Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:27]
Hey, hey, hey.
[1:10]
[music]
[1:21]
hey, hey.
[1:22]
Heat. Hey, Heat. [music]
[2:14]
Heat. Heat. N.
[2:24]
Heat. Heat.
[3:10]
black.
[3:41]
Heat. Heat.
[4:14]
» [music]
[5:20]
» Heat. Heat.
[6:25]
Hey, hey.
[6:59]
Heat.
[7:20]
Heat.
[7:45]
» [music]
[8:34]
» Heat. Heat.
[9:24]
[music]
[9:57]
» [music]
[10:55]
» Hey, hey.
[11:02]
[music]
[11:08]
» [music]
[11:58]
» Heat. Heat. N.
[12:05]
[music]
[12:22]
Heat. Heat. N.
[12:46]
Heat. Heat.
[13:42]
N.
[13:52]
Heat. Heat.
[14:02]
[music]
[14:21]
» [music]
[14:40]
» Heat. Heat.
[14:52]
[music]
[15:25]
» [music]
[15:30]
» Heat. Heat.
[15:47]
[music]
[16:04]
Hey, hey.
[16:23]
» [music]
[16:36]
» Heat. Hey, Heat.
[17:18]
» [music]
[17:38]
» Heat. Heat. N. [music]
[18:26]
» [music]
[18:31]
» Hey. Heat. Heat.
[20:23]
Hey.
[20:36]
Heat. Heat.
[20:50]
[music]
[21:35]
Hey,
[21:38]
[music]
[21:51]
hey, hey.
[22:45]
» [clears throat]
[22:46]
>> They're going to be made here.
[23:02]
I'd like to call the order connecting
[23:03]
city council committee meeting for
[23:04]
Monday, December 15, 2025. And the first
[23:08]
committee is public safety. Mr.
[23:10]
Williams.
[23:11]
>> Thank you. Uh we have one item on the
[23:13]
agenda tonight. That is
[23:19]
a reminder the redirection portion of
[23:21]
Front Street to a one-way street from J
[23:23]
Street to Mohawk Avenue and for Monroe
[23:25]
Street to become a one-way street from
[23:27]
Front Street to Gary Boulevard. The
[23:29]
public hearing will be December 22nd. Um
[23:33]
it's just a reminder to the public that
[23:34]
this is going to be taking place. Um
[23:37]
there are no other items to fall before
[23:38]
public safety. May I have a motion to
[23:40]
adjourn.
[23:42]
So move.
[23:42]
>> I will second. All those in favor?
[23:44]
>> I I
[23:48]
Okay. Um I will call to order government
[23:50]
operations
[23:52]
and the we have there's one item on the
[23:54]
agenda, the alignment of weekly hour
[23:56]
requirements for public safety managers
[23:58]
include inclusion of public safety
[24:00]
commissioner, Mr. Turo.
[24:02]
>> Thank you. So uh I'd like to just bring
[24:04]
this back briefly uh this evening before
[24:06]
I defer to uh Miss Barash. Um I know
[24:09]
that um the council wanted to speak to
[24:12]
um Chief Burns regarding uh their 35h
[24:15]
hour work. So if I could ask Chief Burns
[24:17]
to come up and
[24:20]
uh discuss that please.
[24:25]
» Good evening, Madam President, council
[24:27]
members, mayor. Uh so when I came to the
[24:30]
office a couple years ago, I was told it
[24:32]
was a 35 hour work week. We do not get
[24:34]
paid for lunch. Um most of the times we
[24:37]
really don't get lunch. we'll eat at our
[24:38]
desk or whatever, answer emails. Uh I
[24:41]
will say sometimes in the summertime we
[24:42]
get to go out in that picnic table, but
[24:43]
a lot of these lunches turn into
[24:44]
business meetings, right? You're out
[24:46]
there with the rest of the staff. You're
[24:47]
discussing the day or or the plan or
[24:49]
what's going on.
[24:55]
» Chief, of the 19,000 calls that you
[24:58]
handle, do any of those get in the way
[25:00]
of your lunch?
[25:01]
>> Oh, all the time. All the time. Y
[25:04]
>> phone calls from the mayor gets in the
[25:05]
way once in a while.
[25:07]
Uh, any questions for Chief Burns?
[25:11]
[clears throat]
[25:12]
>> Uh, thank you, Chief.
[25:13]
>> You're welcome.
[25:13]
>> At this time, I'd like to defer Miss
[25:15]
Mash.
[25:15]
>> Thank you.
[25:17]
>> Sure. So, um, it's my recommendation
[25:20]
that this be tabled um until next cycle.
[25:24]
Uh there are several other items that
[25:25]
need to be dealt with in chapter 87 of
[25:28]
the code and the law department would
[25:30]
like to uh well needs to be able to
[25:34]
review the entire chapter uh so that
[25:36]
it's all done consistently uh and
[25:39]
accurately with regard to whatever it is
[25:40]
the council decides to change.
[25:43]
>> Thank you.
[25:44]
>> The entire chapter 87.
[25:46]
>> We're going to be taking a look at the
[25:47]
whole chapter.
[25:50]
Okay.
[25:51]
>> Thank you. So,
[25:54]
>> is it that there'll be a recommendation
[25:56]
on whether to adjust or not adjust or
[25:58]
just a review?
[25:59]
>> Uh, the law department won't make a
[26:00]
recommendation on that. The law
[26:02]
department will be reviewing that uh
[26:04]
chapter uh for other things that have
[26:07]
come up as well and so we might we would
[26:10]
like to look at it as a whole and handle
[26:13]
uh amendment of that chapter
[26:16]
together
[26:18]
all the items together.
[26:20]
>> Okay. So anything else come before
[26:22]
government operations
[26:24]
>> Mr. Mair?
[26:24]
>> So as you go into that um to look into
[26:27]
chapter 87 can your recommendation also
[26:30]
look at across the board on management
[26:33]
all management.
[26:34]
>> We are not going to make a
[26:35]
recommendation on the hours. We will be
[26:37]
we will take the council's
[26:39]
recommendation and make the changes but
[26:42]
we are not going to make a
[26:43]
recommendation.
[26:45]
We are going to be looking at it
[26:46]
relating to some other issues that have
[26:48]
come up, but it's beyond the scope of of
[26:51]
our office to make a recommendation of
[26:53]
how many hours a particular department
[26:55]
should work.
[26:56]
>> So, currently the council doesn't have a
[26:58]
recommendation.
[26:59]
>> It's up to the council. It's just not up
[27:01]
to the law department.
[27:02]
>> Okay.
[27:04]
All right. Thank you.
[27:07]
>> Are there any other questions or
[27:08]
concerns?
[27:09]
>> Is there anything else to come before
[27:11]
government operations?
[27:12]
>> Motion to adjourn.
[27:14]
Second. All's in favor. I
[27:17]
>> like to call to order city development
[27:18]
and planning. We have eight items on the
[27:21]
agenda. The first one, city of
[27:23]
connecting Metroplex parking services
[27:25]
agreement, transition to law school
[27:27]
mobile payment technology. Mr. Wallen.
[27:38]
Uh so several weeks ago um I presented
[27:41]
up here with uh David Hogamp of the
[27:43]
Metroplex Development Authority about
[27:45]
Metroplex transition from the passport
[27:48]
um to the Lazo platform after 5 years uh
[27:51]
via the RFP. Um we did that presentation
[27:54]
here. We met with LAGO. Um we've had
[27:57]
some internal meetings. We discussed
[27:59]
with the mayor and the enforcement
[28:00]
provision and Metroplex and we would
[28:02]
like to move forward also adopting the
[28:04]
Lasco platform. Uh under the similar
[28:07]
agreement with Metroplex that we've been
[28:08]
working on that Metroplex would act as
[28:11]
we would be under Metroplex essentially
[28:13]
working uh they would handle most of the
[28:15]
collection and then disperse to the
[28:17]
city. Uh we would use that program uh
[28:19]
starting on January 1st. Um, I have
[28:24]
I'm sorry. I I have a sample of what
[28:28]
we're looking at. We went through some
[28:29]
iterations working, but the signs after
[28:32]
January 1st that say passport would be
[28:34]
replaced with this is a sample. The real
[28:36]
sign would be bigger um with with this
[28:38]
system. So, you would not need to
[28:40]
download any kind of an app. What you
[28:43]
would do is you would see this on a a
[28:44]
post or a sign and you would scan that
[28:48]
QR code there that is, you know, custom
[28:50]
QR code with the city logo in it and
[28:52]
that would immediately take you to the
[28:54]
website where you would pay for your
[28:56]
parking and you would just set it up.
[28:57]
So, we've been working on um setting up
[28:59]
the system. We simplified it with zones.
[29:02]
So, we simplified the city into five
[29:04]
zones. The reason for the zones is it
[29:06]
helps us track where people are parking
[29:08]
and where revenues are coming in. Um
[29:10]
it's very easy to track Put this down
[29:12]
for a second. Um where people are
[29:14]
parking with kiosks because kiosks are
[29:16]
individually accounted for. However, if
[29:19]
we did not use a zone system of some
[29:21]
kind and all we would get would be one
[29:23]
revenue number for the entire city and
[29:25]
we do like to know if people are parking
[29:27]
around city hall, State Street, Lower
[29:30]
State Street, uh or the Broadway area or
[29:32]
upper union. So we've kind of broken
[29:33]
them out into five zones. Um, so we
[29:36]
would like the the council to authorize
[29:38]
the mayor and the and the law department
[29:40]
to enter an agreement with Metroplex for
[29:42]
the LASCO um program.
[29:45]
>> Are there any questions,
[29:48]
Mr. Toro?
[29:48]
>> Thank you. Yes. So, I've read through
[29:50]
everything and and people can still pay
[29:52]
by cash
[29:53]
>> at the kiosk, but it's coin or credit.
[29:56]
>> Coin credit.
[29:57]
>> We do not take cash as that would
[29:59]
require a separate reader and some other
[30:02]
mechanicals that we don't like. We're
[30:03]
trying to get away from cash.
[30:05]
>> You mean coins as cash?
[30:07]
>> Coins as cash.
[30:08]
>> Yes. Yes. So, just for those listening
[30:11]
that they're
[30:12]
>> Yes. The kiosk people know a QR code a
[30:15]
lot of people. So, at least they can go
[30:16]
to the kiosk and take care of things
[30:18]
there.
[30:19]
>> And and I know in the budget was some
[30:21]
new kiosk to replace some of ours. And
[30:24]
we do we did work with um PD and we are
[30:28]
looking at you know uh a little bit of
[30:30]
an upgrade moving some around really
[30:31]
trying to uh make some of them more
[30:33]
efficient and put them in better
[30:34]
locations um in coordination with this.
[30:37]
>> So that would happen once uh once
[30:39]
approved.
[30:40]
>> Thank you.
[30:42]
>> Any other questions?
[30:43]
>> I'll move this item.
[30:44]
>> I'll second. All those in favor?
[30:46]
>> I thank you Mr. Wallen. Uh item number
[30:49]
two, the city council to assume role of
[30:50]
secret lead agency for the Drake a
[30:53]
street connector.
[30:54]
>> So um JC Street connector is a DRRi
[30:57]
project as we've talked about before.
[30:59]
>> Um due to the size and scope of the
[31:01]
project, it required the city to do a
[31:03]
full EAF and declare itself lead the
[31:05]
agency. Um we did that several cycles
[31:08]
ago. Uh after we declared that the city
[31:10]
sent out um letters to all of the
[31:14]
possible involved agencies, DOT, DEEC,
[31:16]
Metroplex, County Planning, uh we got
[31:19]
back responses from all of them
[31:21]
regarding uh no exception to city
[31:23]
assuming lead agency. So I'd like to ask
[31:25]
that the council officially assume lead
[31:27]
agency uh for this project so that we
[31:30]
can move forward as this is a
[31:31]
requirement that we have to have before
[31:33]
we can bid it. Um we are looking to bid
[31:35]
the project in mid January. Okay. Any
[31:39]
other any questions?
[31:40]
>> I'll move the item.
[31:42]
>> I'll second. All those in favor? I
[31:44]
>> I
[31:44]
>> uh item number three, award the bidden
[31:46]
contract for the Craig Mort
[31:49]
replacement to American Evergreen
[31:51]
Incorporated.
[31:53]
>> So, uh as you're probably aware, Craig
[31:55]
Street is getting a very large rehab
[31:57]
come next year. Um that is the main
[32:00]
project. That project, it will be going
[32:02]
out to bid within the next most likely
[32:04]
10 days, if not 5 days. Um that is a $13
[32:07]
million project, one of the largest in
[32:09]
the city. Um it was agreed upon by the
[32:13]
commissioner, city engineer, and the
[32:15]
mayor that the idea was that we we
[32:17]
videoed all the infrastructure below was
[32:20]
in good shape. We made some repairs, but
[32:21]
the water line cannot be videotaped. Uh
[32:24]
water lines are essentially pressurized
[32:25]
systems. So it was decided to replace um
[32:29]
the existing distribution water line.
[32:31]
And then we would also replace any
[32:33]
foundled services which is part of the
[32:36]
state's mandate that if we find any we
[32:38]
will replace. So this is a uh pretty
[32:41]
large project but it's a it's you know
[32:44]
by value but also by scope. We're going
[32:46]
to be going Craig Street essentially
[32:47]
from Strong to Albany replacing the
[32:50]
distribution uh yeah distribution main
[32:52]
there. So
[32:53]
>> yeah. So
[32:54]
>> we when we just you know we did call
[32:56]
references. This is a a group that uh is a large commercial group that we
[33:00]
don't have any um hesitation about. We
[33:02]
don't work a lot with them.
[33:04]
>> Okay. So this wasn't initially a part of
[33:06]
it but after you started doing looking
[33:08]
at the project realized you should this
[33:10]
is something
[33:10]
>> this was not part of the federal federal
[33:12]
won't pay for infrastructure like this
[33:14]
but this was something that we decided
[33:16]
uh that we should do. Um this is
[33:18]
actually just to give you a little bit
[33:19]
more information. This is actually the
[33:21]
rebid. Ideally, we would have had this
[33:23]
done a little earlier instead of doing
[33:24]
the but um when we originally bid this,
[33:28]
the top three biders all did not have
[33:30]
the necessary paperwork in the correct
[33:32]
order and it caused some confusion. And
[33:34]
the best thing that we did is we all got
[33:36]
together as a group and we said we
[33:37]
should just rebid the project with a
[33:39]
very strong focus on making sure
[33:40]
everyone and it did work. All the three
[33:42]
biders that did submit all did have uh
[33:45]
coerent packages as compared to the last
[33:47]
time. So that did work out. Um but we
[33:50]
just lost time
[33:52]
>> and and the um the cost of the project
[33:54]
is accounted for.
[33:56]
>> Yes, the cost of the project is going to
[33:57]
be out of the water fund with some
[33:59]
support from engineering codes that have
[34:01]
been set up.
[34:02]
>> Okay.
[34:04]
Any other questions?
[34:06]
>> I move this.
[34:07]
>> I'll second. All in favor?
[34:08]
>> I.
[34:09]
>> Thank you, Mr. Roll.
[34:10]
>> Thank you. Item number four is a
[34:12]
reminder about amending uh ordinance
[34:15]
161, article 5, section 21 of the code
[34:18]
ordinance to temporarily suspend payment
[34:21]
uh for excess residential waste and
[34:22]
bulky items. Public hearing will be on
[34:25]
December 22nd.
[34:28]
Item number five is a reminder uh
[34:30]
reminder amending chapter 264 for the
[34:33]
reszoning of certain parcels on Maxim
[34:34]
Road. Uh the lots the lots are
[34:37]
identified um in your on the agenda and
[34:42]
they will go from um commercial to which
[34:45]
is C3 to light industrial and the public
[34:48]
hearing again will be on December 22nd.
[34:52]
Item number six is a reminder adding the
[34:54]
definition of better energy storage
[34:56]
facilities to section 264-2 of this
[34:59]
connecting city code to allow battery
[35:02]
energy storage facilities in designated
[35:04]
districts and the public hearing will be
[35:06]
on December 22nd, 2025.
[35:10]
Item number seven is the appointment of
[35:12]
Dan Flynn to the Skenctity Industrial
[35:14]
Development Agency. Mr. Williams.
[35:16]
>> Yes, thank you. Uh excited to bring this
[35:18]
individual forward. I think as we've
[35:20]
heard of vacancies of this board for an
[35:22]
extended period of time, I think
[35:24]
identifying people who are interested in
[35:26]
volunteering their time, but also
[35:27]
volunteering the willingness to learn
[35:29]
and be a part of these decisions
[35:31]
throughout the city of Senate. Um, in
[35:33]
the time that I've known Dan um just
[35:36]
trying to be [clears throat] uh
[35:37]
considerate, uh he has only showed me
[35:39]
that he cares very much very deeply
[35:41]
about the interest of the city and has
[35:43]
pointed out himself uh to to do that
[35:45]
work moving forward. He does it
[35:46]
collaboratively, but excited to have
[35:49]
this individual be considered. He's
[35:50]
sitting directly behind me with the
[35:52]
beautiful locks. Um, if you have any
[35:54]
questions or concerns, please let me
[35:56]
know.
[35:57]
>> Are there any questions,
[35:59]
>> Mr. Toro?
[36:00]
>> They both have beautiful locks rather
[36:02]
than [laughter]
[36:04]
>> There you go. Thank you.
[36:06]
>> Oh, no.
[36:07]
>> Pardon me.
[36:08]
>> This one.
[36:11]
>> I'll move this.
[36:12]
>> I'll second. All those in favor? Hi.
[36:14]
>> Hi.
[36:15]
>> Thank you.
[36:15]
>> Item number eight, an ordinance amending
[36:17]
chapter 183 of Skenki City Code, Miss
[36:19]
Barrage.
[36:22]
>> Chapter 183 of the Skenctity Code um
[36:25]
relates to uh nuisance abatement.
[36:29]
>> Exactly. Wait a minute. and the laws
[36:33]
changed recently and we need to update
[36:37]
the so it would be you have a sample
[36:41]
ordinance in front of you sample
[36:43]
amendment ordinance um if you look at 1B
[36:47]
it's now labeled 1B or B1B uh article
[36:52]
221 is now article 222 of the penal law
[36:56]
>> uh so we need to update that
[36:59]
and then also So we look all the way at
[37:01]
the bottom. We want to include uh we
[37:03]
want to make it clear that any uh that
[37:07]
under the point system uh any violation
[37:11]
of New York state law or the city code
[37:13]
is connected to the S3 points. So uh
[37:16]
these are basically some housekeeping
[37:18]
matters to update the code uh so that we
[37:22]
can continue to do some statements
[37:24]
without issue.
[37:26]
So, we're call we are requesting that
[37:28]
the council uh call a public hearing.
[37:33]
» Are there any questions?
[37:37]
So, this is just a call for a public
[37:38]
hearing to amend.
[37:40]
>> Yep.
[37:41]
>> Okay.
[37:42]
>> So,
[37:43]
>> I'll second. All those in favor?
[37:45]
>> I thank you.
[37:54]
So, I'd like to call the order of the
[37:56]
claims committee. We have one item on
[37:57]
the agenda. We just have to close the
[37:58]
point.
[37:59]
>> Oh, I'm sorry. A motion to adjourn city
[38:01]
development and planning. So,
[38:02]
>> vote.
[38:02]
>> Second. All those in favor?
[38:04]
>> I. Thank you.
[38:05]
>> So, I'd like to call to order the claims
[38:07]
committee. We have one item on the
[38:08]
agenda tonight. That is the discussion
[38:10]
of all state uh ASOS versus that is an
[38:15]
item that needs to be discussed in
[38:16]
executive session. We have a motion.
[38:18]
I'll second it. All those in favor? All
[38:20]
right.
[38:21]
>> All right. Members of the public will
[38:22]
have to leave at this point.
[38:34]
[music]