Agenda
Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:57]
Welcome to today's special
[0:58]
school board meeting. This
[0:59]
special school board meeting of
[1:00]
the School Board of Broward
[1:02]
County, Florida, is now called
[1:03]
to order. Our primary focus is
[1:05]
to create a safe and productive
[1:06]
environment for all
[1:06]
participants. Please be
[1:08]
reminded of the exit doors that
[1:09]
are clearly marked for
[1:11]
emergency exiting while in the
[1:12]
boardroom. Refrain from
[1:13]
obstructing the exit doors. All
[1:15]
attendees must occupy a seat
[1:17]
with the exception of media.
[1:18]
Once the boardroom has reached
[1:19]
its seating capacity, attendees
[1:22]
will be directed to a
[1:23]
designated overflow space,
[1:25]
which is located in the area
[1:27]
adjacent to the vending
[1:28]
machines. If the fire alarm
[1:30]
sounds, exit the room calmly
[1:31]
continue outside the building
[1:32]
and remain there until
[1:34]
authorities give clearance to
[1:35]
return. Thank you for your
[1:37]
cooperation. All please rise
[1:38]
for the Pledge of Allegiance to
[1:39]
the flag of the United States
[1:44]
of America.
[1:45]
>> Pledge allegiance to the
[1:47]
flag of the United States of
[1:49]
America and to the Republic for
[1:51]
which it stands. One nation
[1:54]
under GOD, indivisible, with
[2:03]
liberty and justice for all.
[2:04]
>> As we prepare to begin our
[2:05]
special school board meeting,
[2:07]
we are reminded that our vision
[2:09]
is 100% proficiency for all
[2:10]
students. As an a-rated school
[2:12]
district, our vital task is to
[2:13]
sustain this achievement. We
[2:15]
will continue educating all
[2:16]
students to reach their highest
[2:18]
potential. Now let's write this
[2:21]
next chapter together. Today's
[2:22]
special School Board meeting
[2:23]
will operate in accordance with
[2:25]
School Board Policy 1020, and
[2:26]
the board will review the items
[2:27]
as advertised and presented by
[2:29]
the superintendent. The
[2:30]
superintendent released a
[2:32]
revised agenda with certain
[2:33]
changes for this meeting and
[2:34]
published it on the school
[2:35]
district's website. The chair
[2:37]
finds pursuant to section 120
[2:39]
.525 Florida statutes, that
[2:40]
good cause exists for such
[2:42]
changes and accepts the revised
[2:43]
agenda. MAY I have a motion and
[2:46]
a second to close the agenda?
[2:48]
Moved by DR. Zeman. Seconded by
[2:49]
MISS Thompson. All in favor of
[2:52]
closing the agenda? Say aye.
[2:52]
>> Aye.
[2:54]
>> Any opposed? Say no. The
[2:58]
agenda is now closed. We will
[2:59]
soon hear from our registered
[3:01]
public speakers. We ask that
[3:02]
decorum be maintained in
[3:04]
civility and respect be shown
[3:05]
during public comment. Our
[3:06]
General Counsel will assist the
[3:08]
chair in maintaining decorum
[3:09]
during this period. We also
[3:10]
want to remind our public
[3:12]
speakers of the rules and
[3:13]
expectations regardinghe
[3:14]
agenda. Public comment portion
[3:15]
of the Special School Board
[3:17]
meeting, as well as board
[3:18]
policy attorney Dupree Bruno,
[3:19]
please explain the rules of
[3:20]
public comment.
[3:22]
>> Thank you and good evening.
[3:23]
Public comment is governed by
[3:25]
school Board Policy 1020 and is
[3:27]
intended to provide input on
[3:28]
the board's duties, decisions
[3:29]
in the overall operation of the
[3:31]
school district. The school
[3:32]
board is viewpoint neutral
[3:34]
during public comment per
[3:35]
school board policy 1020. The
[3:37]
procedures are as follows.
[3:39]
Speakers must state their name,
[3:40]
city of residence and whether
[3:41]
they are a lobbyist. Before
[3:43]
beginning their remarks. All
[3:45]
remarks must be directed to the
[3:46]
board as a whole. The board
[3:48]
will not respond to or engage
[3:49]
with speakers during public
[3:51]
comment, and no action will be
[3:53]
taken unless the item is on the
[3:54]
agenda. During the agenda
[3:56]
speaking time, speakers will
[3:57]
have up to three minutes per
[3:59]
item and up to one minute on
[4:01]
motions or amendments. The
[4:02]
chair MAY adjust the order of
[4:03]
speakers, recognize speakers
[4:05]
and enforce all limits. The
[4:06]
chair MAY reduce individual
[4:08]
speaking time or establish a
[4:10]
total amount for public comment
[4:11]
when necessary. To ensure all
[4:12]
speakers have an opportunity to
[4:14]
be heard. A visible timer will
[4:16]
be used in the microphone MAY
[4:19]
be turned off when time expires.
[4:20]
Speakers must limit their
[4:21]
comments to agenda. Specific
[4:23]
items must remain relevant to
[4:25]
the specific item. Comments MAY
[4:26]
not address matters that are
[4:27]
pending litigation. Quasi
[4:29]
judicial proceedings, active
[4:30]
investigations or
[4:32]
administrative hearings,
[4:33]
solicitation and lobbying
[4:35]
activities must comply with
[4:36]
applicable school board
[4:38]
policies. Abusive language
[4:39]
defined as profanity
[4:40]
threatening or name calling is
[4:42]
prohibited. In addition,
[4:44]
clapping, hissing, booing,
[4:45]
shouting, yelling or other
[4:46]
disruptions from the audience
[4:48]
are not allowed. Speakers who
[4:49]
fail to follow proper decorum
[4:51]
in the chambers will be ruled
[4:53]
out of order by the board chair.
[4:54]
Failure to comply MAY result in
[4:55]
the microphone being turned off
[4:58]
or a recess being called. After
[5:00]
a warning. The chair MAY also
[5:01]
direct removal from the meeting
[5:03]
by law enforcement or the
[5:05]
Sergeant at Arms. MADAM Chair.
[5:06]
>> Thank you, Attorney Dupree.
[5:08]
Bruno, the board wants to hear
[5:09]
from the public, and we
[5:10]
appreciate your cooperation in
[5:12]
maintaining a respectful,
[5:14]
orderly and productive meeting
[5:16]
environment. MAY I have a
[5:18]
motion and a second on item one
[5:19]
moved by DR. Zeman, seconded by
[5:22]
MISS Hixon. Is there a public
[5:23]
comment on item one?
[5:24]
>> Yes, MADAM Chair, there are
[5:26]
three registered speakers. Amy
[5:29]
Edelman, Liliana Rubio and
[5:31]
PRESIDENT Anna Fusco. You MAY
[5:48]
approach the podium.
[5:53]
>> Is this the one about
[5:56]
wanting Anna Fusco, PRESIDENT?
[5:58]
>> This is item one,
[5:58]
superintendent's annual
[5:59]
financial report to the
[6:01]
Commissioner of Education.
[6:03]
>> Alrighty. So financial
[6:05]
report to the Commissioner of
[6:07]
Education, new one in old, one
[6:08]
out. Lot of expectations from
[6:10]
the other one new expectations
[6:13]
from the new one. We're hoping
[6:16]
that this report is based on
[6:17]
truly what's happening in the
[6:20]
Broward County public schools,
[6:23]
where we do have obviously
[6:25]
lower enrollment from students.
[6:27]
There's no real understanding
[6:29]
of where they're going. I do
[6:31]
know with the schools that
[6:32]
closed and the schools that
[6:34]
they were supposed to be
[6:36]
entering, that hasn't happened.
[6:37]
I checked with Chapel Trail
[6:39]
when Panther one closed,
[6:41]
hundreds were there, 43 went to
[6:44]
Chapel Trail. So we would like
[6:46]
to know what exactly was your
[6:48]
guys plan when you closed six
[6:49]
schools to actually have the
[6:50]
students get to our public
[6:53]
schools? Where is the plan?
[6:55]
Where is the tracking that's
[6:57]
lost money? The other situation
[6:59]
that we would like to
[7:01]
understand is even though we
[7:03]
have low enrollment, we had a
[7:04]
school board member, Jeff
[7:06]
Holness, who put it out there
[7:09]
last year, thousand positions
[7:12]
last school year, 1000
[7:13]
positions for this school year
[7:15]
and 1000 positions for next
[7:17]
school year. But what you
[7:18]
didn't take into account and
[7:19]
you guys are hiding behind it,
[7:21]
and I'm going to come after you
[7:24]
and say you're hiding behind it.
[7:25]
You school board members must
[7:28]
be hiding behind it that our
[7:32]
teachers and our staff are
[7:34]
overworked. Class size is
[7:37]
ridiculous. I have kindergarten
[7:39]
classes with 25 students. I
[7:42]
have third third grade classes
[7:45]
with 2829 students. We have
[7:47]
fifth grade classes with 32 to
[7:49]
35 students. We have middle
[7:52]
school classes with 5060 kids,
[7:54]
high school classes. And you
[7:55]
guys all look at it like Anna
[7:58]
Fusco is making it up. And I am
[8:02]
not I'm not making it up.
[8:03]
Teachers are reporting this.
[8:05]
They're making it loud and
[8:07]
clear. The enrollment MAY have
[8:10]
lowered, but the student ratio
[8:12]
to teacher has largely
[8:13]
increased, with the
[8:14]
expectations of still
[8:16]
performing and the extra work
[8:19]
put on them. There's a lot of
[8:21]
extra work as as it is
[8:22]
appreciated to look at the
[8:23]
guidance of of cutting screen
[8:26]
time when you cut computer time
[8:28]
for certain grade levels and it
[8:31]
goes to paper, how are they
[8:32]
grading it? You guys don't
[8:34]
listen to the details. That
[8:36]
comes with ramifications when
[8:37]
you're taking away positions
[8:39]
that are needed in schools. You
[8:41]
were told it wasn't going to
[8:43]
affect schools, but it is. It's
[8:47]
real. And we'll get to it later.
[8:49]
About the raise. That was very
[8:51]
largely spoken about from the
[8:53]
budget report I read. I don't
[8:55]
see it in there, so I'm not
[8:57]
sure exactly. All in details
[8:59]
what's being presented, but I
[9:01]
hope it was done with severe
[9:04]
scrutiny and detail.
[9:09]
>> Thank you. Next speaker.
[9:13]
>> My excuse me. My name is Amy
[9:14]
Edelman and I'm from Country
[9:17]
Isles Elementary. We know about
[9:20]
the 4% that was promised to us,
[9:25]
and I'm just here to say, hey.
[9:30]
Anna. Please go by what you
[9:32]
said and give us that 4%. I'm
[9:35]
telling you now, I won't tell
[9:38]
you where I lived, but it's
[9:41]
going around in their online
[9:44]
that we should not vote for the
[9:46]
referendum because all of the
[9:50]
people in that area said, why
[9:51]
should we havee to pay the
[9:55]
teachers? It's t tehahat t the
[9:59]
hohool boaoard paiaid th teachers.
[10:02]
So it's a very large community
[10:05]
and if that's what happens, the
[10:06]
teachers are going to go back
[10:09]
ten, 12,000, 6000, whatever
[10:12]
they got, the money's going to
[10:17]
go back. We need to have our 4%
[10:20]
raise from you guys. Figure it
[10:25]
out in your budget. Because I
[10:28]
know for a fact that word gets
[10:31]
around in the neighborhood and
[10:33]
nobody wants to vote yes for
[10:35]
that referendum in that certain
[10:38]
neighborhood. Thank you.
[10:45]
>> Thank you. Next speaker.
[10:46]
>> Broward Teachers Union
[10:49]
Liliana Ruido, and I hope the
[10:51]
report matches what's going on
[10:53]
in our schools at this point.
[10:55]
When you go to the schools and
[10:58]
you see the high schools,
[11:01]
nevertheless, the high schools
[11:02]
packed with substitute teachers.
[11:04]
So you keep saying we lost so
[11:06]
many students, oh, so many
[11:08]
students. But yet some classes
[11:10]
have 50, 60 students. So what
[11:13]
are you doing to, you know, to,
[11:14]
to control that narrative at
[11:16]
this point? That's one thing.
[11:20]
The other part is that report
[11:21]
that you're going to present to
[11:23]
all of us. We are watching what
[11:24]
you're going to present. And at
[11:26]
the same time, we're watching
[11:29]
how you are going to present
[11:33]
that back to the people behind
[11:35]
the report. So my my question
[11:38]
to you is, who is supervising
[11:40]
the schools? How how are you
[11:42]
going to give reports? If I
[11:44]
don't see you out there and
[11:45]
you're not seeing the reality
[11:48]
of our teachers right now,
[11:49]
especially when it comes to
[11:50]
teachers that have to deal once
[11:52]
with 60 students, they're
[11:55]
overworked, they're overwhelmed.
[11:56]
And this is just the beginning
[11:58]
of the school year. And also,
[12:00]
I'm going to ask you to reflect,
[12:02]
like I always do, ask you to
[12:05]
reflect on how you are going to
[12:07]
use your budget. And we're
[12:08]
watching and we're expecting
[12:09]
that you do the right thing.
[12:11]
Because let me tell you, we are
[12:13]
watching your decision out
[12:14]
there. You're sitting up there,
[12:16]
but you forgot that the
[12:18]
majority of you were teachers.
[12:21]
So, you know what? Do the right
[12:22]
thing by the teachers and by
[12:26]
the employees. So you, you can
[12:30]
feel, you know, in peace with
[12:33]
your mind. Thank you.
[12:34]
>> That concludes registered
[12:35]
speakers.
[12:35]
>> Thank you. Any board
[12:40]
discussion on item one?
[12:43]
>> MADAM Chair? DR. Holness
[12:47]
thank you, MADAM Chair. MADAM
[12:48]
Chair, I have a couple of
[12:52]
questions for Doctor Hepburn.
[12:54]
Doctor Hepburn did the motion
[12:58]
to cut staff. Include cutting
[13:00]
teachers.
[13:01]
>> Thank you for the question,
[13:05]
DR. Holness. No, it did not.
[13:06]
>> Okay, so, Doctor Hepburn, is
[13:11]
it true that over the last 10
[13:13]
to 15 years, we've lost
[13:15]
somewhere between 40 to 50 000
[13:16]
students, but kept
[13:17]
approximately the same number
[13:18]
of staff?
[13:20]
>> That's correct.
[13:23]
>> Okay. So would you agree
[13:25]
that it's a it would have been
[13:28]
or it is a responsible decision,
[13:30]
considering that Broward County
[13:33]
schools lost 40 to 50 000
[13:36]
students over the last 10 to 15
[13:38]
years. But we kept the same
[13:40]
number of staff. Was it a
[13:42]
responsible decision, in your
[13:46]
opinion, that we cut staff to
[13:48]
align with our budget?
[13:50]
>> Yes, I concur in addition to
[13:52]
add to that is a dollar amount
[13:53]
and revenue loss over that same
[13:55]
amount of time to DR. Holness,
[13:57]
which I think up to this point
[13:59]
in the year is about $450
[14:01]
million in lost revenue over
[14:03]
over the past decade.
[14:05]
>> Okay. So, Doctor Hepburn, if
[14:08]
we continue to lose students
[14:09]
and as you mentioned, when we
[14:12]
did motion to cut the staff, it
[14:14]
did not include teachers.
[14:16]
Correct. So if we continue to
[14:18]
lose students and we continue
[14:20]
to keep the same number of
[14:22]
staff, that's when we had 5000
[14:25]
more students. What are the
[14:26]
consequences to the district
[14:29]
for not taking action?
[14:31]
>> There's severe consequences.
[14:33]
Our largest expense for our
[14:35]
district is actually employees.
[14:37]
So we have to rightsize
[14:39]
ourselves based on the revenue
[14:40]
realities that we have. So if
[14:41]
we continue to pay for that
[14:42]
expense, we will definitely run
[14:45]
out of reserves quickly.
[14:47]
>> Okay. And when we run out of
[14:49]
reserve, what is the then
[14:50]
consequence to the district?
[14:52]
That's a possibility. Doctor
[14:52]
Hepburn.
[14:54]
>> Yes. So that's a possibility
[14:56]
of the state coming in and
[14:57]
taking over our financial
[14:59]
situation.
[15:00]
>> MISS Fusco, this is your
[15:01]
first warning. Please don't
[15:04]
call out from the audience.
[15:07]
>> Okay, so, Doctor Hepburn, it
[15:09]
appears that over the 10 to 15
[15:13]
years we were. Losing students
[15:15]
and consequently losing
[15:16]
teachers. But we were keeping
[15:18]
the same number of non-teaching
[15:22]
staff. Is that a fair statement?
[15:23]
>> Yeah. That's correct.
[15:25]
>> Okay. So what we've actually
[15:27]
done in the motion to cut staff
[15:31]
is to align with what has
[15:32]
happened to our teachers. And
[15:34]
it wasn't happening to our
[15:35]
non-teaching staff. Correct?
[15:37]
>> Correct.
[15:39]
>> Okay. So and to clarify the
[15:40]
motion, Doctor Hepburn, the
[15:43]
motion was to cut 1000 staff
[15:45]
the first year and the second
[15:48]
and third year to cut at least
[15:50]
500 and no more than 1000. Is
[15:51]
that how you understood it?
[15:52]
>> That's correct.
[15:53]
>> Okay. And when that motion
[15:55]
was made, Doctor Hepburn, I
[15:56]
believe the vote was seven
[15:58]
board members to two in favor
[16:00]
of that motion. Is that correct?
[16:02]
>> I don't recall the specific
[16:05]
vote, but I know it passed.
[16:06]
>> Okay. But it would have
[16:08]
passed by at least five board
[16:08]
members.
[16:09]
>> Correct.
[16:10]
>> Okay. And Doctor Hepburn,
[16:11]
for the record, it was passed
[16:13]
by seven board members
[16:15]
supporting to responsibly cut
[16:17]
staff to match the declining
[16:19]
enrollment so we can be
[16:21]
fiscally responsible and not
[16:22]
end up in the possibility of
[16:24]
state receivership. Correct.
[16:27]
MADAM Chair, thank you so much.
[16:30]
>> Thank you, MR. Cervera.
[16:33]
>> Thank you, chair, just to to
[16:35]
piggyback back to this motion
[16:38]
that we were just discussing.
[16:40]
Doctor Hepburn, I want to make
[16:41]
sure that we're crystal clear
[16:43]
on this and that we're not
[16:45]
playing wordsmithing with our
[16:47]
with our words and, and, and
[16:50]
using words in a way that could
[16:52]
be potentially be deemed as
[16:55]
deceiving in the cuts that DR.
[16:58]
Holness just referenced.
[17:01]
Thousand employees will no
[17:04]
longer have positions with bcc.
[17:06]
DR. Holness asked if we were
[17:09]
cutting 1000 teachers in
[17:13]
response to that, you said no.
[17:16]
However, I think and I want to
[17:17]
make sure that we're clear
[17:19]
we're on the same page. When
[17:20]
you say teachers, are you
[17:22]
talking about classroom
[17:23]
teachers and teachers that are
[17:26]
physically embedded in our
[17:27]
schoolhouses throughout the
[17:28]
county?
[17:28]
>> Correct.
[17:30]
>> Okay. So clearly there are
[17:32]
certified teachers, individuals
[17:34]
who heard teacher
[17:36]
certifications that maybe we're
[17:37]
working out of this district or
[17:39]
working out of this building,
[17:40]
or they're parts of the
[17:41]
district that will no longer be
[17:43]
employed here. So in fact, we
[17:46]
are losing teachers, just maybe
[17:47]
not teachers that are in a
[17:50]
schoolhouse right now. Correct?
[17:51]
>> Correct.
[17:53]
>> Okay. So I want to be very
[17:57]
clear. This thousand on number
[17:59]
that was brought up by this
[18:01]
motion, we will lose certified
[18:02]
teachers.
[18:03]
>> Yes, we will lose employees
[18:05]
that have a teacher
[18:06]
certification, but their job
[18:09]
they were in was not directly
[18:10]
providing instruction to a
[18:10]
student.
[18:11]
>> What is the requirement in
[18:13]
this state to be defined as a
[18:14]
teacher? Is it just the holding
[18:18]
of a teacher certificate?
[18:20]
>> Yes, I simply say yes, a
[18:22]
certified instructor. Yes.
[18:23]
>> Okay. So if you have a if
[18:25]
you have a teaching certificate
[18:27]
recognized by the state of
[18:28]
Florida and you happen to be
[18:29]
working at the security desk
[18:31]
for whatever reason, you are
[18:33]
still a teacher under the legal
[18:35]
definition in the state of
[18:36]
Florida, are you not?
[18:37]
>> You are. You are an
[18:39]
individual with a teacher
[18:41]
certification. For me to extend
[18:44]
that definition, I would call
[18:45]
your teacher. If you're in a
[18:47]
classroom, directly provide
[18:48]
instruction to students.
[18:50]
>> Okay, so pk is definition of
[18:51]
a teacher is somebody with a
[18:52]
teacher certificate and someone
[18:54]
who's physically embedded in a
[18:54]
school.
[18:55]
>> Correct.
[18:56]
>> Okay. I don't know if I
[18:57]
agree with that, but I'll
[19:01]
accept your your definition.
[19:03]
Also, sir. I want to be I want
[19:07]
to be clear on on this, the
[19:11]
vote that was taken on this was
[19:12]
7 to 2, right? So there were
[19:14]
two individuals that did not
[19:16]
vote in favor of these cuts.
[19:17]
Right.
[19:19]
>> I can't recall the vote. I
[19:19]
just know it passed.
[19:21]
>> Do you remember it being
[19:22]
unanimous.
[19:24]
>> Being who?
[19:25]
>> Unanimous.
[19:26]
>> I can't recall.
[19:27]
>> Okay. Well it wasn't and
[19:29]
I'll tell you why, because I
[19:31]
didn't vote for it. And if
[19:32]
memory serves correct, neither
[19:34]
did MISS Rupert. And the reason
[19:35]
that I didn't vote for it is
[19:37]
for the exact situation that
[19:38]
we're finding ourselves in
[19:41]
right now, where I have kids in
[19:43]
my schools in district six that
[19:46]
are 23, 24, 25 kids deep in
[19:48]
first and second grade. And I
[19:51]
can't take teachers with
[19:52]
teaching certificates and place
[19:54]
them in their schools. If we're
[19:56]
getting rid of 1000 of them.
[19:58]
Right. So I want to be very,
[20:00]
very clear that there is, in
[20:01]
fact, a trickle down effect, a
[20:02]
very real trickle down effect
[20:04]
of wholeness motion to rid the
[20:06]
district of 1000, whether he
[20:08]
wants to call them teachers or
[20:09]
non teachers or former teachers,
[20:11]
or soon to be teachers, however
[20:12]
you want to define them, if
[20:13]
they have a teaching
[20:15]
certificate, okay, and they are
[20:17]
no longer being employed, that
[20:18]
takes away a body, somebody
[20:20]
that you can take, put into a
[20:23]
school and help with this
[20:24]
overcrowding problem that we're
[20:25]
going to address at the next
[20:27]
school board meeting, by the
[20:28]
way, and a lot more detail than
[20:30]
we are today, but we now lose
[20:32]
that ability by making these
[20:34]
cuts. So I want to make sure
[20:35]
the public is clear. I don't
[20:37]
want to play. Let me, if I MAY,
[20:39]
finish. I want to make sure
[20:40]
that we're very clear. We're
[20:41]
not playing games and we're not
[20:43]
trying to wordsmith what a
[20:44]
teacher is. To be recognized as
[20:46]
a teacher in the state of
[20:47]
Florida, you need to have a
[20:48]
certified teaching certificate.
[20:49]
It's not a requirement that you
[20:51]
have to have a teaching
[20:52]
certificate, and you have to be
[20:54]
in a school. I'm pretty sure
[20:55]
the admin rules don't say
[20:56]
anything like that, but go
[20:56]
ahead.
[20:58]
>> No, I was going to mention
[21:00]
that. Correct me if I'm wrong,
[21:01]
Ernie. At least over 90% of
[21:03]
those impacted employees from
[21:04]
the from the 1000, which I
[21:05]
think was 300, are actually
[21:07]
still working in our system in
[21:09]
various positions, correct? Yep.
[21:11]
So we didn't lose a lot of
[21:13]
people externally. We actually
[21:15]
placed them into instructional
[21:16]
roles in other various roles
[21:18]
that were vacant in the
[21:18]
district.
[21:20]
>> And that's encouraging. And
[21:21]
perhaps maybe we can start
[21:22]
sticking them in some of my
[21:23]
schools that don't have enough
[21:24]
teachers to teach the
[21:25]
classrooms right now. But be
[21:28]
that as it MAY, the point of my.
[21:30]
I'll call it a mini diatribe. I
[21:32]
didn't go full diatribe. Maybe
[21:34]
later, but not right now, was
[21:35]
to just make sure that we're
[21:36]
clear that certified teachers
[21:38]
will be losing their jobs based
[21:40]
on the motion that DR. Holness
[21:42]
was referencing. Thank you.
[21:43]
>> Thank you.
[21:44]
>> DR. Zeman thank.
[21:45]
>> You so much, chair.
[21:48]
Appreciate it. I wanted to
[21:50]
thank Doctor Shim and his team
[21:53]
for putting together. I know
[21:57]
this report's 246 pages, but
[21:59]
that really is kind of a pretty
[22:01]
good representation of how much
[22:02]
work it takes to assemble these
[22:03]
things and put it together.
[22:06]
I've read through this report.
[22:12]
There are so many good. Reports
[22:13]
in terms of writing up,
[22:14]
explaining the spreadsheets,
[22:15]
explaining the graphs, and
[22:17]
things like that. This is a
[22:19]
major step forward in terms of
[22:20]
the community understanding how
[22:23]
we spend $5.5 billion a year.
[22:25]
And I'm I'm just very impressed.
[22:26]
And I just want you and your
[22:29]
staff to know that I personally
[22:30]
appreciate how much time it
[22:32]
takes to put together something
[22:35]
like this. To the earlier
[22:38]
conversation. I haven't heard
[22:41]
anybody say that it was
[22:43]
responsible to reduce 101,000
[22:44]
positions in Broward County
[22:46]
schools, but I know that it is.
[22:48]
If you split the world of
[22:50]
education into those that are
[22:51]
working at schools and those
[22:53]
that are not working at schools,
[22:56]
this board, by the way, not
[22:57]
because one member made the
[22:59]
motion or a majority voted for
[23:00]
it, but because our
[23:02]
superintendent had talked about
[23:04]
reducing 1000 positions for
[23:06]
months before this board took
[23:08]
this action. So this board
[23:10]
decided to take cuts away from
[23:12]
schools, and that preserves the
[23:15]
dignity of our core education
[23:16]
system. To Doctor Hepburn's
[23:18]
point, 90% of the human beings
[23:20]
of the 300 that actually
[23:21]
influence this are still
[23:22]
working in Broward County
[23:23]
schools. So they actually help
[23:25]
the student teacher ratio. They
[23:27]
don't hurt it. And 30 people
[23:29]
were either not offered jobs or
[23:31]
turned down jobs to put it
[23:33]
together. Out of 25000
[23:35]
employees going through fiscal
[23:37]
emergency, you know, with
[23:38]
dramatic reductions in
[23:39]
enrollment, reducing our
[23:41]
revenue by over $100 million a
[23:43]
year for the past two years. It
[23:45]
was the only sane and
[23:47]
responsible approach for a
[23:48]
large urban school district
[23:53]
like this to take. People can
[23:55]
talk about aspects of this all
[23:57]
they want. This was a smart,
[24:00]
wise fiscal policy. It is a
[24:01]
reflection of declining
[24:03]
enrollment. It is not a sign of
[24:04]
weakness for this district or
[24:06]
this board that we did this. It
[24:09]
is a sign of strength and we
[24:12]
will continue, I'm sure. I mean,
[24:13]
my prediction anyway, is it
[24:15]
will continue to make the best
[24:17]
decisions that we can for
[24:19]
preserving the education of the
[24:21]
students in Broward County. So
[24:23]
thank you, Doctor Hepburn, for
[24:25]
bringing that issue up. Thank
[24:27]
you to the people who voted for
[24:29]
it. We've got tougher times
[24:30]
ahead. We've got a referendum
[24:33]
on NOVEMBER 3rd that's going to
[24:33]
determine that, you know,
[24:36]
whether 16% of our funds get
[24:37]
provided through local
[24:40]
continuation of a one mill ad
[24:42]
valorem tax. After that, we MAY
[24:45]
have to do other things with
[24:46]
our budget for this year in
[24:48]
order to stay above the 3.0 and
[24:49]
do everything that we can to
[24:53]
serve students. Thank you.
[24:57]
>> Thank you, MISS Hixon.
[24:59]
>> Thank you. Just want to
[25:00]
clarify a couple of things. So,
[25:03]
Doctor Hepburn, to your
[25:05]
recollection, recollection, did
[25:07]
the motion that was passed, did
[25:09]
it say to get rid of 1000
[25:09]
teachers?
[25:10]
>> No, it did not.
[25:12]
>> It said positions if I'm not
[25:14]
mistaken. Correct. Second
[25:16]
question are members of your
[25:18]
cabinet chiefs, directors,
[25:20]
assistant directors? Do they
[25:21]
hold teaching certificates?
[25:23]
>> Yes, as well as I.
[25:25]
>> Thank you. So I just want to
[25:27]
make it clear that the the
[25:30]
motion was to reduce positions.
[25:32]
And again, as DR. Zeman
[25:34]
mentioned, any business, any
[25:36]
organization that loses
[25:40]
customers has to downsize both
[25:42]
where they do business and the
[25:44]
people that they employ in the
[25:46]
business. So that's where we're
[25:48]
at right now. So I don't think
[25:51]
our motion had anything to do
[25:53]
with teachers per se. Happens
[25:56]
to be people who hold teaching
[25:57]
certificates, had those
[26:01]
positions. Doctor Hepburn.
[26:03]
Reducing positions by
[26:06]
approximately 1000 positions.
[26:07]
Does that have anything to do
[26:09]
with class size this school
[26:10]
year?
[26:11]
>> No.
[26:13]
>> So there are two completely
[26:14]
separate.
[26:16]
>> Completely separate issues.
[26:18]
>> Thank you. And can you tell
[26:20]
us again? I've asked earlier
[26:23]
today, but I'll ask again
[26:24]
because I have gone into the
[26:26]
schools and I can tell you that
[26:28]
I call Doctor Hepburn when I'm
[26:29]
leaving them to say, there's
[26:30]
way too many kids in this class,
[26:32]
and what are we doing? And they
[26:34]
are working on it. So but can
[26:35]
you tell us again and maybe
[26:38]
kind of a timeline of when we
[26:40]
can see that those classes
[26:43]
won't be the size that they are
[26:43]
now?
[26:44]
>> Yes, absolutely. So the
[26:46]
staff has been working for the
[26:47]
past couple of weeks in
[26:49]
balancing out classes to the
[26:51]
tune of also adding growth
[26:53]
positions, which entails
[26:54]
teachers being transitioned
[26:56]
from schools that have lower
[26:58]
enrollment to schools that have
[26:59]
higher enrollment so we can
[27:00]
balance out the class sizes.
[27:03]
And Doctor Lozano or Doctor Dr
[27:06]
Fulton as far as timeline. So
[27:06]
complete.
[27:09]
>> So the timeline has teachers
[27:11]
with their new classes of
[27:15]
students on SEPTEMBER 14th.
[27:17]
>> Thank you. And my last
[27:19]
question, are there still
[27:22]
people employed in positions
[27:23]
that have teaching
[27:24]
certification certifications
[27:27]
that in the instance that we
[27:29]
have a teaching position in a
[27:30]
school but don't have
[27:32]
applicants for it, that we
[27:34]
could move the people from the
[27:36]
position they're holding now
[27:39]
into a school, because that is,
[27:42]
as we know, where we want to
[27:44]
have our we don't want any
[27:45]
vacancies. We don't want
[27:47]
interim subs in there. We want
[27:49]
certified teachers. So is that
[27:50]
going to be the next step?
[27:52]
>> Yes. Those are options that
[27:54]
don't exercise. When when
[27:55]
urgency heightens, it heightens
[27:56]
to that level.
[27:57]
>> And there's enough people in
[27:58]
the district still employed
[28:00]
that we would be able to do
[28:02]
that. Okay. Thank you.
[28:03]
>> Thank you. Any other board
[28:07]
discussion on item one? All in
[28:08]
favor of item one, say aye. Aye.
[28:11]
All opposed? Say no. Item
[28:13]
passes unanimously. Could I get
[28:16]
a motion on item two? Move
[28:18]
moved by DR. Zeman. Seconded by
[28:22]
Miss Hixon. Item two is
[28:24]
itbfy23184. Athletic Security
[28:28]
Service funding. Is there any
[28:29]
public comment on item two?
[28:31]
>> Yes, MADAM Chair, there is
[28:32]
one registered speaker,
[28:50]
PRESIDENT Anna Fusco.
[28:56]
>> Anna Fusco, Broward Teachers
[28:58]
union PRESIDENT. This is an
[29:01]
outside organization with the
[29:04]
wanting. I would say that this
[29:06]
is something that you guys
[29:10]
could bring out and use the
[29:12]
security that we have. I go to
[29:14]
games at night. I go to
[29:16]
theaters at night. I go to many
[29:18]
places, and I know that it's an
[29:21]
outside company and they're
[29:24]
nice. But when you've got a
[29:25]
group of people that are hired
[29:27]
by their organization, they
[29:29]
have more bite in the game.
[29:30]
They have more teeth in the
[29:32]
game. To give a little bit more
[29:37]
conscientious of caring. So. I
[29:38]
haven't gone through the exact
[29:40]
numbers. I would ask one of you
[29:42]
up there to really talk about
[29:44]
what is the fee to have this
[29:47]
outside company at all of our
[29:50]
games that are wanting? Every
[29:52]
person that comes into a game
[29:54]
or a night activity or an after
[29:56]
school activity, and why are
[30:00]
our people not doing the work?
[30:02]
They're their supervising their,
[30:04]
their security wise. And by the
[30:06]
way, I've also heard that
[30:08]
there's a struggle on wanting
[30:10]
to pay our security personnel
[30:12]
because it's overtime, but we
[30:17]
need security. They want to be.
[30:18]
Made to believe that they can
[30:20]
only take comp time or flex
[30:21]
time or however you want to
[30:23]
word it. That is just so
[30:23]
inappropriate and
[30:26]
unprofessional. We need the
[30:27]
security. We have to keep
[30:30]
everybody safe for GOD, for God
[30:31]
forbid. There was another
[30:33]
shooting the other day. So why
[30:35]
are we mincing? N n here in
[30:36]
Browarar But you know,w, it s
[30:39]
ononhe new Why are w we mincing
[30:40]
ouound w witroroward Cntnty
[30:42]
Public School employees to do
[30:46]
the job? We know we know a lot
[30:47]
more about the person that
[30:49]
actually works for Broward
[30:50]
schools than a person that
[30:52]
works for a separate company.
[30:55]
So what is really, you know,
[30:57]
important couple things. What's
[30:59]
the amount of money? What is
[31:00]
the amount of money for the
[31:02]
company? What would be the
[31:03]
amount of money? Just having
[31:04]
our employees? What is the
[31:06]
safety piece on having the
[31:07]
people hired that are doing the
[31:10]
work? We know that. We know the
[31:11]
extensive background check that
[31:12]
our employees of Broward
[31:14]
Schools goes through. Can we
[31:15]
say that for every outside
[31:17]
company that you have? I don't
[31:21]
think so. But again, if we
[31:22]
started working on getting rid
[31:24]
of outside consultants, outside
[31:25]
programs, you wouldn't have to
[31:27]
cut employees. And I'm going to
[31:28]
stand in this position every
[31:31]
single time. I like you, Doctor
[31:32]
Hepburn. I know what you're
[31:34]
doing. I like you, Debbie Hixon,
[31:36]
Jeff Holness, but I know what
[31:37]
you guys are doing. If you want
[31:39]
to keep playing this game and
[31:41]
be fooled that teachers were
[31:44]
not let go last year, shame on
[31:45]
you. Just because they didn't
[31:47]
say let a thousand teachers go.
[31:50]
I didn't say that, but they
[31:52]
were in the mix of being let go.
[31:54]
And our schools are seeing the
[31:55]
punishment of it. And that is a
[31:59]
fact.
[32:00]
>> Thank you. Any other
[32:01]
registered public speakers?
[32:02]
>> No other speakers.
[32:03]
>> All right. Board member
[32:08]
discussion on item two. MR.
[32:15]
Cervera.
[32:17]
>> I do want to follow up on
[32:19]
the speakers inquiry. Have we
[32:21]
run any kind of analysis on how
[32:23]
much this would cost us to use
[32:24]
our own security folks in-house,
[32:28]
as opposed to signing this 700
[32:30]
000 plus contract for a year? I
[32:32]
mean, if if these guys and gals
[32:35]
are there anyway, could we not
[32:38]
find a a happy medium? Yes.
[32:40]
Have them do it and perhaps
[32:42]
give them a little bit more
[32:43]
more money, but save the
[32:44]
district, I don't know, a
[32:45]
couple hundred thousand dollars.
[32:48]
>> Yeah. So this is a very well
[32:51]
orchestrated security for after
[32:53]
school activities and sports.
[32:55]
The security are already there.
[32:56]
They they work during the
[32:57]
during the school day. And so
[32:59]
we would have to pay them
[33:01]
significantly, much more. This
[33:02]
kind of helps supplement. We do
[33:04]
use some of our security for
[33:06]
activities after schools and
[33:07]
sports and all of that, which
[33:08]
we have to pay them overtime
[33:10]
for. So we do use them. But
[33:12]
this is also in addition to
[33:13]
supplement some of those costs,
[33:14]
some of those services as well,
[33:15]
too.
[33:16]
>> And I understand and I can
[33:17]
appreciate that. But the
[33:19]
question was, have we run an
[33:21]
analysis saying rather than
[33:24]
paying these 100 people over
[33:26]
time, it's cheaper to bring in
[33:27]
this whole separate other
[33:29]
company with their employees
[33:32]
for $700,000 than paying our
[33:33]
core people overtime.
[33:35]
>> Yes.
[33:39]
>> That's been done. Yes. Okay.
[33:42]
>> MRS. Alhadeff.
[33:45]
>> Have we looked at using our
[33:46]
weapons detection detector
[33:48]
machines that we currently have
[33:50]
to use in our. Instead of doing
[33:51]
the Wanding.
[33:54]
>> We we do that as well too.
[33:55]
But when you think about the
[33:57]
gates for many of our large
[33:58]
events, be it athletics or
[34:00]
other events that require
[34:02]
wanding or somebody to walk
[34:03]
through our metal detection or
[34:04]
weapons detection system, we do
[34:08]
use both.
[34:11]
>> So we're not able to do 100%
[34:13]
of the weapons detections.
[34:16]
>> Not not for we use some of
[34:17]
the weapons detection systems,
[34:20]
but not for all of the events,
[34:22]
just for sheer logistics and
[34:24]
taking them out and calibration
[34:26]
and all of that. So we do use
[34:27]
some. You'll see them at
[34:28]
football games. You'll even see
[34:29]
them at basketball games and
[34:31]
things like that. But to bring
[34:33]
them all out and then to prep
[34:34]
them again for the following
[34:35]
day, puts what their primary
[34:37]
purpose is in jeopardy to for
[34:38]
the following day. But we do
[34:39]
use weapon detection, those
[34:41]
weapon detection systems for
[34:42]
some of our gates.
[34:44]
>> Thank you.
[34:46]
>> Thank you, MISS Hixon.
[34:47]
>> Thank you. I just had a
[34:50]
quick question because it was
[34:52]
suggested that if our security
[34:53]
works overtime, they're not
[34:54]
being paid. Could you.
[34:56]
>> Oh, no, they're being paid.
[34:59]
>> There's no trying to do comp
[34:59]
time.
[35:01]
>> No, they're being paid. I, I
[35:03]
just looked at that earlier as
[35:05]
we continue to press on
[35:06]
overtime. So yes, absolutely.
[35:08]
Thank you.
[35:09]
>> Thank you. Any other
[35:12]
discussion on item two? All in
[35:12]
favor?
[35:13]
>> Have a question.
[35:15]
>> Go ahead, MR. Rupert.
[35:18]
>> Thank you. It's actually one
[35:20]
about varying exceptionalities
[35:22]
with the group that we do from
[35:24]
the outside contract. I know
[35:27]
that that the people that are
[35:29]
internal for us do have that
[35:30]
training for, for people on the
[35:33]
spectrum and other various
[35:34]
Exceptionalities. So I'm
[35:36]
wondering, is that built into
[35:38]
there something that we talk
[35:40]
over with them? Because I know
[35:42]
our guys and our ladies are,
[35:43]
you know, they've gone through
[35:45]
that training and they know how
[35:48]
to handle people in a situation
[35:51]
where they can de-escalate,
[35:52]
etc. And understand really
[35:55]
what's happening. Doctor
[35:55]
Hepburn.
[35:56]
>> Yeah, I'm not sure that.
[35:58]
Asks Doctor Wanza if she has
[36:00]
any information. But you know,
[36:03]
most of this is for guests and
[36:05]
adults who are entering for
[36:06]
certain events at our at our
[36:07]
school facilities. Go ahead,
[36:09]
Doctor Wanza.
[36:10]
>> Thank you. Good evening,
[36:12]
MISS Rupert. So to Doctor
[36:14]
Hepburn. Hepburn's point. I'm
[36:15]
not certain that we put an
[36:17]
actual training requirement in
[36:18]
for these contracted services.
[36:20]
We can certainly look. But
[36:22]
again these are individuals who
[36:26]
purchase tickets to attend
[36:27]
extracurricular football games,
[36:28]
basketball games, things of
[36:30]
that nature. I'm not certain
[36:31]
that that is a stipulation in
[36:35]
this contract, but I have not
[36:36]
seen over the years where that
[36:38]
has presented a problem. But we
[36:39]
will certainly go look. MISS
[36:41]
Rupert and do greater due
[36:42]
diligence.
[36:44]
>> I would appreciate that,
[36:46]
because I know that when
[36:47]
attending evening events or
[36:49]
after school hours events,
[36:51]
students buy tickets and
[36:54]
students show up as well. So
[36:55]
just a point. I really wanted
[36:58]
to make that if we could see
[37:01]
that there is any training and
[37:02]
moving forward, it's something
[37:05]
to think about again, with our
[37:08]
own people that we could be
[37:09]
saving money for the district
[37:12]
as and getting the job done as
[37:14]
as safe as it possibly could be.
[37:17]
So I appreciate it. Thank you.
[37:19]
>> Thank you. Any other
[37:21]
discussion on item two? All in
[37:24]
favor of item two? Say I all
[37:27]
opposed. Say no. Item two is
[37:30]
approved unanimously. The
[37:31]
scheduled order of business for
[37:33]
the Special School Board
[37:34]
meeting of the School Board of
[37:35]
Broward County, Florida has
[37:36]
been completed. Seeing no
[37:37]
objections, I will adjourn the
[37:54]
special school board meeting.