[This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person -- it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.]

[0:00] On the center of the device, prior to speaking, then press and hold the same button to turn the audio device off. We share the audio devices. Also, for recording purposes, if you wish to address the planning commission, please still have a yellow speaker card, found in the podium, and place it in the box at the moment. Make sure to state your name for speaking, and you're limited to three minutes.
[0:29] And with that, let's conduct the role.
[1:08] Present.
[1:15] Present.
[1:20] Is it all set?
[1:21] Here.
[1:22] We have more.
[1:24] Thank you.
[1:25] Now I will entertain a motion to excuse the abs of planning commissioners.
[1:31] Do we have a motion to that effect?
[1:39] Okay.
[1:40] So the motion has been moved exactly.
[1:42] All those in favor of promotion meeting, call the vote.
[1:47] All those in favor?
[1:49] Aye.
[1:49] Aye.
[1:54] In now, let's have the pledge of weakness of the flag.
[2:04] That one Biden, you've planned a commissioner and our outgoing president.
[2:08] To leave the committee.
[2:11] I pledge allegiance to the flag.
[2:34] We'll move now to item three on the agenda, which presentations in the world of communications.
[2:38] The time you set aside from members of the general public to address the planning commission
[2:43] on any item not on the agenda for tonight, which is within the subject manager's station
[2:48] in the planning commission.
[2:50] No action or discussion shall be taken on any item presented, except that any commissioner
[2:56] in response to statements made or questions asked, or may ask questions for clarification,
[3:02] and all matters in the administrative nature will be referred to staff, all matters relating
[3:06] to planning commission will be noted in a minutes, and then the schedule for discussion of
[3:10] the future meeting or referred to staff for clarification and report. And in commissioner,
[3:16] may place matters brought up under oral communications on a future agenda. All speakers are asked
[3:22] to announce their name in order to obtain a certificate for the minutes. So we have anyone who
[3:29] public who would like to address items not on tonight's agenda.
[3:36] Seeing no one, we will now turn
[3:40] to the commissioners and invite them to share any more comments they would like to make.
[3:50] And the
[3:50] minutes will show that Commissioner Dodge has arrived to
[3:58] communications from the commission.
[4:02] Seeing none, we can move to public hearings and the matter of course is a resolution of the
[4:11] I don't know if you mentioned in the city you watched the bill.
[4:14] Denying the appeal of zoning administrator approval
[4:17] and administrative review permit for a low barrier
[4:20] navigation center located at 1.18 1.5 by a cherry court
[4:26] and 1.2 0 first city, APNs, 0.17 and dash 1.72, dash 32, 31,
[4:34] and 35.
[4:36] And the call for approval by the zoning administrator
[4:39] of administrative review permit and finding the project exempt from review under California
[4:47] Environmental Floney at C-book for still just July 1, section 1, 5, 2, 6, 8, we'll begin the process
[4:57] with the presentation for the six staff.
[5:01] Thank you, Mr. Erin.
[5:02] It's the candidates.
[5:06] Yes.
[5:07] Mr. Beach Olson.
[5:09] Thank you.
[5:12] I understand that the city has received a letter from the applicant from Helen
[5:16] alleging that I have a conflict of interest in this item.
[5:21] I have worked with the city attorney's office,
[5:23] and I do not believe that I have a conflict.
[5:25] In fact, many of the allegations in the center are factually inaccurate.
[5:31] Specifically, neither my husband nor I have ever received any income from the applicant,
[5:36] Honorary County, or Westview Presbyterian Church.
[5:40] So my husband has previously been employed by the Presbyterian Art Gallery
[5:43] and has not received any income from the Westview Church.
[5:52] Nonetheless, I do not want my presence,
[5:55] to provide any basis for litigation for further appeals for this item.
[6:01] I also understand that I can live in power for some of my ability for any determination
[6:06] that a conflict exists, and that I can be named in a lawsuit regarding the Commission's
[6:12] decisions. Out of an abundance of caution for these reasons,
[6:17] and because I want to avoid any indication that I, or the city, have conducted improperly
[6:24] for a few days. I will be refusing from the side up. Thank you.
[6:35] Thank you.
[6:36] Thank you for your speech.
[6:45] And now we'll be meeting both members with the rest of the
[6:51] issue.
[6:51] I should have read.
[6:52] And I'm glad you're here.
[6:53] This is slide on for you.
[6:55] I'm going to pull this up a little bit.
[6:56] Which will we think of here?
[7:01] All right.
[7:02] So I'm here tonight.
[7:03] I'm not a lot.
[7:05] I think this is the letter.
[7:05] I'm sending you to the interim acting.
[7:08] and I am very pleased to present the PLA of these energy-sphere approval given that share
[7:16] a new comment for the feedback and that patient center.
[7:19] Thank
[7:27] you for watching.
[7:28] The moment tonight you're here.
[7:40] So, the time line of events here for this project, and October 24th, October 24th, 2020, 30th, 15th of the initiatives
[7:50] This is a very rough conceptual plan that is essentially just the rectangles on a satellite
[8:00] image.
[8:02] The other staff would be treated in the project as an emergency shelter, which is a
[8:05] used fragilated under the last moment of the school cover.
[8:10] However, it was very elite, so staff would like to guide this little letter of the rest
[8:15] of the more information in order to further use the project.
[8:19] Between November 23 and June 24, I was when I was probably in the earlier soil
[8:25] of Joe Extension to dry in. To me, yeah, I'm going to go over the guidance letter and
[8:30] you know what we requested from that. That review included a span of a month and included
[8:36] review of state laws related to many different intentional uses for the site,
[8:41] over in that patient center to serve as shelters, with even bloodline regulations, building
[8:46] of those environments.
[8:48] Those meetings inform the selection of the modular unit types by now, again, as well as the
[8:54] site layout and the location of the lower area and applications that are on the site.
[9:00] Then on July 11, 2020, we're going to see a few seconds of no.
[9:04] I'm happy with who do responses to the city's virtual October 2020 through guidance,
[9:08] whether related to the emergency shelter requirements, as well as references to the state
[9:13] law of regulating lower area navigation centers that should be applied.
[9:16] Because the project over the couple months I have changed significantly and since the initials
[9:23] to know, these adversons that requested that the applicant's been a new administrative
[9:27] group in the application, that I am all of the first who did it in the project area
[9:33] of a personal day or only at the end of that month.
[9:37] And I also spoke as they specify whether the project wasn't back to the general area.
[9:43] I don't know about this.
[9:44] you stay for.
[9:46] On August 23, 2014,
[9:48] Saturday, CD Thursday,
[9:50] and then to the new application
[9:52] with all the relevant information
[9:53] and attachments in the community.
[9:56] This is the first, the first chance
[9:58] that you had to do with forward view
[9:59] with all city departments in the new public works,
[10:02] police, fire, and we also shared
[10:05] the application that intelligence.
[10:08] This application was a huge burden of plans
[10:10] to state law related to
[10:12] over and out, Jesus, for Santa and FIs, the use and their letter.
[10:16] And as the term of this project, and by the fourth criteria,
[10:19] located in different good stations six by six, two and a double portion of it.
[10:23] So on September 20, 2014, the administrator of the B-comet
[10:27] received by the zoning district, and not that we also requested additional information.
[10:33] We've actually submitted that time, including from the snow.
[10:37] And then on October 20, 2014, we received a group of seed
[10:40] and a heal letter, and that is why I've heard about what we've sent.
[10:47] So there's a low-berry navigation center.
[10:50] It is defined under state law as a housing-first, low-berry, or submissive-installed,
[10:54] or bogus-line-beaming people, and a permanent housing,
[10:57] that provides temporary-looking facilities,
[10:59] all-pacemen, and there's connected to ging up.
[11:07] Under the definition of low-berry, or, well, it means practices to reduce air,
[11:11] and to try to get included into the presence of partners, pests,
[11:16] storage, possessions, and practices.
[11:21] AB 101, which was a 7-0 in 2019, and committed to government code section 6, 5, 6, 6, 7,
[11:28] pertains to the low-bearer navigation center of regulations, and it does the following days,
[11:33] provides statutory changes necessary to enact the housing and helplessness-related provisions
[11:38] of a budget back to 2019, including string-lining the approval of low-bearer navigation centers.
[11:44] It also provides a library process and expedited a review for low-bearer navigation centers in certain
[11:50] in terms of zones.
[11:52] It also berates local governments from a prior vacation use permit or other discretionary
[11:56] approval of the low-variant navigation centers, and needs to use them as a certain operational
[12:00] center.
[12:06] As a library of use, the only entitlement requirement for the low-variant navigation center
[12:10] is an administrator for the view permit, and for the last of the list, we'll go to a per-resistant
[12:14] administrator for the view permit, instead of a share of prior to this establishment, and
[12:18] then all the rights to principally permit it for the library of use, that the provisions
[12:22] of the code.
[12:23] Now, there are various state and local regulations on that.
[12:26] There are no provisions of the lawful useful code related to the low-variant navigation
[12:30] center specifically.
[12:31] So, the only regulations that have the rules that are those in our organization's
[12:34] six-five, six-six
[12:38] -six-six.
[12:38] So, we can go to a question.
[12:41] As I mentioned before, a perfect discrimination of the program application is set to
[12:45] development, it's a unified rights.
[12:47] And here is for mixed use.
[12:49] And none of those systems are minimal to end re-uses.
[12:51] It means the requirements of this session in the 88th of people up and a local jurisdiction
[12:57] shall permit a low-variant navigation set in your office, it means the volume of the process.
[13:02] So those four requirements are one, you know, other services to connect people with kind of housing,
[13:07] your services plan to identify a service assignment, to it is linked to a coordinated entry
[13:12] system, so the staff and the inter-pacility, where staff can co-locate them, so they may
[13:16] conduct assessments, and provide services to connect people with kind of housing.
[13:20] 3, you can buy as the chapter 6.5,
[13:25] I'm going to say this section,
[13:26] the B2 live live division for the well-burned institutions covered,
[13:30] which in the whole housing first programs and so on,
[13:33] one of them that just stands for.
[13:35] And then, over and as the system for engineering,
[13:36] information regarding client states, client demographics,
[13:39] client income, and exit destination,
[13:42] put a local homeless management information system
[13:44] on our HMIS.
[13:48] No other standards of bacteria can be applied
[13:49] in the consideration of the application
[13:51] for the Greater Navigation Center.
[13:53] For example, the city's not the authority to remove the site design,
[13:56] property and consenting, any other use
[13:58] on the property, such as the existing church.
[14:01] As part of the end time of the application,
[14:02] we can go to the Greater Navigation Center project.
[14:05] However, public safety requirements,
[14:07] such as fire code, building code, and court standards,
[14:10] can be applied during the building permit for a deep process.
[14:19] Overview of the application review and analysis
[14:21] that's been notified by the zoning administrator.
[14:23] I'll go to the 4.1 by one with and give support
[14:26] that it's the support of that is that was used to support the protocol.
[14:30] So, the first point that the researchers can't be able to look at the housing, the
[14:35] project is a part of the live with the lead-me-owned moderates and the bigger kind of
[14:39] continuum of care, the operational standards from emergency others, and the kind of
[14:43] moderates on the services good they were going to call.
[14:46] So, this is that I'm going to be provided by several agencies, including CSU and B-Trinity
[14:50] I don't engage in it, telling birds and kidding me, I
[14:59] don't know if it's you.
[15:00] Emergency dollars, and the County of Monterey homelessness is good neighborhood on the call. So, this is starting. We provide a several agencies including CSEE and B-Treative Yelp engagement, Humbers and Q&A Act.
[15:17] On number two, it's like the coordinated entry system. The delivery of aggregations that are in the participating in the local coordinated entry system that has required by the leading MMR and SAMHSA.
[15:27] We have continued to prepare our operational standards for emergency dollars.
[15:34] Besides the chapter 6.25 of the well-burned institutions gathered,
[15:39] chapter 6.25 of the well-burned institutions
[15:41] of the requirements, the incorporation of the whole components of the housing
[15:45] personnel production to have the programs.
[15:47] So the housing personnel requirement,
[15:49] like all programs we're seeing here at France,
[15:51] as I mentioned, this required $8,000.
[15:54] It was awarded the $8,000,
[15:55] but it was awarded the $8,000,
[15:56] but the well-burned applications that required
[15:58] to provide with this session of the well-burned institutions.
[16:01] And it is an additional housing purchase or a product that we've known moderates in the
[16:05] video, Germany, and consumer care operational standards.
[16:14] So exactly as the government has a first name to the other companies and then in the
[16:18] space model that uses housing as a tool rather than a reward for recovery.
[16:22] And then the government is not providing or connecting homeless people to prevent housing
[16:25] as quickly as possible.
[16:27] Housing purchase providers offers services that has needed to prevent requests that are
[16:30] non-volunary basis.
[16:32] And then do not make housing contingent upon their decisions.
[16:34] So,
[16:40] the author asks the system for answering information to the station, I ask the system.
[16:45] So, we need to have a lot of ransom unit or family and operational standards.
[16:48] We're part of all emergency programs including low-bearer navigation centers.
[16:53] To have participants at home was managed and information system managed by a coalition of homelessness priors.
[16:58] And for us, all of the coalition of homelessness providers, I think I have a pause in the procedure.
[17:04] So
[17:09] based on the compliance of this four-press area, the visitor review permit application was approved on the bodies that have probably been told to report.
[17:17] That clears the outcome into the Senate and the building permit application.
[17:21] In the determination to let us mention previously, we included feedback from all the city departments including planning, building, public works, fire, police.
[17:30] Since that was an additional collection of interventions he submitted with the building
[17:34] for the smell related to testing, landscaping, egress needless, striving, fire requirements,
[17:40] occupancy, allow the looderming, seeing or seagre, that's ability to deliverations,
[17:45] electroservice, pet waste, a line of the upcoming challenges and improvements along
[17:50] for Street and St. Louis 29, as well as the on-site surveillance system.
[17:59] As I mentioned, on October 7th, 6th, received an appeal application from Calming and Tortoise
[18:03] for a question on the question of who, and we're seeing the setting of the status of people
[18:08] and the administrative of the administrative of the administrative review permit. The amount of
[18:12] the contents of the approval was defective and a problem based on 15 reasons I've been arrived
[18:16] from there.
[18:20] I just have a quick paraphrase here, it's all in the sabbable analysis,
[18:23] like the point range from withholding information to the city council,
[18:27] making false statements to the council, and the property of the application,
[18:31] not uncertain to see uses and conditions. In the premium application,
[18:34] It probably did not mean you permission to use for adjacent residents, and rapidly with open boundaries
[18:39] of public records.
[18:41] I request that you will say, eventually, to complete this application and be willing to
[18:45] refer such usefulment for the church as a correct result of the project.
[18:50] Now, just wanting to move analysis from the neighbor of the community.
[18:53] I'm probably going to bring out the patient back and sitting in the project as a emergency
[18:57] shelter.
[18:58] Now, I have a button for requesting all of the patients for the entity responsible for managing
[19:02] over in that position center and rapidly submitting a building permit submission to call
[19:06] him prior to the program they are the application.
[19:09] Going to that.
[19:10] They all all see a little bit in that position center.
[19:13] Going to the park.
[19:14] They never fall asleep and don't need to consider all side issues at one of the key seconds.
[19:23] In terms of the appeal process, you can know the rules of the zoning, but the sharing
[19:27] is the approval of the visitor to be a permit to be over 10, and the money which must
[19:31] find that the action is taken by the zoning of the share, which is taken to run
[19:35] I was thinking this is the intent of the zoning
[19:37] discovery relations that regulate the production.
[19:41] So in this case, the proposed action is actually regulated
[19:43] by government budgetation in 65, 169,
[19:45] a lot of them will be discolored.
[19:47] So the point in which is limited to consideration,
[19:49] whether the zoning management or error
[19:50] application or criteria related to approval,
[19:54] local, or network management, or network management.
[20:01] So going to the documents on the appeal reasons,
[20:07] I was one, two, five, six, seven,
[20:09] can you remove because they're not related to the action we take it by the zone in our share.
[20:15] I have a review.
[20:16] Can you remove it?
[20:17] Because the parties are taking out positions of the payment fee.
[20:20] You know, they're in the late end, that's honestly, they're used with labor workers.
[20:26] So, there are any two or four and eight related to the consideration of existing use
[20:34] in conditions on the property and the ability to require a special use permit
[20:38] for the transition of the prerequisite of the
[20:42] project.
[20:42] The government doesn't see five to sixty-two is not identified any requirements related to the existing use of the project site or on the Jason Roberts.
[20:50] The only use related requirements is that the site needs some per next use.
[20:54] The downtime for selling to the district is they need to use some, in which multi-damned residential use of their principles,
[21:00] but the low-variant navigation center is a lot of direct.
[21:03] The existing uses of the reparsal, public work, and it cannot be considered as part of the value analysis for a group.
[21:09] I
[21:17] had it's nine 13 and 14 and 15 are all in a purpose under the government code.
[21:21] It's actually six to two.
[21:24] And then it's all related to the,
[21:26] Incidentally, you've been living through the submission balance.
[21:29] We don't even have it when we permit.
[21:30] Similarly, that's so that's not correct.
[21:35] There are many ones.
[21:36] 10 to 11, that's like 10.
[21:39] Can you do a group?
[21:40] Because this is a low-brain application center.
[21:42] Not hundreds of shelters.
[21:43] just find a code,
[21:50] and I'm sorry, you're back.
[21:52] The city denied a via a restful location
[21:54] to the NST responsible for managing a little bit
[21:56] in our PhD center.
[21:59] The E-German code section, in 2016, does not create
[22:01] the city in the or need to request or analyze the qualifications
[22:04] of the services providers.
[22:06] Rather, we just have to make sure that the application
[22:08] might identify the sorts of plans of the
[22:14] staff.
[22:14] So in summary, the information presented in the Diletta
[22:17] does not warrant those who are trying to understand
[22:18] what was an administrator's approval of it.
[22:20] here, I think I can do this.
[22:30] All right, I'll take a sec.
[22:37] I'm sorry.
[22:39] I'm sorry.
[22:40] I'm sorry.
[22:42] It's the time you want to write your tonight.
[22:46] That's all.
[22:49] I'm sorry.
[22:55] Thank you.
[22:56] So I have enough terms to, uh,
[23:00] commissioners and, uh, to suggest that they,
[23:03] focus a question to protect when they're,
[23:05] Can
[23:13] you go back to the first aid
[23:23] system that helps you acquire the specialties of the church
[23:27] doesn't prevent us from the project, can you clarify that?
[23:30] What I mean, I think I missed it, but just want you to have a clarification on that.
[23:36] The intention of the talent was that the suggestion is a legal platform to use on property needs,
[23:42] etc.
[23:42] and it's originally established, and so we tend to think that it is required with the additional delivery and application center to come back in and get these sessions from the front of the board, the city and the delivery and applications that are on the site.
[24:00] But that's not, it's basically an unborn use, can continue to continue to continue, unless it is extended or enlarged.
[24:06] and this is the establishment of a do something that we know that is actually not introduced
[24:10] in their order.
[24:12] The establishment is the best not, I guess.
[24:22] You want to ask, um, this is really to me, the guidance noted in the review of the work
[24:33] at the where we're taking the idea of the executive.
[24:37] Is that a deal with the public?
[24:40] The second work of
[24:45] the last year was because it really appreciate all of their work.
[24:49] the way in which you can feel these two sides, whether it's ready for your response.
[24:56] It was a little confusing to follow, and I'm just going to suggest that you go through each one
[25:00] like he is moving forward. I think because there's so many members of the public here,
[25:05] I think it would be a whole kind of helpful for me to go through each one of the things in here,
[25:10] stats, response, and analysis, because this is really the crux of what we're going to need to
[25:15] So I just want to have to just that because I don't know if everyone is seeing what's
[25:19] available for the subject or not, but it just seems really clear, I am as small as we
[25:25] in terms of the set of babies, don't apply it just on the five, but we just look at each one,
[25:29] I think it will be very helpful. And might I suggest that as we go through these, we could
[25:35] rely on it and pause with each one and then have the technical questions that relate to that.
[25:41] I am going to ask otherwise it's going to be a jungle,
[25:44] which I think are difficult for us to deal with this occupation and the audience probably
[25:49] listen to it. So is that something? Yeah, it will be a bit of repeating the same thing.
[25:58] There are a few of them because it's not one of my response to several of these,
[26:01] but it's really the opposite of it. Of course, it's just a proprietary kind of kind of good
[26:05] sections. So when I mentioned that they were removed, they were because they weren't
[26:09] like it to the score of the pharmacy, they're a possession, but I'm not being able to do that one moment.
[26:15] So, I don't have the oldest of Bernardo and paraphrase ones that are in the next city.
[26:20] I'll go back to this one.
[26:22] So, the number one, to be staffed in wrapping with other political information,
[26:26] the agency council members were very in collaboration with staff.
[26:29] Can we get from the officials to ask the signing of the project
[26:32] at the rescue, the president and the church location?
[26:35] The staff.
[26:36] And also, it was that this comment is not related to the intent.
[26:38] and then the two process and design are in the actions
[26:40] for what I mean, since I'm not setting up the striker,
[26:43] they're going to go with this.
[26:44] It's not grounds for a lot of light,
[26:46] but we're only designing a series of people
[26:47] with the ARPD 202697 and the
[27:00] other uses.
[27:01] Is it the appeal itself?
[27:06] Cast is the individual items in the context
[27:11] of the entitlement review process.
[27:14] And so I'm interested in the working depth
[27:18] of the entitlement that you process, I have a bit of a grasp, but I would like some of
[27:25] your assurance that I'm getting, perhaps I would rather have a sense of it because I
[27:29] think that the definition of the entitlement of the new process is actually part of the
[27:37] valuation of the previous, but the relevancy of the various items that are mentioned here.
[27:43] We have an unfortunate kind of a key said, she said scenario in these cases because I
[27:49] Unlike most appeals in the court system,
[27:51] the appeal here we all really have a way of certifying the facts.
[27:57] So we have doing facts.
[28:00] And I just think in an easier way to do something.
[28:03] Basically, the sense with some of this would be
[28:06] to find in the entitlement review process.
[28:12] To the extent that these fall outside of that,
[28:14] then they are no longer concerned.
[28:18] So because it's certainly been
[28:20] part of the catalog. And if we can show that the catalog would be processes and we'll tell
[28:25] us what I think you just implies. And I think it's helpful.
[28:30] Okay. So the headline of yours even is that it would be correct. It's a ministerial
[28:36] group, a few of the ministerial units that are in the satellite where a map patient comes in. It's
[28:41] right by right use that should, you know, comply with the rest of the code. And so that goes through
[28:45] realized that whatever relations apply to it are in fact, you know,
[28:49] game environment, uh,
[28:51] you check boxes and then the administration.
[28:54] And so that process in this instance,
[28:56] and stretch out much longer than it would usually, um,
[28:59] from a lot to basically turn you three, three, two,
[29:01] such time or 20 or four, um, basically,
[29:05] because it was, it ended up being more like a normal,
[29:08] and I decided this is a little more project.
[29:10] It gave us a little more project design.
[29:12] Usually, with an administrator,
[29:13] that there's not site design considerations.
[29:17] You have a sub that was addressed on the University of Schelter,
[29:19] unfortunately, the code, the way that this is originally viewed,
[29:24] has a rich thing as a low-are navigation center,
[29:29] and they think we're looking at that since it takes two.
[29:32] You just have to check these four boxes.
[29:34] We wouldn't be aware of that.
[29:37] So, the entitlement with you processes, if you find it like time,
[29:42] And it's also defined by specific steps within the process.
[29:48] So, things can be going on concurrently.
[29:51] For example, the allegations that information was developed.
[29:57] Things like that.
[29:58] I mean, is that part of the environment?
[30:01] Now, I believe from the warden will submit it to the application package. This is about the same last of the precinct measure.
[30:10] And relations to correspondence with the admin, county minority, county centers.
[30:16] Prior to meeting the application.
[30:22] Thank you. That helps me out.
[30:28] So we have, we exhausted the commissioner's questions about item work.
[30:39] So from the two side, I'm properly making bussets, this is in council and public
[30:44] priority, permeating involvement by staff with the state grant application
[30:48] for funding projects, it's the same response to number one, which is the
[30:52] sound of the sound of the sound of the waves, the entire review process, and the
[30:54] sign that by the National Security Institute, I'm going to share that word, this is
[30:59] not ground support by the leader of the group, but we're working as an illustrator
[31:02] as a approval of the ARP to 16th century.
[31:06] This is not the one that I believe is referring to just
[31:09] conversations at the city manager running the latest projects,
[31:21] it seems that we're here
[31:23] here on that to the three please.
[31:26] Okay.
[31:26] So here's that.
[31:27] And properly set the application.
[31:29] This is because the application is effective.
[31:31] This is an important information.
[31:35] City staff or, you know, says, City staff is a part of the
[31:38] Department of Education, which are there for you to complete this.
[31:41] The project moved several rounds of review and to receive several incomplete letters before the
[31:46] application is deemed complete and part of the application's proof.
[31:49] This is common practice for entitlement applications which definitely
[31:52] incomplete or part of my changes in compliance with the public standards and other regulations
[31:56] that have been beginning to move.
[32:01] Any commissioner want to follow up with that?
[32:05] Okay, now we move to number four, which I think is an important one in terms of the
[32:13] to answer the process.
[32:16] Okay, so the normal goal is to have properly
[32:17] approved the application,
[32:19] the faculty and Santa and the attorney needs
[32:20] to send you to send you to send the project.
[32:23] That's running, firemen.
[32:25] Analysis is the project site.
[32:26] It's a domicile report.
[32:28] There is a system for students,
[32:29] there are provisions of their recommendations.
[32:31] It says, it's a symbol of life.
[32:33] That government does it for life.
[32:34] The minimum requirement is the project site.
[32:37] You can send the project site with a sign.
[32:49] Properly get up and detect
[32:51] the informational meetings for adjacent citizens
[32:53] and by a variety of politics and scheduling,
[32:57] we now develop the same kind of knowledge
[33:01] and if I were to be brought to this side,
[33:03] and if I had to choose to raise the tape by a certain
[33:05] striker, I was going out that this every year,
[33:08] it's been a long time before the other meetings,
[33:11] we're looking to it, so.
[33:13] And it's going to, we'll see if the action's taking
[33:16] to be, if the council will take it,
[33:18] we'll look later to,
[33:19] probably, we'll be reaching out to the rest of this,
[33:21] in the area to know that this is not required under the
[33:26] spot.
[33:32] In which six, the relevant critical public documents
[33:35] received your generous, the attorney members, the
[33:37] members, the committee members, and any
[33:39] chosen by the committee members.
[33:42] Sorry, I'm going on.
[33:45] And then else is what this
[33:49] interview process is
[33:52] on.
[33:53] I hope it was.
[34:05] Thank you.
[34:06] I was wondering, was there a request?
[34:08] Was there a whole record exactly
[34:10] a question assignment?
[34:11] We did it in several ways.
[34:13] And those were dealt with in that process.
[34:17] Is the elevation directed, the city clerk, or is it directed for 20?
[34:23] I mean, given the context of the appeal, it should be directed as an administrator,
[34:29] but as I mentioned, that's not an appropriate design.
[34:31] So, you'd have to ask the panel in advance and see whether.
[34:37] Andrew, we've followed the question about this.
[34:39] Does this have one specific question on this?
[34:40] My understanding is, please, all relevant requests are addressed.
[34:44] to address, and I can't say too, is there an interest in that?
[34:50] It's
[34:53] so wondering whether the allocation just
[34:58] doesn't have to.
[35:07] Yeah.
[35:08] It's just a rather than a further perspective,
[35:12] the request to come in, they are typically assigned to hopefully
[35:16] individuals or departments that are responsible.
[35:20] So for some of your approach,
[35:25] largely in the direction of planning work.
[35:34] The heal or previous process for the CPRA process,
[35:38] It's the person that's been in this clinic where you were murdering, because that wouldn't be appropriate.
[35:44] Process of 11 in that clinic.
[35:48] I can't say that.
[35:49] We're going to be our boss which
[35:54] required to respond to this in the original time, right?
[35:58] And they started to do so.
[36:03] We think that would be a process of staff or out of the appropriate sitting department at that.
[36:08] If there is, if there is a process, I wish somebody could submit a complaint about this if you are in
[36:14] question for the first time?
[36:17] First time speaking, I need something to listen to.
[36:19] I'm sure you better be able to listen to the question.
[36:21] What's the word for students from?
[36:23] Yeah.
[36:23] Sign up.
[36:26] You have an estimate of where you should go right.
[36:33] Especially there.
[36:34] And
[36:40] it's all our minutes to collect.
[36:41] This is a different issue.
[36:42] I didn't mean that.
[36:54] And that's right.
[36:55] All of this.
[37:49] So my question
[37:55] is, so when the complete sets that he made in the field are the mentions that
[38:04] It's a statin problem with health critical health documents from attorney through the CBRA process.
[38:10] So my question is that it's clear to me based on staffish laws that in appeal and CBRA,
[38:16] the process is not appropriate that they're this, this is where I'm going to deny it.
[38:20] So my question is, is there a process that this, the person that said this to us?
[38:25] I mean, if you refer to it, is there any appeal in this process?
[38:29] If people believe that the CBRA process is not affected,
[38:43] Thank you.
[38:45] Thank you.
[38:45] Thank you.
[38:46] And first, may I apologize to that.
[38:48] I should end public debate.
[38:49] Like certain things beyond my control.
[38:51] Thank you for your indulgence on that.
[38:55] You are correct.
[38:55] This isn't going to appropriate for him to air a public record act.
[39:00] Concern.
[39:01] It's my understanding that all records that are responsive to the request for provided.
[39:05] But it was a person who made the request to leave that there for documents that were inappropriate
[39:09] of people to help.
[39:11] The public represented cell and the housing process that could be followed.
[39:15] I don't know how the statutory reference for you right now, but if you'd like me to
[39:18] write for a report.
[39:20] It's not an alternative.
[39:21] You said it would be asked that I didn't appreciate you provided to the person next
[39:25] side of the word.
[39:26] Sure.
[39:26] Thank you.
[39:27] That sounds nice.
[39:35] Are we picking up a check?
[39:36] Yes.
[39:38] Yes.
[39:38] The numbers of this that are only made both public statements,
[39:41] the legitimate application is not a system project,
[39:44] which is like to public discretion.
[39:46] The analysis is that the sum is not related to the government.
[39:49] You got a sense of the item, I think, actions that were introduced
[39:51] to take on the signature sentence on the sentence as the recent sentence.
[39:56] The total context here I believe is referring to a public statement by a
[40:04] head.
[40:04] Is it a time about, I think, there's a big loss of translation here.
[40:08] I think what you're trying to say is that we have not actually
[40:10] a brief signal, yeah, I think that's not that that needs this, because we've been
[40:15] between October 23 and December 23 and we've seen the way the two or three days
[40:18] two or three days initials in the middle, and July 11 and July 24, there were no
[40:23] sufficient submittals, there were a lot of meetings that's on the conversation
[40:26] about projects inside, it was like useful as, but there was not an additional submittal
[40:30] that could be shared with other people in the middle of July 11,
[40:38] so, so we would get me,
[40:40] I mean, it's just, you spend some time on this because I think that time spent on this particular point is going to resonate, and I think that it's sort of as well as we proceed with that.
[40:54] actually you're in the same problem you think it's not on this
[41:01] slide over.
[41:26] Okay, so remember to set up a properly filled sky gap and to team by necessity,
[41:31] especially external research and predicating step in the time of the project.
[41:35] And the analysis was that the liver and amnesians ended up as a use-by-rides
[41:39] for government agencies to decide that an e-create will need to be applied
[41:43] for use-by-rides means that the local purpose for you may not require
[41:47] initially used to make a new development permit or other discretionary local government for
[41:51] you or a pool that would constitute a project for purposes of developing a environmental
[41:56] environment. They're from those specialties from a major part of the city as a prediating step
[42:00] for the entire event of the projects. And just so as to expand on what I said earlier,
[42:05] Liz, it's not one of the uses I grant, but this is the slide deck. But this is the section
[42:09] that I want to know. Just one of the deals with non-performing uses. It states that the non-performing
[42:14] may only be increasing size and more intensity or modified in the patient or character
[42:19] to be granting it, especially when you start to activate the bindings that such expansion
[42:23] in the application will not adversely affect the joining properties and those findings
[42:26] required by this other conception. So what's being discussed in the church, as I mentioned,
[42:32] there's a little bit more than going to use, meaning that it was established prior to the
[42:37] birth zone. That is not being increased in size or intensity or modified in the patient
[42:41] and various part of the proposed project,
[42:43] so we need to continue our work too.
[42:45] And nothing in the government section
[42:47] is regulating, we're going to have
[42:48] issues that are triggered for you
[42:50] or the legal government for me to choose.
[42:52] This is establishment, I mean, you use our property,
[42:56] and the transition from it to say,
[42:57] it is not the church use that is isn't there today,
[43:01] Yes, you'll boil it down for something simple.
[43:03] Is the question a change in the church use
[43:06] or a change in the church property?
[43:09] And I think that may be where
[43:11] some of the agreement arises, and I understand that the city's position is that the use
[43:18] this remain the same, it hasn't intensified, it hasn't expanded, it hasn't changed, these have
[43:26] even shirts,
[43:30] but the talent takes the position and we'll have to speak with themselves, of course,
[43:36] which just didn't clarify it this moment.
[43:39] The appellant takes the position that just by the nature
[43:44] of the low-variant application center being placed
[43:48] on the same set of parcels that inevitably
[43:53] results in one chance to find the answer to change
[43:55] the use of the property.
[43:56] And so that's where the web is.
[43:58] Yes.
[43:58] I will also go to one of the long lines of
[44:01] in the beginning, you can correct this.
[44:03] that even if it were the case that the amount of quality traditions needed to be grinded
[44:08] in blind situations, especially from that, that would not include the approval of what
[44:12] there are not patients that are on the site because it doesn't have code.
[44:15] So that if that weren't to be found to be an issue that even needed to be set early in this group.
[44:20] And it would fall upon the use of the church.
[44:25] It might affect the use of the church.
[44:27] There would be some sort of enforcement effort, potentially, or something like that.
[44:31] But that would not then expand to the lower your navigational sector.
[44:37] Yes. And when you're in a prior to the group,
[44:41] that is an important point, I think that if I'm incorrect, the idea is that the entire parade is held up
[44:51] in the opinion of the pilot, the whole parade is held up until the site used for that is delivered.
[45:03] So is there a whole question for the committee?
[45:09] Some media are on the 9th.
[45:11] Staff are properly jailed to the songs in the legal analysis presented by the neighborhood of China.
[45:17] The second song is comment is not related to the event.
[45:19] The view process is not identified by the actions committed to the second death zone.
[45:23] The, this kind of is related to a letter that the city received on July 29th,
[45:29] on July 29th, on April 4th.
[45:30] We're in our slogan, which I mean, covered in several issues, and I'm going to have a little bit of a step forward, which is the
[45:41] I don't know if we're going to work with you.
[45:43] Yes, and now it's back to our bill.
[45:45] I've been last, we're hasn't been all that gone in church lights.
[45:48] I'm wish we were hearing that that was not being used in this case, so let's see over that.
[45:54] And then it also covered the, what we just covered in number eight was that they
[45:59] contended that air needed to be especially used for an issue for the church prior to
[46:03] the approval of able during nations around it's like, this letter was received, it was
[46:09] embedded, considered, included in the analysis of the establishment of the project at the time.
[46:15] It also did not demand our response to the wording letter, the analysis is that this
[46:22] information and helpful to your consideration of this project.
[46:26] And yeah, many questions here.
[46:27] Please do it for your contact me.
[46:30] I think you're,
[46:31] say,
[46:31] it's not to be under consideration as part of the music audience.
[46:34] But we look at different conversations,
[46:36] whether or not,
[46:37] the existing on what we used to need to be addressed as part of this project.
[46:42] So.
[46:42] And is it that way of thinking that,
[46:45] just,
[46:46] result in that way of being,
[46:48] or maybe,
[46:48] from the,
[46:52] The issues for醫 and the letter were just in the exact analysis of the staff report already.
[46:58] So we ended up in the need to pass it to some of it.
[47:08] We go back on the slide to get to that.
[47:11] It's a great question.
[47:23] So number 10.
[47:25] The staff and hopefully you've prepared the application by the term in the size of the patient.
[47:29] You can pass it to the character of the project that we use as an emergency shelter as a fine and really awesome.
[47:33] So, the analysis here is that the lower navigation center is not regulated under the
[47:39] block of the setting code because it is not a versus the shelter.
[47:42] This is the top of the event, the conversation is one, and also certain that what
[47:46] you want to create between 23 and four.
[47:50] The requirements of different code and section six, six, six, two, which
[47:53] regulate the very number of data centers do not allow consideration of the size,
[47:57] location, capacity, or character of the lower navigation centers.
[48:00] However, the size of the patient, the last name character, the project, more clearly stated
[48:04] in the ARP applications, that were received in review by the CSAP, prior to project
[48:10] approval, and the city did provide guidance for the applicant on information that she
[48:15] submitted as part of the clinical review process, or even that
[48:21] time.
[48:21] So, as she is passing the night, we're at the power to take an exception to the distinction
[48:29] and you're making me bring in more of a shelter
[48:31] in the low barrier navigation center.
[48:33] Is that what's going on there, they're saying
[48:36] this isn't where you see shelter.
[48:38] That seems to be an intention of this comment
[48:41] and I don't understand the inclusion given that this has
[48:43] sort of shouldn't it in title over time,
[48:46] you know, there's no application that's a transitional housing.
[48:49] This city's guidance letter,
[48:50] or referred to emergency shelters,
[48:51] because that was the one section of the last one
[48:53] when this will go, we have a line to housing
[48:57] of this, for housing for the own house, and then throughout the meetings, I mean, you know,
[49:05] we scored lots of different housing types, transitional housing, supportive housing,
[49:10] but we're in our nation centers, and then we'll be asked in the clarification that they went
[49:15] with, we're in our nation center, so that's how it was reviewed after we received the third
[49:19] that will, and I'll excuse me, 20, 20 more.
[49:32] Yeah, we've probably been able to repart him
[49:34] that, yeah, and specified the entity responsible for managing
[49:37] the versus shelter and providing the call patients
[49:39] to set up there.
[49:41] Since that analysis, that we're going to section 65, 65,
[49:44] 16, A, or any of ours at Project County.
[49:46] So this is a plan that I identify, so this is static.
[49:49] The application materials that I've identified,
[49:52] they're hitting action orders that providers are so static.
[49:58] But this is one of the, the, the,
[49:59] the only good likelihood is pretty vague,
[50:01] just said that they have to submit the setting plan and identify the client, which is
[50:07] saying, we're going to identify the plan.
[50:10] So, this might be an odd trade to ask this question if you could explain the relative
[50:17] responsibility, as you understand them, if you can move the actual board, can you give
[50:28] So, of course, I think that'd be a good question
[50:31] or the outcome would be good over here.
[50:33] I sort of remember what I had when I read it
[50:36] and then I was on that page that I think
[50:38] to give the appropriate attention
[50:40] as it would be the outcome.
[50:42] Right.
[50:43] Because, again, I do think it's very,
[50:45] what do you say response that we're managing?
[50:47] Because I think the cat was listed as providing staff.
[50:50] But that kind of affects the question.
[50:52] It was the ultimate, where is the clock stop,
[50:54] with respect to management, disability,
[50:56] And then are we the appropriate authority decide whether or not the manager is a
[51:09] group leader? And I would ask perhaps Wendy the parents make their picture.
[51:24] They might
[51:25] So there's one group that leads to the CSU leader that has done an outreach to the folks on
[51:30] the lefty, on the front end of the identifying folks, get into the facility, they got to see
[51:36] the cabin, the design engine, the people inside, the design engine, the design maker, the cattle,
[51:42] health side of things, another one of the deals with employment. So there's multiple groups that are involved
[51:46] in this project that I feel a bit different.
[51:51] So it's a, right sure, right, I want to also point
[51:54] to that given brand application that we have a copy of page 13 of the team, there's a
[51:59] complaints that I've been less for the project. Yes, you know, and I think that that's
[52:30] And we're kind of in the land use business, and simply there's some overlap with that. You see that the context of liberalized systems and things like that. But in this one, I'm just a little bit shaky is to, you know, what role we have and how much influence we should have over that. And that's why I'm going to suggest to the comment, address that with us.
[53:00] is a number-to-all, Prakwaply, Senate and E. Building Permission,
[53:04] Calvary, and SELF, and new and poor,
[53:06] courage and burdensome economic occupancy, and criminal institutions.
[53:09] I did not see it in a part of the application video
[53:12] on issues previously, since that reached out me,
[53:14] you know, it took down that statute,
[53:16] or in the local proposed work, I won't be sailing 29 and any choir about
[53:19] whether they had questions and concerns,
[53:21] the creative guests during the future building-burned process.
[53:25] The project is in Prakwap, and all of a sudden,
[53:30] And this is a normal part of the development of U-process.
[53:33] We can have quite a few who will heads out of the line.
[53:35] You can talk about, of course, those are your projects.
[53:38] So we had to be done in serial.
[53:41] And we designed lots of programs.
[53:43] And we've been like that for years.
[53:44] And there's more to make sure how this potential
[53:47] to be tried with fit with those plans.
[53:50] So we shall not respond.
[53:53] And they provided a little bit of feedback
[53:54] that can be taken into consideration.
[53:55] But we too, we see that a little bit of navigation.
[53:58] How would the public interest be compromised or negatively adversely affected if a building permit
[54:06] were set up in a counter-assparative fluidification?
[54:11] And I'm a little confused about the reason that this is included among the 15 complaints.
[54:18] I mean, this, if you might be successful, I'm not sure.
[54:23] Another question.
[54:23] I mean, the main comment was, and the first requirement that you prior to doing work in the book,
[54:29] is essentially, I'm going to mention, and, like you, I don't know how to handle it.
[54:35] You know, you had a building from the association, but I don't know how to handle it.
[54:39] I mean, between it is curious aspect.
[54:42] It must be something special.
[54:44] We've got the timing, the previous, and, again, we'll have a chance to address that.
[54:50] And I think there was some views on the time about whether or not this is a little in July,
[54:55] 2024, it was a building permit application in person's entirety.
[54:59] And I should have a view from that patient from October 23.
[55:03] Just simply because it was like the time that it came back between those two days.
[55:06] So that might be one of those of it's just new, new future that at least end in time.
[55:14] For 13.
[55:16] Yes.
[55:16] And it probably failed to evaluate if the animal policy and the emergency shelter,
[55:20] including density and domestic animals,
[55:22] and requirements that were designed in Detroit,
[55:24] property, chapter one and type of states
[55:26] who wasn't a useful good staff analysis,
[55:28] and animal policy, how do you consider
[55:30] under the Bureau of Armageddon's
[55:32] Section 6560?
[55:34] That's not one of the sort of criteria
[55:36] that this is actually,
[55:38] but that's part of the duty.
[55:47] So, it's probably failed to require
[55:49] an adequate good neighbor policy.
[55:51] The analysis,
[55:53] is that a good neighbor policy is not
[55:54] one of the new requirements and never get a success in 162.
[55:57] How about everybody?
[55:58] Isn't very completely coming, Murray,
[56:00] and the services they never got involved
[56:02] which was submitted as part of the ARP application.
[56:05] So if that wasn't part of the day,
[56:06] it'd submit to be been in a quality that they would be
[56:15] buying.
[56:15] With your position, the city's position is to say,
[56:18] there wasn't a good one, but we're sitting back, right?
[56:21] The fact that it was done in a different way,
[56:24] what is extra encryption?
[56:26] Yes, that's right.
[56:28] Good, thank you.
[56:30] staff, I probably felt considered issues pertaining to the looks and issues
[56:34] to some longer.
[56:35] I want you to sit in the studio.
[56:37] I also have some little submissions to some longer.
[56:39] The only perception is not to argue about that,
[56:41] and you don't need to sit in the room.
[56:44] You don't need to sit in the room.
[56:44] You don't need to sit in the room.
[56:55] Any questions?
[57:01] Okay.
[57:02] All right.
[57:02] Well, thank you.
[57:03] Not for one of you better.
[57:04] I know that thanks
[57:10] for helping me.
[57:10] Happy to have you.
[57:11] Happy to have you.
[57:11] Happy to have you.
[57:12] And the audience.
[57:12] to be the nature of some of the point
[57:19] of order of education in the city of turn is the
[57:21] presentation necessarily within a five-minute. It will be the planned mission decided to expand
[57:30] the presentation time. That's how it became the applicant will have time for that vehicle to do.
[57:39] Yes, I'd like to mention that the discretion is that it just seems to me that I don't know what my
[57:45] commissioners, it seems to me that there's a lot of me on the road. And I just don't want to
[57:54] sacrifice, you know, an interest in superfaults and this is in five minutes,
[58:00] we can take a lot of time with ourselves and have the appellant fuel here under pressure or
[58:06] after, you know, set aside some of their points in order to address points that we've requested.
[58:11] So allowing
[58:16] a little bit more time to go to science if that's something that's set.
[58:32] So it was an extremely long, unless it's a time to be able to go through whatever you think.
[58:37] I don't know specifically, I'm glad that for the members of the public, thank you.
[58:55] I think
[58:59] it's an registration, but I think if we were to move to 15 minutes per side, I think that would make a big difference in terms of their ability to communicate where they stand and what some of their points are in the points.
[59:14] at, you know, really get into these five
[59:21] minutes just
[59:26] in the audience, the community, right?
[59:28] This is a public jury.
[59:35] I think, you know, it's that they do regard this as an important matter,
[59:41] and so I wouldn't want to presume, and just speak to the audience, but my assumption was
[59:48] and the day you bring it both such.
[59:54] I'm just thinking 15 minutes per side. What if we do that?
[1:00:04] We're not asking the field of time, but we also just, it's like a game show, and I wonder if the budget will offer it in a minute sense.
[1:00:15] So I'll entertain a motion.
[1:00:20] Okay, so I'm motion and second for expanding the timeline for both, you call it ending up to 10 to 10 years.
[1:00:29] Okay, so with that, I would ask the other than, oh, I'm sorry.
[1:00:36] I didn't see any objection that I think we should, for purposes of our record.
[1:00:42] Make your drive pass and work fly.
[1:00:45] take a vote. So all those.
[1:00:48] All those in favor.
[1:00:50] five.
[1:00:52] So we have.
[1:00:56] That's good.
[1:00:57] So we're good.
[1:00:59] So what to ask the.
[1:01:01] college to take the vote.
[1:01:24] Number of the.
[1:01:27] Of the.
[1:01:27] Of the.
[1:01:30] Of the.
[1:01:30] Of the.
[1:01:31] Of the.
[1:01:32] Of the.
[1:01:33] Of the.
[1:01:33] Of the.
[1:01:33] and the commission that the council has established and other commission
[1:01:38] of the last year in the president church side.
[1:01:42] I believe learning about the council,
[1:01:44] about the council, for the need and the presence of prisoners,
[1:01:48] we had it as a court of canny in NHS.
[1:01:53] NHS to our community district 1.
[1:02:00] Not to worry about this, I mentioned a little
[1:02:04] bit of a reaction to the
[1:02:04] We'll be closer to the microphone.
[1:02:06] You might be talking to five.
[1:02:08] Like, okay, frankly, we'll give you an extra 30 seconds.
[1:02:12] Thank you.
[1:02:14] Do you want to respond to our love or a hand?
[1:02:16] I don't have a question.
[1:02:17] Do I want you to start off with me?
[1:02:22] So I'm a resident of the CD.
[1:02:24] I'm all over here in the neighborhood
[1:02:26] to make sure that it focuses this type of shift.
[1:02:28] But the full of shelter at the last few
[1:02:31] because they're in church class.
[1:02:33] I'm going to have all the proposed shelter.
[1:02:35] many neighbors, press press servants, beaded except for planning and then just to our community district one.
[1:02:47] I have a lack of signatures, orientations, and I have a form of a coalition of neighbors who have felt threatened by hopeless individuals.
[1:02:56] We have spoken at the City Council and community teams, press press press conference turns about as a project.
[1:03:03] The CSF, their assets will be documented and built to provide some key documents altogether.
[1:03:12] We obtain legal advice from a regular land use attorney who provided us and analysis due to CD staff,
[1:03:20] HighLiving, receiving it with a proposal.
[1:03:24] CSF is not the first level of legal analysis and outlook in the agenda that I've provided to you.
[1:03:33] Do you think this is a handful of this matter to participate in this topic coming to an end?
[1:03:40] This is just pertaining to the conditionally use status of the church,
[1:03:44] on the regulation governing the dilation center.
[1:03:48] The primary has the most important condition for the commission is the church.
[1:03:54] It is not a permanent condition, how they use permits.
[1:04:00] Do you do the changes of social establishment of the shelter?
[1:04:07] The city's selling code requires that the use is being provided for the venture,
[1:04:14] which is a traditional legal material of the program before the shelter.
[1:04:19] The selling administrator did not require the church in that action.
[1:04:25] which constituted a evocation of the seating 67 code. As a result, the stilling of probal was issued in her book, and she, her fourth, he revoked.
[1:04:43] The rest of the commission. I mean, this part of a lack of time, I've never told a shun, but point-to-semin, because there's permanent approval.
[1:04:50] I want to provide information that is been with help from you by staff, but it's relevant.
[1:04:57] That's the first time to be a gender report that you're just debating.
[1:05:02] This is called by government, but section 6, 5, 6, 6, 2.
[1:05:05] Related to low barrier shelters.
[1:05:08] staff, that's it.
[1:05:09] It's the pre-ass level of energy.
[1:05:11] And then the provision of your city's own growth applies.
[1:05:15] The entire structure of your gender report is written without assumption.
[1:05:19] Please be aware that the set of assumptions is called unknowable and should be challenged.
[1:05:25] Fast manipulation on this matter has created a assertion that should be written.
[1:05:31] For example, on this rate of the legendary work,
[1:05:35] Fast states, the commission can moment insert issues identified in the appeal.
[1:05:40] But that's Fast states that this means that the commission can only insert four criteria of low barriers shelters
[1:05:46] that are in every sort of six-fives succession, that is non-sensical.
[1:05:52] Staff claims that government session six-fives-sensical
[1:05:55] can win the granture's own code is simply false.
[1:05:59] The commission has properly received the appeal
[1:06:01] and has every right to consider it because she was in it.
[1:06:05] But people and related battles have rebounded by documents,
[1:06:08] but I said to you this afternoon,
[1:06:10] shouldn't be the control and guide for your decision making?
[1:06:13] There is another series issued to resolve this matter.
[1:06:17] Sets says that low-bearing elevations are not shown as they used in the Los Angeles
[1:06:23] Unino.
[1:06:24] And that means that, then, that Los Angeles has no regulations for low-bearing shelters.
[1:06:30] Sets then claims that this means that the only regulations that are applied are government
[1:06:35] codes fixed by six to two.
[1:06:38] This analysis is wrong.
[1:06:39] The downtown Los Angeles specific when, which you have proved,
[1:06:45] states that any US national in the related table 6-3 is allowed by right and is regulated by that code.
[1:06:54] Also, regardless of the low-variant Navigation Center issue,
[1:06:58] the particles are governed by the rules for churches, since their is a church on the property.
[1:07:04] The South Union, we also received another document from me.
[1:07:08] In childhood, sir did help.
[1:07:30] This led the council and the public, not the city manager alone, but the zoning and the district's
[1:07:37] busy marathon. You can see all the documentation in that document. It has four hundred and two pages.
[1:07:44] It has not, she said, it is actual quotes from the city managers, as well as the zoning administrator.
[1:07:52] In the math board line was kept out of the loop, and in this conversation, the water
[1:07:58] right can't be, can you cut the size? How did the size load out of this project?
[1:08:04] Thank you.
[1:08:14] Members of the Commission, I need to see me in the light. Also remember, the neighbor is
[1:08:18] coalition. There were several points that I wanted to follow in this form too. One of
[1:08:23] And this is that, again, the properties are sold in your downtown specific plan, and in that area that it states that, and you use not shown in that table, then it is a print business below if I write and is break related by the downtown specific plan rules and then all other global parts of your regular zone.
[1:08:48] But just on which that is finding out that government consequences since two is only
[1:08:56] think that governments are all ready, but just in dispute.
[1:09:02] There's another issue that needs to be resolved.
[1:09:07] Staff explains you that, well, when staff withholds public documents from somebody who is an
[1:09:22] with the document request. So they think about it. Staff is telling you no that staff doesn't have to let
[1:09:31] effective neighbors know what's happening and then the effective neighbors then can't figure out what's happening
[1:09:39] and they can't figure out how to do a functional meaningful response. Then there is no recourse and there's
[1:09:47] that we need them, and that that's because of this dubious stimulus concept they presented
[1:09:53] to you, that there is a entitlement for human process as to how they have tried to artificially
[1:10:01] to find you, in a way that there is no legal basis for step to be trying to show and guide
[1:10:11] and channel due into complying with third artificial
[1:10:15] constrained definitions, or particularly
[1:10:18] when, and then, it completely cripples any type of functional
[1:10:23] participation in the process to figure out what's going on,
[1:10:28] and then people will be participating in providing input,
[1:10:32] so that the project can end up being
[1:10:35] conditioned and evaluated properly,
[1:10:38] or controlling the impacts on that.
[1:10:40] And then there was a discussion about the non-conforming use issue.
[1:10:46] But what to point out something?
[1:10:47] Extab is also given you a manipulation and multiplication
[1:10:51] on how to evaluate a non-conforming use.
[1:10:55] Think of something that we would have, a property present
[1:11:00] is going to be evaluated.
[1:11:03] You're used for this specified.
[1:11:06] Where the use is on the property which area occupies the nature of the use and the specific particulars.
[1:11:21] The conditional use or non-conforming use is interpreted by its location presence on a property.
[1:11:29] It given use is not confined to a specific building that you can speak and distribute across the property of the building.
[1:11:41] That's where that gives you.
[1:11:43] Thank you.
[1:11:48] And I'd like to ask the applicant to follow you in the address today.
[1:11:58] Thank you.
[1:12:01] Thank you.
[1:12:01] Thank you.
[1:12:01] My name is Frank Campbell.
[1:12:02] I am the county who served as a instructor for the county of Warray.
[1:12:05] Thank you so much for this opportunity to speak on behalf of the first of you.
[1:12:09] First of all, welcome to the first of us, RDF for the time to know each.
[1:12:13] RDF was a touched on and desired to meet the definition of a well-bearing navigation center.
[1:12:19] In compliance with the center, we built one, one, seven, built two, and seven, built 13, many, five.
[1:12:25] participants of this program will have access to 24-hour staff, housing education,
[1:12:31] connections to health benefits, medical care, jobs, medical doctorate, where placements
[1:12:35] mental health and substance use disorder service patients.
[1:12:39] These rapid-out services will be offered to support the ultimate goal of moving in
[1:12:43] and permanent housing.
[1:12:45] Clients can choose to be entered into the coordinated entry system and either count.
[1:12:50] Actually, the coalition will continue to prepare for monitoring how these two
[1:12:53] So, theoretically, they can be housed within one of the radiologists.
[1:13:00] Space managers and service coordinators will be trained on evidence-based practices for
[1:13:05] Planionation, including but not limited to one of the shoulder viewing and health
[1:13:09] course philosophies.
[1:13:11] The client's information, their outcomes and demographics will be trapped in a homeless
[1:13:15] benefit information system of both families.
[1:13:18] Six different clients from the surrounding neighborhoods of the U.S.
[1:13:22] On board.
[1:13:23] She reaches the side of our security venting, 24 hours surveillance,
[1:13:28] ADA ramps, private rooms, lead resistance,
[1:13:31] and five sprinklers each year.
[1:13:33] Clients can be offered to a survey being within the walls of the program,
[1:13:37] which includes a heavily fair area,
[1:13:40] showers, food services, storage.
[1:13:43] This is unlike most of the programs that you currently have
[1:13:45] in the city of U.S.
[1:13:48] And because the amenities are limited to program participants,
[1:13:52] so traffic by outsiders in an outcome of poverty will be billed.
[1:13:56] And, yes, let's be improved by programs staff.
[1:14:00] I want to emphasize that RDS is not a traditional self-resistence
[1:14:04] and has been named several several times
[1:14:05] around all of the doctors that drive red.
[1:14:08] It is not warning shelter, it is not a confidence center.
[1:14:12] It is a service enriched before our low barrier navigation centers.
[1:14:17] At this core, or yet offers much more than temporary shelter, it provides a support and
[1:14:23] environment to pair with critical services.
[1:14:26] It will offer a chance for individuals to move beyond mere survival.
[1:14:30] It will help them rediscover and rebuild the less fields that they have to adapt or abandon
[1:14:36] while living in shelter, and will re-affirmate clients to living in numerous.
[1:14:41] During the month of August, the December of 2022,
[1:14:44] the chain outreach chain mentioned in one of the slides where we are having to identify
[1:14:49] 50's better people between river miles, two and five.
[1:15:00] Inconcessions, and ineffective, which is why both counties have agreed to establish a partnership and properly serve this population.
[1:15:09] Through this partnership, the healthier moderate has identified nearly 8 million dollars in state funding and is leading the development of the society.
[1:15:16] and Santa Cruz County plans to take over the project at the sunset of New York.
[1:15:22] This is a part of the fact, two counties that are structurally and culturally set by different things.
[1:15:30] But everything aside, we, the common goal, which is to help the people who ask for it.
[1:15:35] Earlier, there was a question about the relationships and all of us that you can see, we have quite a few people here.
[1:15:40] So, dignity moves is what is called the Development Management Agency.
[1:15:46] They are responsible for coordinating all of the teams, but surveyors, the contractors,
[1:15:54] and they are kind of the central point of the entire group of this working on this project.
[1:16:01] Community Action Board is what facing home first.
[1:16:03] So, inside your packet and immediately you receive the application that can help you
[1:16:07] has submitted to the state that we had listed home first, as this looks provider, but since then we have
[1:16:14] huge role-level service provider with extensive experience in working with Watsonville residents,
[1:16:20] and also working with this population.
[1:16:25] We are here today because the city staff had a group of
[1:16:28] counties on the counties and so many of them, so many parents have occasion, and that group was being
[1:16:34] killed, and well, I do absolutely feel for the frustrations of the appellant.
[1:16:39] I also don't want to dismiss the event that 57 people asked for out two years ago.
[1:16:44] And this is a project that is intended to help them.
[1:16:47] I think it's really important to find what in the size.
[1:16:50] That this project is not for people who want to remain homeless.
[1:16:55] This project is for people who want to resolve their homelessness.
[1:16:58] This is not the people that the folks that are so passionate being disperaged by.
[1:17:08] This is a whole, this group of folks wants help.
[1:17:13] And I feel like that's two governments, three governments, including the city of Watson.
[1:17:17] This is an opportunity for so far that to infer through the appeal and itself,
[1:17:21] is about to qualify this project as a virus abuse.
[1:17:26] RDS has been assessed for requirements
[1:17:28] of low-variant navigation centers,
[1:17:30] which is why I respect the asset
[1:17:32] this appeal we tonight.
[1:17:33] Inside of your packet, you would also
[1:17:35] should never see the letters on the state of California.
[1:17:38] We have engaged in the housing community,
[1:17:41] development, housing and accountability unit.
[1:17:43] As a view of all of our applications,
[1:17:45] they are very familiar with this project.
[1:17:47] They're what we've funded this project.
[1:17:49] And they also worried that visitors will be able to bear their notifications.
[1:17:53] So that's actually the end of my comments, because I was prepared for five minutes.
[1:17:58] But if you guys have any questions, I'd be very sensitive.
[1:18:02] Thank you.
[1:18:04] Any questions?
[1:18:08] Any questions?
[1:18:10] I just don't like to see how many of these races have.
[1:18:14] Thank you, Michael, I'm still, I don't know what to say.
[1:18:19] It's not that different.
[1:18:21] Well, could you be thinking about taking a time to address and see me?
[1:18:26] We thought it was very long presentation.
[1:18:30] It was just to be able to report members of community
[1:18:34] about the, you know, the pellets,
[1:18:40] I'm trying to keep my terminology, you're correct.
[1:18:43] It's part of our community today.
[1:18:47] You can accept that.
[1:18:49] Well,
[1:18:52] for those people that haven't been safe with this whole process,
[1:18:55] and so I'd like that.
[1:18:56] I want to really kind of became involved.
[1:18:58] There was sort of an emphasis after the, after the cover,
[1:19:02] but let's hit the area, or it just was a project that was in motion before the last two years.
[1:19:11] So, historically, every year, we tell me of what a rate is, and I can't have a clean up a lot of the talker I'll ever, and so a few years ago, there was a little bit of attention, because we did a clean up bloodflakes and we told them what's in both sides,
[1:19:32] But I have reached out to both the county of San Cruz and the city of Los Angeles, when I first got to the county of Monterey to say, hey, for the nonprofit sector, and I let them know that we work by knowing that we're in front of the Internet, but I wanted to coordinate sort of this outreach of those things to the people that we had done so.
[1:19:50] That was in at the end that I was in the month, but specifically on the fall of December
[1:19:58] which was in 2022 and during the conversations of coordinating the cleanup, we had discovered
[1:20:07] that there's probably a better way for us to do this.
[1:20:10] And that's when I deployed the J.
[1:20:12] outreach team for the 19th of November,
[1:20:14] we realized there's even a interest for people on the Latin
[1:20:17] for us for services and to find out why we weren't
[1:20:20] engaged in the services that had lands
[1:20:22] or applications for us, the Latin for March, the year after.
[1:20:27] And we're at your action by the moderate
[1:20:28] counting side of the river for full.
[1:20:30] So we weren't doing it on the Latin side,
[1:20:33] but we wanted to provide our neighbor
[1:20:35] services instead of doing it.
[1:20:37] and coordinate services.
[1:20:38] Because we know what happens.
[1:20:40] They just hop back and forth between the world,
[1:20:42] almost as forever.
[1:20:44] I'm very noted, but in the interest of this hearing,
[1:20:49] the applicant is accounting on the rate,
[1:20:51] which is a little different.
[1:20:54] Yes.
[1:20:55] So I'm actually contextual that this effort
[1:20:58] started on accounting on the water rate
[1:21:00] and that travel transition did.
[1:21:02] No, actually, the result of accounting on the rate
[1:21:05] decided to pursue the fighting is really because we did want it to feel like we were just assuming
[1:21:10] that the Communist Center Chris would go out for the money and build it on their side of
[1:21:14] river and it would serve our population. This is a partnership, so we wanted to split up all of the
[1:21:19] roles and responsibilities that have the advantage of what we're going through right now. But the
[1:21:24] sustainability of that program, the Chinese Santa Cruz is taking it out of the river and we're
[1:21:29] question.
[1:21:31] What's that timeline of that? The end of the grant ends on June 30, 20, 26.
[1:21:40] We're seeing some documentation. We're familiar with the Department of Housing, the community of development.
[1:21:46] From the same health care? Yes. Correct. Yes.
[1:21:49] We're certain to know which needs of information for that to them. From that,
[1:21:55] pertaining state block regarding low varied applications, centers, and you comment on that,
[1:22:02] in
[1:22:05] the lower area of education center.
[1:22:12] Yes.
[1:22:12] So, as I mentioned earlier, this project was typically designed
[1:22:15] within that definition.
[1:22:16] Inside of the application space,
[1:22:18] we did call it a housing navigational center.
[1:22:20] It's a cultural difference,
[1:22:21] but the technical term is a lower area of education center.
[1:22:25] I'm the State of California.
[1:22:26] It did pass a law,
[1:22:27] as mentioned by Matt earlier.
[1:22:30] So, as I mentioned earlier, this project was typically designed within that definition. Inside of the application state, we did call it a housing navigational service, of course, all of your friends, but the technical term is a low-bearing navigational service.
[1:22:42] The state of California did pass a law, as mentioned by Matt earlier, that allowed these projects to be by right, and to do a little different from traditional emergency shelter, which is why I believe that the state had made it by right,
[1:22:56] It's because it's not just to give somebody a safe place to sleep for an evening,
[1:23:01] they will touch this wrap on the services and get them a house so they are a longer homeless.
[1:23:06] And that is our goal when we get people off the left of the vehicles and into, you know,
[1:23:12] the rest of the lives.
[1:23:14] It's in my understanding of several of these book,
[1:23:17] vocabulary and application centers.
[1:23:20] I'm already counting.
[1:23:21] We have three.
[1:23:22] I'm sorry.
[1:23:22] We have three.
[1:23:24] located in the county area or in terms of the city.
[1:23:27] There are in the city of Salinas, the city of C-Side.
[1:23:31] But actually we have four.
[1:23:33] We have two in the city of Salinas and one in C-Side.
[1:23:36] What's the longest standing over here in the city that you've got?
[1:23:39] The Shia Center is the original one and that we've been not too long ago.
[1:23:43] There's a lot of class.
[1:23:44] I believe it's 2019, 2020.
[1:23:48] It's 2020.
[1:23:49] It's a bit of a little bit.
[1:23:51] And can you talk about the transitional rate from that project?
[1:23:55] Absolutely.
[1:23:56] The Chair Center performs higher than any other traditional emergency shelter in the community.
[1:24:02] At average, it houses permanently about 78% of the occupants that move to that program.
[1:24:09] It is our collection.
[1:24:12] How many people have circulated through that program?
[1:24:14] Well, we're in housing.
[1:24:16] Well, we're in housing this way.
[1:24:18] Thank you very much for taking the time with us.
[1:24:21] That's nice.
[1:24:23] Thank you.
[1:24:29] Okay.
[1:24:31] I now will move to clarify questions from the plan of commission.
[1:24:39] Would like to begin.
[1:24:49] So, if no one else has,
[1:24:52] I just got a question.
[1:24:53] I would like to, to say,
[1:24:56] let's just, you know, this is all thing about
[1:24:57] if you're not confused, you're not paying attention.
[1:25:00] Okay, I don't think I'm quite there yet, I'm paying attention, but I do have some areas that I would like clarify in the context of the presentation made by the capital.
[1:25:11] Because the appellant seems to have a take-great exception to the way that the city is reading and interpreting the law.
[1:25:20] And in particular, the extent to which the state of California has preempted local government
[1:25:27] with respect to low barrier entered.
[1:25:30] And that is really central to what the function, as I see it,
[1:25:35] up above the plan of the nation that is tonight.
[1:25:37] I mean, I love hearing about the success stories,
[1:25:40] things like that, but honestly, those are things that I don't think really fall
[1:25:46] on our side of the money.
[1:25:47] But evaluating the appeal and particularly most part of the appeal that essentially
[1:25:54] take us to task or misifying the law and misinterpreting a lot, that's the thing where the
[1:26:01] tire needs the road thrust. And so if I may turn to our city attorney and just ask her for an
[1:26:09] We'll review the city's position and in particular, you can address the points made by Mr.
[1:26:18] Selvyn on behalf of the App, the app, the app, the app, the app, the app, and the library.
[1:26:23] I'm sure.
[1:26:32] Thank you for the question.
[1:26:34] First, I think it's important to go back to the staff's training.
[1:26:37] Where do you know where the code section six, five, six, six, two?
[1:26:40] It's very clearly states that a low barrier navigation center is a used by right in areas that are zone for
[1:26:47] use and non-residential uses are many called that family uses. So it's very clearly stated
[1:26:56] that use by rate is a defined term. I mean we cannot require any type of discretionary review.
[1:27:02] So the project needs the definition of a low barrier navigation center and it complies
[1:27:08] statutory requirements that this statute then the city is required to permit that use that put it
[1:27:20] very succinctly. With respect to the questions for the issues that were raised in the letter from
[1:27:28] the attorney had part of that find it, I know that as before was referred to and that it's not with this
[1:27:35] project. What's submitted as it's not submitting under that. Those provisions. There's, I think, a difference of opinion about what, what, what I'll leave a lot in forming use means and whether or not this project triggers a need or a church itself to come in for a conditional use permit.
[1:27:59] and I can read the staff's presentation on that
[1:28:02] and that is not triggered by the use of the low barrier
[1:28:07] navigation center.
[1:28:10] And I apologize to another third point in that.
[1:28:12] Why are you actually happy with what I came up with?
[1:28:14] Thank you.
[1:28:15] I have another set up.
[1:28:16] I didn't know if I was going to answer that question.
[1:28:19] Thank you very much.
[1:28:20] We'll be back.
[1:28:25] So we talked about set of bill four.
[1:28:28] We talked about the special use for a minute.
[1:28:33] And then I think there was a question about how this property is identified in the downtown wants in the specific plan.
[1:28:42] And I think again, you're stopped at an excellent job of explaining that the uses are not listed, they are permitted unless they're not permitted elsewhere.
[1:28:51] And this use is not prohibited elsewhere in the code, so it is a use that is allowed.
[1:28:56] I think there's also a little bit of a bit of a deferring misunderstanding perhaps.
[1:29:03] We don't have a dotted development criteria that apply to this type of edus.
[1:29:08] So there were no standards in the city's own ordinance to apply to this project.
[1:29:13] So if you're aware of what that state preemption affect us, the importance of going to that.
[1:29:20] Potentially, I think yes.
[1:29:22] I
[1:29:25] think those are the points in the letter or something that I've missed that you'd like me to address in that.
[1:29:33] Well, and just to be above the nuclear, this was not included with the appeal packet.
[1:29:38] And it wasn't submitted as a public comment to this hearing.
[1:29:43] So I don't think it was intentionally would help you from anyone.
[1:29:47] I appreciate that you have it tonight.
[1:29:50] So it was not submitted as part of the opinion.
[1:30:00] And issued for the planning commission versus what is sort of a societal commentary on where the state of California is, what it's approaches to these little very navigation centers. And I think it's been conflated. I think that, you know, our job is quite defined, and it's been limited. And so that's why I want to focus on things like this because I think this is really what we do need to focus hard on. Thank you. Thank you.
[1:30:30] other questions.
[1:30:39] So I may ask the city attorney, what I'm hearing, what I'm hearing, what I'm hearing you say is that the staff is not around us in interpreting a low barrier navigational center.
[1:30:55] I believe that your staff appropriately applied the provisions of the city's regulations and the statutory requirements for low barrier navigational center.
[1:31:03] and sectoral tour requirements imposed by the state.
[1:31:07] Thank you.
[1:31:11] So with that, we can move forward and go to the public comments.
[1:31:15] And I'm unclear.
[1:31:16] It's not stating the agenda.
[1:31:17] What is the kind of a lot of proof to be there?
[1:31:22] Do you think the pandemic has been proven?
[1:31:24] But as I said, the discussion about the chair for how much time to provide.
[1:31:29] And it's also a discussion.
[1:31:31] You said once you don't even have a lot of people say comments, you can say that I've
[1:31:37] heard back to you, so I'm just supportive of what this is for you too.
[1:31:42] Pretty easily.
[1:31:42] It's something for the business you've heard of.
[1:31:47] So with that, I hesitate to actually pair back for three minutes, because it feels like
[1:31:51] I take something away, and I don't necessarily think that we need to build more time
[1:31:57] to do it.
[1:31:57] So shall we just proceed and allow each speaker to three minutes?
[1:32:01] Okay.
[1:32:03] So, right, members of the public.
[1:32:29] My name is Gustav Yelp, I am the director of Toronto Council.
[1:32:32] In fact, we're going to need to answer more.
[1:32:35] I'm here tonight with our new on this prevention intervention.
[1:32:38] The director, my,
[1:32:41] Kid Rish.
[1:32:42] Calvism, I'll use this at my aunt,
[1:32:45] a very community action agency,
[1:32:47] for Senators County.
[1:32:48] Good for you, I'm in one sense.
[1:32:51] We have more major services components,
[1:32:53] including homelessness, prevention, and interventions that this is, which have provided
[1:32:58] resistance systems to a position for almost four decades, as well as programs to address
[1:33:03] homelessness, and housing navigation solutions, and work experience support for primary and
[1:33:09] mental health, how many lots of mental adults, on-house adults. As you know, Cat has been selected
[1:33:15] and has signed on as the contractive non-profit operator of the MDF courses at WICSUS.
[1:33:23] low barrier navigation center projects.
[1:33:26] To providing tens wrap around case management,
[1:33:30] an interim housing solution
[1:33:31] from those who have been embarked by our lending.
[1:33:36] We know that the efforts to provide solutions
[1:33:38] without having happened are urgent,
[1:33:40] as repairs to the living are needed
[1:33:42] for the Black safety of our community.
[1:33:46] We look forward to on this project
[1:33:48] starting as one solution to homelessness in our community.
[1:33:56] But with our long-standing involvement in connection with our on-the-house community,
[1:34:00] for our current homelessness programs and services in these past years,
[1:34:04] we're here tonight to express our support and commitment to the
[1:34:08] resources. They force us to also know that it's a timing-home project,
[1:34:12] our dedication, experience services, and referral model will continue as we bring
[1:34:18] RDF, low barrier navigations that are online.
[1:34:22] Additionally, through the course, participating
[1:34:24] with the city's new task force on the homelessness
[1:34:26] group, as well as our continued desire
[1:34:29] to collaborate with community partners
[1:34:31] to help create support and increase solutions
[1:34:35] that are needed to improve the dial on housing
[1:34:38] and homelessness in our city and community.
[1:34:42] Thank you, thank you.
[1:34:45] Chair for me.
[1:34:46] Yes, please.
[1:34:47] I would like to ask everyone to come back to this comment and give this a lovely yellow
[1:34:53] one that places it in the last six months earlier, or should you please say anything.
[1:35:04] Thank you very much.
[1:35:06] There's the only chance I use that for Director of the Housing Centre's family.
[1:35:10] And I'm here to express our strong support for both time and complex projects.
[1:35:16] This project represents a crucial step in addressing our communities pressing needs
[1:35:20] was safe staying up in affordable housing. Housing is wanted just to move on with someone's head.
[1:35:27] Foundation for stability, the lean and opportunity. The tiny homes project workers and innovative
[1:35:35] solutions are provided individuals with a face to forth home, fostering, dignity, independence,
[1:35:41] and strongness and stuff community. We have a particularly competent and successful
[1:35:47] this project because we'll be managed by the Community Action Committee.
[1:35:53] With decades of experience, service, the Americans County care has demonstrated
[1:35:58] a deep understanding of the local needs and improvement track record of delivering
[1:36:03] impactful community-centered programs. If leadership makes them and ideal fits all the
[1:36:09] seedest project, then ensure that it drives.
[1:36:14] This project isn't just about building homes. It's
[1:36:17] building home and creating a pathway to a brighter future for those who are the most
[1:36:23] leading. By moving this project forward, you will ensure that more members of our community
[1:36:29] can access the stability they need to thrive. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration.
[1:36:36] Thank you.
[1:36:48] Thank you, Dean Commission. I'm a large salt. I'm a water bill resident in district 2.
[1:36:54] I've been sitting in the right calm and I'm in support of denying the appeal of the movie
[1:36:59] forward. I'm grateful for the work we've done. I would welcome one of my neighborhood Mr.
[1:37:30] This is a proven model with a high rate of success in re-housing. I myself been a housing navigator with
[1:37:37] 180180 later housing first and have seen how these programs work and didn't get people on their
[1:37:42] feet. While the revenues, the concerns that neighbors have, this project is, I believe,
[1:37:48] like the two interests that can serve rather than exacerbate them. We don't have many solutions here
[1:37:53] and lots of people at this point. And this is one that is finally happening and is important for
[1:37:57] regardless of any of this, it seems to me that the reality is, there's just things in
[1:38:02] good grounds for a reversal. You know, I'm kind of, as to some of your points, I'm sorry
[1:38:06] that you have to deal with it. I'm not sure that it's a necessarily in your purview and I don't
[1:38:11] know where it will go. I do know we hear that, you know, California State is involved in terms
[1:38:17] of what's happening. Actually, I can address the right-by-use issue. One of the questions I would
[1:38:23] be interested in here is if we didn't move forward with it, what do we open ourselves up to as
[1:38:28] the city owner and concerns there as far as your delegation or any issues in that respect.
[1:38:36] So I'm just asking that you would please consider denying this appeal and allowing this to move forward.
[1:38:42] And we can see dress issues that they arise. I know that we have a long-force in our city
[1:38:49] that I trust is done a good job in some aspects
[1:38:52] with our community, our on-house community
[1:38:55] and we'll continue to do that.
[1:38:59] And perhaps at the end of the grant,
[1:39:00] they provide an opportunity to assess
[1:39:02] how the success rates have been,
[1:39:03] and consider continuation,
[1:39:04] if we even have people who are willing to consider to that point.
[1:39:08] It's only getting colder
[1:39:09] as we all feel outside to let's get this move
[1:39:13] and it gets folks off our shores next.
[1:39:16] Thank you.
[1:39:29] Hello, my name is Bradson Grayson. I'm a law civil resident and I'm here also up to
[1:39:34] have the Affordable Housing now to support this project. As a former attorney,
[1:39:42] and dealt with some housing issues, I don't see any reason to set aside the determination
[1:39:51] but beyond that, I just project addresses the needs of be all known as fair.
[1:39:58] We know that the unhealthy population has increased in a while to build.
[1:40:03] At this time for us, we're interested.
[1:40:06] Many of the issues, the concern neighbors of these kinds of profits,
[1:40:11] will actually be a leading when these projects are built.
[1:40:14] When people actually have access to housing, it improves the quality of life for everyone around them.
[1:40:20] So, I'd urge you to go back home to something administrator to ask you.
[1:40:49] So, I'm Pastor Westview Breastanger staying in the hospital.
[1:40:53] I hope she likes something to do with my human now.
[1:40:57] I just want to say, when I heard of this project, I thought I don't.
[1:41:01] And they asked me to put it on my top of the desk.
[1:41:03] I thought that's just just something that I need.
[1:41:06] And I've heard about that and what it's supposed to be.
[1:41:10] And this is a project of slighting thing.
[1:41:13] But one specifically that is supposed to be model-backed,
[1:41:16] Santa Barbara.
[1:41:17] When I went visit it, I was blown away.
[1:41:20] But it wasn't like tense, trash.
[1:41:22] That came outside.
[1:41:24] But that, there's actually a work in Spanish.
[1:41:25] It's planned to burn.
[1:41:27] It's a beautiful, I walked inside.
[1:41:29] I didn't see enough people.
[1:41:31] I saw people that had a house.
[1:41:33] and you're playing in a kind of
[1:41:38] intense type of really bad
[1:41:42] current, a very similar concern about this being in our backyard.
[1:41:48] And it will be the answer, it will give you a lot of issues.
[1:41:55] And it will be a solution.
[1:41:56] And you know that it has issues for our house and the neighborhoods.
[1:42:00] And this will get them housed and on to provide
[1:42:04] information.
[1:42:09] The other thing I just wanted to ask is, is the work that we've done.
[1:42:13] We've been serving breakfast in the house as a church for eight years on all of it.
[1:42:18] I've got to know that in their stories.
[1:42:21] And 86% of the people that are not housed in 10 years,
[1:42:25] count in our firm, stay in the kitchen.
[1:42:28] These are our own neighbors that are in distress.
[1:42:33] This is the working class community of Watson.
[1:42:36] There are a lot of people very close to the end that could be managed.
[1:42:41] One job was one enhancement, one injury on the sick, one divorce, one addiction relief.
[1:42:50] So this is a way to address and help our neighbors to work per any challenge.
[1:42:55] That's what we
[1:43:03] ask.
[1:44:12] and I'm not sure if we can figure out what we're gonna do.
[1:44:18] In the years, I don't know what I'm going to do with this.
[1:44:22] Because I've been there for a long time and I've been working for a few years
[1:44:27] and I've been working for a few years.
[1:44:32] My children come to my house to my house.
[1:44:36] I'm sure I can figure it out.
[1:44:40] It's the same that I've been working for a few years.
[1:44:44] and please don't forget to subscribe to my channel.
[1:44:48] Don't forget to like, share and subscribe to my channel.
[1:45:07] I have some that I might,
[1:45:17] but I guess
[1:45:20] close to where you want to develop, but where you want to have this development for our homeless.
[1:45:34] I see a lot of people here, but I don't know them, I don't get them in my neighborhood, where you want to develop this project.
[1:45:43] I think that a lot of the people here.
[1:45:48] But they want to be in the same place, they want to be in their home and feel safe and feel happy.
[1:45:56] But we won't be happy and safe.
[1:45:58] If you develop, if you build this project, where we live, we want to be safe.
[1:46:04] We want to be living in a safe place.
[1:46:08] Peace and wine by our guests of this project.
[1:46:12] I get home late at night from work.
[1:46:15] And you also want to make sure that I don't be saved, but I get home.
[1:46:22] My children also get home gradually.
[1:46:26] You just want to make sure that my children will arrive to my house.
[1:46:31] And that's one of the reasons why I'm going to agree with this project.
[1:46:34] And I want to ask you for your young.
[1:46:37] I don't have anything I guess our homeless.
[1:46:41] I think that they also be the same things where you live,
[1:46:45] but they want to be somewhere else.
[1:46:48] We want to be safe, we want to be safe, we want to be safe now, and
[1:46:56] that's all I have to do.
[1:47:06] I'm a means of the security guests, and I work for meeting our someone at the San Francisco meeting,
[1:47:12] and I am the South County for meeting and tree.
[1:47:17] So this thank you.
[1:47:20] I work directly with all the side of adults.
[1:47:23] and not all homogeneity roles are drug addicts.
[1:47:29] A lot of individuals that I work with are agricultural workers,
[1:47:35] and they try to save their money for the season is over,
[1:47:41] but they do run out of their savings, and they end up homeless.
[1:47:45] Also work with individuals that come from vocation.
[1:47:51] one individual that I worked with. She came from a broken relationship and she started thinking
[1:47:59] we can go to the business and she just needed somebody to help her out and working with me. She was
[1:48:07] She gets sober, she got house, and she's waking up down to so many people.
[1:48:13] So it works, it works, it's just, I hope.
[1:48:20] There's just so many people out there that can help them.
[1:48:23] I can't believe
[1:48:27] that.
[1:48:28] There's people here, yes.
[1:48:42] That's it.
[1:48:43] and there's a council for a five county,
[1:48:46] which I've certainly experienced quite a bit
[1:48:47] corrected, I was wondering how, also when we felt
[1:48:51] they were supposed to be, I mean,
[1:48:53] it was corporation was 4,000.
[1:48:56] I was going to tell them, I was going to tell them
[1:48:57] what I meant, I was going to actually get an impact.
[1:49:00] That was a wrong rate, I mean, very clean,
[1:49:03] we'll get an impact,
[1:49:08] and it's scattered.
[1:49:08] At that point, I just like to determine
[1:49:09] what I'm going to call it, and try to help avoid
[1:49:12] certainly those of those fortunate to
[1:49:17] do
[1:49:17] see on here as stigma and stereotypes.
[1:49:23] To put in you one, every person that you can
[1:49:26] individual, and I think that's a lot of fear and I feel fear, but I think it's a false,
[1:49:31] a false illness, a very cruel. And it's not real. It's not a valuable family concern. People
[1:49:39] are a unique person who can't swim in a walk to say, oh, all of them are certain. You know,
[1:49:44] we can be scared to go home and have to be there. You know, we have to respect this visual
[1:49:50] to be the first name of the federal authority.
[1:49:54] And I, I thought it tells people to get some place to get.
[1:49:57] Someone was a
[1:50:07] portion of sign-in content.
[1:50:11] I think we saw this as humanity.
[1:50:13] As a people who are part of the political and the source of interest.
[1:50:17] And he, well, he was a people.
[1:50:18] I did work with our family and they've been able to policy upon this
[1:50:27] project.
[1:50:27] It's not like we've
[1:50:38] been, we've been through this later.
[1:50:40] But we'll be surprised that they haven't
[1:50:44] clearly saw it.
[1:50:45] Hopefully, you have.
[1:51:00] The background is a section.
[1:51:03] Yes, sorry, I saved work on September 10, but I had saved everything that was so cool.
[1:51:12] At the front of a workshop room, guys, there's a one-minute or shaving, which is called
[1:51:20] And I gave up to the people
[1:51:28] for suffering.
[1:51:31] It would be given the homeless and you know,
[1:51:33] just like homeless.
[1:51:35] Like I give it my son and really want somebody help.
[1:51:39] There's the homeless.
[1:51:41] We have so much to try and be friends,
[1:51:45] and I'm proud for our organization.
[1:51:46] We try to help the best in the country.
[1:51:50] But in the beginning, the project of this
[1:51:53] which is to make them more difficult. Just thinking, it is your son, it is your dad who
[1:52:02] can have some work. It's not in your home. It's my son. Come on, somebody help. I think the
[1:52:12] be more open and more flexible.
[1:52:16] So I'll tell you the crunch of everything.
[1:52:30] We can also be more open and more flexible talk room in Transylgenics.
[1:52:36] Thank you.
[1:52:50] Thank you.
[1:52:51] In the mayor of Los Cercos, the University of the State of the Netherlands, the NACA, the PPEG,
[1:52:59] and the
[1:53:41] I am the one who gave you the right to be treated as a child.
[1:53:46] When you were a child, you were a child,
[1:53:50] you were a child, because you wanted us to go to a younger age,
[1:53:56] and we have to keep you there, with your parents, with your parents,
[1:54:01] with your parents, with your parents, with your parents,
[1:54:05] and with your parents, because those who are not with us,
[1:54:10] to be able to look at.
[1:54:12] And when they say, what they want to do is to look at the reality,
[1:54:17] because they don't think they're the result,
[1:54:20] that the people and the people that they want to look at,
[1:54:24] they are not, they are not, they are all,
[1:54:27] they are all, they are all, they are all, they are all.
[1:54:45] My name is Ramon Pacheco.
[1:54:48] President of this term, one of the biggest,
[1:54:50] But
[1:54:55] what I mean is the same words as sad that I got a people here,
[1:55:02] where parents were grandparents, where children.
[1:55:07] And I know that you as parents, children, as grandchildren, grandparents,
[1:55:11] you want them, you want the best for them.
[1:55:15] Who's the one to guarantee me that all the homeless people here,
[1:55:20] we only have sexual predators,
[1:55:26] pray about our children, our grandchildren. You have, again, you
[1:55:30] have children, you have grandchildren.
[1:55:36] The pastor was the leader of the church. He's been
[1:55:39] trying to be a financial benefit from us, in the past when the children are watching me like
[1:55:45] it has to be. And if you want it, I would support because you wanted to sell it at higher price.
[1:55:52] But at the end we were going to bathe my chances and bathe more and I'm tired of boss.
[1:55:57] So I asked him, I can go into Nalmas Bay World and he said, no, so I asked him,
[1:56:02] why do you want us to work with you so that you can bathe money?
[1:56:08] And that's exactly what they're doing today.
[1:56:11] I've made you bathe in high blood type.
[1:56:13] He is really willing to adopt that wellness.
[1:56:16] What he wants is to make more money than our cost, but it's possible, and make orders in this district.
[1:56:25] And you
[1:56:31] can take one big, from third generation lots of bill.
[1:56:34] I own a business, less than two hundred yards from this spot.
[1:56:40] I'm here with these people talking about surveillance, cleaning up, going to take care of these people.
[1:56:46] But they're not taking care of, it's the field around the business that gets left there by the home lists, which I've seen it happen.
[1:56:55] They're not videotaping and surveilling my neighborhood. They're going to surveil that section there.
[1:57:03] So, nobody cares if people around this accountant, they care about the people in the government.
[1:57:12] So, I'm very against this.
[1:57:15] I'm sick of it, I think, bad advice.
[1:57:17] I've been, uh, um, had, uh, self broke into in my business.
[1:57:24] And nothing gets done.
[1:57:26] We can call it police.
[1:57:27] They can't have surveillance cameras, man.
[1:57:30] They don't.
[1:57:31] They can't tell who it is. I got guys coming with a mask on when you know who it is. So I'm very
[1:57:39] against this and I hope this doesn't happen here. And Monterey, I assume they're the ones that
[1:57:48] got this grant and now let's get it's get put in our backyard. Put it back to Monterey.
[1:58:04] This is
[1:59:05] But you have to know that what is happening is not the most difficult thing.
[1:59:12] All the community is working a lot.
[1:59:18] The police have a problem to control the problem that they want to do.
[1:59:24] And now they have the problem that they want to do.
[1:59:27] Have you seen the police have been attacked?
[1:59:30] Well, that's why the people...
[1:59:32] It's not liked to be the reason why people use different ways of controlling or having a good idea.
[1:59:43] I would like to say that the student god is the student god, but if the student god is the student god,
[2:00:00] Habido muchos problemas, la comunidad va todo vamos a perder, que estos ciertos recursos no es la ayuda, es perpodicada a toda la comunidad
[2:00:11] de vida, cuáles gente no sabe lo que está pasando, si supieran estudiar la imprescente, pero no se ha dado
[2:00:19] información, porque siempre anda con elevación, nunca se les comunica a toda la comunidad que vamos a hacer
[2:01:03] Aunque es que en mi manera en la vida de miren,
[2:01:08] es una vez, por lo que está en el momento.
[2:01:12] Que en el que el hecho de la muerte
[2:01:14] es que los defensores, en el momento...
[2:01:23] y en el medio de la muerte,
[2:01:24] también en el momento, ¿no?
[2:01:28] En el que el que se ha habido en este momento,
[2:01:30] le ha aceptado el lugar en el que se ha logrado.
[2:01:33] En el que se ha logrado,
[2:01:35] es a la vida ultrético.
[2:01:37] En la política donde se encuentra en la vida
[2:01:45] a la vida, a la vida del que está en los que sonaron.
[2:01:50] Todos ellos que songan a la vida,
[2:01:50] a la vida de la vida, de la vida de la vida de los canımios.
[2:01:53] Ahora, hay que estar en el desarrollo de la vida del que 콩apatate.
[2:01:57] De la vida al mismo sistema,
[2:02:00] y en la vida de la vida,
[2:02:02] orgen,
[2:02:03] te digo que no.
[2:02:05] Los actos se están comprensando.
[2:02:08] Pero ¿en qué hay? Es uneness visto como un daring de 30 de jun dalalping de esc Goodbyeines.
[2:02:15] Es esa y con cruzado nueva,
[2:02:19] así que no debe de más creating, pero él lo ha dado como un punite.
[2:02:27] También no tengo lo que es más toothbrushes ni que ver tanto.
[2:02:31] como en serio
[2:02:33] no puedo decir resembles
[2:02:36] los hijos de
[2:02:54] que�or como
[2:03:05] es como
[2:03:08] Se trata de encernos en maravillos, en Salinas, en San Jose, y en el now here in the Washington.
[2:03:18] ¿Vos sonos?
[2:03:20] ¿Vos?
[2:03:24] ¿Vos?
[2:03:26] ¿Vos?
[2:03:27] ¿Vos?
[2:03:28] ¿Vos?
[2:03:28] ¿Vos?
[2:03:29] ¿Vos?
[2:03:29] ¿Vos?
[2:03:30] ¿Vos?
[2:03:34] ¿Vos?
[2:03:35] ¿Vos?
[2:03:36] para nosotros.
[2:03:40] La gente está inmedia,
[2:03:42] ahí está en el mundo que nos showá en la casa.
[2:03:49] ¿Los лучше?
[2:03:50] Me gustaría preguntarnos si nosotros
[2:03:52] nos quiera más una
[2:04:04] empresa en el mundo.
[2:04:10] La gente está pegando las cosas bien,
[2:04:11] pero no me sigo.
[2:04:12] Los últimos 10 años podemos que no,
[2:04:18] Pero esta es...
[2:04:19] ¿Aba un poco?
[2:04:21] Esta es la righto y del tiempo, o la righto del tiempo...
[2:04:27] ... las que nos ha忙ado, y ahora Finallyamos...
[2:04:31] ... y creo que es una nueva idea sobre cómo...
[2:04:35] ... a laweitio de que el programa es la una de los que sea a la banda de viele años.
[2:04:40] Es una una misada.
[2:04:44] Pero como le da...
[2:04:47] es que es un inversion del mundo que se va hacia donde no puede poder hacer,
[2:04:51] en las ciudades en las centenas de cabres de la capital.
[2:04:56] Viene aquí ...
[2:04:59] ... en la historia de la ciudad y está viviendo en Belvedria.
[2:05:03] A mi hermano le va a ser un teléfono de un hermano mas de nuevo,
[2:05:09] que también siempre no haces.
[2:05:11] Y estos años están pegando cada vez.
[2:05:15] Dos minutos,
[2:05:16] nosotros vamos a hablar.
[2:05:16] Voy a decir,
[2:05:17] es decir,
[2:05:20] estamos aquí de un par de más
[2:05:22] de un partido subindo.
[2:05:24] Y tanto,
[2:05:26] los humanos podran en el mundo
[2:05:28] y los grupos de preguntas
[2:05:31] que los puntos sepan en el mundo.
[2:05:40] se han de hacer una descisa perra de la inscreva.
[2:05:45] La gente ha sido muy bons.
[2:05:46] ¿Que tal es esa?
[2:05:47] No es porque lo mismo.
[2:05:49] Como típeles están toda la forma,
[2:05:50] es porque está en la historia de la historia de la gente.
[2:05:53] Pero ¿por qué?
[2:05:56] Pero es lo más lazım.
[2:06:02] ¿Qué hemos venido?
[2:06:04] ¿Qué hemos venido?
[2:06:06] No se se se se se se se la se se se se se se se se se se casan,
[2:06:06] en el mundo.
[2:06:08] Estoy poniendo第三 veces.
[2:06:09] Cuando evamso de este año,
[2:06:12] tengo una razón de una mano de propias propiedades
[2:06:15] van a ser decznie yo no sabes como
[2:06:19] Yo creo que en la parte del części
[2:06:20] de 24 horas,
[2:06:22] una tarda de que también tienes que hacer algo
[2:06:24] como este.
[2:06:26] Es decir mágimos.
[2:06:28] Esto es uno de los que fíjense aicianica.
[2:06:31] Es que tiene una máquina de propias propias propias propias
[2:06:34] pero es el層ización deladesh del pacto de Leicedge,
[2:06:37] las提zan las tirores y las ries menores.
[2:06:38] A hacer el interior de launuzía de la tasa deatkas
[2:06:44] y de albojo la balada y almojo en partes del dedigo hasta
[2:07:08] después de manejarться
[2:07:21] a nosotros
[2:07:28] con ma
[2:07:28] en el preso de Shakespeare.
[2:07:30] Back then, shall we close the public hearing?
[2:07:37] Let's close. And then we turn to the budget conditions.
[2:07:46] Discussion. I'd
[2:07:55] like to make a motion tonight in the field of a zoning out of administrative approval of a administrative repeat.
[2:08:04] is for a low-variant application center.
[2:08:07] We'll get it one, one, one, one, eight.
[2:08:08] First three, five chair records in 2020, first three,
[2:08:12] 90 minutes correctly.
[2:08:14] This resolution.
[2:08:16] And I'll pull over to approval by the zoning administrator
[2:08:18] of administrative review permit.
[2:08:20] I'm finding project example review in the California
[2:08:23] five-minute quality act, just in which you see
[2:08:26] the guidelines, 1, 5, 2, 6, 8.
[2:08:32] Is your second?
[2:08:33] I'll go ahead and second that motion.
[2:08:36] Okay.
[2:08:37] The motion has been moved.
[2:08:38] You're seconded.
[2:08:39] And then that opens the subject to your deliberation of discussion.
[2:08:46] Although, first,
[2:08:52] when you're invited to the guidance of our city of Katrina, that the city staff was not here.
[2:09:01] Our position was a representative of one of us.
[2:09:04] This evening, stay lost and applicable.
[2:09:07] And a lot of the came in and came here.
[2:09:10] I understand what it's like to be terrible
[2:09:15] when it's in a challenge, and in a neighborhood
[2:09:18] I could not get a response due to the individual and told me this is right to be able
[2:09:25] to smoke that the police department would come and nothing would happen over and over and
[2:09:32] over.
[2:09:33] I believe just what we're saying here in front of us, the testimony received tonight is the
[2:09:40] the opposite approach to that with somebody who had those kind of visions of seeking what
[2:09:46] she felt had the opportunity to be able to do that. I find that I'm supporting it. There's
[2:09:53] a denial of the feel to be able to, on this matter, going with staff's recommendation of our
[2:10:08] I
[2:10:27] would like to say I appreciate the interest that's been expressed on both sides of the issue.
[2:10:33] And I do feel a bond with people on both sides, because I did those people who come from the community and the neighborhood who are concerned about the effects of this chance.
[2:10:54] You have valid concerns, and you always, you know, one at one address, we've mentioned, and the people who are popular in the Japanese are making the agreements with HR.
[2:11:05] I appreciate the intentions of those people who support it.
[2:11:09] I want to emphasize again that the function of our commission is really to evaluate the records before us.
[2:11:19] and to determine whether there are grounds to overturn the zoning
[2:11:25] and administrators decision under law.
[2:11:30] And my conclusion is that the city has a conflict with the law
[2:11:37] and therefore, I could support the resolution,
[2:11:43] which has to be of course, about denying the
[2:11:49] behavioral purpose.
[2:11:59] And you're, yes, motion is denying the appeal.
[2:12:02] Correct?
[2:12:03] Yes.
[2:12:18] Yes.
[2:12:22] And, yeah?
[2:12:24] Well done.
[2:12:39] Turn down to the report of our Secretary of Justice,
[2:12:56] by your attention.
[2:12:57] It was in the first place.
[2:12:59] Well, we're sorry to question you,
[2:13:01] this and we thought this actually looked at it.
[2:13:05] And we thought it was said that some of our commission
[2:13:07] shall be finalized in the appeal.
[2:13:10] I think that was a file on the way.
[2:13:11] and it's more to the color today, it's all there to be about that.
[2:13:18] And actually, we're going to take a look at what I'm talking about.
[2:13:22] What I want to tell you is this is also going to take a look at the topic tonight and about what I'm going to share with you.
[2:13:31] As I said, he has been under a table in the homeless house course, and he has
[2:13:43] a lot of access to it.
[2:13:44] And I actually knew this is going to benefit with those that are here tonight, and they're interested in how I'm going to talk about what this is going to look like.
[2:13:55] And this is an opportunity, or an opportunity on the topic from a policy perspective,
[2:14:05] but
[2:14:05] just a moment spent.
[2:14:15] So I just wanted to
[2:14:21] say that it's such a task force.
[2:14:23] We're going to take to learn more things with each other.
[2:14:31] We're
[2:14:35] going to participate.
[2:14:36] We're going to be informed,
[2:14:45] which is that earlier today.
[2:14:47] I'm all with members of...
[2:15:08] We had a coordination meeting. I'm talking briefly about the challenges of, like, the soy marker, the red funding, how's it due to, to be successful. It's a pretty good funding. And we'll be forwarding to funding on wide range of faiths that are in fund.
[2:15:25] that touched down the pound of other parts of what's in it.
[2:15:28] I just wanted to let you know that that is on that earlier stage.
[2:15:33] The intent is to put a positive relationship at better coordination.
[2:15:38] I mean, someone shall we should try to just give it how difficult it is to find these people.
[2:15:42] Funding,
[2:15:47] lose, hope, but we didn't also let you possibly
[2:15:57] pay attention on what we're having.
[2:15:59] And so that we're going to be talking about this.
[2:16:02] You'll notice that either for being through the
[2:16:08] involves or consideration of
[2:16:15] the item.
[2:16:16] It's not ready to go tonight.
[2:16:18] There's a room where you can continue it to a date, sir.
[2:16:22] The matter is by wrong, but far as far to recommend it,
[2:16:25] I think one of it to be in February.
[2:16:28] That's how we just look at the date.
[2:16:30] I don't know if it's evaporated first, but I'm sorry, I'm just going to get back to you.
[2:16:39] That's why it's evaporated here.
[2:16:41] But we've got to say that percent of the January percent of the rest.
[2:16:44] Basically, we were a bit of a contradiction earlier in the day.
[2:16:49] It's a part of the
[2:16:58] question.
[2:17:00] So that would put it on Tuesday.
[2:17:15] Just as this was a standardized item,
[2:17:17] Territory and please don't want us to come and see
[2:17:24] that.
[2:17:25] So members of the public, I have four B,
[2:17:30] a gem guys, and so anyone would like to comment on 480.
[2:17:42] We're just looking to comment.
[2:17:52] And just for the sake of, you know, all the procedures.
[2:17:55] Because this is a good advice.
[2:17:57] And we're continuing it.
[2:17:59] It does require energy to take action.
[2:18:01] So you know, almost a second and that's a problem.
[2:18:02] So motion to postpone until the February 8th.
[2:18:05] This is a new second question.
[2:18:08] Second question.
[2:18:09] Commissioning roll.
[2:18:16] So it's something to make.
[2:18:22] All this matter?
[2:18:23] All right.
[2:18:25] All this.
[2:18:30] Here's the question.
[2:18:31] Okay,
[2:18:36] um,
[2:18:48] Yeah.
[2:18:48] You're just saying like,
[2:18:49] you're the company,
[2:18:51] the building rules and just saying you're that.
[2:18:53] No,
[2:18:55] the decision public and total,
[2:18:59] unless you
[2:18:59] and that is a stage
[2:19:01] and soon as there's no peer
[2:19:07] -op or stroke process,
[2:19:08] it doesn't move at all.
[2:19:12] All right, then.
[2:19:14] So, we have a two-to-be German,
[2:19:16] and we will talk a little bit more about
[2:19:23] that.
[2:19:24] Um, Fred, it's quite all right.
[2:19:33] We can turn to you in the director,
[2:19:36] to talk about the transition to communication,
[2:19:40] to to notify the
[2:19:46] engineers,
[2:19:49] to communicate with us more rapidly and manner,
[2:19:52] whether we should let go.
[2:19:53] I know that you asked us to be able to meet with you today.
[2:19:56] Now, my short notice for me, my steps looked out a long period of time, and maybe that's
[2:20:01] something we can follow up to be able to introduce myself, some of the newer staff members,
[2:20:06] there's been staff, what would be of me and Ron here from the audience for
[2:20:17] it, and so maybe we
[2:20:19] can continue our dialogue so that I can't do things that a
[2:20:29] couple of these days. I do live in
[2:20:31] traffic that I've seen in 30, which is my 14 years ago. I have woke up on this freeway.
[2:20:40] I've got to look at kind of things. I've just watched the bill. It's bad mock itself in
[2:20:52] both
[2:20:52] chains.
[2:21:04] But that was all because of this, I've never really talked about my general plan.
[2:21:07] How did you know that maybe you would go have a conversation with
[2:21:13] a third question that thought
[2:21:14] of communication in the organization.
[2:21:18] In addition to the email, I had the meetings in welcoming you
[2:21:22] even if you were any other members of the commissioners,
[2:21:25] I wanted to have some kind of range in which,
[2:21:30] and so we had a couple of big questions
[2:21:33] before the use of the community.
[2:21:36] And you think that, you know, just coming back
[2:21:38] on tonight's meeting, you know,
[2:21:39] part of the course you go on,
[2:21:43] while we actually apply.
[2:21:45] But I think much of a frustration.
[2:21:48] That was how you went back when you were
[2:21:50] come from the feeling that process was sort of fast-tracked
[2:21:55] you know, people weren't necessarily given difference and then kind of the thing. So I think the more we do,
[2:22:04] two things, we need to really design it.
[2:22:08] Even if sometimes we don't have a certain,
[2:22:17] you
[2:22:21] know, we can't.
[2:22:30] Those have been the same but I think they still live us up there. I think I said you know while we came to the meetings a couple we had people we had to come up there and then I had to put that picture.
[2:22:52] Okay, yeah.
[2:22:56] I'll tell you something.
[2:22:58] I'll tell you something.
[2:22:58] I'll tell you something.