[2:39] um on Wednesday September 20th this is
I'm going to call to order the meeting
[2:43] of the committee of adjustment
held in the council chambers and start
[2:49] time is 202 pm
so first of all I'm going to read a land
[2:55] acknowledgment so
I'd like to begin the meeting by
[2:59] recognizing the First Nations maybe
Inuit people of Canada as traditional
[3:04] stewards and caretakers of the land
we acknowledge that the town of Wasaga
[3:09] Beach is located on the boundaries of
treaty 18 the traditional lands of the
[3:12] nishinaabe hoduna Shawnee
wendat and home of the many First
[3:19] Nations matey and Inuit people as part
of the intricate nationhood that reaches
[3:24] across Turtle Island
at this time of Truth and Reconciliation
[3:28] we welcome an opportunity to work
together towards new understandings and
[3:33] relationships and ask for guidance in
all that we do
[3:37] next is disclosure of any pecuniary
interests from any of the members and I
[3:43] see one of the members
from item number one
[3:49] so is that three point Sorry 4.1 for 34
Nancy street is that correct thank you
[3:56] so just make sure you excuse yourself
anyone else
[4:00] [Music]
okay
[4:04] I'm seeing none next is the adoption of
the minutes of the meeting from August
[4:09] 16 2023 and the recommendation is that
the committee of adjustment adopts the
[4:15] minutes of August 16 2023
um so do I have a mover
[4:23] okay and sorry that was uh Andy a
segmented by Leo
[4:32] um
so uh thank you so now we're going to
[4:35] get into the actual application so we
have
[4:41] done sorry moved by and seconded by Leo
sorry Andy Leo all in favor oh sir sorry
[4:48] all in favor
that's Carrie thank you
[4:54] um
so we have six applications uh being
[4:57] heard today so just to give a
introduction to everyone here today so
[5:02] my name is Adam Herron I'm the chair of
the committee
[5:06] members of the committee are Vice chair
Dave Morrison a member uh Harold van
[5:12] gool
member Andy Ferguson and member Leo
[5:17] casameno for each application being
considered by the committee today the
[5:22] following process will occur
firstly the
[5:25] [Music]
um
[5:27] firstly as the chair I will invite the
applicant agent or owner to the podium
[5:33] or if they are appearing virtually I
will ask that they turn on the camera
[5:39] and microphone
following this the secretary treasurer
[5:44] will then read the application being
considered
[5:46] and we'll review any comments regarding
the application that were made by Town
[5:49] departments outside agencies and the
public and will then provide
[5:53] recommendations made by planning
services
[5:55] after the application is read by the
secretary committee sorry the secretary
[6:00] treasurer I'll ask the applicant to
enter agent to present their application
[6:05] and address any issues raised by the
raised in the staff report or public
[6:09] concerns already filed
[6:13] next uh the
uh
[6:18] public portion of the meeting will be
any any members attending for the public
[6:23] portion of the meeting will be able to
provide any comments and concerns with
[6:26] respecting the application so I see that
we have a number of people here and I'm
[6:30] not sure if they're here for the matters
or if they're here as interested to
[6:33] members
so you will have an opportunity to
[6:38] present any comments or concerns
uh so the recording secretary will be
[6:43] monitoring
um and providing each member of the
[6:46] public who wishes to speak their
opportunity to do so
[6:51] um
I'll ask the applicant members of the
[6:54] public or town staff to answer any
questions that may have been
[6:58] may have been presented with respect to
the applications being heard
[7:03] before closing the public portion I will
ask the recording secretary if there are
[7:08] any further questions from the attendees
I will then ask the committee members if
[7:13] they have any questions
and following this the public portion of
[7:18] the meeting will be closed
committee members will then put forward
[7:21] a motion
the committee members will render a
[7:24] decision by either granting the
application with conditions
[7:28] granting applications with modified
conditions reserving their decision
[7:33] refusing the application as submitted or
deferring the application to another
[7:37] public meeting
[7:41] I believe there is a sign-in sheet is
that correct
[7:45] Okay so
it is important that the town receives
[7:49] the correct names and addresses of the
individuals having interest in each of
[7:52] the applications being heard
um therefore if you plan to speak to the
[7:57] committee at the meeting or wish to
receive a copy of the decision you must
[8:02] provide your name address and email
address name address or email address to
[8:07] the secretary treasurer and there is a
sign-in sheet
[8:12] under the planning act the applicant
specified person or public body May
[8:16] appeal the decision the appeal period
for the committee of adjustment is 20
[8:20] days from the date of decision being
signed the deadlines for each of the
[8:25] application will be provided on the
notice of decision
[8:29] the applicant applicant prior to the
committee rendering its decision may
[8:34] wish to have their application deferred
until the next meeting such requests
[8:39] will be at the sole discretion of the
committee
[8:43] the public portion uh sorry the public
meeting is being recorded and live
[8:47] streamed so your name and address and
other personal information are being
[8:51] recorded recorded in accordance with the
municipal Freedom of Information and
[8:56] protection to Privacy Act
[9:00] so we will get started with the meeting
so we have application number one
[9:07] b3223
this is for 34
[9:12] Nancy Street and I believe we have the
owner's agent here so if you want to
[9:19] step forward
um and uh we have that uh disclosure of
[9:26] peculinary Interest
um
[9:29] would you like to leave the room just
for the
[9:33] um
[9:42] we'll call you back in
[9:51] uh welcome so if you want to state your
name for the records
[9:55] um
gurjit mahant Ontario land severe
[9:59] working with Rudy Max survey acting
agent for this project perfect thank you
[10:05] very much so I'm going to get the
secretary treasurer to read the
[10:09] application so if you want to just grab
a seat for now thank you
[10:18] thank you chair
so application b3223 at 30 the land
[10:24] subject to the application is 34 Nancy
Street
[10:29] and an application for consent to sever
um
[10:34] application v3223 was submitted by gergy
mahant on behalf of Merriman Kamali math
[10:42] frujaki owner of the subject lands
[10:47] the applications or survey proposes to
create one new lot for a total of two
[10:52] lots the portion of the property
proposed to be severed as shown on the
[10:56] updated Severance sketch provided as
Parts two and three has a frontage of
[11:00] approximately 16.25 meters a depth of
approximately 30.3 meters and an area of
[11:07] approximately
492.6 square meters the portion of the
[11:12] property proposed to be retained as
shown on the update Severance sketch
[11:15] provided as Parts 1 and 4 has a frontage
of approximately
[11:21] 29.53 meters a depth of approximately
32.3 meters and an area of approximately
[11:28] 627.3 square meters
[11:32] comments Public Works is
Public Works does not oppose the
[11:39] applicant's request the mvca has no
objection to the approval and with Sega
[11:44] distribution reviewed the proposal and
has no objections
[11:50] other comments received was from Hydro 1
and they have no comments or concerns
[11:57] and we received a public comment from
the owners at 44 Nancy Street 43 Nancy
[12:07] Street Sharon and Alex Annette Jake
Jason vocage
[12:12] they would like to be they perhaps are
here at the meeting today to address the
[12:17] trees on the lot being severed and as
they're leaning over the roof causing
[12:23] gutters to clog every year and pushing
on their fence causing it to lean and
[12:29] I'll read out the recommendation and
then if they're in the audience
[12:32] and
recommendation and consideration the
[12:36] foregoing based on the above the
planning department supports the
[12:39] application b3223 subject to the
following conditions being applied that
[12:45] number one that the five percent
residential Parkland contribution as
[12:48] required by the planning act be paid as
a requirement of the approval of the
[12:52] severance the parcel severed the
determination of the value of the
[12:56] Parkland contribution will be based upon
an appraisal prepared by an AIC and
[13:01] sorry an appraisal
member of the appraisal Institute Canada
[13:06] and pursuant to section
51.14 of the play act number two that
[13:13] the applicant provides a deposit
reference plan said reference plan to
[13:17] show all the parcel to be severed
number three that an overall lot grading
[13:21] plan is to be provided showing both Lots
in accordance with the town current town
[13:27] of Wasaga Beach engineering standards
and policies specifically the info lot
[13:30] grading and drainage policy existing
Services locations to be shown on the
[13:35] above plan for both retained and severed
Lots number four that the owner is
[13:40] required to complete a full title search
of the property to determine that the
[13:45] current ownership of Parts three and
parts four and subsequent the above if
[13:49] Parts three and part four are not
currently owned by the town of saga
[13:52] Beach then the parcels are to be
dedicated to the town
[13:57] of Osaka Beach and number five that all
conditions of the decision be fulfilled
[14:01] and that the documents presented to the
planning department for issuances
[14:05] certificate of consent within a period
not to exceed to 24 months
[14:15] yeah
thank you
[14:18] um and uh do you wish to address the
committee
[14:26] for this application
[14:31] can you hear me
[14:39] oh
yeah no we will we agree with the
[14:44] conditions and we'll fulfill them for
the severance application recommended by
[14:47] the staff report
[14:51] and sorry there was a comment from the
member of the public are they here today
[15:01] uh the members of the public that wrote
In from 44 Nancy Street and 43 Nancy
[15:06] Street Sharon and Alex Annette or Jason
bokich are they in the are they here
[15:13] today yes and would you like to speak
and would you like to speak to the
[15:18] application
yes yes
[15:22] yeah so if you want to come up to the
podium and just make sure you press the
[15:26] button in the center of the microphone
just to turn it on
[15:31] yep thank you okay
[15:36] sorry I'm just going to stop but I don't
think if you want to step closer to the
[15:40] microphone or bring it closer to you and
just press the button it turned off uh
[15:44] thank you okay
[15:51] hello
[15:54] I think that's it okay we are the
neighbors of um your clients and we have
[16:01] no nothing concerning I'm severing the
lot but we would like to address the
[16:06] trees that are hanging over our roof and
I have pictures like we're not picky
[16:12] neighbors but the the trees are just
covering our roof and right now the
[16:17] roofs full of pine needles and leaves
and come fall it's going to get worse
[16:23] so if he would address maybe taking the
trees down or cutting the branches
[16:28] that's over our roof
[16:32] so those are your only comments just
about the trees yep yeah okay with no
[16:38] objection to the suffering of the lot
but the lot that he's going to sever is
[16:42] on our side so maybe before he sells it
he would address that
[16:47] so unfortunately the committee can't
make any sort of conditions like that
[16:52] in their in their application this this
is a matter that maybe you can speak to
[16:57] the homeowners or through their agents
and maybe come to some sort of a
[17:02] resolution between the parties but I
mean obviously you have some concerns
[17:08] hopefully they can come to some sort of
resolution between between everyone okay
[17:13] okay can I leave the pictures with you
yeah okay
[17:18] and we're number 44 if he has any
objections he can come see us okay yeah
[17:23] and maybe you guys can speak afterwards
and maybe exchange phone numbers or
[17:28] emails or whatever the case may be okay
okay
[17:30] thank you
[17:33] okay was there anyone else that uh
wanted to speak to the committee
[17:42] okay anyone online
[17:46] okay
do any of the uh committee members have
[17:51] any questions
[17:57] okay uh seeing none I will close this
public portion of the meeting for this
[18:03] application
and then I will
[18:07] call the vote that the committee of
adjustment hereby approve the
[18:11] application from gurjet Manhunt and
that's for 34 Nancy street
[18:19] so do I have a mover
do I have a mover
[18:23] Leo seconded
Andy thank you and all in favor
[18:31] and that is carried thank you thank you
[18:41] thanks so we're just going to hold on
until the uh other member gets back
[19:14] foreign
[19:32] okay so moving on so we have application
B 33 23 and this is for 60 Robert Street
[19:40] I'm not sure if the okay the owner or
the agent is here so if you want to just
[19:46] come forward state your name for the
record and then I'll get the secretary
[19:50] treasurer to read the application
[19:54] Suzanne Roo the owner for his 60s
[20:02] application b33 23.
land subject to the application
[20:07] municipally addressed as 60 Robert
Street South the purpose and effect the
[20:13] application proposes to create one new
lot for a total of two lots the portion
[20:18] of the property proposed to be severed
as shown as the proposed parcel to be
[20:22] severed on the severance sketch
submission as a frontage of
[20:25] approximately
18.72 meters along Robert Street South a
[20:30] depth of approximately 38 meters and an
area of approximately
[20:36] 711.36 square meters the portion of the
property proposed to be retained shown
[20:40] as the proposed parcel to be repained
retained on the severance sketch
[20:45] submission has a frontage of
approximately 12 meters along Roberts
[20:49] Street South a depth of approximately
77.76 meters in an area of approximately
[20:57] 1724.64 square meters
[21:02] comments the towns Public Works and
Engineering nearing department does not
[21:07] oppose the application the mvca does not
oppose the application wdi has no
[21:13] objections
and we have one
[21:18] sorry two comments so
um one comment from the public and Hydro
[21:23] One also sent in comments after the uh
the agenda was posted saying that they
[21:29] have no comments or concerns at this
time
[21:34] and a
um a neighbor from
[21:39] 95 or sorry a gentleman from 95 still a
piano Crescent
[21:46] has commented saying that they they
think expanding the density and
[21:50] framework of the street will be a
benefit to the community
[21:55] and the recommendation is as follows the
playing Department supports application
[22:00] b3323 subject to the following
conditions being applied that the five
[22:04] percent residential Parkland
contribution as required by the planning
[22:08] act be paid as a requirement of the
approval of severance the parcel suburb
[22:12] the determination of the value of the
Parkland contribution will be based upon
[22:17] an appraisal prepared by an individual
who is a member of the appraisal
[22:21] Institute of Canada and pursuant to
section
[22:25] 51.14 of the planning act number two
that the applicant provides a registered
[22:30] reference plan said reference plan to
show all of the parcel to be severed and
[22:34] all the parcels be retained number three
that an overall lot grading plan is to
[22:39] be provided showing both thoughts in
accordance with the current town of
[22:42] Wasaga Beach engineering standards and
policies specifically the info lot
[22:46] grading and drainage policy existing
Service locations to be shown on the
[22:52] above plan for the severed lot and the
new sewer and water services for the
[22:57] retain lot
number four that new sewer and water
[23:01] services to be installed to the retained
lot by a town approved contractor in
[23:06] accordance with Channel asaga Beach
standard drawings 12 8 and 12 B
[23:10] number five that a road occupation
permit is to be obtained prior to any
[23:13] Works within the right towns right away
and number six that all conditions of
[23:18] this decision be fulfilled in the
documents presented to the planning
[23:22] department for issuance of the
certificate of consent within a period
[23:25] not to exceed 24 months from the data
decision
[23:31] perfect if you want to step forward and
address the committee with your
[23:36] application if you have anything further
to add
[23:39] that's pretty straightforward so we've
we've read through it all and it looks
[23:44] good
thank you if you want to grab a seat uh
[23:48] is there anyone from the public wishing
to speak to this application
[23:58] sorry if you can just come back up the
committee members may have some
[24:01] questions sorry
um
[24:06] so anyone online
[24:10] no okay
okay all right do any of the committee
[24:15] members have any questions
[24:20] um no questions for me you have reviewed
the um
[24:25] recommendations and you're good with the
recommendations that's okay
[24:29] perfect
so I will close the public portion of
[24:33] this meeting and I will call the vote
that the committee of adjustment hereby
[24:39] approve the application
from Gerald and Suzanne Roo and this is
[24:44] for 60 Robert Street application b3323
with the conditions as set out do I have
[24:53] a mover
um member Ferguson and seconded
[24:58] a member of angul so all in favor
and that is carried thank you very much
[25:04] thank you very much
[25:16] all right so the next application is uh
for
[25:21] uh 10 38
Mosley Street
[25:26] and this is application a19
23
[25:33] and is the applicant here
online
[25:45] rosabella as you hear
[25:49] is she supposed to be
[26:00] yeah
um so the recording secretaries
[26:03] indicated that she was online a moment
ago so we will perhaps just pause for a
[26:07] moment to see if she lost connection or
something sure do you want us to move on
[26:12] to the next application hold this one
down
[26:17] yep we can do
[26:24] that so the next application is
application number four a 2023
[26:31] this is for uh 34 uh
60 seconds Street North
[26:40] do I have the applicant here
[26:48] are they online
[27:14] there is one one individual online that
their name is not displayed so I've
[27:20] asked for clarification on that so once
we hear back we can determine who that
[27:23] person is okay
[27:41] okay
[27:56] all right just uh in the interest of
time is there is like are we expecting
[28:01] these people to show up
do we do we know
[28:10] um I believe that we did have a resident
who was going to speak to this
[28:13] application however I do not see them
online
[28:16] and I am wondering if it is possible
that one of these five individuals that
[28:23] are on the zoom call right now are to
speak to this application so perhaps
[28:27] they can
put their cameras on in their microphone
[28:30] so that they can advise us of who they
are
[28:37] and that would be for application a 2023
so we believe that the applicant owner
[28:44] uh roselba Rosa for application a 1923
was online but perhaps lost connection
[28:51] so and when we moved over to a 2023
um there is somebody online but we are
[28:57] not sure if it's somebody willing
wanting to speak to this application
[29:02] the applicant or agent
[29:09] and sorry can we confirm that they can
people can hear Us online
[29:21] the recording secretary has affirmed me
that there's two people trying to speak
[29:25] right now
[29:44] if you're online and you can hear us can
you please
[29:47] um say yes you can hear us or indicate
that you cannot I believe somebody was
[29:51] trying to speak but a period though
their microphone was off
[30:21] foreign
[30:30] at this time I think we're having some
issues with some of the audio so we can
[30:33] either move on to the next application
um which would be b1823
[30:40] I believe
the applicant Lee is here as well as the
[30:47] planners here so is that accurate
okay perfect so let's uh let's move on
[30:53] to application number five
b1823 and this is for 88 and 176 Lions
[31:01] Court
so if you can just state your name for
[31:07] the record my name is Lee bull I'm with
mhbc I am the agent for the applicant
[31:12] thank you
[31:16] and if you want to read in the
application please
[31:21] so application b1823 for 88 and 176
Lions Court municipally the minute lands
[31:29] are subject
sorry municipally address that 88 and
[31:33] 176 Lions Court the purpose and effect
an application has been submitted by
[31:38] mhbc planning care of Meatball on behalf
of the owners Das Development
[31:44] Corporation
the application proposes to create one
[31:48] new lot to be transferred into separate
ownership for a total of two lots one
[31:53] new lot one retained and 12 easements
for servicing and access including but
[31:58] not limited to storm water pipes
driveway access sewers water mains gas
[32:03] hydro and Telecommunications as shown on
the severance sketched
[32:08] Severance sketch proposed easement s
provided the portion of the property to
[32:13] be severed contains the existing
playtime casino and Match Eatery
[32:17] operating by Gateway entertainment
limited and is associated in the
[32:22] associated parking lot the lands are
shown as part 18 to 19
[32:27] 22 23 and 27 on the severance sketch
provided and has a frontage of
[32:33] approximately 91.5 meters on Mosley
Street a depth of approximately at 194
[32:39] meters an approach an area of
approximately 2.35 hectares
[32:45] the portion of the property proposed to
be retained shown as Parts 1 to 17 21 to
[32:51] 20 to 21 and 24 to 26 on the severed
sketch provided has a frontage of
[32:57] approximately
234.5 meters on Mosley Street a varied
[33:02] lot depth and an area of approximately
12.97 hectares
[33:07] the application also proposes to the
creation of 12 easements for servicing
[33:12] and access included including but not
limited to Stone water pipes driveway
[33:16] access sewers water mains gas hydro and
Telecommunications
[33:23] comments
Public Works does not object the
[33:27] application I'm VCA has no objection to
the application with Sega distribution
[33:32] has reviewed the proposal and have no
objections to
[33:36] has no objections to its approval
subject to the following comments
[33:41] we'll say good distribution as received
and reviewed the submitted proposal
[33:45] plans this review however does not imply
any of the approval of the project or
[33:50] plan in addition to the easements
located on part 2 5 24 and 26 of the
[33:54] easement sketch the applicant should be
aware that wdi does require legal
[33:59] easement through a retained portion of
the property this easement is for
[34:03] existing electrical service that feeds
the Transformers located on the separate
[34:07] portion of the property
[34:11] MTO has comments and they have no but
they have no concern or objection
[34:19] and Frank from Frank Proto Manny from
ardn Investments Inc is in full support
[34:25] of the application to create one
commercial lot for a total of two lots
[34:29] the recommendation is as follows
planting stocks the staff support
[34:33] application be teen 23 subject to the
following conditions being applied that
[34:38] the Parkland contribution as required by
the planning act be paid as a
[34:42] requirement of the approval of the
approval of the severance the parcel
[34:45] severed the determination of the
Parkland contribution will be based upon
[34:49] an appraisal prepared by an individual
who's a member of the appraisal
[34:53] Institute of Canada number two that the
applicant provides a deposited reference
[34:58] plan said reference plan to show all the
parts of Liberty suffered all of the
[35:01] easements as presented in the attachment
two of the report number three that
[35:07] construction of the access over the
retained land from Lions court is
[35:12] constructed to the satisfaction of the
MTO
[35:15] such that it may be approved for opening
to the general public and number four
[35:19] that all conditions of this decision be
fulfilled in the documents presented to
[35:23] the plane department for issuances
certificate of consent within a period
[35:27] not to exceed 24 months from the data
decision
[35:34] thank you um is there anyone from the
public wishing to speak to this
[35:39] application here today
[35:44] okay
um if you want to just uh if you have
[35:49] anything further to add in regards to
this application now is your opportunity
[35:52] to do so
thank you chair I do have a brief
[35:56] presentation for the committee
are you able to
[36:03] like and they're recording secretary
will pull that up now
[36:08] thank you
[36:14] will she flip through the slides okay
all right
[36:19] okay
[36:56] I have it on a thumb drive would that
help
[37:00] okay all right
[37:07] beautiful
[37:11] thank you
good afternoon everyone as I indicated
[37:16] earlier my name is Lee Bull and I'm an
associate with mhbc planning out of
[37:20] their Berry office
we represent Das Development Corporation
[37:24] on the consent application before the
committee this afternoon
[37:28] also joining us by Zoom are the
applicant and their lawyer who is
[37:33] available to answer any detailed
questions that you may have about the
[37:37] proposed easements to be created through
this consent application
[37:42] the property that is subject to this
application is located at 88 and 176
[37:48] Lions Court which is located the
southwest corner of lions court and
[37:53] Mosley Street
the lot proposed to be severed is
[37:57] currently home to the existing playtime
Casino while the retained lot is
[38:02] currently vacant
site is primarily surrounded by roads
[38:06] with residential development north of
Mosley Street and East of lions Court as
[38:11] well as south of the property
[38:15] and Highway 26 runs along the Southwest
boundary of the property
[38:20] the purpose of the application is
twofold firstly the application is
[38:24] intended to facilitate the severance of
the existing Casino from the remaining
[38:29] vacant portion of the property and the
second purpose of the application is to
[38:33] create easements for servicing and
access to both the severed and retained
[38:37] parcels
[38:40] portions shown in red on the slide
illustrates the casino lands which are
[38:45] proposed to be severed from the
remainder of the land Holdings the lands
[38:49] in blue are proposed to be retained
[38:55] the proposed consent application also
includes the creation of 12 easements
[39:00] for servicing and access including but
not limited to storm water management
[39:04] pipes storm water flow driveway access
sewers water mains gas hydro and
[39:10] Telecommunications
we have completed a land use planning
[39:14] analysis of the proposed Severance and
in our opinion it is consistent with the
[39:18] relevant policies of the provincial
policy statement in Conformity with the
[39:22] relevant policies of the growth plan
both of which direct development to
[39:26] settlement areas
we have also reviewed the application
[39:29] against the lot creation policies within
the town of Wasaga Beach official plan
[39:34] and in our opinion the application
conforms to those policies
[39:40] we have completed a zoning compliance
review for both the proposed severed and
[39:44] retained Lots the retained in severed
Lots comply with the Zone standards of
[39:49] the district commercial Zone within
which they are located
[39:54] in my opinion The Proposal is consistent
with the relevant policy regime and the
[39:59] town of Wasaga Beach zoning bylaw and
represents good planning I have read the
[40:04] report prepared by the planning
department on this application and agree
[40:08] with their recommendation that this
consent application be approved by the
[40:12] committee subject to the conditions as
outlined by staff in their report I'd be
[40:17] happy to answer any questions that you
may have at this time
[40:23] thank you very much to any of the
members have any questions for either
[40:27] the agent or the lawyer that's here via
Zoom
[40:36] okay seeing none and I don't believe we
have anyone here just to confirm wishing
[40:43] to speak to this matter either online or
in person
[40:48] okay I will close this public portion in
the meeting seeing as there's no
[40:52] questions from the public or comments
and no questions from the committee
[40:55] members
I will now call the vote that the
[41:00] committee of adjustment sorry the
just give me one second
[41:37] sorry so the committee of adjustment
hereby approved the application from Das
[41:42] Development Corporation it's for consent
um
[41:47] um
with the conditions as set out in the
[41:50] staff report sort of a mover
[41:55] member
Casa Mano and seconded by member van
[42:01] Ghul
um and all in favor
[42:06] and that is Kerry thank you thank you
[42:29] do we know if we have anyone online
[42:37] not pertaining to that application now
the person online that was waiting was
[42:41] for a previous one but they are gone now
okay
[42:46] is there anyone else
[42:53] did you want to go back to um
to a 1923.
[43:00] uh is the applicant here or
[43:15] I I personally don't feel comfortable
proceeding with the applications without
[43:18] the applicants being here they may have
an issue with the conditions and they
[43:22] may want to present I don't know if
staff have any comments or
[43:28] if if it's normal for Apple applicants
not to show up
[43:35] there has been situations in the past
where applicants haven't
[43:39] attended or the applicant or agent or
owner hasn't attended but with that
[43:45] being said I believe somebody from the
audience said that they did see her
[43:48] online
um
[43:53] okay
but the but the committee if depending
[43:59] on
what you decide to do then
[44:04] I guess what is uh what is the best way
forward do we
[44:09] wait for these people to maybe show up
or
[44:17] it's very suit
yeah
[44:20] I suggest that we move to a 2023 for the
time being
[44:26] which is that the Gentlemans indicate
that they are here today so that's the
[44:31] application 4.4
okay so we'll move on to application
[44:37] number four I'm not sure if one of the
staff members can reach out to the
[44:43] applicants for these files just to see
if they're intending to show up if they
[44:47] have any objections is that something
that can be done
[44:50] well then I would ask you if the
recording secretary noticed if she did
[44:54] try to get online then maybe she's
having connection issues which would be
[44:58] different than her not
showing up
[45:02] okay
all right so application number four a
[45:06] 20 23 34 62nd Street North
um and we have Sue here or
[45:18] I'm your husband okay do you want to
step forward and state your name for the
[45:22] record Eddie Edward proceeding
okay
[45:27] sorry what was your last name
pursuiti yes okay
[45:32] on your the uh husband husband okay and
Sue is here yes okay perfect all right
[45:39] so this is for a variance so um as you
may have heard the uh secretary
[45:45] treasurer will read in the application
okay
[45:50] so application a 2023
[45:55] um land subject to the application
sorry municipally addressed as 34 62nd
[46:02] Street North
and an application for a minor variance
[46:06] was submitted by Edward prasuti on
behalf of Sue facility owner of the
[46:11] subject lands the application requests
relief from section 4 residential type 1
[46:16] R1 zone of comprehensive zoning Bella
sorry 2003-60 and they're specifically
[46:25] requesting relief from section
4.3.6 to permit an additional in
[46:30] addition to the existing dwelling with a
rear yard setback of Five Point 98
[46:36] meters whereas the minimum rear yard
depth of 7.6 meters is required section
[46:42] 4.3.9 to permit a total lock coverage of
38.6 where maximum Total Lock coverage
[46:50] of 35 is permitted and the variances
were requested would facilitate the
[46:56] construction of a one-story 16.84 square
meter addition to the rear of the
[47:01] existing dwelling unit the
recommendation
[47:05] sorry comments Public Works does not
oppose the application the mvca has no
[47:10] objection to the application
[47:16] there's no public comments
[47:20] and the recommendation
is as follows playing Department
[47:24] supports application a 2023 subject to
the following conditions being applied
[47:28] that the development will be
substantially consistent with the site
[47:32] plan drawing provided with the
application contained within appendix
[47:36] one of this report of the report
[47:43] thank you
would you like to just uh speak to this
[47:48] application if you can just stand up to
the podium
[47:52] basically we want to expand the dwelling
just to expand our kitchen washroom and
[47:59] construct like a utility overflow room
which we don't have at the moment so
[48:03] just additional space
[48:06] it's basically it
[48:09] okay thank you
um do any of the uh I guess anyone here
[48:15] from the public wishing to speak to this
application
[48:20] okay any of the committee members have
any questions comments
[48:31] um okay seeing uh
none I will close the public portion of
[48:36] the meeting
and I'm not sure if you read in the
[48:40] recommendations
um Christy
[48:44] okay
so you've obviously seen the
[48:49] recommendations and conditions
[48:55] drainage that what we were proposing
would not affect
[49:01] storm water or water runoff to other
properties and it would it that the
[49:06] development be substantially consistent
with the site plan drawing provided oh
[49:10] yes yes
[49:14] okay perfect thank you um so if you uh
no questions from the committee members
[49:20] then I will uh
call the vote and sorry that the um
[49:26] the committee of adjustment hereby
approved the application from Sue facili
[49:30] and this is for a 2023
34 62nd Street North for the variants
[49:39] with the conditions as set out another
mover
[49:45] uh
and seconded
[49:51] thank you
[49:54] and all in
all in favor
[50:06] and that is completed so you're free to
stick around or head out thank you thank
[50:11] you
[50:34] okay so
um
[50:36] have we heard back from
the other applications
[50:43] don't see her online anymore for
application e1923
[50:52] okay
[Music]
[50:53] um
so I guess we I'm assuming that everyone
[50:57] else is here for the last application
is that correct
[51:03] yeah okay
so we'll deal with that and then go back
[51:08] to the final one afterwards
[51:12] um so do we have the
applicant here
[51:19] Barbara
okay
[51:30] sorry can you just put on the mic just
press the middle button
[51:36] thank you
good afternoon my name is Barbara
[51:39] puckery I'm the agent owner of the
corporation that owns the property I'm
[51:44] here today with my husband as well
who's brought a model of the the cabin
[51:50] and the neighbor to the North and the
South is also present
[51:56] okay perfect if you wanted to grab a
seat we'll get the Secretary of
[51:59] Treasurer to read in the application
and then you'll have an opportunity to
[52:03] present your case
[52:11] foreign
[52:15] application a 1922
um land subject to the application is
[52:22] municipally dressed as six Burns Lane
purpose and effect the applicant
[52:27] requests relief from section 3.22
non-conforming uses of the zoning bylaw
[52:34] 2003-60 to permit the expansion of a
legal non-conforming seasonal cabin use
[52:40] the applicant has indicated the
requester relief would enable the
[52:45] expansion of the Season seasonal cabin
and continue the seasonal cabin use the
[52:51] applicant has indicated the requested
relief would seek to expand the existing
[52:56] 30.23 square meter seasonal cabin by way
of an 8.57 square meter deck Edition
[53:02] along the east portion of the seasonal
cabin and by way of an 8.65 square meter
[53:10] deck Edition along the south portion of
the seasonal cabin as indicated in the
[53:15] site plan drawings provided
for an overall increase of 17.22 square
[53:21] meters and a resultant size of
47.45 square meters further the
[53:29] applicant is seeking to increase the
height of the seasonal cabin from 4.5
[53:34] I'm sorry for 4.7 meters to 5.4 meters
in addition to the above the applicant
[53:40] request relief from section 3.23
non-complying Lots buildings or
[53:45] structures to recognize the location of
the non-compliant building
[53:49] comments received the Public Works does
not oppose the applicant's request and
[53:55] they have no conditions at this time
[53:59] the mvca it's not regulated by the nbca
the building department has indicated
[54:05] that the property owner will need to
sign an affidavit in regards to the
[54:09] classification of the building as to not
be permitted as anything more than a
[54:13] seasonal cabin for seasonal recreational
use the draft affidavit is affixed to
[54:19] the to the report
and there is public comments from a
[54:23] resident Helen Harper of 1789 Shore Lane
I own as Seoul shareholder shareholder
[54:31] of three corporations the cottage at
eight Burns Lane
[54:34] the car 2014 the garden Lots at two to
four Burns Lane 2015 and the former
[54:41] Cottage 2015 and now my new home 21
2021 to 2022 at 1789 Shore Lane in
[54:51] Wasaga Beach Ontario I'm writing to
express my support of the application
[54:55] for the town's consent for six Burns
Lane for the raising of the cabin
[54:59] number one raising the cabin as it has
to be done number two reinforcing and
[55:03] insulating the roof planned
number three building a porch on the
[55:09] south and east side of the cabin as
planned number four enlarging the cabin
[55:13] to allow for composting toilet plant the
application is desirable and an
[55:19] appropriate development of the seasonal
cabin I cannot see that there would be
[55:24] any undue adverse impacts on the
surrounding properties the most
[55:28] proximate of which I own or neighborhood
indeed there would be a significant
[55:33] improvement over the present state in
which the cabin has been essentially
[55:37] derelict for years raising the cabin
allows airflow under the wood cabin and
[55:43] stops the dry rot this is consistent
with the continuation of the seasonal
[55:48] residential use moving the cabin further
into the lot
[55:53] is more consistent within with the
setbacks a waterless composting toilet
[55:58] is more consistent with sustainable
development and Environmental Protection
[56:02] than the previous Outhouse which is a
which existed at the time of purchase
[56:07] I've known Barbara puckering for over 62
years and I was excited when she and her
[56:12] husband bought the cabin I look forward
to the time when once again we can live
[56:16] in close proximity for a portion of the
year
[56:20] and no other comments were received at
the time of writing the report and the
[56:25] recommendation is as follows
the playing Department supports
[56:29] application a1922 subject to the
following conditions being applied
[56:33] number one that the development be
consistent with the site plan provided
[56:37] with the application contained within
appendix one at the report with the
[56:41] following setbacks
front yard setback Southeast Corner 2.85
[56:46] meters front yard setback northeast
corner
[56:49] 5.808 meters interior side yard setback
to Southern Property boundary 1.64
[56:56] meters
and number two that the permission
[56:59] granted to this application for minor
variants shall be for a seasonal cabin
[57:04] use and that the property owner shall
sign an affidavit speaking to the use of
[57:10] the seasonal cabin which will accompany
any building permit application
[57:14] number three that the maximum height of
the seasonal cabin shall be 5.4 meters
[57:20] from grade to Peak
[57:26] perfect and uh sorry there was somebody
here from the public uh is that
[57:32] um sorry uh Helen Harper
[57:38] okay perfect I just wanted to confirm if
so there's no further comments than you
[57:42] okay perfect uh is there anyone else
from the public wishing to speak to this
[57:47] application
[57:50] okay
um now's your opportunity to present
[57:55] your case okay
as stated what it's a legal
[58:00] non-conforming seasonal use cabin and we
had a model built with respect
[58:09] to the and if I can just it would
would be permissible to pass it around
[58:18] which basically shows that the only
improvements to the seasonal cabin are
[58:23] to allow the raising of it
and a porch on the South and the east
[58:30] side of the cabin
[58:33] and there's a gradient they are showing
um
[58:37] the lot
[58:52] the enlargement of the legal
non-conformer use is relatively minor
[58:57] and the other condition that um the
secretary referred to was a form of a
[59:04] statutory declaration or affidavit on
the return I have amended the foreman
[59:09] provided the amended form but insofar as
it dealing with the issues that
[59:15] um
were spoken to in the recommendation
[59:18] they deal with the fact that it is a
seasonal cabin will continue to be used
[59:22] as a seasonal carbon
[59:30] I don't know if Joel has any issue with
respect to the I forged on to you
[59:39] uh so through the chair at this point in
time there there is no desire to look at
[59:46] any type of affidavit as the decision
has not been made my recommendation
[59:50] would be that if there is an affidavit
that has been provided by the applicant
[59:55] that is not consistent with appendix 9
that further discussions with the
[1:00:01] building department be had in order to
determine if that affidavit is
[1:00:04] acceptable to the building department
standards
[1:00:08] I assumed I have to apply it can if I've
applied for a building permit so I'm
[1:00:13] assuming those discussions would be
ongoing
[1:00:17] through the chair
I suppose my my recommendation in this
[1:00:23] regard is to if the committee is in
support of the application to disregard
[1:00:28] the content of the affidavit at this
point and let that be addressed through
[1:00:31] the building permit process with the
building department and to Simply make
[1:00:35] the decision on the matters and the
conditions as presented
[1:00:39] not necessarily considering the specific
appendix as provided that's just a draft
[1:00:45] so we're not stating that that has to be
the appendix going forward
[1:00:49] but the building department will have
the ultimate decision on that
[1:00:55] I'm chair Herod if I can add a comment
at this point I was in a meeting
[1:01:00] immediately
preceding the committee of adjustment
[1:01:05] um
meeting today and I had learned from the
[1:01:09] director of planning that the Chief
Building official was now aware of this
[1:01:14] affidavit and unbeknownst probably to
Joel
[1:01:18] is that he had indicated that he wants
the condition left as is and indicated
[1:01:24] that he would be happy to discuss the
matter further subsequent to the
[1:01:30] decision of committee today
so again just to confirm what planner
[1:01:35] Vine said
that the determination as to how that
[1:01:40] condition is satisfied would be
subsequent to the decision that there
[1:01:44] would be that appendix 9 would not
necessarily be the the format content
[1:01:50] absolutely required to satisfy the
condition and we would look at that
[1:01:55] subsequent to the decision today the
condition would still allow for that
[1:01:59] leeway to discuss how the condition
could be satisfied the content of the
[1:02:03] affidavit and so forth
I and if I might speak to it I'm content
[1:02:08] to deal with the building department
with respect to whatever their concerns
[1:02:11] are I think I've addressed them but I I
haven't been able to speak to anyone in
[1:02:15] the building department yet so I'm fine
with that it's just the there are the
[1:02:20] number of undefined terms in the draft
that I had concerns with
[1:02:26] and if they're defined then it won't be
a concern
[1:02:40] okay
do any of the committee members have a
[1:02:44] you have any comments questions
[1:02:48] Mr chair uh just for clarification
was the alterations and construction
[1:02:55] commenced without the benefit of a
building permit and this building permit
[1:02:59] in fact would Legalize It should it be
issued
[1:03:03] I don't believe that's the legal
situation the cabin was raised with
[1:03:08] respect to prior to the building permit
has not yet issued yet we go we received
[1:03:14] a notice from the town to say that we
had to apply for a building's permit and
[1:03:17] not to proceed with any so there's
pictures I guess in the application of
[1:03:23] the current state of the cabin which is
raised but unaltered from when the stop
[1:03:28] order issued in 2000 and
17 I believe it remains a legal
[1:03:35] non-conforming cabin regardless of
whether or not it's been moved in law
[1:03:39] but I appreciate that the zoning
department and myself may have a
[1:03:44] different opinion as to what the lies
and we don't have to agree on that we
[1:03:47] have just have to agree with respect to
what we do going forward
[1:03:52] so the issue is it's still illegal
non-conforming cabin the the town agrees
[1:03:59] with that in their report and I can
direct you to it that they've provided
[1:04:02] satisfactory proof
that since 1961 it's been a seasonal
[1:04:07] one-room cabin and will continue to be
so the enlargement we have to see the
[1:04:13] permission of the Town legally because
it's an enlargement we haven't done the
[1:04:17] enlargement yet we um that's the
building permit that is
[1:04:22] been filed back in
2017 so that's when the
[1:04:29] that's the the approach on the east side
and the north side now that it's been
[1:04:34] raised but the cabin was raised without
the benefit of a building permit
[1:04:39] which required the stop order in 2017
and there's been a whole history which I
[1:04:45] don't think is actually necessary to go
into at this time as to why we're it
[1:04:50] took so long thank you
[1:04:55] foreign
further questions
[1:05:01] is there is there a possibility that
sanitary will be on that street
[1:05:09] through the chair from the comments that
we've received through the public works
[1:05:12] department it does not appear as though
that's going to be a potential solution
[1:05:15] in the in the future as of right now the
street is not determined to be a
[1:05:21] right-of-way to Municipal standards and
the public works department has not
[1:05:25] provided any comment with regard to
Future Servicing
[1:05:30] so the only way they can continue using
that particular building or property is
[1:05:36] if we pass this
[1:05:41] that would be correct through the chair
the applicant has
[1:05:46] has provided information to the planning
department indicating that the water
[1:05:51] will be brought in and that these
sanitary will be achieved through a
[1:05:55] compost list in Violet toilet which was
spoken to in the staff report
[1:06:07] any further questions
[1:06:12] okay I just have a just confirming so
you're you are not opposed to uh signing
[1:06:19] the affidavit uh but uh there is some
language in there that you are wanting
[1:06:25] changed is that uh correct
that's are defined but yes yes and I
[1:06:31] appreciate that the language relates to
the building departments
[1:06:35] participation and and that would require
I guess negotiation as my he's indicated
[1:06:40] with the the building officials so
it really has it doesn't have to do with
[1:06:46] the zoning right okay so so no no the
reason why I'm asking is it doesn't
[1:06:52] reference uh appendix 9 in the
recommendations or the conditions that
[1:06:57] uh planning staff it just simply says
and that the property owners sign and
[1:07:02] aft David speaking to the use of the
seasonal cabin which will accompany any
[1:07:06] building permit application and I've
already signed it yes okay that's no
[1:07:10] problem okay
[1:07:14] um any uh further questions
and there's no one from the public
[1:07:19] wishing to speak to this application
[1:07:25] okay
all right so I will close the public
[1:07:29] portion of the meeting and
call the vote that the committee of
[1:07:35] adjustment hereby approved the
application from Barbara Pucker
[1:07:41] puckering and this is for application a
1922 6 Burns Lane do I move her
[1:07:50] member Morrison seconded
uh
[1:07:54] member of angul all in favor before you
hold the vote I'd like to comment on
[1:07:58] this if I could this is the appropriate
time because the motion's just been put
[1:08:01] on the floor so this is the appropriate
time for me to pass a short comment
[1:08:05] love it there's a part of me that
remembers old Wasaga that remembers
[1:08:11] Cottages it's I'm sort of down from the
old brox Beach area what was called
[1:08:15] Brock Avenue going on to gurrock if
you've been around long enough you
[1:08:19] remember what that is it's now 72nd
Street and the idea of this I went down
[1:08:23] and saw it today it took me a while to
find it I mean it's there's not a road
[1:08:26] trust me
um I was just fascinated by it and when
[1:08:30] I found the place there's like three
places tucked away back in there and I'm
[1:08:35] sure that there are all kinds of
inconveniences in being there but on the
[1:08:39] other hand I kind of loved the whole
Cottage atmosphere surrounded by trees
[1:08:43] isolation so many of the files that that
come before us are about being
[1:08:48] Progressive and moving forward and
that's fine I have that this is not what
[1:08:51] I'm objecting to I just think it's
really cool to see people that are happy
[1:08:55] with what they have and are just making
it legal non-conforming so they can
[1:08:59] enjoy it and so all the more power to
you I'm happy to move the motion and
[1:09:03] most certainly be voting for it thank
you Mr chair
[1:09:06] thank you for those comments
any further comments before I call vote
[1:09:15] so all in favor
[1:09:18] and that is carried
thank you
[1:09:24] all right so the last application we'll
go back to uh
[1:09:29] 4.3 and this is for 1038 to Mosley
Street do we have the applicant online
[1:09:40] there is still one applicant that I am
waiting for a response from so I am
[1:09:45] asking that person at this time if they
could respond or turn their camera on if
[1:09:51] it pertains to the application
this is the only matter left correct
[1:09:58] I I think I see
is this uh is this rosabella
[1:10:06] can she hear me
[1:10:14] asked her to unmute her
um self there so
[1:10:19] hi can you hear us
[1:10:27] can you hear us
[1:10:49] foreign
[1:11:00] the person online with their video
can you hear us
[1:11:25] jerk we'd like to take a brief break I
can try to call the applicant or the
[1:11:30] owner of the property
I mean at this point it might be
[1:11:34] beneficial we can see that she's online
but clearly she can't hear us so I don't
[1:11:38] know if her speakers are off or
yeah or as you suggested before
[1:11:43] um the application you had asked about
deferral for the application as well or
[1:11:49] possibly
I mean is there a cost to the applicant
[1:11:54] if if we defer it no there'd be no cost
to the applicant for it to come back at
[1:12:00] the next meeting
point of clarification and I really just
[1:12:04] want to understand something I'm not
objecting anything
[1:12:06] like is there a rule that the applicant
is required to be in attendance during
[1:12:10] these things because I'm sure we've
dealt with things in the past without
[1:12:13] them in attendance and it's a beautiful
day out I can't imagine that if I had
[1:12:16] something before us that I thought was
not going to be controversial I'm pretty
[1:12:20] sure I wouldn't be here either
so I'm just I'm just curious what the
[1:12:24] what the rules are if they have to be
here then we've got to do something if
[1:12:26] not let's just move ahead
[1:12:31] through you the chair with the
application that we're dealing with
[1:12:34] today so with 8 19 23 for remote 1038
mostly sweet the applicant is clearly
[1:12:41] online today with us today intending to
attend the meeting
[1:12:46] so for this application in particular
she's here and able to and would like to
[1:12:52] participate I apologize for my final
comment it was I shouldn't have been
[1:12:56] stated this is a different situation but
the first question is still the reason I
[1:12:59] asked for the clarification is are are
we required to have the the applicant in
[1:13:05] attendance in some manner in order to
review the event and decide a file I'm
[1:13:09] not suggesting I understand what you're
saying about this one yeah but in
[1:13:12] general is that true or not
[1:13:15] so so if if I may I think we have to
provide them with an opportunity to
[1:13:20] present their case
and this is based on natural justice so
[1:13:25] and the rules of natural Justice we're a
tribunal exercising uh
[1:13:32] powers of uh and so
the committee May
[1:13:38] decide not to vote in favor of this so
we need to provide the applicant the
[1:13:42] opportunity to present their case so
um again I don't know what staff
[1:13:48] recommend if this if this is normal this
is the first time I've ever come across
[1:13:53] this so if
the manager wishes to uh
[1:13:59] provide some clarity on this
I just it's my understanding I'm not
[1:14:04] familiar with overly familiar with the
details of this particular application
[1:14:08] but it's my understanding that there
what there were comments received from
[1:14:12] the public on this application and in
that situation then the applicants
[1:14:18] ability to respond to those comments
um would require that
[1:14:25] they'd be
that they'd be able to respond to them
[1:14:29] and they obviously have made an effort
to be part of this public meeting
[1:14:36] okay
um so I'm gonna put forwards a
[1:14:42] motion to defer this application to the
next committee meeting we spent enough
[1:14:49] time trying to get a hold of the
applicant and maybe staff can follow up
[1:14:54] and see if she can either attend in
person or
[1:14:58] trying to get those so so that the
applicant sort of the application
[1:15:04] um
[1:15:10] e19 23. thank you application a 1923 for
1038 Mosley Street rosabella DeAngelo so
[1:15:20] this is for a variance
I'm going to put forward the motion that
[1:15:25] this uh
application applicant application be
[1:15:31] deferred to the next scheduled meeting
before you do that chair Herod if I can
[1:15:36] interject for a moment is it possible
for us to chat
[1:15:40] use the chat function I've been doing
that for the past half an hour
[1:15:46] okay and
are we
[1:15:49] again through the chair is it possible
for us to give them a phone call I'm not
[1:15:54] opposed to that if if the members are
good with taking a five minute recess so
[1:15:59] that we can try to get a hold of the
applicant
[1:16:03] and I through you again
um is there anyone in the public here to
[1:16:08] speak to this today
yes there there is
[1:16:14] okay so for want of
one more try
[1:16:19] a telephone maybe we can still wrap this
up today okay
[1:16:23] um so we'll take a five minute recess
and if somebody can try to phone the
[1:16:29] applicant that would be great
yeah
[1:16:33] just before
[1:20:31] for one moment for the recurring
secretary to confirm that the recording
[1:20:36] has started
okay so it's uh 319 right now we started
[1:20:45] at two o'clock uh
uh the the application that we're
[1:20:51] waiting to hear is a 1923 and this is
for 1038 Mosley Street uh
[1:20:59] um and this is rosabella uh to Angelo
for a variance
[1:21:04] um she has tried to connect multiple
times
[1:21:09] unfortunately it appears that she's
having
[1:21:12] technical issues
um
[1:21:15] I
don't feel as if we should be proceeding
[1:21:21] with this application
um based on our duty of procedural
[1:21:27] fairness which is the right to
participate in having the right to
[1:21:32] participate and the right to be heard
[1:21:37] So based on those grounds I don't feel
comfortable proceeding with this
[1:21:41] application we've staff have attempted
multiple times to reach this individual
[1:21:46] I appreciate that people are here
wishing to speak to this application
[1:21:52] I personally don't feel comfortable
proceeding so I am going to put forward
[1:21:57] a motion that this application be
deferred to the next scheduled meeting
[1:22:01] and request that staff follow up with
the applicant to see if they can attend
[1:22:07] in person next time
um do I have a well I guess I'll move it
[1:22:12] do I have a secondary
member van Ghul all in favor
[1:22:18] and that is carried
um so this uh so just for the
[1:22:24] individuals in the audience
um just to confirm
[1:22:28] we've deferred this to the next
scheduled meeting hopefully you can
[1:22:33] attend if this is something you're
wishing to speak with
[1:22:37] um
I don't know if you still have an
[1:22:39] opportunity to present
um like if you're unable to attend in
[1:22:44] person next time if you can maybe send
your information to the secretary
[1:22:49] treasurer so they can be read into the
record just like the previous applicants
[1:22:55] um or sorry applications that were done
so if you're if you're not able to
[1:22:59] attend that's my suggestion to you but I
do appreciate the time that you've spent
[1:23:04] waiting to hear this and unfortunately
we're just not able to proceed
[1:23:12] not in relation to this unfortunately
we've we've voted on it to defer the
[1:23:19] matter to the next meeting
[1:23:26] so I I appreciate uh the time that you
spent to to try to speak to this
[1:23:33] application unfortunately
um we've we've just voted on it so
[1:23:38] um if you haven't already sent your
comments I would suggest doing so okay
[1:23:44] all right so that concludes the meeting
uh today so the next scheduled meeting
[1:23:50] uh is on October 18th uh 2023
um so uh do I have a mover to adjourn
[1:23:58] the meeting
[1:24:01] remember Morrison and seconded by uh
cool Savannah
[1:24:10] all in favor
thank you
[1:24:17] yes if if you wish yes