Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[3:15]
My phone now says it's 7:00 and
therefore I will call this meeting
[3:22]
of the Bedford Planning Board to order
and uh February 24th, 2026. Six. First,
[3:30]
I must begin by reading the statements
from the governor and government.
[3:38]
Pursuant to legislation S 2475 extending the
suspension on certain provisions of the open
[3:44]
meeting all GL38 paragraph 20, this meeting of
the Bedford Planning Board will be conducted via
[3:49]
remote participation to the greatest extent
possible. No in one person uh attendance of
[3:58]
members of the public will be permitted but every
effort will be made to ensure that the public can
[4:03]
adequately access the proceedings in real time
via technological means. In the event that we're
[4:09]
unable to do so despite best efforts, we will post
on the town's website an audio or video recording
[4:15]
transcript or other comprehensive repres represent
record of proceedings as soon as possible after
[4:22]
the meeting. Thank you one and all for listening
to that and it's also notifying to all attendees
[4:30]
that the meeting is being recorded and which we
much appreciated and we are now at full strength
[4:37]
and I believe the um first topic on the agenda
is a comprehensive plan update and it might be
[4:45]
Jennifer Goldson here to speak on this. Am I
correct? Yes. Hi Steve. Thank you so much. Jen
[4:51]
Goldson here. Um Austin and I have a Oh, can you
hear me? We can hear you and thank you. Yes, thank
[5:00]
you. Did you want me to take over? Yeah, go ahead.
Can I also just interject, Mr. Chair, u that we
[5:06]
have a handful of people in the audience who are
interested in the subdivision application, which
[5:13]
late this afternoon was requested to be continued
without testimony. And so for I just thought we
[5:21]
might save Oh, is this the 145 Davis Road? Yeah,
145 Davis Road is not going to be heard this
[5:28]
evening. And um I didn't I didn't get through to
all the abutters I was aware of and I do see at
[5:36]
least two in the audience. Okay, that now do we
do we need to move to continue this to a future
[5:44]
meeting? Well, one option would be to take it out
of order and continue it to a future meeting. Let
[5:51]
let's let's do that. Then we we can have that and
then my memory won't be taxed any longer. Is there
[5:58]
a motion to uh continue the meeting the hearing
for 145 Davis Road, Jeffrey Circle, subdivision
[6:07]
plan to the next meeting. So move. Second. Second.
Okay. Thank you. Roll call vote. Todd Hi, Don. Hi,
[6:19]
Chris. Just point of clarification that is March
10th. Yes. I I just said a future meeting because
[6:26]
we we need them to speak. Well, it needs you
need if you don't continue to a date certain,
[6:33]
we'll have to readvertise it. So, okay. For the
time being, I would just ask you continue it to
[6:38]
March 10th. March 10th. Wonderful date. I like
that one. And how do you vote? John I. Chris I.
[6:48]
And the chair votes I. All right. Now we are going
to go back to um Jennifer and Austin. Whomever of
[6:59]
you would like to speak first. We are all ears.
Thank you. Appreciate it. Yeah, we're happy to be
[7:05]
here. I'm Jen Goldson. I'm the owner and founding
founding uh uh person founder of Jam Goldson,
[7:13]
my firm that I created about 20 years ago. We've
been doing uh comprehensive plans like this uh
[7:18]
as well as community engagement, housing plans,
housing trust, and uh and we've met some of you,
[7:24]
but not all of you. So, what we what we thought
we'd do is do a presentation just giving a status
[7:29]
report of what has been happening. There's a lot
that's been happening. I bet you've been involved
[7:34]
with some of it. I know that um that some of your
members on the committee uh have been very very um
[7:41]
instrumental in having some extremely successful
engagement over the past several several months
[7:48]
and uh we're going to present a little bit about
what we've learned and where we are in the process
[7:53]
and then what's coming up next. There's some
important uh things coming up including working
[7:57]
sessions in April that we hope you all can
go to and we'll tell you more about that as
[8:02]
we get into it. So Austin, I think you should be
able to share your screen as a panelist, right?
[8:11]
And uh you can just go to the the next slide.
So our team is a little bigger than who you see
[8:17]
here. Austin is our project manager and he really
keeps everything going on a day-to-day basis. He's
[8:23]
very organized and uh and he's been your main
point of contact. I'm the project director. Um,
[8:30]
and then we have a couple people that are
working more behind the scenes. Lucy Corlet
[8:35]
is one of our project assistants and Flavio Vila
um is also a project assistant and they've done
[8:41]
um quite a bit of mapping and analysis and and
and doing things behind the scenes. Uh you may
[8:47]
see them from time to time, but mostly you'll see
me and Austin. Next slide. So first I just want to
[8:54]
say that this has been an extremely collaborative
effort and that's the kind of project that we
[8:58]
that we enjoy and actually seek out and uh
the planning department the comprehensive
[9:04]
plan advisory committee and just the community
has had a a lot of energy towards engaging in
[9:08]
this so far. So we wanted to just upfront just
thank everyone for for the momentum um so far.
[9:18]
Uh so the the comprehensive plan is
I'm sure I'm sure a lot of this may
[9:23]
be review. Um there may also be people
watching who it's the first time they've
[9:27]
heard of a comprehensive plan. So we wanted to
go through a little bit of the basics before
[9:31]
we get into the meat of what's been
going on. But a comprehensive plan is
[9:35]
uh really a roadmap for the next decade for
Bedford. Uh it helps you to align decisions
[9:43]
um anticipate change and then connect investments
to community priorities. It's a it's really meant
[9:49]
to be a big push to get community engagement so
that decision makers like yourselves and other
[9:55]
boards and committees in the in the community
can really understand where the community wants
[10:00]
to see the town going and what's realistic
um as well for for the town. What kind of
[10:06]
uh implementation capacity do you have? Where can
you get funding? All of those things will be part
[10:11]
of really the next phase when we think about
strategies. But what we've been doing so far is
[10:16]
trying to understand what are the things that uh
community members really value about Bedford and
[10:22]
where what are they looking to improve upon, where
do they want to go in the future. Next next slide.
[10:33]
So we we believe in deep public engagement and
I think that's one of the reasons why Bedford
[10:39]
hired us. Um, we have a very strong track record
of of engaging communities in in this discussion.
[10:46]
We think this is probably the most important
discussion these community members will have
[10:51]
in the next decade um just about the future of
the town. And so we we do everything we can to
[10:56]
get the word out and uh and that includes um
uh well we'll talk more about the the different
[11:03]
kinds of engagement we've done, but essentially
our our goal is to have both both deep and broad
[11:09]
conversations. So we say deep public engagement
here but it's also broad public engagement. Some
[11:14]
people won't be able to contribute in a deep way
and that's okay. Um but we want everyone to have
[11:20]
the opportunity to participate at the level that
they can. So we have some shorter ways people can
[11:25]
engage and we have some deeper ways people can
engage. Raise your hand if you were part of a I
[11:30]
know a couple of you were but if you were part of
a meeting in a box that happened. Yeah. Yeah. So
[11:35]
that was that's an example of a deeper way that
you can engage. you can really have a in-depth
[11:41]
conversation for a couple of hours. Um, shorter
ways are uh, you know, stopping by a pop-up table
[11:49]
and uh, participating in an activity or um, or
even the survey could be considered a shorter way.
[11:55]
It's not it's not short short, but it's not as
long as a meeting in a box. Um, or even something
[12:00]
that we did online that we call the crowd map,
but it's basically an interactive map online. So,
[12:06]
that's kind of a quicker way. you know, you could
spend a long time on it or you could pop in and
[12:10]
say, "I want to see improvements here and I want
to preserve this." Um, our plans are also data
[12:15]
informed and uh and we'll go through everything
we've done to date, including the existing
[12:21]
conditions summary, which Austin will present to
you uh in more detail. And then uh really grounded
[12:29]
once we get to the strategy stage u grounded in in
in actionable strategies that are aligned. So you
[12:35]
can have actionable strategies, but if they're
not aligned with what the community is looking
[12:39]
for and what's realistic for the community, what
kind of regional things are going on, uh what kind
[12:44]
of resources are out there. So being both aligned
and actionable are really important. Uh all right,
[12:50]
next slide. So we are kind of straddling. We're
sort of at the end of phase two, starting to
[12:58]
enter into phase three. In the first phase, we we
really worked um to try to understand Bedford and
[13:07]
we put together uh an analysis that's backed up by
Excel spreadsheets um that are very detailed and
[13:15]
we put it into a summary format that um that the
department the planning department has reviewed
[13:22]
and I know the planning department also sent that
out to department managers back in late August,
[13:28]
early September. to also review um the committee
has also um uh reviewed this and uh and I want
[13:39]
to just say that tonight we'll present some of the
key findings but but Austin's really going to just
[13:45]
touch the surface of it because there actually
is a very robust analysis around the you know
[13:50]
we didn't want to spend an hour talking to you
about it or two hours so we're just hitting the
[13:54]
highlights so if you do have other questions or
or want to dive in deeper just let us now and I
[13:59]
think you got that um deliverable in your packet.
So you should be able to uh see the whole thing as
[14:05]
well. All right. And then starting really in
October, we really kicked off this phase two
[14:12]
which is really getting out into the community
and trying to understand what are the issues you
[14:17]
see today and and what is the future that you hope
for um that this plan will help you address. and
[14:23]
we spent several months starting in October uh and
really starting to wind down now around trying to
[14:29]
understand that. And so tonight, Austin's going to
also talk through what we learned from that. He's
[14:34]
going to go through the different tools that were
out there, some of the things that that people
[14:38]
told us, and then uh and then hit the highlights
of um of what themes came out of that. And then
[14:45]
we're about to enter into this phase three. This
is where people, you know, a lot of committee
[14:49]
members that I work with are itching to get to
this point um where we're really talking about
[14:54]
strategies, we're talking about zoning, we're
talking about local initiatives, talking about
[14:58]
staffing, resources, etc. for the next decade.
So, that's what we're just about to dive into.
[15:03]
And that phase will really go through until into
the summer, into the middle of the summer. um we
[15:10]
don't like to shortch change that or the visioning
or really any of these phases but but we like to
[15:16]
really come up with um a plan that has a lot of
ownership. So we think that the engagement at each
[15:22]
phase is very important including this strategy
phase and then at the end we'll basically wrap up
[15:29]
lay lay it all out. By then the decisions will
have been made um by the time you get into phase
[15:34]
four and we're basically making it pretty by then.
Uh we're we're kind of uh pulling in photographs,
[15:41]
laying it out, working with our graphic designer,
making sure that you think the way it it is laid
[15:47]
out and looks and the photos that we're using
is speaking to the community in the way you
[15:52]
want to convey the messages. Um and then we also
talk about implementation and how Bedford wants
[15:58]
to go about implementing what kind of oversight
etc. That all happens in phase four. All right.
[16:05]
So you can see also at the bottom um we have a
little graphic that just shows how the phases
[16:10]
are really overlapped. There's not really a clean
break like we're we're done and we're moving on.
[16:15]
Um they're all a bit overlap. All right, next
slide. All right. So, I'm going to hand this off
[16:21]
to Austin who will walk you through that existing
conditions summary profile and I'm sure he's happy
[16:27]
to answer questions and then uh and then we'll
touch on excuse me engagement vision themes and
[16:33]
then we'll wrap up with next steps. All right,
Austin. Hello everyone. Thank you so much for
[16:39]
having us here tonight. Um, I'm just going to
touch on some highlights like Jen said because
[16:44]
um, the existing conditions summary is a summary
of about 65 pages or so. So to touch on all 65
[16:52]
pages would definitely take more than two hours.
So I'm just going to touch on a few highlights
[16:56]
um, per per the kind of elements of planning that
we're coming to this comprehensive plan with that
[17:02]
have been really instrumental and valuable kind
of findings that we've taken into the project. But
[17:09]
first, I want to talk about our purpose and our
approach. So, the study of existing conditions is
[17:15]
something that's required in comprehensive plans
per Massachusetts general laws. And traditionally,
[17:20]
they're very lengthy, very technical documents.
Um, kind of a process document that can sometimes
[17:26]
get lost or get forgotten or not even get fully
brought forward. So we want to make sure that all
[17:32]
the work that we're doing for the town establishes
a really strong foundation for the community to be
[17:38]
planning for the next 10 years of really useful
information that's relevant directly to the
[17:44]
project to the next stages of the project and to
the next 10 years. So the elements as part of that
[17:50]
planning study include land use, housing, economic
development, natural and cultural resources, open
[17:57]
space and recreation, services and facilities,
and circulation and transportation. So, we really
[18:02]
wanted to make sure that going through all of
that kind of breadth of information, we're right
[18:08]
sizing our research approach to the planning task
that's at hand because there's a lot of different
[18:13]
technical studies. Um, like we conducted Bedford's
housing study several years ago, and that's a more
[18:19]
in-depth way of diving into one of these details,
but we wanted to make sure the study we were doing
[18:24]
was the right kind of tool for the job for this
comprehensive planning project. So, we found out
[18:30]
that Bedford is growing, diversifying, and aging.
Growing to about just over 14,000 residents in
[18:37]
2020 as of the 2020 census, diversifying with more
than one in four residents now identifying as a
[18:43]
race other than white, and aging with 20% more
residents over the age of 65 since the year 2010.
[18:51]
Population projections vary significantly though
depending on the methodology that's used. Um,
[18:56]
and this is something that we're seeing that's
pretty common throughout municipalities in the
[19:00]
region. It really depends on the local
land use regulations, migration patterns,
[19:06]
um, both in the region and internationally. That's
something I know that's kind of shifting quite a
[19:12]
bit past few years. Austin, could you hold a
second? Um, do you want people to ask questions
[19:19]
uh, while you're like right now Chris has his
hand up. You know, I wonder if it I wonder
[19:26]
Austin if it would be better to get through the
answers might might become apparent and sort of
[19:31]
take them at the end. That's what what that's
what my advice would be. Okay. Thank you Chris.
[19:39]
Okay. Thank you. So the the key factors kind of
in in what the population projections could turn
[19:47]
out to be vary significantly. Um, so it it could
be one of very two very different answers. Um,
[19:54]
but it will depend on how the next few years
shake out and how Bedford kind of aims to meet
[20:00]
the the challenges and opportunities that it's
facing. And when we studied housing in Bedford,
[20:06]
we found that there's a mismatch between the
households and the homes available for them.
[20:11]
There's a lot more large homes than there are
large households. And part of this is just because
[20:16]
of the fact that homes were built at one point
and households change on a faster basis than the
[20:23]
homes themselves do. So for example, I know Jen's
household recently got smaller because both of her
[20:29]
kids went away to college. So her household shrank
significantly and now she has extra bedrooms
[20:35]
um that she's not really using. My household
also got smaller cuz I'm now living in a studio
[20:40]
by myself. So now I'm a oneperson household. Um,
so examples like that are kind of show how quickly
[20:46]
the population's needs can change in terms of
housing, but when a building lasts 100 years,
[20:51]
it can be slow for them to keep up. So, there's
been a long-term trend toward smaller and smaller
[20:56]
household sizes. This is not just in Bedford, but
it's true in in the region and also the nation.
[21:02]
And that means there's often a mismatch between
what people need and what the household needs
[21:07]
are and the the available homes. And this means
that even if Bedford's population doesn't grow in
[21:13]
terms of total number of people, there could be a
need for housing production even just for smaller,
[21:19]
more accessible homes for an aging population
or for people that are living alone or living
[21:25]
as a couple longer um longer in their lives.
And we also looked at housing cost burden. And
[21:33]
so what we mean in the field when we're talking
about cost burden is that your housing costs are
[21:38]
really high for your income. If you're a renter,
that means your rent, your renters's insurance,
[21:42]
your utilities. If you're a homeowner, that means
property taxes, mortgage, mortgage insurance,
[21:47]
etc. And if you're costbururdened, it means
you're spending more than 30% of your income
[21:53]
on housing costs. If you're extremely
costburdened, you're spending more than
[21:58]
50% of your income on those housing costs. And so
in Bedford, what we found was that there are cost
[22:06]
burdens that extend not just to extremely low
or very lowincome individuals and households,
[22:12]
but also to moderate income households. So there's
a need need for more deeply affordable homes to
[22:18]
be certain, but still a need to home for homes
that are affordable at 80% and even at 100% AMI.
[22:26]
And the AMI when we talk about that in the field
as well is that kind of middle income level in
[22:31]
the region used to determine eligibility for
affordable housing programs. Many are at 80%
[22:37]
AMI like those in chapter 40B. Um the community
preservation act sets it at 100% AMI. Currently
[22:44]
the AMI for a family of four is 160,900. Um for
a single person household to be qualified in
[22:51]
low income. That's up to 80% AMI. Here is
a $92,650 income for a single person. So,
[23:00]
they qualify for subsidized housing under 40b. And
you can see that just nearly a half of Bedford's
[23:08]
households that are in that range are spending
either more than 30% or more than 50% of their
[23:15]
income on housing costs. and it's twothirds
of households basically in the very low income
[23:21]
and extremely low income categories. So that
kind of points to some significant challenges
[23:27]
with housing cost and the amount that people are
having to pay to maintain their home in Bedford.
[23:36]
We also looked at Bedford's local economy
and we really learned that Bedford is a very
[23:40]
specialized and evolving employment hub. And
when I said employment hub, I mean that more
[23:45]
people commute into Bedford than out during the
day. This really reinforces Bedford's status as
[23:53]
uh a home of biotech companies and of industrial
areas. Lots of people come into town to work every
[23:59]
day in those higher wage specialized sectors.
And there's also opportunity there, not just
[24:04]
um the strength that Bedford has for the evolution
of those sectors. um as spaces become vacant
[24:10]
or the economy changes um less toward biotech
and more toward AI and other things like that,
[24:17]
the evolution of those sectors can give Bedford
some opportunities for advanced manufacturing,
[24:21]
biotech, and defense R&D. And the live and work
and hybrid employment environment also changes up
[24:27]
um Bedford's local economy as well. Some
underutilized older office or commercial buildings
[24:33]
can see reuse and new uses. And more all day
commerce because folks are maybe working hybrid
[24:39]
or having a flexible work schedule can lead to
more revitalization of commercial corridors like
[24:45]
the great road. If there's more folks available
at more times a day to get their laundry done,
[24:50]
to go to the cleaners, to go to a coffee
shop, etc. When we looked at transportation,
[24:56]
we also found that the congestion patterns in
Bedford are evolving. And this is both true
[25:01]
um in the traffic patterns as well as anecdotally
partly because of remote and hybrid work. The peak
[25:06]
traffic patterns are more spread throughout
the day now. Um so you're seeing more all day
[25:11]
congestion throughout town. There's also limited
transit options in Bedford and low use of transit.
[25:17]
Um less than 1% of Bedford residents use transit
to get to work. It could be that more residents
[25:23]
are using it for nonwork trips. Um but the g the
options that are given are not um as conducive
[25:29]
to Bedford residents forgetting to work as they
stand. There's also safety concerns at key areas
[25:35]
um with over a thousand crashes in since 2020. The
pedestrian bicycle plan implementation has been
[25:41]
aligned with other ongoing projects like the great
road master plan and to the extent possible the
[25:46]
um new traffic calming policy that's being
rolled out. Um, so there's some alignment
[25:52]
there in terms of increasing safety. We
also found that Bedford has a very active
[25:58]
community culture with lots of local event
programming, a Bedford cultural district,
[26:02]
a local historic district that regulates exterior
changes to the buildings in downtown Bedford,
[26:08]
and a significant number of documented historic
resources. um though most of them are after the
[26:13]
year 1700 and scattered in a few specific places
in town along corridors um and in specific areas.
[26:23]
We also know that Bedford has a really valued
areas of green space and recreation access.
[26:29]
There's abundant outdoor and indoor
recreation facilities partly because
[26:33]
um Bedford was an early adopter of the Community
Preservation Act at the 3% search charge level.
[26:38]
So that has given the town dedicated regular
funding and access to those state distributions
[26:43]
to to get bonus money to dedicate to open space
to historic preservation and community housing as
[26:50]
well. The green network covers nearly a third
of the town um third of the town's area with
[26:55]
a federal wildlife refuge areas, town forests,
neighborhood parks, centralized athletic fields,
[27:01]
and rail trail connections. 70% of the open
space in town is permanently protected. And
[27:06]
most of that protection comes from the federal
ownership in the wildlife refuge. Bedford
[27:12]
also has a reputation as a well-run local
government known for outstanding schools,
[27:16]
prudent fiscal management, and robust public
services. We found that some older facilities
[27:22]
may need some accessibility and adaptation
upgrades in coming years, and succession
[27:26]
planning and workforce development are ongoing
needs as they are for many small town governments.
[27:33]
So moving forward the key kind of points that we
found to summarize that that 65page document that
[27:40]
itself was a summary of a lot of analysis that
we had done on the back end is that Bedford's
[27:46]
not static. The community is evolving and ready
to meet the changing circumstances. So we have
[27:52]
the kind of final edits incorporated from the
planning department comments that we received a
[27:56]
few weeks ago and we're ready to post the latest
draft on the project website for the public.
[28:03]
So, I'll pause here and take any comments or
questions you have on this piece before I continue
[28:09]
on to the vision, themes, and goals. Okay,
Chris, you have the floor. Thank you. Yeah. Uh,
[28:16]
first off, excuse me, great presentation. Uh,
thank you so much for this. Will the the slides
[28:23]
be available? Sorry, I think I coughed exactly
at the time of your the important part of your
[28:29]
question. Please will the slides be available?
Absolutely. Absolutely. And second question,
[28:37]
if you go back to the population predictions,
yes, and this is getting a bit into the weeds,
[28:45]
but the the two projections which diverge
dramatically after 2020, I'm Yeah. Did either of
[28:54]
those models attempt to go back to 1990 and then
forward predict to 2020 to see how they did with
[29:00]
respect to reality? That is a great question. Um
I I don't have that number off the top of my head,
[29:06]
but I know that um MAPC has been doing these
projections for several decades now. Um so I can
[29:13]
I can go back through and have a double check of
how close they were to reality. Yeah, I'm I'm very
[29:20]
curious, you know, how they they look, you know,
five 10 years out if they have have projections
[29:25]
from from backways. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. I I'm
I have a feeling that I'm recalling from the last
[29:33]
comprehensive plan that you all did um several
years ago that the projections were expected
[29:38]
to be a little more stable. So, it looks like
there was more growth than they were expecting.
[29:44]
um that could be partly due to some local land
use regulation changes or any 40bs that might
[29:49]
have come through over the last 1015 years or so
that could have impacted that. Um things like that
[29:55]
they can't really you can't predict a 40B. Yeah.
Yeah. And that's you part of my question is that
[30:01]
they're you know they're going to have their model
and then there are other things that they can't
[30:06]
never mind if the model is you the li the inherent
limitations of the model itself. Yeah, you have,
[30:13]
you know, noisy inputs and you're not capturing
all effects. Do the effects that you're not able
[30:18]
to capture in the model end up dwarfing the trends
that that you're able to uh that you think you're
[30:25]
able to predict? That that's where I'm going with
that. Yeah, Chris, those are great questions and
[30:28]
I'm always skeptical of the projections. You know,
as a planner, you know, there's so much that could
[30:33]
that could change. I see Katherine has her hand
up. Yeah, I was just going to comment on this that
[30:38]
um I actually raised with Austin the fact that
last time there had been two sets of projections
[30:44]
um being produced around the time we were doing
the plan um and that you know they they've varied
[30:49]
quite a bit and so we were interested to see well
did one of them come out as right and the other
[30:54]
one wrong or whatever and it did actually come out
in between the two um but but it's as a result of
[30:59]
that comment I think that they've shown again
there are two different projections available
[31:04]
um so I think That's I mean that's an
interesting point in it in its own right and
[31:08]
uh as they've explained it depends on it depends
partly on what you do to follow on from the plan.
[31:14]
It depends partly on your own actions in terms of
zoning but it also depends on all sorts of things
[31:19]
like turnover in the existing housing stock and a
lot and the economy and lots of different things.
[31:26]
Um following on that, what about neighboring
towns to us and yet because you're working
[31:34]
with a lot of towns, Jennifer, is MAPC
their preferred U model that other towns
[31:41]
use. It depends. We typically present both
just because we know that the they diverge
[31:47]
and in in my opinion it highlights the fact that
nobody really knows what's going to happen. Um,
[31:54]
so I think it's safer to just use both,
but sometimes communities have asked us to
[32:00]
uh use one over the other. All right. Thank you.
You're welcome. Other questions or comments?
[32:12]
All right. You want to go back to Can you
presenting Austin? I would be pleased to.
[32:19]
All right. So, my next little presentation
section is the draft, vision, themes,
[32:24]
and goals. And I'm going to again touch on these
um in a higher level because I know you received
[32:28]
more of the full content in your packet, and
it wouldn't be nearly as fun for me to just
[32:33]
read them verbatim. So, where this came from,
68 678 participation points and counting. So,
[32:41]
by using all of these different ways to get input
that Jen kind of touched on in the beginning,
[32:46]
the community survey that was held online, the
crowd map, which is that tool where you can drop
[32:51]
pins on the map, the meeting in a box, which I
know some of you joined um and some that were able
[32:56]
to be hosted by the advisory committee members um
at town hall and at the library, as well as the
[33:02]
inerson openhouse that we facilitated. using all
those different ways. Um you've already exceeded
[33:07]
the amount of public input from the previous
comprehensive plan and we're only halfway
[33:12]
through. So there's more public input planned
um especially in this next stage in phase three
[33:18]
where we'll be focusing on strategies with six
in-person workshops scheduled for midappril. So,
[33:24]
I wanted to touch on kind of that that overview of
the public engagement process so far and what we
[33:30]
heard because what we heard directly informed
the vision, core themes and goals. We didn't
[33:36]
invent those out of out of thin air. We took
them through a a verbatim reading of everything
[33:42]
that we had transcribed from the open houses, the
workshops, the meetings in a box, and the survey.
[33:47]
We heard things like people want more walkability
and bike accessibility, more affordable housing,
[33:53]
meaning smaller units that are just easier to
upkeep and more affordable to buy. Better public
[33:58]
transportation options. Someone said, "I want to
feel that my kids are safe when they walk or bike
[34:03]
to school." And one person said they're looking
for a more overarching look and feel of the town
[34:08]
to bring people together. And when we asked in
the survey, "What do you love most about Bedford?"
[34:13]
A quarter of people said that they love that
it's a safe community. 20 just nearly 20% of
[34:19]
people said that outstanding school public
school system is what they loved most. Other
[34:25]
responses were accessible open spaces and natural
resources, the town's historic significance,
[34:30]
and award-winning town services. Through the crowd
map, we got a lot of very detailed space-based um
[34:38]
feedback that were partly drawing into the vision,
themes, and goals and partly drawing directly into
[34:42]
some strategy ideas that we're starting to work
on behind the scenes. People suggested ideas like
[34:48]
adding a new crosswalk to the school campus,
more great roadfacing small shops to create a
[34:55]
visually appealing walkable shopping area like
Conquered Center or Lexington Center. And then
[35:00]
ideas for Lumis Street in the Depot area being
a potential second town center or common area if
[35:06]
done well with buildings like the Blake Block more
downtown cited as an example with green space,
[35:11]
hidden parking, mixed use, outdoor seating, and
public art. So people got a lot of good ideas
[35:17]
flowing through the crowd map and we were really
happy to see all of those all of those engagement
[35:21]
points there. So in general the structure of the
plan is a little bit like a Russian nesting doll.
[35:28]
The vision statement o overlies the whole thing.
Um so that's kind of the guiding message of the
[35:34]
comprehensive plan. Each of the themes sits
underneath that vision statement as one of the
[35:41]
kind of themes of that vision. And each theme
has a set of goals. The goals are designed to
[35:46]
support that theme and the theme then supports the
vision. So tonight's focus is just on the vision,
[35:53]
themes and goals. The next layer under
that is that each goal will have a set
[35:57]
of strategy ideas. The strategies are much more
specific ideas. Um like Jen mentioned earlier,
[36:03]
which committees are going to do which kinds of
actions over the next 10 years or if you want to
[36:08]
study something else in particular, that's
a strategy idea. So the goals, the vision,
[36:13]
the themes um are more intentionally higher level
because they're more about what you're aiming for
[36:20]
rather than how you're going to get there. The
plan is also going to include metrics. So that's
[36:26]
part of the way that you'll be able to measure
your progress toward the goals and toward the
[36:31]
vision in the themes. Those are specific ways
to kind of measure that success. And so we'll
[36:36]
be developing those in phases three and four as
the strategy ideas are are worked on and revised.
[36:45]
So there's six themes in the plan and these
themes are are both going to become chapters
[36:51]
of the comprehensive plan itself but are also six
themes that we heard from the public engagement
[36:57]
and these have been workshopped with the the
advisory committee in two separate meetings. Um,
[37:02]
so we feel really good about presenting them here
to you tonight. And we also have a public comment
[37:07]
survey open on our project website to get more
public feedback on these as well. So the first
[37:13]
theme is safe and easy ways to get around. This
is all about safety, about choice and how to
[37:18]
get around town and about mitigating traffic.
The second theme is vibrant village centers
[37:25]
and a stronger local economy. This one's about
strengthening what already exists in Bedford,
[37:30]
about improving the quality and function of these
spaces as they evolve. The third one is design
[37:37]
history and a strong sense of place. This is about
guiding how the town evolves. Really strengthening
[37:44]
the community identity through public spaces
and through design and through a celebration of
[37:49]
the town's history. The fourth theme is homes
that support choice, dignity, and belonging.
[37:56]
That's about providing the options that people
need as their households evolve and as their needs
[38:01]
evolve and providing those options thoughtfully
and in the right locations so that people can
[38:06]
have the kind of lives that they want to lead in
Bedford. It's about choice, not about mandates.
[38:11]
It's about adapting and allowing the homes to
meet the needs of residents as they evolve. The
[38:18]
fifth theme is belonging, civic life, and shared
spaces. This one's about civic involvement and
[38:24]
about trust in local government. There's a lot of
different ways in which communication has changed
[38:30]
in the last 10 years since the last comprehensive
plan. Social media has changed a lot. Internet
[38:34]
communication is totally different. Um, so
it's about making sure the town is up to speed,
[38:39]
up to-date, and how people want to communicate,
how they want to engage with local government on
[38:44]
adapting and meeting to resident needs um
through the processes that the town uses,
[38:49]
the town's facilities, and also the
town services. And theme six is outdoor
[38:54]
recreation and environmental stewardship.
And this reflects a really strong community
[38:59]
identity with open spaces, with the town's
environment, sustainability, and recreation.
[39:06]
So these themes are really kind of directional
for the plan. Each theme will be given its own
[39:11]
chapter of the plan so that we can go through in
detail what those goals are and what the strategy
[39:17]
ideas are for each of the themes. And the goal is
for it to be aspirational. So it's partly about
[39:24]
what success feels like in 2036 after 10 years.
It doesn't really mandate um specific projects
[39:31]
or regulatory changes in these themes. those
are more to come in the strategies over this
[39:36]
next phase. So this these themes start to outline
your roadmap um which is much more of a a kind of
[39:44]
flexible approach to how you work in the next
10 years rather than a very rigid blueprint. So
[39:50]
you've got flexibility in how you approach meeting
the vision. It's really about how the town guides
[39:57]
change over the next 10 years. So as I mentioned
earlier um the goals are intentionally high level.
[40:03]
The themes are intentionally high level and they
reflect um directly what we heard from the public
[40:08]
input so far and how you go about them through
the specific strategies that we'll be working
[40:14]
um on over the next several months
are flexible to lots of different
[40:18]
approaches. So I'll pause here if there are any
questions or comments on the themes thus far.
[40:32]
I don't see any hands said presently. You You must
be dazzling everybody. Austin can press on. Okay,
[40:42]
I will. So, next I just wanted to touch on the
project timeline. Jen gave a little bit more of
[40:48]
a highlevel overview of the four phases of the
comprehensive plan and we're just entering phase
[40:53]
three of four right now. Overall, the project
schedule, we're operating on an expedited project
[40:59]
timeline to adhere to a contract end date of
the end of October of this year, both on time
[41:05]
and on budget. So, when we first met with um Tony
really in the end of the summer this past summer,
[41:11]
to kind of nail out the project management plan,
the schedule of advisory committee meetings,
[41:17]
we scheduled all of those meetings and made the
tentative agendas for the meetings up to a year
[41:22]
in advance. Um, so that's kind of shown on this
schedule here. Each of the brown tiles is one
[41:28]
of the advisory committee meetings that we already
have an agenda in mind for. So we're just entering
[41:34]
phase three right now. Phase three is all about
the strategies as we've said. And in phase three,
[41:39]
we're planning multiple stages of review and input
from both town staff as well as members of boards,
[41:46]
committees, and commissions and the public
over the next several months. So phase three is
[41:51]
going to last until about midsummer or so. Um and
there will be kind of a a volley of review stages
[41:58]
um bouncing back from town staff to us to the
advisory committee to us to the public to the
[42:05]
advisory committee. So there's lots of layers
of review in that. Um, and through revision and
[42:10]
and revising and revising the strategy list,
we think you're going to really come up with
[42:14]
something that is really strongly vetted by all of
the key stakeholders and the community in Bedford.
[42:21]
So the first up is kind of a preliminary staff
review and we've sent a preliminary list of
[42:26]
strategy ideas that our team has prepared
to the planning department staff so they're
[42:31]
able to look at it this week and get us some
preliminary comments before we bring it to the
[42:36]
advisory committee at their next meeting. The
second layer of review is the public strategy
[42:43]
working sessions. Those are scheduled for April
and I'll touch on those in just a second. Um our
[42:48]
agenda and plan for those. The third is another
staff board and committee commission review.
[42:54]
This time with a focus on implementation needs.
So once the strategy list has gone through two
[43:00]
layers of review or so with the advisory committee
with the public and then with some word smmithing
[43:05]
and adjustments from from our team, we'll bring
it to staff boards committees and commissions
[43:11]
to focus directly on implementation. So now that
the strategies have been ironed out a bit more,
[43:16]
what would you actually need if you're responsible
for implementing this? What are your staffing
[43:21]
needs? What are your funding needs? What are
the timeline considerations for this? And we can
[43:26]
bring all of that input into the implementation
matrix closer to the end of the plan. So there's
[43:32]
advisory committee review between each stage
of the engagement there. And open right now,
[43:40]
as I mentioned earlier, is a public comment survey
on the vision, themes, and goals that you received
[43:44]
in your packet. We've tentatively planned to hold
this open until this coming Wednesday, March 3rd,
[43:50]
um because that gives us enough time to summarize
all the public feedback and bring it to the
[43:55]
advisory committee for their next meeting. So for
any of the members of the public watching, that
[44:00]
is available on the project website. The link is
here. It's tinyurl.com/bedford comprehensive plan.
[44:06]
That's the hub website for the project that we've
set up to host all of the engagement activities.
[44:15]
And next up, as I mentioned earlier,
are the strategy working sessions. So,
[44:18]
the tentative dates we have held for these um and
we're in the process of reserving those spaces,
[44:24]
as I understand it, with town staff are Sunday,
April 12th at Town Hall in the Read Room and
[44:29]
Saturday, April 18th at Bedford High School in
the cafeteria. We're planning for these to be
[44:35]
larger scale public events um so that we wanted
those kind of big spaces so that we could have a
[44:41]
lot of kind of interactive activity. The design
is some 2-hour small group discussions. There's
[44:47]
one session for each theme of the plan. So,
six sessions total split over those two days.
[44:54]
There'll be themes 1 through 3 on April 12th and
themes 4 through 6 on April 18th. Our plan is to
[45:01]
have these open to everyone. So whether you're a
member of the public, whether you're town staff, a
[45:06]
member of a board or committee, um they're really
intended to be open for everyone. The small group
[45:11]
discussions will kind of break down into basically
going through the strategy ideas one by one for
[45:18]
each goal in that theme that's in that session. So
there will be opportunities to talk with friends
[45:24]
and neighbors about what works about a strategy,
if a strategy wouldn't work too well, if what they
[45:30]
think about it, basically if they need any
revisions to it for them to feel like it's
[45:35]
it's not a deal breaker and they could support
it in the plan or if they have any new ideas
[45:39]
that they want to bring forward. So, it's a pretty
open-ended um but very designed workshop activity
[45:46]
for members of the public, boards, committees, and
town staff to engage with. We'll also have a kind
[45:52]
of presentation on the comprehensive plan process
at the beginning as well as remarks from some
[45:57]
local resource leaders. Um, and those are kind of
folks that we're going to want to be recruiting
[46:02]
over the next few weeks if they want to offer a
few words at the beginning of that session because
[46:07]
each session being one of the themes of the plan
is going to have kind of a theme. So, for example,
[46:12]
in theme four, which is all about housing, if
there's either a member of town staff or a member
[46:18]
of a border committee or just an active advocate
in the community that wants to say a few words at
[46:24]
the beginning about the existing conditions of
what housing is and what Bedford's status is,
[46:31]
um, in regards to that theme, they can offer a
few words there as well, and we'll kind of coach
[46:36]
them through how to help set the stage for the
working session. And then we'll break down into
[46:41]
small groups. And folks will get into groups
of three to five or so and work through each
[46:47]
of the strategies. Um rank the ideas, propose any
revisions to the strategies or suggest new ones
[46:53]
if they think there's a gap to help meet those
goals. So we we're going to need your help sharing
[46:59]
the word to this. We're going to post it on our
project website with a set of RSVP links. Um,
[47:05]
these will be public meetings, so an RSVP will
not be required, but we do encourage it because
[47:09]
it helps us know how much food to bring. And
it also helps us know um or helps us uh get
[47:16]
folks email addresses so that we can send them the
meeting materials in advance. We'll send them the
[47:20]
pre-work packet, which is basically all of the
strategy ideas with some space to take notes,
[47:26]
um, some space to jot down a ranking of the
strategies in advance. We're not going to
[47:31]
collect the pre-work packets. It's just for folks
to start thinking about the ideas before they
[47:36]
come to the meeting. Yeah, Jen, go ahead. I see
your hand up. I didn't want to break your flow,
[47:42]
but you keep saying um ranking and it's actually
rating. I know it's very easy to confuse those
[47:48]
two. Thank you. But yeah, we're not ranking them
is basically putting them in order and rating
[47:53]
them is talking about which ones we really
support, which ones we don't support at all,
[47:58]
and which ones we're feeling a little bit in
the middle about. So that's what the activities.
[48:04]
That's exactly right. So there's two kind of
key pieces of feedback that we'll be collecting
[48:10]
through these working sessions. The first is each
small group is going to be taking notes about each
[48:16]
of the strategy ideas and then notes at the end
about any other ideas that they want to see added.
[48:22]
So we'll collect those group notes um which just
takes if 50 people attend that's a and they split
[48:28]
into small groups that's just much fewer packets
for us to collect and easier to sort through the
[48:33]
ideas. The second piece is that we'll do the
rating system. So each individual that joins
[48:40]
will take an exit poll and rate the strategies
either a one if they want to remove the strategy,
[48:46]
they don't like it at all, a two if they think it
needs a little bit of work, but they could see it
[48:51]
in the plan, and a three if they think it's
good as is and they love it. and we'll take
[48:56]
all of those exit polls and basically average the
results to come up with an understanding of which
[49:02]
strategies are really the most supported by the
public um and the members that were able to come
[49:08]
to that meeting of what should be in the plan.
So that's that's our methodology for for that.
[49:17]
And I'll pause there again. Are there any
questions or comments or ideas about this so far?
[49:25]
Uh Chris, just wanted to uh note I I I looked
through the um your working version of the the
[49:34]
themes and goals and a lot of of good stuff there.
Wrote some fairly lengthy comments. I'm not sure
[49:41]
if Tony's passed those along to you yet. But
yeah, absolutely was I think what you presented
[49:48]
here great segue into strategies. And that was my
comments were really all oriented towards strategy
[49:55]
and what what you have and the um the draft themes
and goals. I'm really uh encourage that is the
[50:02]
next step. So I feel like this is really looking
good. Great. I'm glad to hear that and I hope to
[50:09]
see you at some of the working sessions. So one
look forward to attending and I and I said plural
[50:16]
because I Austin so I have a question. you you
mentioned on uh you know of the six vision areas
[50:22]
you're going to approach or somehow you're going
to approach or identify local experts uh advocates
[50:30]
etc in each of these areas. Um how are you going
to do that? Yeah, if I could there's multiple
[50:39]
ways you can do it but I just want to hear what
your thoughts are. Yeah, what we like to do is
[50:44]
get two or three re we call them resource people.
It's, you know, it can be town staff, it could be
[50:51]
a border committee member, it's somebody who has
a particular perspective that would be respected
[50:56]
in this group. Um, you know, and uh and how we
would do that is we would work with the committee,
[51:03]
the advisory committee and town staff to help
us figure out who those people are, who you want
[51:08]
to invite, and then uh we obviously have to talk
with them soon to make sure they're even available
[51:13]
those days. Yeah. How much notice uh that you just
your last sentence was the one uh how much notice
[51:22]
are you looking for on this to identify them?
Yeah, I mean it would be good at your next meeting
[51:27]
which I think is the week after next. I don't have
the date in my head. Um of the committee meeting,
[51:32]
not the planning board, uh to really start to I
don't know if you've already talked about it at
[51:37]
your last meeting, but to start to talk about
it and finalize that list shortly thereafter.
[51:44]
Yeah, we we haven't, but obviously there's there's
relevant committees on each of these areas in
[51:51]
town. Um Okay. And if um if committee members
could start thinking about it now and bring their
[51:57]
ideas to the meeting, that would be that would
probably be more efficient. Sure. Thank you.
[52:05]
Um look like press on Austin. Well, I will not
press much further because that is my final slide.
[52:18]
Well, thank thank you all. Um, thank you for
letting us go so long. I know we've spent almost
[52:23]
an hour of your time and I appreciate that.
Sometimes we get 15 minutes on these agendas,
[52:28]
so I really do appreciate it. It's it's um it's
nice to have a a lengthier discussion like this
[52:34]
and um and we we do hope you'll participate in
those uh working sessions. Um maybe not all.
[52:41]
We don't expect people to come to all of them,
but certainly you're welcome to all of them. I
[52:45]
know it's a long day, long two days. Um but we do
encourage it. and then we'll come back and see you
[52:52]
um at the end towards the end of the
the phase three and we should have a
[52:58]
short list at that point that you'll get
in your packet um so that you can sort of
[53:03]
see where we landed and give us any additional
comments before we start laying out the plan.
[53:11]
All right, I I think that's all all we have unless
you have any questions for us. uh questions both
[53:18]
members of the board or other people on the call
other residents of the town of Bedford. Yes,
[53:27]
Steve. It's fun. One of the things that um that
I was wondering as I was um listening um I know
[53:35]
we've we've scheduled you know a Saturday and a
Sunday um three sessions each of those days um to
[53:43]
do this. So, is it your vision that, you know,
if we have sessions at 9, noon, and 3, then in
[53:52]
each of those sessions, we'd go through sections
1 through 3, 1 through 3, 1 through 3 on like the
[53:59]
first day. What how how are you looking at? No,
sorry that wasn't clear. No, each session is just
[54:05]
one theme. Okay. So, session one is only theme
one and session two is theme two. Okay. Thank you.
[54:12]
You're welcome. Yeah, we're trying to make these
into as bite-sized chunks as we can, but still
[54:18]
allow people to have these deep discussions. So,
clearly we got we need to make it um well known
[54:28]
to the general public the time of each session
because obviously there's people that are focused
[54:34]
on a subject as opposed to all subjects. So, all
right, good that we got that clear. Thank you.
[54:42]
Um, if this is everything, then we will thank
you for your time. Look forward to seeing you
[54:48]
again shortly. Sounds good. Thank you so much. And
then I believe we just on the board, our next item
[54:59]
on the agenda is the um 229 Old Bill Ricker Road
subject. And the question then being, thank you,
[55:08]
J uh Jen. Thank you, Austin. Is there someone
to speak on this subject? John, uh if I may,
[55:15]
Mr. Chair. Yes, Tony. Just at 7 just before the
meeting started, conferring with attorney Brown,
[55:24]
uh they request that 229 be postponed to the
March 10 meeting. Okay. Is there a motion to John,
[55:36]
you have something to say? Um I was going to
suggest that we we let people know that the
[55:42]
other item in the session was also delayed. So for
I think I think you need to vote on a continuation
[55:49]
for the road. Oh, agreed. But we got to so some
hands up there. So for those in the audience,
[55:56]
the board has already continued at the request of
the applicant. The subdivision affecting 145 Davis
[56:05]
Road and Jeffrey Circle has already been continued
to March 10. And you and the board is about to
[56:15]
consider a request to postpone discussion of what
is or was 229 Old Bill Rucker Road, which is going
[56:27]
to be reumbered as 6 Michael Bacon Way under the
approved development plan for those properties.
[56:37]
Um but given the information that we just received
tonight from town council uh the applicants
[56:45]
council and the applicant uh have requested
to continue. They have seen those respons.
[56:56]
Yeah I just like to know what we have penciled
in for the agenda on March 10th. I'm starting
[57:04]
to think that this is going to get pretty full
if if it's continued to the 10th rather than the
[57:08]
uh subsequent meeting. Yeah. So, the problem
for our applicants is the subsequent meeting
[57:16]
is town meeting. Mhm. So, the planning board
won't meet is not scheduled to meet until u
[57:29]
I forgot the exact date, but the next meeting
is April uh the next scheduled meeting is not
[57:35]
till April 14th. Mhm. Um it is I would
guess that not everything being continued
[57:46]
tonight will be ready for discussion on the
10th. He would agree with Tony. U Todd you
[57:55]
get your hand up. Yeah. Apologize. I was just
looking for clarification that um the council
[58:02]
uh for 229 road has received the comments
from town council. Uh they have not yet.
[58:11]
Okay. That uh we I've simply notified
them that they have those comments.
[58:16]
Okay. And we'll share them either at the end
of this meeting or tomorrow. Okay. Thank you.
[58:25]
Okay. So, is there a motion
to extend consideration of the
[58:30]
um 229 Old Bill Ricker Road uh request for lease
of covenant to the March 10, 2026 meeting of the
[58:39]
Bedford Planning Board or say so moved? So
moved. Thank you, Todd. Chair, I mean second.
[58:52]
Second. Second. Thank you, John. How do you vote?
Todd I. John I. Don I. Chris I. And the chair
[59:06]
votes I. All right. That is uh then officially
extended. I think continued is a technical term,
[59:14]
right? Continued. Yeah. I I've not recovered
from snow shoveling the U. Thank you.
[59:23]
Um I think that's all of the formal topics
that were on the agenda and now we can go to um
[59:34]
liaison reports and then staff reports.
Anybody anything to come up from liaison?
[59:44]
If not we can move on to staff reports.
[59:51]
John, um I did not go to select board meeting two
weeks ago, but I did go last night. Um they still
[1:00:00]
haven't closed the warrant officially, although
they've they've closed all the wording is still
[1:00:07]
uh up in the air, but there aren't
aren't going to accept any more articles.
[1:00:11]
Um there was a long discussion
about the relationship between
[1:00:18]
uh elected boards and stat and and department
heads and and and the relevant department heads
[1:00:25]
which honestly I don't understand where they
where they ended up. Um and it's still going
[1:00:32]
back and forth about um the library versus the
planning board versus the board of health. Um,
[1:00:42]
I trust it will end up in some place useful.
Um, I don't think there was anything else.
[1:00:56]
Uh, Chris, while John's thinking, this is a
question for, uh, Mr. Mlan. Uh, two questions
[1:01:03]
actually. Um, if you want to bet on it ending up
someplace useful, I'm happy to take your money.
[1:01:13]
The uh the second question, I guess somewhat more
seriously, although I was serious about that,
[1:01:23]
I was on the charter and bylaw review
committee and we made a recommendation. Um,
[1:01:28]
so it wasn't simply an up or down vote on
whether to adopt the charter and bylaws
[1:01:34]
committee recommendation and put that to town
meeting. There was uh discussion of revising what
[1:01:41]
what we recommended. I guess it just would seem to
me that yeah, we had this committee to recommend
[1:01:48]
changes to the the charter and and bylaws.
time one might see fit to recommend simply
[1:01:56]
bringing forward those those recommendations
for town meeting to consider. So I think
[1:02:07]
I think there's a couple hang-ups and and and
and part of this was from the meeting a month
[1:02:13]
ago. There was some discomfort about treating the
library trustees different than planning board and
[1:02:22]
um board of health and and and then just
to make things even more complicated
[1:02:30]
um you know it seems like the interpretation of
our so there's an argument to be made that the
[1:02:38]
interpretation of our bylaws the town's bylaws
has changed over the last five or six years. Um,
[1:02:47]
and the board and and and I think the position
of the library board of trustees is that they
[1:02:53]
do not like the new interpretation. And if
the new interpretation is what's happening,
[1:02:58]
they want a bylaw change to um to clarify their
their authority visa v the library director.
[1:03:09]
So, it's it's um I think the
technical term is a mess.
[1:03:17]
I think that's a term you can
use in polite company. Yes,
[1:03:22]
I I could use other terms, but but
yes, this is a a family meeting. So,
[1:03:27]
um Well, I'm happy we're polite company. Worried
sometimes. other uh reports from liaison,
[1:03:41]
any information from staff? Well, just to just
to add to John's comments about the select board
[1:03:48]
meeting last night, the the proposed bylaw changes
do include um the changes that I announced in the
[1:04:01]
meeting preview about adding unregistered
and uninspected and non-operable vehicles.
[1:04:08]
So among the by among the general bylaw changes
in that that is absorbed into the larger article
[1:04:16]
to amend the the the general bylaw. It's not a not
going to be a standalone article for the purposes
[1:04:26]
of the general bylaw. It will be a standalone
article for the zoning part. uh it was announced
[1:04:34]
uh by the town manager and it it didn't seem to
get any didn't really seem to get any reaction. So
[1:04:40]
um so I guess it's it's just it's can be included
and um the um but and then to just I think also
[1:04:55]
just specific to Kurt's question about the
recommendation of the charter and bylaw review
[1:05:01]
committee where there was compromised language
that the planning board and board of health kind
[1:05:06]
of accepted where you know policy you know, policy
direction from the elected board still applies
[1:05:15]
to my position and to the director of health. But
the uh there are concerns still among the library
[1:05:25]
trustees and the library trustees had suggested an
amendment to the to whatever compromised language
[1:05:34]
and that seemed to go in a lot of seemed to have a
lot of circles last night. So that issue I assume
[1:05:40]
will get further discussion at their next
meeting. Um other I'm not sure if there are
[1:05:46]
other elements of the bylaw recommendations that
are getting um anywhere near that much scrutiny.
[1:05:56]
Uh otherwise the the um I think the draft warrants
now with like 32 articles. Um, thank you to member
[1:06:03]
Crowley for offering to step up and present
uh the cottage overlay district which will be
[1:06:09]
on your next agenda as a public hearing item.
Uh, we will also need somebody to speak on the
[1:06:20]
addition to unregistered vehicles being modified
to include uninspected or nonoperable vehicles.
[1:06:32]
Is that one not being proposed by the select
board? Oh, but it is. Oh, that's true. Uh, yeah,
[1:06:40]
I'll have to work. But well, somebody's still
going to have to give whatever the planning
[1:06:43]
board recommendation is. But Mhm. um yeah, we'll
have to work out with the town manager whether
[1:06:49]
the presentation is actually going to be done by
the select board or by well I guess the only other
[1:06:59]
person would be the town manager, but so we'll
have to start looking at that because it is it's
[1:07:12]
It's an interesting dynamic. Um,
[1:07:21]
yeah. Otherwise, um, we are continuing
to have discussions with, uh, Cummings
[1:07:29]
Properties over the future of the two office
buildings at 174 and 176 Middle Sex Turnpike.
[1:07:37]
Uh we are going to have a construction
coordination meeting with Brian Develis in
[1:07:43]
a month or well within a month about the start of
construction of the multi- well the mixed housing
[1:07:52]
project that was the 40B on Carile Road. It's
not your jurisdiction, but we're sticking our
[1:07:58]
fingers in to make sure it gets built in
accordance with the decision. And then um
[1:08:09]
um other um we're hopeful that other projects
that have been sitting on the back burner may
[1:08:16]
also finally get up and running this year as um
interest rates have finally maybe at least leveled
[1:08:22]
off and people are re calibrating the finances to
get some of these other approved projects built.
[1:08:40]
I think that's all we have. Yeah. Yeah. To
that end, the U part of the presentation we
[1:08:48]
saw tonight was another town downtown area over
on Lim Street, but there's the development at
[1:08:56]
Railroad Avenue Junction there that is is still on
hold, it seems, unless you've heard that they've
[1:09:04]
uh improved their financing and construction.
Yeah. So, the mixeduse project at one railroad
[1:09:10]
avenue was actually um on the select board consent
agenda last night to accept the revised easements
[1:09:19]
related to the parking and sidewalk where right
we're trading some on street parking in order for
[1:09:26]
the public sidewalk to be on the private property
and for that project to um get off the ground.
[1:09:33]
And so they are anticipating breaking ground this
spring. They've been working with Eversource on um
[1:09:45]
applying the pro whatever protective things
they're going to do on the wires because some
[1:09:50]
of you may recall that building is tight to right
some locations the second and and and top story
[1:09:57]
are a little tight to the wire. So that requires
some carefully planned construction methodology.
[1:10:06]
Um that's being that's been worked out. U say the
revised easements related to the parking. Well,
[1:10:14]
um yeah. So, in the on street parking, uh there's
also been a discussion with the fire department
[1:10:21]
about um reducing the on street parking just a
bit so that they will have fire um we're creating
[1:10:31]
basically a fire access lane. I don't somewhere
to actually park uh a fire engine should there
[1:10:40]
be an event at that location. Um so so the the
preconstruction discussions have been ongoing.
[1:10:48]
Uh the building permit uh applications are live
and under active review by various departments. So
[1:10:57]
um they think they've got um they think they've
got the funding worked out. They think they've got
[1:11:03]
all the you know they've been working on the on a
variety of contracts. They've been they brought in
[1:11:09]
a housing consultant to deal with the u two of the
units have to be affordable units. So they've been
[1:11:17]
going through the paces of getting the affordable
units and the paperwork involved with that all
[1:11:24]
queued up. So um so it looks kind of promising
that that might actually get up and underway.
[1:11:34]
Thank you. That's encouraging. other
subjects from anyone on the call.
[1:11:42]
Todd? Yeah, three things now. Um, again, the
priest bill can put their name in the hat,
[1:11:49]
but I would be willing to present um the zoning
change for the vehicles on a lot if needed. Um,
[1:11:58]
number one. Number two, uh I do have I made at
least the first draft of the slide deck for the
[1:12:04]
um cottage overlay district. I have a few
questions for the the planning board in terms of
[1:12:12]
um and and staff um in terms of one um how much
of the initial proposal that was shown in front
[1:12:23]
of us should be shown to the public at all. I I I
don't know. I I put it in there as a first draft,
[1:12:33]
but I wanted to get the planning board's thoughts
cuz I know it may not be what gets built,
[1:12:38]
but that's what was shown because it kind of
shows the 1800 square feet and so forth. Um,
[1:12:43]
but I didn't know what was appropriate.
[1:12:48]
I I'd recommend being cautious about showing
project because that's not what being photo
[1:12:59]
but okay. Um but do you think I
shouldn't even show any pictures
[1:13:05]
but I my words can really convey
how this is a proposal. I don't
[1:13:10]
know potential you know initial proposal
not necessarily what would be built but
[1:13:20]
Chris I think are really good they can convin
[1:13:36]
sorry distracting Um there's uh maybe it's not
appropriate it's probably not appropriate to
[1:13:44]
choose areas of town um or sketches of of projects
that are envisioned for town which they may or may
[1:13:52]
not uh proceed. But if you could find examples
of 10 units per acre and you 1800ish square foot
[1:14:03]
15- 1800 square foot homes in other locations.
you know, be it Arlington or, you know, Actton,
[1:14:12]
um, so that folks have an idea of what they would
be endorsing. I think that would be a good idea.
[1:14:22]
I'll see what I can find. Yeah, I know it's easy
to say, but where do we pick up pictures like
[1:14:30]
that? Um, and all right, thank you. Um, yeah, I
am inclined to to put some in, but uh maybe keep
[1:14:39]
some of the details not there. Um, one thing I
have to say that I'm a little frustrated with,
[1:14:45]
but it seems like every time I give the slide deck
to I forget the nice gentleman. Um, but he never
[1:14:52]
puts the uh like uh backup slides in, so I can't
rely on having those because I don't think they
[1:14:58]
get put in. Um, which I understand because
it's a whole one slide deck for everything.
[1:15:04]
Um, but I I wish that could be different. Um, also
just the second question, I my first initial pass
[1:15:10]
I actually don't have anything about 40y in
there explicitly. Again, that's something I
[1:15:15]
probably put in in the backup slides, but seems
like wouldn't be there. But, um, but I'll have in
[1:15:19]
the back of my mind somewhere written down so that
if there's questions, if somebody is aware of it,
[1:15:25]
at least it can be discussed. Um, but I wasn't
going to put anything in there. Um, and then
[1:15:31]
lastly, yeah. Yeah, sorry. My my third thing was
uh something I'd like the planning board to think
[1:15:38]
about, not for this town meeting. Um that that is
I just learned recently within the past month that
[1:15:45]
um we are not required to uh keep our sidewalks
clean uh especially in the winter with snow. Uh I
[1:15:52]
actually thought that was a requirement. I don't
believe it is unless somebody says differently,
[1:15:55]
but that's what I was told um by the DPW. um like
to think about potentially is that a good idea for
[1:16:02]
us to propose to into the bylaws in the future and
or is there anything we can do as a community to
[1:16:08]
help more help um the town clear sidewalks? Uh
as I'm pretty frustrated with how things have
[1:16:14]
gone the past few storms, especially near the
schools. Um and I and I wasn't happy that today
[1:16:21]
had to be cancelled. That that bums me out.
I wish that we could do more to help the town
[1:16:25]
um as a organization, community, something
volunteers to help out. I'm more than willing
[1:16:30]
to do miles if I need to um with my snowblower.
So, just something to think about in the future.
[1:16:35]
Um like to put something more official
on the agenda. Thanks. And to that end,
[1:16:44]
could you make sure that gets folded into the um
this long-term plan that we're supposedly working
[1:16:50]
on cuz that's that's end that topic of getting
around town. If the sidewalks aren't plowed or,
[1:16:57]
you know, then you know that's a problem. So yes,
we should cover it, but also there's a place that
[1:17:03]
should be documented. John. Yeah. So, I actually
looked into this question, I think last year. The
[1:17:10]
state requires that sidewalks be cleared, but it
allows it to be delegated to the residents. Um,
[1:17:17]
and Bedford has chosen not to do that. Um, I will
not uh go on in in this particular form of whether
[1:17:25]
I think that's that's right or wrong because that
might I don't know might be a discussion. But
[1:17:31]
uh but uh my my understanding is is that the
town has taken responsibility for it. Whether
[1:17:41]
they need to do better whether we need to do
better job is perhaps a different question. But
[1:17:48]
thank you. Other subjects from anyone?
[1:17:55]
Is anybody uh is anyone else tired from uh the
latest snow days and wants to adjourn early? You
[1:18:04]
could just say move to adjourn. Move to adjurnn.
Second. Roll call vote. How do you vote? Todd I.
[1:18:14]
Don I. Chris I. John. just to go along. I Yeah.
And the chair go votes I also. I'm looking forward
[1:18:26]
to see everybody next March our next March
meeting which uh may be a long prep of town
[1:18:33]
meeting etc etc. Thank you all for your community
service. See you soon. Thanks. Night. Good night.