easier by this
enforcement of this provision.
I know there's other sections of this law that have merit and might worth passing.
But this particular bill has written, I think, needs to be defeated or not introduced
tonight as it has an impact.
As I understand in Barbara, maybe you can come up and clarify that's not what we're doing tonight.
So Barbara, why don't you explain, sure?
When we first proposed the changes we were looking at that code 127, we proposed just some changes
in updating to the definitions, and we'll be able to draw it up a couple of questions about
us being equal to the DEC standards, so because part of this is mostly about the lighting,
which the planning board is trying to change for the town.
So it's more consistent with Dutch's County planning.
We decided to just remove this, the changes.
We're not removing the code.
We're not changing what's on the books.
We will revisit it and we're just going to when we revisit it,
make it tighter because we do have a lot of issues
with people burning things.
They shouldn't be.
It is very hard for the firemen and the fire inspector.
So we're trying to tighten it.
But just to get the lighting past,
we actually just removed it from this proposal and they would just change it.
So this Joe was related to what we had presented before and then as far as just summarized
commentary so that the whole, you know, the changes that we had intended to try to make,
you know, are not being made tonight and so there's no discussion and no intention to remove
that from tonight.
The strength of the document still shows that the legislation has been straight through
so that the final title was in final form, and it's not understood, so it's from the
line of text, and it looks like we're the strength of the document over the years.
So for the record, we'll make it clear.
I'll make it clear right now.
included in the panel four and we just took out the chapter room of the changes and the leaving it as it is.
Yes. Yes.
Was in the proposal to a man. Yes. Correct.
This is a little, this is a public hearing.
So what are we kind of giving on the one,
the building introduces that to one of my seven.
He was reintroduced without
One, two, three.
The next seven, the other.
Well, that was set at the last meeting.
Where we said it in the last meeting, we would just take that out of the proposal.
Okay.
So one, one, seven, seven, seven.
The one we're looking for.
Exactly the way it is.
So one, twenty seven.
This regereal is somewhat out of date now.
Based on the B.C.
statutes that exist, and also new appliances that exist that you can buy home depot now.
There are people buying chimines and things like that, and using them in their backyard in
a safe manner, however, there are aspects of that code that can be interpreted as if that
is not allowed.
So we want to try to tighten it up so that we're not inadvertently hurting the folks that
want to cook s'mores in their backyard.
And in addition, we've had other cases, Joe, that are related to open burning and fake
containers that have caused issues.
So our intention is to go back and tighten up some of that, but to keep the core of.
Well, the thing is that people have a campfire in their backyard, and they're holding a hot
dog on a stick over it.
when the fire department arrives,
technically we can't tell them to put it out.
So we got to tighten things up to be more specific,
because that's what folks are doing now.
Folks will be out in the back, burning their sticks
and their leaves, and then we'll show up
and they'll have a smore on the end of their stick.
So let's support us changing this to a comedy.
OK, any other comments from the public?
I make a motion to close the public hearing.
Oh, so please.
Okay.
If I may, there were comments from Duchess County
planning on the law, and one of the issues that they raised, I guess, was with
respect to dark style and in looking at the law, the law lists the light levels of 0.0 like
property line,
which seems to be,
so it's E
240, yes, it's in section 3, 2, 4, e, E.
So the dark sky standard is 0.0, 0.1, I believe.
I don't know if that is the reference that they're talking to.
I think it would be virtually impossible to enforce zero foot candles at the property once.
I
mean, I think there's just some light.
This is the first time I've been asked to let you know what happens when one of these things.
There's no doubt about it.
But what it says is illumination beyond the property of which it's.
So lumens at the property once, so the standard is zero.
But the dark sky stand is 0.1 at the property line.
I'm sorry, 0.1 is adjacent to business properties in 0.05.
The brightest moonlight is 0.01 at residential property values.
Is the law also requiring parking lots to have the charging stations and
charging stations?
Is the law requiring parking lots to have
the parking lots to have the parking lots?
So we have a lot of the public asking about electric charging stations since we have some of the electric cars and that is the way of the future and even like Mercedes as an example just put in three.
So when we looked at the parking code, we felt going forward if you're putting in a
whole large parking lot, it would, who the company to be prepared to put in some
electric charging stations.
So there would be it's 30 plus spaces and then it's the consideration of 10% planning board
would have the final approval to wave it to more or less.
Do you know what the cost of our charging station?
I don't know if I can do it.
Is there a standard formula for charging stations based on the size of a parking lot or how it sounds kind of arbitrary to me?
So this is saying that parking requirement of 30 more spaces should have an area improved or reserved for electric charging stations equal to or at least an additional 10%.
So it's not saying they have to put the men, they have to reserve an area for it.
So it goes on to tell them in the infrastructure to put the wiring.
What's happening now is all these companies that they wanted to put it in.
They have to dig up the asphalt to put the wiring in like they did at Mercedes,
requires cement asphalt being dug up to bring it into the building.
So we're asking them potentially, and this would be up to the planning board
to at least look ahead to put the infrastructure in.
So if it's required, then they would have the ability to put it in, put it in, put it in, put it in, put it in, put it in.
So what would be the determining factor for the planning board to decide?
How many spaces?
So if there's 30 spaces, it would be...
Three?
Ten per cent.
So for all new construction moving forward, that would be the case.
Yes, it wouldn't be for companies or commercial spaces that already exist.
But in our department, we're getting a lot of calls from different companies about what they have to do to put it in.
And then we know from just how much they would have to dig up or trench at least to get the electric in.
So it would be cheaper going forward if they put that infrastructure or the electrical infrastructure in up front and pipe it in.
So if they didn't want to put the stations in, they would be prepared at least at some point should they want them.
What is it really the responsibility of the town to dictate this type of thing? Or is it a small business decision?
Well, this is in the parking, this would be under the parking requirements going forward.
just like we can bank a certain amount of parking spaces if they don't want to put them in
at first or don't have the room. It was just another thing we're looking at going forward.
It's pretty much free charging of these cars because the person's not going to pay to have their
car charged. Correct? I don't know if it talks to whether or not that the company can charge or not.
Okay, because that is a possibility that this isn't free because you decide you can
just like everybody else. Exactly. You don't get free gas either. So my point is why would you get free electricity to charge your car? I would assume the company if you were to do that. I would like to know that if that is a possibility.
We're not saying they have to charge or they have to be free. That's not the point today.
But to help somebody recoup the cost of installing this too.
I would strongly think that they would charge.
But we're...
Where is the notion coming from that we, as a municipality, have to require charging stations
for new applicants.
Where does that come in from?
We always see on different help locations that come out.
It's been discussed at the Duchess County Planning, talking to our planners, it's big
in Westchester, it's just trying to help all the people with electric cars, especially
going forward to have places.
And it, I personally, it's just me, think that if I'm going shopping and I had electric car,
I could charge it while I'm in shopping.
So it's, it's a plus for somebody with an electric car to have it available.
Right, but what about those of us that don't have electric cars?
Right.
Are there other spaces or?
I have a lot of questions regarding this particular legislation.
I'm going to move to table the entire package.
I'd like to hear from our planner on these different aspects before we make any decisions on any of this.
Any further comments on the resolution number three concerning the zoning changes in the other amendments?
I make a motion close number three.
Okay, motion second on favor.
Aye.
And he needs our extensions in on motion pass.
We'll move into the resolutions concerning the three public hearing items.
First resolution is resolution 2021-152.
This is resolution adopting a negative declaration
for proposed local law,
pursuant to cannabis law,
one section 131,
opting out of licensing and establishing cannabis.
Retail dispensaries within the town
of Wapinger outside of any village.
Move it.
Okay, motion.
All in favor?
Aye.
the next item is resolution 2021-153. This is a resolution adopting local law number of the year 2021 entitled a local law adopted pursuant to cannabis law, section 131,
offing out of licensing and establishing cannabis retail dispensary premises within the town of Wapinger outside of any
billages.
Lakes second.
In commotion and second all on driver and he
pays attention to seeing none in the motion
to have passed.
The next item is resolution 2021 154.
This is a resolution adopting negative declaration for proposed
local law pursuant to cannabis law section 131,
opting out of licensing and establishing onsite.
Thank you.
Enemy consumption premises within the town of Wafinger outside of any village.
A moment.
Second.
Motion and second on favour?
Aye. An enase or abstain, seeing on the motion opt out, passes.
The next item is resolution 2021-155 resolution, adopting local law number of the year 2021 and child
of a local law adopted pursuing to cannabis law section 131, opting out of licensing
then establishing on-site cannabis consumption premises within the town of Wopenshire outside of any villages.
I move it.
So I can vote.
And second, all on favor.
And these are extensions in on the motion passes.
This is not about to say one thing.
We have opted out of this.
We were leading in that direction anyway, but it wasn't appropriate to say that prior to your information.
But I just want to say for the record here,
I know a lot of municipalities are having this conversation.
I know there's debates on both sides of the aisle on this.
But as a first responder in this town who has responded to dozens of overdoses,
many of them second and third time, same patient.
I want to be careful that we're not sending the wrong message.
And I think that by taking this position, we are standing firm on not advocating additional
recreational drug use in this town.
The wrong message is being sent, and this is my opinion, I don't know how we can five years
ago be outlawing smoking tobacco everywhere in the entire, we're the first town in
recreational parks, and I got a lot of flack for that.
I moved that local law.
And my position was if you can prevent smoking in Yankee Stadium,
you can prevent smoking at Robertson Lane.
But a lot of people were against that.
And we have taken that position.
Vaping, as you mentioned, is a significant problem.
There are kids vaping marijuana in the schools right now.
Okay.
We have amended our park regulations to include vaping,
being prohibited on the property.
And now we take this position tonight because we believe that this is the right message for this town.
I'm not concerned about the tax quote-unquote revenue.
I'm not concerned about that.
I think that especially having some locations within our town and in our village that already
are leaning towards a recreational model.
And we know that for a fact because one place actually told us that right here,
That as soon as this passes, they're going to start offering recreational options.
Now they won't be able to.
And I believe that's the right message to send.
And I understand the notion of decriminalizing marijuana.
I get that.
But I do not support endorsing marijuana use through local legislation.
And again, I've said this before.
I don't care what people do in their backyard.
You know, at their private property, not around their kids.
That doesn't concern me if they want to smoke marijuana.
that's not my business, and certainly medical marijuana has benefits, so don't confuse that.
But I think by taking this position right now, we, as a town, are doing the responsible
thing, so I thank my colleagues for without hesitation passing this legislation to opt
out.
Both into dispensary situation and as well as the onsite consumption.
So thank you.
I often understand where somebody's health comes second to revenue dollars.
I'm not sure if anybody here. I'm sure some of you have seen people die of lung cancer.
And it is now pleasant. And people feel, oh, it'll never happen to me.
Interest me. One way or the other, it comes back.
So I don't understand the logic of this state.
So thank you for your presentation also. And I totally agree with my colleague here.
Yes.
Hey, why can't I just piggyback really with, I just suddenly came to mind when you said
about parks.
I was actually with my family, my kids, so we're older, but nonetheless, we were at great
adventure for a bright vest, and there was a big sign in the smoking area.
People were actually smoking cigarettes, and they were allowed to smoke marijuana in this
area.
And here I am with my, and my kids are not kids, like I said.
But I'm looking at all the families around me that have to walk through this, so it's very scary and I don't know how we came from
tobacco, banning tobacco and restaurants or whatever, to now it being okay, and it's actually up for discussion.
So I cannot give you my opinion, but I think it's safe to assume that I'm not okay with it.
So I thank you for allowing me to speak, and I'm proud as a Dutchess County resident that you opted out, so I do thank you.
We'll keep up the good work, okay. Thank you, thank you. I don't you leave these up here. Like I said.
You put a right on that thread.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Next item is resolution 2020.
Thank you. Okay. Sure.
So the two local laws are adopted subject from the
Next item is Resolution 2021-156. Resolution adopting local law of 2021, which would amend chapter
240 zoning, chapter 210 solid waste, littering and storage of garbage, and chapter 217 subdivision
a land of the town code with respect to the variety of matters. Mr. Biel, you wanted to make
a motion.
Yeah, with all the respect, I just want to move to table this and this is nothing against the hard work that's been done by our professionals and our staff.
I just would like to get some time to review this more specifically. I'd also like to get some input from the town planner on this with respect to some perspective on what other municipalities are doing with the charging stations and things like that.
Some of them move to table this, I also want to say though, if we moving forward, if we can get away from the bundle resolutions because when we bundle all these changes into one resolution, it becomes muddy in my opinion and it's easier for us to focus on and I know there's some when we do these major overhauls I get it we have to do that, but if we can in 2022 if we can try to be more specific for each change to a specific resolution, I think it would be a little bit
a little bit easier. So I will move to take a
pause second and I'll make comments on the comment on the comment on
the planner to come in and present to us on any of these things that
come before us. So we understand a little bit better.
Thank you. Sorry. Yeah, it's a kind of problem. I just want to say I agree with
Bill, I think that a lot of these times we bundle things and I'm not a big fan of
bundling things. We've got a couple of things coming on the agenda later on
with some of bundled some aren't and I think what it does is it makes it too vague.
So I'd rather be more specific because, again, there's a lot of things on the covers as we found out today, looking at some of the stuff that came forward that really need to be, you know, deeper dive on some of that stuff.
So I'm not sure if the Council won't be all in that.
So we have a motion and second on favor of tabling.
Hi.
And a naser extension seen on the motion passed.
Next item is public portion of the meeting.
So do I have a motion to open the public, you know?
motion and second all in favor.
Aye.
Any naser extensions?
Send none motion pass.
So now any of the public items any of the items on the agenda that the public would like to come in on, please come up to the podium and identify yourself and state your comments.
Aye.
amount of material that's kind of dumped on us on a Friday afternoon and kind of work through.
So, my comment was on the best solution to authorize the water tendency agreement.
So, there's a bunch of things that I don't understand about this.
Begin with, I don't understand why it's on the town at least fiscal letterhead.
I don't understand the assertion that the planning board gave a negative declaration of approval.
I know that's true, but that decision is under litigation right now.
I don't understand why we're running service lines to 119 and 121 New Hamburg road.
Why those two properties were chosen out of those in the neighborhood?
My understanding is that those individuals, those property owners have not been notified about that.
Don't understand the implications or give an explanation of why there'd be service lines being run to them.
So in my view, I recommend that this vote be postponed until those that are involved in it.
And the litigation is resolved, and at that point in time, we can discuss this agreement.
So thank you.
Thank you for coming.
Any other comments?
Good evening.
I'm Dan Kohler with Hudson Land Design.
and I'm here just to reiterate our support for our application
for the reason of the property at 26 Myers-Corners Road
from Conservation Commercial to R20.
I've gone through this with you before,
so I'm gonna waste any more of your time.
If you have any questions for me,
please feel free to ask.
This is now an unbundled applicant specific
just to this property.
So I appreciate your consideration.
Thank you.
Any other comments on any agenda item?
Mr. Supervisor Members of the Board, Nicholas Ward Willis with Keenan Bean for the African
gas land, the item on your agenda smite.
The item is on the East-Chill agenda because you appoint a conflict council, and that's
Mr. Wood's office.
The negative declaration, well, under the litigation, it's valid, it's not being disputed
so this board has every right and should rely upon that negative declaration, but complaining
where the doctor after a public hearing and after hearing from opponents and proponents of
project. So it's certainly a valid document that should not be dismissed. As far as running
the service lines, that is something that the planning board condition to require us
to offer. We have not approach those individuals, because we don't have the agreement with the
town yet for the Tennessee agreement. We would be appropriate to have that step first, so
that when we go to the residents, we know that we have that agreement, so we're not wasting
anyone's time. The town planning board has examined the warder issues, found that it's appropriate
and label conditions, and it's certainly something that we're preparing to offer to those residents
at the applicants expense, at the appropriate time.
We also have President Wippa's deceiving Mr. Lippin from the chasing group who can answer any questions
the board may have about the water tendency room, but we think it's fairly straightforward and
is set forth in the documentation of the resolution of the agreement prepared by your
work, conflict attorney, and it's an agreement that you've entered into on many other
more occasions so we would request that you adopted tonight without any further delay.
Thank you for your time.
Please identify yourself.
Good evening, Chris DeFruble, with the Chays and Companies representing gasoline petroleum.
I just want to add to the two service lines that we are asked to by the planning board
to extend the neighboring property lines.
Those particular locations are adjacent to where the water line is being installed,
which is beneath a paved access road.
Similarly speaking, as you were talking about the EV charging stations, the thought process is installing the connections now and extending it to the neighboring properties.
So that in the future if these neighboring properties wanted to participate and time into municipal water, it would be available to.
Additionally, I'm not the same side of the property that it bought some is a retaining wall that also wouldn't require a reconstruction to get in the future.
So that was probably what went into the forward thinking of extending these connections to the neighboring property.
Because the intent is, and just for a reminder for everybody, it's not aware of the proposal as part of the Water Agency agreement,
The plan board asked the applicant to extend a water line from U. Hammered Road north to the northern extension of their property.
It's 560 linear feet. Those two properties, once again, lie adjacent to that where we have a paid access road.
So it's easier to provide them the connection now. They also asked us for the rear property in the back that we provide a valve for a future connection in the event that the town expanded along the expanded water district.
Thank you.
Any other comments?
Good evening.
Phil Jay Everton, Lewis and Greer.
On behalf of the owner of 169 Morris Colors Road.
I'm hoping that the board tonight will adopt the resolution for posing the change
to the cop CLP zoning code and I'll be here if you have any questions and I hope you
can put this on the January 10th agenda for our clients.
Thank you.
Thank you. That's with respect of the storage, correct?
That's right.
Any other comments?
Seeing none?
Motion close.
There's motion and second to close the public portion of the meeting.
All in favor.
Any naser extensions?
Seeing none.
The motion passes.
Now we'll go into discussions and resolutions.
The first item which is set.
Question.
The first item is setting the January 10th, 2022 as the re-org meeting that would also be our second.
First, regular meeting, and I think that if everybody is in agreement, then we also have a resolution right off the
Vice. Right, Jim? Making that the re-work meeting.
Yeah, I have no objection to that. Has there been any discussion about us swearing in ceremony?
Now, we're just going to discuss that a little bit later on, but we can discuss it right now.
Well, I was just wondering how it's going to fit, you know, is it, are we talking about doing it in between?
You know, what do we talk about there is discussion about January 1st, all right,
okay
I get we talk about it under new business then I just want to make sure there's enough
Yeah, that's fine. Yeah, yeah, first and a 10 there's enough. Yeah, no problem. So motion 2nd to make that
Re-org meeting
We make January 10 2022 the re-org meeting second. Okay motion 2nd all on favor
Any naserves, then seeing none of the motions passed.
The next item is we've had discussion about the recycling yard rules and feast schedules.
Joe was going to actually, Joe put a lot of it together, but he's certainly was feeling ill.
Like Cooper, I think, was prepared to just cover a little bit of the discussion.
Yeah, so this year there's some proposed changes to make the annual pass now,
$65 and the senior rate for 60 and over to $45 with our single-use passes now going to be
$25.
What this would include this year now is household garbage that we included actually last year
in the main garbage tickets, as well as including free on now and those with trailers.
Because in the past we used to have those for single-use or double-axle that were $25 and a $30
are charged, but with this, we're also giving our residents the option to actually pay a $15
single use fee for an alternative vehicle, so we've had some residents who would come throughout
the year who would help their parents, who live in the town, who have a bigger vehicle,
such as a truck instead of regular sedan that they have.
and now they're able to actually do that before and the rules, it wasn't allowed.
That is a $15 every time they would come in and they have a single correct.
So, because they would still have their annual pass, they would still have their two household vehicles that they're allowed.
And then the annual pass for the younger is then younger than 60, and it's usually a below 65 dollar.
So did you guys correct that, but weren't on that?
Yeah, you have to fix the wording on the second bullet.
Second bullet?
It should be below.
I know.
Okay.
Just make sure you change.
How about just younger than 60?
15.
It says annual pass for those younger than 60.
You don't know.
You don't qualify to arm.
Just.
Yeah.
Younger than 60.
And now, this is going to be something that's printed up and handed out to people.
Yeah.
So what would be happening is that if they
want it, we could basically make a copy of the rules if it's adopted, and that way people
would be able to have a copy. We can even probably put it on the website. It should be put
on it. Yeah, I believe it is. And many of the current ones, and we do have a brochure.
Yeah, we do have a brochure. And then, of course, think about size here one dough as well, right?
Yes, yes, that's not a problem. And on the recycled yard sign. Yes. Right, I just think that we need to
be careful here how we word things because I don't know if Joe is in a bad mood when he wrote
some of these bullets but the one that says the town board reserves the right to refoke
a permit for excessive use. The center was designed for casual use by residents not for those
running a garbage pickup business. I don't know if we need to, you know, oh pine. I think we need
to have the attorney perhaps take a look at these and just tighten it up in a legal format so it
And some of these, some of these, I agree with the flavor of this, but I think that when we say casual use, we got to be careful saying things like that.
That sounds very arbitrary to me.
Right.
Yeah, I know what you're saying.
I agree with you.
I think it's just more or less to basically, you know, just prevent the abuse of the recycling center really in this, you know.
It's meant to be for our residents.
But Jim, could you look into the verbić?
The one question I have, as far as age 60, determined as of the data application, or as of a particular day of the year, was the current procedure.
So, we usually do it based off the year. So, as of January 1, you're 60 of the year.
We're 60 of the year.
Okay.
I have no prior issue right now.
They're issuing it now, but at effective as a January first of the year.
So what I'm saying is 60 age 60s of what?
Yeah, I think you can be 59 and a half, you know, but that's okay.
But if you waited.
So I agree with this, if we can just have the attorney, just like we did for
the recreation room, just have the attorney tightened up.
So it's, you know, it's really a monotone.
I mean, I understand this, no, that's, that's the purpose bill that we have discussions
so we can, you know.
Yeah, but I'll see as to what kind of, what kind of, what kind of, what kind of, what kind
of the two evidence for residency?
Yeah, we have that, right?
Oh, yes.
So basically, what we use is we ask a residence to bring their driver's license and their vehicle
registration.
So I think on there, too, it actually gives an example of like, you know, we don't really
want PO boxes, but if they have their access, they've got straighted rest with their
registration, and it's its proof of presidency.
They can also alternatively, if we have like new residents coming in, they can bring
like a utility bill or something to show that they're living at their rest of it.
That's fine.
Just to get a change in the dress chat, right?
And again, I understand the rates have to increase again, and if anybody out there in
the public wonders why we have to raise the rates, just look at how much it costs for garbage
disposal.
It's unbelievable.
I understand why we can't do electronics anymore.
I understand why we can't do those CRB televisions anymore.
This is a totally different landscape now than when we started this, back under Regerio.
It was, you know, when there was actually a market for plastic and there was a market for metal.
Now everything's upside down.
So the rates have had to increase to compensate for the additional overhead cost.
However, again, household garbage is now included with this annual fee.
So I think that's value right there.
To your point, Phil, the annual, the monthly charge,
or a proximate average monthly charge is $20,000
at Royale, who's charging us a month.
We get zero in return, so actually,
our highway department is taking metals
and also batteries and other things out.
But it's around 20,000 a month right now.
A little bit increased, Joe, from when you were super...
I don't know, yes, it's unreal.
I don't mean it's about as a charge of $25 for a catch.
Right, right. And I'm this book, not plastic. Electronics. There was a market for electronics back in the day where there is, and as a supervisor, there's a person knows there's no market now in Asia and all over for this.
It's all blocked.
So again, I'm good. I do appreciate the work you guys have done because I know you've done a lot of analysis on this to try to make it, you know, streamline it.
And I have told residents again when they say something to me about the cost. I say listen household garbage two bags of garbage per visit or now
I don't say the free word, but I say they're now included with your permit. Same thing with free on cuz free on you were paying for it
So now you're not gonna pay for that in 2022. So we're trying to we're trying to evolve here with the times and still offer the program and thank you. And we're still looking at other ways to try to reduce the cost of the tax payers
Okay, that's all I had.
That was good.
Thank you.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
Good job.
I will.
Yeah, thanks.
We'll move to the resolutions.
A formal resolutions are prepared in the agenda.
The first resolution is 2021-157.
This is resolution reappointing the board of assessment review member.
This is for Lynn Myers who has served 10 years.
You know, it's a board of assessment review.
Christian would you'd like to say anything to the board?
Hey, what have done more for 10 years?
She starts as a chairwoman last year because the chairwoman before that
had left the board.
She's really attentive. She shows up to all the meetings.
She has a lot of always has some good commentary.
She's good with the public.
We only have, if we appoint Lynn, we still only have three members out of five that we need.
So it's not a desperation, but I think she's an excellent member, and I would
I would totally support.
But you told me.
He tells me the other the members are, be other than Lynn, because we don't know
what the three members are.
Yeah, because I've asked that the members for the assessment board would be listed.
I believe Tom Bauer asked you for the names of everybody, so we could put on the website.
We still don't have that.
No?
Okay.
Well, there's definitely a, no, given the information so we can have it on the website.
That's not wrong.
I can't say, please.
We just sent down a Joe just got something from the county.
They try to verify who our members are.
But I was going to put it on the...
That should be on the website every year.
So, maybe we could put a bomb on the website.
They were looking for members.
Maybe we could find out how to do it.
That's fine too.
That's fine.
If you find two more people, because we ran the board with three people last year,
and that's not how you want to do a board at all.
So, I'll move that it's Lino Del by the way.
I'll move Lino Del by the way.
I'll be real.
I'm sorry.
You know, it is.
Paul's second.
Mr. Smith.
Okay.
Motion in second.
All in favor?
Okay.
Any news or abstention?
Seeing none.
Motion passed.
And can we also, I don't know if we need to do this right now, but if we can maybe post
January 1st is advertised as we normally would, so you can fill this board board of assessment
review.
It works a lot better when you get five numbers.
Because if you terms expire and a September.
I believe so.
Yeah.
So the turbos do not expire the end of the year.
No.
He has expired so that's why we have two members that aren't
expiring you know two vacancies unfortunately one of our members passed the way
we're right before agreement days yep that was uh that's
fortunate yes so sorry to hear that what's the term they serve for five years and
it's a rolling term so no one only one expires for a year so it's always offset by
just like ZB but we have to catch it off we've got to fill the vacancies
So it would be great we could find five members.
So.
And is there training involved too?
Because the county has a training session every year.
Because we want to make sure they get training before
grievance day.
So when they come in and people have questions and issues,
we want to make sure they're there.
So the county puts on an excellent seminar for them.
Over here.
So you should try to get them as soon as possible.
Because how long is the training a couple weeks?
No.
I think they send you the whole pan for the big book.
And then they do a three or four hour session.
Okay.
Let's just make sure they get it.
It's going to get a train.
One was just like a couple weeks before the train.
Yeah.
We sold it in early May.
It's a great day.
It's usually late May.
Due to circumstances in online.
I think last year they did do a zoom version.
That would be good to know.
So it's a no they could have that option.
And then we'll have to take it again.
Because on a point you have to take the course again.
It's probably the third time taking it.
It doesn't hurt.
It's a requirement, so.
Thank you.
Never hurt the Lord.
Thank you.
Any other comments?
Okay.
Now, the next resolution is 2021-158.
This is a resolution acknowledging the appointment
of confidential personal secretary to the town supervisor.
This is Maria, a pianist, Sandra, is leaving, she's moving to Cape Cod, I want to thank
your first service.
I like the table this, and have legal counsel and executive assertion, please?
I like to call her all of a vote right now.
Well, in favor of the resolution?
Well, I'll be motioner table, alright, so I don't know what the question is, I'll be happy
to an executive session. I have no objection to an appointment, but at a respect for the motion
on the table to table, I will have to position myself on that.
Okay, motion table, a second.
Okay, on favor.
Thank you.
Attention.
Attention, see you in on motion pass.
Next item is Resolution 2021, 159.
The Resolution Technology and Appointment of Deputy Town Clerk in setting the salary.
So I guess the question is, should this really be part of the re-ord meaning or is this something we can do tonight?
Because even though we set the salary in the budget, is that necessarily the salary that we pay out?
How do we handle that?
But it wants to point it right now.
That would be effective right now before.
Well, that'll be effective for January 1.
So they're going to be effective now.
effective now. So he's hiring somebody and it's at the
salary. Let me see that. Let's open. Okay. Yeah, no objection.
Then I'll move it. Okay. Second motion. Second, all in favor. Aye.
And a laser extensions seen on the motion passed. Next item is
Resolution 2021-160. This is a resolution adjusting the salary of the
cap assessor. There was an oversight actually on the original budget and this
It was originally supposed to be 2% split.
And so it actually was wrongly calculated it, 1%.
So this makes up for that oversight.
Yeah, so this is the true up there, right?
Yeah.
Okay, so this is $520 each for both us and Fischkele.
The additional.
Okay.
Motion.
Second.
on-favor, any nasal abstentions, see it in on the motion passed.
Next item is resolution 2021, 161, as the resolution accepting Brent would drive and related
easements for hilltop village at Wopinger subdivision together with maintenance agreements
secured by bond.
This is with respect to the total estate.
It's been actually nearing completion.
Jim, the comments with respect to the bond and the underfaking here.
Sure,
so this is...
For the acceptance of rent would drive, which is the entrance road, which goes up to the flavormatic
property, and then all of the other roads in the, within Regency of that approach, to mean
18 by the HOA reviewed the deeds in his hands,
and said, they were prepared at the time
the subdivisions first approved.
The toll has presented a maintenance bond
for two years for the road
in that three,
or such as that.
$93,000,
92,000 for 91, which is 20% of the cost of the construction of the load.
That's for a two-year period.
During that two-year period, a total of degrees to make any change.
Any repairs that are necessary should possible be developed or to defects be found in the drainage
during the highway and then at the I-2-U periods of the maintenance bond, this returned
to toll in addition to improve to accepting the road, we're accepting the easements
for water and sewer, the 10 engineers, 10 solutions have gone out and signed off that all the
And then we have the deeds and transfer documents, which have been signed off of my toll.
We just have to tomorrow get the supervisor to sign on the settlement to the account clerk.
And then there's two bonds that are currently placed.
I sent it over a five resolution for it.
Here's one file in the amount of approximately 450,000 in the order of 140, which represents the bond for the roads, and there's one for prancing at 45,000 for streetlights and street trees and cycles.
So upon the tender of all the documents that we've provided, we then refund the existing performance bonds.
We turn the bonds back to toll, so that's basically it.
And then, like what drives now becomes, at least on one stretch to the turn around, on the back because I'm so good to down with this.
And that's the only part of the tall development that's subject to count maintenance.
All right, I'll make that motion.
Second, motion and second, all on favor.
Aye.
Any news or extensions?
Seeing on the motion passes.
The next resolution is 2021-162, is the Resolution Awarding and Contract for Annual Meetings Contract, for a Rocking Him, Pond, L, which you like to comment on this.
Yes, sure.
So what we're looking to do, there's a Pond over in Regency Drive back there, and we're looking to clean up the Pond.
So we have a company called Solitude.
We've contracted, we're talking to, there are an environmental group, and basically what they do is,
quick, quick, quick control. They look at shoreline control, look at algae. And one of the things we're
looking to do again is clean the pond up. It's something we've been talking about for quite some time.
They take care of all the permits. They handle the inspections. They've actually been on a
boat on the property itself, so they've seen what the pond looks like. We're going to use this kind
of as a pilot program. So it's a two year program. The first year is $4,134. The second year is
of the $4,500.
Again, what they'll do is clean it up.
They've done a number of properties in New York State.
They've been very successful.
Please call it a felon pawn.
I'm in Columbia County, and also a connoital leak up in Ulstwick County.
So they've had some great success there.
So in addition to doing this, again, this is the contract.
So again, 4,134 for the first year, approximately 4,500 for the second.
We're also, again, again, so I think we could use as a pilot program for some of the other
and things that we have.
The other thing we're looking at due to is potentially put an air reader system in this particular pond.
We have a lot of ponds that they have air readers, whether it's electric or solar power that's something we got to consider.
We're also going to look to actually go in there and physically clean the pond.
I potentially were waiting for an estimate to come back for that as well.
As we have some barrels, things like that on the pond.
We really need to clean up.
And then we're also looking at potentially geese mitigation here.
So again, a lot of things from geese going through the pond.
So, we're trying to clean it up a little bit, and it has some things to look at that that
could potentially help out the pond, clean the pond.
We do have some life in there today.
We have frogs, we have snapping turtles, so we're trying to, again, try to clean up the
pond.
So, it will require two things, number one, for the board to approve the contract tonight.
And the second thing, it will also require, which is another amendment, is to actually
transfer money from the B-Fun balance over to this account here for this B-710.441.
So, it's these not impacted in 2022, so we'll take two separate resolutions.
So, first one is awarding the contract, two solitude for this maintenance contract.
Again, first year, 4134, second year approximately 4500.
We want to do it with two-year period, so that we can see how the contract is going to work out.
Again, uses the pilot, it works out good for this pond.
We can use it hopefully for other ponds in the town.
So I make a motion that we accept this.
Second, I want to make a motion that we expect to this.
So the contract calls for them to obtain all the permits.
I looked at the permitting, and the permitting is for aquatic pesticides, application, I believe,
It's somewhat unclear based on that, whether or not we need a seek of resolution here.
Don't believe, not sure if we do or not, but part of this contract in essence, for them to get the permits to go through the seek of process.
One of the obligations is we provide any necessary documentation.
The one question is, I believe this may be blending external habitat.
So, I don't know what effect that's going to have on the ability for the town to get the permit and whether we may require additional services to make a study regarding the endangered species habitat.
So, what do we go from here on that?
I think it's a resolution.
I think you get it approved, and then you've got to move forward and see if there's anything else they need to do, correct?
Yeah, I mean, that's part of it here, I just, you know, so to the extent that
And again, they handle all the requirements, all the permits that are needed.
They work with EPA, whatever they need to do.
They're the ones that are going to work specifically with them.
So, I mean, to the extent that this is considered to be a contract for, in essence,
obtaining the permits, that's a type 2 action under Sieger.
So, like I said, we make that amendment to the resolution, we can do that.
And then, you know, once we get the permits in hand, my concern is that, I know we looked
at potentially filling these pockets on in the past, and we had to get, while, you know,
we had to get a wet land study because this is, the pond is under the national wet lands inventory.
That's, you know, regularly by the Corps of Engineers.
So do you want to give us the words for the amendment?
I'd just, it's a, you know, type two, type two action subject to, it's a type two action for a study.
Okay.
Regarding the permit.
Through the extent that it's necessary.
I mean, the permit is necessary.
Right.
The other additional, you know, studies, and I don't, because I didn't see anything in here,
regarding if we have to do a habitat study.
I know we've done a study in the past, whether that had to be updated,
So they would be responsible for letting us know that and they'd be responsible for letting us know there's an additional cost and then we did come back to us with
by the way it's going to cost next to a thousand dollars or whatever.
Okay.
I can't be out of studies on whether that could be the use.
We have a moment.
Second.
All in favor.
And he needs our extension to see in the motion passed.
So, though, I need that.
I think I need the second motion to be all the transfer of the funds, too.
It's all on the same resolution.
It's not the same, because it's not specific here.
There's just talks about the integral contract.
The actual budgeting change needs to be done.
Or always my verbiage got enough to say it.
I need to transfer from the B fund balance over to this.
B710.
It says the town board here by authorizing the following budget transfer.
Okay.
I just want to make sure that we've got it because I want to make sure Steve is covered for 2022 because again, it's not in his budget today's only a thousand dollars in that particular line
So it's not everybody's okay, but it's all part of that resolution.
It's fine.
Okay, good.
All right.
Thank you very much.
Thanks,
too.
The next item is resolution 2021164.
This is a resolution authorizing the execution of a dog control housing agreement with Hudson Valley and Animal Rescue and Sanctuary.
This has been revealed and approved in this test by our dog warden.
Can we have this one?
Yes.
One, two, three.
Oh, okay.
Yes.
Come back to that one.
So resolution 2021, 163 resolution authorizing a release of security posted in connection with
376 holdings. This is an amount of 25,177 dollars. The site plan has improved and there's been full compliance with the terms.
Right, Barbara?
I'll make the motion.
Okay.
Motion, second, all in favor.
All right.
By any name, sir, extension, send that motion passes.
The next resolution is 2021, 164.
A resolution authorizing execution and a dog control housing agreement with Hudson Valley animal,
Animal Rescue and Sanctuary is what Jerry had discussed with us before, and that he's
reviewing the facilities and the contract, and Jim and I have reviewed the contract.
I'm over.
Okay, motion and second, all in favor.
Aye.
Any naser extensions?
Seeing none.
The motion passes.
The next item is Resolution 20, 21, 165.
This is Resolution authorizing the water tendency agreement for gasoline and petroleum property
on route 9D, as was discussed during the public portion of the meeting.
I'll make that motion.
I'll second.
Motion in second.
All in favor?
Aye.
Any nays or abstention?
Seeing none of the motion passed.
Just a question for the gentleman that are here right now.
The
two addresses, the 119 and 121 to Hamburg road, represent them from chasing if you
could step up for just a second.
Just a couple of questions here.
These were stipulations or recommendations from the planning board.
These are contiguous properties, right?
Jason, okay.
The 560 foot-linear, 560-linear feet of eight-inch ductile-iron height work.
Where is that calling again? I know you mentioned it before.
I just grabbed my plan for you.
You could, yeah, just so we can understand.
So here is the means of ingress and egress off of New Hamburg Road.
The town has an existing 12-inch Dr. Larry Wardermaine here.
We would be connecting here and running it along the northern portion of our property.
Up to the rear property line.
For the Ward's benefit,
The planning board also put a stipulation that in the event that the town was to ever secure an easement from this property owner
Yes, that's between our property and Marlaville road. Yes, the gasoline petroleum would be responsible for installing that remaining 80 feet to the right away of Marlaville road
Okay, and how does that terminate? Is that just ended a valve or how does that right now? It's ending out a valve? Okay until
that time that you're able to secure an easement?
And then we would end it out of that as well.
All right.
So Jim, down the road here, with respect to that property, he's referring to that requires an easement in order to get to Marleville Road.
Yeah.
I'm looking for a fire hydrant to be on Marleville Road at the termination of that.
And that's something, that's a future discussion obviously, but we need to, in my opinion,
have access to that water from Marldo Road for fire protection purposes.
And sir, if you can also show us where the 119 and 111 are with respect to that line.
Here is the service connection.
Right here as you can see here is the wall.
This is all within the pavement as they indicated earlier.
Okay.
Some will be speaking.
Here is the service connection here.
It's going beneath concrete.
Got it.
And then making it square to this property.
Okay, so, so those contiguous properties that are adjacent will have an option in option of connective.
Okay, that was what I was asking for through this process.
All right.
Okay, I appreciate your explanation of that.
Thank you.
Any further questions?
Okay.
Next item is resolution 2021-166.
This is resolution introducing the proposed law.
entitled, a local law amending the town zoning map for the purpose of rezoning
a property to the R20 district. This is what we refer to as 26 miles in a corner row.
And this was previously an R20 property in June of April, 166. So I reviewed everything that's here. This is a single parcel
rezone back to R20, which it was pre-2013. I'd ask for it to be prepared in this fashion and I'll move this.
Second. What's the hearing date, Jim? The Explank in the Resolution.
Okay?
Okay, motion.
Second, all in favour?
Aye.
Any nays or abstention?
Seeing none.
Motion passes.
Next, resolution is 2021-167.
Resolution Introducing proposed loopal law entitled,
Mending Uses Under the zoning code and the Conservation Office Part.
District.
This is to allow the Self-Sourage Warehouse in the CLP which already has.
General Warehouse, yes. So, again, we discussed at the last meeting if we could have this
prepared as a specific resolution for the purposes of identifying this property and the use
to this property. We don't want to use for this property as a more than a letter at all.
Is it more than one property or is that a change? Okay, so, again.
I want to have the planner commit an explosion. So, is this a bundle thing again? Or is this, I mean,
What?
No, it's a text event.
It's an event.
Because we did 26 miles separate.
Now you're not.
Right.
Because this one is an existing conservation office park district's parcel.
So you're basically by text amendment allowing for indoor storage to be, excuse me, indoor
self storage to be an option within the existing uses of that ward.
So if someone else, for example, was going to come in with a CLP parcel, they'd have to go
for the planning board in order for that to be addressed anyway.
This I believe still has to go to the planning board after we after our action correct?
Yes, it gets me further to the point.
And I believe there's 26 miles.
Yeah, so, right, right.
So in this case, I understand your concern.
But I think that this is pretty straightforward in the gentleman in the back.
Supervisor did want to comment.
Yes, yeah.
This is again now CLP.
The previous one was CCD.
So, from on up, talk.
Right.
The other one was the other one, it was the other one, it was conservation.
Yeah, again, it's all these two, I'm okay with it, so.
Yeah, so Fairchild has nothing on it and it's, I believe, a Brownfield anyway.
Okay, it is.
Yeah, so I have no objection to this.
And I'll move it.
Okay.
Motion and second.
All in favor.
Aye.
Any names or extensions?
Seeing none.
The motion passed.
Next item resolution 2021-168 should be table.
The previous table.
The companion resolution.
The resolution authorizing budget transfer.
For confidential secretary position.
Thank you.
So I'll just move.
Just to keep it clean.
I'll move.
Just for further discussion.
Any executive second.
Okay.
Motion and second.
All in favor.
in these are extensions seen on the motion test.
The next item is resolution 2021, 169 authorizing transfer of funds.
This is set forth in from A line.
This is $2,700, A, 0, 9, 1, 7, 2, A, 1, 2.
No, that's under one.
This is a longer one.
You have a long list.
Are they lined up now?
Correct.
but you can stretch your ear.
Now, it looks like there's a lot of stretchers in that.
Great, great.
You want to just come up and discuss these?
I think we need to, because some of this is sensitive information.
Because some of this is personal stuff on here.
Some of the changes.
If you look at some of the transfers.
So if we look at the descriptions on some of these,
we may want to execute this.
Yeah, exactly.
OK, that's fine.
We couldn't, and for an eye contact earlier.
So we, yeah, see, you mentioned that for you.
Yep, understand.
OK.
So why don't we have motion. I make a motion to table. Okay. Okay, motion table. You know second all in favor. I any nayser extension send on motion passes.
Next item is resolution 2021 170. This is on.
acknowledge the correspondence law.
Okay, motion and second, all in favor.
Aye.
Any nazer of sanctions?
Seeing none of that motion passed.
Is there any, are there any items for special consideration of business at this time?
Okay.
Seeing none of the way of a motion, go in executive session.
I make the motion.
You know, discussion as well as the money transfers for personal issues.
Second.
Yeah contract negotiation correct and legal report okay motion second on favor hi and he needs
emergency Federation sees on motion pass. We'll be back.
I'd have to say something there.
Then I'd go outside and they'd say hi.
I don't know what you just had.
I wouldn't tell them. I'd have to buy a IRA.
Can you give me a IRA?
Oh yes.
Oh, and I think you're sick.
No, no, no, I don't need a IRA.
Oh, is it a date there?
It's a different time.
Okay, girl.
How are you got the...
I think that's too much in our feet, James.
Yeah.
Make a motion.
I'm a command of executive session.
A second.
Motion and second.
Come out of executive session.
All in favor.
And these are extensions in motion passed.
We, we made no decisions.
No resolutions.
Dorian executive session.
But we do have a couple that we had tabled and are going to dress right now.
So, well, why don't you take the first one?
Yes.
So resolution 2021169 resolution authorizing transfer of funds, we're only going to make two
minor changes for what was submitted for the resolutions.
The first one we're going to make the change on is it's for line A710, but 421 we're going
to change that to 422, so that's for $1700, which is the transfer internally under the
The budget for Steve, the Fraser and the other other change we're going to make is under
line B-8015-103, Fritter, because revised that amount down to $4,110, so it's a $2,000
reduction.
So there's the only two changes from what was presented to the board previously.
I'm going to have a resolution except there's a mechanism.
So make a motion away except.
Okay, motion, second, all on favor.
I had a laser extensions in the motion task.
The next item is resolution 20, 21, 158 resolution
acknowledging appointment of Maria Giannis as confidential secretary
to the town supervisor.
We had that table to have a motion to remove it and put it back on.
Second.
OK.
Then move and second, on favor, I had any laser extensions
The next item is related to that one, and this is resolution 168.
Yeah, 168, 202, 21168, resolution authorizing a budget transfer for confidential secretary transition as noted in that resolution.
I'll second a motion second on favor. Any needs or extensions see another motion pass any other new business comments
Merry Christmas everybody. Yes, great Christmas. That's happening here. New year. Let's see. Yeah
That's good
Okay, and I'll play people. Don't know where you first. I'm going first. Yeah
We're in Surama, we're January 1st, right so people will come out and see and we appreciate it and I think there's
I think there's some food and stuff out there too. Yeah, so you know a little bit of stuff here. So we don't
We don't crystal be there. Yeah, okay. Well, motion to adjourn. Thank you.
Thank you.
I'll second in the second all in favor. Hi. Any names or extensions. See you then. Thank you. Thank you everyone.