1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:09,200
The list is actually the same project
from the town of Kingsbury, Del Cath

2
00:00:04,840 --> 00:00:13,280
Systems, but one is a area variance and
one was a

3
00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:18,920
site plan review.
So, um

4
00:00:16,160 --> 00:00:22,800
I think so we'll do the
variance first.

5
00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:25,680
Um
So,

6
00:00:24,080 --> 00:00:28,200
one of the things
This is where I actually looked at the

7
00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:33,520
write-up. It's basically they're
requiring a setback relief.

8
00:00:30,880 --> 00:00:37,560
The um they're going to build an
addition to the building to house

9
00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:40,040
additional manufacturing, storage space,
etc.

10
00:00:39,080 --> 00:00:45,840
Because [clears throat] of setback
requirements, they only need a 1 ft 11

11
00:00:42,960 --> 00:00:49,040
in relief request.
So, um

12
00:00:47,840 --> 00:00:52,560
I
So, Pamela did this buffer map before

13
00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:57,000
she left. The first thing that I noticed
on the buffer map is

14
00:00:54,800 --> 00:01:00,640
Del Cath is shown on our property
records as owning the parcel behind it.

15
00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:03,880
And it looks My first thought was,
"Well, why don't they just merge the two

16
00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:07,800
lots?"
Well, it turns out at some point, based

17
00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:13,400
on the records that were submitted by
the applicant, Rozell probably purchased

18
00:01:10,760 --> 00:01:18,560
all of the Del Cath lots owned by that.
So, our property systems are probably

19
00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:23,200
not updated yet, which means they would
definitely need this variance because

20
00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:23,200
they don't own that lot.

21
00:01:23,840 --> 00:01:25,860
» [clears throat]

22
00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:37,560
» Other than that, I mean, I didn't see
anything that wasn't very

23
00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:40,800
straightforward. It's an addition in a
commercial building in a commercially

24
00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:45,680
developed area.
It's just a 1 ft 11 in variance.

25
00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:50,720
And everything stays on their own
property. Yep. It's just that the buffer

26
00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:54,080
will go down to 23 and 1/2 ft instead of
25 ft in their parking lot.

27
00:01:52,960 --> 00:01:59,440
Understood.
I was just asking for clarification.

28
00:01:56,800 --> 00:02:03,360
Matter of local interest?
Tim?

29
00:02:00,480 --> 00:02:08,560
You did that? Uh I would make a motion
that we send it back as a matter of

30
00:02:05,280 --> 00:02:12,966
local concern. Okay. Second?
I'll second that.

31
00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:15,800
I always just get one vote.
>> [laughter]

32
00:02:14,440 --> 00:02:20,080
» All in favor?
Aye. Aye.

33
00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:25,480
Aye.
Okay. All right then. So, the next one

34
00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:29,520
is the site plan review. Again, same
project. There are

35
00:02:28,040 --> 00:02:34,920
drawings
I'm going to give you tiny drawings

36
00:02:31,880 --> 00:02:37,920
at the back of the meeting. Um
the back of the packet.

37
00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:48,960
And it appears that they're adding their
house offices

38
00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:52,600
and the factory space.

39
00:02:56,280 --> 00:03:03,080
That's the same lot?
It's the same lot, yep.

40
00:02:59,880 --> 00:03:03,080
That's what this shows on

41
00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:16,240
Isn't that gray area is the new one?
Shaded area?

42
00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:22,680
Building is pink.
Um the at the very back of the packet is

43
00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:22,680
all of the drawing.

44
00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:32,880
I guess you can find the drawing.
Yeah, the shaded in area.

45
00:03:31,160 --> 00:03:35,280
But my eyes aren't as good as they used
to be.

46
00:03:35,640 --> 00:03:42,520
I was going to say I'm jet
simply because Yeah, it says shaded

47
00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:45,720
shaded area of the proposed building
expansion. There's I'm going to take

48
00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:47,760
that with me. I'm going to take a few
tests right now.

49
00:03:47,287 --> 00:03:52,400
» [laughter]
>> Yeah, look at the second second map.

50
00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:54,600
Yep.
Yep.

51
00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:03,640
I'm wondering
I'm also

52
00:04:03,760 --> 00:04:12,120
Are there anything you saw as relative
concerns Laura?

53
00:04:09,040 --> 00:04:12,120
Not that I saw.

54
00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:14,880
Okay.

55
00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:23,480
And what's the judgment on this one?
Local concern again?

56
00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:28,480
Well, Mr. Chairman, do you want to make
that motion?

57
00:04:25,840 --> 00:04:33,320
Well, put me on the spot. Well,
I'll make the motion make it a matter of

58
00:04:29,760 --> 00:04:36,320
local concern. I'll second that.
All in favor?

59
00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:39,560
Aye. Aye.
Aye.

60
00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:43,120
Opposed?
Carried.

61
00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:48,280
Um
Okay, next project that is

62
00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:52,560
Granville.
Um

63
00:04:49,560 --> 00:04:59,960
So, this is a site plan approval
for a fairly small It's a 2.44 MW solar

64
00:04:57,480 --> 00:05:04,000
farm on 9 acres.
The um

65
00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:08,320
the full plans, the large scale ones are
there if anybody wants to take a look at

66
00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:13,640
them. Also in the black binder is
Granville's solar law.

67
00:05:10,760 --> 00:05:20,680
Um what I what we put in the package for
you is the application. Um this did come

68
00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:24,240
to Granville once. It went back because
the Granville planning board asked for a

69
00:05:22,520 --> 00:05:31,240
few changes.
The changes are at the very back of your

70
00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:37,560
um at the very back of your packet
um from Lamont Engineers. Um

71
00:05:35,720 --> 00:05:43,520
This is basically changes that were made
to this project as a result of requests

72
00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:46,120
from um Granville's
planning board.

73
00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:55,520
But there is a a lot of the changes
related to the decommissioning plan.

74
00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:55,520
Mhm.

75
00:05:55,720 --> 00:06:00,360
So, there is a full decommissioning
plan. Um

76
00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:11,800
This is a 9 acre solar farm on a 20 3
acre plus or minus acre parcel.

77
00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:19,160
And the and the site is fairly flat.
On the river.

78
00:06:19,280 --> 00:06:24,400
This is the new river news. Yeah, so
here's the buffer The buffer map is in

79
00:06:23,280 --> 00:06:28,200
here. It
should be in the back so you can see

80
00:06:25,640 --> 00:06:28,200
where it is.

81
00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:37,480
And it is also um in agricultural one.

82
00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:45,360
Laura, on the agricultural data
statement that's in there. Mhm. The

83
00:06:43,360 --> 00:06:52,040
question where it asked, is the parcel
actively farmed? Both boxes are checked.

84
00:06:48,440 --> 00:06:56,680
There's a question mark next to yes.
That's what I was looking for. So, no.

85
00:06:56,840 --> 00:07:02,360
I'm not familiar with that area.
Could be.

86
00:07:10,080 --> 00:07:16,200
So, according to the Ag data statement,
it's actively farmed.

87
00:07:15,080 --> 00:07:20,040
Um
Walkers

88
00:07:17,880 --> 00:07:25,280
by three different farms.
Oh oh no, this is the adjacent farms.

89
00:07:23,160 --> 00:07:31,560
Walkers, Harry Wilbur, and Kenneth
Thomas would have active farming on

90
00:07:28,920 --> 00:07:34,360
their own parcels.
I don't see the question mark that

91
00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:38,040
you're looking at in the system. Uh it's
on this one that looks like yes.

92
00:07:43,040 --> 00:07:47,520
Well, that
Okay, so those were So, that the

93
00:07:45,960 --> 00:07:51,040
question mark that I'm seeing is under
Henry Wilbur.

94
00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:54,840
So, again, that would be an adjacent
land owner.

95
00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:57,160
Okay, I see what you mean then.
That's farms within 500 ft of the

96
00:07:56,800 --> 00:07:59,440
parcel.
>> Got you.

97
00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:17,040
Recommendation on this one? So, they
made the appropriate changes that the

98
00:08:14,640 --> 00:08:22,080
town of Granville has requested? Yes,
this originally came to us in February

99
00:08:20,080 --> 00:08:27,240
and then Granville contacted us and
asked us to pull it subject to further

100
00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:31,080
review by
their planning boards, attorneys,

101
00:08:29,200 --> 00:08:34,120
whoever else they wanted to have a look
at with. And then they brought it back

102
00:08:32,640 --> 00:08:38,440
to us for this one. Did they have a
decommissioning plan at that time? I

103
00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:44,240
believe most a lot of the changes were
related to the decommissioning.

104
00:08:41,520 --> 00:08:49,040
And again, you will see um that plan is
at the at the back and

105
00:08:46,600 --> 00:08:49,040
um

106
00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:56,080
I guess I didn't make color copies for
everybody, but the changes on my copy

107
00:08:55,080 --> 00:08:59,520
are colored, so I don't know if you can
tell the difference.

108
00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:02,600
I know it.
I think

109
00:09:00,760 --> 00:09:06,560
in the past, at least the most recent
past, that have been on the only

110
00:09:04,840 --> 00:09:10,880
recommendation that we've sent back or
notification that we've sent back on the

111
00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:15,720
town of Granville was to make sure that
they coordinate with emergency services

112
00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:20,040
for site development plans.
Not site plan review, but understanding

113
00:09:17,680 --> 00:09:24,200
of the site and operations prior to
emergency occurrence. Okay.

114
00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:29,240
But other than that, I'll make a motion
it's a matter of local concern.

115
00:09:26,600 --> 00:09:31,880
I'll second that.
I'll second.

116
00:09:30,480 --> 00:09:34,360
We're getting you going now. I'll
second. We're getting you going now. I'm

117
00:09:32,760 --> 00:09:38,320
saying take a breath.
Any further discussion?

118
00:09:36,320 --> 00:09:41,600
All in favor? Aye. Aye.
Aye.

119
00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:48,160
Opposed?
Carried. Next, Richard Palmer Permont.

120
00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:52,480
Okay, this is another Kingsbury project.
Um

121
00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:55,440
This one
um

122
00:09:53,480 --> 00:10:03,000
the applicant
has purchased

123
00:09:57,840 --> 00:10:05,920
an existing home. He over a home on a
um

124
00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:11,560
1 and 1/2 acre parcel.
He owns a non-emergency medical

125
00:10:08,880 --> 00:10:17,320
transportation company and is looking
for additional space to park it park his

126
00:10:14,920 --> 00:10:23,960
uh transportation vans.
So, what was provided

127
00:10:20,040 --> 00:10:28,520
was uh basically the uh
the parcel map that doesn't actually

128
00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:32,760
even show where the existing structures
are.

129
00:10:29,440 --> 00:10:36,880
So, I went and pulled as you will see a
Google Earth map and also a parcel map

130
00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:42,080
that shows where the existing structures
are.

131
00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:46,960
So, my concern on this is you have a
house here and then what looks like

132
00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:51,920
barns or sheds in the back.
What he is proposing based on his

133
00:10:49,160 --> 00:10:58,840
drawing is to put a driveway here to
access the house and a driveway here to

134
00:10:55,080 --> 00:11:03,480
access what is grass and area.
He has stated that he's looking to park

135
00:11:00,880 --> 00:11:08,080
up to eight vehicles there.
So, given that this is grass and area

136
00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:12,800
given the proximity to house, my concern
would be

137
00:11:09,880 --> 00:11:17,600
eight vehicles parked end-to-end would
get you to the back of the lot.

138
00:11:15,120 --> 00:11:22,320
Without turnaround space, you're risking
people backing out onto this 6th Avenue,

139
00:11:20,640 --> 00:11:25,640
which I would see as something that
should be addressed.

140
00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:42,480
Other than that, it's pretty
straightforward. He basically intends to

141
00:11:40,720 --> 00:11:45,520
to rent the house,
use it as a rental property and then

142
00:11:44,480 --> 00:11:51,200
park
and his statement was up to eight

143
00:11:47,400 --> 00:11:51,200
vehicles on the site.

144
00:11:52,120 --> 00:12:00,040
It doesn't say whether he's planning on
putting in a gravel area, a road.

145
00:11:57,080 --> 00:12:04,200
There's no information on that.
Is it just storage of the vans or is it

146
00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:09,440
that's where they go at the end of the
day, that type of thing or

147
00:12:06,600 --> 00:12:13,839
It's said for some of his drivers to be
able to collect the vehicles. So, I

148
00:12:11,600 --> 00:12:19,280
would guess
that if he has a network of drivers that

149
00:12:16,839 --> 00:12:23,160
he's trying to park some vehicles closer
to where his drivers are. Okay.

150
00:12:21,200 --> 00:12:28,240
It also could be that he's simply out of
space where he is. It doesn't say that.

151
00:12:25,880 --> 00:12:31,400
I'm just curious. So,
you have to park you don't have to park

152
00:12:29,839 --> 00:12:36,360
the drivers out there park their cars
there unless they get transported from

153
00:12:33,520 --> 00:12:40,160
the other facilities here.
That's actually another point. If if

154
00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:43,400
drivers are driving their own cars to
this space, they would you know, I I

155
00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:48,160
don't I don't know whether the eight
cars that he's stating includes drivers

156
00:12:46,040 --> 00:12:53,080
bringing their own cars in or if it's
actually eight medical transportation

157
00:12:50,600 --> 00:12:53,080
vans in there.

158
00:12:54,800 --> 00:12:58,160
Your recommendation on this?

159
00:13:02,680 --> 00:13:06,680
What's my recommendation?
>> Yes.

160
00:13:05,120 --> 00:13:13,080
I would
um make a note to the Kingsburg Planning

161
00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:17,800
Board to review the possible traffic
implications and if there's sufficient

162
00:13:16,240 --> 00:13:22,800
room to
make sure that they're not backing

163
00:13:19,440 --> 00:13:22,800
vehicles out 6th Avenue.

164
00:13:22,920 --> 00:13:30,480
Hey, thank you, Ted. The driver Well,
somebody got it.

165
00:13:27,680 --> 00:13:30,480
An illusion.

166
00:13:32,839 --> 00:13:40,440
So, this is just about where where it's
cut off here, just about the end of the

167
00:13:37,320 --> 00:13:45,839
parcel. So,
I don't know how much room there would

168
00:13:42,080 --> 00:13:49,920
be. And it's obviously fairly treed but
the new shape of the road would be no.

169
00:13:47,960 --> 00:13:53,440
I think you can assume that it is. They
point out

170
00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:57,960
if you're driving there, they got to
respond to it.

171
00:13:55,480 --> 00:14:00,480
With their own vehicles, I guess.
So, you don't need room for at least

172
00:13:58,960 --> 00:14:04,440
eight vehicles, you need room for at
least nine vehicles.

173
00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:07,520
I would like a replacement. I would say
more than that.

174
00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:10,600
» say 16 but actually
They have one driver for each

175
00:14:08,960 --> 00:14:14,839
» Right, cuz they have to pull the van in,
park it.

176
00:14:12,160 --> 00:14:19,160
What? Again, he may only be planning on
parking two or three medical vans there

177
00:14:17,040 --> 00:14:22,720
and the rest of them his drivers' cars.
That's unclear. The application said up

178
00:14:21,600 --> 00:14:26,040
to eight.
It says in his little description of

179
00:14:24,440 --> 00:14:31,440
project
two to three drivers per day.

180
00:14:29,520 --> 00:14:34,720
So, maybe he was figuring in with the
eight of

181
00:14:32,720 --> 00:14:37,560
having extra cars there, too.
But I

182
00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:41,800
I would concur, Laura, we should send it
back with a notation that they can

183
00:14:39,520 --> 00:14:44,680
consider where parking is and traffic
implications.

184
00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:51,000
Any other comments?

185
00:14:52,440 --> 00:14:56,760
You have a motion to send it back with
those comments?

186
00:14:57,079 --> 00:15:02,040
As in another local business.
I make that a motion.

187
00:15:05,440 --> 00:15:09,800
Do I hear a second?
Okay.

188
00:15:08,400 --> 00:15:12,520
If that's all the motion, could we have
one vote today?

189
00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:18,680
All in favor? Aye.
I say vote.

190
00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:25,959
Carried.
Um that's all we have. I I um I did not

191
00:15:22,680 --> 00:15:30,440
see any A E notices or
reports of final action comments.

192
00:15:29,120 --> 00:15:34,440
So,
that's all we have for today.

193
00:15:32,160 --> 00:15:34,440
Good.