Okay, good evening, everybody. Let's call the Burnt Hills Village Board meeting to order Monday, January 22nd at 6.30 p.m. Could please have roll call.
Here. Here.
Here. Thank you. Please stand for the pledge allegiance.
as easy as
possible.
I'm just going to give it a big hand.
I'm just going to give it a big hand and make sure that
it's the best.
I'm going to give it a big hand.
Who's your girlfriend?
Who's your grandson?
We'll go on to public comment.
Any public comment?
tonight.
None being heard, going once, going twice, okay?
This time I'll open the public hearing for the Village of Barrington Hills and your
appropriation ordinance for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2024 and ending December
31, 2024.
Do you want to come forward on this?
Nope.
None being heard.
Okay.
None being heard, then I will start the public meeting.
We will minister and obtain a motion to approve the minutes for 12, 19, 23.
Second.
Trustee Rift.
Trustee Exram.
The corrections on this.
None being heard.
Nicky, please call the vote.
Trustee Clark.
Trustee Norman.
Yes.
Trustee Hills.
Trustee Strauss.
Yes.
Trustee Exram.
Yes.
Trustee Red.
Yes.
Great.
Okay, thank you.
One, two, the Chair and Chair of the motion.
For the minutes, January 3rd, 2024, special meeting.
Trustee Rift, Trustee Hoffman.
Any questions, comments?
And being heard, make the please call the vote.
Yes.
Strauss?
Yes.
Do you have access?
Yes.
Right?
Yes.
Great, thank you.
Before I move to two, chief, are you here?
or what happened over the weekend? Or you want to say something?
I'm just, I'm just here because I'm going to stop at meetings once in a line.
Oh, okay, okay.
Do you want, would you mind coming up to the microphone please?
Fire Chief?
And that police chief?
Go.
Just identify yourself, please.
Good evening, Scott.
I'm on PC, chief of fire emergency medical services,
variant and country type fire protection district.
Birkwald, thank you for this opportunity to speak.
I will be meandering around meetings
in different jurisdictions that have served
and could be variant and healthy.
That's seeing me once every couple of months.
Quick update on our organization in October of 2000 and 13.
The variant of interest type fire protection district
decided to release their contract personnel and their contract and hire their own district employees.
All district, all contract employees have been to work for the district by the opportunity to.
I'm glad to say that it's really stable. They're staffing to the public. They're not my,
if you have to lose another. I have let yet to lose a person since June of 2020.
going through. So we're really proud of that and we hope that that will save lives
our personnel and be able to provide the very best in service that you guys as
constituents deserve. Number two, I'm sure everyone has seen it on Saturday at
around 846 in the afternoon. Are the county chief heading emergent to go back to
was involved in what would be a black incident that resulted in an injury of himself and two others.
I am very pleased with the cooperation that I received from the Burnt Hills Police Department
and surrounding jurisdictions. That member is stable. He did receive injuries to his lower
red flag that will need surgical intervention. So please keep them in your thoughts. We appreciate
of support that we've got as an organization. There's any questions about being happy to answer
them, if not, I'll let you get back to your name.
Great. I just want to say I thought some prayers are with them also. I just don't know if you're
here or that or have absolutely have a seat and so thank you very much. Thank you.
Thanks for all you do. Okay,
we'll go on to two finance, Trustee Strauss.
I make a motion to accept the Department of Budget Report for December 31st as submitted.
So, these are four representate 50% for first or around percent of both this year.
They want to bring up that 50% of the reports are a pair of the CAF basis, which is consistent
for five or a month.
It's just me, they don't include the adjustments in a pool that we've got it.
There's a highlight of a few things, the gentleman poll revenue is at 123% of the sphere
budget. Almost all revenue line items were at or exceeded the fiscal year budget. There's
nothing extraordinary to report with the expense line items. The village has expressed
just under 90% of the general on the period by date. As of December 31st, the total cash
and all the finance is just over 6.8 million. The 6.5 million being unrestricted. 5.6 million
is about in seedings or howling months they got.
Great.
Thank you.
Yeah.
No, we agree.
I think you guys touched on the revenue last month.
So we don't need to rehash unless there's questions about it.
But yeah, we had a really good year.
Interest help.
Great.
Traffic fines helped.
Building permits helped.
Those are big line items.
Great.
Thank you for that.
All right.
None other being heard.
Thank you.
Please call a vote.
Yes.
That's the extra.
Yes.
2,2.
Like to motion to accept the open payables report in the amount of $213,588.23.
And Nikki, that includes the addendum, right?
Yeah.
That's complete.
Yeah.
So, we'll just need a second.
That's your riff.
There was a smaller one, there was a couple in West LRB, there was a third payment to Allen,
there was a point to reach one for the worst snow contract, as well as a competitive report
to the body cameras, the ASI and the privates, or I think that was a point of 4.6 dollar.
Otherwise everything looked pretty normal.
Okay.
All right.
No, the question is liquid, please call the vote.
Yes.
Trustee Strauss?
Yes.
Good read.
Yes.
2-3.
I'd like to make a motion to accept this month's overtime report in the amount of $9,898.39.
And there is some reimbursable money that is not in that dollar amount.
Correct.
Is included in it.
Okay.
I'll move.
Thanks.
Okay. Okay.
Okay.
Any other questions?
None. We heard about the vote.
Yes. Yes.
Before.
Like to make a motion to approve the police pension reports for November of 2023 as submitted.
Good.
Okay.
Press here if.
So we did have a three pension board meeting this morning, so I do it in December numbers.
We'll add in December 31st, the toll in that position, how the growth is at $15,746,000,
which is at $2.190,000 greater than that, there's just a position at the-
Great.
Thank you for that.
Anything else?
Not me and her Nick, you please call the vote.
Yes.
Do five.
I'd like to make a motion to make this as a handcrane.
Get the open it up.
Like the move to accept the annual appropriation ordinance for the fiscal year, beginning January
January 1, 2024, ending December 31, 2024, ordinance 24.
Yeah.
Second.
Cross-zero.
Did I
see that?
It's too appropriate.
Oh, OK.
Yeah.
So I'll amend my motion to approve.
Correct.
Second.
OK.
All right.
Wes.
Last month, we had the file there in front of us.
One slight change from the draft that was an occasional error within our Excel workbook.
So this total appropriation has increased $5,000,000 because we admitted a lot of them
account out. So last month total appropriation was $9,644,873. This revised document is
now $9,647,873. So there's one to point that out. It's on the first page, second page of
the actual documents, first page of numbers, and we inadvertently left off special events
other with $30,000.
Other than that, no other changes.
From the document we viewed last month as a reminder,
we approved our budget in December, which is the numbers that we're going to hold ourselves to internally.
The appropriation is the legal document that gives us spending authority up to the dollar amounts listed within the various categories.
This is not the budget. We're not trying to spend in these dollars and dollars amounts.
It just gives us the ability to spend a little too.
So if you have the accounts that we give us a little bit more leeway on because of those
things that are unknown, this year building improvements, it's going to be accounts that
we've appropriated a little bit more than we normally would, which is in that 10 to 20 percent
range legal, bring unknown things you make them up throughout the year. Unemployment, expense,
we give ourselves and some extra leeway road maintenance. And then within the MFT fund this year,
just trying to plan to spend and rebuild it from one o'clock.
We did the additional amounts or appropriate additional amounts within that fund.
Consistorically, it's just been snow-plowing expenses within RFP for less four or five
years, but we have the rebuild in one of my dollars to spend down prior to July 1st of
2025.
five. Sunday road of bridges, fun 90, more fuel tax 95, fun 95. Ask you something about
fun 90 real quick. You got 150 grain and mowing. Shouldn't that be under snowplug contracts?
I don't know. I'm just under fun 90. It's just a snowplug. It was there all right. Mowing and cleanup was like 50K,
Okay.
For
150K.
We've created it again.
Two different things.
Move that around.
Sorry.
Oh, good catch.
Yeah.
The 2024 budget is 120,000.
Then it's morning.
We don't contract.
So the streetwork and things.
It's just the city.
And the appropriated amount is.
20% of all budgeted, which is why it's at 150.
for reference the 2023 by their mob was $150,000.
So this is actually from a budgetary standpoint
and these groups.
So plowing doesn't go on.
This is your same.
No, I'm proud.
It's plowing.
So plowing is any more appeal tax bonus of $5.95.
Thank you.
Not roads and bridges, which is fun on people.
And historically, we did not even let more appeals
to accept a personal plowing contract.
So that's by the line item exists.
Yes, but that's a more recent key.
And just for reference, our budget document to December.
It's all occurred expensive just over 8.5 million appropriation,
which is what we're looking to approve tonight is just over.
It's 9,647,000 state or earlier.
So the appropriated amount is about $1 million more than our budget,
which is about 12%.
So is that real Illinois?
The total amount needs to be spent.
277,000 and some change.
4,500.
277.
Yes, we spent July or early.
Oh, I wouldn't reference.
2025.
July 25, not 20.
Also, we got your hand.
Yes.
That's my reference.
So, ladies.
And it doesn't say spent, doesn't say, upgraded, doesn't say committed. It says approved. So, I think a phone call is needed to the permanent transportation to clarify what that means. If we're not spending it by July of 25, but absolutely all of our products need to get row projects approved. It's stamped.
We do have the dollar amount built in, we have to go through all the steps for the
appropriate approvals through I-DOT, but it is built in the budget for this year.
Which is a clearly document, while we're spending that for and file a property, right?
Yeah, there's some additional forms in the...
on our profits for the big earnings in your open form, the big plan in this year, the
nation is ready to proceed with that, both through the in-profit, all of the restrictions
that are required.
No, no big deal.
And we had talked about this at finance once ago, and we want to spend the money.
Definitely.
Probably by July of 25 to avoid any questions.
Great.
Anything else?
No, I'll be here. Nick, if he's callable.
Trustee Clark.
Mr. Ophman? Yes.
Trustee Hills? Trustee Strauss?
Yes.
Trustee Ekstrom? Yes.
Trustee Riff? Yes.
All right. Ronan Bridges. Trustee Ekstrom?
Okay. Not pretty much everything.
And you have an update from Stella where they're at.
You know, I see they give all of their measuring points before we go.
They're out there.
Okay, so that's in the works.
And, um, you know, why there are things with great boards of filing roads.
And if that's the can, things are good.
Um, see if they move on to the next one, three point two, which is the main thing to do tonight.
which is to buy the motor fuel tax for the snow removal.
So I would move, do I move to adopt, to approve the resolution for the use of
motor fuel tax funds on snow removal. Resolution 24 dash.
Okay, and do I need to read any more of this? Should I read this resolution or?
All right. So I'll just read the beginning of it. Resolution for maintenance under the Illinois
Highway Code and it resolved by the President Board of Trustees of the Village of Barrington
Hills. Illinois that there is hereby appropriate the sum of 300,000 of motor fuel tax funds
for the purposes of maintaining streets and highways under the applicable provisions of the Illinois
Highway Code from January 1st, 2024 to 1231, 2020.
Any questions?
Okay, none being heard.
All right. Thank you for that. I'll make you please call the vote.
Let's see how it goes. Yes. Let's see how it goes. Yes.
Yes. Yes. Let's see, Rhett. Yes.
I'm just on a quick note on the road to bridges. Try to hit an unspecated death.
The name Brett passed away was one of the guys out in the field all the time, so he did
pass away a couple weeks ago.
So our condolences to him, his family, bears with him, but he would not be with obviously
with us anymore, so I just want to pass that along.
So okay, public safety, trusty riff, just this, submitted, did you give anything to add?
Anything to happen in the, once we're all away?
We're at the last week of our COVID-19 pandemic.
And we had a couple of installs of February or a purchase.
That's based on install.
You had another private residence or HOA is putting a camera up.
Or do they come and talk to you about me putting the camera up in there?
I was hoping.
Okay.
We'll leave one of them.
And if they wanted that, they would do something there, HOA would fund, since it's not our
strength, correct.
But we would monitor that.
They have the ability to share that.
They would share it with us, so we don't monitor it or anything.
Monitor share.
If there's a hit, it goes to that.
I'm just asking the patient.
I don't know if that was theirs.
They searched us to go through our system.
And then we had you had a little incident, maybe, of a car that was
got read by one of those readers that we kept somebody or apprehended
somebody or somebody was down the road through a chase or something.
I think a few weeks ago, I think a few weeks ago, one of the cameras took a hit and not
in our town, but it came through and they were able to catch somebody with the LPR camera.
So, yes. So, I'm sorry, chief. I didn't hate you put it a spot. Sorry.
It's not vacation less. So, maybe you heard something, I didn't.
From the acting chief, you mean that? All right, thank you for that.
All right. Thank you, Trustee Riff. We'll go on to building the zoning.
Any permit has submitted from Trustee Hill's permit applications and
enforcement report. You guys all got that? And then there was no, was there a zoning meeting? No zoning meeting. Okay. All right.
Planning will be monthly submitted as submitted.
Sure. And seven, one trustee Strauss. Nothing new to report.
All right.
Everything's going good. It's good. It's healthy.
Okay.
Up in the report, environmental committees they meet, they're going to be running today,
the dynamic.
Okay.
Question.
Dynamite.
Any meetings coming up?
Okay.
Building in grounds.
Monthly report.
We didn't meet, but we're going to schedule something for next month.
Okay.
We're going to get the invite.
Yeah.
Any day, by any day, it's down on paper.
Okay, Mary, want to report attorneys.
Okay.
All right, this time we'll go to one, ten-one.
The chair would entertain motion for ordinance amending the general penalty of the
bill's code adjusting the maximum fine ordinance 24 dash.
Oh, so moved. Second, Dr. Syriff, Trustee Strauss.
Do you have a little background on this?
Oh,
that's good.
It's $750 a day. That is the maximum you're allowed to have.
If you're not at home, it's a facility.
But as I come up with a facility, you're allowed to lower it.
If we could choose.
And we've found different experiences in this,
particularly in the administrative duty case in America, that there are times that 750 may
not be executed on it. And so the flexibility, the fire, would be something that the board
considered to give that latitude to the ability to stay in those requests. It does not mean
that it will be higher than 750, though we requested all, and it's not, so it's 50 that's
if last day did not.
But currently our maximum fine is.
Other towns are somewhere higher.
I know we can talk about this beforehand.
But somewhere higher than that.
Chief correct.
Other towns.
We.
So, you're making very 10,000 to 5,000.
The village of Berington is 5,000.
So, you're right.
So, we're 2,500.
Is that going to be our whole of some different deficit?
We can't find up to 20 side out.
20.
So, the print 5 is 750.
I'm raising the max of 1,500.
So, that gives the administrative lodges the opportunity to go to $2500 a day.
And that's how you're, that's how you're dispensions, you'll have this thing.
I've said in those, some of the adjudications of the judge says, really, that's all I can,
I can give them, that's what he says.
So, that's all I can just care about, talking to him and stuff.
So, just, it's up to the board, you guys, we can change it.
That was just the number.
that was lower than other towns, you know, we've always changed it going in the future,
but for right now, about 2,500 hours was reasonable.
Chief, you've just started together?
It's really helpful.
I cleared by Algonquin in 1,000.
There's no one else at 2,500, but there's quite a few that are a minor.
There's a lot of 750s and 500s.
But Barrington's 5,000, Carpenterville, 1,000, Crystal Lake, 5,000 Lake Barrington, Schomburg
50,000, but that's kind of interesting. So it seems like the
2500 is a good number right in the middle here between 1,000 and 5,000
we think that we're at 750 because it's a carryover from before we were home rule
when you were limited or that's was the limit. So
really helpful to have this chart. So thank you.
Yeah, good number.
Yeah, it's good number. I think it's good number. We can change it whenever we want.
not be sent trash. So if it's not 25 owners of working, we'll make it five.
All right. We're not self-sparing. Nicky, please call the vote.
Yes. Yes. Yes.
Okay. We're going to attend to annexation of contenduous property discussion. Mary,
you want to give a little. Yeah. What is this annexation and continuing
private discussion be going under the planning committee?
Probably maybe in future. Right now,
I think we discussed that at one point, planning or zoning, right?
Right.
I think this I would seem an indicator to you, but since the last one of the, one of
the conversations that I had and some of the research that both of us had done led to
the conclusion that the knowledge at this time would be more advised to manage the property
that is outlined in the yellow highlighted area.
That does remember things.
The first is, it gives you a very nice,
compact, ingenuous property that is,
it fits within the confines of what the law laws
for a forced annexation.
I'm not sure.
And do you have any amount of acreage?
Oh, proposed annexation is 44.52 acres.
The law allows you to do up to 60 acres, and so are we going to hold?
The whole of it is just a little over 60 if we include the relevant property that you
have to.
But that we were, again, and I were doing a lot of research, and we were coming into some
question as to proper ownership of one of the properties, and so one of the boundaries you
you can use renexation as far as preserve.
And so that the green dot parcel is for us preserve.
So if you cut the annexation up there,
we don't run into any of the issues that we may have across.
So if the forest preserve has a large area here,
it does a little piece that comes in.
Oh, interesting.
Did it bribe or something?
That's kind of how it's just all right now.
That's the thing.
Yeah, the forest preserve is all of the new dot here.
It's blue because part of the forest preserve
in various fields already, part of the forest preserves
that incorporated, but yes, this small rectangular
parcel is forest preserves.
So we would recommend with the village stop,
the annexation at that line.
You can always go back and think about more to continue
to square out the boundaries, but it seems like that.
It made sense about myself.
If you then want to come later and address this triangle,
Are we unable to do that because we don't touch it?
It's just for us to serve around it.
You know, we could, the problem that we were running into is that the very triangular
bottom of that, that ownership of that parcel was in question.
And if you were creating enough of a question that at this moment in time to eliminate that
question and to do what the village really wanted to do which is to annex property to have a little
bit more say on development. It just makes sense for us to cut it back. You can always do a successor
another ordinance. So a lot of 44 acres is a lot. It's just a little piece down there and you can't
We could use the creek, which is that we may be lying as an additional, as our additional boundary.
So, it was that what we'd have to do, we have to go back in because in the initial, in the initial calculation of acreage, we did not agree.
We do have to include that, and you can only go to 60 acres, and including all of these.
So is that, or the yellow dots based on the parcels of land?
Yeah.
Okay, because I was going to say it would make sense to take the diagonal and just take everything to the left of the diagonal
and leave the right of the diagonal to South Barrington.
Well, you want to square, you may as well square, square off your border with South Barrington
It's because otherwise you're gonna end up with a little bit of the Wandsland
Right, and actually which is what we have now you can't do it that way
Okay
If you added just this parcel and this parcel are you under the 68?
You can't do that because then you know
Do you have to be bound? It can't be made by an enemy's party by forest preserve for a river
So that dictates when you've been stopped the line, so river would be your own and that would be more than 68 years
It was very very well with the actual numbers
So right now that's 44, that's a good, I mean if we can always come back to it at some point
Right, I would say,
well after we get it finalizing it gets acreage fast
It's
kind of like a building.
Do you think?
It's all, wasn't it?
I don't know.
Is that R1?
Even the landscape companies down here and all that?
They have special use.
Yeah,
that expired.
Oh, landscape.
I have the special use that the landscapeers have.
So I don't know how expensive this is.
They would come into it.
That would come into it.
And once you've annexed, take it down at Pathway, which I looked at.
That's really headed.
Let's take it down to Pathway.
When we annex property to the village in bi-operation of law,
it was to our highest list of restrictive zone, which is R1 single family residents.
So properties, when they're annexed in, there are a designation R1.
If they have a legally used established at the time of our annexation, they can retain
that use until it is a legal nonconformative use bus.
It doesn't, while it has the overlay of our zoning, if there are legal nonconformative
use, they would stay there.
So, for example, Anna has told me that the landscape company is operating, but especially
they would be able to maintain that under the terms of our ordinance.
So it's not as if you were going to have to renew that.
No, you would then say the last key company sells off.
Property goes to some other last key company.
Pond sale.
Yeah, that's what I was going to ask you.
Pond sale of that property.
What happens to go back to R1 then?
You see some
special use permits are very specific.
They say that special use grant and go silly with the owner.
You boost upon sale.
Some special use from the land.
Thank
you.
What in before here is do you want us to concentrate
on the properties in yellow, because then we'll get all the purposes of the next meeting to be able to do this.
We have to get all the public notices and legal notices and but of annexation together.
We wanted to be able to do that in time for your next meeting.
So we're just looking for a little direction. Should we stay within the confines to be able to line or go beyond?
Is there any risk that this is March to then this area some people talking for development
before we would go in you know second phase if you can if this to the river is less than
60 acres would it be more efficient to address it all at once.
Part of another question would be the board would have to sign off and so I think that
the later process because it would be annexing that property, I would recommend we could go forward
with this and then proceed with if you want to do more. The force is there without it because
the force is there and they can't do anything or build out anyways. How much more acreages the rest
of the triangle down to the river? But I'm asking, so with this force, what if we just don't grab the
What doesn't even matter to bearings and hills?
We're not taking it personally.
I've got you, but okay, so this is...
The rest of this triangle, if we try to get all of it down to the river,
that can't be another...
Oh.
But this lot right here, we can't split that in hand.
That would be...
We can't cut that in hand.
This somebody's parcel looks like.
We can't have half of it being...
Well,
that one triangle, I think, is one full parcel.
So you can't say that, hey, I can have it. It's going to be in a half. It's going to go out right at the river. Yeah, you can't cut so much property. Have it. Have them. Thank you.
I would like to just try to grab as much as you possibly can, the first attempt.
In question.
Another question is, since this is basically surrounded by forest preserves, there's a forest
preserves, then have the ability to annex that land before we do in theory, that triangle.
All right.
Basically,
the technicals are trying to base the plan.
Right.
You haven't been able to find it.
So you can't, so you can't just get the plan involved
because then you are reaching an understanding.
So the support is available in both of these.
It says that they're in a great focus.
So, they're not, you know, if it's already there for you or not, they're close, but they're
not going to take anything or make any change there, but if we go and take that little script
on a media level, right now, we've prepared this script.
That's right.
And, you know, I want to spend time on this and I'm going to suggest to you, we feel very confident
about the property outlined in yellow.
And if you want, you don't have to do, you don't have to do a court's annexation all at once, you can break it into parts.
This car saw outline in yellow is under these 60 acres.
We believe that it fits within all of the statutory requirements for annexation.
And, you know, it could be, it could be your first start, and then you can always come back and do more.
We will see the two parts of the grant.
This if we refer to the two parts of the grant.
I agree. I think that makes sense.
It's surrounded by a municipality, by a river, by a forest preserve.
As you can see, you've got the rest of the train,
where you've got Barrington Hills here, Forest Preserve,
and Forest Preserve.
It's direction tells us the logic of panic, sir.
How about we?
Well, where is Barrington Hills here?
I see 4th, the search, 4th, the search, and so on.
B, it's the search, and so on, and so on.
It's the search, and so on, and so on, and so on, and so on.
Right.
Everything worth the paper, else?
Is it suspecting Barrington Hills?
That's self-barrington.
Oh, of course, the search around.
That's self-barring, is it a read?
It's the search, and so on, and so on, and so forth.
It's the search, and so forth, and so forth,
Not at some point.
So is this then?
Is it getting stuff or something?
It's not difficult.
Very.
So it's simply down here.
So essentially what we're doing and protecting this, the corners that really touch are
developable land right now and the stuff next to the forest preserve is what we are forgetting
about for now.
So if we annex it a second time, theoretically if this was 120 acres, we'd have to annex it
into two sections, right, 60 and 60.
Okay.
And I didn't expect them.
So why do you expect them to be on the phone here?
You can't.
I was like, what's in the way it gets to be?
Because it doesn't grow up in the hand.
And it's not the tool.
It's set.
It's a very little bit in the tiny thing right here.
It doesn't grow up in.
It's not part of the property above it.
And the best we've been able to come to is that it is probably
right away going by and going by and going by and growing.
I'm not going to point it out, but the problem with that, only by saying, you know, it
is not part of the screener trying to spend a day with the boarders, or the board itself,
and trying to sort this out.
And part of the problem is nobody cares.
It's such a small piece of property.
and how big is it?
Well, I think it's very good.
Because it doesn't wear a pen, because it's a non-hasteful
castle, we actually have never had that experience.
It's how she's a sister too.
And we can go back in time, far back in time,
to find out when that little triangle was cut free.
But I don't think we know, we can't really know when it's relevant, but the time will still
just get a tad something important.
I think it's going to be all right now.
I'd be happy with that.
Yeah.
Maybe it's going to be all right now.
That's fascinating.
Yeah.
And you say small and small.
It's like, it's like, there's little time.
If this is 60 acres, it's going to be a lot of tax of an 8 probably fat.
16th of an acre is my eighth, the size of a doubt.
So that'd be one.
Trust you ripped my foot, a new garage.
Would you approach this land owner for him to agree to annex the other part of his property
into Burian Hills without it being foreseeable?
Anyone that, at the very start of this conversation, the village can contact anyone,
these things, the mechanics.
So they can all bond early.
They have to have contact with you.
They have to touch very gently.
So you couldn't immediately go to, you couldn't immediately go to, for example, this program.
They're not continuous.
But we could certainly reach out to all of these people and then just keep moving down and
enjoying the one bottle.
But even here, I don't think we have to worry about splitting the property by going to
the river, because that homeowner or landowner could always voluntarily annex the rest, and
we have property.
The problem where it's broken up by different, you know, different people and stuff.
But if we came down to the river, they could, if we came down to that river, then we're
touching the upper part, but you'd have to do that, but to worry about going to the river
because this property owner might have their property, who different.
Well, we were seeing if we was going to the river and the property in Barrington that has
the deer park, unincorporated, it all makes together the people come in and grab different
pieces if that's a very normal, sometimes.
So they could always voluntarily annex once that does, correct, because that name would
be...
It was just something to be aware of, and it wouldn't matter that little thing with them,
because that piece would be touching Barrington, if you did that in China as a second base.
is so that seems positive to me.
Do you have any problems at all?
Sorry, sir.
We can't have a dialogue with you at this point.
Sorry, talk about that.
That's for public comment.
You're more than welcome, but that's over-enforcing.
So there's just no dialogue here.
So you're at the end of the discussion.
You know, people are on the way.
But yeah, people in those areas.
Okay.
Maybe Anna can speak with you tomorrow. Yeah, that's okay.
Sure, sure.
Okay,
sure.
And the only reason why we, yeah, because we have made it into, yeah, okay, that's it, okay.
Okay. Anything else? Anybody? So, would you need direction from us? We need to vote on it or? Right. I agree with the first yellow striping motion of it and try to acquire the rest immediately after. Right, proceed, Rose. I would think both are really about what we're just asking if they want it. Right. Proposal to get going at it and start with it.
I think it's a real problem with the railroad.
It isn't if you don't look at this little piece.
It's a 68 year old.
Right.
Because you can be able to associate with the places.
I think we have the direction you want to miss the end of the board.
The end to do the yellow barrier for new homes.
And then we can do that.
We're going to give you that.
Sure.
We'll find one with you more in the next show.
Okay.
Yep.
Glad you both.
Thank you for.
Yeah, thanks.
Thanks.
All right, would not be heard, the chair will maintain a motion to adjourn at 716, we have moved.
Press the riff, press the extra, I'm all in favor.
Opposed?
Thank you.