>> Everyone, I'm going to call the order the code enforcement hearings for today for the
village of Wellington today is Thursday, August, 20th. And the time is 9 o'clock. My name
is Holly Han and I'm the special magistrate for today's hearings. Do we have any
opening comments? Mr. Yes. Good morning. The special magistrate with here all cases
and gender. The meeting is recorded in televised 11th and government Access Channel 18?
Comcast cable. That's the money for rent and staff. And respondents would be under
oath of the farmer. Rule of evidence. Do not apply. Fundamental due process should
be observed. >> A special magistrate may ask questions of either party
determine pertinent facts, the code compliance officer present his or her case to the
special Magistrate Service of require noticed associated with the case in a photograph
presented by the code compliance officer would be entered as evidence unless
otherwise disputed of a completion of the presentation. The respondent
will have an opportunity to come in to cross examine a special magistrate will issue
findings of facts based on the testimony presented as the special magistrate determine
their water, more violation of Wellington codes of ordinances. He or she may
issue an order requiring the respondent to correct violation by a specific date a
special magistrate may also says cars that have been incurred in the prosecution of
the case. In most cases, Casa says by the special magistrate or due and payable to
Wellington within 30 days from the date of this hearing. For at them. And are the members
May may result the end been filed against the property. In the event violation is not
corrected by the date specify article also for a final certification hearing. No
additional notice will be provided to the respondent. Eileen of the fight against
the property of the SS fines are certified by the special Magistrate. Especially
tremendous issue, a cease and desist order if issued, the respondent is placed notice
that if the same violation reoccur within 5 years staff notify to respond of a hearing
for repeat violations. The hearing staff Lucas, the special Magistrate assess a
fight. The primary objective hearing is not on Tom Dooley penalize anyone but thing
complies with one in court and ordinances in a timely manner. Cases where the respondents
the president will be heard. First when they responded comes to the podium. Please
sign state your name and indicate if you have been sworn in, please ensure cell
phones are turned off or silent mode at this time. Special magistrate with no
swearing of persons who will testify. All right. If everybody excuse me stand who
will be offering testimony at today's hearing? >> And raise your right hand.
Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony about to give is the truth?
Whole truth and nothing but the truth. All right. Thank you very much. You may be
seated. Are there any additions or deletions to the agenda? Yes, we have one
deletion item number 6 on the new business 8 C c 7, 0, 8, 2026.
>> All right. Great. Thank you. All hearing no other additions there. Deletions. I
hereby approve the consent agenda and now we are ready to move on to new business.
>> We're going to go respondent's. We have item number one on the final
certification ACC 18, 91 to under 25 find a Vegas is the court officer. Officer Stephen
Villegas, code compliance village Wellington. Good morning.
>> Case number. And we just SEC dash 18. 91 dash 2025. respondent names given a
village association incorporated. Property address 9, 7, 6, 8, Slash 9, 7, 4, 4
Scrivener lane Wellington, Florida. The hearing date was may 21st 2026. The respondent
was ordered to correct violation of onto Land development regulation
sections. Wellington, 7 8.7 dot C 100 trees and SWAT area in front of various
properties. Several properties found a violation and 7 8 dot to dot ag missing required
street trees, property, not for the development approval on or before July. 17th 2026
or pay a fine not to exceed $25 per day per violation. The order was scheduled. Find
certification hearing on August. 20th 2026. if the coca plants division was not
contacted as required and or the violation was not corrected. Inspection on
7/20/2026, from the property. Still violation of onto land development regulation
sections, 7 DOT a DOT 7 dot seen and 7.8 dot to dot ag. A follow-up inspection on August
10th and August 17th from the violations to exist. But as we're taking, the actually
are. For taking the represen, the condition of the property at the time of the various
inspections. course, the footage be entered as evidence. So entered a peace
research from the response does not have a pending bankruptcy action or pennants
finally gets his property. Contact with Representative staff has been in contact with
the property manager and contractor step provided the property manager, contractor
with the information that they needed. It was communicated that information about the
work that needs to be done by the contracting to be provided to staff as they do not have
an approved permit. There was a previous vegetation move apartment apply for on August
7th 2025. That's 2025. Dash 0, 3, 3, 4, BRP due to no plan being submitted. It was
administratively withdrawn. No European has been applied for or plan submitted on August
18th 2020, 60 attorney, Mister Cortez asked for additional time. However, due to the
nature of this case, how long it's been active in a lack of any planting submitted. His
request was denied by management, Mr. Cortez was advised to attend today's
hearing to state his case. And that's the measured for additional time. Okay, great.
Thank you. And in the matter of Wellington versus Scrivener Village Association.
>> Case number aged SCC dash 18. 91 dash 2, 0, 2, 5, Is there anyone here on the
matter? >> Larry Cortez on behalf of Scrivener Village. Okay,
Great. Thank you. All right. So what is it you want to tell me about this? The there's no
factual dispute. So the complexity the Scrivener village has and this is that
it's I think of it in terms of wagging a dog or attenuated process in that each of these
trees is as between Scrivener village and the homeowners as a homeowner, responsibility.
So it's Grimner village is done. They have not ignore this. And I know from the
village of Wellington's point of it you know, gun for an extended period of time. But
what they've done is they've attempted to compel homeowners in order to to correct these
violations on their own because these trees are their responsibility. Some
homeowners have complied. Some of the COVID have complied perhaps half heartedly and
some, as you can see in some of the photos have not yet complied. So in that part of
that process, now that they've declared those violations and his violations on cured again,
as between Scrivener in the homeowner, Scribner village is now said, OK, now we're going
to enter. We're going to cure it and do it on its own on July, 12th script ability
enter into a contract with vendor sanctuary gardens who a local tree installer. They had
been in some initial discussions with with the village of Wellington staff at
it. And I become forsman officer acknowledge that. But as I'm understanding it this
morning that there hasn't been any recent communication. So what I'm asking for in. So
what we're getting from century gardens is that they can install and be prepared to
install within 2 to 3 weeks to start the project. I think we're talking about 12 trees
and related work so what we would ask special magistrate for isn't for an extension of
either 30 or 45 30 or 45 days in order to accomplish that work. But again, no factual
dispute with what's been presented to the to the special Magistrate. All right.
Thank you, Mr. Cortez for that. There was a mention that the whole scope of work for
this is 12 trees. Is that accurate? >> believe I couldn't. Damien
window. Good Morning, Amy. plan and zoning. Okay. We do have a list of trees that we
provided to them. As the number. >> I guess my question is, is
it like around 12 tries that they have to replace OK? So it's around 12 trees. Just
want to make sure I understand that. And then on if you could refresh my recollection
officer, when did the first notice go out to scrivener that that this work needed to
be done. As far as when did this. I guess when did when did this H go out to them when
where they first aware that there was an issue? That they were in violation of the code.
The property was posted. I believe sometime in May as far as the exact Okay?
>> No, I just I just kind of want to get a ballpark figure this. So in May of 2026,
Scribner was advised that, hey, 12 trees against that because I've got here that the
violation is that is it that trees need to be removed and then replaced?
>> Sorry, a correction. It was posted on April 22nd 2026. So we're just going April.
>> Okay. So maybe I'm a little confused. So because I'm looking at looking at the
violation and it says so. What is it for Land Development regulations? Section 8007.7
points. E. What is that violation? Is it that there? Yeah. What's the violation?
>> So that relations would be had wrecked reason, the swell area and for the various
properties. I have list of those addresses. >> Okay. So there's hat
wrecked trees. And what's the remedy for that? >> So
>> they were advised. By last hearing, too. I believe remove the trees. Okay. So the hat
rack trees that requirement is for Casement. Okay. this property has street tree
requirements so they have to meet make sure that meeting those standards. Okay.
>> So once a tree's been hat rack because I'm thinking, yeah, there's not much you can
do so it has to be then you have to remove it and then replace it occur pursuant
whatever the your regulations are for replacement, the threat of tree and all that
stuff. Okay. So is that the is that what constitutes that violation? Just that they were
hat rack trees and they have to be replayed removed and replaced rent. Okay. So let me
go to the other violation missing required street trees. Not so explain to me what that
violation is. violation is some locations that trees remove previously and they're
currently hasn't been replaced, OK? And in one instance, there is.
>> Palms which were installed, which are not meet the requirement for the kind of
petri trees. So OK, don't have to remove and replace those. Okay.
>> And then one other question is the trees that are have racked are they included in
this the pre the other violation of the missing require trees or they're
they're completely separate thing. They're completely separate. Thank I appreciate
you clarifying all this for me. Ok? So. Mr. Cortez, if you could, because I I think very
simply. And if you could explain to me what is the position what your client's
position on this land development regulations? Section 7.8 point to a point G
the missing required street trees acknowledged, OK, so you acknowledge it. And and so is
that part of the agreement that you have with this firm that's going to come in and
replace those trees. That is correct. So they're there no. It even simpler. In my mind,
there's one violation. bunch of trees need to installed in get that means removing the
one the bad one. This there just needs to be installed. >> So yes, the contract is to
address both violations. Okay. >> And in order to replace the trees. Well, I'm actually
this. So for the hat rack trees. Is a permit required to remove the trees. Yes, okay.
And is is is a separate permit required plant the trees, Pelley new trees or is it all
part of one? >> I believe it could be doing one permit. One permit. Okay.
>> And so for the first violation, a permit would also be required to plant the trees
where they're missing. >> That would be included. We include everything in the one
per minute. Okay, Connie, just like okay. So in a permit has not been applied for a permit,
was applied for, however, it was withdrawn because we then receive Henry some So it's
administrator withdrawn after 90 days, OK? So there was a permit and it was there. It's
good for 9th at the application is active for 90 days.
>> And when did that application expire? >> I don't know the expiration
date, but I know it was applied for August of 2025. Okay. Some OK? So he 25. And
what is your client's position as far as >> applying for a new permit
to remove and replace all these trees. So Mike landing on they have to do that. And
that's part of the part of the of the agreement of the contractors, a contractor.
>> Obviously, my client legally a place where but the contractor does the legwork I
don't want to over speak that. the contract has been in contact with Mr. Noel, what
I'm learning this morning as there's apparently confusion my clients and in terms of the
contractor. My client believes that they that a contractor needs to hire an architect in
order to do this and speaking with Mr. Newell this morning and based on my past
experience is if we're if we're simply putting the trees back exactly where they need
to be permits required, but not the landscape architect. If we're if we're wanting to
move them and I got out of a desire necessarily. But if there's something a city where
we say okay, what that rate the tree needs to be removed. Then a landscape architect.
What needed to draw that to propose a to Mister Dole? What I what I can tell the special
magistrate is why that last conversation, I believe sometime in July as I sit here
in has not followed up in occurred. So so my request for the additional time is to make
that happen. But also to get the to get that reason stalled.
>> And so my what I'm hearing from my questions is that there was application made
back in August a year ago that expired. And now we had the notice of violations that
occurred in August or in April. And here we are today in August and it appears that
your client has some type of arrangement with a landscaping company yet the landscaping
company has not gone through the next logical step, which is the application process.
And I guess, you know, looking at all the time that your clients had and nothing's
really moved. I'm I'm trying to figure out how giving them an extra 30 days would make
something move. Because it's nothing's moved in a year. understood don't I don't know.
That's entirely for the to say the contractor has done something.
>> I think Mr. Nolden knowledge. They've contacted them. But obviously
>> there's less diligence than we would want in terms of taking Mr. Knowles,
information and going back and making the permit application accordingly.
>> If I could, the contractor a part of the process, the contract that does have to do
locates for underground utilities, right? So that is something that's added to it.
The only information don't how it currently is. If they have done that Because that would
also that was one of the questions I with them. you know, based on are you doing a
removal and replacement in the same location and have you done the locates? I haven't
received an update on that. So that would be something that's important police if they have
done that. They're moving along in the process of doing the actual work.
>> Okay. And does the village have a position on granting I guess a continuance on this
for 30 days? >> Based on the information I have, yes in that that the 30
days acceptable to the village >> Mr. Cortez, I appreciate you being based upon the
foregoing, I guess I'm just going to continue the fine certification hearing. We will
continue it to the next hearing date and which is going to be September.
September 17th, but I'm not sure. It is September 17th. All right. We will go ahead
and continue this find certification hearing in this matter to September 17th 2026,
09:00AM here. And I again, thank you for being here. Thank everyone for being here
and hopefully your client can get all of the ducks in a row and get this project moving.
Thank you. I appreciate everyone's time. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. The move
to item number 12, a new business ACC 17 68 when the 26 Johnson's as it was the code
officer.
>> Good morning. Johnson, Joseph Code compliance officer for the village of Wellington.
The case numbers CC. That's 17, 68 dash 2026. >> The respondent name past
and my just 1, 5, 4, 3, 0, meadowood drive Wellington, Florida. This case was
established internal complaint. And again, will survive posters. Notice on
8/12/2026. At the property at the Village Hall. And I think those clerks office, a copy of
the Post, a notice was most of the property owner. I request that the service of units
being. So there's evidence so entered the question. It was on July, 13th 2026. An
inspection on July 14th 2026. Found the following items you may be in the time given and a
notice violation of Wellington Code. Section 13 DASH to Point B 0.1 was gavel staying and
just call it 13 dash. 2 point the driveway and sidewalk staying in or discarded and 13
dash. 2 point people in 4 lawn and swell contains dead in areas and Wilmington and
development regulations. Section 7.8, 7 point the broken sprinkler system and
between Khaleesi a hedge. What it would take and a fairly and accurately represent a
violation at the time. I would quest at the photos be entered into evidence so into
follow-up inspection on August 8.11, 15th 16th and 19th 2026. 1 of found that one ton code
section 13 dash 2 point people. and 13 dash. 2002.4 come into compliance and the
only remaining violations are once and code. Section 13. Dash 2002.4 along welcome
saying state and areas and want and then development regulations. Section 7 POINT
8, 7 Point broken sprinkler systems be in between the KUSI, a hedge, a piece of
sorts from respondent does not have anything cross section or this penance filed against
this property. Contact with the owner and or representative. Multiple
attempts were made to contact the owner via e-mails and by living donors at the property.
On 8/19/2026. A representative of the property owner and cousin of the property owner,
Mister Verb called in response to post a notice at the property. Mr. stated that he
did understand nature of the cold case. Staff had explained the violation and details and
later emailed Mr. 4 for the information and the date of the hearing. As of today, the
staff has not received response and devotion still remains correct. It. The Code
Compliance Division recommends that the respondent be fun involved of Wellington Code
Section 13 Dash 2002.4 and once and then development regulations. Section 7 POINT
8, 7 Point It is recommended that the respondent be given until September 17th 2026. To
correct the violations would be charged a fine not to exceed $24 per day per
violation for each did have a motion continues to exist. It is also recommended that the
costs incurred by the code compliance division and amount of $14.19 The U.S. says in
order to be paid within 30 days of the date of this meeting. It says, and this is
sort of for Peter 5 uses requested. And event the code compliance division is not
contacted as required and order violation is not corrected. It is recommended
that a fine. So the commission hearing be held before the special magistrate on. October
15, 2026. At 09:00AM at at the Wellington Municipal Complex once with 0, 0, 4, a symbol of
Florida once in Florida. It is also recommended that no additional notification but
then set to impose trying to get them. All right. Thank you very much, Mr. Jones of.
>> All right. In the matter of Wellington versus Natalie bus teen. Month periods which is H
Dash, C C 17, 68 to 6. Is there anyone here on this matter? And that best him
okay. Thank you. right. Did you sign And there's a little I years. didn't. It's easy
thing to forget.
All right. Thank you. Just a reminder, we are here only about the broken
sprinkler and the lawn. Swale contains dead and bear area. is best seen. What would you
like to tell me about that? a few clarification. This part here is not caused by a broken
sprinkler. And I have pictures from this morning, too. So >> we need reins. There are 2
areas on my property. The water stays. The the middle part that he should. you go to
the next picture. Most like to be is a sprinkler that spreading the long way. But it
doesn't cause just like you nation of water that you see over there. I have also in
front of my first driveway. And an area where when it rains. The water stays there.
The properties. You can see that after a deal with too. The clears mines stays there.
And that's one of the reasons why the driveway, no matter how often we do. We. We
pressure wash driveway. It was 10, so we try to find another way too. To come out of it. I
have with people there and he told me this is something that I need to bring up to city and
I we do that. So. And despite here, this is not I don't have a sprinkler can reach the Just
paint water. We would have to actually turn on this been critical of the deal of the
direction of the Jets. And this morning when I went there, most of that, you can
see some sprinkle of water over you know, that Quest says to that area, but it's not
enough water to cause stagnant water. And I have videos also and pictures and I would share
with you if it's possible. It also shows the water that's tease with does to a from the
rain and it doesn't go and it causes and you can you walk to meadowood, you can see a lot
of order areas might like that. And I have some videos and pictures of them. It is
causing a mosquito problem. In any case I have hired different people to come and
that's why webs recalled yesterday. I guess they had a hard time understanding what
needed to be done. I definitely. Weaning to work with the Kool-Aid and forced
her to make sure that allegations and addressed. I want to also verify want you
address the have for me because I haven't received any money. meals regarding
violations. They letters sent to the House. I have given them 2, the people who help
with the landscape, one of the is with my mom and I have been dealing with illnesses. So
he's been very difficult like Ray Thompson was to get a doctor's appointment. And I'm
here, but there is no neglect to address to coats. I have had a major the branching in
may. And they did not do what they were supposed to do. So that's what I shared yesterday
when Wentz called because I share the exact notes with him. I said you need to find
out exactly what you need to do because I have spent a lot of money trying to get things
done and it's still not The requirements of I mean to to fix the violations. All right.
Thank you. I just have a couple questions. And this is a great picture to stay on.
>> So if I understand the basis for the violation of the broken sprinkler, is this what
we're looking Yes, exactly. Okay. And so. Based on this picture, it appears that it
would be a sprinkler that is near the hedge and that it that it's leaking water that
is then going into I'll call it the swale area. And Erik, a and you when you took this
photograph and can you tell me what you observed that we're seeing here? Yeah, not only
that I had multiple cannot just go out doing the weekends.
>> Around 06:07AM, ish to what was going on and from what they have told me is that
every time Israel turn on, you can see the water dripping slowly and as well. It's not
like we do have evidence. We have evidence of it happening, but willing to work with you
as you guys actually show me proof that the water that's coming through the head just
not actually point to well and the fact that is sometimes when I go out there, it's
weeks. been raining. So it's not the reigning that's causing the issue.
>> Let me ask you another question in that Swale area. Are there any sprinklers?
>> That I'm aware K? >> And have you been to this area when the sprinklers have
been on? Yes, okay. And is it your testimony that when the spring when you were there and
the sprinklers were on, you could see that the water was coming back towards the swale
area. >> Yes, I have photos the specific time when spring
returns on. Of course, I just have proof the watermark of the water coming from that
hedge and that area foreign to us. Well. >> Right. And you personally
have observed when the sprinklers were there and that the water than is. Going back
into the going into the swale area. Is that correct? Yes, okay. All right. Now moving to
the violation of the law Well contains dead bear areas. I'm going to assume based on this
photograph that the area to the left there. That is the bear area that's constituting
this violation. Chris. This testing, what is it. You do have anything else you want to
add right now. I just want to focus on this dead bear area other than what you sow plans.
And after they called him is a local coming to the House this weekend to address all that
and more things. >> And I told him to just go ahead and cap whatever spring
cause the arches kept them. And then let's see what happens. And that's what will
be done. Okay. And what are what are your plans for remedying the dead bear area
that we see here in the photograph? >> I just need to know exactly
what needs to be done because the will be there this weekend. And I know exactly
what needs to be done and they have the officers number, the Woodworth, Iran, the will send
him and we have someone else's e-mail. That's an email to weather yesterday. So the
Wilson them and if they see that. This is not a number, what else to be done, they
would take care of it. They have the full authority to do that. Okay. And if I
understand your testimony correctly, you're telling me that you already have an
agreement that a firm is going to come out to your home tomorrow or I'm sorry this
weekend this weekend, OK? >> All right. And is there anything else you'd like to
add? >> I will. I mean, I don't want to take more time than
necessary because we're in agreement that anything that needs to be fixed would be
fixed. And then there would be better communication to ensure that the people doing the work
on the stand. The scope and >> The >> requirements I have. Some.
People want to submit for what I think the city needs to help with in metal wood and that
would be separate. I don't think we need to take time for that. Ok? I just want to, you
know, number one, encourage you to work closely with code enforcement.
>> I you know, you mentioned something about not having a correct email. So today would
be an excellent opportunity for you to provide an e-mail. I want to let you know that I
am going to enter an order. Finding you in violation. However you have until
September 17th to correct the violation and there will be no fine assessed. So I do
encourage you since you do, you know, have a plan and that you work closely with code
enforcement and that you know, get this done before the 17th so that you will have. I
think, you know, no financial, no significant financial impact just that. All right.
Based upon the evidence, testimony and photos in this matter. I find that the notice
of violation in hearing for today was properly served further that the owner is
present. I do make the following conclusions of law that the respondent is in
violation of land development regulations. Section 8007.7 Point D Code Section 13 point
Dash 2 dot be dot for. The respondent is ordered to correct these violations by
September 17th 26, a fine in the amount of $25 per day will be assessed against the
respondent, which will begin on September 18th costs in the amount of $14.19 are assessed
against the respondent, a cease and desist order will be issued and that in the event
you do not correct these violations. We will have a fine certification hearing
back here on October. 15th. I will follow that up with a written order of everything I
have ruled here today. But I again encourage you to work with code enforcement so that
you can get this matter, taking care of. Thank you very much. And my best to your
mother. Thank you. And a few staff I have to get outside. Go ahead and call those cases.
>> Item number 2 and a new business HCC 6, 0, 4, 8, 1, to 25 would put loves the code
officer.
Good morning. We're putting All Co compliance officer for the village of
Wellington. Case number is CC Dash 6, 0, 4, 8 dash, 2, 0, 2, 5 respondents name.
>> South Shore Partners, LLC. Property addresses, 1, 2, 1, 6, 0, South Shore Boulevard
unit 105, Wellington, Florida. This case was established based on internal complaint,
the end of an array truss or by certified mail return receipt received request the
service of the interview. No HB entered as evidence. So entered correction date was
July 13th 2026? and Inspection on July 14th 2026 found the following items remain be on
the time given in the notice violation of Wellington code sections chapter. 21 article
2, no business tax receipt for piece of pizza. Photos and screenshots were taken that
fairly and accurately represent the violation. At that time. request of
photographs and screenshots be entered into evidence. So enter follow-up inspection on
August, 5th and 13th 2026. Found the violations still exist. Staff conducted a Pacer
church found the respondent is not every pending bankruptcy action research found. There's
not a list pennants filed against this property staff contact with the owner
representative on May 19th 2026. While dropping off a door hanger. I spoke to one of
the staff behind the counter. I asked for them to have the owner contact me regarding the
business tax receipt. No response has been given. Code compliance. Division
recommends respondent be found in violation of Wellington Code Section chapter. 21
article 2, is recommended that the respondent be found in violation in order to be paid.
The local business tax fee. Plus, a penalty of 25% of the license determine to be due
and a penalty of $250. There's also recommended that the cost incurred and the amount of $13
and $0.54 be assessed in order to be paid within 30 days of the date is meeting seas and
desist order for a period of 5 years as requested. All right. Thank you very much. In the
matter of Wellington versus South Shore Partners, LLC aged FCC.
>> 6, 0, 4, 8 dash 2, 0, 2, 5, Is anyone here on this matter? All right. Seeing no hit
present and the time being 9.36, based upon the testimony, evidence and photos
in this matter. I find that the notice of violation and hearing for today was properly
served on the respondent and that the respondent is not here based upon the foregoing.
I find that the and that the respondent is in violation of chapter. 21 article to failure
to have a business tax receipt respondent is hereby order to obtain and pay for a business
tax receipt a penalty in the amount of $250. Plus, 25% of the business license fee is
also assessed against the respondent costs in the amount of $13 and $0.54 is assessed
and cease and desist order will also be issued. And I will follow that up with a
written order. Thank you. move to item number 3 in the new business. ACC 6, 0, 6, 5, 225
Christopher percent of the code officer.
>> Good morning. Krista Person, Co compliance officer for the village of Wellington.
Case number CC 6, 0, 6, 5 dash, 2, 0, 2, 5, responders named Betsy Caesar Jean Robert
Caesar property address 8, 6, 0, right. Woodway Wellington, Florida. This case was
established based on a neighborhood improvement inspection. The end of Vienna,
which was served by certified mail return receipt received request the service of the end
of no HB Intron as evidence so entered a correction date July 27th 2026. inspection on July.
28th 2026. found the following item be on the time given a notice of violation of wanton
code section chapter. 21 article 2, no business tax receipt for rental property
and 0, wrightwood. Late aunt and Florida. A follow-up inspection on August, 7th
2026. found a following and a violation still does exist. Staff conducted a pace
instructors from respondent does not have a pending bankruptcy action. Research
found is not of the spending filed against property. Staff made multiple attempts to
contact the property owner regarding the business tax receipt, including tough
telephone calls and email correspondence. also contacted the tenant. The property, the
10 and that advise staff that he would reach out to the landlord. I request the
landlord to contact us. As of today. Staff has not received any communication from the
property owner. The Co Compliance Division recommends respond to be found in
violation of Walton Coach Section Chapter. 21 article 2. It is recommended that the
respondent be found in violation and ordered to pay the local business tax fee.
Plus, a penalty of 25%. Of the lice determined to be due and a penalty of $250. It is also
recommended the costs incurred in the amount of $12.76 the SS in order to. To be paid within
30 days of the end of this meeting a season. This is for a period of 5 requested. All
right. Thank you. Okay. In the matter of Wellington versus. >> That's a Caesar. And Jean
Robert Cesar case number aged SCC 6, 0, 6, 5 dash, 2, 0, 2, 5, Is anyone here on that?
This matter? All right. Seeing none and noting the time of 9 9.40 I do have a arpa side how
is it that you determine that this was this the property at 8, 6, 0, brightwood was being
used as a rental. >> So this started with the property maintenance case that
had before and when a left a door hanger, the person came out and inquire. What I was
doing. And I told sidewalk needs to be clean. And he said. There are some of the
things I need to be done and he said he would let the property owner day. He's just
a tenant. So from there that's from this case was opened. >> I guess I'm I'm struggling
with just somebody saying that their attendant. Is not what I see is E really strong basis.
I do see somebody coming up that may be able to provide some additional evidence on
that. >> Smith, the candle, a business tax official with the
village. Thank you. Utilities Department has a tenant on record. If you want to okay.
is that for this, this current period? Yes, okay. And is it on that application for
utilities that the person has Indy Kay did that they are a tenant at 8.60, Brightwood
way. Yes. All right. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. All right. Based upon the
testimony, evidence and photos in this matter. I find that the notice of violation and
hearing for today was properly served on the respondent. I find that the respondent is
not present here. I further find that the respondent is in violation of chapter. 21
article to failure to have a business tax receipt. Therefore, I find that are
there for I order that the respondent must obtain and pay for its business tax fee. It
also I'm going to assess a penalty in the amount of $250. Plus, 25% of the business
license fee further costs in the amount of $12.76 are assessed and a cease and
desist order will be issued follow that up with a written order to the respondent. Thank
you. Thank you. We're gonna move to item number 4 on the new business HCC 86 dash 2026.
>> The front of the cases, the court officer. >> Stephen of filtering into
compliance. This case number is and I wish that does she see. Dash 6, 8, 6 dash 2026.
respondent names James l a pair of was and Victor h Perry was. Probably get addresses
2059 Guadalupe Drive one to Florida. The case was to establish based on an Inter
complaint, the interview in which was served by certified mail return receipt received
request the service and Vienna which evidence so entered correction date was July 13th
2026. inspection on 7/14/2026, from the following items remain beyond that. I'm given
the notice of violation of Alton code sections. Shepherd. 21 article 2, no business
section. She for one to most Restates plc screen us on this page. We're taking a fairly
actually represent violation. At that time. I request Screech Open to the evidence.
So entered a follow-up inspection on July. 21st 2026 July 30th August 6, August
10th and 17th 2026 for the violations to continue to exist. Staff can take it up. A
which follows spotted doesn't have a pending bankruptcy action or Luz Pena spoken
property. has been communicating. Staff have been communicating with the
homeowner through a, you know, explain the violation how to come into compliance and phone
calls. Staff was informed that your son, some this has been changed. However, the address
for means unchanged as 20 59 up a drive. The coca plants to vision recommends respond to
be fun in violation of onto Code Section chapter. 21 article 2, it is recommended
that the respond fund a violation in order to pay local business tax feet. Plus
a penalty of 25% of the license determined to be do. And a penalty of $250. It is
also recommended that the costs incurred in the amount of $12.76 be assessed in order
to be paid within 30 days of the date of this meeting. But he this order for Pierre 5
years requested. >> All right. Thank you very In the matter of Wellington
versus James l Para Victor h Para was h dash CC 8, 6 dash 2, 0, 2, 6, Is anyone here on
this matter? Alright, noting no one is here and the time is 9.44, I have a question.
>> The the sunbiz that was entered into evidence here. When was that taken?
>> This screen shot was taken. I believe. >> Because I can see kind of
the whole thing not saw. Because usually will know if zoom back. Usually on. I think
the top left. It'll tell you, you know, when it was. >> I believe it was on the
17th. And we have have a copy of one for one. >> That's fine. said I just I
like to see the date when it was printed. That's fine. Okay. This and then the other
question I have is on the officers just curious are either of the property owners
listed as officer of or up of these are partners listed in this Wellington Luxury
Estates. Plc. As officers. Yeah, you see Kuz it says authorized person details. I I
can't see the bottom of it. That's all. Would you like the screenshot that if you wanted
to show it to me, that's fine. Like I said, it's I I just always like to see if it's.
Ok, so it is somebody okay. All right, OK, so is one of them to us also OK, that's all
I needed. All right. Thank you very much for the clarification based upon the
evidence, testimony and photos in this matter. I find that the notice of violation for
today was properly served. I find that the respondent is not here further. I conclude
that the respondent is in violation of chapter. 21 article to failure to have a
business tax receipt as a result. I hereby order them to obtain and pay for a business
tax relief. Receipt further a penalty in the amount of $250. Plus, 25% of the business
license fee is also assessed against the respondent and costs in the amount of $12.76
I will follow this up with a written order to the respondent. Thank you. With a
move to item number 2 and a fine certification HCC 3, 6, 6, 9, 2, 125 head of archers.
The court officer. >> Good Morning. Helen Archer Court officer for the village
of Wellington case number Z, C 3, 6, 9, 6, 6, 9, 2025. respondent's name is Kpi
Equity Holdings, LLC, Latitude, Property Investments, LLC. Property
addresses that 1, 5, 7, 5, 6, ocean breeze thing. Wellington, Florida. Hearing
date was June 18th 2026. The respondent was ordered to correct the violations of
algae are 7001.2 expired engineering permit. Angie 23 Dash 0, 0, 3, 9, for scrapping
lot development. Installation of driveways, both temporary and permanent on or before
February 1920. 26 or pay a fine not to exceed $50 per day. The order also scheduled
find certification hearing on 3/19/2026. The Code compliance division was not contacted as
required and are the violation was not corrected. Research on February 23rd 2026. From the
property was to in violation of Ldr. 7001.2 contact was made with representative and
they request a continuance of the case until August. Since then, I have made several
attempts to email left phone messages with the representative, but no contact
has been made Pacer search from the representative that the respondent does not have a
pending bankruptcy auction Orleans pendants filed against this property. The Code
Compliance Division recommends respond to be found in violation of the order of Ldr.
7001.2 and that the respondent be assist to finding the pursuant. To section 2 Dash 3,
8, a 2, the court of Code of Ordinances and Section one. 62 dash. 0, 9, to be the Florida
statutes in determining the amount of the fine, the special magistrate Musk and
it's considered the following factors. One, the gravity of the violation to the actions
taken by the violator to correct the violation and 3, any previous violations of the
same code section committed by the violator on the same property. As to the gravity of
the violation. Unexpired engineering permit as to the actions taken by the visor to
correct the violation permit. Angie? 23 Dash 0, 0, 3, 9, has not been renewed. As to any
previous violations. So the same code section committed by the violator on the same
property. There is no prior record. Based on these factors. The code compliance
Division recommends that the respondent be a set is assessed to find the amount of
$50 per day commencing on February, 20th 2026 and in addition cost in the amount of
$35 and $0.26, does include costs SS in the order. Both continuing to accrue into the
violation is corrected. All right. Thank you. And in the matter of Wellington versus
Kpi Equity Holdings, LLC. >> Latitude, Property Investments, LLC, which is
case number H Dash C C 3, 6, 6, 9, dash, 2, 0, 2, 5, Is anyone here on this matter?
Seeing And noting the time of 9.49 >> I just had a few questions
just to make sure I understand this. So on. This was. So respondents are hereby order
to correct. There was order entered by the special magistrate on January 15th of
2026. Is a correct. That's correct. Okay. Because I'm like I'm seeing here. The
respondent. Okay. All right. So OK, so I'm I got it. All right. your review of the
records is that the expired engineering permit still expired. Correct? Correct? All
right. Thank you very much. based upon the evidence, photos and testimony in this
matter, I find that the notice of find certification and hearing for today was properly
served on the respondent and that the respondent is not here. I see and and see in the
record that on January, 15th 2026, the special magistrate entered an order requiring the
respondent to correct the violation of land Development regulations. Section 1.7 point
2, I further find that this violation has not been corrected as of today's date.
After hearing the testimony, evidence and photos with the requirements of Florida
statute and Wellington code. Given the gravity of violation, which could be a
safety violation in the foot in the respect that this is an expired engineering permit and
that the respondent has made no efforts to correct these violate the violation and that
the respondent does not have a history of a violation at the property. I determined that a
fine in the amount of $50 is appropriate and is assessed against the respondent and it
will begin began assessing on February. 20th 2026. They further order cost in the
amount of $35 and $0.26 are assessed against the respondent. And I will follow
this up with a written order. Thank you, Thank Change opens. Okay. July 17 because they
order. Okay. That's what you're trying to tell. got yard. So we'll do.
>> July 16th, OK? All right. So I will reopen recall the case just to correct that
based upon in order for extension. That was entered by the magistrate on March 19th,
which I didn't see pay attention to. >> That the fine will not
begin in February. Instead, it will begin on. 7/17/2026. A fine in the amount of $50 will
be assessed against the repression against the respondent which began on July
17th 2026. follow that up with a written order. Thank you. >> move to item number 9 and a
new business. And ACC 15. 0, 3, 2026. Nicholas Kristof was a court officer.
>> Good Morning Code. Officer Nicholas with the village of Wellington presenting case
number HCC Dash 15. 0, 3 dash 2026. respondent names. Halle Cairo, Ben Trustee, Matthew,
you, Terry and Trustee and Matthew, you, Terry. In 2000, a living trust property
address, 1, 4, 2, 9, 0, Calypso lane Wellington, Florida. This case was
established based on the complaint, Vienna, which was served by post a notice on
July 23rd 2026. At the property at Village Hall and at the village Clerk's office,
a copy of the post. A notice was mailed to the property owner. I request the service
of the interview. No HB entered as evidence. So entered. Correction date was
8/3/2026, and inspection on August 4th, 2026 found about following items remain beyond
that. I'm in but the given a notice violation of Wellington code sections. 5 dash one,
105, 0.5 expired building permit BP. 23 Dash 46 96 replace existing windows and
doors. Screenshot was taken fairly and accurately represents the violation. At
that time. I request the photo graph The screenshot be entered evidence. So entered.
A follow-up inspection on August 12 and August. 18th 2026 from the violation still
exist. Staff conducted a pace research which found the respondent does not have a
pending bankruptcy Action. Orleans pendants filed against this property. On May 4th,
2020's it May 4th 2026. an email was sent to the property owner regarding the expired
permit on May 14th door Hanger was left at the property May 22nd 2026. I spoke with the
property manager Lawrence. He stated that the windows and doors were inspected under
permit BP. 23 dash. 29, 29 after review from the building department, Lawrence was asked
to submit a copy of the permit card for vacation for verification of inspection. No
further response was received the Code Compliance Division recommends the respondent be
found in violation of Arlington Code. Section 5 Dash 1, 1, 0, 5.5 It is recommended
that the respondent be given until September 17th 2026. to correct the violation or be
charged fine not to exceed $50 per day for each day. The violation continues to exist.
It is also recommended that the cost incurred by the Coke plants, a vision in the amount
of $14 and $0.19 He assessed in order to be paid within 30 days of the date of this
meeting, the cease and desist order for a period of 5 years as requested. In the event,
the code compliance division is not contacted as required and or the violation is not
corrected. It is recommended that a fine certification hearing be held before the
special magistrate on October. 15th 2026. at 09:00AM at the Wellington Municipal Complex.
12, 304 still boulevard, Wellington, Florida. It is also recommended that no
additional notification of intent to impose find to get in.
>> All right. Thank you very much. And in the matter of Wellington versus Holly,
Carbone trustee, Matthew, yet teary and trusty. And Matthew, you get teary 2008 living
trust, case number age, Dash, C, C 15, 0, 3, 2, 0, 2, 6, is anyone here on this matter?
All right. Seeing none and noting the time of 9.56, I just want to make sure I
understand your testimony correctly. It was once the property owner said, oh, yeah,
it's already been inspected. And you said, hey, can you send me the documents that
support that? If you didn't hear anything after that? That's correct. Okay. Thank
you very much. Alright, based upon the testimony, evidence and photos in this matter, I
find that the notice of violation and hearing for today was properly served on
the respondent further that the respondent is not present. I find that the respondent is
in violation of code section one dash. sorry, 5 dash one, 105, 0.5 The permit has
expired and has not been renewed are closed out respondent is hereby order to
correct this violation by September 17th 2026. A fine in the amount of $50 per day is
also assessed against the respondent and cost and cost and the amount of $14.19 are
assessed. The cease and desist order will also be issued and that in the event the
respondent does not correct these violations of find certification hearing will be
held back here on October. 15th and I will follow that up with a written order to the
respondents. Thank you. Thank you. We're gonna move to item number 10 and the new business
ACC 15, 13, 226. >> Nicholas Kristof was a good officer.
>> Good Morning Code Officer Nicholas with the village Wellington present in case
number H dash. You see ash 15, 13 dash 2026. respondent name is Chad. Noel and know just 1,
9, 3, 4 South Club drive Wellington, Florida. This case established based on a
complaint. The end of underage was served by certified mail return receipt received a
request. The service of Novi HB entered as evidence so entered correction date was
July 13th 2026. Inspection on July 14th 2026. From the following items from a be on
the time given a notice of violation of Wellington Code. Section 5 Dash 1, 1, of 5.5
expired building permit BP 20 dash 35. 94 remodeled kitchen and bathrooms. Photos screen
shot was taken the fairly and accurately represent a violation of the time. I
request a screenshot be entered into evidence. So enter the follow-up inspection
on July 28th August, 11th and August 18th 2026 found violations still exist. Staff
conducted a pace research which found the respondent does not have a pending
bankruptcy action or those pendants felt against this property. On May 4th 2026. I
sent an email to the owners regarding the expired permit. On May 14th 2026. I left the
door hanger at the property on July 6, 2026. I spoke with Mister know regarding the code
case in the mail. The stipulation agreement on August 13th 2026. I sent an
e-mail reminder to Mister know regarding the submission of the stipulation agreement. No
further response was received. The Code Compliance Division recommends the respondent be
found in violation of Wellington Code Section 5 Dash 1, 1, 0, 5.5 It is recommended
that the respondent be given until September 17th 2026. To correct the violation or be
charged a fine not to exceed $50 per day for each day. The violation continues to exist.
It is also recommended that cost incurred by the code compliance division in the
amount of $12 and $0.76 be assessed in order to be paid within 30 days. The data this
meeting and and desist order for a period of 5 years as requested in the event, the
code compliance division is not contacted as required under the violation is not
corrected. It is recommended that the final certification hearing that be held before
the special magistrate on October. 15th 2026 09:00AM at the Wellington Municipal
Complex. 12, 304 still boulevard, Wellington, Florida. There's also
recommended that no additional notification of the intent to oppose funding given. All
right. Thank you very much. In the matter of Wellington versus Chad, Noel.
>> And Lorne a noble HDR CC 15, 13 dash 2, 0, 2, 6, Is anyone here on this matter?
All right. Seeing noting the time of 10:00AM based upon the testimony, evidence and photos
in this matter. I find that the notice of violation and hearing for today was properly
served on the respondents and that the respondents are not here. I make the following
conclusions of law that the respondents are in violation of code Section 5 dash one.
105, 0.5 permit expiration. The respondent is hereby order to correct this violation by
September 17th 2026. In the Sorry, a fine in the amount of $50 per day per violation is
assessed against the VI against the respondent and costs in the amount of $12 and
$0.76 are assessed as well. The cease and desist order will be entered. And in the
event that the respondent does not correct this find certification hearing will be
held back here on October. 15th 2026. follow that up with a written order to the
respondents. Thank you. Thank you. We're gonna move to item number 13 and in the business
ACC 18? 55 2026. >> Nicholas Kristof was a court officer.
>> Parting could Officer Nicholas Kristof over the village of Wellington
presenting case number HCC Dash 18, 55 dash 2026. respondent names Linda ISU and
Stephen W let us too. Property just to 5.32 Stone Gate Drive going to Florida. This case
was a step based on a complaint. The end of the unknown which was served by
post a notice on July 23rd at the property at Village Hall and at the votes clerk's
office, a copy of the Post. A notice was mailed to the property owner request the
service of the end of the underage be entered as evidence. So entered
correction date was 8/3/2026, and inspection on August. 4th 2026. found the following item
remain be on top of that. I'm given a notice violation of Lillington Code Section 5 dash
1, 2, 1, 0, 5.5 expired building permits PP. 21 Dash 0, 9, 5, 3, pool spa and DEC
installation and building permit BP. 22 Dash 0, 9, 3, to pull barriers slash right
privacy, vinyl fence with to 5 foot Kates and one for Fugate. Photos are taken Screech up a
screen test for taking that fairly and accurately represent the violation that
the time I request a vote of the screenshots be entered as evidence. Thank you. Yes. A
follow-up inspection on August, 13th and August 18th found a violation still exist.
Staff conducted pace research which found the respondent does not have a pending
bankruptcy action or those pendants filed against this property on May 29th 2026. And
email was sent to the property owner regarding the expired permits on the June 8th door
hanger was left at the property. No response received. The Code Compliance
Division recommends the respondent be found in violation of Arlington Code.
Section 5 Dash 1, 1, 0, 5.5 It is recommended that the respondent be given until
9/17/2026. to correct the violation. a fine not to exceed $50 per day for each
day. The violation continues to exist. It is also recommended that costs
incurred by the code compliance division and the amount of 14 0 isn't $0.19 the
assessed in order to be paid within 30 days of the date of this meeting, the cease and
desist order for a period of 5 years as requested in the event, the code compliance
division not contacted as required under the violation is not corrected. It is
recommended find certification hearing be held before the special magistrate on October.
15th 2026. At 09:00AM at the one to municipal complex. 12, 304 still boulevard going to
Florida is also recommended that no additional notification of the intent to
impose time be given. All right. Thank you very much. And in the matter of
Wellington versus. >> Linda, and Stephanie W H Dash D C 18, 5, 5, 2, 0, 2, 6,
Is anyone here on this matter? Alright, noting the time of 10:00:04AM, based upon the
testimony, evidence and photos in this matter. I find that the notice of violation in
hearing for today was properly served on the respondents and that the respondents are not
here. I make the following conclusions of law that the respondents are in violation
of code Section 5 dash one 105, 0.5 permit exploration. The respondent is ordered to
correct these violations by September 17th 2026, a fine in the amount of $50 per day is
also assessed against the respondents and cost and the amount of $14.19 is also
assessed a cease and desist order will be issued and that in the event, the respondents
failed to correct this Find certification hearing will be held back here on October.
15th 2026 a written order will be sent to the respondents with my ruling. Thank you.
We're going to move to item number 5, undefined certification HCC 5, 7, 3, 3,
>> 2 and a 25 Nicholas Kristof was the code officer. >> Good Morning. Cut Officer
Nicholas Kristof full with the village of Wellington presenting case number and a
wage that she's he dashed. 57. 33 dash 2025. Respondent names. Michael Kamber. It and
chanting again variety. Property. Just 1, 3, 8, 4, Primrose lane Wellington,
Florida. Hearing date was June 18th, 2026. The respondent was ordered to correct the
violation of Arlington Code. Section 5 Dash 1, 1, 0, 5.5 It's part of building permits
PP. 23 Dash 0, 6, 22 and 18 dash 20 to 96 wood fence double gates and replace 16
windows and 4 doors with impact on or before July 16th 2026. or pay a fine not to
exceed $50 per day. The order was also scheduled to find certification hearing on
August. 20th 2026, if the code compliance division was not contacted as required under
the violation was not corrected inspection on 7/17/2026, found the property
still in violation of Arlington Land. The herb sorry on to coach Section 5 Dash
one, one of 5.5 building permit BP. 23 Dash 0, 6.22 Wood fence double Kate was
renewed, however, permit 18 dash. 22 96 replace 16 windows and 4 tours with impact
remained at expired. A follow-up inspection on July 31st. August 12 and August
18th 2026 and found a violation still exist. For a screen. Shots were taken that
represent the condition of the property at the time of the various inspection requests.
The screenshot be entered as evidence, so entered. Pace, research found the respondent
does not have a pending bankruptcy Action. Orleans pendants filed against this
property. On November. 21st 2025 stuff up to play. Smelled of Mister again. Variety on
December 4th, 2025 staff spoke to Mr. Kimber it by phone and referred them to the building
to permit for further assistance on February 6, 2026 staff. It sent email to the
property owner on March. 20th 2026. the door hanger at the property on April 6 2026. I
spoke with Mr. Graham Brady by phone for Dino in the stipulation agreement event.
additional time would be needed to correct the violation beyond the a
previous May 18th correction date on May 20th 2026. I know the stipulation agreement Mr.
Kimber already on June. 11th 2026. I called Mister Kamber Kamber already and left a
voicemail. No further response received. The Code Compliance Division recommends the
respondent be found in violation of the order. Wellington Code Section 5 Dash
1, 1, 0, 5.5 and that the respondent be assessed a fine pursuant to section 2 Dash, 3,
8, a 2 of the code of Ordinances and Section 1, 6, 0, 9, to be of the Florida
statutes. In determining the amount of the fine the special magistrate must consider the
following factors. The gravity of the violation, any actions taken by the violator to
correct the violation and any previous violations of the same code section committed by
the violator on the same property. As to the gravity of the violation permit 18 dash.
22 dash 18 dash 20 to 96 remains expired. As to the actions taken by the violator
to correct the violation, a permit 18 dash 20 to 96 has not been renewed. As to any
previous violations of the same code section committed by the violator on the same
property. There's no prior record. Based on these factors. The Coke plants
Vision recommends the respondent is assessed a fine in the amount of $50 per day
commencing on July 17th 2026. And in addition to causing the amount of $46.70, which does
include cost the system, the order both continuing to accrue into the violation is
corrected. All right. Thank you very much. >> And in the matter of
Wellington versus Michael Gambhir Yadi Shannon Gabriel. It case number aged ACC. 5, 7,
3, 3, 2, 0, 2, 5, Is anyone here on this matter? right. Seeing none in noting the time
of 10, 0, 9, based upon the testimony, evidence and photos in this matter. I find that
the notice of find certification. and hearing for today was properly served on
the respondent further that on June 18th 2026, the special magistrate entered an order
requiring the respondent to correct the violations of code Section 5 dash one 105, 0.5
permits expiration. I do find that the building permit in 2020 2023 has been a resolved.
However, there is the outstanding permit of 18 dash, 2, 2, 9, 6, which is still
outstanding after hearing the testimony, evidence and photos in this matter. And the
reviewing the requirements of Florida law and Wellington code reviewing the gravity of
the violations that the one permit is still it is still at has not been resolved in
closed out and has further. I find that the respondent has made no effort to correct
these violations and that there is no history of this violation at this same
property. I do determine that a fine in the amount of $50 per day is assessed against
the respondent which will begin on which began on July 17th 2026. Costin. The amount
of $46.70 is also assessed and this will be followed up with a written order to the
property owner. Thank you. Thank you. going to move to item number one on the new
business H C C 3, 8, 3, 7, 2025. >> As couple was a court
officer.
>> As a coca plants officer for the village of Wellington. Case numbers H. Cc 3, 8, 3, 7
dash, 2, 0, 2, 5, responding name is Herbert J Grimshaw the second property address is 1,
8, 4, 6 Lindsay Court Wellington, Florida. This case was established based on the
complaint Vienna waits was served by posted a notice on July 23rd 2026. at the
property Village Hall and at the village clerk's office, a copy of the post a notice was
mailed to the property owner request. The service of them will be in a way be answered.
Is evidence so entered? The correction date was August second 2026. and inspection on
August. on the following items remain beyond that. I'm given a notice of violation
Wellington Code Section 9 Dash 3 point nuisance declared stagnant swimming pool. Photos
were taken in a fairly and accurately represent a violation at the time Cuesta
photographs be entered into evidence. So entered. Follow-up inspections on
August. 10th 13th 15th, 16th 18th and 19th from violation still exists. Staff conducted
a pacer search was found responded does not have a pending bankruptcy action or
less dependence fight against this property. Staff contact with the owner Slash
representative staff is maintain ongoing. Communication with the owner
Representative Anthony regarding the state is swimming pool beginning on
July, 30th 2025. and continuing throughout the duration of this case during
multiple conversations, Anthony was advised that the swimming pool pump we need to
be repaired or replaced to eliminate the stagnant water condition. Anthony repeatedly
stated that he had scheduled a repair technician to repair the poor point. Based on
representations that the issue had been corrected. Staff at one point determine the case
could be closed. However, a neighboring property owners subsequently contacted the
village reported that the poor remain stagnant. The water had turned black and at the pool
pump was now operating. Staff confirmed the violation remained on May 14th 2026.
staff advise Anthony that the swimming pool cover would need to be properly votes secure to
prevent it from becoming displaced and exposing the stagnant water. Anthony
acknowledges requirement on June 10th 2026 staff again reminding Anthony that the
poor cover would need to be properly voted unsecured during that inspection,
Anthony. So the swimming pool pump in advised that he continuously becomes clogged
leaves preventing it from operating properly staffed documented the condition
photographs despite ongoing communication, repeated opportunities to achieve
compliance. And owner representatives acknowledgment of the condition staying
swimming pool violation as remain unresolved. The coach K the code compliance Division
recommends the responded be found in violation of one Code section 9 dash 3 point it is
recommended that the respondent be given until September 3rd to correct the
violations or be charged a fine not exceed $50 per day for each day. violation
continues to exist. It is also recommended costs incurred by the code compliance division
in the amount of be assessed in order to be paid within 30 days of the date of this
meeting, cease and desist order for a period of 5 years as requested in the event, the
code compliance division is not contacted as required in or the violation is not
corrected. It is recommended that he finds certification hearing be held before the
special magistrate on September 17th 2026 09:00AM at the one to municipal complex.
1, 2, 3, 0, 0, 4 still boulevard of Florida. It is also recommended that no
additional notifications. So of the intense will post fun to give up.
>> All right. Thank you very much. In the matter of Wellington versus Herbert J
Grimshaw the second aged FCC. 3, 8, 3, 7 dash 2, 0, 2, 5, Is anyone here on this matter?
Seeing noting the time of 10, 15. Based upon the evidence, testimony and photos in this
matter. I find that the notice of violation and hearing for today was properly served on
the respondent who is not present here today. I further find that the respondent is in
violation of code section 9 Dash 3 F unsecured, stagnant pool. Respondent is order to
correct this violation by September. 3rd, 2026. A fine in the amount of $50 per day
per violation is assessed against the property which will begin on September 4th
costs in the amount of $14.19 are further assessed and to cease and desist order will be
issued in the event that the respondent does not correct this Find certification
hearing will be held back here on September. 17th 2026. And I'll follow that up with a
written order to Mr. Grimshaw. We're gonna call the second case under item number one HCC
6, 5, 1, 226 as it covers the court officer. >> Good morning as it
compliance officer for the village of Wellington. Case numbers HCC Dash 6, 5, one
dash 2026. respondent name is Herbert J Grimshaw the second property address is 1, 8, 4, 6
Lindsay Court Wellington, Florida. This case was established based on a
complaint. The end of Ian awaits was served by certified mail return receipt received
request the service of the in a way to be answered. Is evidence so entered the
correction date was July 13th 2026. and Inspection on July 14th 2026. found the following
items remain beyond that. I'm given the notice of violation of Wilmington Code Section 13
DASH to Point B 0.2 driveway staying in or discolored sidewalk staying in or
discolored and Wellington Land Development regulations. Section 2008007.8 through gene
missing shrubs and vegetation and landscape along foundation of the property. Photos were
taken at fairly and accurately represent a violation at that request of photographs be
entered into evidence. So entered. Follow-up inspections on July 22nd July 29th August
3rd, August 10th, August 16th and August 18th of 2026. from the violation still exist.
Staff conducted a pacer search which found the respondent does not have a pending
bankruptcy action or lisp and its fight against property. Staff contact with Donuts.
That's representative I have spoken to and communicated with Anthony on multiple
occasions and advised him of the violations found on the property Anthony's primary
concern was regarding the stagnant pool water located at the rear of the home. I've
also advise Anthony on numerous occasions that the front of the property requires
vegetation in that the driveway and sidewalk requires cleaning. Anthony has not
taken corrective action regarding the required vegetation in the driveway and
sidewalk was scrapped rather than cleaned since our last communication. I have not
received any further contact or updates from Anthony regarding the remaining
violations. The Co Compliance Division recommends to respond to be found violation of
Wellington code sections. 13 DASH to Point B 0.2 and one to land Development regulations.
Section 7.8 point to point a through G it is recommended that the respondent be given
until September 17th 2026. to correct the violation or be charged a fine not to exceed
$25 per day per violation. For each day. The violation continues to exist. It is also
recommended that costs incurred by the code compliance division in the
amount of $12.76 the assessed in order to be paid within 30 days of the date of this
meeting, a seasoned. The cease and desist order for a period of 5 years is requesting in
the event. The code compliance division is not kind of take it as required and or the
violation is not corrected. It is recommended that the fine certification hearing be held
before the special magistrate on October. 15th 2026 09:00AM at the Wellington Municipal
Complex. 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, 4 still boulevard, Wellington, Florida. It is also
recommended and no additional notification of the post. Fun to give.
>> All right. Thank you very much, OK? And in the case of Wellington versus Herbert J
Graham shot aged ACC 6, 5, 1, dash 2, 0, 2, 6, Is anyone here on this matter? Alright,
noting the time of 10, 19 based upon the evidence, testimony and photos in this
matter. I find that the notice of violation hearing for today was properly served on the
respondent and that the respondent is not here. I further find that based upon
the evidence that the respondent is in violation of land development regulations,
Section 8007.2 A 3G and code section 13 dash 2 dot be 0.2 respondent is ordered to
correct these violations by September 17th 2026. a fine in the amount of $25 per day per
violation is assessed and will begin on September. 18th costin the amount of $12. And
$0.76 is assessed the cease and desist order will be entered and that in the event
that the respondent does not correct these violations of find certification hearing
will be held back here on October. 15th 2026. and this also will be forwarded to Mr.
Grimshaw, thank. Thank you. move to item number 5 on the new business and HCC 2, 9, 3,
22 in 6 Vegas's got officer. >> Officer Stephen Villegas field. You want to coca
plants. Case number each dash EC dash 2, 9, 3, 2026. >> Excuse me. Respond a name
change East. You'll go. Property address 10, 6, 7, 9 old him equate want to
Florida. The case was established based on a neighborhood improve an
inspection. The end of, you know, which was served by certified mail return receipt
received, of course, the service. you know, we should be entered as evidence. So
entered. Christian Day was July 13th 2026. And inspection on July 14 26 for the
following items remain beyond that. I'm given in the notice violation of Alton Code
Section. 13 dash 2 debido one walls are stained discolored trim a stand-in or discolored
won't and ldr code section 6.4, 8001004006.6 AC unit not screened from view. The roof
was found to be cleaned. Photographs are taken a fairly accurately represent a
violation at that time request of photographs be entered into evidence. So entered. A
follow-up inspection on July. 21st, 30th August 6th and August 17th 2026 fun of
violations to exist. Pace research which found the respondent does not have a
pending bigger Section Orleans pendants fight against this property. Staff contact with
the owner presented staff reached out to phone calls and door hangers. The violation
has been explained. The violations have been explains. He's being the owner has
acknowledged, but the compliance has not been met. The code compliance Division
recommends that the respond to be funded violation of to code section. 13 dash 2 DOT the DOT
ltr sections. 8004006.6 It is recommended that those spot to be given until September 17th.
26 to correct the violations. Will be charged a fine not to exceed 20 $25 per day for
violation for each of the violation continues to exist. It's also recommended that the
costs incurred by the code compliance division in the amount of $12.76 be assessed
or to be paid within 30 days of the date of this meeting, a cease and desist. Order for a
period of 5 years required. In the event, the code compliance division has not contacted as
required under the violations corrected. is recommended find certification hearing be held
before the special magistrate on October. 15th 2026. at 09:00AM at the one. To me,
that's one complex. 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, forced to Boulevard one to Florida. those are
commended that no additional are vacation of the 10 to impose a fine to get in. All
right. Thank you very much. And in the matter of Wellington versus Ha.
>> East, you go case number H Tash CC 2, 9, 3, dash 2, 0, 2, 6 is anyone here on this
matter? All right. Seeing noting the time of 10. 23, I just want to ask one question
if I understand the violations as they relate to 13 dash 2 dot be 0.1 is that the walls
are stained and that rim is staying correct. Yes, was sustained in that Sting, OK,
great. All right. Thank you very much for that clarification. Okay. Based
upon the evidence, testimony and photos in this matter. I find that the notice of
violation and hearing for today was properly served I further find that the
respondent is not here based upon the foregoing. I find that the respondent is in
violation of code section 13 dash 2 dot be 0.1 and land development regulations.
Section 1004006.6, I order the responded to correct these violations by September 17th
2026. A fine in the amount of $25 per day per violation is also assessed against the
property or the homeowner cost and the amount of $12.76 are also assessed the cease and
desist order will be issued prohibiting future violations. And that in the event the
respondent does not correct these violations of find certification hearing will be
held back here on October. 15th. And I follow that up with a written order to the
respondents. Thank you. Thank you. The move to item number 7 and in the business and ACC 9
to 9 2026. >> Julie occult, there's a court officer.
>> Good morning. Case number HCC 9 to 9 2026. respondent named Jacqueline Kennedy,
Richard Kennedy, property actress 1, 1, 9, 7,000 more terrace, Wellington, Florida.
The case was established based on a neighborhood improvement action. The end of Vienna, was
served by post a notice on July 23rd 2026. at the property at Village Hall and
at the village clerk's office, a copy of the post. A notice with smell to the property
owner. I request the service of the end of the an ohp entered as entered. Correction
date was August first 2026. and inspection in its path. And inspection on August. 3rd,
2026 found the following items remain beyond the time given and notice of violation of
Wellington code sections. 13 dash 2 DOT beat out one roof was and drip. Fed stained and
discolored. 13 dash 2 dot the 0.2 driveway and sidewalk stained and or discolored
Wheaton driveway and sidewalk. 13 dash 3 dot beat out one garbage and or recycling
container, not screened from Wellington Land Development regulations, Section 7 that 7
DOT P landscape is not being maintained and in need healthy, orderly manner.
Plantings, overgrown and need to be trend. 7, not 8 dot to dot a through G missing
vegetation to assure every in front of House 6 top for one that 5 that h missing hedges
in front of fences. Photos, rotation that fairly and accurately represent the
violation. At the time I request of photographs be entered into evidence. So
entered a follow-up inspection on August. 5th 10005th 12 17 found a violation still exist.
Conducted a piece of from the respondent. Does not have a pending bankruptcy action
research found there is a list pennants filed against this property. Staff contact with
Honor Representative door Hanger was left that the property on August 6, but no
contact was made on August 18th. I received an email from Mr. Kennedy stating he just
saw the posting as he does not live at the property anymore. They are trying to sell the
property and one and wants to pressure wash. I emailed him back letting him know that
there are other violations also and offered a stipulation agreement and he can come in
and come. He can come in and sign the agreement on the 19th he called the Code hotline and
spoke to a fellow code officer. The code officer discussed other violations but
Mr. Kennedy was not aware. He asked about the solid waste and was briefly explain the
violation, Mr. Kennedy Acts for me to call him. I called Mister Kennedy back and spoke
with him about the cold case. I informed him that previous in Miles who are sent and was
notified about the violations. I explained that he can come in to speak to the match fee,
but he would not be able to attend. I informed him about the process following the
hearing today and offered to meet with him that property. He stated he would contact me.
The code compliance Division respondent be found in violation of Wellington code
sections. 13 dash 2 dot the DOT one, 13 dash 2 dot the 0.2 and 13 dash 3 dot be 0.1
Wellington Land development, regulation sections 7 that 8 that 7 B 7, 8, dot to dot a
through and 6 top 4.1 that fight that H. It is recommended that the
respondent be given until September 17th 2026. To correct the violations. But
charge a fine not to exceed $25 per day per violation. For each day. The violation
continues to exist. It is also recommended that the costs incurred by the code
compliance ovation and the amount of $14.19, the SS in order to be paid within 30
days of the date of this meeting a season. This is order for a period of 5 years
is requested in the event. The Co compliance division has not contacted as required and or
the violation is not corrected. It is recommended that a fine certification
hearing be held before the special magistrate on October. 15th 2026. At 09:00AM the
Wellington into Bull complex. One to 300 far as how boulevard Wellington, Florida.
It is also recommended that no additional notification of the intent to impose find be
given. Thank you very right. In the matter of Wellington versus Richard Kennedy and
Jacqueline Kennedy aged ACC. >> 9, 2, 9 dash, 2, 0, 2, 6. Is anyone here on this matter?
All right. Seeing none and noting the time of 10. 29, I just had one question and the
violation of code section 13 DASH 3 DOT be 0.2, which is the garbage can. Is that
still? Is that still part of the violations or has that been taken care?
>> And it's a part of the violations as still visible from the street. Okay. I just
want to make sure because I was checking off as you are seeing huge mansion and I miss
that one. So. >> User air, but I just want to make sure are. Thank you
very right. Based upon the evidence, testimony and photos in this matter. I find that
the notice of violation and hearing for today was properly served on the respondents and
that the respondents are not here further. I find that the respondents are in violation
of land development regulations. Section 7. 0.2, I'm sorry. 8007.2 Point a
through G Code section 13 DASH 3 dot be 0.1 land development regulations. Section
8001004006.5 point H Land Development regulations. Section 8007.7 Point B Code
section 13 DASH 3 dot be done to code section 13 dash 2 dot be 0.1 and code section 13
dash 2 dot the 0.2 The respondents are further order to correct these violations by
September 17th 2026. A fine in the amount of $25 per day per violation will begin
thereafter and found a fine and I'm sorry costs in the amount of $14.19 or further
assessed a cease and desist order will be entered and that in the event the respondents
failed to correct these find certification hearing will be held back here on October.
15th 2026 and all follow that up with a written order to the respondents. I do have a
question. Also, it's 13 dash 2 dot beat out one. >> Okay. 13 dash 2 dot 0.2
Very teen dash 3 beat out one and then land development 7 DOT 8 at 7 P 7 that 8 dot to
dot a through G and 6 dot for about one to find that age, correct.
>> Yeah. Whatever is in the okay. order that sometimes I think right. But what we're
going to do is we're going to take the the notice of violation hearing and those of
the violations because none of them have been corrected right? Correct? Yeah. I just
wanted to make sure because I thought I heard a different code section.
>> That one's corrected. Yes. Okay. That's I think that's where I about overtime where
he's OK. So that was all right. So the garbage can has been corrected from the street
up for being at the curb. Yes. And left at Kirby out outside allowed time. Yes, that's been
corrected. >> All right. So the the >> order will reflect that.
That violation will not be part of the order that I will enter.
>> Perfect. Thank you. Thank She ate everything. >> What a move to item number
8 on the new business HCC 13. 63 2026 work. But those the code officer. What we're
putting off Co compliance officer for the village of Wellington. Case numbers, CC
Dash, 1, 3, 6, 3, dash, 2, 0, 2, 6 respondent's name Raman Marja. Property addresses 1,
2, 6, 3, 0, white coral drive Wellington, Florida. This case was established based on
neighborhood improvement inspection, the intervene or H was served by posted notice on
July 23rd 2026. at the property at Village Hall in village clerk's office copy.
The posted notice was mailed to the property owner request the service of the interview.
No HB entered as Entered correction date was August second 2026. and inspection on
August. 3rd, 2026. on the following items remain beyond that. I'm given in the notice
violation of Wellington code sections. 13 Dash 2 DOT beat out one stand and or
discolored was staying and or discolored photos are taken that fairly and accurately
represent a violation at that time. request of photographs be entered into evidence. So
in turn a follow-up inspection on 8/12/2026, from the violations still exist. Staff
conducted a pacer on the respondent is not heavy pending bankruptcy action
research found there's not a list pendants filed against this property staff contact
with the owner. Representative on 4/28/2026. While dropping off a door hanger. I spoke to
the tenant. I explained the violations to him and he complained that the lights
were not on. I explained that the holiday lights could not remain after January. He said
he would remove the light but needed more time to correct the violations. Granted him a
courtesy extension until May 28th 2026. Code Compliance Division recommends the
respondents be found in violation of Wellington Code. Section 13 dash 2 DOT beat out
one. It is recommended that the respondent be given until September 17th 2026. To
correct violation or be charged time not to exceed $25 per day. For each day. The
violation continues to exist. He's also recommended that costs incurred by the code
compliance division and the amount of $14 and $0.19 the assessed in order to be paid
within 30 days of the date of this meeting, the cease and desist order for a period of 5
years as requested. In the event, the code compliance division has not contacted as
required and or the violation is not corrected. It is recommended that a fine
certification hearing be held before the special magistrate on October. 15th 2026. at
09:00AM at the Wellington Municipal Complex. 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, 4 still boulevard,
Wellington, Florida. also recommended that no additional notification of the intent to
impose find be given. >> All right. Thank you very much. And in the matter of
village of Wellington versus remind my case number aged ACC 13. 63 dash 2, 0, 2, 6, Is
anyone here on this matter? Alright, noting the time of 10 36 based upon the testimony,
evidence and photos in this matter. I find that the notice of violation in hearing for
today was properly served on the respondent who is not here. I further find that the
respondent is in violation of Wellington Code. Section 13 dash 2 dot be 0.1 The
respondent is order to correct this. These violations by September 17th 2026. a fine in
the amount of $25 per day per violation is assessed against the respondent, which will
begin thereafter costin the amount of $14.19 are assessed against the respondent. A
cease and desist order will be entered and that in the event they responded does not
correct this find certification hearing will be held back here on October.
15th 2026 and I will send the respondent written order with my ruling. Thank you. Thank
you. >> The move to item number 11 and in the business ACC 17. 27
2026. As a vehicle was a court officer.
>> Good morning as it Cook, let's officer for the village of Wellington. Case numbers
HCC 1, 7, 2, 7, dash, 2, 0, 2, 6, respondent name is Martin Borgias. Property address is
2, 6, 3, 8 Bedford News drive Wellington, Florida. This case was established based on a
neighborhood improvement inspection. The end Ian awaits was served by certified mail
return receipt receive request the service of the end Vienna wage be answered in as
evidence. So entered. The correction date was July 14th 2026. and inspection on July.
15th 2026 from the following items remain the on the time given in the notice of
violation and willing to land development regulations. Section 8007.2 point a through
G missing vegetation at the front plane of the home. 8001004006.6 mechanical
equipment, not completely screened from view and 8001004006.5 point. The
defense is in a state of deterioration with broken boards. Photos were taken in
fairly and accurately represent the violation. At the time request of
photographs be entered into evidence. So entered. Follow-up inspections on July
23rd July 27th August 4th, August, 11th in August 18th of 2026 from the violations to
exist. Staff conducted a pacer search was found. The respondent does not have a
pending bankruptcy action or list pendants filed against property. Staff contact with
the onus last representative staff attempted to establish contact with borgias on
multiple occasions by leaving door hangers and attempting to contact him by cellular
device. Steph, make contact on one occasion through through his ring doorbell camera while
leaving a door hanger at the property. During that conversation, staff advised
Mr. Borgias of the outstanding violations and provide instructions on how to contact
staff. Should he need additional information or clarification regarding the
violations as of today, I have not received any further communication from our in
regarding the violations or this case. The Code Compliance Division recommends to respond
to be found a violation of Wellington Land Development regulations. Section 2008007.8
through Gene 8001004006.6 and 4006.1 48 POINT 5 Point B B, it is recommended that the
respondent be given until September 17th 2026. to correct the violations or be
charged a fine not to exceed $25 per day per violation for each state of violations
continue to exist. It is also recommended that costs incurred by the code
compliance division in the amount of $12.76 the assess in order to be paid within 30
days of the date of this meeting, a cease and desist order for a period of 5 years
is requested in the event, the code compliance division has not contacted as required and
or the violation is not corrected. It is recommended that if and certification
hearing the hope for the special magistrate on October 15th, 2026 09:00AM at the to
municipal complex. 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, 4 still boulevard when it's in Florida. It is also
recommended an audition. A notification of the post fun to get.
>> Thank you very much. And in the matter of Wellington versus Martin, G's SEC 17, 27
to 0 to 6 is anyone here on this matter? Seeing none noting the time of 10, 40, I
just had one question. And that if you could show me the photographs as they relate to
the fence in a state of deterioration, broken boards. >> This is a good photo. If
I'm men on the fence, you can see. More towards the bottom of the gate portion. There is
one section right there that is broken. They put it back, but it's not it's not
corrected its OK? >> And so are these 0 lot line houses so that the house to
the left, their property actually begins at the house because I'm trying I'm trying
to figure out is this the homeowner, the responded they're responsible for for
this entire gate. So property, what's on the left side of the House is what their response.
>> Okay. >> The the homeowner that's on the left, they're not
responsible for the gate. That's to their right to know they have. They have their own
section of fencing. That is to the left of their house as well. Gotcha. Okay. Got you.
Alright. Appreciate the clarification. Alright, based upon the testimony, evidence
and photos in this matter. I find that the notice of violation in hearing for today
was properly served on the respondent who is not here based upon the evidence, photo
and testimony. I further find that the respondent is in violation of Wellington Land
Development regulations. Section 7.8 point to point a through G Land Development
regulations. Section 8001004006.5 Point B B and Land Development regulations.
Section 4006.0 8001.6, the respondent is ordered to correct this via these
violations by September 17th 2026. a fine in the amount of $25 per day per violation is
assessed against the respondent and and costs in the amount of $12.76 or also
assessed cease and desist order for 5 years will be entered and that in the event
the respondent fails to correct these violations, a certification, a fine
certification hearing will be held back here on October. 15th 2026. follow that up with
a written order. Thank you. We're gonna move to item number 14 HCC 1957. 2026.
>> Staff entered into this stipulation agreement with compliance date of November.
1920, 26, if not corrected to find certification hearing in December 10th 2026. and fine
not to exceed $25 per day per violation. 14 0 K.
the item number 15 HCC. 22. 22. 22 86 work. Put those the code
officer. putting all code compliance officer for the village of Wellington.
>> Case number ACC, Dash 2, 2, 2, 2, dash, 2, 0, 2, 6, respondent's name Ruth Graham.
Property address is 6.39 Lake Wellington Drive Wellington, Florida. This case was
established based on a neighborhood improvement inspection. The end of a
underage was served by certified mail return receipt received request the service
of the Nrv under HB enters evidence. So in 2 correction date was 8/3/2026, and
inspection on August. 4th 2026. found the following items remain beyond that. I'm
given the notice violation of Wellington Code Section 13 dash 2 dot the that too
driveway stand and or discolored land development regulations. Section 7 POINT
8.7 Point B hedges and rear property encroaching into over public right of way missing
dying hedges and rear property dead fronds and palm tree. Code. Section 13 dash 2 dot
beat out. One has been corrected. Voters were taking the fairly and accurately
represent the violation at that time. I request of for the rest being hurt in an
evidence. So interred follow-up inspections on August 5th and 13th 2026. From
the violations still exist. Staff conducted a pacer search are trying respond to is not a
deep get bankruptcy action research found there's not a list pendants filed against
this property. Staff contact with the owner representative on June, 18th door Hanger was
left at the property on August. 5th 2026. I sent an email to the property owner
explaining the remaining violations and the hearing date of August. 20th 2026. No
response was given. Codifies Division recommends respond to be found in violation of
Wellington code sections. 13 Dash 2 DOT beat out 2 and land development regulations.
Section 8007.7 Point it is recommended that the respondent be given until
September 17th 2026. To correct the violations or be charged a fine not to exceed
$25 per day per violation for each day. The violations continue to exist. He's also
recommended that the costs incurred by the code compliance division, the
amount of $13 and $0.54 be assessed in order to be paid within 30 days of the day.
This meeting the cease and desist order for a period of 5 years as requested. In the
event there, code compliance division has not contacted as required under the violation
is not corrected. It is recommended that he finds certification hearing be held
before the special magistrate on October. 15th 2026. and 09:00AM at Wellington
Municipal Complex. 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, 4 still boulevard, Wellington, Florida. It is
also recommended that no additional notification of the intent to impose find be
given. All right. Thank you very much. >> And in the matter of
Wellington versus reach 8 Trahan case number aged SCC. 2, 2, 2, 2, dash, 2, 0, 2, 6.
Is anyone here on this matter? All right. Seeing noting the time of 10. 46 based upon the
evidence, testimony and photos in this matter. I find that the respondent was properly
served the notice of violation and hearing for today and they are not present based upon the
evidence testimony and photos. I find that the respondent is in violation of land
development regulations. Section 7 POINT 8 points. 7 Point B and Wellington Code
section 13 dash 2 dot be 0.2 The respondent is ordered to correct these violations by
September 17th 2026. a fine in the amount of $25 per day per violation will begin
thereafter. Costin the amount of $13.54 are further assessed. A cease and desist
order will be entered and that in the event the respondent does not correct these
violations of find certification hearing will be held back here on October.
15th and I will follow this up with a written order to the respondent. Thank you. move to
item number 16 HCC. 22 landed to try to 26 staff and turn it into a stipulation agreement
with compliance date of September. 17th. >> 2026, if not find
certification hearing October. 15th 2026. find out that exceed $25 per day. We're
going to move to item number 17 HCC. 26. 0, 9, 2026. Why put those the court officer?
Good morning. >> We're putting all code compliance officer for the
village of Wellington. Case number is CC Dash. 2, 6, 0, 9 dash, 2, 0, 2, 6, respondent's
name Srp Sub LLC property addresses 1, 6, 1, 3 Farmington Avenue, Wellington,
Florida. This case was established based on a neighborhood improvement
inspection, the intervene or waitress, or by certified mail return, receipt return.
Receipt received. Her quest to service. Have the intervene or HB enters evidence. So entered
correction date was July 27th 2026 and inspection on July. 30th 2026 found the following
items remain beyond that. I'm given in the notice violation of Wellington code sections.
13 dash, 2 dot. Be that too driveway and sidewalk stand and or discolored weeds
growing in driveway and sidewalk. 13 dash 3 that see that to household items on
side and in front of house visible from the street land Development regulations.
Section 7 POINT 8.7 Point B landscape not being maintained any meat healthy. early
appearance, grass ground. needs to be moan dead fronds and palm trees hedges
overgrown and need to be trimmed debris dead from Juan Area Code section. 22 dash 9
DOT beat out 2 was in compliance. Photos are taken that fairly and accurately
represent the violations at that time, request of photographs be entered into
evidence. So entered follow-up inspections on August 6th and 13th 2026. Found the
violations still exist. Staff conducted a pacer from the respondent is not heavy
pending bankruptcy action research found there's not a list pendants filed against
this property. Staff contact with the owner representative on June 10th door Hanger was
left of the property. No response was given. Coca Vice Division recommends respond to
be found in violation of Wellington code sections. 13 Dash 2 DOT beat out 2, 13 dash
3. That seat up to and land development regulations. Section 8007.7 Point B, it is
recommended that the respondent be given until September 17th 2026. to
correct the violations or be charged a fine not to exceed $25 per day per violation for
each day. The violations continue to exist. It is also recommended that the costs
incurred by the code compliance division. The amount of $13.54 be assessed
in order to be paid within 30 days of the date of this meeting cease and desist order
for a period of 5 years as requested. In the event, the code compliance division
contacted as required under the violation is not corrected. It is recommended
that a fine certification hearing be held before the special magistrate on October.
15th 2026. At 09:00AM at the willing to municipal complex. 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, 4 so boulevard,
Wellington, Florida. There's also recommended that no additional notification of the
intent to impose find be given. Thank you very right. In the matter of Wellington
versus Srp Sub LLC H Dash D C. >> To 6 0, 9 dash 2, 0, 2, 6, Is anyone here on this matter?
All right. Seeing noting the time of 10. 51 based upon the evidence, testimony and photos
in this matter. I find that the notice of violation in hearing for today were
properly served on the respondent that the respondent is not present further. I find
that the respondent is in violation of Wellington Land Development regulations.
Section 8007.7 Point B Code section 13 dash 2 dot the 0.2 and code section 13 dash 3 DOT
C 0.2 I further find in order that the respondent correct these violations by September
17th 2026. thereafter a fine in the amount of $25 per day per violation is assessed
against the respondent. Also assessing costs in the amount of $13 and $0.54 entering
cease and desist order and that in the event the respondent does not timely,
correct. These find certification hearing will be held on October. 15th 2026 and
this will be followed up with a written order to the respondent. Thank you. Thank
you. gonna move to item number 18 the business HCC. >> 29 57 2026 as a couple as a
court officer.
>> Good morning. Isaac Moe, Code compliance officer for the village of Wellington.
Case numbers H C C dash 29. 57 dash 2026. Respondent names are Bruce t Holland, more jury
and Helen? Property just as 1, 3, 1, 8, 3 Halifax court Wellington, Florida. This case
was established based on a complaint. The end of Ian awaits passerby post a notice
July 23rd 2026. at the property Village Hall and at the Villas Kirk's office, a
copy of the Post. A notice was mailed to the property owner request. The service of the
end will be in a way be entered as evidence. So entered correction date was
August second 2026. and inspection on August. 3rd, 2026. from the following items
remain the on the time given in the notice of violation and Wilmington code sections, 13
DASH to Point B 0.1 Roof in a state of deterioration. Rufus stained in or discolored was
in the state of deterioration. Well, staying in or discolored. Garage door in a
state of deterioration chimney won the state of deterioration, garage side
door, staying in or discolored 13 dash to point B 0.2 driveway staying in or
discolored corrected, sidewalk stand and Discolored corrected and willing to land
development regulations. Section 7 POINT 8 points. 7 Point that France in the palms
need to be removed, corrected. Hedges are did disease and her dining areas still in
violation. And land development regulations. Section 8007.1, 4 th missing
most within the landscape areas. Photos are taken a fairly and accurately
represent a violation at the time, a request to photograph incident. Evans so entered.
Follow-up inspections on August 10th. 11th 13011th and 18th found a violation still
exist. Staff conducted a pacer search which found the part that's from the respondent
does not have a pending bankruptcy action Orla spend its fight against property.
Staff contact with the owner. that's representative. remain in communication A
representative of the H.O.A. and Joshua Asset per Survation coordinator regarding the
outstanding violations at the property. Josh, a recently advised that he has obtained
access to the property in their work orders have been open to the just incorrect,
outstanding violations. Communication with Diane has also remain ongoing regarding
the property and efforts efforts towards compliance. The CO Compliance Division
recommends to respond find a violation of Wellington Code. Section 13 DASH to Point B 0.1
Wellington Land Development regulations Section 7. 48.7 fully be in some 48.1, 4 th it
is recommended that the respondent be given until September 17th 2026. To
correct the violations or be charged the fine not to exceed $25 per day per violation for
each day to violations continue to exist. It is also recommended that costs
incurred by the code compliance division in the amount of $14.19 be assessed
in order to be paid within 30 days of the date of this meeting. cease and desist
order for a period of 5 years is requested in the event. The code Compliance division is
not coming taken as required and where the violation is not corrected. It is recommended
that he finds certification hearing be held before the special magistrate on October.
15th 2026. and 09:00AM at the women to municipal complex. 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, 4, stove or
dwelling to Florida. It is also recommended and no additional notification of the
intention pokes fun begin. All right. Thank you very much. >> in the matter of Wellington
versus Bruce D who lend or Marjorie Hula in case number which the SEC? 29, 57 dash 2,
0, 2, 6, is anyone here on this matter? Alright, noting the time of 10 56 and based
upon the evidence, testimony and photos in this matter, I find that the notice of
violation and hearing for today was properly served on the respondents and that the
respondents are not here. I further order that the respondent further find that
the respondents are in violation of land development regulations. Section 8007.7
Point B Wellington Code. Section 13 dash 2 dot be 0.1 and land development
regulations. Section 8007.1 point age. I further ordered the respondents to correct
these violations by September 17th 2026. a fine in the amount of $25 per day per
violation is assessed against the respondents and costs in the amount of 30 $14.19 is
also assessed. I will enter cease and desist order for 5 years and that in the event
the respondent does not correct these find certification hearing will be
held back here on October. 15th 2026 and a written order will go to the respondents
with these rulings. Thank you. gonna move to item number 3 and a fine certification it CC
4, 6, 9, 0, 22 5. >> Christopher person as the court officer.
>> Good morning. Krista Persaud coca hopes are for village of Wellington. Case
number CC, 4, 6, 9, 0, 2, 0, 2, 5, Responders name Emily modeling Brett modeling
property address one for 4 to 2 Blackberry drive on Florida. They are in date was April
16th 2026. The respondent was ordered to correct. The violation of long Coat
section. 13, dash 2 dot be that one. 13 dash 2 beat out 2. 13 Dash 3 got beat out one
and one to land development, regulation, action. 7 that set 7 the 7 died be 6 to 4.1 0.5
BB. >> 6th forgot one 0.5 That H. 6 top 4.1 got he got 5 that X.
7 that 8. Not too. Dash on where before July 16 or pay a fine not to exceed $25 per day
per violation. The order also. Schedule of provocation. Here on August. 20th 2026 Indico
Division was not. Contacted, has required an order by nation. We're not corrected.
And this reaction on July 17th 2026. Found the property still in violation of wanton coach
Section. 13, dash 2 dot the 0.1, the garage door in the state of deterioration. All
other violations were correct. A follow-up inspection on July. 21st 2026. And August
11, 2026 found violations still do exist. Photos are taken. They represent the
condition of the property at the time of the various inspections. I request a
photograph speed in Turin as evidence. So entered. Pacers. Church founder responded does
not have a pending bankruptcy action or a list and then filed against a property.
Staff has been in contact with the property. Owner since the beginning of the case. During
the most recent communication. The property owner was advised that only item that remain. To
be correct. It was a deteriorate to garage door. As of July 17th. 26. Since that
time staff has received no response from the property owner and the property remains
a violation. Hochul division recommends respond to be found in violation of the order.
team coach Section 13 Dash 2 DOT beat out one. And respond to be assessed a fine pursuant
to section. 2 Dash 3, 8, too. The Cold Ordinance and Section 1, 6, 2, 0, or 9 to be. Of the
Florida statute. And determination and determine in the fine amount. special
magistrate must consider the following factors. The gravity of the violation actions taken
by violator. To correct the violation. And previous violation of the same coach
Action Committee. By the violent at the same property. Has via lesion of the. As a
drafted, the violation, the violation is moderate. The garage door is visibly
deteriorated with peeling and damage material along the lower portions of the door.
The condition negatively impacts to X 2 appearance and maintenance of the property.
As to the actions taken by violator. The property owner was of eyes. The remaining
violation as of July, 17th 2026. And the most. Recent inspection. No corrective
action has been observed. Has received no response from the property owner of the property
remains a violation. any previous violation of the same section committed by violator
on the same property. This is the first violation of this court's action. Based on these
factors. Koch, I'm playing division recommends response and the SS the fine in amount
of $25 per day convention on July 17. And in addition the cost and amount of $49 and
$0.69, which includes the cost assess and the order both continue accrue into the
violation is correct. All right. Thank you very much. >> All right. In the matter of
Wellington versus Emily J Modlin and Brent See Modlin H Dash C C 4, 6, 9, 0 dash, 2,
0, 2, 5, Is anyone here on this matter? All right. Seeing none and noting the time of
11, 0, 3, based upon the evidence, photos and testimony in this matter. I find that on
February 19th 2026. That the respondent in the special magistrate entered into a
stipulation where in among the many violations, specifically the respondent agreed to
correct the violation of Wellington Code. Section 13 dash 2 dot be 0.1 Further. I
find that the respondent has not corrected this violation when hearing the testimony
evidence and photos and the requirements of Florida statute and Wellington code
when I consider the gravity of the violation and >> garage door and this
violation have a negative impact on the neighborhood and the property. This particular
property respondents efforts to correct these violations. And while the respondent has
made efforts to correct violations of the other, correct the violations of the
other items they have not made despite being advised that the garage door still in
violation, they have not made any efforts to correct that violation. And as far as the
specific garage door violation, there is no history of that. Taking those matters
into consideration. I determined that a fine of $25 per day for this violation is
assessed against the respondent which began on July 17th 2026. costs in the amount
of $49.69 are also assessed. And I will follow that up with a written order to the
respondents. For the item. Number 4, undefined certification HCC 5, 0, 1, 1,
225 Christopher percent of the code officer. >> Good morning, Chris
herbicide. >> Come ICE officer from village of One-tenth. Case
number CC, 5, 0, 1, one, dash, 2, 0, 2, 5, Responders name. Michelle Schumer, Steven
Schumer, property address. to lemon grass lane wounds in Florida. The hearing date was
April 16th 2026. The respondent was order to correct the violation of one
10 code Section 13 dash 2 DOT beat up one. 13 Dash 3 derby that 3 and won't in land
development regulations sections. 6 DOT for 0.1 that 0.1 6 thought for about one
that he got K. >> 6 to 4.1 that he that 5 that BB. 6 that for 0.1, that
he got 5 that H. 7, that 8 that too, that G. 7 that he 7 not be on or before July. 16th
2026 or pay a fine not to exceed $25 per day per violation. No, we're also
schedule a fresh indication here on August. 20th 2026. the code compliance division was
not. Contacted as require an order violation that corrected. Inspection on
7/17/2026. Find a violation. In violation of land of regulations. Section 7 that 7
that be MS in motion. The landscape. All other violations have been
corrected. A follow-up inspection on July. 24. August August 7. August 11 found the
violations still does exist. Owners were taken to represent the condition of the and that
time of diverse inspections. I requested photographs be entered into evidence. So
entered a pacer search. Found respondent does not have a pending bankruptcy Action.
Orleans pendants filed against a property. Staff has been in contact with the property
units throughout the case during the course of the case, the property owner was granted
several extensions as well as a stipulation agreement, providing additional time to
bring the property into compliance. On July 12, 2026 the property owner. a staff
request in a one-month extension to complete required most. Due to the case have
hoping for more than 9 months. Several previous extensions of stipulation agreement have
already been granted the request. 4 additional extension with the night. The
property owner was of eyes that if the remaining violation cannot be corrected
prior to hear. Staff recommend that property 10 August 2020. 26 Karen requested additional
time for compliance from the magistrate. The Koch, a positive vision recommend the
respondent be found in One of the order along to Land Development regulations
section 7 that 7, that be. And the respondent be assessed a fine pursuant to section. 2
Dash 3, 8, that. 2 of the total were in this and the section 1, 6, 2, 9, 0, 9, 2,
the of the Florida statute. And determinant find now special magistrate must
consider the following factors. The gravity of the violation and the actions
taken by violated to correct the violation and his previous violation of the same code
section committed by violent at on the same property. Has set a gravity of the
violation. The violation is minor. That absence of the require mulch and the
property. Does that mean a village established landscape and property maintenance
standards? As actions taken by violator to correct the violation. The proper the
property owner has taken steps to address other violations associated with the case.
Several extensions stipulation agreement provide additional time to achieve compliance.
despite additional time provided the most violations to remains. Any previous. And
the previous violation of the same code section committed by the violator on the same
property. This is the first violation of this court's action. Based on these
factors. Cool complies Division recommends respond to be assessed the fine in the
amount of $25 per day. Convention on July 17th 2026. And the addition to the cost
them out of $47 and $0.48, which doesn't include the costs, the sesame order both
continue to accrue into the violation was corrected. >> All right. Thank you very
Right. In the matter of Wellington versus Michelle. >> Schwimmer and Stephen K
Schwimmer case number aged SCC 5, 0, 1, 1, dash 2, 0, 2, 5, Is anyone here on this matter?
>> All right. Seeing none and noting the time of 11, 10 based upon the evidence,
testimony and photos in this matter. I find that the notice of find certification in
hearing for today was properly served on the wrist and it who is not present further that on
April 16th 2026 respondent and the special magistrate entered into a stipulation where in
the respondent agreed to correct numerous violations, including but not limited to
lent Wellington Land Development regulations. Section 8007.7 Point Further
based upon the evidence and testimony and photos. I find that the respondent has not
corrected that violation after hearing the testimony, evidence and photos and
considering the requirements of Florida law and Wellington Code and looking at the
violation first, the gravity of the violation, the negative in visual impact of the
property and the negative impact to the neighborhood that the respondents efforts
to correct the violation while the respondent has made efforts to correct the other
violations, they've been advised and have not moved to correct the violation of of
Wellington Land Development regulations. Section 8007.7 Point And the history of that
specific violation at that property is none considering those. I determined that a
fine in the amount of $25 per day per violation is assessed against the respondent which
began on jet or July 17th 2026 cost and the amount of $47.48 are further assessed and I
will provide a written order to the respondents with my ruling. Thank you. Thank you.
The move to item number 6 in the final certification ACC 7, 1,
>> That's right. A 26 staff is requesting an extension to the September 17th 2. And a 26
hearing would have fined certification hearing scheduled for October 15,
2026. potential fine of $25 per So granted, thank you. we're gonna move to item
number 7, undefined certification ACC 2, 0, 5, 2, And a 26 doesn't just as the
court officer. Johnson, Joseph Quick compliance officer for fallen son. Case numbers and
stashed CC Dash 2, 5 dash 2026. >> The respondent names are
Chadwick J Walters and Kimberly, tranquil Waters the Friday at just 1, 5, 1, 7, 0
matter would drive Washington, Florida. The respondent was order to correct the
violations of Wellington Code Section 13 DASH to Point B, 1, 1, the roof, the mailbox and
the full stain. And this color and 13 dash to point B point to driveway and sidewalk
stained and discolored and a driveway is in a state of deterioration. Tried worries.
Kraken is to be repaired in a long Then development regulations. Section 7 POINT 7
Point B mulch missing from the landscape area on or before July 16, 2026. Or pay if I
exceed $25 per day per violation. The order also scheduled find Safety
Commission hearing on August 20th 2026. If the code compliance division was not
contacted as required and order violation was not corrected on inspection on
July, 17th 2026. From the probably still in violation of Warrington section 13 dash 2,
the and 13 dash. 2 point. The 0.2 and a long tunnel in development regulations.
Section 7.8 from 7 Point B. If follow-up inspection August 13th and 18th 2026 from the
virus since exists. For his foot as we take in represent the condition of the property
at the time of the inspections request that the photos be entered as evidence. So
entered a pace assist from the respondent does not have that penny because the action or
this pennants filed against this property contact with the property owners last
representative. I have been in contact with the property owner, Mr. Chadwick who I have
met at the property on July 17th 2026. during our meeting, I had explained all the
outstanding violations and Mr. Chadwick stated that he that the surfaces are not dirty,
but are simply just how they are. He had mentioned that he previously attempted to
address the violations through pressure, washing and other methods without any success.
And he requested. I speak with mice with Pfizer to see what could be done. I later emailed
Mr. Chadwick on August 14th 2026. To confirm that the violation are indeed valid.
After speaking my supervisor and if he opposes the violations, he will need to
attend the hearing to contest this case. And as of today, I have heard back from had
weakened the father's, you know, still present. The code compliance Division recommends
that the respondent be funded violation of Williamson. I'm sorry of the Order will
instead go Section 13 DASH to point B. 0.1 13, stupid be point to and want and then
development regulations. Section 7 POINT 7 Point and that the respondent be assess
if and pursuant to this section to 3, a point, a point to a the code of the ordinance
and Section one. 62, 0, 9, to be of the Florida statues. Undetermined amount of the
fine. The special magistrate must consider the following factors. One, the gravity of
the violation to any action taken by the violators to correct the violations and 3,
any previous violation of the same section committed by the violator on the property. Has
gravity of the violations. The violations are unsightly and effects this wrong. The
properties Hastert action taken by the violator to correct the violations. No
action has been taken to bring to nation into compliance has We've is why wasn't the same
code section committed by the violator on the same property? There are no prior violations
of this code section on record on this property. Based on these factors, the code
compliance Division recommends that the respondent is assess a fine amount of $25 per day
per violation commencing July 17th 2026 in addition to cost and the amount of $34.48 Which
does include costs, assess and order. Both continue to accrue to the auditions, corrected.
All right. Thank you very much. >> All right. In the matter of
Wellington versus Chadwick J Walters, Kimberly Walters H C C Dash 205, dash 2, 0, 2, 6,
is anyone here on this matter? All right. Seeing none and noting the time of 11, 16
based upon the evidence, testimony and photos in this matter. I find that the notice
to find certification in hearing for today was properly served on the respondents who
are not present further. That on June 18th 2026, the special magistrate entered an order
requiring the respondents to correct the violations to Wellington Land Development
regulations. Section 8007.7 Point B. Wellington Code. Section 13 dash 2 dot be 0.1
and code section 13 dash 2 dot be 0.2 further. Based upon the evidence, testimony and photos
in this matter. I find that these violations have not been corrected after hearing the
evidence and testimony and photos and considering the requirements of Florida
statutes and Wellington Code, I reviewed the gravity of this violation and it is a visual
negative impact to the property as well as the neighborhood. The respondent
has not made any efforts to correct these violations. And the respondent does not have a
history of violations at address based upon the foregoing, I determined that a
fine in the amount of $25 per day per violation is assessed against the responded to begin
on July 17th 2026. further costs in the amount of $34.48 are assessed and that written
order will go to the respondent with this ruling. Thank you. Thank you. What a
move to item number 8 undefined certification HCC 11. 42 2026.
>> Staff is requesting an extension to the 9/17/2026 herring. Find certification
hearing scheduled for October 15, 226, what a potential fine of $50 per day. Thank you
taken them a kind and ACC 15. 36, 2026 as they come a court officer.
>> Has it co compliance officer for the village of Wellington? Case numbers H C C
5, 3, 6, dash, 2, 0, 2, 6, Responding name is Daniel Rosario. Property addresses 1,
2, 9, 4, 0 Buckland court Wellington, Florida. The hearing date was July 16,
2026. The respondent was order to correct the violation of Wellington code sections. 13
Dash 3 point. The 0.1 garbage container, not completely screened from view in. 22
dash, 9 point commercial vehicle parked in driveway and can clean the screen from
view. On or before July. 22nd 2026 or pay a fine not to exceed $25 per day per
violation. The order also scheduled fight certification hearing on August, 20th 2026
if the code compliance division was not contacted as required in where the
violation was not correct. Inspection on July 23rd 2026. From the property. Still in
violation of Wilmington code sections. 13 DASH 3 point. The 0.1 And 22 dash 9 point
Follow-up inspections on July 28th August 3rd, August 10th August 12 13th 14th, 15th,
16015th 18th and 19th of 2026. from the violation still exists. Photos were taken
represent the condition of the property at the time of the various inspections request.
The photos be entered into evidence. So entered. Pacer. Search from the respondent
does not have a pending bankruptcy action or enlist pendants filed against this
property contact with the representative. I have communicated with Daniel
regarding the violations on the property on April 16th 2026. Daniel advised that he
ordered a car cover for the commercial vehicle which was expected to arrive on April
23rd 2026, advised that a follow-up inspection would be conducted to verify compliance
on May 12 2026. are we going spoke with Victor who advised that Daniel was unavailable. I
left a message requesting that will contact me regarding the cold case. I have not received
any further communication from Daniel and subsequent inspections found that the
violations remain. The Co compliance Division recommends to respond to be found
violation of the order. Wellington code sections. 13 Dash 3 point. The 0.1 in 22
dash 9, 1, C and that the respondent be assessed the fund pursuant to section 2
DASH 3, 8, a 2 of the code of ordinances in Section 1, 1, 6, 2.0, 0, 9, to be of the
Florida statues in determining the amount of the fine. The special magistrate must
consider the following factors. The gravity of the violation. Any actions taken
by the violated to correct the violation in any previous violations of the same code
section committed by violator on the same property. As to the gravity of the violations,
the on-screen garbage container in commercial vehicle are visible from the
street negatively impacting the residential appearance of the property and surrounding
neighborhood as to the actions taken by the violated to correct the violation. Can you
advise the to cover had been ordered for the commercial vehicle? However, subsequent
inspections found that the commercial vehicle and garbage container remained on screen
and the property remains in violation as to the previous as to any previous violations
of the same code section committed by the violator on the city property. There was a
previous violation involving a commercial vehicle that was not completely screened from
view. No previous violations were found regarding the screening of the garbage
container based on these factors, the code compliance Division recommends that the
respondent is assessed a fine in the amount of $25 per day per violation commencing on
July 23rd 2026. and in addition to costing the amount of $48 and $0.67, which does
include costs, assess in the order, both continuing to accrue into the violation is
corrected. >> All right. Thank you very much. And in the matter of
Wellington versus Daniel Rosario aged SCC 15, 36 2026. Is anyone here on this matter?
All right. Seeing none and noting the time of 11. 22, based upon the testimony,
evidence and photos in this matter, I find that the notice of find certification in
hearing for today was properly served on the respondent who is not here further. That on
July 16th 2026, the special magistrate entered an order requiring the respondent to
correct the violations of Wellington Code. Section 13 DASH 3 dot the 0.1 and code
section. 22 dash 9 dot C further that these violations are ongoing and have not been
corrected. And after hearing the evidence, testimony photos and considering the
requirements of Florida law and Wellington Code, I reviewed the gravity of the
violations, which is the negative visual impact to not only this residential
neighborhood but to the entire surrounding neighborhood and that the respondent has not
made any efforts to correct the violations and that the respondent does not have a
history of the same violations at the same location based upon that, I determined that a
fine in the amount of $25 per day per violation is assessed against the respondent which
began on July 23rd 2026. cost in the amount of $48.67 are assessed against the
respondent. And I will follow this up with a written order. Thank you. Thank you. That's
the end of the agenda. All right. Thank you very much for everything. And this meeting