[8:19] Oh, there's zones in this.
[8:34] » Oh, okay.
[9:00] credit.
[9:02] >> Okay. At this time, I'll call to order
[9:03] the meeting of Monday, July 27th, 2026
[9:07] to order. I ask that all who have not
[9:10] signed in, please do so. Please turn off
[9:12] all cell phones and other electronic
[9:14] devices. Please conduct any private
[9:16] conversation in the hallway or outside.
[9:19] Um, this meeting is equipped with
[9:21] inductive loop hearing assistance.
[9:23] Emergency access can be found to your
[9:25] right and to your left. This meeting is
[9:27] also live streamed via YouTube with text
[9:30] commenting available. Uh this evening we
[9:32] have our county clerk Jean Chrisman here
[9:35] and we've asked Jean if she would lead
[9:36] us in the pledge of
[9:37] >> allegiance
[9:43] to the flag of the United States of
[9:46] America and to the republic for it
[9:48] stands one nation under God indivisible
[9:52] with liberty and justice for all.
[10:00] Okay,
[10:02] we have all of our town board members
[10:05] are present
[10:08] for supervisors announcement. Prior to
[10:10] the start of the meeting here, we have
[10:12] eight birthdays to celebrate and
[10:14] recognize in the month of September.
[10:16] Starting with September the 2nd, Greg
[10:19] Knap.
[10:20] September 5th, Casey Paige. The 13th,
[10:23] Steve Hendrickson. And the 13th as well,
[10:25] Debbie Trouad. On the 20th, Tom Psonelli
[10:29] on the 23rd, Hayden Nearpass, the 25th,
[10:32] Joanne Henry, and on the 29th, Stacy
[10:36] Preston. So, happy birthday to all those
[10:39] individuals. [snorts]
[10:40] In addition, I do have a walk-in
[10:43] resolution for the town board's
[10:45] consideration consideration. This would
[10:47] be the acknowledgement of the
[10:48] resignation of a deputy town clerk. and
[10:52] resolution number one which is on this
[10:55] evening's agenda will be moved up and we
[10:58] will consider that prior to uh the
[11:02] privilege of the floor and right after
[11:04] the payment of bills. So couple things
[11:08] at this time for the board's
[11:09] consideration we have meeting minutes
[11:12] from the July 27th town board meeting.
[11:16] So moved second.
[11:18] >> All those in favor? I abain. Thank you.
[11:21] I
[11:23] >> for the approval of minutes for the
[11:25] August 6. This was a special meeting.
[11:29] >> So moved.
[11:29] >> Second.
[11:30] >> All those in favor?
[11:32] >> I.
[11:33] >> And the final one would be again uh the
[11:36] August 10th pay bills only meeting for
[11:39] your consideration.
[11:41] >> So moved.
[11:41] >> Second.
[11:44] >> All those in favor?
[11:45] >> I.
[11:47] And at this time, we'll ask that
[11:49] manifest number 16 be introduced.
[11:54] >> The Victor Town Board has reviewed
[11:56] manifest number 16 in the amount of
[11:58] 668,50044
[12:02] with the following accounts charged.
[12:04] General Townwide, General Outside
[12:06] Village, Parkland Trust Fund, Highway
[12:08] Townwide, Victor Fire Protection, SS
[12:11] Consolidated Sewer Fund, and Trusting
[12:13] Agency.
[12:15] >> Thank you. And you'll see up on the
[12:16] screen, these are expenditures that are
[12:18] in the range of or exceed $5,000. We
[12:21] start with uh item number one, payment
[12:24] to American Rock Salt.
[12:26] Number two, Barkley Damon July legal
[12:29] fees. There are some chargebacks
[12:31] associated with this invoice. Payment to
[12:33] CP Ward for emergency sewer repair and
[12:37] pump station 5 payment. Payment to Doyle
[12:40] security. Upgrades to the court security
[12:42] system. Payment to environmental
[12:45] equipment for a new recycling truck.
[12:48] Payments to payment to Harris Beach for
[12:50] July and August legal services. Payment
[12:53] to RG townwide and street lightning
[12:57] lighting charges and payment to soft
[13:00] surfaces for the um gymnasium flooring.
[13:05] Timewise uh is a July cleaning service
[13:09] invoice. Total of the above mentioned
[13:11] expenditures is $617,44624.
[13:17] Total town expenditures minus the
[13:19] previously mentioned expenditures above
[13:22] equals $50,63920.
[13:26] Town board members, any question on
[13:28] manifest number 16?
[13:31] >> Mark, I just have a question about the
[13:32] road salt. [clears throat] Is this to
[13:35] fill up the barn before winter or is
[13:38] this
[13:38] >> So, the current contract ends at the end
[13:40] of this month.
[13:41] >> Okay.
[13:41] >> And there's a 9% increase for next next
[13:43] the next contract.
[13:44] >> Okay. Well, will then we do another
[13:48] like another order just to make sure
[13:51] it's full, I guess, at capacity. It is
[13:53] full.
[13:54] >> It's full now.
[13:54] >> Oh, yay. Yep.
[13:56] >> And were they good on delivery? Yes. To
[13:58] the time. Okay. Yep. Here we go. That's
[14:01] it. Okay.
[14:02] >> Thank you. So moved. Second.
[14:04] >> All those in favor?
[14:05] >> I
[14:07] >> Okay, as as I mentioned, we're going to
[14:09] just go out of order here a bit. Um, and
[14:12] we're going to go to
[14:15] resolution number one, which is in your
[14:18] agenda, if I may, is to the appointment
[14:21] of an interim town clerk
[14:24] pursuant to section
[14:27] 64
[14:28] five of the New York town law. And
[14:32] whereas uh the office of town clerk is
[14:34] currently vacant due to the retirement
[14:36] of former town victor town clerk Karen
[14:39] Boddine. Whereas an election of office
[14:41] of town clerk will be held on November
[14:43] 4th, 2026 for term of office commencing
[14:46] on January 1st, 2027.
[14:49] Whereas, pursuant to section 6405 of the
[14:52] New York town law, the town board is
[14:54] vested with the authority to appoint a
[14:57] qualified person to fill a vacancy due
[14:59] to the retirement of a town clerk. And
[15:01] whereas the town board believes that it
[15:03] is in the best interest of the town of
[15:05] Victor and his residents to appoint a
[15:07] qualified person to serve as a town
[15:09] clerk on an interim basis until that
[15:11] office can be filled by an election. Now
[15:14] therefore, now therefore, it is hereby
[15:17] resolved that pursuant to section 645 of
[15:20] New York Town Law, Kimberly A. Can
[15:23] Consella is appointed to serve as a town
[15:25] clerk from August 25th, 2026 to December
[15:29] 31st, 2026. And be it further resolved
[15:32] that the town clerk of the town of
[15:34] Victor shall cause a certified copy of
[15:36] this resolution to be duly recorded in
[15:39] the office of of the clerk of Ontario
[15:41] County within 10 days of the adoption of
[15:43] this resolution. And be it further
[15:45] resolved that this resolution shall take
[15:48] effect immediately.
[15:50] >> So moved.
[15:51] >> Second.
[15:52] >> All those in favor?
[15:54] >> I sorry
[15:56] >> just Jack. I'm sorry because I'm so
[15:58] excited about this. Um, but I just want
[16:00] to make sure that and if we submit our
[16:02] resolution to state they don't turn
[16:04] down. November 3rd is election day. You
[16:06] got it. Okay, we're good.
[16:08] >> Wrong on our calendar.
[16:08] >> Now we can clap. [cough]
[16:10] >> Thank you.
[16:14] » At this day, at this time, the county
[16:17] clerk, Jean Chrisman, will
[16:20] administer the office of oath for our
[16:24] new town clerk.
[16:27] >> Raise your right hand.
[16:29] And
[16:31] >> I, Kimberly A. Canella
[16:33] >> I, Kimberly A. Canelo
[16:34] >> do solemnly swear that I will support
[16:38] >> the Constitution of the United States
[16:42] >> and the Constitution of the State of New
[16:44] York
[16:44] >> and the Constitution of the State of New
[16:46] York
[16:46] >> and that I will faithfully discharge
[16:50] >> the duties of the office of
[16:54] >> interim town clerk for the town of
[16:55] Victor
[16:56] >> interim town clerk for the town of
[16:58] Victor
[16:58] >> according to the best of my ability.
[17:02] >> Congratulations. So happy.
[17:05] [applause]
[17:07] >> I just want to thank the board for their
[17:09] support and it's a shortterm
[17:14] interrum.
[17:16] [laughter]
[17:16] Short term.
[17:19] >> Yes. I want it noted for the record.
[17:22] [laughter]
[17:23] >> Thank you.
[17:27] [cough]
[17:28] >> Okay. Privilege of the floor. Mr. James
[17:31] Credicose.
[17:37] » Uh, good evening everybody. Uh, my name
[17:39] is James Credos. I'm with BME
[17:41] Associates. I'm here on behalf of
[17:43] Commercial Street Partners LLC. Um, a
[17:46] couple weeks ago, we submitted a request
[17:48] to this board as part of our Woods of
[17:50] Allentown project. Uh, that was in front
[17:52] of you guys last year for some PDD
[17:54] amendments. Um, we just started into the
[17:57] final section 2 through four subdivision
[18:00] application. We're going to be at the
[18:01] planning board tomorrow night and we
[18:03] were at the conservation board last
[18:04] Tuesday. Um, the request of this board
[18:07] is to abandon some existing easements.
[18:09] These were easements that were created
[18:11] back in 2007 as part of the original
[18:14] High Point uh business park development.
[18:17] Um when we first subdivided out the um
[18:20] lots at the bottom of the hill as well
[18:21] as office buildings 100, 200, 300, etc.
[18:25] Um what happened was there was a design
[18:28] at that time for some townhouse layouts
[18:30] and a lot of the easements were filed
[18:32] including u several conservation
[18:34] easements through the whole woods at
[18:35] Valenton property and some other
[18:37] easements. So the request uh to the town
[18:39] is to abandon seven easements. Uh four
[18:42] of them are conservation easements. Two
[18:44] are utility easements that were
[18:46] associated with some storm sewers and
[18:48] one is a water main easement again that
[18:50] was associated with a water main design.
[18:52] Um the water main easement and the uh
[18:55] two utility easements are shown on this.
[18:57] So that walk you through this. This is
[18:59] the just an existing aerial of the woods
[19:01] of Bontown property. The blue is our
[19:03] property limits. Um the easements we are
[19:05] looking to abandon this red easement up
[19:07] at the top here and this one here. These
[19:09] are the two utility easements that just
[19:10] had to do with some storm sewers and
[19:12] then there's also this red one that goes
[19:14] east west just a little bit here. This
[19:15] is the water main easement. Uh with the
[19:17] new layout and design, none of these are
[19:19] going to be applicable. They'll be
[19:20] conflicting with some building layouts.
[19:21] So those are just going to get
[19:22] abandoned. Um and then we'll recreate
[19:24] new access and utility easements based
[19:26] on the final design as we go through it.
[19:29] The four conservation easements that we
[19:31] are requesting to be abandoned are the
[19:33] four green blobs up at the northern part
[19:36] of the site. Uh basically what we're
[19:37] going to do is abandon those and then
[19:39] recreate the M in approximately the same
[19:41] spot. We need to move some of them, you
[19:44] know, 10 ft this way, 10 ft this way to
[19:45] kind of fit in with the new development,
[19:47] follow the new grading limits, tree
[19:49] lines, etc. Um but what we're going to
[19:51] do is get them recreated. I'll walk you
[19:54] through the rest of this quick. The
[19:55] yellow easements here are existing
[19:56] drainage easements to the town. Those
[19:58] are in place for the stormwater
[20:00] facilities that have been built and
[20:01] operating for probably 15 plus years
[20:03] now. And then the large uh lavender
[20:07] color here, these are the large existing
[20:09] conservation easements that exist
[20:10] between the loop of High Point Drive.
[20:12] Those are in a separate easement
[20:14] document. We're not going to be touching
[20:15] those at all and we're still kind of
[20:16] coordinating with uh the parks and recck
[20:18] department on them starting the trails
[20:20] through those loops. Um, if you wouldn't
[20:22] mind flipping to the next slide.
[20:30] Uh, so this is the proposed layout for
[20:31] the Woods of Valentine Town. As you can
[20:33] see, we've got, uh, the four green areas
[20:36] in approximately the same location, as
[20:37] well as one more additional green area
[20:39] over here just to make sure that these
[20:40] trees never get cleared out um, in the
[20:43] future. And then everything else here,
[20:45] this red, is all either drainage
[20:46] easements or combined access and utility
[20:49] easements. Um, so this is pretty
[20:50] straightforward request. Uh, the board
[20:52] already kind of, uh, completed the first
[20:55] step of this a couple years ago when we
[20:57] abandoned some of the existing access
[21:00] and utility easements in section one and
[21:02] those were recreated. This is something
[21:03] we've always kind of talked about and
[21:05] knew we had to do um, moving into this
[21:07] last step. Um, as I mentioned, we have
[21:09] about a 1% decrease in total area to the
[21:11] conservation easements. We did meet with
[21:13] the conservation board last Tuesday,
[21:15] review this in detail with them. The
[21:17] recommendation was to just abandon the
[21:20] conservation easements. All four of them
[21:22] are exist in one easement document.
[21:24] We're just going to NYX it and then we
[21:26] will recreate those easements with the
[21:28] new town standards site specific based
[21:30] on um some of the trail language and
[21:32] things that we'd like to incorporate
[21:34] into the easements up at the northern
[21:35] part of the site um to allow you know
[21:37] future development of trails. Uh the two
[21:40] utility easements exist in their own
[21:42] easement document. However, there is a
[21:44] separate easement in that one. So we
[21:45] would just look to remove the two
[21:47] easements from that and then the water
[21:48] main easement is a standalone easement
[21:50] to get rid of. So it's pretty
[21:52] straightforward. Basically next these
[21:54] will resubmit new easements that'll get
[21:56] reviewed as part of the final
[21:57] subdivision application and then when we
[21:59] go to um subdivide the lots for the
[22:02] sections two and four for the town
[22:03] houses, we'll create all those easements
[22:05] at the same time.
[22:07] I'd be happy to answer any other
[22:08] questions about the project if you guys
[22:09] are just curious for an update um or if
[22:11] you have questions specific to this.
[22:15] >> I think the uh I appreciate you spending
[22:18] time with the conservation board and I
[22:20] know um uh staff has put together a
[22:24] detailed overview of uh the questions
[22:27] that were asked of you uh during the
[22:29] course of that. upon my review certainly
[22:32] and again this is my opinion. I seems
[22:34] like it checks all the boxes for what I
[22:36] was looking for from um regarding this.
[22:39] So
[22:39] >> I thought it was pretty straightforward
[22:41] James I appreciate it and the comments
[22:43] from the conservation board as well.
[22:47] >> Anyone have any questions for James?
[22:50] >> I agree. uh conservation board noted
[22:53] they recommended consider for the
[22:55] northern boundary uh whether the
[22:57] boundary of the northern conservation
[22:58] unit can be simplified or straightened
[23:00] where feasible. Is that something you've
[23:02] done?
[23:03] >> Yep. We we will incorporate that.
[23:04] Basically what we were doing is we are
[23:06] following the existing um conservation
[23:08] ement along the side. It basically
[23:09] followed the wetland limits that we
[23:11] delineated a long time ago. So there's a
[23:13] lot of angle points in there as part of
[23:14] the town requirements. Every angle point
[23:16] we have to put a marker on. So, they
[23:18] were just asking if we can straighten
[23:20] that so they don't have to have 15
[23:22] markers all kind of in close proximity.
[23:23] So, we'll we'll take care of cleaning
[23:25] that up as part of this and it'll still
[23:27] basically follow the same limits with
[23:29] just less little angles.
[23:31] >> Okay.
[23:32] >> Any other questions for James?
[23:36] Okay. Well, good luck tomorrow night.
[23:38] Your town planning board meeting.
[23:40] >> Perfect. And then we'll just work with
[23:41] you guys to resolve this. Think
[23:43] >> you're good.
[23:44] >> Okay.
[23:45] >> Wonderful. Thank you all so much. Have a
[23:47] great night.
[23:47] >> Thank you.
[23:48] >> Okay.
[23:49] At this time, uh, under the this
[23:51] evening's agenda, public comment and
[23:53] concerns, opportunities for members of
[23:55] the public to address the town board.
[24:02] Okay. Moving to reports of town
[24:05] officials. Within your packet, board
[24:07] members, you had a report from the
[24:09] planning and building department,
[24:11] economic development.
[24:13] Yes, sir. I didn't want why don't you
[24:16] come to the podium so we could hear you.
[24:18] >> I'm sorry. I didn't want to skip over I
[24:20] requested privilege of the floor and I
[24:22] didn't want to skip over the public
[24:23] comment part if this is the time that I
[24:25] can address.
[24:26] >> Yes.
[24:27] Thank you. Good evening ladies and
[24:29] gentlemen of the Vicortown board. Thank
[24:31] you for the privilege of speaking to you
[24:32] tonight. I have a request and an
[24:35] opportunity.
[24:36] >> Excuse me sir. Can you just state your
[24:38] name and your address for the record,
[24:40] please?
[24:40] >> Sure. Uh my name is Edgar Brown. uh 3137
[24:44] Connor Road 47 in Canada.
[24:48] Uh tonight I'm speaking as a member of
[24:50] the Fingerlakes Justice Partnership.
[24:53] 250 years ago, Americans began securing
[24:56] their independence by enumerating and
[24:58] decrying the many injuries, abuses, and
[25:00] usurppations visited upon them by King
[25:03] George III and communicating them to
[25:05] each other through committees of
[25:08] correspondence.
[25:10] Today we feel the need to protest a
[25:12] king-like authoritarian president who
[25:14] thinks he is above the law and is again
[25:16] inflicting an onslaught of injuries,
[25:18] abuses, and intolerable acts upon the
[25:21] American people. We are calling upon you
[25:24] to issue resolutions of condemnation for
[25:26] the current administration in
[25:28] Washington. You can choose whichever
[25:30] issues you feel are the most important
[25:32] to highlight, but the goal is to foster
[25:35] robust public debate and for this
[25:37] governing body to go on public record
[25:39] with your position. Of course, a
[25:42] nonresponse is also a response. And the
[25:45] results of this regionwide initiative
[25:47] that began in June at the Ontario County
[25:50] Board of Supervisors meeting and is part
[25:52] of a broader national initiative in
[25:54] honor of America's 250th birthday will
[25:57] be published in local print and social
[25:59] media in time to help undecided voters.
[26:02] Rather than being divisive, we see this
[26:05] effort as merely illuminating divisions
[26:07] that already exist. We are offering this
[26:10] body an extraordinary opportunity to
[26:12] clarify your position within this
[26:14] current political environment and
[26:16] demonstrate complete transparency for
[26:18] your constituents. As the Declaration of
[26:21] Independence states, "Let the facts be
[26:23] submitted to a candid world." Of course,
[26:26] the original intent of this whole
[26:27] project was to formally condemn federal
[26:30] overreach, but if there's policy that
[26:32] you support, then your constituents need
[26:34] to know that as well. Again, the goal is
[26:36] robust public debate and complete
[26:38] transparency.
[26:40] I'll submit a copy of this request to
[26:42] the clerk, a draft resolution that
[26:44] you're welcome to modify, as well as
[26:46] copies of previous resolutions of
[26:48] condemnation that have been issued by
[26:49] other governing bodies and
[26:51] municipalities from across the country.
[26:53] So far, there have been 95 resolutions
[26:55] in 23 states. As far as I know, you
[26:58] could be the first in New York. I
[27:00] encourage you to explore the link that I
[27:02] have included for more information on
[27:05] the national initiative and the genesis
[27:06] of the project. I thank you for your
[27:09] time this evening and look forward to
[27:10] continuing dialogue. Thank you.
[27:12] >> Thank you, sir.
[27:13] >> Where can I leave this?
[27:15] >> Yep.
[27:17] >> Please.
[27:20] >> Thank you.
[27:23] >> Okay. I'll let just ask again if there's
[27:24] any members of the public care to
[27:26] address the town board.
[27:29] Okay, moving to the reports again. We
[27:31] have planning and building department in
[27:33] your packet, economic development,
[27:37] parks and recreation, which we'll get
[27:39] back to momentarily,
[27:41] highway, and finance report. Board
[27:44] members, any questions on those five.
[27:47] Okay, at this time um we had to shorten
[27:50] our work budget workshop prior to and
[27:53] Brian was ready to uh give us an
[27:56] overview regarding Dryer Road Park.
[28:00] Brian, if you would continue,
[28:04] we'd appreciate it.
[28:20] Thank you, sir.
[28:27] » Thank you.
[28:43] » Good evening. Brian Emerson, director of
[28:45] parks and recreation. Um where we left
[28:48] off with our um budget u proposal
[28:51] earlier tonight was at the end of the
[28:53] operating budget. So uh what I'll focus
[28:56] my comments on um for Supervisor Marin
[28:59] is just on our capital B parks
[29:02] facilities proposal. Um these are
[29:04] expenditures that are typically financed
[29:07] through your Capitol parks trust fund um
[29:10] which is now um set at $2,000 and it's
[29:13] achieved through um the purchase of a
[29:18] new home either by the owner of the home
[29:20] or the developer um absorbs that cost.
[29:23] So these are projects that are largely
[29:26] financed without an impact to taxes.
[29:29] That being said, in 2026, we completed a
[29:32] variety of capital projects um this
[29:34] year, including the construction of a
[29:36] new playground at Dryer Road Park. Uh
[29:39] the second phase of improvements to
[29:41] Harlem Fischer Park, including the
[29:43] landscaping with uh eight additional
[29:45] trees planted and over 100 shrubs um in
[29:48] the park. And um as of today, we just uh
[29:51] had our first day of construction on the
[29:53] new roofing system um at Mary Francis
[29:56] Bluebird Haven, which will be completed
[29:57] by the end of the year. So that will be
[30:00] our um second to last capital project.
[30:03] Um, as the board is also aware, um,
[30:05] originally this year we were budgeted in
[30:07] a capital budget to, um, construct a
[30:10] nine-hole disc golf course, um, on the
[30:13] land known as, um, currently under unde
[30:15] undeveloped land known as Paparon Park.
[30:18] Um, in late spring, um, our park and
[30:20] wreck advisory committee um, in
[30:22] cooperation with a town board asked that
[30:25] we look at another location in our park
[30:27] system for um, a disc golf course. So it
[30:30] might be an 18hole disc golf course,
[30:32] might involve some wooded portions of
[30:34] the dis disc golf course um as well as
[30:37] open meadow. Um we've had one sitewalk
[30:41] um to date of the Fischer Park project.
[30:44] Um the group included myself um J
[30:47] Councilman Tip uh woman Typton uh Dave
[30:51] Cop from the Rochester District um disc
[30:55] golf association. um Ed Martin, a
[30:57] resident and stakeholder, and Dirk
[30:59] Andress, who's with me here tonight, the
[31:01] chair of um our parks and recreation
[31:03] citizen advisory committee, wasn't able
[31:05] to make that, but he's integrally
[31:06] involved with the disc golf course
[31:09] project. I anticipate um having a site
[31:12] design for an 18hole disc golf course um
[31:16] by the end of this week. Um and um uh
[31:20] should the project move forward, I'll be
[31:22] meeting with some additional residents
[31:24] um in Fischer area. I've already met met
[31:26] with two of four um two two thus far.
[31:31] I'm anticipating meeting with four other
[31:34] um uh resident um residents that are on
[31:37] the old Dutch roadside um to give due
[31:40] diligence um getting their feedback for
[31:42] the project. And um if all goes well,
[31:45] I'll have a resolution at uh one of your
[31:48] September meetings for the purchase of
[31:51] um the disc golf baskets which largely
[31:54] comprise um that disc golf course. And
[31:56] that'll bring to close our capital
[31:58] projects for this year. Moving into next
[32:01] year, as you're well aware, the the
[32:04] parks and recreation uh citizen advisory
[32:06] committee is a stakeholder group that is
[32:09] works closely with the department as an
[32:11] advocate for capital projects like I I
[32:14] will share with you tonight. Um we are
[32:16] proposing as a department two capital
[32:18] projects in 2027. Uh the first of which
[32:23] is a $137,000
[32:25] project involving the repaving of the
[32:28] park road and primary parking area at
[32:32] Victor Municipal Park. Um that park road
[32:35] was originally constructed in 2008. Um
[32:39] it was uh constructed um just prior to
[32:42] the park opening in 2010 to facilitate
[32:45] construction when we um installed the
[32:48] park entrance road. Um it was uh
[32:52] discussed with the town board of paving
[32:54] it or chip sealing it um from a cost um
[32:58] standpoint because we were going be
[33:00] committed to a variety of other elements
[33:02] within that park um including a
[33:04] playground in the first phase, a picnic
[33:06] shelter, the fishing pond. Um the board
[33:10] at that time chose to instead of pave it
[33:12] with asphalt chose to um do what's
[33:15] called a double chip seal application.
[33:17] It's a highcapacity park as you all
[33:19] know. Um si additional phases have been
[33:23] built. Um since the park was opened in
[33:25] 2010 and 2012 we built um a year-round
[33:30] lodge there with permanent bathrooms. Um
[33:33] subsequent to that we've built our um
[33:36] special events amphitheater and
[33:37] bandshell to that park. So it gets a lot
[33:39] of use. Um and over the years the road
[33:42] has become in disrepair over the past
[33:44] decade and a half. Um it's uh very flat
[33:48] even though that there's um drainage um
[33:50] associated with that and several storm
[33:52] water ponds that carry water um off that road. Um the surrounding
[33:59] area is a lot of wetlands. There's a lot
[34:02] there's a subdivision that was also
[34:04] built after the park was built and it's
[34:07] time that we should look at addressing
[34:10] um some of the challenges with the
[34:11] potholes in that road. So, um, we're
[34:14] proposing a project to repave the park
[34:18] road.
[34:19] Any questions about, um, that proposed
[34:22] project?
[34:24] We just propose paving the road and then
[34:27] the main parking area. We're not
[34:29] proposing paving the entire 200 um bar
[34:34] parking area because largely, if you
[34:37] recall during the ARPA funding, we um
[34:40] added lights, LED lights to that parking
[34:43] lot. We added cameras to that parking
[34:45] lot and then we also um put an ancillary
[34:48] seasonal parking lot that is um gravel,
[34:52] if you will. It has some drainage in.
[34:54] There's 4in pipe in there. There's some
[34:55] drainage. There's no catch basins in
[34:57] there, but that's largely to support
[35:00] special events like our Thursday night
[35:02] concert series. Um, we have a road race
[35:04] that we host in January that exceeds the
[35:08] capacity of the formal parking area.
[35:10] We're just proposing um paving the
[35:13] entrance road um out to the out out to
[35:16] the park entrance where it splits off
[35:18] from um Doorchester Park subdivision and
[35:21] then the main parking area. Ryan, is
[35:23] there a was it considered of just the
[35:25] lower cost of having our highway
[35:27] department do some general repair and a
[35:29] new a new chip ceiling there, or is it
[35:30] just because of the the infrastructure
[35:32] of that surface is so worn that it
[35:35] requires a full replacement?
[35:36] >> We've we've wedged in there with the
[35:38] department. We've patched potholes um
[35:41] with there and we've done a like a
[35:43] wedging application, I would call it, um
[35:45] several times. Um but um it's not
[35:51] sustainable. I would say it's it it's
[35:54] not going to serve you very well. It's
[35:56] going to continue to disintegrate.
[35:59] Um and
[36:01] uh the staff asked that we look at that
[36:03] in in an upcoming capital budget cycle.
[36:06] because we did look at it with Labella
[36:09] several years ago and the cost to do
[36:12] that was over $700,000.
[36:16] Um it involved a lot more additional
[36:18] drainage. It involved a different type
[36:19] of asphalt application that we're
[36:22] proposing. Um it was right on the heels
[36:25] of doing the dryer road park parking
[36:27] lot. Um, and it had uh an asphalt um and
[36:33] glass sheeting um rolled out onto the
[36:37] road. Um but the cost was insurmountable
[36:42] at that time with us being already under
[36:44] construction in the first phase of
[36:46] Harlem Fisher Park, anticipating a
[36:48] second phase of Harlem Fisher Park and
[36:51] then other future upgrades. We can
[36:53] certainly look at we could certainly
[36:55] look at um uh a more enhanced project,
[37:00] but it I don't think the cost is going
[37:01] to come down. I think our price includes
[37:04] the the highway department aiding us in
[37:07] hauling material for this project, but
[37:10] we would still have to buy asphalt and
[37:12] rent a paver and an operator to hook on
[37:15] to essentially.
[37:18] >> If that answers you.
[37:19] >> Yes. Thank you.
[37:19] >> You got it.
[37:21] Um the other project the advisory
[37:23] committee and I are proposing is um uh
[37:27] creating an asphalt pump track and a
[37:29] bicycle playground for Dryro Park as
[37:32] depicted uh in a similar project in the
[37:34] photos. Um to date we've built three
[37:37] dirt pump tracks at Dry Road Park. Um
[37:42] it's not the most um appealing feature
[37:45] of that park, especially now with the
[37:48] new playground. um the pump tracks uh
[37:51] for bicycles and it's lot it's heavily
[37:54] populated um by toddlers by preschoolers
[37:58] that so they can be in eyesight of the
[38:00] parking lot where their parents are or a
[38:02] sibling on the on the playground. Um
[38:05] we've done three dirt ones, one better
[38:07] than the next. Um, the last one we did,
[38:10] we hired a professional design company
[38:12] to come in and design a dirt pump track.
[38:15] And we watch the wind go down the road
[38:18] and through the trees, and eventually
[38:22] the dirt just dissipates.
[38:24] Um, and we've got a new playground
[38:27] there. We've made major modifications to
[38:30] the trail system to make the existing
[38:32] trails in there more relevant. um given
[38:35] the traffic that that park use. We've
[38:37] got our second box rink in there with
[38:40] new turf and then we have the pump
[38:43] track. And so the committee and I felt
[38:46] that this was the most shovel ready
[38:48] project to look into the near term in
[38:51] weighing a variety of different other
[38:53] projects that the board might be
[38:55] considering and it's been discussed over
[38:57] the past year. Um, we anticipate there
[39:00] being needing a some significant outside
[39:04] fundraising as well. We have met um with
[39:08] our um with Genesee Regional Off-Road
[39:10] Cyclist and they're interested in
[39:12] helping to fund uh offset some of the
[39:16] design costs. The design costs are can
[39:18] be anywhere from 10 to 14,000. It can be
[39:20] a phased project. Um essentially the
[39:23] pump track would uh grow in size and
[39:26] instead of it being dirt rollers in
[39:28] there um it would be asphalt
[39:31] be easier um to use year round and then
[39:35] the concept of a bicycle playground. the advisory committee looked at
[39:39] possibly making um improvements to our
[39:42] existing jump lines, but I think Drew
[39:45] was in the meeting and we felt that like
[39:47] approaching the lowest common
[39:49] denominator of bicyclist that utilizes
[39:51] that park. A bicycle playground in
[39:54] conjunction with an asphalt pump track
[39:56] will get a lot more use than jump lines
[39:58] which create higher higher uh levels of
[40:01] skill, higher higher levels of technical
[40:04] riding ability. So, we obtained um a
[40:07] quote from the American Ramp Company um
[40:11] who does this all across the country. Um
[40:13] they're just finished a project in
[40:15] Saratoga Springs um on a new asphalt
[40:18] pump track in that climate because they
[40:20] had a dirt pump track that they also saw
[40:22] not being able to substain, you know,
[40:26] sustain the environment. I mean, we've
[40:28] covered the pump track to keep the dirt
[40:30] from um it's it's it's a tedious event
[40:34] that we don't even can't even do. And so the group feels that that this is
[40:40] um an existing need that could be
[40:42] realized um immediately that could be
[40:45] partnered with um a local nonprofit that
[40:49] would be a benefit would be of great use
[40:52] um in this area. Um, and it would be a
[40:55] nice addition to the park.
[40:58] So, um, the example, um, that I handed
[41:01] out to you is is of an asphalt pump
[41:03] track with a bicycle playground. And the
[41:06] bicycle playground more or less caters
[41:08] to, um, preschoolers on on no pedal tot
[41:13] bikes where they're at ground level.
[41:15] They can ride through a variety of
[41:17] different apparatus.
[41:19] The park is known for its trail system
[41:21] and and and that's why we brought that
[41:23] theme out in our in the playground. Uh
[41:26] but this is something that uh the
[41:29] advisory committee and I are
[41:30] recommending you consider in an upcoming
[41:32] budget cycle.
[41:34] >> It certainly certainly would attract I
[41:36] think uh the older teen, you know, I
[41:38] mean for the challenges. I mean I like
[41:40] the idea. I don't think I'll be using it
[41:42] but uh you know I definitely like the
[41:44] idea. I I definitely like the idea of it
[41:46] because I think uh like you say, they've
[41:48] been coming out there for years, you
[41:50] know, uh riding that trail as it is, but
[41:53] there's some pretty challenging things
[41:55] that you could put out there for the
[41:56] older kids.
[41:58] >> Looking singularly at this project is
[42:01] excellent and I I I like it. My only
[42:03] concern is is that it offsets funding
[42:07] and pushes back development at that
[42:09] paparone park which we I think that
[42:11] there are some especially with the
[42:12] potential clover clover leaf pickle ball
[42:14] courts uh splash pad you know I think my
[42:18] personal opinion is I I would love to
[42:20] get that going. So my only concern I
[42:22] guess inherently would be that this
[42:24] offset some available funding timelines
[42:26] for maybe that starting that project. So
[42:28] I don't know if that's been discussed a
[42:30] little bit further. I think the the
[42:32] group did discuss that um with me when
[42:35] putting this budget together as well as
[42:37] tonight and the committee feels that
[42:41] there's a concern that that's going to
[42:42] be so far down the line that their
[42:46] families and the participants that they
[42:49] represent will never see that. So I
[42:52] think if
[42:53] >> see the baseball fields
[42:54] >> see that progress next year. I think if the advisory committee felt and Durk
[43:00] is here and he can communicate um for
[43:03] himself, but I think if the advisory
[43:05] committee feel felt that that project
[43:10] was going to go that they would not they
[43:13] would see the needs of the many versus
[43:15] just dry road park again. But I feel
[43:18] that
[43:20] I won't speak for them, but what I'm
[43:23] hearing from them is that they want to
[43:26] realize things
[43:28] in in the not too distant future. And
[43:31] they feel that like there's so many
[43:33] variables associated with the
[43:34] development of that park that's beyond
[43:37] their existing control that they're
[43:40] concerned that it's going to be pushed
[43:42] off for three to five years. If if we
[43:46] went back to them and said, "Hey, Brian,
[43:49] get going on Seeker. Brian, get going
[43:52] with Labella on a master plan,
[43:55] construction cost estimates, a
[43:57] schedule."
[43:58] Then then I think that we're in a good
[44:01] discussion point to maybe say we'd love
[44:04] to do the pump track, but the current
[44:06] feeling is that it might be several
[44:09] years before Paparon has progressed.
[44:13] I don't necessarily agree with that, but
[44:16] I'm I'm with Drew a little bit
[44:18] >> and I'm only I'm speaking for my own
[44:20] position, but if there's a way to get
[44:22] that seeker going and and really get
[44:23] working on I know we have some initial
[44:25] label plans that they've done a couple
[44:27] initial drawings.
[44:29] >> Sure.
[44:31] >> Next year I would I would love
[44:32] personally I would love to get moving on
[44:34] that. But are we looking at a phased in
[44:37] approach for Paparon? Like just doing
[44:40] the clovers and then the year after, you
[44:43] know, we're spending two years designing
[44:44] a splash pad and a year designing pickle
[44:48] ball court. Is that maybe that's not a
[44:51] question for you, Brian. Maybe that's a
[44:52] question for the board. Is that what
[44:53] we're looking at at Paparon? Maybe
[44:55] that's the Is that the concern? I Sorry,
[44:58] I don't know who I'm directing my
[44:59] question to.
[44:59] >> I mean that you're talking about a
[45:01] multi-million dollar project.
[45:02] >> Okay. for pepperon.
[45:04] >> Yeah. And I think I think it would have
[45:06] to be phased in.
[45:07] >> What's that?
[45:07] >> I think it would Pepperon would have to
[45:09] be a phased approach and I personally
[45:11] starting with that clover leaf and
[45:13] getting that underway because we have
[45:14] had some good discussions with Little
[45:15] League and there's some sounds like
[45:17] there's certainly some buy in there. So
[45:19] I think Alexis I think it would have to
[45:20] be a multi multi-year phased in project
[45:22] but I I would like to start phase one
[45:25] >> and the phase one would be the clover
[45:27] leaves.
[45:27] >> Well, that's just my opinion. Okay.
[45:29] >> Yeah. Well,
[45:30] >> have we moved at all on that? We We
[45:33] haven't really, have we, Jack? We
[45:34] haven't really had much discussion on
[45:36] that, have we?
[45:37] >> No. The um the U president did send an
[45:41] email today that he's back from
[45:42] traveling and open to that um
[45:46] conversation.
[45:46] >> I think the reason that was delayed uh
[45:49] was when we were interested in some of
[45:50] that property and we're thinking about,
[45:52] you know, a town facility over the
[45:54] highway facility over there and that
[45:55] kind of has gone to the wayside for an
[45:58] opportunity, you know. So now it's, you
[46:00] know, it's to utilize the the parkland
[46:02] that we have over there. So
[46:05] >> I mean feedback for me, Brian, would be
[46:07] I think that the drier road plans would
[46:10] be fantastic. It would be a great
[46:11] addition to our resources over there. I
[46:14] think I would I would hope that we could
[46:16] do that in conjunction with starting the
[46:18] process at Paperone and not allowing
[46:21] this project at drier to prohibit us
[46:23] from really getting [clears throat]
[46:24] moving on that because I would I would
[46:25] really like to see those ball fields
[46:27] coming in.
[46:30] Yeah, I think you know we we've got
[46:32] interest in the ball fields as far as
[46:34] funding already and you know I think
[46:38] what you were putting out there Brian
[46:40] was this at the drier road park. This is
[46:43] more of like lowhanging fruit like we
[46:45] can get going on it semi right away. I
[46:49] think it would really be dependent on um
[46:52] you know the private funders we can find
[46:53] for it because if we can do both that
[46:56] would be ideal at least start phase one
[46:59] of paparone how we determine it to be
[47:03] but I I I support this
[47:07] >> money money
[47:08] >> also I mean one of the board one thing
[47:10] that the board can consider as you
[47:12] debate the budget moving forward the
[47:15] next six to eight weeks is you'll
[47:17] probably have a good idea uh in the next
[47:20] 6 to8 weeks if you got the
[47:21] million-dollar grant from the state for
[47:23] the New York Place application that that
[47:27] um Emily and I worked on um that you're
[47:29] familiar with and that maybe gives you
[47:32] either a decision to go forward with a
[47:35] little bit of drier and a little bit of
[47:36] paparone or more progressive paparone
[47:39] quicker or progress dryer quicker. It's
[47:42] just that um the committee looked at a
[47:45] variety of different things and they're
[47:48] trying to look at shovel ready projects
[47:52] and
[47:54] I think
[47:56] is can we move without changing the
[47:58] entrance road? I mean there's a lot
[48:00] >> that I mean we've we talked a little
[48:02] league in February and March.
[48:04] >> Yep. I'm here, you know, and so we gota,
[48:08] you know, there's other steps that need
[48:10] I mean that that property sits a foot
[48:12] below the level of the road. So there's
[48:14] a lot of drainage and a lot of site work
[48:17] that needs to be done to make it and and
[48:21] Lella can do that, but
[48:25] you know, I think that the committee I'm
[48:27] sorry, Dirk, go ahead.
[48:28] >> Oh, no. I was just going to everybody
[48:30] Dirk Andress, uh, chair of the CAC. I
[48:32] just want to echo everything that Brian
[48:34] said. So, we looked at all the potential
[48:35] projects. We talked about it as a
[48:37] committee and with the Grace Road idea,
[48:40] we've had the opportunity to do
[48:41] something on that land since 2006. So,
[48:44] that's two generations that's lost that
[48:46] we lost the opportunity to benefit.
[48:47] Yeah. And so, when we looked at the
[48:49] potential projects, we thought drier was
[48:51] something that was shovel ready. We
[48:53] already have a quote. We already have
[48:54] well, we have preliminary designs, but
[48:56] we have funding uh from Grock and others
[48:59] that would help us get to that design
[49:00] stage. And once we have that picture, we
[49:03] can apply for grants which will even
[49:04] help us more. So we thought that was
[49:06] further down the road than when we're
[49:08] still brainstorming usage of a
[49:11] multi-million dollar project that when
[49:13] you add in the utilities, the drainage,
[49:15] the potential Anthony road signal and
[49:19] the complexity, 2027 did not seem
[49:22] feasible.
[49:23] That's what that's what we determined.
[49:31] With that, that's the information I have
[49:33] to share with you tonight. I certainly
[49:34] can answer more questions as you work
[49:36] yourself through the budget process over
[49:40] the next um couple months. Um I don't
[49:43] think the commitment from Jennese
[49:45] regional psych cyclist will go away. Um
[49:49] uh and certainly if um we can get
[49:53] something going with little league um
[49:56] quickly then we can have some ideas of
[50:00] budgets from Labella and
[50:02] know we can take action in 27.
[50:06] >> Very good.
[50:07] >> More questions for me?
[50:08] >> Thank you Brian.
[50:08] >> Thanks.
[50:09] >> Thank you. Appreciate your time.
[50:10] >> Thank you Dirk.
[50:11] >> Thanks Dirk.
[50:14] Okay.
[50:22] Town board members, you have any
[50:24] committees [clears throat] you'd care to
[50:25] report on at this time?
[50:28] >> No, but I know prior to the board
[50:30] meeting starting, we were talking
[50:32] discussing Victor hiking trails. Do we
[50:34] need to continue that discussion with
[50:37] Ryan or hiking on the budget?
[50:40] No. Okay.
[50:44] Raymond, is that was there more to be
[50:46] added?
[50:47] >> I didn't mean to steal the mic from you.
[50:55] The only item in the operating budget
[50:57] related to trails that I didn't get to u
[50:59] beyond the um a formal agreement with
[51:02] Victor hiking trails is that right now
[51:05] Victor hiking trails has several
[51:08] um trail systems that are on revocable
[51:10] permit.
[51:12] And so it's a an agreement um with the
[51:15] private land owner and Victor hiking
[51:17] trails um for the system. I'll give you
[51:20] examples. Dominique Trail. There's a
[51:22] trail that runs on the Dominy, former
[51:24] Dominique property between the Auburn
[51:26] and Lehi trails, which are public trails
[51:29] owned by the town or long-term
[51:31] easements. So, that's on a revocable
[51:33] permit that the land owner can revoke,
[51:35] meaning the trail goes away at their
[51:38] discretion. There's other ex there's
[51:40] several other examples. There's a trail
[51:42] that runs from the Stonington Ridge
[51:45] subdivision up to Dryer Road Park and
[51:48] there's three revocable permits that
[51:49] Victor Hiking Trails has um for that
[51:53] trail. So, it's not right now other than
[51:55] that permit to VHT, it's not permanently
[51:59] in in the public domain like many of our
[52:01] other trails where we got either a trail
[52:05] easement
[52:07] from our Gene when we constructed the
[52:08] Auburn Trail and just recently updated
[52:10] or it comes through the planning process
[52:14] like with James that was here earlier
[52:16] and BME and and Christa and we get a
[52:19] trail easement. So these can be revoked.
[52:24] Helen's Helen's Way trail up in uh
[52:26] Village on the Park. So with Victor
[52:29] hiking trails, we looked at the variety
[52:32] of different revocable permits that we
[52:33] current that they currently have that
[52:36] could go away but are highly valued
[52:38] trails because they have either
[52:40] colllocated with a town park, they're
[52:42] connected to existing townowned trails.
[52:47] Um and so we wanted to start setting
[52:49] some goals of changing these revocable
[52:53] permits into permanent easements so they
[52:55] stay in the public domain. Now typically
[52:58] these are lowcost easements. Okay. The
[53:02] cost is in um usually you have to get a
[53:06] survey. So you know have to understand
[53:09] the meats and bounds. You are typically
[53:11] going to do a valuation of it. So you do
[53:13] some um research. You can hire uh a
[53:17] person that has a real estate license,
[53:18] your attorney to get comps of similar
[53:22] sections. And then there's a legal
[53:25] agreement that's created.
[53:27] It would be it would be good in in next
[53:29] year. I put $12,000 in the operating
[53:32] budget to start progressing these some
[53:34] of these high priority easements so they
[53:37] can stay within the public domain.
[53:40] Okay? so that then not only can they be
[53:44] used by our residents um to enjoy um a
[53:47] walk in the woods but then public funds
[53:50] can also be utilized for their ongoing
[53:52] maintenance and care and management. So
[53:56] because we have several of them and
[53:58] because of the concern of our department
[54:02] as well as the executive board of Victor
[54:04] hiking trails is that our residents and
[54:07] our visitors just look at it as a trail.
[54:10] They just want to use the trail. They
[54:11] want to get from point A to point B or
[54:13] they want to experience nature and a
[54:15] walk in the woods and they don't think
[54:18] who owns the property unless the
[54:20] property is not allowed to be used
[54:22] during hunting season where they have
[54:23] some revocable permits. So when then it
[54:26] stops getting maintained when it goes
[54:28] back reverts back to the private land
[54:30] owner because right now these folks over
[54:33] here to my right are maintaining it.
[54:35] Okay. So our goal is just to do what we
[54:38] had done with the Auburn Trail Corridor
[54:42] is acquire those easements so it then
[54:45] stays in the public domain for its
[54:48] period of probable usefulness. So we'd
[54:51] like to progress some of those.
[54:55] Brian, do we have a map um of the town
[54:59] and including the village of all of the
[55:01] trails highlighting who owns them and
[55:04] who maintains them? We have we have a
[55:07] map of town and village owned trails.
[55:09] >> Okay.
[55:10] >> Um Victor hiking trails has a map system
[55:13] that combines the two I believe that has
[55:15] both basically lands that are trails
[55:18] within the town, trails within the
[55:20] village plus Victor hiking trails
[55:23] has those that are on revotable permit.
[55:27] >> I if I give you guys my card, would you
[55:29] mind sending it to me?
[55:32] >> Is it okay? I will. Thank you. And
[55:34] there's some maps in your in your um
[55:36] those maps that I put um show where the
[55:41] existing trails are that are that are on
[55:44] some of the high priority easements that
[55:47] we should progress as a community.
[55:50] So it's large it's largely the legal
[55:53] work and the um um paperwork associated
[55:57] with
[55:59] obtaining these. These typically aren't
[56:01] highcost easements.
[56:04] um the value is is pretty low because
[56:06] it's typically not developable land
[56:08] within that parcel
[56:12] >> and would we do that through our town
[56:14] attorney or we would fund Victor hiking
[56:16] trails to do that work on their own?
[56:19] >> I would say you would do it as a town.
[56:21] Someone needs to manage
[56:23] >> and and move those along. Someone needs
[56:25] to work with with the town attorney,
[56:29] work with the realtor, work with the um
[56:32] survey crew, and then meet with the land
[56:34] owner if there's any negotiation back
[56:37] and forth.
[56:38] >> Okay.
[56:38] >> And then the transfer once the once the
[56:41] easement once it's acquired, then it
[56:43] goes into management and maintenance.
[56:48] >> Thank you.
[56:48] >> You're welcome. Any other questions?
[56:53] » Thanks.
[56:53] >> Thank you.
[56:57] No board members. Uh
[57:00] any committees you care to report on at
[57:03] this time?
[57:07] Moving to the resolutions. We have a
[57:09] walk-in resolution that should have been
[57:11] at your place setting. This is the again
[57:14] acknowledgement of the resignation of
[57:16] Jenna Wernern from the full-time deputy
[57:18] town clerk's position effective today.
[57:21] >> Okay, we have first. Do we have a
[57:23] second? Second.
[57:25] >> All those in favor?
[57:26] >> I I
[57:28] >> resol. Resolution number two is
[57:31] resolution supported the New York
[57:32] Association of Towns Bill of Rights.
[57:35] >> Second.
[57:37] >> All those in favor?
[57:38] >> I.
[57:40] >> Number three is a resolution scheduling
[57:42] an eminent domain public hearing for
[57:44] property acquisition.
[57:46] >> So move.
[57:50] » Second.
[57:52] All those in favor?
[57:53] >> I I
[57:56] >> Number four, authorizing the engagement
[57:59] of Gleon Strategies.
[58:01] >> So moved.
[58:01] >> Second.
[58:03] >> All those in favor?
[58:05] >> I.
[58:09] » Number five is amending the resolution
[58:12] um number 37 back in 2025 for Tenco plow
[58:16] equipment for the installation on a 2025
[58:19] freight lane. So moved. Second.
[58:23] >> All those in favor?
[58:24] >> I
[58:27] >> number six amending resolution again
[58:30] number 65 of 2025 for additional plow
[58:34] equipment. So move
[58:36] >> second.
[58:38] >> And this is a piece of equipment uh
[58:40] instead of sending to the auction, we're
[58:42] going to retain the 2015 Western Star to
[58:46] be utilized as a spare truck.
[58:49] All those in favor? I I
[58:52] >> Mark, is that the one we have to store
[58:53] outside now?
[58:56] >> Well, we'll see if we can get it. The
[58:58] plan is to put it inside somewhere. Yes.
[59:00] Right now,
[59:00] >> if we can finangle it inside, we're
[59:02] finangling inside.
[59:03] >> Correct.
[59:04] >> But if we can't, it's something's going
[59:05] outside.
[59:06] >> Correct.
[59:06] >> Okay. Thank you.
[59:09] Number seven is the authorization to
[59:12] purchase a 2027 Western Star rolloff
[59:14] truck and tradein 2016 model for the
[59:18] transfer station.
[59:19] >> So moved.
[59:19] >> Second.
[59:21] >> All those in favor?
[59:22] >> I
[59:24] the finance department authorizing the
[59:26] town supervisor execute an equipment
[59:29] lease agreement with the Victor Fire
[59:31] District.
[59:31] >> So moved. Second.
[59:33] >> All those in favor? I
[59:35] >> I
[59:38] >> number nine is amending the 2026 budget
[59:40] to include the purchase of drier road
[59:43] playground surface.
[59:45] >> Moved second.
[59:46] >> Second.
[59:47] >> All those in favor?
[59:49] >> I
[59:51] number 10 out of the parks and
[59:52] recreation Brian Ays uh summer concert
[59:56] moved
[59:56] >> second.
[59:58] >> All those in favor?
[59:59] >> I.
[1:00:01] Number 11, again, summer concert,
[1:00:03] Frederick Seager.
[1:00:05] >> Moved.
[1:00:06] >> Second.
[1:00:07] >> All those in favor?
[1:00:11] >> Number 12, Girls on the Run, uh, youth
[1:00:14] running program.
[1:00:15] >> Moved.
[1:00:15] >> Second.
[1:00:18] >> All those in favor?
[1:00:19] >> I.
[1:00:22] >> And number 13, certificate of liability
[1:00:25] waiver.
[1:00:26] >> Moved. Second.
[1:00:27] >> Second.
[1:00:28] >> All those in favor? I
[1:00:32] >> number 14 is a letter of credit. This is
[1:00:36] related to Bluemont Rise subdivision.
[1:00:39] It's a final release as well as the
[1:00:41] dedication and acceptance of the
[1:00:43] maintenance bond.
[1:00:43] >> All good on the road mark.
[1:00:46] >> Yes. All good.
[1:00:47] >> So moved.
[1:00:48] >> Second.
[1:00:49] >> All those in favor?
[1:00:51] >> I.
[1:00:52] >> At this time, public comment. We'll ask
[1:00:56] it.
[1:00:58] No one. Oh,
[1:01:01] any members of the our audience care to
[1:01:04] address the town board?
[1:01:08] Okay,
[1:01:11] board members, I do need a
[1:01:16] motion to go on executive session under
[1:01:18] rule number two, financial credit and
[1:01:21] unemployment history of particular
[1:01:22] persons,
[1:01:24] town board members and our newly
[1:01:26] appointed town clerk Kim Canella and
[1:01:29] board members. Before I do, you have the
[1:01:32] need for our two councils attorneys that
[1:01:35] we met with prior to uh the board
[1:01:37] meeting. No,
[1:01:38] >> no, no.
[1:01:41] >> So,
[1:01:42] >> and as far as the public, um we will
[1:01:45] adjourn following this uh executive
[1:01:48] session. All those in favor?
[1:01:50] >> I I
[1:01:54] Let's