1 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:53,360 i 2 00:00:53,496 --> 00:00:57,000 d like to call the SEPTEMBER 3 00:00:57,000 --> 00:00:58,301 2nd, 2026 Wilmington Planning 4 00:00:58,301 --> 00:00:59,435 Commission meeting to order and 5 00:00:59,435 --> 00:01:02,435 ask that everyone please rise 6 00:01:03,841 --> 00:01:06,744 for the Pledge of Allegiance. 7 00:01:06,744 --> 00:01:08,880 Thank you for the United States 8 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:11,820 of America, the republic for 9 00:01:11,820 --> 00:01:14,820 which it stands. One nation 10 00:01:21,610 --> 00:01:23,263 under GOD, indivisible, with. 11 00:01:23,263 --> 00:01:25,699 Thank you. I believe we have a 12 00:01:25,699 --> 00:01:27,501 full dais tonight. MR. Tierney, 13 00:01:27,501 --> 00:01:28,569 do we have a quorum? Yes. 14 00:01:28,569 --> 00:01:30,103 MR. CHAIRMAN. 15 00:01:30,103 --> 00:01:31,305 Thank you very much. The 16 00:01:31,305 --> 00:01:32,940 Planning Commission advises 17 00:01:32,940 --> 00:01:34,508 City Council on applications 18 00:01:34,508 --> 00:01:35,543 for rezoning, land Development 19 00:01:35,543 --> 00:01:37,780 Code amendments, street 20 00:01:37,780 --> 00:01:39,214 closures and long range plans 21 00:01:39,214 --> 00:01:40,582 and policies. A commission 22 00:01:40,582 --> 00:01:41,750 holds legislative hearings, 23 00:01:41,750 --> 00:01:43,752 meaning that anyone wishing to 24 00:01:43,752 --> 00:01:44,853 speak on a request MAY do so. 25 00:01:44,853 --> 00:01:45,988 The Commission issues a 26 00:01:45,988 --> 00:01:47,590 recommendation based on 27 00:01:47,590 --> 00:01:48,991 consistency of the request, 28 00:01:48,991 --> 00:01:50,993 with the intent and purpose of 29 00:01:50,993 --> 00:01:52,528 the Land Development Code and 30 00:01:52,528 --> 00:01:53,396 consistency of a request with 31 00:01:53,396 --> 00:01:55,232 the Create Wilmington 32 00:01:55,232 --> 00:01:56,734 Comprehensive Plan and other 33 00:01:56,734 --> 00:01:58,969 relevant adopted plans and 34 00:01:58,969 --> 00:02:00,337 policies. All matters requiring 35 00:02:00,337 --> 00:02:01,338 commission action shall be 36 00:02:01,338 --> 00:02:02,406 presented to the Planning 37 00:02:02,406 --> 00:02:04,775 Commission by the Planning 38 00:02:04,775 --> 00:02:06,344 Staff and the applicant. In 39 00:02:06,344 --> 00:02:07,445 situations where planning staff 40 00:02:07,445 --> 00:02:09,847 is the applicant, there will 41 00:02:09,847 --> 00:02:11,150 only be one presentation. City 42 00:02:11,150 --> 00:02:12,651 staff will make the first 43 00:02:12,651 --> 00:02:13,652 presentation. The applicant 44 00:02:13,652 --> 00:02:15,688 will make the second 45 00:02:15,688 --> 00:02:16,522 presentation to maintain an 46 00:02:16,522 --> 00:02:17,924 orderly meeting. All 47 00:02:17,924 --> 00:02:19,725 presentations shall proceed 48 00:02:19,725 --> 00:02:21,600 without interruption unless the 49 00:02:21,600 --> 00:02:22,895 Commission desires to intervene 50 00:02:22,895 --> 00:02:24,230 with questions or comments. The 51 00:02:24,230 --> 00:02:25,432 chair will open the public 52 00:02:25,432 --> 00:02:26,766 hearing for those physically 53 00:02:26,766 --> 00:02:28,468 present wishing to speak about 54 00:02:28,468 --> 00:02:30,304 an item. Those in favor of an 55 00:02:30,304 --> 00:02:31,873 item shall be heard first, 56 00:02:31,873 --> 00:02:33,541 followed by those opposed to an 57 00:02:33,541 --> 00:02:34,475 item. A ten minute time limit 58 00:02:34,475 --> 00:02:35,977 will be allowed for public 59 00:02:35,977 --> 00:02:37,979 comment in favor of an item, 60 00:02:37,979 --> 00:02:39,481 and a ten minute time will be 61 00:02:39,481 --> 00:02:41,316 allowed for public comment. In 62 00:02:41,316 --> 00:02:42,351 opposition to an item. A staff 63 00:02:42,351 --> 00:02:43,485 member will track the ten 64 00:02:43,485 --> 00:02:43,618 minute time periods, and we 65 00:02:43,618 --> 00:02:45,287 ll 66 00:02:45,287 --> 00:02:47,357 notify the speaker at the five 67 00:02:47,357 --> 00:02:48,925 minute, one and one minute mark 68 00:02:48,925 --> 00:02:51,925 and verbally call time when 69 00:02:52,195 --> 00:02:54,164 time expires. MISS Painter, the 70 00:02:54,164 --> 00:02:55,966 chair, in their discretion, MAY 71 00:02:55,966 --> 00:02:57,367 extend these time periods. All 72 00:02:57,367 --> 00:02:58,669 groups, organizations, 73 00:02:58,669 --> 00:03:00,170 neighborhoods, or similar 74 00:03:00,170 --> 00:03:01,905 associations desiring to 75 00:03:01,905 --> 00:03:03,507 comment are asked to appoint 76 00:03:03,507 --> 00:03:05,510 one spokesperson to present 77 00:03:05,510 --> 00:03:06,678 their concerns or point of view 78 00:03:06,678 --> 00:03:08,413 to the Commission on each 79 00:03:08,413 --> 00:03:09,848 agenda item. The public has 80 00:03:09,848 --> 00:03:11,283 been encouraged to submit their 81 00:03:11,283 --> 00:03:12,918 comments in writing via a web 82 00:03:12,918 --> 00:03:13,252 based form located on the City 83 00:03:13,252 --> 00:03:15,200 of Wilmington 84 00:03:15,200 --> 00:03:16,589 s website. All 85 00:03:16,589 --> 00:03:18,457 comments received prior to 3 86 00:03:18,457 --> 00:03:20,126 P.M. Today were forwarded, 87 00:03:20,126 --> 00:03:21,962 unedited to the Planning 88 00:03:21,962 --> 00:03:23,297 Commission, and all comments 89 00:03:23,297 --> 00:03:26,330 received will be delivered to 90 00:03:26,330 --> 00:03:28,202 the City Council. When the item 91 00:03:28,202 --> 00:03:29,603 advances. MISS Bradshaw, do we 92 00:03:29,603 --> 00:03:31,405 receive anything else other 93 00:03:31,405 --> 00:03:34,410 than what you sent us today? 94 00:03:34,410 --> 00:03:37,410 Nothing for since 3 P.M.. 95 00:03:38,379 --> 00:03:39,548 Thank you. All votes will be 96 00:03:39,548 --> 00:03:41,150 roll call votes after the 97 00:03:41,150 --> 00:03:42,618 proper motions are made and 98 00:03:42,618 --> 00:03:44,253 consistency statements read 99 00:03:44,253 --> 00:03:45,288 into the record. The chair will 100 00:03:45,288 --> 00:03:47,557 state the outcome of the vote 101 00:03:47,557 --> 00:03:48,725 and the action. Rezoning 102 00:03:48,725 --> 00:03:50,259 requests that receive an 103 00:03:50,259 --> 00:03:51,694 unfavorable recommendation from 104 00:03:51,694 --> 00:03:53,463 the Planning Commission MAY be 105 00:03:53,463 --> 00:03:55,265 appealed by the applicant to 106 00:03:55,265 --> 00:03:56,400 the Wilmington City Council. 107 00:03:56,400 --> 00:03:57,668 Appeals should be in the form 108 00:03:57,668 --> 00:03:59,504 of a letter submitted to the 109 00:03:59,504 --> 00:04:01,739 City Clerk within ten days of 110 00:04:01,739 --> 00:04:03,842 this hearing. Any item that is 111 00:04:03,842 --> 00:04:06,110 appealed will be tentatively be 112 00:04:06,110 --> 00:04:09,611 heard by City Council at its 113 00:04:09,948 --> 00:04:11,948 OCTOBER 19th, 2026 meeting. 114 00:04:12,484 --> 00:04:14,687 First item of business will be 115 00:04:14,687 --> 00:04:16,856 approval of the JULY 8th 116 00:04:16,856 --> 00:04:18,892 meeting minutes. Do we have any 117 00:04:18,892 --> 00:04:21,292 comments or questions in 118 00:04:21,561 --> 00:04:23,630 regards to the minutes? Did I 119 00:04:23,630 --> 00:04:24,364 hear a motion to approve? 120 00:04:24,364 --> 00:04:24,998 I make a motion to approve the 121 00:04:24,998 --> 00:04:26,998 minutes. 122 00:04:27,968 --> 00:04:31,568 All those in favor? Aye. Any 123 00:04:31,706 --> 00:04:32,607 opposed? Thank you for item 124 00:04:32,607 --> 00:04:35,100 number one. We have a 125 00:04:35,100 --> 00:04:37,100 conditional district rezoning 126 00:04:38,247 --> 00:04:40,247 for properties containing 2.176 127 00:04:41,317 --> 00:04:43,717 acres located at 120 and 124 128 00:04:44,286 --> 00:04:46,489 Canal Street from our 20 l to 129 00:04:46,489 --> 00:04:48,124 resident. Sorry, our 20 130 00:04:48,124 --> 00:04:50,227 residential legacy district to 131 00:04:50,227 --> 00:04:51,462 our seven cd medium density 132 00:04:51,462 --> 00:04:53,130 single dwelling conditional 133 00:04:53,130 --> 00:04:55,366 district for an eight unit 134 00:04:55,366 --> 00:04:57,766 residential development and MR. 135 00:05:01,772 --> 00:05:03,341 Cherry will be presenting. 136 00:05:03,341 --> 00:05:04,642 Good evening, chair, Vice Chair 137 00:05:04,642 --> 00:05:07,642 and members of the Planning 138 00:05:08,180 --> 00:05:09,448 Commission. After your review 139 00:05:09,448 --> 00:05:10,949 tonight, I present a 140 00:05:10,949 --> 00:05:12,949 conditional district rezoning 141 00:05:14,530 --> 00:05:15,955 at 120 and 124 Canal Street. 142 00:05:15,955 --> 00:05:17,390 Um, a community community 143 00:05:17,390 --> 00:05:19,425 meeting was held in JULY prior 144 00:05:19,425 --> 00:05:20,727 to the application being filed 145 00:05:20,727 --> 00:05:22,329 with the city staff has 146 00:05:22,329 --> 00:05:24,165 reviewed and made the 147 00:05:24,165 --> 00:05:25,366 recommendation on this. And 148 00:05:25,366 --> 00:05:28,366 today is the first public 149 00:05:28,803 --> 00:05:31,206 hearing. This site is zoned r 150 00:05:31,206 --> 00:05:32,807 20, a low density residential 151 00:05:32,807 --> 00:05:33,775 legacy district. Um, the 152 00:05:33,775 --> 00:05:36,175 applicant is proposing to 153 00:05:36,344 --> 00:05:37,712 rezone this to an ar seven 154 00:05:37,712 --> 00:05:39,712 moderate density residential 155 00:05:42,852 --> 00:05:44,654 conditional district. Here is a 156 00:05:44,654 --> 00:05:46,623 vicinity map showing the site 157 00:05:46,623 --> 00:05:47,924 in a broader context. Near a 158 00:05:47,924 --> 00:05:50,924 summer rest trail. The summer 159 00:05:51,194 --> 00:05:52,696 rest community and near the 160 00:05:52,696 --> 00:05:54,731 right to the intersection 161 00:05:54,731 --> 00:05:57,131 between Eastwood Road and 162 00:05:57,768 --> 00:05:59,771 Wrightsville. The existing land 163 00:05:59,771 --> 00:06:01,706 use is a single, single family 164 00:06:01,706 --> 00:06:04,750 dwelling surrounded by mixed 165 00:06:04,750 --> 00:06:05,944 use, single family dwelling and 166 00:06:05,944 --> 00:06:06,578 commercial, but it 167 00:06:06,578 --> 00:06:08,578 s currently 168 00:06:08,647 --> 00:06:10,820 zoned r 20, like I mentioned. 169 00:06:10,820 --> 00:06:12,117 To the south is o and I, to the 170 00:06:12,117 --> 00:06:14,517 west is community business, 171 00:06:15,540 --> 00:06:17,454 conditional districts. Here are 172 00:06:19,560 --> 00:06:21,862 photos of the subject property. 173 00:06:21,862 --> 00:06:24,498 And views. Looking north, south 174 00:06:24,498 --> 00:06:26,133 and west on Canal Street. As 175 00:06:26,133 --> 00:06:26,701 you can see to the north at 176 00:06:26,701 --> 00:06:27,535 dead ends, there 177 00:06:27,535 --> 00:06:29,535 s a road 178 00:06:30,371 --> 00:06:33,971 terminus there. Um, and to the 179 00:06:34,476 --> 00:06:37,476 south is, uh, Eastwood Road. 180 00:06:38,648 --> 00:06:40,817 The applicant is proposing to. 181 00:06:40,817 --> 00:06:42,985 Construct eight townhome units 182 00:06:42,985 --> 00:06:45,385 with associated driveways and 183 00:06:45,889 --> 00:06:48,289 parking. Um, 16 parking spaces 184 00:06:48,491 --> 00:06:49,893 are provided of the 22 maximum 185 00:06:49,893 --> 00:06:51,228 allowed. Uh Stormwater 186 00:06:51,228 --> 00:06:53,628 Management permit will be 187 00:06:53,831 --> 00:06:55,320 required. Um 12 regulated and 188 00:06:55,320 --> 00:06:56,234 nine significant trees are 189 00:06:56,234 --> 00:06:58,690 proposed for removal, while 190 00:06:58,690 --> 00:07:01,690 five specimen trees will be 191 00:07:01,673 --> 00:07:03,775 retained. Here are concept 192 00:07:03,775 --> 00:07:06,344 elevations. This is from Canal 193 00:07:06,344 --> 00:07:07,946 Street looking onto the site. 194 00:07:07,946 --> 00:07:12,146 And here is a view from the 195 00:07:17,491 --> 00:07:19,920 rear from Motts Creek. The 196 00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:20,994 subject property is designated 197 00:07:20,994 --> 00:07:22,629 as an Intracoastal Tidewater 198 00:07:22,629 --> 00:07:22,830 Area of Opportunity on the 199 00:07:22,830 --> 00:07:24,398 city 200 00:07:24,398 --> 00:07:26,501 s growth strategy maps. 201 00:07:26,501 --> 00:07:28,303 Relevant policies to this are, 202 00:07:28,303 --> 00:07:29,738 um, focusing on preserving 203 00:07:29,738 --> 00:07:31,306 character and single family 204 00:07:31,306 --> 00:07:32,441 compatibility, including 205 00:07:32,441 --> 00:07:34,443 preservation of the National 206 00:07:34,443 --> 00:07:35,778 Register Historic District, and 207 00:07:35,778 --> 00:07:37,212 limit the number of driveways 208 00:07:37,212 --> 00:07:39,348 along parkways and loop road 209 00:07:39,348 --> 00:07:41,250 corridor types, encouraging 210 00:07:41,250 --> 00:07:43,520 shared access and a network of 211 00:07:43,520 --> 00:07:45,452 connected space, streets and 212 00:07:45,656 --> 00:07:47,240 pathways to create Wilmington 213 00:07:47,240 --> 00:07:48,125 Comprehensive Plan offers 214 00:07:48,125 --> 00:07:50,525 policy guidance to shape 215 00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:52,363 development in the city. Staff 216 00:07:52,363 --> 00:07:53,497 sets this application with 217 00:07:53,497 --> 00:07:54,598 relevant policies and found 218 00:07:54,598 --> 00:07:54,899 modest support for the 219 00:07:54,899 --> 00:07:55,700 application 220 00:07:55,700 --> 00:07:57,501 s alignment with 221 00:07:57,501 --> 00:07:59,437 the plan. Key policies that 222 00:07:59,437 --> 00:08:00,705 support rezoning the site to an 223 00:08:00,705 --> 00:08:02,241 r-7 conditional district 224 00:08:02,241 --> 00:08:03,576 highlight the need for compact 225 00:08:03,576 --> 00:08:05,110 development. Transitional 226 00:08:05,110 --> 00:08:07,110 buffers, increasing housing 227 00:08:07,646 --> 00:08:09,749 supply while protecting desired 228 00:08:09,749 --> 00:08:11,317 neighborhood character and tree 229 00:08:11,317 --> 00:08:12,685 preservation. Uh. During 230 00:08:12,685 --> 00:08:14,530 review, staff found one policy 231 00:08:14,530 --> 00:08:17,653 to not be aligned with this 232 00:08:19,460 --> 00:08:21,950 proposal. No comments or 233 00:08:21,950 --> 00:08:22,730 testimony were received in 234 00:08:22,730 --> 00:08:24,465 support of this proposal, and 235 00:08:24,465 --> 00:08:26,100 one comment which I believe has 236 00:08:26,100 --> 00:08:29,537 been provided to you today, uh, 237 00:08:29,537 --> 00:08:32,537 has been received in opposition. 238 00:08:33,675 --> 00:08:35,310 To summarize, rezoning from a 239 00:08:35,310 --> 00:08:37,310 low density residential 240 00:08:37,947 --> 00:08:40,150 district to medium density r-7 241 00:08:40,150 --> 00:08:42,252 conditional district on a 2.1 242 00:08:42,252 --> 00:08:43,219 acre site. Um stormwater 243 00:08:43,219 --> 00:08:45,121 management plan will be 244 00:08:45,121 --> 00:08:47,521 required. Five specimen trees 245 00:08:47,591 --> 00:08:49,726 will remain, will be retained, 246 00:08:49,726 --> 00:08:51,361 and policies in the 247 00:08:51,361 --> 00:08:52,596 Comprehensive plan encourage 248 00:08:52,596 --> 00:08:53,965 balancing housing supply with 249 00:08:53,965 --> 00:08:54,833 protecting existing 250 00:08:54,833 --> 00:08:55,834 neighborhood character and 251 00:08:55,834 --> 00:08:57,636 protecting the natural 252 00:08:57,636 --> 00:08:58,937 environment. Staff finds this 253 00:08:58,937 --> 00:09:01,337 request reasonable and in 254 00:09:01,540 --> 00:09:03,775 public interest, and are there 255 00:09:03,775 --> 00:09:04,877 any questions? The applicant is 256 00:09:04,877 --> 00:09:06,578 here as well. I believe they 257 00:09:06,578 --> 00:09:07,713 have a presentation and happy 258 00:09:07,713 --> 00:09:08,180 to answer any questions that I 259 00:09:08,180 --> 00:09:09,882 can. 260 00:09:09,882 --> 00:09:12,419 Thank you. Before we let you 261 00:09:12,419 --> 00:09:13,820 go. Commissioner Jones. 262 00:09:13,820 --> 00:09:14,521 Commissioner Woodruff. 263 00:09:14,521 --> 00:09:14,888 Commissioner Pollack. 264 00:09:14,888 --> 00:09:16,690 Yes. 265 00:09:16,690 --> 00:09:17,524 Sir. 266 00:09:17,524 --> 00:09:18,158 Uh, you don 267 00:09:18,158 --> 00:09:19,226 t have to flip 268 00:09:19,226 --> 00:09:21,462 back, but will you show the 269 00:09:21,462 --> 00:09:21,595 three pictures of the property? 270 00:09:21,595 --> 00:09:23,970 I 271 00:09:23,970 --> 00:09:24,298 m sorry. Where you showed the 272 00:09:24,298 --> 00:09:24,565 three pictures of the property. 273 00:09:24,565 --> 00:09:25,833 You don 274 00:09:25,833 --> 00:09:27,869 t need to scroll back. 275 00:09:27,869 --> 00:09:29,671 Um, are all three of those 276 00:09:29,671 --> 00:09:30,839 homes that you showed coming? 277 00:09:30,839 --> 00:09:32,208 Going to be coming down, or is 278 00:09:32,208 --> 00:09:33,309 that something the applicant 279 00:09:33,309 --> 00:09:34,443 would better address? 280 00:09:34,443 --> 00:09:35,211 Uh, they MAY be better to 281 00:09:35,211 --> 00:09:35,744 address it, but I assume they 282 00:09:35,744 --> 00:09:36,120 will be coming. They 283 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:36,512 ll be 284 00:09:36,512 --> 00:09:37,130 coming down. They 285 00:09:37,130 --> 00:09:37,914 re not shown 286 00:09:37,914 --> 00:09:39,150 on the site. Plan to be 287 00:09:39,150 --> 00:09:39,382 retained. 288 00:09:39,382 --> 00:09:39,582 Okay. 289 00:09:39,582 --> 00:09:40,116 That 290 00:09:40,116 --> 00:09:41,884 s all. Yes, sir. 291 00:09:41,884 --> 00:09:43,884 Okay, thanks. 292 00:09:44,788 --> 00:09:46,557 Commissioner Adams. 293 00:09:46,557 --> 00:09:48,557 Were there any. 294 00:09:48,793 --> 00:09:50,561 Significant design changes for 295 00:09:50,561 --> 00:09:52,230 the layout or density following 296 00:09:52,230 --> 00:09:54,498 either the community meeting or 297 00:09:54,498 --> 00:09:55,567 the technical review with 298 00:09:55,567 --> 00:09:57,567 staff? 299 00:09:57,635 --> 00:09:59,204 Um, so staff in the applicant 300 00:09:59,204 --> 00:10:01,373 did discuss alternative designs 301 00:10:01,373 --> 00:10:02,574 due to some constraints with 302 00:10:02,574 --> 00:10:05,574 natural features such as the 303 00:10:05,912 --> 00:10:08,114 creek and trees. Um, this 304 00:10:08,114 --> 00:10:08,915 became the most feasible. Um, 305 00:10:08,915 --> 00:10:10,984 the applicant MAY be able to 306 00:10:10,984 --> 00:10:12,285 speak more to um, specifically 307 00:10:12,285 --> 00:10:14,685 what those constraints were. 308 00:10:17,157 --> 00:10:18,592 Um, but there were discussions. 309 00:10:18,592 --> 00:10:20,592 Commissioner Collier. 310 00:10:21,229 --> 00:10:22,364 Commissioner Cooper, thank you 311 00:10:22,364 --> 00:10:22,631 very much. Thank you. I 312 00:10:22,631 --> 00:10:24,631 d like 313 00:10:26,202 --> 00:10:26,334 to invite the applicant. 314 00:10:26,334 --> 00:10:28,334 I 315 00:10:30,872 --> 00:10:31,390 ll get that for you. Yes, 316 00:10:31,390 --> 00:10:31,607 ma 317 00:10:31,607 --> 00:10:32,741 am. 318 00:10:32,741 --> 00:10:33,575 Thank you very much. My name is 319 00:10:33,575 --> 00:10:34,476 Cindy Wolfe, and I 320 00:10:34,476 --> 00:10:35,611 m here on 321 00:10:35,611 --> 00:10:36,445 behalf of the owners of the 322 00:10:36,445 --> 00:10:37,460 property. And I 323 00:10:37,460 --> 00:10:38,147 m here with 324 00:10:38,147 --> 00:10:39,182 Nathan Sangamon, who 325 00:10:39,182 --> 00:10:41,182 s, um, one 326 00:10:41,451 --> 00:10:44,451 of the representatives from the 327 00:10:44,922 --> 00:10:47,570 development team. As Tucker 328 00:10:47,570 --> 00:10:49,293 Tucker pointed out. Canal 329 00:10:49,293 --> 00:10:50,861 Street is a dead end roadway. 330 00:10:50,861 --> 00:10:51,662 The right of way stub stubs to 331 00:10:51,662 --> 00:10:51,862 the tidal creek. There 332 00:10:51,862 --> 00:10:53,397 s 333 00:10:53,397 --> 00:10:55,500 certainly no feasibility for 334 00:10:55,500 --> 00:10:56,680 future extension. Um, we 335 00:10:56,680 --> 00:10:58,680 ve got 336 00:10:58,700 --> 00:10:59,805 the four story Grandview 337 00:10:59,805 --> 00:11:00,239 apartments up on Wrightsville 338 00:11:00,239 --> 00:11:01,173 Avenue. It 339 00:11:01,173 --> 00:11:03,173 s three story, 340 00:11:03,776 --> 00:11:05,144 basically over the parking deck 341 00:11:05,144 --> 00:11:05,811 at the rear building. We 342 00:11:05,811 --> 00:11:07,647 ve got 343 00:11:07,647 --> 00:11:09,480 an existing contractor yard, 344 00:11:09,480 --> 00:11:10,383 which is certainly non 345 00:11:10,383 --> 00:11:11,684 conforming to any of the 346 00:11:11,684 --> 00:11:13,684 current regulations for 347 00:11:14,155 --> 00:11:15,890 screening or sidewalks. And 348 00:11:15,890 --> 00:11:17,959 then although the back access 349 00:11:17,959 --> 00:11:20,940 of Atlantic Marine Boat Service 350 00:11:20,940 --> 00:11:22,330 is back there, they keep a 351 00:11:22,330 --> 00:11:23,731 nice, you know, facility. And 352 00:11:23,731 --> 00:11:24,966 certainly the mixed use 353 00:11:24,966 --> 00:11:26,801 building that they have the 354 00:11:26,801 --> 00:11:28,803 first of two planned back 355 00:11:28,803 --> 00:11:31,441 there. Um, has given the street 356 00:11:31,441 --> 00:11:31,707 some character, uh that 357 00:11:31,707 --> 00:11:33,707 s 358 00:11:34,444 --> 00:11:36,579 right. But that being said, I 359 00:11:36,579 --> 00:11:39,649 think the zoning map is, is 360 00:11:39,649 --> 00:11:39,816 evident of what is here. Now 361 00:11:39,816 --> 00:11:40,851 you 362 00:11:40,851 --> 00:11:42,619 ve got the community 363 00:11:42,619 --> 00:11:45,190 business district across both 364 00:11:45,155 --> 00:11:46,857 ways. Although the gray areas, 365 00:11:46,857 --> 00:11:48,760 Wrightsville Beach, it is zoned 366 00:11:48,760 --> 00:11:49,794 c-5, which is the heavy duty 367 00:11:49,794 --> 00:11:51,763 commercial as far as 368 00:11:51,763 --> 00:11:51,930 Wrightsville Beach zoning is. 369 00:11:51,930 --> 00:11:53,698 We 370 00:11:53,698 --> 00:11:55,000 ve got the md ten, which is 371 00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:57,000 multifamily of Wrightsville 372 00:11:57,690 --> 00:11:58,337 West, and then Grandview is a 373 00:11:58,337 --> 00:12:01,974 mixed use in the oh and I 374 00:12:01,974 --> 00:12:03,709 district, as shown. Certainly 375 00:12:03,709 --> 00:12:05,277 the our 20 legacy zoning 376 00:12:05,277 --> 00:12:06,913 district is still appropriate 377 00:12:06,913 --> 00:12:08,849 for all of Summer Haven. There 378 00:12:08,849 --> 00:12:09,115 is no question about that. But 379 00:12:09,115 --> 00:12:10,116 the Mott 380 00:12:10,116 --> 00:12:10,317 s Creek pond and 381 00:12:10,317 --> 00:12:11,852 Mott 382 00:12:11,852 --> 00:12:14,852 s Creek that extends back 383 00:12:15,923 --> 00:12:17,858 here isolates the end of Canal 384 00:12:17,858 --> 00:12:19,360 Street from that community and 385 00:12:19,360 --> 00:12:20,494 more orients it towards the 386 00:12:20,494 --> 00:12:21,996 community that we have 387 00:12:21,996 --> 00:12:24,996 surrounding it, which is much 388 00:12:25,801 --> 00:12:27,202 more commercial. The existing 389 00:12:27,202 --> 00:12:28,637 conditions. I just wanted to 390 00:12:28,637 --> 00:12:29,838 show there are actually just 391 00:12:29,838 --> 00:12:31,838 two homes, Commissioner 392 00:12:32,708 --> 00:12:34,343 Pollock, that um, or whoever 393 00:12:34,343 --> 00:12:36,212 asked that, uh, the other 394 00:12:36,212 --> 00:12:36,379 building there is a garage, so 395 00:12:36,379 --> 00:12:37,246 it 396 00:12:37,246 --> 00:12:39,716 s a pretty good sized 397 00:12:39,716 --> 00:12:42,653 garage. All of those existing 398 00:12:42,653 --> 00:12:45,530 structures would be removed. 399 00:12:46,624 --> 00:12:48,526 Um, we went to a lot of, uh, 400 00:12:48,526 --> 00:12:50,595 exercise in the very beginning, 401 00:12:50,595 --> 00:12:52,300 not only getting the survey 402 00:12:52,300 --> 00:12:54,499 done, you know, all the things 403 00:12:54,499 --> 00:12:56,301 located, the existing, uh, 404 00:12:56,301 --> 00:12:56,868 utilities, all of that thing. 405 00:12:56,868 --> 00:12:57,369 But I think it 406 00:12:57,369 --> 00:12:58,704 s also 407 00:12:58,704 --> 00:13:00,907 important. And I wanted this 408 00:13:00,907 --> 00:13:03,877 exhibit to to show that even 409 00:13:03,877 --> 00:13:06,646 though the tax records and the 410 00:13:06,646 --> 00:13:08,214 technical land boundary show 411 00:13:08,214 --> 00:13:10,784 this being a combined two 412 00:13:10,784 --> 00:13:12,452 acres, it really is only 1.6 413 00:13:12,452 --> 00:13:14,755 acres. The blue line is 414 00:13:14,755 --> 00:13:16,792 basically the high water level. 415 00:13:16,792 --> 00:13:18,226 And so none of the lands below 416 00:13:18,226 --> 00:13:19,600 that, or to the right of the 417 00:13:19,600 --> 00:13:19,828 screens in Mott 418 00:13:19,828 --> 00:13:21,828 s Creek and 419 00:13:22,564 --> 00:13:25,133 along the waterline of that, is 420 00:13:25,133 --> 00:13:27,602 included in the feasible use of 421 00:13:27,602 --> 00:13:29,938 this area. So the blue line is 422 00:13:29,938 --> 00:13:31,406 where then the 75 foot cod, the 423 00:13:31,406 --> 00:13:31,740 conservation overlay district. 424 00:13:31,740 --> 00:13:32,207 And I don 425 00:13:32,207 --> 00:13:32,341 t know that that 426 00:13:32,341 --> 00:13:33,777 s 427 00:13:33,777 --> 00:13:34,911 what we call it anymore in the 428 00:13:34,911 --> 00:13:35,912 ldc, but that 429 00:13:35,912 --> 00:13:37,140 s where the 430 00:13:37,140 --> 00:13:38,548 setback for the more 431 00:13:38,548 --> 00:13:40,548 environmentally sensitive 432 00:13:41,318 --> 00:13:43,718 development happens. That being 433 00:13:43,821 --> 00:13:45,623 said, um, redevelopment of 434 00:13:45,623 --> 00:13:49,223 these two lots into two new 435 00:13:49,326 --> 00:13:51,396 homes would pretty much be by 436 00:13:51,396 --> 00:13:53,899 right, obviously. But then you 437 00:13:53,899 --> 00:13:55,401 negate the preservation of the 438 00:13:55,401 --> 00:13:57,236 requirements of the trees 439 00:13:57,236 --> 00:14:00,236 because neither of these lots 440 00:14:00,506 --> 00:14:02,275 are over an acre. Um, so more 441 00:14:02,275 --> 00:14:03,376 trees could come out as single 442 00:14:03,376 --> 00:14:03,743 family lots. There wouldn 443 00:14:03,743 --> 00:14:05,743 t be 444 00:14:06,145 --> 00:14:08,145 any stormwater requirements 445 00:14:08,649 --> 00:14:11,180 specifically. And so that was 446 00:14:11,180 --> 00:14:12,386 one of the press. The points 447 00:14:12,386 --> 00:14:13,721 that we tried to make when we 448 00:14:13,721 --> 00:14:15,723 had the community information 449 00:14:15,723 --> 00:14:16,491 meeting is, yes, we 450 00:14:16,491 --> 00:14:17,959 re asking 451 00:14:17,959 --> 00:14:18,126 for some more density, but 452 00:14:18,126 --> 00:14:19,527 you 453 00:14:19,527 --> 00:14:22,527 ve got the surety through 454 00:14:22,731 --> 00:14:24,499 the conditional use rezoning 455 00:14:24,499 --> 00:14:26,499 process of stormwater 456 00:14:26,836 --> 00:14:28,204 management of preservation of 457 00:14:28,204 --> 00:14:29,539 trees, all of those types of 458 00:14:29,539 --> 00:14:29,705 things. The other that we 459 00:14:29,705 --> 00:14:30,873 ve 460 00:14:30,873 --> 00:14:34,410 sort of brought up that people 461 00:14:34,410 --> 00:14:35,945 talked about was, uh, noise, 462 00:14:35,945 --> 00:14:37,948 uh, short term rentals, those 463 00:14:37,948 --> 00:14:39,416 types of things where you might 464 00:14:39,416 --> 00:14:40,751 have two homes and two 465 00:14:40,751 --> 00:14:42,619 accessory dwellings that would 466 00:14:42,619 --> 00:14:44,556 be redeveloped here. Yes, you 467 00:14:44,556 --> 00:14:46,558 have eight units, but you also 468 00:14:46,558 --> 00:14:49,427 have seven other members of an 469 00:14:49,427 --> 00:14:50,962 hoa that can make sure that 470 00:14:50,962 --> 00:14:52,964 types of things like short term 471 00:14:52,964 --> 00:14:56,564 rentals or noise or parties are 472 00:14:56,568 --> 00:14:58,971 much more reviewed and, um, you 473 00:14:58,971 --> 00:15:00,607 know, paid attention to very 474 00:15:00,607 --> 00:15:02,842 similar to, uh, Tucker 475 00:15:02,842 --> 00:15:04,611 s shots. 476 00:15:04,611 --> 00:15:06,680 This is looking towards the end 477 00:15:06,680 --> 00:15:08,182 of Canal Street and the 478 00:15:08,182 --> 00:15:10,217 sidewalk where it ends from the 479 00:15:10,217 --> 00:15:12,119 Grandview project. All those 480 00:15:12,119 --> 00:15:14,388 trees along that right away 481 00:15:14,388 --> 00:15:16,757 will be are part of our plan to 482 00:15:16,757 --> 00:15:18,760 be saved. Um, the sidewalk will 483 00:15:18,760 --> 00:15:20,295 extend because luckily, the 484 00:15:20,295 --> 00:15:21,730 carbon gutter is already here, 485 00:15:21,730 --> 00:15:24,133 but the sidewalk will extend 486 00:15:24,133 --> 00:15:26,402 and will be creative in field. 487 00:15:26,402 --> 00:15:28,137 Locating that along the front 488 00:15:28,137 --> 00:15:30,239 yard. Same thing from the 489 00:15:30,239 --> 00:15:31,941 opposite direction. Um, you can 490 00:15:31,941 --> 00:15:33,276 see those trees along the back 491 00:15:33,276 --> 00:15:35,412 of the curb that are all 492 00:15:35,412 --> 00:15:38,820 preserved in the plan. So 493 00:15:38,820 --> 00:15:38,249 again, this is the plan. Um, I 494 00:15:38,249 --> 00:15:39,717 don 495 00:15:39,717 --> 00:15:42,117 t have the existing 496 00:15:43,187 --> 00:15:45,187 building footprints. Um, 497 00:15:45,356 --> 00:15:47,756 underneath here, but basically 498 00:15:47,792 --> 00:15:49,594 the lower building on 120 is 499 00:15:49,594 --> 00:15:51,994 slightly behind the existing 500 00:15:52,631 --> 00:15:54,900 house. The building at 124 is 501 00:15:54,900 --> 00:15:56,736 behind the existing house. Uh, 502 00:15:56,736 --> 00:15:58,904 this is just an exhibit, but I 503 00:15:58,904 --> 00:16:01,700 think then it shows all of the 504 00:16:01,700 --> 00:16:04,607 vegetation that is then in that 505 00:16:04,611 --> 00:16:06,279 75 foot cod buffer and setback. 506 00:16:06,279 --> 00:16:06,680 That would be preserved. That 507 00:16:06,680 --> 00:16:08,215 s 508 00:16:08,215 --> 00:16:10,818 the house on the top end, the 509 00:16:10,818 --> 00:16:13,421 124. And from the bridge over 510 00:16:13,421 --> 00:16:13,588 Summer road, uh, the building 511 00:16:13,588 --> 00:16:15,588 we 512 00:16:15,757 --> 00:16:18,930 re proposing is behind where 513 00:16:18,930 --> 00:16:20,462 that building already is. So I 514 00:16:20,462 --> 00:16:21,696 think that the views from 515 00:16:21,696 --> 00:16:22,764 outside of it, which is 516 00:16:22,764 --> 00:16:24,833 certainly a concern that 517 00:16:24,833 --> 00:16:26,201 everyone had, are going to be 518 00:16:26,201 --> 00:16:28,204 softened and mitigated by the 519 00:16:28,204 --> 00:16:28,438 existing vegetation. That 520 00:16:28,438 --> 00:16:29,539 wouldn 521 00:16:29,539 --> 00:16:30,941 t necessarily be the 522 00:16:30,941 --> 00:16:33,941 case if this were redeveloped 523 00:16:34,845 --> 00:16:35,278 by. Right. Again, a conceptual 524 00:16:35,278 --> 00:16:36,480 you know, it 525 00:16:36,480 --> 00:16:37,981 s difficult 526 00:16:37,981 --> 00:16:39,917 getting an architect involved 527 00:16:39,917 --> 00:16:40,183 at this point to the cost when 528 00:16:40,183 --> 00:16:40,817 you don 529 00:16:40,817 --> 00:16:40,984 t even know you 530 00:16:40,984 --> 00:16:42,984 re 531 00:16:44,922 --> 00:16:46,892 entitled. But the obvious, um, 532 00:16:46,892 --> 00:16:48,727 concept that they have is a 533 00:16:48,727 --> 00:16:50,162 much more contemporary style of 534 00:16:50,162 --> 00:16:51,397 building. These are three 535 00:16:51,397 --> 00:16:53,980 stories where I mentioned that 536 00:16:53,980 --> 00:16:54,733 Grandview is four stories on 537 00:16:54,733 --> 00:16:56,468 the front, and then two stories 538 00:16:56,468 --> 00:16:56,635 over parking deck on the. So 539 00:16:56,635 --> 00:16:58,237 it 540 00:16:58,237 --> 00:17:01,140 s not much different than 541 00:17:01,140 --> 00:17:02,943 that. Uh, across the road, the 542 00:17:02,943 --> 00:17:04,945 Atlantic Marine mixed use 543 00:17:04,945 --> 00:17:05,312 building is also once it 544 00:17:05,312 --> 00:17:05,679 s up 545 00:17:05,679 --> 00:17:07,679 there, it 546 00:17:07,982 --> 00:17:10,418 s a high two stories. 547 00:17:10,418 --> 00:17:12,820 So with that, and I apologize, 548 00:17:12,820 --> 00:17:15,556 this should say proposed r7, 549 00:17:15,556 --> 00:17:15,757 not r5. We do appreciate 550 00:17:15,757 --> 00:17:17,325 staff 551 00:17:17,325 --> 00:17:19,325 s recommendation and 552 00:17:19,627 --> 00:17:21,197 their research of it. Um, one 553 00:17:21,197 --> 00:17:24,797 of the things that I believe 554 00:17:25,134 --> 00:17:28,134 the opponent to this rezoning 555 00:17:28,338 --> 00:17:29,272 had commented in their criteria 556 00:17:29,272 --> 00:17:31,272 was about stormwater 557 00:17:31,441 --> 00:17:33,710 management. Uh, we already have 558 00:17:33,710 --> 00:17:35,545 done the soils testing. We had 559 00:17:35,545 --> 00:17:36,947 tests done in two places all 560 00:17:36,947 --> 00:17:38,716 along that drive that fronts 561 00:17:38,716 --> 00:17:40,510 the parking pads in front of 562 00:17:40,510 --> 00:17:41,352 the building. So between the 563 00:17:41,352 --> 00:17:41,686 buildings and canal, that 564 00:17:41,686 --> 00:17:42,887 s 565 00:17:42,887 --> 00:17:44,890 where all the drainage would be 566 00:17:44,890 --> 00:17:44,990 directed. Uh, we 567 00:17:44,990 --> 00:17:46,990 re in the 568 00:17:48,160 --> 00:17:48,360 resource preservation, so 569 00:17:48,360 --> 00:17:50,360 there 570 00:17:50,429 --> 00:17:52,231 ll be low density impact, 571 00:17:52,231 --> 00:17:54,700 provisions as part of that 572 00:17:54,700 --> 00:17:56,236 design. But the groundwater 573 00:17:56,236 --> 00:17:57,971 depth and the infiltration 574 00:17:57,971 --> 00:17:59,573 rates are excellent for 575 00:17:59,573 --> 00:18:01,308 infiltration for our 576 00:18:01,308 --> 00:18:03,343 stormwater. So all of that has 577 00:18:03,343 --> 00:18:05,345 been sort of painstakingly 578 00:18:05,345 --> 00:18:07,314 reviewed ahead of time. Um, 579 00:18:07,314 --> 00:18:09,314 infill development where 580 00:18:09,817 --> 00:18:12,190 existing things exist is 581 00:18:12,190 --> 00:18:14,356 certainly one of our policies 582 00:18:14,356 --> 00:18:15,891 and strategies and location 583 00:18:15,891 --> 00:18:17,526 efficient housing where we have 584 00:18:17,526 --> 00:18:19,461 all the services, we have the 585 00:18:19,461 --> 00:18:20,963 multi-use path and a lot of 586 00:18:20,963 --> 00:18:22,970 recreation opportunities in 587 00:18:22,970 --> 00:18:22,698 Wrightsville Beach. And along 588 00:18:22,698 --> 00:18:23,566 here. I 589 00:18:23,566 --> 00:18:24,967 d be happy to answer 590 00:18:24,967 --> 00:18:26,569 your questions. 591 00:18:26,569 --> 00:18:28,371 Thank you very much, 592 00:18:28,371 --> 00:18:29,272 Commissioner coffer, start with 593 00:18:29,272 --> 00:18:31,272 you. 594 00:18:31,475 --> 00:18:33,430 Thank you, MISTER Chair. Um, 595 00:18:33,430 --> 00:18:36,643 MISS Wolfe, the only question I 596 00:18:36,714 --> 00:18:38,449 had would be the, um, access on 597 00:18:38,449 --> 00:18:41,686 Canal and then going into your 598 00:18:41,686 --> 00:18:43,521 site. Is that a hammerhead for 599 00:18:43,521 --> 00:18:45,456 fire truck for internal to your 600 00:18:45,456 --> 00:18:47,292 site? Or is it at the end of 601 00:18:47,292 --> 00:18:49,895 canal, or how does that. 602 00:18:49,895 --> 00:18:51,531 Technically, none of neither 603 00:18:51,531 --> 00:18:55,680 unit one on the bottom or four 604 00:18:55,680 --> 00:18:57,370 at the top is beyond the 150ft 605 00:18:57,370 --> 00:18:59,380 that fire trucks necessitate 606 00:18:59,380 --> 00:19:00,740 for turnaround, that they 607 00:19:00,740 --> 00:19:02,609 technically all front on Canal 608 00:19:02,609 --> 00:19:04,411 Street. That being said, yes, 609 00:19:04,411 --> 00:19:05,746 that t head would accommodate a 610 00:19:05,746 --> 00:19:08,516 fire truck if they needed to 611 00:19:08,516 --> 00:19:10,451 turn around on site. But the 612 00:19:10,451 --> 00:19:12,721 end of Canal Street has the 613 00:19:12,721 --> 00:19:13,955 turnaround that, uh, is 614 00:19:13,955 --> 00:19:14,956 measured. Then from Eastward 615 00:19:14,956 --> 00:19:16,956 Road. 616 00:19:17,893 --> 00:19:19,893 Okay. 617 00:19:20,929 --> 00:19:22,231 And are you in the applicant? I 618 00:19:22,231 --> 00:19:24,767 mean, I think at the end in our 619 00:19:24,767 --> 00:19:26,636 conditions, it mentioned, um, 620 00:19:26,636 --> 00:19:28,138 acceptance of the site plan, of 621 00:19:28,138 --> 00:19:30,474 course, but then the elevations 622 00:19:30,474 --> 00:19:32,474 is that accurate? 623 00:19:32,676 --> 00:19:33,760 Yes. There is there conceptual, 624 00:19:33,760 --> 00:19:34,211 but they 625 00:19:34,211 --> 00:19:36,211 re generally the 626 00:19:37,314 --> 00:19:38,716 style, the roof type, the the 627 00:19:38,716 --> 00:19:40,585 character. As far as being 628 00:19:40,585 --> 00:19:43,488 three storeys with garages on 629 00:19:43,488 --> 00:19:46,324 the bottom. Um, the access 630 00:19:46,324 --> 00:19:49,127 points facing the doors into 631 00:19:49,127 --> 00:19:50,529 from Canal Street. So, yes, an 632 00:19:50,529 --> 00:19:52,364 architect will be working with 633 00:19:52,364 --> 00:19:53,499 that concept. 634 00:19:53,499 --> 00:19:54,500 Okay. And I 635 00:19:54,500 --> 00:19:55,568 m assuming I think 636 00:19:55,568 --> 00:19:57,270 I probably know the answer, but 637 00:19:57,270 --> 00:19:58,639 just for the public good at all 638 00:19:58,639 --> 00:20:00,241 lighting ordinances and things 639 00:20:00,241 --> 00:20:02,142 that would apply by right, our 640 00:20:02,142 --> 00:20:02,877 20 would apply to your site as 641 00:20:02,877 --> 00:20:04,111 well. 642 00:20:04,111 --> 00:20:05,713 Absolutely. And noise 643 00:20:05,713 --> 00:20:07,214 ordinances. But like I said, 644 00:20:07,214 --> 00:20:08,950 when you have seven neighbors, 645 00:20:08,950 --> 00:20:11,419 you tend to have a little bit 646 00:20:11,419 --> 00:20:13,187 more stringent policies and 647 00:20:13,187 --> 00:20:13,955 guidelines for how you use your 648 00:20:13,955 --> 00:20:14,355 property. 649 00:20:14,355 --> 00:20:15,891 Thank you. 650 00:20:15,891 --> 00:20:17,891 Thank you. 651 00:20:19,495 --> 00:20:21,495 Commissioner Collier. MISS 652 00:20:22,980 --> 00:20:23,232 Wolfe, um, I saw that. Or heard 653 00:20:23,232 --> 00:20:24,968 you had a community meeting. Is 654 00:20:24,968 --> 00:20:26,636 that correct? Yes. About how 655 00:20:26,636 --> 00:20:29,339 many folks were at that? 656 00:20:29,339 --> 00:20:31,241 Oh, probably 15 to 20. The 657 00:20:31,241 --> 00:20:31,508 usual? Not usual. The folks 658 00:20:31,508 --> 00:20:32,977 that I 659 00:20:32,977 --> 00:20:34,545 ve been familiar with 660 00:20:34,545 --> 00:20:36,470 vary over different projects 661 00:20:36,470 --> 00:20:36,247 from the summer rest area. 662 00:20:36,247 --> 00:20:37,215 They 663 00:20:37,215 --> 00:20:37,415 re all from summer rest. 664 00:20:37,415 --> 00:20:38,850 That 665 00:20:38,850 --> 00:20:41,250 s pretty much yes. 666 00:20:41,553 --> 00:20:42,487 Um, and so the drainage I heard 667 00:20:42,487 --> 00:20:44,550 you say you have good 668 00:20:44,550 --> 00:20:46,455 infiltration and seasonal high, 669 00:20:46,625 --> 00:20:46,791 which is great. Um, well, some 670 00:20:46,791 --> 00:20:47,626 it 671 00:20:47,626 --> 00:20:49,361 s underground. Are you going 672 00:20:49,361 --> 00:20:51,264 to put some level of, uh, 673 00:20:51,264 --> 00:20:51,731 pervious concrete or pervious 674 00:20:51,731 --> 00:20:51,931 pavers? 675 00:20:51,931 --> 00:20:53,166 That 676 00:20:53,166 --> 00:20:53,366 s the idea. I believe 677 00:20:53,366 --> 00:20:54,434 they 678 00:20:54,434 --> 00:20:55,435 ll work with City 679 00:20:55,435 --> 00:20:55,568 Engineering because there 680 00:20:55,568 --> 00:20:57,137 s 681 00:20:57,137 --> 00:20:58,105 some. What you can 682 00:20:58,105 --> 00:20:59,720 t use porous 683 00:20:59,720 --> 00:21:00,340 pavement. If you have 684 00:21:00,340 --> 00:21:00,874 infiltration. But we 685 00:21:00,874 --> 00:21:02,442 ll work 686 00:21:02,442 --> 00:21:04,411 that out. Right, right. Yes. 687 00:21:04,411 --> 00:21:06,146 Okay. Um, so overall for the 688 00:21:06,146 --> 00:21:06,313 size of the site, I believe 689 00:21:06,313 --> 00:21:08,313 we 690 00:21:08,483 --> 00:21:10,118 re even. I mean, this is in 691 00:21:10,118 --> 00:21:12,420 a more sensitive area, so low 692 00:21:12,420 --> 00:21:12,588 density would be just 12%. But 693 00:21:12,588 --> 00:21:12,955 we 694 00:21:12,955 --> 00:21:14,790 re we 695 00:21:14,790 --> 00:21:16,658 re less than 24% 696 00:21:16,658 --> 00:21:17,393 overall as far as our coverage. 697 00:21:17,393 --> 00:21:19,393 Right. 698 00:21:22,297 --> 00:21:23,532 Um, I see that 75 foot cod 699 00:21:23,532 --> 00:21:23,899 marked and you 700 00:21:23,899 --> 00:21:24,667 ve got the 701 00:21:24,667 --> 00:21:25,168 building area. So you 702 00:21:25,168 --> 00:21:26,536 re, I 703 00:21:26,536 --> 00:21:29,406 presume, under all of the 704 00:21:29,406 --> 00:21:31,442 square footages for the 75ft. 705 00:21:31,442 --> 00:21:34,442 There are some provisions for 706 00:21:34,445 --> 00:21:36,314 extending into that 75 foot 707 00:21:36,314 --> 00:21:37,782 setback. And what you see, 708 00:21:37,782 --> 00:21:39,417 crosshatch has all been 709 00:21:39,417 --> 00:21:41,853 calculated. So yes, we are 710 00:21:41,853 --> 00:21:42,688 under that threshold. 711 00:21:42,688 --> 00:21:43,822 And I 712 00:21:43,822 --> 00:21:44,890 m certainly glad to see 713 00:21:44,890 --> 00:21:45,124 that you 714 00:21:45,124 --> 00:21:46,592 ve saved as many trees 715 00:21:46,592 --> 00:21:47,360 as you did. It seems that the 716 00:21:47,360 --> 00:21:47,727 the bulk of what you 717 00:21:47,727 --> 00:21:48,270 re, you 718 00:21:48,270 --> 00:21:49,562 re 719 00:21:49,562 --> 00:21:51,631 taking down are really right in 720 00:21:51,631 --> 00:21:53,699 the, in the apex of the 721 00:21:53,699 --> 00:21:54,133 driveway. Um, I don 722 00:21:54,133 --> 00:21:55,235 t know what 723 00:21:55,235 --> 00:21:56,636 size those are, but. 724 00:21:56,636 --> 00:21:58,636 Uh. 725 00:21:59,472 --> 00:22:00,875 It was a creative plan trying 726 00:22:00,875 --> 00:22:01,175 to get these in here. And yes, 727 00:22:01,175 --> 00:22:02,877 the x 728 00:22:02,877 --> 00:22:03,100 s are just regulated. The 729 00:22:03,100 --> 00:22:04,780 m 730 00:22:04,780 --> 00:22:05,179 s are the ones that are 731 00:22:05,179 --> 00:22:05,613 mitigated. So it 732 00:22:05,613 --> 00:22:05,947 s it 733 00:22:05,947 --> 00:22:07,749 s a 734 00:22:07,749 --> 00:22:07,949 mixture. But we certainly 735 00:22:07,949 --> 00:22:09,617 didn 736 00:22:09,617 --> 00:22:10,485 t mess with any of the 737 00:22:10,485 --> 00:22:12,870 specimens. 738 00:22:12,870 --> 00:22:13,922 Okay, great. All right. Thank 739 00:22:13,922 --> 00:22:15,757 you very much, Commissioner. 740 00:22:15,757 --> 00:22:17,757 Adams. 741 00:22:18,127 --> 00:22:18,995 I think Richard answered, or 742 00:22:18,995 --> 00:22:19,996 you addressed one of my 743 00:22:19,996 --> 00:22:22,650 questions, which was going to 744 00:22:22,650 --> 00:22:22,732 be tree safe considerations. 745 00:22:22,732 --> 00:22:24,732 Um, you 746 00:22:24,968 --> 00:22:27,700 re going to recombine 747 00:22:27,700 --> 00:22:28,839 or recombine and then newly 748 00:22:28,839 --> 00:22:29,206 subdivide this so that it 749 00:22:29,206 --> 00:22:31,174 s a 750 00:22:31,174 --> 00:22:31,375 lot a parcel for each building. 751 00:22:31,375 --> 00:22:33,343 That 752 00:22:33,343 --> 00:22:35,413 s correct. That works well 753 00:22:35,413 --> 00:22:35,614 within the r-7 and the new ldc. 754 00:22:35,614 --> 00:22:37,348 That 755 00:22:37,348 --> 00:22:39,748 s then allowed attached 756 00:22:41,860 --> 00:22:42,721 housing. Um, the r7 has a 757 00:22:42,721 --> 00:22:43,789 little bit extra side setbacks. 758 00:22:43,789 --> 00:22:44,389 I mean, initially that 759 00:22:44,389 --> 00:22:46,389 s why I 760 00:22:47,459 --> 00:22:48,594 had had the r5 on one of those 761 00:22:48,594 --> 00:22:49,610 slides. It doesn 762 00:22:49,610 --> 00:22:49,461 t really 763 00:22:49,461 --> 00:22:51,461 matter. It 764 00:22:51,497 --> 00:22:53,497 s semantics. The 765 00:22:53,901 --> 00:22:56,901 four units per lot are 766 00:22:57,404 --> 00:22:59,640 available up to 3500ft per 767 00:22:59,640 --> 00:23:01,442 unit. And so the quadruplex is 768 00:23:01,442 --> 00:23:03,644 fit. The nice thing was the 769 00:23:03,644 --> 00:23:05,713 semantics is we could provide 770 00:23:05,713 --> 00:23:07,815 the side setbacks and we only 771 00:23:07,815 --> 00:23:10,486 needed four units to make the 772 00:23:10,486 --> 00:23:12,721 project work. And so r7 was our 773 00:23:12,721 --> 00:23:13,289 an easy option. And it doesn 774 00:23:13,289 --> 00:23:15,910 t 775 00:23:15,910 --> 00:23:15,991 just seem as bad as r5, 776 00:23:15,991 --> 00:23:17,259 although it still would have 777 00:23:17,259 --> 00:23:17,960 been just the eight units. 778 00:23:17,960 --> 00:23:19,960 Okay, thank. 779 00:23:22,999 --> 00:23:23,866 You. Commissioner Pawlak. 780 00:23:23,866 --> 00:23:24,267 Unfortunately, I didn 781 00:23:24,267 --> 00:23:26,267 t get a 782 00:23:26,736 --> 00:23:28,105 chance to, um, look at what you 783 00:23:28,105 --> 00:23:30,700 know, the document that was 784 00:23:30,700 --> 00:23:30,575 sent in, shared with us at 785 00:23:30,575 --> 00:23:31,750 three. And that that 786 00:23:31,750 --> 00:23:31,275 s on me. 787 00:23:31,275 --> 00:23:31,709 That 788 00:23:31,709 --> 00:23:33,478 s not. 789 00:23:33,478 --> 00:23:34,245 I just I read it a moment ago, 790 00:23:34,245 --> 00:23:35,780 so I was trying. 791 00:23:35,780 --> 00:23:37,816 To. Yeah. Could you. 792 00:23:37,816 --> 00:23:40,151 Kind of, you know, uh, you 793 00:23:40,151 --> 00:23:41,953 know, uh, crib notes. What what 794 00:23:41,953 --> 00:23:43,321 were the concerns that the 795 00:23:43,321 --> 00:23:44,322 person sent in and how would 796 00:23:44,322 --> 00:23:45,892 you how would you address them? 797 00:23:45,892 --> 00:23:47,260 I just, you know, just for the 798 00:23:47,260 --> 00:23:47,460 record, I just like I said, I 799 00:23:47,460 --> 00:23:48,594 didn 800 00:23:48,594 --> 00:23:49,162 t get a chance to look at 801 00:23:49,162 --> 00:23:51,162 it. 802 00:23:51,297 --> 00:23:53,266 One of them was traffic. That 803 00:23:53,266 --> 00:23:56,360 it is dead end. That being 804 00:23:56,360 --> 00:23:57,704 said, yes, eight townhome units 805 00:23:57,704 --> 00:23:59,807 have slightly more trip 806 00:23:59,807 --> 00:24:02,207 generation than the possibility 807 00:24:02,376 --> 00:24:04,212 of two singles, with two ADUs, 808 00:24:04,212 --> 00:24:07,149 but then they have a higher 809 00:24:07,149 --> 00:24:10,552 trip generation, so I think at 810 00:24:10,552 --> 00:24:12,821 this point the amount of 811 00:24:12,821 --> 00:24:14,189 increase is negligible to the 812 00:24:14,189 --> 00:24:16,792 traffic that comes and goes 813 00:24:16,792 --> 00:24:18,227 from the back of, uh, the 814 00:24:18,227 --> 00:24:19,862 businesses on the left hand 815 00:24:19,862 --> 00:24:22,466 side and Grandview coming out 816 00:24:22,466 --> 00:24:23,901 their driveway. Stormwater was 817 00:24:23,901 --> 00:24:25,569 one of them in the sensitivity. 818 00:24:25,569 --> 00:24:26,971 And as I pointed out, not we 819 00:24:26,971 --> 00:24:29,390 are paying attention to the 820 00:24:29,390 --> 00:24:30,740 sensitivity already, but single 821 00:24:30,740 --> 00:24:30,241 family development wouldn 822 00:24:30,241 --> 00:24:32,241 t 823 00:24:32,843 --> 00:24:34,912 have to at all. Got it. Um, 824 00:24:34,912 --> 00:24:35,213 tree save again. I think we 825 00:24:35,213 --> 00:24:35,379 ve 826 00:24:35,379 --> 00:24:37,181 we 827 00:24:37,181 --> 00:24:37,348 ve addressed that. You know, 828 00:24:37,348 --> 00:24:38,317 you 829 00:24:38,317 --> 00:24:40,453 ve got to break some eggs 830 00:24:40,453 --> 00:24:40,619 to make an omelet, but I think 831 00:24:40,619 --> 00:24:41,887 we 832 00:24:41,887 --> 00:24:44,887 ve been very sensitive to 833 00:24:45,191 --> 00:24:45,358 that. And again, um, because 834 00:24:45,358 --> 00:24:47,193 it 835 00:24:47,193 --> 00:24:49,950 s a conditional use, then 836 00:24:49,950 --> 00:24:51,431 the restrictions of the 837 00:24:51,431 --> 00:24:52,899 conditions maintain that we 838 00:24:52,899 --> 00:24:54,601 have to preserve all the trees 839 00:24:54,601 --> 00:24:57,710 that are in the 75 and away 840 00:24:57,710 --> 00:24:57,838 from the creekside. That 841 00:24:57,838 --> 00:24:59,140 s 842 00:24:59,140 --> 00:24:59,674 those were the bulk of it. 843 00:24:59,674 --> 00:25:01,509 Okay. 844 00:25:01,509 --> 00:25:02,343 The other question I have is, 845 00:25:02,343 --> 00:25:03,845 and I want to make sure I 846 00:25:03,845 --> 00:25:04,946 understood because I think my 847 00:25:04,946 --> 00:25:06,946 fellow commissioners couple 848 00:25:06,981 --> 00:25:08,850 have brought up there is going 849 00:25:08,850 --> 00:25:09,818 to be an hoa here. 850 00:25:09,818 --> 00:25:10,385 Absolutely. 851 00:25:10,385 --> 00:25:12,385 Okay. 852 00:25:12,522 --> 00:25:14,757 Because there are combined 853 00:25:14,757 --> 00:25:17,600 improvements for all four units 854 00:25:17,600 --> 00:25:19,229 on each lot. And even though 855 00:25:19,229 --> 00:25:21,131 these end up being individual 856 00:25:21,131 --> 00:25:24,131 lots, the hoa just covers 857 00:25:24,367 --> 00:25:25,802 everything. Um, the ldc just 858 00:25:25,802 --> 00:25:27,337 provided sort of for these 859 00:25:27,337 --> 00:25:29,440 imaginary lines and it works 860 00:25:29,440 --> 00:25:30,141 well, I believe, because it 861 00:25:30,141 --> 00:25:31,943 s 862 00:25:31,943 --> 00:25:34,346 possible to do these types of 863 00:25:34,346 --> 00:25:36,214 projects without how they used 864 00:25:36,214 --> 00:25:38,150 to be was the md. They had to 865 00:25:38,150 --> 00:25:41,150 be the multi dwelling districts 866 00:25:41,286 --> 00:25:43,880 and the r5 and the r7. Now, I 867 00:25:43,880 --> 00:25:44,156 guess to me keep it a little 868 00:25:44,156 --> 00:25:44,757 cleaner. 869 00:25:44,757 --> 00:25:46,425 Okay. 870 00:25:46,425 --> 00:25:48,161 But yes, it would be a common 871 00:25:48,161 --> 00:25:48,629 hoa for all eight units. 872 00:25:48,629 --> 00:25:50,629 Okay. 873 00:25:50,664 --> 00:25:52,664 Thank you, Commissioner 874 00:25:54,234 --> 00:25:54,935 Woodruff. Commissioner Jones. 875 00:25:54,935 --> 00:25:56,237 Yeah. 876 00:25:56,237 --> 00:25:57,538 Several of my questions were 877 00:25:57,538 --> 00:25:59,774 already covered by the other 878 00:25:59,774 --> 00:26:01,242 end. Um, the only thing I had a 879 00:26:01,242 --> 00:26:03,144 question about was a parking. 880 00:26:03,144 --> 00:26:03,811 Is it the garage and one space 881 00:26:03,811 --> 00:26:05,614 out front? 882 00:26:05,614 --> 00:26:07,316 There are two spaces out front, 883 00:26:07,316 --> 00:26:09,585 and I apologize. Like I said, 884 00:26:09,585 --> 00:26:12,254 the ai that creates the concept 885 00:26:12,254 --> 00:26:13,456 that created the conceptual, 886 00:26:13,456 --> 00:26:14,357 elevation doesn 887 00:26:14,357 --> 00:26:16,357 t have them 888 00:26:16,392 --> 00:26:17,894 quite as wide. But no, the 889 00:26:17,894 --> 00:26:20,290 intention is that the parking 890 00:26:20,290 --> 00:26:21,631 pad has two spaces. What you 891 00:26:21,631 --> 00:26:23,434 see on the site plan, however, 892 00:26:23,434 --> 00:26:25,336 is short for a parking pad, so 893 00:26:25,336 --> 00:26:27,571 the way it works out is two 894 00:26:27,571 --> 00:26:30,308 cars fully in a garage and then 895 00:26:30,308 --> 00:26:30,642 the garage recessed underneath 896 00:26:30,642 --> 00:26:31,342 where you 897 00:26:31,342 --> 00:26:33,342 re seeing the 898 00:26:33,745 --> 00:26:35,947 roofline so that four cars 899 00:26:35,947 --> 00:26:36,648 could park very easily. Okay. 900 00:26:36,648 --> 00:26:38,648 Thank you. That 901 00:26:39,217 --> 00:26:40,653 s all I have. 902 00:26:40,653 --> 00:26:42,588 Um. 903 00:26:42,588 --> 00:26:45,258 In the notes, the package that 904 00:26:45,258 --> 00:26:46,793 we got there was a, uh. And you 905 00:26:46,793 --> 00:26:49,620 touched on this, but I just 906 00:26:49,620 --> 00:26:51,197 wanted short term rentals. 907 00:26:51,197 --> 00:26:52,366 There was the desire for hoa 908 00:26:52,366 --> 00:26:54,301 covenants. Restricting short 909 00:26:54,301 --> 00:26:54,468 term rentals is that I know 910 00:26:54,468 --> 00:26:55,569 it 911 00:26:55,569 --> 00:26:57,438 s not a condition, nor do I 912 00:26:57,438 --> 00:26:57,639 think it could be. But is that 913 00:26:57,639 --> 00:26:58,940 going. 914 00:26:58,940 --> 00:27:00,942 To be certainly something that 915 00:27:00,942 --> 00:27:02,770 is intended? And if you want 916 00:27:02,770 --> 00:27:02,444 Nathan to address it, I 917 00:27:02,444 --> 00:27:04,444 m sure 918 00:27:04,479 --> 00:27:04,613 he could. But yes, I don 919 00:27:04,613 --> 00:27:06,810 t 920 00:27:06,810 --> 00:27:08,250 believe we have any problem 921 00:27:08,250 --> 00:27:08,717 with a condition that. 922 00:27:08,717 --> 00:27:10,552 Even though. 923 00:27:10,552 --> 00:27:11,186 You self-imposed condition. 924 00:27:11,186 --> 00:27:12,721 Even though. I know. 925 00:27:12,721 --> 00:27:12,869 The guy to make those sketches, 926 00:27:12,869 --> 00:27:13,550 I 927 00:27:13,550 --> 00:27:13,355 ll, I 928 00:27:13,355 --> 00:27:14,223 ll I 929 00:27:14,223 --> 00:27:15,992 ll take your word 930 00:27:15,992 --> 00:27:17,600 for it. Um, and then the last. 931 00:27:17,600 --> 00:27:18,495 This is really just a 932 00:27:18,495 --> 00:27:20,297 statement. I know the answer, 933 00:27:20,297 --> 00:27:21,232 but the canal in Eastwood is 934 00:27:21,232 --> 00:27:21,398 signalized, correct? 935 00:27:21,398 --> 00:27:23,398 Yes. 936 00:27:24,902 --> 00:27:25,502 It is. Okay. And that includes, 937 00:27:25,502 --> 00:27:25,769 um. 938 00:27:25,769 --> 00:27:25,869 I don 939 00:27:25,869 --> 00:27:27,571 t. 940 00:27:27,571 --> 00:27:29,674 Have a dedicated movement off 941 00:27:29,674 --> 00:27:31,475 of canal left, right or 942 00:27:31,475 --> 00:27:32,176 straight. 943 00:27:32,176 --> 00:27:32,845 Correct. 944 00:27:32,845 --> 00:27:34,845 Okay. 945 00:27:35,748 --> 00:27:36,115 It is a full. Yes. Left, right 946 00:27:36,115 --> 00:27:37,160 or straight? 947 00:27:37,160 --> 00:27:37,950 Yeah. Okay. 948 00:27:37,950 --> 00:27:39,919 Of course. There was a 949 00:27:39,919 --> 00:27:42,919 gentleman parked in the wrong 950 00:27:43,289 --> 00:27:45,391 lane as I was coming down here. 951 00:27:45,391 --> 00:27:45,591 And with crosswalks. 952 00:27:45,591 --> 00:27:46,392 That 953 00:27:46,392 --> 00:27:48,761 s nice. Yeah. And there 954 00:27:48,761 --> 00:27:49,697 are crosswalks that are, uh, 955 00:27:49,697 --> 00:27:51,665 controlled. 956 00:27:51,665 --> 00:27:52,700 Okay, great. Thank you. Any 957 00:27:52,700 --> 00:27:55,100 other questions? Yes, sir. 958 00:27:55,203 --> 00:27:57,203 Commissioner Collier, Cindy. 959 00:27:57,605 --> 00:27:58,740 The only question I really that 960 00:27:58,740 --> 00:28:00,740 I saw just a second ago, 961 00:28:00,740 --> 00:28:02,110 flipping through it now, uh, 962 00:28:02,110 --> 00:28:04,345 the water main on Canal Street 963 00:28:04,345 --> 00:28:06,481 is a two inch main. How would 964 00:28:06,481 --> 00:28:07,383 you how are we providing fire 965 00:28:07,383 --> 00:28:09,383 flow? 966 00:28:11,387 --> 00:28:13,657 Um, it is, there is. And if you 967 00:28:13,657 --> 00:28:13,957 basically on the plan that 968 00:28:13,957 --> 00:28:15,957 s in 969 00:28:15,992 --> 00:28:17,527 front of you, right there is 970 00:28:17,527 --> 00:28:19,229 the fire hydrant. Atlantic 971 00:28:19,229 --> 00:28:20,998 Marine had to extend the fire 972 00:28:20,998 --> 00:28:23,266 hydrant down to the beginning 973 00:28:23,266 --> 00:28:23,433 of their first building. And so 974 00:28:23,433 --> 00:28:25,433 it 975 00:28:25,770 --> 00:28:28,706 s easily within the 400ft. 976 00:28:28,706 --> 00:28:30,342 And then there is, I guess, a 977 00:28:30,342 --> 00:28:33,342 two inch line generally can 978 00:28:35,146 --> 00:28:36,214 feed about 15 units. And right 979 00:28:36,214 --> 00:28:36,682 now. 980 00:28:36,682 --> 00:28:37,416 But I 981 00:28:37,416 --> 00:28:38,160 m not the engineer. 982 00:28:38,160 --> 00:28:39,418 So okay. 983 00:28:39,418 --> 00:28:40,753 I understand. 984 00:28:40,753 --> 00:28:42,722 But no, there is a fire. 985 00:28:42,722 --> 00:28:42,889 Hi, where is the hydrant at? I 986 00:28:42,889 --> 00:28:43,523 don 987 00:28:43,523 --> 00:28:44,157 t know, I 988 00:28:44,157 --> 00:28:44,291 m assuming it 989 00:28:44,291 --> 00:28:44,691 s 990 00:28:44,691 --> 00:28:44,925 on the color. 991 00:28:44,925 --> 00:28:45,920 The. 992 00:28:45,920 --> 00:28:45,525 Let 993 00:28:45,525 --> 00:28:46,727 s see. 994 00:28:46,727 --> 00:28:47,270 The aerial picture. 995 00:28:47,270 --> 00:28:48,796 I don 996 00:28:48,796 --> 00:28:50,164 t think I have. 997 00:28:50,164 --> 00:28:53,567 Can you point on that thing? 998 00:28:53,567 --> 00:28:56,700 It is just off the lower left 999 00:28:56,700 --> 00:28:56,237 hand side of this picture. So 1000 00:28:56,237 --> 00:28:57,605 it 1001 00:28:57,605 --> 00:28:58,773 s just before the new. 1002 00:28:58,773 --> 00:28:59,540 Mixed use building past the 1003 00:28:59,540 --> 00:29:00,776 buildings and the drive 1004 00:29:00,776 --> 00:29:03,776 through, or just before the 1005 00:29:03,946 --> 00:29:05,414 mixed use building. 1006 00:29:05,414 --> 00:29:07,683 No, the drive through is 1007 00:29:07,683 --> 00:29:08,500 beyond. It is down here. I 1008 00:29:08,500 --> 00:29:08,617 mean, I wouldn 1009 00:29:08,617 --> 00:29:10,617 t be surprised 1010 00:29:10,786 --> 00:29:11,854 if that circle is the valve for 1011 00:29:11,854 --> 00:29:13,854 it. 1012 00:29:20,498 --> 00:29:22,498 Okay. 1013 00:29:22,667 --> 00:29:23,670 All right. Thank you. 1014 00:29:23,670 --> 00:29:25,670 So it 1015 00:29:26,300 --> 00:29:28,390 s within about 150ft of 1016 00:29:28,390 --> 00:29:29,874 our driveway. 1017 00:29:29,874 --> 00:29:31,309 Any other questions from the 1018 00:29:31,309 --> 00:29:32,760 commission? 1019 00:29:32,760 --> 00:29:34,450 Thank you very much. 1020 00:29:34,450 --> 00:29:34,179 Thank you. This time, we 1021 00:29:34,179 --> 00:29:35,714 ll 1022 00:29:35,714 --> 00:29:37,216 open the public hearing and 1023 00:29:37,216 --> 00:29:39,352 invite anyone wishing to speak 1024 00:29:39,352 --> 00:29:42,952 in favor of item number one. 1025 00:29:45,725 --> 00:29:46,993 Please come forward. If you 1026 00:29:46,993 --> 00:29:47,894 could state your name and make 1027 00:29:47,894 --> 00:29:49,396 sure you speak into the 1028 00:29:49,396 --> 00:29:49,563 microphone. So MISS Bradshaw 1029 00:29:49,563 --> 00:29:50,297 isn 1030 00:29:50,297 --> 00:29:51,331 t surely I 1031 00:29:51,331 --> 00:29:53,100 m David Floyd 1032 00:29:53,100 --> 00:29:55,103 and myself and my son Will are 1033 00:29:55,103 --> 00:29:56,638 here. We own the joint 1034 00:29:56,638 --> 00:29:58,730 adjoining property. They are 1035 00:29:58,730 --> 00:30:00,575 across on Canal Street and we 1036 00:30:00,575 --> 00:30:01,843 owned Atlantic Marine. And, um, 1037 00:30:01,843 --> 00:30:02,844 we feel like this would be a 1038 00:30:02,844 --> 00:30:03,450 great use for the property. 1039 00:30:03,450 --> 00:30:04,413 There 1040 00:30:04,413 --> 00:30:05,447 s been several things 1041 00:30:05,447 --> 00:30:06,515 tossed up in the air about what 1042 00:30:06,515 --> 00:30:08,817 might go there, but as far as 1043 00:30:08,817 --> 00:30:10,200 the lowest amount of use and 1044 00:30:10,200 --> 00:30:10,220 kind of keeping with what we 1045 00:30:10,220 --> 00:30:11,121 ve 1046 00:30:11,121 --> 00:30:13,230 built on the other side of the 1047 00:30:13,230 --> 00:30:14,591 property, with the mixed use 1048 00:30:14,591 --> 00:30:16,426 homes and offices, I think it 1049 00:30:16,426 --> 00:30:17,394 would kind of fit. And yes, 1050 00:30:17,394 --> 00:30:18,128 there is a fire hydrant right 1051 00:30:18,128 --> 00:30:19,563 on the front edge of the 1052 00:30:19,563 --> 00:30:20,597 property there that we put in. 1053 00:30:20,597 --> 00:30:21,131 So, um, didn 1054 00:30:21,131 --> 00:30:23,434 t if you have any 1055 00:30:23,434 --> 00:30:25,402 questions for me, but, um, we 1056 00:30:25,402 --> 00:30:26,737 have a space to put an approval 1057 00:30:26,737 --> 00:30:27,873 for another building that will 1058 00:30:27,873 --> 00:30:29,374 be putting up at some point in 1059 00:30:29,374 --> 00:30:31,810 time and not in the next few 1060 00:30:31,810 --> 00:30:32,578 weeks by any means. But, um, 1061 00:30:32,578 --> 00:30:33,112 um, I think it 1062 00:30:33,112 --> 00:30:34,130 d be a pleasant 1063 00:30:34,130 --> 00:30:36,849 little addition to the end of 1064 00:30:36,849 --> 00:30:39,819 that street. Thank you very 1065 00:30:39,819 --> 00:30:42,819 much. Anyone else? Anyone else 1066 00:30:43,690 --> 00:30:45,859 wishing to speak in favor? 1067 00:30:45,859 --> 00:30:47,628 Anyone wishing to speak in 1068 00:30:47,628 --> 00:30:50,280 opposition to item number. 1069 00:30:50,131 --> 00:30:52,131 One? 1070 00:30:52,700 --> 00:30:53,701 All right. Hearing none, I will 1071 00:30:53,701 --> 00:30:55,701 close the public. 1072 00:30:56,771 --> 00:30:56,938 Hearing. And, MISS Jones, why 1073 00:30:56,938 --> 00:30:58,938 don 1074 00:30:59,541 --> 00:31:00,275 t we start with you any 1075 00:31:00,275 --> 00:31:01,376 thoughts? 1076 00:31:01,376 --> 00:31:02,111 Um. I 1077 00:31:02,111 --> 00:31:02,912 m good. I 1078 00:31:02,912 --> 00:31:03,946 m very familiar 1079 00:31:03,946 --> 00:31:04,647 with the street. I think it 1080 00:31:04,647 --> 00:31:06,647 s a 1081 00:31:06,816 --> 00:31:08,184 good use, um, for what 1082 00:31:08,184 --> 00:31:09,685 s there. 1083 00:31:09,685 --> 00:31:10,153 And, um, with what 1084 00:31:10,153 --> 00:31:11,870 s happening 1085 00:31:11,870 --> 00:31:12,488 there, especially with having 1086 00:31:12,488 --> 00:31:13,523 the light at the end of the 1087 00:31:13,523 --> 00:31:15,358 street. So I 1088 00:31:15,358 --> 00:31:16,693 m good. 1089 00:31:16,693 --> 00:31:17,600 Commissioner Woodruff. 1090 00:31:17,600 --> 00:31:17,194 I think it 1091 00:31:17,194 --> 00:31:18,495 s. 1092 00:31:18,495 --> 00:31:19,530 A great plan. I think a lot of 1093 00:31:19,530 --> 00:31:21,650 work has gone into it. I 1094 00:31:21,650 --> 00:31:22,901 appreciate the effort of Cindy 1095 00:31:22,901 --> 00:31:24,235 and her clients to present it 1096 00:31:24,235 --> 00:31:24,435 to us in the way you have. I 1097 00:31:24,435 --> 00:31:26,137 m 1098 00:31:26,137 --> 00:31:27,339 all for it. 1099 00:31:27,339 --> 00:31:27,472 Thank you, Commissioner Pawlak. 1100 00:31:27,472 --> 00:31:29,400 i 1101 00:31:29,400 --> 00:31:30,842 m good. 1102 00:31:30,842 --> 00:31:32,842 Commissioner Adams. 1103 00:31:33,545 --> 00:31:34,947 I appreciate the site plan. Um, 1104 00:31:34,947 --> 00:31:36,248 seeing the tree save and 1105 00:31:36,248 --> 00:31:38,785 looking at how this was 1106 00:31:38,785 --> 00:31:40,754 subdivided. Um, tale of 1107 00:31:40,754 --> 00:31:43,154 caution, though. Relying on, 1108 00:31:43,790 --> 00:31:45,492 uh, artificial intelligence and 1109 00:31:45,492 --> 00:31:46,627 not architectural intelligence. 1110 00:31:46,627 --> 00:31:48,428 I mean, we need to be a little 1111 00:31:48,428 --> 00:31:49,563 careful about that, because you 1112 00:31:49,563 --> 00:31:51,465 could box yourself into 1113 00:31:51,465 --> 00:31:53,167 something that, uh, MAY be 1114 00:31:53,167 --> 00:31:55,704 overly specific, but I. I 1115 00:31:55,704 --> 00:31:57,506 support this project. 1116 00:31:57,506 --> 00:31:58,941 Commissioner Collier. 1117 00:31:58,941 --> 00:31:59,608 Thank you. Yeah, I support the 1118 00:31:59,608 --> 00:31:59,842 project, too. I think it 1119 00:31:59,842 --> 00:32:01,842 s a 1120 00:32:01,944 --> 00:32:02,812 good use in this area. I MAY 1121 00:32:02,812 --> 00:32:04,713 would have had a different 1122 00:32:04,713 --> 00:32:06,615 opinion if a lot of the summer 1123 00:32:06,615 --> 00:32:09,218 Somerset summers rest folks had 1124 00:32:09,218 --> 00:32:11,821 come out. Um, but seeing that 1125 00:32:11,821 --> 00:32:12,990 they are not, um, uh, I am fine 1126 00:32:12,990 --> 00:32:14,491 with it. I think it is really 1127 00:32:14,491 --> 00:32:15,459 nice. Really good use. Thank 1128 00:32:15,459 --> 00:32:17,459 you. 1129 00:32:18,280 --> 00:32:19,530 Commissioner Coffer. 1130 00:32:19,530 --> 00:32:21,299 Thank you, MR. Chair. Yes. This 1131 00:32:21,299 --> 00:32:23,434 one. Um, hits close to home for 1132 00:32:23,434 --> 00:32:25,136 me. From personal anecdote, 1133 00:32:25,136 --> 00:32:25,303 personal living experience. I 1134 00:32:25,303 --> 00:32:27,303 m 1135 00:32:28,773 --> 00:32:31,173 actually in that neighborhood. 1136 00:32:31,277 --> 00:32:32,712 No, to the south of, um, these 1137 00:32:32,712 --> 00:32:35,848 the the the high impact zone 1138 00:32:35,848 --> 00:32:37,250 and then the inner tidal zone, 1139 00:32:37,250 --> 00:32:39,619 but nevertheless, I mean, I 1140 00:32:39,619 --> 00:32:41,321 drive past that intersection 1141 00:32:41,321 --> 00:32:44,357 several times a day. And, um, I 1142 00:32:44,357 --> 00:32:44,491 think that, um, the design, as 1143 00:32:44,491 --> 00:32:44,657 I 1144 00:32:44,657 --> 00:32:46,259 m I 1145 00:32:46,259 --> 00:32:47,595 ll echo my colleagues up 1146 00:32:47,595 --> 00:32:49,300 here as sentiments on the 1147 00:32:49,300 --> 00:32:51,430 design and taking careful 1148 00:32:51,432 --> 00:32:52,834 attention to tree protection, 1149 00:32:52,834 --> 00:32:53,134 um, the stormwater plan, of 1150 00:32:53,134 --> 00:32:53,969 course, it 1151 00:32:53,969 --> 00:32:56,638 s going to come with 1152 00:32:56,638 --> 00:32:58,807 this type of project. Um, and 1153 00:32:58,807 --> 00:33:00,509 just paying careful, discerning 1154 00:33:00,509 --> 00:33:03,312 attention to the sensitivity of 1155 00:33:03,312 --> 00:33:06,616 the, of that area. Um, I think 1156 00:33:06,616 --> 00:33:08,518 when you look at, um, the, the 1157 00:33:08,518 --> 00:33:09,152 zone itself cut by Mott 1158 00:33:09,152 --> 00:33:11,152 s 1159 00:33:11,955 --> 00:33:14,925 Creek, you know, the tampering, 1160 00:33:14,925 --> 00:33:17,925 um, and the transition from 1161 00:33:18,280 --> 00:33:19,263 Grand View down to a 35 foot 1162 00:33:19,263 --> 00:33:20,598 structure, you know, and 1163 00:33:20,598 --> 00:33:22,901 condensing the density into 1164 00:33:22,901 --> 00:33:23,168 that design footprint, you 1165 00:33:23,168 --> 00:33:23,468 know, it 1166 00:33:23,468 --> 00:33:24,302 s just it 1167 00:33:24,302 --> 00:33:26,302 s modern 1168 00:33:27,272 --> 00:33:27,439 urban design standards that 1169 00:33:27,439 --> 00:33:28,507 we 1170 00:33:28,507 --> 00:33:30,750 re putting into practice. 1171 00:33:30,750 --> 00:33:30,843 And I certainly, um, certainly 1172 00:33:30,843 --> 00:33:31,760 support it. I think it 1173 00:33:31,760 --> 00:33:31,210 s a it 1174 00:33:31,210 --> 00:33:32,744 s 1175 00:33:32,744 --> 00:33:32,978 a good project. So I 1176 00:33:32,978 --> 00:33:33,979 m in 1177 00:33:33,979 --> 00:33:35,979 favor. 1178 00:33:37,950 --> 00:33:39,185 Thank you. Um. 1179 00:33:39,185 --> 00:33:41,210 Being involved in the latter 1180 00:33:41,210 --> 00:33:42,957 part of the rewrite of the ldc, 1181 00:33:42,957 --> 00:33:44,859 this is what we asked for. So 1182 00:33:44,859 --> 00:33:48,459 thank you. What are the wishes 1183 00:33:48,729 --> 00:33:48,863 of the commission? 1184 00:33:48,863 --> 00:33:50,863 I 1185 00:33:52,400 --> 00:33:52,867 ll make a motion to approve. 1186 00:33:52,867 --> 00:33:54,867 Uh, let 1187 00:34:02,411 --> 00:34:02,812 s see here. MR. 1188 00:34:02,812 --> 00:34:03,479 CHAIRMAN, I 1189 00:34:03,479 --> 00:34:04,847 d like to make a 1190 00:34:04,847 --> 00:34:06,820 motion to approve agenda item 1191 00:34:06,820 --> 00:34:08,751 number one. The request to 1192 00:34:08,751 --> 00:34:11,151 rezone 120 and 124 Canal Street 1193 00:34:11,154 --> 00:34:12,522 from our 20 legacy residential 1194 00:34:12,522 --> 00:34:13,924 district to our seven 1195 00:34:13,924 --> 00:34:15,924 conditional district. Moderate 1196 00:34:16,194 --> 00:34:17,695 density residential. Um, the 1197 00:34:17,695 --> 00:34:19,230 Planning Commission deems this 1198 00:34:19,230 --> 00:34:21,633 request is consistent with the 1199 00:34:21,633 --> 00:34:23,670 objectives and policies of the 1200 00:34:23,670 --> 00:34:24,569 following plans adopted by the 1201 00:34:24,569 --> 00:34:27,239 City of Wilmington. The Create 1202 00:34:27,239 --> 00:34:28,340 Wilmington Comprehensive Plan, 1203 00:34:28,340 --> 00:34:29,775 the Planning Commission 1204 00:34:29,775 --> 00:34:30,976 considers its approval to be 1205 00:34:30,976 --> 00:34:32,378 reasonable and in the public 1206 00:34:32,378 --> 00:34:34,800 interest. Because the proposal 1207 00:34:34,800 --> 00:34:36,160 provides greater environmental 1208 00:34:36,160 --> 00:34:38,160 protection, expands housing 1209 00:34:38,510 --> 00:34:39,386 opportunities, and serves as an 1210 00:34:39,386 --> 00:34:40,654 appropriate transition between 1211 00:34:40,654 --> 00:34:42,389 existing commercial and 1212 00:34:42,389 --> 00:34:43,189 residential areas. Therefore, 1213 00:34:43,189 --> 00:34:44,358 the Planning Commission 1214 00:34:44,358 --> 00:34:46,326 recommends approval of this 1215 00:34:46,326 --> 00:34:48,326 request. 1216 00:34:49,196 --> 00:34:50,599 Of second. Second move by 1217 00:34:50,599 --> 00:34:52,467 Commissioner Coffer, seconded 1218 00:34:52,467 --> 00:34:54,203 by. Excuse me, Commissioner 1219 00:34:54,203 --> 00:34:56,400 Adams. Commissioner Jones, how 1220 00:34:56,400 --> 00:34:57,806 do you vote? I. 1221 00:34:57,806 --> 00:34:58,941 I. 1222 00:34:58,941 --> 00:34:59,108 , I. 1223 00:34:59,108 --> 00:34:59,641 Can 1224 00:34:59,641 --> 00:35:01,641 t talk. 1225 00:35:01,777 --> 00:35:03,120 Commissioner Pawlak. 1226 00:35:03,120 --> 00:35:05,120 I can I 1227 00:35:05,140 --> 00:35:06,883 m sorry, I.. 1228 00:35:06,883 --> 00:35:08,850 MR. Adams. Yes, Commissioner. 1229 00:35:08,850 --> 00:35:10,850 Collier. Yes, Commissioner 1230 00:35:10,870 --> 00:35:12,957 Kupfer, a chair votes I as 1231 00:35:12,957 --> 00:35:14,957 well. Congratulations. Seven 1232 00:35:26,605 --> 00:35:27,907 zero. In favor? Agenda item 1233 00:35:27,907 --> 00:35:30,907 number two is a conditional 1234 00:35:31,177 --> 00:35:33,177 district rezoning modification 1235 00:35:33,446 --> 00:35:35,446 for properties containing 12.26 1236 00:35:36,716 --> 00:35:39,116 acres located at 2225 Stonecrop 1237 00:35:39,285 --> 00:35:41,354 Drive and 1124 Gallery Park 1238 00:35:41,354 --> 00:35:42,924 Boulevard, from an existing oh 1239 00:35:42,924 --> 00:35:44,625 and office institutional 1240 00:35:44,625 --> 00:35:46,494 conditional district to a new 1241 00:35:46,494 --> 00:35:48,494 Odni offices. Institutional 1242 00:35:48,596 --> 00:35:49,697 conditional district to allow 1243 00:35:49,697 --> 00:35:51,299 for a future mixed use 1244 00:35:51,299 --> 00:35:52,934 development in MISS Hopkins 1245 00:35:52,934 --> 00:35:54,436 will be presenting.. 1246 00:35:54,436 --> 00:35:55,804 Good evening chair, Vice Chair 1247 00:35:55,804 --> 00:35:57,172 and members of the Planning 1248 00:35:57,172 --> 00:35:58,307 Commission for your review. 1249 00:35:58,307 --> 00:35:59,675 This evening I present a 1250 00:35:59,675 --> 00:36:00,877 conditional rezoning from an 1251 00:36:00,877 --> 00:36:01,978 existing office and 1252 00:36:01,978 --> 00:36:03,680 institutional conditional 1253 00:36:03,680 --> 00:36:04,814 district to a new office and 1254 00:36:04,814 --> 00:36:06,814 institutional conditional 1255 00:36:08,185 --> 00:36:10,185 district at 2225 Stonecrop 1256 00:36:10,420 --> 00:36:12,820 Drive and 1124 Gallery Park 1257 00:36:14,570 --> 00:36:15,793 Boulevard. Prior to submittal, 1258 00:36:15,793 --> 00:36:19,970 a community meeting was held in 1259 00:36:19,970 --> 00:36:20,999 JUNE of 2026. The application 1260 00:36:20,999 --> 00:36:22,634 was submitted in JULY of 2026 1261 00:36:22,634 --> 00:36:24,269 and reviewed by staff, and it 1262 00:36:24,269 --> 00:36:27,873 is now here for your review and 1263 00:36:27,873 --> 00:36:30,273 recommendation. The site is 1264 00:36:30,376 --> 00:36:31,377 currently zoned o and I cd 1265 00:36:31,377 --> 00:36:32,511 Office and Institutional 1266 00:36:32,511 --> 00:36:33,913 Conditional District, and is 1267 00:36:33,913 --> 00:36:35,515 part of the Berkeley West 1268 00:36:35,515 --> 00:36:36,883 Master Plan. Development. 1269 00:36:36,883 --> 00:36:37,952 Potential uses include 1270 00:36:37,952 --> 00:36:39,952 professional and medical 1271 00:36:40,220 --> 00:36:41,989 offices, places of assembly, 1272 00:36:41,989 --> 00:36:43,424 small scale services and 1273 00:36:43,424 --> 00:36:45,824 commercial district mixed use, 1274 00:36:46,594 --> 00:36:49,197 all limited to a height of 45ft 1275 00:36:49,197 --> 00:36:50,765 or 96ft with a step back. 1276 00:36:50,765 --> 00:36:52,201 Existing conditions apply to 1277 00:36:52,201 --> 00:36:53,636 all Berkeley West. Developments 1278 00:36:53,636 --> 00:36:55,636 include required architectural 1279 00:36:55,705 --> 00:36:57,506 consistency with existing and 1280 00:36:57,506 --> 00:36:59,375 future phases of development. 1281 00:36:59,375 --> 00:37:00,777 Limits on residential density, 1282 00:37:00,777 --> 00:37:02,812 and the prohibition of strip 1283 00:37:02,812 --> 00:37:04,314 retail. The applicant proposes 1284 00:37:04,314 --> 00:37:06,349 a new owned conditional 1285 00:37:06,349 --> 00:37:08,618 district that allows all office 1286 00:37:08,618 --> 00:37:09,687 and institutional uses as 1287 00:37:09,687 --> 00:37:11,589 allowed today, with the 1288 00:37:11,589 --> 00:37:13,224 exclusion of crematory, funeral 1289 00:37:13,224 --> 00:37:14,759 homes and mortuaries, railroad 1290 00:37:14,759 --> 00:37:16,759 facilities, and wireless 1291 00:37:16,795 --> 00:37:17,929 telecommunication facilities. 1292 00:37:17,929 --> 00:37:19,970 The proposed conditions 1293 00:37:19,970 --> 00:37:21,970 maintain architectural 1294 00:37:21,199 --> 00:37:22,133 consistency as a priority set. 1295 00:37:22,133 --> 00:37:23,435 Minimum ground floor 1296 00:37:23,435 --> 00:37:25,170 fenestration standards, and 1297 00:37:25,170 --> 00:37:27,570 maximum building setbacks, and 1298 00:37:31,711 --> 00:37:32,979 define locations for parking. 1299 00:37:32,979 --> 00:37:34,314 This map shows the site and the 1300 00:37:34,314 --> 00:37:35,849 general vicinity surrounding 1301 00:37:35,849 --> 00:37:38,518 the request. The site is in the 1302 00:37:38,518 --> 00:37:41,518 vicinity of the Point Midtown 1303 00:37:44,325 --> 00:37:45,727 ymca and Halliburton Park. A 1304 00:37:45,727 --> 00:37:47,596 portion of the site to the 1305 00:37:47,596 --> 00:37:48,964 north is an existing medical 1306 00:37:48,964 --> 00:37:51,200 office, while the larger 1307 00:37:51,200 --> 00:37:52,467 portion to the south is vacant. 1308 00:37:52,467 --> 00:37:54,300 Surrounding uses include 1309 00:37:54,300 --> 00:37:55,504 commercial to the north, 1310 00:37:55,504 --> 00:37:58,504 multifamily to the east and 1311 00:38:01,210 --> 00:38:02,679 south, and vacant to the west. 1312 00:38:02,679 --> 00:38:03,981 The site is currently zoned 1313 00:38:03,981 --> 00:38:05,182 Office and Institutional 1314 00:38:05,182 --> 00:38:06,617 conditional district. 1315 00:38:06,617 --> 00:38:08,617 Surrounding districts include 1316 00:38:10,121 --> 00:38:12,490 rb and rb, cd to the north, emd 1317 00:38:12,490 --> 00:38:16,900 17 cd to the east and south, 1318 00:38:19,131 --> 00:38:20,666 and rb cd to the west. These 1319 00:38:20,666 --> 00:38:22,670 are photos of the existing site 1320 00:38:22,670 --> 00:38:23,680 conditions. The site currently 1321 00:38:23,680 --> 00:38:24,970 includes Wilmington Health 1322 00:38:24,970 --> 00:38:27,970 Building one and a vacant 1323 00:38:28,541 --> 00:38:29,942 property. These are views of 1324 00:38:29,942 --> 00:38:31,344 the subject property from 1325 00:38:31,344 --> 00:38:32,745 several viewpoints, including 1326 00:38:32,745 --> 00:38:34,130 looking east on Gallery Park 1327 00:38:34,130 --> 00:38:36,413 Boulevard and south on 1328 00:38:38,653 --> 00:38:39,854 Stonecrop Drive. These are 1329 00:38:39,854 --> 00:38:41,756 photos of the adjacent 1330 00:38:41,756 --> 00:38:43,240 properties and land uses. There 1331 00:38:43,240 --> 00:38:44,580 is a hotel to the north, a 1332 00:38:44,580 --> 00:38:45,827 medical office under 1333 00:38:45,827 --> 00:38:47,662 construction to the east, and 1334 00:38:47,662 --> 00:38:51,262 vacant parcels to the south and 1335 00:38:55,204 --> 00:38:56,673 west. This site is part of the 1336 00:38:56,673 --> 00:38:59,730 Berkeley West Master Plan 1337 00:38:59,142 --> 00:39:00,243 development, approved in 2013. 1338 00:39:00,243 --> 00:39:01,745 Conditions and design 1339 00:39:01,745 --> 00:39:02,979 strategies adopted at the time 1340 00:39:02,979 --> 00:39:04,281 apply to all sites in the 1341 00:39:04,281 --> 00:39:06,550 master planned area that have 1342 00:39:06,550 --> 00:39:07,784 not been rezoned since 2013. A 1343 00:39:07,784 --> 00:39:09,153 few conditions important to 1344 00:39:09,153 --> 00:39:10,988 this site include requiring 1345 00:39:10,988 --> 00:39:12,457 architectural consistency, 1346 00:39:12,457 --> 00:39:14,457 prohibiting strip retail, 1347 00:39:14,492 --> 00:39:16,261 integratg a mix of uses, 1348 00:39:16,261 --> 00:39:17,496 providing ample open space, and 1349 00:39:17,496 --> 00:39:19,564 preserving trees above the 1350 00:39:19,564 --> 00:39:22,101 requirements of the ldc, and 1351 00:39:22,101 --> 00:39:23,602 limiting residential density in 1352 00:39:23,602 --> 00:39:26,380 areas of the master plan zoned 1353 00:39:26,380 --> 00:39:28,741 o and I and rb. Residential 1354 00:39:28,741 --> 00:39:30,177 density is limited to 116 1355 00:39:30,177 --> 00:39:31,945 units. This currently leaves 1356 00:39:31,945 --> 00:39:33,881 the development with 44 more 1357 00:39:33,881 --> 00:39:36,281 potential units in commercial 1358 00:39:38,719 --> 00:39:40,421 areas. Site specific conditions 1359 00:39:40,421 --> 00:39:42,123 that prohibit non compatible 1360 00:39:42,123 --> 00:39:43,557 uses remove the existing limit 1361 00:39:43,557 --> 00:39:45,260 on density. Maintain 1362 00:39:45,260 --> 00:39:46,427 architectural consistency 1363 00:39:46,427 --> 00:39:48,130 across the current and future 1364 00:39:48,130 --> 00:39:49,565 phases of development, and set 1365 00:39:49,565 --> 00:39:51,167 design standards for parking 1366 00:39:51,167 --> 00:39:53,167 locations, building setbacks 1367 00:39:53,335 --> 00:39:55,171 and fenestration are proposed. 1368 00:39:55,171 --> 00:39:56,639 A master Tia was completed for 1369 00:39:56,639 --> 00:39:58,408 the planned development. At the 1370 00:39:58,408 --> 00:40:00,430 time of its approval, the 1371 00:40:00,430 --> 00:40:01,844 conditions and the trc process 1372 00:40:01,844 --> 00:40:03,379 will require an updated Tia for 1373 00:40:03,379 --> 00:40:04,649 this phase of the development. 1374 00:40:04,649 --> 00:40:06,250 Any improvements to 1375 00:40:06,250 --> 00:40:07,585 infrastructure recommended in 1376 00:40:07,585 --> 00:40:08,419 this Tia would need to be 1377 00:40:08,419 --> 00:40:09,620 completed before the 1378 00:40:09,620 --> 00:40:12,200 development could receive its 1379 00:40:12,223 --> 00:40:13,424 Certificate of Occupancy. The 1380 00:40:13,424 --> 00:40:14,859 proposed conditional district 1381 00:40:14,859 --> 00:40:16,594 would remove the limit on 1382 00:40:16,594 --> 00:40:17,729 residential density included in 1383 00:40:17,729 --> 00:40:19,640 the current conditions, and it 1384 00:40:19,640 --> 00:40:21,333 would be subject to the limits 1385 00:40:21,333 --> 00:40:24,333 of the underlying zoning only 1386 00:40:24,470 --> 00:40:26,539 at 17 units per acre. If the 1387 00:40:26,539 --> 00:40:27,607 development were to commit 10% 1388 00:40:27,607 --> 00:40:28,942 of residential units to 1389 00:40:28,942 --> 00:40:30,543 workforce housing for a period 1390 00:40:30,543 --> 00:40:34,143 of 15 years, there would be no 1391 00:40:35,482 --> 00:40:36,183 limit on density. Staff has 1392 00:40:36,183 --> 00:40:36,550 reviewed this application 1393 00:40:36,550 --> 00:40:37,918 s 1394 00:40:37,918 --> 00:40:39,320 alignment with relevant adopted 1395 00:40:39,320 --> 00:40:40,555 plans. The Create Wilmington 1396 00:40:40,555 --> 00:40:43,555 Comprehensive Plan is the only 1397 00:40:44,292 --> 00:40:45,627 plan that applies to this site. 1398 00:40:45,627 --> 00:40:46,940 The comprehensive plan 1399 00:40:46,940 --> 00:40:48,940 s growth 1400 00:40:48,130 --> 00:40:49,331 strategies maps identifies 1401 00:40:49,331 --> 00:40:50,832 areas of opportunity with 1402 00:40:50,832 --> 00:40:52,568 corresponding policies to guide 1403 00:40:52,568 --> 00:40:54,236 the look, feel, and use of new 1404 00:40:54,236 --> 00:40:55,604 development. This site is 1405 00:40:55,604 --> 00:40:57,730 located in a greenfield sites 1406 00:40:57,730 --> 00:40:58,608 as multi-use places, area of 1407 00:40:58,608 --> 00:41:00,177 opportunity and a mixed use 1408 00:41:00,177 --> 00:41:01,678 place. The comprehensive plan 1409 00:41:01,678 --> 00:41:03,678 recommends moderate densities 1410 00:41:03,714 --> 00:41:07,314 and lot coverages in mixed use 1411 00:41:08,152 --> 00:41:09,620 places. The comprehensive plan 1412 00:41:09,620 --> 00:41:10,921 also offers broader policy 1413 00:41:10,921 --> 00:41:12,356 guidance to shape new 1414 00:41:12,356 --> 00:41:14,126 development throughout the 1415 00:41:14,126 --> 00:41:15,227 city. Staff assess this 1416 00:41:15,227 --> 00:41:16,528 application with relevant 1417 00:41:16,528 --> 00:41:17,429 policies and found modest 1418 00:41:17,429 --> 00:41:17,830 support for the application 1419 00:41:17,830 --> 00:41:19,598 s 1420 00:41:19,598 --> 00:41:21,367 alignment with the plan. Key 1421 00:41:21,367 --> 00:41:23,169 policies that support this 1422 00:41:23,169 --> 00:41:24,871 request highlight the need for 1423 00:41:24,871 --> 00:41:26,472 well-planned, mixed use centers 1424 00:41:26,472 --> 00:41:28,174 with a diverse mix of uses and 1425 00:41:28,174 --> 00:41:29,909 integrated design, while 1426 00:41:29,909 --> 00:41:31,909 discouraging strip commercial 1427 00:41:32,146 --> 00:41:33,113 retail development. Staff finds 1428 00:41:33,113 --> 00:41:34,114 this location to be well 1429 00:41:34,114 --> 00:41:35,583 connected to three major 1430 00:41:35,583 --> 00:41:37,218 roadways 17th Street, 1431 00:41:37,218 --> 00:41:39,218 Independence Boulevard, and 1432 00:41:42,957 --> 00:41:44,426 Carolina Beach Road. One 1433 00:41:44,426 --> 00:41:45,693 comment has been received in 1434 00:41:45,693 --> 00:41:46,895 opposition, noting concerns 1435 00:41:46,895 --> 00:41:49,295 with traffic impacts and 1436 00:41:52,335 --> 00:41:53,870 multimodal connectivity. In 1437 00:41:53,870 --> 00:41:54,971 summary, this proposal requests 1438 00:41:54,971 --> 00:41:57,600 to rezone the site from an 1439 00:41:57,600 --> 00:41:59,209 existing owned icd to a new 1440 00:41:59,209 --> 00:42:00,677 owned icd with new conditions 1441 00:42:00,677 --> 00:42:02,450 that remove the existing limit 1442 00:42:02,450 --> 00:42:04,450 on density, maintain 1443 00:42:04,800 --> 00:42:05,382 architectural consistency, and 1444 00:42:05,382 --> 00:42:07,285 set direction for ground floor 1445 00:42:07,285 --> 00:42:08,887 fenestration, building setbacks 1446 00:42:08,887 --> 00:42:10,488 and parking locations. The 1447 00:42:10,488 --> 00:42:12,290 comprehensive plan encourages a 1448 00:42:12,290 --> 00:42:13,792 diverse mix of uses, moderate 1449 00:42:13,792 --> 00:42:14,926 density, and compatible design 1450 00:42:14,926 --> 00:42:17,926 that aligns with the existing 1451 00:42:18,297 --> 00:42:19,698 character of this development. 1452 00:42:19,698 --> 00:42:20,833 Staff finds the request to be 1453 00:42:20,833 --> 00:42:22,801 consistent with the Wilmington 1454 00:42:22,801 --> 00:42:24,738 Comprehensive Plan reasonable 1455 00:42:24,738 --> 00:42:26,807 and in public interest. Staff 1456 00:42:26,807 --> 00:42:27,874 recommends approval. I am happy 1457 00:42:27,874 --> 00:42:29,743 to answer any questions and the 1458 00:42:29,743 --> 00:42:31,211 applicant is present as well. 1459 00:42:31,211 --> 00:42:33,611 Thank you, MISS Hopkins. 1460 00:42:34,810 --> 00:42:34,515 Commissioner Jones. 1461 00:42:34,515 --> 00:42:36,250 I don 1462 00:42:36,250 --> 00:42:36,984 t have any questions yet. 1463 00:42:36,984 --> 00:42:38,984 Okay. 1464 00:42:40,888 --> 00:42:42,888 Commissioner. 1465 00:42:43,859 --> 00:42:44,593 The reference to, uh, workforce 1466 00:42:44,593 --> 00:42:45,260 housing, it 1467 00:42:45,260 --> 00:42:45,761 s just kind of a 1468 00:42:45,761 --> 00:42:46,595 statement that 1469 00:42:46,595 --> 00:42:48,995 s in there. Was 1470 00:42:49,198 --> 00:42:51,000 there discussions about that or 1471 00:42:51,000 --> 00:42:52,435 recommendations about that or 1472 00:42:52,435 --> 00:42:53,536 refusal of that? 1473 00:42:53,536 --> 00:42:55,604 Um, there was just a brief 1474 00:42:55,604 --> 00:42:57,240 discussion that because they 1475 00:42:57,240 --> 00:42:58,274 were looking to remove that 1476 00:42:58,274 --> 00:42:59,276 limit on density, that that was 1477 00:42:59,276 --> 00:43:00,878 an option that they could 1478 00:43:00,878 --> 00:43:02,790 pursue if they chose to, but 1479 00:43:02,790 --> 00:43:04,181 they did not indicate any 1480 00:43:04,181 --> 00:43:06,181 interest or disinterest. 1481 00:43:06,484 --> 00:43:08,884 All right. Thank you. 1482 00:43:09,387 --> 00:43:10,321 Commissioner Pawlak. 1483 00:43:10,321 --> 00:43:10,455 Nothing at this point. I 1484 00:43:10,455 --> 00:43:12,257 ll 1485 00:43:12,257 --> 00:43:14,250 wait for the applicant. 1486 00:43:14,250 --> 00:43:15,860 Commissioner Adams. 1487 00:43:15,860 --> 00:43:17,797 Could you go back a slide to 1488 00:43:17,797 --> 00:43:20,197 your conditions? One more 1489 00:43:21,267 --> 00:43:23,269 slide. Um, so the to reach the 1490 00:43:23,269 --> 00:43:24,738 17 units per acre in the. Oh, 1491 00:43:24,738 --> 00:43:27,541 Annie density would would that 1492 00:43:27,541 --> 00:43:29,776 require the cdm? You overlay 1493 00:43:29,776 --> 00:43:30,777 kind of design aspect to that. 1494 00:43:30,777 --> 00:43:32,412 Correct. It would be through 1495 00:43:32,412 --> 00:43:33,413 cdm. Q but they could use the 1496 00:43:33,413 --> 00:43:34,949 existing Wilmington Health 1497 00:43:34,949 --> 00:43:35,984 Building as that commercial 1498 00:43:35,984 --> 00:43:37,984 component. 1499 00:43:38,553 --> 00:43:41,423 Okay. All right. Thank you.. 1500 00:43:41,423 --> 00:43:42,824 Commissioner Collier. 1501 00:43:42,824 --> 00:43:44,659 Commissioner coffer. 1502 00:43:44,659 --> 00:43:45,794 Thank you, MR. Chair. Yeah, I 1503 00:43:45,794 --> 00:43:46,461 MISS Hopkins. I can 1504 00:43:46,461 --> 00:43:48,461 t put my 1505 00:43:48,597 --> 00:43:49,932 fingers on what exactly is the 1506 00:43:49,932 --> 00:43:51,468 maximum number of residential 1507 00:43:51,468 --> 00:43:52,936 units allowed? 1508 00:43:52,936 --> 00:43:53,303 Allowed in? Oh, and I are 1509 00:43:53,303 --> 00:43:55,303 currently. 1510 00:43:55,505 --> 00:43:55,772 Allowed in this master plan. I 1511 00:43:55,772 --> 00:43:56,873 mean, we 1512 00:43:56,873 --> 00:43:58,873 re. 1513 00:43:59,676 --> 00:44:02,112 For this site. There are 44 1514 00:44:02,112 --> 00:44:04,148 units that they could build the 1515 00:44:04,148 --> 00:44:07,748 total limit on. On the Berkeley 1516 00:44:08,752 --> 00:44:11,190 West master plan is 1375, I 1517 00:44:11,190 --> 00:44:13,192 believe, but only 116 were able 1518 00:44:13,192 --> 00:44:14,760 to be in commercial areas. So 1519 00:44:14,760 --> 00:44:18,897 they have built out a lot of 1520 00:44:18,897 --> 00:44:20,800 that 116. They have 44 left. 1521 00:44:20,800 --> 00:44:22,468 Okay. Thank you. That was what 1522 00:44:22,468 --> 00:44:24,270 I was curious about. And this 1523 00:44:24,270 --> 00:44:27,107 Tia update that would be 1524 00:44:27,107 --> 00:44:27,274 required. Um, I mean, I just 1525 00:44:27,274 --> 00:44:28,575 it 1526 00:44:28,575 --> 00:44:30,100 s procedural question. Is 1527 00:44:30,100 --> 00:44:31,545 that something that just comes 1528 00:44:31,545 --> 00:44:32,580 down the road. When does that 1529 00:44:32,580 --> 00:44:34,580 all occur? 1530 00:44:34,815 --> 00:44:35,783 When they apply for a pre trc 1531 00:44:35,783 --> 00:44:37,252 and go through the formal 1532 00:44:37,252 --> 00:44:38,860 technical review process. That 1533 00:44:38,860 --> 00:44:41,686 is when they will need to 1534 00:44:41,856 --> 00:44:43,358 complete a Tia. Mm. 1535 00:44:43,358 --> 00:44:44,527 I just I 1536 00:44:44,527 --> 00:44:45,528 m sorry. 1537 00:44:45,528 --> 00:44:48,528 And then the last question 1538 00:44:48,965 --> 00:44:49,232 would just be I MAY have I MISS 1539 00:44:49,232 --> 00:44:50,166 I couldn 1540 00:44:50,166 --> 00:44:50,433 t quite hear MR. 1541 00:44:50,433 --> 00:44:52,368 Woodruff 1542 00:44:52,368 --> 00:44:55,205 s question, but I MAY 1543 00:44:55,205 --> 00:44:57,107 be repeating it. Was there any 1544 00:44:57,107 --> 00:44:59,900 discussion on the cap of uh, 1545 00:44:59,900 --> 00:45:02,900 with the being eliminated with 1546 00:45:02,313 --> 00:45:03,514 the 10%, uh, workforce housing? 1547 00:45:03,514 --> 00:45:04,716 Uh, minimal? We mentioned that 1548 00:45:04,716 --> 00:45:06,684 it was an option, but they did 1549 00:45:06,684 --> 00:45:07,352 not share interest or lack of 1550 00:45:07,352 --> 00:45:09,352 interest. 1551 00:45:09,588 --> 00:45:12,588 Okay. Thank you so much. 1552 00:45:13,191 --> 00:45:15,727 I just had a quick question on 1553 00:45:15,727 --> 00:45:17,830 page 17 of the handout. 1554 00:45:17,830 --> 00:45:20,767 Actually on page 16 of our 1555 00:45:20,767 --> 00:45:22,669 package. Um, the level of 1556 00:45:22,669 --> 00:45:23,303 service for the adjacent roads 1557 00:45:23,303 --> 00:45:25,720 are all a 1558 00:45:25,720 --> 00:45:27,720 s with planning 1559 00:45:30,377 --> 00:45:33,347 capacity of 9080 ts. Is that 1560 00:45:33,347 --> 00:45:34,949 sound familiar? Yes. Okay, so 1561 00:45:34,949 --> 00:45:36,652 looking down at the projected 1562 00:45:36,652 --> 00:45:38,554 difference by if this request 1563 00:45:38,554 --> 00:45:40,255 were to be successful, I mean, 1564 00:45:40,255 --> 00:45:41,458 in your experience, is a 1565 00:45:41,458 --> 00:45:42,758 medical office building more 1566 00:45:42,758 --> 00:45:45,561 impactful to traffic or an 1567 00:45:45,561 --> 00:45:46,950 apartment building? 1568 00:45:46,950 --> 00:45:47,290 Um, I wouldn 1569 00:45:47,290 --> 00:45:48,965 t say in my 1570 00:45:48,965 --> 00:45:50,633 experience, but looking at the 1571 00:45:50,633 --> 00:45:52,368 numbers, you do see more trips 1572 00:45:52,368 --> 00:45:55,205 generated from a medical office 1573 00:45:55,205 --> 00:45:55,639 than you do from multifamily. 1574 00:45:55,639 --> 00:45:57,740 Okay? 1575 00:45:57,740 --> 00:45:58,209 Especially at the scale that 1576 00:45:58,209 --> 00:45:59,143 they could build on this size 1577 00:45:59,143 --> 00:46:01,143 of a site. 1578 00:46:01,946 --> 00:46:02,113 Okay. Well, yeah. Yes, because 1579 00:46:02,113 --> 00:46:04,113 one 1580 00:46:05,450 --> 00:46:07,850 s forecasted to be 1581 00:46:08,219 --> 00:46:09,420 213,000ft. 1582 00:46:09,420 --> 00:46:11,857 Okay. Because they can build up 1583 00:46:11,857 --> 00:46:14,930 to 40%. Okay of the site area. 1584 00:46:14,930 --> 00:46:16,596 So really this is reducing the 1585 00:46:16,596 --> 00:46:16,796 potential traffic impact. If 1586 00:46:16,796 --> 00:46:17,330 they 1587 00:46:17,330 --> 00:46:19,730 re if they went 1588 00:46:19,799 --> 00:46:22,799 residential as opposed to oh 1589 00:46:23,300 --> 00:46:23,436 and I the office buildings. 1590 00:46:23,436 --> 00:46:24,170 I don 1591 00:46:24,170 --> 00:46:24,337 t know that I would say 1592 00:46:24,337 --> 00:46:25,338 it 1593 00:46:25,338 --> 00:46:27,106 s reducing because they 1594 00:46:27,106 --> 00:46:28,241 could build medical offices 1595 00:46:28,241 --> 00:46:29,310 today. They could build it with 1596 00:46:29,310 --> 00:46:30,578 this rezoning. This just 1597 00:46:30,578 --> 00:46:31,779 creates the opportunity for 1598 00:46:31,779 --> 00:46:32,814 them to build more residential. 1599 00:46:32,814 --> 00:46:35,214 If they choose to. 1600 00:46:36,170 --> 00:46:37,819 Got it. Okay. Better said. Any 1601 00:46:37,819 --> 00:46:39,688 other questions from the 1602 00:46:39,688 --> 00:46:40,550 commission, Commissioner 1603 00:46:40,550 --> 00:46:40,555 Collier. 1604 00:46:40,555 --> 00:46:41,456 While we 1605 00:46:41,456 --> 00:46:43,856 re on traffic, though, 1606 00:46:43,959 --> 00:46:46,296 the medical office, before 1607 00:46:46,296 --> 00:46:47,897 their intensity was 642. Was 1608 00:46:47,897 --> 00:46:48,231 that a limit or was it just how 1609 00:46:48,231 --> 00:46:48,431 much is it? 1610 00:46:48,431 --> 00:46:48,631 That 1611 00:46:48,631 --> 00:46:49,399 s what 1612 00:46:49,399 --> 00:46:51,399 s currently built. 1613 00:46:52,769 --> 00:46:55,769 Okay, so the 213, the proposed 1614 00:46:56,600 --> 00:46:56,406 213 change that is a max number 1615 00:46:56,406 --> 00:46:57,608 two or that 1616 00:46:57,608 --> 00:46:57,775 s a proposal or 1617 00:46:57,775 --> 00:46:58,675 it 1618 00:46:58,675 --> 00:47:00,244 s just a max. They could get 1619 00:47:00,244 --> 00:47:01,311 in with the oh and icd. 1620 00:47:01,311 --> 00:47:02,213 That would be the maximum that 1621 00:47:02,213 --> 00:47:04,750 they could get in. Oh and. 1622 00:47:04,750 --> 00:47:06,285 I and I, I agree with the uh 1623 00:47:06,285 --> 00:47:08,887 with MR., with CHAIRMAN Linden 1624 00:47:08,887 --> 00:47:09,288 too. It is more of a traffic 1625 00:47:09,288 --> 00:47:10,389 less it 1626 00:47:10,389 --> 00:47:11,557 s lessening of track it 1627 00:47:11,557 --> 00:47:14,894 more than it more so than it is 1628 00:47:14,894 --> 00:47:16,696 adding to it. I believe so.. 1629 00:47:16,696 --> 00:47:17,396 Any other questions for MISS 1630 00:47:17,396 --> 00:47:18,931 Hopkins? 1631 00:47:18,931 --> 00:47:19,650 Thank you. Thank you. 1632 00:47:19,650 --> 00:47:19,899 I 1633 00:47:19,899 --> 00:47:22,899 d like to invite the 1634 00:47:32,513 --> 00:47:34,315 applicant. 1635 00:47:34,315 --> 00:47:35,160 Good evening. Good evening, 1636 00:47:35,160 --> 00:47:36,384 MR.. 1637 00:47:36,384 --> 00:47:37,719 CHAIRMAN, and members of the 1638 00:47:37,719 --> 00:47:38,319 Commission. My name is Matt 1639 00:47:38,319 --> 00:47:39,422 Nichols. I 1640 00:47:39,422 --> 00:47:40,723 m an attorney in 1641 00:47:40,723 --> 00:47:41,230 Wilmington, and I 1642 00:47:41,230 --> 00:47:43,230 m here 1643 00:47:43,590 --> 00:47:45,459 tonight representing the owner 1644 00:47:46,596 --> 00:47:47,396 and applicant. Um, with me this 1645 00:47:47,396 --> 00:47:48,640 evening. Uh, that 1646 00:47:48,640 --> 00:47:49,465 s Cameron 1647 00:47:49,465 --> 00:47:51,340 Land. Uh, excuse me. Cameron 1648 00:47:51,340 --> 00:47:53,360 Properties land company. And 1649 00:47:53,360 --> 00:47:55,205 with me here this evening is 1650 00:47:55,205 --> 00:47:57,241 Hill Rodgers with Cameron 1651 00:47:57,241 --> 00:47:59,277 Management. And we appreciate 1652 00:47:59,277 --> 00:48:00,845 the opportunity to present this 1653 00:48:00,845 --> 00:48:02,614 proposal for your consideration 1654 00:48:02,614 --> 00:48:04,883 this evening. We have a few 1655 00:48:04,883 --> 00:48:06,317 slides that, um, I think will 1656 00:48:06,317 --> 00:48:06,852 help explain the request. And 1657 00:48:06,852 --> 00:48:07,419 then we 1658 00:48:07,419 --> 00:48:08,119 ve heard some 1659 00:48:08,119 --> 00:48:08,520 questions, and we 1660 00:48:08,520 --> 00:48:10,220 re certainly 1661 00:48:10,220 --> 00:48:11,423 here to try to answer any 1662 00:48:11,423 --> 00:48:13,823 questions that the Commission 1663 00:48:15,361 --> 00:48:18,298 has. This is a, uh, a 1664 00:48:18,298 --> 00:48:20,600 relatively recent drone shot of 1665 00:48:20,600 --> 00:48:21,902 the area. And I put the movie 1666 00:48:21,902 --> 00:48:23,203 theater on there just for 1667 00:48:23,203 --> 00:48:24,304 reference. I think everyone 1668 00:48:24,304 --> 00:48:26,373 generally knows where the movie 1669 00:48:26,373 --> 00:48:28,342 theater is at the point the 1670 00:48:28,342 --> 00:48:30,742 subject property is shown, 1671 00:48:30,811 --> 00:48:32,447 outlined in the dotted yellow 1672 00:48:32,447 --> 00:48:33,382 with the yellow star, and it 1673 00:48:33,382 --> 00:48:35,382 s 1674 00:48:38,554 --> 00:48:38,721 roughly 12 and 12.25 acres. Uh, 1675 00:48:38,721 --> 00:48:40,721 it 1676 00:48:42,240 --> 00:48:43,125 s currently zoned. Oh, and I 1677 00:48:43,125 --> 00:48:43,492 one which I don 1678 00:48:43,492 --> 00:48:44,493 t know that 1679 00:48:44,493 --> 00:48:44,894 that exists anymore, but it 1680 00:48:44,894 --> 00:48:46,894 s 1681 00:48:48,640 --> 00:48:50,801 only one cd, and that is a 1682 00:48:50,801 --> 00:48:51,368 result of the City Council 1683 00:48:51,368 --> 00:48:53,368 s 1684 00:48:54,605 --> 00:48:57,605 approval of the bigger Berkeley 1685 00:48:58,242 --> 00:49:00,642 West conditional rezoning in 1686 00:49:00,812 --> 00:49:01,379 2013. So what you 1687 00:49:01,379 --> 00:49:03,379 re looking at 1688 00:49:03,548 --> 00:49:05,750 here is really about half of 1689 00:49:05,750 --> 00:49:08,150 Berkeley, West. Berkeley West 1690 00:49:09,210 --> 00:49:12,258 was approved, um, as about a 1691 00:49:12,258 --> 00:49:14,258 302 acre multi conditional 1692 00:49:16,596 --> 00:49:17,864 district. Uh, development, um, 1693 00:49:17,864 --> 00:49:19,566 about half of it is on the 1694 00:49:19,566 --> 00:49:20,333 south side of independence, and 1695 00:49:20,333 --> 00:49:21,100 about half of it 1696 00:49:21,100 --> 00:49:21,601 s on the north 1697 00:49:21,601 --> 00:49:22,335 side. What you 1698 00:49:22,335 --> 00:49:24,335 re looking at 1699 00:49:24,872 --> 00:49:28,472 here is the south side of 1700 00:49:28,476 --> 00:49:30,278 independence. And, um, it has 1701 00:49:30,278 --> 00:49:32,678 obviously developed over time 1702 00:49:33,882 --> 00:49:36,882 since 2013, but a lot has 1703 00:49:38,220 --> 00:49:40,220 changed since 2013. Um, 1704 00:49:40,220 --> 00:49:41,791 probably two too long to list, 1705 00:49:41,791 --> 00:49:42,826 but some of the main items 1706 00:49:42,826 --> 00:49:43,960 would be you 1707 00:49:43,960 --> 00:49:46,360 ve got an entirely 1708 00:49:46,830 --> 00:49:47,898 new land development code. Uh, 1709 00:49:47,898 --> 00:49:49,199 when this went through the 1710 00:49:49,199 --> 00:49:50,267 process, when we were going 1711 00:49:50,267 --> 00:49:53,267 through the process, we were 1712 00:49:53,337 --> 00:49:54,738 actually under the old zoning 1713 00:49:54,738 --> 00:49:58,275 code, which I think was chapter 1714 00:49:58,275 --> 00:50:01,875 18 of the city code. And then 1715 00:50:02,281 --> 00:50:05,281 that changed in 2004 ish. I 1716 00:50:07,486 --> 00:50:08,487 think, um, and then we when we 1717 00:50:08,487 --> 00:50:09,989 when we came before City 1718 00:50:09,989 --> 00:50:11,323 Council, we were under what was 1719 00:50:11,323 --> 00:50:14,226 then chapter 19. I think the 1720 00:50:14,226 --> 00:50:15,280 zoning code. And at that time, 1721 00:50:15,280 --> 00:50:15,795 um, you also didn 1722 00:50:15,795 --> 00:50:17,631 t have your, 1723 00:50:17,631 --> 00:50:17,831 your comprehensive plan. So 1724 00:50:17,831 --> 00:50:19,831 that 1725 00:50:19,933 --> 00:50:22,136 s a big change that was 1726 00:50:22,136 --> 00:50:22,469 adopted. Um, 2016. It 1727 00:50:22,469 --> 00:50:22,803 s hard to 1728 00:50:22,803 --> 00:50:23,671 believe that 1729 00:50:23,671 --> 00:50:26,710 s been ten years. 1730 00:50:26,273 --> 00:50:28,142 But, um, when this was adopted, 1731 00:50:28,142 --> 00:50:32,342 I think it was the future land 1732 00:50:34,917 --> 00:50:37,286 use plan 22,004 to 2025 was the 1733 00:50:37,286 --> 00:50:38,788 name of the plan. Um, and then, 1734 00:50:38,788 --> 00:50:40,590 of course, just the changes in 1735 00:50:40,590 --> 00:50:42,525 population growth and job 1736 00:50:42,525 --> 00:50:45,295 growth and changes in the 1737 00:50:45,295 --> 00:50:47,931 retail market and office demand 1738 00:50:47,931 --> 00:50:49,232 and everything else since 2013. 1739 00:50:49,232 --> 00:50:49,966 So really what we 1740 00:50:49,966 --> 00:50:51,836 re here for 1741 00:50:51,836 --> 00:50:53,771 is asking for a consideration 1742 00:50:53,771 --> 00:50:55,940 to update these conditions from 1743 00:50:55,940 --> 00:50:57,175 2013 on this. What 1744 00:50:57,175 --> 00:50:59,100 s one of the 1745 00:50:59,100 --> 00:51:00,979 sort of more remaining parts of 1746 00:51:00,979 --> 00:51:03,979 this portion of Berkeley West? 1747 00:51:04,216 --> 00:51:07,786 So looking at the at the 1748 00:51:07,786 --> 00:51:09,255 property itself, um, the 1749 00:51:09,255 --> 00:51:09,455 existing building will remain. 1750 00:51:09,455 --> 00:51:10,323 That 1751 00:51:10,323 --> 00:51:12,459 s the Wilmington Health 1752 00:51:12,459 --> 00:51:13,593 Building. And MISS Hopkins 1753 00:51:13,593 --> 00:51:15,562 showed that in a number of 1754 00:51:15,562 --> 00:51:18,165 photos. Um, this is a little 1755 00:51:18,165 --> 00:51:20,133 bit of an older, um, Google 1756 00:51:20,133 --> 00:51:20,467 Maps photo, but the there 1757 00:51:20,467 --> 00:51:22,302 s a 1758 00:51:22,302 --> 00:51:23,137 new parking area that has since 1759 00:51:23,137 --> 00:51:23,737 been created and that 1760 00:51:23,737 --> 00:51:25,737 s behind 1761 00:51:26,174 --> 00:51:28,574 the Wilmington Health Building. 1762 00:51:29,111 --> 00:51:30,178 And then you can see on the 1763 00:51:30,178 --> 00:51:32,281 upper sort of right hand 1764 00:51:32,281 --> 00:51:35,150 corner, which is not part of 1765 00:51:35,150 --> 00:51:37,286 the rezoning request, there is 1766 00:51:37,286 --> 00:51:38,354 a current office building under 1767 00:51:38,354 --> 00:51:39,388 construction. If you were to go 1768 00:51:39,388 --> 00:51:39,855 out there today, you would see 1769 00:51:39,855 --> 00:51:40,622 that. And it 1770 00:51:40,622 --> 00:51:41,290 s, um, it 1771 00:51:41,290 --> 00:51:43,290 s well 1772 00:51:43,794 --> 00:51:46,630 underway. Um, the property 1773 00:51:46,630 --> 00:51:49,630 that, um, is undeveloped is 1774 00:51:49,660 --> 00:51:50,340 roughly seven and a half acres, 1775 00:51:50,340 --> 00:51:52,403 just a little bit under seven 1776 00:51:52,403 --> 00:51:53,638 and a half acres. And we would 1777 00:51:53,638 --> 00:51:55,339 like the opportunity to have 1778 00:51:55,339 --> 00:51:57,739 some more flexibility with 1779 00:51:58,610 --> 00:52:00,110 that. Um, when you look at some 1780 00:52:00,110 --> 00:52:01,914 of the slides, MISS Hopkins 1781 00:52:01,914 --> 00:52:03,820 showed. Look, I 1782 00:52:03,820 --> 00:52:05,820 m thinking back 1783 00:52:05,451 --> 00:52:06,752 to 2013 and we had a number of 1784 00:52:06,752 --> 00:52:08,254 neighborhood meetings and we 1785 00:52:08,254 --> 00:52:10,823 had a lot of discussions about 1786 00:52:10,823 --> 00:52:10,990 the overall development. But 1787 00:52:10,990 --> 00:52:12,258 it 1788 00:52:12,258 --> 00:52:13,660 s really interesting to see, 1789 00:52:13,660 --> 00:52:15,295 like back in 2013, the 1790 00:52:15,295 --> 00:52:17,130 discussion about density. And 1791 00:52:17,130 --> 00:52:19,266 when you fast forward ahead 13 1792 00:52:19,266 --> 00:52:20,601 years and all the changes, like 1793 00:52:20,601 --> 00:52:21,502 if you could identify a place 1794 00:52:21,502 --> 00:52:21,869 in Wilmington where you 1795 00:52:21,869 --> 00:52:23,404 d want 1796 00:52:23,404 --> 00:52:24,772 more density with all the 1797 00:52:24,772 --> 00:52:26,841 infrastructure. And as you 1798 00:52:26,841 --> 00:52:29,177 mentioned, MR. CHAIRMAN, the a 1799 00:52:29,177 --> 00:52:30,412 level service of the roads, all 1800 00:52:30,412 --> 00:52:32,147 the different intersections 1801 00:52:32,147 --> 00:52:33,582 that have been improved, I 1802 00:52:33,582 --> 00:52:34,683 could go through and, you know, 1803 00:52:34,683 --> 00:52:35,384 show you things here even on 1804 00:52:35,384 --> 00:52:36,752 this that weren 1805 00:52:36,752 --> 00:52:38,822 t in place in 1806 00:52:38,822 --> 00:52:40,323 2013. But if you were wanting 1807 00:52:40,323 --> 00:52:42,158 to increase density in 1808 00:52:42,158 --> 00:52:43,126 Wilmington, this is exactly the 1809 00:52:43,126 --> 00:52:43,426 place where you would want to 1810 00:52:43,426 --> 00:52:44,494 do it. It 1811 00:52:44,494 --> 00:52:45,950 s close to grocery 1812 00:52:45,950 --> 00:52:46,129 stores, it 1813 00:52:46,129 --> 00:52:48,529 s close to public 1814 00:52:48,966 --> 00:52:51,340 parks. It has probably the best 1815 00:52:51,340 --> 00:52:52,350 access of any large site and 1816 00:52:52,350 --> 00:52:53,938 all of Wilmington, with 1817 00:52:53,938 --> 00:52:55,807 Independence Boulevard, 17th 1818 00:52:55,807 --> 00:52:57,976 Street, Carolina Beach Road, 1819 00:52:57,976 --> 00:52:59,144 um, most of this is signalized. 1820 00:52:59,144 --> 00:53:02,144 Signalized, and none of that 1821 00:53:02,648 --> 00:53:05,648 was really there in 2013. Um, 1822 00:53:05,884 --> 00:53:07,553 but, um, when the when the 1823 00:53:07,553 --> 00:53:10,523 approval when it was approved 1824 00:53:10,523 --> 00:53:12,292 in 2013, um, there was a lot 1825 00:53:12,292 --> 00:53:14,261 more zoning space. There was a 1826 00:53:14,261 --> 00:53:17,798 lot more arb space, a lot more 1827 00:53:17,798 --> 00:53:18,132 commercial space. And it 1828 00:53:18,132 --> 00:53:19,400 s 1829 00:53:19,400 --> 00:53:21,368 really pretty interesting to 1830 00:53:21,368 --> 00:53:24,968 see the density that was put 1831 00:53:28,544 --> 00:53:30,246 upon what equates to. 223 acres 1832 00:53:30,246 --> 00:53:33,249 of combined. Oh, and I won and 1833 00:53:33,249 --> 00:53:34,917 rb was limited to 116 units, 1834 00:53:34,917 --> 00:53:38,488 which is about one unit for 1835 00:53:38,488 --> 00:53:38,721 every two acres. And really, 1836 00:53:38,721 --> 00:53:39,789 what we 1837 00:53:39,789 --> 00:53:42,189 re asking for tonight 1838 00:53:42,625 --> 00:53:44,127 is can, you know, just to sort 1839 00:53:44,127 --> 00:53:45,595 of lift that density cap on 1840 00:53:45,595 --> 00:53:46,931 this remaining part and allow 1841 00:53:46,931 --> 00:53:49,100 the opportunity to have it 1842 00:53:49,100 --> 00:53:52,100 developed just like any other 1843 00:53:54,500 --> 00:53:56,107 only site? And, um, again, the 1844 00:53:56,107 --> 00:53:58,507 the residential certainly helps 1845 00:53:59,177 --> 00:54:01,346 the commercial component. Um, 1846 00:54:01,346 --> 00:54:03,148 the roadways are more than 1847 00:54:03,148 --> 00:54:04,751 adequate for allowing some more 1848 00:54:04,751 --> 00:54:07,120 residential on that seven and a 1849 00:54:07,120 --> 00:54:07,453 half, um, acres, but there 1850 00:54:07,453 --> 00:54:09,453 s no 1851 00:54:09,656 --> 00:54:10,230 definite plan right now. So, 1852 00:54:10,230 --> 00:54:11,570 um, it 1853 00:54:11,570 --> 00:54:12,192 s really just 1854 00:54:12,192 --> 00:54:13,593 opportunities as they sort of 1855 00:54:13,593 --> 00:54:15,395 plan out one of these last 1856 00:54:15,395 --> 00:54:16,863 parts of vacant property within 1857 00:54:16,863 --> 00:54:18,298 the within the Berkeley West 1858 00:54:18,298 --> 00:54:19,333 development to have an 1859 00:54:19,333 --> 00:54:20,667 opportunity to put some more 1860 00:54:20,667 --> 00:54:21,269 residential. So that 1861 00:54:21,269 --> 00:54:23,269 s kind of 1862 00:54:23,605 --> 00:54:24,739 how we got here today. And um, 1863 00:54:24,739 --> 00:54:26,174 I would like to say we 1864 00:54:26,174 --> 00:54:26,374 appreciate the planning 1865 00:54:26,374 --> 00:54:28,374 staff 1866 00:54:28,543 --> 00:54:28,810 s, um, discussions with 1867 00:54:28,810 --> 00:54:29,878 us. They 1868 00:54:29,878 --> 00:54:31,880 ve been very available 1869 00:54:31,880 --> 00:54:33,182 and helpful with us. And, um, 1870 00:54:33,182 --> 00:54:34,249 sort of walking through 1871 00:54:34,249 --> 00:54:35,217 different ways to approach 1872 00:54:35,217 --> 00:54:35,417 this. So I do want to say 1873 00:54:35,417 --> 00:54:36,352 staff 1874 00:54:36,352 --> 00:54:38,755 s been great to work with 1875 00:54:38,755 --> 00:54:39,356 on this. And, um, I 1876 00:54:39,356 --> 00:54:40,791 ve got a 1877 00:54:40,791 --> 00:54:41,658 few more slides that might help 1878 00:54:41,658 --> 00:54:43,293 elaborate on some of the 1879 00:54:43,293 --> 00:54:43,460 questions. Part of the reason 1880 00:54:43,460 --> 00:54:44,194 you 1881 00:54:44,194 --> 00:54:46,730 ll see the shape of the 1882 00:54:46,730 --> 00:54:46,931 property is because the track 1883 00:54:46,931 --> 00:54:48,931 that 1884 00:54:49,233 --> 00:54:51,202 s in the upper right hand 1885 00:54:51,202 --> 00:54:51,736 corner. Um, uh, Cameron 1886 00:54:51,736 --> 00:54:52,236 Properties doesn 1887 00:54:52,236 --> 00:54:52,570 t own that 1888 00:54:52,570 --> 00:54:53,300 anymore. That 1889 00:54:53,300 --> 00:54:54,272 s owned by 1890 00:54:54,272 --> 00:54:56,275 Wilmington Health that was 1891 00:54:56,275 --> 00:54:59,275 recently sold. And I think 1892 00:54:59,311 --> 00:55:01,480 APRIL of this year. And then, 1893 00:55:01,480 --> 00:55:04,350 um, MISS Hopkins touched on 1894 00:55:04,350 --> 00:55:05,117 the, uh, consistency with the 1895 00:55:05,117 --> 00:55:05,718 plans, but there 1896 00:55:05,718 --> 00:55:06,219 s not many 1897 00:55:06,219 --> 00:55:06,719 properties you 1898 00:55:06,719 --> 00:55:08,321 re going to see 1899 00:55:08,321 --> 00:55:10,823 in Wilmington that are in a, in 1900 00:55:10,823 --> 00:55:12,892 a higher intensity area of 1901 00:55:12,892 --> 00:55:14,428 opportunity, a transit oriented 1902 00:55:14,428 --> 00:55:16,731 mixed use center, a high 1903 00:55:16,731 --> 00:55:18,399 capacity transit route, and has 1904 00:55:18,399 --> 00:55:20,680 this much access to existing 1905 00:55:20,680 --> 00:55:22,468 commercial goods and services. 1906 00:55:23,137 --> 00:55:25,407 You can walk to all sorts of 1907 00:55:25,407 --> 00:55:25,707 things within the area you 1908 00:55:25,707 --> 00:55:26,908 re 1909 00:55:26,908 --> 00:55:28,209 close to signalized 1910 00:55:28,209 --> 00:55:30,209 intersections, grocery stores, 1911 00:55:30,913 --> 00:55:32,140 and as I said, um, it is really 1912 00:55:32,140 --> 00:55:34,284 where you would want to see 1913 00:55:34,284 --> 00:55:35,618 some more density. Um, if we if 1914 00:55:35,618 --> 00:55:35,785 you can put it there and it 1915 00:55:35,785 --> 00:55:37,354 s 1916 00:55:37,354 --> 00:55:38,822 going to be very high quality, 1917 00:55:38,822 --> 00:55:40,790 just like the entire Berkeley 1918 00:55:40,790 --> 00:55:41,758 West is. So I think that 1919 00:55:41,758 --> 00:55:43,460 s the 1920 00:55:43,460 --> 00:55:45,128 conclusion. Um, staff 1921 00:55:45,128 --> 00:55:45,395 recommends approval. I 1922 00:55:45,395 --> 00:55:46,964 m sure 1923 00:55:46,964 --> 00:55:47,164 you all have questions, but 1924 00:55:47,164 --> 00:55:49,164 that 1925 00:55:49,167 --> 00:55:50,769 s sort of the, the the 1926 00:55:50,769 --> 00:55:52,204 long and the short of it. 1927 00:55:52,204 --> 00:55:53,138 Thank you very much, 1928 00:55:53,138 --> 00:55:53,305 Commissioner coffer. We 1929 00:55:53,305 --> 00:55:54,673 ll 1930 00:55:54,673 --> 00:55:56,673 start with you. 1931 00:55:56,908 --> 00:55:58,477 Thank you, MR. Chair. Um, I 1932 00:55:58,477 --> 00:55:59,545 guess, MISTER Nichols, the 1933 00:55:59,545 --> 00:56:02,545 first question that just pops 1934 00:56:04,830 --> 00:56:06,253 off the page is why not do the. 1935 00:56:06,253 --> 00:56:08,540 O the workforce piece that 1936 00:56:08,540 --> 00:56:09,890 eliminates all the residential 1937 00:56:09,890 --> 00:56:10,958 barriers? 1938 00:56:10,958 --> 00:56:12,958 Uh, uh, it 1939 00:56:13,270 --> 00:56:13,193 s a great point. We 1940 00:56:13,193 --> 00:56:15,193 don 1941 00:56:16,530 --> 00:56:18,132 t have a plan, but what the 1942 00:56:18,132 --> 00:56:20,100 residential barrier is 1943 00:56:20,100 --> 00:56:21,769 resulting from the 2013 1944 00:56:21,769 --> 00:56:24,769 condition. So when the city 1945 00:56:24,907 --> 00:56:27,307 council approved this in 2013, 1946 00:56:27,676 --> 00:56:30,676 they limited the entire density 1947 00:56:37,520 --> 00:56:40,520 of the 302 acres to 1375 units, 1948 00:56:40,558 --> 00:56:42,293 1259 of those units were the 1949 00:56:42,293 --> 00:56:44,693 maximum. In the multifamily 1950 00:56:46,300 --> 00:56:49,630 zone. So the only units allowed 1951 00:56:50,502 --> 00:56:52,700 for again over 200 and 223 1952 00:56:52,700 --> 00:56:56,270 acres to be exact. Of all the 1953 00:56:56,308 --> 00:56:58,144 rb and all, the only one was 1954 00:56:58,144 --> 00:56:59,450 116 units. I 1955 00:56:59,450 --> 00:57:01,247 m not sure why 1956 00:57:01,247 --> 00:57:02,215 that was. I think at the time 1957 00:57:02,215 --> 00:57:03,850 there was just different 1958 00:57:03,850 --> 00:57:05,385 demands for different housing 1959 00:57:05,385 --> 00:57:06,586 types. I think if you were 1960 00:57:06,586 --> 00:57:09,550 going through this today, it 1961 00:57:09,550 --> 00:57:10,123 would be vastly different. I 1962 00:57:10,123 --> 00:57:11,758 would say there would be really 1963 00:57:11,758 --> 00:57:14,861 no reason to have a cap on the 1964 00:57:14,861 --> 00:57:15,950 density. The code has caps, and 1965 00:57:15,950 --> 00:57:15,997 all we 1966 00:57:15,997 --> 00:57:18,233 re really asking for 1967 00:57:18,233 --> 00:57:19,467 here is just to have this, uh, 1968 00:57:19,467 --> 00:57:20,568 what essentially amounts to 1969 00:57:20,568 --> 00:57:21,837 seven and a half acres. Just 1970 00:57:21,837 --> 00:57:22,671 have it treated like every 1971 00:57:22,671 --> 00:57:23,905 other owner 1972 00:57:23,905 --> 00:57:26,305 s owned property in 1973 00:57:26,541 --> 00:57:29,445 the city. As far as density. 1974 00:57:29,445 --> 00:57:31,213 Um, so the density cap exists 1975 00:57:31,213 --> 00:57:33,160 not because of the code. It 1976 00:57:33,160 --> 00:57:34,500 exists because of the 2013 1977 00:57:34,500 --> 00:57:34,584 approval. And that 1978 00:57:34,584 --> 00:57:34,751 s really why 1979 00:57:34,751 --> 00:57:35,180 we 1980 00:57:35,180 --> 00:57:36,860 re here. We 1981 00:57:36,860 --> 00:57:37,487 re asking for 1982 00:57:37,487 --> 00:57:38,489 consideration. Can can we 1983 00:57:38,489 --> 00:57:41,658 please go back and look at 1984 00:57:41,658 --> 00:57:42,159 those 2013 conditions? Because 1985 00:57:42,159 --> 00:57:43,930 frankly, they 1986 00:57:43,930 --> 00:57:45,930 re really 1987 00:57:45,362 --> 00:57:45,629 outdated at this point. Some of 1988 00:57:45,629 --> 00:57:47,398 them don 1989 00:57:47,398 --> 00:57:48,320 t even apply anymore. 1990 00:57:48,320 --> 00:57:48,399 Um, 1991 00:57:48,399 --> 00:57:48,599 And. 1992 00:57:48,599 --> 00:57:50,434 There 1993 00:57:50,434 --> 00:57:52,137 s been such a dramatic 1994 00:57:52,137 --> 00:57:53,806 shift in population growth, job 1995 00:57:53,806 --> 00:57:55,574 growth, demands for different 1996 00:57:55,574 --> 00:57:56,475 types of housing. 1997 00:57:56,475 --> 00:57:57,776 But right now we 1998 00:57:57,776 --> 00:57:59,776 re limited to 1999 00:58:01,981 --> 00:58:04,317 this cap on density in the 2000 00:58:04,317 --> 00:58:04,750 commercial areas out there. Um, 2001 00:58:04,750 --> 00:58:05,451 so I don 2002 00:58:05,451 --> 00:58:07,220 t know if that answers 2003 00:58:07,220 --> 00:58:08,355 the question, but. And not to 2004 00:58:08,355 --> 00:58:10,491 sound like a broken record, but 2005 00:58:10,491 --> 00:58:13,261 I would I would say that again, 2006 00:58:13,261 --> 00:58:15,620 um, we just want the 2007 00:58:15,620 --> 00:58:15,963 opportunity to put the density 2008 00:58:15,963 --> 00:58:16,197 that the code allows. We 2009 00:58:16,197 --> 00:58:18,197 re not 2010 00:58:18,432 --> 00:58:19,734 asking for anything above and 2011 00:58:19,734 --> 00:58:21,503 beyond what anybody else could 2012 00:58:21,503 --> 00:58:22,237 do on any property. 2013 00:58:22,237 --> 00:58:24,237 And I. 2014 00:58:24,439 --> 00:58:25,708 Guess a follow up question MR. 2015 00:58:25,708 --> 00:58:26,943 Nichols would be then, is this, 2016 00:58:26,943 --> 00:58:31,143 I mean, because it seems like a 2017 00:58:31,614 --> 00:58:34,140 really specific number of 208, 2018 00:58:34,851 --> 00:58:37,320 um, is that is that meeting the 2019 00:58:37,320 --> 00:58:38,889 code today? Does that bring. 2020 00:58:38,889 --> 00:58:40,991 I think that was a number that 2021 00:58:40,991 --> 00:58:41,425 staff calculated. That wasn 2022 00:58:41,425 --> 00:58:42,493 t a 2023 00:58:42,493 --> 00:58:42,693 number that we did. Again, 2024 00:58:42,693 --> 00:58:44,395 there 2025 00:58:44,395 --> 00:58:44,762 s no plan there. It 2026 00:58:44,762 --> 00:58:46,264 s 2027 00:58:46,264 --> 00:58:48,664 possible that no residential 2028 00:58:48,667 --> 00:58:49,901 would go there. Um, but we 2029 00:58:49,901 --> 00:58:51,303 would like the opportunity to 2030 00:58:51,303 --> 00:58:52,637 put residential there. I think 2031 00:58:52,637 --> 00:58:53,572 it makes perfect sense to add 2032 00:58:53,572 --> 00:58:54,740 more residential. It 2033 00:58:54,740 --> 00:58:56,642 s needed. 2034 00:58:56,642 --> 00:58:58,610 We need it in the city. We need 2035 00:58:58,610 --> 00:59:00,914 it in locations exactly like 2036 00:59:00,914 --> 00:59:03,160 Berkeley West. Um, but right 2037 00:59:03,160 --> 00:59:04,117 now, um, I don 2038 00:59:04,117 --> 00:59:05,485 t know what 2039 00:59:05,485 --> 00:59:05,652 density is left, but there 2040 00:59:05,652 --> 00:59:07,254 s 2041 00:59:07,254 --> 00:59:07,455 not much left out there. And 2042 00:59:07,455 --> 00:59:08,689 there 2043 00:59:08,689 --> 00:59:11,890 s still property to 2044 00:59:11,125 --> 00:59:11,325 develop. In hindsight, I think 2045 00:59:11,325 --> 00:59:13,193 there 2046 00:59:13,193 --> 00:59:15,129 s probably would have 2047 00:59:15,129 --> 00:59:16,630 been better to have more 2048 00:59:16,630 --> 00:59:18,267 density in the commercial 2049 00:59:18,267 --> 00:59:18,567 sections. And I think that i 2050 00:59:18,567 --> 00:59:19,267 think that 2051 00:59:19,267 --> 00:59:20,669 s definitely what 2052 00:59:20,669 --> 00:59:21,637 you would see today. If you 2053 00:59:21,637 --> 00:59:21,770 were developing it today, you 2054 00:59:21,770 --> 00:59:23,605 d 2055 00:59:23,605 --> 00:59:25,574 have, I think, significantly 2056 00:59:25,574 --> 00:59:27,309 more residential within the o. 2057 00:59:27,309 --> 00:59:27,810 And I and the rb zones out 2058 00:59:27,810 --> 00:59:29,810 there. 2059 00:59:30,413 --> 00:59:31,747 And I guess the, the and this 2060 00:59:31,747 --> 00:59:33,115 MAY just be a staff question 2061 00:59:33,115 --> 00:59:35,519 would be because the numbers 2062 00:59:35,519 --> 00:59:35,786 are so specific 208. Would that 2063 00:59:35,786 --> 00:59:37,786 be what 2064 00:59:38,220 --> 00:59:40,422 s allowed today under 2065 00:59:40,758 --> 00:59:43,758 the non 2013 code? The updated 2066 00:59:45,463 --> 00:59:48,299 2021 ldc and comp plan um with 2067 00:59:48,299 --> 00:59:50,869 208 b you know suitable to this 2068 00:59:50,869 --> 00:59:51,903 particular site. It just seems 2069 00:59:51,903 --> 00:59:52,637 you know again it just seems 2070 00:59:52,637 --> 00:59:52,972 specific. And then it 2071 00:59:52,972 --> 00:59:54,473 s just 2072 00:59:54,473 --> 00:59:56,108 curious that this 2073 00:59:56,108 --> 00:59:57,677 recommendation that the whole 2074 00:59:57,677 --> 00:59:59,780 all residential density for the 2075 00:59:59,780 --> 01:00:00,914 whole project, it sounds like, 2076 01:00:00,914 --> 01:00:01,447 would be eliminated, you 2077 01:00:01,447 --> 01:00:02,949 d have 2078 01:00:02,949 --> 01:00:04,150 a no ceiling, as many 2079 01:00:04,150 --> 01:00:07,120 residential units as you want. 2080 01:00:07,120 --> 01:00:08,588 If you did the 10%. Um, for the 2081 01:00:08,588 --> 01:00:09,289 15 years designated as 2082 01:00:09,289 --> 01:00:09,756 workforce. So there 2083 01:00:09,756 --> 01:00:11,693 s two 2084 01:00:11,693 --> 01:00:13,328 things that are just kind of 2085 01:00:13,328 --> 01:00:14,462 juxtaposing, at least in my 2086 01:00:14,462 --> 01:00:15,497 bullets here. So but thank you 2087 01:00:15,497 --> 01:00:16,164 for your responses. I 2088 01:00:16,164 --> 01:00:16,431 appreciate that. 2089 01:00:16,431 --> 01:00:17,832 Yes. 2090 01:00:17,832 --> 01:00:19,832 Sir. 2091 01:00:19,968 --> 01:00:21,436 MR. Kupfer, 2092 01:00:21,436 --> 01:00:23,906 Uh, in response to your 2093 01:00:23,906 --> 01:00:26,275 questions, the 208 units is 2094 01:00:26,275 --> 01:00:27,576 assuming that the site for 2095 01:00:27,576 --> 01:00:29,379 which these conditions are 2096 01:00:29,379 --> 01:00:30,747 being applied is built out at 2097 01:00:30,747 --> 01:00:31,810 17 units per acre. So that 2098 01:00:31,810 --> 01:00:32,582 s 2099 01:00:32,582 --> 01:00:34,584 where staff did that to 2100 01:00:34,584 --> 01:00:35,519 estimate, uh, associated 2101 01:00:35,519 --> 01:00:37,888 traffic with that. So that 2102 01:00:37,888 --> 01:00:39,790 assumes 17 units per acre. When 2103 01:00:39,790 --> 01:00:41,250 we say removing the residential 2104 01:00:41,250 --> 01:00:41,959 cap it it 2105 01:00:41,959 --> 01:00:42,226 s it means they 2106 01:00:42,226 --> 01:00:44,226 re no 2107 01:00:44,261 --> 01:00:46,465 longer going to be restricted 2108 01:00:46,465 --> 01:00:47,833 to that 44 units, which is in 2109 01:00:47,833 --> 01:00:49,401 the current conditions, which 2110 01:00:49,401 --> 01:00:50,669 is all that is left for 2111 01:00:50,669 --> 01:00:52,137 residential development in the 2112 01:00:52,137 --> 01:00:54,306 o and I and rb portions of 2113 01:00:54,306 --> 01:00:55,441 Berkeley West. So and it would 2114 01:00:55,441 --> 01:00:57,676 not apply to the entire 2115 01:00:57,676 --> 01:00:59,845 Berkeley property project just 2116 01:00:59,845 --> 01:01:01,470 to the site. Uh, that is shown 2117 01:01:01,470 --> 01:01:03,183 in your packet and that the 2118 01:01:03,183 --> 01:01:05,583 applicant outlined, as Hayley 2119 01:01:05,719 --> 01:01:07,388 mentioned, if, if when they 2120 01:01:07,388 --> 01:01:10,491 develop this site, they opt to 2121 01:01:10,491 --> 01:01:12,727 do 10% of workforce housing for 2122 01:01:12,727 --> 01:01:14,729 15 years. That does allow them 2123 01:01:14,729 --> 01:01:16,697 to go above 17 units per acre. 2124 01:01:16,697 --> 01:01:18,299 Again, only on this site. Uh, 2125 01:01:18,299 --> 01:01:20,436 and then there is no specific 2126 01:01:20,436 --> 01:01:21,937 density cap. 2127 01:01:21,937 --> 01:01:23,106 Thank you, MR. Painter. That 2128 01:01:23,106 --> 01:01:23,506 makes sense. So you 2129 01:01:23,506 --> 01:01:25,506 re doing 2130 01:01:25,908 --> 01:01:27,744 the calculations based on this 2131 01:01:27,744 --> 01:01:30,680 site and per year calculations, 2132 01:01:30,680 --> 01:01:32,649 208 is the maximum allowed. But 2133 01:01:32,649 --> 01:01:33,783 if the applicant decided to on 2134 01:01:33,783 --> 01:01:35,285 this site alone, not all the 2135 01:01:35,285 --> 01:01:36,486 Berkeley do the workforce 2136 01:01:36,486 --> 01:01:37,989 piece, then there would be no 2137 01:01:37,989 --> 01:01:38,189 cap. Correct. Okay. Thank you. 2138 01:01:38,189 --> 01:01:40,189 That 2139 01:01:40,591 --> 01:01:44,191 s what I was looking for. 2140 01:01:45,263 --> 01:01:47,663 Got it. Commissioner Collier. 2141 01:01:50,302 --> 01:01:52,302 Commissioner Adams. 2142 01:01:52,471 --> 01:01:55,700 When was the last time that we 2143 01:01:55,700 --> 01:01:57,210 saw the site and looked at it? 2144 01:01:57,210 --> 01:01:58,712 Amending the conditional use 2145 01:01:58,712 --> 01:01:59,412 district, or the conditional 2146 01:01:59,412 --> 01:02:01,412 uses? 2147 01:02:02,282 --> 01:02:05,418 It was 2023. I have a slide 2148 01:02:05,418 --> 01:02:07,818 showing that, um, here. 2149 01:02:09,123 --> 01:02:10,291 So if what 2150 01:02:10,291 --> 01:02:12,691 s so different in 2151 01:02:13,462 --> 01:02:15,364 your mind about 20, 2013, in 2152 01:02:15,364 --> 01:02:17,566 this original master plan, when 2153 01:02:17,566 --> 01:02:19,501 this came before us three ish 2154 01:02:19,501 --> 01:02:19,835 years ago, why weren 2155 01:02:19,835 --> 01:02:21,503 t we 2156 01:02:21,503 --> 01:02:23,903 talking about this density 2157 01:02:25,941 --> 01:02:26,475 issue then? And we are now. 2158 01:02:26,475 --> 01:02:27,910 Um, that 2159 01:02:27,910 --> 01:02:28,770 s a good question. I 2160 01:02:28,770 --> 01:02:28,411 don 2161 01:02:28,411 --> 01:02:29,278 t I don 2162 01:02:29,278 --> 01:02:30,881 t really remember 2163 01:02:30,881 --> 01:02:32,249 exactly how it came up. I know 2164 01:02:32,249 --> 01:02:33,684 we were looking at this site 2165 01:02:33,684 --> 01:02:36,354 and this was a this was an 2166 01:02:36,354 --> 01:02:39,354 actual rezoning. So this was 2167 01:02:39,757 --> 01:02:41,258 oh, and I and md 17 getting 2168 01:02:41,258 --> 01:02:42,793 rezoned to rb because we 2169 01:02:42,793 --> 01:02:44,996 thought that was a better fit 2170 01:02:44,996 --> 01:02:46,965 for the overall development 2171 01:02:46,965 --> 01:02:48,667 with potential commercial use, 2172 01:02:48,667 --> 01:02:51,670 uses up near Independence 2173 01:02:51,237 --> 01:02:52,400 Boulevard. So the difference 2174 01:02:52,400 --> 01:02:52,471 here is we 2175 01:02:52,471 --> 01:02:52,772 re really we 2176 01:02:52,772 --> 01:02:54,307 re not 2177 01:02:54,307 --> 01:02:56,642 asking for any change in the 2178 01:02:56,642 --> 01:02:57,577 underlying district. We 2179 01:02:57,577 --> 01:02:59,577 re oh, 2180 01:03:00,580 --> 01:03:01,114 and one excuse me. Oh, and I 2181 01:03:01,114 --> 01:03:03,160 now we 2182 01:03:03,160 --> 01:03:03,182 re asking for oh and I, 2183 01:03:03,182 --> 01:03:04,551 we 2184 01:03:04,551 --> 01:03:05,353 re just asking for updated 2185 01:03:05,353 --> 01:03:06,287 conditions. So it 2186 01:03:06,287 --> 01:03:07,388 s the same 2187 01:03:07,388 --> 01:03:09,388 zone.. 2188 01:03:10,625 --> 01:03:12,260 Okay. Um, I did have a question 2189 01:03:12,260 --> 01:03:13,762 about this. The number of units 2190 01:03:13,762 --> 01:03:17,650 with the overlays. So thank you 2191 01:03:17,650 --> 01:03:17,232 for that. Um, when the, um, 2192 01:03:17,232 --> 01:03:18,633 it 2193 01:03:18,633 --> 01:03:20,235 s unusual for us to see 2194 01:03:20,235 --> 01:03:22,235 conditional requests without 2195 01:03:24,400 --> 01:03:26,176 site plans. Um, and, you know, 2196 01:03:26,176 --> 01:03:27,978 you talk a lot about, um, 2197 01:03:27,978 --> 01:03:31,147 numbers of units, and you talk 2198 01:03:31,147 --> 01:03:34,584 a lot about the ability to 2199 01:03:34,584 --> 01:03:36,954 integrate with circulation. Um, 2200 01:03:36,954 --> 01:03:38,255 both pedestrian as well as 2201 01:03:38,255 --> 01:03:40,255 vehicular, but it 2202 01:03:40,892 --> 01:03:42,327 s I mean, 2203 01:03:42,327 --> 01:03:43,495 until you sort of see how that 2204 01:03:43,495 --> 01:03:46,298 actually works, how are we 2205 01:03:46,298 --> 01:03:49,298 supposed to determine that, you 2206 01:03:51,337 --> 01:03:53,337 know, 208 441, whatever number 2207 01:03:53,939 --> 01:03:55,808 of units that you could do is 2208 01:03:55,808 --> 01:03:57,376 being done in a smart way from 2209 01:03:57,376 --> 01:03:58,478 a design standpoint? 2210 01:03:58,478 --> 01:04:00,800 Well, I think all you have to 2211 01:04:00,800 --> 01:04:00,948 do is look out at what 2212 01:04:00,948 --> 01:04:02,948 s there. 2213 01:04:03,184 --> 01:04:05,584 This the infrastructure is 2214 01:04:07,488 --> 01:04:09,991 there. Uh, the Stonecrop Drive, 2215 01:04:09,991 --> 01:04:12,193 Chippenham, Dusty Miller Lane, 2216 01:04:12,193 --> 01:04:12,660 all of that is in place. We 2217 01:04:12,660 --> 01:04:13,227 ve 2218 01:04:13,227 --> 01:04:14,295 got I 2219 01:04:14,295 --> 01:04:15,998 m looking here at two 2220 01:04:15,998 --> 01:04:16,499 traffic circles. I 2221 01:04:16,499 --> 01:04:18,499 m looking 2222 01:04:21,904 --> 01:04:25,508 at, uh, two. At least two major 2223 01:04:25,508 --> 01:04:27,677 full, uh, full movement 2224 01:04:27,677 --> 01:04:30,770 intersections that my client 2225 01:04:31,247 --> 01:04:34,247 installed at their cost. Um, 2226 01:04:35,219 --> 01:04:37,655 here you can see how it would, 2227 01:04:37,655 --> 01:04:38,356 um, I guess I can 2228 01:04:38,356 --> 01:04:39,491 t think of 2229 01:04:39,491 --> 01:04:41,693 the term, but it would just be 2230 01:04:41,693 --> 01:04:44,950 how it fits within the cohesive 2231 01:04:44,950 --> 01:04:45,864 development of Berkeley West. 2232 01:04:45,864 --> 01:04:50,640 And my client has done a great 2233 01:04:50,336 --> 01:04:50,536 job with Berkeley West. Um, and 2234 01:04:50,536 --> 01:04:51,738 there 2235 01:04:51,738 --> 01:04:52,872 s really no reason to 2236 01:04:52,872 --> 01:04:55,142 think they would come to this 2237 01:04:55,142 --> 01:04:57,577 last seven and a half acres and 2238 01:04:57,577 --> 01:04:57,978 make a mess of it. The reason 2239 01:04:57,978 --> 01:04:59,978 why we don 2240 01:05:00,781 --> 01:05:03,181 t have a, um, 2241 01:05:03,417 --> 01:05:04,952 specific site plan is because 2242 01:05:04,952 --> 01:05:07,254 when this was developed under 2243 01:05:07,254 --> 01:05:09,524 the future land use plan, it 2244 01:05:09,524 --> 01:05:11,860 was designated a certain higher 2245 01:05:11,860 --> 01:05:13,610 intensity area of opportunity. 2246 01:05:13,610 --> 01:05:14,563 And there was a specific 2247 01:05:14,563 --> 01:05:15,998 provision in your code at the 2248 01:05:15,998 --> 01:05:18,133 time that allowed us to 2249 01:05:18,133 --> 01:05:20,636 essentially do a bubble plan. 2250 01:05:20,636 --> 01:05:23,636 Uh, that bubble plan is 2251 01:05:24,640 --> 01:05:25,242 essentially shown here. That 2252 01:05:25,242 --> 01:05:27,242 s 2253 01:05:28,110 --> 01:05:30,314 what was approved in 2013. All 2254 01:05:30,314 --> 01:05:33,184 per the code. So you can see on 2255 01:05:33,184 --> 01:05:35,353 there the oh and I is the light 2256 01:05:35,353 --> 01:05:37,521 blue. The rv is the darker 2257 01:05:37,521 --> 01:05:39,557 blue. And you can see back in 2258 01:05:39,557 --> 01:05:40,758 2013, I mean the thought was 2259 01:05:40,758 --> 01:05:44,358 this was going to be mostly 2260 01:05:44,363 --> 01:05:45,931 commercial. It was. But but 2261 01:05:45,931 --> 01:05:48,367 again it was a different time. 2262 01:05:48,367 --> 01:05:48,668 You know, look what look what 2263 01:05:48,668 --> 01:05:50,136 s 2264 01:05:50,136 --> 01:05:51,904 happened with retail and office 2265 01:05:51,904 --> 01:05:52,105 space since 2013. Look, look 2266 01:05:52,105 --> 01:05:53,673 what 2267 01:05:53,673 --> 01:05:56,673 s happened with it since 2268 01:05:57,277 --> 01:05:57,477 the pandemic. Um, and look 2269 01:05:57,477 --> 01:05:58,110 what 2270 01:05:58,110 --> 01:05:58,311 s happened with 2271 01:05:58,311 --> 01:06:00,311 Wilmington 2272 01:06:00,381 --> 01:06:02,750 s housing demand and 2273 01:06:02,750 --> 01:06:06,350 job growth. So it makes perfect 2274 01:06:07,210 --> 01:06:08,656 sense to say with the cdm, 2275 01:06:08,656 --> 01:06:10,258 opportunities to try to put 2276 01:06:10,258 --> 01:06:12,658 more housing in those 2277 01:06:12,694 --> 01:06:14,429 commercial areas. But again, it 2278 01:06:14,429 --> 01:06:14,863 was a the reason why we 2279 01:06:14,863 --> 01:06:16,863 re here 2280 01:06:17,867 --> 01:06:20,370 is because that was limited to 2281 01:06:20,370 --> 01:06:20,503 116 units on everything you 2282 01:06:20,503 --> 01:06:22,503 re 2283 01:06:22,539 --> 01:06:23,606 seeing there in blue. And I 2284 01:06:23,606 --> 01:06:23,940 would respectfully say that 2285 01:06:23,940 --> 01:06:25,940 s 2286 01:06:27,444 --> 01:06:27,644 an outdated condition. And we 2287 01:06:27,644 --> 01:06:28,478 that 2288 01:06:28,478 --> 01:06:29,179 s and we hope you see it 2289 01:06:29,179 --> 01:06:29,446 that way too, that we 2290 01:06:29,446 --> 01:06:31,446 re just 2291 01:06:32,150 --> 01:06:32,716 trying to get more units there. 2292 01:06:32,716 --> 01:06:33,217 But again, I 2293 01:06:33,217 --> 01:06:33,383 ll stress we 2294 01:06:33,383 --> 01:06:35,383 re 2295 01:06:35,787 --> 01:06:35,954 not asking for any extra units. 2296 01:06:35,954 --> 01:06:37,656 We 2297 01:06:37,656 --> 01:06:38,824 re simply asking, can we 2298 01:06:38,824 --> 01:06:41,224 please have this property 2299 01:06:41,226 --> 01:06:43,996 treated like any other? Oh, any 2300 01:06:43,996 --> 01:06:44,763 property in Wilmington as far 2301 01:06:44,763 --> 01:06:45,640 as density, if you 2302 01:06:45,640 --> 01:06:45,964 re going to 2303 01:06:45,964 --> 01:06:46,532 do cdm, you we 2304 01:06:46,532 --> 01:06:47,633 re not asking 2305 01:06:47,633 --> 01:06:48,100 for extra units. We 2306 01:06:48,100 --> 01:06:50,100 re just 2307 01:06:50,436 --> 01:06:53,840 asking to lift what we think is 2308 01:06:53,840 --> 01:06:55,208 an outdated density cap from 2309 01:06:55,208 --> 01:06:56,443 2013. 2310 01:06:56,443 --> 01:06:57,210 Thank you. 2311 01:06:57,210 --> 01:06:59,210 Thank you. 2312 01:06:59,613 --> 01:06:59,747 Commissioner Pawlak. 2313 01:06:59,747 --> 01:07:00,848 I 2314 01:07:00,848 --> 01:07:02,848 m still thinking. 2315 01:07:03,884 --> 01:07:05,884 Okay. 2316 01:07:06,120 --> 01:07:08,623 MAY take a while, I guess. 2317 01:07:08,623 --> 01:07:09,992 Yeah, man. I it 2318 01:07:09,992 --> 01:07:10,159 s in my mind. 2319 01:07:10,159 --> 01:07:10,926 It 2320 01:07:10,926 --> 01:07:11,600 s no big deal. But you 2321 01:07:11,600 --> 01:07:12,461 re 2322 01:07:12,461 --> 01:07:12,795 talking obviously density here. 2323 01:07:12,795 --> 01:07:13,496 I mean that 2324 01:07:13,496 --> 01:07:14,463 s the important 2325 01:07:14,463 --> 01:07:15,231 thing. And it 2326 01:07:15,231 --> 01:07:16,131 s changed no 2327 01:07:16,131 --> 01:07:17,433 doubt about it. Over the last 2328 01:07:17,433 --> 01:07:18,267 ten whatever years. But I 2329 01:07:18,267 --> 01:07:20,267 m a 2330 01:07:20,837 --> 01:07:22,305 little bit like MR. Adams 2331 01:07:22,305 --> 01:07:24,407 about, you know, usually we 2332 01:07:24,407 --> 01:07:27,430 have a plan. You need to, you 2333 01:07:27,430 --> 01:07:28,179 know, a change to accommodate 2334 01:07:28,179 --> 01:07:28,646 the plan, but you don 2335 01:07:28,646 --> 01:07:29,947 t have a 2336 01:07:29,947 --> 01:07:30,214 plan. As far as I know, there 2337 01:07:30,214 --> 01:07:31,883 s 2338 01:07:31,883 --> 01:07:32,490 no concept. But if there is, we 2339 01:07:32,490 --> 01:07:32,483 don 2340 01:07:32,483 --> 01:07:32,817 t know about it. It 2341 01:07:32,817 --> 01:07:34,817 s just. 2342 01:07:35,219 --> 01:07:36,854 You want the ability to do 2343 01:07:36,854 --> 01:07:39,524 something different. Why are we 2344 01:07:39,524 --> 01:07:42,394 not waiting until you come up 2345 01:07:42,394 --> 01:07:45,298 with why you need this change? 2346 01:07:45,298 --> 01:07:47,500 Well, again, the the the 2347 01:07:47,500 --> 01:07:48,568 property was approved and 2348 01:07:48,568 --> 01:07:50,968 developed and has been 2349 01:07:51,710 --> 01:07:53,710 developed very responsibly 2350 01:07:54,740 --> 01:07:55,942 under the 2013 approval as a 2351 01:07:55,942 --> 01:07:57,644 quote unquote, bubble plan that 2352 01:07:57,644 --> 01:08:01,244 was allowed. Uh, I think my 2353 01:08:02,215 --> 01:08:04,686 clients have exceeded, uh, the, 2354 01:08:04,686 --> 01:08:05,820 um, sort of expectation as far 2355 01:08:05,820 --> 01:08:08,557 as the quality of the 2356 01:08:08,557 --> 01:08:09,958 development, the landscaping, 2357 01:08:09,958 --> 01:08:11,426 the layout, much of what you 2358 01:08:11,426 --> 01:08:11,627 see here from 2013, that 2359 01:08:11,627 --> 01:08:13,627 s 2360 01:08:13,729 --> 01:08:15,397 essentially the same sort of 2361 01:08:15,397 --> 01:08:17,299 main arterial layout of the 2362 01:08:17,299 --> 01:08:19,699 streets. All the traffic 2363 01:08:20,570 --> 01:08:22,372 signals, um, the trying to 2364 01:08:22,372 --> 01:08:23,940 provide a mixed use center and 2365 01:08:23,940 --> 01:08:27,440 a very sort of centralized part 2366 01:08:27,440 --> 01:08:29,313 of the, of the city. So, um, 2367 01:08:29,313 --> 01:08:31,849 there is no current plan. But 2368 01:08:31,849 --> 01:08:34,618 in looking at folks that MAY 2369 01:08:34,618 --> 01:08:36,654 want to sort of come in and, 2370 01:08:36,654 --> 01:08:36,821 and do something there, um, 2371 01:08:36,821 --> 01:08:37,856 we 2372 01:08:37,856 --> 01:08:39,424 re just asking for the 2373 01:08:39,424 --> 01:08:41,930 opportunity to complete the 2374 01:08:41,930 --> 01:08:43,162 project under the current 2375 01:08:43,162 --> 01:08:43,362 framework of a bubble plan. 2376 01:08:43,362 --> 01:08:45,362 There 2377 01:08:45,765 --> 01:08:47,400 s no plan there today. 2378 01:08:47,400 --> 01:08:48,801 And they could go out there and 2379 01:08:48,801 --> 01:08:49,836 do development there without 2380 01:08:49,836 --> 01:08:51,537 going through a conditional 2381 01:08:51,537 --> 01:08:54,537 process, because it is already 2382 01:08:54,541 --> 01:08:56,377 conditional approved. So I 2383 01:08:56,377 --> 01:08:58,279 realize the code has changed, 2384 01:08:58,279 --> 01:08:59,881 but we would ask for the 2385 01:08:59,881 --> 01:09:00,915 ability just to proceed under 2386 01:09:00,915 --> 01:09:02,283 the format that it was 2387 01:09:02,283 --> 01:09:03,985 approved. And I think my 2388 01:09:03,985 --> 01:09:05,353 clients have proven to the city 2389 01:09:05,353 --> 01:09:07,389 that they have done a very 2390 01:09:07,389 --> 01:09:09,558 responsible job in developing 2391 01:09:09,558 --> 01:09:10,725 it and continue to do high 2392 01:09:10,725 --> 01:09:11,393 quality, and there 2393 01:09:11,393 --> 01:09:11,960 s no reason 2394 01:09:11,960 --> 01:09:12,261 to believe that they 2395 01:09:12,261 --> 01:09:13,496 re going 2396 01:09:13,496 --> 01:09:16,299 to, again, go out there and do 2397 01:09:16,299 --> 01:09:18,168 something that will, um, really 2398 01:09:18,168 --> 01:09:18,334 hurt or hurt the development. 2399 01:09:18,334 --> 01:09:19,970 It 2400 01:09:19,970 --> 01:09:21,204 s obviously in their in 2401 01:09:21,204 --> 01:09:22,572 their best interest to continue 2402 01:09:22,572 --> 01:09:23,440 to develop it in a very 2403 01:09:23,440 --> 01:09:23,573 responsible way. And that 2404 01:09:23,573 --> 01:09:23,840 s 2405 01:09:23,840 --> 01:09:24,341 what they 2406 01:09:24,341 --> 01:09:24,541 re going to do. And 2407 01:09:24,541 --> 01:09:25,542 that 2408 01:09:25,542 --> 01:09:27,942 s absolutely what their 2409 01:09:30,415 --> 01:09:32,617 track record is. And so, um. 2410 01:09:32,617 --> 01:09:34,190 The the project was designed 2411 01:09:34,190 --> 01:09:36,655 with some flexibility in mind. 2412 01:09:36,655 --> 01:09:39,424 And that flexibility, um, is 2413 01:09:39,424 --> 01:09:40,125 um, is still important to them. 2414 01:09:40,125 --> 01:09:42,125 Thank you. 2415 01:09:42,628 --> 01:09:44,628 MR. Commissioner Jones. 2416 01:09:44,863 --> 01:09:47,233 Um, yeah. Just to point out for 2417 01:09:47,233 --> 01:09:48,680 you, his question is that 2418 01:09:48,680 --> 01:09:49,136 number of years it 2419 01:09:49,136 --> 01:09:51,136 s hard to 2420 01:09:51,705 --> 01:09:52,806 project what the trends are 2421 01:09:52,806 --> 01:09:54,341 going to be and how people are 2422 01:09:54,341 --> 01:09:56,377 going to live and things 2423 01:09:56,377 --> 01:09:58,912 change. And why would we would 2424 01:09:58,912 --> 01:10:00,614 go ahead and rezone it now is 2425 01:10:00,614 --> 01:10:01,749 because when clients come or 2426 01:10:01,749 --> 01:10:03,618 interested in a piece of 2427 01:10:03,618 --> 01:10:05,354 property, they factor in the 2428 01:10:05,354 --> 01:10:08,190 time that it takes to go 2429 01:10:08,190 --> 01:10:10,726 through the process. Um, the 2430 01:10:10,726 --> 01:10:14,664 question I had was on the tree 2431 01:10:14,664 --> 01:10:15,364 line behind Wilmington Health. 2432 01:10:15,364 --> 01:10:16,933 Yes. 2433 01:10:16,933 --> 01:10:17,433 Is that like construction? 2434 01:10:17,433 --> 01:10:18,334 Staging? There 2435 01:10:18,334 --> 01:10:20,360 s several looks 2436 01:10:20,360 --> 01:10:21,871 like buildings right there on 2437 01:10:21,871 --> 01:10:23,871 the bottom right. 2438 01:10:24,742 --> 01:10:25,576 The. 2439 01:10:25,576 --> 01:10:27,411 I think she 2440 01:10:27,411 --> 01:10:28,212 s above the words 2441 01:10:28,212 --> 01:10:29,800 future development. 2442 01:10:29,800 --> 01:10:31,150 Right above. 2443 01:10:31,150 --> 01:10:32,717 Oh, yeah. So there 2444 01:10:32,717 --> 01:10:32,884 s, um I 2445 01:10:32,884 --> 01:10:33,218 don 2446 01:10:33,218 --> 01:10:33,751 t know if it 2447 01:10:33,751 --> 01:10:34,819 s shown in the 2448 01:10:34,819 --> 01:10:35,520 recent photo. Let me let me go 2449 01:10:35,520 --> 01:10:35,787 back to the other one. 2450 01:10:35,787 --> 01:10:36,454 Is that. 2451 01:10:36,454 --> 01:10:37,389 The the. Yeah. 2452 01:10:37,389 --> 01:10:37,789 That Wilmington Health 2453 01:10:37,789 --> 01:10:39,424 building. 2454 01:10:39,424 --> 01:10:39,724 Yeah. So the parking okay. 2455 01:10:39,724 --> 01:10:41,724 Yeah. I 2456 01:10:41,727 --> 01:10:44,364 m not sure that exact 2457 01:10:44,364 --> 01:10:46,320 equipment. Um, but, um, you can 2458 01:10:46,320 --> 01:10:48,301 see from the previous photo 2459 01:10:48,301 --> 01:10:50,337 that, um, that parking lot 2460 01:10:50,337 --> 01:10:52,639 really is a big benefit. Um, 2461 01:10:52,639 --> 01:10:53,974 that it was needed. Um, there 2462 01:10:53,974 --> 01:10:54,541 was there, um, it 2463 01:10:54,541 --> 01:10:55,742 s very 2464 01:10:55,742 --> 01:10:57,312 helpful to have that additional 2465 01:10:57,312 --> 01:11:00,749 parking there. I can I can 2466 01:11:00,749 --> 01:11:01,583 speak to that myself. Um, so I 2467 01:11:01,583 --> 01:11:03,510 know that that was just 2468 01:11:03,510 --> 01:11:06,510 recently completed. It MAY be 2469 01:11:06,922 --> 01:11:07,355 part of it. Um, but, um, yeah, 2470 01:11:07,355 --> 01:11:09,355 I think that 2471 01:11:09,458 --> 01:11:11,727 s a big, a big, 2472 01:11:11,727 --> 01:11:12,528 uh, improvement with the 2473 01:11:12,528 --> 01:11:12,761 availability because that 2474 01:11:12,761 --> 01:11:12,961 s a 2475 01:11:12,961 --> 01:11:13,429 that 2476 01:11:13,429 --> 01:11:14,496 s a doctor 2477 01:11:14,496 --> 01:11:15,598 s office, and 2478 01:11:15,598 --> 01:11:17,901 you want to have ample parking 2479 01:11:17,901 --> 01:11:19,970 for folks to get in and out. 2480 01:11:19,970 --> 01:11:20,704 Um, so I, I 2481 01:11:20,704 --> 01:11:22,390 m not sure the 2482 01:11:22,390 --> 01:11:23,107 specific equipment you were 2483 01:11:23,107 --> 01:11:24,408 referencing, but there has been 2484 01:11:24,408 --> 01:11:26,408 construction activity out 2485 01:11:27,578 --> 01:11:27,711 there, and there is ongoing. 2486 01:11:27,711 --> 01:11:28,679 I 2487 01:11:28,679 --> 01:11:29,447 m just guessing what that is 2488 01:11:29,447 --> 01:11:29,814 because it looks like it 2489 01:11:29,814 --> 01:11:31,814 s a, 2490 01:11:32,116 --> 01:11:33,585 you know, undeveloped parcel 2491 01:11:33,585 --> 01:11:33,952 with things around the tree 2492 01:11:33,952 --> 01:11:35,200 line. And I 2493 01:11:35,200 --> 01:11:35,721 m guessing that 2494 01:11:35,721 --> 01:11:36,789 Monteith or whoever 2495 01:11:36,789 --> 01:11:37,990 s did their 2496 01:11:37,990 --> 01:11:38,324 construction staging back 2497 01:11:38,324 --> 01:11:38,924 there, but it 2498 01:11:38,924 --> 01:11:39,580 s not. 2499 01:11:39,580 --> 01:11:39,391 I 2500 01:11:39,391 --> 01:11:40,126 d have. 2501 01:11:40,126 --> 01:11:40,360 Not really relevant. 2502 01:11:40,360 --> 01:11:40,959 I don 2503 01:11:40,959 --> 01:11:41,327 t know. Yeah. I 2504 01:11:41,327 --> 01:11:41,560 d have to 2505 01:11:41,560 --> 01:11:42,128 ask. I 2506 01:11:42,128 --> 01:11:42,328 m sorry. 2507 01:11:42,328 --> 01:11:44,328 No. 2508 01:11:45,398 --> 01:11:45,598 No worries. 2509 01:11:45,598 --> 01:11:47,598 That 2510 01:11:47,600 --> 01:11:49,569 s a I mean, you answered 2511 01:11:49,569 --> 01:11:51,172 my other two questions down the 2512 01:11:51,172 --> 01:11:52,473 line. 2513 01:11:52,473 --> 01:11:54,208 Commissioner Collier. 2514 01:11:54,208 --> 01:11:55,643 Thank you, MR. Chair. MR. 2515 01:11:55,643 --> 01:11:59,243 Nichols, the I guess the one 2516 01:11:59,914 --> 01:12:01,416 question the the overall 1375 2517 01:12:01,416 --> 01:12:02,584 is that the total number or 2518 01:12:02,584 --> 01:12:03,952 something thereabouts. That 2519 01:12:03,952 --> 01:12:04,519 number is not changing. 2520 01:12:04,519 --> 01:12:04,719 Correct? 2521 01:12:04,719 --> 01:12:05,153 That 2522 01:12:05,153 --> 01:12:05,654 s correct. 2523 01:12:05,654 --> 01:12:06,788 So what you 2524 01:12:06,788 --> 01:12:07,557 re doing is you 2525 01:12:07,557 --> 01:12:07,723 re 2526 01:12:07,723 --> 01:12:09,396 you 2527 01:12:09,396 --> 01:12:10,994 re being able to move some 2528 01:12:10,994 --> 01:12:12,362 of the density into this one 2529 01:12:12,362 --> 01:12:15,962 area, more so than what you 2530 01:12:16,866 --> 01:12:18,234 would have in 2013 or 20 18 or 2531 01:12:18,234 --> 01:12:19,350 2023. Is that correct or 2532 01:12:19,350 --> 01:12:19,536 incorrect? 2533 01:12:19,536 --> 01:12:20,503 I think it 2534 01:12:20,503 --> 01:12:20,637 s yes, sir, if I 2535 01:12:20,637 --> 01:12:22,172 m 2536 01:12:22,172 --> 01:12:24,172 understanding correctly. So, 2537 01:12:26,770 --> 01:12:29,800 um, the what one of the 2538 01:12:29,800 --> 01:12:31,116 original concepts was to simply 2539 01:12:31,116 --> 01:12:34,386 come back in and ask for the 2540 01:12:34,386 --> 01:12:35,821 1375 to be raised. Um, after 2541 01:12:35,821 --> 01:12:37,880 discussions with the city, our 2542 01:12:37,880 --> 01:12:39,488 understanding is that would 2543 01:12:39,858 --> 01:12:40,959 require us to rezone all 302 2544 01:12:40,959 --> 01:12:42,262 acres. There 2545 01:12:42,262 --> 01:12:43,496 s multiple 2546 01:12:43,496 --> 01:12:44,970 different owners now. There 2547 01:12:44,970 --> 01:12:46,970 s 2548 01:12:47,334 --> 01:12:49,169 it would be, um, it would be 2549 01:12:49,169 --> 01:12:49,837 very sort of complicated to do 2550 01:12:49,837 --> 01:12:50,938 that. 2551 01:12:50,938 --> 01:12:52,673 Resets the code. 2552 01:12:52,673 --> 01:12:54,608 So yes. Yeah. So and again, in 2553 01:12:54,608 --> 01:12:55,342 discussions with staff and we 2554 01:12:55,342 --> 01:12:56,377 do appreciate staff 2555 01:12:56,377 --> 01:12:58,377 s help and 2556 01:12:59,213 --> 01:13:00,649 guidance on how, how we could 2557 01:13:00,649 --> 01:13:02,851 potentially present this for 2558 01:13:02,851 --> 01:13:05,851 consideration would be to have 2559 01:13:06,422 --> 01:13:08,357 a um, just have a zone sort of 2560 01:13:08,357 --> 01:13:11,160 carved out here where it has 2561 01:13:11,160 --> 01:13:13,329 its own conditions and most of 2562 01:13:13,329 --> 01:13:14,730 the conditions are again, yeah, 2563 01:13:14,730 --> 01:13:16,599 there was like 26 or so. 2564 01:13:16,599 --> 01:13:18,999 Condition conditions would not 2565 01:13:19,690 --> 01:13:20,838 be outside of the the 2566 01:13:20,838 --> 01:13:22,838 conditions previously. Correct. 2567 01:13:24,410 --> 01:13:25,420 Like the 1375. 2568 01:13:25,420 --> 01:13:25,443 No reply to this. 2569 01:13:25,443 --> 01:13:27,443 So you 2570 01:13:29,514 --> 01:13:31,820 re saying 1375 in 2013 2571 01:13:31,820 --> 01:13:33,251 would have been a total. But 2572 01:13:33,251 --> 01:13:35,588 today if we agreed with this, 2573 01:13:35,588 --> 01:13:36,155 it would be 1375 plus I know 2574 01:13:36,155 --> 01:13:37,557 208 it 2575 01:13:37,557 --> 01:13:38,624 s just a number, but 2576 01:13:38,624 --> 01:13:39,250 plus 208. 2577 01:13:39,250 --> 01:13:39,425 I think that 2578 01:13:39,425 --> 01:13:39,559 s I think that 2579 01:13:39,559 --> 01:13:40,426 s 2580 01:13:40,426 --> 01:13:40,793 one way to look at it. Yes, 2581 01:13:40,793 --> 01:13:41,327 sir. That 2582 01:13:41,327 --> 01:13:43,327 s right. 2583 01:13:43,363 --> 01:13:43,630 All right. And I have no qualms 2584 01:13:43,630 --> 01:13:44,597 that what 2585 01:13:44,597 --> 01:13:45,999 s going to be built 2586 01:13:45,999 --> 01:13:47,467 would be built in the in a 2587 01:13:47,467 --> 01:13:48,468 professional manner that is 2588 01:13:48,468 --> 01:13:48,835 very evident of what 2589 01:13:48,835 --> 01:13:49,870 s out 2590 01:13:49,870 --> 01:13:50,604 there. I think everyone 2591 01:13:50,604 --> 01:13:52,173 s just 2592 01:13:52,173 --> 01:13:53,408 more discussing how the how the 2593 01:13:53,408 --> 01:13:54,876 density side of it is going to 2594 01:13:54,876 --> 01:13:56,177 be done. And if there was a 2595 01:13:56,177 --> 01:13:56,344 limit on if you said, okay, 2596 01:13:56,344 --> 01:13:58,344 we 2597 01:13:58,446 --> 01:13:58,680 re only going to go to 150, 2598 01:13:58,680 --> 01:13:59,247 I don 2599 01:13:59,247 --> 01:14:00,849 t know what the number 2600 01:14:00,849 --> 01:14:02,951 is, but a number that MAY make 2601 01:14:02,951 --> 01:14:05,351 everyone more palatable. Um, 2602 01:14:05,454 --> 01:14:07,656 you also changed the uses to 2603 01:14:07,656 --> 01:14:09,458 all uses in. Oh, and I accept 2604 01:14:09,458 --> 01:14:11,294 that which ones you accepted I 2605 01:14:11,294 --> 01:14:12,195 thought were really good, but, 2606 01:14:12,195 --> 01:14:12,596 um, so I don 2607 01:14:12,596 --> 01:14:12,996 t know. I don 2608 01:14:12,996 --> 01:14:13,163 t I 2609 01:14:13,163 --> 01:14:14,231 don 2610 01:14:14,231 --> 01:14:14,431 t have any issues with 2611 01:14:14,431 --> 01:14:15,766 what 2612 01:14:15,766 --> 01:14:16,767 s going on, but I do want 2613 01:14:16,767 --> 01:14:17,734 to know how the density is 2614 01:14:17,734 --> 01:14:18,168 going to be done, because it 2615 01:14:18,168 --> 01:14:19,503 sounds like we 2616 01:14:19,503 --> 01:14:20,671 re fixing one 2617 01:14:20,671 --> 01:14:21,672 little park, but we 2618 01:14:21,672 --> 01:14:23,507 re adding 2619 01:14:23,507 --> 01:14:24,875 density to the overall, which 2620 01:14:24,875 --> 01:14:25,743 is what I thought that the city 2621 01:14:25,743 --> 01:14:27,112 was telling you. You would have 2622 01:14:27,112 --> 01:14:27,312 to change to do it. And I know 2623 01:14:27,312 --> 01:14:28,881 that 2624 01:14:28,881 --> 01:14:29,470 s not exactly right, but 2625 01:14:29,470 --> 01:14:29,548 it 2626 01:14:29,548 --> 01:14:30,916 s. 2627 01:14:30,916 --> 01:14:32,251 Yeah, well, a couple of things. 2628 01:14:32,251 --> 01:14:33,752 I would say this is one of the 2629 01:14:33,752 --> 01:14:35,754 last remaining parts on this 2630 01:14:35,754 --> 01:14:35,921 side of the, of the street. So 2631 01:14:35,921 --> 01:14:37,560 it 2632 01:14:37,560 --> 01:14:37,723 s um, we 2633 01:14:37,723 --> 01:14:39,291 re really kind of 2634 01:14:39,291 --> 01:14:41,961 at the toward the end of the 2635 01:14:41,961 --> 01:14:44,263 finish line. Um, not quite 2636 01:14:44,263 --> 01:14:45,633 there, but, um, like I said, 2637 01:14:45,633 --> 01:14:49,233 the the density has for the 2638 01:14:50,104 --> 01:14:53,400 most part been allocated and is 2639 01:14:53,400 --> 01:14:53,441 been, um, used up. I don 2640 01:14:53,441 --> 01:14:54,175 t know 2641 01:14:54,175 --> 01:14:54,475 how else to say it. I don 2642 01:14:54,475 --> 01:14:54,809 t 2643 01:14:54,809 --> 01:14:55,510 know if that 2644 01:14:55,510 --> 01:14:56,311 s the planning 2645 01:14:56,311 --> 01:14:57,245 term, but we 2646 01:14:57,245 --> 01:14:59,645 re toward the end 2647 01:15:01,349 --> 01:15:02,510 of the allowable 2013 density 2648 01:15:02,510 --> 01:15:04,510 and. 2649 01:15:04,220 --> 01:15:05,888 The 1375. 2650 01:15:05,888 --> 01:15:07,888 The 1375. Yes, sir. 2651 01:15:08,910 --> 01:15:09,892 So hang on. Let me ask, is that 2652 01:15:09,892 --> 01:15:10,560 the 44 you were talking about? 2653 01:15:10,560 --> 01:15:11,294 Is that all that 2654 01:15:11,294 --> 01:15:11,427 s left on the. 2655 01:15:11,427 --> 01:15:12,128 I 2656 01:15:12,128 --> 01:15:12,428 m sorry, Matt, I didn 2657 01:15:12,428 --> 01:15:14,197 t mean 2658 01:15:14,197 --> 01:15:14,397 to cut you off. 2659 01:15:14,397 --> 01:15:14,831 That 2660 01:15:14,831 --> 01:15:16,232 s all that 2661 01:15:16,232 --> 01:15:17,667 s left for 2662 01:15:17,667 --> 01:15:20,504 commercial area. So for. Oh, 2663 01:15:20,504 --> 01:15:22,140 and I and rb zoned master 2664 01:15:22,140 --> 01:15:22,774 planned areas, they have 44 2665 01:15:22,774 --> 01:15:23,274 left. 2666 01:15:23,274 --> 01:15:23,708 Okay. 2667 01:15:23,708 --> 01:15:24,976 Right. 2668 01:15:24,976 --> 01:15:25,243 Sorry I apologize. No that 2669 01:15:25,243 --> 01:15:27,243 s 2670 01:15:27,579 --> 01:15:28,647 fine. Um, I 2671 01:15:28,647 --> 01:15:31,647 ve lost my train of 2672 01:15:34,253 --> 01:15:36,222 thought, but, um, on the as far 2673 01:15:36,222 --> 01:15:38,692 as the density cap, again, the 2674 01:15:38,692 --> 01:15:40,930 cap is in the code. 2675 01:15:40,930 --> 01:15:40,894 17 units an acre, right? 2676 01:15:40,894 --> 01:15:41,895 Yeah. So we 2677 01:15:41,895 --> 01:15:43,398 re not asking for 2678 01:15:43,398 --> 01:15:45,467 anything beyond what the code 2679 01:15:45,467 --> 01:15:45,899 allows. And again, perhaps I 2680 01:15:45,899 --> 01:15:47,568 m 2681 01:15:47,568 --> 01:15:48,680 oversimplifying it, but but 2682 01:15:48,680 --> 01:15:50,680 again, all we 2683 01:15:50,604 --> 01:15:53,400 re asking is in 2684 01:15:53,641 --> 01:15:55,410 2026, does it make sense to say 2685 01:15:55,410 --> 01:15:58,800 you could only do 44 units? 2686 01:15:58,800 --> 01:16:00,480 There? And we respectfully 2687 01:16:01,350 --> 01:16:02,718 contend no. Again, of all the 2688 01:16:02,718 --> 01:16:05,870 things that you all consider 2689 01:16:05,870 --> 01:16:06,756 and you have much sort of 2690 01:16:06,756 --> 01:16:09,756 bigger unit counts come before 2691 01:16:11,260 --> 01:16:12,329 you at times. Um, I would say 2692 01:16:12,329 --> 01:16:15,432 of all the different sites that 2693 01:16:15,432 --> 01:16:15,599 you evaluate, this is probably 2694 01:16:15,599 --> 01:16:16,267 it 2695 01:16:16,267 --> 01:16:16,567 s not my call, it 2696 01:16:16,567 --> 01:16:16,700 s y 2697 01:16:16,700 --> 01:16:16,834 all 2698 01:16:16,834 --> 01:16:18,834 s 2699 01:16:18,836 --> 01:16:20,671 call. But this is probably one 2700 01:16:20,671 --> 01:16:23,541 of the types of sites that you 2701 01:16:23,541 --> 01:16:25,143 would say is ideal for more 2702 01:16:25,143 --> 01:16:27,143 density. 2703 01:16:27,345 --> 01:16:29,113 And I agree it is ideal for 2704 01:16:29,113 --> 01:16:30,382 more density. I am not 2705 01:16:30,382 --> 01:16:32,184 absolutely not debating that 2706 01:16:32,184 --> 01:16:32,351 one with you at all. I think 2707 01:16:32,351 --> 01:16:32,952 it 2708 01:16:32,952 --> 01:16:34,654 s the it 2709 01:16:34,654 --> 01:16:34,921 s just how it seems 2710 01:16:34,921 --> 01:16:35,388 that it 2711 01:16:35,388 --> 01:16:36,555 s you 2712 01:16:36,555 --> 01:16:38,955 re adding on the 2713 01:16:39,659 --> 01:16:39,959 total that was approved in 2013 2714 01:16:39,959 --> 01:16:40,260 and we 2715 01:16:40,260 --> 01:16:40,493 re, we 2716 01:16:40,493 --> 01:16:40,960 re we 2717 01:16:40,960 --> 01:16:41,294 re adding 2718 01:16:41,294 --> 01:16:41,694 to it. We 2719 01:16:41,694 --> 01:16:42,495 re we 2720 01:16:42,495 --> 01:16:44,495 re going over 2721 01:16:46,320 --> 01:16:46,633 it artificially. Um, and site 2722 01:16:46,633 --> 01:16:46,833 plan or not, it 2723 01:16:46,833 --> 01:16:47,168 s we 2724 01:16:47,168 --> 01:16:48,636 re still 2725 01:16:48,636 --> 01:16:49,937 going up over the cap that was 2726 01:16:49,937 --> 01:16:50,405 agreed upon. So I 2727 01:16:50,405 --> 01:16:51,806 m not sure 2728 01:16:51,806 --> 01:16:52,574 how to reconcile that in my 2729 01:16:52,574 --> 01:16:53,975 mind. But you 2730 01:16:53,975 --> 01:16:55,377 re right. This is 2731 01:16:55,377 --> 01:16:56,645 absolutely the perfect place to 2732 01:16:56,645 --> 01:16:57,946 put the density. You can go 2733 01:16:57,946 --> 01:16:58,113 high if you want to. I think 2734 01:16:58,113 --> 01:16:58,981 it 2735 01:16:58,981 --> 01:17:00,981 s wonderful. 2736 01:17:01,817 --> 01:17:03,285 Yeah. And and please keep in 2737 01:17:03,285 --> 01:17:04,487 mind that as part of the 2738 01:17:04,487 --> 01:17:05,955 condition, through the process, 2739 01:17:05,955 --> 01:17:06,189 there is like a so there 2740 01:17:06,189 --> 01:17:08,189 s a 2741 01:17:08,725 --> 01:17:09,259 sort of a, an overall Tia for 2742 01:17:09,259 --> 01:17:11,259 this that 2743 01:17:12,329 --> 01:17:14,865 s been um, sort of 2744 01:17:14,865 --> 01:17:16,500 adopted, updated, uh, sort of 2745 01:17:16,500 --> 01:17:18,635 renewed over time. So this will 2746 01:17:18,635 --> 01:17:19,690 go through whatever goes there, 2747 01:17:19,690 --> 01:17:19,737 whether there 2748 01:17:19,737 --> 01:17:19,970 s residential or 2749 01:17:19,970 --> 01:17:20,938 not, it 2750 01:17:20,938 --> 01:17:23,938 s going to go through 2751 01:17:24,576 --> 01:17:27,446 the full trc review. The Tia 2752 01:17:27,446 --> 01:17:27,613 analysis, um, you know, this 2753 01:17:27,613 --> 01:17:29,613 isn 2754 01:17:30,249 --> 01:17:32,484 t a the approval tonight, 2755 01:17:32,484 --> 01:17:35,254 which we certainly hope that, 2756 01:17:35,254 --> 01:17:36,556 um, in in the commission 2757 01:17:36,556 --> 01:17:38,324 s um, 2758 01:17:38,324 --> 01:17:38,791 decision here proves it, but 2759 01:17:38,791 --> 01:17:39,726 that doesn 2760 01:17:39,726 --> 01:17:41,595 t allow us to go out 2761 01:17:41,595 --> 01:17:42,162 and, and as, as you know, MR. 2762 01:17:42,162 --> 01:17:42,763 Collier doesn 2763 01:17:42,763 --> 01:17:45,990 t allow us to go 2764 01:17:45,990 --> 01:17:46,500 out and do anything other than 2765 01:17:46,500 --> 01:17:47,935 apply and go through the city 2766 01:17:47,935 --> 01:17:49,270 process and meet all the 2767 01:17:49,270 --> 01:17:49,403 requirements. And if there 2768 01:17:49,403 --> 01:17:50,304 s 2769 01:17:50,304 --> 01:17:51,506 additional improvements that 2770 01:17:51,506 --> 01:17:53,700 need to be done, they certainly 2771 01:17:53,700 --> 01:17:53,341 have to be done. But we 2772 01:17:53,341 --> 01:17:53,508 re 2773 01:17:53,508 --> 01:17:55,508 we 2774 01:17:56,211 --> 01:17:58,180 re asking for, again, a 2775 01:17:58,180 --> 01:18:00,580 reconsideration of a 13 year 2776 01:18:01,250 --> 01:18:03,486 old condition. Um, that to me 2777 01:18:03,486 --> 01:18:06,422 was a very low cap to begin 2778 01:18:06,422 --> 01:18:07,723 with. And we 2779 01:18:07,723 --> 01:18:09,525 re asking to just 2780 01:18:09,525 --> 01:18:11,561 meet what the code allows as 2781 01:18:11,561 --> 01:18:13,931 far as density on that site. 2782 01:18:13,931 --> 01:18:15,466 Would this be the last? In 2783 01:18:15,466 --> 01:18:17,135 general, the last parcel that 2784 01:18:17,135 --> 01:18:19,137 you would want to put that 2785 01:18:19,137 --> 01:18:19,471 density on, I think is right 2786 01:18:19,471 --> 01:18:20,138 now what we 2787 01:18:20,138 --> 01:18:21,773 re talking about 2788 01:18:21,773 --> 01:18:21,906 only applies in yellow. That 2789 01:18:21,906 --> 01:18:22,841 s 2790 01:18:22,841 --> 01:18:23,141 correct. Yellow boundary. 2791 01:18:23,141 --> 01:18:23,875 Right. That 2792 01:18:23,875 --> 01:18:24,976 s a great point. It 2793 01:18:24,976 --> 01:18:26,111 does what what we 2794 01:18:26,111 --> 01:18:28,111 re asking for 2795 01:18:29,348 --> 01:18:31,784 tonight as far as not having 2796 01:18:31,784 --> 01:18:32,719 this, uh, 2013 density cap only 2797 01:18:32,719 --> 01:18:35,789 applies to what you see in 2798 01:18:35,789 --> 01:18:37,324 yellow, uh, two thirds or a 2799 01:18:37,324 --> 01:18:37,757 third of it, which is you 2800 01:18:37,757 --> 01:18:38,258 already know it 2801 01:18:38,258 --> 01:18:38,925 s there. It 2802 01:18:38,925 --> 01:18:39,920 s a 2803 01:18:39,920 --> 01:18:39,893 it 2804 01:18:39,893 --> 01:18:40,794 s an office building and a 2805 01:18:40,794 --> 01:18:41,194 parking lot. So we 2806 01:18:41,194 --> 01:18:43,194 re down to 2807 01:18:43,730 --> 01:18:44,431 about seven and a half acres, 2808 01:18:44,431 --> 01:18:46,133 and we think it 2809 01:18:46,133 --> 01:18:47,968 d be a great it 2810 01:18:47,968 --> 01:18:48,936 would be a great opportunity to 2811 01:18:48,936 --> 01:18:50,936 potentially have some 2812 01:18:51,339 --> 01:18:53,141 residential there. Um, but we 2813 01:18:53,141 --> 01:18:54,910 do not have a plan for it. And 2814 01:18:54,910 --> 01:18:57,790 we look forward to, you know, 2815 01:18:57,790 --> 01:18:58,280 having an opportunity to have 2816 01:18:58,280 --> 01:19:00,482 someone come up with something 2817 01:19:00,482 --> 01:19:01,817 there that really fits and they 2818 01:19:01,817 --> 01:19:03,185 can be very selective about 2819 01:19:03,185 --> 01:19:04,487 what they want to go there. 2820 01:19:04,487 --> 01:19:06,487 Sure. And it 2821 01:19:07,157 --> 01:19:07,391 s not, uh, and my 2822 01:19:07,391 --> 01:19:08,992 client 2823 01:19:08,992 --> 01:19:10,794 s not going to just have 2824 01:19:10,794 --> 01:19:11,695 something there because someone 2825 01:19:11,695 --> 01:19:11,862 comes along with it. I mean, 2826 01:19:11,862 --> 01:19:12,796 it 2827 01:19:12,796 --> 01:19:15,320 s very important that it 2828 01:19:15,320 --> 01:19:15,933 fits in with the development 2829 01:19:15,933 --> 01:19:17,268 and that it 2830 01:19:17,268 --> 01:19:18,436 s cohesive with the 2831 01:19:18,436 --> 01:19:20,271 rest of the development and 2832 01:19:20,271 --> 01:19:21,239 fits the architecture and fits 2833 01:19:21,239 --> 01:19:21,439 the use and all that sort of 2834 01:19:21,439 --> 01:19:23,439 thing. 2835 01:19:23,708 --> 01:19:25,444 So will we only apply the 17 2836 01:19:25,444 --> 01:19:27,279 dwelling units an acre to the 2837 01:19:27,279 --> 01:19:30,879 two green treed areas and not 2838 01:19:30,917 --> 01:19:33,386 to the Wilmington Health parcel? 2839 01:19:33,386 --> 01:19:34,587 Um, could you say that again? 2840 01:19:34,587 --> 01:19:35,540 Sorry. So in the in your 2841 01:19:35,540 --> 01:19:35,755 picture, you 2842 01:19:35,755 --> 01:19:37,924 ve got a big 2843 01:19:37,924 --> 01:19:38,224 overall yellow area that is. 2844 01:19:38,224 --> 01:19:38,725 Yes. I don 2845 01:19:38,725 --> 01:19:39,526 t know what that 2846 01:19:39,526 --> 01:19:39,993 acreage is right now. 2847 01:19:39,993 --> 01:19:41,929 But it 2848 01:19:41,929 --> 01:19:42,463 s about 12.25. 2849 01:19:42,463 --> 01:19:43,640 So then there 2850 01:19:43,640 --> 01:19:44,932 s seven and a 2851 01:19:44,932 --> 01:19:46,501 half left to be developed or 2852 01:19:46,501 --> 01:19:47,680 thereabouts, 8 to 8 acres or 2853 01:19:47,680 --> 01:19:48,169 something like that. 2854 01:19:48,169 --> 01:19:51,769 Seven and a half. Yes, sir. 2855 01:19:52,674 --> 01:19:53,408 Would that 7.5 times 17 be all 2856 01:19:53,408 --> 01:19:53,642 that you put it on? You 2857 01:19:53,642 --> 01:19:55,642 wouldn 2858 01:19:56,711 --> 01:19:59,711 t try to apply 17 times 2859 01:20:00,490 --> 01:20:02,449 the entire yellow boundary. 2860 01:20:03,190 --> 01:20:04,120 Um. I don 2861 01:20:04,120 --> 01:20:04,754 t they 2862 01:20:04,754 --> 01:20:05,855 re not doing 2863 01:20:05,855 --> 01:20:06,356 anything with the building at 2864 01:20:06,356 --> 01:20:06,957 all. 2865 01:20:06,957 --> 01:20:07,691 I understand. 2866 01:20:07,691 --> 01:20:08,325 , yeah, I don 2867 01:20:08,325 --> 01:20:08,658 t. 2868 01:20:08,658 --> 01:20:09,426 But if we 2869 01:20:09,426 --> 01:20:11,426 re talking about 2870 01:20:11,595 --> 01:20:13,364 density, only an area, the 2871 01:20:13,364 --> 01:20:15,332 density is calculated on either 2872 01:20:15,332 --> 01:20:17,736 the total area or a part of it. 2873 01:20:17,736 --> 01:20:19,671 So if you put 16, 17 units an 2874 01:20:19,671 --> 01:20:20,272 acre on seven acres or seven 2875 01:20:20,272 --> 01:20:21,273 and a half, that 2876 01:20:21,273 --> 01:20:21,440 s the 208 2877 01:20:21,440 --> 01:20:22,740 we 2878 01:20:22,740 --> 01:20:22,374 re talking about. 2879 01:20:22,374 --> 01:20:24,374 Yeah. 2880 01:20:24,543 --> 01:20:24,710 Sort of. But if you do the 12. 2881 01:20:24,710 --> 01:20:25,143 It 2882 01:20:25,143 --> 01:20:26,178 s. 2883 01:20:26,178 --> 01:20:26,445 Yeah, I see what you 2884 01:20:26,445 --> 01:20:27,212 re saying. 2885 01:20:27,212 --> 01:20:27,646 Sort of like the county 2886 01:20:27,646 --> 01:20:28,714 s 2887 01:20:28,714 --> 01:20:30,150 version of Performance 2888 01:20:30,150 --> 01:20:30,782 Residential, where you can sort 2889 01:20:30,782 --> 01:20:32,418 of that 2890 01:20:32,418 --> 01:20:33,252 s a really a question I 2891 01:20:33,252 --> 01:20:33,619 would ask to the city. I 2892 01:20:33,619 --> 01:20:35,389 d 2893 01:20:35,389 --> 01:20:36,823 never even thought about that 2894 01:20:36,823 --> 01:20:38,192 being being allowed or 2895 01:20:38,192 --> 01:20:39,727 possibility. I think. I thought 2896 01:20:39,727 --> 01:20:40,794 you could just do the the 2897 01:20:40,794 --> 01:20:41,128 density on the acreage you 2898 01:20:41,128 --> 01:20:41,729 re 2899 01:20:41,729 --> 01:20:43,729 developing. 2900 01:20:43,798 --> 01:20:44,310 You can. But by what we 2901 01:20:44,310 --> 01:20:44,832 re 2902 01:20:44,832 --> 01:20:45,633 approving, we 2903 01:20:45,633 --> 01:20:46,934 re approving it 2904 01:20:46,934 --> 01:20:49,700 to be able to be on that total 2905 01:20:49,700 --> 01:20:50,104 area, not just the seven and a 2906 01:20:50,104 --> 01:20:51,639 half acres. 2907 01:20:51,639 --> 01:20:53,709 True. But but you 2908 01:20:53,709 --> 01:20:54,543 d have to 2909 01:20:54,543 --> 01:20:55,277 that, if I 2910 01:20:55,277 --> 01:20:56,245 m not mistaken. I 2911 01:20:56,245 --> 01:20:58,548 mean, the question sort of 2912 01:20:58,548 --> 01:20:59,882 assumes that the building and 2913 01:20:59,882 --> 01:21:00,716 the parking lot are going to be 2914 01:21:00,716 --> 01:21:01,284 torn down and it 2915 01:21:01,284 --> 01:21:02,452 ll just be 2916 01:21:02,452 --> 01:21:03,553 vacant, but that 2917 01:21:03,553 --> 01:21:04,153 s there 2918 01:21:04,153 --> 01:21:05,588 s no 2919 01:21:05,588 --> 01:21:07,390 intent to tear the building 2920 01:21:07,390 --> 01:21:08,958 down. The parking lot was just 2921 01:21:08,958 --> 01:21:09,560 built. So we 2922 01:21:09,560 --> 01:21:10,928 re talking about 2923 01:21:10,928 --> 01:21:11,395 developing the seven and a half 2924 01:21:11,395 --> 01:21:12,430 acres, and that 2925 01:21:12,430 --> 01:21:13,664 s it. And my 2926 01:21:13,664 --> 01:21:14,165 understanding in the city can 2927 01:21:14,165 --> 01:21:14,832 correct me if I 2928 01:21:14,832 --> 01:21:16,534 m wrong, that 2929 01:21:16,534 --> 01:21:17,100 the density would be based upon 2930 01:21:17,100 --> 01:21:19,100 the acreage you 2931 01:21:22,841 --> 01:21:24,810 re developing. 2932 01:21:24,810 --> 01:21:26,110 The density would be based on 2933 01:21:26,110 --> 01:21:26,478 the total acreage of the 2934 01:21:26,478 --> 01:21:27,247 property that 2935 01:21:27,247 --> 01:21:29,148 s included in the 2936 01:21:29,148 --> 01:21:30,650 cdm, whether that be the 2937 01:21:30,650 --> 01:21:30,850 parcels that are undeveloped or 2938 01:21:30,850 --> 01:21:32,285 if it 2939 01:21:32,285 --> 01:21:33,553 s including the office 2940 01:21:33,553 --> 01:21:35,922 space, which I believe was 2941 01:21:35,922 --> 01:21:37,958 alluded to as being a potential 2942 01:21:37,958 --> 01:21:38,425 commercial component of that. 2943 01:21:38,425 --> 01:21:40,294 Yes, that 2944 01:21:40,294 --> 01:21:40,494 s that is true, that 2945 01:21:40,494 --> 01:21:41,562 that 2946 01:21:41,562 --> 01:21:42,629 s true, that we would want 2947 01:21:42,629 --> 01:21:43,497 the opportunity to have the 2948 01:21:43,497 --> 01:21:44,366 commercial building. 2949 01:21:44,366 --> 01:21:44,499 As long as you tell me you 2950 01:21:44,499 --> 01:21:46,499 re 2951 01:21:47,200 --> 01:21:48,269 going to limit it to 17 times 2952 01:21:48,269 --> 01:21:49,972 7.5, I 2953 01:21:49,972 --> 01:21:50,138 m okay with that, but I 2954 01:21:50,138 --> 01:21:51,600 don 2955 01:21:51,600 --> 01:21:51,240 t want it to come back to 2956 01:21:51,240 --> 01:21:53,750 bed. We 2957 01:21:53,750 --> 01:21:53,508 re doing 17 times 12. 2958 01:21:53,508 --> 01:21:54,910 Well, I 2959 01:21:54,910 --> 01:21:55,544 m not going to put any 2960 01:21:55,544 --> 01:21:57,790 limitation. I 2961 01:21:57,790 --> 01:21:59,140 m not going to. 2962 01:21:59,140 --> 01:21:59,215 We want to follow the code. 2963 01:21:59,215 --> 01:22:00,820 That 2964 01:22:00,820 --> 01:22:00,349 s it. Okay. And that 2965 01:22:00,349 --> 01:22:00,516 s all 2966 01:22:00,516 --> 01:22:01,450 we 2967 01:22:01,450 --> 01:22:03,553 re asking for is for that 2968 01:22:03,553 --> 01:22:05,722 property to follow the code. 2969 01:22:05,722 --> 01:22:07,257 Um, so if I misunderstood the 2970 01:22:07,257 --> 01:22:09,293 question or how the development 2971 01:22:09,293 --> 01:22:10,594 process would be evaluated, 2972 01:22:10,594 --> 01:22:10,928 then I apologize. But we 2973 01:22:10,928 --> 01:22:11,950 re 2974 01:22:11,950 --> 01:22:11,395 we 2975 01:22:11,395 --> 01:22:13,300 re we 2976 01:22:13,300 --> 01:22:15,430 re simply asking for 2977 01:22:16,467 --> 01:22:18,302 the prior density cap to be 2978 01:22:18,302 --> 01:22:21,140 removed from this site. The 2979 01:22:21,140 --> 01:22:22,341 opportunity to do cmu, if that 2980 01:22:22,341 --> 01:22:24,343 presents itself with the 2981 01:22:24,343 --> 01:22:25,778 development that my clients 2982 01:22:25,778 --> 01:22:27,980 think makes sense there and 2983 01:22:27,980 --> 01:22:30,817 will fit well and, um, you 2984 01:22:30,817 --> 01:22:31,751 know, meets the meets there, 2985 01:22:31,751 --> 01:22:34,120 what they would like to see 2986 01:22:34,120 --> 01:22:35,321 there. Uh, but whatever density 2987 01:22:35,321 --> 01:22:37,758 the city allows us to put 2988 01:22:37,758 --> 01:22:39,594 there, we do not want to limit 2989 01:22:39,594 --> 01:22:41,796 that. And nor do I think it 2990 01:22:41,796 --> 01:22:42,497 should be limited. I don 2991 01:22:42,497 --> 01:22:43,564 t what 2992 01:22:43,564 --> 01:22:46,401 would be the reason to limit 2993 01:22:46,401 --> 01:22:47,502 the density? There? 2994 01:22:47,502 --> 01:22:47,835 Well, I think what you 2995 01:22:47,835 --> 01:22:49,835 re 2996 01:22:50,372 --> 01:22:50,939 hearing from the from up here 2997 01:22:50,939 --> 01:22:51,873 is everybody 2998 01:22:51,873 --> 01:22:53,341 s expecting now 2999 01:22:53,341 --> 01:22:53,608 208 times 17 because it 3000 01:22:53,608 --> 01:22:54,744 s I 3001 01:22:54,744 --> 01:22:55,178 mean two. Yeah. Because that 3002 01:22:55,178 --> 01:22:57,178 s 3003 01:22:57,647 --> 01:22:58,147 seven and a half acres. But I, 3004 01:22:58,147 --> 01:22:59,150 I know if we 3005 01:22:59,150 --> 01:23:00,817 re approving it, 3006 01:23:00,817 --> 01:23:02,719 it is for the entire yellow 3007 01:23:02,719 --> 01:23:04,354 area. Correct. So but and you 3008 01:23:04,354 --> 01:23:05,489 can put that whole density on 3009 01:23:05,489 --> 01:23:05,655 your seven and a half acres. 3010 01:23:05,655 --> 01:23:06,456 It 3011 01:23:06,456 --> 01:23:06,756 s not like you couldn 3012 01:23:06,756 --> 01:23:06,923 t. 3013 01:23:06,923 --> 01:23:07,691 It 3014 01:23:07,691 --> 01:23:08,125 s you can go higher. I 3015 01:23:08,125 --> 01:23:09,626 m all 3016 01:23:09,626 --> 01:23:09,793 about height I like it I think 3017 01:23:09,793 --> 01:23:11,195 it 3018 01:23:11,195 --> 01:23:11,763 s great. I just want to be 3019 01:23:11,763 --> 01:23:12,330 clear on what we 3020 01:23:12,330 --> 01:23:13,898 re approving 3021 01:23:13,898 --> 01:23:14,900 and everyone else is approving 3022 01:23:14,900 --> 01:23:16,101 understanding it too. 3023 01:23:16,101 --> 01:23:16,234 Okay, I understand, and I 3024 01:23:16,234 --> 01:23:17,369 m 3025 01:23:17,369 --> 01:23:18,336 certainly not arguing with you, 3026 01:23:18,336 --> 01:23:18,470 anybody out there, but I 3027 01:23:18,470 --> 01:23:19,404 m 3028 01:23:19,404 --> 01:23:19,738 trying to understand what 3029 01:23:19,738 --> 01:23:21,707 s the 3030 01:23:21,707 --> 01:23:23,142 concern with putting density as 3031 01:23:23,142 --> 01:23:25,611 much density as you can on that 3032 01:23:25,611 --> 01:23:26,440 site under the code. 3033 01:23:26,440 --> 01:23:26,645 Where we 3034 01:23:26,645 --> 01:23:27,112 re at, I don 3035 01:23:27,112 --> 01:23:28,280 t have 3036 01:23:28,280 --> 01:23:29,951 any issue with the density 3037 01:23:29,951 --> 01:23:30,217 there, honestly. Yes, sir. 3038 01:23:30,217 --> 01:23:31,840 What? I 3039 01:23:31,840 --> 01:23:31,484 m just all I 3040 01:23:31,484 --> 01:23:32,619 m saying 3041 01:23:32,619 --> 01:23:32,786 is for everybody understands 3042 01:23:32,786 --> 01:23:34,786 we 3043 01:23:34,822 --> 01:23:35,956 re not talking about 208. So 3044 01:23:35,956 --> 01:23:37,191 if everyone gets in their mind, 3045 01:23:37,191 --> 01:23:40,428 okay, we can probably deal with 3046 01:23:40,428 --> 01:23:41,662 that. It could be more than 3047 01:23:41,662 --> 01:23:42,229 208. It 3048 01:23:42,229 --> 01:23:42,530 s all I it 3049 01:23:42,530 --> 01:23:42,663 s all i 3050 01:23:42,663 --> 01:23:44,663 m 3051 01:23:44,799 --> 01:23:46,467 bringing up I think I think 3052 01:23:46,467 --> 01:23:48,470 density there is phenomenal I 3053 01:23:48,470 --> 01:23:49,710 do I know that the water sewer 3054 01:23:49,710 --> 01:23:49,505 is there. I know it 3055 01:23:49,505 --> 01:23:51,600 s the right 3056 01:23:51,600 --> 01:23:52,541 place for it and I know the 3057 01:23:52,541 --> 01:23:52,708 height would be okay there. I 3058 01:23:52,708 --> 01:23:53,509 don 3059 01:23:53,509 --> 01:23:53,910 t this isn 3060 01:23:53,910 --> 01:23:55,177 t being 3061 01:23:55,177 --> 01:23:56,312 subdivided out as a single 3062 01:23:56,312 --> 01:23:56,479 parcel. Correct. 3063 01:23:56,479 --> 01:23:56,746 It 3064 01:23:56,746 --> 01:23:58,414 s it 3065 01:23:58,414 --> 01:23:58,581 s two parcels. Now. 3066 01:23:58,581 --> 01:24:00,550 It 3067 01:24:00,550 --> 01:24:01,951 s the, the out of the yellow 3068 01:24:01,951 --> 01:24:05,551 and the end of the yellow. 3069 01:24:05,623 --> 01:24:07,225 Uh, no, sir. This, um, this is 3070 01:24:07,225 --> 01:24:08,926 based upon the subdivision map 3071 01:24:08,926 --> 01:24:11,562 that was recorded in APRIL of 3072 01:24:11,562 --> 01:24:11,696 this year. The property I 3073 01:24:11,696 --> 01:24:12,864 m 3074 01:24:12,864 --> 01:24:14,833 just going to call it the the 3075 01:24:14,833 --> 01:24:17,535 Block, which is bordered by a 3076 01:24:17,535 --> 01:24:19,535 gallery park, stonecrop, 3077 01:24:20,372 --> 01:24:23,372 Chippenham on the bottom and 3078 01:24:23,509 --> 01:24:25,110 Dusty Miller Lane. That block 3079 01:24:25,110 --> 01:24:27,747 has been subdivided into three 3080 01:24:27,747 --> 01:24:30,150 tracks. Tract one, you can see 3081 01:24:30,150 --> 01:24:32,619 faintly, is tract tract c, one. 3082 01:24:32,619 --> 01:24:35,155 R one is roughly seven and a 3083 01:24:35,155 --> 01:24:36,924 half acres, roughly, uh. The 3084 01:24:36,924 --> 01:24:37,124 bottom track is tract three r 3085 01:24:37,124 --> 01:24:38,692 that 3086 01:24:38,692 --> 01:24:41,863 s seven and a half acres, 3087 01:24:41,863 --> 01:24:44,833 roughly. And then the track one 3088 01:24:44,833 --> 01:24:46,268 c, one r two in the corner. 3089 01:24:46,268 --> 01:24:46,868 That is not owned by my 3090 01:24:46,868 --> 01:24:47,336 clients, that 3091 01:24:47,336 --> 01:24:48,270 s owned by 3092 01:24:48,270 --> 01:24:48,437 Wilmington Health. And that 3093 01:24:48,437 --> 01:24:50,437 s 3094 01:24:51,206 --> 01:24:52,741 also roughly four point, I 3095 01:24:52,741 --> 01:24:54,944 think seven seven acres or 3096 01:24:54,944 --> 01:24:56,813 something like that. So of the 3097 01:24:56,813 --> 01:24:57,147 dotted yellow area, the 12 3098 01:24:57,147 --> 01:24:57,781 acres that 3099 01:24:57,781 --> 01:24:58,982 s under your 3100 01:24:58,982 --> 01:25:00,784 consideration this evening. It 3101 01:25:00,784 --> 01:25:00,918 is two separate tracks. It 3102 01:25:00,918 --> 01:25:02,850 s 3103 01:25:02,850 --> 01:25:04,850 two separate tracks. 3104 01:25:04,254 --> 01:25:06,791 What is the height limit on 3105 01:25:06,791 --> 01:25:07,825 buildings in this zoning? Is it 3106 01:25:07,825 --> 01:25:09,593 45? 3107 01:25:09,593 --> 01:25:11,729 I believe it is. 3108 01:25:11,729 --> 01:25:14,132 It would be 45 unless I chose 3109 01:25:14,132 --> 01:25:15,200 to do a step back and 96. 3110 01:25:15,200 --> 01:25:16,468 Yeah, unless you do the step 3111 01:25:16,468 --> 01:25:18,270 back completely. Okay. 3112 01:25:18,270 --> 01:25:20,773 MR. Collier, if I MAY. 3113 01:25:20,773 --> 01:25:23,900 Um, the 208 units was 3114 01:25:23,900 --> 01:25:26,900 calculated based on the full 3115 01:25:26,120 --> 01:25:27,714 12.26 acres. Yes. So they can 3116 01:25:27,714 --> 01:25:29,649 go again. They can go above the 3117 01:25:29,649 --> 01:25:31,840 208. If they do, the workforce 3118 01:25:31,840 --> 01:25:33,487 housing component. But if they 3119 01:25:33,487 --> 01:25:34,922 do not do workforce housing 208 3120 01:25:34,922 --> 01:25:36,491 units is is calculated at the 3121 01:25:36,491 --> 01:25:37,458 17 units an acre for the full 3122 01:25:37,458 --> 01:25:38,926 parcel size. 3123 01:25:38,926 --> 01:25:40,294 Okay. Thank you. I take back 3124 01:25:40,294 --> 01:25:41,362 the last half hour of your life 3125 01:25:41,362 --> 01:25:42,330 while I talked about something 3126 01:25:42,330 --> 01:25:43,531 that made no difference. 3127 01:25:43,531 --> 01:25:44,833 And if I if I seem too 3128 01:25:44,833 --> 01:25:45,223 argumentative, I do apologize, 3129 01:25:45,223 --> 01:25:46,670 sir. 3130 01:25:46,670 --> 01:25:48,670 You never argument. 3131 01:25:50,600 --> 01:25:51,574 No, I, uh, the staff report, we 3132 01:25:51,574 --> 01:25:52,809 understand, is correct on the 3133 01:25:52,809 --> 01:25:54,770 unit count, but that was a 3134 01:25:54,770 --> 01:25:54,210 staff calculation, and we 3135 01:25:54,210 --> 01:25:55,378 re 3136 01:25:55,378 --> 01:25:56,179 fine. No worries. Yeah. 3137 01:25:56,179 --> 01:25:58,281 Thank you very much. 3138 01:25:58,281 --> 01:25:59,549 Thank you. 3139 01:25:59,549 --> 01:26:00,784 You good? 3140 01:26:00,784 --> 01:26:02,784 Yes, sir. 3141 01:26:05,789 --> 01:26:07,789 Commissioner Pollack. 3142 01:26:07,792 --> 01:26:10,528 My question is actually more 3143 01:26:10,528 --> 01:26:12,928 towards Commissioner Collier if 3144 01:26:12,931 --> 01:26:14,833 which is. Yeah, I want because 3145 01:26:14,833 --> 01:26:17,302 listening to your dialogue with 3146 01:26:17,302 --> 01:26:18,837 MR. Nichols is. That was kind 3147 01:26:18,837 --> 01:26:21,600 of what I was looking to to 3148 01:26:21,600 --> 01:26:21,139 hear a little bit of and and 3149 01:26:21,139 --> 01:26:23,108 i 3150 01:26:23,108 --> 01:26:26,120 m wondering is, is it 3151 01:26:26,120 --> 01:26:28,882 possible and mad if you could 3152 01:26:28,882 --> 01:26:29,516 go back a couple screens? Well 3153 01:26:29,516 --> 01:26:30,684 right there. 3154 01:26:30,684 --> 01:26:32,684 Yes, sir. 3155 01:26:33,870 --> 01:26:35,122 Is it possible because I 3156 01:26:35,122 --> 01:26:37,522 understand your point. You 3157 01:26:38,959 --> 01:26:39,126 know, in spades that says 3158 01:26:39,126 --> 01:26:41,610 you 3159 01:26:41,610 --> 01:26:41,463 re limiting the density to 3160 01:26:41,463 --> 01:26:42,931 I mean, it 3161 01:26:42,931 --> 01:26:44,767 s almost like if you 3162 01:26:44,767 --> 01:26:44,900 draw an artificial line and 3163 01:26:44,900 --> 01:26:45,134 I 3164 01:26:45,134 --> 01:26:45,567 m, I don 3165 01:26:45,567 --> 01:26:46,802 t even know what 3166 01:26:46,802 --> 01:26:47,360 that street is there, but it 3167 01:26:47,360 --> 01:26:48,671 s 3168 01:26:48,671 --> 01:26:50,472 the where it says a future 3169 01:26:50,472 --> 01:26:53,900 development. Is there a way to 3170 01:26:53,900 --> 01:26:56,112 to put a condition in this 3171 01:26:56,112 --> 01:26:58,781 approval that cordons off that 3172 01:26:58,781 --> 01:26:59,650 future development block as the 3173 01:26:59,650 --> 01:26:59,783 density? Is that what you 3174 01:26:59,783 --> 01:27:00,251 re 3175 01:27:00,251 --> 01:27:00,651 looking for? 3176 01:27:00,651 --> 01:27:01,685 Well, that 3177 01:27:01,685 --> 01:27:03,154 s what I was asking 3178 01:27:03,154 --> 01:27:03,687 originally, because I thought 3179 01:27:03,687 --> 01:27:04,788 that I didn 3180 01:27:04,788 --> 01:27:06,223 t do the math well 3181 01:27:06,223 --> 01:27:08,593 enough. In my head. I was 3182 01:27:08,593 --> 01:27:11,593 thinking that that area times 3183 01:27:11,763 --> 01:27:12,997 17 was 208, and then the other 3184 01:27:12,997 --> 01:27:14,232 corner up where the the 3185 01:27:14,232 --> 01:27:14,399 Wilmington Health Building is, 3186 01:27:14,399 --> 01:27:15,700 it 3187 01:27:15,700 --> 01:27:18,270 s still in this yellow. The 3188 01:27:18,270 --> 01:27:20,506 other 4.8 acres. I did a bad 3189 01:27:20,506 --> 01:27:21,741 math calculation. So the 208 is 3190 01:27:21,741 --> 01:27:23,509 the total number they could put 3191 01:27:23,509 --> 01:27:25,110 in on this yellow block period. 3192 01:27:25,110 --> 01:27:25,945 Period. Yeah. 3193 01:27:25,945 --> 01:27:26,646 Okay. Unless I 3194 01:27:26,646 --> 01:27:27,547 m misreading 3195 01:27:27,547 --> 01:27:29,349 something now. 3196 01:27:29,349 --> 01:27:31,349 Nope. 3197 01:27:31,818 --> 01:27:32,853 Um, you know, Matt, I guess the 3198 01:27:32,853 --> 01:27:33,353 only question I would really 3199 01:27:33,353 --> 01:27:34,956 have is it 3200 01:27:34,956 --> 01:27:37,356 s been asked 2 or 3 3201 01:27:37,892 --> 01:27:39,961 times. Here is, you know, at 3202 01:27:39,961 --> 01:27:41,830 sometime at some pieces along 3203 01:27:41,830 --> 01:27:43,665 this discussion. This has felt 3204 01:27:43,665 --> 01:27:45,267 like a discussion for a general 3205 01:27:45,267 --> 01:27:46,301 rezoning versus a conditional 3206 01:27:46,301 --> 01:27:46,668 rezoning. I mean, it 3207 01:27:46,668 --> 01:27:48,137 s kind of 3208 01:27:48,137 --> 01:27:51,600 just, just just the way the 3209 01:27:51,600 --> 01:27:52,776 discussion has gone on. Um, but 3210 01:27:52,776 --> 01:27:54,344 clearly understand the the 3211 01:27:54,344 --> 01:27:54,478 conditional piece. So I guess 3212 01:27:54,478 --> 01:27:55,278 I 3213 01:27:55,278 --> 01:27:56,213 m, I guess I 3214 01:27:56,213 --> 01:27:57,648 m okay with 3215 01:27:57,648 --> 01:27:59,516 directionally because obviously 3216 01:27:59,516 --> 01:28:01,180 your clients have demonstrated 3217 01:28:01,180 --> 01:28:03,320 over the years the quality and 3218 01:28:03,320 --> 01:28:03,854 the, you know, the, the 3219 01:28:03,854 --> 01:28:04,354 building. So it 3220 01:28:04,354 --> 01:28:04,688 s just I 3221 01:28:04,688 --> 01:28:06,490 ve 3222 01:28:06,490 --> 01:28:08,626 just it was a little confusing 3223 01:28:08,626 --> 01:28:10,329 to me as I was trying to 3224 01:28:10,329 --> 01:28:13,298 visualize what what you were 3225 01:28:13,298 --> 01:28:14,232 asking for. Um, around this 3226 01:28:14,232 --> 01:28:15,301 because this is the way the 3227 01:28:15,301 --> 01:28:15,634 boxes are drawn. But I 3228 01:28:15,634 --> 01:28:16,340 m going 3229 01:28:16,340 --> 01:28:16,702 to I 3230 01:28:16,702 --> 01:28:17,870 m going to make an 3231 01:28:17,870 --> 01:28:19,438 assumptive statement and then 3232 01:28:19,438 --> 01:28:19,605 please validate or tell me I 3233 01:28:19,605 --> 01:28:21,730 m 3234 01:28:21,730 --> 01:28:22,742 wrong. The reason this is drawn 3235 01:28:22,742 --> 01:28:24,443 this way is because the 3236 01:28:24,443 --> 01:28:26,513 property, the upper right 3237 01:28:26,513 --> 01:28:26,714 corner, upper right quadrant. 3238 01:28:26,714 --> 01:28:27,514 That 3239 01:28:27,514 --> 01:28:28,782 s because that property 3240 01:28:28,782 --> 01:28:28,983 has been sold. 3241 01:28:28,983 --> 01:28:29,850 That 3242 01:28:29,850 --> 01:28:31,619 s correct. My my. 3243 01:28:31,619 --> 01:28:32,653 Saw has no no bearing here. 3244 01:28:32,653 --> 01:28:34,550 We well they don 3245 01:28:34,550 --> 01:28:34,489 t own it so. 3246 01:28:34,489 --> 01:28:35,723 Yeah. 3247 01:28:35,723 --> 01:28:35,923 Exactly. Exactly. Right. So 3248 01:28:35,923 --> 01:28:36,157 that 3249 01:28:36,157 --> 01:28:36,724 s why it 3250 01:28:36,724 --> 01:28:36,891 s drawn the way 3251 01:28:36,891 --> 01:28:38,891 it 3252 01:28:41,290 --> 01:28:43,531 s drawn. So. Right. Okay. 3253 01:28:43,531 --> 01:28:45,201 Um, and I appreciate my, the, 3254 01:28:45,201 --> 01:28:46,435 my fellow commissioners. Great. 3255 01:28:46,435 --> 01:28:46,802 You know, great questions for 3256 01:28:46,802 --> 01:28:47,670 me as I 3257 01:28:47,670 --> 01:28:48,771 ve been trying to 3258 01:28:48,771 --> 01:28:50,540 listen and get my head around 3259 01:28:50,540 --> 01:28:50,907 this thing. So, um, MR. 3260 01:28:50,907 --> 01:28:52,876 CHAIRMAN, I 3261 01:28:52,876 --> 01:28:54,878 m good for now. 3262 01:28:54,878 --> 01:28:59,780 So this my last chance to do 3263 01:29:02,553 --> 01:29:03,121 this. So. Please go ahead. 3264 01:29:03,121 --> 01:29:03,655 Matt. 3265 01:29:03,655 --> 01:29:03,788 Yes, sir. 3266 01:29:03,788 --> 01:29:05,457 I 3267 01:29:05,457 --> 01:29:08,259 m going back. When you first 3268 01:29:08,259 --> 01:29:09,561 started this plan, um, you 3269 01:29:09,561 --> 01:29:11,763 mentioned that the idea was to 3270 01:29:11,763 --> 01:29:13,465 get rid of the 1300. Whatever, 3271 01:29:13,465 --> 01:29:13,665 cap. Completely. And that 3272 01:29:13,665 --> 01:29:14,700 didn 3273 01:29:14,700 --> 01:29:16,340 t work. I mean, it was too 3274 01:29:16,340 --> 01:29:16,568 much other stuff to do that, 3275 01:29:16,568 --> 01:29:17,636 right? That 3276 01:29:17,636 --> 01:29:19,706 s correct. So this 3277 01:29:19,706 --> 01:29:20,807 effort tonight is to still get 3278 01:29:20,807 --> 01:29:21,341 to the where you want to be, 3279 01:29:21,341 --> 01:29:23,341 but it 3280 01:29:23,543 --> 01:29:26,460 s you are not able to 3281 01:29:26,460 --> 01:29:26,880 eliminate the 1300 cap. 3282 01:29:26,880 --> 01:29:28,215 Correct. 3283 01:29:28,215 --> 01:29:28,949 Uh, we we can 3284 01:29:28,949 --> 01:29:29,683 t. That 3285 01:29:29,683 --> 01:29:30,250 s 3286 01:29:30,250 --> 01:29:31,785 something we can 3287 01:29:31,785 --> 01:29:33,785 t do without 3288 01:29:34,521 --> 01:29:34,655 rezoning all 302 acres is what 3289 01:29:34,655 --> 01:29:35,222 I 3290 01:29:35,222 --> 01:29:35,423 m told. So we 3291 01:29:35,423 --> 01:29:35,790 re we 3292 01:29:35,790 --> 01:29:36,725 re just 3293 01:29:36,725 --> 01:29:36,958 trying to do what we can with 3294 01:29:36,958 --> 01:29:38,326 what we. 3295 01:29:38,326 --> 01:29:38,860 Have left. So the cap is still 3296 01:29:38,860 --> 01:29:39,161 there? 3297 01:29:39,161 --> 01:29:39,528 Yes. 3298 01:29:39,528 --> 01:29:41,528 And that 3299 01:29:41,563 --> 01:29:42,131 s across this property 3300 01:29:42,131 --> 01:29:42,531 currently. 3301 01:29:42,531 --> 01:29:43,632 Yes. 3302 01:29:43,632 --> 01:29:44,333 Okay. And so you 3303 01:29:44,333 --> 01:29:46,135 re not asking 3304 01:29:46,135 --> 01:29:48,300 us to do anything to change 3305 01:29:48,300 --> 01:29:48,304 that cap. Yeah. But you 3306 01:29:48,304 --> 01:29:50,304 re 3307 01:29:53,911 --> 01:29:55,245 going to you want to put 204 or 3308 01:29:55,245 --> 01:29:57,147 whatever the number MAY be, 3309 01:29:57,147 --> 01:29:59,160 which raises the cap or raises 3310 01:29:59,160 --> 01:30:00,384 the level above the cap. Right. 3311 01:30:00,384 --> 01:30:03,200 Well, let me try to explain it 3312 01:30:03,200 --> 01:30:03,254 this way. Um, and I if I 3313 01:30:03,254 --> 01:30:04,555 m not 3314 01:30:04,555 --> 01:30:07,625 doing a good job of explaining 3315 01:30:07,625 --> 01:30:10,628 this, I apologize. But if you 3316 01:30:10,628 --> 01:30:12,731 let me go back to, um. 3317 01:30:12,731 --> 01:30:15,731 Actually, MISS Hopkins had a 3318 01:30:18,710 --> 01:30:20,974 good slide that had the 2013 cd 3319 01:30:20,974 --> 01:30:22,308 approval, and then it had, like 3320 01:30:22,308 --> 01:30:23,900 a piece of a puzzle. It had the 3321 01:30:23,900 --> 01:30:25,900 12 acres we 3322 01:30:25,378 --> 01:30:26,947 re talking about. 3323 01:30:26,947 --> 01:30:27,581 Um, well, that 3324 01:30:27,581 --> 01:30:28,548 s being pulled 3325 01:30:28,548 --> 01:30:28,750 up essentially what we 3326 01:30:28,750 --> 01:30:30,451 re 3327 01:30:30,451 --> 01:30:32,620 asking for with regard to the 3328 01:30:32,620 --> 01:30:35,620 density is we understand that 3329 01:30:35,991 --> 01:30:37,892 when the 302 acres was rezoned, 3330 01:30:37,892 --> 01:30:40,280 there was a density cap on the 3331 01:30:40,280 --> 01:30:40,328 entire puzzle or piece. We 3332 01:30:40,328 --> 01:30:42,328 re 3333 01:30:42,731 --> 01:30:46,269 asking for that piece to be 3334 01:30:46,269 --> 01:30:49,172 lifted out of that. And be 3335 01:30:49,172 --> 01:30:51,572 considered independent of that 3336 01:30:52,509 --> 01:30:54,578 cap for purposes of development 3337 01:30:54,578 --> 01:30:56,613 under the code as allowed 3338 01:30:56,613 --> 01:30:56,847 today. But I would keep in mind 3339 01:30:56,847 --> 01:30:57,981 that we 3340 01:30:57,981 --> 01:30:59,183 re putting in 3341 01:30:59,183 --> 01:30:59,316 additional conditions. So we 3342 01:30:59,316 --> 01:31:00,885 re 3343 01:31:00,885 --> 01:31:02,887 not just asking for a general 3344 01:31:02,887 --> 01:31:05,757 zoning zoning. We do have a 3345 01:31:05,757 --> 01:31:07,426 number of conditions that are 3346 01:31:07,426 --> 01:31:08,727 completely agreeable on this 3347 01:31:08,727 --> 01:31:11,130 site. I can go through each of 3348 01:31:11,130 --> 01:31:12,564 those there in your packet. And 3349 01:31:12,564 --> 01:31:14,233 most, most of those are 3350 01:31:14,233 --> 01:31:16,200 architectural related. And I 3351 01:31:16,200 --> 01:31:17,436 think they probably exceed what 3352 01:31:17,436 --> 01:31:19,710 was the specificity. 3353 01:31:19,710 --> 01:31:20,406 Let me stop you. I understand 3354 01:31:20,406 --> 01:31:20,706 completely. Okay. Like Richard, 3355 01:31:20,706 --> 01:31:21,875 I think it 3356 01:31:21,875 --> 01:31:22,242 s a great plan. It 3357 01:31:22,242 --> 01:31:22,476 s 3358 01:31:22,476 --> 01:31:24,344 how we 3359 01:31:24,344 --> 01:31:24,578 re getting there is and 3360 01:31:24,578 --> 01:31:24,978 I don 3361 01:31:24,978 --> 01:31:25,145 t want to say it 3362 01:31:25,145 --> 01:31:26,547 s 3363 01:31:26,547 --> 01:31:27,448 bothering me, but it 3364 01:31:27,448 --> 01:31:28,816 s it seems 3365 01:31:28,816 --> 01:31:30,952 to me to be staring us in the 3366 01:31:30,952 --> 01:31:33,254 face. The cap is 1300 something. 3367 01:31:33,254 --> 01:31:35,230 You want to put the potential 3368 01:31:35,230 --> 01:31:36,491 to build more. Whatever it is 3369 01:31:36,491 --> 01:31:38,493 that takes you above the cap. 3370 01:31:38,493 --> 01:31:40,296 You tried to get rid of or 3371 01:31:40,296 --> 01:31:42,965 tried to attempted to deal with 3372 01:31:42,965 --> 01:31:44,900 the city about getting rid of 3373 01:31:44,900 --> 01:31:45,680 the cap. Um, but you said it 3374 01:31:45,680 --> 01:31:45,868 s 3375 01:31:45,868 --> 01:31:46,235 too much work. We don 3376 01:31:46,235 --> 01:31:46,803 t want to 3377 01:31:46,803 --> 01:31:47,236 go that way. So we 3378 01:31:47,236 --> 01:31:49,236 re going to 3379 01:31:49,606 --> 01:31:49,873 try this. And it just seems to 3380 01:31:49,873 --> 01:31:51,708 me we 3381 01:31:51,708 --> 01:31:53,243 re making an end run to 3382 01:31:53,243 --> 01:31:54,678 get where you want to be. And I 3383 01:31:54,678 --> 01:31:55,545 understand you want to go the 3384 01:31:55,545 --> 01:31:55,879 best way, and I don 3385 01:31:55,879 --> 01:31:56,647 t have a 3386 01:31:56,647 --> 01:31:56,781 problem getting there. It 3387 01:31:56,781 --> 01:31:57,348 s 3388 01:31:57,348 --> 01:31:58,160 just how you 3389 01:31:58,160 --> 01:31:59,751 re attempting to 3390 01:31:59,751 --> 01:32:00,551 get there. Now, I 3391 01:32:00,551 --> 01:32:02,120 m looking at 3392 01:32:02,120 --> 01:32:02,287 it again. The the sheet that 3393 01:32:02,287 --> 01:32:03,588 we 3394 01:32:03,588 --> 01:32:04,622 ve got. And I brought up the 3395 01:32:04,622 --> 01:32:05,791 first time this came around 3396 01:32:05,791 --> 01:32:07,926 with this workforce housing. 3397 01:32:07,926 --> 01:32:10,128 And I mean, it says, you know, 3398 01:32:10,128 --> 01:32:13,128 the cap on residential density, 3399 01:32:13,532 --> 01:32:15,435 which is the 1300 maybe 3400 01:32:15,435 --> 01:32:16,836 eliminated by the 10% 3401 01:32:16,836 --> 01:32:17,370 workforce. And I 3402 01:32:17,370 --> 01:32:19,370 m wondering, 3403 01:32:19,373 --> 01:32:21,208 is that what the city threw out 3404 01:32:21,208 --> 01:32:24,211 to you to say instead of doing 3405 01:32:24,211 --> 01:32:28,181 the, you know, you can you can 3406 01:32:28,181 --> 01:32:28,849 raise this cap by doing this? 3407 01:32:28,849 --> 01:32:29,830 Okay. 3408 01:32:29,830 --> 01:32:29,650 And I 3409 01:32:29,650 --> 01:32:30,284 m sorry to interrupt. 3410 01:32:30,284 --> 01:32:32,120 No, no, no. 3411 01:32:32,120 --> 01:32:33,688 But I do want to comment. This 3412 01:32:33,688 --> 01:32:37,888 is not an end around in any 3413 01:32:39,270 --> 01:32:41,297 way. Um, we parcels have been 3414 01:32:41,297 --> 01:32:41,563 sold out there, uh, such that 3415 01:32:41,563 --> 01:32:43,499 we don 3416 01:32:43,499 --> 01:32:45,601 t have ownership to 3417 01:32:45,601 --> 01:32:47,903 submit a rezoning application 3418 01:32:47,903 --> 01:32:50,407 for all the property. Like my. 3419 01:32:50,407 --> 01:32:52,760 In 2013, my clients, my client 3420 01:32:52,760 --> 01:32:53,844 owned all of it. It was all 3421 01:32:53,844 --> 01:32:56,213 owned by Cameron Properties. 3422 01:32:56,213 --> 01:32:57,348 All 302 acres. So we could 3423 01:32:57,348 --> 01:32:58,816 submit the rezoning 3424 01:32:58,816 --> 01:32:59,851 application. We can 3425 01:32:59,851 --> 01:33:01,385 t submit a 3426 01:33:01,385 --> 01:33:01,786 rezoning application. It 3427 01:33:01,786 --> 01:33:02,530 s not 3428 01:33:02,530 --> 01:33:02,687 that it 3429 01:33:02,687 --> 01:33:03,254 s not that we 3430 01:33:03,254 --> 01:33:03,588 re we 3431 01:33:03,588 --> 01:33:04,889 re 3432 01:33:04,889 --> 01:33:06,525 shying away from hard work and 3433 01:33:06,525 --> 01:33:09,695 that sort of thing. We would 3434 01:33:09,695 --> 01:33:12,465 have to go and get I understand 3435 01:33:12,465 --> 01:33:13,900 everybody out there. Signature 3436 01:33:13,900 --> 01:33:14,901 on it. I don 3437 01:33:14,901 --> 01:33:16,536 t know if they got 3438 01:33:16,536 --> 01:33:16,736 to talk to their lenders. 3439 01:33:16,736 --> 01:33:17,737 There 3440 01:33:17,737 --> 01:33:17,904 s loans out there we 3441 01:33:17,904 --> 01:33:19,904 don 3442 01:33:20,173 --> 01:33:21,608 t know. Um, but in any 3443 01:33:21,608 --> 01:33:23,143 event. So this is definitely 3444 01:33:23,143 --> 01:33:23,410 not an end around all we 3445 01:33:23,410 --> 01:33:25,410 re 3446 01:33:26,180 --> 01:33:27,582 trying to do. And it boils down 3447 01:33:27,582 --> 01:33:29,918 to sort of your right to 3448 01:33:29,918 --> 01:33:31,853 petition the government, which 3449 01:33:31,853 --> 01:33:32,921 we all talk about in civics 3450 01:33:32,921 --> 01:33:33,880 class and that sort of thing. 3451 01:33:33,880 --> 01:33:35,880 We 3452 01:33:35,190 --> 01:33:36,691 re trying to get in front of 3453 01:33:36,691 --> 01:33:37,926 this commission and ultimately 3454 01:33:37,926 --> 01:33:39,795 get in front of city Council 3455 01:33:39,795 --> 01:33:41,300 and say, could you please look 3456 01:33:41,300 --> 01:33:43,600 back at that condition you did 3457 01:33:43,600 --> 01:33:46,436 in 2013? Does it make sense 3458 01:33:46,436 --> 01:33:46,903 today? If you think it does, 3459 01:33:46,903 --> 01:33:48,738 then we 3460 01:33:48,738 --> 01:33:49,606 ll go home. If you 3461 01:33:49,606 --> 01:33:50,700 think that it doesn 3462 01:33:50,700 --> 01:33:52,700 t make 3463 01:33:53,243 --> 01:33:54,545 sense in 2026 to limit 3464 01:33:54,545 --> 01:33:57,545 everything you see there in 3465 01:33:58,215 --> 01:34:00,615 blue to 116 residential units, 3466 01:34:01,186 --> 01:34:02,621 please just lift the cap from 3467 01:34:02,621 --> 01:34:03,880 what we have left. That 3468 01:34:03,880 --> 01:34:03,255 s all 3469 01:34:03,255 --> 01:34:04,389 we 3470 01:34:04,389 --> 01:34:04,923 re asking. And we 3471 01:34:04,923 --> 01:34:06,859 re going 3472 01:34:06,859 --> 01:34:07,559 to follow everything in your 3473 01:34:07,559 --> 01:34:08,393 code. We 3474 01:34:08,393 --> 01:34:10,620 re not asking for any 3475 01:34:10,620 --> 01:34:11,931 special treatment. And on top 3476 01:34:11,931 --> 01:34:14,700 of that, put all these 3477 01:34:14,700 --> 01:34:16,270 different conditions. We are 3478 01:34:16,270 --> 01:34:18,839 agreeable to, which I think 3479 01:34:18,839 --> 01:34:20,841 should be noted, which are all 3480 01:34:20,841 --> 01:34:21,508 the. 3481 01:34:21,508 --> 01:34:21,709 Um. 3482 01:34:21,709 --> 01:34:23,709 They 3483 01:34:24,145 --> 01:34:24,311 re in your report. So 3484 01:34:24,311 --> 01:34:25,946 it 3485 01:34:25,946 --> 01:34:27,982 ll go above and beyond your 3486 01:34:27,982 --> 01:34:28,182 oh eye ordinance because we 3487 01:34:28,182 --> 01:34:30,182 re 3488 01:34:30,718 --> 01:34:31,619 going to, um, there 3489 01:34:31,619 --> 01:34:33,619 s 12 of 3490 01:34:33,722 --> 01:34:34,556 them. Where we 3491 01:34:34,556 --> 01:34:35,858 ve agreed that 3492 01:34:35,858 --> 01:34:36,258 additional, um, we 3493 01:34:36,258 --> 01:34:37,393 re going to 3494 01:34:37,393 --> 01:34:39,195 follow the architectural 3495 01:34:39,195 --> 01:34:39,362 consistency of Berkeley West. 3496 01:34:39,362 --> 01:34:41,362 We 3497 01:34:42,650 --> 01:34:42,665 re going to do the Tia 3498 01:34:42,665 --> 01:34:43,266 updates. We 3499 01:34:43,266 --> 01:34:44,600 re not going to do 3500 01:34:44,600 --> 01:34:45,535 linear strip retail 3501 01:34:45,535 --> 01:34:46,350 development. We 3502 01:34:46,350 --> 01:34:47,203 re going to put 3503 01:34:47,203 --> 01:34:48,772 the off street parking behind 3504 01:34:48,772 --> 01:34:49,806 the buildings. Unless we do the 3505 01:34:49,806 --> 01:34:51,750 traffic circle or the 3506 01:34:51,750 --> 01:34:52,910 roundabout, which looks great 3507 01:34:52,910 --> 01:34:53,978 out there. Um, we 3508 01:34:53,978 --> 01:34:55,747 re going to 3509 01:34:55,747 --> 01:34:57,916 modify the setbacks to be 3510 01:34:57,916 --> 01:35:00,180 consistent with the rest of the 3511 01:35:00,180 --> 01:35:00,351 development. And then we 3512 01:35:00,351 --> 01:35:01,887 ve got 3513 01:35:01,887 --> 01:35:04,550 all internal street facing 3514 01:35:04,550 --> 01:35:05,557 facades on Gallery Park and 3515 01:35:05,557 --> 01:35:06,992 Stonecrop and include a minimum 3516 01:35:06,992 --> 01:35:09,392 ground floor fenestration of 3517 01:35:10,363 --> 01:35:10,597 30% for office, 15. This stuff 3518 01:35:10,597 --> 01:35:11,598 I don 3519 01:35:11,598 --> 01:35:13,433 t really understand. An 3520 01:35:13,433 --> 01:35:13,600 architect wrote this, but what 3521 01:35:13,600 --> 01:35:14,534 it 3522 01:35:14,534 --> 01:35:14,901 s going to, what it 3523 01:35:14,901 --> 01:35:15,569 s going 3524 01:35:15,569 --> 01:35:16,169 to and I 3525 01:35:16,169 --> 01:35:16,536 m gonna I 3526 01:35:16,536 --> 01:35:18,172 m going to 3527 01:35:18,172 --> 01:35:20,974 look to MR. Adams to explain 3528 01:35:20,974 --> 01:35:21,942 the administration. But we but 3529 01:35:21,942 --> 01:35:22,750 what I understand is that 3530 01:35:22,750 --> 01:35:23,677 s 3531 01:35:23,677 --> 01:35:25,813 going to assure you that this 3532 01:35:25,813 --> 01:35:30,130 is not going to be your sort 3533 01:35:30,180 --> 01:35:31,620 of, you know, 1990s strip mall 3534 01:35:31,620 --> 01:35:32,854 in the middle of Berkeley West. 3535 01:35:32,854 --> 01:35:33,822 And it would never happen 3536 01:35:33,822 --> 01:35:34,590 anyway. But we 3537 01:35:34,590 --> 01:35:35,624 re glad to put 3538 01:35:35,624 --> 01:35:35,791 that into the condition that 3539 01:35:35,791 --> 01:35:37,226 you 3540 01:35:37,226 --> 01:35:38,594 re going to have very high 3541 01:35:38,594 --> 01:35:38,861 quality development out there 3542 01:35:38,861 --> 01:35:40,196 on what 3543 01:35:40,196 --> 01:35:42,596 s remaining this seven 3544 01:35:42,898 --> 01:35:45,202 and a half acres. So again, all 3545 01:35:45,202 --> 01:35:46,503 this came about because we 3546 01:35:46,503 --> 01:35:48,305 think that the density 3547 01:35:48,305 --> 01:35:50,674 limitation needs to get 3548 01:35:50,674 --> 01:35:52,376 revisited. And this is the way 3549 01:35:52,376 --> 01:35:55,146 that I think the only way we 3550 01:35:55,146 --> 01:35:56,948 can reasonably do it is to come 3551 01:35:56,948 --> 01:35:58,490 in and ask that this be taken 3552 01:35:58,490 --> 01:35:58,616 out. And we 3553 01:35:58,616 --> 01:35:59,160 re glad. We 3554 01:35:59,160 --> 01:36:00,510 re glad 3555 01:36:00,510 --> 01:36:02,210 to do everything else out 3556 01:36:02,210 --> 01:36:05,658 there, but we just want to be, 3557 01:36:05,658 --> 01:36:06,859 uh, evaluated, treated going 3558 01:36:06,859 --> 01:36:07,793 forward on that property, just 3559 01:36:07,793 --> 01:36:08,795 like you would any other 3560 01:36:08,795 --> 01:36:10,496 property subject to all the 3561 01:36:10,496 --> 01:36:12,131 other conditions. And if we can 3562 01:36:12,131 --> 01:36:12,498 put more density out there, we 3563 01:36:12,498 --> 01:36:13,666 think that 3564 01:36:13,666 --> 01:36:13,833 s great. I think 3565 01:36:13,833 --> 01:36:15,335 it 3566 01:36:15,335 --> 01:36:18,906 s a great place to put more 3567 01:36:18,906 --> 01:36:20,708 density. And again, no extra 3568 01:36:20,708 --> 01:36:22,143 density whatever the code would 3569 01:36:22,143 --> 01:36:23,578 allow. And the code has a lot 3570 01:36:23,578 --> 01:36:24,846 of stringent provisions in 3571 01:36:24,846 --> 01:36:26,647 there on your density and your 3572 01:36:26,647 --> 01:36:28,820 cdm requirements. If we could 3573 01:36:28,820 --> 01:36:28,316 meet it, please let us do it. 3574 01:36:28,316 --> 01:36:28,950 And we 3575 01:36:28,950 --> 01:36:30,451 re going to meet all 3576 01:36:30,451 --> 01:36:31,653 these other architectural 3577 01:36:31,653 --> 01:36:31,953 requirements. And that 3578 01:36:31,953 --> 01:36:33,953 s what 3579 01:36:34,923 --> 01:36:35,190 it boils down to. So I, I hope 3580 01:36:35,190 --> 01:36:35,858 I didn 3581 01:36:35,858 --> 01:36:37,293 t make it more 3582 01:36:37,293 --> 01:36:37,493 confusing, MR. Woodruff, but 3583 01:36:37,493 --> 01:36:39,950 that 3584 01:36:39,950 --> 01:36:40,463 s not. Yeah, but this is 3585 01:36:40,463 --> 01:36:40,630 not an end around in any way. 3586 01:36:40,630 --> 01:36:41,498 We 3587 01:36:41,498 --> 01:36:42,332 re not trying to I 3588 01:36:42,332 --> 01:36:43,733 m not get 3589 01:36:43,733 --> 01:36:45,669 get around the. 3590 01:36:45,669 --> 01:36:45,802 Accusing you of end around what 3591 01:36:45,802 --> 01:36:46,436 I 3592 01:36:46,436 --> 01:36:47,370 m saying is you 3593 01:36:47,370 --> 01:36:48,105 re doing a 3594 01:36:48,105 --> 01:36:49,206 different method than you 3595 01:36:49,206 --> 01:36:50,541 thought you were going to do in 3596 01:36:50,541 --> 01:36:50,974 the beginning. And I 3597 01:36:50,974 --> 01:36:52,974 m 3598 01:36:53,143 --> 01:36:55,413 questioning just simply, is 3599 01:36:55,413 --> 01:36:58,116 this what we can do to just 3600 01:36:58,116 --> 01:36:59,885 close our eyes to that 1300 cap 3601 01:36:59,885 --> 01:37:01,687 and say, you now can go out 3602 01:37:01,687 --> 01:37:03,255 there and put another 200 and 3603 01:37:03,255 --> 01:37:04,723 some houses or units. 3604 01:37:04,723 --> 01:37:04,890 On it. So I understand, but 3605 01:37:04,890 --> 01:37:05,190 we 3606 01:37:05,190 --> 01:37:05,357 re not, we 3607 01:37:05,357 --> 01:37:05,524 re we 3608 01:37:05,524 --> 01:37:06,759 re 3609 01:37:06,759 --> 01:37:07,560 certainly not asking anyone to 3610 01:37:07,560 --> 01:37:07,693 close their eyes to it. We 3611 01:37:07,693 --> 01:37:09,562 re 3612 01:37:09,562 --> 01:37:11,732 asking you to look at it 3613 01:37:11,732 --> 01:37:12,633 plainly on its paper and just 3614 01:37:12,633 --> 01:37:12,966 tell us if you think it 3615 01:37:12,966 --> 01:37:14,100 s still 3616 01:37:14,100 --> 01:37:16,403 reasonable to have that cap 3617 01:37:16,403 --> 01:37:17,771 there in 26, 20, 26. And we 3618 01:37:17,771 --> 01:37:18,500 say, absolutely not. There 3619 01:37:18,500 --> 01:37:19,473 s no 3620 01:37:19,473 --> 01:37:21,142 reason to have that density cap 3621 01:37:21,142 --> 01:37:21,275 on that property. And that 3622 01:37:21,275 --> 01:37:21,509 s 3623 01:37:21,509 --> 01:37:22,977 what it 3624 01:37:22,977 --> 01:37:24,977 s about. 3625 01:37:26,247 --> 01:37:26,581 Um, bear with me a second, MISS 3626 01:37:26,581 --> 01:37:27,315 Painter. I 3627 01:37:27,315 --> 01:37:29,118 m going to ask MR. 3628 01:37:29,118 --> 01:37:31,253 Chambers this just because of 3629 01:37:31,253 --> 01:37:33,989 his decades of service to the 3630 01:37:33,989 --> 01:37:35,992 city of Wilmington. How many 3631 01:37:35,992 --> 01:37:37,860 large scale mixed use or 3632 01:37:37,860 --> 01:37:39,328 planned development projects 3633 01:37:39,328 --> 01:37:41,364 have you seen in your time in 3634 01:37:41,364 --> 01:37:41,531 the planning department? Here? 3635 01:37:41,531 --> 01:37:43,499 Let 3636 01:37:43,499 --> 01:37:43,666 s scale. Um. 3637 01:37:43,666 --> 01:37:45,201 Let 3638 01:37:45,201 --> 01:37:45,668 s define large scale. More 3639 01:37:45,668 --> 01:37:47,668 than. 3640 01:37:48,500 --> 01:37:49,407 Just a handful. Um, this would 3641 01:37:49,407 --> 01:37:50,741 be one of them. Autumn Hall, 3642 01:37:50,741 --> 01:37:53,478 Mayfair, those types of things. 3643 01:37:53,478 --> 01:37:54,746 Fairfield Park. Um, okay. And 3644 01:37:54,746 --> 01:37:56,648 how many of those have come 3645 01:37:56,648 --> 01:37:58,349 back in to revise their 3646 01:37:58,349 --> 01:37:59,351 original bubble plan or master 3647 01:37:59,351 --> 01:38:00,518 plan? 3648 01:38:00,518 --> 01:38:00,719 None of those have because 3649 01:38:00,719 --> 01:38:01,753 they 3650 01:38:01,753 --> 01:38:03,356 re MKs and they have a 3651 01:38:03,356 --> 01:38:03,556 different zoning category that 3652 01:38:03,556 --> 01:38:05,258 doesn 3653 01:38:05,258 --> 01:38:06,626 t. Hang on restriction. 3654 01:38:06,626 --> 01:38:08,294 To it. Okay, so Fairfield Park 3655 01:38:08,294 --> 01:38:09,395 did because I was involved in 3656 01:38:09,395 --> 01:38:11,264 Fairfield Park, and that was 3657 01:38:11,264 --> 01:38:14,670 supposed to be Harris Teeter 3658 01:38:14,670 --> 01:38:15,435 and Residential behind. And now 3659 01:38:15,435 --> 01:38:17,103 you have residential 3660 01:38:17,103 --> 01:38:18,380 everywhere, a church and 3661 01:38:18,380 --> 01:38:19,906 apartments, right? 3662 01:38:19,906 --> 01:38:21,810 That fair enough. But that, 3663 01:38:21,810 --> 01:38:23,845 that was, that was brought in 3664 01:38:23,845 --> 01:38:25,580 to allow for another set of a 3665 01:38:25,580 --> 01:38:27,282 mixed use, another mixed use 3666 01:38:27,282 --> 01:38:28,450 project that would be the same 3667 01:38:28,450 --> 01:38:28,817 rules would still apply. 3668 01:38:28,817 --> 01:38:29,618 The point I 3669 01:38:29,618 --> 01:38:30,686 m trying to make is 3670 01:38:30,686 --> 01:38:34,560 can you go back to the bubble 3671 01:38:34,560 --> 01:38:34,390 plan for a second? Whoever 3672 01:38:34,390 --> 01:38:34,857 s 3673 01:38:34,857 --> 01:38:35,157 driving, I don 3674 01:38:35,157 --> 01:38:35,391 t know who 3675 01:38:35,391 --> 01:38:37,391 s 3676 01:38:37,593 --> 01:38:39,593 driving now. That 3677 01:38:41,980 --> 01:38:41,231 s it. So. 3678 01:38:41,231 --> 01:38:42,990 I 3679 01:38:42,990 --> 01:38:42,666 m driving, but I 3680 01:38:42,666 --> 01:38:42,900 m not sure 3681 01:38:42,900 --> 01:38:44,900 if that 3682 01:38:45,469 --> 01:38:47,204 s in MR. Nichols 3683 01:38:47,204 --> 01:38:47,404 presentation or if that is in 3684 01:38:47,404 --> 01:38:48,138 staff 3685 01:38:48,138 --> 01:38:48,305 s presentation. 3686 01:38:48,305 --> 01:38:49,406 It 3687 01:38:49,406 --> 01:38:49,874 s fine. Thank you, MISS 3688 01:38:49,874 --> 01:38:50,274 Bradshaw. I 3689 01:38:50,274 --> 01:38:50,841 m sorry. I 3690 01:38:50,841 --> 01:38:51,709 m just 3691 01:38:51,709 --> 01:38:54,709 wondering where that voice was 3692 01:38:55,179 --> 01:38:56,982 coming from. Um, I guess MR. 3693 01:38:56,982 --> 01:38:59,982 Nichols, for you, the question 3694 01:39:01,487 --> 01:39:03,989 is, in 2013, why? Why do a plan 3695 01:39:03,989 --> 01:39:05,625 like this, a bubble plan, like, 3696 01:39:05,625 --> 01:39:06,859 expand o that a little bit? 3697 01:39:06,859 --> 01:39:07,260 Well, um. 3698 01:39:07,260 --> 01:39:08,695 It 3699 01:39:08,695 --> 01:39:09,929 s certainly on the larger 3700 01:39:09,929 --> 01:39:12,329 size of development for 3701 01:39:13,534 --> 01:39:15,360 Wilmington. And in 2013, um, 3702 01:39:15,360 --> 01:39:15,569 you know, what? Weren 3703 01:39:15,569 --> 01:39:17,238 t really 3704 01:39:17,238 --> 01:39:18,906 sure exactly what was going to 3705 01:39:18,906 --> 01:39:21,442 go there. There were there was 3706 01:39:21,442 --> 01:39:22,877 some bigger concepts, and there 3707 01:39:22,877 --> 01:39:25,130 was a lot of conditions, a 3708 01:39:25,130 --> 01:39:27,582 framework set up to develop the 3709 01:39:27,582 --> 01:39:30,786 property. Um, in a way that 3710 01:39:30,786 --> 01:39:33,456 would be, again, cohesive, have 3711 01:39:33,456 --> 01:39:33,656 architectural consistency. 3712 01:39:33,656 --> 01:39:35,656 There 3713 01:39:37,627 --> 01:39:40,463 d be a, a broad 3714 01:39:40,463 --> 01:39:42,532 circulation pattern. Um, but it 3715 01:39:42,532 --> 01:39:44,670 was to provide flexibility 3716 01:39:44,670 --> 01:39:45,268 because you, you know, here we 3717 01:39:45,268 --> 01:39:45,802 are 13 years later and we 3718 01:39:45,802 --> 01:39:46,837 re 3719 01:39:46,837 --> 01:39:47,204 still developing it. It 3720 01:39:47,204 --> 01:39:47,371 s a, 3721 01:39:47,371 --> 01:39:47,738 it 3722 01:39:47,738 --> 01:39:48,640 s a, it 3723 01:39:48,640 --> 01:39:49,841 s a large project. 3724 01:39:49,841 --> 01:39:52,241 The housing market different 3725 01:39:53,110 --> 01:39:54,980 than it was 13 years ago. It is. 3726 01:39:54,980 --> 01:39:56,281 Absolutely different. 3727 01:39:56,281 --> 01:39:57,549 Is the office market different 3728 01:39:57,549 --> 01:39:57,682 than it was 13 years ago? 3729 01:39:57,682 --> 01:39:59,251 I 3730 01:39:59,251 --> 01:40:01,153 m not an expert, but it is. 3731 01:40:01,153 --> 01:40:02,588 It is a lot different. Okay. It 3732 01:40:02,588 --> 01:40:03,622 is a lot different. And the 3733 01:40:03,622 --> 01:40:04,256 retail space is a lot 3734 01:40:04,256 --> 01:40:06,256 different. 3735 01:40:07,160 --> 01:40:10,160 Okay. Um, in all the 3736 01:40:12,199 --> 01:40:14,599 conversation about density, um, 3737 01:40:15,836 --> 01:40:16,503 sorry. Oh, um, I 3738 01:40:16,503 --> 01:40:17,972 ll save the 3739 01:40:17,972 --> 01:40:18,439 last part for my for my 3740 01:40:18,439 --> 01:40:18,706 comment. That 3741 01:40:18,706 --> 01:40:19,140 s that 3742 01:40:19,140 --> 01:40:21,140 s really 3743 01:40:24,446 --> 01:40:28,460 the only question I had. Um. 3744 01:40:28,350 --> 01:40:28,484 Commissioner Pollock. 3745 01:40:28,484 --> 01:40:29,985 I 3746 01:40:29,985 --> 01:40:32,922 m trying to simplify this in 3747 01:40:32,922 --> 01:40:34,156 my mind, Matt. So let me let me 3748 01:40:34,156 --> 01:40:35,591 make a couple declarative 3749 01:40:35,591 --> 01:40:36,492 statements and see if this 3750 01:40:36,492 --> 01:40:37,560 applies. You 3751 01:40:37,560 --> 01:40:39,560 re asking, I 3752 01:40:39,896 --> 01:40:40,630 think, two things, right? 3753 01:40:40,630 --> 01:40:42,630 You 3754 01:40:42,132 --> 01:40:43,167 re asking, um, and if we 3755 01:40:43,167 --> 01:40:45,703 could go back to the one where 3756 01:40:45,703 --> 01:40:47,104 you have the yellow, you know, 3757 01:40:47,104 --> 01:40:49,841 the cordoned off area and the 3758 01:40:49,841 --> 01:40:50,775 yellow, and again, I. Amy, are 3759 01:40:50,775 --> 01:40:51,342 you driving or. I 3760 01:40:51,342 --> 01:40:53,342 m not sure 3761 01:40:56,848 --> 01:41:00,253 who is. It just hit a tree. 3762 01:41:00,253 --> 01:41:01,654 Yeah. Um, but I, I guess I can 3763 01:41:01,654 --> 01:41:01,955 do without the visual. Okay. I 3764 01:41:01,955 --> 01:41:03,955 think you 3765 01:41:04,190 --> 01:41:04,490 re asking two things. 3766 01:41:04,490 --> 01:41:04,791 Uh, that 3767 01:41:04,791 --> 01:41:05,491 s that 3768 01:41:05,491 --> 01:41:06,292 s good enough. 3769 01:41:06,292 --> 01:41:06,993 So, first of all, you 3770 01:41:06,993 --> 01:41:08,993 re asking 3771 01:41:09,596 --> 01:41:13,196 the area that you have defined 3772 01:41:13,400 --> 01:41:15,135 in yellow to create, uh, a 3773 01:41:15,135 --> 01:41:16,700 because every multiple people 3774 01:41:16,700 --> 01:41:16,237 owned properties out here, 3775 01:41:16,237 --> 01:41:17,672 you 3776 01:41:17,672 --> 01:41:20,241 re asking number one to 3777 01:41:20,241 --> 01:41:21,476 have that defined as a new only 3778 01:41:21,476 --> 01:41:22,377 district by itself. 3779 01:41:22,377 --> 01:41:24,377 That is correct. 3780 01:41:24,880 --> 01:41:25,280 Okay. And in that ask, you 3781 01:41:25,280 --> 01:41:26,281 re 3782 01:41:26,281 --> 01:41:26,515 saying, you know, we I 3783 01:41:26,515 --> 01:41:28,417 ve heard 3784 01:41:28,417 --> 01:41:30,817 the numbers, you know, 17 3785 01:41:31,120 --> 01:41:32,210 times. Uh, 12 or 12 point 3786 01:41:32,210 --> 01:41:32,554 something, but you 3787 01:41:32,554 --> 01:41:33,223 re asking 3788 01:41:33,223 --> 01:41:33,623 that, you know, and if that 3789 01:41:33,623 --> 01:41:35,623 s 3790 01:41:35,725 --> 01:41:38,262 the city code, then more than 3791 01:41:38,262 --> 01:41:39,763 happy to adhere to that city 3792 01:41:39,763 --> 01:41:40,630 code. Yeah, I think that 3793 01:41:40,630 --> 01:41:40,264 s 3794 01:41:40,264 --> 01:41:40,864 that 3795 01:41:40,864 --> 01:41:41,131 s part of what you 3796 01:41:41,131 --> 01:41:41,599 re 3797 01:41:41,599 --> 01:41:42,320 asking. 3798 01:41:42,320 --> 01:41:42,533 I think that 3799 01:41:42,533 --> 01:41:44,234 s correct. 3800 01:41:44,234 --> 01:41:44,401 Okay. The second thing I think 3801 01:41:44,401 --> 01:41:45,803 you 3802 01:41:45,803 --> 01:41:48,203 re asking, which is 3803 01:41:48,339 --> 01:41:49,774 confusing, I know I, me and I 3804 01:41:49,774 --> 01:41:51,209 think several of my 3805 01:41:51,209 --> 01:41:53,110 commissioners, it fell 3806 01:41:53,110 --> 01:41:53,845 commissioners is the second 3807 01:41:53,845 --> 01:41:55,845 piece you 3808 01:41:55,881 --> 01:41:57,881 re referencing the 3809 01:41:58,517 --> 01:41:59,850 1375 cap. And you 3810 01:41:59,850 --> 01:42:00,319 ve gone into 3811 01:42:00,319 --> 01:42:02,255 a lot of detail. Would it have 3812 01:42:02,255 --> 01:42:04,257 been simpler to just say, I 3813 01:42:04,257 --> 01:42:05,158 know that based on that master 3814 01:42:05,158 --> 01:42:06,726 plan, that 3815 01:42:06,726 --> 01:42:08,929 s going to take the 3816 01:42:08,929 --> 01:42:11,329 number of 13 is 1375, whatever 3817 01:42:11,365 --> 01:42:11,499 it is up to, you know, 1500, 3818 01:42:11,499 --> 01:42:12,633 I 3819 01:42:12,633 --> 01:42:13,000 ll just use round numbers. 3820 01:42:13,000 --> 01:42:14,680 And you 3821 01:42:14,680 --> 01:42:14,735 re asking the city to 3822 01:42:14,735 --> 01:42:16,470 say that 3823 01:42:16,470 --> 01:42:16,604 s okay. I think that 3824 01:42:16,604 --> 01:42:16,871 s 3825 01:42:16,871 --> 01:42:17,505 what you 3826 01:42:17,505 --> 01:42:18,720 re asking. 3827 01:42:18,720 --> 01:42:18,973 I think that 3828 01:42:18,973 --> 01:42:21,973 s one way to look 3829 01:42:22,900 --> 01:42:24,379 at it. Um, but I didn 3830 01:42:24,379 --> 01:42:26,379 t want to 3831 01:42:26,515 --> 01:42:29,180 confuse and say that we were 3832 01:42:29,180 --> 01:42:32,618 asking for the number to be, 3833 01:42:32,956 --> 01:42:34,157 um, raised from 1375 because we 3834 01:42:34,157 --> 01:42:35,240 were told we can 3835 01:42:35,240 --> 01:42:36,226 t do that 3836 01:42:36,226 --> 01:42:36,426 without rezoning the whole 3837 01:42:36,426 --> 01:42:37,600 thing. 3838 01:42:37,600 --> 01:42:39,600 I understand. 3839 01:42:39,629 --> 01:42:41,598 Which which, frankly, um, I 3840 01:42:41,598 --> 01:42:43,267 disagreed with, but I respect 3841 01:42:43,267 --> 01:42:43,468 what the city staff. And we 3842 01:42:43,468 --> 01:42:44,302 didn 3843 01:42:44,302 --> 01:42:46,171 t want to have a big 3844 01:42:46,171 --> 01:42:47,205 argument with them. But to me, 3845 01:42:47,205 --> 01:42:50,805 the easiest thing to do would 3846 01:42:50,975 --> 01:42:53,679 have been a one line condition 3847 01:42:53,679 --> 01:42:56,140 request. Can we just take the 3848 01:42:56,140 --> 01:42:58,250 cap off and follow the code 3849 01:42:58,250 --> 01:42:58,584 that? But I get it. They 3850 01:42:58,584 --> 01:42:59,170 re 3851 01:42:59,170 --> 01:43:00,190 saying we can 3852 01:43:00,190 --> 01:43:00,152 t do that and I 3853 01:43:00,152 --> 01:43:01,540 m 3854 01:43:01,540 --> 01:43:02,155 not going to argue with them. 3855 01:43:02,155 --> 01:43:02,522 So we said, well, we 3856 01:43:02,522 --> 01:43:03,757 re really 3857 01:43:03,757 --> 01:43:05,792 only talking about seven and a 3858 01:43:05,792 --> 01:43:06,526 half acres here of that 3859 01:43:06,526 --> 01:43:08,526 s sort 3860 01:43:09,620 --> 01:43:10,364 of vacant. And if we add the 3861 01:43:10,364 --> 01:43:11,198 office space in because we own 3862 01:43:11,198 --> 01:43:11,465 it and it makes sense, it 3863 01:43:11,465 --> 01:43:13,200 s in 3864 01:43:13,200 --> 01:43:14,301 the same block. If we add that 3865 01:43:14,301 --> 01:43:16,904 in, then that would allow us to 3866 01:43:16,904 --> 01:43:19,474 do cd you. If that opportunity 3867 01:43:19,474 --> 01:43:21,310 presents itself and we will 3868 01:43:21,310 --> 01:43:24,179 follow the code, we will we 3869 01:43:24,179 --> 01:43:25,881 will follow your code. And in 3870 01:43:25,881 --> 01:43:26,649 addition to all the other 3871 01:43:26,649 --> 01:43:27,490 conditions that we 3872 01:43:27,490 --> 01:43:27,216 ve said, 3873 01:43:27,216 --> 01:43:27,516 we 3874 01:43:27,516 --> 01:43:28,500 re we 3875 01:43:28,500 --> 01:43:29,552 re fine with. 3876 01:43:29,552 --> 01:43:29,818 Yeah, all things being equal. 3877 01:43:29,818 --> 01:43:30,419 Yeah. We 3878 01:43:30,419 --> 01:43:30,819 ll just follow the 3879 01:43:30,819 --> 01:43:31,387 code again. We 3880 01:43:31,387 --> 01:43:33,387 re not asking 3881 01:43:33,489 --> 01:43:34,757 for any extra density or any 3882 01:43:34,757 --> 01:43:35,257 special treatment. We 3883 01:43:35,257 --> 01:43:37,257 re just 3884 01:43:37,428 --> 01:43:38,562 asking that the commission and 3885 01:43:38,562 --> 01:43:40,970 ultimately the City Council, 3886 01:43:40,970 --> 01:43:41,666 please look back at a condition 3887 01:43:41,666 --> 01:43:43,568 that was placed on this 13 3888 01:43:43,568 --> 01:43:45,536 years ago. Does it make sense? 3889 01:43:45,536 --> 01:43:46,904 Today? We respectfully contend 3890 01:43:46,904 --> 01:43:48,600 it does not make sense today. 3891 01:43:48,600 --> 01:43:48,206 And the condition that you 3892 01:43:48,206 --> 01:43:49,574 re 3893 01:43:49,574 --> 01:43:51,974 referencing is nothing more 3894 01:43:52,444 --> 01:43:53,179 than the 1375 cap. That 3895 01:43:53,179 --> 01:43:53,612 s it in 3896 01:43:53,612 --> 01:43:53,813 a nutshell. 3897 01:43:53,813 --> 01:43:54,580 That 3898 01:43:54,580 --> 01:43:54,714 s it in a nutshell. We 3899 01:43:54,714 --> 01:43:56,282 re 3900 01:43:56,282 --> 01:43:56,415 here because of that. Um, I 3901 01:43:56,415 --> 01:43:58,510 m 3902 01:43:58,510 --> 01:43:59,452 not going to call it arbitrary, 3903 01:43:59,452 --> 01:44:00,320 because there was certainly a 3904 01:44:00,320 --> 01:44:01,540 reason for it. And I 3905 01:44:01,540 --> 01:44:01,287 m not I 3906 01:44:01,287 --> 01:44:01,788 m 3907 01:44:01,788 --> 01:44:02,655 not saying it 3908 01:44:02,655 --> 01:44:04,157 s some random 3909 01:44:04,157 --> 01:44:05,291 number. I think it had to 3910 01:44:05,291 --> 01:44:06,659 probably do with the overall 3911 01:44:06,659 --> 01:44:09,590 density. And they were 3912 01:44:09,963 --> 01:44:10,970 calculating things and I don 3913 01:44:10,970 --> 01:44:11,966 t 3914 01:44:11,966 --> 01:44:13,868 know how that number came to, 3915 01:44:13,868 --> 01:44:14,602 um, but that was the number 3916 01:44:14,602 --> 01:44:14,769 that was put on there. 3917 01:44:14,769 --> 01:44:15,971 It 3918 01:44:15,971 --> 01:44:16,638 s probably relevant at this 3919 01:44:16,638 --> 01:44:18,638 point. 3920 01:44:18,907 --> 01:44:19,407 I think 13 years later it 3921 01:44:19,407 --> 01:44:20,508 s 3922 01:44:20,508 --> 01:44:20,909 well outdated. It 3923 01:44:20,909 --> 01:44:22,811 s out there. 3924 01:44:22,811 --> 01:44:24,880 Just trying to simplify the 3925 01:44:24,880 --> 01:44:26,248 ask. Yes, in my mind so that, 3926 01:44:26,248 --> 01:44:26,815 you know, to consider it. And I 3927 01:44:26,815 --> 01:44:27,683 think you 3928 01:44:27,683 --> 01:44:30,830 ve answered my first 3929 01:44:30,353 --> 01:44:32,956 question that says, you know, 3930 01:44:32,956 --> 01:44:33,123 separate. Oh, and I for this as 3931 01:44:33,123 --> 01:44:34,992 you 3932 01:44:34,992 --> 01:44:36,927 ve cordoned off. Right. And 3933 01:44:36,927 --> 01:44:37,895 I want to develop that tree, 3934 01:44:37,895 --> 01:44:39,329 the pieces that are, you know, 3935 01:44:39,329 --> 01:44:41,565 these in your picture of their 3936 01:44:41,565 --> 01:44:43,867 treed want to have the ability 3937 01:44:43,867 --> 01:44:46,171 to do residential right within 3938 01:44:46,171 --> 01:44:48,507 the city code, which is the 17 3939 01:44:48,507 --> 01:44:50,507 times 12 point something 200 3940 01:44:51,610 --> 01:44:53,779 and 208 um, and could get 3941 01:44:53,779 --> 01:44:56,615 bigger if you do the. If you do 3942 01:44:56,615 --> 01:44:56,816 the different calculations. So 3943 01:44:56,816 --> 01:44:57,490 that 3944 01:44:57,490 --> 01:44:58,500 s, that 3945 01:44:58,500 --> 01:44:58,517 s the first ask. 3946 01:44:58,517 --> 01:44:59,151 And I think what 3947 01:44:59,151 --> 01:45:01,151 s confused 3948 01:45:01,387 --> 01:45:04,258 this is without a plan without 3949 01:45:04,258 --> 01:45:05,125 a site plan. The second piece 3950 01:45:05,125 --> 01:45:05,726 at least, and I 3951 01:45:05,726 --> 01:45:07,726 ve heard has 3952 01:45:08,162 --> 01:45:09,530 caused some confusion. And the 3953 01:45:09,530 --> 01:45:11,399 other, the other piece of the 3954 01:45:11,399 --> 01:45:12,660 confusion is, again, I 3955 01:45:12,660 --> 01:45:13,301 m 3956 01:45:13,301 --> 01:45:13,501 struggling personally with it 3957 01:45:13,501 --> 01:45:14,168 s 3958 01:45:14,168 --> 01:45:15,303 the second piece. It 3959 01:45:15,303 --> 01:45:17,205 s the 3960 01:45:17,205 --> 01:45:17,972 1375. And I don 3961 01:45:17,972 --> 01:45:18,539 t mean this is 3962 01:45:18,539 --> 01:45:19,707 I, I don 3963 01:45:19,707 --> 01:45:22,178 t know that I care 3964 01:45:22,178 --> 01:45:22,745 about 1375 at this point. 3965 01:45:22,745 --> 01:45:23,446 Right. That 3966 01:45:23,446 --> 01:45:24,413 s that 3967 01:45:24,413 --> 01:45:24,680 s kind of 3968 01:45:24,680 --> 01:45:25,381 where I 3969 01:45:25,381 --> 01:45:26,149 m at a little bit 3970 01:45:26,149 --> 01:45:27,383 because we 3971 01:45:27,383 --> 01:45:29,783 re talking about a 3972 01:45:30,860 --> 01:45:32,555 limited, you know, bound by 3973 01:45:32,555 --> 01:45:33,890 conditions, you know, bound by 3974 01:45:33,890 --> 01:45:34,524 city code. Um, I 3975 01:45:34,524 --> 01:45:36,326 m not sure 3976 01:45:36,326 --> 01:45:36,893 that I care that that 3977 01:45:36,893 --> 01:45:37,527 s going 3978 01:45:37,527 --> 01:45:37,795 to change because it 3979 01:45:37,795 --> 01:45:39,297 s not 3980 01:45:39,297 --> 01:45:42,801 going to change any of the 3981 01:45:42,801 --> 01:45:44,402 other pieces of the 1375 in any 3982 01:45:44,402 --> 01:45:45,236 of the other residential pieces 3983 01:45:45,236 --> 01:45:46,738 that are there, does that 3984 01:45:46,738 --> 01:45:47,405 change in any of that at all? 3985 01:45:47,405 --> 01:45:47,572 Correct. 3986 01:45:47,572 --> 01:45:48,673 We 3987 01:45:48,673 --> 01:45:49,908 re not changing anything 3988 01:45:49,908 --> 01:45:50,108 outside of that yellow dotted 3989 01:45:50,108 --> 01:45:50,275 area. 3990 01:45:50,275 --> 01:45:50,809 We 3991 01:45:50,809 --> 01:45:50,976 re saying the same thing. 3992 01:45:50,976 --> 01:45:51,676 We 3993 01:45:51,676 --> 01:45:51,977 re not changing. We 3994 01:45:51,977 --> 01:45:53,211 re not 3995 01:45:53,211 --> 01:45:53,779 proposing that anything change 3996 01:45:53,779 --> 01:45:54,790 outside of that. 3997 01:45:54,790 --> 01:45:55,130 Yeah, that 3998 01:45:55,130 --> 01:45:56,282 s what I just want 3999 01:45:56,282 --> 01:45:57,116 to get clear in my mind. Keep 4000 01:45:57,116 --> 01:45:57,317 it real simple. What 4001 01:45:57,317 --> 01:45:57,450 s you 4002 01:45:57,450 --> 01:45:57,684 re 4003 01:45:57,684 --> 01:45:58,218 asking? 4004 01:45:58,218 --> 01:45:59,552 Yes, sir. 4005 01:45:59,552 --> 01:45:59,753 Two things. That 4006 01:45:59,753 --> 01:45:59,919 s all. 4007 01:45:59,919 --> 01:46:00,220 You 4008 01:46:00,220 --> 01:46:00,487 re asking. We 4009 01:46:00,487 --> 01:46:02,880 re not 4010 01:46:02,880 --> 01:46:03,423 proposing there be any change 4011 01:46:03,423 --> 01:46:06,326 to anything out of that yellow 4012 01:46:06,326 --> 01:46:06,493 dotted area. Okay? And, um, 4013 01:46:06,493 --> 01:46:07,928 we 4014 01:46:07,928 --> 01:46:09,263 re and we 4015 01:46:09,263 --> 01:46:10,497 re proposing a 4016 01:46:10,497 --> 01:46:11,465 number of conditions on top of 4017 01:46:11,465 --> 01:46:11,999 your code. Right. We 4018 01:46:11,999 --> 01:46:13,999 ll follow 4019 01:46:16,204 --> 01:46:17,720 your code and almost, I guess 4020 01:46:17,720 --> 01:46:17,906 everything. Well, not 4021 01:46:17,906 --> 01:46:19,740 everything, because some of 4022 01:46:19,740 --> 01:46:21,710 this is outside of Berkeley, 4023 01:46:21,710 --> 01:46:24,113 but was was not developed with 4024 01:46:24,113 --> 01:46:25,948 a specific site plan. Anyway, 4025 01:46:25,948 --> 01:46:28,317 as far as the seed plan, it was 4026 01:46:28,317 --> 01:46:30,152 a it was to allow flexibility 4027 01:46:30,152 --> 01:46:31,855 with the development. And I 4028 01:46:31,855 --> 01:46:32,223 think my clients have proven 4029 01:46:32,223 --> 01:46:33,457 that they 4030 01:46:33,457 --> 01:46:34,725 ve been very 4031 01:46:34,725 --> 01:46:36,260 responsible with that 4032 01:46:36,260 --> 01:46:38,280 flexibility. And there is 4033 01:46:38,280 --> 01:46:38,329 absolutely no reason to believe 4034 01:46:38,329 --> 01:46:38,996 that they 4035 01:46:38,996 --> 01:46:41,165 re going to come in 4036 01:46:41,165 --> 01:46:43,000 there and do something to hurt 4037 01:46:43,000 --> 01:46:44,201 their own development. They 4038 01:46:44,201 --> 01:46:44,502 have done all of that around 4039 01:46:44,502 --> 01:46:46,104 it. It 4040 01:46:46,104 --> 01:46:47,272 s in the middle of this 4041 01:46:47,272 --> 01:46:47,405 mixed use development, and it 4042 01:46:47,405 --> 01:46:49,208 s 4043 01:46:49,208 --> 01:46:50,509 sort of the last little piece 4044 01:46:50,509 --> 01:46:52,278 of the puzzle. And we were 4045 01:46:52,278 --> 01:46:54,314 trying to get some more density 4046 01:46:54,314 --> 01:46:55,881 in there because the city needs 4047 01:46:55,881 --> 01:46:56,282 it. There 4048 01:46:56,282 --> 01:46:56,883 s there 4049 01:46:56,883 --> 01:46:58,883 s a demand 4050 01:47:00,186 --> 01:47:00,854 for it. I can go on and on, but 4051 01:47:00,854 --> 01:47:02,854 I think it 4052 01:47:03,356 --> 01:47:05,560 s an ideal place to 4053 01:47:05,560 --> 01:47:06,270 put density. You 4054 01:47:06,270 --> 01:47:08,270 re not going 4055 01:47:08,362 --> 01:47:11,232 to find a better established 4056 01:47:11,232 --> 01:47:12,700 infrastructure of roadways, 4057 01:47:12,700 --> 01:47:14,536 access to signalized 4058 01:47:14,536 --> 01:47:16,671 intersections, center of the 4059 01:47:16,671 --> 01:47:18,440 city. Uh, people could walk to 4060 01:47:18,440 --> 01:47:19,808 work. People can walk to 4061 01:47:19,808 --> 01:47:21,760 restaurant, they can walk to 4062 01:47:21,760 --> 01:47:21,677 the movie theater. There 4063 01:47:21,677 --> 01:47:23,246 s 4064 01:47:23,246 --> 01:47:24,948 sidewalks out there. There 4065 01:47:24,948 --> 01:47:25,115 s 4066 01:47:25,115 --> 01:47:26,149 it 4067 01:47:26,149 --> 01:47:27,283 s it 4068 01:47:27,283 --> 01:47:28,118 s where you want to put 4069 01:47:28,118 --> 01:47:28,485 density. If you 4070 01:47:28,485 --> 01:47:29,686 re going to 4071 01:47:29,686 --> 01:47:30,286 concentrate density to where 4072 01:47:30,286 --> 01:47:30,453 you want to put it. 4073 01:47:30,453 --> 01:47:31,588 You 4074 01:47:31,588 --> 01:47:32,222 ve answered my two 4075 01:47:32,222 --> 01:47:32,689 questions. So I 4076 01:47:32,689 --> 01:47:33,123 ll I 4077 01:47:33,123 --> 01:47:33,690 ll go 4078 01:47:33,690 --> 01:47:34,691 silent and I 4079 01:47:34,691 --> 01:47:37,910 ll defer back to 4080 01:47:38,228 --> 01:47:38,729 the chair, please. 4081 01:47:38,729 --> 01:47:39,697 Matt, you 4082 01:47:39,697 --> 01:47:41,800 re doing great. You 4083 01:47:41,800 --> 01:47:43,401 really are. And I understand 4084 01:47:43,401 --> 01:47:44,736 and I, I will shut up after 4085 01:47:44,736 --> 01:47:44,903 this one. But quite frankly, 4086 01:47:44,903 --> 01:47:46,271 it 4087 01:47:46,271 --> 01:47:46,505 s not directed to you. It 4088 01:47:46,505 --> 01:47:47,840 s 4089 01:47:47,840 --> 01:47:48,206 directed to staff. So if I 4090 01:47:48,206 --> 01:47:49,108 m 4091 01:47:49,108 --> 01:47:51,143 out of line doing that, 4092 01:47:51,143 --> 01:47:53,412 somebody tell me. But, um, is 4093 01:47:53,412 --> 01:47:54,313 there any aspect of this 4094 01:47:54,313 --> 01:47:55,881 proposal that 4095 01:47:55,881 --> 01:47:58,281 s been before us? 4096 01:48:00,554 --> 01:48:02,556 Um, in violation of that cap 4097 01:48:02,556 --> 01:48:03,724 that originated back on 4098 01:48:03,724 --> 01:48:05,726 whatever year that it was of 4099 01:48:05,726 --> 01:48:05,926 1300? Is there any aspect of 4100 01:48:05,926 --> 01:48:07,940 what 4101 01:48:07,940 --> 01:48:08,195 s being asked to do here, 4102 01:48:08,195 --> 01:48:10,565 which is obviously going to 4103 01:48:10,565 --> 01:48:12,200 make a higher number? Is that a 4104 01:48:12,200 --> 01:48:14,268 problem to staff? Because if 4105 01:48:14,268 --> 01:48:14,636 you guys got worked out, I got 4106 01:48:14,636 --> 01:48:16,636 it worked. 4107 01:48:17,873 --> 01:48:20,576 Out. If this property is 4108 01:48:20,576 --> 01:48:22,178 rezoned to a new cd and and for 4109 01:48:22,178 --> 01:48:23,913 all intents and purposes 4110 01:48:23,913 --> 01:48:26,149 removed from that original 4111 01:48:26,149 --> 01:48:27,450 master plan, then it would be 4112 01:48:27,450 --> 01:48:28,585 compliant on its own and it 4113 01:48:28,585 --> 01:48:30,530 would not be in conflict with 4114 01:48:30,530 --> 01:48:31,488 the original master plan. 4115 01:48:31,488 --> 01:48:33,324 Okay, and I understand that, 4116 01:48:33,324 --> 01:48:33,925 but you use the word if. Is 4117 01:48:33,925 --> 01:48:34,992 that what we 4118 01:48:34,992 --> 01:48:35,193 re doing? 4119 01:48:35,193 --> 01:48:35,827 That 4120 01:48:35,827 --> 01:48:35,960 s exactly what you 4121 01:48:35,960 --> 01:48:36,194 re 4122 01:48:36,194 --> 01:48:38,194 doing. 4123 01:48:39,797 --> 01:48:41,633 Okay. Thank you. 4124 01:48:41,633 --> 01:48:44,269 Does anyone have any more 4125 01:48:44,269 --> 01:48:45,871 questions, Commissioner coffer? 4126 01:48:45,871 --> 01:48:46,872 Sorry, I apologize, not trying 4127 01:48:46,872 --> 01:48:47,906 to belabor anything, but you 4128 01:48:47,906 --> 01:48:48,390 made a few comments that I 4129 01:48:48,390 --> 01:48:48,974 m 4130 01:48:48,974 --> 01:48:50,877 just curious to get some 4131 01:48:50,877 --> 01:48:53,379 clarity on. On the cdm muse 4132 01:48:53,379 --> 01:48:55,348 come up several times. So how 4133 01:48:55,348 --> 01:48:56,783 does that fit into this 4134 01:48:56,783 --> 01:48:59,219 discussion of rezoning to. Oh, 4135 01:48:59,219 --> 01:49:00,354 and I for this parcel? 4136 01:49:00,354 --> 01:49:02,723 Well, we would have the 4137 01:49:02,723 --> 01:49:04,725 opportunity to do residential 4138 01:49:04,725 --> 01:49:05,325 on the only property zoned. Oh 4139 01:49:05,325 --> 01:49:05,993 and I now we 4140 01:49:05,993 --> 01:49:08,263 re asking for that 4141 01:49:08,263 --> 01:49:09,497 to stay the same. But we would 4142 01:49:09,497 --> 01:49:11,133 have the opportunity to do the 4143 01:49:11,133 --> 01:49:13,533 cdm with the existing 4144 01:49:13,869 --> 01:49:15,103 commercial. That is what that 4145 01:49:15,103 --> 01:49:15,370 would be within the district 4146 01:49:15,370 --> 01:49:16,572 that you 4147 01:49:16,572 --> 01:49:18,572 re considering the 4148 01:49:21,176 --> 01:49:23,176 12.5 for 12.25 acres. 4149 01:49:23,345 --> 01:49:24,580 And and this would have to just 4150 01:49:24,580 --> 01:49:26,516 jump over to staff. So how does 4151 01:49:26,516 --> 01:49:26,750 that change the complexion of 4152 01:49:26,750 --> 01:49:27,584 what we 4153 01:49:27,584 --> 01:49:29,984 re talking about when 4154 01:49:30,254 --> 01:49:33,324 we go from, oh, and I without 4155 01:49:33,324 --> 01:49:34,925 us, with 208 units, based on 4156 01:49:34,925 --> 01:49:36,494 your acreage calculations, no 4157 01:49:36,494 --> 01:49:37,895 site plan for the structure. 4158 01:49:37,895 --> 01:49:40,564 Um, but conditions that the 4159 01:49:40,564 --> 01:49:42,333 applicant self-imposed had cdm 4160 01:49:42,333 --> 01:49:43,335 um, fit into this. What what 4161 01:49:43,335 --> 01:49:45,400 was that look like? 4162 01:49:45,400 --> 01:49:47,840 If this is rezoned to a new. 4163 01:49:47,840 --> 01:49:50,509 Oh, and I cd, the cdm would be 4164 01:49:50,509 --> 01:49:51,677 an option for development under 4165 01:49:51,677 --> 01:49:52,545 the under the new conditional 4166 01:49:52,545 --> 01:49:54,545 district. 4167 01:49:54,714 --> 01:49:54,981 With a cap of 208 residential 4168 01:49:54,981 --> 01:49:56,516 units. 4169 01:49:56,516 --> 01:49:57,650 It would be capped at 17 units 4170 01:49:57,650 --> 01:49:58,885 pe acre, which I believe works 4171 01:49:58,885 --> 01:50:00,454 out to 208 units. 4172 01:50:00,454 --> 01:50:02,356 Is there anything else 4173 01:50:02,356 --> 01:50:03,891 significant or salient that we 4174 01:50:03,891 --> 01:50:06,194 would need to know about cnu at 4175 01:50:06,194 --> 01:50:07,595 that point to evaluate this 4176 01:50:07,595 --> 01:50:09,595 properly? 4177 01:50:10,398 --> 01:50:11,990 Um, the cdm requirements, cdm 4178 01:50:11,990 --> 01:50:12,000 requirements, there 4179 01:50:12,000 --> 01:50:13,235 s a minimum 4180 01:50:13,235 --> 01:50:13,435 commercial component. There 4181 01:50:13,435 --> 01:50:14,603 s a 4182 01:50:14,603 --> 01:50:14,803 minimum parking requirement, 4183 01:50:14,803 --> 01:50:15,704 there 4184 01:50:15,704 --> 01:50:16,538 s a minimum open space 4185 01:50:16,538 --> 01:50:16,772 requirement. And then there 4186 01:50:16,772 --> 01:50:18,474 s 4187 01:50:18,474 --> 01:50:19,142 the 17 units per acre on the 4188 01:50:19,142 --> 01:50:21,142 density. 4189 01:50:21,311 --> 01:50:22,378 Okay. Thank you Brian. 4190 01:50:22,378 --> 01:50:24,378 Yes, sir. 4191 01:50:24,581 --> 01:50:25,482 Um. We 4192 01:50:25,482 --> 01:50:28,482 ve talked a little bit 4193 01:50:28,885 --> 01:50:29,886 about the 1375 from 2013, and 4194 01:50:29,886 --> 01:50:30,200 maybe it was arbitrary. I 4195 01:50:30,200 --> 01:50:30,854 m 4196 01:50:30,854 --> 01:50:32,890 sure it had some kind of 4197 01:50:32,890 --> 01:50:33,557 purpose, but if you do the math 4198 01:50:33,557 --> 01:50:33,724 on 302 acres, it looks like 4199 01:50:33,724 --> 01:50:35,527 it 4200 01:50:35,527 --> 01:50:37,329 s about 4.5 units per acre. 4201 01:50:37,329 --> 01:50:39,164 And this 208 addition would 4202 01:50:39,164 --> 01:50:40,499 make you right on 5.5 units per 4203 01:50:40,499 --> 01:50:42,634 acre, which kind of lends 4204 01:50:42,634 --> 01:50:44,369 itself into r somewhere between 4205 01:50:44,369 --> 01:50:46,171 r seven and our ten. If we were 4206 01:50:46,171 --> 01:50:49,771 to rezone the whole site today, 4207 01:50:49,809 --> 01:50:51,100 302 acres to our between our 4208 01:50:51,100 --> 01:50:53,460 seven and our ten, it would be 4209 01:50:53,460 --> 01:50:54,681 this calculation if we applied 4210 01:50:54,681 --> 01:50:56,617 it to the whole project. I just 4211 01:50:56,617 --> 01:50:58,819 wanted to make that little, um, 4212 01:50:58,819 --> 01:51:00,921 comment and see if you, I 4213 01:51:00,921 --> 01:51:02,256 guess, part of why this feels a 4214 01:51:02,256 --> 01:51:02,423 little disjointed is because we 4215 01:51:02,423 --> 01:51:03,457 don 4216 01:51:03,457 --> 01:51:04,992 t have the full history of 4217 01:51:04,992 --> 01:51:05,426 that file. You know, we weren 4218 01:51:05,426 --> 01:51:06,861 t 4219 01:51:06,861 --> 01:51:07,610 there. Part of this thread 4220 01:51:07,610 --> 01:51:08,496 that 4221 01:51:08,496 --> 01:51:09,864 s evolved, and I get the 4222 01:51:09,864 --> 01:51:11,166 flexibility that needs to be 4223 01:51:11,166 --> 01:51:12,968 injected into a project like 4224 01:51:12,968 --> 01:51:13,769 this, but MR.. The CHAIRMAN 4225 01:51:13,769 --> 01:51:16,238 Also brought up, you know, 4226 01:51:16,238 --> 01:51:17,640 other community, other projects 4227 01:51:17,640 --> 01:51:19,675 of this magnitude. And you 4228 01:51:19,675 --> 01:51:20,710 know, obviously I 4229 01:51:20,710 --> 01:51:21,744 m just one 4230 01:51:21,744 --> 01:51:23,713 person, but, you know, okay, 4231 01:51:23,713 --> 01:51:24,781 well, what if we plop 208 units 4232 01:51:24,781 --> 01:51:25,314 in the middle of Autumn Hall 4233 01:51:25,314 --> 01:51:25,949 just because it 4234 01:51:25,949 --> 01:51:27,585 s a local 4235 01:51:27,585 --> 01:51:28,886 family that has great, you 4236 01:51:28,886 --> 01:51:30,821 know, good faith and fair 4237 01:51:30,821 --> 01:51:33,221 dealings with the community. 4238 01:51:33,724 --> 01:51:35,126 Um, so, you know, one question 4239 01:51:35,126 --> 01:51:36,728 in that line of thought would 4240 01:51:36,728 --> 01:51:38,963 be that Wilmington Health 4241 01:51:38,963 --> 01:51:40,665 parcel that was sold off, was 4242 01:51:40,665 --> 01:51:43,340 that building completed when it 4243 01:51:43,340 --> 01:51:43,301 was sold, or was it. 4244 01:51:43,301 --> 01:51:44,803 Um, it 4245 01:51:44,803 --> 01:51:46,572 s being constructed now. 4246 01:51:46,572 --> 01:51:47,874 So they are Wilmington Health 4247 01:51:47,874 --> 01:51:49,375 is building it. 4248 01:51:49,375 --> 01:51:51,578 Yes. They own the property. 4249 01:51:51,578 --> 01:51:52,746 So the opportunity exists for 4250 01:51:52,746 --> 01:51:54,214 your client to sell this 4251 01:51:54,214 --> 01:51:55,715 property once it goes through 4252 01:51:55,715 --> 01:51:55,949 entitlement. And but you 4253 01:51:55,949 --> 01:51:56,950 wouldn 4254 01:51:56,950 --> 01:51:58,485 t build the proper 4255 01:51:58,485 --> 01:51:59,953 product. Just like woman Health 4256 01:51:59,953 --> 01:52:00,921 is not building that. I mean, 4257 01:52:00,921 --> 01:52:01,421 just like your client 4258 01:52:01,421 --> 01:52:02,857 s not 4259 01:52:02,857 --> 01:52:05,257 building the Wilmington Health 4260 01:52:07,529 --> 01:52:08,296 building. That fair to say? 4261 01:52:08,296 --> 01:52:09,331 Um, I 4262 01:52:09,331 --> 01:52:10,766 m not sure I understand 4263 01:52:10,766 --> 01:52:12,000 the question, but, I mean, my 4264 01:52:12,000 --> 01:52:13,302 client is anybody could could 4265 01:52:13,302 --> 01:52:15,204 sell their property at any 4266 01:52:15,204 --> 01:52:15,804 time. Yeah. I mean, that 4267 01:52:15,804 --> 01:52:15,971 s I 4268 01:52:15,971 --> 01:52:16,972 don 4269 01:52:16,972 --> 01:52:18,707 t I don 4270 01:52:18,707 --> 01:52:18,841 t mean that to be. 4271 01:52:18,841 --> 01:52:19,475 I 4272 01:52:19,475 --> 01:52:20,176 m just I don 4273 01:52:20,176 --> 01:52:20,877 t I 4274 01:52:20,877 --> 01:52:21,912 m not sure I 4275 01:52:21,912 --> 01:52:23,413 understand, but. Yeah. 4276 01:52:23,413 --> 01:52:25,582 Well I mean I think you, you, 4277 01:52:25,582 --> 01:52:27,170 you made a couple points and, 4278 01:52:27,170 --> 01:52:28,152 and I understand to advocate 4279 01:52:28,152 --> 01:52:30,120 for the client and the and the 4280 01:52:30,120 --> 01:52:32,423 family and the, the company. I 4281 01:52:32,423 --> 01:52:34,191 get that. Um, but but I think 4282 01:52:34,191 --> 01:52:35,493 in fairness and to be candid 4283 01:52:35,493 --> 01:52:36,930 and frank, it could be sold. 4284 01:52:36,930 --> 01:52:36,727 And they aren 4285 01:52:36,727 --> 01:52:38,464 t the ones who 4286 01:52:38,464 --> 01:52:38,931 built it. Build it. 4287 01:52:38,931 --> 01:52:39,765 Well, that 4288 01:52:39,765 --> 01:52:40,299 s true, but that 4289 01:52:40,299 --> 01:52:42,299 s 4290 01:52:42,434 --> 01:52:43,736 true. All you all zoning can 4291 01:52:43,736 --> 01:52:45,104 control is land use. You 4292 01:52:45,104 --> 01:52:46,873 absolutely have no control over 4293 01:52:46,873 --> 01:52:48,808 ownership, right? Uh, you can 4294 01:52:48,808 --> 01:52:51,811 own the property. You can put 4295 01:52:51,811 --> 01:52:53,120 it in a condo. You can. But the 4296 01:52:53,120 --> 01:52:56,120 assurances you have here are 4297 01:52:56,150 --> 01:52:57,685 the conditions. So it has to be 4298 01:52:57,685 --> 01:52:57,885 consistent with Berkeley West. 4299 01:52:57,885 --> 01:52:59,885 That 4300 01:53:01,556 --> 01:53:03,570 s in the conditions. Um, 4301 01:53:03,570 --> 01:53:03,691 let me let me again. I don 4302 01:53:03,691 --> 01:53:03,891 t I 4303 01:53:03,891 --> 01:53:05,159 didn 4304 01:53:05,159 --> 01:53:06,127 t really go through each 4305 01:53:06,127 --> 01:53:06,394 of the conditions, but I do 4306 01:53:06,394 --> 01:53:08,363 think it 4307 01:53:08,363 --> 01:53:10,363 s significant that, 4308 01:53:11,266 --> 01:53:12,702 um, the conditions are going to 4309 01:53:12,702 --> 01:53:14,904 require it, that it be 4310 01:53:14,904 --> 01:53:17,904 consistent with what you have 4311 01:53:18,107 --> 01:53:19,676 out there. Um, I mean, my 4312 01:53:19,676 --> 01:53:21,911 clients are are going to do 4313 01:53:21,911 --> 01:53:23,113 that anyway, but they have no 4314 01:53:23,113 --> 01:53:24,214 problem at all putting that as 4315 01:53:24,214 --> 01:53:24,481 a condition because they 4316 01:53:24,481 --> 01:53:26,481 re 4317 01:53:26,817 --> 01:53:28,952 going to mandate it. Um, zoning 4318 01:53:28,952 --> 01:53:29,850 or not. There. Again, they 4319 01:53:29,850 --> 01:53:29,887 re 4320 01:53:29,887 --> 01:53:30,880 not going to have anything 4321 01:53:30,880 --> 01:53:32,880 that 4322 01:53:32,924 --> 01:53:35,260 s not consistent with very 4323 01:53:35,260 --> 01:53:37,426 high quality mixed use 4324 01:53:37,729 --> 01:53:38,997 development. They they have an 4325 01:53:38,997 --> 01:53:41,397 extremely high level of 4326 01:53:41,533 --> 01:53:43,135 investment in this property. 4327 01:53:43,135 --> 01:53:43,902 And you can see that from just 4328 01:53:43,902 --> 01:53:46,302 look at the roadway 4329 01:53:47,273 --> 01:53:49,509 improvements alone. So, um, 4330 01:53:49,509 --> 01:53:49,676 regardless of who owns it, um, 4331 01:53:49,676 --> 01:53:50,510 it 4332 01:53:50,510 --> 01:53:52,546 s going to have to be 4333 01:53:52,546 --> 01:53:54,946 consistent with Berkeley West. 4334 01:53:57,170 --> 01:54:01,217 And you can see that with, um, 4335 01:54:01,655 --> 01:54:03,900 conditions. Um, nine for 4336 01:54:03,900 --> 01:54:04,158 example, linear strip retail 4337 01:54:04,158 --> 01:54:05,628 and service development shall 4338 01:54:05,628 --> 01:54:06,728 be prohibited unless proposed 4339 01:54:06,728 --> 01:54:07,363 architectural design is 4340 01:54:07,363 --> 01:54:08,931 compatible 4341 01:54:08,931 --> 01:54:10,432 And consistent with the 4342 01:54:10,432 --> 01:54:12,635 existing phases of the Berkeley 4343 01:54:12,635 --> 01:54:14,270 West development. And then we 4344 01:54:14,270 --> 01:54:15,338 go through ten, 11 and 12, 4345 01:54:15,338 --> 01:54:15,571 which is going to assure you 4346 01:54:15,571 --> 01:54:17,730 that it 4347 01:54:17,730 --> 01:54:18,541 s going to meet the 4348 01:54:18,541 --> 01:54:20,143 sort of the community standard, 4349 01:54:20,143 --> 01:54:23,113 if you will, out there with 4350 01:54:23,113 --> 01:54:26,113 what you see. And, um, 4351 01:54:26,684 --> 01:54:29,840 sidewalks, the parking, the. 4352 01:54:29,954 --> 01:54:31,522 Um, so whether they do it or 4353 01:54:31,522 --> 01:54:32,190 not, it they 4354 01:54:32,190 --> 01:54:33,891 re going to have 4355 01:54:33,891 --> 01:54:35,226 control over it. 4356 01:54:35,226 --> 01:54:36,761 Right. And those conditions 4357 01:54:36,761 --> 01:54:38,163 will follow the, the property. 4358 01:54:38,163 --> 01:54:39,832 Absolutely. Run with the land. 4359 01:54:39,832 --> 01:54:41,501 So it could be sold ten times 4360 01:54:41,501 --> 01:54:41,667 over. And and whoever does it 4361 01:54:41,667 --> 01:54:42,735 it 4362 01:54:42,735 --> 01:54:43,200 s going to have to it 4363 01:54:43,200 --> 01:54:43,870 s not 4364 01:54:43,870 --> 01:54:44,270 going to be sold ten times 4365 01:54:44,270 --> 01:54:46,270 over. But I 4366 01:54:46,539 --> 01:54:48,341 m just saying, um, 4367 01:54:48,341 --> 01:54:49,743 whoever has it has to meet all 4368 01:54:49,743 --> 01:54:51,177 of these conditions as well as 4369 01:54:51,177 --> 01:54:53,177 the code. Right. 4370 01:54:54,848 --> 01:54:56,883 Yeah. Um, I, I think that was 4371 01:54:56,883 --> 01:54:58,753 all my questions or comments. I 4372 01:54:58,753 --> 01:55:00,188 mean, beyond just echoing, I 4373 01:55:00,188 --> 01:55:01,189 think Commissioner Pollack had 4374 01:55:01,189 --> 01:55:03,158 mentioned, I mean, this is very 4375 01:55:03,158 --> 01:55:03,892 similar to a general rezoning. 4376 01:55:03,892 --> 01:55:04,993 Um, but it 4377 01:55:04,993 --> 01:55:06,194 s also similar to 4378 01:55:06,194 --> 01:55:07,796 you kind of having to do your 4379 01:55:07,796 --> 01:55:10,196 own infill development within 4380 01:55:10,732 --> 01:55:10,999 your master plan. Um, so thank 4381 01:55:10,999 --> 01:55:12,768 you. 4382 01:55:12,768 --> 01:55:14,768 Thank you. 4383 01:55:16,440 --> 01:55:16,673 Any other questions? Thank you 4384 01:55:16,673 --> 01:55:17,841 MISTER. 4385 01:55:17,841 --> 01:55:19,760 Thank you for your time and 4386 01:55:19,760 --> 01:55:20,310 consideration. I appreciate it. 4387 01:55:20,310 --> 01:55:20,577 Thank you. This time, I 4388 01:55:20,577 --> 01:55:22,577 d like 4389 01:55:22,679 --> 01:55:22,880 to open the public hearing. If 4390 01:55:22,880 --> 01:55:24,140 there 4391 01:55:24,140 --> 01:55:26,617 s anyone wishing to speak 4392 01:55:26,617 --> 01:55:29,119 in favor of agenda item number 4393 01:55:29,119 --> 01:55:32,119 two, please come up. Anyone 4394 01:55:32,257 --> 01:55:34,426 wishing to speak in favor? 4395 01:55:34,426 --> 01:55:37,426 Anyone wishing to speak in 4396 01:55:38,364 --> 01:55:40,165 opposition to agenda item two. 4397 01:55:40,165 --> 01:55:42,335 Anyone wishing to speak in 4398 01:55:42,335 --> 01:55:44,871 opposition. And we did receive 4399 01:55:44,871 --> 01:55:47,871 one written comment, which i 4400 01:55:48,740 --> 01:55:50,244 think everybody got today. 4401 01:55:50,244 --> 01:55:53,800 Same person on all three. 4402 01:55:53,800 --> 01:55:54,949 Yes, yes. Uh, but I believe I 4403 01:55:54,949 --> 01:55:56,918 think we in MISTER Nichols 4404 01:55:56,918 --> 01:55:59,186 addressed some of the items 4405 01:55:59,186 --> 01:56:01,550 that were brought up in that 4406 01:56:01,550 --> 01:56:02,290 hearing. No further, uh, 4407 01:56:02,290 --> 01:56:02,423 individuals wishing to speak. 4408 01:56:02,423 --> 01:56:03,825 I 4409 01:56:03,825 --> 01:56:04,359 ll close the public hearing 4410 01:56:04,359 --> 01:56:05,960 and we 4411 01:56:05,960 --> 01:56:07,563 ll start Commissioner 4412 01:56:07,563 --> 01:56:08,264 Jones, with you. Any thoughts? 4413 01:56:08,264 --> 01:56:08,397 Comments? 4414 01:56:08,397 --> 01:56:08,898 I 4415 01:56:08,898 --> 01:56:09,632 m good. Y 4416 01:56:09,632 --> 01:56:10,633 all asked every 4417 01:56:10,633 --> 01:56:12,168 question I could ever think 4418 01:56:12,168 --> 01:56:13,636 about asking. 4419 01:56:13,636 --> 01:56:13,770 Commissioner Woodruff. 4420 01:56:13,770 --> 01:56:15,672 I 4421 01:56:15,672 --> 01:56:16,606 m going to vote in favor 4422 01:56:16,606 --> 01:56:17,907 based upon staff 4423 01:56:17,907 --> 01:56:19,907 s statement 4424 01:56:20,110 --> 01:56:21,912 that this was pulling this 4425 01:56:21,912 --> 01:56:24,912 track out of the original 4426 01:56:25,249 --> 01:56:27,151 agreement and that the 1300 4427 01:56:27,151 --> 01:56:28,753 number is not applicable to 4428 01:56:28,753 --> 01:56:30,455 this anymore. So therefore, I 4429 01:56:30,455 --> 01:56:31,156 find it to be a great project. 4430 01:56:31,156 --> 01:56:32,570 Good luck. 4431 01:56:32,570 --> 01:56:33,391 Commissioner Pawlak. 4432 01:56:33,391 --> 01:56:35,791 Nothing further to add. 4433 01:56:36,261 --> 01:56:38,261 MR. Adams. 4434 01:56:38,263 --> 01:56:40,663 One clarifying question for 4435 01:56:40,699 --> 01:56:43,136 staff. This would be handled 4436 01:56:43,136 --> 01:56:45,238 under the regional Stormwater 4437 01:56:45,238 --> 01:56:46,206 design for all of Berkeley 4438 01:56:46,206 --> 01:56:47,341 West, right? 4439 01:56:47,341 --> 01:56:47,541 Yeah. All the properties out 4440 01:56:47,541 --> 01:56:47,707 there. 4441 01:56:47,707 --> 01:56:49,760 Are. 4442 01:56:49,760 --> 01:56:49,576 Subject to that regional pond. 4443 01:56:49,576 --> 01:56:49,943 Okay. 4444 01:56:49,943 --> 01:56:51,378 On this. 4445 01:56:51,378 --> 01:56:52,112 Side of the road? Yes. 4446 01:56:52,112 --> 01:56:54,112 Okay. 4447 01:56:54,314 --> 01:56:56,149 Um, it took me a while to get 4448 01:56:56,149 --> 01:56:57,518 comfortable with this because, 4449 01:56:57,518 --> 01:56:58,219 again, um. 4450 01:56:58,219 --> 01:57:00,219 i. 4451 01:57:00,355 --> 01:57:01,690 As a rule of principle, I like 4452 01:57:01,690 --> 01:57:03,625 seeing a site plan generally. 4453 01:57:03,625 --> 01:57:06,528 So we have some accountability 4454 01:57:06,528 --> 01:57:09,298 around design, but, um, knowing 4455 01:57:09,298 --> 01:57:11,600 the, the design guidelines of 4456 01:57:11,600 --> 01:57:14,600 the Berkeley West master plan, 4457 01:57:14,704 --> 01:57:17,274 the o and I, the city mu um, 4458 01:57:17,274 --> 01:57:19,376 you know, site plan guidelines. 4459 01:57:19,376 --> 01:57:20,811 It it took me a little bit also 4460 01:57:20,811 --> 01:57:22,120 just to, to I had to put my 4461 01:57:22,120 --> 01:57:22,780 brain around what could go 4462 01:57:22,780 --> 01:57:23,581 there because we 4463 01:57:23,581 --> 01:57:25,383 re not seeing 4464 01:57:25,383 --> 01:57:28,152 what a specific proposal would 4465 01:57:28,152 --> 01:57:30,522 be. And the napkin sketch to me 4466 01:57:30,522 --> 01:57:30,755 says, if you take Wilmington 4467 01:57:30,755 --> 01:57:32,490 Health 4468 01:57:32,490 --> 01:57:32,657 s building and parking, 4469 01:57:32,657 --> 01:57:33,658 you 4470 01:57:33,658 --> 01:57:36,696 re going to wind up with 4471 01:57:36,696 --> 01:57:39,232 plus or minus eight ish acres 4472 01:57:39,232 --> 01:57:41,968 of developable land, and you 4473 01:57:41,968 --> 01:57:45,380 divide that by 208 and you get 4474 01:57:45,380 --> 01:57:46,373 a density of about 20 to 23 4475 01:57:46,373 --> 01:57:48,441 units per acre, which is three 4476 01:57:48,441 --> 01:57:50,410 story, garden style apartments 4477 01:57:50,410 --> 01:57:51,878 in my mind. So I agree this is 4478 01:57:51,878 --> 01:57:53,481 the right place for for more 4479 01:57:53,481 --> 01:57:53,848 density. Um, and you know, I 4480 01:57:53,848 --> 01:57:55,216 ll 4481 01:57:55,216 --> 01:57:57,216 support this project. 4482 01:57:58,386 --> 01:58:00,322 Thank you, Commissioner Collier. 4483 01:58:00,322 --> 01:58:01,756 Other than to say I do agree, 4484 01:58:01,756 --> 01:58:03,225 the density is where it needs 4485 01:58:03,225 --> 01:58:05,761 to be in this project. Berkeley 4486 01:58:05,761 --> 01:58:06,928 is a great project. Never was 4487 01:58:06,928 --> 01:58:08,630 that in any question. I wanted 4488 01:58:08,630 --> 01:58:09,197 to make sure we the density 4489 01:58:09,197 --> 01:58:10,400 numbers were what we were 4490 01:58:10,400 --> 01:58:12,435 talking about. But I will 4491 01:58:12,435 --> 01:58:14,971 support it wholly. Thank you. 4492 01:58:14,971 --> 01:58:16,971 Commissioner Coffer. 4493 01:58:17,808 --> 01:58:19,808 Thank you. 4494 01:58:20,144 --> 01:58:20,744 I think the, um, I mean, it 4495 01:58:20,744 --> 01:58:20,911 s 4496 01:58:20,911 --> 01:58:21,845 it 4497 01:58:21,845 --> 01:58:22,980 s it 4498 01:58:22,980 --> 01:58:23,147 s just the approach and 4499 01:58:23,147 --> 01:58:24,315 it 4500 01:58:24,315 --> 01:58:24,715 s the procedure and it 4501 01:58:24,715 --> 01:58:26,117 s 4502 01:58:26,117 --> 01:58:28,253 having these come up before us 4503 01:58:28,253 --> 01:58:29,421 in different cases, outside of 4504 01:58:29,421 --> 01:58:31,323 a bubble plan, outside of a 4505 01:58:31,323 --> 01:58:32,691 master plan. How do you inject 4506 01:58:32,691 --> 01:58:34,930 it inside the master plan but 4507 01:58:34,930 --> 01:58:35,360 still evaluate it the same way 4508 01:58:35,360 --> 01:58:36,328 you would others? I mean, I 4509 01:58:36,328 --> 01:58:37,530 think the applicant asked 4510 01:58:37,530 --> 01:58:39,131 several times, or the counselor 4511 01:58:39,131 --> 01:58:40,399 asked, um, what is your concern 4512 01:58:40,399 --> 01:58:42,301 about putting this much density 4513 01:58:42,301 --> 01:58:42,468 on that site? Well, that we I 4514 01:58:42,468 --> 01:58:42,801 don 4515 01:58:42,801 --> 01:58:43,636 t think you 4516 01:58:43,636 --> 01:58:44,905 ve heard not 4517 01:58:44,905 --> 01:58:45,572 not a whole lot, but I had to 4518 01:58:45,572 --> 01:58:46,840 procedural it 4519 01:58:46,840 --> 01:58:48,642 s process and, 4520 01:58:48,642 --> 01:58:49,310 you know, um, not to it 4521 01:58:49,310 --> 01:58:49,710 s not 4522 01:58:49,710 --> 01:58:50,778 to say that you 4523 01:58:50,778 --> 01:58:52,460 re establishing 4524 01:58:52,460 --> 01:58:55,460 some sort of odd precedent, 4525 01:58:55,817 --> 01:58:58,820 but, um, you know, 208 in this 4526 01:58:58,820 --> 01:59:01,220 site within other Mayfair, 4527 01:59:01,589 --> 01:59:03,492 other other, you know, master 4528 01:59:03,492 --> 01:59:04,326 plans, but without a site plan 4529 01:59:04,326 --> 01:59:05,461 and without additional 4530 01:59:05,461 --> 01:59:06,896 questioning. I mean, it could 4531 01:59:06,896 --> 01:59:07,963 be it could be concerning 4532 01:59:07,963 --> 01:59:08,431 elsewhere, but I don 4533 01:59:08,431 --> 01:59:09,666 t think 4534 01:59:09,666 --> 01:59:11,167 there is a whole lot of concern 4535 01:59:11,167 --> 01:59:11,567 here in this particular site. 4536 01:59:11,567 --> 01:59:12,936 So, yes, I 4537 01:59:12,936 --> 01:59:15,405 m in favor of this 4538 01:59:15,405 --> 01:59:17,374 project or this rezoning. 4539 01:59:17,374 --> 01:59:18,875 I think this project has all 4540 01:59:18,875 --> 01:59:21,875 the buzzwords to get people 4541 01:59:22,246 --> 01:59:24,646 fired up. Density, apartments 4542 01:59:26,551 --> 01:59:29,551 change. Um, the agenda review. 4543 01:59:31,356 --> 01:59:33,859 This item took 90s maybe two 4544 01:59:33,859 --> 01:59:37,459 minutes to talk about. Um, and 4545 01:59:38,164 --> 01:59:40,200 so MISS Hopkins, I in no way my 4546 01:59:40,200 --> 01:59:41,701 suggestion, given what 4547 01:59:41,701 --> 01:59:43,236 transpired here tonight, is 4548 01:59:43,236 --> 01:59:46,440 that when this goes to council, 4549 01:59:46,440 --> 01:59:48,909 there be a more comprehensive 4550 01:59:48,909 --> 01:59:51,780 explanation of kind of where we 4551 01:59:51,780 --> 01:59:54,448 got to versus how long it took 4552 01:59:54,448 --> 01:59:57,219 us to get there, meaning, uh, 4553 01:59:57,219 --> 01:59:59,210 the large master plan. This is 4554 01:59:59,210 --> 01:59:59,822 a piece of that master plan. 4555 01:59:59,822 --> 02:00:00,288 This is what they 4556 02:00:00,288 --> 02:00:01,991 re asking 4557 02:00:01,991 --> 02:00:03,692 for. This is the outcome. And 4558 02:00:03,692 --> 02:00:07,292 ps, this is the perfect place 4559 02:00:07,630 --> 02:00:09,532 to do it. Um, because I think 4560 02:00:09,532 --> 02:00:13,270 it will go twice as long as it 4561 02:00:13,270 --> 02:00:14,905 did tonight. Um, otherwise. So 4562 02:00:14,905 --> 02:00:17,410 no, you did a great job. I 4563 02:00:17,410 --> 02:00:18,976 think. Just big picture going 4564 02:00:18,976 --> 02:00:20,644 through this experience. A 4565 02:00:20,644 --> 02:00:22,447 suggestion is to, uh, maybe 4566 02:00:22,447 --> 02:00:24,949 think about changing that up a 4567 02:00:24,949 --> 02:00:27,850 little bit. Um, everybody said 4568 02:00:27,850 --> 02:00:30,685 everything the right way to me. 4569 02:00:31,123 --> 02:00:32,258 This is a no brainer. So, 4570 02:00:32,258 --> 02:00:33,459 Commissioner Coffer, how would 4571 02:00:33,459 --> 02:00:34,160 you vote? Oh, I 4572 02:00:34,160 --> 02:00:35,394 m sorry. It 4573 02:00:35,394 --> 02:00:37,764 might help if somebody made a 4574 02:00:37,764 --> 02:00:41,364 motion first. What is the will 4575 02:00:43,603 --> 02:00:43,738 of the commission? 4576 02:00:43,738 --> 02:00:45,738 I 4577 02:00:45,872 --> 02:00:49,472 ll make a motion to approve. 4578 02:00:53,470 --> 02:00:53,181 Um, just give me one second. 4579 02:00:53,181 --> 02:00:54,482 I 4580 02:00:54,482 --> 02:00:55,684 ll make a motion to approve 4581 02:00:55,684 --> 02:00:58,620 agenda item number two. The 4582 02:00:58,620 --> 02:00:59,354 request to rezone 524 South 4583 02:00:59,354 --> 02:01:02,354 College Road. Is that the 4584 02:01:03,392 --> 02:01:04,928 correct one? Yes. Rezone from. 4585 02:01:04,928 --> 02:01:06,162 Oh and I cd office and 4586 02:01:06,162 --> 02:01:08,162 institutional conditional 4587 02:01:08,531 --> 02:01:09,866 district to a new cd office and 4588 02:01:09,866 --> 02:01:10,700 institutional conditional 4589 02:01:10,700 --> 02:01:12,302 district. The Planning 4590 02:01:12,302 --> 02:01:13,838 Commission um finds this 4591 02:01:13,838 --> 02:01:15,372 request to be consistent with 4592 02:01:15,372 --> 02:01:16,707 the objectives and policies of 4593 02:01:16,707 --> 02:01:17,674 the following plans adopted by 4594 02:01:17,674 --> 02:01:19,420 the City of Wilmington. 4595 02:01:19,420 --> 02:01:21,111 Commissioner Kupfer. Yes. Stop 4596 02:01:21,111 --> 02:01:23,615 you for a second. What is that 4597 02:01:23,615 --> 02:01:24,316 address? 4598 02:01:24,316 --> 02:01:26,316 Yeah. 4599 02:01:27,520 --> 02:01:30,520 On our paperwork, MISS Painter. 4600 02:01:33,659 --> 02:01:36,659 It says 524 South College Road. 4601 02:01:36,796 --> 02:01:39,796 That address should be 2 to 2 4602 02:01:41,135 --> 02:01:42,736 five Stonecrop Drive and 1124 4603 02:01:42,736 --> 02:01:43,971 Gallery Park Boulevard. 4604 02:01:43,971 --> 02:01:46,600 Okay, so just a point of order. 4605 02:01:46,600 --> 02:01:46,974 Can I. Can I write that on the. 4606 02:01:46,974 --> 02:01:47,708 Yes you can. 4607 02:01:47,708 --> 02:01:48,876 Yeah. 4608 02:01:48,876 --> 02:01:50,378 Okay. I 4609 02:01:50,378 --> 02:01:51,379 m sorry, Commissioner 4610 02:01:51,379 --> 02:01:52,120 Kupfer. I just wanted to 4611 02:01:52,120 --> 02:01:53,447 correct that. 4612 02:01:53,447 --> 02:01:54,482 So do I need to read that 4613 02:01:54,482 --> 02:01:56,718 address? Are you okay with 4614 02:01:56,718 --> 02:01:58,718 doing with right. 4615 02:01:58,854 --> 02:02:00,356 MR.. Sir. 4616 02:02:00,356 --> 02:02:00,956 Please read it again with that 4617 02:02:00,956 --> 02:02:02,625 address. 4618 02:02:02,625 --> 02:02:04,393 Okay. Can somebody, um, write 4619 02:02:04,393 --> 02:02:05,270 that down for me? I couldn 4620 02:02:05,270 --> 02:02:05,695 t 4621 02:02:05,695 --> 02:02:07,497 hear. 4622 02:02:07,497 --> 02:02:09,999 Hang on, hang on just one 4623 02:02:09,999 --> 02:02:11,999 second. 4624 02:02:12,350 --> 02:02:13,336 It should be on the agenda in 4625 02:02:13,336 --> 02:02:14,370 your packet. In your. 4626 02:02:14,370 --> 02:02:14,672 On the front. 4627 02:02:14,672 --> 02:02:15,573 Hang on. 4628 02:02:15,573 --> 02:02:17,573 Your folder. 4629 02:02:21,212 --> 02:02:23,281 I got it right here. The 4630 02:02:23,281 --> 02:02:24,816 address is going to be two two, 4631 02:02:24,816 --> 02:02:27,816 two five Stonecrop Drive and 4632 02:02:28,453 --> 02:02:28,920 1124 Gallery Park Boulevard. 4633 02:02:28,920 --> 02:02:30,456 Okay, let 4634 02:02:30,456 --> 02:02:31,858 s start over. I make 4635 02:02:31,858 --> 02:02:34,194 a motion to approve agenda item 4636 02:02:34,194 --> 02:02:37,194 number two. The request to 4637 02:02:37,664 --> 02:02:40,640 rezone 2225 Stonecrop Drive and 4638 02:02:40,300 --> 02:02:42,569 112 for Gallery Park Boulevard, 4639 02:02:42,569 --> 02:02:45,500 uh, from an existing oh and I 4640 02:02:45,500 --> 02:02:46,340 cd office and institutional 4641 02:02:46,340 --> 02:02:48,175 conditional district to a new 4642 02:02:48,175 --> 02:02:50,780 cd office and institutional 4643 02:02:50,780 --> 02:02:51,546 conditional district. Uh, the 4644 02:02:51,546 --> 02:02:52,914 Planning Commission finds this 4645 02:02:52,914 --> 02:02:54,383 request is consistent with the 4646 02:02:54,383 --> 02:02:55,651 objectives and policies of the 4647 02:02:55,651 --> 02:02:57,452 following plans adopted by the 4648 02:02:57,452 --> 02:02:59,455 City of Wilmington. The Create 4649 02:02:59,455 --> 02:03:00,623 Wilmington Comprehensive Plan. 4650 02:03:00,623 --> 02:03:01,957 Uh, the Planning Commission 4651 02:03:01,957 --> 02:03:03,359 considers its approval to be 4652 02:03:03,359 --> 02:03:05,728 reasonable and in the public 4653 02:03:05,728 --> 02:03:06,830 interest because the proposal 4654 02:03:06,830 --> 02:03:08,231 allows for additional 4655 02:03:08,231 --> 02:03:09,800 residential density and an 4656 02:03:09,800 --> 02:03:12,800 appropriate mix of uses and 4657 02:03:13,237 --> 02:03:15,172 proximity to services, while 4658 02:03:15,172 --> 02:03:17,172 remaining compatible with 4659 02:03:17,174 --> 02:03:18,843 existing character and 4660 02:03:18,843 --> 02:03:20,678 conditions. In the staff 4661 02:03:20,678 --> 02:03:22,246 report. Therefore, the Planning 4662 02:03:22,246 --> 02:03:24,246 Commission recommends approval 4663 02:03:24,917 --> 02:03:26,510 of this request. 4664 02:03:26,510 --> 02:03:27,453 Thank you, Commissioner Kupfer, 4665 02:03:27,453 --> 02:03:28,870 do we have a second? 4666 02:03:28,870 --> 02:03:29,989 Second. 4667 02:03:29,989 --> 02:03:30,823 Commissioner Jones a second. 4668 02:03:30,823 --> 02:03:32,823 Commissioner Cooper 4669 02:03:33,392 --> 02:03:35,270 s motion. 4670 02:03:35,270 --> 02:03:36,463 Commissioner Kerr for. A 4671 02:03:36,463 --> 02:03:38,164 commissioner. Collier. High 4672 02:03:38,164 --> 02:03:39,398 commissioner. Adams. Yes. 4673 02:03:39,398 --> 02:03:40,800 Commissioner. Pawlak. High 4674 02:03:40,800 --> 02:03:42,770 commissioner. Woodruff. High 4675 02:03:42,770 --> 02:03:45,170 commissioner. Jones. I the 4676 02:03:45,807 --> 02:03:48,207 chair. Votes. Passes 7 to 0. 4677 02:03:54,849 --> 02:03:57,849 Thank you very much. Agenda 4678 02:03:58,186 --> 02:04:01,186 item. Agenda item number three 4679 02:04:02,292 --> 02:04:04,961 is a request for 3301 Burnt 4680 02:04:04,961 --> 02:04:07,130 Mill drive to rezone from light 4681 02:04:07,130 --> 02:04:09,232 industrial to. Oni office and 4682 02:04:09,232 --> 02:04:11,232 institutional. And our 4683 02:04:11,735 --> 02:04:13,837 presenter is MISS Taylor. 4684 02:04:13,837 --> 02:04:14,972 All right. Good evening. Chair, 4685 02:04:14,972 --> 02:04:16,674 vice chair and members of the 4686 02:04:16,674 --> 02:04:18,243 Planning Commission. For your 4687 02:04:18,243 --> 02:04:21,113 review, I present a general 4688 02:04:21,113 --> 02:04:23,513 rezoning from Lee light 4689 02:04:24,349 --> 02:04:27,185 industry to Oni Office and 4690 02:04:27,185 --> 02:04:29,185 Institutional District at 3301 4691 02:04:31,791 --> 02:04:34,930 Mill Drive. This application 4692 02:04:34,930 --> 02:04:35,596 was submitted in mid-JULY, has 4693 02:04:35,596 --> 02:04:38,399 been reviewed by staff, and is 4694 02:04:38,399 --> 02:04:41,268 now at the first public hearing. 4695 02:04:41,268 --> 02:04:42,937 The site is currently zoned Lea 4696 02:04:42,937 --> 02:04:44,839 Light Industry and is occupied 4697 02:04:44,839 --> 02:04:47,408 by a single story multi-tenant 4698 02:04:47,408 --> 02:04:49,430 office building. The allowable 4699 02:04:49,430 --> 02:04:51,120 applicable uses in the Lea 4700 02:04:51,120 --> 02:04:53,120 district include professional 4701 02:04:53,616 --> 02:04:55,484 offices, light manufacturing, 4702 02:04:55,484 --> 02:04:57,486 wholesale, retail and warehouse 4703 02:04:57,486 --> 02:04:59,886 and distribution centers. The 4704 02:05:00,890 --> 02:05:02,124 maximum height is 45ft, with an 4705 02:05:02,124 --> 02:05:03,960 additional height of up to 96ft 4706 02:05:03,960 --> 02:05:05,695 allowed with a step. The 4707 02:05:05,695 --> 02:05:07,397 allowable applicable uses in 4708 02:05:07,397 --> 02:05:08,665 the proposed Oni district 4709 02:05:08,665 --> 02:05:10,665 include professional and 4710 02:05:10,801 --> 02:05:12,801 medical offices, personal 4711 02:05:13,400 --> 02:05:15,273 services, studios, and colleges 4712 02:05:15,273 --> 02:05:17,475 and universities. The maximum 4713 02:05:17,475 --> 02:05:19,644 height is again 45ft, with an 4714 02:05:19,644 --> 02:05:23,244 additional height of up to 96ft 4715 02:05:24,115 --> 02:05:26,151 allowed with a step back. The 4716 02:05:26,151 --> 02:05:28,121 site is located on Burnt Mill 4717 02:05:28,121 --> 02:05:29,923 Drive between Emerson Street 4718 02:05:29,923 --> 02:05:32,323 and Randall Parkway, and 4719 02:05:32,726 --> 02:05:34,661 consists of approximately 2.02 4720 02:05:34,661 --> 02:05:36,263 acres. The site is located 4721 02:05:36,263 --> 02:05:37,898 within the Burnt Mill Business 4722 02:05:37,898 --> 02:05:40,367 Park and is in the vicinity of 4723 02:05:40,367 --> 02:05:42,636 reserve at Forest Hills, Avalon 4724 02:05:42,636 --> 02:05:44,636 Apartments and Aspire 349 4725 02:05:44,806 --> 02:05:47,806 apartment complexes, as well as 4726 02:05:48,900 --> 02:05:49,511 an McCrary Park. These are 4727 02:05:49,511 --> 02:05:51,647 views of the property looking 4728 02:05:51,647 --> 02:05:54,647 north and northwest from Burnt 4729 02:05:55,830 --> 02:05:57,252 Mill Drive. The site is 4730 02:05:57,252 --> 02:05:59,421 currently zoned Lea Light 4731 02:05:59,421 --> 02:06:01,570 Industry, so zoning districts 4732 02:06:01,570 --> 02:06:02,859 neighboring the site include md 4733 02:06:02,859 --> 02:06:04,228 17 high density multiple 4734 02:06:04,228 --> 02:06:06,228 dwelling residential district 4735 02:06:06,496 --> 02:06:08,650 to the north and northwest, and 4736 02:06:08,650 --> 02:06:10,234 Oni Office and Institutional 4737 02:06:10,234 --> 02:06:12,634 District to the northeast. 4738 02:06:14,538 --> 02:06:17,341 East, south, and southwest. For 4739 02:06:17,341 --> 02:06:19,445 context, in JUNE of 2002, 4740 02:06:19,445 --> 02:06:20,913 approximately 42 acres of the 4741 02:06:20,913 --> 02:06:22,815 Burnt Mill Business park were 4742 02:06:22,815 --> 02:06:24,850 rezoned from lm Light 4743 02:06:24,850 --> 02:06:26,986 Manufacturing and wm Heavy 4744 02:06:26,986 --> 02:06:28,254 manufacturing to Oni to better 4745 02:06:28,254 --> 02:06:30,890 reflect the office oriented 4746 02:06:30,890 --> 02:06:31,190 character of the business park. 4747 02:06:31,190 --> 02:06:32,892 The owner of the subject 4748 02:06:32,892 --> 02:06:34,694 property requested not to be 4749 02:06:34,694 --> 02:06:36,496 included in the rezoning 4750 02:06:36,496 --> 02:06:37,665 application. Since the lm 4751 02:06:37,665 --> 02:06:37,932 district was appropriate for 4752 02:06:37,932 --> 02:06:39,801 the site 4753 02:06:39,801 --> 02:06:41,202 s use at the time as 4754 02:06:41,202 --> 02:06:42,603 the corporate headquarters of 4755 02:06:42,603 --> 02:06:45,603 an automotive, oil and gas 4756 02:06:46,674 --> 02:06:48,376 company. The site is currently 4757 02:06:48,376 --> 02:06:50,545 occupied by a single story 4758 02:06:50,545 --> 02:06:51,613 multi-tenant office building. 4759 02:06:51,613 --> 02:06:53,782 Uses of the surrounding 4760 02:06:53,782 --> 02:06:55,782 properties include educational 4761 02:06:56,619 --> 02:06:58,421 services to the northeast, a 4762 02:06:58,421 --> 02:06:59,456 k-8 school and construction 4763 02:06:59,456 --> 02:07:01,224 company office to the 4764 02:07:01,224 --> 02:07:02,458 southeast, social and 4765 02:07:02,458 --> 02:07:04,270 healthcare services to the 4766 02:07:04,270 --> 02:07:06,270 southwest, and healthcare 4767 02:07:07,431 --> 02:07:08,332 services to the west. Staff has 4768 02:07:08,332 --> 02:07:08,765 reviewed this application 4769 02:07:08,765 --> 02:07:10,667 s 4770 02:07:10,667 --> 02:07:12,237 alignment with relevant adopted 4771 02:07:12,237 --> 02:07:13,738 plans. The Wilmington 4772 02:07:13,738 --> 02:07:15,730 Comprehensive Plan is the only 4773 02:07:15,730 --> 02:07:17,876 adopted plan that applies to 4774 02:07:17,876 --> 02:07:19,578 this site. The Create 4775 02:07:19,578 --> 02:07:21,213 Wilmington Comprehensive Plans 4776 02:07:21,213 --> 02:07:23,810 Growth Strategies maps 4777 02:07:23,810 --> 02:07:24,783 identifies areas of opportunity 4778 02:07:24,783 --> 02:07:26,385 with corresponding policies to 4779 02:07:26,385 --> 02:07:28,587 guide the look, feel, and use 4780 02:07:28,587 --> 02:07:30,900 of new development. The site is 4781 02:07:30,900 --> 02:07:31,558 located within a live Work 4782 02:07:31,558 --> 02:07:33,930 Innovation Zones area of 4783 02:07:33,930 --> 02:07:35,162 opportunity and an employment 4784 02:07:35,162 --> 02:07:36,530 Academic center, and along a 4785 02:07:36,530 --> 02:07:38,930 special character street and 4786 02:07:39,833 --> 02:07:41,268 conceptual green connection. 4787 02:07:41,268 --> 02:07:43,700 The Create Wilmington 4788 02:07:43,700 --> 02:07:44,538 Comprehensive Plan also offers 4789 02:07:44,538 --> 02:07:45,539 broader policy guidance to 4790 02:07:45,539 --> 02:07:47,539 shape new development 4791 02:07:47,542 --> 02:07:48,944 throughout the city. Staff 4792 02:07:48,944 --> 02:07:50,479 assess this application with 4793 02:07:50,479 --> 02:07:51,881 the relevant policies and found 4794 02:07:51,881 --> 02:07:52,281 modest and strong support for 4795 02:07:52,281 --> 02:07:53,148 the application 4796 02:07:53,148 --> 02:07:55,148 s alignment 4797 02:07:55,885 --> 02:07:57,854 with the plan. Key policies 4798 02:07:57,854 --> 02:08:00,854 that support rezoning the site 4799 02:08:01,570 --> 02:08:03,590 at three 3301 Mill Drive from 4800 02:08:03,590 --> 02:08:04,161 Lee light industry to Oni 4801 02:08:04,161 --> 02:08:05,930 office and Institutional 4802 02:08:05,930 --> 02:08:07,198 District, promote compatible 4803 02:08:07,198 --> 02:08:08,933 mixed use development in 4804 02:08:08,933 --> 02:08:10,335 appropriate areas and the 4805 02:08:10,335 --> 02:08:12,270 redevelopment of industrial 4806 02:08:12,270 --> 02:08:13,905 land for non-industrial uses. 4807 02:08:13,905 --> 02:08:16,905 Where industrial activity is no 4808 02:08:19,444 --> 02:08:20,879 longer viable or appropriate. 4809 02:08:20,879 --> 02:08:22,315 Comments from the community are 4810 02:08:22,315 --> 02:08:24,918 accepted leading up to the 4811 02:08:24,918 --> 02:08:26,619 public hearing. Staff received 4812 02:08:26,619 --> 02:08:28,187 one comment in support of this 4813 02:08:28,187 --> 02:08:29,989 application, noting that 4814 02:08:29,989 --> 02:08:30,957 updating the zoning to Oni will 4815 02:08:30,957 --> 02:08:32,592 bring the parcel into 4816 02:08:32,592 --> 02:08:32,792 conformity with the business 4817 02:08:32,792 --> 02:08:34,792 park 4818 02:08:34,928 --> 02:08:36,496 s existing character. 4819 02:08:36,496 --> 02:08:38,499 Staff did not receive any 4820 02:08:38,499 --> 02:08:41,499 comments in opposition to this 4821 02:08:44,390 --> 02:08:44,906 request. To summarize the 4822 02:08:44,906 --> 02:08:45,340 application and staff 4823 02:08:45,340 --> 02:08:47,275 s 4824 02:08:47,275 --> 02:08:49,675 findings, rezoning the site, 4825 02:08:50,379 --> 02:08:52,714 located at 3301 Mill Drive from 4826 02:08:52,714 --> 02:08:53,983 Lee Light Industry to Oni 4827 02:08:53,983 --> 02:08:55,451 Office and Institutional 4828 02:08:55,451 --> 02:08:57,254 District, would create the 4829 02:08:57,254 --> 02:08:59,254 opportunity for office, 4830 02:08:59,289 --> 02:09:01,291 institutional and studio and 4831 02:09:01,291 --> 02:09:02,860 personal services uses with 4832 02:09:02,860 --> 02:09:04,127 potential to enhance access to 4833 02:09:04,127 --> 02:09:06,130 neighborhood goods and services 4834 02:09:06,130 --> 02:09:08,165 in the vicinity. Commercial 4835 02:09:08,165 --> 02:09:10,167 district mixed use or dmu is 4836 02:09:10,167 --> 02:09:11,680 also permitted in Oni, which 4837 02:09:11,680 --> 02:09:13,437 could further allow for 4838 02:09:13,437 --> 02:09:15,400 residential uses in the mix. 4839 02:09:15,400 --> 02:09:16,341 Staff finds this application to 4840 02:09:16,341 --> 02:09:18,143 align with the recommendations 4841 02:09:18,143 --> 02:09:19,612 of the Comprehensive Plan, 4842 02:09:19,612 --> 02:09:21,130 particularly policies that 4843 02:09:21,130 --> 02:09:22,648 promote office and academic 4844 02:09:22,648 --> 02:09:24,250 development while integrating 4845 02:09:24,250 --> 02:09:26,650 residential uses within mixed 4846 02:09:27,553 --> 02:09:28,921 use development areas. Staff 4847 02:09:28,921 --> 02:09:30,390 finds this request to be 4848 02:09:30,390 --> 02:09:32,590 reasonable in the public 4849 02:09:32,590 --> 02:09:33,227 interest and consistent with 4850 02:09:33,227 --> 02:09:34,695 the relevant policies in the 4851 02:09:34,695 --> 02:09:36,695 Create Wilmington Comprehensive 4852 02:09:38,266 --> 02:09:39,567 Plan. Staff recommends approval. 4853 02:09:39,567 --> 02:09:40,101 This concludes staff 4854 02:09:40,101 --> 02:09:41,690 s 4855 02:09:41,690 --> 02:09:41,536 presentation. I 4856 02:09:41,536 --> 02:09:43,710 m happy to 4857 02:09:43,710 --> 02:09:44,606 answer any questions, and the 4858 02:09:44,606 --> 02:09:46,574 applicant is here as well. And 4859 02:09:46,574 --> 02:09:48,343 she has a presentation as well. 4860 02:09:48,343 --> 02:09:49,812 Thank you. Thank you. 4861 02:09:49,812 --> 02:09:50,847 Commissioner Jones, any 4862 02:09:50,847 --> 02:09:52,481 questions? 4863 02:09:52,481 --> 02:09:54,170 Um, my only question at this 4864 02:09:54,170 --> 02:09:56,850 point is you said it could go 4865 02:09:56,850 --> 02:09:58,850 up to 96ft. 4866 02:09:58,870 --> 02:10:00,657 Yes, with an optional step 4867 02:10:00,657 --> 02:10:02,657 back. So it 4868 02:10:02,959 --> 02:10:03,593 s 45ft. And if they 4869 02:10:03,593 --> 02:10:03,693 make us, if they do, it 4870 02:10:03,693 --> 02:10:04,561 s. 4871 02:10:04,561 --> 02:10:05,595 Not many buildings. 4872 02:10:05,595 --> 02:10:05,796 And build it up to. 4873 02:10:05,796 --> 02:10:06,698 There 4874 02:10:06,698 --> 02:10:08,166 s not many buildings that 4875 02:10:08,166 --> 02:10:08,666 are even 45ft in that area. 4876 02:10:08,666 --> 02:10:09,968 And they 4877 02:10:09,968 --> 02:10:11,968 re mostly single 4878 02:10:12,103 --> 02:10:14,103 storey office buildings. 4879 02:10:15,741 --> 02:10:16,708 Yeah, I work in there. Um, my 4880 02:10:16,708 --> 02:10:19,108 suggestion would be to 4881 02:10:19,378 --> 02:10:19,811 condition it to the 45ft. The 4882 02:10:19,811 --> 02:10:21,313 uses. I 4883 02:10:21,313 --> 02:10:21,513 m fine with. So that 4884 02:10:21,513 --> 02:10:23,513 s 4885 02:10:23,984 --> 02:10:25,485 my only question. 4886 02:10:25,485 --> 02:10:26,787 Commissioner Jones. 4887 02:10:26,787 --> 02:10:28,689 Just for the record, they could 4888 02:10:28,689 --> 02:10:31,592 do that height today under the 4889 02:10:31,592 --> 02:10:33,160 existing Lee zoning. So? So 4890 02:10:33,160 --> 02:10:34,962 going going to Oni does not 4891 02:10:34,962 --> 02:10:35,162 change the height limit that 4892 02:10:35,162 --> 02:10:37,162 s 4893 02:10:38,320 --> 02:10:39,600 allowed. 4894 02:10:39,600 --> 02:10:41,302 Commissioner. Okay. 4895 02:10:41,302 --> 02:10:42,371 Commissioner. Woodruff. 4896 02:10:42,371 --> 02:10:44,139 Commissioner. Pawlak. 4897 02:10:44,139 --> 02:10:45,341 Commissioner. Adams. 4898 02:10:45,341 --> 02:10:47,443 Could you go back to the slide 4899 02:10:47,443 --> 02:10:51,430 that had the allowable uses for 4900 02:10:54,217 --> 02:10:55,651 the two zones? 4901 02:10:55,651 --> 02:10:57,651 Yes. 4902 02:10:58,554 --> 02:11:01,325 Is there anything about how the 4903 02:11:01,325 --> 02:11:02,893 building is being used today in 4904 02:11:02,893 --> 02:11:05,763 the ally zoning? That is a 4905 02:11:05,763 --> 02:11:07,732 nonconforming use that is 4906 02:11:07,732 --> 02:11:08,966 triggering a desire to go. Oh, 4907 02:11:08,966 --> 02:11:10,966 and I. 4908 02:11:13,338 --> 02:11:13,538 Um, the uses today are, um, 4909 02:11:13,538 --> 02:11:15,538 there 4910 02:11:16,241 --> 02:11:19,379 s an office for a custom 4911 02:11:19,379 --> 02:11:20,813 deck, and fence company, so I 4912 02:11:20,813 --> 02:11:23,316 believe that is allowed in. Oh, 4913 02:11:23,316 --> 02:11:25,785 and I but say a tenant comes in 4914 02:11:25,785 --> 02:11:27,721 with a request to develop or to 4915 02:11:27,721 --> 02:11:29,389 have a studio or a personal 4916 02:11:29,389 --> 02:11:32,125 service use, and that would not 4917 02:11:32,125 --> 02:11:33,593 be allowed. Um, whereas it is 4918 02:11:33,593 --> 02:11:35,830 compatible with the surrounding 4919 02:11:35,830 --> 02:11:36,965 character. So in a sense 4920 02:11:36,965 --> 02:11:38,767 rezoning to. Oh, and I would 4921 02:11:38,767 --> 02:11:39,601 allow for these additional uses 4922 02:11:39,601 --> 02:11:41,236 that would serve the 4923 02:11:41,236 --> 02:11:42,804 neighborhood to come in to, to 4924 02:11:42,804 --> 02:11:44,573 the building. 4925 02:11:44,573 --> 02:11:46,573 Okay. Thank you. 4926 02:11:47,175 --> 02:11:49,175 Commissioner Collier. 4927 02:11:50,746 --> 02:11:51,648 Commissioner coffer, thank you. 4928 02:11:51,648 --> 02:11:51,781 Thank you. 4929 02:11:51,781 --> 02:11:52,549 I 4930 02:11:52,549 --> 02:11:55,549 d like to invite the 4931 02:12:00,457 --> 02:12:01,925 applicant to come up. 4932 02:12:01,925 --> 02:12:02,159 Good evening. Chair, vice 4933 02:12:02,159 --> 02:12:02,559 chair. 4934 02:12:02,559 --> 02:12:03,360 And members. 4935 02:12:03,360 --> 02:12:04,461 Of the commission. I 4936 02:12:04,461 --> 02:12:04,962 m Andy Van 4937 02:12:04,962 --> 02:12:05,696 Treat. I 4938 02:12:05,696 --> 02:12:07,331 m an attorney with 4939 02:12:07,331 --> 02:12:08,599 Marks and Taylor and Gibson. 4940 02:12:08,599 --> 02:12:10,168 Um, appearing tonight on behalf 4941 02:12:10,168 --> 02:12:11,803 of the property owner, Kia 4942 02:12:11,803 --> 02:12:12,104 Properties llc. Um, we 4943 02:12:12,104 --> 02:12:13,720 re here 4944 02:12:13,720 --> 02:12:15,874 in support of our general 4945 02:12:15,874 --> 02:12:17,476 rezoning application for 3301 4946 02:12:17,476 --> 02:12:19,211 through 3305 Mill Drive in 4947 02:12:19,211 --> 02:12:20,312 Burwell Business Park. Um, as 4948 02:12:20,312 --> 02:12:20,479 Hillary just presented to you, 4949 02:12:20,479 --> 02:12:21,447 we 4950 02:12:21,447 --> 02:12:22,748 re requesting the rezoning 4951 02:12:22,748 --> 02:12:24,517 of a single two acre parcel 4952 02:12:24,517 --> 02:12:25,518 from light industrial, the 4953 02:12:25,518 --> 02:12:27,521 light industrial district to 4954 02:12:27,521 --> 02:12:28,822 office and institutional. The 4955 02:12:28,822 --> 02:12:29,790 subject property is already 4956 02:12:29,790 --> 02:12:30,858 fully developed, with an 4957 02:12:30,858 --> 02:12:31,792 existing single story, 4958 02:12:31,792 --> 02:12:32,526 multi-tenant commercial 4959 02:12:32,526 --> 02:12:33,594 building. I 4960 02:12:33,594 --> 02:12:35,796 m going to probably 4961 02:12:35,796 --> 02:12:37,310 shorten my spiel because, 4962 02:12:37,310 --> 02:12:39,100 frankly, this is a 4963 02:12:39,100 --> 02:12:39,701 straightforward request. Um, 4964 02:12:39,701 --> 02:12:41,200 its purpose isn 4965 02:12:41,200 --> 02:12:42,804 t to permit any 4966 02:12:42,804 --> 02:12:44,673 new construction or intensify 4967 02:12:44,673 --> 02:12:45,608 its permitted uses, but rather 4968 02:12:45,608 --> 02:12:45,941 to better align the property 4969 02:12:45,941 --> 02:12:47,276 s 4970 02:12:47,276 --> 02:12:48,745 zoning with its existing and 4971 02:12:48,745 --> 02:12:50,480 anticipated tenant uses, which 4972 02:12:50,480 --> 02:12:51,915 are essentially the uses that 4973 02:12:51,915 --> 02:12:53,483 are allowed in the oney, which 4974 02:12:53,483 --> 02:12:55,385 are also the uses that are in 4975 02:12:55,385 --> 02:12:56,686 most of the surrounding 4976 02:12:56,686 --> 02:12:59,860 properties in this business 4977 02:12:59,789 --> 02:13:01,759 park. Um, you know, Hillary 4978 02:13:01,759 --> 02:13:03,261 also talked about the history, 4979 02:13:03,261 --> 02:13:05,230 and it is actually helpful in 4980 02:13:05,230 --> 02:13:08,230 understanding how we got here. 4981 02:13:08,833 --> 02:13:10,902 Um, so, like she said in 2002, 4982 02:13:10,902 --> 02:13:13,438 the city rezoned the majority 4983 02:13:13,438 --> 02:13:14,640 of the other parcels in Burnt 4984 02:13:14,640 --> 02:13:16,174 Mill Business Park from the 4985 02:13:16,174 --> 02:13:18,174 former manufacturing districts 4986 02:13:19,120 --> 02:13:19,279 to, oh, and I, um, my client 4987 02:13:19,279 --> 02:13:20,447 s 4988 02:13:20,447 --> 02:13:21,748 property was not included in 4989 02:13:21,748 --> 02:13:22,883 that rezoning and therefore 4990 02:13:22,883 --> 02:13:24,351 retained its former light 4991 02:13:24,351 --> 02:13:26,751 manufacturing zoning, which is 4992 02:13:26,853 --> 02:13:28,655 now Lee. And that made sense 4993 02:13:28,655 --> 02:13:30,791 initially because, again, it 4994 02:13:30,791 --> 02:13:32,920 was the headquarters for Go Gas 4995 02:13:32,920 --> 02:13:33,994 and Automotive. An automotive 4996 02:13:33,994 --> 02:13:35,129 oil and gas company, which at 4997 02:13:35,129 --> 02:13:37,132 the time it was an 4998 02:13:37,132 --> 02:13:38,500 appropriately and appropriately 4999 02:13:38,500 --> 02:13:40,900 industrial use for an 5000 02:13:41,300 --> 02:13:42,371 industrial zoning district. But 5001 02:13:42,371 --> 02:13:44,473 today, the circumstances are 5002 02:13:44,473 --> 02:13:46,609 different. Go gas was sold in 5003 02:13:46,609 --> 02:13:47,843 2015. Its former owner, who 5004 02:13:47,843 --> 02:13:48,277 together with his wife Debbie 5005 02:13:48,277 --> 02:13:48,844 Austin, who 5006 02:13:48,844 --> 02:13:51,800 s here with me 5007 02:13:51,800 --> 02:13:52,748 tonight, owns Kia Properties 5008 02:13:52,748 --> 02:13:53,984 and has since maintained office 5009 02:13:53,984 --> 02:13:55,520 space at this property. While 5010 02:13:55,520 --> 02:13:55,953 it evolved over the last 5011 02:13:55,953 --> 02:13:56,820 several years into a 5012 02:13:56,820 --> 02:13:58,355 multi-tenant commercial 5013 02:13:58,355 --> 02:13:59,590 building serving office and 5014 02:13:59,590 --> 02:14:01,920 service oriented tenants like 5015 02:14:01,920 --> 02:14:01,959 those occupying the surrounding 5016 02:14:01,959 --> 02:14:03,461 properties in the business 5017 02:14:03,461 --> 02:14:06,461 park, the vast majority of 5018 02:14:06,731 --> 02:14:06,898 which are already owned by um. 5019 02:14:06,898 --> 02:14:08,600 Let 5020 02:14:08,600 --> 02:14:10,600 s see here. 5021 02:14:10,768 --> 02:14:12,380 Recently, Debbie undertook a 5022 02:14:12,380 --> 02:14:12,304 comprehensive review of the 5023 02:14:12,304 --> 02:14:13,139 property 5024 02:14:13,139 --> 02:14:14,607 s zoning when 5025 02:14:14,607 --> 02:14:16,175 evaluating a proposed lease of 5026 02:14:16,175 --> 02:14:17,777 space for use as a new dance 5027 02:14:17,777 --> 02:14:19,345 studio. That review brought 5028 02:14:19,345 --> 02:14:20,647 into focus the fact that as 5029 02:14:20,647 --> 02:14:22,810 neither a dance studio nor 5030 02:14:22,810 --> 02:14:23,349 other similar uses would likely 5031 02:14:23,349 --> 02:14:24,551 be permitted in the Lee 5032 02:14:24,551 --> 02:14:25,719 district. That zoning 5033 02:14:25,719 --> 02:14:27,354 designation is no longer the 5034 02:14:27,354 --> 02:14:28,956 best fit. The owner then 5035 02:14:28,956 --> 02:14:30,191 decided to proactively address 5036 02:14:30,191 --> 02:14:31,359 the issue and seek the zoning 5037 02:14:31,359 --> 02:14:32,293 classification that is most 5038 02:14:32,293 --> 02:14:33,394 appropriate for the property 5039 02:14:33,394 --> 02:14:34,395 over the long term, which in 5040 02:14:34,395 --> 02:14:37,310 our opinion, and I believe the 5041 02:14:37,310 --> 02:14:39,670 opinion of staff is. Oh, and I, 5042 02:14:39,670 --> 02:14:40,102 as noted in the staff report, 5043 02:14:40,102 --> 02:14:41,236 the district is intended to 5044 02:14:41,236 --> 02:14:42,738 accommodate professional and 5045 02:14:42,738 --> 02:14:43,972 medical offices, institutional 5046 02:14:43,972 --> 02:14:45,474 and assembly uses, and 5047 02:14:45,474 --> 02:14:46,543 complementary service uses, 5048 02:14:46,543 --> 02:14:48,578 including performing arts and 5049 02:14:48,578 --> 02:14:49,813 dance studios. Without the 5050 02:14:49,813 --> 02:14:51,448 additional intensity, 5051 02:14:51,448 --> 02:14:52,649 additional intensity associated 5052 02:14:52,649 --> 02:14:54,510 with broad commercial and 5053 02:14:54,510 --> 02:14:55,152 retail development. The 5054 02:14:55,152 --> 02:14:56,486 requested rezoning is a 5055 02:14:56,486 --> 02:14:56,987 logical, modest adjustment that 5056 02:14:56,987 --> 02:14:57,588 brings the property 5057 02:14:57,588 --> 02:14:58,622 s zoning 5058 02:14:58,622 --> 02:14:59,790 into conformity with its 5059 02:14:59,790 --> 02:15:00,390 current commercial function and 5060 02:15:00,390 --> 02:15:02,790 the character of the 5061 02:15:02,993 --> 02:15:04,262 surrounding development. The 5062 02:15:04,262 --> 02:15:04,563 rezoning is also well grounded 5063 02:15:04,563 --> 02:15:05,230 in the city 5064 02:15:05,230 --> 02:15:06,980 s zoned planning 5065 02:15:06,980 --> 02:15:06,698 policy, and I won 5066 02:15:06,698 --> 02:15:08,698 t belabor 5067 02:15:09,334 --> 02:15:10,936 that point. The staff concluded 5068 02:15:10,936 --> 02:15:12,738 that generally, the requested 5069 02:15:12,738 --> 02:15:15,738 rezoning is consistent with the 5070 02:15:18,770 --> 02:15:19,278 comprehensive plan. Um, the 5071 02:15:19,278 --> 02:15:21,348 requested rezoning will not 5072 02:15:21,348 --> 02:15:22,516 introduce a new or incompatible 5073 02:15:22,516 --> 02:15:23,450 development pattern into Burnt 5074 02:15:23,450 --> 02:15:24,585 Mill Business Park. It 5075 02:15:24,585 --> 02:15:26,120 essentially does the opposite 5076 02:15:26,120 --> 02:15:27,354 by bringing this remaining Li 5077 02:15:27,354 --> 02:15:28,189 parcel into a zoning district 5078 02:15:28,189 --> 02:15:28,456 that better reflects the 5079 02:15:28,456 --> 02:15:30,357 property 5080 02:15:30,357 --> 02:15:30,858 s current function and 5081 02:15:30,858 --> 02:15:31,325 the district that 5082 02:15:31,325 --> 02:15:32,326 s applied to 5083 02:15:32,326 --> 02:15:33,561 the surrounding properties for 5084 02:15:33,561 --> 02:15:35,730 more than 20 years. At this 5085 02:15:35,730 --> 02:15:36,965 point. We also believe the 5086 02:15:36,965 --> 02:15:38,266 impact of the requested 5087 02:15:38,266 --> 02:15:39,635 rezoning will be will be 5088 02:15:39,635 --> 02:15:40,870 minimal. All necessary 5089 02:15:40,870 --> 02:15:42,138 utilities and transportation 5090 02:15:42,138 --> 02:15:43,500 infrastructure is already in 5091 02:15:43,500 --> 02:15:44,400 place, sufficient to 5092 02:15:44,400 --> 02:15:46,440 accommodate the current and 5093 02:15:46,542 --> 02:15:48,770 anticipated only uses. The 5094 02:15:48,770 --> 02:15:49,780 owner is pursuing this rezoning 5095 02:15:49,780 --> 02:15:50,547 in good faith in order to 5096 02:15:50,547 --> 02:15:51,948 establish an appropriate long 5097 02:15:51,948 --> 02:15:53,149 term zoning classification for 5098 02:15:53,149 --> 02:15:54,851 the property, provide greater 5099 02:15:54,851 --> 02:15:55,986 certainty for its tenants, and 5100 02:15:55,986 --> 02:15:57,655 ensure that the property is 5101 02:15:57,655 --> 02:15:57,989 managed and used consistently 5102 02:15:57,989 --> 02:15:58,590 with the city 5103 02:15:58,590 --> 02:15:59,857 s land use 5104 02:15:59,857 --> 02:16:01,659 regulations and planning 5105 02:16:01,659 --> 02:16:03,270 objectives. The rezoning will 5106 02:16:03,270 --> 02:16:04,362 also promote the continued 5107 02:16:04,362 --> 02:16:05,230 productive use and reinvestment 5108 02:16:05,230 --> 02:16:06,264 of an existing commercial 5109 02:16:06,264 --> 02:16:07,732 building. Support local 5110 02:16:07,732 --> 02:16:09,234 businesses, and make efficient 5111 02:16:09,234 --> 02:16:10,802 use of existing public 5112 02:16:10,802 --> 02:16:11,637 infrastructure, all without 5113 02:16:11,637 --> 02:16:12,471 adversely affecting 5114 02:16:12,471 --> 02:16:14,400 neighborhood properties or 5115 02:16:14,400 --> 02:16:14,908 public facilities. For all 5116 02:16:14,908 --> 02:16:15,809 these reasons, and for the 5117 02:16:15,809 --> 02:16:16,910 reasons outlined in our 5118 02:16:16,910 --> 02:16:18,311 application and in the staff 5119 02:16:18,311 --> 02:16:19,112 report, we respectfully ask the 5120 02:16:19,112 --> 02:16:20,380 Commission to recommend 5121 02:16:20,380 --> 02:16:22,215 approval of the requested 5122 02:16:22,215 --> 02:16:22,382 rezoning. Thank you. And I 5123 02:16:22,382 --> 02:16:23,784 m 5124 02:16:23,784 --> 02:16:24,685 certainly here to try to answer 5125 02:16:24,685 --> 02:16:25,519 any questions you MAY have 5126 02:16:25,519 --> 02:16:27,519 about this request. 5127 02:16:28,622 --> 02:16:29,757 Thank you. Commissioner Cooper. 5128 02:16:29,757 --> 02:16:31,159 Um, I do not have any 5129 02:16:31,159 --> 02:16:32,994 questions. Thank you. 5130 02:16:32,994 --> 02:16:34,994 Commissioner Collier. 5131 02:16:35,497 --> 02:16:37,497 Commissioner Adams. 5132 02:16:40,502 --> 02:16:40,636 Commissioner Pawlak. 5133 02:16:40,636 --> 02:16:41,737 I 5134 02:16:41,737 --> 02:16:43,339 m going to try and phrase 5135 02:16:43,339 --> 02:16:44,440 this as politely as I can. I 5136 02:16:44,440 --> 02:16:46,442 drove by there today, and there 5137 02:16:46,442 --> 02:16:47,743 were names on the door. Okay. 5138 02:16:47,743 --> 02:16:50,143 And which looked like 5139 02:16:50,214 --> 02:16:50,681 occupants. Um, as I 5140 02:16:50,681 --> 02:16:51,949 m looking 5141 02:16:51,949 --> 02:16:53,250 at your presentation, it 5142 02:16:53,250 --> 02:16:54,718 appears to me that these 5143 02:16:54,718 --> 02:16:56,754 occupants are more that are 5144 02:16:56,754 --> 02:16:59,754 already. There are more. Oh, 5145 02:16:59,757 --> 02:17:01,426 and I centric. So are we to to 5146 02:17:01,426 --> 02:17:03,661 put it bluntly, are we asking 5147 02:17:03,661 --> 02:17:05,229 forgiveness? But to rezone? I 5148 02:17:05,229 --> 02:17:06,632 mean, it sounds like that the 5149 02:17:06,632 --> 02:17:07,333 people you want in there are 5150 02:17:07,333 --> 02:17:08,330 already there. 5151 02:17:08,330 --> 02:17:09,100 Well, that 5152 02:17:09,100 --> 02:17:09,168 s essentially what 5153 02:17:09,168 --> 02:17:11,168 we 5154 02:17:11,537 --> 02:17:13,206 re asking to better align 5155 02:17:13,206 --> 02:17:14,473 the zoning with the existing 5156 02:17:14,473 --> 02:17:16,242 uses, which are also the uses 5157 02:17:16,242 --> 02:17:19,780 that are most appropriate. So 5158 02:17:19,780 --> 02:17:21,514 this this is sort of the reason 5159 02:17:21,514 --> 02:17:22,616 that the history is helpful is 5160 02:17:22,616 --> 02:17:23,784 that, you know, in the last 5161 02:17:23,784 --> 02:17:25,252 several years, I think I said 5162 02:17:25,252 --> 02:17:26,621 2015 was when gas was sold. It 5163 02:17:26,621 --> 02:17:27,722 was a few years after that one 5164 02:17:27,722 --> 02:17:28,356 tenant came in and then 5165 02:17:28,356 --> 02:17:28,923 another. And it 5166 02:17:28,923 --> 02:17:31,323 s been kind of 5167 02:17:31,993 --> 02:17:33,161 a slow transition to a building 5168 02:17:33,161 --> 02:17:35,263 that was really only used by 5169 02:17:35,263 --> 02:17:36,498 the owner to becoming a 5170 02:17:36,498 --> 02:17:38,498 multi-tenant commercial 5171 02:17:40,269 --> 02:17:42,669 building. Um, only recently, 5172 02:17:42,872 --> 02:17:45,342 um, has Debbie stepped in to 5173 02:17:45,342 --> 02:17:47,878 handle a lot of the, um, 5174 02:17:47,878 --> 02:17:49,479 management and operation of the 5175 02:17:49,479 --> 02:17:51,915 of k properties, including the 5176 02:17:51,915 --> 02:17:53,350 property management. Um, and in 5177 02:17:53,350 --> 02:17:55,319 the course of that transition 5178 02:17:55,319 --> 02:17:57,187 has had occasion to look a 5179 02:17:57,187 --> 02:18:00,187 little bit more into the 5180 02:18:00,291 --> 02:18:02,260 current zoning and existing 5181 02:18:02,260 --> 02:18:03,595 uses, as well as obviously 5182 02:18:03,595 --> 02:18:04,796 evaluating other tenants that 5183 02:18:04,796 --> 02:18:06,231 are coming to her wanting to 5184 02:18:06,231 --> 02:18:07,232 lease the open space in the 5185 02:18:07,232 --> 02:18:08,330 building. So it 5186 02:18:08,330 --> 02:18:10,433 s sort of all 5187 02:18:11,370 --> 02:18:12,304 just came about within the last 5188 02:18:12,304 --> 02:18:14,840 I mean, certainly this year, 5189 02:18:14,840 --> 02:18:15,574 very recently. Um, and as she 5190 02:18:15,574 --> 02:18:16,109 discovered that that 5191 02:18:16,109 --> 02:18:16,276 s why 5192 02:18:16,276 --> 02:18:18,178 we 5193 02:18:18,178 --> 02:18:20,280 ve brought this to you and 5194 02:18:20,280 --> 02:18:21,615 tried to trying to correct this, 5195 02:18:21,615 --> 02:18:22,116 because I think it 5196 02:18:22,116 --> 02:18:23,150 s clear to 5197 02:18:23,150 --> 02:18:24,618 everybody that, oh, and I is 5198 02:18:24,618 --> 02:18:26,530 the most appropriate, um, 5199 02:18:26,530 --> 02:18:27,588 district for the property, not 5200 02:18:27,588 --> 02:18:29,624 just because of the existing 5201 02:18:29,624 --> 02:18:32,160 uses, but also because it just 5202 02:18:32,160 --> 02:18:35,798 is because of the way that the, 5203 02:18:35,798 --> 02:18:36,866 um, overall park is, is 5204 02:18:36,866 --> 02:18:38,866 operated now. 5205 02:18:40,369 --> 02:18:41,537 Okay. Thank you. 5206 02:18:41,537 --> 02:18:43,206 Commissioner Jones, you have 5207 02:18:43,206 --> 02:18:43,906 anything? Okay. 5208 02:18:43,906 --> 02:18:45,906 Thank you. 5209 02:18:46,843 --> 02:18:47,443 Thank you. 5210 02:18:47,443 --> 02:18:48,440 At this time, I 5211 02:18:48,440 --> 02:18:49,646 d like to open 5212 02:18:49,646 --> 02:18:49,846 the public hearing and ask if 5213 02:18:49,846 --> 02:18:51,315 there 5214 02:18:51,315 --> 02:18:54,850 s anyone wishing to speak 5215 02:18:54,850 --> 02:18:56,587 in favor of agenda item number 5216 02:18:56,587 --> 02:18:59,587 three. Anyone wishing to speak 5217 02:18:59,991 --> 02:19:01,426 in favor. Hearing none. Is 5218 02:19:01,426 --> 02:19:03,862 there anyone wishing to speak 5219 02:19:03,862 --> 02:19:06,331 in opposition to agenda item 5220 02:19:06,331 --> 02:19:08,835 number three? Anyone wishing to 5221 02:19:08,835 --> 02:19:10,637 speak in opposition? For the 5222 02:19:10,637 --> 02:19:14,237 record, as noted, we did have 5223 02:19:14,607 --> 02:19:16,810 one. Um, submittal via the 5224 02:19:16,810 --> 02:19:18,311 website, which was distributed 5225 02:19:18,311 --> 02:19:20,711 to the Planning Commission 5226 02:19:22,182 --> 02:19:25,452 today in favor of this. Um, 5227 02:19:25,452 --> 02:19:26,955 request. So, uh, hearing no 5228 02:19:26,955 --> 02:19:29,357 further comments, I will close 5229 02:19:29,357 --> 02:19:31,293 the public hearing and 5230 02:19:31,293 --> 02:19:32,661 Commissioner Jones, any 5231 02:19:32,661 --> 02:19:33,662 comments? Thoughts? 5232 02:19:33,662 --> 02:19:34,196 No. 5233 02:19:34,196 --> 02:19:34,763 Good. 5234 02:19:34,763 --> 02:19:36,763 All good. 5235 02:19:37,966 --> 02:19:38,100 MR. Pawlak. Commissioner Adams. 5236 02:19:38,100 --> 02:19:40,100 I 5237 02:19:40,169 --> 02:19:42,400 ll just say I kind of 5238 02:19:42,400 --> 02:19:44,241 appreciate the honesty and the 5239 02:19:44,241 --> 02:19:46,577 transparency around maybe what 5240 02:19:46,577 --> 02:19:48,345 is triggering this. So, um, 5241 02:19:48,345 --> 02:19:49,913 thank you for doing that. And, 5242 02:19:49,913 --> 02:19:52,490 uh, I think this is a great 5243 02:19:52,490 --> 02:19:53,484 thing to support and do. 5244 02:19:53,484 --> 02:19:55,484 MR. Collier. Commissioner, 5245 02:19:56,454 --> 02:19:57,555 cover for me. All I had to do 5246 02:19:57,555 --> 02:19:58,756 is look at the map with the 5247 02:19:58,756 --> 02:20:01,930 gray square in the middle of 5248 02:20:01,930 --> 02:20:04,960 the blue, and that that kind 5249 02:20:04,960 --> 02:20:05,698 of. Okay, what is the will of 5250 02:20:05,698 --> 02:20:07,990 the commission? 5251 02:20:07,990 --> 02:20:08,601 MR. CHAIRMAN? I guess be 5252 02:20:08,601 --> 02:20:11,601 prepared to make a motion, 5253 02:20:13,740 --> 02:20:15,475 please. As for agenda item 5254 02:20:15,475 --> 02:20:18,475 number three, the request to 5255 02:20:18,913 --> 02:20:20,815 rezone 3301 Burnt Mill Drive 5256 02:20:20,815 --> 02:20:22,517 from light industrial to Oni 5257 02:20:22,517 --> 02:20:24,850 office and institutional um 5258 02:20:24,850 --> 02:20:25,887 recommend approval. This 5259 02:20:25,887 --> 02:20:27,221 request is consistent with the 5260 02:20:27,221 --> 02:20:28,490 objectives and policies of the 5261 02:20:28,490 --> 02:20:30,692 following plans adopted by the 5262 02:20:30,692 --> 02:20:32,561 City of Wilmington. The Create 5263 02:20:32,561 --> 02:20:33,828 Wilmington Comprehensive Plan. 5264 02:20:33,828 --> 02:20:35,163 The Planning Commission 5265 02:20:35,163 --> 02:20:36,265 considers its approval to be 5266 02:20:36,265 --> 02:20:38,134 reasonable and in the public 5267 02:20:38,134 --> 02:20:39,936 interest. Because the proposed 5268 02:20:39,936 --> 02:20:41,604 rezoning is consistent with the 5269 02:20:41,604 --> 02:20:43,139 properties and is compatible 5270 02:20:43,139 --> 02:20:44,107 with the surrounding area. 5271 02:20:44,107 --> 02:20:46,107 Therefore, the Planning 5272 02:20:46,476 --> 02:20:48,476 Commission recommends approval 5273 02:20:48,945 --> 02:20:50,130 of this request. 5274 02:20:50,130 --> 02:20:51,810 We have a motion from 5275 02:20:51,810 --> 02:20:53,217 Commissioner Adams. Do we have 5276 02:20:53,217 --> 02:20:53,952 a second? 5277 02:20:53,952 --> 02:20:55,952 Second. 5278 02:20:56,154 --> 02:20:58,990 We have a second. Uh, 5279 02:20:58,990 --> 02:21:00,990 Commissioner Jones. 5280 02:21:01,526 --> 02:21:02,794 A yes. 5281 02:21:02,794 --> 02:21:02,928 Commissioner Adams. 5282 02:21:02,928 --> 02:21:03,829 I 5283 02:21:03,829 --> 02:21:04,363 m gonna go with a at this 5284 02:21:04,363 --> 02:21:05,564 time. 5285 02:21:05,564 --> 02:21:06,932 Okay. Commissioner Collier. 5286 02:21:06,932 --> 02:21:08,330 Hi. 5287 02:21:08,330 --> 02:21:10,330 Hi. 5288 02:21:10,169 --> 02:21:12,569 Chair votes I passes 5289 02:21:17,440 --> 02:21:19,444 unanimously 7 to 0. Thank you. 5290 02:21:20,800 --> 02:21:22,449 All right. Um, that concludes 5291 02:21:22,449 --> 02:21:24,585 the item of items of business. 5292 02:21:24,585 --> 02:21:25,486 Do we have any items from the 5293 02:21:25,486 --> 02:21:27,486 commissioner? Commissioner 5294 02:21:31,760 --> 02:21:33,529 Cooper, start with you. 5295 02:21:33,529 --> 02:21:36,632 My little mic here is coming on 5296 02:21:36,632 --> 02:21:38,340 and off. I got it. This MAY not 5297 02:21:38,340 --> 02:21:38,167 be my last meeting. From what 5298 02:21:38,167 --> 02:21:39,869 I 5299 02:21:39,869 --> 02:21:40,102 ve heard from staff, so i 5300 02:21:40,102 --> 02:21:42,102 ll 5301 02:21:42,238 --> 02:21:44,700 save any of those comments for 5302 02:21:44,700 --> 02:21:45,943 for the next one. But for those 5303 02:21:45,943 --> 02:21:47,244 of, um, our peers and 5304 02:21:47,244 --> 02:21:48,379 colleagues and friends here on 5305 02:21:48,379 --> 02:21:51,315 the commission, that this will 5306 02:21:51,315 --> 02:21:53,218 be your last meeting. I most 5307 02:21:53,218 --> 02:21:54,686 enjoyed our time together. Uh, 5308 02:21:54,686 --> 02:21:56,654 what a great think tank that 5309 02:21:56,654 --> 02:21:56,821 this body is. Uh, I think it 5310 02:21:56,821 --> 02:21:58,556 s 5311 02:21:58,556 --> 02:22:00,525 just so well rounded. I like 5312 02:22:00,525 --> 02:22:00,725 the fact that we, uh, we don 5313 02:22:00,725 --> 02:22:02,127 t 5314 02:22:02,127 --> 02:22:04,530 all agree. And even when we do 5315 02:22:04,530 --> 02:22:05,832 agree, we come at the 5316 02:22:05,832 --> 02:22:08,232 discussion from so many 5317 02:22:08,401 --> 02:22:08,768 different angles that, um, it 5318 02:22:08,768 --> 02:22:10,170 s 5319 02:22:10,170 --> 02:22:11,404 just a I think a think tank is 5320 02:22:11,404 --> 02:22:11,571 the best way to put it. I think 5321 02:22:11,571 --> 02:22:13,730 it 5322 02:22:13,730 --> 02:22:16,476 s a great, uh, service to 5323 02:22:16,476 --> 02:22:17,511 the city council and, um, and 5324 02:22:17,511 --> 02:22:18,779 hopefully the citizens of 5325 02:22:18,779 --> 02:22:20,481 Wilmington think the same way. 5326 02:22:20,481 --> 02:22:20,680 And I feel like everyone here 5327 02:22:20,680 --> 02:22:22,517 that 5328 02:22:22,517 --> 02:22:23,885 s, um, shares their 5329 02:22:23,885 --> 02:22:26,285 comments, shares their thoughts 5330 02:22:26,588 --> 02:22:28,657 and how they got to. Yes. Or 5331 02:22:28,657 --> 02:22:30,920 how they got to know just 5332 02:22:30,920 --> 02:22:32,461 instills more of that public 5333 02:22:32,461 --> 02:22:34,363 trust and transparency. And, 5334 02:22:34,363 --> 02:22:36,265 um, and the land use process 5335 02:22:36,265 --> 02:22:37,800 and how we go about zoning. So 5336 02:22:37,800 --> 02:22:39,169 and a special thanks to, um, 5337 02:22:39,169 --> 02:22:39,670 John Lennon, the chair who 5338 02:22:39,670 --> 02:22:41,638 s 5339 02:22:41,638 --> 02:22:43,440 done a remarkable job leading, 5340 02:22:43,440 --> 02:22:45,576 um, this group on several 5341 02:22:45,576 --> 02:22:48,479 occasions. And, um, and MISTER 5342 02:22:48,479 --> 02:22:49,613 Commissioner Woodruff, uh, 5343 02:22:49,613 --> 02:22:50,981 farewell. That 5344 02:22:50,981 --> 02:22:52,490 s my only 5345 02:22:52,490 --> 02:22:54,490 comment. 5346 02:22:55,319 --> 02:22:57,719 Thank you, Commissioner Collier. 5347 02:22:57,756 --> 02:22:59,625 No, not a lot of comments. Uh, 5348 02:22:59,625 --> 02:23:01,494 I would like to thank the 5349 02:23:01,494 --> 02:23:03,950 outgoing commission, because i 5350 02:23:03,950 --> 02:23:04,764 do believe that we have been a 5351 02:23:04,764 --> 02:23:06,320 very, very good group together. 5352 02:23:06,320 --> 02:23:07,600 And we do think about things in 5353 02:23:07,600 --> 02:23:09,680 different ways, which makes it 5354 02:23:09,680 --> 02:23:10,503 for good, good discussion, 5355 02:23:10,503 --> 02:23:12,272 sometimes way too lively and 5356 02:23:12,272 --> 02:23:14,740 way too long, but good 5357 02:23:14,740 --> 02:23:14,241 discussion. CHAIRMAN Lennon, 5358 02:23:14,241 --> 02:23:15,900 you 5359 02:23:15,900 --> 02:23:16,770 ve done a great job this 5360 02:23:16,770 --> 02:23:16,477 last year. We appreciate 5361 02:23:16,477 --> 02:23:17,411 everything you 5362 02:23:17,411 --> 02:23:18,120 ve done and 5363 02:23:18,120 --> 02:23:18,512 certainly hope you 5364 02:23:18,512 --> 02:23:19,413 ll sit out a 5365 02:23:19,413 --> 02:23:20,682 year and come back. 5366 02:23:20,682 --> 02:23:21,215 So thank you. 5367 02:23:21,215 --> 02:23:23,215 Yes, sir. 5368 02:23:23,751 --> 02:23:23,918 Commissioner Adams. 5369 02:23:23,918 --> 02:23:25,918 It 5370 02:23:26,210 --> 02:23:27,822 s hard to pile on much more 5371 02:23:27,822 --> 02:23:29,624 than that, but, um. Yeah. Thank 5372 02:23:29,624 --> 02:23:29,958 you John. Thank you. Ron. Um, 5373 02:23:29,958 --> 02:23:31,661 John, it 5374 02:23:31,661 --> 02:23:34,597 s been great to serve 5375 02:23:34,597 --> 02:23:36,366 as your, uh, co-chair. Um, so I 5376 02:23:36,366 --> 02:23:38,468 wish you both well. Thank you. 5377 02:23:38,468 --> 02:23:40,103 Thank you, Commissioner Pollock. 5378 02:23:40,103 --> 02:23:42,505 A couple of things before I get 5379 02:23:42,505 --> 02:23:45,308 to the, uh, personal comments. 5380 02:23:45,308 --> 02:23:47,444 Um, to the to the staff. Can we 5381 02:23:47,444 --> 02:23:50,381 consider changing a policy? And 5382 02:23:50,381 --> 02:23:52,317 the policy is simply we wait 5383 02:23:52,317 --> 02:23:54,586 till, like, 3:00 on the day of 5384 02:23:54,586 --> 02:23:56,621 a meeting to for, you know, to 5385 02:23:56,621 --> 02:23:58,290 put out any comments that come 5386 02:23:58,290 --> 02:23:59,257 in on the website. Is it 5387 02:23:59,257 --> 02:24:00,859 possible to change the 5388 02:24:00,859 --> 02:24:03,259 procedure that says the 5389 02:24:03,595 --> 02:24:05,264 comments, you know, come in and 5390 02:24:05,264 --> 02:24:06,933 end of business the day before? 5391 02:24:06,933 --> 02:24:08,535 So then the morning of a 5392 02:24:08,535 --> 02:24:09,469 meeting you can forward those 5393 02:24:09,469 --> 02:24:10,837 out. So we have a little bit 5394 02:24:10,837 --> 02:24:12,939 more time to look at them. Just 5395 02:24:12,939 --> 02:24:15,339 something to consider. Process 5396 02:24:17,344 --> 02:24:17,511 change. Is it. 5397 02:24:17,511 --> 02:24:18,612 We 5398 02:24:18,612 --> 02:24:20,548 ll have to take a look to 5399 02:24:20,548 --> 02:24:21,649 see where the 3:00 comes from. 5400 02:24:21,649 --> 02:24:23,452 Yeah, please. 5401 02:24:23,452 --> 02:24:24,887 To to determine that. 5402 02:24:24,887 --> 02:24:26,887 Okay. 5403 02:24:27,823 --> 02:24:28,691 Um, this the second thing is I 5404 02:24:28,691 --> 02:24:30,691 understand you 5405 02:24:30,693 --> 02:24:33,930 ve had a staff 5406 02:24:35,698 --> 02:24:35,865 addition. Um. 5407 02:24:35,865 --> 02:24:37,166 We 5408 02:24:37,166 --> 02:24:37,834 ll cover that under staff 5409 02:24:37,834 --> 02:24:38,935 reports. 5410 02:24:38,935 --> 02:24:40,935 Okay? Okay. 5411 02:24:42,273 --> 02:24:43,641 I guess then, John, it, you 5412 02:24:43,641 --> 02:24:45,409 know, thank you for your 5413 02:24:45,409 --> 02:24:45,542 leadership. You know, I know 5414 02:24:45,542 --> 02:24:46,577 I 5415 02:24:46,577 --> 02:24:47,778 ve kidded you before, it 5416 02:24:47,778 --> 02:24:49,130 says, are we ever going to have 5417 02:24:49,130 --> 02:24:49,914 anything to do? Because some of 5418 02:24:49,914 --> 02:24:51,449 our meetings have been pretty 5419 02:24:51,449 --> 02:24:52,784 light. But I appreciate your 5420 02:24:52,784 --> 02:24:54,419 sense of humor. I appreciate 5421 02:24:54,419 --> 02:24:56,454 your your guidance. And thank 5422 02:24:56,454 --> 02:24:58,570 you for your, your, uh, you 5423 02:24:58,570 --> 02:24:59,859 know, your custodian of the 5424 02:24:59,859 --> 02:25:01,260 chair. I appreciate that very 5425 02:25:01,260 --> 02:25:01,894 much, Ron. I 5426 02:25:01,894 --> 02:25:04,294 m going to MISS 5427 02:25:04,497 --> 02:25:05,765 The carpooling, buddy, but you 5428 02:25:05,765 --> 02:25:05,932 only live around the block, so 5429 02:25:05,932 --> 02:25:06,366 we 5430 02:25:06,366 --> 02:25:07,367 ll we 5431 02:25:07,367 --> 02:25:08,635 ll stay in touch. But 5432 02:25:08,635 --> 02:25:12,105 thank you for your service. I 5433 02:25:12,105 --> 02:25:14,105 appreciate it. 5434 02:25:14,241 --> 02:25:16,440 Uh, I really welcomed 5435 02:25:16,440 --> 02:25:18,346 everybody. Great people, great 5436 02:25:18,346 --> 02:25:19,581 staff. Um, but I know this is 5437 02:25:19,581 --> 02:25:22,551 not going to be what I watch on 5438 02:25:22,551 --> 02:25:22,984 tv on Tuesday nights. 5439 02:25:22,984 --> 02:25:24,984 My mother 5440 02:25:26,121 --> 02:25:27,923 s still watching. 5441 02:25:27,923 --> 02:25:28,560 Um, yes. Thank you to both of 5442 02:25:28,560 --> 02:25:29,458 y 5443 02:25:29,458 --> 02:25:31,226 all. John, thank you for 5444 02:25:31,226 --> 02:25:31,960 serving as chair. And I 5445 02:25:31,960 --> 02:25:32,940 m sure 5446 02:25:32,940 --> 02:25:34,940 I 5447 02:25:34,297 --> 02:25:35,532 ll see you very often. Um, 5448 02:25:35,532 --> 02:25:35,899 Ron, I hope I get to see you 5449 02:25:35,899 --> 02:25:37,000 often. I 5450 02:25:37,000 --> 02:25:38,568 ve enjoyed working 5451 02:25:38,568 --> 02:25:41,572 with you and and getting to 5452 02:25:41,572 --> 02:25:43,173 know you better. 5453 02:25:43,173 --> 02:25:44,508 Um, thank you all. This has 5454 02:25:44,508 --> 02:25:47,511 been awesome. This has been a 5455 02:25:47,511 --> 02:25:49,180 fantastic group. Um, shout out 5456 02:25:49,180 --> 02:25:52,840 to Jake Lyle, who sort of 5457 02:25:52,840 --> 02:25:53,785 prepared me for all this. Um, I 5458 02:25:53,785 --> 02:25:55,487 think I would leave you with 5459 02:25:55,487 --> 02:25:55,854 this thought. Um, no, it 5460 02:25:55,854 --> 02:25:56,522 s not 5461 02:25:56,522 --> 02:25:58,324 a lesson. It 5462 02:25:58,324 --> 02:25:59,859 s just an opinion. 5463 02:25:59,859 --> 02:26:01,560 I wake up every morning. Thank 5464 02:26:01,560 --> 02:26:03,930 GOD I live in a place that is 5465 02:26:03,930 --> 02:26:05,965 growing, um, that is thriving 5466 02:26:05,965 --> 02:26:07,700 economically, where our biggest 5467 02:26:07,700 --> 02:26:09,169 worry is what our bridge is 5468 02:26:09,169 --> 02:26:12,206 going to look like, because we 5469 02:26:12,206 --> 02:26:14,675 even get to build a bridge. Um, 5470 02:26:14,675 --> 02:26:18,246 so that comes at a cost. And 5471 02:26:18,246 --> 02:26:20,181 that cost is growth. Um, but I 5472 02:26:20,181 --> 02:26:21,816 would just ask that we 5473 02:26:21,816 --> 02:26:24,786 constantly remember this is the 5474 02:26:24,786 --> 02:26:27,890 planning Commission, not the 5475 02:26:27,890 --> 02:26:29,425 reaction Commission, not the 5476 02:26:29,425 --> 02:26:29,692 Public Opinion Commission. It 5477 02:26:29,692 --> 02:26:31,361 s 5478 02:26:31,361 --> 02:26:31,894 the planning commission. So we 5479 02:26:31,894 --> 02:26:33,894 take the city 5480 02:26:34,197 --> 02:26:36,432 s codes and, um, 5481 02:26:36,432 --> 02:26:38,201 restrictions and regulations, 5482 02:26:38,201 --> 02:26:42,401 and we look at a project based 5483 02:26:42,873 --> 02:26:44,575 on that period. Um, and I think 5484 02:26:44,575 --> 02:26:44,976 if we do that, then we 5485 02:26:44,976 --> 02:26:46,244 ve all 5486 02:26:46,244 --> 02:26:47,579 done our job as a, as a 5487 02:26:47,579 --> 02:26:47,712 planning commission. So it 5488 02:26:47,712 --> 02:26:49,314 s 5489 02:26:49,314 --> 02:26:52,914 been an honor to the staff. 5490 02:26:52,951 --> 02:26:54,190 Thank you very much. And, um, 5491 02:26:54,190 --> 02:26:55,530 probably we 5492 02:26:55,530 --> 02:26:57,453 ll never you never 5493 02:26:58,657 --> 02:27:02,257 know. All right. Uh, items from 5494 02:27:02,963 --> 02:27:04,531 staff, MISS Painter. 5495 02:27:04,531 --> 02:27:05,899 Thank you, MR. Chair. And 5496 02:27:05,899 --> 02:27:08,869 before we go into our items, I 5497 02:27:08,869 --> 02:27:11,205 do want to thank both you and, 5498 02:27:11,205 --> 02:27:12,639 uh, Ron for your service to the 5499 02:27:12,639 --> 02:27:12,806 community and to the city. It 5500 02:27:12,806 --> 02:27:13,975 s 5501 02:27:13,975 --> 02:27:15,576 a very important job that you 5502 02:27:15,576 --> 02:27:17,678 guys undertake. And we 5503 02:27:17,678 --> 02:27:19,481 understand how much it takes of 5504 02:27:19,481 --> 02:27:21,350 your time to spend it. Spend it 5505 02:27:21,350 --> 02:27:23,520 here with us on these lovely 5506 02:27:23,520 --> 02:27:24,987 evenings. Uh, so, moving on 5507 02:27:24,987 --> 02:27:28,587 from that, we did provide you 5508 02:27:28,958 --> 02:27:32,428 with your annual report for fy 5509 02:27:32,428 --> 02:27:34,300 2026. Um, I know that there are 5510 02:27:34,300 --> 02:27:35,264 probably fewer cases on here 5511 02:27:35,264 --> 02:27:37,101 that the charts show that you 5512 02:27:37,101 --> 02:27:38,836 had fewer applications than you 5513 02:27:38,836 --> 02:27:40,204 have in the past, but I think 5514 02:27:40,204 --> 02:27:41,505 you do need should celebrate 5515 02:27:41,505 --> 02:27:42,707 some of the big things you did, 5516 02:27:42,707 --> 02:27:44,842 including the adoption of the 5517 02:27:44,842 --> 02:27:46,277 Greater Downtown Plan, because 5518 02:27:46,277 --> 02:27:48,346 that was that was a big item 5519 02:27:48,346 --> 02:27:50,181 for for the city to to bring 5520 02:27:50,181 --> 02:27:51,750 forward some other things that 5521 02:27:51,750 --> 02:27:53,319 are happening. Uh, the Tree 5522 02:27:53,319 --> 02:27:55,688 Commission has established a 5523 02:27:55,688 --> 02:27:57,688 tree ordinance subcommittee 5524 02:27:57,723 --> 02:28:00,930 that will be working on 5525 02:28:00,930 --> 02:28:01,628 identifying amendments to the 5526 02:28:01,628 --> 02:28:01,828 proposed amendments to the 5527 02:28:01,828 --> 02:28:03,828 city 5528 02:28:03,930 --> 02:28:05,498 s tree ordinance. So they 5529 02:28:05,498 --> 02:28:07,000 will be inviting subject matter 5530 02:28:07,000 --> 02:28:08,769 experts as well as various 5531 02:28:08,769 --> 02:28:10,538 stakeholders, including the 5532 02:28:10,538 --> 02:28:11,739 Alliance for Cape Fear Trees, 5533 02:28:11,739 --> 02:28:13,708 the development community, to 5534 02:28:13,708 --> 02:28:15,310 participate in that process. 5535 02:28:15,310 --> 02:28:17,145 Uh, we are staffing that 5536 02:28:17,145 --> 02:28:19,314 committee and we will have also 5537 02:28:19,314 --> 02:28:20,615 recommended that before they 5538 02:28:20,615 --> 02:28:22,517 get to the point where they are 5539 02:28:22,517 --> 02:28:23,652 finalizing their proposal, we 5540 02:28:23,652 --> 02:28:25,200 would actually like to do a 5541 02:28:25,200 --> 02:28:26,421 meeting with this with with the 5542 02:28:26,421 --> 02:28:28,191 commission, or if you want to 5543 02:28:28,191 --> 02:28:29,592 appoint a subcommittee to look 5544 02:28:29,592 --> 02:28:31,294 at this so that so that we have 5545 02:28:31,294 --> 02:28:32,696 the two groups working together 5546 02:28:32,696 --> 02:28:35,132 before we bring you a formal 5547 02:28:35,132 --> 02:28:37,634 proposal at a public hearing, 5548 02:28:37,634 --> 02:28:39,670 uh, we also, since the chair 5549 02:28:39,670 --> 02:28:41,138 mentioned it, uh, the Cape Fear 5550 02:28:41,138 --> 02:28:43,138 Memorial Bridge Environmental 5551 02:28:43,307 --> 02:28:45,577 assessment was published and is 5552 02:28:45,577 --> 02:28:47,546 open for public comment through 5553 02:28:47,546 --> 02:28:49,214 OCTOBER 15th. There are two 5554 02:28:49,214 --> 02:28:51,550 public hearings coming up on 5555 02:28:51,550 --> 02:28:53,485 SEPTEMBER 14th and 15th, and 5556 02:28:53,485 --> 02:28:55,354 you can find more information 5557 02:28:55,354 --> 02:28:55,621 about the project on the city 5558 02:28:55,621 --> 02:28:56,956 s 5559 02:28:56,956 --> 02:28:58,324 website. There is actually if 5560 02:28:58,324 --> 02:29:00,259 you go to Wilmington, nc, dot 5561 02:29:00,259 --> 02:29:01,794 gov. There is a large banner 5562 02:29:01,794 --> 02:29:03,970 that will take you to a web 5563 02:29:03,970 --> 02:29:04,164 page that was created to help 5564 02:29:04,164 --> 02:29:06,564 the public understand the 5565 02:29:07,100 --> 02:29:08,302 project, and then, uh, as 5566 02:29:08,302 --> 02:29:10,302 Commissioner Pollock alluded 5567 02:29:10,905 --> 02:29:12,707 to, we do have a new community 5568 02:29:12,707 --> 02:29:14,410 planning and design manager who 5569 02:29:14,410 --> 02:29:16,477 will be joining us, uh, 5570 02:29:16,477 --> 02:29:17,579 officially on Tuesday. So you 5571 02:29:17,579 --> 02:29:20,115 will be seeing them at your 5572 02:29:20,115 --> 02:29:22,785 next meeting. And, uh, we are 5573 02:29:22,785 --> 02:29:25,154 very excited to have them. So 5574 02:29:25,154 --> 02:29:25,521 with that. 5575 02:29:25,521 --> 02:29:27,521 Okay. 5576 02:29:28,691 --> 02:29:28,992 Can I just add if anybody, um, 5577 02:29:28,992 --> 02:29:29,993 to Linda 5578 02:29:29,993 --> 02:29:32,950 s point about the Cape 5579 02:29:32,950 --> 02:29:32,929 Fear Bridge, take a look at the 5580 02:29:32,929 --> 02:29:33,430 replay of last night 5581 02:29:33,430 --> 02:29:34,531 s council 5582 02:29:34,531 --> 02:29:36,990 meeting, because I talked to 5583 02:29:36,990 --> 02:29:37,868 Linda before. I thought she did 5584 02:29:37,868 --> 02:29:38,603 an excellent job of here 5585 02:29:38,603 --> 02:29:40,603 s 5586 02:29:40,738 --> 02:29:40,939 really what option a is, and 5587 02:29:40,939 --> 02:29:42,939 here 5588 02:29:42,941 --> 02:29:46,770 s really what option b is. 5589 02:29:46,770 --> 02:29:48,346 And it was a very, you know, 5590 02:29:48,346 --> 02:29:49,614 nonpartisan, very objective. 5591 02:29:49,614 --> 02:29:50,480 This is what it is. This is 5592 02:29:50,480 --> 02:29:51,216 what it isn 5593 02:29:51,216 --> 02:29:52,551 t. So I would you 5594 02:29:52,551 --> 02:29:54,319 know, I would encourage you if 5595 02:29:54,319 --> 02:29:55,253 you get a chance. And even 5596 02:29:55,253 --> 02:29:55,488 though I know Ron, you just 5597 02:29:55,488 --> 02:29:56,220 said it 5598 02:29:56,220 --> 02:29:56,156 s not things you 5599 02:29:56,156 --> 02:29:57,457 re 5600 02:29:57,457 --> 02:29:58,625 going to be watching on tv, 5601 02:29:58,625 --> 02:29:59,859 take a look at that. Because it 5602 02:29:59,859 --> 02:30:01,461 was really nice. Job done. 5603 02:30:01,461 --> 02:30:02,529 And and honored who watched 5604 02:30:02,529 --> 02:30:02,763 this. Most of them. What 5605 02:30:02,763 --> 02:30:03,463 s 5606 02:30:03,463 --> 02:30:04,398 that? I said I 5607 02:30:04,398 --> 02:30:04,831 m the nerd who 5608 02:30:04,831 --> 02:30:04,998 watches me. 5609 02:30:04,998 --> 02:30:06,433 You 5610 02:30:06,433 --> 02:30:08,100 re right with me. But yeah. 5611 02:30:08,100 --> 02:30:10,905 So yeah, take a look at it. It 5612 02:30:10,905 --> 02:30:12,706 was a nice job, Linda. 5613 02:30:12,706 --> 02:30:15,577 Very good. Anything else from 5614 02:30:15,577 --> 02:30:16,311 staff? Do you have a motion to 5615 02:30:16,311 --> 02:30:17,713 adjourn? 5616 02:30:17,713 --> 02:30:18,413 So moved. 5617 02:30:18,413 --> 02:30:19,648 Second. 5618 02:30:19,648 --> 02:30:20,215 All in favor? 5619 02:30:20,215 --> 02:30:22,215 Aye, aye. 5620 02:30:27,230 --> 02:30:29,423 Meeting adjourned. Thank you.