Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:29]
There is so many of us.
[0:35]
» Okay, we're good.
>> You are.
[0:37]
» Okay, thank you very much.
Uh, welcome to the July 27, 2026 regular
[0:44]
council meeting for the Village of
Belcarra.
[0:47]
We wish to acknowledge that this meeting
took place on the unceded territory of
[0:51]
the Coast Salish peoples. Um, to me,
Wayburn or Belcarra is home to an
[0:56]
ancestral village of the Squamish First
Nation. Thankful I can do my work within
[1:02]
their territory.
So, I'm going to call the meeting to
[1:05]
order at
7:02.
[1:11]
In terms of the, uh, approval of the
agenda, we're going to ask the question
[1:15]
of Amanda, please.
>> Uh,
[1:19]
» we have, uh,
>> I'll put this on
[1:22]
the agenda.
The agenda has a second.
[1:25]
» Oh, okay. Okay. So, um,
that the agenda for the regular council
[1:30]
meeting July 27, 2026 be approved as
circulated.
[1:35]
» So moved.
>> Thank you, Carolyn.
[1:37]
» I second.
>> Uh, Joe, thank you. I'll get back to you
[1:40]
later. Uh,
All right.
[1:44]
Yeah.
So, we'll call, uh,
[1:48]
So, take this through the business.
>> Ask the good question from the public
[1:51]
and council.
>> Okay. Are there any questions or
[1:54]
comments from council?
[1:59]
» I am.
>> It's a big conflict.
[2:01]
» Oh, it's a um yes, um through the chair
um
[2:05]
with respect to 10.5
>> I believe it's 10.5.
[2:10]
» And uh speaking or voting on the item as
I'm a director of Crab, so it's a
[2:15]
conflict of interest for me.
[2:19]
» Thank you.
>> Thank you. Could you repeat that at the
[2:21]
time of the item? Okay.
>> Okay, that's good. Thanks very much.
[2:26]
Thank you both for giving.
Okay, so um it's been moved and
[2:32]
seconded. Are there any questions or
comments comments from council?
[2:37]
Seeing none, I'll look to have called
the question. All those in favor say
[2:41]
aye.
Okay.
[2:44]
We'll go to
adoption of the minutes to regular
[2:47]
council meeting July 13th, 2026. And I'm
going to read out the motion that the
[2:52]
minutes from the regular council meeting
held on July 13th, 2026 be adopted. And
[3:00]
I'll get a mover and a seconder, please.
[3:05]
Janet.
>> Mhm.
[3:06]
» Okay. And second.
Thank you, Joe.
[3:11]
Okay, so
um are there questions or comments from
[3:14]
council on this?
[3:18]
Seeing none, I'll look to call the
question. All those in favor say aye.
[3:21]
And I note that it carries.
So, the public hearing July 13th, 2026
[3:27]
going to uh the motion is that the
record of the public hearing held on
[3:32]
July 13th, 2026 be adopted. That's the
motion. I'm going to get a mover and a
[3:38]
seconder. Moving it, please.
>> Moved.
[3:42]
» Second.
>> Joe and Gerald.
[3:48]
Okay, so are there questions or comments
from council on this?
[3:52]
Seeing none, I'll look to call the
question. All those in favor say I, and
[3:56]
I know that it carries.
Uh public input, um I'll ask Amanda to
[4:01]
speak to this item, please.
[4:05]
» Uh protocol for public input is outlined
in the agenda.
[4:09]
A period of 15 minutes will be available
on each regular council meeting agenda
[4:13]
for members of the public to submit to
council.
[4:17]
Public input period is a venue for
submissions in the form of statements.
[4:21]
Questions can be directed to question
period at the end of the agenda.
[4:26]
Each person is provided 2 minutes to
comment on items presented on the
[4:29]
agenda.
A second opportunity to speak is
[4:33]
permitted when others have had an
opportunity to provide their comments.
[4:37]
Comments must be directed to the chair
of the meeting and not to individual
[4:40]
[clears throat] members of council.
[4:44]
» Okay.
[4:48]
Do we have anybody that would like to um
speak?
[4:55]
» [laughter]
>> Going once, going twice,
[4:59]
and going three times.
Right. Okay.
[5:03]
Thank you. Um
we will delegations and presentations.
[5:07]
Uh
items on the consent agenda, there are
[5:11]
no items on the consent agenda. So,
we'll go to uh staff reports.
[5:16]
And the zoning bylaw number 510-2018
amendment bylaw number 643-2026.
[5:25]
I'm going to ask Melanie to speak to
this item if she could, please.
[5:31]
» Staff are pleased to bring forward the
first three readings of the zoning
[5:35]
amendment bylaw for 3641 Kelly Avenue.
It is the village's first rezoning. It
[5:40]
follows a thorough process of review and
consultation to ensure and support our
[5:45]
housing objectives in the village while
also being an appropriate fit.
[5:49]
On that note, staff have completed work
to address council comments from the
[5:53]
regular meeting on June 8th, 2026 when
the information came forward on this
[5:58]
rezoning.
Uh Chichi Kai from Punico Group is
[6:02]
joining the meeting virtually and has
offered to provide some additional
[6:05]
details about that. Over to you, Chichi.
>> Hi. It's Melanie.
[6:11]
Uh good evening, Mayor and Council. It's
nice to see you all again virtually this
[6:15]
time.
Um so as Melanie mentioned, rezoning for
[6:18]
3641 Kelly Avenue was introduced first
to you on June 8th, 2026.
[6:24]
Following Council's endorsement that
evening, public notification was sent to
[6:28]
residents via email and mail to homes
within 100 m of the subject site. The
[6:35]
notification was also posted at Village
Hall and on the Village's website. So as
[6:40]
a quick refresher, the proposal for 3641
Kelly Avenue was for the consolidation
[6:44]
of two parcels along Kelly Avenue and
rezoning to CD to build three duplexes
[6:50]
for a total of six residential units.
So following the June 8th Council
[6:55]
meeting, staff developed a site-specific
development permit guidelines
[6:59]
to uh for forming character,
which is applicable for an
[7:03]
if an applicant pursues redevelopment of
the site with three duplexes. The
[7:08]
guidelines do not apply to the
development of a single-family home or
[7:12]
one or one or two duplexes since these
forms are already permitted in the
[7:17]
village without a DP.
So the intent of the guidelines is to
[7:22]
enable achievement of a high standard of
building design, site aesthetics, and
[7:27]
neighborhood compatibility for a
three-duplex project. The guidelines are
[7:31]
designed to be flexible enough to
accommodate a range of architectural
[7:35]
solutions while capturing the intent
necessary to ensure a quality outcome
[7:39]
for the village.
So accompanying the DP guidelines a
[7:43]
checklist that outlines the required
submission materials, including
[7:47]
architectural plans, geotechnical
reports, and application fee.
[7:52]
So, staff recommendation is for council
to grant first, second, and third
[7:55]
readings of the zoning bylaw number 510
2018 amendment bylaw number 643 2026,
[8:03]
and approve the development permit
guidelines with 3641 Kelly Avenue. Thank
[8:08]
you.
[8:10]
» Okay.
Thank you very much, and um
[8:15]
Put it on the floor.
[8:18]
Okay.
Okay. Yeah. Okay.
[8:25]
Okay, so the motion is that zoning bylaw
number 510 2018 amendment bylaw number
[8:31]
643 2026 be read a first, second, and
third time.
[8:38]
That development permit guidelines be
approved to support the potential future
[8:42]
development of three duplexes on the
site, and that the following conditions
[8:47]
be met. Consolidation of the two
existing lots into one with registration
[8:52]
of the subdivision plan as land titles
office prior to adoption.
[8:57]
Submission of a development permit
application and meeting involved
[9:01]
development permit condition prior to
the issuance of a development permit for
[9:06]
three duplexes. Submission of the design
as well as fees and securities for
[9:12]
off-site services prior to the issuance
of a development permit for the three
[9:18]
duplexes. So, I will
look for someone
[9:22]
» Moved.
>> Thank you, Council Clark.
[9:25]
Thank you.
>> Can I have a question?
[9:30]
» Okay. You have a question, go ahead,
please.
[9:31]
» Yeah, thank you. So, I'll I already made
all my comments about the design and
[9:36]
what I thought about this in the
previous meeting so I won't repeat
[9:39]
myself. I like to thank GG for putting
the guidelines together. That's very
[9:44]
helpful. I think that was that's a way
to
[9:47]
to guarantee that
the feedback from the community at that
[9:51]
public meeting because we're not going
to have a public hearing on this.
[9:55]
It's met so it's met with the
guidelines. The only thing I do not see
[9:59]
here
but first I'll say that I really like
[10:03]
the dark sky policy here by the
It's not something we do like obviously
[10:08]
in every new construction but because
this is a zoning change like we can put
[10:13]
this guidelines based on the community
feedback on the public meeting that that
[10:18]
the applicant had for the residents
on the information meeting. Sorry.
[10:23]
So yes, so I
I really like what I see here but the
[10:25]
only thing I do not see is height. I
don't know if I'm missing because I know
[10:29]
they reduced the height after the
meeting. Is that my understanding?
[10:34]
But I don't see the height
on the guideline.
[10:39]
So to the chair.
[10:42]
» I can take the first
and then I'll
[10:46]
over to GG. So there's actually a few
pieces that go with the zoning amendment
[10:50]
bylaw.
The first DLC is attachment one which is
[10:54]
the actual bylaw and has a schedule A
which is all of the requirements for the
[11:00]
CD1 zone and that's where you're going
to see all of the height restrictions
[11:04]
and that's about it.
In addition to that there's also the
[11:07]
development permit guidelines and the
checklist.
[11:11]
» Okay, thank you. So yes, so I I missed
that. I read the whole thing but somehow
[11:15]
I managed to miss it.
So no, so I'm good then. Yeah, I thought
[11:19]
we would have to have something on the
guidelines as well but as long as it's
[11:22]
covered tomorrow I'm happy. Thank you
and thanks again for the very detailed
[11:27]
guideline and
and report to GG.
[11:30]
it.
>> No no problem. Happy to be a part of the
[11:33]
village's uh first rezoning.
>> Awesome. I know, first. Wow, after so
[11:38]
many years being incorporated, that's
that's crazy.
[11:41]
Yeah.
>> Or have switched.
[11:43]
» Yeah, so just a couple of um just
comments and thoughts. First off, um
[11:47]
yeah, I I'm super excited about this
development. I think that hopefully it
[11:51]
goes really, really well because we need
it, too. Um I had a few things that
[11:56]
seemed in conflict to me in terms of the
guidelines. Um and again, I still
[12:00]
struggle with, you know, um
what is
[12:05]
sort of the our identity in the village
in terms of semi-rural as far as
[12:09]
development because uh we have
everything. We've got a mix match of
[12:12]
everything, so I don't really get that.
Um but, you know, the current draft
[12:16]
talks about respecting the West Coast
residential character, which to me
[12:21]
is supposed to being natural wood, big
windows, you know,
[12:25]
stone, that kind of thing. And then,
which is kind of in conflict with the
[12:30]
FireSmart requirements, yeah, which are
really metal roof, hardy board, stone,
[12:35]
you know, brick, whatever. And so, I
don't know how we reconcile those two
[12:39]
things, but it just seemed to me that
you know, one is a little bit at odds
[12:43]
with the other. Um so, anyway, just a
comment on that. I think that the
[12:48]
FireSmart should to me would be the
priority in terms of developing going
[12:51]
forward in our village.
And so, um so, I don't know if we need
[12:56]
to modify that a little bit, but just a
thought. The other thing is um
[13:00]
you know, I read the thing about the
landscape plan and the landscape
[13:03]
architect, and my question was why?
And and really because, you know, um
[13:09]
we did our own landscaping. I think it
looks fantastic myself, but um and so, I
[13:15]
don't know
you know, I I worry about the
[13:17]
incremental costs to people trying to do
these things when you have to bring
[13:21]
those sorts of resources in, and a
landscape architect to me sounds
[13:26]
expensive. I could be wrong.
Um but I mean I could use AI and take a
[13:30]
picture of a dirt spot and have a
beautiful landscape like that.
[13:34]
So, I don't and I don't know if I I
guess my question is really is there
[13:37]
some flexibility in these guidelines as
we move forward where things like that
[13:42]
might be you know there might be a
better alternative to forcing that
[13:46]
issue. And so, anyway, just a thought on
that.
[13:50]
And then the only other comment I had
overall was um
[13:54]
thank you for doing the FAQ, like the
frequently asked questions,
[13:58]
um because this is super helpful and you
know looking through here I think this
[14:02]
is really good in terms of again
communicating with the community what's
[14:06]
going on, what's happening. So, I was
really happy to see this without even
[14:10]
asking for it. So, so thanks for doing
that. Um but anyway, those those were my
[14:14]
comments. Um
you know, Westcoast, I love Westcoast,
[14:18]
but you know, it's not always aligns
with FireSmart. So,
[14:21]
Oh, and also I was just curious, how
is the combined property and how big is
[14:27]
it? Well, is it half an acre?
Is that what it is?
[14:35]
The two lots combined, what is the size
of the two lots combined?
[14:38]
» 18,500
square feet.
[14:41]
» Yeah, does that equal half an acre?
>> Not quite.
[14:44]
» So, then they're little
>> Okay, perfect. Okay, thanks. Anyway, I'm
[14:48]
really happy to see this coming forward.
So, thank you.
[14:51]
» Okay, thanks very much, Jen.
Go ahead and Lisa.
[14:54]
» Thank you. Um
thank you so much Kiki for this report
[14:57]
and it's nice to see you again.
I as well I'm excited to see this moving
[15:02]
forward for the future of our village.
Not just today's standards, but for the
[15:07]
future.
Uh with respect to Counselor
[15:12]
Resnicky's comment
about FireSmart, in fact the in here
[15:17]
or it's uh
[15:19]
Yeah.
So, on page, um,
[15:24]
I think it's four, but anyways, just
before the frequently asked questions of
[15:28]
that. And it it does say fire smart
smart requirements drawings submitted
[15:32]
with fire smart building standards. It's
right in there. So, even though it talks
[15:35]
about West Coast design, it also talks
about fire smart. But my question, uh,
[15:39]
through the chair to Chichi,
and
[15:42]
I probably read this thoroughly, but I I
can't seem to find it. How does a fee
[15:46]
simple title work if there are two or
more duplexes built on one consolidated
[15:52]
lot? So, you've got your homes there,
but you've only got one fee simple
[15:56]
title. So, how does that work? Do you
have Let's just say you've got two
[16:00]
duplexes.
Um, are the owners of both duplexes or
[16:05]
three duplexes all going to be on the
title very similar to how we handle
[16:08]
parent home or Can you answer that for
me through the check?
[16:12]
Thank you.
>> Uh, yeah, through the chair to
[16:13]
Councillor Lauder. I think that's
something that, uh, Melanie, we've
[16:16]
talked about this before. Um,
so, we'll have to kind of take a little
[16:20]
closer look at that when that happens
because right now, you know,
[16:24]
typically, if it's one lot, then you
kind of have a bit of a strata situation
[16:29]
unless cuz we're consolidating into one
parcel. So, we Right now, how we're
[16:34]
thinking about it, it's more of a
strata, um,
[16:37]
strata kind of situation where you own
your duplex, but not necessarily the
[16:41]
entire
lot.
[16:44]
property. Yeah. So, I think we'll have a
chat about this a little bit more, uh,
[16:47]
Melanie and I to kind of work out work
out the details.
[16:51]
» Okay. Wonderful. Thank you for that
answer.
[16:56]
» Okay. Do we have any others?
>> Oh. I guess just a comment. So, um, so
[17:00]
we're doing all this, the rezoning, but
that doesn't also stop someone from
[17:04]
coming in, buying the property, and
leave leaving as it is, right? And just
[17:09]
building one house.
I just like to make that clear.
[17:12]
» [laughter]
>> Or, uh, yeah, for whoever has a lot of
[17:16]
concerns this plan. So, cheers.
>> It's not dictating what's going to
[17:21]
happen because the village is not buying
and neither is Billy, so.
[17:25]
It'll be up to the person who buys and
builds.
[17:30]
» Okay. So, I mean, I think
people have talked about this. This is a
[17:35]
very good thing for our village and
in terms of the fine points, that's I
[17:41]
think it's good to bring them up and but
in the end, it's going to be a very,
[17:45]
very good piece and it will only be
specific to this, but it may also offer
[17:51]
things in other parts of the village.
So, each one is individual and doesn't
[17:56]
affect others. So.
Okay.
[17:58]
» I just want to make sure that our
counselor received his question was
[18:01]
answered, I guess.
Cuz he had a few comments and Oh, just
[18:05]
wanted to make sure you got what you
needed if you did.
[18:07]
» Yeah, I I mean, I I guess at the end of
the day, it's really um
[18:11]
is there some flexibility in terms of
those guidelines at all because I think
[18:15]
that, you know, if if you're the person
coming forward, you wanting to do this
[18:20]
and you have all these things laid out
and it's like, okay, well, what about
[18:22]
this? Like, is there some flexibility
was really the main question. The other
[18:26]
one was just the conflict between um
Westcoast Design and Firesmart and I
[18:31]
think, you know, obviously, that will
that will develop as we go along. Um
[18:37]
it just seemed kind of funny that
that two that those two things. So, I'm
[18:42]
good.
>> Yeah, go ahead.
[18:44]
» Um
>> Thank you.
[18:46]
» Through the chair,
uh I think your point about Firesmart
[18:49]
taking precedence over Westcoast was a
good one and noted. And they are
[18:54]
guidelines, so yes, there is some
flexibility.
[18:56]
» Yeah, good.
That's good.
[18:59]
» Okay. So, we've got
any other comments from council? Seeing
[19:04]
none, follow up to uh call the question.
All those in favor, say I. And a no for
[19:09]
the chair is
Thank you very much, GG for your work.
[19:13]
Much appreciate it.
>> No problem. Thank you, counselor.
[19:17]
Have a good night.
>> Bye.
[19:19]
» Yes.
We'll see you again. Um so, the budget
[19:23]
10.2 is the budget variance report.
Due diligence results to June 30th,
[19:30]
2026. I'm going to ask Melanie to speak
for the item, please.
[19:35]
» Staff are pleased to bring forward
another favorable quarterly report.
[19:40]
I've continued to work closely with
staff as well as the village's financial
[19:44]
consultant and Bjorgard to identify
opportunities, cost savings, and
[19:48]
efficiencies, which in turn support our
revenue generation. They minimize our
[19:52]
expenses and increase our reserves.
Building on the good foundational work
[19:58]
done by Ken in earlier years, this has
put the village in a great financial
[20:01]
position.
Ken's joining the meeting virtually
[20:05]
tonight as Mike provides some additional
details about the Q2 2026 budget
[20:09]
variance report.
>> Welcome, Ken.
[20:13]
» Ken, do you need to
Do you need to co-host, Ken?
[20:17]
» Uh yes, that would be helpful, Amanda.
>> Okay, give me 2 seconds, Ken.
[20:32]
Goodbye.
>> Take care.
[20:41]
» Okay, you've got the wheel.
>> [laughter]
[20:45]
» Thank you. I'm going to share my screen,
then.
[20:53]
Can everyone see that?
>> Thank you.
[20:56]
» [laughter]
[21:00]
» I'm just going to walk you through that.
[21:04]
10.2
[21:08]
» It's good then?
>> Yeah, very on trend.
[21:13]
» Okay, so
as council knows from prior years,
[21:18]
the village does a variance report.
The first one of the year being for the
[21:24]
six months ending June 30th of 2026,
where we
[21:30]
show the year-to-date
revenues and expenses,
[21:35]
and then we project where we think we're
going to end up at the end of the year
[21:39]
based on year-to-date results,
and then we compare that to the budget.
[21:44]
So, this is of course part of a council
policy
[21:49]
to do this and it's a very worthwhile
thing to do because uh
[21:53]
you can find out a lot of things when
you're doing these interim financing
[21:57]
reports and it prepares you for year-end
as well.
[22:01]
Um so, looking at each of the operating
funds, general,
[22:07]
water and ward, and capital, I will go
through highlights of those
[22:13]
in terms of where we are at year-to-date
and where we expect to be at year-end at
[22:18]
this point in time
with the caveat that of course things
[22:22]
could change between now and the end of
the year when unknown things happen.
[22:28]
The details of the variances are kept
within the appendices that are attached
[22:33]
to the report.
So, in terms of the general operating
[22:38]
fund,
you can see here where um
[22:42]
the revenues are expected to be
approximately $20,000
[22:47]
over budget based on higher tax penalty
revenue
[22:52]
and funds from sale of assets and cost
recovery for legal and planning costs.
[22:58]
In terms of operating expenses, we're
expected to be uh under
[23:03]
uh budget by about $21,000.
And that's related to lower legal and
[23:09]
consulting costs and more work done
in-house.
[23:13]
In terms of the uh centralized support,
it's going to be uh recovered at a lower
[23:19]
rate because of lower expenses by about
$2,800.
[23:24]
So, you can see here in terms of the
bottom line that we're expecting to
[23:28]
transfer
uh $670,000
[23:32]
to reserves and surplus
uh for the year, which is $38,000,
[23:38]
$39,000 over the budget.
So, uh as council knows, you know, over
[23:43]
the past years we've tried to build that
up and it's a significant amount that is
[23:48]
being
uh set aside for the future for the
[23:51]
village.
And once you add the community works
[23:55]
funds to that, which is not included in
this,
[23:58]
um of course, the village
is
[24:01]
uh
transferring approximately 600 730
[24:07]
to 740,000 dollars a year from the
general fund
[24:12]
for capital and other needs
um that are
[24:16]
basically securing the future of the
village.
[24:23]
In terms of the water operating fund, um
the water operating fund has gotten a
[24:28]
lot healthier.
And uh we are expecting to be about
[24:33]
$5,300
over in terms of operating revenue,
[24:38]
which is the additional revenue from
Metro Vancouver based on billings for
[24:42]
actual water usage.
We're expected to be about $9,000 in
[24:47]
lower expenses
for uh lower repair and maintenance and
[24:51]
contracted costs.
And so, you can see that we're expecting
[24:55]
to transfer roughly 116, 117,000 dollars
to
[25:00]
the reserve and surplus versus a budget
of 104,000,
[25:04]
which is approximately 12,000 over the
budget, which is a positive thing
[25:10]
as well. And if we look at the ward
operating funds, you can see here that
[25:15]
uh revenues are more or less on budget,
but we're expected to be approximately
[25:20]
2,000 dollars
uh lower in expenses due to lower waste
[25:25]
and centralized support costs.
And therefore, our transfer to surplus
[25:30]
is about 2,000 expected to be about
2,000
[25:34]
dollars higher than budget.
Um as council will recollect, uh
[25:40]
couple years ago, we did an internal
borrowing
[25:43]
because the ward surplus was
insufficient. So, uh the funds that are
[25:49]
going to surplus will firstly be used to
pay pay off the internal loan,
[25:54]
which was uh set up in a prior year.
So, when we look at capital overall, um
[26:03]
as I said, there's more detail in the
appendix and uh it goes through each of
[26:07]
the capital projects, but you can see
here that more or less general water and
[26:12]
ward capital are expected to be very
close to budget,
[26:15]
and that uh projects are proceeding as
planned.
[26:20]
So, uh this is the first uh budget
variance report
[26:24]
of the year, and of course, uh we will
be doing another one at the end of
[26:29]
September.
And I think that these reports are are
[26:34]
very helpful for staff and council um to
make sure things are on track.
[26:40]
So, there's a a um
a recommended motion for council to
[26:44]
consider.
[26:47]
» Okay.
Great. So, um
[26:51]
the motion is that the report dated July
27th, 2026 titled budget variance report
[26:58]
Q2 results to June 30th, 2026 be
received into the record for information
[27:04]
and I'll look to get a mover and a
seconder.
[27:07]
» Second.
>> Janet.
[27:09]
» [clears throat]
>> Wildish.
[27:10]
» Yes.
[27:13]
Okay.
So, it's on the table for discussion.
[27:17]
» Just a couple of comments. Very happy to
see
[27:21]
you know, positive variance on the
transfer to general reserves and surplus
[27:25]
on all three of these major categories.
So, I'd say we're trending in the right
[27:31]
direction. No concerns.
>> Yeah.
[27:36]
» Okay, anybody else?
[27:40]
» Yeah. Yeah.
>> Okay. So,
[27:43]
we will
do then I'll look to call the question
[27:47]
on the motion. All those in favor say I.
I'll put it carried.
[27:51]
» Thanks, Dan.
>> Thank you, Dan.
[27:53]
» Yes.
>> We really appreciate that.
[27:57]
» He's not done yet.
>> Yeah.
[28:00]
Okay, so 10.3 strategic plan and key
infrastructure projects Q2 2026 status
[28:08]
report I'm going to get that this week
to the night of the 20th.
[28:12]
» The village continues to make
exceptional progress on an ambitious
[28:16]
strategic plan and council and staff
have worked diligently to move things
[28:20]
ahead as noted by the complete and in
progress status of several items.
[28:25]
Some notable highlights from the Q2 2026
quarter include the following.
[28:31]
In the water system improvements,
amendments to the water supply and
[28:34]
distribution bylaw were approved to
support the water service extension to
[28:38]
the bull house in Belcarra Regional
Park.
[28:41]
Amendments to the water works bylaw as
well as the fees and charges bylaw were
[28:45]
also approved to renew these park water
user pays based on the what people
[28:49]
operation and maintenance of the system
plus actual water consumption based on
[28:53]
meter usage.
With the Roden and fire halls,
[28:59]
a report in Q4 2025 provided information
on the development sale of Rodens as a
[29:04]
source of revenue. It also confirmed
that the formal sale of the lots would
[29:08]
be pursued with proceeds from the sale
of the first lot funding development
[29:11]
work of the others.
A road closure bylaw for Roden 13 was
[29:16]
brought forward for three readings,
public notification and adoption in Q1
[29:20]
2026.
Since then, staff have been undergoing
[29:24]
registration with the land titles office
and also [clears throat] engaged land
[29:28]
consultants to assist with the land sale
negotiation which are also now currently
[29:33]
underway.
Regarding the fire halls, Metro
[29:37]
Vancouver, Belcarra, and Anmore staff
worked in collaboration to prepare and
[29:41]
submit an application to the Build
Community Strong Fund
[29:45]
to request funding of
40% or $8.4 million towards the fire
[29:49]
hall replacement costs. And that request
is also being supported by MP Zoe Roy.
[29:58]
In Q2, we also first three readings of
the official community plan amendment
[30:02]
bylaw number 42 2026 regarding changes
to provincial housing legislation also
[30:08]
brought forward.
Consultation referrals were also issued
[30:12]
to parties that may be affected and the
work is now underway to incorporate the
[30:16]
comments received before bringing those
amendments back to council.
[30:21]
And the fire safety and wildlife
wildfire management review was carried
[30:27]
out by staff earlier in the year to
identify grant funding options for the
[30:30]
fire fuel reduction activities.
Provincial FireSmart Community Funding
[30:35]
and Supports Program no longer funds
fuel management activities and they've
[30:39]
shifted more towards more planning based
initiatives.
[30:43]
I did some digging to find out the
rationale for this. Why has fuel
[30:48]
management funding been removed?
And the response was that fuel
[30:52]
treatments have high per hectare costs
that vary significantly throughout the
[30:56]
province, and those challenges make it
difficult to make fuel treatment
[31:00]
activities equitably and then ensure the
timely distribution of the remaining
[31:04]
funding for that period over a closed
intake.
[31:08]
It was noted that Ministry of Forests
supports fuel management activities and
[31:12]
that funding in other areas to mitigate
risk to communities including the Crown
[31:16]
Land Wildfire Risk Reduction Program and
the Forest Enhancement Society ABC.
[31:22]
So, with that news, staff have been
reviewing other options and are also
[31:26]
working on the development of a phased
approach to fire fuel reduction based on
[31:30]
the priority mapping and assessments,
which we can complete it, which we can
[31:33]
then put from budgeting to.
And in turn, we're also looking at
[31:37]
exploring the use of unallocated and
emergency management operational funds
[31:41]
to retain a contractor for the
prescribed fire fuel reduction measures
[31:45]
on public land around the village hall,
the public works yard, board, and fire
[31:50]
hall. So, we'll bring that to council as
an information only item on that.
[31:55]
And with that, I will close my remarks
and turn it over to the mayor.
[31:58]
» Okay, thank you very much, Ron. Um
So, the motion is that the report dated
[32:03]
July 27, 2026 titled Strategic Plan and
Key Infrastructure Project Q2 2026
[32:11]
Status Report be received into the
record for information, and I'll get a
[32:16]
mover and a seconder.
>> So moved.
[32:18]
» Second.
>> Did you second?
[32:20]
» Thank you, Councillor. Thank you.
Okay, it's on the table for discussion.
[32:29]
» Uh
>> Well, I just want to call I mean, it's
[32:32]
it's amazing
and wonderful to see so many projects
[32:35]
completed, and kudos to staff for the
work they did down there.
[32:40]
Some some still pending there, but
they're things seem to be moving along
[32:45]
on schedule from what I can see. So,
it's been good work by everybody.
[32:51]
» Can I ask this question? Because I know
you reported it at the last meeting and
[32:56]
it was very interesting on the grant for
the fire halls that you know that were
[33:01]
mutually
Metro Vancouver and I don't know it's
[33:06]
amazing how we get along so well
sometimes you know when it comes to that
[33:09]
but that's
of course a reminder
[33:13]
of the 50/50 share so any grants that
would come through would be
[33:19]
50/50 would be in our favor for a change
I would say
[33:24]
as I judge that but
that remains to be seen.
[33:28]
I would say how does
two questions right? First and foremost
[33:32]
is how does this proceed if you can tell
me that? How long will it take? How does
[33:36]
this look like? It's great to see
a liberal you know MLA I'm not here to
[33:41]
call the halls of any MLAs or any party
but it's great to see our liberal MLA on
[33:47]
side and working cooperatively with the
mayors and with the CAOs and that so
[33:53]
great work and that's encouraging to
have that support.
[33:58]
And I didn't my other question would be
just like you can clear the other
[34:02]
question but I noticed no provincial
grants have been applied for here and
[34:07]
and my understanding was under that
federal grant that
[34:12]
Premier Horgan is touting so much and
giving out to so many people here.
[34:17]
One of it was contingent on perhaps
getting some provincial grants. Now, I
[34:23]
just read that somewhere along the way
so
[34:26]
will we be applying? Will we be
contacting our local MLA Mr. Grewal, and
[34:34]
to also seek some money. I know
there's not much money. We hear that all
[34:39]
the time,
particularly in some areas that someone
[34:42]
is working in. No money for anything,
apparently. But, nonetheless, if we
[34:46]
don't try,
you don't know. So, there are my
[34:48]
questions, and I thank you for a great
report again. It's always great to have
[34:52]
good things.
Okay. Did you want to respond to that?
[34:56]
» Uh so, through the chair, on your first
question, there is no timeline currently
[35:01]
on the grant. We did an expression of
interest. So, it's an open-ended
[35:05]
application process. So, I'll just keep
council up-to-date on any proceedings
[35:09]
with that.
>> Thank you.
[35:11]
» And with respect to provincial funding,
uh we also have a joint meeting with
[35:15]
Metro Vancouver staff and provincial
staff at the UBCM uh convention this
[35:21]
fall. And we have booked a meeting or
put in a request for a meeting with the
[35:24]
minister in that regard, specifically
with funding.
[35:28]
» Yes, answers to my questions. So, thank
you very much. No further questions for
[35:31]
me. And thank you for the work done on
the turf for all parties involved and
[35:36]
all municipalities and Metro Vancouver,
[clears throat]
[35:39]
who are doing an amazing number of
things recently
[35:42]
that I can sort of say even
>> [clears throat]
[35:45]
» my council thought my feet.
>> [laughter]
[35:51]
» Okay.
Go ahead, please.
[35:53]
» Yeah, this
Yeah, thank you for the report. This is
[35:56]
great and great to see the progress
you're making. I had one question, and
[35:59]
that's on the um so, the correlation
system, if I remember correctly, and and
[36:04]
I might not, um
what was the role of Fraser Health in
[36:09]
this?
[36:13]
» Um for the chair, I'm going to relay the
question to Stuart Novak to provide some
[36:18]
more details on that.
>> I I recalled something.
[36:20]
» Mr. Chair, uh they are actually approved
the permitting for that project. So,
[36:26]
they reviewed the plans and they
approved the project. And as a matter of
[36:30]
fact, uh we'll be having an on-site
meeting with them uh within the next
[36:34]
month.
>> Yep.
[36:38]
» Thank you.
>> Good. Can I have a follow-up on that uh
[36:42]
chlorination just quick quick quick
quick quick? I just happened to see the
[36:47]
Drake company working up there and I was
struck by the complexity. I thought this
[36:54]
was a fairly simple kind of system that
we would put in a shack and you know,
[36:59]
we'd have something but there is a lot
of complex work, you know, concrete
[37:04]
platforms laid, uh proof quake, you
know, the right storage capacity and uh
[37:11]
they seem to be doing very good work uh
from what I can see up there. So, again,
[37:16]
kudos. I I was a bit, you know,
reticent, I would say, on this at one
[37:21]
point because I was a bit concerned that
it really wouldn't get us to where we
[37:26]
need to be on the FUS on on the fuse
thing and but I I believe that this will
[37:32]
certainly stand to making a secure water
as we go into that tank. And what will
[37:39]
we be holding the capacity at? 95%?
Would that be or we're going up to
[37:44]
through the chair?
>> And through the chair, yes, it it there
[37:46]
will need to be some sort of circulation
because we still have the altitude valve
[37:50]
which will have to be adjusted but it
will it will be staying topped up
[37:56]
uh permanently at approximately 95%.
>> And sorry, is there is there an
[38:00]
agitation to keep it to keep that
chlorine moving or is it just depending
[38:05]
on the pumping of the water?
>> Uh
[38:07]
and through the chair, um just to
actually give council an update on where
[38:11]
we are on that project. Of course, we've
completed the trenching and laying the
[38:16]
conduit. Uh
we've uh completed the
[38:20]
pouring the concrete, making the
foundation. We've installed the kiosk
[38:24]
and we're currently doing the wiring
right now.
[38:28]
Um and speak to your question, uh
tomorrow I believe, tomorrow or sometime
[38:33]
this week, we will be entering into the
reservoir and uh or
[38:39]
uh from the top and laying down the um
the actual mixer, uh which will be
[38:47]
continually going to keep that water
circulating.
[38:51]
» Which is
>> That's correct.
[38:52]
» Thank you for the update.
[38:56]
» Thank you.
>> That's great update. Thank you.
[38:59]
» Good. So, any any other questions?
When you say entering into the tank,
[39:06]
» Um to clarify, they won't be won't be
actually inside the [clears throat] tank
[39:10]
or entering into the tank. They will be
on top of the tank and they will be
[39:14]
literally dropping
uh a tripod-like structure, which has
[39:19]
the mixture mixer uh in the
uh you know, in the center of it.
[39:24]
» Yeah. Good. Good. That makes sense.
Thank you for your reporting.
[39:27]
» Sure.
>> Okay, any other questions?
[39:30]
Seeing none, I'll look to call the
question. All those in favor, say I. And
[39:33]
may note that it carries.
And that moves us on to 10.4, 2027
[39:38]
financial planning schedule. And I'm
going to ask Melanie to speak about it.
[39:43]
Please.
>> All right. The staff report brings
[39:46]
forward information on the 2027
financial planning process and
[39:49]
recommends that the 2027 to 2031
financial plan budget schedule be
[39:54]
approved.
The schedule has been structured to
[39:58]
leverage the knowledge and experience of
the existing council to establish the
[40:01]
draft budget and to carry out public
consultation prior to the election.
[40:07]
We are fortunate to be in a stable and
favorable financial position with plans
[40:11]
to fund our operational capital
operations, as well as was replacements.
[40:17]
As such, the recommendation is to stay
the course and to build on the success
[40:21]
we created together.
Following the election, any new council
[40:25]
members will get to vote on the budget
and they'll also have an opportunity to
[40:28]
complete their orientation
and get exposed to and familiar with the
[40:33]
village budget and financial position
before next year's budget process.
[40:37]
They'll also have an opportunity to
provide their input on priorities and
[40:40]
expenditures for the development of a
new four-year strategic plan just after
[40:44]
the election.
And with that, I'll turn it back to the
[40:47]
chair.
>> Okay. Thanks very much.
[40:50]
We have a motion here that for 2027
financial planning process and 2027
[40:57]
to 2031 financial plan/budget
schedule be approved and I'll look for
[41:03]
» So moved.
>> Councilor Clark.
[41:05]
» Thank you. Second.
>> Thank you, too.
[41:07]
» Second.
>> Okay. Good. It's on the floor for
[41:12]
discussion. Do you have a question?
>> Yeah, no, it's more like a comment, but
[41:16]
but um I guess
the CEO answered my question before I
[41:20]
got to it. And issue is that Yeah, I was
I was just a bit concerned here um
[41:25]
because there's an election this year
and will the new council that sits in
[41:29]
will have an opportunity to give their
say and make any amendments to the
[41:33]
budget. So, from what I heard
from our CEO right now, from her
[41:36]
comments introducing um this item, it it
they will have because, you know, it's
[41:41]
just have to
hand hand it in in May, right? So, um so
[41:46]
they'll have quite a few months. So, I'm
okay with that.
[41:50]
» Great. Good.
Any other um comments on that?
[41:55]
» Nope.
>> Okay. Seeing none, I'll look to call the
[41:58]
question. All those in favor, say I and
I note none of the chairs.
[42:03]
And we're now on 10.5, Brown Land Sign
at this point.
[42:09]
» Um I'll just ask the corporate officer
for
[42:13]
to be counselor Wilder.
Counselor Wilder, if you'd like to
[42:16]
excuse yourself in the discussion of
this item.
[42:18]
» Yes, I would. If conflict of interest
really, do I need to leave the room or
[42:22]
do I sit here and listen?
>> You need to leave the room.
[42:25]
» Yeah, bye-bye.
>> Bye.
[42:27]
» So, we'll call you back after
>> Well, we won't miss you. We'll miss you,
[42:31]
but we don't want to miss you. And we'll
come and get you.
[42:33]
I mean, I mean, I ask you this straight
to the CAO or the CEO.
[42:38]
There's There are those of us who
believe this. This whole conflict of
[42:41]
interest thing can become very
convoluted, as you know, I'm sure. I'm
[42:45]
not unfamiliar. But, as members of
crowd, which we probably all are,
[42:50]
um you know, we will be voting on an
organization that we are members of as
[42:55]
well. We're okay to vote, or you don't
You're not in the corporate sector. You
[42:58]
don't see any
conflict in a matter that would make us
[43:02]
all have to leave the room for just to
you?
[43:04]
» I think
>> But, it's up to the lower of the report.
[43:07]
I didn't think about that at that ahead
of time, but I think because Lisa's more
[43:10]
is closer to it, each counselor it's up
to each counselor to decide whether or
[43:15]
not they're in conflict. It isn't up to
We can recommend that you leave, but it
[43:20]
is up to the mayor. Is it It is up to
you. If you feel you're going to be in
[43:24]
conflict, you can excuse yourself from
it. But, if everyone here leaves, that
[43:28]
that uh
>> Nobody in the immediate
[43:30]
» Makes it challenging.
>> It was That's right.
[43:33]
» It was [laughter]
>> Lisa says, "Let's go."
[43:35]
» No, I I can't I don't feel myself. Thank
you very much. I don't feel I'm in any
[43:38]
conflict. I'm quite comfortable coming
to the situation. Thank you.
[43:41]
I'll let the others speak for
themselves.
[43:43]
» Counselor Rushton,
no, I didn't know you were twiddling
[43:46]
your pen or letting me speak.
>> No, no.
[43:49]
» Okay, that puts us in a good spot. Thank
you. So, I'm going to get Stuart to
[43:54]
speak to the item, if you could, please.
>> Yes, thank you, Mayor Ross.
[43:58]
Uh this report is brought forward on
behalf of the Community Recreation
[44:03]
Association of Bel Air,
commonly known as the crowd Committee.
[44:08]
Uh the Crab Committee would like to
replace the existing billboard sign uh
[44:13]
which is located on Ben Ewell Bay Road
at the bus stop just east of Sanctuary
[44:18]
Road. Uh they would like to install a
new LED signboard which is more visible
[44:24]
and will allow Crab Committee members to
update the sign through Wi-Fi so they
[44:29]
won't need to uh climb a ladder and uh
change the signage manually.
[44:35]
The Crab Committee will uh pay for the
purchase and installation of the
[44:39]
signboard but
uh they're hoping that the municipality
[44:43]
will
pay the ongoing hydro costs which are
[44:47]
expected to be less than $40 per month.
I know on the report it says 40 to 75
[44:53]
but we were playing it very safe because
we didn't have all of the information.
[44:58]
Well, we still haven't confirmed the
price but um what they have confirmed is
[45:04]
that we won't need a meter for that. Uh
so it's expected to be uh similar to our
[45:09]
street lights which is $38 a month or
even cheaper.
[45:14]
Uh anyways, uh the sign is a positive
contribution for the village as it is
[45:19]
used to share the community information
and announcements
[45:23]
and uh pending council's consideration
and approval, staff work with the Crab
[45:28]
Committee members to support the
permitting and installation of the
[45:33]
signage. Back to the chair, please.
>> Thank you very much for that report,
[45:36]
sir. And the motion is that the
installation of the new LED sign to
[45:41]
replace the existing Crab sign be
approved and that the village assume
[45:46]
monthly hydro costs for the sign. We
need a mover and a seconder, please.
[45:51]
» Second.
>> Okay. Councillor Park, Councillor
[45:54]
Woodhouse.
>> No.
[45:56]
» Okay, it's on the floor now.
>> Um if I may, yeah.
[45:59]
» Yeah, go ahead, please.
>> So fancy. Oh, yay. You gave what you're
[46:03]
doing from your from your phone. I have
to say I do like the letters, but I I
[46:07]
can understand why they want to make
this easier on themselves. Um yeah, I'm
[46:12]
more than happy to vote this
recommendation more than how happy to
[46:16]
vote in favor of.
Um and I I do appreciate staff um um
[46:22]
citing on their report about um you
know, signs that distract drivers and
[46:27]
impact dark sky objectives. I think it
would be my
[46:33]
um
uh objectives and also the distraction
[46:37]
when you're coming in. So uh and as long
as not shining on any of those buddies'
[46:41]
window cuz I know people would get
pretty upset about that. Then um then
[46:44]
yeah, I'm excited for Crab and
I'll miss the old sign. You could just
[46:49]
leave it there. I just like
Yeah.
[46:55]
» [laughter]
>> Um so yeah, it's uh yeah, it's not good
[46:59]
for you guys.
>> Go ahead. Thank you. Thank you.
[47:01]
» I just want to say that
>> I I like this just because I think it's
[47:04]
a lower liability risk.
>> Yeah, stepping on ladders in
[47:08]
» [clears throat]
>> in inclement weather trying to change
[47:10]
out letters on a sign. And so and and I
think this is good. I think a lot of
[47:13]
people do reference that sign on the way
in for a variety of reasons.
[47:18]
So I like it. I think it's good.
>> Yeah, go ahead.
[47:22]
» Yeah,
I I I I like the idea for all those
[47:25]
reasons. I'm just thinking now that you
know, it's a the idea of of course neon
[47:30]
is gone. Nobody uses neon
[clears throat] anymore. So
[47:33]
I'm happy to see that. There there was a
neon sign at my garden gate when I first
[47:38]
moved here, right? So I can attest to
that. I spoke about going to LED, but I
[47:43]
like the character of the village, you
know, we talk about the rural character
[47:47]
and everything. I just feel a little bit
concerned that our the character of this
[47:50]
village that you know, with with this
modernization into LED technology,
[47:56]
cheaper as it is, more efficient than
anything, but more costly when anything
[48:00]
goes wrong. But the the current
generator that we have is covered here.
[48:03]
It's a
It would be nice to see
[48:06]
picture of what it might look like. You
know, like just to to get an idea
[48:11]
because there'd be nothing worse than to
turn around and put it in there and
[48:15]
somebody say, "Well,
this doesn't fit right." Like I'm home
[48:20]
running.
>> Somebody will say that.
[48:22]
» Yeah.
>> And it will be me, okay?
[48:25]
» That is definitely you.
>> Yes.
[48:26]
» [laughter]
>> Now that you've heard my comment, so but
[48:30]
I do support the motion.
>> And I I would support this motion for a
[48:34]
couple of reasons and I think some of
you have touched upon it. It's very
[48:38]
important to have
>> [clears throat]
[48:40]
» structures that are safe for people that
are doing it and in many cases
[48:45]
volunteering. So I think as a
municipality and working with Stewart
[48:50]
and stuff, it's important to make sure
we keep people safe and over the years
[48:55]
I've seen some wonderful
ones, but I've also seen like in the
[48:59]
winter people struggling to get things
up and I've always worried about it and
[49:04]
I think actually it's the outcome that
will really help all all of us.
[49:09]
Okay. So we're good with that. I'll look
to um
[49:15]
I'll look to call the question. All
those in favor say I and then we'll
[49:19]
vote. It carries.
And number 11, bylaws, number 12,
[49:25]
release of items from closed council
meetings
[49:28]
and mayor and council reports.
Um
[49:32]
Oh, I'll go to poll for
>> Chief Ghazi.
[49:36]
» Yeah. Ghazi.
[49:39]
You want to make sure he
treats people.
[49:42]
» The meeting
>> 11:00 London.
[50:02]
» So, um in terms of the mayor and council
reports, I have one item to uh
[50:08]
uh talk about on Friday, July 24th, I
went to the Metro Vancouver
[50:13]
board meeting and
very interesting now because you do the
[50:19]
from home next one.
Say that uh
[50:29]
» You're doing from Zoom?
>> Yeah. Yeah, Zoom. Yeah.
[50:32]
» The board meetings?
>> Yes, yeah.
[50:34]
» Is that going forward a thing or
>> it's going forward right now.
[50:37]
» Oh.
>> Yeah.
[50:41]
Okay, does anybody else have Okay, I'll
do Janet and then Lisa.
[50:46]
» Yeah, just wanted a quick update. So,
July 14th, I attended the UBCM small
[50:50]
community meeting.
Um and basically the gist of it the the
[50:55]
overall discussion was really around
preparation for UBCM
[50:59]
» [clears throat]
>> and, you know, what are the resolutions
[51:01]
that were top priority and, you know, is
there an opportunity for the small
[51:05]
community members to connect there in in
a a less formal way because, you know,
[51:11]
there's always I mean, you always meet
people at the meeting in the different
[51:15]
sessions or whatnot. So, they were they
were working on that. But anyway, it was
[51:19]
interesting and it's always, you know,
we do have a lot of commonality with
[51:22]
these small communities in terms of
their issues, so it's always interesting
[51:26]
to listen in on that one.
That's it for me.
[51:28]
» Good. Thank you for doing that. And
>> And the other thing I wanted to uh just
[51:33]
comment on was just a reminder
to the residents to if they if you've
[51:38]
not already done so, to complete the
Admiralty Heights subarea survey
[51:43]
um
on or before the July 31st, which is
[51:47]
Friday deadline.
Um, I know that there was a notice
[51:51]
in addition to putting it on the
the Crab sign.
[51:55]
Um, it was also posted on Facebook
together um, the Facebook Bel Car
[52:01]
Together site as well as Crab sent a an
email out to all the residents that like
[52:06]
it's email. So, just a reminder if you
haven't already done it, please do so
[52:11]
and if you can't get the link,
contact the office or
[52:16]
um, just reply to the Crab email and
they'll send you another link.
[52:20]
That might be a little bit more helpful.
>> Thank you very much.
[52:22]
» That's right.
Very important for the
[52:26]
» And anybody else have any items to
share? So, I have got
[52:29]
Councilor Worthy, do you have anything
to share at all?
[52:32]
» Uh, no, just a reminder.
>> Well, I'm I'm I'm actually jumping ahead
[52:37]
of um, because you know, my next meeting
with the Tri-Cities Food Council is
[52:41]
coming up on Thursday and I have seen
the agenda, so I I know it's it's almost
[52:46]
unusual to report an event before it
even happens, but
[52:50]
these are important events and
nonetheless and we won't be back
[52:53]
together till September, so
I would just like my fellow councilors
[52:58]
to be assured that they will be
represented. I will be attending the
[53:01]
meeting on Thursday and [clears throat]
to hold the banner. There are some
[53:06]
changes
There are some There are some changes
[53:09]
coming in group formations and
a lot of things happening, but hopefully
[53:15]
um, hopefully we get this
organization a little bit more out
[53:19]
there. The The work is good. It really
is well intended
[53:24]
» [clears throat]
>> well intended and when it gets going,
[53:26]
it's hugely important. Food security,
we're reading about it more and more all
[53:31]
the time and I think this council going
into its next council meeting will have
[53:35]
to start to become more active and more
involved in food security. Although we
[53:40]
don't have businesses and industries
here, we need to be out there
[53:45]
holding our banners up and helping out
on that issue and reminding the
[53:49]
residents here of the importance of food
security going forward. And I'll be
[53:53]
doing that on Thursday. Thank you.
>> We do have our veggie garden.
[53:57]
» Oh, I didn't know that.
>> [laughter]
[53:58]
» I knew it was a worm garden, not a
veggie garden.
[54:01]
» There's a new gardens.
>> Yeah. Um I I I just have
[54:04]
» Thank you, Councillor O'Leary.
>> Yeah. I just have a reminder. So, um so,
[54:07]
our next council meeting won't be until
the end of towards the end of September.
[54:11]
But before that, there will be a
uh Sasamat Volunteer Fire Department
[54:15]
Board of Trustees regular meeting. So,
uh watch for that. That will be on For
[54:20]
now, it's scheduled for September 10th.
Um that's a Thursday.
[54:25]
Um and hopefully then we'll have a
design in hands. I also wanted to uh let
[54:29]
the community know I do have some
concerns about because uh
[54:32]
the land that the halls are being built
in
[54:35]
on the Belcarra side, it's not owned by
the village. So, I I I will bring that
[54:40]
on next Trustees meeting, but I have
some concerns about uh what's going on
[54:44]
in the province and federal level as far
as um
[54:48]
um
municipal and and federal lands go are
[54:52]
going uh with the disputes on the court.
So, I'll be bringing that up
[54:57]
um on the next Trustees meeting
um to Metro Vancouver staff just to get
[55:02]
some clarity on that before we put a lot
of money into a piece of land that we do
[55:07]
not own.
So, I just wanted to put that out there.
[55:12]
» Okay.
>> That's all.
[55:13]
» Thank you.
Any Anyone else want to comment? Okay.
[55:16]
If not, turn the page, and tell me,
please.
[55:21]
» All right. For operational updates
coming from our fine public works team,
[55:26]
they've been continuing with lawn mowing
and trail maintenance throughout the
[55:29]
village.
Uh also maintenance at Midden Station.
[55:33]
At Tatlow, they're supporting the
chlorine system installation work, which
[55:37]
you heard earlier.
At the Dutchman reservoir maintenance
[55:41]
and vegetation removal.
More vegetation removal at the fire
[55:45]
hall.
Also water valve exercising and water
[55:48]
sampling and some flushing of the dead
ends in the water system.
[55:52]
Uh a few catch basin clean outs and up
at the yard doing truck and small
[55:58]
equipment maintenance and also repairing
uh repair of the garage door
[56:03]
was completed as well.
Administrative updates, uh we have a
[56:08]
election web page now up and running for
2026 if you haven't seen it already.
[56:13]
That's on the village website. Uh we all
information about the upcoming
[56:17]
[clears throat] election will be posted
there.
[56:19]
Any questions from uh residents or
counselors alike can be sent to
[56:23]
elections@belcarra.ca.
[56:27]
Uh we also have a candidate information
session. So, we will be hosting virtual
[56:32]
candidate information session on
Wednesday, August 12th at 7:00 p.m. And
[56:36]
that's with the village's chief election
officer, Lisa Zorn.
[56:40]
This is a great opportunity to find out
about becoming a candidate, learn about
[56:44]
the role of being a council member, and
to ask questions.
[56:48]
We do have information about that posted
on the Village of Belcarra website
[56:52]
election web page as well.
And lastly, just a reminder that stage
[56:57]
two water restrictions uh went into
effect on July 16th. Uh and those are
[57:03]
remaining in effect until further
notice.
[57:07]
I'm finished. Okay.
>> Any Any questions for Melina?
[57:12]
» Just have a question and it's a bit I
don't know if staff can help me out on
[57:15]
this but I do get some questions
sometimes from residents about um
[57:20]
» [clears throat]
>> why are the lids on the ward that the
[57:23]
the lid for the green waste bin, why are
some of them locked and some are not?
[57:29]
Like I I residents asking me,
"Can we just unlock them all so when one
[57:34]
side is full the person can go and throw
it on the other side and I'm talking
[57:38]
about the bigger lid. Uh because they're
all bear proof, right? So um so I just
[57:43]
wanted to understand
why some of them are locked sometimes.
[57:47]
» Who is the chair of this?
>> I can confirm our manager of municipal
[57:49]
services.
>> Thank you and thank you Kelly.
[57:52]
» And as a reminder
uh the one side there's the two sides of
[57:56]
the one side of the bin has the 4-ft
hatches and it has the two 2-ft x 2-ft
[58:02]
hatches that are have the bear proof
lids in them which are accessible all
[58:06]
the time.
>> Okay.
[58:07]
» On the uh the opposite side that only
has the 4-ft x 4-ft lids and yes they
[58:14]
are they have a mechanism that's
supposed to be bear proof. However um it
[58:19]
has caused problems and the bears have
been able to get in and people have been
[58:24]
you know uh not closing them all the
time. So we had to control it a little
[58:29]
bit more um
just because the problems that is
[58:33]
attracting the bears. So we try to
monitor it.
[58:36]
» Yes.
>> When the one uh hatch becomes full then
[58:40]
we'll move up to the other and the
other. So
[58:43]
um that's what we're trying to do. In
the meantime we are actually
[58:48]
uh going to be installing
uh smaller 2-ft x 2-ft hatches in those
[58:55]
lids on the other side as well. So those
will always be open on that side when
[58:59]
those lids are installed.
>> Okay. I think the concern would be not
[59:02]
so much for green waste from the kitchen
it would be green waste from the yard.
[59:06]
That's why people were wondering why the
bigger lids aren't open so you can
[59:11]
uh so yeah so in other words it's to
keep the bear safer because the system
[59:15]
right now they were getting in.
>> That's true.
[59:18]
» So you just have the one lid.
Okay.
[59:21]
» So
thanks for your question. So when you
[59:25]
approach it there's a right side and a
left side, right? And on the right side
[59:30]
are the larger ones.
>> Yes, that's correct.
[59:33]
» And what what's being done uh the
bear-proofing around that?
[59:37]
» Um so uh right now as as as the council
has said that you're locking three and
[59:43]
keeping one open. When that uh when that
gets full or close to full, then we'll
[59:48]
lock that and we'll near the
>> In the meantime,
[59:51]
similar to the opposite side, and we
will be installing smaller bear-proof
[59:55]
hatches
>> uh on the right-hand side as well.
[59:58]
» Yeah. Okay. [snorts]
So, yeah, not an immediate task with the
[1:00:02]
bears around.
I was only advised some of the people in
[1:00:06]
the community that are concerned about
what's happening, right?
[1:00:09]
» Yeah, I would I would say that, you
know, if we're installing the the
[1:00:13]
smaller lids, I just worry people will
start leaving like, you know how it
[1:00:17]
happens with the garbage bin. The
garbage bin's full, people leave it
[1:00:21]
outside uh of the garbage bin. So, I
don't want to see the same thing happen.
[1:00:24]
And I I would prefer to see at some
point a mechanism that allows you to
[1:00:29]
keep the bigger doors all the bigger
doors open without locking. Uh but also
[1:00:35]
uh a mechanism that works that the bears
won't get in.
[1:00:39]
So, I guess that would be a long-term
vision on that. I think it's it's not
[1:00:43]
limiting residents to just one big bin
open so we can put the green waste, but
[1:00:48]
also make it more bear-proof
if they're getting into the big lids.
[1:00:53]
That's what I would say.
>> And if I may to the chair, just one last
[1:00:57]
comment on that.
Just just a reminder that we do have our
[1:01:02]
April um tree chipping event.
>> Yeah.
[1:01:05]
» Um
we
[1:01:07]
There's opportunity for us to to move
twice a year if council wish. I mean,
[1:01:12]
that's
it's you know, there's certain costs
[1:01:15]
attached to that. However, our primary
objective is to make sure that we always
[1:01:20]
have room for the household, kitchen, uh
waste. Yeah.
[1:01:24]
» Yeah, and I I totally understand that
and I appreciate that. I guess that the
[1:01:28]
idea is the main our main concern is the
is the kitchen waste. Um
[1:01:32]
but you know, but I do like when people
use as well. Although you can always go
[1:01:35]
to to the dump equal and which I do have
to go often [laughter]
[1:01:39]
to get rid of things. Um but um
but you know, at the end of the day it's
[1:01:44]
the easiest that we can make for people
to clear
[1:01:47]
things and to make their properties more
fire safe because when it comes to
[1:01:51]
fires, more clearing bushes and trimming
things and making sure they're thrown
[1:01:56]
um in the proper disposal versus just in
the forest. So, I would argue that if we
[1:02:00]
need to uh look at a
longer term um
[1:02:05]
um
uh solution for that would be make those
[1:02:09]
those bears a bit more um make those
lids a bit more bear-proof so they can
[1:02:13]
stay open so people can throw more. And
if that means that we're going to be
[1:02:16]
dumping it a little bit sooner a few
days sooner than we do in order to keep
[1:02:21]
those brushes off the the forest and
people's property. I I I do think that's
[1:02:25]
worth it. And adding another day because
before when we came to council in 2018,
[1:02:30]
there was 2 days a year. We should go
back to that if not more. And if we do
[1:02:34]
have a a a machine now that trims,
that's another reason um to do that.
[1:02:41]
I was sorry, Stuart. We're we're But um
but yeah, I think everything we can do
[1:02:45]
um
to maintain this more fire safe our
[1:02:49]
properties and all I think is really
worth it even if that means putting a
[1:02:53]
little bit more money in it. I really
think it's worth it. Thank you.
[1:02:58]
» Okay. Thanks so much. All right. So,
some of that stuff may happen just more
[1:03:03]
long term, correct?
Okay. In in terms of the vision about uh
[1:03:09]
not that we're there now, but twice a
year and the 2018 reference and some
[1:03:15]
pieces around Like I I think some when I
go up there, it looks like things are
[1:03:20]
getting better. They're not Sometimes
I'm
[1:03:24]
not sure why something's happened, but I
just figure
[1:03:28]
I get it in and if it's not good, go
home.
[1:03:32]
So, but so anyway, thank you for your
questions and thank you for your work on
[1:03:36]
this too. Easy work. And um
Everybody good with that? And we are at
[1:03:44]
public question period.
[1:03:49]
» Yay!
>> Hey, can you read that?
[1:03:51]
» Good.
>> Read out my protocol.
[1:03:54]
» Oh, yes.
>> Yep.
[1:03:56]
» Thank you.
>> [laughter]
[1:03:58]
» You're welcome.
[1:04:01]
» The protocol for the [clears throat]
public question period is outlined in
[1:04:03]
the 20 minutes allocated for this
session and it will end at 11:00 p.m.
[1:04:08]
unless extended by council.
Question period provides an opportunity
[1:04:12]
for residents to ask questions in a
formal quick setting that are not a
[1:04:15]
council back and forth conversation
between residents, council, and or
[1:04:19]
staff. Submissions must be in the form
of the question and each question should
[1:04:23]
must be directed to the chair.
The chair can ask staff to respond and
[1:04:27]
staff responses will be provided to the
chair. There is a time limit of 2
[1:04:31]
minutes per turn. Each requestor may ask
one question addressed to the chair. A
[1:04:36]
second turn to submit a follow-up or new
question is permitted if no one else is
[1:04:40]
waiting to participate. Council may
defer responding to a question to obtain
[1:04:45]
any information required to provide a
complete and accurate response.
[1:04:53]
» That.
>> I'm 14.
[1:04:56]
» Ian Melbourne, 3552 Main Avenue. My
question is on behalf of my little
[1:05:03]
nursing bat colony
and also the owls that are present in
[1:05:10]
the forest behind my property.
They we heard two times where the dark
[1:05:18]
sky
policy is being referenced, you know.
[1:05:23]
And
currently that's policy that's impacting
[1:05:28]
quite significantly
on
[1:05:32]
the owls and the bat colony.
And
[1:05:37]
I'm just [clears throat] wondering
what's the procedure?
[1:05:42]
Cuz I don't know everybody's aware
that there is a dark sky policy that uh
[1:05:50]
the village is pursuing.
And so how is this being implemented? I
[1:05:57]
mean you
you're not your staff are not around at
[1:06:02]
night to see
what's being done within the village cuz
[1:06:08]
I assume they're not.
So you're probably relying on
[1:06:14]
somebody telling on their neighbor or
something. I don't know what
[1:06:18]
what's how is this being implemented?
[1:06:23]
» What I uh
I have a call.
[1:06:25]
» Ed must want to speak first. I don't
know. Wait, Google I'll speak second.
[1:06:29]
» All right. To the
chair.
[1:06:32]
Um a couple of the ways the policy's
being implemented is how you see tonight
[1:06:36]
which is that we take it into account in
our decision making and in our planning
[1:06:40]
of our capital projects moving forward.
Uh with respect to individual
[1:06:46]
complaints I would suggest we connect
after the council meeting.
[1:06:50]
And if there's concerns with that that
you bring those to staff's attention and
[1:06:54]
we'll have this opportunity to follow up
on that.
[1:06:57]
» Okay.
>> Okay. Yeah. And I I I have the same
[1:07:01]
piece that you know, if it's happening
at night staff aren't seeing it but they
[1:07:06]
could be you know, communicating and
saying here's a peaceful tone there and
[1:07:11]
I'm sure that we could make some form of
that.
[1:07:15]
» Can I ask a question on that?
>> Yeah, go ahead.
[1:07:17]
» What is it that's happening?
Like I'm not sure what it is. You know,
[1:07:22]
I appreciate dark sky and but but what
actually is happening that we're seeing
[1:07:26]
that we're concerned about?
>> Floodlights.
[1:07:29]
» Floodlights?
From from a property?
[1:07:31]
» Mhm.
>> Oh, okay. I guess the LEDs are getting
[1:07:35]
brighter and brighter. Yes.
>> The light pollution is getting worse and
[1:07:39]
worse.
>> So floodlights that are on constantly,
[1:07:41]
is that what you're seeing in there?
>> Yes.
[1:07:42]
» Okay.
Okay. Thank you.
[1:07:44]
» Timers are a wonderful thing. Just
remind
[1:07:47]
» I mean
>> I [laughter] have everything on timers
[1:07:49]
on my property.
>> that when you walk through they come on
[1:07:51]
because it's dark.
>> Yeah, yeah.
[1:07:53]
» Yeah, yeah. The motion lights, yeah.
>> But yeah, that's okay. Good, thank you.
[1:07:59]
» Um yeah, just want to make a follow-up
comment similar to our other bylaws and
[1:08:02]
policies in the village. Uh we use do
take a compliance-based approach. So our
[1:08:06]
first approach in that case is to reach
out to homeowners and see if we can't
[1:08:10]
get compliance and just make them aware
of of what we have in place.
[1:08:16]
» I think it's doable. It's a new neighbor
that doesn't isn't aware, I think. But
[1:08:22]
that's what I was trying to figure out.
>> There you go.
[1:08:24]
» Awesome. Thanks for bringing it forward.
>> You know, like welcome to the
[1:08:27]
neighborhood. By the way, I want to
turn off your lights.
[1:08:32]
Good welcome.
>> [laughter]
[1:08:34]
» Okay. So
Do you have a second question?
[1:08:38]
» No, thank you very much.
>> Okay. Thank you very much. Okay, so we
[1:08:43]
are at that time. Uh the motion is that
the July 27th, 2026 regular council
[1:08:50]
meeting be adjourned and counselor
Flounder. Thank you and counselor
[1:08:55]
» Murphy Dean.
>> Thank you.
[1:08:59]
And I would like to call the question.
All those in favor? Aye. Motion carries.
[1:09:04]
And the meeting adjourned at 8:10.
[1:09:08]
Thank you, everyone.
>> Second.
[1:09:18]
» So, you backed it, Skip?
>> Yeah.
[1:09:20]
» What was the motion?