1
00:00:30,430 --> 00:00:35,270
Good evening and welcome to the Monday, July 6, 2026 West Fargo City Commission meeting.

2
00:00:35,610 --> 00:00:37,270
Please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance.

3
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:49,940
the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God,

4
00:00:50,680 --> 00:00:52,980
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

5
00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:53,720
All

6
00:00:58,260 --> 00:01:00,280
right, the next item is a roll call.

7
00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:00,700
Good morning.

8
00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:02,100
Commissioner Jorgensen.

9
00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:04,600
President Maison.

10
00:01:05,260 --> 00:01:06,280
Commissioner Zendall.

11
00:01:06,840 --> 00:01:07,000
Here.

12
00:01:07,460 --> 00:01:08,240
Commissioner Erickson.

13
00:01:08,600 --> 00:01:08,720
Here.

14
00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:10,460
Commissioner Sedman.

15
00:01:10,740 --> 00:01:10,880
Here.

16
00:01:11,300 --> 00:01:12,380
Commissioner Dredelich.

17
00:01:12,740 --> 00:01:12,900
Here.

18
00:01:14,870 --> 00:01:17,750
All right, the next item is to prove the order of the agenda.

19
00:01:17,750 --> 00:01:18,070
and a.

20
00:01:18,730 --> 00:01:19,450
We'll leave it.

21
00:01:20,270 --> 00:01:20,730
Second.

22
00:01:21,850 --> 00:01:22,690
Any discussion?

23
00:01:24,610 --> 00:01:26,790
Hearing none, all those in favor, please say aye.

24
00:01:27,170 --> 00:01:27,430
Aye.

25
00:01:27,930 --> 00:01:28,250
All right.

26
00:01:29,690 --> 00:01:30,550
Motion passes.

27
00:01:31,350 --> 00:01:31,650
All right.

28
00:01:32,330 --> 00:01:35,150
Approval of the minutes from the June 15th,

29
00:01:35,170 --> 00:01:36,710
2026 commission meeting.

30
00:01:37,610 --> 00:01:38,490
I'll move to approve.

31
00:01:39,470 --> 00:01:40,370
Is there a second?

32
00:01:41,150 --> 00:01:41,610
Second.

33
00:01:42,110 --> 00:01:42,510
All right.

34
00:01:43,210 --> 00:01:43,770
Any discussion?

35
00:01:45,390 --> 00:01:47,630
Hearing none, all those in favor, please say aye.

36
00:01:47,750 --> 00:01:48,110
Aye.

37
00:01:49,430 --> 00:01:49,950
Opposed?

38
00:01:51,370 --> 00:01:51,890
Passes.

39
00:01:52,850 --> 00:01:54,990
Building permits. Item number F.

40
00:01:57,620 --> 00:01:57,960
Mayor?

41
00:01:58,600 --> 00:01:59,020
Yes.

42
00:01:59,940 --> 00:02:03,560
I need to recuse myself from voting on the building permits, please.

43
00:02:04,140 --> 00:02:04,500
All right.

44
00:02:07,050 --> 00:02:07,890
I move we approve.

45
00:02:08,750 --> 00:02:09,530
Is there a second?

46
00:02:10,290 --> 00:02:11,050
I'll second.

47
00:02:11,830 --> 00:02:14,170
We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion?

48
00:02:15,890 --> 00:02:18,250
Hearing none, all those in favor please say aye.

49
00:02:18,650 --> 00:02:18,970
Aye.

50
00:02:18,970 --> 00:02:20,210
All right, I opposed.

51
00:02:21,310 --> 00:02:22,250
Motion passes.

52
00:02:24,490 --> 00:02:26,770
Our consent agenda, items A through B.

53
00:02:29,720 --> 00:02:31,360
Questions or comments?

54
00:02:32,220 --> 00:02:34,160
I'll make a motion to approve the consent agenda.

55
00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:35,960
All right, we have a motion to approve.

56
00:02:37,060 --> 00:02:38,840
Second, we have a second.

57
00:02:39,900 --> 00:02:40,920
Any discussion?

58
00:02:45,090 --> 00:02:47,730
Hearing none, all those in favor, please say aye.

59
00:02:47,950 --> 00:02:48,330
Aye.

60
00:02:48,350 --> 00:02:48,710
Aye.

61
00:02:49,570 --> 00:02:50,090
Opposed?

62
00:02:50,990 --> 00:02:52,330
The consent agenda passes.

63
00:02:53,150 --> 00:02:58,190
Under the regular agenda, and I don't believe we have any public comment tonight. Is that correct?

64
00:02:58,810 --> 00:02:59,770
That is correct.

65
00:03:00,090 --> 00:03:12,010
All right. And no public hearing. So we will jump to item number three, the first reading of ordinance number 1281 relating to discharge of firearms and carrying loaded firearms in vehicles.

66
00:03:12,770 --> 00:03:14,870
Chief of Police, Peter Nielsen.

67
00:03:14,870 --> 00:03:20,230
Good evening, Commission President Jurteweg, fellow commissioners. I stand before you tonight

68
00:03:20,830 --> 00:03:25,870
with the first reading of ordinance 1281 Discharge of Firearms, Dangerous Weapons within the City.

69
00:03:26,610 --> 00:03:31,330
The proposed change to this ordinance would be section, in section 2, subsection number

70
00:03:31,330 --> 00:03:38,790
5. And what that states is persons lawfully participating in a management plan or program

71
00:03:38,790 --> 00:03:42,850
are approved by the City Commission for the control of deer or other animals within

72
00:03:42,850 --> 00:03:49,450
the city limits. Just a little bit of feedback on this. Back in June of 2022, the police department

73
00:03:49,450 --> 00:03:57,810
came to in front of the commission in regarding some fire on usage by the USDA. The USDA was

74
00:03:57,810 --> 00:04:03,050
contracted out by different entities, mainly Cargill in the city of West Fargo and to

75
00:04:03,050 --> 00:04:07,710
have them come out and to euthanize some of the animals that would be coming up

76
00:04:07,710 --> 00:04:13,370
passed on the property. The commission granted that that conditional usage but

77
00:04:13,370 --> 00:04:18,930
that only lasted for one year. So what we're proposing is to bring this change

78
00:04:18,930 --> 00:04:24,590
of the ordinance so we could go into a MOU or MOA with with the USDA to allow

79
00:04:24,590 --> 00:04:31,790
them access to come into the city and to use a firearm to euthanize these

80
00:04:31,790 --> 00:04:37,210
animals. But with this gives us more clarity, more control over the

81
00:04:37,210 --> 00:04:43,570
situation, because of the fact that now we have an actual MOA with them. It strictly advises

82
00:04:43,570 --> 00:04:50,390
the USDA what they can and cannot do. It also advises them of a procedure of how we'd like

83
00:04:50,390 --> 00:04:56,170
that to be done, and what that would be was contacting whatever dispatch, contacting

84
00:04:56,170 --> 00:05:01,650
the on-duty sergeant to know that they're going to be at those facilities during different

85
00:05:01,650 --> 00:05:06,530
times. So we think this is a good ordinance. We've had help with our city attorney

86
00:05:06,530 --> 00:05:13,430
and we believe that this would be something that could benefit the USDA along with the

87
00:05:13,430 --> 00:05:18,530
police department. We also have Mr. Brandon Nooner here. He's a representative from USDA

88
00:05:18,530 --> 00:05:23,510
if you have any questions. But at this time, I stand for any questions on the first reading.

89
00:05:24,790 --> 00:05:31,690
Any questions? I know you had mentioned that it would be basically number five on that first

90
00:05:31,690 --> 00:05:38,310
section. On that copy that we have, G and H are also underlined under number two. Are

91
00:05:38,310 --> 00:05:42,910
those additions due to century code changes? I'm assuming that's why that's in there?

92
00:05:43,110 --> 00:05:45,130
Yes. Okay. Sounds good. Thank you. That's all I have.

93
00:05:46,410 --> 00:05:50,810
I just have a quick question, Chief Nielsen. Who will be monitoring to ensure that the

94
00:05:50,810 --> 00:05:55,590
rule set up that they do let you know that there's going to be firearm discharge? What

95
00:05:55,590 --> 00:05:57,530
happens if they don't? Who monitors that?

96
00:05:57,530 --> 00:06:04,110
So, if they wouldn't do that, they would break the MOA, so at that point we would believe

97
00:06:04,110 --> 00:06:10,430
that at that time the MOA would not be in accordance and it wouldn't be valid any longer, so they

98
00:06:10,430 --> 00:06:14,610
would not be able to utilize the procedures that they're looking to do.

99
00:06:15,430 --> 00:06:19,790
Do they see that in the changes, is the question?

100
00:06:20,530 --> 00:06:24,830
I don't know if the MOA is actually in the agenda packet at this time because it

101
00:06:24,830 --> 00:06:31,210
hasn't been sent to the mayor and the city attorney or the city manager so I

102
00:06:31,210 --> 00:06:35,670
don't think that's a movie it is in there it's attached it's attached yeah so

103
00:06:35,670 --> 00:06:39,610
presumably that person who did that not under the MBOA would be I presume charged

104
00:06:39,610 --> 00:06:42,650
with discharging a firearm within city limits because they wouldn't be doing so

105
00:06:42,650 --> 00:06:46,090
under accordance of a contract would that be correct any

106
00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:50,520
additional questions

107
00:06:53,200 --> 00:07:00,380
what's your preference I move that we approve the first reading all right we

108
00:07:00,380 --> 00:07:01,560
Any further discussion?

109
00:07:04,070 --> 00:07:08,850
Hearing none, all those in favor? Oh, actually, we're a slight change.

110
00:07:09,210 --> 00:07:15,630
Moving forward, almost screwed it up, Emily. A slight change is moving forward on the regular agenda items.

111
00:07:15,750 --> 00:07:19,890
We're going to be doing a roll call vote. So, Emily, you want to take over?

112
00:07:20,350 --> 00:07:26,690
And it'll also be a random shuffle. I just did a literal shuffle button on the website, so.

113
00:07:27,950 --> 00:07:28,610
Are we ready?

114
00:07:28,870 --> 00:07:30,490
Yeah, it's going to be a surprise who gets here first.

115
00:07:35,580 --> 00:07:38,770
I'm sorry.

116
00:07:42,770 --> 00:07:43,530
Zundal?

117
00:07:44,050 --> 00:07:44,090
Yes.

118
00:07:44,650 --> 00:07:45,090
Erickson?

119
00:07:45,490 --> 00:07:45,750
Yes.

120
00:07:46,170 --> 00:07:46,550
Steadman?

121
00:07:46,810 --> 00:07:47,070
Yes.

122
00:07:47,390 --> 00:07:47,770
Jardovic?

123
00:07:48,050 --> 00:07:48,330
Yes.

124
00:07:49,310 --> 00:07:50,390
Motion passes.

125
00:07:51,530 --> 00:07:51,790
Thank you.

126
00:07:53,370 --> 00:07:59,930
Item number four, Improvement District number 3006, Westwood Reconstruction, City Engineer,

127
00:08:00,150 --> 00:08:00,790
Jerry Walz.

128
00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:03,500
Yes.

129
00:08:03,680 --> 00:08:06,700
Thank you, Mr. Commissioner and Commissioners.

130
00:08:06,700 --> 00:08:13,640
Here before you tonight with an item for the Westwood Reconstruct Project Improvement

131
00:08:13,640 --> 00:08:22,260
District number 3006, essentially this is a change order for the amount shown there $154,911.80

132
00:08:23,220 --> 00:08:31,280
where we would be installing the final asphalt lift to complete the streets for the neighborhood.

133
00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:37,580
Again, as you can see in the packet there, funding would be proposed to come from the

134
00:08:37,580 --> 00:08:39,180
Capital Improvement Sales Tax Fund.

135
00:08:40,320 --> 00:08:46,900
When we originally scoped this work, that was how we had anticipated completing that

136
00:08:46,900 --> 00:08:48,900
work, so no change from the intent there.

137
00:08:50,800 --> 00:08:54,740
Essentially, just a brief background in history behind this.

138
00:08:57,560 --> 00:09:02,360
When we originally scoped the project, there was meetings with engineering staff, public

139
00:09:02,360 --> 00:09:09,200
work staff, our consultant engineer about looking at essentially holding off on the final lift

140
00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:09,680
of asphalt.

141
00:09:10,620 --> 00:09:17,240
There's several communities in the area that's a common practice, and we wanted to try to

142
00:09:17,240 --> 00:09:20,300
see if it was something that we could implement in West Fargo.

143
00:09:21,940 --> 00:09:27,140
Over the course of the project now, you know, we've had some, you know, call it

144
00:09:27,140 --> 00:09:30,860
growing pains, we've learned some things. You know, one thing that, you know,

145
00:09:30,900 --> 00:09:34,320
Public Works had commented on is that, you know, it made their operations more

146
00:09:34,320 --> 00:09:40,060
difficult, more challenging. So that was something that, you know, we're

147
00:09:40,060 --> 00:09:43,680
certainly considering at this point. The other thing that was noted is just

148
00:09:44,180 --> 00:09:47,420
because there's that little lip, you know, between the curb and the asphalt,

149
00:09:47,420 --> 00:09:54,300
There is going to be some standing water that just commonly sits there until it evaporates.

150
00:09:55,100 --> 00:09:59,840
And then there was also identified that it is a potential tripping hazard throughout the neighborhood.

151
00:10:00,240 --> 00:10:02,600
So just something else to think about.

152
00:10:03,880 --> 00:10:09,480
But essentially at this point now, we've observed pretty minimal sediment.

153
00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:15,240
There's been one full freeze-thaw cycle on the roads in the underground in the neighborhood.

154
00:10:16,140 --> 00:10:26,460
We have three options. We can install the final where course now under the existing contract, as is shown in the change order in the packet.

155
00:10:27,420 --> 00:10:36,020
We could potentially look to bid this work as a separate future project, or we could delay the installation.

156
00:10:36,660 --> 00:10:41,940
Initially, we had talked about just having public works, you know, put the final lift

157
00:10:41,940 --> 00:10:47,220
of asphalt in since for several years now, they've been completing mill and overlays.

158
00:10:49,420 --> 00:10:53,640
Unfortunately, I'm sure everybody's aware of the pending litigation on that, so the

159
00:10:53,640 --> 00:10:56,980
jury's still out as to whether or not we'll be able to continue to do that.

160
00:10:57,920 --> 00:11:04,620
But again, here before you tonight with that change order, our recommendation is

161
00:11:04,620 --> 00:11:09,540
that we proceed with approving the change order and install that final lift with the

162
00:11:09,540 --> 00:11:15,160
contractor we have under contract right now. And with that, I'm available for any questions

163
00:11:15,160 --> 00:11:18,440
you may have. Does anyone have any questions?

164
00:11:19,820 --> 00:11:23,660
Just a quick question. Maybe it's that terminology. When you say it's a change order, this is

165
00:11:23,660 --> 00:11:27,500
part of the original project. So the reason it's a change order is because we didn't

166
00:11:27,500 --> 00:11:30,720
do it originally, so we're coming back now to finish the project. And that's

167
00:11:30,720 --> 00:11:31,340
Why is the change order?

168
00:11:32,200 --> 00:11:32,860
Great question.

169
00:11:34,100 --> 00:11:37,040
So essentially, this was not going

170
00:11:37,040 --> 00:11:39,040
to be part of the original project.

171
00:11:39,980 --> 00:11:43,760
And public works had attended, like I said,

172
00:11:43,960 --> 00:11:48,780
to just do this with likely capital improvement sales tax.

173
00:11:50,820 --> 00:11:54,660
And so now we're making it part of the project.

174
00:11:56,820 --> 00:11:57,200
Great question.

175
00:11:57,340 --> 00:11:57,720
Good clarification.

176
00:11:58,560 --> 00:11:59,240
Thank you.

177
00:11:59,240 --> 00:12:05,300
any other questions? I'll make a motion to approve. Alright, we have a motion to

178
00:12:05,300 --> 00:12:09,940
approve. Is there a second? Second. I have a second. Any additional discussion?

179
00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:22,300
Hearing none. Mr. Mayor. Yeah. Thank you Mr. Mayor. Mr. Wallace, if you feel

180
00:12:22,300 --> 00:12:27,300
comfortable answering the question, you know, moving forward with this

181
00:12:27,300 --> 00:12:35,880
projects in foregoing doing the work ourselves internally. That doesn't have

182
00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:41,700
any bearing on anything with that litigation, does it? No, not that I'm aware.

183
00:12:42,040 --> 00:12:50,710
Okay, Commissioner. Great question. Okay, thank you. You bet. All right, I'll do a

184
00:12:50,710 --> 00:12:52,010
Is that all, Jorgensen?

185
00:13:02,230 --> 00:13:03,510
Zendall? Yes.

186
00:13:04,250 --> 00:13:06,550
Erickson? Yes. Steadman? Yes.

187
00:13:07,210 --> 00:13:11,590
Jardavik? Yes. Motion passes. Thank you.

188
00:13:12,830 --> 00:13:17,210
All right. Number five is our proposed organizational appointments and assignments.

189
00:13:17,750 --> 00:13:19,790
That one is assigned to me. Have fun.

190
00:13:22,550 --> 00:13:29,130
I won't go through all of this, but just to kind of make sure to call out a couple changes

191
00:13:29,130 --> 00:13:31,650
changes from how this has been done in the past.

192
00:13:32,250 --> 00:13:36,850
You'll notice that the portfolio assignments have changed to really just have a primary

193
00:13:36,850 --> 00:13:41,690
portfolio and getting rid of the secondary portfolios, which is about driving some clarity

194
00:13:41,690 --> 00:13:45,890
and also to map our portfolio assignments to our city leadership structure.

195
00:13:46,750 --> 00:13:48,990
So that's kind of the main item.

196
00:13:49,490 --> 00:13:52,410
The only other one that I will call out just so that people don't think it's a

197
00:13:52,410 --> 00:14:01,010
typo, because it's not, is former Mayor Dardis is going to be appointed to continue to be

198
00:14:01,010 --> 00:14:07,530
in the seat for the Lake Agassiz Water Authority. So, any questions or discussion?

199
00:14:12,100 --> 00:14:12,520
Since it's

200
00:14:12,520 --> 00:14:18,980
my motion or my topic, I will make the motion to approve. Second. All right, we have a

201
00:14:18,980 --> 00:14:20,560
motion in a second. Any further discussion?

202
00:14:23,120 --> 00:14:24,520
All right, we can vote, Emily.

203
00:14:25,660 --> 00:14:37,580
Jorgensen? Yes. Zendal? Yes. Erickson? Yes. Steadman? Yes. Jodovic? Yes. All right. The portfolio

204
00:14:37,580 --> 00:14:43,620
assignments have passed. Item number six, direct staff to work on policy options regarding the

205
00:14:43,620 --> 00:14:52,640
use of economic development sales tax funds. So to try to simplify and make and help people

206
00:14:52,640 --> 00:14:59,880
understand what this ask is. So any time that over quite a few years

207
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:05,720
The city has provided some type of an incentive for economic development, you know, the construction

208
00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:12,780
of a building, for example. And if it was a pilot or a TIF, you know, some type of tax incentive

209
00:15:13,420 --> 00:15:21,300
that was passed. So for example, if a property was, you know, paying $5,000 a year in property

210
00:15:21,300 --> 00:15:25,500
tax, and that building gets torn down, and it's now, you know, the new structures, you

211
00:15:25,500 --> 00:15:30,780
You know, should be being taxed 50 grand a year, but for maybe a period of five years

212
00:15:30,780 --> 00:15:32,820
they're continuing to only pay the five.

213
00:15:33,740 --> 00:15:37,220
So that has an impact in theory on our budget.

214
00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:47,320
What I'm suggesting is to look at the options and to come back to the commission to approve

215
00:15:47,320 --> 00:15:52,300
that, but to look at paying for that out of economic development sales tax.

216
00:15:52,300 --> 00:15:57,760
So, basically, as part of our budgeting process, we would look like, what are those incentive

217
00:15:57,760 --> 00:16:04,000
dollars that we would sort of be missing, I guess you could say, for the 2027?

218
00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:12,220
And in conversations, the estimate is probably four to $500,000 in that ballpark.

219
00:16:12,780 --> 00:16:17,440
And to sort of make the budget, and Dustin might not like me using this word, but I'll

220
00:16:17,440 --> 00:16:20,740
say it make the make the budget whole for the dollars that we would have

221
00:16:20,740 --> 00:16:25,540
otherwise had if those incentives hadn't been given out and the building had

222
00:16:25,540 --> 00:16:31,110
been built. So that's the general idea. I don't know if you guys have any

223
00:16:31,110 --> 00:16:32,850
questions. Hopefully I explain that well.

224
00:16:35,130 --> 00:16:36,510
Mayor Durdavig, I was just gonna

225
00:16:36,510 --> 00:16:41,450
mention I fully support exactly what your this isn't an actionable item by

226
00:16:41,450 --> 00:16:45,550
the way is it this is just well we are taking a vote to direct city staff

227
00:16:45,550 --> 00:16:53,310
to so it is so fully support this so when I was campaigning the last six

228
00:16:53,310 --> 00:16:56,930
months you know there are a lot of different conversations about the idea

229
00:16:56,930 --> 00:17:02,470
of how there's a clear opportunity cost with giving out incentives that you're

230
00:17:02,470 --> 00:17:06,450
losing out on that tax revenue property tax revenue over those the

231
00:17:06,450 --> 00:17:12,610
duration of those incentives being in place and this if feasible on multiple

232
00:17:12,610 --> 00:17:18,190
for us. I think it's a really good idea, so I just wanted to tell you that. I thought it was a

233
00:17:18,190 --> 00:17:24,870
good idea. Appreciate that. Any other discussion or questions? Do you have sort of a guideline of

234
00:17:24,870 --> 00:17:29,530
what you're looking for so that the staff doesn't just kind of wonder what you're looking for? Yeah,

235
00:17:29,650 --> 00:17:36,070
so I mean it's very specific in the conversations I've had around commercial development. So this

236
00:17:36,070 --> 00:17:43,610
is not looking at housing incentives or anything like that. It is specific to commercial properties

237
00:17:43,610 --> 00:17:50,870
because those arguably any incentive that has been provided by the commission has been

238
00:17:50,870 --> 00:17:56,050
done so, I would assume, under the belief of economic development. And voters have

239
00:17:56,050 --> 00:18:03,810
given us an economic development sales tax that we can utilize to offset that.

240
00:18:08,110 --> 00:18:08,370
Any

241
00:18:08,370 --> 00:18:08,950
Any other questions?

242
00:18:14,020 --> 00:18:14,900
You look like you have a question.

243
00:18:15,400 --> 00:18:15,500
No.

244
00:18:16,100 --> 00:18:16,660
All right.

245
00:18:17,340 --> 00:18:18,620
Well, again, since this is mine,

246
00:18:18,740 --> 00:18:22,520
I'll make the motion to direct city staff

247
00:18:22,520 --> 00:18:25,220
to work on a policy options regarding the use

248
00:18:25,220 --> 00:18:27,180
of these dollars as discussed.

249
00:18:27,600 --> 00:18:27,820
Second.

250
00:18:28,300 --> 00:18:28,900
We have a second.

251
00:18:29,700 --> 00:18:31,160
Any further discussion?

252
00:18:34,140 --> 00:18:34,740
Hearing none.

253
00:18:35,300 --> 00:18:35,420
Emily.

254
00:18:36,060 --> 00:18:36,540
Jorgensen.

255
00:18:45,390 --> 00:18:45,950
Zendall.

256
00:18:46,390 --> 00:18:46,610
Yes.

257
00:18:47,030 --> 00:18:47,470
Erickson.

258
00:18:48,030 --> 00:18:48,390
Yes.

259
00:18:48,750 --> 00:18:49,090
Steadman.

260
00:18:49,510 --> 00:18:49,670
Yes.

261
00:18:50,030 --> 00:18:50,290
Jodefin.

262
00:18:50,650 --> 00:18:50,970
Yes.

263
00:18:51,890 --> 00:18:52,930
Motion passes.

264
00:18:54,170 --> 00:18:58,170
Item number seven, direct staff to work on community outreach options regarding data

265
00:18:58,170 --> 00:18:58,490
centers.

266
00:18:58,890 --> 00:19:04,250
So, trying to make this quick, first off, there's just a, so there's no rumors.

267
00:19:04,530 --> 00:19:07,170
There's, you know, no conversation being had.

268
00:19:07,510 --> 00:19:12,850
There's nothing I'm aware of, but through the campaign and in talking with people

269
00:19:12,850 --> 00:19:19,430
and, you know, just around the entire country, there's a lot of challenges within communities

270
00:19:19,430 --> 00:19:23,170
around data centers and even locally we can see you know with what applied

271
00:19:23,170 --> 00:19:27,930
digital stepping into Harwood you know a year ago and and and those those projects

272
00:19:27,930 --> 00:19:32,130
come really quick they can be there can be a lot of misinformation in the

273
00:19:32,130 --> 00:19:38,110
public and there's a lot of opinions on both sides of that and you know just

274
00:19:38,110 --> 00:19:43,390
under the belief of wanting to be proactive you know I really as part

275
00:19:43,390 --> 00:19:46,130
of this commission don't want to wait until the day an opportunity could

276
00:19:46,130 --> 00:19:52,370
present itself and then not have had the opportunity before that to gather a community input.

277
00:19:52,830 --> 00:19:58,530
And so this motion is really to direct city staff to look at options for community outreach,

278
00:19:59,410 --> 00:20:03,610
both to, you know, maybe dispel some of the rumors and misinformation out there, but also

279
00:20:03,610 --> 00:20:06,410
to kind of try to get a gauge as to where the community is.

280
00:20:07,690 --> 00:20:10,750
Is West Fargo open to that kind of development?

281
00:20:11,170 --> 00:20:11,710
Are we not?

282
00:20:12,470 --> 00:20:18,290
And, you know, that empowers us as a commission, I think it empowers us from an economic development perspective knowing that answer.

283
00:20:19,230 --> 00:20:22,610
And so that's the general idea.

284
00:20:24,050 --> 00:20:26,990
Do you, I'm presuming this is going to have a fiscal loan attached to it.

285
00:20:27,050 --> 00:20:31,690
So are you proposing that sort of come out of economic development sales tax to fund it?

286
00:20:31,750 --> 00:20:35,370
In terms of, like, doing, like, a public forum or something, any...

287
00:20:35,370 --> 00:20:39,670
Or, like, surveys or, I mean, anything, mailers, anything that we would have.

288
00:20:39,670 --> 00:20:45,630
I think it's directing city staff to come back with a little bit of a plan whether that's

289
00:20:45,630 --> 00:20:47,370
a survey, whether that's a community forum.

290
00:20:47,830 --> 00:20:51,190
If there is a request for dollars, then that would probably be the end of that.

291
00:20:51,190 --> 00:20:54,270
So you're just looking for how we would, of course, support that?

292
00:20:54,470 --> 00:20:54,670
Yep.

293
00:20:54,810 --> 00:20:58,870
This is really about directing city staff, so the time commitment to come up with a

294
00:20:58,870 --> 00:21:04,670
plan and come back so that we can be proactive, I guess, in terms of how we look at this

295
00:21:04,670 --> 00:21:04,950
topic.

296
00:21:06,190 --> 00:21:06,850
I like it.

297
00:21:07,790 --> 00:21:09,410
Do you want to make the primary motion?

298
00:21:09,810 --> 00:21:10,950
Because you go three for three?

299
00:21:11,530 --> 00:21:11,790
Oh, sorry.

300
00:21:11,990 --> 00:21:12,230
Question or comment?

301
00:21:12,410 --> 00:21:12,610
You're OK?

302
00:21:13,050 --> 00:21:15,130
Mayor, I just wanted to add one thing.

303
00:21:15,330 --> 00:21:19,350
So if you've been following the legislative interim committees that have been happening

304
00:21:19,350 --> 00:21:26,190
and in the spirit of expedition because of, you know, because things are happening

305
00:21:26,190 --> 00:21:32,810
so quickly out, you know, in the private landscape, if the only revision, if I could

306
00:21:32,810 --> 00:21:40,630
would add to it is if we could add a duration or kind of a deadline for staff to get back

307
00:21:40,630 --> 00:21:49,510
to us by the end of the third Wednesday or the third Monday next month, if that is feasible.

308
00:21:50,930 --> 00:21:53,530
So timely is what we're looking for.

309
00:21:53,830 --> 00:21:54,330
Yes, yep.

310
00:21:54,790 --> 00:21:55,930
I completely would agree with that.

311
00:21:55,930 --> 00:22:02,170
Just to add exactly what you were saying because things, we wouldn't want to pass

312
00:22:02,170 --> 00:22:07,130
on something because we didn't, we didn't do our due diligence with getting industry

313
00:22:07,130 --> 00:22:11,810
different coalition groups to come in and educate us.

314
00:22:12,030 --> 00:22:14,510
I think that sounds wonderful.

315
00:22:14,890 --> 00:22:15,090
Awesome.

316
00:22:17,250 --> 00:22:18,170
Any further questions?

317
00:22:18,450 --> 00:22:25,990
If none, again, I will make my own motion to direct staff, along with what Commissioner

318
00:22:26,670 --> 00:22:29,530
Verixen suggested in terms of timeframe.

319
00:22:30,130 --> 00:22:30,770
Is there a second?

320
00:22:31,350 --> 00:22:31,770
Second.

321
00:22:31,770 --> 00:22:33,890
All right. Any further discussion?

322
00:22:36,030 --> 00:22:37,570
Hearing none, we'll go ahead and vote.

323
00:22:39,010 --> 00:22:49,690
Jorgensen? Yes. Zundal? Yes. Erickson? Yes. Steadman? Yes. Jordavik? Yes. All right. Our

324
00:22:49,690 --> 00:22:53,210
City Administrators' Reports. Dustin Scott, City Administrator.

325
00:23:00,500 --> 00:23:01,980
Well, good evening, Mayor and

326
00:23:01,980 --> 00:23:07,960
Commissioners. It's great to see fresh new faces up there. Looking forward to working with all

327
00:23:07,960 --> 00:23:15,420
will do. Just a few updates tonight. First, the first draft of the preliminary budget

328
00:23:15,420 --> 00:23:20,700
as has been scheduled will be in front of you at the next commission meeting. That again

329
00:23:20,700 --> 00:23:26,140
is the first draft of the entire preliminary budget. What we presented last month to the

330
00:23:26,140 --> 00:23:31,900
prior commission was really just an outline and an estimated position line. So what you'll

331
00:23:31,900 --> 00:23:36,980
see on July 20th will be a lot more detail as it will be again our our

332
00:23:36,980 --> 00:23:43,500
preliminary budget so now in the coming days and over the next couple weeks prior

333
00:23:43,500 --> 00:23:47,980
to that meeting you will receive a lot of budget information that'll be all of

334
00:23:47,980 --> 00:23:52,820
the departmental detail as well as some of the other the special funds that

335
00:23:52,820 --> 00:23:56,420
we have and really all of the meat of that budget so that you are fully

336
00:23:56,420 --> 00:24:03,220
prepared to provide feedback and comments at the July 20th meeting. Any questions on the

337
00:24:03,220 --> 00:24:03,900
preliminary budget?

338
00:24:06,330 --> 00:24:13,970
Right? Along the financial lines, update on our 2025 annual audit. Work

339
00:24:13,970 --> 00:24:20,930
is progressing nicely. We hope that I, Bailey, could even have a draft ready for that July

340
00:24:20,930 --> 00:24:25,350
20th Commission meeting as well. Our Finance Director Willie is going to touch base with

341
00:24:25,350 --> 00:24:32,890
here and solidify that schedule. If not, hopefully the first meeting in August. So, again, things are

342
00:24:32,890 --> 00:24:41,110
going well with our 2025 audit. And then last, just more of a save the date announcement. We are

343
00:24:41,110 --> 00:24:48,170
planning to hold our annual employee appreciation event September 24th. That is a Thursday.

344
00:24:49,090 --> 00:24:53,830
And similar to last year, we are proposing to hold this at the city plaza at the lights,

345
00:24:54,890 --> 00:25:00,750
pending weather. If there is bad weather, we will pivot to a backup plan. But right now,

346
00:25:00,870 --> 00:25:07,510
just save the date for September 24th at the lights. With that, any other questions for me?

347
00:25:11,670 --> 00:25:12,770
Thank you.

348
00:25:14,170 --> 00:25:14,730
Correspondents?

349
00:25:19,200 --> 00:25:21,500
All right. Any non-agenda items?

350
00:25:25,970 --> 00:25:27,670
All right. Do we have a motion to adjourn?

351
00:25:27,670 --> 00:25:35,490
So moved. Second? Second. Alright, we stand adjourned. 25 minutes, not bad.