[1:03] Maybe it's considered a park. I don't
know. I guess I could look at the parks
[1:07] um plan, but I think there was enough
there was support among the members to
[1:13] continue to have the open spaces
portion. Uh I also think that we haven't
[1:20] really determined I know it says here
meet in alternating months. There's
[1:25] enough activity especially on bike and
ped safety that that's not enough
[1:32] meeting dates. And so we'd like to see
something more fleshed out for a meeting
[1:38] schedule for the two committees.
[1:45] Trusty Stoker Brandon I think you you
stole a lot of my thunder. So, I'll I'll
[1:50] reiterate though a little bit and and
kind of I I first of all, I I supported
[1:53] this uh when we've discussed it in the
past up at the board level. I think um
[1:58] it was a good experiment, but uh it's
clearly uh uh uni close to unanimous if
[2:04] not unanimous that it should go back to
two uh both the uh pedestrian and
[2:09] bicycle safety committee. And again, I
would I would support your uh your idea
[2:12] of saying parks and open spaces
committee that it would encompass more.
[2:16] Um I note that we received a couple of
emails on this um from uh Sandy and
[2:21] Gary. Um and uh you know, my takeaway
from those emails um thank you. Uh was
[2:27] that there's a lot of work to be done
especially on the pedent bike safety um
[2:31] committee. So I I too would support
going to a uh meeting every month. You
[2:36] know, you can always cancel the
meetings. I'm a designate, you can take
[2:39] the minutes. I just think that if you're
going to really get momentum going on
[2:43] any kind of committee or commission or
board that you serve on, it's really
[2:47] helpful to be meeting monthly. And if
you don't need it, you don't need it.
[2:50] Maybe you don't meet as much during the
summer or when people are away, but I
[2:53] really I like the idea of having pet and
bike safety meet once a month. Um, so
[2:59] bottom line, I do support this. uh you
know these are priorities for the
[3:03] village and I think that separating them
into two to be more efficient to get
[3:07] more done um is a good idea and will
drive more work and um align nicely with
[3:13] village priorities.
[3:18] » So um
[3:22] if we were to change the motion um
that we'll meet is it imperative that we
[3:29] specify
that that will meet monthly that will
[3:35] meet what do we what is required here to
to give flexibility but also keep in
[3:41] mind that we favor the monthly the
current monthly meeting path.
[3:47] » I mean I was I could try to I could take
a shot at it if you
[3:52] » that we could just say that we'll meet
monthly.
[3:54] » Yeah. I I was just I I think head and
bike safety is where the monthly request
[3:58] is coming from. So I my my idea was to
make that monthly and parks parks and
[4:03] open spaces committee meet uh bimonthly
or is that the right word or once every
[4:09] two months?
[4:13] » Every other month.
I guess
[4:17] would it be better to not have it if I
mean when they go to working on the
[4:22] comprehensive outdoor recreation plan if
there are times that they would like to
[4:28] meet monthly is there anything that
would if we say if we don't say this in
[4:33] this
well it would just be a draft
[4:37] » how how about for parks and open spaces
we go monthly or as as needed that gives
[4:42] them flexibility
>> we'll go
[4:46] Do you want do you want me to take a
shot?
[4:48] » Go ahead. I move to recommend that an
ordinance amendment be drafted to repeal
[4:52] the parks and public spaces committee
and create a parks commission which will
[4:56] meet every other month or as needed or
sorry let me rewind and create a parks
[5:02] and open spaces committee which will
meet every o every every other month or
[5:06] as needed and a bicycle and pedestrian
safety committee which will meet every
[5:11] month each consisting of seven members
uh each consisting of seven seven me
[5:17] seven seven members I think that ends
Second
[5:22] » motion in a second. Any other comments
from
[5:25] » just so then um what would quorum be for
these committee? Would it be four?
[5:31] » I think we'd probably draft that in the
ordinance. I think we would establish
[5:34] that.
Sandy, you want
[5:38] » Andy Pendleton, 3529 North Frederick
Avenue. I'm currently chair of the
[5:42] pedestrian and bicycle safety
subcommittee. uh chair Warren and Sto
[5:47] Trusty Stokerbrand and director uh
village manager Ewald first thank you
[5:52] for service and for taking up this
issue. Um just brief comment on the
[5:57] motion is currently drafted. Um it
wouldn't be in my opinion or suggesting
[6:03] that we want to call it um parks and
open spaces. It would be parks and
[6:08] public spaces committee. Um
this has been a common like stumbling
[6:14] block. We we've been doing all doing
been doing this for years. But the idea
[6:18] is that this committee would be devoted
to improving our parks and improving our
[6:23] public spaces particularly placemaking
um at various places in the village that
[6:29] are owned by the village but aren't
necessarily um parks. Um and then we've
[6:35] been calling that other committee the
ped bike committee forever. Um, so I
[6:40] would suggest we call it the ped bike
committee uh going forward rather than
[6:45] the pedestrian and bicycle
safety committee. I wouldn't want the
[6:52] title safety to limit the role and
mission of that committee because I'm a
[6:58] firm believer that more biking, more
pedestrian activity in our village is
[7:05] crucial for lots of things. reducing
crime, increasing property value,
[7:10] increasing business prosperity. Um, so I
would suggest that part of the mission
[7:16] of the ped bike committee is not only
ensuring that our ordinances uh promote
[7:22] ped and bike safety, but also uh promote
more active transportation in the
[7:27] village. So, thank you for uh the
consideration of my uh suggestion.
[7:33] » Thank you. Any other public comment
hearing? None. I would I think both
[7:40] those recommendations make sense.
>> I concur.
[7:42] » So I would I would alter my motion to
reference um public spaces instead of
[7:47] open cibases and refer and create the
ped bike committee instead of ped and
[7:51] bike safety.
You
[7:54] » I concur.
>> All right. So we have the the motion and
[7:58] a sec the altered motion and a second.
Any further discussion?
[8:04] All those in favor?
>> I
[8:05] » I motion carries two to zero.
[8:12] Next item on the agenda for the JPNL
committee is consider Class B and Class
[8:20] B licenses for Jersey Fresh LLC DBA
Pizzeria Deluso 4511 North Oakland
[8:27] Avenue.
[8:30] have anyone presenting on this today or
is it just a
[8:35] Okay, we have any discuss.
>> I can make a motion.
[8:40] » Go ahead. I move to recommend the class
B fermented malt beverage and the class
[8:44] B into Intoxicating liquor licenses for
Jersey Fresh LLC doing business as
[8:49] Pizzeria Deluso located at 4511 North
Oakland Avenue, Shorewood, Wisconsin
[8:54] 53211 to the full board for approval and
cons consideration on September 21,
[9:01] 2020.
>> I will second that motion. Motion and a
[9:06] second. Have any further discussion from
the trustees?
[9:11] Any discussion from the public?
>> When do they open?
[9:19] » You just
>> just come to the microphone. Give your
[9:22] name and address.
>> Asking asking for my family a block and
[9:24] a half away.
>> I know. I actually
[9:28] » My anniversary is September to 16th.
>> That is not gonna happen. I'm sorry. My
[9:33] name is Kyle Toner. I am the owner and
the agent, the liquor licensed agent for
[9:38] Pizzeria Deluso. Um, my address, h yes,
133 West Monrovia in White Fishb um
[9:46] business at 4511 North. Um,
what's the question?
[9:51] » When when do you open?
>> We're hoping four to six weeks.
[9:56] We're thinking four to six weeks as a
>> I'm pretty confident.
[10:02] » Great. Great.
>> We're all excited. We're very excited.
[10:06] » Appreciate it. Thank you very much.
>> Yeah. In case you can't tell.
[10:09] » Yeah. Yeah. So, we're we're moving
forward.
[10:13] » Thank you.
>> I heard seven weeks at the le heard.
[10:17] » That's what you just heard me say?
>> Yeah.
[10:19] » I heard four to six.
>> The absolute latest.
[10:23] » I'm just I'm, you know, I'm just trying
to look out for me.
[10:26] will be open and ready to go.
>> Thank you so much for our
[10:31] » Thank you
>> for having us.
[10:33] » Well, we can't we can't wait to see
>> at the location.
[10:36] » Believe me, it's been a it's been a
longer process tonight.
[10:40] » Yeah.
>> Welcome and thank you.
[10:43] » Thank you.
Motion and a second. Any further
[10:47] discussion?
All those in favor? I I opposed. Motion
[10:53] carries unanimously. Thank you.
[10:57] Last item for the JPNL
committee and I'm trying to read the
[11:02] exact agenda item here is uh consider
committee appointments.
[11:08] Opening it up to the floor for a motion
or discussion
[11:13] brand.
Um I'm going to um make a motion that
[11:18] includes the names just so that when it
goes to the minutes they're included.
[11:24] » That sounds good. Um, I move to approve
Jeremy Spurgeon uh for the business
[11:30] improvement district and Liz Nelson and
Paul Roadie for the design review board
[11:37] as presented to the village board for
approval consideration.
[11:41] » I will second
motion and a second. Any further
[11:46] discussion?
>> I just like to thank the clerk's office
[11:49] again for managing all these
applications. Thank you.
[11:53] » And thank you to the applicants for for
serving on these boards. We very much
[11:56] appreciate
>> indeed.
[11:59] » Motion and a second. All those in favor?
>> I
[12:02] » I opposed. Motion carries.
And with that, uh we are concluded. Um
[12:10] » if I just have one more thing, the one
um these volunteer appointment
[12:15] applications, the one that's submitted
first, I really like this format. Um,
[12:20] it's just it's reads easier online. I
might say that. Um, if we could have
[12:26] that as opposed to the the second format
makes a big difference when you're going
[12:30] through. Thank you.
>> Thank you.
[12:35] I
>> think that's all the business we have.
[12:37] So, um, I can I will take a
>> I move to adjurnn. If you're ready to
[12:43] inter
>> I will second your motion. All those in
[12:46] favor?
>> I
[12:47] » I opposed. We are adjourned at 6:18.
[13:02] » Good evening everyone. I'd like to call
the committee of the whole meeting to
[13:06] order at 6:30 p.m. Um, trustees are
present except for Trusty Ardorfer and
[13:14] Trusty Ersync.
Um,
[13:18] oh, and it's not publicly noticed. Uh,
so we have one item, we have two items.
[13:23] Um, the first one is on street parking
assessment. Um, that'll be presented by
[13:28] Captain Santiago.
So, there is a PowerPoint.
[13:42] And just for um context, is this from
the request to look at parking um from
[13:48] Trusty Kudo? Okay. So, this is the
starting place of uh looking at our
[13:53] revisiting our parking capacity and
procedures.
[14:00] » Um thank you for having me. Uh one of
the reasons I'm here is I guess a couple
[14:05] of months ago, I think that's when the
conversation kind of started and there
[14:08] were some uh questions about uh some of
the parking data. We just went through a
[14:12] new system in May, so some of the stuff
it was kind of hard to assess because I
[14:15] think people weren't really comfortable
with the new system and the numbers
[14:18] didn't really make a lot of sense to us.
That has since hopefully changed a
[14:22] little bit. I mean, it's still going to
take some time to get a accurate
[14:25] reading, but we are able to provide some
data and some of the stuff that I know I
[14:29] spoke to uh Bart um was that people
wanted to know a little bit more about
[14:33] permits, how many do we have, a little
bit about on street parking capacity,
[14:37] off- streetet parking availability um
and what that looked like. daytime
[14:41] parking for purposes of how much was
available to people. I know we've done a
[14:45] couple of studies in the past, but um
hopefully I'll be able to answer some qu
[14:50] some questions and um my hope is that it
guides some um a little bit more
[14:56] understanding and then we can get some
questions as to why you're actually
[15:00] looking for me. I can get better
guidance and we can then put something
[15:03] together that you're comfortable with
getting whether it's annual every six
[15:07] months and you can actually kind of keep
a have what's going on with parking
[15:12] through the year.
[15:17] I actually printed the slides because I
figured looking back and talking might
[15:20] be a little more complicated. Um
>> a lot of this information you're all
[15:23] very familiar with. I mean Shorewood is
very densely populated with creates some
[15:28] challenges for parking. Um and that also
certain things that happen around the
[15:32] village affect it whether it's students
moving in uh this past week um whether
[15:37] it's festivals whether it's like
activity at our park it changes
[15:40] depending on what time of the year we're
dealing with um so
[15:46] we use I use the information from the
2017 2020 study I use the information
[15:51] that I have from um basically that
initiative that we explore a couple
[15:55] years ago with curb management meter
parking some of the old as reports that
[15:59] I had uh as far back as 2021. I was able
to find some data and then obviously I
[16:04] used the data that I have now from T2
that I've been looking at since about
[16:07] May. So we went live in May. We really
didn't get into the thick of it till
[16:12] probably June when we are a actually
able to get some people moved to the new
[16:16] system and a lot of the problems kind of
went away at that point or they they
[16:22] lowered quite a bit.
[16:27] We can go to the second slide.
Well, I just put this slide in here.
[16:31] This is from the 2020 study because I'm
going to refer a little bit to the uh
[16:34] bid section of the village and the 2020
study. These are the blocks and block or
[16:40] the streets and block faces they looked
at. And it's just sometimes you think
[16:45] you remember what it is, but when you
actually look at the picture, you
[16:47] realize, oh, there's a lot more streets
than that that we thought about. Um, so
[16:51] just a quick reminder to everyone. And
when you look at this, this is about
[16:55] onethird of the available, I guess,
streets or pavement of the village. Um,
[17:01] when you take it as a whole,
>> are those numbers?
[17:09] » Well, they're actually just it's
designated what the lots are. I didn't
[17:13] put them in here because some of them we
don't um actually manage anymore. Oh. So
[17:17] I was more for purposes of looking at
the picture saying, "Hey, these are the
[17:20] the plot face that they're talking about
in the study.
[17:26] We can
so right now when it comes to off-
[17:29] streetet parking, and I'm going to talk
a little bit about off street and on
[17:31] street and then daytime. Um, we manage
seven off street parking lots. Uh, they
[17:36] all obviously have a limited number of
available spaces and they have different
[17:40] hours and time restrictions. Some are 20
24-hour lots where you can you have to
[17:44] move your car uh once every 24 hours.
Some are you can only park from 8:00
[17:48] p.m. till 8 a.m. but you have to be out
of the lot at that time. Um some are
[17:53] only four hour time limits. So you
actually you can be in the lot you have
[17:56] your permit but you got to move every
four hours. Um
[18:00] and there's a few of them like I'm sure
you're all familiar Ligh Horse Village
[18:05] Hall and Oakland that are very high
demand and for like the Oakland North
[18:10] and even Village Hall a lot of times we
have maybe one or two spots that have
[18:14] any kind of turnover from month to
month. So they're they're people want to
[18:18] want those lots and we do get a lot a
lot of calls. So those
[18:25] not really a lot almost every well
actually every other lot other than
[18:29] these three have spots available.
So right now we have about 200 off
[18:34] street permits and there's about 263
available. Some of them people don't
[18:39] really like them as much whether it's
because they feel they're not as safe as
[18:42] the other ones, whether it's just far
from their houses depending where they
[18:45] live in the village. So, a lot of them
we might have 40 spots available, but
[18:48] only five have been used. Uh like Metro
Market is one of them. I think there's
[18:52] only five right now permits being used
at Metro Market
[18:57] » off the top of my head.
It's
[19:02] No, it's
>> five.
[19:04] » Correct. Five permits for that lot.
I want to say that one has 25 or it's a
[19:10] significant number.
>> Is that the whole top floor that's
[19:12] available?
>> Yeah.
[19:13] » Yeah.
[19:22] » So, when it comes to on street parking
permits, um, and I'm talking about both
[19:26] monthly and annual. uh about uh I want
to say three or four years ago, we allow
[19:32] people to actually buy a monthly permit
as opposed to having to go every single
[19:36] month and buying the permit for the next
month. they used to be kind of
[19:39] designated that way where there was the
April permit you know the May permit the
[19:42] June and now uh they have the option to
actually buy a recurring permit and kind
[19:46] of set it and forget it which is one of
the reasons I think when you look at the
[19:49] numbers you're going to see that some of
them have increased a little bit but a
[19:53] lot of it I believe is because of the
ease of access of the new system and how
[19:57] simple it is for people to actually go
in buy a permit enter their information
[20:00] and just kind of be done with it and to
cancel it if they ever want to
[20:06] in 2025 we between 1,000 and,00 permits
sold per month. And when you look at the
[20:11] monthly breakdown there, it's been
pretty consistent since we changed um
[20:16] how people are able to purchase permits.
Um right about that between I don't know
[20:20] 870 8.90 mark. Uh for the 2026, we only
have the first couple of months of data
[20:25] because I didn't want to take May or
June since people are still trying to
[20:28] get into that. So we kind of did the a
July and August permits and that's where
[20:33] we're at right now.
I realized I have a question on for
[20:38] going back to off- streetet parking
permits. Is there any forced turnover or
[20:44] can one person hold a permit as many
times?
[20:47] » There is by the system. So this is it's
actually easier than it was in the past.
[20:51] So if somebody let's say a credit card
is declined or they don't buy the permit
[20:55] within the first five days of the month,
uh it becomes available. Oh,
[20:58] » okay. So, um, yeah,
[21:03] before they had to and it's hard, well,
actually before the permit wouldn't
[21:08] expire. Um, we would have to go in and
look and say, "Hey, these people have
[21:13] not paid." So, we either got to reach
out or we got to cancel their permits
[21:17] because now it's been two weeks and it's
been a month. There's times that we
[21:20] found some depending on some of those
lots that weren't used as often that
[21:23] people might go four months uh with the
permit that the credit card just kept
[21:28] getting declined on the first of every
month but the permit was still valid
[21:31] manual.
>> Yes. Yeah. So you would look at the
[21:36] expiration date and usually you could
tell because obviously it says payment
[21:40] hasn't been confirmed or hasn't been
made but we had to look at the list and
[21:44] say oh these are overdue by quite a bit
so we have to cancel those. And then you
[21:48] got to deal with their phone calls and
they they didn't realize the credit card
[21:52] was the CL. I mean, it was a whole
thing. So now it's just it's pretty
[21:55] quick and they're actually they can if
they have an issue with it, they can do
[21:59] it right through their website. We see
it that they're contesting basically the
[22:03] the reason for it and we can approve it.
We can say send us the information from
[22:08] your credit card. You know, we just want
to see the picture and then we can
[22:11] reinstate it. Like if you have proof
that yeah, something just it was a
[22:14] glitch. Oh, makes it much easier.
>> So, I'm sorry to get really.
[22:20] » So, if I were a person that was um
wanted an off- streetet parking space
[22:25] » in a particular lot that was full, um I
could I'd have to go on, you know, every
[22:35] first of the month to see if I was if
it's just a lottery. Like,
[22:39] » we might have an option to creating a
waiting list. Um, but right now since we
[22:43] had so much going on at the beginning,
>> we didn't want to have to deal with
[22:47] maintaining a waiting list, but it is
something that we could potentially do
[22:50] in the future, especially if we just
choose like the one lot like Oakland
[22:53] North, which is really our main one.
>> Um, not everybody uses the recurring
[22:57] permit or the recurring uh charge or
billing. So, there's always two or
[23:02] three. So, if that person were to
obviously not go on themselves on the
[23:06] first, they will lose the permit.
>> So, yeah. Okay. So, it's basically luck
[23:10] of the draw as to what permanent you
trying to get into a certain lot.
[23:14] » If you don't have one, you need somebody
to get get out of the lot. Yeah. And
[23:18] then renew the permit
>> and then you have to look at the system
[23:20] at the right time. Correct.
>> Get into a lot as opposed to us. This
[23:24] person's been waiting for two years.
They're the next in line.
[23:26] » Yeah. Because unfortunately, we we at
this point we have no idea. Um because
[23:31] we just started. So, I mean, if we were
to start a waiting list, we potentially
[23:36] could do that.
Not being critical at all, just one.
[23:39] » Oh, no. I I completely understand, but I
mean, it creates other challenges,
[23:42] right? Because now I have to notify the
person that the space is available. I
[23:46] got to try to either email them or
>> uh call them on the phone and say, "Do
[23:49] you still want it?" Because if it's been
six months, you know, maybe they don't
[23:53] want it. So, we can also the system
right now is set up to give it to them
[23:57] automatically,
>> but if it's like a student that moved
[24:00] away or your daughter that went to
college, now they don't want the permit
[24:03] and now you're stuck with a permit that
you're getting built for. It's kind of
[24:07] so there's a lot of little things that
we need to figure out before we actually
[24:09] go live with the waiting list.
>> Yeah, it's it's administration because
[24:12] everything is automated. So now it's um
it creates other challenges.
[24:18] » Okay. But we don't have a policy that
you know if you've you have you can
[24:23] renew your permit um 12 months in a row
and then you have to take a break if
[24:29] » we do not but the permits do expire at
the end of the year. So then everybody
[24:33] for that purpose at the end of the year
everybody has to kind of start over.
[24:36] » Uhhuh.
>> So they can't just keep that permit. The
[24:39] annual permits are the same way.
>> The yearly ones they have to renew in
[24:43] January.
>> Okay. But if you have
[24:47] and it gets to the end of the year,
>> it tells you.
[24:51] » Correct.
>> And then it won't become available.
[24:54] » Correct.
>> Okay. All right. I just separate
[24:56] » they have a a right of first refusal.
>> You get two separate emails that say,
[24:59] "Hey, this is coming up in a few days."
and then again a couple days before.
[25:03] » Okay.
>> And
[25:04] » thank you. That's what I was trying to
look at is if
[25:06] » if there's some um it's not like it's
camp registration and everybody's, you
[25:12] know, starts from scratch.
>> No, because we wouldn't want to do that
[25:14] because then then we have the other
problem where it happened with Ames
[25:17] where somebody would move away, forget
to turn off the recurring permit, and
[25:20] now they're like, can I get a year and a
half worth of refunds?
[25:24] » Okay.
>> It's like, no, we really can't do that.
[25:26] » So, unfortunately. So
>> um just so I can clarify, Oakland North
[25:30] is the 4,400 block of Oakland. Okay.
>> Does anyone recall why there was such a
[25:37] large increase from 21 to 26
>> on the on street overnight parking
[25:43] permits?
>> Which one? on street overnight parking
[25:48] monthly and annual went from
approximately
[25:51] you know in 2021 650 to five years later
890
[25:56] » in 2021 is when we went to AS
that was that because that was only the
[26:02] last four months of the year.
>> Mhm.
[26:04] » So they went live at the end of August.
So my guess somewhere was had to do with
[26:09] people learning how to use the system or
moving from whatever you guys the
[26:13] village had before which I think it was
called Duncan Technologies or something
[26:16] like that.
>> Okay.
[26:17] » So um it was probably an education piece
saying you have to go to this and
[26:23] eventually it went up once people
realized you know I can go into these
[26:26] permits.
>> Okay.
[26:27] » At that time we had also um created the
on street overnight permit. So the study
[26:33] was con conducted in 2019 finished in
20. We took those recommendations and
[26:38] the first thing was actually
changing the overnight and so the we
[26:45] went through the code in detail and then
it made it available so people didn't
[26:50] have the availability to buy that type
of a permit before. Mhm.
[26:53] » Um and then parking was also restricted
under the prior ordinance to specific
[27:00] blocks or people with lived in a certain
area within the scope. It was
[27:05] » okay
>> complex, but it provided
[27:09] greater equity for obtaining a parking.
>> Okay. Can I ask a question about a
[27:15] couple slides back?
>> Um looking at the map.
[27:20] » Yeah. Um, I see the breakdown is it
gives you the on street parking
[27:24] restrictions, the amount of hours
um that you're allowed to park in these
[27:28] particular areas. Do you know I mean
without someone calling to complain are
[27:33] do we ever
>> We do have somebody that works that goes
[27:37] and uh say keeps track of the cars. They
don't do it all the time obviously
[27:42] because they get called away to other
things.
[27:44] » So are we like chalking cars or what we
>> Well, you don't chalk cars anymore. It's
[27:48] uh done digitally. So it
>> that's how old I am.
[27:50] » It figures out where the the air is.
>> Yeah.
[27:54] » Mars.
>> Okay.
[27:56] » By the air.
>> I'm just wondering how often I mean if
[27:59] if we're trying to promote turnover
especially in the business there are
[28:03] time restrictions.
>> How often we're actually going in cars
[28:07] that staying in the same spot for
>> Yeah. And I can get those numbers for
[28:12] you. But like today we got a call
probably about two hours ago. Somebody
[28:15] said, "Hey, there's cars on Edgewood
that haven't moved. they're over the
[28:18] two-hour limit. So, unfortunately, the
thing people don't realize is that the
[28:23] timer starts when you call us, right? We
can't show we can't show up and just
[28:27] pick it up because you say they've been
there.
[28:29] » So, then we have to then go through and
come back a couple hours and we usually
[28:34] give them like two hours and 15 minutes.
Well,
[28:36] » okay. people
>> uh for the tire, you know, where you
[28:42] pump your air like gauge the system when
you go through with the LTR notes
[28:46] location and then where that bulb is
that you can basically that's not moves
[28:54] reading
[28:58] » a lot of data.
>> Yep. things seems so much simpler like
[29:02] wow that's that's
>> especially when you can go out and you
[29:04] know take care of it
>> okay
[29:09] » obviously the thing doesn't show on that
>> no I'm done
[29:13] » is the u res
[29:18] » congested
>> yes we're just focus
[29:25] that res
>> the southeast corner Mhm.
[29:30] » Yeah. A whole different city,
>> right?
[29:33] » Well, it's a two-hour parking basically
for the whole thing unless you have a
[29:38] permit for daytime parking.
>> Yeah.
[29:44] » Do you refer to it ever anymore? And
this is because I when you said it, I
[29:49] thought, gosh, I haven't heard the
residential congested.
[29:53] » Do we were are you in the process of
like phasing that out now? It's just
[29:56] daytime permit.
>> We just call it daytime parking. daytime
[29:59] parking permits. Now, I just wanted to
make sure I was on
[30:01] » um because we did run into and this is
>> probably a year and a half ago, maybe
[30:05] two years, but when we went to the new
system, we realized that it's really not
[30:09] fair for somebody to pay for a daytime
parking permit and then move two blocks
[30:14] down to another daytime parking area and
then get a ticket. So, you know, it's
[30:20] you're still within two restricted areas
of the village um that are under the
[30:24] same
conditions. We just call it two
[30:27] different things. So it wouldn't make a
lot of sense to give you a ticket in one
[30:30] area, not the other if you already paid
for the permit. So because usually it
[30:34] happened when somebody lives in the
resident congested area and then they
[30:37] will go to the business district and
visit a business but they were parked on
[30:42] an area that was also restricted
and now you're just trying to take it
[30:46] and try having avoid it.
So the
[30:52] code but
[30:56] it is for purposes of having a needing a
daytime parking permit which was the per
[31:02] purpose behind it and it still has a
2hour restrict throughout without a
[31:06] permit.
[31:15] I think we're on on street parking. a
couple slides forward.
[31:20] » You want me to go back
>> forward? Are we Oh, yeah. This one.
[31:24] » Okay.
>> Uh I just wanted to mention the daytime
[31:26] permits. Uh we probably had about 200
annual uh 2025 once we changed that and
[31:33] we made it a little easier because right
now the businesses are allowed to buy
[31:37] some permits for their employees uh so
that the employees don't incur that
[31:41] charge especially some of the people
that are working for lower wages. It
[31:44] didn't make a lot of sense. So, um, we
have a few like the vet clinics do it
[31:48] for their employees. They buy like two
or three, um, and they just call us
[31:51] directly. They tell us what their plates
are and we they get charged for the
[31:54] permits. So, those have increased uh, in
the last year. So, there's probably
[31:59] close to 400 daytime park permits
altogether. So,
[32:04] » and before that change was made, it was
about 200
[32:07] » for just the um correct just daytime
because this also includes any um
[32:12] village employees that are parking in
village hall during the day. Okay.
[32:15] » All those are included in there.
>> They're one and the same.
[32:21] » How much do the overnight and um daytime
permits cost? The overnight is $40 per
[32:28] month and the daytime is $30 for 30.
[32:37] All right, next one.
[32:41] These are the uh single night free
permits that we issue. I know the
[32:45] numbers look crazy, but I mean it's it
is it people do use this quite a bit.
[32:51] uh they're limited to only 20 per year
per license plate and obviously they can
[32:55] do that themselves on the website. They
don't have to call it in anymore. They
[32:57] just enter the date. Uh we've gotten rid
of a lot of the issues now too because
[33:01] there's a uh guideline on the website
that says you have to select tomorrow
[33:06] even though
>> it's Tuesday night and you're selecting
[33:09] Tuesday night. It's Wednesday at 2 am
that we look at the So that's I mean it
[33:13] probably has dropped 90% the amount of
people calling us saying I selected the
[33:17] wrong date. Um it's it's been that part
has been phenomenal.
[33:21] » Happened to me.
>> Yeah, it happens to everyone. I don't
[33:23] know why it's an option. I never
understood why it's an option, but none
[33:26] of the system can get rid of that.
>> Um so we issue about 150 of those per
[33:31] night and those are look at only at
enforce enforcement nights of the year.
[33:36] There's there's about 244 I think the
whole year. So no holidays, no Saturday,
[33:41] Sunday nights. Um so that's how many we
issue per night.
[33:46] Uh the citations for on street overnight
parking um it's usually about 10% of our
[33:50] citations that we issue per year. So
we're looking at about 36 to 40 per
[33:54] night that we're what's the total
I said getting getting tired. What's the
[34:00] total revenue? What's the we bring in
off of those tickets?
[34:04] » Oh god the revenue that's a tough one.
>> Sorry I'm making you do a lot of math.
[34:07] » What's the
>> what's the ticket? I How much does the
[34:10] ticket cost?
>> 25.
[34:12] » Well it changes dramatically. I mean, we
issued probably 16,000 tickets last
[34:15] year, a little more. Uh, but the
revenue, you can't just look at the $25
[34:20] because after 12 days, it goes to 50.
Um, so the citation increases and we
[34:25] wouldn't be able to know without looking
at the actual numbers how many went up.
[34:28] But I want to say it's probably
$300,000.
[34:31] I I think that's right around there is
what um that would Yeah, that would that
[34:36] would be the math.
>> Yeah, for just citation revenue. And
[34:40] that is that for is that for the is that
for the uh on on street overnight
[34:43] parking or is that total?
>> That's total. Okay. Okay.
[34:46] » So about 10% of them are uh on street
parking.
[34:49] » So about 30 30,000.
>> Yeah.
[34:55] So the reason I bring that up is because
I know we're talking about capacity. So
[34:59] when we look at we can go to the next
one. When we look at the summary, when
[35:03] we're looking at on street parking
permits that we have, and that includes
[35:05] obviously the monthly, the annual, uh,
which they're about 880 per night for
[35:10] the last few years, the on street free
parking permissions averaging around 150
[35:15] to 155 per night. And, uh, we can assume
that obviously if you're getting a
[35:20] ticket, you park on the street, that's
another 40 per night. You're looking
[35:23] between right around,00 vehicles that we
can say are more than likely parked on
[35:28] the street every night. When you compare
that to the numbers from the 2020
[35:32] parking study, which only included the
business district block faces, we
[35:35] determined that there were about almost
200
[35:39] um available spots on the street and
understanding that that's about
[35:43] one-third of the village, then you can
safely assume without looking at every
[35:47] single parking spot that the number of
available spaces throughout the village
[35:51] will more than double at that point. So,
we're about 15 20% occupancy for the
[35:56] whole village just for on street parking
overnight. That's not lots or garages or
[36:02] anything else um or daytime parking
permits. For purpose of the study, they
[36:07] consider an issue when occupancy goes to
about 85% peak level uh which we never
[36:13] even in the study I think 44% was the
most we ever got and it was like at 2
[36:17] p.m. in the residential congested area.
So it was a very specific set of
[36:21] circumstances that gave us that higher
rate. Other than that, we're nowhere
[36:25] near um anywhere in the village.
>> I'd be curious as to how the industry
[36:29] standard 85% is set. Um that's something
that's comparing like for like is that
[36:34] something that's comparing um something
where it's where it's comparing more
[36:39] congested areas such as downtown
Chicago? I'm just curious as to how they
[36:43] arrive at 85% as the magic number which
considering
[36:46] » I think I mean that's the study the 2020
study they actually go through their uh
[36:50] logic behind it but I think it does
consider the the time of the day the
[36:55] just the the area like the um the
density of the area.
[36:59] » Okay. uh how fast because a lot of the
things they look at is how fast you
[37:02] could turn those spots that are actually
available because once you get over 85%
[37:06] of unavailable spots then you can
actually say we have an issue with
[37:10] parking. Uh anything below that to them
is not really you have available parking
[37:16] I guess.
And when you look at uh residential um
[37:21] perception since 2016, there have been
four community service surveys and the
[37:27] most recent recent one was posted and
it's never gone below 80% of residents
[37:32] saying that overnight parking in their
street is easy or somewhat easy. Um and
[37:37] in the next slide that I kind of
summarize a little bit of the um the
[37:42] survey for this last year
and again it's over 81% once again uh
[37:49] 76% also said that to find parking in
structures and lots was easy or somewhat
[37:54] easy and only 42% said that it was or
about 42% said it was easy and somewhat
[38:00] easy to find parking during the uh
around the business district.
[38:04] » And that was this year's number. That
was this year's numbers.
[38:06] » Well, out of curiosity, do we have a
number on that
[38:10] » prior survey? I'm just curious as to
>> They have not changed much. I mean,
[38:13] maybe a couple percentage points in each
direction.
[38:16] » So, that 42% doesn't go up when because
I know we have the
[38:19] » Well, the 42% went down uh the east and
somewhat easy, but I'm assuming it has
[38:23] to do with the construction because
Oakland Avenue was already under
[38:26] construction when the survey came out.
Yeah.
[38:28] » So, you know, recency bias people uh in
the last few months. Obviously, it's
[38:32] difficult to find parking on Oakland,
but my guess is once it's done and you
[38:36] go back, it was going to match the
numbers from the last three surveys.
[38:39] » Do you happen to know what those numbers
are?
[38:41] » Not off hand. I mean, we have them. Um,
I do have them, but not in front of me.
[38:45] » Okay. Yeah.
>> Yeah.
[38:46] » I don't recall um the numbers from this
survey, but is it safe to assume that if
[38:52] 42% found it very easy or somewhat easy,
then 58% found it very difficult or
[38:57] somewhat difficult?
Yeah, I mean the numbers they're they're
[39:00] not straightforward. Um because if you
were to add I think it wasn't somewhat
[39:06] difficult. It was somewhat difficult in
the question. Um but then that number
[39:11] was pretty big. So the very difficult
was
[39:14] » okay.
>> Yes. Kind of.
[39:16] » But we don't know we don't have the
breakdown of the very easy to somewhat
[39:19] easy.
>> We do. I think we can look it up on
[39:22] post.
>> I just can't remember it.
[39:25] Is is there a neutral is there a neutral
option too or is it either difficult or
[39:28] hard or difficult or easy?
>> There was just those four.
[39:31] » Okay. Answer a little more straight.
Yeah.
[39:35] » Basic.
[39:45] Well, but I mean I think Nicole has
[39:53] » this night parking.
[39:58] Oh, here.
>> So, excellent or good? Uh, this is there
[40:03] one for the business district? I thought
there was one for
[40:10] and if you can break down the 42% as
well, that'd be helpful. If you're
[40:13] saying that most of it is
>> I'll just use this one. It's fine.
[40:17] » Somewhat easy.
>> So, excellent and good uh was again over
[40:22] 80% for daytime parking
>> in the business district.
[40:25] » This one does not say business district.
>> Okay.
[40:28] » So, it just says daytime parking.
>> I'm looking at I'm looking for business
[40:31] district in
>> it doesn't either way it doesn't break
[40:33] it down for what was the question you
asked just a second ago? I'm looking for
[40:36] so the last
icon you have is 42% reported it was
[40:41] very easy or somewhat easy to find
parking in the business.
[40:44] » I'm wondering within that portion of the
survey what the breakdown is between the
[40:50] four options.
>> So if it's if it's very easy or somewhat
[40:54] easy then it's very hard or somewhat
hard.
[40:56] » Oh, here we go. Now we got thought it
was somewhere.
[41:00] So very easy somewhat easy for 2026 was
uh 42%. It's 36% saying it was somewhat
[41:09] difficult and 21% saying very difficult.
>> Okay,
[41:13] » for this year. Now interesting enough
the 10% that it was easy went down from
[41:21] 2020 23 by 8%. And the very difficult
went up by 15%. From 2023. Again, I'm
[41:30] guessing that has to do with
construction.
[41:32] » And what was very easy? What was the
number for that?
[41:35] » 10.
>> It was 18.
[41:38] » But this one in 2026, very easy was 10%
somewhat
[41:43] » 32.
>> 32.
[41:45] » I'm rounding up. But yeah. Yeah.
[41:51] But it's still a clear majority for
difficult.
[41:56] » Okay. Thank you.
[42:04] » Well, that's all I have. Um, any
questions? And I know we've went through
[42:08] a lot of questions, but yeah.
>> So, the new software, how far along
[42:11] would you say you're 80% into it? Are
you 90% in terms of using all
[42:15] functionality that you're hoping for?
not necessarily starting this waiting
[42:19] list but um how far along are you with
>> we are probably 100% as to where we were
[42:25] at with
um there's other things that I think we
[42:28] can do probably more efficiently
especially when it comes to like the
[42:31] court uh how that works um with
adjudications and some of the things
[42:37] that the judge is able to do with her
decisions but some of that stuff we're
[42:40] still kind of working through it because
sometimes you know a written um or an
[42:45] oral determination doesn't really
translate to a program. So, we're trying
[42:49] to figure out how that sometimes works
to make sure their ruling is follow. So,
[42:54] but so far we've been able to do almost
everything.
[42:57] » Good. And so, um, how much staff is
involved in parking besides the random
[43:04] patrol person that might do a parking? I
mean, we've got the two csos,
[43:09] » correct?
>> And how much of your time would you say
[43:12] you do?
>> Yeah. a week
[43:16] probably 10 to 15 hours
>> and then um I'm sorry the woman desk
[43:24] with
>> Oh yeah. I mean I probably estimate I
[43:29] don't know 10 15 phone calls a day. Um
and then obviously
[43:34] » and I'm sorry I don't I I'm blanking on
>> Oh Teresa. Teresa thank you. Yeah. So,
[43:41] how much of her job do you think is
parking?
[43:44] » Well, you say
>> just curious.
[43:46] » Didn't you just say 75?
>> 70. Yeah, it's it's quite a bit because
[43:51] people coming in and
>> and you just got the new Jeep, right?
[43:54] » Correct.
>> You have the other ones.
[43:58] Is the new one fully function?
>> Yes.
[44:04] » All right.
Are there any specific questions um
[44:09] further questions on the data presented
or then I'll defer um to the committee
[44:14] of in terms of where you want to go with
this information?
[44:19] » More questions on the
[44:23] » I don't have any questions on the data.
It's just I want to make sure we're
[44:26] keeping tabs on
um the business district and
[44:31] specifically if there are you know when
we do another survey or whatever in 27
[44:37] um that we have a solid baseline through
construction because there like you said
[44:42] there might be some bias obviously with
construction but once that clears up um
[44:49] you know I keep an eye on it. Appreciate
it. second trustee.
[44:57] » The other thing is we have two new
restaurants.
[45:02] » I think as we all know
those restaurants will rely on
[45:16] we got three.
>> It's three talking tacos. Oh,
[45:22] which
[45:25] » um we digress. So, um are you aware of
any types of um restriction, parking
[45:33] restrictions that we still have in place
that
[45:37] maybe are not contemporary that could
create more on street parking. So, for
[45:43] example,
um, similar to how we changed overnight
[45:49] parking and it made it much more
accessible. Was when we went through
[45:53] that process, was there a place where we
stopped and said like, you know, we'll
[45:58] just lift the restrictions here, but
then there are streets right next to it
[46:02] where we could open up, you know, more
parking by changing the restriction. I
[46:06] mean, I'm sure depending on who you ask,
I mean, but a lot of people really
[46:10] dislike the 15minute parking or the one
hour parking um restrictions because it
[46:16] limits them. Uh, and especially what
some of them are, they are, I would
[46:19] agree, in some streets that
>> that don't necessarily make a lot of
[46:22] sense anymore.
>> Uh, maybe business have changed there
[46:25] throughout the years. I have only been
here five years, but um, I'm sure
[46:28] there's places where we can be more
efficient and make it easier for people.
[46:32] But when you if you park in those spaces
overnight, that restriction doesn't
[46:36] apply, right? Because it's correct, just
during business hours.
[46:40] » And then if we changed traffic patterns,
I know this is going outside, you know,
[46:46] outside the box, but um so for example,
if we changed traffic patterns on, you
[46:53] know, Bartlett and Kramer,
um to make them one-way streets or
[46:57] something, would that open up would that
create more parking? Well, without
[47:02] actually doing some research, but I
guarantee anytime you change any
[47:06] parking, whether it's direction, whether
you restrict it to one side of the
[47:10] street, you're going to create some
other challenge somewhere else, whether
[47:14] it's the homeowner or the school nearby
or I mean, it's going to happen because
[47:18] you're changing the way people are used
to,
[47:21] » you know, so somebody else is getting
left out. Um,
[47:27] » are we changing the traffic better?
>> No.
[47:30] Okay, double checking.
>> Uh, yeah,
[47:32] » make sure I didn't miss anything.
>> I thought that the um that part of this
[47:37] exercise was to see if there were any
ways that we could um create more
[47:42] parking on the street by lifting
restrictions.
[47:46] » Gotcha.
>> I got a question. You mentioned um
[47:49] getting calls from people who are
pointing out that a car has been parked
[47:53] for more than two hours. Do those tend
to be in residential or is that in
[47:58] commercial areas like on Oakland and
Capitol? Uh
[48:00] » usually residential.
>> Okay. Uh Edgewood is the one we get
[48:04] quite a few. Um and we always get them
obviously at the beginning of the year,
[48:07] the school year because of the students.
They don't know the rules. They don't
[48:10] even realize they're in Sherwood. So it
takes a little bit of time for them to
[48:13] get educated and realize, oh, I got to
move my car. Can't just be here for the
[48:17] whole day.
And then are there, and again, this
[48:20] might not be in the police department,
but um the lots that we don't manage
[48:25] anymore. Um are can people still get
permits like in Lake Bluff, can they get
[48:31] a permit from the school? Or if a
private business has parking spots that
[48:36] are open overnight, is there anything
barring that business from uh permitting
[48:41] their own lot?
>> That I don't know.
[48:45] » No, not that I'm aware.
>> Yeah. So like for example if there's a
[48:49] wedding event the atrium
>> I mean many times I see what really has
[48:54] to people going to a wedding reception
at at
[48:58] » water.
Right.
[49:01] Yeah. So that's temporary like overflow
parking but to permit like to get an
[49:06] off- streetet overnight parking permit
from the school district for example.
[49:10] Um,
>> after having done this for five years,
[49:12] my guess is nobody wants the headache
and the time that it takes to actually
[49:17] manage a parking parking lot.
>> Well, I know we used to manage the Lake
[49:20] Bluff parking lot.
>> Um, yeah, but I was thinking more like
[49:25] Shorewood Chiropractic has, you know,
eight or 10 spots and they don't have
[49:32] nighttime businesses there, so they
could potentially permit those.
[49:37] » Yeah. Usually the issue is the morning.
>> Mhm. you know, trying to get those
[49:40] vehicles out of the lot
>> by the time your business opens.
[49:46] » All right. Thank you very much.
>> Thank you.
[49:49] » All right. We'll close that item and
move on to the um
[49:54] salary survey results.
[50:01] » Thank you.
>> All right. So um every two years the
[50:06] village performs a salary survey just to
make sure that we are in line with
[50:10] neighboring communities and with the
market. Um so this year in May I sent
[50:16] out a request to the same nine
communities that we used in the 2024
[50:21] survey and then also added in the
Northshore communities requesting their
[50:25] salary data. In June, I started to
receive some of that data and compiling
[50:30] it. And then in July and August was when
we began meeting with department heads
[50:34] and the finance team to kind of go over
what data we received and um what we
[50:40] could potentially do with that. And in
our findings, there were 11 positions
[50:46] that were out of market range. Those are
the village manager, the chief of
[50:51] police, our two captains, the DPW
superintendent, village clerk, um one of
[50:58] our equipment operators, both of our
utility leads, the utility operator one
[51:04] position and our administrative
assistant in DPW.
[51:08] And so attached to um the memo was the
data that we found. And I gave you two
[51:15] options in there to so you can kind of
um analyze it either way. So what you
[51:21] see at the top is what the salaries
would be for the proposed freights which
[51:26] would bring them all at least to
average. And then also looking at where
[51:30] they're at in the midpoint and kind of
manipulating that data with that. And
[51:34] then the one on the bottom of the page
would be strictly if these positions
[51:38] only received the 3% cola. Um so if we
were to move forward with the um
[51:47] proposed numbers of bringing them up
into the market value then it would be
[51:52] an additional $26,786.95
[51:57] on top of what the 3% cola would be for
the village.
[52:03] » Thank you. And I was um just wanted to
confirm the last salary adjustment that
[52:09] we did last year. None of these
positions were in that group, right?
[52:14] » I don't believe so
[52:19] » two years ago.
>> Was it two years ago? It feels like
[52:24] » I don't know.
>> You have a list of what municipalities
[52:29] you checked?
>> Yes. Um I can read them off to you now,
[52:32] but I also can send it to you. So we did
um Bayside, Brown Deere, Cedarberg, Fox
[52:40] Point, Glendale, Greenale, Greenfield,
Meccoan, Middleton, Milwaukee, Manona,
[52:48] Port Washington, Sussex, Wawaossa, West
Alice, and Whitefish Bay.
[52:55] » Okay. Can you send over um the break the
data that used the breakdown that you
[53:01] used
>> from those municipalities to get to
[53:04] these numbers?
>> Yes.
[53:06] » Just to see if Milwaukee is wildly high
>> scale or something like that.
[53:12] » And we did um per position depending on
their job description, how big the
[53:20] municipality was. There were some where
we did take out their data um and kind
[53:24] of
only base it on ones that really fit the
[53:29] position that we have here. Sure.
>> Um so for example, the village clerk,
[53:33] there were um positions that they were
clerk treasurers and ours is not. So
[53:38] those were not considered in the data
with the village clerk. Um so you will
[53:42] see that in the data as well. If it has
a missing number, it's because it was
[53:45] taken out for that reason. But I can
share that with you so you can look at
[53:48] it.
>> Yeah, I would appreciate it.
[53:51] Yes.
>> And so then to figure out the total pay,
[53:54] you take the rate times 40 time 52,
right?
[53:57] » Yes. To get and then this is just pay
that no benefit.
[54:01] » Mhm.
[54:08] » Okay. And is there anything particular
you need from us tonight?
[54:12] » Um no, this is just to analyze the data
and then um no motion required. it would
[54:17] be brought to you in the budget and then
you would be able to make your decision
[54:21] at that point.
>> And so will um
[54:27] will you bring us a budget with these
numbers in and it's up to us to take
[54:30] them out?
>> Yes. Okay.
[54:32] » And then I'll get you all of the
supporting data ahead of time as well.
[54:35] » All right. Thank you very much.
>> So for clarity, the budget will include
[54:38] the
>> Yes. It'll like the market adjustment.
[54:43] » Yeah, the market.
>> So it'll include the cola Plus for this
[54:48] group
the
[54:52] » Yes.
>> Yes. And just to clarify um the proposed
[54:56] numbers there's not going to be a 3%
cola on top of that number. So that
[55:00] would be theirs and then the rest of the
staff would strictly be getting the 3%
[55:04] cola. for the proposed and chart.
>> Yes.
[55:12] » And would we assume that we'd be done
these?
[55:18] » Yes, we would look at it again in two
years.
[55:23] » Thank you.
>> Yeah. Thank you very much.
[55:25] » Thank you.
>> All right. That concludes our second
[55:29] agenda item. And so with that, I would
take a motion to adjurnn.
[55:32] » Move to adjurnn.
>> Second. Uh motion by Trusty Kudo, second
[55:36] by Trusty Warren. All those in favor?
>> I.
[55:39] » We stand adjourned at 7:12 p.m.
[55:46] » So I'm really ready to go tonight. We
just
[55:54] Good evening everyone. I'd like to call
the meeting of the village board uh to
[55:58] order. Um, all trustees are present
except for trustee Ersync who is excused
[56:05] and then trustee Arnover is joining us
virtually.
[56:09] Everyone else is in person. Has this
meeting been publicly noticed?
[56:15] » This meeting has been uh properly
noticed and posted.
[56:19] » Thank you. Item four, we have one
special order of business this evening.
[56:23] the 2025 audit um presented by Sikitch.
[56:31] » Hi there. Can you hear me? Okay.
>> Yes.
[56:35] » Good evening everyone. Uh my name is
Kellen Ali. I'm a director at Sikage. Uh
[56:39] on behalf of Sikage, uh thanks for
inviting me to present the December
[56:45] 31st, 2025 audit for the village of
Shorewood. Uh as part of our audit, we
[56:50] issued five total reports. We issued the
annual financial report, the uh
[56:56] auditor's communication to the board of
trustees and three TID reports. Um I'm
[57:01] going to cover just some brief high
highle highlights of the annual
[57:05] financial report. Um within the annual
financial report is our opinion on the
[57:11] financial statements which is the
independent auditor's report. Uh when we
[57:16] issue a opinion on the financial
statements we need to follow two sets of
[57:20] standards. We set we follow standards
set by the AICPA which is the American
[57:25] Institute of Certified Public
Accountants. Uh the ASICPA uh tells us
[57:30] the procedures that we need to uh
perform when we're conducting our audit.
[57:35] And then we follow standards set by
Gazsby which is the governmental
[57:39] accounting standards board. And Gazsby
sets the rules for reporting for local
[57:44] governments such as the village. I'm
pleased to present an unmodified
[57:48] opinion. Uh that's also referred to as a
clean opinion. That's the highest level
[57:51] of assurance that we can provide on the
district's uh financial statements or on
[57:56] the village's financial statements.
Um following the independent auditors
[58:01] report is the management's discussion
analysis. MDNA is prepared by
[58:05] management. Um it's a it's a highle
executive summary of the financial
[58:10] statements. It also includes comparative
data. Um, and Sikage reviews this to
[58:15] make sure it material aligns with the
basic financial statements. If you're
[58:19] going to read one area in the report, we
highly recommend reading the MDNA as
[58:22] it's going to provide you with that
additional analysis.
[58:27] The basic financial statements, um, you
know, just some high some key updates
[58:33] within the the financial from a
financial result standpoint. um
[58:37] governmental activities which is the the
villages tax supported funds were
[58:42] overall up 4.7 million in the current
year or 23.7%.
[58:47] And had an ending net position of 24.4
million. Um that ending net position is
[58:53] broken into three categories.
Unrestricted net position of 204,000,
[58:59] restricted net position of 15.9 million
and net invested in capital assets.
[59:06] uh business type activities which is the
villages water, sewer, utility and
[59:11] parking funds had an ending net position
of 17.7 million and net position in the
[59:17] business type activities was up 45,000
over the prior year.
[59:23] Uh the vill's governmental funds
reported a total ending fund balance of
[59:27] 28.8 million. That's up about 6.2
million from the prior year.
[59:34] Uh the general fund which is the main
operating fund of the village uh had an
[59:40] ending net position of 8.3 million
nearly all of which is unassigned or
[59:45] unrestricted. Uh that represents about
62% of current year um current year
[59:53] expenditures and represents a health
reserve and is in line with the villages
[59:56] established fund balance policy.
Uh within our board report, we also did
[1:00:03] not uh note any material weaknesses or
significant deficiencies as part of this
[1:00:08] year's audit.
Um with that, I I'd like to, you know,
[1:00:12] say thank you to village staff and and
everybody that participates in the audit
[1:00:17] process. There's a lot of work that goes
into the the annual audit process, and
[1:00:21] we we surely thank you every everyone
for their cooperation. Um, and I'd be
[1:00:27] happy to answer any questions that the
board has.
[1:00:31] » All right. Thank you very much for your
presentation, um, and your hard work
[1:00:35] and, uh, attention to detail.
Um, are there any questions, uh, from
[1:00:41] the board?
[1:00:46] Uh this just a general comment about um
I know one of the concerns that we have
[1:00:51] about our finances is our our debt and
I'm just wondering I was looking at um
[1:00:57] and you can tell me if there's a better
way to look at this um page 479 of our
[1:01:02] packet we have total liabilities of 72
million and total assets and deferred
[1:01:09] outflow of resources 134 million. So is
it fair to say that
[1:01:16] if you're looking at it that way, assets
versus liabilities, we have um
[1:01:23] you know that level of debt.
At what point would that start to be a
[1:01:27] concern?
[1:01:32] » So one one area where I you know I I
point you to is is your is your fund
[1:01:36] balance. um a as that's going to be kind
of your um your gauge to your total
[1:01:44] assets less your liabilities and
specifically within your governmental
[1:01:49] activities. Um this year there was a uh
uh in the prior year there was a deficit
[1:01:55] balance in um in for the um unrestricted
um fund balance this year. That was a a
[1:02:07] $24,000
positive. Um,
[1:02:12] and your net invested in C capital asset
is going to represent what
[1:02:18] all the district's capital assets,
infrastructure,
[1:02:22] uh, less the debt that was used to
acquire them. So, I think that using the
[1:02:28] the net position and and fund balance
metrics are good good indicators of of
[1:02:32] of the the the health of the the
village.
[1:02:37] Keeping in mind that we can't really
sell well we can sell some assets.
[1:02:43] Thank you.
>> Yeah.
[1:02:49] » Anyone else?
[1:02:56] » All right. Well, that concludes I I
think we're all happy with the clean
[1:02:59] audit and uh not a lot of findings to
talk about. So, uh that's a good one.
[1:03:05] So, we'll say good night for this
evening and and until next year.
[1:03:10] » Thank you very much. Have a great
evening, everyone.
[1:03:13] » Thank you.
>> Yep.
[1:03:15] » Moving on to the consent agenda. Um, is
there a motion to pro to approve the
[1:03:19] consent agenda?
>> Move to approve.
[1:03:23] » Second.
>> Motion by Trusty Kudo, seconded by
[1:03:26] Trustee uh McGovern. Um, any discussion?
>> Yes. like to pull um item B is in Betty
[1:03:36] » 5B.
Any further discussion?
[1:03:41] All those in favor of the consent agenda
with the exception of 5B say I.
[1:03:46] » I.
>> Any opposed?
[1:03:48] » Yes, sir.
>> Um motion carries.
[1:03:54] Moving on to um items removed from the
consent agenda. 5B consider regular
[1:04:00] village board minutes August 3rd 2026.
Trusty Stokeand.
[1:04:04] » Thank you. I just wanted to um add some
clarification on item 9B is in Donna.
[1:04:12] New business um consider atwater beach
lifeguard coverage expansion. Uh the
[1:04:18] sentence says trustee Stoker brand
requested that the cost analysis also
[1:04:21] include an option to improve the
geographic footprint.
[1:04:27] And I just would like to add to possibly
continue to offer a paddle sport launch
[1:04:32] area. That was my concern that we'd see
if we could still
[1:04:38] continue to offer a paddle sport launch
area and then continue and suggested
[1:04:43] exploring potential funding sources.
[1:04:49] » Okay. Any objections?
>> Move to approve.
[1:04:54] » I just didn't know if they're sure. Uh,
you can move to approve.
[1:05:01] » Okay.
>> Second. Second. Catch you off.
[1:05:04] » Motion by Trusty Stoker and seconded by
Trusty Warren. Any further discussion?
[1:05:10] » Hearing none. All those in favor say I.
>> I. I.
[1:05:13] » Any.
>> Uh, motion carries. That concludes item
[1:05:18] six. We have no public hearings this
evening. Are there any citizens to be
[1:05:22] heard? This is for matters not on the
agenda.
[1:05:29] All right. Hearing and seeing none,
we'll close item eight and move to new
[1:05:33] business. 9A, consider ordinance 3090,
modifications to village code 466-24,
[1:05:41] streets and sidewalks.
So, this comes to us from was it the
[1:05:47] public works committee?
[1:05:52] » Yes.
>> Okay.
[1:05:54] and director Butch is also online.
>> Okay. Um,
[1:06:00] so sorry, I'm trying to change.
>> Yeah,
[1:06:05] » it's more of a point of information. I
mean, I support this. Um,
[1:06:10] um, think this is an improvement of the
code. Is this something that's just
[1:06:12] being driven by making our code
consistent with other municipalities or
[1:06:16] is it Can I ask a question?
>> You can ask a question. Sure. or or is
[1:06:19] it something where we're seeing more
damage to um village trees, village
[1:06:23] shrubbery, things like that? I'm just
I'm just curious.
[1:06:27] » Director Butchlick, can you tell us the
um the reason for the code update now?
[1:06:33] » Um sure. We have had instances in the
past and actually this has been kind of
[1:06:38] on my housekeeping list for a little
while. Um, coincidentally,
[1:06:43] in the time that we started this process
and went in front of the public works
[1:06:48] committee, we've had three separate
instances of damage to public property.
[1:06:53] You're aware of the nature preserve
issue, I believe. Um, we have also had
[1:06:58] two separate instances
just in the last
[1:07:03] four to six weeks of residents removing
the street trees in front of their home.
[1:07:10] Is it um cutting them down?
>> Yes, cutting them down.
[1:07:15] Um and so um you know, unfortunately, no
code language is going to undo those
[1:07:23] actions, but certainly
our goal is to make those make that
[1:07:28] language much clearer. um and and
perhaps send a message that you know
[1:07:35] that's public property and that type
those types of actions have
[1:07:39] consequences.
[1:07:42] » Thank you.
>> I would add as well uh just the other
[1:07:45] day I was walking around my neighborhood
and one one of my neighbors stopped me
[1:07:49] and said that she had seen somebody
digging plants out of one of the
[1:07:52] bioailes on Wilson Drive.
>> Oh wow.
[1:07:55] » To just take them home as to keep them
as their own plants. So, I think, you
[1:07:59] know, this is something I'm going to
support and I think we should do some
[1:08:02] more public education on, you know, this
is this is village property. We've
[1:08:07] increased the the fines and, you know,
that it's we want to discourage that
[1:08:12] behavior.
[1:08:16] » Yeah. Thank you for bringing it to our
attention. Happy to support. Is there a
[1:08:20] motion?
[1:08:24] I can move approval of ordinance 3090,
an ordinance repealing and replacing
[1:08:29] village code 466-24
regulating damage to flowers, trees, or
[1:08:33] other plants on any public way or
property.
[1:08:36] » Second.
>> Motion by Trusty Cudo, seconded by
[1:08:40] Trusty McGovern. Any discussion? Just to
clarify then the the new business says
[1:08:46] streets and sidewalk
but what we're doing is
[1:08:52] flowers right
>> yeah it's correct on the memo
[1:08:57] » okay
[1:09:00] » I believe streets and sidewalks is the
name of the larger code chapter
[1:09:08] » thank you um with no further discussion
this will be a roll call vote
[1:09:15] Trusty Kudo.
>> Yes.
[1:09:17] » Trusty Ander.
>> Hi.
[1:09:20] » Oakran.
>> Hi.
[1:09:21] » Trusty McGovern.
>> Hi.
[1:09:23] » Trusty Warren.
>> Hi.
[1:09:25] » President McKay.
>> I.
[1:09:28] » Motion carries 6.
>> Thank you. Uh moving to new by new new
[1:09:34] business 9B. Um consider resolution
2026-11
[1:09:38] amendment to municipal ordinance
violation deposit schedule. Um this
[1:09:44] comes to us from our municipal judge uh
Kercher. Um and uh the memo is um
[1:09:52] provided for us. It's pretty
straightforward. Uh but the judge is
[1:09:55] here to entertain any questions
[1:10:03] » and if there's judge
>> well done. So with that I would
[1:10:07] » some
>> I would entertain a motion to approve.
[1:10:10] » I'll move to approve.
>> I'll second.
[1:10:14] » Okay. Motion by Trusty Kudo, seconded by
Trusty Warren. Um any discussion?
[1:10:19] All those in favor say I.
>> I. Oh, this will be a roll call vote.
[1:10:25] Apologies.
[1:10:28] » Ander,
[1:10:32] » you're muted, Jim.
[1:10:36] » I
>> trusty Storan.
[1:10:39] » Hi.
>> Trusty Kudo.
[1:10:40] » Yep.
>> Trusty McGovern.
[1:10:42] » Hi.
>> President McCay.
[1:10:43] » I trusty Warren.
>> I motion carries 6.
[1:10:48] » Thank you.
>> Thank you.
[1:10:49] » Thank you.
It probably took you longer to get here
[1:10:53] than that.
Um, all right. That
[1:10:59] concludes
Whoop. Hold on. That concludes new
[1:11:04] business. Correct.
Switching back to my agenda. Um, and now
[1:11:08] we have reports of village officials.
Um,
[1:11:13] I think my only item is uh linked here
are the minutes from the Northshore Fire
[1:11:19] Department board meeting from August
11th. Uh the September meeting has been
[1:11:24] changed to September 29th um where the
chief is hoping to have the numbers for
[1:11:32] um benefits increases well for benefits
and premiums things like that um so that
[1:11:38] we can have final numbers for the budget
and then that'll be coming forward to us
[1:11:44] for review.
Um I don't believe I have any other
[1:11:48] reports. So village trustees
Yes, I had a question about the um the
[1:11:55] Northshore Fire
emails.
[1:12:01] Are there really are things in motion to
consider a possible merger
[1:12:06] or I mean that would
>> No.
[1:12:10] » Okay. So um there the budget um was
presented and this is the first year
[1:12:17] where there is a deficit that um is not
easily addressed um by reserves or or
[1:12:25] other revenue coming in or onetime res
revenues. And so, um, we're going to
[1:12:32] address this budget, but then for moving
forward, um, he just put it on the table
[1:12:37] that the board may want to have a
conversation about longer term
[1:12:42] strategies. Um, and so that's where some
more significant policy decisions would
[1:12:47] come through come in. Um, and that's
something that the board is going to
[1:12:51] engage in some strategic planning.
because the other thing that was um
[1:12:57] noteworthy was there seems to be this
push to add
[1:13:03] um and I'm just wondering if obviously
they're discussing possibly not adding
[1:13:08] the that's I believe it was seven
equipment
[1:13:15] what's the impetus for need the
adding
[1:13:19] if you're having trouble with your
budget what's the big push for adding
[1:13:25] Well, it's his job is to present um
service levels and and then budget. So,
[1:13:31] they're kind of two parallel discussions
and they'll come to a head.
[1:13:40] So, not taking it lightly. I'm just not
prepared to report on it since it is a
[1:13:44] report, but we could definitely schedule
um a presentation from the chief
[1:13:53] does.
>> Yeah, with the budget, but if there's
[1:13:56] something in addition, you know, where
um the board is wanting something prior
[1:14:01] to that or a different type of update or
more information as part of the Friday
[1:14:06] update, we can accommodate that as well.
[1:14:14] All right. Any other reports of village
officials?
[1:14:19] village manager.
[1:14:23] » Yes. Three items tonight. One was a a
brief update on um
[1:14:29] just our a review of the hovered lots in
the city of Glendale and the
[1:14:36] availability we've had to get
information uh regarding those sites. Um
[1:14:53] We have communicated with Wii energies
and they have
[1:15:00] relayed that they'll be providing us
with information regarding utilities on
[1:15:04] the site and by or by November. Um and
we're also in communication with UWM.
[1:15:11] however, still um waiting for their
specific recommendations on next steps
[1:15:16] as it relates to um vacation of the
right of way. Um they have voiced their
[1:15:23] amendable
um attitude towards working with us. Um
[1:15:28] so, but we need to Oh, thank
uh but we will wait to hear their final
[1:15:38] information.
So we're still on
[1:15:42] in the meantime you know one of the
things that we have is initially you
[1:15:47] know we are looking at the site either
for a full facility or for a transfer
[1:15:53] station um a transfer station the
berento study was estimated about
[1:15:57] 750,000
um for the type of replacement in kind
[1:16:01] of the system that we have right now
which is open air
[1:16:05] um in order to put a transfer station on
this site Glendale bill is requiring
[1:16:10] that it be enclosed and four-sided um
which increases the costs from an
[1:16:16] estimated 3.6 to 4.4 million. Um Bay is
currently a partial owner of the current
[1:16:23] transfer station and has advised that
they would not be interested in making a
[1:16:26] capital investment for an enclosed
station. Um, and so as we,
[1:16:32] you know, look at this property and and
possibilities of what could be placed
[1:16:37] there, um, we'll definitely want to
prioritize alternative service models.
[1:16:46] Um, in light of the increased
expenditures um, that would c come with
[1:16:51] a forsighted.
Um, so I'll be back after the budget
[1:16:57] concludes. We'll be coming back to the
board and we'll be laying out some
[1:17:01] options and really getting the the board
to weigh in on what if anything you'd
[1:17:05] like me to continue exploring. um or if
you'd like to continue to pursue the
[1:17:10] foresighted station
if this if it's amendable to the site
[1:17:15] and we energies comes back with um
estimates that are closer in line to
[1:17:23] what we we believe they will be. Um so
we'll be back at it having that
[1:17:28] discussion. the um a review of services
was not something that we anticipated at
[1:17:36] this point, but I want to definitely
provide the board with an option to do
[1:17:40] that. And if you so choose, happy to you
to proceed and take a look at those
[1:17:45] alternatives and lay out a schedule for
that. Um if you don't, that's okay, too.
[1:17:50] Um, but I I I definitely think that
we'll want to have a check-in before we
[1:17:54] take a next conceptual step um with
evaluating the site either be for a
[1:17:59] transfer station or for future facility
[1:18:05] » question. So Rebecca, the way I'm
reading the memo, um, effectively Hubard
[1:18:11] has eliminated
yard,
[1:18:16] we'd run into the same problems that
running into
[1:18:21] Yes, unless UWM would actually give us
some additional land from their parcel,
[1:18:25] but that I think would be um
challenging.
[1:18:30] » Trying to figure out how we kind of
narrow the app.
[1:18:35] » But give do you mean make available?
>> Correct. And so,
[1:18:41] » oh no, go ahead. Um so
vacation of the street I thought
[1:18:53] you're in that problem
um for a facility
[1:19:01] for for a facility for a transfer
station um we would still want the
[1:19:06] rightway from the road and Glendale's
amendable to vacating that roadway. Um
[1:19:11] what we need to know from UWM is that
they'd be amendable to providing us that
[1:19:15] portion of the right way. So under state
statute when rightaway is vacated, it
[1:19:20] goes to splits in half to the adjacent
property.
[1:19:25] though we've asked UWM if we could have
their portion that would have been
[1:19:28] provided to them because be it not for
our request to the city of or our
[1:19:33] potential request to the city of
Glendale, they would not be vacating the
[1:19:36] roadway.
>> And the alley side of the is split
[1:19:42] between city of Milwaukee, city of
>> correct.
[1:19:47] » So that would stay the same if we
[1:19:54] That would be Flynnale
Milwaukee
[1:20:05] unknown be deter.
>> Yeah, I believe it to be determined.
[1:20:12] I mean, it would still technically be
located in the city of Glendale because
[1:20:15] we would be in the city of Glendale uh
as as
[1:20:22] » it could be a term of an agreement
hasn't been negotiated.
[1:20:26] » East side
>> if
[1:20:28] » Yes.
and the Wii energy
[1:20:33] um
reviewing its if we they need to do
[1:20:38] something with their
abilities. Would we bear that
[1:20:44] or is that
>> that's one of the reasons why we've
[1:20:47] requested them to review the site and
provide an estimate. If we would need to
[1:20:51] move utilities on the site, we've asked
them to review each one to see what an
[1:20:55] estimated cost would be. And yes, it is
typically the person requesting the move
[1:20:59] to move the utility, pay bear the cost
of moving the utility.
[1:21:04] » A storm sewer that be moved
>> there. There is a storm sewer on the on
[1:21:10] the site. Those weren't from a an
engineering standpoint, things that
[1:21:16] couldn't be otherwise moved or prepared
for. I think the larger expenses were
[1:21:21] the the Wii Energies facilities in
general because those costs can be
[1:21:25] significantly higher.
[1:21:29] » When we're talking about potentially
having to deal with EW systems on the
[1:21:34] portion of the vacated rightway,
>> do we have do you feel like you have a
[1:21:39] decent understanding of the timeline of
what that would be? So it you know what
[1:21:44] I mean? Like it's one thing to say it's
in their court. It's another thing to
[1:21:48] say it's in their court and it takes
three months, six months, three years,
[1:21:52] five years. Like I don't know what that
process is. Um I don't know if it is it
[1:21:58] just a UWM
>> for that information.
[1:22:02] » Okay.
>> Cuz I imagine if it goes back to the
[1:22:05] university then it be it's a state
property and
[1:22:09] » could take some time.
Okay. Thank you. Can you let us know
[1:22:14] when you have that answer when they
provide it?
[1:22:17] » Absolutely.
So, I'll close this as it is a report. I
[1:22:22] don't want to go outside of scope. Um,
but I heard just questions, not
[1:22:26] discussion.
>> There's one final. Keeping a transfer
[1:22:31] station
as we have it now open, would we be
[1:22:35] grandfathered
if we kept it or say it open? I would I
[1:22:40] would direct that as a future question.
Does because we're it's not part of the
[1:22:46] report.
[1:22:50] » Did Did you Did you note that future
question?
[1:22:52] » Yes.
>> Yes. Okay.
[1:22:53] » Thank you.
[1:22:57] » All right. With that, we'll close. Oh, I
think there's another village.
[1:23:00] » Two more items.
>> Two more items. just wanted to provide
[1:23:02] you with the syllabus and some of the
context for the communication class that
[1:23:06] we'll be working with from UWM um
regarding the villages communications
[1:23:10] and how we can meet people where they're
at. So, thank it was probably too much
[1:23:15] information to provide you, but I
thought I wanted to share um some
[1:23:18] context of the class that we'll be
working with. Um we're excited to get
[1:23:22] started with them.
>> And so, what's the endgame?
[1:23:28] So there um one of the attachments
within the packet it calls for a small
[1:23:35] team of four to six students who's going
to be partnered with us to review um
[1:23:40] learn how we're communicating our
communication processes in place and
[1:23:44] then to also provide some
recommendations and how we can move
[1:23:49] forward with communications. Um
they're going to provide us with
[1:23:54] feedback and um at the end pro provide
us with a presentation and an executive
[1:24:02] summary of their findings
um so that we can hopefully improve on
[1:24:07] some of the good communication habits
that we have so far.
[1:24:12] » Include various types for example for
which they
[1:24:17] um I guess the thing that um seems most
urgent to me is village.
[1:24:27] » So, we have started on that redoing the
website.
[1:24:31] » Yep. You're actually going to be getting
an update from me on that Friday.
[1:24:35] » Okay.
>> Um to for you to weigh in with your
[1:24:37] input. I asked Nicole if we could get
some of your
[1:24:40] » We didn't budget.
[1:24:44] » We're in the process of updating it now.
>> Oh, by yourself? with Civic Plus.
[1:24:51] » Oh,
>> correct.
[1:24:57] » And no, is that in the
[1:25:06] We're getting a new village website,
[1:25:13] » correct? It was work scheduled for 2020.
>> Okay. And so what's the ETA on?
[1:25:21] » Um well, you're going to get an
opportunity to provide input on it and
[1:25:25] see what they have come up with at this
point. And so, you know, we're looking
[1:25:31] forward and receiving your feedback and
u improving it from there.
[1:25:37] » Let Yes, I think we're getting outside
of the scope of the report. if we could
[1:25:42] move on to the grace period during the
SNA paint and implementation.
[1:25:47] » Sure. Just wanted to make you aware that
um in our communication with the PSC,
[1:25:52] you know, we've talked through with them
the transition to the BSNA software and
[1:25:57] that's been taking um a considerable
amount of all of our time. It's a
[1:26:01] heavier lift and we're on Brack and
we're making progress, but we also
[1:26:05] recognize that um with having people
sign up for all new accounts, there
[1:26:10] could potentially be a lag. And so we
explored to them what would be within
[1:26:14] our purview for purposes of providing or
you know an extension in that time
[1:26:19] period to make sure that we get people
signed up within the new date. So
[1:26:23] outlined before you is just how we will
proceed um with that temporary grace
[1:26:29] period um
based on our discussions with the PSC.
[1:26:34] » What's BSNA?
Um, BSNA is our the payment software,
[1:26:42] » the like the new utility bill,
>> correct?
[1:26:46] » There's still the popup on the side, but
>> we've updated that. So, BSNA does more
[1:26:52] than just the payments that are being
taken in, but if you'll recall from the
[1:26:55] credit card discussion, we needed to
switch vendors in order to be able to
[1:27:00] charge the um this isn't occurring for
utility bills specifically. um but in
[1:27:06] all other payments to charge those
credit card fees, there was a strategic
[1:27:11] decision policy that was made to charge
those fees. So to do that, we needed to
[1:27:15] switch vendors. Um it was also time was
ripe to kind of take a look at those
[1:27:19] different proposals and they um had the
most cost effective um approach. But
[1:27:26] what it did require is that all people
who were signed up for automatic billing
[1:27:30] and getting their utility bills by email
had to physically re-register through a
[1:27:34] different software. Um because there's
typically there's typically no direct
[1:27:41] link because the vendor who you leaving
from
[1:27:44] doesn't
>> does not like for you to leave. So
[1:27:47] » um we have to kind of walk people
through that process and get them reset.
[1:27:54] » Thank you. Maybe I missed this. What
update? What's the new grace?
[1:27:59] » It's in the memo.
>> So, um, interest in penalty charges are
[1:28:04] not going to be assessed until 60 days
after the September 17th due date.
[1:28:14] » Correct. And I also have a brief memo on
it um in our packet here. I'm sure as we
[1:28:18] get closer to that timeline, we'll be
doing more communication on it. and I
[1:28:22] can also provide a friendly reminder,
but um there's been a lot of care and
[1:28:28] time into this transition,
provide an update.
[1:28:32] » Yeah, thanks.
>> Yeah, thanks to the staff for
[1:28:37] um taking care of that.
All right, that concludes uh reports of
[1:28:42] village officials. Um we have no future
items of consideration and we have a
[1:28:47] close session um scheduled for this
evening. Um, ma'am, you joined us uh a
[1:28:54] few minutes ago. Did you come for a
certain business item?
[1:29:09] Uh, are you speaking to me, Amy Cyel?
>> No. Um Amy, we have a resident who who
[1:29:15] came into the um courtroom and I just
want to make sure that they've been
[1:29:19] addressed before we go into close
session. So did you to address the board
[1:29:23] that
oh
[1:29:32] wonderful
all right well there there's a whole web
[1:29:36] page all about it. So lots Glad to have
you aboard. So, at this time, we're
[1:29:42] gonna um I'm looking for a motion to go
into close session. Um
[1:29:48] and uh and then we will proceed.
>> Sure. Uh the village board will I move
[1:29:53] to adjourn the village board into close
session pursuant to 19.851G
[1:29:59] to confer with legal counsel on strategy
regarding pending litigation on various
[1:30:03] legal items involving Rowdy
Supermarkets, Inc. versus Village of
[1:30:07] Shorewood.
Second.
[1:30:11] » All right. Any discussion?
Hearing none. This will be a roll call
[1:30:15] vote.
[1:30:18] » Trusty Warren.
>> I.
[1:30:19] » Trusty McGovern.
>> I.
[1:30:21] » Trusty Kudo.
>> Yep.
[1:30:23] » Trusty Ander.
>> I.
[1:30:25] » Trusty Storan.
>> I.
[1:30:27] » President McKG.
>> I.
[1:30:30] » Trusty McGovern.
Motion carries 6.
[1:30:36] » And for um Mr.
Michael Miller who is online. We're
[1:30:41] going to actually be going to a breakout
room and and shutting down the meeting.
[1:30:46] So the there's no action being taken,
but I wanted to let you know since you
[1:30:50] were kind enough to join us this
evening. Come on.