1 00:00:01,140 --> 00:00:06,940 The meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Wooder Park for May 5, 2026 will come to order. 2 00:00:07,540 --> 00:00:17,660 Let me begin by stating that the purpose of the Planning and Zoning Board is to review and make a recommendation on conditional uses, subdivisions, comprehensive plan amendments, land development code amendments, 3 00:00:17,660 --> 00:00:25,100 and other ordinances affecting the development of property and to make final decisions on applications for a lake for a home approval. 4 00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:36,960 Any decision regarding lake for homes under city code section 58-87 is under the purview of the sport and the boards vote is a final decision that will not be heard by the city commission. 5 00:00:37,580 --> 00:00:44,120 The city commission will consider the board's recommendations may tonight on other public hearing items on Wednesday May 27, 6 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:49,880 2026 at 330 p.m., or assume their actors may be heard, and the city commission will make 7 00:00:49,880 --> 00:00:55,220 the final decision on such matters. You're encouraged to keep a prize to the status of such 8 00:00:55,220 --> 00:00:59,820 matters, going before the city commission by reviewing the city's website, an upcoming city 9 00:00:59,820 --> 00:01:05,240 commission meeting agenda. The meeting will proceed as follows. The chair or staff will announce 10 00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:09,600 each public hearing item as it appears on the agenda, which is available outside the front door. 11 00:01:10,260 --> 00:01:14,000 Staff will begin by making a presentation on each item and will provide the staff's 12 00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:23,420 recommendation. Next we will hear from the applicant. After that the floor will be open to the public for anyone who wishes to speak in support of or an opposition to the request. 13 00:01:24,380 --> 00:01:32,220 After public comment, the applicant will be given an opportunity to respond to the public comments. Please approach the podium and state your name and address for the record. 14 00:01:33,300 --> 00:01:42,560 With the exception of ordinances proposing comprehensive plan amendments and land development code amendments, the public hearing matters coming before the board are mostly quasi judicial and nature. 15 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:52,580 For quasi-judicial matters, the Board considers the testimony and evidence in the record at the hearing and determines whether the applicable criteria for approval have been met. 16 00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:59,880 The testimony that you give to the Board should be fully truthful in the same manner as if you were giving sworn testimony in a court of law. 17 00:02:00,700 --> 00:02:07,080 In the interest of time, we ask that each person appearing before the Board limit their comments to one appearance of three minutes. 18 00:02:07,080 --> 00:02:12,160 We have a large group tonight and I expect they're going to be a number of people who wish to speak. 19 00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:17,200 I want to give everybody the opportunity to say their peace, 20 00:02:17,720 --> 00:02:21,680 but I also want to be respectful of everyone's time including city staff, 21 00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:25,620 my fellow board members, the applicant, and all the members of the public. 22 00:02:26,100 --> 00:02:29,380 So I'm going to limit you to three minutes tonight. 23 00:02:30,520 --> 00:02:32,820 I reserve the right to let somebody go over, 24 00:02:33,300 --> 00:02:36,900 but we're going to be judicious with our time today. 25 00:02:36,900 --> 00:02:37,180 Okay. 26 00:02:40,220 --> 00:03:08,340 Large groups are asked to name a spokesperson. We asked that your testimony be relevant to the public hearing matter to which you are speaking and avoid repeating arguments and testimony made by yourself or others. Order into quorum will be preserved at all times. Please address all your comments to the board and not to the audience. After all public input, the public comment period will be closed. The board members will then discuss and we will vote on a recommendation to the city commission with any conditions that may be appropriate. 27 00:03:08,500 --> 00:03:12,180 Please turn off for silence all mobile devices during these public hearings. 28 00:03:12,920 --> 00:03:17,520 The first item of the business is the approval of the April 7th, 2026 meeting minutes. 29 00:03:19,390 --> 00:03:20,990 Does everyone have chance to review the minutes? 30 00:03:21,330 --> 00:03:22,050 If so, is there a motion? 31 00:03:23,050 --> 00:03:24,030 Make a motion to approve. 32 00:03:25,530 --> 00:03:25,610 Second. 33 00:03:26,230 --> 00:03:27,390 Of a motion in a second? 34 00:03:28,190 --> 00:03:31,070 Or are there any public comments on the agenda prior to a vote? 35 00:03:31,610 --> 00:03:33,210 Chairman, we have anyone registered? 36 00:03:34,010 --> 00:03:34,850 I have a motion in a second. 37 00:03:34,950 --> 00:03:36,070 Can I have a roll call vote, please? 38 00:03:36,870 --> 00:03:37,710 Mr. Seagull. 39 00:03:38,110 --> 00:03:38,330 Hi. 40 00:03:39,390 --> 00:03:42,410 Yes. Mr. Steinberg. Mr. Dick. 41 00:03:43,030 --> 00:03:44,050 Yes. Vice Chair Boenstein. 42 00:03:44,350 --> 00:03:45,150 Chairman Johnson. 43 00:03:45,590 --> 00:03:46,750 All right. 44 00:03:46,850 --> 00:03:50,690 The next item of business is public comments for items not on the agenda tonight. 45 00:03:51,130 --> 00:03:53,530 We did not have anyone to register to unless someone would like to speak. 46 00:03:53,810 --> 00:03:56,170 Thank you. We'll move forward with the first item on the agenda. 47 00:04:03,340 --> 00:04:08,260 Good evening board. First item on your agenda is a request of the development services. 48 00:04:08,260 --> 00:04:12,000 For condition use approval to develop for one story buildings, 49 00:04:12,240 --> 00:04:16,940 to only just under 30,000 square feet at 860 West Fairbanks Avenue, 50 00:04:17,860 --> 00:04:21,940 including approval for alcohol sales within 300 feet of residential properties. 51 00:04:22,820 --> 00:04:27,100 In conjunction with the Vestids C3 zoning and a community benefit agreement. 52 00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:33,240 So as you recall, the board tables this item at your meeting last month 53 00:04:33,240 --> 00:04:36,420 and gave the applicant two topics to address. 54 00:04:36,420 --> 00:04:43,040 Number one, to revise our architectural design, to incorporate additional building articulation, 55 00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:48,960 and to prepare a streetscape plan for Holt, which could include either a striping plan 56 00:04:48,960 --> 00:04:53,640 demonstrating dedicated on street parking or enhancement, such as a wide- and sidewalk 57 00:04:53,640 --> 00:04:55,760 and improved pedestrian buffer. 58 00:04:56,780 --> 00:04:59,560 So here's the updated site plan. 59 00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:06,200 You can see they also incorporated one of the conditions that we had on your table 60 00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:12,080 item to make the pond a more natural shape so that they have updated the plan to reflect 61 00:05:12,080 --> 00:05:17,400 that condition and then also decided to move forward with parallel parking along hold 62 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:22,400 Avenue. It's a little bit hard to see in this plan so I blew it up and two sections here 63 00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:27,060 the western section of hold on the top of the screen and the eastern section on the bottom of 64 00:05:27,060 --> 00:05:35,300 screen. So their proposal is for two-way drive aisle and nine by 18. I'm sorry, nine by 65 00:05:35,300 --> 00:05:41,540 22 parking spaces as well as a nine-foot sidewalk on the back of the curb and an eight-foot 66 00:05:41,540 --> 00:05:48,100 landscape buffer. And they were able to accommodate 13 parallel parking spaces. So they satisfied 67 00:05:48,100 --> 00:05:55,220 that plan with kind of providing both options and enhanced pedestrians experience there with the 68 00:05:55,220 --> 00:06:01,200 larger sidewalk as well as the buffer and then the 13 parking spaces. 69 00:06:03,220 --> 00:06:07,860 This is up to landscape plan that shows the reshape of the pond area. 70 00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:13,740 They also incorporated some sabers trees within the pond area. 71 00:06:14,620 --> 00:06:22,420 Again, this shows the landscape buffer on the private property side outside of the sidewalk for that eight foot landscape buffer. 72 00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:32,320 And then they also revise the articulation of the larger buildings at the end, the one 73 00:06:32,320 --> 00:06:37,340 at the corner of Dending of Fairbanks and the one at the corner of Cape End in Fairbanks. 74 00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:43,000 So the old is on top, you see the top area is flat on the new version, they've bumped 75 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:49,040 out at least two feet on those two detail pieces, so it creates more of articulation along 76 00:06:49,040 --> 00:06:57,420 front longer buildings. And in terms of the smaller buildings in between, they do have a 10-foot 77 00:06:57,420 --> 00:07:03,440 articulation in between the two buildings. So it's not flat all across the four separate buildings. 78 00:07:03,840 --> 00:07:10,680 So it does jut out 10 feet towards Fairbanks Avenue. And then again with the buildings of the 79 00:07:10,680 --> 00:07:17,700 smaller versions in the middle, being only 61.5 feet wide, they decided to keep it as one fly elevation 80 00:07:17,700 --> 00:07:25,260 because the OEO code requires it to be set back every 36 feet, which creates for an awkward 81 00:07:25,260 --> 00:07:29,960 tenant space there for that restaurant space, so it's just the one art... 82 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:46,000 Education piece that they don't have in the smaller buildings. But again, as I mentioned, they provide the ten foot articulation between the first building along the western edge as you move towards the east. It has a additional articulation, so it's not flat as you're looking down. 83 00:07:48,820 --> 00:07:56,080 And then here's another view of those two buildings in the middle, just wanted to point out within themselves. 84 00:07:56,200 --> 00:08:02,200 They do have articulation, it's just not at that 36 point foot mark in the middle. 85 00:08:02,280 --> 00:08:15,420 It's built into recess of the storefronts, the corners on the top, the recess of the windows, twice, one to the front face of the windows and then again where the insets of the windows are. 86 00:08:15,420 --> 00:08:21,880 So there's lots of articulation built in within the building, just not at that 36 point mark right in the middle, 87 00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:27,020 which would create for kind of an awkward view of the building due to the architecture they're proposing. 88 00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:35,120 Then just kind of recapping the comparison of what we have here. I went over a lot of this in our last meeting, 89 00:08:35,300 --> 00:08:42,680 but just to reiterate, we started with the OEO standards, which is what their zoning district is, 90 00:08:42,680 --> 00:08:48,260 but they requested a vesting agreement with the City Commission to go to the C3 standards. 91 00:08:48,920 --> 00:08:54,920 So we started with the ability to get 100% for a ratio invested to the lower C3 standards 92 00:08:54,920 --> 00:09:01,180 of 43% for a ratio, but they're proposing a 19.4% for a ratio. 93 00:09:01,720 --> 00:09:08,520 So they're 80 to 25% under the max for a ratio that could be built when we started. 94 00:09:09,460 --> 00:09:16,540 In terms of height, oil, that was four, C3, that was three, they're proposing one, so the 95 00:09:16,540 --> 00:09:19,520 three is two stories under what they could do. 96 00:09:20,580 --> 00:09:24,520 In terms of setbacks, the front setbacks of oil were much higher than C3. 97 00:09:25,260 --> 00:09:29,900 So oil requires a 35 foot front setback, C3 is a 10 foot setback. 98 00:09:30,140 --> 00:09:34,580 They're providing 35, 243 depending on which building you're looking at. 99 00:09:34,580 --> 00:09:38,940 So, again, 25 to 13.5 over in terms of parking, 100 00:09:39,640 --> 00:09:44,860 OEO and C3 required the same amount of parking at 175 parking spaces 101 00:09:44,860 --> 00:09:49,660 that are proposing 199 parking spaces at the first 102 00:09:49,660 --> 00:09:51,760 start of construction of this project. 103 00:09:51,900 --> 00:09:55,120 They'll be over parked by 49 parking spaces, 104 00:09:55,680 --> 00:09:58,100 but if they come back for the second conditional use 105 00:09:58,100 --> 00:10:00,860 for that 6,000 square foot office building, 106 00:10:00,860 --> 00:10:03,860 then there'll be 24 spaces over. 107 00:10:05,200 --> 00:10:08,340 So, either scenario, whether without the office building, 108 00:10:08,540 --> 00:10:12,440 they're over parked, and then that also doesn't include the 13 109 00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:17,060 on street parking spaces that they're going to construct as part of this. 110 00:10:17,840 --> 00:10:21,920 Just kind of summarize, because FAR is kind of hard to understand. 111 00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:24,700 It percentages with the C3 investing. 112 00:10:24,900 --> 00:10:28,840 You see there at the bottom, that means they're leaving 51,900 113 00:10:28,840 --> 00:10:32,980 to 6-square feet off the table with this proposed development. 114 00:10:35,650 --> 00:10:40,490 So with that, staff recommendations for approval with the four conditions that we had 115 00:10:40,490 --> 00:10:45,730 from the last meeting, number one, the community benefit, be fully executed prior to the certificate 116 00:10:45,730 --> 00:10:51,930 of occupancy, number two, that the oak trees identified in this community benefit agreement 117 00:10:51,930 --> 00:10:57,110 at the two intersections are preserved until such time that the future transportation 118 00:10:57,110 --> 00:11:00,070 and prevents on fair banks, can't commence. 119 00:11:00,990 --> 00:11:03,190 Number three, the pond be refined to incorporate 120 00:11:03,190 --> 00:11:04,410 a more natural edge shape. 121 00:11:04,550 --> 00:11:06,150 You can see they've already done that, 122 00:11:06,330 --> 00:11:08,170 but just continuing that on as a condition 123 00:11:08,170 --> 00:11:10,430 to make sure it doesn't get lost, as we move forward. 124 00:11:11,190 --> 00:11:13,370 And number four, that the applicant, again, 125 00:11:13,550 --> 00:11:15,490 enhanced the streetscape along Colt Avenue, 126 00:11:15,870 --> 00:11:19,070 which they provided and they revised some middle package. 127 00:11:20,330 --> 00:11:22,710 So with that, I will take any questions. 128 00:11:22,850 --> 00:11:23,910 The board has for staff. 129 00:11:23,910 --> 00:11:26,210 Is this a member? 130 00:11:28,170 --> 00:11:36,650 Allison, that our work session represented it's from the transportation group came in because 131 00:11:36,650 --> 00:11:42,130 we had a discussion on that intersection with whole and dining and they were going to do something. 132 00:11:43,030 --> 00:11:53,650 And now my question is what is it that they're going to do and how if any would that affect this project? 133 00:11:55,070 --> 00:11:58,830 So, you know, the issue with the traffic is happening now. 134 00:12:00,110 --> 00:12:04,930 So, what the transportation division is going to do is perform our own traffic study. 135 00:12:05,330 --> 00:12:09,510 So, take a look at what the applicant has provided as part of their updated traffic data. 136 00:12:09,710 --> 00:12:15,970 Once the property was constructed, they have all that trip generation and traffic study that they provided. 137 00:12:16,290 --> 00:12:22,290 So, we'll incorporate that into a holistic study that takes a look at a larger area other than just the single property. 138 00:12:22,290 --> 00:12:28,310 and then determine what steps need to be done from the city side to improve the streets 139 00:12:28,310 --> 00:12:32,530 if any changes need to be made as a result of that study. 140 00:12:33,230 --> 00:12:38,510 So in other words, theoretically, if we were to approve the plan as presented, 141 00:12:39,530 --> 00:12:45,770 that still would not prevent it from being amended further on if traffic the vision comes back. 142 00:12:45,870 --> 00:12:47,690 It would be on the city side. 143 00:12:47,690 --> 00:12:52,250 on the right, but they would have to do that they would look at it and say, I think we need 144 00:12:52,250 --> 00:12:57,490 to do something with this based on this or not. I mean, I'm just saying is it would be 145 00:12:57,490 --> 00:13:00,810 based on whatever the traffic division comes back with. 146 00:13:01,170 --> 00:13:04,730 Right, and we have control of the city rights of the way, so it wouldn't be impacting the city 147 00:13:04,730 --> 00:13:06,450 rights of it, not the private property. 148 00:13:07,510 --> 00:13:13,350 Right, so if the city recommends that something some adjustments be made with that intersection, 149 00:13:14,830 --> 00:13:15,970 they would do it. 150 00:13:15,970 --> 00:13:20,970 the city. Yeah, and DOT because the DOT route. Because there's a timing issue with regards 151 00:13:20,970 --> 00:13:26,710 my understanding also, so people understand is that DOT controls fair banks. That's not the city. 152 00:13:27,250 --> 00:13:32,230 So there's a question is to when that left turn Lane's going to be installed, there's going to be a 153 00:13:32,230 --> 00:13:38,050 project to resurface or something, so where the city's going to try and get that in there. 154 00:13:38,070 --> 00:13:43,710 We're made to do it this morning. It's made to make that reality sooner and if that happens, then the 155 00:13:43,710 --> 00:13:47,490 traffic signals will be adjusted to compensate for that. 156 00:13:47,630 --> 00:13:48,110 Yes, exactly. 157 00:13:49,710 --> 00:13:51,450 Thank you. 158 00:13:51,930 --> 00:13:53,110 Questions for city staff? 159 00:13:53,550 --> 00:13:54,470 Mr. Worsey. 160 00:13:55,630 --> 00:14:02,270 Under the condition two, the outtrees at the Fairbanks Denning and Fairbanks 161 00:14:02,270 --> 00:14:03,090 keep an intersection. 162 00:14:04,050 --> 00:14:07,950 So will they just get torn down at the point that future transportation improvements 163 00:14:07,950 --> 00:14:08,810 commence? 164 00:14:09,190 --> 00:14:12,370 Unfortunately, because they're in the way of the right of way that's needed for the 165 00:14:12,370 --> 00:14:12,770 Certainly. 166 00:14:13,330 --> 00:14:14,930 Will there be any compensation for those trees? 167 00:14:15,190 --> 00:14:15,250 Yes. 168 00:14:15,810 --> 00:14:21,710 And that would be by who the city or the developer. 169 00:14:22,290 --> 00:14:23,310 It would be within the right away. 170 00:14:23,550 --> 00:14:25,250 So would be the city's responsibility. 171 00:14:26,090 --> 00:14:26,430 Okay. 172 00:14:27,250 --> 00:14:28,390 And that's on the city's agenda. 173 00:14:28,490 --> 00:14:29,670 It knows it will have to happen. 174 00:14:35,380 --> 00:14:36,400 You have the questions for staff. 175 00:14:40,120 --> 00:14:41,000 Thank you. 176 00:14:41,220 --> 00:14:41,700 With the applicant. 177 00:14:41,920 --> 00:14:43,120 Care to make a presentation. 178 00:14:50,660 --> 00:14:51,040 Good evening. 179 00:14:51,320 --> 00:14:51,980 Bob Zigg and first. 180 00:14:51,980 --> 00:14:58,200 development services 12.01 East Robinson Street Orlando Florida 3.2804 was up here a couple 181 00:14:58,200 --> 00:14:59,980 weeks ago giving him a reason. 182 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:22,840 Presentation, my job got easier tonight. We've done everything that's asked of us. We've gone through and created. I think some of the residents concerns that may be here again tonight and we come back up and certainly respond to any concerns that they might have, but to reiterate some of those safety of pedestrians was a common theme of what we talked about when we were here last time. 183 00:15:22,840 --> 00:15:34,520 And as Allison showed you, I've got a PowerPoint presentation here that's, you know, got some similar things in that what Allison showed, but I'm going to go ahead and get to the site plan here, 184 00:15:37,580 --> 00:15:37,800 eventually. 185 00:15:39,780 --> 00:15:52,860 So you can see the parallel parking in Allison had the little blow up. I think some important things to, you know, add to Allison's narrative on this is that when we talk about those overages in parking, 186 00:15:52,860 --> 00:16:22,080 we're not counting on these parallel parking spaces as part of that overage. So these are, in addition to the code required parking, I think a lot of the concerns that were raised here last time were, you know, more of larger events, maybe at the baseball field behind us and now there is overflow parking in the streets, not only that, but also wanting to create that separation from the driving public and the walking public and also give the walking public a wider sidewalk. 187 00:16:22,080 --> 00:16:27,700 So we've accomplished that by creating the separation with those parallel park cars and also 188 00:16:27,700 --> 00:16:30,220 with that wider sidewalk for pedestrian safety. 189 00:16:30,760 --> 00:16:33,080 So that's kind of what we've done along hold. 190 00:16:33,660 --> 00:16:36,920 And looking at the storm motor attention pond, it was just to make it a little bit more 191 00:16:36,920 --> 00:16:39,500 of an aesthetic feature, feel a little bit more natural. 192 00:16:40,340 --> 00:16:46,660 The landscaping plan, as you saw, there's enhanced landscaping around that wall there 193 00:16:46,660 --> 00:16:50,280 that intersection, as well as a enhanced slanscaping along, 194 00:16:50,360 --> 00:16:54,880 hold behind that wider sidewalk that I was just referencing as well. 195 00:16:55,340 --> 00:16:59,860 Allison did a very good job of explaining what was done on the buildings and what the thought process was 196 00:16:59,860 --> 00:17:05,560 of the architect as they went away from this last meeting and the feedback that we had received in that meeting 197 00:17:05,560 --> 00:17:09,700 and feel that we've met the intent of what everybody was looking for in that last discussion. 198 00:17:10,740 --> 00:17:14,600 So with that being said, I'm here to answer any questions now and reserve the right to come back up 199 00:17:14,600 --> 00:17:18,240 and respond to anything that might be brought up here this evening. 200 00:17:18,820 --> 00:17:19,540 Thank you. 201 00:17:19,700 --> 00:17:20,680 Questions for the applicant? 202 00:17:23,770 --> 00:17:24,110 Anyone? 203 00:17:25,430 --> 00:17:25,730 Thank you. 204 00:17:26,630 --> 00:17:29,410 We have members of the public who wish to speak on this application. 205 00:17:30,030 --> 00:17:31,370 Chair, I have three registered. 206 00:17:31,630 --> 00:17:32,970 There may be more in the audience. 207 00:17:33,930 --> 00:17:35,270 The first one is Ken Brown. 208 00:17:41,020 --> 00:17:41,440 Good evening. 209 00:17:41,560 --> 00:17:42,440 Members of the council. 210 00:17:42,720 --> 00:17:44,880 My name is Ken Brown, 1044 North Kentucky. 211 00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:48,120 I run a land entitlement investment fund here. 212 00:17:48,220 --> 00:17:50,820 And as such, I regularly evaluate projects. 213 00:17:50,820 --> 00:17:54,340 such as this, and so I'm well positioned to speak to its merits. 214 00:17:55,100 --> 00:17:59,580 I'd like to express my support for the redevelopment of the property 860 West Fairbanks. 215 00:18:00,600 --> 00:18:06,520 Winter Park thrives when development is intentional, and especially residential office 216 00:18:06,520 --> 00:18:10,840 and thoughtfully designed and retail they come together to create energy and community 217 00:18:10,840 --> 00:18:14,800 restaurants play a key role in that process as they bring people together. 218 00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:16,420 They increase walkability. 219 00:18:16,420 --> 00:18:22,580 They support the surrounding businesses and contribute meaningfully to the local economy. 220 00:18:23,720 --> 00:18:28,340 Beyond that, projects like this tend to have a ripple effect, I'm sure you guys know 221 00:18:28,340 --> 00:18:29,440 that. 222 00:18:29,940 --> 00:18:34,980 When you introduce high quality restaurant space into an area surrounded by residential 223 00:18:34,980 --> 00:18:38,760 office uses, you don't just fill the space but you create a destination. 224 00:18:39,820 --> 00:18:44,180 That drives foot traffic, supports nearby businesses, increases property values. 225 00:18:44,180 --> 00:18:48,600 and enhances overall experience of the area for both residents and visitors. 226 00:18:50,080 --> 00:18:52,180 As it stands today, if you guys are familiar with this property, 227 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:55,500 I feel that the property does not reflect the standard, 228 00:18:55,880 --> 00:18:57,860 nor the potential of winter park. 229 00:18:58,420 --> 00:19:00,300 This proposal represents a clear improvement, 230 00:19:00,600 --> 00:19:04,800 one that aligns with the city's vision, and with the OA overlay guidelines 231 00:19:06,040 --> 00:19:07,420 for thoughtful development. 232 00:19:07,940 --> 00:19:11,120 I mean, in many cases, even below what the OA requires. 233 00:19:11,440 --> 00:19:13,860 So I think that was really well done in their park. 234 00:19:13,860 --> 00:19:18,900 I also want to acknowledge the stewardship behind the proposal, the Hall of Family, has a long-standing 235 00:19:18,900 --> 00:19:23,980 presence in the community, which reflects leadership, innovation, and a commitment to doing things 236 00:19:23,980 --> 00:19:26,600 the right way values that clearly continue today. 237 00:19:27,720 --> 00:19:32,300 And when you look at the project holistically, you will find a well-qualified developer, a project 238 00:19:32,300 --> 00:19:37,980 that improves and beautifies the area, a use that strengthens the local economy and a proposal 239 00:19:37,980 --> 00:19:41,540 that aligns with and even proves upon the OA of Framework. 240 00:19:42,560 --> 00:19:46,900 For my perspective as an industry professional and as someone I actually live a Jason to 241 00:19:46,900 --> 00:19:49,060 this property, so a couple hundred yards away. 242 00:19:50,160 --> 00:19:54,300 This is exactly the kind of thoughtful community line development that Winter Park has known 243 00:19:54,300 --> 00:19:57,520 for and I respectfully encourage approval. 244 00:19:58,080 --> 00:19:59,200 Thank you, members of the council. 245 00:19:59,860 --> 00:20:00,120 Thank you. 246 00:20:00,640 --> 00:20:02,420 Next is Sonja McLean. 247 00:20:07,700 --> 00:20:11,180 Well, I'm Sonja McLean, 935, North Kentucky Avenue. 248 00:20:11,180 --> 00:20:14,160 First off, I just want to say Allison has been great. 249 00:20:14,380 --> 00:20:21,940 She's been kind of feeling all our project ideas and everything, and I just wanted to give her a shout out. 250 00:20:23,360 --> 00:20:27,480 Again, the last time I was here, I'm, again, I'm in for the project. 251 00:20:28,060 --> 00:20:36,120 I appreciate the fact that it's not something that's opposing, you know, that it's not a multi-story structure, 252 00:20:36,120 --> 00:20:43,360 which is nice because I've been planning to do these meetings where, unfortunately, people will complain that all of a sudden there's no more sunlight. 253 00:20:43,500 --> 00:20:49,480 Now we have a shade garden versus a sun garden, so I really do appreciate that fact. 254 00:20:51,340 --> 00:20:59,320 I've also lived at this property for 36 years, and I remember when Holland Chevrolet was still there. 255 00:20:59,860 --> 00:21:03,720 And there was four lanes of traffic, I know we discussed this last time. 256 00:21:04,420 --> 00:21:12,820 And even when they were at their busiest, I never had a problem turning left out of my property from North Kentucky on to Denning. 257 00:21:13,480 --> 00:21:15,540 And then of course, the two lane happened. 258 00:21:16,420 --> 00:21:23,340 Which we couldn't understand because we knew that property was going to be redeveloped at some point and also that six points was going to be redeveloped. 259 00:21:23,360 --> 00:21:24,860 So it didn't make any sense to us. 260 00:21:24,860 --> 00:21:33,720 So now, you know, we have the issues with the traffic and all of you are quite familiar with, you know, what with this with the backups. 261 00:21:34,880 --> 00:21:46,340 And since since that's happened, we've also had in a very short period of time, at least two cars trying to try to turn themselves into lawn ornaments or neighbors corner property. 262 00:21:48,820 --> 00:21:54,880 And as it is half the time, I have to go over to South Kentucky to make a left because 263 00:21:55,780 --> 00:22:00,260 well, the traffic backs up, so I'm now creating more traffic on their area. 264 00:22:01,980 --> 00:22:05,380 And my husband and I were the ones that came up with the right turn in, right turn out. 265 00:22:06,100 --> 00:22:08,600 And we kind of updated it and sent it into Allison. 266 00:22:08,600 --> 00:22:24,060 But we want to make sure that we can actually, you know, enter and exit our properties without having to, you know, check our blood pressure right afterwards. 267 00:22:24,800 --> 00:22:29,980 It's, again, it's, we've kind of had a re-adjust ever since it's too late and we can't go back. It's not there. 268 00:22:30,000 --> 00:22:36,080 There's no time machine to go back and change that. But we're just want to make sure that it doesn't 269 00:22:36,080 --> 00:22:43,420 create more imposing traffic into our area and work cut through traffic. I use cuts through traffic 270 00:22:43,420 --> 00:22:48,060 all the time, so I'm not going to be at hit the grid about it. I do it. I wish we had a lower 271 00:22:49,280 --> 00:22:54,500 traffic, you know, speed sign, because as you well know, when you put 15 people go 20, 272 00:22:59,960 --> 00:22:59,980 if you put 273 00:23:00,640 --> 00:23:13,960 But we just want, again, we're for the project, we just want the city to be thoughtful about our roads and to give our, you know, ideas and to give more consideration. 274 00:23:14,640 --> 00:23:18,500 I thank you so much. Next is Susie Stein. 275 00:23:26,460 --> 00:23:35,460 I'm Susie Stein, and I live at 1035 in North Kentucky. And I don't want to repeat what Sonia said, but my biggest issue is still the traffic. 276 00:23:35,460 --> 00:23:40,820 Like just coming here tonight, I was trying to go straight from North Kentucky to Holt. 277 00:23:41,200 --> 00:23:44,560 And I had to wait for two cycles of lights because I could not get through. 278 00:23:45,260 --> 00:23:50,000 And so, two things will one, I don't know what we're doing about this traffic, but two 279 00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:55,240 is there any talk about making that light a little bit longer so that more traffic can get 280 00:23:55,240 --> 00:23:58,240 through, because there's times of day that three cars get through. 281 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:02,520 I think there was a discussion not to get into a back and forth with the community, but there 282 00:24:02,520 --> 00:24:06,640 discussion with Mr. Steinberg and Allison, where we talk about something that was discussed 283 00:24:06,640 --> 00:24:12,160 at our work session recently, where we had somebody from City Traffic Department come and 284 00:24:12,160 --> 00:24:18,340 speak, and once the turn lanes are put in, this can't happen until that happens, but once 285 00:24:18,340 --> 00:24:24,020 the turn lanes are put in, and you have that change in the intersection, the lights will 286 00:24:24,020 --> 00:24:29,260 be retined. We can't guarantee what that's going to mean, but that will happen when 287 00:24:29,260 --> 00:24:30,160 the turn lanes are put in. 288 00:24:30,160 --> 00:24:32,560 I wasn't sure what specifically you guys had discussed. 289 00:24:32,860 --> 00:24:34,620 And the second thing is is there any way 290 00:24:34,620 --> 00:24:37,180 to have resident only parking on our street 291 00:24:37,180 --> 00:24:38,680 or anything like that? 292 00:24:38,780 --> 00:24:40,900 So our street doesn't become a parking lot. 293 00:24:41,760 --> 00:24:44,700 It's just such a narrow street to begin with. 294 00:24:45,260 --> 00:24:46,580 I don't know the answer to that question. 295 00:24:49,350 --> 00:24:51,090 If it's a public street, or not, 296 00:24:51,150 --> 00:24:53,790 able to restrict it based on residents. 297 00:24:54,250 --> 00:24:56,030 I mean, there's not a framework for that. 298 00:24:57,530 --> 00:24:59,370 That's, that's, that's my expectation 299 00:24:59,370 --> 00:25:00,730 for what the answer is, but yeah. 300 00:25:00,730 --> 00:25:01,550 Okay. 301 00:25:02,030 --> 00:25:02,370 That's it. 302 00:25:02,410 --> 00:25:02,830 Thank you. 303 00:25:02,890 --> 00:25:03,490 Thank you. 304 00:25:03,870 --> 00:25:05,510 Our last speaker is Steve Sikri. 305 00:25:15,530 --> 00:25:16,910 My name is Steve Sikri. 306 00:25:17,030 --> 00:25:17,890 I live at 1041. 307 00:25:18,090 --> 00:25:19,030 South Kentucky Avenue. 308 00:25:19,270 --> 00:25:23,210 And there is actually street parking over New Orleans where it's required to have a sticker. 309 00:25:23,470 --> 00:25:24,310 So there is some president. 310 00:25:25,010 --> 00:25:31,170 My question is that I'm visiting the cut through traffic being substantial. 311 00:25:32,030 --> 00:25:38,970 And do we have any obligation to study it ahead of time and come up with some base numbers? 312 00:25:40,790 --> 00:25:47,470 and then assuming so what would be that process and then what would be the threshold that we 313 00:25:47,470 --> 00:25:55,070 say okay we have to make some changes to that cut-through area yeah I'm happy to allow 314 00:25:55,070 --> 00:25:59,810 city staff to answer these questions but frankly this is more related to just sort of 315 00:25:59,810 --> 00:26:04,590 general traffic and sermons about a particular neighborhood in the city and less than having 316 00:26:04,590 --> 00:26:05,690 to do with the application. 317 00:26:07,230 --> 00:26:09,870 But Allison, Nicholas, can you answer that question? 318 00:26:11,960 --> 00:26:13,960 I can't tell you what the threshold is. 319 00:26:13,980 --> 00:26:15,300 Are they need to be studied? 320 00:26:16,460 --> 00:26:16,880 I mean, yeah. 321 00:26:16,980 --> 00:26:20,160 And that's my observation is I haven't met anyone 322 00:26:20,160 --> 00:26:23,200 in the neighborhood or otherwise that's opposing the development. 323 00:26:23,880 --> 00:26:26,580 The only concerns I hear are the cut-through traffic. 324 00:26:27,280 --> 00:26:28,200 And I've lived there long enough. 325 00:26:28,400 --> 00:26:31,400 It's going to back up from Dending towards 1792. 326 00:26:31,400 --> 00:26:33,320 And people are going to turn right on the ward. 327 00:26:33,560 --> 00:26:35,320 Go down North Kentucky and try to get across. 328 00:26:35,320 --> 00:26:40,040 when they're leaving, that light's going to back up and people are going to turn left and want 329 00:26:40,040 --> 00:26:45,920 to go through that neighborhood back to ward and then head because that's, you can't otherwise 330 00:26:45,920 --> 00:26:55,420 get west so it's going to be a problem and it's going to be relatively high volume of certain 331 00:26:55,420 --> 00:27:00,220 busy times of night. So I guess I'm not opposed at all to this. I'm just curious if we can 332 00:27:01,180 --> 00:27:05,780 set some thresholds and then maybe have some kind of a plan in the event that it does exceed 333 00:27:05,780 --> 00:27:08,540 those thresholds. 334 00:27:08,760 --> 00:27:14,120 So again, if this is the right form of my apologize, but I am curious, I guess I am curious, 335 00:27:14,280 --> 00:27:21,300 does the city have any obligation to monitor that and to take action with regard to this? 336 00:27:21,740 --> 00:27:28,300 With regard to this particular project, I don't think that this particular project envisions 337 00:27:28,300 --> 00:27:34,460 any sort of traffic study being done to make sure that it falls within whatever... 338 00:27:34,460 --> 00:27:45,220 Yeah, and you know, maybe a wound, but that's what that's my question is couldn't we establish and I've been talking to the transportation people about doing that, but I haven't got any really like answers. 339 00:27:45,700 --> 00:27:49,160 I know they're planning on doing something with the retiming of the lights. 340 00:27:49,300 --> 00:27:49,740 Absolutely. 341 00:27:50,340 --> 00:27:52,240 Yeah, that I do understand. 342 00:27:53,300 --> 00:28:02,120 That might solve some of it, but I have a feeling that the cut through traffic, I have a feeling that it's going to be dramatically more than it currently is, which is substantial right now. 343 00:28:02,120 --> 00:28:05,820 So, I guess so, it sounds like I need to speak to them, see. 344 00:28:07,220 --> 00:28:12,260 Well, I think if the, it just seems to me that if the applicant were proposing to build 345 00:28:12,260 --> 00:28:18,180 something that was 50,000 square feet larger, there would probably be more traffic than 346 00:28:18,180 --> 00:28:21,440 what is, you know, going to happen with what's being proposed for any of that. 347 00:28:21,440 --> 00:28:22,120 Thank you. 348 00:28:22,220 --> 00:28:22,740 Thank you, sir. 349 00:28:24,560 --> 00:28:25,520 Anyone else? 350 00:28:26,480 --> 00:28:27,140 No, chairman. 351 00:28:27,640 --> 00:28:28,520 We don't have anyone else scheduled? 352 00:28:30,140 --> 00:28:34,340 Would the applicant care to make any rebuttal? 353 00:28:40,080 --> 00:28:41,300 Hello, Bob Zigg and Puss again. 354 00:28:41,400 --> 00:28:47,340 The only thing I would add, we have talked about it before, but the landowner and developer 355 00:28:47,340 --> 00:28:53,980 in this particular case is making a dedication of right away both on the north side of Fairbanks 356 00:28:53,980 --> 00:28:59,980 and the south side of Fairbanks to help with the city's desire to put in that westbound 357 00:28:59,980 --> 00:29:04,000 left-turn lane from Westbound Fair banks on to Southbound Denning. 358 00:29:04,720 --> 00:29:09,220 So we are contributing and trying to help the greatest extent possible here with the 359 00:29:09,220 --> 00:29:13,060 development plan that we're putting forward, both with the development that we previously 360 00:29:13,060 --> 00:29:13,620 approved. 361 00:29:14,080 --> 00:29:19,380 We do have near approval on the north side for the start construction there as well as the 362 00:29:19,380 --> 00:29:21,260 dedication right away on this side as well. 363 00:29:21,960 --> 00:29:26,600 So, it's certainly willing to participate and talk where we deal with city staff all the time 364 00:29:26,600 --> 00:29:30,800 their transportation department as they move forward in their study in any way that we might 365 00:29:30,800 --> 00:29:32,960 be able to help them out in that study as well. 366 00:29:33,380 --> 00:29:35,380 And then just here to answer any questions you might have. 367 00:29:36,240 --> 00:29:37,180 Any questions for the applicant? 368 00:29:38,840 --> 00:29:39,360 Thanks sir. 369 00:29:40,440 --> 00:29:41,840 All right, we'll go into closed session. 370 00:29:42,700 --> 00:29:44,180 Let me start down at this in Charles. 371 00:29:45,340 --> 00:29:53,280 Well my main concern and I had expressed it was the effect of the project on the traffic, on 372 00:29:53,280 --> 00:29:59,840 setting and that intersection with whole. And to the extent that the city is now. 373 00:30:00,430 --> 00:30:23,330 The Transportation Department is making a study and a determination as to whether or not anything has to be done, as well as trying to accelerate with the state, you know, the turn lane on Fairbanks. I think that, you know, as far as the city is concerned, they've alleviated that issue. I mean, we'll see, but I mean, they're addressing that issue as much as possible. 374 00:30:23,330 --> 00:30:27,250 And I would otherwise before the project, you know, 375 00:30:27,390 --> 00:30:32,930 now the city is on, it's on their time table to do something with that. 376 00:30:33,850 --> 00:30:37,350 So I would before the project as submitted. 377 00:30:38,350 --> 00:30:38,910 Mr. Dick? 378 00:30:40,470 --> 00:30:45,750 Yeah, I think I initially shared that I was on the Orange Avenue 379 00:30:45,750 --> 00:30:47,390 overlay steering committee. 380 00:30:48,630 --> 00:30:51,550 And under those guidelines, I was always a little apprehensive 381 00:30:51,550 --> 00:30:54,190 of what this application was going to look like. 382 00:30:54,950 --> 00:30:56,770 But I was very pleasantly surprised. 383 00:30:57,690 --> 00:31:01,170 It's pretty much understated from what 384 00:31:01,170 --> 00:31:02,130 could have been there. 385 00:31:02,990 --> 00:31:10,270 I do appreciate the later changes to the building, 386 00:31:10,450 --> 00:31:11,510 especially the setbacks. 387 00:31:11,630 --> 00:31:15,410 I think they're a lot more effective than the art 388 00:31:15,410 --> 00:31:17,170 speculation on the one longer building. 389 00:31:17,370 --> 00:31:19,430 So I was pleased with that. 390 00:31:21,190 --> 00:31:27,630 So, I'm very pleased with him, and for this occasion. 391 00:31:30,050 --> 00:31:34,350 Yeah, I really appreciate all the changes that were made to the site plan. 392 00:31:35,050 --> 00:31:41,030 I think there are substantial improvements to what was before. 393 00:31:41,730 --> 00:31:50,690 And again, like others have mentioned, this is underdeveloped for what could be developed here. 394 00:31:50,690 --> 00:32:16,770 So, I appreciate the quality of the site plan, the materials, articulation of detail and I think it'll be a great improvement to this intersection and hopefully in time we can address the traffic concerns that the residents have expressed and there can be some resolution to that issue. 395 00:32:19,010 --> 00:32:20,090 Mr. Seigle? 396 00:32:21,170 --> 00:32:23,030 Just a popular area. 397 00:32:23,750 --> 00:32:33,790 Traffic is always going to be a problem, but this is a very good result, and they've made some great changes so happy to vote for it. 398 00:32:34,030 --> 00:32:34,370 Mr. Seigle? 399 00:32:34,990 --> 00:32:46,750 Yeah, I think this is a great example of a sort of synergistic opportunity where a development comes in and not only improves an area, but potentially leads to 400 00:32:46,750 --> 00:32:49,650 to the solution to some existing problems. 401 00:32:51,210 --> 00:32:55,990 The one thing I would recommend is as traffic studies are done 402 00:32:55,990 --> 00:32:59,030 and information comes out that the public, 403 00:32:59,030 --> 00:33:00,770 I don't know if there's a way for the public to be notified 404 00:33:00,770 --> 00:33:03,290 or the neighborhoods affected to be notified, 405 00:33:04,030 --> 00:33:05,590 so that there is some transparency. 406 00:33:07,290 --> 00:33:11,970 And the city can inform people about plans for the area. 407 00:33:12,330 --> 00:33:14,290 I just think it'd be a really good idea to do that 408 00:33:14,290 --> 00:33:16,090 as it takes place. 409 00:33:16,930 --> 00:33:18,330 Otherwise, I think it's a great project. 410 00:33:20,350 --> 00:33:22,770 Yeah, I shared Mr. Dick's apprehension. 411 00:33:22,890 --> 00:33:24,710 If you'd asked me two and a half years ago, 412 00:33:24,830 --> 00:33:26,130 what was going to come on this property? 413 00:33:26,150 --> 00:33:28,810 I shared his apprehension about what it would look like. 414 00:33:30,170 --> 00:33:33,470 I was heartened when the applicant came in with its plans 415 00:33:33,470 --> 00:33:36,170 for the north side of Fairbanks. 416 00:33:37,490 --> 00:33:40,310 And I think flowed through to this proposal. 417 00:33:40,310 --> 00:33:48,230 It is underbuilt over-part, and I've long said that, you know, development isn't a dirty word. 418 00:33:48,530 --> 00:33:55,290 If it's attractive in scale and fits within the charm of the city of Winner Park, it should be encouraged. 419 00:33:56,730 --> 00:34:04,670 And I, like many other members of the board, appreciate the fact that the applicants come in with something that I believe is attractive in scale 420 00:34:04,670 --> 00:34:10,690 far under what they could have proposed to put on this property and for those reasons I would 421 00:34:10,690 --> 00:34:11,350 support it. 422 00:34:11,350 --> 00:34:17,730 I would note that everybody on the board shares the concerns of the local residents on North 423 00:34:17,730 --> 00:34:24,210 and South Kentucky about the traffic in that area, specifically how you get westbound 424 00:34:24,210 --> 00:34:29,750 onto Fairbanks when you're coming from Denning from the South. 425 00:34:29,750 --> 00:34:36,650 It's a nightmare intersection, hopefully it will be improved with the addition of those turn 426 00:34:36,650 --> 00:34:38,290 lanes and the retiming of the lights. 427 00:34:38,890 --> 00:34:43,410 But as I said at the last meeting, that's not really the applicant's issue, it's really 428 00:34:43,410 --> 00:34:45,410 more the city's issue and DOT's issue. 429 00:34:46,190 --> 00:34:50,890 So I appreciate the applicant making the changes that the board requested and being patient 430 00:34:50,890 --> 00:34:51,870 with us. 431 00:34:52,590 --> 00:34:54,850 And so at that point I will entertain a motion. 432 00:34:55,990 --> 00:34:57,830 I would move to approve as submitted. 433 00:34:59,030 --> 00:35:01,490 I have a motion of a second, can I have a roll call vote, please? 434 00:35:01,550 --> 00:35:04,550 Can I get a clarification if that includes the staff? 435 00:35:04,890 --> 00:35:08,130 Can I get a clarification if that motion includes the staff conditions? 436 00:35:10,930 --> 00:35:11,890 Well, yes. 437 00:35:13,610 --> 00:35:14,310 With the conditions. 438 00:35:14,570 --> 00:35:16,430 I said as proposed. 439 00:35:16,830 --> 00:35:23,050 Well, I said as submitted, but I stand corrected, so with all the papers in the agenda. 440 00:35:23,110 --> 00:35:25,490 As it appears in the agenda, thank you. 441 00:35:26,830 --> 00:35:28,390 I'll be still second in that. 442 00:35:28,590 --> 00:35:28,790 Miss Cable? 443 00:35:29,150 --> 00:35:29,710 Yes, I'm here. 444 00:35:30,010 --> 00:35:30,190 You're school. 445 00:35:30,290 --> 00:35:31,230 Motion to the second. 446 00:35:31,730 --> 00:35:32,710 Can I have a roll call, though, please? 447 00:35:33,130 --> 00:35:33,470 Yes. 448 00:35:33,710 --> 00:35:34,210 Mr. Dick? 449 00:35:34,710 --> 00:35:35,090 Yes. 450 00:35:35,470 --> 00:35:36,150 Miss Ackesian? 451 00:35:36,870 --> 00:35:37,030 Yes. 452 00:35:37,390 --> 00:35:38,250 Mr. Steinberg? 453 00:35:38,610 --> 00:35:38,950 Yes. 454 00:35:39,090 --> 00:35:39,910 Mr. Seagull? 455 00:35:40,290 --> 00:35:40,590 Yes. 456 00:35:40,750 --> 00:35:41,710 Bester Borenstein? 457 00:35:42,030 --> 00:35:42,190 Yes. 458 00:35:42,390 --> 00:35:42,990 Chairman Johnson. 459 00:35:43,370 --> 00:35:43,510 Hi. 460 00:35:54,940 --> 00:35:55,540 Good evening, boy. 461 00:36:10,800 --> 00:36:11,520 We're going to the right direction. 462 00:36:12,100 --> 00:36:12,220 Okay. 463 00:36:24,880 --> 00:36:25,760 Here we go. 464 00:36:26,520 --> 00:36:27,300 All right, my name is Karina. 465 00:36:27,360 --> 00:36:27,960 Plan R1. 466 00:36:28,260 --> 00:36:30,740 I will be presenting your, like, fun item for the night. 467 00:36:30,740 --> 00:36:39,160 This is a request of Verge Properties for approval to construct additions to the existing single family home, totalling at 652 square feet. 468 00:36:39,380 --> 00:36:46,440 Located on Lake Berry at 673, a ball moral road zone, R1, Triple A. 469 00:36:47,540 --> 00:36:52,840 Here is the Location Map to show where it is on Lake Berry. 470 00:36:54,320 --> 00:36:56,820 And here is the aerial map. 471 00:36:57,000 --> 00:37:00,280 The applicant's property is highlighted in purple. 472 00:37:00,700 --> 00:37:03,420 We did get neighbor letters in approval. 473 00:37:04,080 --> 00:37:07,160 And from the north and the south highlighted here in green. 474 00:37:08,880 --> 00:37:10,160 Here is the survey. 475 00:37:11,880 --> 00:37:13,880 And here is the proposed site plan. 476 00:37:14,600 --> 00:37:16,540 So this is our one triple A. 477 00:37:16,640 --> 00:37:19,000 So they get a maximum of 35%. 478 00:37:19,000 --> 00:37:20,840 They're meeting that by 19%. 479 00:37:21,840 --> 00:37:29,820 They are impervious. They're meeting it at 39%. They are meeting the front step back if you follow the green highlighted line. 480 00:37:30,020 --> 00:37:41,200 They're existing setback is 32.1, and the addition is also meeting that setback. They are asking for a variance for the side setback and the rear setback. 481 00:37:42,120 --> 00:37:55,480 The existing side setback is 10 feet, but because of the pinch of the property line and with the addition set, the new setback is now at 9 feet, 7 inches, so 5 by bench difference. 482 00:38:00,020 --> 00:38:10,420 So the rear sub back, they are proposing 90 feet because the addition is moving closer to the 483 00:38:10,420 --> 00:38:10,540 lake. 484 00:38:10,640 --> 00:38:13,880 This applicant also needs to meet the four Lakefront criteria. 485 00:38:14,680 --> 00:38:15,920 So first is tree preservation. 486 00:38:16,420 --> 00:38:19,980 They are not removing any of the trees on site, so they meet that requirement. 487 00:38:21,060 --> 00:38:23,900 Actually, there are no trees, I think, on this site. 488 00:38:25,280 --> 00:38:26,400 Second is view of the lake. 489 00:38:26,400 --> 00:38:36,120 So, where the lowest point of the grade on the lot is 77.98, and they're proposing the new deck at 490 00:38:37,060 --> 00:38:43,200 862, so it's actually under that three-foot maximum, so they need that requirement. 491 00:38:44,140 --> 00:38:45,760 Third is storm water retention. 492 00:38:46,180 --> 00:38:53,700 They are adding an additional soil right here at the southwestern portion of the property, and 493 00:38:53,700 --> 00:39:00,680 They also have an existing swell here at the Lakefront along that rear. 494 00:39:02,180 --> 00:39:04,620 And lastly is the view of the neighbors. 495 00:39:06,900 --> 00:39:09,780 So my fun little view plan here. 496 00:39:10,940 --> 00:39:18,240 So the applicant is the house with the pool. 497 00:39:18,800 --> 00:39:23,240 The neighbor to the north actually came here for approval last year. 498 00:39:23,240 --> 00:39:31,260 They're rear setbacks on 92 and the south neighbor is that house no longer exists 499 00:39:31,260 --> 00:39:38,320 It's now a vacant lot, but we did take the rear setback of the what you see here in the aerial and that's around 110 500 00:39:38,320 --> 00:39:40,320 So that's an average of 101 501 00:39:42,080 --> 00:39:45,600 feet setback and again the proposals 90 502 00:39:48,600 --> 00:39:49,640 Um, however, 503 00:39:52,410 --> 00:39:57,770 what did I say? Um, so similar to recent Lake Front approvals along the portion 504 00:39:57,770 --> 00:40:03,190 of the Lake of Lake Barry, the curvature of the Lake creates the southwestern facing view, 505 00:40:03,210 --> 00:40:09,870 which I try to create with these view of the north and south neighbors. Um, and therefore, 506 00:40:10,010 --> 00:40:15,990 even with the prior home, if it still existed there, what and even, um, affect the traditional 507 00:40:15,990 --> 00:40:24,570 view of the lake and it also puts the proposal structure in line with the existing properties 508 00:40:24,570 --> 00:40:25,790 on Lakebury. 509 00:40:28,110 --> 00:40:30,710 Here are some elevations and 510 00:40:34,520 --> 00:40:36,700 here's a summary of that Lakebury. Do you 511 00:40:36,700 --> 00:40:43,220 criteria? There are no trees being removed. Use from the lake. They're not exceeding that three foot 512 00:40:43,220 --> 00:40:50,360 maximum. The neighbor views. Again, both neighbors approve the additions on the site plan. 513 00:40:51,340 --> 00:40:55,340 The neighbor to the north is on 92, they are requesting 93. 514 00:40:55,740 --> 00:40:59,420 The south is a vacant lot, which might come to you in the future. 515 00:41:00,260 --> 00:41:04,340 The curvature of the lake creates the southwestern facing view lake. 516 00:41:05,440 --> 00:41:10,540 Like recent lakefront approvals along the portion of this lake, there would not be any significant 517 00:41:10,540 --> 00:41:12,820 effect of the traditional view. 518 00:41:13,600 --> 00:41:19,140 And the storm water, they're adding an additional swell to the ones that's already existing 519 00:41:19,140 --> 00:41:21,260 and a lot. And with that stuff, 520 00:41:21,260 --> 00:41:22,680 recommendation is for approval. 521 00:41:23,840 --> 00:41:27,120 So it meets all the recurrent review criteria. 522 00:41:27,420 --> 00:41:29,420 And the only variance is requested 523 00:41:29,420 --> 00:41:32,220 or a five-inch side setback variance. 524 00:41:32,500 --> 00:41:34,020 And then the rear setback variance. 525 00:41:34,400 --> 00:41:36,020 How much is the rear setback variance? 526 00:41:36,040 --> 00:41:36,900 That's being requested. 527 00:41:37,680 --> 00:41:39,960 So I believe there. 528 00:41:41,420 --> 00:41:42,780 Let me go back to that. 529 00:41:48,670 --> 00:41:50,550 Think they were at. 530 00:41:50,670 --> 00:41:52,310 See what the rear was. 531 00:41:52,310 --> 00:41:59,450 So the average lakefront has to be 101 and they're asking for 90. 532 00:42:00,010 --> 00:42:02,810 So the 11 foot variance? 533 00:42:03,290 --> 00:42:03,310 Yes. 534 00:42:04,170 --> 00:42:12,190 And if you look at the other houses on the lake, they're roughly around that 90. 535 00:42:13,630 --> 00:42:17,070 So the only one that's set back really far is that vacant lot. 536 00:42:17,730 --> 00:42:19,910 So that's why the average is a little bit higher. 537 00:42:20,570 --> 00:42:25,650 then let's say if you if you go down the line. 538 00:42:28,430 --> 00:42:30,170 Any other questions for city staff? 539 00:42:30,610 --> 00:42:37,530 Yeah one you kept referencing a neighbor to the north with Balmer out sort of runs pretty 540 00:42:37,530 --> 00:42:42,790 much east in the west which one is the one to the north. The top green property. 541 00:42:45,700 --> 00:42:45,700 Okay. 542 00:42:48,350 --> 00:42:49,510 So more north western. 543 00:42:53,200 --> 00:42:55,060 Can we see the site plan again? 544 00:43:02,310 --> 00:43:03,850 The area in dark gray is the 545 00:43:05,890 --> 00:43:12,850 So there's a line in the rear, they're extending the garage, I think some storage space. 546 00:43:20,260 --> 00:43:24,100 We had any comments from any of the neighbors negative or positive? 547 00:43:24,520 --> 00:43:28,940 Yes, both neighbors are in favor of the proposal. 548 00:43:30,200 --> 00:43:32,480 So that's the one of the north and the empty lot to the south. 549 00:43:33,380 --> 00:43:33,900 Both owners. 550 00:43:38,090 --> 00:43:39,370 What are the questions for staff? 551 00:43:40,290 --> 00:43:40,730 Mr. Dick? 552 00:43:40,730 --> 00:43:53,390 Yeah, just one screen, similar to our application last month for a single family, Lakefront home. 553 00:43:53,950 --> 00:43:59,610 We know that the city is sort of restricted on front-loaded garages. 554 00:44:00,430 --> 00:44:09,750 And again, I didn't see any specific elevation here that gave dimensions that you showed compliance with that particular guidelines. 555 00:44:09,750 --> 00:44:19,790 So are you talking about the three foot or are you talking about the dimensions of the garage doors the the maximum opening? 556 00:44:20,050 --> 00:44:29,150 I did see one one measurement of the total wall the wall of 22 feet in my insinuate 557 00:44:29,150 --> 00:44:34,890 That that arrows down to an 18 foot opening which is you can't exceed that 558 00:44:34,890 --> 00:44:37,210 but I can't tell plus the mentioned. 559 00:44:38,090 --> 00:44:41,970 So I just want to put the same caveat in the approval. 560 00:44:43,210 --> 00:44:44,450 We can put the same condition. 561 00:44:44,450 --> 00:44:47,450 You know, that is in compliance with that one specific kind. 562 00:44:47,550 --> 00:44:51,450 Yeah, so if you go, if the board wants to put that condition, 563 00:44:52,850 --> 00:44:53,930 that can be done. 564 00:45:02,660 --> 00:45:08,120 Okay, thank you. Do we have any members of the public who wish to speak on the application? 565 00:45:08,880 --> 00:45:12,380 We did not have any one of them. I'm sorry. Is the applicant, would the applicant care to make a presentation? 566 00:45:13,220 --> 00:45:13,680 My apologies. 567 00:45:30,000 --> 00:45:32,360 First, the one on the, or is it? 568 00:45:32,360 --> 00:45:36,500 All right, Chris Barnes, First Properties, ten-fourteen, West Fairbanks Avenue. 569 00:45:37,780 --> 00:45:44,480 The owner is also in presence here, but looking at what you've got here, the existing house. 570 00:45:45,720 --> 00:45:50,160 Everything gray to the south is all solid edition. 571 00:45:50,640 --> 00:45:53,360 Everything towards the lake is an open one eye. 572 00:45:54,160 --> 00:45:57,380 So it's roofed, but it's currently has no one eye. 573 00:45:57,840 --> 00:46:00,480 So that's the only thing we're encouraging on the lake side. 574 00:46:00,860 --> 00:46:03,120 It's still an open air of the line. 575 00:46:05,900 --> 00:46:09,980 I know the property to the south is already developed their plans. 576 00:46:10,240 --> 00:46:11,960 They're moving in line with our house. 577 00:46:11,960 --> 00:46:16,080 So at that point, if you took the averages of what they proposed, I know it hasn't been 578 00:46:16,080 --> 00:46:17,160 permanent yet and approved. 579 00:46:18,480 --> 00:46:22,420 We wouldn't need the variance on the south side or the lakeside. 580 00:46:22,960 --> 00:46:27,000 The five inches is just us trying to keep the house where it up and make the 581 00:46:27,000 --> 00:46:27,880 roof lawns work perfectly. 582 00:46:29,860 --> 00:46:33,860 So as far as the garage door question, yes, it is an 18 inch 18 foot garage 583 00:46:33,860 --> 00:46:37,480 door with two foot side columns on either side of it. 584 00:46:37,740 --> 00:46:39,160 It gives you the 22 feet. 585 00:46:46,020 --> 00:46:50,240 We've got approval from both the neighbors to the north and the neighbors to the south. 586 00:46:53,260 --> 00:46:54,540 Any questions for the applicant? 587 00:47:04,120 --> 00:47:13,340 So when you said the gray, the dark gray part, where are the 9.7, 9 feet, 7 inches is that box. 588 00:47:13,540 --> 00:47:17,180 If we were to cut that along that line, the box with the 9.7 is enclosed. 589 00:47:17,840 --> 00:47:20,900 The other box to the left of it is open. 590 00:47:27,900 --> 00:47:47,580 So if you look here, where you see the cut to A41, that's an open air porch, where it's open at the top as well, when beam across there, and then the line that comes just off to the peak to the right vertical down, that's the rise to the addition portion. 591 00:47:50,450 --> 00:47:52,130 Is there a rear view elevation? 592 00:47:52,590 --> 00:47:54,130 Which one is top as the rear view? 593 00:47:54,290 --> 00:47:54,950 Top as the rear view. 594 00:47:57,760 --> 00:48:00,160 So that's over to the right side. 595 00:48:01,560 --> 00:48:01,660 Right. 596 00:48:06,680 --> 00:48:09,500 And then here you can see the bottom. 597 00:48:10,280 --> 00:48:12,620 This is the additional the rear. 598 00:48:12,680 --> 00:48:15,300 You see how it's an open air condition. 599 00:48:21,600 --> 00:48:24,460 I guess in conjunction with this, I'm at. 600 00:48:27,080 --> 00:48:33,060 Do we have any idea what the neighbor to the south is proposing to build on that property right now and how we don't. 601 00:48:33,260 --> 00:48:33,540 No. 602 00:48:33,820 --> 00:48:34,300 No. 603 00:48:34,300 --> 00:48:40,580 of considering this be a waiver, a very answering, measuring a house that was demolished. 604 00:48:41,660 --> 00:48:47,320 So it's no longer really relevant, it's just the only house we had to measure the average 605 00:48:47,320 --> 00:48:47,860 to. 606 00:48:48,020 --> 00:48:48,540 I got you. 607 00:48:49,240 --> 00:48:52,680 My only concern, the reason I'm asking you a question is, is I'm worried about presidential 608 00:48:52,680 --> 00:48:53,180 effect? 609 00:48:53,540 --> 00:48:55,840 Yeah, I mean, this is the new lake for an average. 610 00:49:01,530 --> 00:49:08,070 The property does sit along sort of the houses are facing one way kind of opposite. 611 00:49:08,590 --> 00:49:09,350 Curve it like that. 612 00:49:09,350 --> 00:49:10,950 They're not going to block each other's views. 613 00:49:11,550 --> 00:49:14,690 Within the last year, we saw the neighbor to the Northwest. 614 00:49:15,450 --> 00:49:21,010 And the one beyond that have both asked for, like, front and approachments to be in line with the other houses. 615 00:49:21,390 --> 00:49:22,870 That continue along that curvature. 616 00:49:24,410 --> 00:49:29,630 So they're basically in line with the prevailing pattern of that top portion. 617 00:49:29,630 --> 00:49:37,550 You know, the next house is probably the last one that I can say is on that northeastern curvature of the lake. 618 00:49:38,350 --> 00:49:50,030 So in terms of precedent, we've either seen either a new house or an addition bill on most of the properties that we've seen that are going to have that same view shed. 619 00:49:50,030 --> 00:49:52,070 Thank you. Mr. Seagull. 620 00:49:52,310 --> 00:49:57,410 The house on the back in a lot just went down two to three months ago. 621 00:49:58,050 --> 00:50:02,010 If it was still there, would always work, would it? 622 00:50:02,650 --> 00:50:02,730 Okay. 623 00:50:03,190 --> 00:50:05,110 That's when everything comes from right now. 624 00:50:05,270 --> 00:50:10,950 We're treating it as it is still there because we have no idea what the new house is going to be. 625 00:50:11,570 --> 00:50:19,070 Obviously, the setback here is advantageous in terms of the Lakefront average for the neighbor to the south. 626 00:50:19,910 --> 00:50:24,950 But we have no idea what that's going to be proposed as we haven't seen any plans. 627 00:50:25,790 --> 00:50:29,070 You know, it's in one of our, I'm sure they're going to underbuild it. 628 00:50:32,870 --> 00:50:33,610 Thank you, sir. 629 00:50:33,990 --> 00:50:34,930 Thank you. 630 00:50:36,190 --> 00:50:39,870 I think I asked once Mariana, there are no members of the public who are just speaking on this? 631 00:50:39,870 --> 00:50:40,990 No, there we go. 632 00:50:41,690 --> 00:50:43,390 Okay, we'll go into closed session. 633 00:50:43,850 --> 00:50:45,430 Open the floor to any comments. 634 00:50:46,310 --> 00:50:50,250 I'm wondering why there aren't no issues with this. 635 00:50:50,710 --> 00:50:54,250 Honestly, the issue is going to be with the next house that comes in and make 636 00:50:54,250 --> 00:50:58,030 sure that they just meet line of sight. 637 00:50:59,330 --> 00:51:00,590 So, well, they're asking for two variants. 638 00:51:01,110 --> 00:51:03,670 The five inch variants, I don't consider to be material. 639 00:51:04,430 --> 00:51:08,590 11 feet is a material variance, but which may probably go away with the next house 640 00:51:08,590 --> 00:51:09,050 comes in. 641 00:51:09,070 --> 00:51:11,070 And that's where the issue is going to come up. 642 00:51:11,070 --> 00:51:17,310 But we're establishing what Allison's my question Allison was making the point that we're 643 00:51:17,310 --> 00:51:25,470 but if we approve this we're establishing a new rear setback average at that the new owner 644 00:51:25,470 --> 00:51:30,490 that the person building to the south could use to their advantage to put that house closer to the lake. 645 00:51:30,850 --> 00:51:33,410 And I'm just concerned about creating precedent here. 646 00:51:33,490 --> 00:51:37,990 Yeah, I mean every single time you approve one of these you set a new average. 647 00:51:37,990 --> 00:51:39,570 right. So. 648 00:51:41,970 --> 00:51:45,210 But there was a house there. We'd know what the, what the, what the real 649 00:51:45,210 --> 00:51:49,330 averages and what we were really talking about as of now. Yeah. Yeah. We were sort of 650 00:51:49,330 --> 00:51:53,290 pretending like you old house is still there. It's worth noting. I'll pull up the map too. 651 00:51:53,370 --> 00:51:59,350 But as we get closer to the actual eastern portion side of the lake, the lot start 652 00:51:59,350 --> 00:52:06,510 to shrink. They get, they get closer. I couldn't tell you what those setbacks are. 653 00:52:09,310 --> 00:52:09,310 You 654 00:52:09,310 --> 00:52:14,530 do encroach closer to the lake. This and the neighbor to the south are probably the deepest 655 00:52:14,530 --> 00:52:20,590 two lots on that portion of the lake. You know, so we have the neighbors to the north that 656 00:52:20,590 --> 00:52:24,190 are encroached, you know, that are roughly about 90. I've adventure to guess they're probably 657 00:52:24,190 --> 00:52:29,470 about 80 to 90 on that portion, but you know, I can't tell you. I mean, with any lake front, 658 00:52:29,470 --> 00:52:29,970 a lot worse. 659 00:52:30,000 --> 00:52:41,460 It's on the curve of less concerned about presidential effect, because of this unique nature of the type of lot we're talking about, but still, I wanted to ask the question on address it. 660 00:52:42,320 --> 00:52:54,860 But I mean, I see your point that there's not a lot to discuss here, but I mean, as always looking at the pictures, it looked like the issue is that those two deep lots that are creating that 110 feet. 661 00:52:54,860 --> 00:52:57,520 And if you, I mean, it's all a guest in it, obviously. 662 00:52:57,860 --> 00:53:00,120 But as I looked at the pictures of the houses to the north 663 00:53:00,120 --> 00:53:03,120 and the few to the south, it looked like those, uh, 664 00:53:03,460 --> 00:53:06,220 we were setbacks were short. Yeah. 665 00:53:06,560 --> 00:53:10,240 So I guess I'm just not as concerned as, I understand the issue of precedent. 666 00:53:10,620 --> 00:53:14,160 Makes total sense. I'm just not back concerned in this particular case. 667 00:53:16,500 --> 00:53:18,680 Could look at that picture again and see where, you know. 668 00:53:18,900 --> 00:53:24,620 No. I noticed the two, and I think the reason the setback is what it is right now 669 00:53:24,620 --> 00:53:29,280 because that house that has been torn down was pretty safe and way from pretty 670 00:53:29,280 --> 00:53:29,560 people. 671 00:53:31,260 --> 00:53:32,220 Thank you. 672 00:53:32,220 --> 00:53:32,740 Thank you. 673 00:53:33,000 --> 00:53:34,140 Thank you. 674 00:53:34,720 --> 00:53:34,940 Yeah. 675 00:53:35,020 --> 00:53:39,520 You can tell those two houses to the directly to the south of where the one that's been 676 00:53:39,520 --> 00:53:41,600 torn down, they're pretty close to the lake. 677 00:53:43,940 --> 00:53:44,080 Okay. 678 00:53:44,980 --> 00:53:45,840 Thank you. 679 00:53:46,380 --> 00:53:46,620 Thank you. 680 00:53:47,600 --> 00:53:48,280 Other comments? 681 00:53:50,300 --> 00:53:51,300 I'll entertain a motion. 682 00:53:53,240 --> 00:54:01,000 The vacant lot is somewhat pretty much rectangular as opposed to I should, I think, it shouldn't 683 00:54:01,000 --> 00:54:04,300 him in, but anyway, it looks good to me. 684 00:54:05,680 --> 00:54:06,480 Is that a motion to approve? 685 00:54:07,980 --> 00:54:08,900 A motion to approve. 686 00:54:09,460 --> 00:54:09,920 Well, second. 687 00:54:10,480 --> 00:54:11,520 The motion is second. 688 00:54:11,640 --> 00:54:12,860 Can I have a roll call, though, please? 689 00:54:13,460 --> 00:54:13,800 Yes. 690 00:54:13,840 --> 00:54:14,780 Mr. Steinberg? 691 00:54:15,120 --> 00:54:15,320 Aye. 692 00:54:15,840 --> 00:54:16,400 Mr. Dick? 693 00:54:16,700 --> 00:54:17,080 Yes. 694 00:54:17,280 --> 00:54:17,560 Yes. 695 00:54:17,560 --> 00:54:19,640 Mr. Siegel? 696 00:54:19,640 --> 00:54:20,300 Yes. 697 00:54:20,300 --> 00:54:20,440 Yes. 698 00:54:21,940 --> 00:54:22,320 Chairman Johnson. 699 00:54:22,800 --> 00:54:22,840 Aye. 700 00:54:29,310 --> 00:54:29,910 See. 701 00:54:30,490 --> 00:54:31,210 Any board members? 702 00:54:31,370 --> 00:54:32,670 Nick Lewis, Planner 2. 703 00:54:33,130 --> 00:54:34,550 I'll be handling the next item. 704 00:54:34,690 --> 00:54:36,230 This is conditional user quest. 705 00:54:36,410 --> 00:54:39,090 This is request of L car wash Florida LLC. 706 00:54:39,890 --> 00:54:47,170 For a conditional user approval to construct a new 3,707 square foot automated car wash facility. 707 00:54:47,170 --> 00:54:53,590 The property is two parcels, 2011, along with Avenue and four 16-lander road, both parcels 708 00:54:53,590 --> 00:54:54,870 are zone and C3 commercial. 709 00:54:57,260 --> 00:55:02,900 Here's a quick location in zoning, both C3, flanked on the eastern west with C1 and 710 00:55:02,900 --> 00:55:08,460 C3 properties, the difference between C1 and C3 is C1 is generally reserved for more shopping 711 00:55:08,460 --> 00:55:09,200 center types. 712 00:55:09,200 --> 00:55:14,640 Zoning, C3 is our general standard commercial, and then we have single family residential 713 00:55:14,640 --> 00:55:17,820 and the rear behind the back of the lander property. 714 00:55:18,940 --> 00:55:21,960 We've got the Sprout shopping center to the west. 715 00:55:22,220 --> 00:55:25,780 We have the public shopping center and the mellow mushroom to the right. 716 00:55:27,140 --> 00:55:31,360 On-site currently, both parcels are not being utilized. 717 00:55:31,620 --> 00:55:37,240 We have the former fifth-third bank building with the drive-through in teller lanes on the 718 00:55:37,240 --> 00:55:43,440 a loma parcel. We have a previous self-service car wash facility on the northern partial 719 00:55:44,720 --> 00:55:51,640 offlander. Here's just a quick existing condition survey. You can see we've got the car wash 720 00:55:51,640 --> 00:55:56,040 facility in the rear and then we have the bank facility with the tele lanes towards the front of the 721 00:55:56,040 --> 00:55:56,280 loma. 722 00:55:58,690 --> 00:56:05,890 Quick site photos of what exists there today. You can see the banks developed the car wash 723 00:56:05,890 --> 00:56:11,190 relatively old development, a lot of pervious coverage, a lot of curb cut area, and that's 724 00:56:11,190 --> 00:56:16,710 on the land or road portion. There are two trees that are going to be preserved as part of 725 00:56:16,710 --> 00:56:24,050 this request. The tree on the left is on the subject property that's the fifth or third bank. It is 726 00:56:24,050 --> 00:56:30,090 within the subject parcel, however, it's being preserved by the applicant. And then there is a large 727 00:56:30,090 --> 00:56:36,450 specimen oak tree in the back, that is also being preserved, that's on the current car wash 728 00:56:36,450 --> 00:56:36,910 facility. 729 00:56:39,650 --> 00:56:44,230 Here's a quick site plan of the proposed car wash facility, a couple of things 730 00:56:44,230 --> 00:57:00,950 that I want to note here. We have as proposed a left-in right-in left-out only entrance. I'll get into 731 00:57:00,950 --> 00:57:08,650 up towards the aloma side as opposed to back towards the residential side. We have internal 732 00:57:08,650 --> 00:57:14,630 location or transformer. We have a proposed dumpster enclosure that's meeting the 35 foot 733 00:57:14,630 --> 00:57:20,910 setback and then we also have the required six foot masonry wall screen with the 10 feet of 734 00:57:20,910 --> 00:57:25,050 landscape buffer facing the single-family residential to the rear. 735 00:57:27,480 --> 00:57:30,400 A couple rear setbacks. It's 45 feet 736 00:57:30,400 --> 00:57:39,020 proposed to the opening of the driveway is 35 feet, which is the minimum to the corner of the dumpster enclosure. 737 00:57:40,020 --> 00:57:48,360 It's just under 70 feet to the closest vacuum facility, and then it's 150 feet from the rear property line to the edge of the building. 738 00:57:50,400 --> 00:57:59,440 Also here on note queuing, there's enough for 14 spaces, there's 12 weighting spaces, and there's two more weighting spaces in here, 739 00:57:59,440 --> 00:58:04,720 and then we have the pay stations here before you go into the car wash in a single file format. 740 00:58:07,230 --> 00:58:08,910 Stormwater management plan. 741 00:58:09,610 --> 00:58:13,350 We've got both above ground and underground storage. 742 00:58:13,630 --> 00:58:18,870 We have underground retention located in the dry vials here highlighted in gray. 743 00:58:19,930 --> 00:58:24,170 And then on the northwestern corner is an above ground retention pond. 744 00:58:24,670 --> 00:58:29,090 Staff is proposing the same condition that we saw with the Haller property that that 745 00:58:31,590 --> 00:58:36,410 change to a more natural shape, and I'll get into that in a little bit as well. 746 00:58:38,140 --> 00:58:41,820 Tree management plan, again, those two oak trees are being preserved. 747 00:58:41,980 --> 00:58:45,820 There are five other specimen trees currently on the two properties. 748 00:58:46,840 --> 00:58:52,920 The three highlighted here, one, two, three are all within the existing landscape islands 749 00:58:52,920 --> 00:58:59,560 of the bank building, and then the two others are within the property boundary between 750 00:58:59,560 --> 00:59:06,080 the two parcels. Obviously the parcels are now becoming combined, being redeveloped, the applicant 751 00:59:06,080 --> 00:59:12,080 has provided a tree mitigation plan for the five trees being removed, seven trees will be proposed. 752 00:59:13,680 --> 00:59:18,940 And here is that landscape plan, so they're meeting all of our landscape requirements, 753 00:59:19,420 --> 00:59:25,640 they're screening any type of enclosure, be it dumpster, vacuum, transformer, otherwise, 754 00:59:26,340 --> 00:59:37,300 They're meeting the 10-foot buffer, Mr. Drink Fellow brought up at our work session about the understory trees, making sure that they're going all the way down. 755 00:59:37,340 --> 00:59:40,240 That's been added as a condition of approval since that comment. 756 00:59:41,260 --> 00:59:45,680 So we can address that a couple quick elevations, 757 00:59:50,230 --> 00:59:51,010 renderings 758 00:59:53,920 --> 00:59:55,140 with that. 759 00:59:55,140 --> 00:59:57,740 I spend most of the time going through the conditions of approval. 760 00:59:57,740 --> 00:59:59,040 Yes, sir. 761 00:59:59,040 --> 00:59:59,780 Take the aerial. 762 01:00:07,580 --> 01:00:08,300 So 763 01:00:10,820 --> 01:00:19,520 we've received correspondence from the neighborhood in the rear. We've received three letters in opposition, one letter in favor. 764 01:00:20,220 --> 01:00:28,240 The main issues include additional cut-through and increased traffic on Taylor Edwin and basically the neighborhood at large. 765 01:00:29,100 --> 01:00:35,200 noise, stormwater runoff and retention, and just the general use as a car wash itself. 766 01:00:36,860 --> 01:00:41,200 By and large traffic concerns are the largest concern. 767 01:00:42,220 --> 01:00:46,360 I think that was first seen from the offset, so staff had requested that they do 768 01:00:46,360 --> 01:00:47,260 a left-out only. 769 01:00:47,360 --> 01:00:57,250 The applicant did that, seeing the amount of opposition to making sure that there's any sort 770 01:00:57,250 --> 01:01:03,550 cut through traffic, staff has proposed the first condition that you see here that it be adjusted 771 01:01:03,550 --> 01:01:09,510 to a right in, left out only pattern with the appropriate radius, directional signage, and 772 01:01:09,510 --> 01:01:14,910 raised curve to minimize the amount of potential illegal right out turns and cut through traffic 773 01:01:14,910 --> 01:01:20,230 through the neighborhood. What this does, this gives our transportation folks some teeth in order 774 01:01:20,230 --> 01:01:24,750 to make sure that the applicant provides no justification of permitting that whatever the final 775 01:01:24,750 --> 01:01:33,110 proposal is, we have done everything we can to limit any sort of illegal right out in traffic 776 01:01:33,110 --> 01:01:38,990 patterns. Also with the right end and left out, that means that we become a little bit 777 01:01:38,990 --> 01:01:43,930 sharper, making sure that we're actually directing people to the south, and what it does 778 01:01:43,930 --> 01:01:49,610 that keeps people going south on Lakemont who want to cut back through those property, the 779 01:01:49,610 --> 01:01:53,990 neighborhood to the back, to be able to come in the back way and enter the property. You have 780 01:01:53,990 --> 01:02:00,450 enter from the Aloma portion. There's also going back to the aerial row fest. 781 01:02:03,570 --> 01:02:04,070 You can see 782 01:02:04,070 --> 01:02:08,350 it so if you're directed south on Aloma, let's say you wanted to go north on Lakemont, 783 01:02:09,130 --> 01:02:13,750 the main entrance to the Sprout Shopping Center is about 30 feet north of the Lakemont. 784 01:02:14,190 --> 01:02:19,690 That does bump out or pop out on the opposite side to be able to go north on Lakemont. 785 01:02:19,790 --> 01:02:24,090 If you didn't want to go on Aloma, just to go north on Lakemont. 786 01:02:31,430 --> 01:02:31,970 There's no 787 01:02:32,670 --> 01:02:38,630 egress from either from that shopping center north onto Edwin Wright? 788 01:02:38,750 --> 01:02:38,830 No. 789 01:02:39,570 --> 01:02:39,610 Okay. 790 01:02:41,550 --> 01:02:45,030 The second condition, the other thing that we've heard of was noise. 791 01:02:45,170 --> 01:02:48,430 This is an attempt to limit that somewhat later in the evening. 792 01:02:49,290 --> 01:02:53,930 Most L. car wash locations located in Central Florida closed APM. 793 01:02:54,310 --> 01:02:56,450 Per their community meeting. 794 01:02:56,490 --> 01:02:59,830 They mentioned that their operating hours would go till 9. 795 01:02:59,830 --> 01:03:15,550 It's asked proposing that their car wash and vacuums facility sees it eight, consistent with all other L-car wash locations, and then the all non-essential lighting and related to the building and vacuums be cut off promptly at APM. 796 01:03:16,610 --> 01:03:26,050 The third that I'll use in a band and curb cuts that exist on site of both parcels today are have the apron removed and replaced with appropriate curb and landscaping. 797 01:03:26,050 --> 01:03:28,550 the applicant did show that on the site plans. 798 01:03:28,810 --> 01:03:31,010 They're already meeting that, but we want to make sure 799 01:03:31,010 --> 01:03:32,530 that that goes all the way through permitting. 800 01:03:34,370 --> 01:03:37,110 For, they provided a preliminary sign package. 801 01:03:39,130 --> 01:03:41,730 Staff's recommending approval that the final sign package 802 01:03:41,730 --> 01:03:43,110 meets all sign requirements. 803 01:03:43,930 --> 01:03:47,870 The general areas, locations, signage types are OK. 804 01:03:48,330 --> 01:03:49,750 There's just some minor modifications 805 01:03:49,750 --> 01:03:51,830 that need to be made, so we want to make sure 806 01:03:51,830 --> 01:03:56,790 any size, as illumination, any sign types are adjusted accordingly. 807 01:03:58,450 --> 01:04:03,210 Five, right now, the proposals that employees will be parked in the vacuum stations, 808 01:04:03,590 --> 01:04:07,830 just making sure that there's not a world where employees are parking over across 809 01:04:07,830 --> 01:04:13,650 its sprouts or behind the public's shopping center. 810 01:04:13,650 --> 01:04:16,330 We want to make sure that employees are being parked on site. 811 01:04:18,390 --> 01:04:20,410 6, that the design of the pawn, 812 01:04:20,510 --> 01:04:24,630 be refined to incorporate and naturalize shape rather than rigid edges. 813 01:04:25,670 --> 01:04:29,130 And then 7, based off of Mr. Schringfeld's comments 814 01:04:29,130 --> 01:04:32,190 of the work session, that we make sure that those provided 815 01:04:32,190 --> 01:04:35,770 understory trees along the northern property line, 816 01:04:36,220 --> 01:04:41,010 as part of the landscape buffer, are there throughout the entire property line. 817 01:04:42,150 --> 01:04:44,170 So with that, I'm happy to take any questions. 818 01:04:44,170 --> 01:04:47,810 I know the applicant's team is here as well. 819 01:04:47,990 --> 01:04:54,010 Yes, they're going to close the car wash and vacuum facilities at 8. 820 01:04:54,230 --> 01:05:00,230 So I would imagine that would mean no one enters after 730 or so, right? 821 01:05:00,510 --> 01:05:04,490 Yeah, since I'll let the applicant speak to maybe the last amount of time that they would 822 01:05:04,490 --> 01:05:08,550 need in order, you know, when the last car could essentially go through in order to make sure 823 01:05:08,550 --> 01:05:10,370 that all facilities cease at 8. 824 01:05:16,800 --> 01:05:20,040 The question is Billy, any other questions for staff? 825 01:05:20,580 --> 01:05:21,440 Mr. Dick. 826 01:05:23,000 --> 01:05:23,180 Yeah. 827 01:05:24,540 --> 01:05:26,380 On number one, Nick. 828 01:05:28,180 --> 01:05:29,560 You know, I just had an observation. 829 01:05:30,640 --> 01:05:32,900 You know, looking at the signage on, 830 01:05:32,960 --> 01:05:35,380 I think that's landers. 831 01:05:36,220 --> 01:05:40,260 There's only one sign there, you know, saying no parking 832 01:05:40,260 --> 01:05:44,080 and then one sign on the same pole, you know, 833 01:05:44,080 --> 01:05:46,300 you're saying no, no, through traffic. 834 01:05:47,420 --> 01:05:51,860 And that sign was more than halfway into the project 835 01:05:51,860 --> 01:05:53,420 on landers. 836 01:05:53,700 --> 01:05:57,080 So I'm wondering, and this isn't the applicants' responsibility, 837 01:05:57,280 --> 01:06:01,560 but I'm thinking maybe the city might want to relocate 838 01:06:02,200 --> 01:06:07,160 that existing sign closer to a Loma, 839 01:06:07,820 --> 01:06:09,900 not that that's going to make a whole lot of difference, 840 01:06:09,900 --> 01:06:26,020 But it might, and then maybe add one additional no-through street parking up closer to the, you know, the residential neighborhood, you know, it's extra reinforcement. Again, it might not help. 841 01:06:26,020 --> 01:06:27,160 it might. 842 01:06:29,700 --> 01:06:36,980 On the number of five, all the employees must be parked on site, I think there's 843 01:06:36,980 --> 01:06:44,980 a total of 17 vacum stations. So it is a my understanding that the employees will be 844 01:06:44,980 --> 01:06:53,720 parking in one of those 12-ness private applicants, you know, response, you know, parking spaces 845 01:06:53,720 --> 01:06:59,740 or 17 maybe. Yeah. Yeah, that's that's staff's concern as well. There's 17 parking spaces. 846 01:06:59,940 --> 01:07:04,720 There's 16 vacuum spaces. The last space is 80A so they can't put back in facilities there. 847 01:07:05,900 --> 01:07:09,800 The applicant is answer and I'll let them speak to it as well. 848 01:07:09,860 --> 01:07:14,760 Is that the employees will be taking up if there's only going to be two or three employees at a time. 849 01:07:14,860 --> 01:07:17,980 They'll be taking up two or three of those vacuum spaces. 850 01:07:18,940 --> 01:07:21,640 That's how it's supposed to make sure that the employees are staying on site. 851 01:07:22,460 --> 01:07:26,100 So if the applicant's desire is to... 852 01:07:26,100 --> 01:07:29,940 That's how the aerial showed the additional parking on the back side of it, isn't it? 853 01:07:36,080 --> 01:07:42,780 So, we've got the 10 spaces here, plus the 7 spaces here for 17. 854 01:07:46,080 --> 01:07:52,040 Yeah, I didn't see any designated employee parking, which is why I was asking the question because 855 01:07:52,040 --> 01:08:03,060 I think I saw somewhere also in the parking details that accompanied the site plan that there was five employees. 856 01:08:03,060 --> 01:08:05,800 I don't know if that's five employees on one shift, 857 01:08:06,800 --> 01:08:10,940 or you mentioned two or three of the applicant can provide the number. 858 01:08:10,960 --> 01:08:11,660 Speak to you. 859 01:08:11,940 --> 01:08:16,600 And I can't imagine, you know, taking up five potential, 860 01:08:16,740 --> 01:08:21,480 or even the three potential, you know, money-making, 861 01:08:23,140 --> 01:08:26,280 you know, opportunities, I guess, for the vacuum stations, 862 01:08:26,580 --> 01:08:27,180 but I'll let them. 863 01:08:27,320 --> 01:08:29,620 Yeah, yeah, I'll let them speak to it. 864 01:08:29,620 --> 01:08:35,060 I think what they're coming from is that besides peak hour, which is usually Friday evenings 865 01:08:35,060 --> 01:08:41,620 and Saturday mornings, not every station is going to be full, probably about half the 866 01:08:41,620 --> 01:08:44,900 stations at maximum would be full, but I'll let them speak to it. 867 01:08:48,360 --> 01:08:56,920 You mentioned that previously, Mr. Strinkfell, I had mentioned the four understory trees along 868 01:08:56,920 --> 01:09:04,740 the back, because I only saw four in the specs, but one of the conditions now is to bring 869 01:09:04,740 --> 01:09:06,480 those all along the back wall. 870 01:09:07,020 --> 01:09:11,780 Right, I'm not sure if they were left off intentionally or not, but we added that condition 871 01:09:11,780 --> 01:09:12,720 that they do that. 872 01:09:13,280 --> 01:09:17,780 Then the other thing that Mr. String fellow brought up was the vacuum tower. 873 01:09:18,060 --> 01:09:20,680 It is enclosed, and it is the enclosure's landscape. 874 01:09:21,900 --> 01:09:26,580 I believe the applicant is prepared to talk about the noise from the facility at 875 01:09:26,580 --> 01:09:32,740 and the bits and pieces and to see if there's a better location for that, or if that is in the best available location. 876 01:09:33,960 --> 01:09:41,580 Okay, one known as long the front, the landscaping that was specced. 877 01:09:41,720 --> 01:09:50,620 You've got four or five crate murdals, one, two, three, actually six crate murdals, along that whole frontage. 878 01:09:50,620 --> 01:09:54,880 And, you know, that's, that's colorful, which is good. 879 01:09:54,880 --> 01:10:01,440 I always like to see seasonal color, but that has a downside of, you know, being leafless, 880 01:10:01,660 --> 01:10:05,600 you know, a deciduous, you know, for six months out of the years. 881 01:10:06,280 --> 01:10:15,720 So, you might want to, you know, add some, you know, solid, you know, non-deciduous, not across 882 01:10:15,720 --> 01:10:23,360 the whole front, but maybe on the anchor corners, and whatever that was being would be 883 01:10:23,360 --> 01:10:24,340 up to the applicant, 884 01:10:26,960 --> 01:10:33,540 I think I noticed on the east elevation and I know these are probably 885 01:10:33,540 --> 01:10:41,600 conceptual, but it looked like there's a chain length fence along that property line on 886 01:10:41,600 --> 01:10:43,380 the east elevation on the colored one. 887 01:10:43,380 --> 01:10:50,200 if anything that is probably existing on the property line well the polls are existing but there's no no 888 01:10:50,200 --> 01:10:58,140 fencing yeah either in residence or commercial chain links not a permitted fence type so they would have to do a permitted 889 01:10:58,140 --> 01:11:02,060 fence type be aluminum you know rod iron picket would 890 01:11:02,060 --> 01:11:08,820 PVC something along okay so there is no chain link fence on shown in the elevation correct yeah okay 891 01:11:11,760 --> 01:11:20,360 Could you go into a little more detail from a zoning point of view on the heights of the 892 01:11:20,360 --> 01:11:28,980 buildings and see three zoning and I know C3 allows two or three stories but it doesn't 893 01:11:28,980 --> 01:11:38,300 really designate feet per say. I think this project expected 35 feet. I was wondering how we got 894 01:11:38,300 --> 01:11:49,240 Yeah, so the 35 feet, so the single story, the proposed tower up towards Aloma is the only portion, it's a 35 feet. 895 01:11:49,660 --> 01:11:57,300 The majority of the building sitting about 20 feet. Both of those are consistent with the one story commercial building in C3. 896 01:11:57,980 --> 01:12:01,820 Well, the point of concerns is the front tower. 897 01:12:01,820 --> 01:12:12,040 being 35 feet, as opposed to 30 feet, per example, which is a one typical, two-story, 898 01:12:12,760 --> 01:12:21,280 you'll see three versus 35. So yeah, I mean, for like if this was a residential, if it was on the larger side, 899 01:12:21,600 --> 01:12:31,300 we allow 35 feet for a two-story, you know, single-family home, so there's not not precedent within the city to allow 35 feet. 900 01:12:31,300 --> 01:12:35,800 But I hear what you're saying, you know, do the applicant see if the, if 35 is. 901 01:12:35,980 --> 01:12:37,840 I think there's more of a zoning thing. 902 01:12:39,180 --> 01:12:42,440 You know, I know one of their sites doesn't have a tower at all. 903 01:12:42,560 --> 01:12:49,340 So I don't know if that's, obviously part of branding versus, you know, visibility and whatnot. 904 01:12:49,820 --> 01:12:51,380 But you know, I'll let the applicant do that. 905 01:12:51,720 --> 01:12:57,160 I prefer, you know, I feel the 35 feeds a little, you know, imposing. 906 01:13:02,540 --> 01:13:12,720 So, and finally, was there any, you know, question or, you know, thought of doing a noise 907 01:13:12,720 --> 01:13:17,420 abatement study, you know, there's a lot of studies attached to this, you know, soils 908 01:13:17,420 --> 01:13:23,940 and drainage, stormwater, et cetera, with this particular application at this particular 909 01:13:23,940 --> 01:13:31,300 site. I'm wondering if that was considered and whether that might be something we might want to see. 910 01:13:32,040 --> 01:13:36,300 Yeah, I believe the applicants prepared to speak to the noise of the different, you know, 911 01:13:36,440 --> 01:13:40,800 the decimal levels and different portions of the structure, the vacuums, the vacant hours, 912 01:13:40,940 --> 01:13:46,440 all that. I believe they're, you know, available to speak to that. The code requires the traffic 913 01:13:46,440 --> 01:13:51,460 study in the stormwater analysis. We don't have a noise abatement, a requirement as part of the 914 01:13:51,460 --> 01:13:57,180 additional use required documents, but I believe the applicants prepared to speak to that. 915 01:13:58,200 --> 01:13:58,720 That's all. 916 01:13:59,300 --> 01:14:00,400 I have a question. 917 01:14:01,040 --> 01:14:11,580 Regarding the tower, is there any other building along Aloma that has a building of 918 01:14:11,580 --> 01:14:15,820 this height at this setback along the corridor? 919 01:14:20,860 --> 01:14:24,200 There's office buildings along Aloma that has three stories. 920 01:14:24,200 --> 01:14:30,400 Okay, but what's the front set back for 10 feet, 10 feet? 921 01:14:31,260 --> 01:14:33,640 What's the requirement for C3? 922 01:14:33,960 --> 01:14:34,360 Okay, but. 923 01:14:34,360 --> 01:14:37,720 I think the point is the 35 foot portion of it is right up on the road. 924 01:14:38,220 --> 01:14:40,520 Yeah, right here you have a four-story height limit. 925 01:14:41,280 --> 01:14:42,140 Because it's next to Eloma. 926 01:14:42,640 --> 01:14:43,320 But I'm just wondering. 927 01:14:44,480 --> 01:14:46,680 Is there any other building along? 928 01:14:47,760 --> 01:14:48,480 I don't know. 929 01:14:48,900 --> 01:14:54,690 I don't know. 930 01:14:54,690 --> 01:14:59,970 because we didn't do that. I don't think they're building that's ten feet from... 931 01:15:00,000 --> 01:15:15,560 The question is probably 10 feet from the right of way, but it's not. It's probably 28 to 30 feet tall, which will be the most room next door. It's right up on the street. It's only as a 10 foot setback. 932 01:15:18,380 --> 01:15:22,620 So in terms of setback, I mean, that's what C3 requires, but yeah, you're right, in terms of height. 933 01:15:23,220 --> 01:15:35,340 I'm sure it's a consistency along the corridor and the visual appeal and then also you've got this 35-foot tower kind of stands out like it's worth on 934 01:15:35,960 --> 01:15:38,620 Well, the hot pink neon sign will help with it. 935 01:15:39,300 --> 01:15:39,320 Yeah. 936 01:15:39,320 --> 01:15:41,360 The motion has parking in front. 937 01:15:41,580 --> 01:15:42,660 So it's set for the back, 938 01:15:46,480 --> 01:15:46,480 right? 939 01:15:46,840 --> 01:15:49,900 Does the proposed signage comply with the code? 940 01:15:50,520 --> 01:15:53,600 Yeah, we don't allow neon signage, so they're not proposing neon signage. 941 01:15:53,600 --> 01:15:58,220 Yeah, yeah, it's not neon or anything like that, it's, it's not some of their other locations. 942 01:15:58,800 --> 01:16:01,000 I think they do, they're proposing channel letter. 943 01:16:02,040 --> 01:16:06,580 The proposed locations are all fine, they're, you know, they're all slightly larger. 944 01:16:06,820 --> 01:16:11,200 We have a maximum of 45% I think the proposed are roughly 60 in the preliminary. 945 01:16:12,800 --> 01:16:18,100 And then there were some other minor things, like the directional signage, we're on polls. 946 01:16:18,320 --> 01:16:20,020 We would prefer those to be a monument style. 947 01:16:20,020 --> 01:16:22,240 So that's all things that we would catch in the sign permit 948 01:16:22,240 --> 01:16:23,620 with the final sign code. 949 01:16:24,700 --> 01:16:31,300 That's why we added the sign code condition of approval. 950 01:16:32,020 --> 01:16:36,440 So there is, so sort of, no, because I have another, 951 01:16:36,740 --> 01:16:39,400 it's unrelated to what we're talking about, sign it. 952 01:16:39,700 --> 01:16:41,600 Mine's unrelated to sign code, so please. 953 01:16:41,680 --> 01:16:43,660 All right, so I have a question about employee 954 01:16:43,660 --> 01:16:46,240 back to the employee parking situation. 955 01:16:48,670 --> 01:16:50,950 We really have no designated employee parking 956 01:16:50,950 --> 01:16:57,330 spaces on the site plan and you're saying that they're going to park in the vacuum spaces. 957 01:16:58,590 --> 01:17:06,310 So then I go to why do we have so many vacuum stations then? If employees are going to be parking there? 958 01:17:07,910 --> 01:17:19,780 Yeah, I don't know. So my brain is still. Why can't the footprint be reduced and eliminate 959 01:17:19,780 --> 01:17:26,940 some of the vacuum places and create a greater setback from the residential development. 960 01:17:27,920 --> 01:17:32,580 My question is along the lines of what Miss Sarketian just asked, and that is, there is 961 01:17:32,580 --> 01:17:36,300 one parking place here for handicap. 962 01:17:37,420 --> 01:17:37,520 Right. 963 01:17:38,180 --> 01:17:40,840 That is not a vacuum stop-correct, correct. 964 01:17:41,720 --> 01:17:46,220 In my mind, the vacuum stalls are, might as well be part of the building, they're part 965 01:17:46,220 --> 01:17:46,760 of the business. 966 01:17:46,960 --> 01:17:48,020 It's not parking. 967 01:17:48,620 --> 01:17:53,940 There is no place to park the employees on this proposed property, 968 01:17:56,100 --> 01:17:56,760 unless you park them 969 01:17:56,760 --> 01:18:00,140 somewhere inside what the business is using to conduct its business. 970 01:18:00,660 --> 01:18:02,620 That's not parking to me. 971 01:18:03,800 --> 01:18:04,440 I don't know. 972 01:18:04,520 --> 01:18:05,080 I agree. 973 01:18:06,300 --> 01:18:12,500 I only initially brought that up because I did visit one or two sites and this one site in particular, 974 01:18:12,500 --> 01:18:20,260 I think in Casalberry, you know, so cars, which I assume were employees, but that was just 975 01:18:20,260 --> 01:18:25,360 an assumption, not really in the space, it was kind of parked, you know, off to the side 976 01:18:25,360 --> 01:18:30,240 of the curb, you know, within the property, but it wasn't really a designated space, so it's 977 01:18:30,240 --> 01:18:35,140 just kind of like a haphazard, you know, wherever they could grab a space, that's where they were 978 01:18:35,140 --> 01:18:35,760 going to park. 979 01:18:41,810 --> 01:18:42,890 Other questions for staff? 980 01:18:43,570 --> 01:18:44,590 This is your time work. 981 01:18:44,590 --> 01:18:47,090 Could you go back to the landscape plan 982 01:18:50,390 --> 01:18:55,850 and the reason I ask is I'm looking at the rendering 983 01:18:55,850 --> 01:19:05,050 that goes from the dumpster and it comes down, you know, the driveway? What is that? 984 01:19:07,370 --> 01:19:12,710 Yeah, it should be some sort of ground cover hedge. This line here that goes right up. 985 01:19:13,010 --> 01:19:17,030 Yeah, exactly. So how high is that? 986 01:19:17,030 --> 01:19:21,770 It's just continuous hedge and one understory tree and 987 01:19:24,110 --> 01:19:29,290 I don't know how tall I can be out and speak to that. 988 01:19:29,290 --> 01:19:33,470 What's got to cover the entire enclosure so are these six feet? 989 01:19:33,730 --> 01:19:34,510 At least six feet? 990 01:19:36,750 --> 01:19:39,370 And do we know what type of hedge it is? 991 01:19:40,170 --> 01:19:41,290 The applicant can enter that. 992 01:19:44,390 --> 01:19:48,770 Also, and all of these spaces are vacuum spaces. 993 01:19:49,090 --> 01:19:50,870 All except the ADA space, yeah. 994 01:19:51,230 --> 01:19:54,470 Well, the ADA space is the handicap spot. 995 01:19:55,170 --> 01:19:58,530 And then everything to the right of that is vacuum spaces. 996 01:19:58,930 --> 01:19:59,110 All right. 997 01:19:59,510 --> 01:20:03,110 And then what is that space that looks like it's incorporated. 998 01:20:03,390 --> 01:20:08,470 There's a hedge or some landscape that's going, that's right next to those spaces. 999 01:20:08,710 --> 01:20:09,890 Right next to the ADA space? 1000 01:20:10,210 --> 01:20:11,870 No, it's all the way down at the end. 1001 01:20:11,870 --> 01:20:13,890 down at the end here. 1002 01:20:13,890 --> 01:20:15,250 No, the other end. 1003 01:20:15,370 --> 01:20:15,530 The other end. 1004 01:20:15,550 --> 01:20:16,110 Right there. 1005 01:20:16,890 --> 01:20:18,950 That's the pump for the vacuum facilities. 1006 01:20:20,050 --> 01:20:20,250 OK. 1007 01:20:20,410 --> 01:20:21,250 So there's a tower. 1008 01:20:21,770 --> 01:20:25,150 There's another essentially mimic of the dumpster enclosure. 1009 01:20:28,590 --> 01:20:28,850 Right. 1010 01:20:28,970 --> 01:20:29,910 That's what that is. 1011 01:20:29,910 --> 01:20:30,430 OK. 1012 01:20:30,430 --> 01:20:30,710 OK. 1013 01:20:30,710 --> 01:20:31,110 I see. 1014 01:20:31,310 --> 01:20:32,230 Thank you. 1015 01:20:34,040 --> 01:20:34,420 I'm just. 1016 01:20:34,520 --> 01:20:35,200 I'm just. 1017 01:20:39,300 --> 01:20:41,060 There's equipment in there. 1018 01:20:41,060 --> 01:20:41,420 Yeah. 1019 01:20:41,780 --> 01:20:42,560 It's mechanical equipment. 1020 01:20:42,940 --> 01:20:44,820 And so how high is that? 1021 01:20:44,820 --> 01:20:46,680 I'll let the outcomes speak to that. 1022 01:20:46,880 --> 01:20:49,420 That was the other one of Mr. Stringfeld's comments, 1023 01:20:49,680 --> 01:20:51,800 was is that the best location of that, 1024 01:20:51,800 --> 01:20:52,440 or is there a difference? 1025 01:20:52,460 --> 01:20:54,480 Also, it's to the residential area. 1026 01:20:54,600 --> 01:20:56,460 Correct, which is the genesis for the comment. 1027 01:20:56,620 --> 01:20:58,840 Is that the best location or could it be location 1028 01:20:58,840 --> 01:21:00,680 in one of the other parking islands 1029 01:21:00,680 --> 01:21:02,780 or next to the Transformers, something along those lines? 1030 01:21:02,900 --> 01:21:04,860 OK, yeah, I'm just trying to, 1031 01:21:04,920 --> 01:21:07,500 that's obviously a concern is. 1032 01:21:07,500 --> 01:21:08,600 Sure, yeah, I think we can. 1033 01:21:08,600 --> 01:21:10,580 All right, thank you. 1034 01:21:10,860 --> 01:21:11,980 Other questions for staff? 1035 01:21:14,360 --> 01:21:14,820 Thank you, Nick. 1036 01:21:14,820 --> 01:21:17,220 The applicant care to make a presentation. 1037 01:21:19,100 --> 01:21:19,840 Good evening everyone. 1038 01:21:19,900 --> 01:21:23,980 McRegger, love to 15 North Eola Drive here on behalf of the applicant. 1039 01:21:25,280 --> 01:21:31,880 I'm going to have to adjust to Nick's very thorough and clear presentation and not walk you through a painstaking review of mine. 1040 01:21:32,560 --> 01:21:35,940 Nick did a great job outlining most of the points that we would have hit on. 1041 01:21:36,920 --> 01:21:39,440 What I will do is introduce the team we have here tonight. 1042 01:21:39,460 --> 01:21:41,740 We have Jordan Draper from Kimley Horn. 1043 01:21:41,740 --> 01:22:11,720 So our project engineer, we also have Alex Quintana from El Carwash, I can tell already from a couple of the comments here that some of you have a background in potentially development and you all have some specific questions for both potentially Jordan and Alex, I know that Alex can speak certainly to the concerns raised about the employee parking, and I also know that he's very familiar with El Carwash is looked into the 1044 01:22:11,740 --> 01:22:18,740 sort of noise abatement issue internally in their operations, and he can I'm sure speak to that as well. 1045 01:22:20,280 --> 01:22:22,640 So I'll briefly go through our presentation. 1046 01:22:23,020 --> 01:22:24,940 You've seen much of this. This is the location. 1047 01:22:26,640 --> 01:22:29,200 And I'll hit on, you know, this is again the existing. 1048 01:22:30,000 --> 01:22:34,320 Board is familiar with this property, certainly the residents are familiar with this property. 1049 01:22:36,020 --> 01:22:42,520 But just to underscore, we have the northern parcel, which is a more recently developed bank property. 1050 01:22:43,360 --> 01:22:53,000 And we have the southern parcel, which is an old carwash, just to note along the western boundary, along lander, 1051 01:22:53,580 --> 01:22:58,520 There, on the car wash parcel, there's currently no screening from trees. 1052 01:22:58,740 --> 01:23:04,320 So along that, along that boundary for the car wash parcel, there'll be additional trees. 1053 01:23:04,800 --> 01:23:06,380 Add it as was discussed. 1054 01:23:07,520 --> 01:23:09,080 I'll go through these really quickly. 1055 01:23:10,440 --> 01:23:11,100 We've seen, we've seen these. 1056 01:23:11,240 --> 01:23:13,060 We've asked questions about them. 1057 01:23:13,320 --> 01:23:14,000 Here are the renderings. 1058 01:23:16,430 --> 01:23:19,350 This I think is an angle that the boards not see initially. 1059 01:23:21,910 --> 01:23:23,190 As this may be. 1060 01:23:37,750 --> 01:23:44,070 And if you would like to discuss any of these at any point during our, during our hearing, please let me know. 1061 01:23:52,670 --> 01:23:56,670 That gives you a better view of the, of the vacuum spaces as well that we're being discussed. 1062 01:23:58,070 --> 01:24:00,650 And I believe that's the last rendering we have. 1063 01:24:01,150 --> 01:24:08,550 Let me, let me just ask the question right now, because you said that the, you know, the representative of the car wash could address there. 1064 01:24:08,910 --> 01:24:13,650 How there employees intend to park, but let me ask you as a, as a land use attorney. 1065 01:24:16,130 --> 01:24:19,190 Are the vacuum stalls parking spaces? 1066 01:24:20,410 --> 01:24:21,550 Yes, that's the intent. 1067 01:24:21,770 --> 01:24:24,110 That's the intent that it would be vacuum space. 1068 01:24:24,310 --> 01:24:26,130 They would be in employee spaces. 1069 01:24:26,730 --> 01:24:28,410 And again, operationally, that's not something 1070 01:24:28,410 --> 01:24:33,810 that I've discussed in detail with Alex and the team. 1071 01:24:34,090 --> 01:24:38,030 That's not vending issue that has been raised until recently, 1072 01:24:39,050 --> 01:24:40,290 but we can discuss that tonight. 1073 01:24:40,490 --> 01:24:43,150 I understand it's the intent to park their employees there. 1074 01:24:43,150 --> 01:24:48,110 What I'm asking you is, do you consider, as somebody who does a lot of land use law and 1075 01:24:48,110 --> 01:24:55,190 development work, do you consider those slots to be parking, dedicated parking for employees? 1076 01:24:55,850 --> 01:25:00,530 I would consider them to be dedicated parking in this context because it is an automated 1077 01:25:00,530 --> 01:25:03,950 car wash facility that has limited number of employees. 1078 01:25:05,030 --> 01:25:06,610 I think they meet the requirements. 1079 01:25:07,070 --> 01:25:12,230 There are members of the general public who are speaking in the gallery during the presentation. 1080 01:25:12,230 --> 01:25:16,450 Please stop. You'll have your chance to come up and make your points, but it's a little bit distracting. 1081 01:25:16,810 --> 01:25:29,050 So, what I would say to your question is that any business that's open to the public has a parking lot of spaces and most of them don't have a separate employee parking only section. 1082 01:25:29,490 --> 01:25:40,210 So, every business is going to have some of its parking lot dedicated to employees, boss. The only difference with these is that those also have the ability to be a vacuum spot. 1083 01:25:40,210 --> 01:25:44,350 that is the only difference. I don't think that makes it less of a parking spot, 1084 01:25:44,590 --> 01:25:50,350 makes it a more usable parking spot for multiple uses, but it's still the same principle. 1085 01:25:50,770 --> 01:25:55,050 A portion of your parking structure is going to be taken up by employees. 1086 01:25:56,750 --> 01:26:01,810 What happens when that needs that spot needs to be used as a vacuum? 1087 01:26:03,030 --> 01:26:04,430 And again, I think that's what... 1088 01:26:04,430 --> 01:26:07,370 Just the employee move his car to his or her car to. 1089 01:26:08,150 --> 01:26:19,890 I believe that's what Mr. Quintana can speak to operationally. They're not operating with kind of a deficit of those vacuum spots, but he can speak to that. 1090 01:26:20,410 --> 01:26:24,750 And it's a reasonable question. I'm not trying to downplay this question at all. 1091 01:26:24,750 --> 01:26:31,650 It doesn't matter if it's employee or guests, there's usually designated on-street or 1092 01:26:31,650 --> 01:26:37,790 there's designated parking spaces, so that's our concern that there's no designated parking. 1093 01:26:38,710 --> 01:26:44,690 It's serving a dual function, but at peak hour, what happens? 1094 01:26:46,650 --> 01:26:54,650 Again, there's also a refractory time when certain people come to replace the other people. 1095 01:26:54,650 --> 01:26:59,110 when they're getting off, said there's going to be two cars for a while while they're handing off their duties. 1096 01:27:04,060 --> 01:27:04,740 I didn't mean to. 1097 01:27:04,860 --> 01:27:06,020 No, no, it's totally fine. 1098 01:27:07,200 --> 01:27:08,840 Please jump in anytime you have a question. 1099 01:27:10,860 --> 01:27:14,300 So this is a question again that we can go into in more detail. 1100 01:27:15,380 --> 01:27:20,700 We are aware that there are folks here tonight and folks that have written this city with concerns. 1101 01:27:21,360 --> 01:27:26,120 I will note that there are many of the concerns that we have read 1102 01:27:26,120 --> 01:27:29,160 from the neighbors that do related 1103 01:27:29,160 --> 01:27:30,660 does seem that there is a real problem 1104 01:27:30,660 --> 01:27:32,100 with cut-through traffic in the neighborhood. 1105 01:27:32,740 --> 01:27:34,980 And not to similar from the discussion 1106 01:27:34,980 --> 01:27:37,300 that you had in your first item, 1107 01:27:38,120 --> 01:27:39,720 that is not necessarily something 1108 01:27:39,720 --> 01:27:44,080 that the applicant has the obligation to make better. 1109 01:27:44,120 --> 01:27:45,880 Certainly they have the obligation 1110 01:27:45,880 --> 01:27:48,600 of not exacerbating the problem, 1111 01:27:51,100 --> 01:27:54,160 but the broader concern is one of, 1112 01:27:54,420 --> 01:27:55,700 that the city has to deal with. 1113 01:27:55,700 --> 01:28:05,100 When a park is a popular place to be, and this is a Loma is a busy street, and there is a problem that residents have with cut through traffic. 1114 01:28:05,760 --> 01:28:05,920 Yes, sir. 1115 01:28:06,060 --> 01:28:07,700 I'm going to jump in here for a second, sir. 1116 01:28:08,360 --> 01:28:09,380 You're talking about traffic. 1117 01:28:10,180 --> 01:28:13,960 Now, traffic studies were done for this project, is that correct? 1118 01:28:14,020 --> 01:28:15,020 That's correct. 1119 01:28:15,340 --> 01:28:25,080 Were any of those traffic studies address any of the traffic issues on this neighborhood as opposed to the other locations of this company? 1120 01:28:28,320 --> 01:28:34,380 How do you mean, what I mean is, is that in the traffic studies that I saw, they were looking 1121 01:28:34,380 --> 01:28:41,600 at the locations in Highly of Florida and South Miami, Burbroan, 69th, which is a two-and-a-half 1122 01:28:41,600 --> 01:28:50,060 two miles from the high school I went to, Cork Ables High School, and they were doing traffic 1123 01:28:50,060 --> 01:28:58,200 accounts to those locations and then trying to do an addition and subtraction as far as 1124 01:28:58,200 --> 01:29:03,200 what the traffic was going to be at this location. But my concern was that this location 1125 01:29:03,200 --> 01:29:08,520 has a particular issue with cut-through traffic and a residential neighborhood that backs 1126 01:29:08,520 --> 01:29:14,560 right up to it that none of those locations have. And the traffic study didn't really address 1127 01:29:14,560 --> 01:29:20,300 what the traffic was in this location, which is where it's going to be built. 1128 01:29:20,820 --> 01:29:25,460 That was a concern I had. So I'm asking you, don't you think there needs to be a traffic 1129 01:29:25,460 --> 01:29:31,400 study addressing this location of the current issue and how that issue may be exacerbated 1130 01:29:31,400 --> 01:29:39,780 or not depending on what this property is going to bring to that location, that this business. 1131 01:29:40,300 --> 01:29:43,160 And it doesn't, as far as I can see, I didn't see one. 1132 01:29:44,080 --> 01:29:49,660 If you did, there is, you know, tell me, correct me, but my concern is that there wasn't 1133 01:29:49,660 --> 01:29:56,420 a traffic study that was done that addresses this property in this location and the traffic 1134 01:29:56,420 --> 01:29:58,080 concerns there. 1135 01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:07,540 I understand your question entirely. I don't believe that the city staff accepted the traffic study that we submitted. 1136 01:30:08,600 --> 01:30:11,340 And we're not to stay off. I'll ask a few of the questions on that. 1137 01:30:11,440 --> 01:30:12,180 That's fair. 1138 01:30:14,880 --> 01:30:16,080 So the answer is no. 1139 01:30:16,360 --> 01:30:20,380 The answer is no. Not at this stage, not at the conditional use permit stage. 1140 01:30:22,980 --> 01:30:25,620 So again, back to the concerns. 1141 01:30:25,620 --> 01:30:32,040 And that is, the concerns are the reason why we, and I encourage you as we're discussing 1142 01:30:32,040 --> 01:30:38,620 these things, don't feel as if the applicant doesn't have any room to listen to your 1143 01:30:38,620 --> 01:30:43,000 concerns and incorporate them into approval conditions. 1144 01:30:43,340 --> 01:30:50,040 I think I don't know that we've said no to one of city staff's requests yet, and many 1145 01:30:50,040 --> 01:30:53,740 of these have come above what the code would require. 1146 01:30:54,360 --> 01:30:58,260 And that's another point that I would make about this company, L. Car Wash. 1147 01:30:58,420 --> 01:31:05,600 What you're looking at is not a prototypical L. Car Wash, as far as I can tell, there is not a prototypical L. Car Wash. 1148 01:31:05,940 --> 01:31:15,820 This is designed to custom forward this property and to address the interactions we've had with staff and the concerns they have related to. 1149 01:31:15,820 --> 01:31:18,720 buffering, landscaping, tree preservation, 1150 01:31:20,800 --> 01:31:23,900 and we want to bring that same attention to your concerns 1151 01:31:24,480 --> 01:31:30,160 and any comments that you have tonight. So don't feel as if this is simply what we're 1152 01:31:30,160 --> 01:31:35,100 proposing and there's no room to work. That's what this, you know, applicant is willing to do 1153 01:31:35,100 --> 01:31:37,980 that we're happy to work with the on these issues. 1154 01:31:40,660 --> 01:31:43,260 I want to briefly touch on some of the 1155 01:31:43,260 --> 01:31:49,500 conditional use permit criteria because that's something that is not, was not as emphasized in 1156 01:31:49,500 --> 01:31:56,000 staff's presentation. One of them says that the conditional use permit has to be consistent with 1157 01:31:56,000 --> 01:32:02,540 the goals of the comprehensive plan. Again, I'll go back to the existing condition. 1158 01:32:05,820 --> 01:32:12,240 There's a reason why every comprehensive plan that's passed for cities and counties has an element 1159 01:32:12,240 --> 01:32:15,100 to it that encourages infill development. 1160 01:32:15,240 --> 01:32:18,400 Infill development means you're taking in underutilized 1161 01:32:18,400 --> 01:32:20,920 or vacant property and you're redeveloping it. 1162 01:32:21,360 --> 01:32:26,440 This one in particular has two structures that are vacant. 1163 01:32:28,060 --> 01:32:30,920 And nothing is a more attractive nuisance 1164 01:32:30,920 --> 01:32:34,880 than a vacant commercial structure, especially at night 1165 01:32:34,880 --> 01:32:35,900 when it gets dark. 1166 01:32:35,960 --> 01:32:39,700 So the opportunity to redevelop it as a use 1167 01:32:39,700 --> 01:32:51,320 that could serve the residents in nearby area is certainly one that's consistent with that goal from your comprehensive plan. 1168 01:32:52,600 --> 01:33:00,600 The second criteria I'll talk about is that it meets her exceeds the minimum standards in your land development code. 1169 01:33:00,600 --> 01:33:06,220 this certainly does, those conditions that Nick went through many of those are not required 1170 01:33:06,220 --> 01:33:07,040 by your code. 1171 01:33:07,260 --> 01:33:10,880 They're simply, and if they're usually, if they're required, they don't have to be listed 1172 01:33:10,880 --> 01:33:11,460 as conditions. 1173 01:33:12,500 --> 01:33:14,120 They are over and above. 1174 01:33:16,860 --> 01:33:24,940 The use type operating hours traffic impact commensurate with the area, this is a C3 zoning 1175 01:33:24,940 --> 01:33:25,640 district. 1176 01:33:25,760 --> 01:33:26,940 This is in the commercial core. 1177 01:33:26,940 --> 01:33:30,760 or as you know, this is an intensely developed area. 1178 01:33:33,020 --> 01:33:39,900 And I could go through more of these, but I think that you understand what our argument is, 1179 01:33:40,140 --> 01:33:42,660 what our cases for redevelopment of this property. 1180 01:33:43,040 --> 01:33:52,100 I know that you have specific questions about the employee parking and the landscaping materials 1181 01:33:52,100 --> 01:33:53,420 and the height of the building. 1182 01:33:53,420 --> 01:34:00,420 I'm going to go ahead and call up Mr. Alex Quintana to address those of which he can speak to now. 1183 01:34:01,220 --> 01:34:05,480 I'm happy to answer any other questions you have as we continue to talk. 1184 01:34:05,880 --> 01:34:06,660 Thank you. 1185 01:34:10,180 --> 01:34:11,500 Good evening, Alex Quintana. 1186 01:34:12,040 --> 01:34:18,940 Senior Director of Development, L. Car Wash, 253, Northwest 87th Avenue, Darrell Ford, 33172. 1187 01:34:20,340 --> 01:34:20,860 Not sure. 1188 01:34:22,060 --> 01:34:22,840 Here we go. 1189 01:34:23,500 --> 01:34:29,220 Okay, so I was taking some notes, so the first one is the employee parking, as you guys 1190 01:34:29,220 --> 01:34:35,340 have mentioned, we do operate upwards of 95 sites across our two markets right now between 1191 01:34:35,340 --> 01:34:36,620 Michigan and Florida. 1192 01:34:37,120 --> 01:34:42,540 What we try to develop our sites is to maximize what we consider our vacuums, which are 1193 01:34:42,540 --> 01:34:44,820 complementary to the purchase of a car wash. 1194 01:34:46,440 --> 01:34:51,880 At any given moment, we're going to have a maximum of two to three employees on shift that 1195 01:34:51,880 --> 01:34:58,180 give a moment. So we understand that at those shift changes per se, we could have a potential 1196 01:34:58,180 --> 01:35:04,520 of five cars. It's kind of one of those things that our crews are our staff works out 1197 01:35:04,520 --> 01:35:10,940 together. What we were proposing was, if it is a rainier day or gloomier day or towards the end 1198 01:35:10,940 --> 01:35:21,720 of a day, where we kind of see those seasonal down shifts, we will reduce the staffing of just 1199 01:35:21,720 --> 01:35:28,240 in line. So what we're kind of our proposing is we do understand that, you know, these flex 1200 01:35:28,240 --> 01:35:33,240 faces, but they're not going to be taking up, per se, the prime ones, which would be kind 1201 01:35:33,240 --> 01:35:40,020 of to the right of the ADA space, where we would be having them as more down towards the 1202 01:35:40,020 --> 01:35:45,660 pastation area. Those two to three spots right there, where we would kind of direct them to 1203 01:35:45,660 --> 01:35:50,880 there. Just to kind of mention also we do have numerous sites down in South Florida that 1204 01:35:50,880 --> 01:35:58,680 do significant volume upwards of 1,000 cars a day, 1,000 plus a day, which we're not predicting that this site would be doing. 1205 01:36:00,640 --> 01:36:05,860 And we have less vacuum spaces where the employees are doing that. 1206 01:36:06,080 --> 01:36:09,760 So we do have the three primary positions are the pay station. 1207 01:36:09,980 --> 01:36:13,240 We will always have an employee there to keep people flowing. 1208 01:36:13,580 --> 01:36:19,080 We'll have a lot of tendon where someone is monitoring the lot, making sure people aren't playing music too loudly. 1209 01:36:19,080 --> 01:36:27,360 And that they're also using the Vax and a respectable manner of timing, not sitting there for 30 plus minutes detailing their car, we try to ask. 1210 01:36:27,780 --> 01:36:35,300 We've started instituting signs at each vacuum stall that says, be courteous to your other members that keep it to 10 to 15 minutes. 1211 01:36:36,080 --> 01:36:44,460 If not, and we also realize that keeping stock of towels and any other products kind of expedites that timing. 1212 01:36:44,460 --> 01:36:52,160 So I think that right now we're anywhere down towards like seven to eight minutes where most people are detailing their car detailing and getting in and out of there 1213 01:36:53,280 --> 01:36:59,760 Another one is hours. You asked I'm not sure which member asked, but when is the last customer? 1214 01:37:00,640 --> 01:37:04,500 We usually will not turn away someone that's in queue at 8 p.m. 1215 01:37:05,060 --> 01:37:12,440 But we will kindly ask them to kind of we will put out cones at the entry point of that queue right there where that last car shown on this plan 1216 01:37:12,440 --> 01:37:19,940 We'll move cones out there kind of decks as an APA. It's shutting down time at APM or we can adjust to 7.45 1217 01:37:19,940 --> 01:37:24,440 If you guys wanted to give a 15-minute warning, we'd be willing to bait adapts to that condition. 1218 01:37:25,740 --> 01:37:29,980 Afterwards, all the equipment will be shut off. They'll probably be an out. 1219 01:37:30,000 --> 01:37:44,460 Or ish of maintenance inside the tunnel? No loud equipment will be going on, it's mainly just kind of pressure washing inside the tunnel. Just to clean up for the day and then the employees will be out of there, lighting will go down to a minimum and stay within the city standards. 1220 01:37:46,320 --> 01:37:53,860 Another one was the sound, so let me book you on to some extra slides here in a second. 1221 01:37:54,960 --> 01:37:58,060 Okay, so here's a good representation. 1222 01:37:58,860 --> 01:38:01,560 I'll try to put the decibel scale on there because I know decibels. 1223 01:38:02,120 --> 01:38:05,720 We all learned about it in seventh grade physical science and then we forget about it. 1224 01:38:06,000 --> 01:38:08,720 But just decibels right now me speaking. 1225 01:38:09,340 --> 01:38:13,220 We're setting around 70 decibels more than likely over this microphone. 1226 01:38:13,220 --> 01:38:21,780 So, this is the bottom chart, is taking from one of our most recent sound studies that was done for a project in Del Rey Beach. 1227 01:38:22,200 --> 01:38:31,580 I can also provide a study that we had recently done for a project in Melbourne, off North Wickham that was approved at the end of last year. 1228 01:38:32,160 --> 01:38:40,040 But as you can see, they take the sound from various points around the site and as you at various distances. 1229 01:38:40,040 --> 01:38:46,060 and as you can see the sound dissipates and this is without any solid walls as we've all 1230 01:38:46,060 --> 01:38:52,500 learned in this car wash industry solid wall stop sound better than any other thing possible. 1231 01:38:52,800 --> 01:38:59,240 So that is a 3D rendering of our vacuum enclosures. It's a 8-foot CMU block construction. 1232 01:39:00,760 --> 01:39:06,520 On three sides with a metal gate on the opening so the employees can get in there or maintenance 1233 01:39:06,520 --> 01:39:08,960 crew can get in there and service the equipment as needed. 1234 01:39:09,800 --> 01:39:14,060 It's open to the air just to keep air flowing through it to prevent overheating. 1235 01:39:15,280 --> 01:39:19,640 And so what we've realized is that sound reverberating and then being projected upwards 1236 01:39:19,640 --> 01:39:27,460 or outward really helps and then also I just want to accentuate that also we have that 1237 01:39:27,460 --> 01:39:31,760 solid wall on the back end of the property, don't know if we. 1238 01:39:31,820 --> 01:39:35,800 Yeah, you can see it there on that northern part that will help also dissipate the 1239 01:39:37,800 --> 01:39:49,440 another one that you guys mentioned was the Tower height. As Mr. Love went over the current 1240 01:39:49,440 --> 01:39:54,900 conditions, we do have that monument. There's that existing Pylon slash monument sign 1241 01:39:54,900 --> 01:40:01,060 with the building out there in our initial meetings in our tack review with staff. We kind 1242 01:40:01,060 --> 01:40:07,620 I conceded or we compromised, I guess, in that sense that we would not be going for a monument 1243 01:40:07,620 --> 01:40:08,560 sign there. 1244 01:40:08,780 --> 01:40:13,700 In the sense that we could get our tower at that 35-foot height and then actually it's creating 1245 01:40:13,700 --> 01:40:14,560 a better visibility. 1246 01:40:14,640 --> 01:40:20,040 I know that we've provided site triangles to staff inside of our packet that Mr. Draper can 1247 01:40:20,040 --> 01:40:21,220 go over if needed. 1248 01:40:22,200 --> 01:40:27,440 And then also, I know that there are some concerns about traffic, sorry, going around direction 1249 01:40:27,440 --> 01:40:27,940 here. 1250 01:40:27,940 --> 01:40:33,540 Um, we did have our, uh, legacy, uh, traffic consultant, they've been with, uh, L. 1251 01:40:33,640 --> 01:40:34,840 Car Wash and stay one. 1252 01:40:34,940 --> 01:40:38,940 They're based out of medley for the, uh, HBC engineering, uh, Dr. 1253 01:40:39,560 --> 01:40:42,500 Modet's, uh, side, uh, for conducted this report. 1254 01:40:42,500 --> 01:40:47,780 And as you can see, on the top of that top table, it does take into account the traffic 1255 01:40:47,780 --> 01:40:51,520 counts at the proposed site of 416 land or road. 1256 01:40:52,060 --> 01:40:57,480 Um, and then compares it to our bird road, our F, I, I, you, West Miami and our coral 1257 01:40:57,480 --> 01:41:03,080 of reef sites. These are our most mature sites in our repertoire. These are the sites. I know 1258 01:41:03,080 --> 01:41:08,500 that it is down in Miami, but these are sites that have less vacuum, shorter tunnels, 1259 01:41:09,380 --> 01:41:17,160 and do thousand plus cars a day that don't have any major issues. They run cars through 1260 01:41:17,160 --> 01:41:27,460 there constantly. And, you know, that's where our model was perfected and brought up, you know, 1261 01:41:27,460 --> 01:41:34,320 it meets ITE standards. And as you can see on the lower table, they kind of compare it to 1262 01:41:34,320 --> 01:41:39,980 serrigate sites where what we've noticed is a lot of our traffic is passed by traffic. So 1263 01:41:39,980 --> 01:41:45,680 it's not a destination location like our restaurant or grocery store. We try to incorporate 1264 01:41:45,680 --> 01:41:51,840 our locations into everyday life where you're going from one place and then you know stop 1265 01:41:51,840 --> 01:41:56,240 another. Yes sir. What's the well time service big for time the 1266 01:41:56,240 --> 01:42:00,300 end or until the time they may leave at the right now at our 1267 01:42:00,300 --> 01:42:04,040 drought. Yeah right now at our drought HQ location we've actually 1268 01:42:04,040 --> 01:42:08,880 integrated into an AI camera system that has been logging in you know cars 1269 01:42:08,880 --> 01:42:12,700 as they enter our property to when they leave the property based on some 1270 01:42:12,700 --> 01:42:16,220 initial readings what we're finding is right around I think the average is 1271 01:42:16,220 --> 01:42:20,320 right around 12 minutes based on peak times that's actually as you're in the 1272 01:42:20,320 --> 01:42:22,980 you moving through and then going out. 1273 01:42:24,300 --> 01:42:30,880 So as a new detail, and then a new, sorry, I'm going the wrong way. 1274 01:42:32,620 --> 01:42:37,760 And then just to show, we have one more slide here to show that this is just how it integrates 1275 01:42:37,760 --> 01:42:41,960 into your daily traffic, sorry, for the smaller graphics. 1276 01:42:42,260 --> 01:42:47,840 This is actually using a Placer AI data, so it takes cell phone data from existing sites. 1277 01:42:47,840 --> 01:42:56,300 So this is using our golden rod location, and so what it's finding is that, yes, 42% 1278 01:42:56,300 --> 01:43:00,900 of people come from their home, but as you can see, they're going to various locations 1279 01:43:00,900 --> 01:43:03,500 afterwards, whether it be to the Costco nearby. 1280 01:43:04,260 --> 01:43:08,980 So this is one of those locations when we were initially doing the real estate reconnaissance 1281 01:43:08,980 --> 01:43:17,820 was, it's a Sprouts, you know, you're out on your Saturday errands, you're going to the 1282 01:43:17,820 --> 01:43:25,660 found that the market kind of calls for it here is that this winter park location would fill 1283 01:43:25,660 --> 01:43:32,380 in a central gap in between our three existing stores where hopefully it seems like traffic 1284 01:43:32,380 --> 01:43:36,880 is a pretty big concern especially me trying to come up here from South Florida at a rush hour 1285 01:43:36,880 --> 01:43:44,360 traffic time that we would be moving a location closer to some of our core demographic in the 1286 01:43:44,360 --> 01:43:49,660 and core members in the area, and that they would have an easier location to reduce their 1287 01:43:49,660 --> 01:43:50,420 times on the road. 1288 01:43:51,260 --> 01:43:52,880 So, and then... 1289 01:43:53,500 --> 01:43:57,960 What's the distance between the proposed location and the castle burial location? 1290 01:43:58,360 --> 01:44:01,740 I believe right now we're right around five miles. 1291 01:44:02,180 --> 01:44:02,360 Ish? 1292 01:44:02,780 --> 01:44:03,100 Yes. 1293 01:44:04,160 --> 01:44:05,660 And they're completely two different markets. 1294 01:44:05,920 --> 01:44:10,360 I mean, I know that they overlap, but you can faintly see it that kind of the red blue and 1295 01:44:10,360 --> 01:44:13,440 green kind of designates where they're all pulling from. 1296 01:44:13,440 --> 01:44:20,160 And so, what we're hoping that this location will do is equalize and kind of infill right now 1297 01:44:20,160 --> 01:44:25,180 in the sense that it'll be a closer commute and you bring it's closer. Yes, sir. 1298 01:44:25,480 --> 01:44:32,740 Okay. Where exactly is your Castle Berry location? Can you point it out on a? 1299 01:44:32,760 --> 01:44:37,360 Castle Berry is up there in the blue. There's a blue with a white circle. 1300 01:44:37,480 --> 01:44:39,800 Yes, my question is. It's on 436. 1301 01:44:39,800 --> 01:44:41,660 Yeah, does it back up to a neighborhood? 1302 01:44:42,380 --> 01:44:42,560 No. 1303 01:44:43,200 --> 01:44:43,540 Okay. 1304 01:44:44,180 --> 01:44:44,380 All right. 1305 01:44:44,460 --> 01:44:45,580 Your ECF location. 1306 01:44:46,260 --> 01:44:47,560 Does it back up to a neighborhood? 1307 01:44:48,020 --> 01:44:48,260 Listen. 1308 01:44:48,940 --> 01:44:50,180 Your golden rod location. 1309 01:44:50,520 --> 01:44:51,660 Does it back up to a neighborhood? 1310 01:44:52,480 --> 01:44:52,780 No, sir. 1311 01:44:52,860 --> 01:44:57,240 But on the other side, I can name you off multiple locations on the South Miami area 1312 01:44:57,240 --> 01:44:59,780 and across all of our markets that backup into. 1313 01:45:00,000 --> 01:45:05,860 Residents. Well, I looked at the five, and it's been a few years. I mean, I did graduate 1314 01:45:05,860 --> 01:45:13,060 high school, but not yesterday from down there. But I know where the bird road location is, and I 1315 01:45:13,060 --> 01:45:18,260 know where the Carl Reef location, 152nd Street. I didn't hang out in Highland, but I looked 1316 01:45:18,260 --> 01:45:26,960 on the map where those two locations are. None of them backed up to any residential. They were 1317 01:45:26,960 --> 01:45:33,660 are on a major thoroughfare, and they don't have the back-street issues that this location 1318 01:45:34,460 --> 01:45:42,780 potentially has. That's my issue is we're dealing with apples and oranges and I understand 1319 01:45:42,780 --> 01:45:49,960 the traffic, so that's why I ask Council about that because that's the big issue that I see right 1320 01:45:49,960 --> 01:45:50,080 here. 1321 01:45:50,340 --> 01:45:55,120 And we heard from staff and all of our meetings and that's where we adjusted our site plan. 1322 01:45:55,120 --> 01:45:59,880 that we adjusted our initial entry point from our pre-application meeting to one 1323 01:45:59,880 --> 01:46:06,490 preserve the oak tree that's on land or right there. The second one was to create a 1324 01:46:07,660 --> 01:46:09,750 extended throat distance into the 1325 01:46:10,700 --> 01:46:17,000 entry of our site down land. I think we're about 400 feet up there. I don't know. I don't 1326 01:46:17,000 --> 01:46:20,760 pull me to it, but I think we're significantly farther off the road than a sprouts. 1327 01:46:20,760 --> 01:46:28,800 So you don't have any of that extent, and then also staff requested that we, you know, make it a left out only. 1328 01:46:29,520 --> 01:46:32,960 We've accentuated that curve, we can accentuate even more. 1329 01:46:33,460 --> 01:46:35,280 We have some directional signage. 1330 01:46:35,960 --> 01:46:39,120 It's a little bit right there. 1331 01:46:39,220 --> 01:46:40,980 You can see it by that white SUV. 1332 01:46:41,660 --> 01:46:48,060 We'll, our 3D rendering, real oriented at the incorrect direction, but we'll turn that so it's forcing those in. 1333 01:46:48,060 --> 01:46:52,960 like we can do all we can to force patrons to go left out of the site. 1334 01:46:56,960 --> 01:47:01,900 So, which I know that, I mean, but, you know, the person wants to take a right. 1335 01:47:02,020 --> 01:47:02,920 They're going to take a right. 1336 01:47:04,080 --> 01:47:07,800 And you can't even get people to walk across a street and winter park on it. 1337 01:47:08,400 --> 01:47:12,640 But what I guess what we're getting at is that we've worked with staff. 1338 01:47:12,800 --> 01:47:17,000 We've done everything we could to force the traffic to the left. 1339 01:47:17,000 --> 01:47:29,700 I know that the sprouts development has a full movement there, so I mean what we've done is we've done our best to accommodate to the staff and that's all we can do for you guys. 1340 01:47:29,840 --> 01:47:37,800 I know it seems like, you know, just as Mr. Love pointed out, first project it seems like it's a citywide issue. We have it down in Miami a lot. 1341 01:47:37,800 --> 01:47:41,760 people love cutting through alleys and access streets and, you know, 1342 01:47:43,180 --> 01:47:44,660 probably the nature of the beast unfortunately. 1343 01:47:44,940 --> 01:47:45,540 Mr. Tick? 1344 01:47:47,420 --> 01:47:54,420 Yeah, you've mentioned you've done noise studies in other sites. 1345 01:47:55,280 --> 01:47:58,160 What triggered those studies and why? 1346 01:47:58,360 --> 01:47:59,580 I've only done here. 1347 01:48:00,000 --> 01:48:03,020 I believe Melburn, so to speak to Melburn, 1348 01:48:03,880 --> 01:48:30,240 They, it was part of their conditional use requirements built into their city code, so when we had their pre-app, they requested it, and we provided it, and then the Delray Beach, same, same issue with the conditional use process, that one's actually borders are residents as well, or a neighborhood right behind us, so we, we did the sound study as they requested at the pre-app meeting. 1349 01:48:31,180 --> 01:48:34,420 Another site that we are doing, 1350 01:48:34,420 --> 01:48:37,420 I'm completely blanking, Miramar Parkway, Miramar 3, 1351 01:48:37,640 --> 01:48:38,820 our third site there. 1352 01:48:39,060 --> 01:48:41,160 It backs up to a residence right now. 1353 01:48:42,500 --> 01:48:44,940 And we provide a sound study for them. 1354 01:48:45,840 --> 01:48:48,860 And we're going into PNZ and June on that project. 1355 01:48:49,900 --> 01:48:50,440 Okay. 1356 01:48:51,260 --> 01:48:54,260 Getting back to the front, 1357 01:48:54,260 --> 01:49:00,900 you know, signage monument, which is, you know, I guess what it is, because you're actual office 1358 01:49:01,680 --> 01:49:09,080 building is like 19 feet, two inches, to the parapets who add on another, you know, one or two feet, 1359 01:49:09,240 --> 01:49:16,800 you know, I guess for the full height of the building, and then you've got another, you know, 14 feet of, 1360 01:49:17,500 --> 01:49:24,240 I guess airspace, you know, to get up to the 35 feet, I just don't, you know, to me that's 1361 01:49:24,260 --> 01:49:28,520 I mean, that's a sign monument, it's not a real structure, 1362 01:49:30,760 --> 01:49:32,680 so it's part of our brand. 1363 01:49:32,860 --> 01:49:39,380 We have it at, I would say probably 85% of our stores have that tower feature, it's, you 1364 01:49:39,380 --> 01:49:46,060 know, we build within city codes and, you know, that's what we presented initially to staff. 1365 01:49:47,040 --> 01:49:52,760 We're willing to compromise some, but I know that we've also compromised and said to staff 1366 01:49:52,760 --> 01:49:58,700 that we weren't going to submit for a monument sign, per se, or a pylon sign, to promote 1367 01:49:58,700 --> 01:49:59,240 signage. 1368 01:49:59,680 --> 01:50:05,820 And so this is our kind of our compromise that we get some height back for advertisement and 1369 01:50:05,820 --> 01:50:06,780 visibility from the road. 1370 01:50:06,940 --> 01:50:11,360 I mean, I know we're built right up against the road, but with a limited signage, it's 1371 01:50:11,360 --> 01:50:13,960 easier to kind of get your signage up. 1372 01:50:24,740 --> 01:50:25,140 Okay. 1373 01:50:25,140 --> 01:50:30,540 I mean, when you're to find a lot, this size down in South Florida, you're paying upwards 1374 01:50:30,540 --> 01:50:31,260 of eight figures. 1375 01:50:32,480 --> 01:50:36,960 So we have a lot more room to work with here and so the longer the tunnel, the more cars 1376 01:50:36,960 --> 01:50:40,480 were able to process and the better wash that were able to give to our customers. 1377 01:50:41,220 --> 01:50:47,260 And so the capacity of this tunnel is five cars versus an 80 foot tunnel where you can 1378 01:50:47,260 --> 01:50:50,420 maybe only fit two cars in there at any given moment. 1379 01:50:50,620 --> 01:50:55,120 So we can process cars through faster, which means less stacking, which means more people 1380 01:50:55,120 --> 01:50:58,520 get into the vacuumed quicker and get off-site quicker. 1381 01:51:01,010 --> 01:51:07,790 Yes, I'm just wondering, have you done a sort of, you had the, the aerial with the 1382 01:51:07,790 --> 01:51:16,090 different locations, and then this location, the, the projected volume of cars that you're 1383 01:51:16,090 --> 01:51:27,190 expecting and then does this size merit that volume is, it's a long building, I guess is what 1384 01:51:27,190 --> 01:51:29,990 I'm getting that. And is it? And when you're saying that you have. 1385 01:51:30,010 --> 01:51:32,730 So right now, uh, sorry to catch you off. Sorry. 1386 01:51:33,090 --> 01:51:40,010 Your car washes in South Florida do a lot of volume, but they're smaller. So why the 1387 01:51:40,010 --> 01:51:44,770 large building footprint, when probably the volume will be less here? 1388 01:51:46,370 --> 01:51:51,430 It's, like I said, it's a, it's a business decision in the sense that we can have a longer 1389 01:51:51,430 --> 01:51:57,110 tunnel, which kind of, it's more touchpoints for the vehicle. What we found also up in central 1390 01:51:57,110 --> 01:52:02,450 footers. We don't have as big of a bug problem down in South Florida as you guys do up here. 1391 01:52:03,070 --> 01:52:07,870 And so we try to have more touch points and longer tunnels up here. So there's a better 1392 01:52:07,870 --> 01:52:12,870 clean on your car. You're not coming out with three-quarter clean car like you see at some 1393 01:52:12,870 --> 01:52:18,170 car washers. If that makes sense. More touch points for these more locations? More touch points 1394 01:52:18,170 --> 01:52:23,310 is inside the tunnel. There's more ability to rinse and soap your car. There's longer, 1395 01:52:23,310 --> 01:52:29,970 Soak time on your vehicle that the soap is on there because the that's getting tuned into the 1396 01:52:30,000 --> 01:52:38,020 Weeds Car Washular is the longer the soaps on the vehicle, the better it is to penetrate smashed 1397 01:52:38,020 --> 01:52:43,680 bugs on your car and get them off easier. But this is based on the golden rod, site which 1398 01:52:43,680 --> 01:52:49,660 opened in July of 2025. And as you can see, our visits have been stayed pretty consistently 1399 01:52:50,600 --> 01:52:58,080 as we've taken over the site. And I know we purchased it recently and rebranded it as of last year 1400 01:52:58,080 --> 01:53:01,900 and it's operating anywhere between four to seven hundred cars per day. 1401 01:53:02,820 --> 01:53:04,900 So that's what we're estimating for this site, 1402 01:53:05,180 --> 01:53:07,280 which can easily handle this volume. 1403 01:53:07,940 --> 01:53:10,000 You're estimating that for this site, 1404 01:53:10,200 --> 01:53:11,640 based on what Golden Rod's doing? 1405 01:53:12,240 --> 01:53:13,560 Yes, sir, because as I mentioned, 1406 01:53:13,700 --> 01:53:17,180 it's that infill location in the sense that 1407 01:53:17,180 --> 01:53:20,740 also this one is it's customers benefit from our network 1408 01:53:20,740 --> 01:53:22,580 and the sense that they use multiple locations 1409 01:53:22,580 --> 01:53:24,680 that are depending on where they are, 1410 01:53:24,880 --> 01:53:26,520 just what side of the city they're on, 1411 01:53:26,520 --> 01:53:29,900 which way their communities for that day, et cetera, et cetera. 1412 01:53:30,640 --> 01:53:35,500 So the ability of adding an extra car wash in this area 1413 01:53:36,560 --> 01:53:40,840 will open up that ability for it to kind of stabilize. 1414 01:53:48,220 --> 01:53:53,280 How do you determine, well, I think you've 1415 01:53:53,280 --> 01:53:57,240 said that based on the unique nature of this site, 1416 01:53:57,320 --> 01:53:59,820 the length of it, you were able to put a longer tunnel in, 1417 01:53:59,820 --> 01:54:07,300 Is that why you have a large number of vacuum stalls that you say you probably won't need or 1418 01:54:07,860 --> 01:54:14,980 Do you make the number do you determine I mean we think I want to say okay to determine the proposed number of vacuum stalls based on what the volume 1419 01:54:14,980 --> 01:54:16,640 You think is going to be at the store 1420 01:54:18,780 --> 01:54:24,680 No because I have I have sites that down in South Florida right now that I'm developing that are only going to have eight vacuums 1421 01:54:24,680 --> 01:54:31,160 And we're projecting that these cars are going to do a thousand cars today. Is that it because you do have enough space on those smaller lots in South Florida? 1422 01:54:31,160 --> 01:54:39,050 Yes, but if I had more space, but at the same time, there is a fine line also because you don't want them to be 1423 01:54:40,300 --> 01:54:44,400 Godian, I don't want to get up here in slander in the other companies but some of the car washes that we inherited 1424 01:54:45,020 --> 01:54:45,480 have 1425 01:54:46,060 --> 01:54:50,320 3040 plus vacuums that when they were operating at a 1426 01:54:50,320 --> 01:54:52,770 400 to a 700 cars per day 1427 01:54:53,420 --> 01:55:01,140 the cycle looked empty at any given moment and an empty business is not a profitable business in our eyes, and so there's a fine line of managing and 1428 01:55:01,160 --> 01:55:06,820 what we landed on with 17 spaces here also because of space constraints and kind of redesigning 1429 01:55:06,820 --> 01:55:10,600 the side I think staff has maybe seen two or three iterations of the site plan and this 1430 01:55:10,600 --> 01:55:15,140 is what we settled on that would be most efficient and also meet all city standards. 1431 01:55:15,800 --> 01:55:18,940 Well, I mean it doesn't need any parking standards because it doesn't have any dedicated 1432 01:55:18,940 --> 01:55:24,560 parking but that is you aside to the sites that you for instance the site you said 1433 01:55:24,560 --> 01:55:29,700 that has eight vacuum stalls of the South Florida. Is there any parking for staff dedicated 1434 01:55:29,700 --> 01:55:32,160 parking on for staff on those properties? 1435 01:55:32,860 --> 01:55:34,480 Those can be a little bit different. 1436 01:55:34,600 --> 01:55:40,720 In the sense that Miami people have mutual agreements with neighboring properties, or shared 1437 01:55:40,720 --> 01:55:46,600 parking agreements in alleyways, but I know that one or two of them we kind of designated 1438 01:55:46,600 --> 01:55:52,560 this space by the dumpster that was kind of unused that was just we created this parking 1439 01:55:52,560 --> 01:55:53,420 space out of it. 1440 01:55:53,500 --> 01:55:56,420 You know, you just get creative with maximizing your space there. 1441 01:55:56,420 --> 01:56:02,460 Right. And if we, I think, was Mr. Keyesons point earlier, which is if all of the things or if all the 1442 01:56:02,460 --> 01:56:06,340 stalls are being used and somebody comes to park their car, maybe it was Mr. Seagull, 1443 01:56:06,680 --> 01:56:10,280 they're just going to find a place they could put the car on that lot, which isn't necessarily 1444 01:56:10,280 --> 01:56:15,920 a parking place. And that wouldn't be that would be the area manager, the regional manager, 1445 01:56:16,120 --> 01:56:22,540 the site managers, responsibility to make sure we have a clear policy in our staff that are in our 1446 01:56:22,540 --> 01:56:27,040 company policies that we don't let them just park on a curb and I understand the 1447 01:56:27,040 --> 01:56:30,560 concern of whatever happened at Golden Rod and you know we can look into that 1448 01:56:30,560 --> 01:56:31,260 from an upside. 1449 01:56:33,800 --> 01:56:36,580 I just want to clarify you had said that you had a South 1450 01:56:36,580 --> 01:56:41,340 Florida location that does 1,000 cars a day. Multiple guests there. Multiple 1451 01:56:41,340 --> 01:56:46,660 look at I can imagine that and then the one you were talking though you referenced 1452 01:56:47,140 --> 01:56:48,920 had eight vacuum stalls. 1453 01:56:49,020 --> 01:56:49,720 Yes, sir. 1454 01:56:49,940 --> 01:56:50,160 Okay. 1455 01:56:51,460 --> 01:56:52,500 This one has what? 1456 01:56:52,860 --> 01:56:53,040 17? 1457 01:56:53,680 --> 01:56:54,020 Yes, sir. 1458 01:56:54,480 --> 01:56:55,880 And is it fair to say? 1459 01:56:55,900 --> 01:56:59,060 And I'm looking at a projection of between four and seven hundred cars a day? 1460 01:56:59,060 --> 01:56:59,980 That's the golden rod. 1461 01:57:00,140 --> 01:57:01,620 But I mean, is that something that you would? 1462 01:57:01,660 --> 01:57:03,660 Do you know how many cars a day would come to this? 1463 01:57:04,880 --> 01:57:08,300 If I had a crystal ball, I'd be a lot more profitable man. 1464 01:57:08,400 --> 01:57:09,020 But yes, sir. 1465 01:57:09,020 --> 01:57:14,220 I mean, based on the data, that's what we can just concurrent right now with the mark our central 1466 01:57:14,220 --> 01:57:16,880 for the market is operating, that's what we're estimating 1467 01:57:16,880 --> 01:57:17,140 that we're talking about. 1468 01:57:17,140 --> 01:57:18,160 Between $700. 1469 01:57:19,260 --> 01:57:19,400 Yes, sir. 1470 01:57:19,400 --> 01:57:22,000 So you got a space before and $700 cars a day 1471 01:57:22,000 --> 01:57:25,360 with 17 vacuum stalls when you got another, 1472 01:57:25,360 --> 01:57:28,520 that does 1,000 cars a day with eight vacuum stalls. 1473 01:57:28,660 --> 01:57:31,820 So is there any rhyme or reason to pick that? 1474 01:57:32,040 --> 01:57:32,340 I mean, why? 1475 01:57:33,640 --> 01:57:34,080 One, two, one. 1476 01:57:34,080 --> 01:57:37,540 It's just, you know, not to get to any of the weeds. 1477 01:57:37,740 --> 01:57:39,000 The sites are designed differently. 1478 01:57:39,140 --> 01:57:40,040 You know, I know the highly, 1479 01:57:40,340 --> 01:57:42,300 the site that you mentioned, the old one. 1480 01:57:42,460 --> 01:57:44,080 That one was a back first concept. 1481 01:57:44,080 --> 01:57:47,600 So you have people actually vacuuming in the queueing. 1482 01:57:47,700 --> 01:57:53,080 I mean, I'm just trying to find out if there's any, if there's any relationship 1483 01:57:53,080 --> 01:57:56,880 between a number of vacuum sites and the number of projected cars per day. 1484 01:57:58,040 --> 01:58:03,400 And I'm not seeing it, but I think I can say, I mean, I could, I could develop a site. 1485 01:58:03,480 --> 01:58:07,580 You know, there's one of our rock-wood sites has, I think, 54 vacuumes on it, 1486 01:58:07,920 --> 01:58:12,420 and probably at most 10 are used at any given moment. 1487 01:58:12,420 --> 01:58:14,580 Is that on North Morrell Road? 1488 01:58:15,100 --> 01:58:15,740 Near Eister? 1489 01:58:16,660 --> 01:58:17,520 I believe so. 1490 01:58:17,700 --> 01:58:18,240 Yeah, the Rockwich. 1491 01:58:18,660 --> 01:58:22,380 I mean, I think it's just, you've maxed out to sight. 1492 01:58:22,660 --> 01:58:25,260 We maxed out to sight. We prepared for the worst conditions. 1493 01:58:25,260 --> 01:58:31,600 We would rather have, I would rather have 17 vacuums or 14 operational because two employees 1494 01:58:31,600 --> 01:58:33,240 or three employees are part there then. 1495 01:58:33,240 --> 01:58:36,660 And thinking, you didn't have to max out to sight. 1496 01:58:36,740 --> 01:58:40,660 You just made it smaller and then maybe created a greater buffer from the residential. 1497 01:58:42,400 --> 01:58:50,880 So, you know, there's at the same time I also don't want to impede the residents and be respectful of them and don't ever want our site to 1498 01:58:51,300 --> 01:58:59,260 stack out onto the road if someone, if we were to only reduce down to a certain number of vacuums and the site is occupied at that given. 1499 01:58:59,260 --> 01:59:01,240 back to the combat, you know, 1500 01:59:01,340 --> 01:59:05,600 but you're projecting maybe 400 to 700 visits a day. 1501 01:59:05,740 --> 01:59:08,880 It doesn't sound like that merits 17 vacuum stalls. 1502 01:59:11,300 --> 01:59:13,560 Anyway, back to the tower. 1503 01:59:14,740 --> 01:59:18,980 What are you all willing to do in terms of reducing the size of the tower? 1504 01:59:20,900 --> 01:59:24,200 You said you might be willing to compromise or... 1505 01:59:24,200 --> 01:59:27,520 I mean, I was kind of just looking at Google Street View 1506 01:59:27,520 --> 01:59:29,440 to see kind of surrounding businesses. 1507 01:59:29,440 --> 01:59:34,020 I know there's a three story office building kind of across the street ish and then I know that 1508 01:59:34,020 --> 01:59:40,520 this sprouts is set further off the road, but you know, mellow mushroom has a pylon sign out by the road. 1509 01:59:42,120 --> 01:59:44,440 Does that mean the answer to your question is you're not willing to? 1510 01:59:44,560 --> 01:59:50,080 No, I am willing to. I'm just trying to give, I'm just trying to give a reason of why we presented to staff and 1511 01:59:50,080 --> 01:59:58,840 we're at 10 feet, you're at 10 feet, and they're not at 10 feet. So, you're right at the edge of the right away. 1512 01:59:58,840 --> 01:59:59,980 What would be a cup of 1513 02:00:00,000 --> 02:00:10,800 Dr. Will Hype for you guys, and I can take that up to our higher levels to make a business decision on it, but I think right tonight I would be authorized to say that we'd be willing to look into it. 1514 02:00:11,040 --> 02:00:21,940 Yeah, and because this is a recommending body, you can make a recommendation to city council with a specific number and we can take that to the final decision. 1515 02:00:22,660 --> 02:00:33,200 So I think to Alex's point, I encourage you to discuss internally and suggest a number because this is a recommending body. 1516 02:00:35,570 --> 02:00:36,950 Any other questions for the applicant? 1517 02:00:40,830 --> 02:00:41,190 Thank you. 1518 02:00:42,090 --> 02:00:44,310 Could I briefly just make one clarifying question. 1519 02:00:44,730 --> 02:00:47,350 I just want to ask staff or maybe a Dan. 1520 02:00:47,890 --> 02:00:54,230 Because the question of parking has come up now a few times that I just want to make sure that we're clear on the record, 1521 02:00:54,230 --> 02:00:57,450 whether the city considers these to be parking spaces. 1522 02:01:00,880 --> 02:01:04,920 So we don't have a requirement for parking spaces for a car wash. 1523 02:01:05,740 --> 02:01:09,400 All we have is retail operations, 1524 02:01:09,720 --> 02:01:13,000 is the closest thing I could say that it would conform to, 1525 02:01:13,020 --> 02:01:14,480 and it's based on the square footage. 1526 02:01:16,630 --> 02:01:18,230 It's not based on the number of employees. 1527 02:01:18,670 --> 02:01:20,910 No, we don't have that requirement in the code. 1528 02:01:22,670 --> 02:01:29,850 Obviously, this move forward for approval so you aren't really concerned about the parking 1529 02:01:29,850 --> 02:01:30,310 issue. 1530 02:01:33,090 --> 02:01:34,190 I'm not going to answer your question. 1531 02:01:34,530 --> 02:01:36,330 I'm piggybacked in the last question. 1532 02:01:37,010 --> 02:01:42,350 Even though there may not be a minimum parking requirement as I also said for this type of 1533 02:01:42,350 --> 02:01:49,430 use, the factors that you consider in a traditional use of approval do factor in parking 1534 02:01:49,430 --> 02:01:52,890 is one of the things that the board does review. 1535 02:01:53,630 --> 02:01:56,790 So it's the one in the purview of the board to consider that issue. 1536 02:01:57,030 --> 02:01:57,330 Absolutely. 1537 02:01:57,330 --> 02:01:57,630 And absolutely. 1538 02:01:57,850 --> 02:02:04,250 I think it's in a requirement because of the city code, and this is not retail, then why is there a handicap space there? 1539 02:02:04,530 --> 02:02:04,830 I just... 1540 02:02:04,830 --> 02:02:06,170 That's a building code requirement. 1541 02:02:07,450 --> 02:02:09,590 It just isn't making sense to me. 1542 02:02:10,590 --> 02:02:17,170 What I'm hearing is we've just maximized the lot, and we're going to put as many vacuums on this as we can. 1543 02:02:17,170 --> 02:02:20,230 And we'll park some people there and get away with it, 1544 02:02:20,250 --> 02:02:21,530 but there's not dedicated parking. 1545 02:02:22,810 --> 02:02:24,810 And we'd really like to use them all to have vacuums 1546 02:02:24,810 --> 02:02:26,050 because we want to bring as many cars 1547 02:02:26,050 --> 02:02:27,230 through this things we can't. 1548 02:02:27,510 --> 02:02:29,930 That's what it says to me. 1549 02:02:30,010 --> 02:02:32,610 I'm sorry, this is really more close session commentary, 1550 02:02:32,930 --> 02:02:34,510 but are there any other questions for the applicant? 1551 02:02:36,940 --> 02:02:37,500 Thank you. 1552 02:02:37,620 --> 02:02:38,380 Thank you. 1553 02:02:41,760 --> 02:02:45,620 Sorry, I was just getting a text message from our senior VP 1554 02:02:45,620 --> 02:02:46,840 of development and construction. 1555 02:02:46,980 --> 02:02:48,920 We are willing to compromise a couple of spots, 1556 02:02:48,920 --> 02:02:52,760 just to be solely dedicated to employees and not backing them there. 1557 02:02:53,260 --> 02:02:53,920 So, yeah. 1558 02:02:55,020 --> 02:02:57,780 Do we have members of the public who wish to speak? 1559 02:02:58,940 --> 02:03:02,100 Chairman, I have two requests, but one may have left. 1560 02:03:02,900 --> 02:03:04,460 The first one is Julia Gettinger. 1561 02:03:05,380 --> 02:03:09,220 I saw a number of people in the audience raise their hands. 1562 02:03:09,320 --> 02:03:13,340 If you would like to speak, can you please go back and fill out one of the forms? 1563 02:03:13,560 --> 02:03:16,540 So we have your name so we can call you up in orderly fashion. 1564 02:03:16,540 --> 02:03:19,180 Thank you very much, 1565 02:03:22,350 --> 02:03:26,110 and the first speaker again is that you, ma'am. 1566 02:03:27,450 --> 02:03:31,470 As a reminder, if you could start by stating your name and address for the record. 1567 02:03:37,580 --> 02:03:38,780 Hello, I'm Julia Guessinger. 1568 02:03:38,940 --> 02:03:41,220 I'm a resident of the East Gate neighborhood. 1569 02:03:42,200 --> 02:03:45,800 My address is 106 bell place in winter park. 1570 02:03:47,180 --> 02:03:49,400 And I'm a resident of the neighborhood. 1571 02:03:49,400 --> 02:03:52,100 been there for many years. 1572 02:03:52,820 --> 02:03:54,540 Love our winter park neighborhood. 1573 02:03:55,700 --> 02:04:00,800 And I'm very concerned that there's another car wash going there. 1574 02:04:01,080 --> 02:04:04,700 The old car wash is dilapidated, I can see that. 1575 02:04:05,360 --> 02:04:08,200 And surely would be nice to have something new there. 1576 02:04:08,940 --> 02:04:12,460 But I don't think a car wash would be a good addition 1577 02:04:12,460 --> 02:04:14,380 for the winter park community. 1578 02:04:15,140 --> 02:04:17,660 There's so many car washers already in the area. 1579 02:04:21,340 --> 02:04:26,300 And several of my main concerns are, of course, the traffic, like we already discussed. 1580 02:04:27,080 --> 02:04:29,840 This already is a very tricky neighborhood. 1581 02:04:30,980 --> 02:04:35,760 We have animals and kids, and there's a lot of cut-through traffic to avoid the light 1582 02:04:35,760 --> 02:04:37,380 between Aloma and Lakemont. 1583 02:04:38,400 --> 02:04:46,800 So the neighborhood is already very heavily used for cut-through traffic, and I think cars going 1584 02:04:46,800 --> 02:04:49,060 with a car wash are just going to make it worse. 1585 02:04:49,340 --> 02:04:51,300 It doesn't matter if they only can turn left, 1586 02:04:51,820 --> 02:04:56,640 that's only going to make the exit from land 1587 02:04:56,640 --> 02:04:58,500 or onto Aloma much worse. 1588 02:04:58,520 --> 02:05:02,600 It's already terrible because of the sprouts location. 1589 02:05:04,160 --> 02:05:06,900 Sprouts also is very noisy in the middle of the night. 1590 02:05:07,280 --> 02:05:10,080 The unpack their groceries. 1591 02:05:11,040 --> 02:05:12,980 We have a very much noise problem, 1592 02:05:13,280 --> 02:05:16,640 even though there is a wall between the neighborhood 1593 02:05:16,640 --> 02:05:23,160 and the shopping plaza. And if we now have to deal with a car wash that has up to 70 1594 02:05:23,160 --> 02:05:31,260 even if it's just eight vacuum's. I don't think the noise study was considering all of those 1595 02:05:31,260 --> 02:05:38,840 aids running at the same time. I saw that it shows one edit time, but I don't think they have 1596 02:05:38,840 --> 02:05:44,420 noise study that will tell you how loud it will be. 1597 02:05:44,700 --> 02:05:49,360 Just go to any of the car washes, like on four sites, and Aloma, there's one. 1598 02:05:49,680 --> 02:05:50,320 It's very noisy. 1599 02:05:51,140 --> 02:05:55,420 Also, the runoff, I'm very concerned about chemicals being sprayed, 1600 02:05:55,940 --> 02:05:58,440 chemicals being going into our groundwater. 1601 02:05:59,040 --> 02:06:03,180 We have a female urban farm in our neighborhood. 1602 02:06:03,520 --> 02:06:05,560 I'm part of that initiative. 1603 02:06:05,560 --> 02:06:09,340 and I want no chemicals in the vicinity. 1604 02:06:11,020 --> 02:06:18,560 The other thing was, oh yes, is there an emissions test done? 1605 02:06:18,920 --> 02:06:22,560 Because if people are in the line, constantly their cars are running, 1606 02:06:23,040 --> 02:06:28,920 there should be some sort of a pollution emissions test for the cars running. 1607 02:06:29,460 --> 02:06:34,700 I don't think we should in this area have any sort of drive-through traffic. 1608 02:06:34,700 --> 02:06:42,220 If you want to build a office or a doctor's office or something like that, that's, you know, 1609 02:06:42,460 --> 02:06:47,480 it's not going to show heavily impact the neighborhood that's behind it. 1610 02:06:47,600 --> 02:06:49,580 Thank you very much for your consideration. 1611 02:06:50,260 --> 02:06:51,520 Next is Jenna Four. 1612 02:06:55,690 --> 02:06:56,870 Thank you everyone for filling those out. 1613 02:06:56,890 --> 02:07:00,110 It makes us much easier than me picking people from the audience. 1614 02:07:01,570 --> 02:07:02,130 Hi, my name. 1615 02:07:02,410 --> 02:07:02,710 Oh, sorry. 1616 02:07:03,210 --> 02:07:03,770 No, we can do that. 1617 02:07:03,770 --> 02:07:04,950 I'm at the better for us, yeah. 1618 02:07:05,310 --> 02:07:11,530 My name is Jennifer. I live at one one eight bill place. I am the owner operator of the small urban farm there. 1619 02:07:11,530 --> 02:07:15,090 It is midmodder bin farm. I am licensed through the city. 1620 02:07:15,710 --> 02:07:21,790 So everything that I'm doing is legal. It's an organic farm. I am also very concerned about chemical spray, 1621 02:07:22,030 --> 02:07:29,970 the water runoff, the ground pollution. I also have a four and five-year-old children who it is already, like nerve-wracking to let. 1622 02:07:30,000 --> 02:07:59,980 Then, play in the front yard in any way, shape or form. Because of the traffic, I know everyone's talking about the cut through traffic, through the neighborhood. But like Julia said, my concern is more of the traffic turning out. It is a nightmare to turn on to a Loma from lander. There are so many near misses all the time. It's awful. So, I'm also, I have a petition that the neighbors and I put together. This is the signature of every state. 1623 02:08:00,000 --> 02:08:04,680 single person that lives on lander and bell place and the majority of the people that live 1624 02:08:04,680 --> 02:08:09,980 on Byron and I also have people from Glenarton as well, none of them want the car wash 1625 02:08:09,980 --> 02:08:10,400 there. 1626 02:08:10,860 --> 02:08:15,840 So this is literally went door to door and got every one of our neighbors to sign. 1627 02:08:16,380 --> 02:08:18,020 They don't want it. 1628 02:08:18,160 --> 02:08:23,100 Brett also has an online one that I'll let him talk about that people signed as well. 1629 02:08:24,100 --> 02:08:26,160 It's also not enriching our community. 1630 02:08:26,160 --> 02:08:29,260 If they're only having two to three employees, 1631 02:08:29,520 --> 02:08:31,880 it's not like it's creating jobs for anyone. 1632 02:08:31,900 --> 02:08:35,120 It's not a third space for people to go to 1633 02:08:35,120 --> 02:08:36,980 and no offense to El Car Wash. 1634 02:08:37,260 --> 02:08:41,980 It's ugly, so sorry, the other thing is, 1635 02:08:42,200 --> 02:08:45,040 is there's a bunch, it is, it's an isor. 1636 02:08:46,020 --> 02:08:49,440 And there's also caliber car wash is 2.3 miles away. 1637 02:08:49,980 --> 02:08:52,620 It's not five miles to the castle, very El Car Wash. 1638 02:08:52,700 --> 02:08:54,120 It's 3.6 miles. 1639 02:08:54,120 --> 02:09:00,480 the golden rod location is 3.1 miles away. There's also a spotless car wash 4.5 miles away 1640 02:09:00,480 --> 02:09:08,720 and a water's car wash 4.8 miles away. I think we're good on car washes. So yeah, so I just think 1641 02:09:08,720 --> 02:09:13,320 it's not creating jobs. It's just making money for our car wash. It's, and like Julie said, 1642 02:09:13,400 --> 02:09:19,500 anything else there, a restaurant, a doctor's office, anything, anything but a car wash. So 1643 02:09:19,500 --> 02:09:24,920 Um, it's also a, like, the echo, the, my kids play outside. 1644 02:09:25,160 --> 02:09:29,160 I'm embarrassed when one of them hurts themselves and starts crying because the way our 1645 02:09:29,160 --> 02:09:30,840 neighborhood is set up, it echoes. 1646 02:09:31,120 --> 02:09:33,400 Like, you can hear it all the way down the street. 1647 02:09:33,580 --> 02:09:38,800 So I can only imagine, like, when a car washes there, what that's going to do also. 1648 02:09:38,980 --> 02:09:44,260 So, and like Julia said, the idling of the cars and just the extra traffic. 1649 02:09:44,260 --> 02:09:46,800 I just don't think that we need it. 1650 02:09:46,800 --> 02:09:49,280 there's so many other car washes around there everywhere. 1651 02:09:50,640 --> 02:09:52,360 So I also just think as the City Commission, 1652 02:09:53,320 --> 02:09:55,740 you guys, we voted you guys in and- 1653 02:09:55,740 --> 02:09:57,280 Not the City Commission, we're planning it so- 1654 02:09:57,280 --> 02:10:00,480 Plating and zoning, but as far as it's like, 1655 02:10:00,520 --> 02:10:02,420 we're the residents and all the residents, 1656 02:10:02,680 --> 02:10:03,420 we don't want it. 1657 02:10:03,560 --> 02:10:06,120 And they're an L car wash from like, not here. 1658 02:10:06,660 --> 02:10:08,960 So, and I just ask, would you guys want this 1659 02:10:08,960 --> 02:10:10,120 backed up to your neighborhood? 1660 02:10:11,600 --> 02:10:12,480 Thank you. 1661 02:10:12,600 --> 02:10:16,480 Thank you. 1662 02:10:16,480 --> 02:10:24,080 staff so that it's in the record? It's up to you, but I think when we get emails from 1663 02:10:24,080 --> 02:10:29,940 residents, it all goes into the record. Otherwise it's just you saying I've got a bunch of 1664 02:10:29,940 --> 02:10:34,600 people signed those? Next is Brett Bissie. 1665 02:10:40,920 --> 02:10:43,460 Hello, thank you for having me. I just read Bissie at 1666 02:10:43,460 --> 02:10:49,740 530 Lander Road about five houses down from the proposed development. I just want to start by 1667 02:10:49,740 --> 02:10:52,700 saying I also have a petition that I did online. 1668 02:10:53,020 --> 02:10:56,300 We have 101 signatures, majority of those are in winter 1669 02:10:56,300 --> 02:10:58,520 park, some of which are in our neighborhood. 1670 02:11:00,460 --> 02:11:02,640 The main point of the petition is the incompatibility 1671 02:11:02,640 --> 02:11:07,780 of this lot with directly bordering a residential lot. 1672 02:11:08,020 --> 02:11:09,540 It's also bordering a minimum mushroom. 1673 02:11:10,080 --> 02:11:12,460 I don't think people want to be eating outside and hearing 1674 02:11:13,100 --> 02:11:13,540 vacuums. 1675 02:11:15,480 --> 02:11:17,300 Also sounds like a lot of compromises 1676 02:11:17,300 --> 02:11:19,240 or having to be made to make this happen. 1677 02:11:19,980 --> 02:11:22,560 So why do we have to make all these compromises? 1678 02:11:22,720 --> 02:11:24,740 Because it's an isor because it's loud, 1679 02:11:25,560 --> 02:11:27,800 and it directly affects the residents of the neighborhood. 1680 02:11:28,640 --> 02:11:31,880 There's not a single car wash that directly borders 1681 02:11:31,880 --> 02:11:33,820 a residential lot in winter park. 1682 02:11:34,160 --> 02:11:36,240 And you would struggle to find one in the surrounding 1683 02:11:36,240 --> 02:11:40,380 greater Orlando area, that directly borders a residential lot. 1684 02:11:41,500 --> 02:11:44,300 So I don't think this is the time to enforce that standard 1685 02:11:44,300 --> 02:11:45,540 in winter park. 1686 02:11:45,540 --> 02:11:48,780 Like Jenna mentioned, there's many car washes nearby. 1687 02:11:50,540 --> 02:11:52,660 Another issue I have is the entrance, 1688 02:11:53,480 --> 02:11:55,080 that we see on the rendering right here. 1689 02:11:55,160 --> 02:11:57,800 There's the stop sign to get, 1690 02:11:57,800 --> 02:12:00,200 that if you're driving on lander to get into our neighborhood. 1691 02:12:00,880 --> 02:12:02,500 So as I'm coming up with that stop sign, 1692 02:12:02,960 --> 02:12:04,880 I would have to simultaneously monitor 1693 02:12:05,390 --> 02:12:08,420 left turns out and that stop sign intersection. 1694 02:12:09,080 --> 02:12:13,460 So that seems like a confusing or difficult traffic situation 1695 02:12:13,460 --> 02:12:17,520 for residents and people entering and exiting the car wash. 1696 02:12:18,940 --> 02:12:28,240 Additionally, a left turn only is, you know, a suggestion to drivers, and they might just turn right in turn neighborhood. 1697 02:12:29,820 --> 02:12:35,260 For the previous conditionally this permit, we were talking about the charm of winter park and the walkability. 1698 02:12:35,260 --> 02:12:41,300 It's really rare to find a home and I'm very grateful that my wife and I were able to buy a house in this neighborhood, 1699 02:12:41,960 --> 02:12:48,200 because of the walkability, I'm always biking or skating or walking around in this area. 1700 02:12:49,020 --> 02:12:50,500 And this would destroy that charm. 1701 02:12:50,940 --> 02:12:56,160 It would make it really difficult for me to bike skate walk around the car wash, 1702 02:12:56,280 --> 02:13:01,060 because of the 400 to 700 additional cars that are going to be on lander. 1703 02:13:01,060 --> 02:13:07,360 I think it's worth mentioning and you pointed out that their traffic analysis is based on 1704 02:13:07,360 --> 02:13:13,500 surrogate modeling from South Florida. None of those car washes have a residential neighborhood 1705 02:13:13,500 --> 02:13:19,700 right next to it and their traffic analysis actually looked into it a bit. It's purely 1706 02:13:19,700 --> 02:13:23,960 talking about alumma. It's not considering the additional traffic on lander. 1707 02:13:28,460 --> 02:13:31,040 I, you know, I've 1708 02:13:31,920 --> 02:13:44,300 Another thing, I was the only resident at the community meeting and, you know, they didn't really make that community meeting known to residents outside of that 500 foot radius. 1709 02:13:44,980 --> 02:13:49,940 And they did it at the second closest elementary school that at Rush Hour. 1710 02:13:50,280 --> 02:13:52,380 So there is no real community outreach effort. 1711 02:13:53,900 --> 02:13:54,060 Thanks. 1712 02:13:54,540 --> 02:13:55,140 Thank you. 1713 02:13:55,440 --> 02:13:56,580 Next is Sean Travis. 1714 02:14:08,540 --> 02:14:14,020 Okay, this is Sean Travis, I'm from 2108 by Rode, I live in the neighborhood as well, pretty close to them. 1715 02:14:14,460 --> 02:14:22,500 Mine, just one of the points has already been mentioned, but it's a lot of the traffic information is like everybody said, 1716 02:14:22,560 --> 02:14:28,340 you know, it's based off of traffic going on to land a road and trying to impact that from happening less, 1717 02:14:28,660 --> 02:14:32,240 but the big concern for me, like mentioned they had mentioned is the traffic going out. 1718 02:14:32,320 --> 02:14:36,540 You know, if there's like a semi-truck or something like that that's coming out as far out, it's already like extremely difficult 1719 02:14:36,540 --> 02:14:39,660 to get out of there. Sometimes you're waiting like 10-plus minutes and people are cutting 1720 02:14:39,660 --> 02:14:43,700 through spouts. Like this is only going to intensify that. So it's going to make it worse. 1721 02:14:43,920 --> 02:14:48,160 Like regardless of what is said. And then, you know, we're having a traffic study done by 1722 02:14:48,160 --> 02:14:53,680 that's out of state or not out of state, but from South Florida and it's also being paid for 1723 02:14:53,680 --> 02:14:58,040 by them. So, you know, they're going to tailor that traffic study in any sort of way that's going 1724 02:14:58,040 --> 02:14:59,660 to benefit them. Obviously, you know, you know. 1725 02:15:00,000 --> 02:15:29,340 I'd like to, honestly, I wish I would have known about the sooner I probably would have had my own traffic study done by a third party company that, you know, obviously, I could share, I pretty positive, could come up with a different answer and then it just to, I think, to reclassify the land use or property use to say it's compatible, it's just false, it's not, it's not true, you know, a bank is extremely low impact and this is not that it's high impact and they're going to have hundreds of cars there, it's just not the same. 1726 02:15:29,340 --> 02:15:35,400 so that's all I have. Thank you. Next is Steven Jacobs. 1727 02:15:50,350 --> 02:15:52,770 Good evening. My name is Steve Jacobs. 1728 02:15:52,830 --> 02:15:59,010 I live on 1928 Taylor Avenue. I live there since November of 1998. So for about 27 and a 1729 02:15:59,010 --> 02:16:04,330 half years I'm speaking today against the approval of the conditional use permit for the L. Car Wash. 1730 02:16:05,030 --> 02:16:10,610 One of the reasons which has been talked about a lot is the traffic study. If you look at the 1731 02:16:10,610 --> 02:16:21,030 So the last appendix, the last two pages, it talks about driveway conflicts, and all of the driveway conflicts that have been identified are right turns from 1732 02:16:21,030 --> 02:16:23,110 Aloma and left turns from Aloma. 1733 02:16:23,590 --> 02:16:31,670 There's no driveway conflicts from all the people, most of the people that are coming from winter park, the central area of winter park are going to come down Palmer. 1734 02:16:32,110 --> 02:16:36,570 Then they're going to make a right turn at the Y and come down Lakemont and then they're going to make a decision. 1735 02:16:36,570 --> 02:16:41,530 am I going to sit at the left turn to go on a loma and then make another brutal left turn 1736 02:16:41,530 --> 02:16:46,370 on the lander or am I going to cut down my street tail or avenue and come in the backway. 1737 02:16:46,910 --> 02:16:51,090 That traffic study doesn't even comprehend the possibility of those drivers. 1738 02:16:51,610 --> 02:16:54,070 It completes leap completely omits them. 1739 02:16:54,770 --> 02:16:58,370 And so it's completely flawed and you can't base your decision on that. 1740 02:16:58,650 --> 02:17:02,230 And as far as the left turn only as you lead, come on, please. 1741 02:17:02,230 --> 02:17:14,470 We see those types of curbs all over town, and what you see is tire marks going over the curb because people aren't doing what the the turn thing is telling them to do you see those all over the place 1742 02:17:14,470 --> 02:17:18,890 So this is going to create an entire mess regarding the traffic 1743 02:17:19,610 --> 02:17:23,690 As far as aesthetics are concerned, I think a lot of people have used words 1744 02:17:23,690 --> 02:17:31,510 I'm not going to say I saw some people have said I saw but the bright turquoise hot pink color scheme certainly does not fit in 1745 02:17:31,510 --> 02:17:37,850 the aesthetic of winter park, which is more historic, elegant, conservative and restrained. 1746 02:17:38,250 --> 02:17:42,190 It sticks out. The height makes it stick out, the colors make it stick out. 1747 02:17:42,630 --> 02:17:46,510 But the most important thing, and the thing that no one's people talked about noise, and they've 1748 02:17:46,510 --> 02:17:51,710 talked about vacuums, I'm more concerned about the industrial dryers at the end of the tunnel, 1749 02:17:51,990 --> 02:17:56,630 that below the water off your car. I went and got my car wash today at rain dancer, 1750 02:17:56,630 --> 02:17:59,510 which is on the other side of town, off a 1792, 1751 02:18:00,250 --> 02:18:03,830 bordered by 1792 train tracks in a gas station, 1752 02:18:04,070 --> 02:18:05,990 by the way, not residential neighborhoods. 1753 02:18:07,790 --> 02:18:09,150 The good thing about these apple watches 1754 02:18:09,150 --> 02:18:11,990 is that you can record the decibel levels right on your watch. 1755 02:18:12,750 --> 02:18:16,550 And I stood outside of the wash 1756 02:18:17,070 --> 02:18:20,110 where these commercial dryers are located 1757 02:18:20,110 --> 02:18:23,770 on the other side of a block wall, 88 decibels 1758 02:18:23,770 --> 02:18:25,450 on the other side of a block wall. 1759 02:18:25,450 --> 02:18:28,750 I crossed the parking lot about 50 feet. 1760 02:18:28,890 --> 02:18:32,950 That was 76 decibels once and 81 decibels a second time. 1761 02:18:33,410 --> 02:18:37,150 85 decibels can cause hearing loss after eight hours. 1762 02:18:37,850 --> 02:18:39,650 So we're talking about noise levels 1763 02:18:39,650 --> 02:18:42,530 that are far beyond what this space. 1764 02:18:42,610 --> 02:18:43,990 I know it's commercial space, 1765 02:18:44,230 --> 02:18:47,350 but this is not the highest in best use of this commercial space. 1766 02:18:47,370 --> 02:18:49,930 It's the worst use, and it's because of the noise, 1767 02:18:50,310 --> 02:18:51,870 and that's something we're going to have to live with 1768 02:18:51,870 --> 02:18:54,090 if this goes through for the rest of our lives. 1769 02:18:54,090 --> 02:18:59,280 from seven o'clock in the morning until eight o'clock at night every day. Thank you very much. 1770 02:19:01,850 --> 02:19:03,510 Next is Mike Emerson. 1771 02:19:23,880 --> 02:19:28,880 Howdy, I'm Mike Emerson, 215 Taylor Avenue. We live right in the corner of Taylor, 1772 02:19:29,040 --> 02:19:36,080 land there where there's an anti-degree corner there. It's just to echo what a lot of other people 1773 02:19:36,080 --> 02:19:41,850 are saying about the traffic in the area. I will tell you right now that I'm not with FDOT or 1774 02:19:41,850 --> 02:19:48,390 You know, I never ever go down land or to make a left end to a Loma in the morning or in the afternoon. 1775 02:19:49,310 --> 02:19:51,550 It's just impossible. You're not going to get out there. 1776 02:19:52,290 --> 02:19:57,070 One or two crazy people who want to do that, and they're going to hold up traffic for 10 or 15 minutes at that point. 1777 02:19:57,390 --> 02:19:59,010 And it is actually easier to go down. 1778 02:19:59,710 --> 02:20:06,350 Taylor, make a left on Lakemont and go to and make a left on to a Loma if you want to go left on the Loma. 1779 02:20:06,490 --> 02:20:07,870 It's just ways you're to do that. 1780 02:20:08,910 --> 02:20:11,390 There's going to be a bunch of people cutting through, guaranteed. 1781 02:20:11,810 --> 02:20:15,010 There's no way they're going to, you know, this, this left turn only thing coming out of 1782 02:20:15,010 --> 02:20:15,270 there. 1783 02:20:15,750 --> 02:20:21,510 I am at Sprouts several times a week and every single time I go to Sprouts, there's somebody 1784 02:20:21,510 --> 02:20:22,830 going up the wrong way. 1785 02:20:23,530 --> 02:20:27,650 They've got a one-way parking lot on the side of Sprouts between Sprouts and Landr. 1786 02:20:28,290 --> 02:20:31,070 And guaranteed, if you spend 15 minutes there, you're going to see someone going to 1787 02:20:31,070 --> 02:20:31,810 the wrong way up there. 1788 02:20:32,090 --> 02:20:36,970 There's two huge signs that they do not enter on both sides of that and people just ignore 1789 02:20:36,970 --> 02:20:38,490 and go through there all the time anyway. 1790 02:20:39,730 --> 02:20:45,710 So there's no way that they're going to listen to a no right turn sign there at that 1791 02:20:45,710 --> 02:20:45,990 point. 1792 02:20:46,150 --> 02:20:46,990 It's just not going to happen. 1793 02:20:47,950 --> 02:20:48,770 But that's it. 1794 02:20:48,990 --> 02:20:52,490 The traffic thing, traffic is already terrible there. 1795 02:20:53,470 --> 02:20:56,390 I kind of like the idea of a car wash that the car washers are neat, you know, you get your 1796 02:20:56,390 --> 02:20:59,470 car clean, get it done pretty quick and get back to it. 1797 02:21:00,310 --> 02:21:03,430 But this is just terrible location for that traffic. 1798 02:21:03,430 --> 02:21:08,130 There already needs to be a light there, light there, light has landed as it is. 1799 02:21:08,550 --> 02:21:09,150 That's it. 1800 02:21:10,090 --> 02:21:11,130 Thank you. 1801 02:21:11,170 --> 02:21:12,250 Scott Patton. 1802 02:21:23,490 --> 02:21:25,250 Your name's Scott Patton. 1803 02:21:25,910 --> 02:21:28,270 2 007 Byron Road. 1804 02:21:29,250 --> 02:21:32,210 My family has lived on Byron for 62 years. 1805 02:21:33,430 --> 02:21:39,450 Paying property taxes in winter part and enjoying the quality of life in winter part. 1806 02:21:40,130 --> 02:21:49,590 What we have here is a conflict of two ideologies. 1807 02:21:50,750 --> 02:21:52,730 The applicant has a profit motive. 1808 02:21:55,340 --> 02:21:57,780 The city of Winner Park has a quality of life motive. 1809 02:21:59,200 --> 02:22:05,380 And I would hope that the city of Winner Park would stick with that profit motive 1810 02:22:05,380 --> 02:22:10,960 with that quality of life, motive, and protect the quality of your life for the citizens 1811 02:22:10,960 --> 02:22:16,340 in one or part, and in our little neighborhood that I'm guessing these folks probably 1812 02:22:16,340 --> 02:22:21,120 don't know the name of, it's East Gate, by the way. 1813 02:22:22,640 --> 02:22:28,860 So thank you for having me, we're not supposed to repeat each other a lot, but you see a 1814 02:22:28,860 --> 02:22:29,380 here. 1815 02:22:29,900 --> 02:22:29,980 It's... 1816 02:22:30,000 --> 02:22:39,040 Traffic congestion, period, and quality of life. And I hope that you side with the quality of life. Thank you. 1817 02:22:39,280 --> 02:22:40,100 Thank you. 1818 02:22:40,380 --> 02:22:41,180 Greg Ackerman. 1819 02:22:49,490 --> 02:22:59,350 Good evening board members, Greg Ackerman, 1933, Taylor Avenue. I just want to echo a lot of what other people have said here. 1820 02:23:00,090 --> 02:23:06,890 Traffic is a huge problem. I've lived in the neighborhood since 2003, so 23 years approximately. 1821 02:23:06,890 --> 02:23:14,990 race, three kids. And over the years we've actually consulted with the State of Winter Park Police Department 1822 02:23:14,990 --> 02:23:23,170 to try to minimize the already bad cut-through traffic that we have in the neighborhood. The police departments 1823 02:23:23,170 --> 02:23:29,110 have done traffic studies. They've laid down strips on the road to monitor how many cars come through. 1824 02:23:29,110 --> 02:23:36,650 They've done some speed, radar ring, and we believe it or not, we've got the results of those tests, 1825 02:23:36,790 --> 02:23:42,030 and we've had people come to the neighborhood at 80 miles an hour, done on Taylor Avenue. 1826 02:23:42,950 --> 02:23:49,770 It's only by the grace of God that no kid in our neighborhood has been killed by one of these vehicles 1827 02:23:49,770 --> 02:23:56,510 coming through our neighborhood. And having a car wash here with 400 to 700, it's just going to be an 1828 02:23:56,510 --> 02:24:08,590 absolute unmitigated disaster to have his car wash and that location. Frankly, the self-serve car wash that's bit that was there for a while. 1829 02:24:09,130 --> 02:24:14,610 I don't know why it's there. I think that particular location should be re-zone to something else. 1830 02:24:15,450 --> 02:24:18,530 The bank is much different than a car wash. 1831 02:24:18,530 --> 02:24:26,990 And so I oppose this very much, and I think that some of the things that the car wash people 1832 02:24:26,990 --> 02:24:31,650 have said, you all picked up on it, it doesn't make it's not right. 1833 02:24:31,730 --> 02:24:36,310 The left hand turn, the fact that employees are going to use some of the parking spots that 1834 02:24:36,310 --> 02:24:39,190 are there for customers, it's just, it's not believable. 1835 02:24:40,310 --> 02:24:46,070 So I think that you should recommend that this be rejected, thank you very much. 1836 02:24:46,770 --> 02:24:47,370 Thank you. 1837 02:24:49,360 --> 02:24:50,980 That was the final speaker, Chairman. 1838 02:24:51,760 --> 02:24:53,780 Okay, would the team care to make her a bubble? 1839 02:24:56,860 --> 02:24:58,300 Again, for the record, McGregor loved. 1840 02:24:58,880 --> 02:25:02,060 I will say that I'm sorry that I didn't hear from most of you at the community meeting. 1841 02:25:02,840 --> 02:25:08,280 To Brett's point, the notice was sent out consistent with the city's requirements. 1842 02:25:08,640 --> 02:25:11,380 That's not something that was intentional. 1843 02:25:11,780 --> 02:25:17,140 We certainly would have genuinely would have liked to hear some of this feedback prior to being here tonight. 1844 02:25:17,140 --> 02:25:18,780 That's what the process is for. 1845 02:25:18,780 --> 02:25:22,680 and it would certainly guide our decision-making. 1846 02:25:23,480 --> 02:25:25,720 So thank you for coming out and speaking tonight. 1847 02:25:27,420 --> 02:25:29,180 Another thing that we were discussing internally 1848 02:25:29,180 --> 02:25:32,100 while folks were getting up and discussing these concerns, 1849 02:25:33,500 --> 02:25:37,560 this is a general statement, but to the city staff, 1850 02:25:37,860 --> 02:25:39,860 we're absolutely open to making, 1851 02:25:40,080 --> 02:25:42,880 I don't know whether the folks here feel 1852 02:25:42,880 --> 02:25:45,860 that there are off-site improvements needed 1853 02:25:45,860 --> 02:25:48,000 to the roadway networks in their area. 1854 02:25:48,000 --> 02:25:55,700 of the gentleman mentioned, you know, the idea that a signal would be necessary, but we're 1855 02:25:55,700 --> 02:26:00,060 open to making off-site improvements that the city feels would actually improve the situation 1856 02:26:00,060 --> 02:26:09,300 on this property. And again, that is not because that's necessarily something that a traffic 1857 02:26:09,300 --> 02:26:16,200 study would say you must do, but we've recognized the situation is real. I know that these folks 1858 02:26:16,200 --> 02:26:22,860 start making up the traffic situation they're dealing with, and, you know, we're happy to address 1859 02:26:22,860 --> 02:26:27,380 that if possible. So I don't know that that could be reduced any sort of condition, 1860 02:26:27,600 --> 02:26:33,500 but it's on the record statement that we're willing to accommodate, you know, traffic 1861 02:26:33,500 --> 02:26:43,460 improvements off-site. Thank you. Any questions for the applicant before we go to the 1862 02:26:43,460 --> 02:26:45,980 Mister Quintana speak briefly. I'm sorry. 1863 02:26:48,500 --> 02:26:51,980 Sorry about that. I just wanted to hit a couple of the topics that were brought up by 1864 02:26:53,120 --> 02:26:56,740 The community which I appreciate you guys all coming out. It's 1865 02:26:56,740 --> 02:26:58,340 important to be part of the community 1866 02:26:58,340 --> 02:27:04,420 Elcar Wash tries to integrate into our communities. We are a just want to clarify. We are a four to own business 1867 02:27:04,420 --> 02:27:09,240 Yes, we do operate down in South Florida, but as I mentioned we are 1868 02:27:09,240 --> 02:27:13,880 Slowly becoming the number one operator here in central Florida and so 1869 02:27:14,820 --> 02:27:18,460 most of our employees live anywhere from three to five miles from our sites. 1870 02:27:20,080 --> 02:27:25,540 And yes, per shift we only have two to three employees, but you're thinking two shifts. 1871 02:27:25,740 --> 02:27:27,380 Multiply that. That's four to six employees. 1872 02:27:27,860 --> 02:27:32,360 But then also you're talking about all the further jobs that come down the line. 1873 02:27:32,600 --> 02:27:36,280 Area new area managers, new regional managers, et cetera, et cetera. 1874 02:27:36,400 --> 02:27:40,240 That grows the business. And you know, we promote internally. 1875 02:27:40,240 --> 02:27:45,400 we believe in, you know, someone starting from the ground up and then working there where I have to 1876 02:27:45,400 --> 02:27:52,400 corporate, we have numerous employees like that. The chemical runoff I know is a big question. Mr. 1877 02:27:52,660 --> 02:27:58,340 Draper, with Kimway Horan, has designed our site to meet all city and state regulations that 1878 02:27:58,340 --> 02:28:03,860 maintains all of our rainwater on our site. I'm headed to give a moment. We also design our 1879 02:28:03,860 --> 02:28:11,100 with three 2000 gallon reclaim tanks that come out of the tunnel. They use a 1880 02:28:11,100 --> 02:28:16,740 baffle and wear system so essentially they flow from one tank to another and at 1881 02:28:16,740 --> 02:28:22,900 that given point when that reclaim water is reused one gallon is reused six 1882 02:28:22,900 --> 02:28:27,120 different times at various points of the car wash. From there it goes through an oil 1883 02:28:27,120 --> 02:28:33,840 sand separator where then it is put out into the city system. So every chemical that we 1884 02:28:33,840 --> 02:28:38,660 use as biodegradable and that we can provide MSDS sheets from 1885 02:28:38,660 --> 02:28:42,740 Sonny's who's also a four-to-one company that we work with and we get all our 1886 02:28:42,740 --> 02:28:49,060 chemicals from. And then community 1887 02:28:52,800 --> 02:28:55,080 meeting as we mentioned we were there. I was 1888 02:28:55,080 --> 02:29:00,040 there present and attendance. I know that we sent out the notices, 1889 02:29:00,460 --> 02:29:05,130 personity regulations and shows based on accommodation to meet the 1890 02:29:05,130 --> 02:29:10,050 should do get to this meeting in time. And then also the blowers out coming out of the tunnel 1891 02:29:10,050 --> 02:29:17,510 and that was a big concern. Our car wash, we tried to, we recognized that pain point at a lot 1892 02:29:17,510 --> 02:29:22,750 of our sites and we developed what it is is a pressure plate system. So when your car gets to a 1893 02:29:22,750 --> 02:29:27,790 certain point in the tunnel, then those blowers activate for a temporary time as you're going 1894 02:29:27,790 --> 02:29:33,190 through that only that section. They're not running 247. So if a car is not in the tunnel or active 1895 02:29:33,190 --> 02:29:37,850 in that point of the pressure plate, then those blows aren't doing. We also have the ability 1896 02:29:37,850 --> 02:29:45,410 to, you know, turn them inwards, a lot of older car washes, point them just outwards 1897 02:29:45,410 --> 02:29:49,570 because they want to blow the water out of there. We try to keep all of our water in the tunnel, 1898 02:29:49,770 --> 02:29:54,800 so they kind of move with you, but they don't point outwards towards the building and then I know 1899 02:29:55,410 --> 02:29:59,390 one other citizen had a concern about where the sounds coming from. 1900 02:30:00,000 --> 02:30:29,980 I didn't clarify fully, but those backing producers, it's not a motor at each individual vacuum. I know it looks like it because we have our little trash cans there in the towel bins, but all the motors are being powered by that single producer. That's inside that concrete enclosure. So that's where the sound is coming from when you pull the nozzle off. That's why the sound is different at just that one. Just sounds like you're vacuum running at a given moment. But the main one is we keep that vacuum enclosure or the producers inside that vacuum enclosure. 1901 02:30:33,240 --> 02:30:37,270 And that is mainly it. 1902 02:30:38,510 --> 02:30:38,530 Okay. 1903 02:30:38,590 --> 02:30:39,610 Can I ask one question? 1904 02:30:40,470 --> 02:30:46,530 Did I hear you say that a single gallon of water is used six times in the same wash cycle? 1905 02:30:47,310 --> 02:30:47,690 Yes, sir. 1906 02:30:47,930 --> 02:30:52,030 So we use a combination of what we call reclaim water and fresh water. 1907 02:30:52,150 --> 02:30:53,290 So at various points. 1908 02:30:53,850 --> 02:30:55,630 So the initial soak of your car. 1909 02:30:56,210 --> 02:30:57,810 I can provide all this data to you guys. 1910 02:30:57,950 --> 02:30:59,950 So what we've done is every single piece of equipment. 1911 02:30:59,950 --> 02:31:02,950 and we've deemed that it either uses fresh water 1912 02:31:02,950 --> 02:31:06,930 or reclaim water, mainly we use the reclaim water 1913 02:31:06,930 --> 02:31:08,890 for like the undercarriage spray. 1914 02:31:09,930 --> 02:31:12,070 And so what it does is then it goes into that trench, 1915 02:31:12,310 --> 02:31:13,470 which is then funneled back out. 1916 02:31:13,470 --> 02:31:16,910 And we have also RO tanks inside the equipment room, 1917 02:31:17,130 --> 02:31:18,910 which then pulls that water back in, 1918 02:31:19,190 --> 02:31:21,590 is treated with a biodegradable chemical, 1919 02:31:21,830 --> 02:31:23,470 and then used on this undercarriage spray. 1920 02:31:24,030 --> 02:31:26,970 And then after it's reused all those different times, 1921 02:31:27,730 --> 02:31:29,250 then it goes to the oil sand separator 1922 02:31:29,250 --> 02:31:32,130 make sure that everything is fully out of it and then put into your 1923 02:31:32,130 --> 02:31:32,230 rescue. 1924 02:31:32,230 --> 02:31:32,570 Appreciate it. 1925 02:31:32,870 --> 02:31:34,250 It has really nothing to do with the application. 1926 02:31:34,510 --> 02:31:37,970 I was just curious whether every time I go through one of these car washers, I'm 1927 02:31:37,970 --> 02:31:40,710 getting five gallons of dirty water versus one gallon of clean. 1928 02:31:40,970 --> 02:31:41,930 No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. 1929 02:31:42,210 --> 02:31:46,070 You're getting anywhere from, I think that we've worked it down on a different project 1930 02:31:46,070 --> 02:31:46,970 on an orange counting. 1931 02:31:47,050 --> 02:31:51,730 I think we've worked it down to anywhere from 18 to 20 gallons of fresh water per 1932 02:31:51,730 --> 02:31:53,870 car and then the rest is reclaim water. 1933 02:31:53,870 --> 02:31:54,330 Thank you. 1934 02:31:54,410 --> 02:31:54,810 Yes, sir. 1935 02:31:54,810 --> 02:31:57,510 Mr. Chair, over here. 1936 02:31:57,830 --> 02:31:59,630 I was hoping that applicant could clarify 1937 02:31:59,630 --> 02:32:01,730 they had made a comment that they were willing 1938 02:32:01,730 --> 02:32:04,670 to concede parking spaces for employees, 1939 02:32:04,690 --> 02:32:07,550 but they did not specify the amount of parking spaces. 1940 02:32:07,550 --> 02:32:08,290 It's not aware. 1941 02:32:08,950 --> 02:32:10,710 I mean, I'd like that put on the record 1942 02:32:10,710 --> 02:32:13,930 and I appreciate that. 1943 02:32:14,030 --> 02:32:16,210 Specifically, you said specifically, 1944 02:32:16,570 --> 02:32:18,230 I'd be willing to give up three 1945 02:32:18,230 --> 02:32:20,550 because we keep three on any given moment, 1946 02:32:21,050 --> 02:32:22,290 but we're open to discussions. 1947 02:32:22,290 --> 02:32:22,570 Thanks. 1948 02:32:23,550 --> 02:32:23,590 Good. 1949 02:32:24,570 --> 02:32:25,610 So thank you for that. 1950 02:32:25,870 --> 02:32:26,370 Three to five. 1951 02:32:27,190 --> 02:32:27,970 Give her take. 1952 02:32:30,530 --> 02:32:34,130 While I have the microphone, did anyone leave a pair of glasses up here? 1953 02:32:36,130 --> 02:32:36,830 Thank you, Mr. Love. 1954 02:32:38,710 --> 02:32:38,950 Okay. 1955 02:32:39,750 --> 02:32:40,830 We'll go into closed session. 1956 02:32:41,870 --> 02:32:43,230 Who wants to start? 1957 02:32:43,790 --> 02:32:44,590 Left or right? 1958 02:32:48,150 --> 02:32:48,630 I'd 1959 02:32:53,780 --> 02:32:55,420 like to see a traffic study. 1960 02:32:56,160 --> 02:32:58,160 I think that's a big issue here. 1961 02:32:58,160 --> 02:33:05,360 I think everyone's commented on the traffic conditions that already exist, and if there's going to be 400 to 1962 02:33:07,520 --> 02:33:08,720 700 cars, 1963 02:33:09,900 --> 02:33:16,340 using the facility per day, then where are those cars coming from and where are they going? 1964 02:33:19,020 --> 02:33:26,160 I kind of have issues with a lot of things, so I guess the bottom line is it just feels like 1965 02:33:27,500 --> 02:33:32,860 the wrong use in the wrong location to me. 1966 02:33:33,760 --> 02:33:36,980 I could go through the tower height that bothers me. 1967 02:33:37,000 --> 02:33:40,500 I appreciate the fact that you're willing to remove 1968 02:33:41,480 --> 02:33:45,520 three of the vacuum stalls to create three parking spaces. 1969 02:33:50,120 --> 02:33:51,080 It feels 1970 02:33:53,800 --> 02:33:56,220 like there's a lot of issues with this project, 1971 02:33:56,420 --> 02:33:58,860 and I think maybe the number one thing is probably the traffic. 1972 02:33:58,860 --> 02:34:06,240 So I'd like to see a specific location traffic study on this particular location. 1973 02:34:07,480 --> 02:34:08,740 Mr. Seagull? 1974 02:34:10,900 --> 02:34:17,660 This is a good example of why we have public hearings because we were briefed on it. 1975 02:34:18,820 --> 02:34:20,540 You know, you hear the staff. 1976 02:34:20,540 --> 02:34:25,880 point of view, you look at it, but then you have neighbors that come out and point out 1977 02:34:25,880 --> 02:34:34,300 a lot of things that maybe didn't meet the eye, and this is an example to me of cumulative 1978 02:34:34,300 --> 02:34:39,680 impacts. You just, you know, it checks a lot of boxes, but, you know, it just gets there 1979 02:34:39,680 --> 02:34:46,560 and maybe meets the test, but maybe doesn't barely meet it, but, you know, when you have 1980 02:34:46,560 --> 02:34:53,560 So many issues, and then I look at East Gate and, you know, it's a sweet little community. 1981 02:34:54,500 --> 02:35:04,300 And it has been the victim of a lot of cut-through traffic over time, and this is a conditional 1982 02:35:04,300 --> 02:35:06,740 use, not a by-right. 1983 02:35:08,800 --> 02:35:13,440 So I'm leaning towards not supporting it. 1984 02:35:15,460 --> 02:35:20,620 Mr. Vice Chair, it's your last meeting, so I'm going to give you the last word on the last application, so let me move on. 1985 02:35:23,540 --> 02:35:24,080 I'm sorry. 1986 02:35:24,760 --> 02:35:25,600 Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 1987 02:35:28,580 --> 02:35:33,300 You know, I think they're trying, but it's just not compatible for the location. 1988 02:35:33,840 --> 02:35:41,120 I don't think that the uniqueness of this location by virtue of the fact that it backs up to the neighborhood 1989 02:35:41,120 --> 02:35:47,100 and has cut through issues and none of that was addressed in determining whether or not this would be 1990 02:35:47,100 --> 02:35:52,260 compatible for the location and a lot of their other locations, not one of the other locations 1991 02:35:52,260 --> 02:35:58,720 in Florida has the same issue that this one does. So why should they be special? I just 1992 02:35:58,720 --> 02:36:04,600 don't see it. I think it's not compatible for several reasons and I think that's the main 1993 02:36:04,600 --> 02:36:09,080 one. So I would not recommend it. Mr. Dick? 1994 02:36:09,920 --> 02:36:31,040 Yeah, as minimum I was, you know, thinking that we needed to table this first, you know, additional information, you know, certain issues come up, pink, well, you know, have any architectural guidelines and winter parks, so, you know, you can't really judge, you know, a development by its color, 1995 02:36:33,100 --> 02:36:38,980 you know, my initial concerns were, you know, basically the, the imposing, you know, tower, 1996 02:36:39,080 --> 02:36:48,000 When you have a 20-foot basic building, you can still put some signage on that that would 1997 02:36:48,000 --> 02:36:57,360 kind of mark the territory that is there so that possibly could have been dealt with. 1998 02:37:01,420 --> 02:37:11,380 Yeah, it just comes down to you have a conditional use that allows car washes. 1999 02:37:11,380 --> 02:37:23,020 But that doesn't guarantee a car wash so you know, I'm hoping that the applicant didn't get too much of a 2000 02:37:23,020 --> 02:37:25,460 You know, not from staff that this would 2001 02:37:26,740 --> 02:37:29,980 You know, be acceptable certainly probably check the 2002 02:37:30,000 --> 02:37:45,640 On the boxes, I was a little distressed that it was a local traffic study. I was also distressed that there was no noise studied done, notwithstanding the fact that it wasn't required. 2003 02:37:47,040 --> 02:37:55,440 I think anybody would have to realize that this was going to be a sensitive application and a sensitive location, so that should have been forthcoming. 2004 02:37:57,220 --> 02:38:03,240 So I would have been willing to do a table and have all these other things come back positive 2005 02:38:03,240 --> 02:38:09,280 and fix, but I think, you know, from hearing the neighborhood, I think it's pretty 2006 02:38:09,280 --> 02:38:14,540 conclusive to me that this is not the right project for this particular site. 2007 02:38:15,820 --> 02:38:18,560 I'm going to give my vice chairman the last word. 2008 02:38:19,160 --> 02:38:25,420 I echo Mr. Seagull's comments that this is, you know, a textbook example of why it's 2009 02:38:25,420 --> 02:38:32,840 to have a public meeting, at our work session, I think some of us had a few concerns about it. 2010 02:38:32,940 --> 02:38:38,880 We talked about a few things, but I think my concerns were heightened by hearing more 2011 02:38:38,880 --> 02:38:45,200 about it tonight and by hearing some of the public comment. This is commercial property. 2012 02:38:47,040 --> 02:38:51,900 There is going to be some commercial development of this property, but it's a conditionally 2013 02:38:51,900 --> 02:38:59,020 use request and we're allowed to recommend approval or denial of it based on what we see 2014 02:38:59,020 --> 02:38:59,460 fit. 2015 02:39:00,240 --> 02:39:05,700 And I understand that having the tower and having the brand and hot pink is part of your 2016 02:39:05,700 --> 02:39:06,060 brand. 2017 02:39:06,980 --> 02:39:11,240 And the reason you want that big tower with that hot pink signage is to get as much attention 2018 02:39:11,240 --> 02:39:11,860 as possible. 2019 02:39:12,620 --> 02:39:18,880 But I don't think it fits within the scale and charm of what the city of Winter Park is looking 2020 02:39:18,880 --> 02:39:19,600 for there. 2021 02:39:19,600 --> 02:39:26,000 is a new auto zone that's going in where the old Denny's was, right? 2022 02:39:26,000 --> 02:39:31,800 Right next to Interstate 4, doesn't back up to a residential property, and we forced them 2023 02:39:31,800 --> 02:39:37,280 to change the look of that property, so it fit more within the type of architecture 2024 02:39:37,280 --> 02:39:39,240 that we like here in the city of Wooder Park. 2025 02:39:39,520 --> 02:39:47,810 I mean, I just don't think this fits in with what the city's idea of what redevelopment 2026 02:39:47,810 --> 02:39:55,690 some of these parcels looks like. I think you found a unique parcel or two sets of parcels 2027 02:39:55,690 --> 02:40:01,390 that were pretty deep. You maximized what you could put on that to the exclusion of having 2028 02:40:01,390 --> 02:40:07,770 any dedicated parking. I understand you're conceding that now. But if you had cut this back 2029 02:40:07,770 --> 02:40:12,730 to a much smaller, more normal sized tunnel, or maybe you couldn't fit as many cars throughout 2030 02:40:12,730 --> 02:40:20,250 same time, you could have created a greater buffer with the residents to the back, but I pulled 2031 02:40:20,250 --> 02:40:25,270 up an area of this and I didn't realize to lies zoomed in that like immediately to the 2032 02:40:25,270 --> 02:40:29,730 north there was a house and you couldn't tell on the original area I saw because the roof 2033 02:40:29,730 --> 02:40:37,490 is dark, but you're right up next to homes in this neighborhood. I share a lot of the concerns 2034 02:40:37,490 --> 02:40:43,830 about traffic, I think making it right in, left out only is going to be a name only. 2035 02:40:43,930 --> 02:40:46,350 People are going to drive over that curb and cut through the neighborhood. 2036 02:40:48,570 --> 02:40:52,250 I don't know if there's anything the applicant can do about that, but it's a concern of mine. 2037 02:40:52,870 --> 02:40:58,390 But more for me, and it's not that it's car wash, it's that I just don't think it fits 2038 02:40:58,390 --> 02:41:01,590 within the scale and charm of what the city is trying to do with its redevelopment 2039 02:41:01,590 --> 02:41:02,190 for that reason. 2040 02:41:02,430 --> 02:41:03,630 I would vote against it. 2041 02:41:03,630 --> 02:41:05,270 Mr. Vice Chairman, 2042 02:41:07,430 --> 02:41:11,490 if I could for a second briefly, Mr. Chairman, if I could interrupt before. 2043 02:41:12,850 --> 02:41:15,210 Hang on one second, let me give you the Vice Chair's. 2044 02:41:16,810 --> 02:41:18,350 My last, maybe my last words. 2045 02:41:20,830 --> 02:41:25,850 I always try to come in here with an open mind. 2046 02:41:26,630 --> 02:41:37,170 And I'm always willing to change my mind based on new testimony and what I hear at meetings. 2047 02:41:37,530 --> 02:41:44,370 I came in honestly, sort of liking the idea of a car wash two minutes from our house, 2048 02:41:45,350 --> 02:41:53,130 where my wife could use, and she loves the semi self-service car washes, so the convenience 2049 02:41:53,130 --> 02:41:59,630 of that and the fact that it was going to be a new facility taking the place of what right 2050 02:41:59,630 --> 02:42:07,870 now is an empty bank and a really derelict old car wash seemed like an improvement to me. 2051 02:42:07,870 --> 02:42:09,690 That being said, 2052 02:42:11,750 --> 02:42:16,850 the residents, tonight were pretty damning. 2053 02:42:18,530 --> 02:42:29,590 And I, you know, listening to the impact to everybody behind the car wash had an impact on me. 2054 02:42:30,750 --> 02:42:31,230 So, 2055 02:42:34,090 --> 02:42:42,490 I mean, I would strongly recommend to you all that you table this or type pull it off the table before you go to City Commission. 2056 02:42:42,690 --> 02:42:45,550 You know how the vote's going to go from planning and zoning tonight. 2057 02:42:45,730 --> 02:42:48,210 I think that's pretty evident. 2058 02:42:49,070 --> 02:42:53,690 I do hope that this property gets developed in an appropriate way at a certain point. 2059 02:42:55,130 --> 02:43:02,130 And move forward from there, my goal and my six years on planning and zoning has always 2060 02:43:02,130 --> 02:43:07,910 been to try to look out for the greater good of the city of Winter Park, not the single 2061 02:43:07,910 --> 02:43:15,530 resident, not necessarily even the single neighborhood, but what will make the city a better 2062 02:43:15,530 --> 02:43:16,470 place to live. 2063 02:43:17,330 --> 02:43:23,210 And right now for better or for worse, what we are hearing is that this car wash, a car wash, 2064 02:43:23,210 --> 02:43:29,510 not this car wash because you guys are not the enemy. You are not, you are not doing a bad 2065 02:43:29,510 --> 02:43:38,770 thing by looking at a business model here. But this does not seem to me to be something that 2066 02:43:38,770 --> 02:43:47,530 will promote the greater good of the city of Winter Park. Thank you. Thank you. And Mr. Borenstein 2067 02:43:47,530 --> 02:43:52,470 your comments dot tell nicely into what I was going to say, which is it just in the 2068 02:43:52,470 --> 02:43:56,290 as the same for you, it was the first time that you've heard a lot of these objections. 2069 02:43:56,530 --> 02:44:01,550 It's really the first time we've heard them as well, unfortunately, and that I know that 2070 02:44:01,550 --> 02:44:04,770 there are residents here tonight that were outside the buffer area. 2071 02:44:06,090 --> 02:44:10,510 There was one resident here tonight that was at the community meeting, but it really wasn't 2072 02:44:10,510 --> 02:44:17,170 until we saw the online petition that we even knew that there was a really a sustained and 2073 02:44:17,170 --> 02:44:23,110 and sizable concern about the project and it wasn't until tonight that we heard those 2074 02:44:23,110 --> 02:44:29,830 concerns and like you that has an impact on on how we think about this project and what 2075 02:44:29,830 --> 02:44:34,570 might need to be done to potentially make it compatible with the neighborhood. 2076 02:44:35,170 --> 02:44:41,950 We would ask for a continuing to table in the results of that maybe that the team concludes 2077 02:44:42,730 --> 02:44:48,610 that it can't be made to address these concerns or that we don't move forward with it, 2078 02:44:48,710 --> 02:44:54,970 but it provides us with an opportunity to digest what we've heard tonight, and see if we can address 2079 02:44:54,970 --> 02:44:56,150 those concerns and revise. 2080 02:44:56,370 --> 02:44:58,450 I appreciate that. 2081 02:44:58,650 --> 02:44:59,970 Dan, is it- 2082 02:45:00,240 --> 02:45:19,500 Within my authority's chair to just, I mean, we've been through a lot tonight. We've heard from a lot of the members of the general public who came and spoke on the issue, I think you're entitled to an upper down vote, and I would say no to a tabling of it. Can I make that decision, you know, laterally, you're doing need to have a vote at the board? 2083 02:45:20,080 --> 02:45:21,660 It's the vote of the board. 2084 02:45:22,300 --> 02:45:24,840 The applicant's not entitled to a table, 2085 02:45:25,040 --> 02:45:26,980 and it's up to the board by vote. 2086 02:45:28,300 --> 02:45:29,020 Okay. Thank you, Mr. 2087 02:45:29,340 --> 02:45:30,040 Mr. Wood? 2088 02:45:30,420 --> 02:45:33,780 I mean, they could pull it from the agenda for city commission 2089 02:45:33,780 --> 02:45:35,780 prior to the meeting. Could they not? 2090 02:45:35,860 --> 02:45:37,400 They could do all the application, right? 2091 02:45:37,400 --> 02:45:39,840 They could withdraw the application before you vote. 2092 02:45:39,940 --> 02:45:41,440 If you start voting, they cannot. 2093 02:45:42,880 --> 02:45:45,080 But they could withdraw it right now. 2094 02:45:45,280 --> 02:45:47,420 They could withdraw it right now, before they start voting. 2095 02:45:48,820 --> 02:45:51,200 But then if they would draw, they have to start over. 2096 02:45:52,960 --> 02:45:59,700 The question, I'm sorry, was the question whether they can ask the commission the table? 2097 02:46:01,500 --> 02:46:01,780 Yeah. 2098 02:46:02,920 --> 02:46:06,200 This can go forward with a recommendation for denial. 2099 02:46:06,820 --> 02:46:06,860 Right. 2100 02:46:09,160 --> 02:46:13,100 Once it gets to the commission, if they ask the commission the table, they could table. 2101 02:46:13,580 --> 02:46:14,120 That's up the commission. 2102 02:46:14,120 --> 02:46:14,840 That's true. 2103 02:46:14,840 --> 02:46:20,780 Right. My opinion, though, is that these residents deserve an upper-down vote by this board, 2104 02:46:21,140 --> 02:46:26,280 tonight, what the applicant does with its application after that is up to the applicant, of course. 2105 02:46:27,640 --> 02:46:31,540 Okay, so there is a request by the applicant to table the application. 2106 02:46:34,180 --> 02:46:37,040 Is anybody on the board want to do that? 2107 02:46:37,240 --> 02:46:39,420 So please make a motion and we'll see if there's a second. 2108 02:46:41,500 --> 02:46:46,420 If they withdraw their application prior to a vote, what does that do to their timetable? 2109 02:46:47,720 --> 02:46:48,780 It's a sort of process all over. 2110 02:46:48,800 --> 02:46:49,960 Because they start the process all over. 2111 02:46:50,200 --> 02:46:55,720 Another community meeting, another advertising, another application fee. 2112 02:46:58,770 --> 02:47:00,130 The facts over Maine. 2113 02:47:00,550 --> 02:47:02,510 Would you like me to answer kind of what we might do? 2114 02:47:02,930 --> 02:47:04,310 Because this is a recommending body. 2115 02:47:04,510 --> 02:47:09,050 We wouldn't really wouldn't be any benefit to us with drawing it right now. 2116 02:47:10,230 --> 02:47:38,550 But we could always do that before City Commission, but what we've asked for is a tabling so that we can actually come back before you because you've done some of the brain damage to understand the issues here, and we'd like to present you with a revised plan, and I think you'd all remember, and we'd be able to show our progress and you could judge it just like you judged the first application today that came back to you. 2117 02:47:41,740 --> 02:47:42,700 Thank you, Mr. Love. 2118 02:47:44,560 --> 02:47:47,280 If anybody wants to make a motion to table, I'll entertain it. 2119 02:47:53,580 --> 02:47:57,900 Is there a motion to, with respect to the application itself? 2120 02:47:58,180 --> 02:47:59,460 I'm not hearing a motion to table. 2121 02:48:07,300 --> 02:48:08,860 You want to make the final motion, Mr. Bordstein? 2122 02:48:11,040 --> 02:48:12,560 Let's go through two ways. 2123 02:48:13,600 --> 02:48:16,860 I'll make a motion to table, which we can vote. 2124 02:48:17,380 --> 02:48:19,760 Is there a second on the motion to table? 2125 02:48:20,800 --> 02:48:24,040 And if there's no second, then it dies there. 2126 02:48:25,320 --> 02:48:30,060 I will recommend that we recommend the city council, then I hope. 2127 02:48:30,500 --> 02:48:30,880 That's okay. 2128 02:48:31,360 --> 02:48:35,980 So I didn't hear a second of the motion to table, so the motion fails for like a second. 2129 02:48:36,340 --> 02:48:37,460 I'll make a motion to the nine. 2130 02:48:40,370 --> 02:48:41,690 Billy, would you like to second it? 2131 02:48:41,750 --> 02:48:43,170 Is this the application? 2132 02:48:43,970 --> 02:48:44,150 Yes. 2133 02:48:44,650 --> 02:48:45,330 I'll take it. 2134 02:48:45,550 --> 02:48:50,270 And then just for the record, the recommendation to the analysis based on the comments 2135 02:48:50,270 --> 02:48:55,710 from the board collectively, since the motion that are articulated, but we do get a lot 2136 02:48:55,710 --> 02:48:56,650 of comments from the board. 2137 02:48:56,990 --> 02:49:02,730 Is that the intent of the motion to essentially wrap up all the members' comments on 2138 02:49:02,730 --> 02:49:03,970 the record with respect to the board? 2139 02:49:03,970 --> 02:49:06,390 Is the need like some specific reason? 2140 02:49:07,270 --> 02:49:13,610 It's helpful for the staff to communicate to the commission why you're making that recommendation. 2141 02:49:14,610 --> 02:49:23,030 My opinion is that above all, it was traffic, seems to be in the surrounded bulk to the surrounding neighborhoods, that's my opinion. 2142 02:49:23,730 --> 02:49:25,310 So, let me do this. 2143 02:49:25,930 --> 02:49:26,470 Will you withdraw? 2144 02:49:28,170 --> 02:49:33,210 I have in the past refrain from making motions myself. 2145 02:49:33,870 --> 02:49:41,950 In this situation, I think what I would like to do is go back to sort of what we used to do on the Board of Adjustments, 2146 02:49:41,950 --> 02:49:49,170 which is recommend approval so that no votes are very clear on what they mean when the city 2147 02:49:49,170 --> 02:49:54,690 commission hears it. Does that make sense? So if people, if I vote to approve and everybody 2148 02:49:54,690 --> 02:49:59,870 votes know, then there are six no votes in the city commission hears, it got six no votes. 2149 02:50:00,230 --> 02:50:09,330 Whereas if we vote to deny, and there are six yes votes, it's still denied, but I make a motion 2150 02:50:09,330 --> 02:50:17,890 to approve. May I interject, I'm sure. My concern is that, okay, so if you move to approve, 2151 02:50:18,150 --> 02:50:25,110 and that's denied, there isn't a decision at that point. You still have, there has to be a decision 2152 02:50:25,110 --> 02:50:30,490 because a motion to approve that's denied does not actually deny that. Oh, it's not making a 2153 02:50:30,490 --> 02:50:34,610 recommendation, okay. That's different. That's just different. That's the difference between 2154 02:50:34,610 --> 02:50:37,610 Yeah, are boarders for it, yes, you're right. 2155 02:50:37,950 --> 02:50:39,130 Thank you for that, Mr. Langley. 2156 02:50:39,910 --> 02:50:42,670 Okay, so we are sticking with the motion for tonight. 2157 02:50:43,490 --> 02:50:47,470 For the reasons for the stated in closed session by the members of the board. 2158 02:50:51,480 --> 02:50:52,360 Is there second? 2159 02:50:52,640 --> 02:50:53,040 Okay. 2160 02:50:54,020 --> 02:50:56,320 The motion is second. Can I have a roll call vote, please? 2161 02:50:56,920 --> 02:50:58,180 Yes, Mr. Dick. 2162 02:50:59,140 --> 02:51:00,100 Mr. Steinberg. 2163 02:51:00,240 --> 02:51:00,640 Hi. 2164 02:51:01,200 --> 02:51:01,760 Mr. Seigle. 2165 02:51:02,020 --> 02:51:02,300 Yes. 2166 02:51:02,600 --> 02:51:03,340 Mr. Seigle. 2167 02:51:03,340 --> 02:51:04,160 Yes. 2168 02:51:04,280 --> 02:51:05,460 Vice Chair Boycein? 2169 02:51:05,680 --> 02:51:05,820 Yes. 2170 02:51:06,260 --> 02:51:06,760 Chairman Johnson. 2171 02:51:07,160 --> 02:51:07,200 Aye. 2172 02:51:09,280 --> 02:51:10,120 Thank you. 2173 02:51:11,340 --> 02:51:15,880 Do we have any action items? 2174 02:51:19,630 --> 02:51:21,350 Do we have any other items on the agenda? 2175 02:51:22,930 --> 02:51:25,330 No, just the last split that was on your agenda, 2176 02:51:25,510 --> 02:51:26,570 that was withdrawn by the app. 2177 02:51:27,410 --> 02:51:29,110 And then to the plan moving forward with that 2178 02:51:29,110 --> 02:51:31,510 is to have a work session in June to talk about it. 2179 02:51:31,510 --> 02:51:33,490 And thank God for my ability to have dinner tonight 2180 02:51:33,490 --> 02:51:34,810 that it was what you wanted. 2181 02:51:35,210 --> 02:51:36,190 Right, I know. 2182 02:51:36,630 --> 02:51:37,290 Almost eight o'clock. 2183 02:51:38,090 --> 02:51:49,710 Let me take the opportunity under board comments to thank Vice Chairman Bornstein for his six years of service to this board and for a number of those years as chairman of this board. 2184 02:51:50,430 --> 02:51:53,670 I just sincerely appreciate your work and dedication. 2185 02:51:54,410 --> 02:51:56,530 We certainly invite you to the work session later this month. 2186 02:51:57,170 --> 02:51:57,770 Thank you very much. 2187 02:51:59,070 --> 02:52:01,710 Hopefully there will be somebody else that can. 2188 02:52:01,890 --> 02:52:03,350 Will we hope to see you in the future? 2189 02:52:03,350 --> 02:52:05,350 I'll second that one. 2190 02:52:07,130 --> 02:52:07,910 Okay, we return. 2191 02:52:08,210 --> 02:52:08,390 Yeah. 2192 02:52:08,870 --> 02:52:09,770 Thank you.