1
00:00:40,950 --> 00:00:41,870
There we go.

2
00:00:44,210 --> 00:01:10,350
Calling the meeting to order. This is the York Historic District Commission, town of York, our regular monthly meeting. I'm calling the meeting to order at 5.30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 2nd. Welcome to anyone watching us at home. We do not have attendees. This is our monthly meeting. We're appointed by the board of staff.

3
00:01:10,350 --> 00:01:15,130
to maintain the character of historic districts and landmark buildings,

4
00:01:15,130 --> 00:01:18,890
according to Article 12 of the town's zoning ordinance.

5
00:01:19,450 --> 00:01:24,370
Our job is to review applications for certificates of appropriateness,

6
00:01:24,490 --> 00:01:30,570
determining whether or not proposed changes to any structures designated in the ordinance

7
00:01:30,970 --> 00:01:32,990
are consistent with its guidelines.

8
00:01:33,710 --> 00:01:38,190
These guidelines are based on the secretary of the interior standards

9
00:01:38,190 --> 00:01:40,210
for the treatment of historic structures.

10
00:01:40,970 --> 00:01:42,230
My name is Scott Stevens.

11
00:01:42,570 --> 00:01:43,550
I chair the commission.

12
00:01:44,330 --> 00:01:48,290
I'm joined by John Covino, Donald Rose, and Carrie LePray.

13
00:01:49,350 --> 00:01:50,390
We are all here.

14
00:01:50,770 --> 00:01:52,390
So we have a quorum.

15
00:01:52,470 --> 00:01:53,310
We have a full house.

16
00:01:54,450 --> 00:01:57,010
I would normally open a public hearing,

17
00:01:57,230 --> 00:02:01,710
but there is no one here to participate in a public hearing.

18
00:02:01,710 --> 00:02:21,340
So the first thing I would like to do is discuss our efforts to modify the Article 12.16.

19
00:02:22,240 --> 00:02:29,300
That's something I assume you and I have maybe a couple of copies for our friends.

20
00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:36,240
You're very familiar this. We've been working on it for a long time. We did hear back

21
00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:44,280
from the town attorney last week, and John Covino and I made

22
00:02:46,970 --> 00:02:50,690
– she made suggested changes.

23
00:02:50,710 --> 00:02:58,390
We accepted most of them and altered one bit of wording. I just want you to be aware of

24
00:02:58,390 --> 00:03:07,510
what we submitted then to the planning board for its public hearing on June 11th.

25
00:03:07,630 --> 00:03:12,670
And I can, John, do you want to talk about the changes?

26
00:03:12,930 --> 00:03:13,570
Should I do that?

27
00:03:17,900 --> 00:03:20,300
My suggestion would be that neither of us do.

28
00:03:21,920 --> 00:03:26,360
Since this is a public meeting, we don't want it to get into Advice and Council, and that

29
00:03:26,360 --> 00:03:26,680
doesn't matter.

30
00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:30,820
Your call, Mr. Chairman, but that would be my suggestion.

31
00:03:30,820 --> 00:03:59,740
I think what I'll do rather than go through it line by line is just generalize that her changes were intended to clarify and highlight important aspects of her interpretation of the enabling legislation and these have to do with who is eligible and under what and what the requirement is.

32
00:04:00,820 --> 00:04:05,720
which is a maintenance plan consistent with our standards.

33
00:04:06,860 --> 00:04:15,220
So that was achieved by moving around some things,

34
00:04:15,500 --> 00:04:21,840
not changing the wording, but just simply moving things from one place to another

35
00:04:21,840 --> 00:04:25,300
and maybe

36
00:04:27,700 --> 00:04:34,560
I don't read a change of, minor changes of wording. Going through it, we quickly

37
00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:42,900
decided to accept the changes and then we just made a minor word to week.

38
00:04:43,240 --> 00:04:53,680
So I have to apologize if what I sent to you, Mr. Paragraph or so, the other day I thought

39
00:04:53,680 --> 00:04:58,620
that was what Dylan Smith was going to submit to our attorney rather than what

40
00:04:58,620 --> 00:05:02,160
you're going to submit to the planning board. When you asked if there was an

41
00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:06,420
attachment I said no and then you just mentioned it's going to the

42
00:05:06,420 --> 00:05:10,820
planning board as oh my that's right yeah we were under the gun that day he had to

43
00:05:10,820 --> 00:05:15,240
get the materials to the planning board so I don't need to submit it to the

44
00:05:15,240 --> 00:05:21,200
planning board now okay all right that's fine yeah it turns out but I feel bad

45
00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:26,260
that I gave you what appeared to be and turned out to be incomplete because I thought it was for a different person.

46
00:05:26,280 --> 00:05:28,720
I'm sure that was a fair and it took me a lot of time on my part.

47
00:05:30,060 --> 00:05:38,820
So this is in the pipeline and on the 11th car in John are going to attend that public hearing.

48
00:05:39,020 --> 00:05:44,480
Unfortunately, I can't, I made an obligation before I knew there would be a public hearing that day.

49
00:05:45,100 --> 00:05:49,840
I appreciate your doing that in my stead.

50
00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:53,300
Any questions or comments?

51
00:05:58,410 --> 00:06:02,090
So the planning board will have had this ahead of the meeting.

52
00:06:02,350 --> 00:06:04,270
Yes, they will have this.

53
00:06:04,370 --> 00:06:06,430
The public at the meeting to ask about it.

54
00:06:06,430 --> 00:06:07,390
The public might be.

55
00:06:07,850 --> 00:06:08,970
They won't have seen it.

56
00:06:09,570 --> 00:06:13,570
I think it will have been, I think any of their materials will be,

57
00:06:13,710 --> 00:06:18,630
will be attached to agenda whatever else.

58
00:06:18,630 --> 00:06:26,050
I will just ask you, Scott, after making sure I have what they have.

59
00:06:26,410 --> 00:06:26,550
Right.

60
00:06:27,410 --> 00:06:27,630
Good.

61
00:06:28,270 --> 00:06:35,530
So this is the first public hearing with them to get input and then is there a-

62
00:06:35,530 --> 00:06:43,190
Well, we had a public hearing earlier in the year, got their input, so and this is not a

63
00:06:43,190 --> 00:06:50,630
major reconstruction of it. So this is the second public hearing of a slightly

64
00:06:50,630 --> 00:06:54,350
tweet version. Broad concepts being the same.

65
00:06:55,710 --> 00:07:06,090
What's the next step? They will act to recommend change or not recommend it. Then it

66
00:07:06,090 --> 00:07:16,570
will go to the board of the select board and they will have a public hearing and choose how they act up.

67
00:07:16,870 --> 00:07:20,730
Do we know, I assume the planning board has a separate attorney than we have?

68
00:07:21,130 --> 00:07:23,990
No, the attorney serves all all of them.

69
00:07:24,090 --> 00:07:28,010
Okay, I was just envisioning that they de-decented to their attorney.

70
00:07:38,990 --> 00:07:43,050
So the stuff that's crossed out, that's way back from the very beginning?

71
00:07:43,190 --> 00:07:43,850
That goes from the original.

72
00:07:43,950 --> 00:07:54,510
Yeah, this is the format that they get because it shows what's been eliminated from the current wording in the ordinance.

73
00:07:54,510 --> 00:07:59,490
And anything that

74
00:08:01,540 --> 00:08:06,440
remains is either originally there or what we have added.

75
00:08:06,960 --> 00:08:09,800
Okay. Are there things in italics or what you add?

76
00:08:09,880 --> 00:08:14,560
The things in italics are what she are.

77
00:08:16,240 --> 00:08:17,040
No, the thing.

78
00:08:18,060 --> 00:08:22,880
Yeah, I think the things in italics are changes that she made.

79
00:08:26,650 --> 00:08:32,010
But I'm not sure that, no, maybe that's, I think the things in italics are the changes,

80
00:08:32,210 --> 00:08:37,470
are all changes. They have to be. She didn't do this much work on it. They're all, all

81
00:08:37,470 --> 00:08:45,110
our changes are in italics. And I think, I'm sure Dylan did that with what we sent him

82
00:08:45,110 --> 00:08:50,870
because he knows how it's supposed to be presented to the planning board. So it didn't change

83
00:08:50,870 --> 00:08:52,750
the wording, it merely changed the font.

84
00:08:53,190 --> 00:08:55,030
Yes, she had some comments on the side.

85
00:08:55,410 --> 00:08:55,590
Right.

86
00:08:55,770 --> 00:08:56,110
I think in a town.

87
00:08:56,510 --> 00:08:56,630
Right.

88
00:08:57,450 --> 00:08:57,710
Okay.

89
00:09:03,340 --> 00:09:04,640
Other comments or questions?

90
00:09:06,860 --> 00:09:07,560
If not,

91
00:09:10,410 --> 00:09:12,030
I'd like to raise another matter.

92
00:09:12,190 --> 00:09:12,550
Are we good?

93
00:09:13,570 --> 00:09:13,770
Yeah.

94
00:09:14,130 --> 00:09:14,330
Right.

95
00:09:16,450 --> 00:09:27,710
So what I want to point to, I'm sure I mentioned this, but in the in Article 12, 12.8,

96
00:09:27,710 --> 00:09:32,790
Improvements not requiring historic district commission review.

97
00:09:33,530 --> 00:09:52,930
12.8.1, nothing in this article shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any architectural feature of any building or structure where such repair does not involve a change in design, material or appearance.

98
00:09:52,930 --> 00:10:03,370
So, that was the issue that came up as we approached this meeting this month.

99
00:10:04,410 --> 00:10:13,390
There were a couple of submissions regarding a historic house in a historic district.

100
00:10:15,070 --> 00:10:21,630
And I think what they were doing, I, of course, we don't see everything until it's ready

101
00:10:21,630 --> 00:10:23,390
for us to consider, right?

102
00:10:23,530 --> 00:10:28,950
But I think what was happening is people were bringing it to code and saying, do we need

103
00:10:28,950 --> 00:10:32,730
to submit an application for a certificate of appropriateness?

104
00:10:33,170 --> 00:10:43,270
And then code, the Director of Code Harry Norton, Jr., contacted me and said, do you think

105
00:10:43,270 --> 00:10:44,230
we need to?

106
00:10:44,870 --> 00:10:53,370
and that conversation got a little bit stretched out due to his time in my time, not coinciding,

107
00:10:53,610 --> 00:11:03,510
but my clear impression was there was no change of design form or material, so no.

108
00:11:04,350 --> 00:11:11,710
But it occurred to me that we've had instances where observant members of this commission

109
00:11:11,710 --> 00:11:17,190
or others have said, you know, there's something going on at this house, you know, in this

110
00:11:17,190 --> 00:11:24,670
historic district and we didn't talk about that. So I thought we should suggest protocol

111
00:11:24,670 --> 00:11:31,810
to the code office, how these, for how these things are dealt with. So we are not surprised.

112
00:11:33,190 --> 00:11:39,010
And so that we're on the same page and everybody understands the standards that we're applying.

113
00:11:39,890 --> 00:11:47,930
What I would suggest is that, like with letters involving historical or archaeological

114
00:11:47,930 --> 00:11:55,270
resources where we have to, we get requests from engineering firms or whatever site planners

115
00:11:56,120 --> 00:12:02,810
to look at their site maps and tell them whether there is anything of potential value there

116
00:12:02,810 --> 00:12:04,710
that they need to plan for.

117
00:12:04,710 --> 00:12:12,250
The way we handle that now is they come to me and I consult the main historic preservation

118
00:12:12,250 --> 00:12:17,070
commission in their superior maps, I consult our maps and then I write a letter that says

119
00:12:17,070 --> 00:12:22,970
yes, there is something within 500 feet or no there isn't and then I inform you.

120
00:12:23,630 --> 00:12:30,710
I think we should basically do the same thing but I welcome your thoughts and I don't have

121
00:12:30,710 --> 00:12:37,910
have to be the gate. Any one of us can, it's a pretty simple judgment I think. Any one

122
00:12:37,910 --> 00:12:45,670
of us could, I want to make sure that one person isn't making all the decisions unless

123
00:12:45,670 --> 00:12:51,710
you are entirely comfortable with those coming to me only.

124
00:12:56,080 --> 00:13:03,760
Comfortable with that. I'm just thinking, oh, it brings to mind the question of who decides

125
00:13:03,760 --> 00:13:12,280
that there's no change in these things because sometimes people say, oh, it looks the same and we say, well, it doesn't really look the same.

126
00:13:12,980 --> 00:13:24,240
You know, I guess the materials is the obvious thing. I mean, if they're not changing materials, then they sort of get a pass.

127
00:13:24,780 --> 00:13:31,640
But I mean, is there a burden of proof for them to say we're not changing these things?

128
00:13:31,640 --> 00:13:35,460
or is it just, like you said, you just...

129
00:13:36,080 --> 00:13:37,580
It's, that's a great question.

130
00:13:37,780 --> 00:13:40,520
It's a, it's a little bit of a sketchy area

131
00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:45,900
because if you're replacing an asphalt shingle roof

132
00:13:46,900 --> 00:13:49,160
with other asphalt shingles,

133
00:13:49,880 --> 00:13:52,200
I don't even think you need a permit now.

134
00:13:53,260 --> 00:13:54,780
I think it's...

135
00:13:54,780 --> 00:13:56,080
Yeah, no, it's your right.

136
00:13:56,280 --> 00:13:57,140
Considered maintenance.

137
00:13:57,140 --> 00:14:05,920
So, code might not ever even see it until the job is underway, and then if what if they're

138
00:14:05,920 --> 00:14:14,200
drastically different shingles, I don't know if that's an issue or whatever, but maybe

139
00:14:14,200 --> 00:14:18,080
that's a bad – well, we don't regulate color, that's the interesting –

140
00:14:18,080 --> 00:14:24,960
Well, I've always – we regulate color of material, we don't regulate paint color, but I've

141
00:14:24,960 --> 00:14:28,840
I always wondered whether asphalt shingled color fell in there.

142
00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,880
I mean, you wouldn't want that wet bright red asphalt shingles

143
00:14:31,880 --> 00:14:33,280
in the middle of the district or something.

144
00:14:33,920 --> 00:14:37,720
But I didn't know whether that would ever come for us,

145
00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:40,380
or like you said, it would just pass out.

146
00:14:40,420 --> 00:14:42,720
I mean, there are architectural shingles,

147
00:14:42,820 --> 00:14:44,760
and then there are whatever others,

148
00:14:45,040 --> 00:14:47,860
and so how precise do we need to be?

149
00:14:48,460 --> 00:14:53,140
These are good points, and I'm afraid we'll only discover

150
00:14:53,140 --> 00:14:59,820
or how we should improve our protocol by seeing something that we wouldn't have agreed.

151
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:29,980
It might be worth a workshop with the code office to talk about this and really get into it in detail. And possibly some elaboration of the ordinance to help property owners know, understand the standards in a more nuanced way. I was thinking, too. For instance, composite wood or whatever wood.

152
00:15:29,980 --> 00:15:34,600
And would somebody think that was the same thing as whatever?

153
00:15:34,900 --> 00:15:36,660
It's not, yeah.

154
00:15:37,080 --> 00:15:39,480
So yeah, I think a workshop isn't a bad idea.

155
00:15:39,860 --> 00:15:42,800
We could go over the whole procedural thing to do that.

156
00:15:42,980 --> 00:15:47,600
Right, we could talk about procedure, talk about materials.

157
00:15:48,160 --> 00:15:52,800
Materials are getting to be a gray area these days.

158
00:15:55,460 --> 00:15:58,980
I just hope I don't live along enough for vinyl sighting

159
00:15:58,980 --> 00:16:00,560
to become the story.

160
00:16:01,660 --> 00:16:07,500
Are we there? Oh, no. Scott, I object. I hope you do live. Let me, let me

161
00:16:07,500 --> 00:16:13,000
rephrase it. I hope I don't serve long enough in the seat. No, I also hope you serve

162
00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:14,600
longer. Yeah. Yeah. Thanks. Anyway.

163
00:16:16,660 --> 00:16:20,040
So okay. If, if that, do we agree that's the best

164
00:16:20,040 --> 00:16:27,600
approach to have a workshop, a discussion, I'll find out what the protocol for that has

165
00:16:27,600 --> 00:16:34,900
to be whether they come to one of our meetings, whether a delegation of us can go to theirs.

166
00:16:35,460 --> 00:16:43,500
I think if we all go, it has to be a publicly noticed meeting, but I think if two go and

167
00:16:43,500 --> 00:16:51,180
have this conversation and report back, then that is appropriate.

168
00:16:51,180 --> 00:16:54,740
I think you did it before a long time ago, didn't you?

169
00:16:55,120 --> 00:17:01,500
We were, for a while, meeting routinely, quarterly with the code office.

170
00:17:01,680 --> 00:17:10,120
And I think that would be a really good thing to resume doing because it – there's a

171
00:17:10,120 --> 00:17:16,240
surprising amount to talk about and it helps avoid miscommunication, especially now with

172
00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:21,340
the transition that we're making to our administration being done by the Code Office.

173
00:17:21,460 --> 00:17:30,080
They're really working – they're being very thoughtful and attentive to what our

174
00:17:30,080 --> 00:17:34,920
needs are and what the appropriate procedure is, but their – but questions do come up.

175
00:17:35,340 --> 00:17:40,020
So we should do that.

176
00:17:40,180 --> 00:17:40,900
One or the other.

177
00:17:41,060 --> 00:17:45,540
I think that might be the better way to go if – if a couple of us went to their meeting,

178
00:17:45,540 --> 00:17:55,780
I think asking them to come to one of our meetings is a lot, and I just think it's better

179
00:17:55,780 --> 00:18:02,440
to present a policy in a public hearing rather than present the process of getting there

180
00:18:02,440 --> 00:18:04,180
in a public hearing.

181
00:18:04,200 --> 00:18:04,860
Oh, I see what you mean.

182
00:18:05,060 --> 00:18:06,720
If they get to our meeting, it would be.

183
00:18:06,760 --> 00:18:09,460
It would be public, and it's not a workshop.

184
00:18:09,820 --> 00:18:09,920
Right.

185
00:18:11,220 --> 00:18:11,320
Yeah.

186
00:18:12,400 --> 00:18:12,840
Right.

187
00:18:13,900 --> 00:18:20,260
Okay. Well, but I guess what you were saying before about the change or the ordinary maintenance

188
00:18:20,260 --> 00:18:25,800
repair. I mean, you're saying the code enforcement is going to consult with one of us and say

189
00:18:25,800 --> 00:18:33,360
this is what they're proposing. Is this a change? I would say we can request that. They are

190
00:18:33,360 --> 00:18:39,480
of course in charge of their own procedure. And they may say now we're, we think we understand

191
00:18:39,480 --> 00:18:41,320
and we'll be careful and we'll let you know.

192
00:18:41,660 --> 00:18:45,100
But I think it would be good to have the conversation.

193
00:18:45,740 --> 00:18:49,640
This has come up a couple of times lately

194
00:18:49,640 --> 00:18:54,120
because I also had somebody talk to me informally

195
00:18:54,120 --> 00:18:59,260
about their roof and what they had to go through

196
00:18:59,260 --> 00:19:01,000
in a historic district, what they had to go through

197
00:19:01,000 --> 00:19:04,920
to change it and was aware of that provision

198
00:19:04,920 --> 00:19:14,140
and of the lack of a need for a permit, etc., so it's come up now twice within a month.

199
00:19:14,800 --> 00:19:23,320
It seems we need to clarify that, again, in the interest of doing our job as well as possible

200
00:19:23,320 --> 00:19:27,780
and making life as easy as possible for the people in the historic districts.

201
00:19:30,530 --> 00:19:36,290
Then, with your blessing, I will arrange that conversation.

202
00:19:37,190 --> 00:19:43,230
Does anybody care to volunteer to join me at a meeting with the...

203
00:19:44,090 --> 00:19:46,010
I can, if you want, if you want.

204
00:19:46,390 --> 00:19:47,310
It would depend on timing.

205
00:19:47,710 --> 00:19:48,450
Yeah, okay.

206
00:19:48,650 --> 00:19:54,790
I'll let you know when they ignore me and will figure that I think I should be there, but

207
00:19:54,790 --> 00:20:00,630
but I would welcome other sharper minds.

208
00:20:02,990 --> 00:20:06,370
Okay. Is there, we have minutes to look at?

209
00:20:06,450 --> 00:20:06,710
Yeah.

210
00:20:06,990 --> 00:20:07,190
Yeah,

211
00:20:10,150 --> 00:20:12,330
and again, the back and forth and the posting.

212
00:20:12,330 --> 00:20:13,670
Who sends the minutes?

213
00:20:14,470 --> 00:20:18,410
We could go over procedurally in a workshop or something.

214
00:20:18,850 --> 00:20:19,110
Yes.

215
00:20:44,960 --> 00:20:45,460
Okay.

216
00:20:45,960 --> 00:20:50,040
Meeting the minutes of May 5th, 2026.

217
00:20:50,040 --> 00:21:00,400
I'll move. They be accepted as submitted. Do I have a second? I will second. Is there

218
00:21:00,400 --> 00:21:01,160
any discussion?

219
00:21:04,760 --> 00:21:16,080
There being no discussion? I'll ask that you vote. I vote as unanimous.

220
00:21:16,080 --> 00:21:22,700
acceptor? Is there any new business that we should treat?

221
00:21:25,980 --> 00:21:32,420
Not other than the old business. Any old business that we haven't already

222
00:21:32,420 --> 00:21:32,820
treated.

223
00:21:35,610 --> 00:21:44,410
If not, I will accept a motion to adjourn. I move we adjourn at by 52 on the

224
00:21:44,410 --> 00:21:55,390
state. Motion by Donald Rose to adjourn. Any discussion? All in favor? All right. Thank you,

225
00:21:55,390 --> 00:21:55,990
to my friends.