Welcome to the planning board meeting for August 27th. Our next meeting is
September 10th. Please stand for the pledge.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the
republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all.
We have a decision for Lan Realy 11 Hazelwood Avenue.
Anybody here for the applicant? Um, wave the reading. We need a motion
to accept the resolution as written. So moved.
» Second. >> All in favor?
» I. >> Uh, we'll begin with the work session.
Sherman Properties LLC, 61 Sunset Avenue,
» you're right.
You guys can talk about it because it's a work session. Comments and
chang.
» Okay. >> Well, we've got the comments and there
aren't any real objections. I mean, this is really a defensive maneuver. Try to
keep the people in the 7-Eleven safe from the crazies.
propert.
Well, I I think that's an enforcement activity that we've really got to pay
attention to and insist this is the opportunity we have.
» Yeah. Having garbage on their >> right.
[snorts] From what I understand, they moved those
garbage pales inside because people were using them as their garbage pales for
from their cars. >> Because people were using them as
village garbage pales. [laughter]
» Well, I think we should ask that the uh site be restored to the approved site
plan that includes the shrubbery and the garbage cans. And if that can be
conditional, I think then we could move forward.
Yes, I agree.
You really don't want them coming in the store.
» More of a bash one. >> They're not Look, they're not good.
» So, will you wait make a recommendation?
» Okay. >> And I'd like to see them not be black.
» Okay. >> Do we want bright, bright yellow?
» No. >> No. So, what do we want
» then?
» So, what color?
maybe like a skin tone, >> you know, at park if you set if the
parking stalls are >> if the parking stalls are 10 foot, you
know, you have an opportunity to drive between them. So, I would split in the
middle and I would say six foot centers instead of 4 foot centers,
» you know, so you can't drive. So, it'll catch and even at six foot centers, it
doesn't catch every car.
Yeah, most of them.
If you when you go there late at night, there's not a lot of cars there. That's
the opportunity to drive in between them. That's I'm just looking at it
like, hey, tight them up. You know, not 10 foot on center, but maybe six
» about
Yeah, we'll you'll catch almost all of them at six foot. So, that's just my
thoughts.
» So, we'll give the applicants some suggestions and have them come back.
» No yellow balls.
Yeah.
» All right. That's I guess there's a bunch of little issues.
» Is that it? Anybody else? >> Done.
» No, I think it's covered. Yeah. I or I was going to say on the north and south
side of that building there's brick walls where you might be able to let up
on the distance between the b not have as many on each on each end
» where there's brick walls >> where one is probably going to aim for
the front door or the glass areas but you know
Yeah, [laughter]
» I six butt centers sounds good to me. >> Welcome.
» Yes, >> we heard from you. That's enough.
» That's enough from me. >> How about Dave? He hasn't been talking.
» I will defer to the collective. >> We'll leave it. That will allow the
experts to uh render opinions to the applicant and we'll revisit
158 Mil Road, West Hampton Beach LLC. 162 Mil Road, West Hampton Beach,
» LLC.
» Okay. >> Hey, members of the board, thanks for
your time tonight. My name is Brian Teeman and I am representing um the
ownership of the uh the properties, the subject properties. Um in short, what
[clears throat] our tenants are looking to do is to um
basically operate the way Eerts used to operate um by putting some paint on
things and making things look a little bit better, so to speak. Um
so we're looking for um for site plan waiver. Um we have and you know there's
been a lot of talk as we know in our small village. Um down the road um our
tenants might have ideas of of other things at which time we will come to you
beforehand discuss um and see see what's uh see what everyone likes. But for the
time being, they'd like to just open um they have their uh permit application in
with the board of trustees for outdoor seating, which um includes some uh
outdoor lighting, seasonal. Um and that's really that's really all. Um we
got your comments today. Um so I'd be happy to go through them with you if you
would like to hear or if you'd like written response. uh just let you know
let me know how you want to handle that and um we're happy to accommodate.
» Well, I think um we were clear when you got those today that we wouldn't be
commenting or making the changes today. So,
» okay.
» Bren, do you want to start off
[laughter] >> How about Brad?
» Yeah. So, the comments were just It's really just
fence.
one big question. >> Yeah, I can I can address all those
things. One is uh Brad, we got the note about site plan versus survey marked up.
So, we'll get that taken care of. Um we'll get it formalized as a site plan
overlay, so to speak. >> [clears throat]
» Um the um handicap accessibility
question on that. Would Brad, you and I were at the site. Um would like a
concrete pad be the most logical thing for the first
parking spot area that can get directly to the front door.
» Concrete or asphalt.
Sure.
» From either side of the car, probably, right? Yeah. Okay. I mean, that makes
sense. So, with the board's permission, you know, we would want to uh rectify
that with a with a pad. We'll look into what material would be best for it. Um
» stop >> on the road.
That doesn't Yeah, that doesn't doesn't count for it.
» So, it's a it's a good question, Ron. Um, so the funny thing is
it's we call it we're calling it a parking lot, but it's really only a
cleared space on a vacant property that has been defaulted to a parking lot. So,
I'm not really sure how it should be handled.
» That was really bad. [laughter] >> Take notes, Jim.
Why do I see the picture of a duck and I hear the quacking of a duck? [laughter]
» So, I just I'm putting that out there because we want to handle it however the
village wants to handle it. So,
Sure.
» The curbs. Yeah.
» Yeah.
» One of the things you talked about
A lighting what?
» Straight it up.
spotlights or anything. >> You have to be real careful.
» Would that be under the >> perviewed one way or the other? It's got
to be defined. >> That's under the perview of the board of
trustees though, right? >> Yes.
They will enterain temporary
There's no permanent lighting on this.
» No, not permanent. No, not at this point. No.
» Dumpster detail. >> Sure.
Um, so the third thing that Brad had brought
up that I wanted to address is the shed. Um, the shed has been improved and fixed
up. It was fallen down, doors were missing, etc. Um, maybe down the road,
we'd love to talk to you about maybe some sort of use of it, but at this
point, we're not looking for any permission of use of it or use of it at
all. Um, we want to keep the outside the way
it was when Eerts was there. Um, I don't know how we need to handle the shed
going forward, but um, for all intents and purposes, it's
structurally sound now and not intended to be used.
» Yes. So, I would notate as such. >> Okay.
You didn't make any changes.
» Okay. >> Yeah.
» For storage only. Maybe >> something along those lines.
» Sure. Okay.
Okay.
» It is on that application already and noted about this application.
» Yeah. Okay. >> Okay. A little cleaning up and we'll see
you again, I guess. >> Yeah. I don't think Do we have to see
him again?
Well, I think we can rely on you to uh handle that.
» Mr. Chairman, I'd like to move forward. I think it's a good business. Um I see
I've been in the espion operation. It's outstanding. And um I did go by the site
today and I did see that shed, that nice looking shed you have in that that north
northwest corner of the property. >> I want to rent it for the summer.
» And and and in terms of the lighting, although it's not in our wheelhouse,
it's with the trustees, it's lighting that's not going to affect anyone
because there's no residential area. There's no
» to that to that point, Don. It's temporary.
» Unlike the seasonal seating on Main Street and closer to the downtown area,
you are abudding or getting reasonably close to the residential property. It's
not >> in front of the on the street. It's
behind the building and what some of us in this end of town have experienced
with the movie theaters morphing nightclub slashbar west
whatever it is. Um, you know, it's, you know, it's run pretty late at night.
there has been some, you know, concerns and some unhappiness.
» So, I'm not saying that's what you're going to do. I'm just saying to the
extent that that gets brought up with trustees with the lighting, hours of
operation, um noise abatement, music, that kind of thing. Just have those
concerns raised at least. >> Are you seven days a week or or five
days a week? >> Um I think we'll probably start at
seven. >> Okay.
And to your point, uh, Dave, um, additionally, I think one of the
comments in, uh, the report from you guys was, um, talking about optional
rear yard landscape buffer, >> which I think could be a good thing to
discuss >> uh, for the benefit of residential.
» You know, like I said, if you're going to be stringing those lights that you
get at Home Depot, that's one thing. I think it's more noise issue, amplified
music, you know, right? >> These things sudden do tend to happen.
You know, nobody's really thinking about it. It's just like, "Oh, let's do that.
That sounds like a good idea." >> This isn't going to be Scarlet's front
yard, though. >> What are the hours of operation?
» Hours of operation. >> I think it's it's it's not going to be
late.
Whether it's 9:00 or 10 o'clock
[laughter]
» have a working partner, huh? >> It's not going to be just a breakfast
place anymore. >> No.
» Okay. >> Good.
I'll still go I'll still go to your >> Spiancor.
[laughter]
» Hopefully there'll be some more seats now in
» Spianc Larry. Any input?
» Uh, no. Looking forward to seeing it all built.
» Dave, >> other than what I've said? No.
» My piece. >> Okay.
» Thank you all. >> All right. Thank you.
West Hampton Performing Arts Center, 76 Main Street.
» Good evening for the applicant, James N. Hume, 323 Mill Road, West Hampton Beach.
And we have the Julian, the executive director, and our architectural support.
Um, I've been to so many of these meetings about this, I've kind of
forgotten what we've told to who, but just real simply, uh, we're looking to
um remove some existing structures from the uh the plan from the the site and
provide an 8,900 square foot um addition to the back of the property and some
pretty extensive renovation internally, mainly with the goal of uh creating more
seating. uh so that at for the same tick price
we'll have more revenue so that we can afford to bring in bigger names and
larger groups of people u is really what we're about. We're just um this is on a
work session so we're not even public hearing stage yet. I think because of
the size of the building we well I know because of the size of the building
we've filed the special permit uh application to the trustees
um because it exceeds the uh the code limit for square footage and we met with
them last last week last week uh and had a brief discussion with them about this
project and we're here to uh get this project moving with you guys as well. Um
I think the big issue here is the initial issue here will be uh secret if
I'm not mistaken. Um so I don't know where you want to go
from here but we're to discuss any aspect.
» We we we given some thought to to seeker on this and uh the
the trustee the real big issue in this is going to be parking and the impact on
parking. That's that that's the big issue. And right now the trustees are
revamping, you know, there's a parking moratorum and the trustees are revamping
the parking code and what we're contemplating is that the
trustees will end up taking jurisdiction over
parking. We're not going to call them variances anymore. They're going to be
parking special permits. That's the what's being contemplated
um at least for the downtown area because that's the area where it's
municipal parking and the impacts are going to be on the municipality as a
whole as opposed to any individual site. So, um at least our initial
thought, you know, Brad and I talking about it is that the trustees really are
likely to be the lead agency on this. um because of all the work they're
working on as far as the the new parking plan for the downtown
area. So, and I don't think we've seen anything quite like this in terms of the
size of a like a variance application for parking,
but um they'll figure out how to handle it and the new code will contemplate how
to handle it. So most likely it it it's going to make more sense for them to be
lead agency on this. >> As much as I love seeing you guys and
we'll be able to see you anyway. >> Doesn't mean you won't.
» I agree. I agree with the council's analysis. I think the the over
overriding issue here is the parking and uh that's in the trustes hands both
because of the special permit and because of the change of the law. So I
think that makes a lot of sense to Put the lead agency there as opposed to
here.
» Don, >> Don, why don't you start?
» I just have a >> Let's get the experts.
» I need I just need
» Who'd like to go first? >> There we go. [laughter]
» Obviously broadstrokes. I would I don't like to see what that protected
» because you are proposing this sort of mass behind the facade which is my very
iconic east end of Long Island very important
» obviously
you know it's something of that magnitude
» um and then I just sort of said you know it's a very large 65%
So I think we should probably provide some data points that show
you 500 tickets or we have this you know year round demand or some sort of
operational number >> going to need the seats for the NBA
games. >> Yeah. Why the Knicks are going to repeat
again?
» We all think
» we could certainly provide the facade easement. Um there's several other
levels of protection for that. One is that because of that easement, we're
right now have an application pending before the um historic board, landmarks
board for the town uh and uh because they need to approve this project
because of the terms of the easement. And one of the conditions that they have
imposed is a letter from the CPF people who provided the funds pursuant to the
easement to confirm that uh what we're proposing is within the scope of what we
agreed to in that easement. But we'll be happy to provide a copy of the easement
itself. >> Approval, not just advisory.
» No, we need to get a certificate of um >> should they be an involved agency?
That's the first time I'm hearing that. So they should be an involved agency for
secret purposes. >> I agree.
» Landmarks and historic town Southampton. >> Southampton.
[clears throat] >> It's interesting.
» And then just you know as you evolve along the process more of a site
planning issue which is to say you know you're removing these twotory structures
that kind of have open space around them. I think we might want to
the north side of the property and how we can preserve some of that reserve
use. Um, but I think we may need to soften that mask if we have the
opportunity.
» Yeneral, >> Sure. Understood.
» Understood.
Even at night when lights are off. We can't do that. Sorry.
I'm not sure
it's probably
» major piece of this. Yes.
We could stick to conceptual for now. I mean, it makes the most sense for secret
purposes to stay conceptual and not get into the fine engineering stuff yet
until the real
broad strokes are worked out. >> Yeah, I agree.
» You don't have to spend money on >> that yet, right?
» Yeah, that's what I'm saying. >> Yeah.
Right. >> Yeah.
The trustes are going to be handled as we talked about.
covering.
» Understood. >> We'll talk about that.
redo the arithmetic at a minimum. >> Sure.
» Right now it is based on
like
something that >> Yeah, we can't rely on Rio Delben to run
into the back of the building anymore to provide contrasts, but
we will obviously take a look at that. Maybe a drive-in movie in that back lot.
[laughter] >> That's an idea.
» Requires a whole bunch more parking, but [laughter]
» Don, >> yeah, just just two minutes. First of
all, congratulations on the grant money. I know you probably worked hard on that.
Been involved with that with nonprofits and it's a lot of paperwork and it's
more of a problem getting paid as you go along. You you'll see that though. Um I
have two things I just want to ask you on your demolitions. Is this beautiful
home of Sunset being demolished >> where the gate is?
» Yes, >> it is.
» Yes. >> Okay. I just want to hand this to my
planning board members. Although it's out of our wheelhouse possibly.
» Um >> you have someplace to put it
» one for the record. >> Donated.
» No. Unless you want to move it. [laughter]
» We don't. >> We don't move houses anymore.
» No. Okay. >> Um my other question is I when this
first hit the papers, I think in March or April, we talked about profit margin
on tickets >> and um there's a big concern here. I
represent the village taxpayers of course on this board.
» Um and there's a um a major problem with tickets where we can go to the board the
the ticket booth Wednesday and Sunday but when you go online you get stuck
with all these brokers that charging 75% higher.
» How does the brokers work? Do you get a piece of that action?
» No, not at all. >> Can you avoid them?
» No, >> you can't avoid them.
» No, they can. anybody can purchase tickets from the theater. So we have a
lot of um safeguards in place to try to prevent against fraud because you know
there's third party um ticket sellers who just buy them up and resell them in
an unfortunately legal way but then there are some that um are selling uh
fraudulently and and it's it's a mess and uh you know New York State the
attorney general I know is trying to crack down across the country
everybody's trying to crack down on it but it's really
» just to make myself clear I represent the taxpayers of the village of
Westester Beach and I think you might want to
consider an idea where village residents could get a little more of a discount on
the tickets for some events. >> I think with increased capacity that's
very possible. >> Okay, very good. That's all I have.
Chairman. >> Yeah. Uh my only concern would be the
north and the west facade. Uh looking straight off in front, you got to get a
mile back to be able to see what we proposed up on the roof.
You know, that's my only concern. Um I I think the four square house that's in
the rear is a nice old house. U it's not an
architectural gym, I would say, but uh and the barber shop and uh historical
society's got the barber pole. I don't I don't know if that means
» you could have a nice building, [laughter]
» but the inside of that building has been >> grants for that.
» Yeah. [clears throat] >> renovated over time. So, it's it's an
office. It's not There's no remnants of the barber shop or uh Ria's presence
there in the house any longer. >> It's a nice house.
» They're pulling down nicer ones. They have
» bulldozing them every day. >> It's what we do in West Hampton.
» Well, hopefully in return we're providing a benefit.
» This would be the rare occasion. >> Yeah. Benefits the village.
» Mr. Roy, >> I just have to channel my inner Paul
Hulahan here. Um, >> no, it is what it is
» from. [laughter] I didn't believe you me. I know this is
three decades in the past, but >> my recollection of the whole
preservation movement >> was to preserve the small town feel of a
movie theater to just you know have that kind of venue
preserved and um
if we do this I think that defeats the purpose.
» You want the NBA there? >> It's just you know it's just that's what
it was designed. That's why it was preserved the way it was preserved. As
Julian knows, I've spent most of the last decade there. And, you know, I
enjoyed every time I was there because of the way it was laid out. And, you
know, I could show my kids what it was like when I used to go watch movies
there. And it's a it's a continuation thing. And I just think the the way it
is is is part of the community. And I I would just hate to lose that.
» Yeah, I understand. And I'm sorry to say this, but um and Dave, you know how much
I love this theater. I've been there for 18 years, but one thing I've learned in
18 years and especially since CO is I I don't mean to sound doomsday about it,
but I don't think the theater will be able to sustain at 425 seats. And if I
thought it could, believe me, I I I believe in the intimate nature of the
auditorium. I love that it's a conversation between artists, but I know
John's going to speak to this in a second. We have done everything we can
in the design to uh retain the intimacy of the theater. That's so important, but
we need to have more seats. the cost of acts. We want to bring in high quality
worldclass. You know, in 2011, 12,13, you probably all remember we had
Blondie, the B-52s, uh Cindy Looper. I mean, these are huge names that are
completely out of our reach now. And even if we can get the marquee name
artists, the tickets are so wildly expensive and we just we're not going to
be able to sustain. We're facing ticket price resistance. um people don't want
to pay more than $150 per ticket, understandably so in the the economic
times we're in. And so I think again with community in mind, I think we have
to do everything we can to preserve um the history and the intimacy of the
room, but I think we really have to think in terms of how this theater is
going to exist for the next generations to come.
» John, do you want to speak to this? >> John Rose, architect. One of our
specialties is historic preservation work. Um we do a lot of landmark work
and as a kid I also attended that theater. I recognize how important it is
and the state and obviously will make us preserve it but it's really important
that when this is all done it's all put back together from the inside you really
won't feel much of a difference. Yeah, the stage is getting bigger but the
fabrics, the seating style, the general layout is remaining the same. The front
entrance will not be it'll be repaired where it's falling apart a little bit,
but it's going to stay exactly the same. You won't be able to see the lion share
of the work until you turn the corner. As you know, there's a building on the
corner that hides everything but the front of the building. That won't change
from Main Street. You won't be able to see what we're doing from Main Street.
You got to go around the back. So, I get it. You're right. It's a really special
place and it's going to stay that way.
Will we be able to get the circus back? [laughter]
» That's all it takes. >> Rock, you know, I I listen to what Dave
said and I'm just thinking about how much change we've seen in the village,
you know, in the last 10 years, how many different buildings have come in and
knock, you know, the structures have been knocked down. And I think
the expansion is pro, you know, also to keep it alive economically, I think the
expansion is justified, right? Um, I think in the process of
trying to figure it out, I think the elephant in the corner is part
» and and just my thoughts as a contractor, I'd want to figure that out
before I burn a lot of money moving forward.
» But that's that's my thoughts on that. >> Top of the list.
» Yeah. because I mean you can go all the way and then the parking falls apart
» all these issues and >> we're we're certainly aware [laughter]
» so that's >> working with the trustees and with
» yeah I'm I'm sure architecturally you'll bring it you you'll bring it in line
» you don't have a choice >> well well exactly don't have a choice
but so that that's my thoughts that's that's
what I'm thinking >> thank you
do you want to make some comments are you for this application.
» Spectator.
» Um, off the top of my head, no. But in my records, since I've been involved
since the very first shovel, I think I could find that out.
» It's just my curiosity. >> Yeah. No, we can we can find that out.
Well, I think this is really going to wind up in the lap of the trustees more
than the planning board for the immediate future. So, I don't know when
we'll be seeing you again. So,
and I think I don't think you have a direction that you need to go into at
this moment in order to proceed with the path you need to go down. So, I don't
really think this board has any more significant comments than other than I
think you need to say that you choose not to be lead agency.
» Well, we'll we'll get that start. We got to get the
» process started with the trustees and >> I'll probably do that at the next
meeting. So, it's a couple couple weeks, right?
» There's also and Britain would know there's a hold over on the property
north of the rear of the theater right now. Am I correct, Britain?
» There's a hold over right there because they want to do something there also.
There's a lot of development going on. >> You know about that or not, Jim, but
there's >> Yes. Oh, no. I'm fully aware. Yeah.
» Okay. >> I'm not representing them.
» Pardon me. >> What effect?
» What effect it has on you or them? I I'm not sure, but
Is that next week? >> First Thursday. Oh my god. [laughter]
» It's September. >> It's September already.
» Do we um need to do anything for that? Do we need to come?
» No, I don't.
first week of September.
» There's so many involved agencies that we have to send out.
» You know, we're not going to get like an individual waiver here and there and
speed up the process. So, we we just have to go through that process and
» Okay. Well, we will see you at some point and
we will look forward to it. Thank you for working with you on this.
» Nice seeing you, John. >> Just like to say I really do appreciate
and take all the comments to heart. >> Thank you.
» Okie dokie. Um, we're going to engage in a secret discussion regarding 220 Dune
Road. >> Yeah. So, I can report back. Um, we told
you we would address it with the zoning board. They have no problem deferring to
the planning board to be lead agency. So I I think with your
holding of the board last time, what we could probably use would be just
a resolution um
instructing staff to get that process started to to let the involved agency
know involved agencies know that you're electing to
uh or requesting to proceed as lead agency and identifying them as involved
agencies. So, if you want to do that resolution, we'll get the process
started. >> Well, I don't know. Do we want to do
that resolution tonight? Um, my thought was,
[clears throat] speaking for myself, the secret pool is a deep one. And, um, what
I did is I went to Nikon for the training material that they do for
planning boards and zoning boards. And, um, bought the training session and I
what I would like to do is give that to each member of the planning board and
anybody else who's interested so that we all have a better understanding of the
secret process and the steps involved um before we start a clock. You have to
start the clock. So when they file an application, there's a requirement that
you begin the process as early as possible. And so we can't just drag out
the beginning. Uh all you would be doing >> for two weeks.
» No, but it's already been several. They started
» an hour doing that was >> Yeah, it's it's I'm just telling you
that they're entitled to have it move along. All we would be doing today is
sending out notices that then it just starts a 30-day process for other
agencies to object or not to you being lead agency. That's all. It's as as
innocuous a step as there is. And there's really no I can't say there's
any reason not to do it unless you don't want it anymore. I mean, if you change
your mind about being lead agency, >> he's asking for a delay doesn't mean he
doesn't want it anymore. >> I'm not asking for a delay. I'm asking
for a period to gather information. >> So, we will have that. I promise you
there's going to be [clears throat] ample period to gather information.
» But we got to get we got to get you started as lead agency and and that's
going to take it takes 30 days just to get to that ability for you to even say
we are now lead agency. All you'd be saying is we want to be
lead agency. That's it. So, I I'm happy to,
you know, be involved and walk you through this process and we're going to
take our we're not going to rush this process. I I that I promise you, but we
at least have to give them a lead agency because they are entitled to that.
» Anybody want to make any comments? >> There is another referral later on.
What I'm hearing is
» I want the board members to understand the process
» because it's not a simple process. You know, this isn't like neg deck world,
you know, where you're just going a house, you know, down the block. This
has a little more gravity to it than you know our normal secret process here.
» Nothing can happen. Um
» I guarantee everyone
So if you want between like one of the meetings in September,
» um >> we could set aside to have a
» just training material in my hands tomorrow actually.
» No, but after you have that problem, >> you could distribute it and then we
could have a session just to talk about >> the process. That's all. I mean, we'll
doesn't even have to be specific to this application only, but just to
» Yes. >> kind of have a a primer and a and a
refresher on the process that you should expect.
» I'd like [snorts] to do that. >> So, we could do that.
» The other thing I want to tell you is that when when I had the discussion with
the zoning board about it, they all said they want to still be involved since
they have a very big decision to make. And one of the things that I told them
we could set up when the time comes, this is not next month and probably not
the next month, but at some point would be a joint work session where they can
come and since you're the lead agency, they can come as a board, not just as
one person or two people, but we can advertise it as a joint work session
where you can hear their concerns about things that they would want you as lead
agency to be looking at for their benefit because that's the
responsibility of the lead agency is to gather the information that all the
other agencies need to make their decision. And so
um I thought it would be a nice thing to have
» possibly a joint work session. We've done it once before with when the
trustees were involved in an application with you I think and we had the two
boards I can't remember what it was for. It
might have been the old CVS or >> something like that. But it was
something um where we we did that and advertised a meeting. And I think it's a
nice thing to do on a on an important application like this.
» We get pizza, too. >> We can do that. [laughter]
» Pepperoni. >> Roco, do you have any comments on this?
» Jim can even have some pizza while he's not yet. But I do want to see I do want
to review the secret. So, you said you would you would
» I'll distribute the information. >> Yeah, definitely.
» We've all been attending Nikon training events. I would assume this one goes
back to uh 2023. Wade, who teaches those courses, really does a phenomenal job.
And as I recall that training session, he did a phenomenal
job on it. So, I contacted Ncom today and hopefully I can have that um
» information distributed. They said 24 hours.
» This only like an online class like we've been doing
» it. It'll be a video. It'll be like a YouTube
» so we can go stop, start, look at action, just
» no interaction. Yeah. >> Yeah, I'd like to do that.
» Okay. >> And just keep in mind too that the DEC's
website, >> it actually has some really good
resources as well. They have like different levels of, you know, kind of
like an introductory level >> a little bit a handbook. They have
something called the secret handbook which is a Q&A style but in pretty good
detail and then they have the regulations and more technical stuff.
But you know after you've done the Nikon thing it's a great resource to you have
a question and I'm not available to answer it.
» Yeah. You'll typically be able to find that answer on the DC's website,
» especially that secret handbook, which is
» I still look at it sometimes when I >> um you know, they they've spent decades
working on it and refining. >> Fix that now and refining it.
» Fix that. [laughter]
» So, I'll make sure you have all the resources you need.
» Appreciate. Thank you. >> Thank you.
» It's up to you. hasn't changed. I don't think we should
be agency. >> I can't hear you, Dave. I'm sorry.
» I don't think we should be lead agency. My opinion hasn't changed.
» Larry Young comments. >> No. Ready to go. Let's have a look at
all your stuff. >> We've already voted to be lead.
» That ship sailed. >> Dave wasn't on the boat that day.
[laughter] >> Somebody let the air out of the tires.
» [laughter] >> All right, then. So, um I guess we'll
adopt I need a resolution then. >> Just just uh it's sort of informal just
to let the staff know that we can >> start the the process for you. So,
predicated on the polling that we did and the uh actions we taken this
evening, um the planning board of the village of West Hampton Beaches is
extending itself to be lead agency if we're so honored in the future.
[laughter] >> There you go. I like that.
» I respectfully deserve. [laughter]
» It is an honor.
» Okay. >> Tick tick tick. I need a motion for
that. >> No, we don't. We don't need a motion.
» I second a motion.
» We're done. >> It's not It's not even
» We just need instruction. That's all. It's not There's nothing formal about it
yet. It'll be formal at the at the meeting when
they actually adopt fleet agency status. So,
» it'll be at that meeting that we need for
» Thank you, Tony. on the vote now. >> All right.
Haven't been adjourned yet. >> I need a motion.
» Well, it was the way you presented that to the PCA. Nice.
» Oh, yeah. >> I have minutes from August 13th. I need
a resolution to accept the minutes as written.
» Go with it. >> I
» I
um that's it.
Need a motion to close. >> Make a motion.
» Okay. >> Anything you want to talk about for
[laughter] next meeting?