1 00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:23,280 Hello everyone. 2 00:01:23,280 --> 00:01:24,560 >> Hi. 3 00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:27,040 >> I don't I'm sorry it's at the ceiling. I 4 00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:28,799 don't have control about that camera, 5 00:01:28,799 --> 00:01:31,680 but you can see me in one of them. Um I 6 00:01:31,680 --> 00:01:33,600 know Lori's here. I'm sure she'll come 7 00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:36,880 down in a moment with her, myself, and 8 00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:38,960 Brandy. I believe that's enough for a 9 00:01:38,960 --> 00:01:42,320 quorum out of our five. 10 00:01:42,320 --> 00:01:44,640 I don't know whether or not Severin is 11 00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:47,280 going to join and didn't hear back from 12 00:01:47,280 --> 00:01:50,079 Chloe. So, at least be three of us 13 00:01:50,079 --> 00:01:52,079 voting. 14 00:01:52,079 --> 00:01:55,280 Um, but I have to wait for Lori to 15 00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:59,360 really start. So, we'll just Sorry. Hang 16 00:01:59,360 --> 00:03:25,190 tight for a minute. 17 00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:26,239 Hello. 18 00:03:26,239 --> 00:03:27,440 >> I lost out. 19 00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:29,200 >> Well, good. I know. I did, too. Well, 20 00:03:29,200 --> 00:03:32,400 Sean's here. I Lori is still not quite 21 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:35,760 here yet, but 22 00:03:35,760 --> 00:03:43,750 >> I'm glad we have another voting member. 23 00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:46,159 We're just hanging tight for Lori for a 24 00:03:46,159 --> 00:04:18,390 minute. 25 00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:20,479 Well, I think she's walking down. I will 26 00:04:20,479 --> 00:04:22,960 go ahead and call the meeting to order. 27 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:26,000 It's 503. 28 00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:28,880 Uh, let me write that down. 29 00:04:28,880 --> 00:04:31,520 I circulated meeting minutes in an email 30 00:04:31,520 --> 00:04:32,720 a few minutes ago. So, hopefully 31 00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:35,280 everybody had time to review that. My 32 00:04:35,280 --> 00:04:38,880 goal um today the agenda was sent out is 33 00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:40,880 to one approve our last meeting minutes 34 00:04:40,880 --> 00:04:44,400 from March 30th, 2026 and then also to 35 00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:46,800 do another review. We saw um you know 36 00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:50,320 the draft of the strategic plan um and 37 00:04:50,320 --> 00:04:55,199 matrix last meeting. Um 38 00:04:55,199 --> 00:04:59,600 we will consider it for approval today 39 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:02,560 as well as that one pager that Daniel 40 00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:05,919 sent over. um earlier this week and he 41 00:05:05,919 --> 00:05:07,600 could present that and we can review it 42 00:05:07,600 --> 00:05:10,000 together in this meeting before we move 43 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:14,560 into any sort of vote. But uh let's well 44 00:05:14,560 --> 00:05:18,639 first I'll uh this I am Kirsten Thompson 45 00:05:18,639 --> 00:05:21,039 the chairperson of the community 46 00:05:21,039 --> 00:05:23,520 development committee. Um also in 47 00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:28,080 attendance is Sever Johnson Lori Thomas. 48 00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:33,199 Uh Carrie Malovich is on the call as our 49 00:05:33,199 --> 00:05:36,960 um city council liaison as well as uh 50 00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:39,199 Brandy John's, community development 51 00:05:39,199 --> 00:05:41,759 committee member and we also have Daniel 52 00:05:41,759 --> 00:05:43,840 Jensen on the call from Sunrise 53 00:05:43,840 --> 00:05:48,230 Engineering. Um, 54 00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:50,320 if 55 00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:54,230 we could 56 00:05:54,240 --> 00:05:56,160 move to the next item on the agenda, 57 00:05:56,160 --> 00:05:58,800 approval of the March 30, 2026 meeting 58 00:05:58,800 --> 00:06:02,870 minutes. 59 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:05,919 Would anybody like to make a motion? 60 00:06:05,919 --> 00:06:07,440 I'll make a motion to approve the 61 00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:10,800 minutes of March 30th, 2026. 62 00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:13,600 >> And I'll second that. 63 00:06:13,600 --> 00:06:17,440 Sever and second. Uh, all in favor? 64 00:06:17,440 --> 00:06:20,880 >> I 65 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:23,280 >> Let me keep Randy. 66 00:06:23,280 --> 00:06:27,919 >> Okay. Uh, moving on to the next item. 67 00:06:27,919 --> 00:06:30,000 Daniel, if you'll just take a moment, if 68 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:32,000 we could just do a quick review again, 69 00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:35,360 show some of the updates. 70 00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:37,680 I know there nothing too substantial has 71 00:06:37,680 --> 00:06:40,880 changed, but um if we could just review 72 00:06:40,880 --> 00:06:42,560 those and then answer any questions, 73 00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:44,240 we'll start there. 74 00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:45,919 >> Do you want me to share my screen so 75 00:06:45,919 --> 00:06:48,080 people can see the 76 00:06:48,080 --> 00:06:50,479 >> uh Are we talking about the Excel draft? 77 00:06:50,479 --> 00:06:52,240 >> Let's do both. Let's start with the 78 00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:54,639 Excel draft and then we'll go over the 79 00:06:54,639 --> 00:06:57,039 one page. Well, whatever it is, one or 80 00:06:57,039 --> 00:07:00,080 two pager. Um yeah, let's start with 81 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:01,440 that Excel draft. If you could share 82 00:07:01,440 --> 00:07:03,039 your screen, that would be helpful for 83 00:07:03,039 --> 00:07:06,479 the rest of us. Okay. Here 84 00:07:06,479 --> 00:07:08,880 we go. So, as a reminder for everyone, 85 00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:10,720 we've been working on the general plan, 86 00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:12,319 planning commission's reviewing that's 87 00:07:12,319 --> 00:07:14,560 going to go to council for review. And 88 00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:17,440 the strategic plan outlines the goals 89 00:07:17,440 --> 00:07:20,319 that we are focusing on in the more 90 00:07:20,319 --> 00:07:22,560 immediate future over the next one to 91 00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:26,000 three years. And so, this document 92 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:28,319 outlines those goals. We have the 93 00:07:28,319 --> 00:07:30,639 corresponding chapter in the general 94 00:07:30,639 --> 00:07:33,039 plan that these goals relate to. What 95 00:07:33,039 --> 00:07:35,840 the specific action step is, which 96 00:07:35,840 --> 00:07:38,560 general plan goal it relates to. 97 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:41,280 Sometimes it's close to verbatim to the 98 00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:43,280 same goal. Other times it's maybe a 99 00:07:43,280 --> 00:07:46,160 little bit broader and encapsulates 100 00:07:46,160 --> 00:07:48,720 multiple goals. Other times this action 101 00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:50,880 step is more specific, right? And we may 102 00:07:50,880 --> 00:07:53,520 have one or two action steps uh to point 103 00:07:53,520 --> 00:07:55,680 us toward one of the general plan goals. 104 00:07:55,680 --> 00:07:58,160 So, they don't always perfectly align 105 00:07:58,160 --> 00:08:00,479 and that's just the nature of tasks, you 106 00:08:00,479 --> 00:08:01,440 know. Um, 107 00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:03,039 >> Daniel, could I interrupt you for a 108 00:08:03,039 --> 00:08:05,840 moment? This isn't the I don't I don't 109 00:08:05,840 --> 00:08:08,400 necessarily mind about the not the color 110 00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:09,840 coding, but this doesn't look like the 111 00:08:09,840 --> 00:08:12,080 version I sent that was a table. 112 00:08:12,080 --> 00:08:14,000 >> Yeah, you're right. Let's see. I have 113 00:08:14,000 --> 00:08:15,440 >> Sorry to interrupt you. 114 00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:17,840 >> Yeah. Um, 115 00:08:17,840 --> 00:08:24,230 you are right. Let's see. 116 00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:26,400 But I did like your explanation on how 117 00:08:26,400 --> 00:08:30,080 the goals are possibly the same or 118 00:08:30,080 --> 00:08:31,599 different because that that was one of 119 00:08:31,599 --> 00:08:34,000 my questions on how the strategic goals 120 00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:36,159 were different from the goals in the 121 00:08:36,159 --> 00:08:39,360 general plan. 122 00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:41,919 >> Yeah. And it needs to be updated as 123 00:08:41,919 --> 00:08:44,800 tasks move along, right? 124 00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:46,640 >> Sorry, what were you saying, Kirsten? 125 00:08:46,640 --> 00:08:48,160 Well, I feel like what you were saying 126 00:08:48,160 --> 00:08:51,600 is that you were talking about column C, 127 00:08:51,600 --> 00:08:54,320 which is pointing to 128 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:56,000 >> what 129 00:08:56,000 --> 00:08:59,360 goal in the general plan the action step 130 00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:03,440 aligns with most closely. 131 00:09:03,440 --> 00:09:04,959 >> Yes, we have the action step and then 132 00:09:04,959 --> 00:09:08,320 the Yeah. And these don't always 133 00:09:08,320 --> 00:09:11,200 match verbatim, right? 134 00:09:11,200 --> 00:09:14,880 Um, so let's see. Oh, Kirsten, you sent 135 00:09:14,880 --> 00:09:16,720 it to me. I think what happened is I 136 00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:18,800 didn't 137 00:09:18,800 --> 00:09:20,959 save it in the file. So, let me pull up 138 00:09:20,959 --> 00:09:24,320 my email. Sorry. 139 00:09:24,320 --> 00:09:25,760 >> Yeah, if you you're welcome to not 140 00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:27,440 screen share if you don't want all of 141 00:09:27,440 --> 00:09:28,480 this. 142 00:09:28,480 --> 00:09:30,320 >> Yeah. Right now, are you just you're 143 00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:31,760 just seeing my one screen, right? Or do 144 00:09:31,760 --> 00:09:33,360 you see both? 145 00:09:33,360 --> 00:09:34,959 >> Uh just the one. 146 00:09:34,959 --> 00:09:37,600 >> Okay. 147 00:09:37,600 --> 00:09:39,760 >> He has a hidden screen. Yeah, 148 00:09:39,760 --> 00:09:48,470 >> I do. I have two monitors. 149 00:09:48,480 --> 00:09:50,560 While we're waiting, I'm I'm on my way 150 00:09:50,560 --> 00:09:52,880 driving home and the elk are kind of by 151 00:09:52,880 --> 00:09:54,720 the mailboxes. It's nice to see them 152 00:09:54,720 --> 00:10:04,070 out. 153 00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:14,230 Here 154 00:10:14,240 --> 00:10:14,959 we go. 155 00:10:14,959 --> 00:10:16,720 >> So, this is the one that you're talking 156 00:10:16,720 --> 00:10:20,079 about, the one on the right. Yes. 157 00:10:20,079 --> 00:10:21,120 >> Okay. 158 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:22,320 >> There you go. 159 00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:23,920 >> There we go. 160 00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:26,720 >> Okay. So, 161 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:29,360 >> if you're familiar with Excel, so the 162 00:10:29,360 --> 00:10:32,720 top allows you to then filter 163 00:10:32,720 --> 00:10:34,800 um like if you're planning commission 164 00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:36,880 and responsible parties, you could 165 00:10:36,880 --> 00:10:38,720 filter by just anything that applies to 166 00:10:38,720 --> 00:10:40,480 the planning commission. Or if you're 167 00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:42,560 like city council, what are things that 168 00:10:42,560 --> 00:10:45,200 are immediate? Then you could filter by 169 00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:46,560 things that immediately need to be 170 00:10:46,560 --> 00:10:47,120 looked at. 171 00:10:47,120 --> 00:10:48,480 >> How do you do that? Show. 172 00:10:48,480 --> 00:10:51,120 >> So, the little square on the each 173 00:10:51,120 --> 00:10:54,320 column. Um, that one's probably not like 174 00:10:54,320 --> 00:10:56,079 the best example. Go to responsible 175 00:10:56,079 --> 00:10:57,600 parties. 176 00:10:57,600 --> 00:10:59,279 >> Right here. Here we go. 177 00:10:59,279 --> 00:11:01,839 >> And then you would just click whichever 178 00:11:01,839 --> 00:11:02,640 one. 179 00:11:02,640 --> 00:11:05,360 >> We'd want these to be like as close as, 180 00:11:05,360 --> 00:11:07,360 you know, consolidated cuz it's going to 181 00:11:07,360 --> 00:11:09,519 be unique, like if there was spaces or 182 00:11:09,519 --> 00:11:10,959 something and 183 00:11:10,959 --> 00:11:13,680 >> it's going to then have Ted and Dave as 184 00:11:13,680 --> 00:11:15,920 two different things. But I think those 185 00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:20,079 mostly are not repeats. So anyway, and 186 00:11:20,079 --> 00:11:23,600 then um if if you scroll a little bit 187 00:11:23,600 --> 00:11:26,560 and I don't know, feel free to give your 188 00:11:26,560 --> 00:11:30,000 opinion. I do not necessarily want to 189 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:31,680 die on the hill of these being 190 00:11:31,680 --> 00:11:34,480 colorcoded, but I didn't know if it if 191 00:11:34,480 --> 00:11:36,399 it was easier from a visual standpoint 192 00:11:36,399 --> 00:11:39,440 to kind of see the different 193 00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:41,279 uh topics 194 00:11:41,279 --> 00:11:43,040 um visually 195 00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:44,959 with separation of color or 196 00:11:44,959 --> 00:11:47,519 >> I like the color coding, but 197 00:11:47,519 --> 00:11:48,560 >> if it's too busy, 198 00:11:48,560 --> 00:11:50,640 >> it might not work when it's if it gets 199 00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:53,279 printed that would be too that it makes 200 00:11:53,279 --> 00:11:55,839 it hard to read, but if it's just in a 201 00:11:55,839 --> 00:11:58,480 electronic form arm. It's all right. 202 00:11:58,480 --> 00:11:59,600 >> Yeah. 203 00:11:59,600 --> 00:12:01,760 So, I don't have a strong opinion 204 00:12:01,760 --> 00:12:03,600 about that. If you don't want the color 205 00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:04,880 coding or if you guys feel like that's 206 00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:09,440 not going to be effective, but um 207 00:12:09,440 --> 00:12:13,360 Yeah. So, any opinions on the look and 208 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:17,910 feel of this so far? 209 00:12:17,920 --> 00:12:20,720 Do we like it as is? 210 00:12:20,720 --> 00:12:23,760 I think most of this was input by, you 211 00:12:23,760 --> 00:12:25,680 know, Daniel meeting with Ted and 212 00:12:25,680 --> 00:12:29,200 meeting with um 213 00:12:29,200 --> 00:12:30,959 I don't know if you were able to get 214 00:12:30,959 --> 00:12:32,880 insights back. I It sounded like you 215 00:12:32,880 --> 00:12:34,320 were waiting to hear back if Wayne was 216 00:12:34,320 --> 00:12:37,120 going to get back to you. 217 00:12:37,120 --> 00:12:39,519 >> Yeah. So, I've not heard back. Um I've 218 00:12:39,519 --> 00:12:45,200 not met with Wayne. Also, uh PTR, 219 00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:47,279 I think it's PTR, not PRT. I always get 220 00:12:47,279 --> 00:12:51,760 that mixed up. PTR. Um, I have not heard 221 00:12:51,760 --> 00:12:55,440 back from them. I don't believe they had 222 00:12:55,440 --> 00:12:59,360 another meeting here in April. So, yeah, 223 00:12:59,360 --> 00:13:02,079 I don't know if it would change much. 224 00:13:02,079 --> 00:13:04,320 Um, 225 00:13:04,320 --> 00:13:06,160 >> yeah. 226 00:13:06,160 --> 00:13:09,839 >> Okay. Well, if we feel comfortable, this 227 00:13:09,839 --> 00:13:12,000 is supposed to be a living breathing 228 00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:13,680 document. It's not supposed to be 229 00:13:13,680 --> 00:13:15,519 something that 230 00:13:15,519 --> 00:13:18,560 um our committee they can't we want to 231 00:13:18,560 --> 00:13:20,079 be able to pass it forward to the city 232 00:13:20,079 --> 00:13:22,560 council and for them to add in tasks or 233 00:13:22,560 --> 00:13:24,399 work with the PTR committee to add in 234 00:13:24,399 --> 00:13:27,680 tasks um that they feel like will then 235 00:13:27,680 --> 00:13:29,279 help them accomplish the goals of the 236 00:13:29,279 --> 00:13:32,079 general plan. So, if we feel comfortable 237 00:13:32,079 --> 00:13:34,320 that this at least provides a starting 238 00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:38,079 point for council and city employees to 239 00:13:38,079 --> 00:13:40,800 be a a usable 240 00:13:40,800 --> 00:13:44,000 um city tracker 241 00:13:44,000 --> 00:13:45,519 um 242 00:13:45,519 --> 00:13:47,279 are there any thoughts about that? How 243 00:13:47,279 --> 00:13:49,760 do we feel about that? 244 00:13:49,760 --> 00:13:52,160 Okay. So, is there a way to make the top 245 00:13:52,160 --> 00:13:55,120 um row frozen so that as you scroll down 246 00:13:55,120 --> 00:13:57,040 it will always be visible? 247 00:13:57,040 --> 00:14:01,680 >> Good call. Um cuz I forget what column 248 00:14:01,680 --> 00:14:02,560 I'm in. 249 00:14:02,560 --> 00:14:07,040 >> It should be in view I think. 250 00:14:07,040 --> 00:14:10,480 And then freeze panes 251 00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:12,079 and 252 00:14:12,079 --> 00:14:14,560 kind of top row. 253 00:14:14,560 --> 00:14:22,790 Good thinking. Okay. And then 254 00:14:22,800 --> 00:14:24,959 so how are the general plan goals and 255 00:14:24,959 --> 00:14:28,079 the strategic plan goals? I mean, are 256 00:14:28,079 --> 00:14:29,120 they this? 257 00:14:29,120 --> 00:14:31,839 >> There aren't strategic plan goals. 258 00:14:31,839 --> 00:14:33,839 There's action steps 259 00:14:33,839 --> 00:14:36,560 >> that align with the general plan. 260 00:14:36,560 --> 00:14:38,079 >> Yes. So, these are the steps they're 261 00:14:38,079 --> 00:14:39,839 going to take and who's responsible for 262 00:14:39,839 --> 00:14:44,710 them to then get to the plan goal. 263 00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:47,839 » Any other is that as an action is 264 00:14:47,839 --> 00:14:49,920 completed, we would move to the next 265 00:14:49,920 --> 00:14:52,800 step. Right? The goals always stay the 266 00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:55,360 same until the goal is checked off. But 267 00:14:55,360 --> 00:14:58,720 this document would be um updated 268 00:14:58,720 --> 00:15:01,920 frequently hopefully, right? Hopefully 269 00:15:01,920 --> 00:15:03,760 actions get checked off and new ones get 270 00:15:03,760 --> 00:15:06,720 added on and two to three years from now 271 00:15:06,720 --> 00:15:09,199 this document looks very different. 272 00:15:09,199 --> 00:15:11,839 >> And maybe to help in the status column, 273 00:15:11,839 --> 00:15:14,160 should we just put in progress on all of 274 00:15:14,160 --> 00:15:16,320 them and then as they get completed 275 00:15:16,320 --> 00:15:18,399 they, you know, whoever completes it 276 00:15:18,399 --> 00:15:20,079 feels like they can then switch it to 277 00:15:20,079 --> 00:15:22,800 complete. 278 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:25,040 >> Yeah. either that or they remove it. So 279 00:15:25,040 --> 00:15:26,480 I Yeah, I don't 280 00:15:26,480 --> 00:15:27,920 >> I would think you'd want a record 281 00:15:27,920 --> 00:15:31,110 though. 282 00:15:31,120 --> 00:15:32,560 » So I don't know if I would suggest 283 00:15:32,560 --> 00:15:34,079 removing it, but that'll be up I 284 00:15:34,079 --> 00:15:35,680 whatever that's up to the city council. 285 00:15:35,680 --> 00:15:37,839 >> I kind of I kind of like that idea of 286 00:15:37,839 --> 00:15:41,279 having that um in progress or completed 287 00:15:41,279 --> 00:15:44,560 so that it could continue to be shown. 288 00:15:44,560 --> 00:15:47,199 So if anyone comes back and says, "Oh, 289 00:15:47,199 --> 00:15:48,480 what are you working on? Well, we 290 00:15:48,480 --> 00:15:50,720 finished this. Now we're on to this." 291 00:15:50,720 --> 00:15:53,199 And then it shows the history as well of 292 00:15:53,199 --> 00:15:58,079 what's been done as well as the current. 293 00:15:58,079 --> 00:16:00,320 >> Yeah. Uh there looks like there was a 294 00:16:00,320 --> 00:16:03,279 hand raised if 295 00:16:03,279 --> 00:16:05,680 you would like to ask. 296 00:16:05,680 --> 00:16:07,759 >> Thank you. I love the idea of being able 297 00:16:07,759 --> 00:16:10,240 to track. I think it would also be 298 00:16:10,240 --> 00:16:12,720 helpful to have either the committee 299 00:16:12,720 --> 00:16:14,399 name 300 00:16:14,399 --> 00:16:18,639 or some identifier if you want to get 301 00:16:18,639 --> 00:16:20,240 more information. you know how to 302 00:16:20,240 --> 00:16:22,560 quickly just right here you look at the 303 00:16:22,560 --> 00:16:24,000 spreadsheet you know where we're at you 304 00:16:24,000 --> 00:16:26,800 know who's working on it 305 00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:29,040 and I think the archival needs to be 306 00:16:29,040 --> 00:16:31,440 accessed access to like if it was 307 00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:35,360 completed there needs to be a way to see 308 00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:37,360 what the steps were because hopefully 309 00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:43,360 there's also notes of what you know the outcome analysis did 310 00:16:43,360 --> 00:16:45,839 we like there was this element that we 311 00:16:45,839 --> 00:16:49,040 wouldn't do again because of blink blink 312 00:16:49,040 --> 00:16:52,240 Anyway, just my input 313 00:16:52,240 --> 00:16:53,759 >> and I tried to come in but the outside 314 00:16:53,759 --> 00:16:55,759 door is locked. 315 00:16:55,759 --> 00:16:58,320 >> Oh, I had to come through to the office 316 00:16:58,320 --> 00:16:59,279 door. 317 00:16:59,279 --> 00:17:08,230 >> Yeah, I had to do that, too. Um, 318 00:17:08,240 --> 00:17:11,120 » maybe we add like a Well, the person you 319 00:17:11,120 --> 00:17:12,640 would contact would be the responsible 320 00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:13,679 party. 321 00:17:13,679 --> 00:17:15,360 >> Do you want there be a place though if 322 00:17:15,360 --> 00:17:20,230 there's like notes? You know, if there's 323 00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:24,640 like she's like outcomes or issues or 324 00:17:24,640 --> 00:17:26,480 things that would that you would want to 325 00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:28,480 record any sort of additional 326 00:17:28,480 --> 00:17:29,280 information 327 00:17:29,280 --> 00:17:31,280 >> maybe just notes. Yeah. And then you can 328 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:31,760 put 329 00:17:31,760 --> 00:17:34,080 >> well and I think some of them would be 330 00:17:34,080 --> 00:17:35,919 internal notes because you don't 331 00:17:35,919 --> 00:17:38,799 necessarily need everything there 332 00:17:38,799 --> 00:17:42,640 showing the steps but at least um the 333 00:17:42,640 --> 00:17:45,120 progress um that the steps that are 334 00:17:45,120 --> 00:17:48,320 important and then the the finished um 335 00:17:48,320 --> 00:17:49,919 because otherwise it would take up a lot 336 00:17:49,919 --> 00:17:51,840 of room that aren't maybe aren't 337 00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:54,160 necessary but we still want the record 338 00:17:54,160 --> 00:17:59,909 that it's been done and maybe how um 339 00:17:59,919 --> 00:18:01,360 » process 340 00:18:01,360 --> 00:18:03,520 I would just say just delete out 341 00:18:03,520 --> 00:18:05,200 >> Go ahead. Oh, go just delete out some of 342 00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:06,799 those notes on the side there in that 343 00:18:06,799 --> 00:18:08,160 side column because I think those were 344 00:18:08,160 --> 00:18:13,120 from our last meeting. And then um 345 00:18:13,120 --> 00:18:15,840 Okay. So, I feel like the notes I think 346 00:18:15,840 --> 00:18:20,000 would cover if there's any need for 347 00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:25,520 um whoever's working on that to add 348 00:18:25,520 --> 00:18:27,520 if there's issues, outcomes, things that 349 00:18:27,520 --> 00:18:29,280 are different 350 00:18:29,280 --> 00:18:34,480 um that changed and maybe why so 351 00:18:34,480 --> 00:18:35,760 would it be 352 00:18:35,760 --> 00:18:38,400 >> the difference is between the difference 353 00:18:38,400 --> 00:18:40,799 is between if if it's something that's 354 00:18:40,799 --> 00:18:43,120 being worked on that's more of a draft 355 00:18:43,120 --> 00:18:46,640 that may change compared to 356 00:18:46,640 --> 00:18:50,960 um what happened and and why or or 357 00:18:50,960 --> 00:18:53,120 something because remember all of these 358 00:18:53,120 --> 00:18:55,840 are public documents and sometimes if 359 00:18:55,840 --> 00:18:57,440 you have a public document that's 360 00:18:57,440 --> 00:19:01,360 working document um if it's if it's 361 00:19:01,360 --> 00:19:03,440 really only a draft and somebody takes 362 00:19:03,440 --> 00:19:05,919 it as if it's already been completed it 363 00:19:05,919 --> 00:19:09,679 could be a problem in communication so I 364 00:19:09,679 --> 00:19:11,520 would rather communicate what we 365 00:19:11,520 --> 00:19:15,600 actually have done not what we hope. Um, 366 00:19:15,600 --> 00:19:18,400 and make sure that those notes are more 367 00:19:18,400 --> 00:19:21,600 of a completion outline rather than a I 368 00:19:21,600 --> 00:19:23,840 think we're going to do because we don't 369 00:19:23,840 --> 00:19:26,320 want to get one of our employees saying, 370 00:19:26,320 --> 00:19:27,760 "Oh, well, I wrote that I was going to 371 00:19:27,760 --> 00:19:29,039 do this." And then the council says, 372 00:19:29,039 --> 00:19:30,640 "Well, no, we're not doing it that way 373 00:19:30,640 --> 00:19:33,360 or we don't have budget or whatever." 374 00:19:33,360 --> 00:19:35,280 That's confusing for residents. I'd 375 00:19:35,280 --> 00:19:44,390 rather it be this is what we've done. 376 00:19:44,400 --> 00:19:47,120 There we go. Project completion notes. 377 00:19:47,120 --> 00:19:50,240 And and I think that's like optional. 378 00:19:50,240 --> 00:19:51,520 I don't think that's something that they 379 00:19:51,520 --> 00:19:53,919 have to use, but if they feel like it's 380 00:19:53,919 --> 00:19:56,240 useful to add any other context, they 381 00:19:56,240 --> 00:19:58,400 have a place to do it. 382 00:19:58,400 --> 00:20:01,600 Um, okay. Well, let's then just review 383 00:20:01,600 --> 00:20:06,240 the other one, the word document. If 384 00:20:06,240 --> 00:20:07,840 there's no other questions or comments 385 00:20:07,840 --> 00:20:11,679 on that strategic plan 386 00:20:11,679 --> 00:20:14,400 matrix, 387 00:20:14,400 --> 00:20:17,520 >> I really liked this one pager, Danielle. 388 00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:20,000 I thought you capsulated it all in a 389 00:20:20,000 --> 00:20:23,600 very very thoughtful way. Um, any 390 00:20:23,600 --> 00:20:25,840 citizen who looks at that is going to be 391 00:20:25,840 --> 00:20:28,720 able to see that the structure and that 392 00:20:28,720 --> 00:20:30,720 it's reviewed and this is what it does 393 00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:33,440 and doesn't do. I really I really like 394 00:20:33,440 --> 00:20:37,360 this for our public facing and then as 395 00:20:37,360 --> 00:20:40,559 anyone has um questions they can contact 396 00:20:40,559 --> 00:20:42,960 the person that's going to be 397 00:20:42,960 --> 00:20:44,880 implementing or completing those 398 00:20:44,880 --> 00:20:49,750 projects. 399 00:20:49,760 --> 00:20:52,880 Agreed. I think it helps to show that 400 00:20:52,880 --> 00:20:55,760 this isn't trying to add goals in 401 00:20:55,760 --> 00:20:57,280 addition to the general plan. This is 402 00:20:57,280 --> 00:21:00,080 actionable steps that are 403 00:21:00,080 --> 00:21:01,919 translating into those general plan 404 00:21:01,919 --> 00:21:06,240 goals. And um I like that it outlines 405 00:21:06,240 --> 00:21:09,039 that there'll be a formal review and 406 00:21:09,039 --> 00:21:16,789 update um by staff annual. And 407 00:21:16,799 --> 00:21:18,880 I don't know I don't anything else 408 00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:21,280 anybody else comments questions about 409 00:21:21,280 --> 00:21:26,710 this feedback? 410 00:21:26,720 --> 00:21:30,640 It's so good. That's my comment. It is 411 00:21:30,640 --> 00:21:34,480 so good. It is so such an easier read. 412 00:21:34,480 --> 00:21:37,520 It is clean. It is professional. I'm 413 00:21:37,520 --> 00:21:40,559 really really impressed. 414 00:21:40,559 --> 00:21:43,200 >> I'm glad you like it, Diana. 415 00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:45,039 >> Thanks, Carrie. 416 00:21:45,039 --> 00:21:47,280 >> Well, thank you both. 417 00:21:47,280 --> 00:21:49,760 Well, you know, and as we get new new 418 00:21:49,760 --> 00:21:52,799 council people in the future and they 419 00:21:52,799 --> 00:21:55,360 the onboarding won't be as hard because 420 00:21:55,360 --> 00:21:58,240 the structure is there and then if they 421 00:21:58,240 --> 00:22:03,840 have a particular assignment, they'll be able to figure it out. 422 00:22:03,840 --> 00:22:07,280 >> Yeah. Well, um, if there's no other 423 00:22:07,280 --> 00:22:11,200 comments, questions, concerns, need for 424 00:22:11,200 --> 00:22:12,799 discussion, 425 00:22:12,799 --> 00:22:14,799 um, 426 00:22:14,799 --> 00:22:17,760 would we like to would anyone like to 427 00:22:17,760 --> 00:22:21,830 motion? 428 00:22:21,840 --> 00:22:24,720 » Um, I'll make 429 00:22:24,720 --> 00:22:27,919 what I'll do is 430 00:22:27,919 --> 00:22:30,159 >> go ahead, Daniel. So what I'll do then 431 00:22:30,159 --> 00:22:32,880 is I put this in in design within the 432 00:22:32,880 --> 00:22:34,960 general plan 433 00:22:34,960 --> 00:22:36,960 um right at the very beginning before 434 00:22:36,960 --> 00:22:40,640 chapter one right as like a standalone. 435 00:22:40,640 --> 00:22:45,840 It's not going to be part of the same um 436 00:22:45,840 --> 00:22:48,400 numbering system. So it' be like a Roman 437 00:22:48,400 --> 00:22:51,679 numeral like two or three whatever like 438 00:22:51,679 --> 00:22:53,200 right at right right after the table of 439 00:22:53,200 --> 00:22:54,640 contents or before the table of contents 440 00:22:54,640 --> 00:22:57,200 of the general plan. Right. 441 00:22:57,200 --> 00:23:00,400 Well, let's let's understand that. Are 442 00:23:00,400 --> 00:23:02,559 there are there feelings about that? It 443 00:23:02,559 --> 00:23:04,799 seemed like there was some that wanted 444 00:23:04,799 --> 00:23:07,280 this to be concurrent with the general 445 00:23:07,280 --> 00:23:10,240 plan and and part of it. Are there any 446 00:23:10,240 --> 00:23:12,159 opinions where they feel like it should 447 00:23:12,159 --> 00:23:14,799 be separate and is that a bother to 448 00:23:14,799 --> 00:23:16,720 anybody that would it would be part of 449 00:23:16,720 --> 00:23:19,039 that first few pages of the general 450 00:23:19,039 --> 00:23:20,720 plan? 451 00:23:20,720 --> 00:23:22,799 >> I think we're talking that the one the 452 00:23:22,799 --> 00:23:25,280 one pager would be in that general plan. 453 00:23:25,280 --> 00:23:28,159 the specifics would not the table the 454 00:23:28,159 --> 00:23:30,080 table will not be part of it but the 455 00:23:30,080 --> 00:23:33,200 that one pager is is um I think that 456 00:23:33,200 --> 00:23:35,520 would be helpful to have that at the 457 00:23:35,520 --> 00:23:38,880 beginning um just to showcase that it is 458 00:23:38,880 --> 00:23:40,640 in conjunction with but it's a 459 00:23:40,640 --> 00:23:45,270 standalone document 460 00:23:45,280 --> 00:23:47,120 » so maybe right after the table of 461 00:23:47,120 --> 00:23:50,320 contents before chapter one 462 00:23:50,320 --> 00:23:52,880 >> yeah just to show that there is action 463 00:23:52,880 --> 00:23:54,320 because I think that's what a lot of 464 00:23:54,320 --> 00:23:56,880 people don't realiz is we have a general 465 00:23:56,880 --> 00:23:59,440 plan but and people will say okay that's 466 00:23:59,440 --> 00:24:02,080 good until the next time but that will 467 00:24:02,080 --> 00:24:04,400 show that there's actually action steps 468 00:24:04,400 --> 00:24:06,720 being taken with regards to the general 469 00:24:06,720 --> 00:24:09,679 plan but it won't show any specifics of 470 00:24:09,679 --> 00:24:12,080 what action is being taken at the moment 471 00:24:12,080 --> 00:24:14,080 because that will depend on the action 472 00:24:14,080 --> 00:24:19,510 item itself in the other document. 473 00:24:19,520 --> 00:24:21,919 » Okay. Well, 474 00:24:21,919 --> 00:24:23,679 any comments on that? Do we need to 475 00:24:23,679 --> 00:24:26,640 change the cover so that it like go back 476 00:24:26,640 --> 00:24:29,440 to the cover the very front like does it 477 00:24:29,440 --> 00:24:31,760 need to say Wooden Hills general plan 478 00:24:31,760 --> 00:24:35,120 and I mean put both documents listed 479 00:24:35,120 --> 00:24:36,720 there? 480 00:24:36,720 --> 00:24:38,159 >> I don't think so because we're not 481 00:24:38,159 --> 00:24:39,919 putting the other one in there. We're 482 00:24:39,919 --> 00:24:41,600 just going to put this one sheet that 483 00:24:41,600 --> 00:24:44,000 says it's going to be its own document. 484 00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:46,960 But that but it is just the general 485 00:24:46,960 --> 00:24:49,279 plan. It's it the strategic plan will 486 00:24:49,279 --> 00:24:51,520 not be a part of but because they're two 487 00:24:51,520 --> 00:24:53,679 for two different audiences. The general 488 00:24:53,679 --> 00:24:56,880 plan is is as you would say owned by the 489 00:24:56,880 --> 00:24:59,600 planning commission um with approval of 490 00:24:59,600 --> 00:25:01,600 the council where the strategic plan is 491 00:25:01,600 --> 00:25:04,320 a standalone document for the council 492 00:25:04,320 --> 00:25:06,880 than to dictate to themselves or to 493 00:25:06,880 --> 00:25:09,440 staff on action items. 494 00:25:09,440 --> 00:25:12,640 >> Is it confusing that it's just suddenly 495 00:25:12,640 --> 00:25:15,279 in there? There's 496 00:25:15,279 --> 00:25:17,520 um should it be like incorporated into 497 00:25:17,520 --> 00:25:21,440 that introduction section 498 00:25:21,440 --> 00:25:23,039 >> or we could put it as one of the 499 00:25:23,039 --> 00:25:26,799 appendix at the end as an appendix 500 00:25:26,799 --> 00:25:27,360 whichever. 501 00:25:27,360 --> 00:25:29,120 >> Yeah, I feel like that's almost better 502 00:25:29,120 --> 00:25:30,960 just like Yeah, 503 00:25:30,960 --> 00:25:32,799 >> I feel like it would be kind of odd to 504 00:25:32,799 --> 00:25:34,320 like you open it all a sudden there's a 505 00:25:34,320 --> 00:25:35,760 strategic plan but you don't really see 506 00:25:35,760 --> 00:25:38,080 anything about it. 507 00:25:38,080 --> 00:25:40,640 >> It's just kind of a Yeah, I like the 508 00:25:40,640 --> 00:25:45,350 appendix. Okay. 509 00:25:45,360 --> 00:25:47,840 » Okay. Well, anything else to settle, 510 00:25:47,840 --> 00:25:49,279 Daniel? 511 00:25:49,279 --> 00:25:51,200 >> I don't think so. 512 00:25:51,200 --> 00:25:55,520 >> Um, if we feel good about that one, that 513 00:25:55,520 --> 00:25:58,559 word document being added into as an 514 00:25:58,559 --> 00:26:01,200 appendix item to the general plan, just 515 00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:03,520 saying that the city has a strategic 516 00:26:03,520 --> 00:26:05,279 plan matrix and this is kind of what it 517 00:26:05,279 --> 00:26:09,200 does and what it is. And then we provide 518 00:26:09,200 --> 00:26:11,760 to the city that working file that 519 00:26:11,760 --> 00:26:15,600 allows them to track uh actionable steps 520 00:26:15,600 --> 00:26:18,799 leading toward the general plan goals 521 00:26:18,799 --> 00:26:23,919 um for their use if desired. So if we 522 00:26:23,919 --> 00:26:27,360 all feel good about those things, 523 00:26:27,360 --> 00:26:31,679 would anybody like to motion to approve 524 00:26:31,679 --> 00:26:33,760 >> the strategic plan? 525 00:26:33,760 --> 00:26:36,240 >> This is Diana again. I can't mo move, 526 00:26:36,240 --> 00:26:37,760 but I had one more comment. I'll lower 527 00:26:37,760 --> 00:26:38,320 my hand. 528 00:26:38,320 --> 00:26:39,440 >> Go ahead. 529 00:26:39,440 --> 00:26:41,840 >> I It is 530 00:26:41,840 --> 00:26:46,080 I You guys are just gonna see I I'm tr 531 00:26:46,080 --> 00:26:47,760 showing my true self. I really cannot 532 00:26:47,760 --> 00:26:51,039 stand if the doc any document if someone 533 00:26:51,039 --> 00:26:52,480 were to pick it up that and it's 534 00:26:52,480 --> 00:26:55,200 important like this pick it up and it's 535 00:26:55,200 --> 00:26:56,640 out of context. They don't know what it 536 00:26:56,640 --> 00:26:59,200 is. Can we 537 00:26:59,200 --> 00:27:01,760 maybe the bottom of every single page 538 00:27:01,760 --> 00:27:05,679 Woodland Hills, Utah, you know? identify 539 00:27:05,679 --> 00:27:08,320 at least where it is. Like just seeing 540 00:27:08,320 --> 00:27:10,480 Woodland Hills strategic plan overview 541 00:27:10,480 --> 00:27:12,320 is triggering for me and I don't I don't 542 00:27:12,320 --> 00:27:14,799 want to be I already show I'm already 543 00:27:14,799 --> 00:27:16,640 showing my craziness, but Woodland 544 00:27:16,640 --> 00:27:19,200 Hills, Utah feels more appropriate. I 545 00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:20,640 just think we need to be careful that we 546 00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:22,720 don't leave out something that if 547 00:27:22,720 --> 00:27:24,960 someone were to 548 00:27:24,960 --> 00:27:26,559 >> take it out of context, 549 00:27:26,559 --> 00:27:28,240 >> they just don't have enough info to put 550 00:27:28,240 --> 00:27:30,960 it where it belongs. That that's a great 551 00:27:30,960 --> 00:27:33,279 idea because I actually get quite a co 552 00:27:33,279 --> 00:27:34,799 few calls from Woodland Hills, 553 00:27:34,799 --> 00:27:36,720 California asking me questions about 554 00:27:36,720 --> 00:27:39,760 things. So maybe putting Woodland Hills, 555 00:27:39,760 --> 00:27:43,120 Utah so that it it's in order and out of 556 00:27:43,120 --> 00:27:45,120 not in and that it's in context each 557 00:27:45,120 --> 00:27:47,600 page if it was taken out of context. 558 00:27:47,600 --> 00:27:49,760 Someone could say, "Hey, this isn't 559 00:27:49,760 --> 00:27:52,240 there's something missing." 560 00:27:52,240 --> 00:27:55,279 Is that okay, Daniel? this point 561 00:27:55,279 --> 00:27:56,559 >> you do 562 00:27:56,559 --> 00:27:58,559 >> I think we have control over the 563 00:27:58,559 --> 00:28:00,480 Woodland Hills Utah strategic plan 564 00:28:00,480 --> 00:28:02,880 overview name I think the general plan 565 00:28:02,880 --> 00:28:05,919 has moved on into the hands of the 566 00:28:05,919 --> 00:28:09,919 planning commission and city council u 567 00:28:09,919 --> 00:28:11,279 but I think it's something that could be 568 00:28:11,279 --> 00:28:13,760 carried forward Carrie that would 569 00:28:13,760 --> 00:28:16,320 >> or or one of our planning commission 570 00:28:16,320 --> 00:28:17,120 members if 571 00:28:17,120 --> 00:28:21,279 >> we can yeah we can say that as it goes 572 00:28:21,279 --> 00:28:24,399 forward um but if the doc document 573 00:28:24,399 --> 00:28:26,960 hasn't been completely finalized. If if 574 00:28:26,960 --> 00:28:29,039 Daniel wants to just put that little 575 00:28:29,039 --> 00:28:30,320 clarification that it's Wooden Hills, 576 00:28:30,320 --> 00:28:32,480 Utah on every page, that's I don't see 577 00:28:32,480 --> 00:28:35,600 where anyone would have fault with that. 578 00:28:35,600 --> 00:28:39,360 >> No. Yeah, that'd be fine. 579 00:28:39,360 --> 00:28:42,960 >> Okay. Well, I will let everyone else 580 00:28:42,960 --> 00:28:46,399 handle that. Uh but for today, we have 581 00:28:46,399 --> 00:28:48,000 the strategic plan overview and the 582 00:28:48,000 --> 00:28:51,360 strategic plan matrix. 583 00:28:51,360 --> 00:28:56,230 Would anyone like to make a motion? 584 00:28:56,240 --> 00:28:59,840 I motion to accept. 585 00:28:59,840 --> 00:29:00,080 I'll 586 00:29:00,080 --> 00:29:03,120 >> second that. All in favor? 587 00:29:03,120 --> 00:29:06,720 >> I 588 00:29:06,720 --> 00:29:08,960 >> Okay. 589 00:29:08,960 --> 00:29:12,320 528. Brandy. 590 00:29:12,320 --> 00:29:14,080 Second. 591 00:29:14,080 --> 00:29:15,760 Lori. 592 00:29:15,760 --> 00:29:17,679 Unanimous. 593 00:29:17,679 --> 00:29:22,320 Okay. Well, um I do not 594 00:29:22,320 --> 00:29:26,640 see a need to meet again until we know 595 00:29:26,640 --> 00:29:29,919 um the timeline of when this will go 596 00:29:29,919 --> 00:29:32,000 before the council and then if there was 597 00:29:32,000 --> 00:29:36,799 any needs that arose from that. Um so at 598 00:29:36,799 --> 00:29:38,880 this point I don't have another date to 599 00:29:38,880 --> 00:29:41,360 set for this community development 600 00:29:41,360 --> 00:29:45,200 committee to meet um and 601 00:29:45,200 --> 00:29:47,039 until I have a little more information. 602 00:29:47,039 --> 00:29:51,200 So um with that I think we can adjurnn. 603 00:29:51,200 --> 00:29:53,200 >> I move that we adjourn. 604 00:29:53,200 --> 00:29:56,720 >> Great. Seconded severed 605 00:29:56,720 --> 00:29:59,120 at 528 606 00:29:59,120 --> 00:30:01,600 and 607 00:30:01,600 --> 00:30:04,480 second. Uh all in favor 608 00:30:04,480 --> 00:30:07,840 >> I great. Thank you Daniel. Thank you 609 00:30:07,840 --> 00:30:09,200 Carrie. Thank you Diana for your 610 00:30:09,200 --> 00:30:10,720 comments. Very helpful. And thank you 611 00:30:10,720 --> 00:30:13,600 Brandy to joining during your busy time. 612 00:30:13,600 --> 00:30:15,039 >> All right. Thanks everyone. have a good 613 00:30:15,039 --> 00:30:15,440 night 614 00:30:15,440 --> 00:30:17,600 >> and