[0:17] Uh, good evening, President. It's 7 o'clock and we do have quorum.

[0:22] » All right, then.

[0:25] » Good evening and welcome to the August 18th, 2025 regular meeting of the

[0:30] Alhhamra Planning Commission. Um, we'll start with a roll call, please.

[0:35] » Chen, present. Dorado >> here. Gardia

[0:40] » present. >> Graalva

[0:42] » present. >> Ho

[0:44] » here. >> Wararez

[0:46] » here. >> Maharo.

[0:49] » Garcia >> here.

[0:51] » Olsson >> here. Please rise and join me in the

[0:55] flag salute.

[0:59] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the

[1:05] republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and

[1:11] justice for all.

[1:19] » All right. Next on our uh is our consent agenda. Agenda items number one through

[1:24] three. Items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will

[1:29] be enacted, approved, or adopted by one motion unless a request for removal is

[1:35] received from a commissioner or citizen. Items removed from the consent calendar

[1:39] shall be considered immediately following the adoption of the consent

[1:43] agenda. Uh does anyone wish to uh remove an item from the consent agenda?

[1:52] Then I will hear a motion, please.

[1:57] I'll move to approve. >> We have a second.

[2:00] » I second. >> Commissioner Garda has moved to approve

[2:04] and Commissioner Ghavva has moved to second. Uh, may we have a roll call?

[2:08] » Chen, yes. Dorado, >> yes.

[2:12] » Garda, >> yes.

[2:14] » Graova, yes. Hog, >> I have for July

[2:20] otherwise. Yes. Wararez,

[2:23] » yes. >> Maharo,

[2:27] » yes. >> Garcia,

[2:29] » yes. >> Olen,

[2:31] » yes. >> Thank you.

[2:35] Now, agenda item number four is a public hearing to legalize an addition to an

[2:42] existing automotive repair shop. Is there a presentation from staff for this

[2:47] item? >> Yes, assistant planner Avery Tow will be

[2:49] giving the presentation tonight.

[2:54] Good evening, commissioners. Good evening, chair. Item four before you is

[2:59] conditional use permit CUP 2402 for Phoenix Auto Care located at 3071 West

[3:06] Valley Boulevard. Phoenix Autocare is existing auto repair shop operating

[3:10] within the commercial mixeduse zone. Uh the request tonight is to legalize a

[3:15] 206q ft office and restroom addition that was constructed without permits.

[3:21] Staff's recommended action is to adopt resolution number 255 approving the

[3:26] conditional use permit and finding the project exempt from SQA.

[3:32] This is the project site located in the northeast intersection of West Valley

[3:36] Boulevard and Westmont Drive. The property has about 137 ft of frontage

[3:42] along Valley Boulevard and 104 ft of frontage along Westbond Drive with a 15t

[3:48] wide alleyway along the northern property line. The surrounding

[3:51] neighborhood consists of a mix of commercial, office, and residential use.

[4:02] The property has operated as a auto repair facility since 1981 with Phoenix

[4:08] Autoare as the tenant since 2017. No changes to the building or use occurred

[4:13] at that time. In March 2024, the city zoning update reclassified the site from

[4:19] valley specific boulevard uh valley my bad uh valley boulevard specific plan to

[4:25] CMU commercial mixuse making automotive repair a non-conforming use at this site

[4:31] between June and September 2023. A 206qt addition was constructed without

[4:37] permits. A code enforcement case followed in October 2023 and a planning

[4:42] application was submitted in January 2024 to legalize the addition which had

[4:47] since been reviewed for compliance with the Alhhamra Municipal Code.

[4:53] The proposed expansion includes a large office area of approximately 161 square

[4:59] ft and a restroom expansion of about 45 ft. The addition does not include any

[5:05] expansion of the existing repair garages. Accessibility improvements have

[5:10] been added, including an ADA compliant ramp, guardrails, and a um accessible

[5:15] restroom. There are 13 on-site parking spaces, which exceeds the city's minimum

[5:20] requirement of five spaces. One ADA compliant stall has also been added.

[5:26] The addition's design matches the existing building in terms of materials,

[5:30] massing, and scale and was approved by the design review board on June 10th,

[5:35] 2025.

[5:40] Here we have the existing floor plan outlined um alongside alongside the

[5:46] proposed floor plan. You could see the area of added square footage outlined in

[5:50] the dotted line. Uh the hatched area on the proposed ford plan uh denotes

[5:55] woodframe construction and areas of the building that have been remodeled but do

[5:59] not encompass new square footage. The office and restroom areas are both

[6:03] expanded to improve employee working conditions and customer service

[6:07] capacity. Uh the rest of the building layout remains dedicated to automotive

[6:11] repair operations.

[6:15] These photos show the current conditions of the site. You could see the addition

[6:20] to be legalized marked with dotted lines in photo two located as the last photo

[6:25] in the second row of the photo arrangement. The building is a single

[6:29] story 12 ft in height as well uh well below the 40ft maximum allowed in the

[6:34] CMU zone and the addition has been integrated into the design of the

[6:37] existing building.

[6:42] Here are the architectural renderings as approved by the design review board.

[6:46] They confirmed that the addition is integrated into the existing building

[6:50] design with consistent materials and finishes.

[6:56] Because the addition is a expansion of non-conforming use, it cannot be

[7:00] permitted under the previous cup from 1981. The cup from 1981 only encompasses

[7:06] approval for what was physically developed on the site at the time. The

[7:11] municipal code allows expansion of a non-conforming use only with a new

[7:16] conditional use permit. Staff has determined that with appropriate

[7:19] conditions, the expanded use will remain consistent with the general plan,

[7:24] compatible with surrounding uses, and compliant with all applicable

[7:27] development standards.

[7:31] In conclusion, the proposed expansion improves business functionality um

[7:36] accompasses uh accommodates for expanded administrative offices, remains

[7:41] consistent with both the operational history of the site and the surrounding

[7:45] land uses. Staff recommends that the planning commission adopt resolution

[7:50] number 255 approving the conditional use permit CUP 2402 to legalize addition and

[7:57] find the project exempt from SQA. Staff and applicant are available for any

[8:01] questions. Thank you. >> Thank you. Does the applicant have a

[8:06] presentation? >> Okay. Commissioners, do you have any

[8:12] technical questions or requests for clarification from staff based on their

[8:17] presentation?

[8:21] » Yes, I have a a point of clarification. Um, when I'm looking at the uh

[8:26] conditions for the use, I'm not sure I see anything that

[8:30] restricts the um the use to only an office and a restroom. So did I did I

[8:39] miss anything? Is there anything that that says there's no there's a

[8:42] restriction on the use that that is that it has to be only office and a restroom.

[8:50] Um so on the floor plans it has been noted that the expansion is just um for

[8:55] the office and the restroom. Um so this for this particular expansion it's not

[9:00] expansion of the garages um and it's something that has been indicated on the

[9:04] submitted floor plans but >> right but there's no specific um

[9:08] exclusion of use of that 216 ft. The reason I'm asking is because I' I'd like

[9:15] to know if that's a uh something we could discuss on whether we can um add

[9:20] to that conditional use permit that the um that space can only be used as an

[9:27] office and uh and restroom. So there isn't any expansion of the operations

[9:32] the repair operations into that area. That's why I'm asking if there's

[9:36] anything that's in the conditional use uh documents now

[9:42] that prohibits the expansion of operations.

[9:47] So, it's there's no prohibition specifically, but if you look at PL6, it

[9:51] it essentially says that the plans submitted as part of this staff report

[9:55] that are being approved as part of this conditional use permit that they need to

[9:58] operate in accordance with those plans. So if they're showing on the plans that

[10:02] it's for office space, approval of this conditional use permit would require

[10:06] that it be utilized for office space >> from henceforth and forever more

[10:12] » unless they requested an amendment to the conditional use permit.

[10:16] » Okay. Thank you. >> Thank you, Commissioner Dorado. Um are

[10:20] there uh is there anyone who has pre-registered to provide public

[10:24] comment? I see we have one card here. Uh are there any written comments that have

[10:30] been submitted? >> Uh we did receive one email uh related

[10:34] to this agenda item. Uh we provided copies up on the dis for each of the

[10:38] commissioners. Um that email was submitted by Mr. Lewis McCann.

[10:46] » Um yes and Mr. McCammon has uh submitted a um request to speak on this item. So

[10:54] Mr. McCammon, you're up.

[10:59] a few things to pass out to you first before I begin speaking there.

[11:05] And should be enough copies

[11:10] or uh

[11:14] the staff up here too. There's two items there.

[11:27] This is this is

[11:35] Yeah.

[11:45] Thank you.

[11:48] Almost.

[12:18] [Music]

[12:42] Okay, good evening. Luman, 105 North Cordova

[12:47] Street. First off, let me say I think this u uh project is entirely within

[12:53] order and is non-controversial and you should pass it. Um my um what I want to

[13:00] talk about this evening is um the map I noticed in there, which actually doesn't

[13:06] even apply to this project uh in the sense that it has way more

[13:12] than enough parking on site. So, the matter of uh the ability to reduce the

[13:19] parking requirement isn't even necessary item to address. Nonetheless, it's in

[13:24] there and it does um uh it does bring to mind I've asked before for when when we

[13:34] had the update on state housing laws that you received recently. I said there

[13:39] really needs to be a followup about the impact of pending legislation

[13:45] uh in Sacramento on these things. And I think we do need to go back and review

[13:50] that particularly with the terms like the definition of what is a major

[13:56] transit stop and things of that nature. I've seen various items in u that Skagg

[14:04] has put out in their regional transportation studies adopted initially

[14:09] back in 2020 and uh the stuff that's coming out of Sacramento

[14:16] uh in which case you really have to follow the trail of what what does

[14:22] something mean and it'll refer you one code section to another to another and

[14:28] so forth. Very hard to follow. But um I have tried to put together some

[14:34] stuff and uh if my email there was reproduced too, you have a lot more of

[14:38] it. There is one typo I noticed in the email and it's also in the part here and

[14:45] that is just in uh the last introducing that last section that last uh uh next

[14:53] last boldfaced line there. It does. It should be uh

[14:59] California Public Resources Code section 211064.3

[15:05] which matches the code number referred to above. I had just hadn't caught that

[15:11] typo before I put it out. But at any rate, uh you'll notice previously when

[15:17] we've had maps distributed, what are the major transit stops that are we have to

[15:24] be concerned with in approving developments?

[15:28] Um the three

[15:33] stops along Atlantic Boulevard were the ones that were highlighted and you were

[15:39] just looking at things within a half mile of those um yellow dots. Now, this

[15:45] map here has greatly expanded that and included all these little uh blue

[15:52] circles. Um some of which are really in my mind

[15:58] very very minor things. In fact, uh if if you're uh now in major transfer

[16:05] stops, they're talking about intersections of bus lines. They're not

[16:10] talking about just a one group bus line. There are things called transit

[16:15] quarters, which could just be the one route, but if you're talking about

[16:18] transit stop, it it's an intersection, and they say it's an intersection of two

[16:24] major bus lines. We just had a study which came before

[16:29] the city council on June 23rd, very elaborate study,

[16:33] uh, done by a city retained consultant about the act lines. And one of the

[16:38] pages in that I just unfortunately I didn't have time to reproduce that also

[16:42] for you, but it's on uh digital page 79 of the uh of the online agenda for that

[16:52] me city council meeting. It talked about the act blue line and the act green line

[16:58] and it had a column over here in the end. Is this high frequency?

[17:03] uh and they said 15 minutes or better at the peak hour and they're using a little

[17:09] bit different criteria and some parts of state law refer to 15 minutes some parts

[17:13] of state law refer to 20 minutes and on the act blue line and green line was no

[17:21] but they were referring to a 15minute thing there uh it's generally about 20

[17:26] minutes sometimes may be a minute or two over but um

[17:32] at any rate. They don't carry a huge amount of traffic

[17:37] and I and particularly in the case of the blue line, you're looking at uh

[17:42] Cordova and u or not Cordova but um uh Chapel in Maine. There's almost nobody

[17:50] switches from one line to the other there because they essentially run

[17:53] fairly parallel through most of the city and everything. Um at any rate, that's

[17:58] that's my five minutes. I just think we need a um a chance to reiterate that

[18:04] thing if we really need a study as soon as possible and what's going on with the

[18:08] legislation in Sacramento. How do all these various things come together from

[18:13] SKAG and the state about the major transit stops the impact on the city if

[18:20] everything is going to go with this map? Boy, you can build to the max anywhere

[18:25] in the city. Just throw out our zoning code.

[18:28] » Thank you. >> Thank you. Yeah.

[18:31] » Uh, do we have any other um speakers online?

[18:35] » We do. We have Jennifer Ing. >> Go ahead, Jennifer.

[18:43] » Good evening, commissioners. My name is Jennifer Ing. I am a member of our

[18:46] designer review board, but I'm speaking for myself as an individual. Um, I don't

[18:50] really have an opinion at all regarding uh this particular property, but I do

[18:55] have the map concerns, and I I want to thank Lou for pointing those out. I

[18:59] actually completely overlooked it on the agenda until he sent the email out.

[19:04] Um, I'm not going to repeat everything that that Lou said, but I have many

[19:08] similar questions. I know we have the three major transit hubs that are along

[19:12] Atlantic, but all these other, you know, white dots with the blue outlines, um,

[19:16] I'm not sure what those those are. Um, I don't think there's a state law that

[19:20] goes along with those yet. So, I'm really looking for more clarification on

[19:24] what's going on, um, with this this map. Um, and you know, I again I don't want

[19:30] to duplicate a lot of what L said, so I will leave it there. And um, Bert would

[19:35] like to speak as well. >> Hi there. My name is uh, Bert Ing. I'm a

[19:40] resident of Alhhamra. Uh, as just disclosure, I am uh, a member of the,

[19:46] uh, historic preservation commission. Uh, and I'm speaking about item number

[19:51] four, not about the actual conditional use permit, but rather the uh the

[19:56] exhibit uh with the map and the uh the definitions and delineations of uh the

[20:02] different transit stops. Um uh again, I want to thank Lou for bringing this to

[20:07] our attention. I uh I didn't see it. Um, but when I did look at it, a concern

[20:14] that I did have was what the blue circles really mean. What

[20:20] is the implication uh of making those blue and how that

[20:26] affects our zoning and how that affects potentially our historic preservation

[20:31] ordinance from the perspective of uh preserving homes, preserving

[20:35] neighborhoods. Um, I know that there's a lot of different Senate bills out there

[20:40] right now. Uh, and a lot of things are up in the air. Uh, but coming down the

[20:46] pipeline seems like there's, you know, definitions of, uh, bus stops, transit

[20:52] stops, and so on that actually have implications to zoning. And I'm curious

[20:57] what that map means that we have, uh, in that exhibit, and again, what the

[21:02] implications are. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Rang. Do we have any

[21:08] other speakers online? >> No, we don't.

[21:11] » Okay, cool. Can staff speak to any of those concerns about the blue circles or

[21:19] the purpose of the the of the blue circles on the map? Yeah, just to

[21:23] provide some context, um, uh, at a recent meeting, after a recent planning

[21:27] commission meeting, we had received a request from a commissioner to in the

[21:30] future include the, um, major transit stop map as an attachment for your

[21:35] reference. So, that was the reason why we included it is just for reference, so

[21:39] to help you guys better understand where these stops are. Um, for the purposes of

[21:43] this project and um, how this project relates to AB2097.

[21:48] under AB2097, the project is not required to meet this

[21:53] the city's minimum parking requirements. So that's why we included the map just

[21:56] to demonstrate that they are providing parking, but um if there was a desire

[22:01] for the commission to impose stricter parking requirements or additional

[22:05] parking, we wanted to advise you that AB2097 precludes us from doing that. Um,

[22:12] with respect to the map, there was an update to the legislation um, in AB2097

[22:17] that went into effect uh, January 1st of this year, and it updated the definition

[22:21] of a major transit stop from 15-minute headways to 20-minute headways. So, with

[22:26] that updated definition, it now includes additional stops in the city,

[22:30] particularly those on the um, ACT line, the blue and green line, which do have

[22:34] 20-minute headways. So that is why you are seeing additional um areas of the

[22:40] city that now qualify as a major transit stop based on that public resources code

[22:44] definition which was updated earlier this year. Thank you.

[22:48] I also understand that some of you are referring or some of our callers are

[22:53] referring to SB uh 79 um which I understand will be there will

[23:00] be a discussion at our next uh city council meeting on SB79 and its

[23:05] implications. So stay tuned for that. Uh

[23:12] well hang on just one second. Let me see.

[23:16] Uh so we have nobody else wishing to speak

[23:20] then I will close the public testimony portion of the public hearing and uh

[23:26] first um we'll go to uh see if the applicant wants to respond to any

[23:31] comment that was made. Okay. And does staff want to respond to any comment on

[23:36] any public testimony or comments made? >> Not at this time.

[23:40] » Okay. Then commissioners. >> Yes. Thank thank you for thank you for

[23:43] your forbearance. This is a followup to that and I

[23:47] appreciate the uh the background you gave us. I think the the major point is

[23:52] what about the two major the intersection of two major routes as a

[23:58] defining uh criteria for a criterion for designation of major transit stop.

[24:11] » So here's your question. What qualifies as a major bus route?

[24:15] » No, the intersection. So, right. So, it says that the intersection of two major

[24:20] bus routes. >> Correct.

[24:22] » What what defines that if that of what I'm looking at this I don't see major

[24:28] bus routes intersecting at those at the blue dots.

[24:33] » So, okay. So are your question is how we determined those dots are intersecting

[24:38] bus lines >> not bus lines major intersection because

[24:42] that's the that's the language right two >> it's the intersection of two major bus

[24:48] routes >> that's right

[24:49] » yes >> so intersection not along the along the

[24:52] route but where it intersects that's what I'm understanding is where they

[24:56] intersect that's what's considered a maj major bus

[25:00] » yes so that's what's reflected on the map is it's showing the intersection of

[25:05] ma of major bus routes >> and and that's the blue dots that's the

[25:10] yellow ones, right?

[25:16] » So both the blue the dots with the white dots with the blue outline and the

[25:22] yellow dot with the red outline both reflect the intersection of uh bus

[25:28] routes, >> major bus routes.

[25:31] » Correct. Yes. What the difference in in what they're

[25:35] showing is that the the line along Atlantic um that's based on the the SCAG

[25:44] RTP regional transportation plan sustainable community strategy transit

[25:47] stops. And then the the ones with the white circle with the blue outline are

[25:52] just showing all of the transit stops that meet that uh qualification of the

[25:57] 20-minute headways. >> Okay.

[26:02] So then that does fall within the definition of an intersection,

[26:05] » right? Yes.

[26:09] » We have any other commissioners with Yes.

[26:12] President. >> All right. Just thank you. Thank you,

[26:15] President Olsson. Just to double click on that a bit more. Um I'm aware of the

[26:19] Metro line that runs on Atlantic and I'm aware of the SCAG um major transit stops

[26:24] that were at least depicted before the definition was revised. Um, and given

[26:30] the revision of the definition, now we have the apparently the ACT bus lines

[26:34] that now fall within the major transit stops definition. Um, so I could see why

[26:39] the dots here have circles. The white dots have circles and the yellow dots

[26:43] have circles in the map. What I'm still kind of struggling with though is the

[26:46] definition of major transit stop being that it's the intersection of two or

[26:50] major bus routes. So I don't understand where the again Atlantic has a corridor

[26:57] and with another bus route intersects with that Atlantic. That would be an

[27:02] example where they intersect as a major transit stop according to the code

[27:07] according to this code to 1064.3.

[27:12] Are you saying that every one of these act bus circles has is reflects reflects

[27:20] two two bus routes intersecting at that intersection.

[27:24] » Yes. So there's also a metro line that runs along valley. So it's the the fact

[27:28] that there's a metro line running along valley plus we have the act lines that

[27:32] » that runs up and north that runs north and south those ACT lines. So the um I

[27:37] think it's the green line, one of them is circular and the blue line I think um

[27:41] kind of goes down Fremont. So it's the intersection intersection of both the

[27:47] act lines and the metro lines. >> So what you're seeing here is those

[27:51] metro lines on valley metro lines on Atlantic and AC

[27:56] » correct. Yes. >> And ACT bus lines running intersecting

[28:00] directions of those like opposite of what the metro line runs. or having

[28:04] basically to qualify as intersecting, it just needs to have a stop basically at

[28:08] the same intersection. >> Even if they're going in the same

[28:10] direction, >> let's call it overlapping instead of

[28:12] intersecting. How about that? >> Yeah. So, they're not they're not

[28:16] intersecting in the terms of what I think of an intersection, different

[28:19] directions of traffic. They're just could be going parallel. So HCD has

[28:23] provided loose guidance and based on their loose guidance of how to interpret

[28:27] that it it basically just means that you have more than one bus line that shares

[28:33] the same stop somewhere at an intersection.

[28:36] » Okay. And then have we confirmed for sure that all our ACT bus lines that are

[28:40] reflected here are 20 minutes or less? >> Yes, that's correct.

[28:43] » Okay. And then uh just one point, I was the commissioner who asked to have these

[28:47] maps added. So thank you Maya for doing so. So, I apologize you're getting all

[28:50] these questions as a result of my request, but that's why I actually

[28:53] wanted to have that those maps added because there's two terms that have been

[28:57] thrown around in the past. One was um high uh quality transit areas and that's

[29:03] where the whole corridor is highlighted and now ACT is included. I don't even

[29:06] know what the map looks like now at this point. It might just be all blue. And

[29:09] then there's the high quality or I'm sorry, there's the high uh there's a

[29:14] major transit stop map which before was just you know essentially maybe maybe

[29:18] two full circles and partials of three other circles which now has been

[29:22] replaced by what you see in the agenda today. So again I think it's very

[29:25] informative that you did this. So thank you for doing that.

[29:30] » We have any other comments or questions? Commissioner Garda?

[29:33] » Yes. To bring us back to the topic at hand. I was wondering I had two

[29:37] questions. One is uh on the site plan there's an area in the alley that looks

[29:44] like it's an easement. Maybe it's an Edison easement where the power line

[29:49] runs. And I was just wondering um why it's just like a landscape strip in the

[29:55] back there and if the if the applicant is responsible for the maintenance of

[29:58] that. Mhm. Um so the site plan submitted by the applicant shows that there's a

[30:04] existing electrical pole uh located inside the landscaping strip. Um so

[30:08] based on the plans we could deduce that there is some sort of eastment to the

[30:11] north of the property uh with the landscaping belonging to the subject

[30:14] property. >> So the applicant is responsible for the

[30:18] maintenance of that strip back there behind the alley on the alley.

[30:21] » That's correct. >> Okay. And then um my second question was

[30:28] when we're considering the externalities of this type of use, I'm wondering if we

[30:32] can't um with the applicant's consent perhaps add a condition restricting the

[30:37] hours of operation to what they've listed in their application.

[30:44] » Well, maybe we'll have the applicant come to the podium to respond to see if

[30:47] they'd be amendable to that.

[30:53] So what do you guys propose?

[30:57] » So right now uh there's restrictions on hours for construction.

[31:01] » Okay. >> And it's 7 to 7, but in your application

[31:04] you seem to have more limited hours than that in particular on Saturdays and I'm

[31:08] wondering if you just would mind having a a condition imposed that would

[31:12] coincide with the hours of operation that you have listed on the application.

[31:17] » That's fine. Just to clarify for the record, so the

[31:21] the hours of operation that the applicant provided are Monday to Friday,

[31:24] 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Saturday, 9:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. and closed on Sundays.

[31:33] » Yes.

[31:37] » And uh I think that's it. Just want to come to you. Uh, one other thing I just

[31:41] wanted to ask was, uh, there seems to be a lot of, um, items that are stored on

[31:46] the site that are unrelated to the automobile repair use, and I'm wondering

[31:51] if, uh, you're amable to removing those items from the site.

[31:55] » That's not a problem. >> Okay. Thank you.

[31:57] » Yeah.

[32:01] » We have any other comments or questions from commissioners?

[32:06] Uh, all right then. Um, I will now close the

[32:12] public hearing and entertain any motion on the proposed resolution.

[32:17] » I move that it uh be approved as voiced or written

[32:23] » with the additional condition. >> Yes, the additional condition.

[32:26] » The hours of operation. >> I'll uh

[32:28] » hours of operation and clean up of the uh

[32:30] » extra things. >> Yeah, I think that's already in there.

[32:33] Good. >> Yeah, I'll second that.

[32:35] » Excellent. So, we have uh miss uh a motion from Commissioner uh Maharo and

[32:43] I'm sorry, Dorado and a second from Commissioner Gardea. Um do we have can

[32:49] we have a roll call, please? >> Chen, yes. Dorado,

[32:54] » yes. >> Garda,

[32:56] » yes. >> Galva,

[32:58] » yes. >> Ho,

[33:00] » yes. >> Wararez,

[33:02] » yes. >> Moaro,

[33:04] » yes. Garcia, >> yes.

[33:06] » Olsson, >> yes.

[33:09] Next, we have oral and congratulations. >> Yes.

[33:14] » Next, we have oral communications for non-aggendaized items. This is the time

[33:18] in the meeting when the public may comment on anything not listed on the

[33:21] agenda. Anyone wishing to address the commission may fill out a blue card, a

[33:26] speaker request card, and step to the podium. If you are on Zoom, you may

[33:30] raise your hand using the raise hand feature on Zoom. If you have called into

[33:34] the meeting, please dial star9 on your phone's dial pad to raise

[33:39] your hand and star six to unmute yourself. If you could also state your

[33:43] name for the record, it would be appreciated. You will have five minutes.

[33:47] Is there anyone wishing to provide public comments?

[33:54] » We have no one online. >> All right. Thank you.

[33:57] Uh then we will now continue to general comments from the planning commission

[34:02] and conference and meeting reports. Uh do we have

[34:07] uh do commissioners have any comments or announcements?

[34:14] All right, then we will now continue to comments from staff. Is there a report

[34:18] from the director of community development?

[34:20] » Uh there's no report tonight. >> Right. Thank you. We have now completed

[34:23] all the items on this evening's agenda. The next regularly scheduled meeting of

[34:27] the Alhhamra Planning Commission will be held on Monday, September 15th at 7 PM.

[34:33] We are adjourned.

[34:38] » Well, that was easy. I know it's intense.

[34:50] » Get a headache behind your left eye. >> Everybody's working. Say,

City of Alhambra Planning Commission Meeting - August 18, 2025

Transcript